WEBVTT - Bill Dudley: Why Markets Should Worry About Inflation

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Kind the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. Good is time for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Today we are joined by Bill Dudley. He's a senior

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>research scholar at Princeton University Center for Economic Policy Studies

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and obviously also former president of the Federal Reserve Bank

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.279
<v Speaker 1>of New York based in Princeton, New Jersey. Bill, thanks

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us here. Love to chat with

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.919
<v Speaker 1>you kind of about your column about inflation. I think

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve would like to see some inflation come

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>back into this marketplace, but the signs really aren't there.

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>What are your thoughts on that. Well, the first thing

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is that people are of the view that it's not

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>going to come back. And so if you look at

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the spread between normal treasuries and inflation protected treasuries, spread

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it on a tenure basis is one point nine. That's

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>on a CPI basis, So that translates to UH you know,

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>core PC deflator of about one point six So basically,

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>market participants are saying the Fed's not going to succeed

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>in their goal of pushing inflation not just back to

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>two percent, but above two. I've set the missages that

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>we've had in recent years, so market participants are very,

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>very confident that inflations will stay low in definitely, and

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that just a little bit too optimistic and assessment.

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>There are some indicators though maybe I do that. What

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 1>about the five year five year forward which has been

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>creeping up and is at what two point nearly three

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>percent at this point. Yeah, we've had some movement in

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the last week, so people are finally, I think, is

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>taking this on board. But there are a number of

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>reasons why I think inflation is a greater risk and

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>what's pricing from markets. The first is base effects. So

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>last April, March and April we saw a big decline

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in the COREPC deflator because the onset of the pandemic.

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>When we get to May and those numbers drop out

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of the UH year over year statistics, all sudden inflation

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>will look a little bit firmer. Second, I think that

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>as we as we get an economic recovery in the

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>second half of the year, which I fully anticipate, I

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>think you're going to see more pricing power in those

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>areas that were hurt most by the pandemic, things like

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>hospitality and leisure, especially given the fact that that we

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>probably actually are gonna have a shortage of capacity in

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>some of those areas, given business failures that have occurred

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>over the intermediate period. Third, you know, the other issue,

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, is we know the fens will be very patient.

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:32.399
<v Speaker 1>The fat is basically said they're not going to raise

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>short term interest rate until they until maximum employment gets

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 1>until we get the maximum employment, until we get to

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>two percent inflation, and the fattest confident inflation is going

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to go above a two percent for some period of time,

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 1>So the FED is gonna be slow rather than fast.

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>And then uh, I think the final thing that makes

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>me more more worried about inflation is fiscal policy. There's

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.519
<v Speaker 1>a pretty strong consensus developing that that if economies we

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>use fiscal policy, there's not a lot of worry anymore

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>about uh, that sustainability over the medium to longer term.

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>So fiscal policy is a lever that can be used

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>more aggressively than before. If you remember back during the

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.519
<v Speaker 1>last economic cycle, fiscal policy restraint was one reason why

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>we had a subpar recovery in two thousand and twelve

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>without fourtune well bill, just like on that last point,

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and maybe this is just political positioning, um, but we're

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>actually starting to hear some Republicans say, whoa, whoa, whoa,

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 1>let's put the brakes on some of the fiscal stimulus

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>that we're talking about. Three trillion UH is way too

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>big the number. We're thinking something less than a trillion

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, just on the discussion this latest fiscal stimulus,

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>do you believe that after years of supporting higher and

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>higher spending, that the Republicans have any stomach for kind

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of reining it in. Well, historically the Republicans have been

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>uh for fiscal consolidation when Democrats are in the White

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>House and not so much when Republicans. Certain way, I

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>think they'll I think they'll continue that that pattern. The

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>important thing on the fiscal size, it looks like we're

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>going to get another round of physical stimuls. If there's

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>nine billion dollar proposal goes forward, it seems more likely

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>than not at this point that I think is sufficient

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to provide a bridge to the recovery that we're going

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to see late spring uh an early summer bill. So

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>we definitely will see price increases in perhaps places like services,

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>which make up about there all c p I and

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the core measures. So I could see where you would

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>get inflation. But if we have slack in the labor force,

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>which were likely to have for some time, won't that

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>offset that kind of inflation at least for the federal reserve? Well,

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it. I think the question is how long

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is that slack in the liver market actually going to persist?

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And the other issue I think is, you know, people

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about the scarring of the economic caused by the pandemic,

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>but the scarring isn't just about you know, workers being unemployed.

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>It's also about businesses. They are just going under so

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>capacity is also suffering. I mean, in my hometown Cranford,

0:04:59.880 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, to two of the major restaurants have gone

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>out of business. So when demand comes back, there's gonna

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 1>be a lot more pricing power for those that have

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>survived this, this this pandemic bill, how do you view

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the labor market here? We get you know, a week

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>after week we get this really really sobering jobless claims,

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and of course we had some of the jobs data

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>on Friday. Here, how do you view the labor market

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and the resiliency of the labor market as we come

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 1>onto the back side of this pandemic arguably beginning maybe

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you know sometime next year. Well, it's not as good

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 1>as the employment statistics suggests. For example, looking at the

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>unemployer rate of six point seven percent. The our reason

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that as low as six point seven percent is a

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of people have dropped out of the labor force.

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>You're only counted as unemployed in the United States if

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you're actively looking for work. The labor force participation rates

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>dropped by nearly two percentage points since February. So there's

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot more people unemployed than suggested by the current

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>labor market, and that's certainly going to hold inflation back

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 1>for a while. But I do think the recovery in

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the second half the years quite powerful. Once you get

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>people vaccinated and the risk of pandemic goes down from

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a health perspective, social distancing land, you'll have an opening up.

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>And so I think there's a lot of pen of demand.

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you look at the savings rate, the stavings

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>rate right now, it's really high, even though we've gone

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:19.479
<v Speaker 1>through a very bumpy economy. So it seems to me

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:23.359
<v Speaker 1>like there are resources, especially among higher income people to

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 1>go out and spend. So, Bill, if you don't mind

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>taking us through it very slowly for some of us

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>who may may maybe you know, less quick of thought

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 1>than you. Take that restaurant example that you just gave

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>us in your hometown to have closed. The others will

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>have pricing power when people come back and start eating

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>out properly. But how long will it take before those

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>businesses or new businesses open to take that pricing power away,

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to employ some of the people that haven't been employed,

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that were in the services sector, and that then you know,

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>contribute to the labor market becoming sort of full again

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>full employment. Well, I wish I knew the answer to

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>that question. I mean, we've never gone through anything quite

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>like this before, and the burden of course has fallen,

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, disproportionately on leisure and hospitality and especially on

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of small businesses. You know, if you look

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>at the share of you know, demand, it's it's gone

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>disproportionately towards the larger, large, larger stores, larger businesses. You know,

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Walmart's is able to stay open because they sell super

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>sell sell groceries, or while follower smaller stores that specialize

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>in things that Walmart sells, maybe you know, don't don't

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>have as much much business. So I think, you know,

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right that you know, there will be

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, a small business creation. But then that's about

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, mobilizing capital and being credit worthy, and so

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to take some time. Hey, Bill,

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. We appreciate that. Bill Dudley,

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>former year FED president and senior researcher at Prince University,

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and Vonnie, that's a big, big issue I think for

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>some of these small businesses, the you know, the how

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>quickly they can come back, or maybe a new entrepreneur

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>comes in and starts a new restaurant in that old

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>old space. Well that's just it. And you know, to me,

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>in some senses, that might be the critical question how

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>long does that take? Because that's when we're going to

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>see those indicators move around, the inflation indicator, the employment indicator,

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's how they all sort of interact that you know,

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>decides whether we suffer from too much inflation, or whether

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the FED needs to do something about the FED folds

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>back and so on, so many questions to resolve that

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>was built only former Fed Reserve. New York billion dollar

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and logistics company d h L has just released its

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>annual Global Connectedness Index, which it does in conjunction with

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>n y U Stern School of Business, and the report

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>highlights key developments in international flows of capital, trade, information,

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and people. Joining us now with the conclusion from the

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>report that globalization is far from dead is the CEO

0:08:56.800 --> 0:09:00.080
<v Speaker 1>of the America's of dhl Express America's Mike Power and

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining Mike. So my globalization may not be

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:05.679
<v Speaker 1>dead according to the report, but what are the flows

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>showing us. Are we dealing with other countries as much

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>as we did a peak globalization? Well, good morning, Bonnie

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 1>and Paul, and thanks for having us. Yeah, I mean

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:20.479
<v Speaker 1>the report in itself, uh, there there weren't big surprises.

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>So obviously people flows, if you've seen the report, people

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>flows suffered an unpreceded decline in We expected that based

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>on what was happening during the pandemic um capital flows

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>were hit a bit harder, but they are rebounding UM.

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>And that is positive, as you know, with governments and

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>central banks having stabilized the markets and helping to do that.

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>But the one that came out that we're actually excited

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 1>about his international trade. It's rebounded uh strongly. And people

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>ask us all the time, is this a U shape

0:09:56.280 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and L shape? Uh? It's a rather narrow V shape

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>recovery that we have seen. UM. Our lowest point at

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>DHL this year was in April. Uh. If you think

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>about when we found out about the pandemic UH in

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Wuhan and where it started, we started flowing from the

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>US to China ppe equipment UH. And then it turned

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>around in March April and you started the c PP

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>equipment that started to flow from China to the world

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>into the United States. UH. So really what we've seen

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>is the world remains connected. UH. International trade UH is key,

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and globalization has been more resilient uh than expected. So

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>it's far away from coming to a standstill. Yeah, Mike,

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting to hear your perspective because folks at DHL,

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously it just has a bird's eye view of kind

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of global trade. Here one of the concerns that some

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>folks have is, uh the trade war between the US

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and China, and not so much the tariffs and maybe

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the method in which the Trump administration carried out some

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>of its trade policies with China, tariffs and so on,

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>but just the general belief that the world needs to

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>get tougher with China. Does that uh throw some roadblocks

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:27.319
<v Speaker 1>into the globalization story at all? I would say at

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, Paul, I think there was a lot of speculation,

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of anecdotes that went out there. There is

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>always gonna be a change in the world, especially for

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>US when we're dealing in two d and twenty countries

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 1>and territories globally. What we have seen is China continues

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to be one of our biggest trade lanes for US

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 1>at DHL China, US and a p US. I think

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>when you take a look at it, Uh, they're firing

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>in all cylinders right now, China and Asia Pacific to

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Europe in the United States. So what I would say is, uh,

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the things that took place this past year,

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.439
<v Speaker 1>whether it be the U S m c A deal

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and the revision of NaSTA, which by the way, was needed,

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>some form of revision was needed, but there are biggest

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>trading partners now as well, UH and China. There needed

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to be a reset from that perspective as well. But

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>there's been no slowing down at all. Mike. What have

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you done in terms of changing routes, re prioritizing routes,

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>putting stuff on certain routes and so on in order

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to deal with the changes the last year or two. Yeah,

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>it's thank you for that, UM, because we've been in

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>peak season, as I said, since early June, and as

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a result of that, we've been adding jobs. So we

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 1>took a decision in the month of March that we

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>would not furlough one single employee UH. And all we've

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 1>been doing is adding jobs. So we're over three thousand

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>new added jobs and growing in the United States as

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>an example, over six thousand when you take into account Canada. UH.

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>In Mexico, we've added additional capacity as a reduction as

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a result of reduction in airline capacity UH, and that

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>is coming back slow. As you can imagine some of

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the recent announcement of further restriction, further lockdown. From a

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>commercial airline perspective, we had to supplement that with additional

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>capacity in the air. So we've added additional flights that

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>of Asia, China into Europe and into the United States,

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>intra United States, into Canada, into Mexico, uh, down south

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:39.079
<v Speaker 1>into Central South America. UH. And that has been ongoing

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>for us really since the month of June. Uh And again,

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>don't see that slowing down anytime soon. Uh. And really

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>we've seen growth in eat commerce. UH so more and

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>more people, maybe like yourselves. I don't know about yourself,

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 1>but my wife's shops everything online, have gone to shopping online.

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>You you all the results of Black Friday and Cyber Monday,

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the biggest ever online shopping numbers, uh in

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:09.959
<v Speaker 1>the history of the United States. We saw greater than

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a fift uh in a very short period of time.

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>And I get asked. I got asked the other day, Mike,

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is this gonna slow down? I don't see it slowing down.

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>And we basically saw ten years of e commerce in

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in a in a six month period of time. Wow. Yeah,

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>just extraordinary how consumer behaviors change. E commerce has just

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>been accelerated. I'm sure you see that clearer than just

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>about anyone. Mike Parrott, Thanks so much for joining us.

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>We really appreciated Mike Parrott, chief Executive Officer for the

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Americas for d h L Express America's joining us on

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Plantation, Florida. Just extraordinary. They're seeing the

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>recovery uh, you know in Asia, in China more specifically, uh,

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and then a broad recovery in terms of traffic just

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>across the board. Amazing. We just got word that the

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>call between Prime Minister Boris Johnson and the US vander

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Lyon has finished. Desperate to know what actually happened, because

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>this was the call during which talks could collapse or

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>they could actually find a solution. So let's bring in

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to as Raphael to let us know what she knows.

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Torez a Booberg opinion editor and is based in London.

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Tores what do we know anything more about the call

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>except that is over? Yeah, I'm sorry to say we

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Um, we don't have any detailed readout at

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that call. It was a crucial one, as you said,

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>because uh, the talks are at an impast. This week

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>is considered, you know, if not the last week, then

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty close to it. Given the European Council meet on Thursday. Um,

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and Uh, the UK is due to leave its transition

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>period at the end of the month, and there's a

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>lot that needs to happen before that in terms of

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>legally scrubbing and translating and getting approval for any deal. Um.

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>There needs to be a political solution at this point.

0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that much is clear, and that's why we

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>have Boris Johnson and Slavander Lai and the European Commission

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>President speaking directly now whether they can unlock things, I

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>think we're unlikely to hear um the announcement of a deal,

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>for example, tonight. But what we I think, what what

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>everyone is waiting to hear is whether they're going to

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>keep talking at least another couple of days. Sores talk

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>to us about fishing. Why is fishing such a big thing?

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I just don't get it when I read headlines of

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>thousands of jobs, finance jobs leaving London, billions of dollars

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of capital leaving. Okay, I get that's an issue, But fishing, Yeah,

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it's It's actually much simpler than it sounds. Uh. The

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>whole you know, Brexit was was thought on the one

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>very basic central idea, and that is that Britain would

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>take control of its borders, its laws, its money. And

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the map of Britain, right, it's

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>an island and there's water and and their fish in

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that water. And to you know, to to to the

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>common person's mind, well, if we control our borders, we

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>also control our water. And why should the EU have

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the automatic right to fish? Uh to to claim you know,

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>very large share of the fish in British water. So

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the simple assertion that the UK makes. It's

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 1>not so simple in reality, because um, EU fishermen have

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>been fishing those waters for you know, generations and more. Uh.

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>The fish are spawned in EU water, some of them

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and then mature and are caught in British waters. It's

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>very complicated. Most of what Britain catches it sells into

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the EU. So it's a very it's one of these

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 1>small issues that has the potential to blow things up.

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>That said that, the word out over the weekend was

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that they were pretty close to agreeing a deal on

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>fish and that things were really hung up over these

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>what are called level playing field issues, you know, UH,

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>state aid subsidies for industry, labor, and environmental standards and

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:53.919
<v Speaker 1>that sort of things, and those are pretty um, you know,

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty important too to Boris Johnson and his party because

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>they signify how much the UK can divert from the

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>rest of Europe, which is again another you know, fundamental

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>reason why they're leaving the EU. But this fisheries issue

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>TOAs it's important on its own, but it's also sort

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 1>of symbolic of the whole thing, right because it will

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>decide what stands either parties take on things like creep

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 1>mission creeping and what gets decided for the past versus

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 1>what gets decided for the future in terms of what

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>companies can do. The Europeans don't want the British to

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 1>have the right to sort of change mandates over time, right, Yes,

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's the level playing field a side of this,

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's really stuck because the EU, from the used perspective,

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>what they don't want is a is a you know,

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>medium to large size economy right on their doorstep, having

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the ability to undercut European companies in all sorts of

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>ways and yet having access to EU market. So they're

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>negotiating position is quite clear. Uh, if you want access

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to the single markets, which is a euro terrfzuro quota deal.

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>Then you need to agree not to undercut European UM

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 1>countries with through regulations and different standards on labor markets

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>for example, UM and the UK's position as well, we've

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>left the single market, we've left the EU, why should

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 1>we follow your rules still, UM, we've left for the

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>very purpose of diverging. So that has created, you know,

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the impass And as with all of these things, there

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 1>is a solution, but it would require concessions and political will,

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we haven't seen up to now. We

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen either side being willing to give enough to

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>get to a deal. So tres It's so it's fair

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to assume by some that no deal will be reached

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 1>if there's a kind of a no deal here at

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>this last minute. What is crashing out of the EU

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>at your end really mean? Well, the first thing it

0:19:56.160 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>means is that there are a whole load of terror

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>that come into play. So right now there's free movement

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of good services, capital, labor, that's what the single market means.

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Suddenly you have teriffs. So for example, UM, sheep meet

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the EU. UH that thirty percent of the UK sheep

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 1>meat goes into EU markets and terrorists would um add

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>about I think it's something like six ad belorum you know,

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>per year on that and there's a whole host of terrorits.

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>It would make British farming, um it would. It would

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>price it out of the European market. It would have

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a huge impact on the automotive sector because of all

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 1>of the input, the intermediate goods, the supply chain that

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>involves EU part It also means a whole lot of

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>non tariff barriers. And by the way, this happens even

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>if there's a deal, So we we tend to think

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of a deal as kind of you know, releasing all

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of the pressure that's built up. But even with the deal,

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>we see a lot of non tariff barriers and those

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>are things like customs checks, rules of origin, where did

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>this product have to originate from? How do you certify that? Uh,

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>food safety standards and those kinds of certification. For a

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>British citizen who wants to take their dog to provounce

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in the summer, you will need a special pet passport,

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>You'll need to get a vet to certify it. All

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>of these things become more complicated if you have a

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>second home in the South of France or Spain. You

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>will only be able to use it for I think

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>it's ninety days and a eighty day period um, whereas

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>now you can spend as much time as you want there.

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>So this is all sorts of implications. Some of them

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 1>are you know, seem quite you know, sort of small hassles,

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and others are quite significant. But we're talking about, you know,

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>potentially a six percent loss of GDP compared to staying

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>in the EU. Uh GDP growth compared to what it

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>would be staying in the EU, according to the Office

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of Budget Responsibility. So it's it's it's significant whether brigons

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>will feel it from day one, um, that remains to

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>be seen, but I think it's it's a sea change

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of levels, and no deal most of

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 1>all means that the relationship between Britain and it's its

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>closest trading partner, it's geographical neighbor um are put on

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>on very sort of um, you know, not not a

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>good place. Yeah, terrible place, boyd dress. I remember when

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:21.479
<v Speaker 1>we used to speak to you you on a daily basis

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>pre pandemic. But the it looks like we're finally getting

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:27.439
<v Speaker 1>to the short strokes here. For Brexit uh winner or

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>lose thres Raphael Bloomberg, opinion editor covering the politics and

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>economics of Europe, joining us on a Brexit update. Just

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at the d X Y Spot Dollar index trading

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>right now at about nineties spots seven five. That's done

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 1>about ten percent from just March. Here. As we think

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>about the Federal Reserve and uh FED Chairman Pale talking

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>about lower rates for longer, let's get a sense of

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in the currency markets relative to the dollar.

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>We welcome Wolfgang Coaster, senior strategy officer for Kiriba uh Wolfgang,

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>thanks what for joining us here. So we have had

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>this pullback in the dollar and again summer calling for

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 1>maybe some continued weakness. What are your thoughts? My thoughts

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Good morning everybody. Um My thoughts are that while we've

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 1>had some weakening here and certainly significant, the bigger issue

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>for corporations is really the volatility. Sometimes it's uptront as

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it's down. We all know that we've had some we've

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:28.919
<v Speaker 1>seen those continuous strength, we see some repriets. They're clear

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>with all the global economic things that are going on

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to continue to see. One thing, which

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>is volatility. And the problem with the volatility is that

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't just happen on day one and day nine

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.239
<v Speaker 1>d of the quarter. It happens every single day. And

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of corporations who if they are negative

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to the impact of that forn exchange, its impacts their

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 1>cash and it's all about liquidity right now, as we

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>all know. So what we're helping companies was just trying

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 1>to make that as agnostic as possible and not worry

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 1>about whether dolls going up or down, but reality run

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>their business as I was a constant dollar business. Yeah,

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>just for context, let's let everybody know that the dollar

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>index today is at ninety point seven five nine zero

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>point seven five is you know, thanks to you know,

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>factor is beyond the dollars control as well, of course,

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 1>like euro strength and I mean not the British pounds

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>hurt nay, because that's been weakening too. So well, King,

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I know you're particularly concerned about airbnbs currency problem. What

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 1>does the likes of AIRBND that's dealing with all sorts

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 1>of currencies all the time do, So what companies like

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that should do is really understand where all their exposers

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>come from. And then manage it to a point that

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it becomes immaterial. Lots of companies around the world do

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that today. It looks like in the statements from Airbnb

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that they recognize they have an issue. They actually mentioned

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>in their opening documents their currency sixty nine times. They're

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>in forty countries. Um they mentioned euro and Sterling is

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the two largest exposures, which is a little bit of

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>setting right now. But overall, what what what investors will

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>be looking at is how they actually manage this and

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>what they're showing in their two thousand twenty results so

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>far as a sixty three million dollar hit due to

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>four exchange. That's sixty three million dollars worth of cash

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that they do not have, and that is over ten

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of their overall net losses. So they would have ten

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>less losses if they've managed that to a level where

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it becomes immaterial. And lots of companies, as I said,

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>like the Googles of the world and others who have

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the same problem, manage this. Just to follow, if you

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>don't mind, are they not hedging? It looks like they're

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>doing some hedging, but it doesn't seem to be as

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>effective as it could be, So they look like they're

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>doing from what they're saying, they are using their product

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 1>to partially manage this. How exactly they're doing it don't know,

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>But what I do know is that they have that

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>they have very material losses that they shouldn't be having.

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>So what's gotting up to last let's call it years?

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 1>As the global commony global economy has become much more

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>global uh and internationalism has uh, you know, increased. From

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>your perspective, how are companies today managing their currency exposure risk?

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>It still seems like when I listen to earnings calls,

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I hear big, big numbers of currency swings, hits and

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 1>or gains to the earnings. Yeah, so that's absolutely correct. Unfortunately,

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>because we try to help companies make sure that that

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen. We we do actually a quarterly report where

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>we do were last quarter we had losses of in

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred North American companies by exceeding seventeen billion dollars,

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 1>which is a lot of money. So you have to

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>answer your question. You have two camps. You have the

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>camps of companies will really understand it, understand their exposure

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and actually fully automate that management. Today it is automated

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>all it is, and it is not expensive to do,

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and especially relative to the losses that that we're seeing

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 1>companies have. And then you see the ones who kind

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of think that this is a zero sum game and

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>practice it is not a zero sum game. You may

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>have ops, you may have downs, but they hit you

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 1>every single day during your business, and you may well

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>be losing lots of money in times when you need

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 1>it and so during for example, this these tough times.

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:16.880
<v Speaker 1>U does is it really good for Airbnb to lose

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.439
<v Speaker 1>another sixty million dollars due to this? I think not

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:23.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's not necessary to there. Now, what's impressive about

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>Airbnb is still they're doing a great job through these

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>through this economy quite frankly, still having some nice revenues

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 1>of two and a half a billion dollars. So fundamentally

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>they have a lot of things going for for them.

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 1>But the financial risk management, it looks like it's in

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that they unfortunately are a little bit more in the

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>camp of could improve. All right, then, well that's that's

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>telling them. Volcang. Let us know if they if they

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>get back to you and put a strategy in place,

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 1>we'd love to hear about it. All Going a Coaster

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>is senior strategy officer at Kiriba, based there in downtown

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>New York, New York Plaza. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:03.399
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever a podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Bonnie Quinn, I'm on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn, and I'm

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast,

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio