WEBVTT - Paramount Sweetens Warner Bros. Bid Terms to Woo Investors 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple, Coarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Business app. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's turn our attention to the media space. Lot's going

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 2>on out there. Spotify reported some earnings, but we want

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 2>to lead with Warner Brothers Discovery.

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:33.520
<v Speaker 3>That MNA sag can continues to play out today.

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Paramount kind of amended its bid to add some more

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 2>cash funding for a termination fee, instituting a ticking option

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 2>here for this thing. Keitha Ranganath and she file follows

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 2>this as the media analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. Keith, let's

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 2>start with Warner Brothers Discovery here. I'm still surprised that

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Powermount has not raised its bid from thirty dollars. That

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 2>are making changes and maybe some enhancement mins to the offer,

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 2>but not raising the bid in general.

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 3>What do you make of it?

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, still playing the cat and mouse game here, Paul.

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 4>They did stop short of actually raising the offer, but yes,

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 4>you're right, they are offering now this almost one dollar

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 4>and eighty cents per share to cover the termination fee

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 4>with the Netflix deal, as well as some of the

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 4>financing costs, and then of course, as you just mentioned,

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 4>the ticking feed. I don't know though, if this will

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 4>necessarily fly with the Warner Brothers Discovery boat. I think

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 4>this is just Paramount exhausting all of its options before

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, they actually raise the bid. But in my mind,

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 4>what this signals is, yes, they did stop short of

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 4>actually raising that thirty dollars bid, but I do think

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 4>that the signals that they are willing to kind of

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:44.199
<v Speaker 4>go back to the table and probably raise that bid.

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 4>As you know, kind of this thing keeps dragging on.

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it does feel a little bit silly given that

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 5>David Ellison had said that thirty dollars a share was

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 5>not their best and final offer, So let's let's kind

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 5>of get to it. That begs the question, Keithan, this

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 5>is a dumb question. Do they have the money to

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 5>raise bid?

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 4>They do, But the question is really going to be

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 4>what happens after Scarlet. So you know, right now we're

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 4>looking at a company with the thirty dollars per share bid.

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 4>We're looking at a company that's going to be levered

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 4>about six and a half times, they raise that bid

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 4>to let's say thirty two, thirty three, thirty four, whatever

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 4>the number is. You're going to look at a company

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.239
<v Speaker 4>that's value that's going to be levered at about seven

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 4>to maybe seven point three times. What happens with those

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 4>dangerous levels of debt is, you know, it just becomes

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 4>a distraction. You're not going to be able to invest

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 4>in growth, You're just going to be focused on deleveraging.

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 4>This is exactly what we've seen, you know, happen many

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 4>a time in the media world. It's happened actually to

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 4>Warner Brothers Discovery itself. You know, they had over fifty

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars in debt and the only thing that they

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 4>were hyper focused on is Okay, how do we keep

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, reducing that dead pile. And so the biggest

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 4>worry is that's what's going to happen to Paramount. So, yes,

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 4>they could get their hands on this absolutely world class asset,

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 4>but yes, leverage becomes this huge, huge headache for them.

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 2>If any sense of timing, it doesn't seem like either

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 2>side feels.

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 3>The need to, I don't know, be aggressive here.

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 4>So February twentieth. That's what that's the date that paramounts

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 4>a proxy bid actually expires. It was initially Jan twenty

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 4>at the extended to February twentieth, So that's the thirty

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 4>dollars hostile bid. That's the date of expiring. Remember, Paul

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 4>and Scarlett, only about seven percent of Warner Brothers shares

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 4>two date have been tendered at that thirty dollars bit,

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 4>so everybody's still kind of holding out for that higher

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 4>per share offer.

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 5>I think that tells you everything you need to know

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 5>right now. Then Februy twenty eight is the day we'll

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 5>watch for Geita. Let's also talk about Spotify here. It

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 5>added a record number of users thirty eight million users

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 5>to seven hundred and fifty one million, topping analyst estimates.

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 5>How much more room is there to raise prices because

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 5>increased price prices in the US was certainly part of

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 5>that story. And it looks like consumers continue to sign up.

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 4>Conzuomer's continue to sign up. Yes, we're seeing Spotify and

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 4>if you just look at the subscriber trajectory scuddled over

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 4>the past few years, they've added about twenty eight to

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 4>thirty million subscribers every year, and there's just no signs

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 4>of slowing down. They keep adding a record number of subscribers,

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 4>record number of active users quarter after quarter. So there's

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 4>just so much of appetite for this platform for music

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 4>in general, for audio in general, So that is definitely

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:24.919
<v Speaker 4>good news. You talked about pricing power. I think, you know,

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 4>just with kind of the user interface that Spotify offers,

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 4>with all of the content that it offers in terms

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 4>of breadth and depth of content, and as they keep

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 4>adding more enhancements, they do have a lot more leverage

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 4>to keep raising those prices. So you know, they've made

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 4>a pretty bold move by raising their prices a little

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 4>bit earlier this year. So now now it is thirteen

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 4>dollars for an individual plan in the US. That was

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 4>a little bit above the rest of their competitors. But

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 4>then we just saw a few days ago Amazon Music

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 4>also kind of raising prices, which then I think just

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 4>speaks to the audio industry in general. I mean, everybody

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 4>there has a lot of pricing power, but I think

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 4>Spotify definitely has the most, just kind of again given

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 4>the fact that they are a best in class product.

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:16.119
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 5>We have markets in the green right now, and the

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 5>NASAC is among them. We've had seen this decoupling between

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 5>big tech and the rest of the stock market, but

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 5>big tech is back in the green once again, and

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 5>the big news really is Alphabet and all the hyperscalars.

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 5>It's going to need about one hundred and eighty five

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars in terms of capex over the this year,

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 5>and so it has to raise a lot of money

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 5>in the debt market. Caroline Hyde is the co anchor

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 5>of b Tech and Caroline Alphed has had a banner

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 5>twenty four hours looking to raise almost thirty two billion

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 5>dollars or a pretty much to raise thirty two billion

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 5>dollars in less than twenty four hours.

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 6>I know we've got dollar denominated debt, you've got sterling,

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 6>you've got Swiss frank and what's extraordinary is the extent

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 6>of demand. They could have sold way more the thirty

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:15.599
<v Speaker 6>two billion dollars. They had extraordinary, more than one hundred

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.919
<v Speaker 6>billion dollars worth of orders for the upsized twenty billion

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 6>dollar US sale. We're ranging from you know, three year

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 6>to ten is out to as much as thirty year,

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 6>thirty two year. But then you're looking to the UK,

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 6>they're selling one billion pounds of my great British sterling

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 6>in one hundred year bonds, a century bond. Now you

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.119
<v Speaker 6>haven't seen a tech company do that since motor rollers.

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 7>It's the nineties.

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 6>And look this, it's such a vote confidence. Yes, you

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 6>can say, is Google going to be here in one

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 6>hundred years time? A lot of these companies pay off

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 6>the debt well ahead of one hundred years. Disney they

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 6>issued back in the nineties, they paid it off in

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 6>the in twenty twenties. But really what this is a resolute,

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 6>clear signal of is that people believe in Alphabet, they

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 6>believe in their ability to pay for the AI infrastructure,

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 6>They believe in that one hundred and eighty five billion

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 6>of spending in capex is a wise decision, and that

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 6>they are going to be an AI winner.

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 3>More across the.

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 6>Board, we're seeing a record Swiss frame issuance. You haven't

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:14.119
<v Speaker 6>seen a market been tapped to this extent and again

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 6>a record amount of demand for it.

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Rob Schiffman covers the tech from the credit size for

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 8>T says, the windows wide open for these companies. They

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 8>can keep coming to the market, which is amazing for

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 8>them and they are. We also got a piece of

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 8>news Thaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing said their January sales worth their

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 8>fastest clip in months. So if you needed, I guess

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 8>another data point supporting this continuing AI spending, there you go.

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, thirty seven percent increase year on year. In terms

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 6>of yes, it was probably a bit of a slower year.

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 6>It's a slower January previous year because of the way

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 6>that the vacations and holidays fell in China. But TSMC

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 6>is the chip manufacturer to the world in Nvidia Apple.

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 6>If you think about a consumer electronics, if you're thinking

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 6>about the AI data center story, this is the company

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 6>that has been dining out on it. The shares are

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 6>at a record when you're looking at them entire one

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 6>or indeed on their ADRs trading abroad, and it just

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 6>signals that the AI bubble that we're so concerned about

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 6>the idea that everyone's just passing money amongst themselves. There

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 6>is real orders going in from on a fundamental basis

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 6>for this particular chip maker.

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and it's the hardware maker TSMC. Let's talk about

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 5>other hardware companies because they are paying up for memory chips,

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 5>and those memory chip makers, some are winning, some maybe

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 5>are under more pressure, and investors are trying to discern

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 5>whose best place. How are you thinking about this?

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 6>I think a lot of people are trying to understand

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 6>where is the cost pressure. The cost pressure is for

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 6>those electronics companies. Apple has more control over its supply chain,

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 6>its own own chips, but still, more broadly, if you're

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 6>looking at an index of electronics makers, like thinking of

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.559
<v Speaker 6>the Nintendos of this world, they've sold off about ten

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 6>percent in the beginning of this year. Meanwhile, the memory

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 6>makers are up about one hundred and sixty percent or so.

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 6>We're seeing Samsung being the winner here, you're seeing the

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 6>likes of Micron. You're seeing Yes, there is turbenance day

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 6>in day out, but more broadly it has been up

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 6>and to the right for these memory makers because not

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 6>only is there necessary to put them into your hardware

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 6>and your electronics but really the ferocious demand to put

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 6>them in AI data centers. Remember this is high bandwidth

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 6>memory that everyone's been going on about. The hk Heinex

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 6>has been winning in for Skhinex, for example, over in Korea. Well,

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 6>because there's so much demand there and it's so much

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:19.719
<v Speaker 6>more profitable for them, they're having to sort of put

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 6>their boring, bog standard memory chips that you want in

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 6>your devices to the back burner, and it's really hurting

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 6>these companies.

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up. Care

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 3>for this.

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am.

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 3>He's done on.

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple, Coarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 5>Let's get to some more corporate earnings, because we are

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 5>knee deep in earning season. We're past the big tech

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 5>companies and now we're really focused on the companies that

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 5>make up this US economy. Companies like Has, the toymaker.

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 5>The shares are up more than seven percent right now.

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 5>Lindsay Dutch is joining us. She is the consumer Hardline

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 5>Senior analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence and Lindsay. This earnings report

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 5>shows it had a decent fourth quarter revenue and earnings

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 5>for share beat, but the guidance the outlook was seen

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 5>as fairly conservative, yet investors seem to be rewarding the

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 5>Stock's the what's the story here for Hasbro?

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 9>Hice Garlet, thanks for having me. So the story for

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 9>Hasbro is, you know, the result in twenty five, including

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 9>the fourth quarter, is really being driven by their Wizard

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 9>of the Coast digital gaming segment. That that segment has

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 9>been growing rapidly forty five percent on the year, sixty

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 9>percent I think for Magic of the Gathering in the quarter.

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 9>So just tremendous growth coming out of that brand, better

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 9>than expected, and that unit is really going to carry

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 9>the growth in twenty twenty six. The outlook for the

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 9>consumer products with their toy segment is still kind of weak,

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 9>so it's really coming out of that digital gaming segment.

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 9>But I think investors are pleased with the outlook there

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 9>just because they're lapping very difficult comps. So to see

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 9>solid growth in twenty six coming out of that, it

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 9>was a good surprise.

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 3>What's the competitive landscape out there? Hasbro Mattel others. How's

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 3>that playing out.

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So we get matel results later today and we'll

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 9>have to see how that goes. It was a very

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 9>challenging twenty twenty five, you know, with the tariffs, we

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 9>had retailers delaying the holiday orders and that really threw

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 9>a wrench into the entire year for these toymakers. Hasbro

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 9>did report, you know, a plus seven percent sales growth

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 9>in the fourth quarter for consumer products.

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 7>That was the first quarter of growth and quite some time.

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 9>They do expect toy growth in twenty twenty six, but

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 9>it could be low single digits.

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:51.439
<v Speaker 7>You know, there's a lot of headwinds.

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 9>You know, we just saw you know, disappointing retailer sales

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 9>for December, so there's a lot of uncertainty about consumers

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 9>out there and a rebound in that category. And we

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 9>should hear more from Mattel, you know that they're the

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 9>dominant player in dolls.

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 7>So we'll heal more later today.

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 5>Lindsay, what about Tariff's Is this something that Hasbro has

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:16.079
<v Speaker 5>figured out and it's no longer something that leaves its

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 5>earnings to be kind of unreliable and they've kind of

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 5>smoothed things out.

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 9>So it definitely affected the year, so about forty million

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 9>dollars in the fourth quarter. A headwind for margin there,

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 9>especially on that consumer products segment, so that margin did

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 9>decline year over year, which was a disappointment.

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 7>It's certainly going to be a headwind.

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 9>For profitability at least in the first half, and comps

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 9>will get easier in the second half. But Hasbro did

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 9>note that, you know, much of the cost savings program

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 9>that they're working on and other supply chain efficiencies, they

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 9>were able to offset a significant portion of that cost.

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 9>So that is a good sign, but there's still a

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 9>little bit of a headwind for the next two quarters.

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm just looking at the FA function on the Bloomberg terminal,

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 2>gives me all the financial analysism. Boy, the operating income

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 2>profit for the Wizards of the Coast and the digital

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 2>segment is huge, whereas the profitability of their regular toy

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 2>business not so much. Is a company just throwing all

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 2>the resources into their digital stuff?

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Is that the strategy?

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 9>So they have definitely been pushing for several years now

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 9>to become a bigger player in that digital world, but

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 9>also really to become known for that. So I would say,

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 9>you know, one of Hasbro's big brands, Monopoly that that's

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 9>what many people know that the company for is that

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 9>traditional Monopoly board game. But they are pushing into this

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 9>world of digital games. You know, they want to be

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 9>valued as such. And I will say, you know, they

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 9>do have a digital version of Monopoly Monopoly Go, and

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:53.679
<v Speaker 9>that has done very very well over the past couple

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 9>of years. It continues to surprise, including in the fourth quarter.

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.199
<v Speaker 9>So they're definitely moving in that direction. But that toy

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 9>segment consumer products, you know, still is pretty large. It

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 9>was still around fifty percent of revenue for twenty five.

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 9>I do think that will that mix will come down

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 9>over time, but it's still a big piece of their

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:15.199
<v Speaker 9>business that they can't ignore.

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 10>Lindsay.

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 5>I also noticed that in this latest earning support, they

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 5>announced a one billion dollar stock buyback authorization. I believe

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 5>this is the first by back since twenty eighteen. What

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 5>does that signal to you?

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 9>You know, I think that their Hasbro was still working

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 9>through their capital allocation priorities. They're still focused on reducing leverage.

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 9>You know, their dividend has been flat for quite some time,

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 9>so I think they're looking at different avenues now that

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 9>they're in a much better financial position than they had been.

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 7>Maybe a year or two ago.

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 9>So I think it's just a signal that that that

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 9>position is solidly better and they're looking to redeploy cash

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 9>in different ways that they maybe couldn't have done a

0:14:57.480 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 9>year or so ago.

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Again, using the PG function, you can see where the

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 2>revenue comes from geographically for this companigy, and the international business,

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 2>which was about forty percent of the revenue, has been

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 2>declining as a percentage of total revenue. Here, is there

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 2>a strategy there to focus on the US or are

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 2>they pulling back from international?

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 3>What's that strategy?

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so I don't think that they're necessarily pulling back

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:21.479
<v Speaker 9>from international.

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 7>Toys is a global business.

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 9>I think a lot of that is reflecting the growth

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 9>and wizards of the cost and the digital gaming. So

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 9>the digital gaming, it's really picking up very quickly in

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 9>the US or seeing a lot of growth there, and

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 9>that's partly shifting that geographical concentration. That digital gaming business

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 9>is a global business, So some of that shift might

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 9>move back the reverse over time, but I think the

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 9>near term shift is just part of that growth on

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 9>the digital gaming side.

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us more from Bloomberg Intelligence coming.

0:15:54.360 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Up there for this, you're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligen

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in the podcast Catch us Live weekdays at ten am.

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 3>He's done on.

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple, Cocklay and Android Auto with the blue Berg Business App.

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>us Live on YouTube.

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 5>All right, let's get back to earning season, because those

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 5>are not the only companies that reported. Coca Cola also

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 5>came out with its latest results and maybe perhaps a

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 5>bit underwhelming given the stock price reaction down two percent

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 5>at the moment. Kenshe is our consumer products analysts, our

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 5>senior consumer products analysts, and he joined us now from Princeton.

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 5>So what's the story from Coca Cola, Ken, What did

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 5>they tell us?

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, hi, Scarlett. Well, Coke in the fourth quarter, revenues

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 10>are up to EPs was up six percent, pretty much

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 10>in line with expectations. But I think what maybe concerning

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 10>the mark a little bit about Coke is that the

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 10>mix was not as favorable as it had been well,

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 10>so the company with the past couple of years had

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 10>been relying heavily on price mix to boost the top line.

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 10>It was a considerable slow going in the quarter. Having

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 10>said that, there's always some noise in the fourth quarter.

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 10>It's hard to draw too many conclusions from the fourth quarter.

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 10>But I think the market is also being spooked a

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:14.360
<v Speaker 10>little bit by the guidance for next year, which came

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 10>in a bit a little bit late. The company's long

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 10>term algorithm is to generate about four to six percent

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 10>organic revenue and from that it can generate high comparable

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 10>EPs growth, and it did that in twenty twenty five.

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 10>In twenty twenty six, other saying four to five percent

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 10>top line and four to five percent EPs growth, and

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 10>so that's EPs growth again, that's excluding currency effects. It's

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 10>not only below their long term algorithm, but also below

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.120
<v Speaker 10>consensus expectations going in.

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 2>What's the You know, we always talk at a lot

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 2>of your companies, the contuber products companies as staples companies

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 2>that you think about them as kind of GDP maybe

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 2>a little bit GDP plus kind of growth here.

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Is there any secret.

0:17:57.640 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Sauce to the Coca Cola story or is that the

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 2>way we should think about it?

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 10>Well, there's a lot of truth to that, Paul, because

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 10>Coke is in the two hundred markets around the world.

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 10>You know, I guess the way for growth is lunar

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 10>at this point, I mean they're everywhere. But I think

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 10>there's gonna be a new CEO on March thirty first,

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 10>Henry Barraun. He's a long time veteran at Coca Cola,

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 10>was the COO used to head a Latin American operations.

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 10>I think there's a lot of confidence in his ability

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 10>to take the reins here. And I think what he's

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 10>going to spell out in his vision next week at CAGNY,

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 10>that's when they usually do it.

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.880
<v Speaker 3>That's what you'll be Yeah.

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:40.199
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think he's gonna say that they need to

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 10>step up their marketing and innovation here to boost that

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 10>top line growth. And I think they're going to talk

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 10>a lot about functionality, something that we talked about with Pesico.

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 10>What I mean by functionality, well, well, consumers want more

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 10>from their beverages than just taste good and hydrate them.

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 10>They want to not only have zero calies, zero sugar,

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 10>but if they wants to have more electrolytes in their water,

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 10>it wants to have more protein in their drinks. Particularly

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 10>the JLP one crowd, they want to have fiber coke

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 10>offers in its probiotics. So it is like simply pop

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 10>So these are the kind of things they're going to

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 10>talk about in terms of product innovation, I believe next week.

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 10>In addition to that, I think the company's going to

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:25.360
<v Speaker 10>spend more in marketing, digital marketing, get the message out

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 10>to new young consumers.

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 5>I guess the idea is to just have your drink

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 5>or place your food.

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 3>I guess.

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 5>Zero Sugar actually was a standout, right with Coca Cola

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 5>Zero Sugar posting double digit volume growth in the quarter.

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 5>When you say that they want to focus on the

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 5>innovation and get the word out, what does that mean

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 5>in terms of spending on marketing. What does that mean

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 5>on in terms of capital expenses?

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think, broadly speaking, more social media advertising. I

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.160
<v Speaker 10>mean on a purview basis, that's a lot more cost

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 10>efficient than traditional ways like television poll You would know

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:02.360
<v Speaker 10>that right analyst days. So it's more of that. It's

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 10>also working more closely with their bottlers in terms of

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 10>co marketing ventures. That could be a wide range of things,

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 10>not only digital marketing, but perhaps coming out new packaging,

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 10>whether it's multi packs to attract an economical consumer, to

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:23.239
<v Speaker 10>spending more on its fountain dispenser. You see a lot

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 10>of a lot of fast food restaurants where they can

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 10>make their own sodas and so on. Spread that out

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 10>more to have more consumer engagement matter where they are. Yep,

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 10>so I see.

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:35.440
<v Speaker 6>More of that.

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal