Speaker 1: Hey guys, it's Linda from the Handity Show here. And
Speaker 1: as you know, Sean and I never promote the stock
Speaker 1: market or investing in it, but I'm sure you've all
Speaker 1: seen the great GDP numbers, the awesome economy that Donald
Speaker 1: Trump is giving us, and we want you to benefit
Speaker 1: from it as well. So now we've discovered doctor Richard
Speaker 1: Smith his incredible financial software tools. They're trusted by thousands.
Speaker 1: It tracks over twenty billion dollars of investments. And if
Speaker 1: you're planning for your retirement, you have any money at
Speaker 1: all invest in the stock market, you need to go
Speaker 1: to Hannity dot com forward slash retirement right now. Check
Speaker 1: it out, Hannity dot Com Retirement. All right, glad you
Speaker 1: with us and write down our toll free telephone number.
Speaker 1: We'd love to hear from you. It's eight hundred and
Speaker 1: nine four one sewn if you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program. Oh, we're telling you it's coming,
Speaker 1: it's coming, and it's coming now. It's going to be well.
Speaker 1: It's like an avalanche. And as much as you get
Speaker 1: that first bit of snow to start, next thing, you know,
Speaker 1: it starts building up momentum and gets ahead of itself,
Speaker 1: and that is exactly what's going to happen here. Late
Speaker 1: last night, just before we're coming on TV, we had
Speaker 1: The New York Times, John Solomon, Fox News, we all
Speaker 1: kind of confirmed it simultaneously that the Attorney General of
Speaker 1: the United States, William Barr, just appointed the top US
Speaker 1: attorney in Connecticut to investigate the origins of the witch
Speaker 1: hunt into the Trump campaign. Now, remember Barr said to
Speaker 1: Lindsey Graham, he was very very clear, Lindsey went through
Speaker 1: we have that. Let me know, Jacon, do you share
Speaker 1: my concerns about the FISA warrant process? Yes? Do you
Speaker 1: share my concerns about the counterintelligence investigation, how it was
Speaker 1: opened and why it was opened. Yes, you share my
Speaker 1: concerns that the professional, lack of professionalism and the Clinton
Speaker 1: email investigations something we should all look at. Yes. Do
Speaker 1: you expect to change your mind about the bottom line
Speaker 1: conclusions of the Muller report? No. Do you think the
Speaker 1: president's campaign in twenty sixteen was thoroughly looked at in
Speaker 1: terms of whether or not they colluded with the Russians? Yes,
Speaker 1: and the answer is no. According to Bob Muller, that's right.
Speaker 1: He couldn't decide about obstruction you did, Is that correct?
Speaker 1: That's right. You feel good about your decision, absolutely, all right,
Speaker 1: So Mueller's over, which I've been telling you, But all
Speaker 1: these other issues are not. By the way, the president's
Speaker 1: motorcade had been in an accident. From all our understanding
Speaker 1: is nobody was hurt. I've seen that car, the beast
Speaker 1: is it is so fortified. You can't even believe you
Speaker 1: could withstand anything in that car, maybe short of a
Speaker 1: nuclear bomb dropped on it, but everything else you would withstand. So,
Speaker 1: you know, if you pay attention to what the Attorney
Speaker 1: General said in that exchange, and what the Attorney General
Speaker 1: is now doing, and what we already expect coming, and
Speaker 1: that would include the FIS applications themselves, the three O two's,
Speaker 1: the FBI's own investigation into the FBI apparently not complimentary.
Speaker 1: I'll get into that in a second. And then the
Speaker 1: you know, all this information is going to come cascading down.
Speaker 1: Now there might even be the possibility. I don't know
Speaker 1: this to be true, but it wouldn't be beyond the
Speaker 1: realm of possibility that the Inspector General Horowitz may have
Speaker 1: even handed over to the Attorney General the report of
Speaker 1: his and perhaps it's even connected to his announcement last night,
Speaker 1: and that is because it's huge news that the Attorney
Speaker 1: General appointed this top US attorney in Connecticut to investigate
Speaker 1: the origins of the witch hunt into the Trump campaign.
Speaker 1: It could all be related, is it? I don't know,
Speaker 1: but we know that when the Attorney General said what
Speaker 1: we all knew, and that was the Trump campaign was
Speaker 1: by we now know in a multitude of ways. One
Speaker 1: of the ways was based on the phony pies applications
Speaker 1: with Russian disinformation in them that Hillary paid for that
Speaker 1: were unverifiable. I mean that was one way they not
Speaker 1: only got a warrant to spy on Carter Page, Trump
Speaker 1: campaign associate, but also all things within the Trump campaign
Speaker 1: and used it as such. I mean, that was a
Speaker 1: backdoor into everything past, present, future. That was like a
Speaker 1: get out of jail, spy on everything cart for all
Speaker 1: things campaign Trump and then thereafter transition Team Trump and
Speaker 1: then thereafter that President Trump. Because it went on a
Speaker 1: full year because pies application has to be renewed every
Speaker 1: three months. So is it related. I don't know, but
Speaker 1: watching this happen at this time and knowing that we
Speaker 1: expected sometime mid May the release of the IGS report.
Speaker 1: It would not shock or surprise me that that report
Speaker 1: is already finished. I don't know where John Hoober stands
Speaker 1: with his report as it relates to leaking, but the
Speaker 1: Attorney General himself was very clear that he is going
Speaker 1: to look into the spine. He will look into the
Speaker 1: investigation of possible crimes that Hillary Clinton had committed. If
Speaker 1: you really want to break it down, this is what
Speaker 1: really happened in twenty sixteen. They robbed Bernie Sanders. Bernie
Speaker 1: Sanders didn't know it at the time, but he had
Speaker 1: no shot. The system was rigged in Hillary's favor, and
Speaker 1: Bernie had no chance to win. Now they've made some
Speaker 1: tweaks and changes to the Democratic nominating system, but not
Speaker 1: enough that would really make it fair. But it's certainly
Speaker 1: going to be more fair, which won't bode well for
Speaker 1: Biden if he's supposed to be Hillary. You know Redux
Speaker 1: or you know, the second coming of Hillary. So that's
Speaker 1: point number one. Then you've got the Hillary investigation, and
Speaker 1: you know, it's kind of laffable when you get the
Speaker 1: text messages released of Struck and Page and they're both
Speaker 1: saying that, well, no, all those decisions are being made
Speaker 1: by Lauretta Lynch, the same person that met with Bill
Speaker 1: Clinton on the tarmac in Arizona and Phoenix just days
Speaker 1: before the final decision about whether to indict his wife
Speaker 1: was being made. They only talked about grandchildren and of
Speaker 1: course telling Comy it's a matter, it's not an investigation. No,
Speaker 1: it was an investigation. It was supposed to be midyear investigation,
Speaker 1: not operation crossed by our hurricane. Then it's a question
Speaker 1: of the FISA applications and the lies that were told
Speaker 1: to FISA court judges. And in that particular case, this
Speaker 1: was a conspiracy. This was a premeditated conspiracy to commit
Speaker 1: fraud on the court withholding certain information like that Hillary
Speaker 1: paid for it, and not verifying the information later finding
Speaker 1: out it's unverifiable because the author doesn't stand by it,
Speaker 1: and then that gives them an opportunity to spy into
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign through Carter Page, a Trump campaign associate. Simultaneously,
Speaker 1: at some point we have the hiring of the spies.
Speaker 1: Now there's some dispute as to whether it's the FBI
Speaker 1: or whether or not it's our Intelligence community CIA people.
Speaker 1: But Stephan Helper is empowered to go talk to again
Speaker 1: they're using this other spy, Joseph of Mood, the guy
Speaker 1: that is the professor in London but also has connections
Speaker 1: to many spy agencies. And now we found out about
Speaker 1: the you know, the hot, flirtatious, thirty year old blonde,
Speaker 1: bombshell spy that was very well, let's say, touchy feely,
Speaker 1: which with George Popiopolis. So that all went on too,
Speaker 1: and they were going after Page Popiopolis, Sam Clovis another
Speaker 1: way they spied on the Trump campaign. And remember the
Speaker 1: media outrage age when the President said that you know,
Speaker 1: Obama's team was spying on him. Well, it turned out
Speaker 1: all of that was true. We just didn't know the
Speaker 1: details of how they were doing it or why they
Speaker 1: were doing it. But the issue now of you know,
Speaker 1: if you purpose, if you didn't verify that information and
Speaker 1: affies application says verified, and you're putting your signature on it,
Speaker 1: and you're doing it for political purposes because you want
Speaker 1: that backdoor into the Trump campaign and you can't get
Speaker 1: it legally, well that would be a significant, serious felony
Speaker 1: violation of constitutional rights in an attempt to rig the
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen election, just like they rigged the primary election,
Speaker 1: and then we get into the post presidency and the
Speaker 1: behavior at that point, well, that's when the insurance policy
Speaker 1: that struck him. Page talked about. You know, he can't win, right,
Speaker 1: tell me he can't ever win, and in the no,
Speaker 1: he's never gonna win, and it can't happen, it won't happen,
Speaker 1: and if it does, we haven't an insurance policy. Well,
Speaker 1: then they talk about the insurance policy being discussed in
Speaker 1: McCabe's office. McCabe was the one guy that was honest
Speaker 1: enough to say at one point, were it not for
Speaker 1: the dirty Russian dossier, there wouldn't be a fis A
Speaker 1: warrant to begin with. And then every three months thereafter
Speaker 1: they've got to get a FIES of renewal warrant. And
Speaker 1: the bulk of information remains the bought and paid for
Speaker 1: Clinton dossier. And every time they're not telling the files
Speaker 1: of court judges. There are numerous judges I assumed four
Speaker 1: separate ones in this particular case, and they're being told
Speaker 1: by the highest ranking people in our government FBI, Department
Speaker 1: of Justice that are signing their name to it that
Speaker 1: they have verified that the information they're presenting to the
Speaker 1: court is true. And accurate, and there's lies by omission.
Speaker 1: I think it would be a big red flag for
Speaker 1: any judge if you said, well, yeah, this ebolveds the
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen presidential campaign and Hillary paid for it the
Speaker 1: opposition party, And I think any judge would say, hold on,
Speaker 1: why would we believe in the validity of this or
Speaker 1: does the author even stand by it at that point? No?
Speaker 1: And so what Barr is going to do here is
Speaker 1: he's assigned to get to this. We're now going to
Speaker 1: get to the bottom of this. It's interesting to watch
Speaker 1: the in fighting because now you got struck in page
Speaker 1: they're now turning on the likes of Loretta Lynch and
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice under her. That raised his questions
Speaker 1: about where are her emails, text messages and what did
Speaker 1: she know and when did she know it? We know
Speaker 1: there were meetings inside the Oval office. Susan Rice we
Speaker 1: hear has been in some of these meetings, and Joe
Speaker 1: Biden and Barack Obama himself, what did they know and
Speaker 1: when did they know it? Then you've got James Comey
Speaker 1: ripping mad at Rod Rosenstein, and Rod Rosenstein now firing
Speaker 1: back against James Comey in a speech saying he's acting
Speaker 1: as a partisan pundit. I don't blame the former FBI
Speaker 1: director for being angry. I would be too, So I
Speaker 1: do not blame the former director for being angry. I
Speaker 1: wouldn't be too if I were in issues. But now
Speaker 1: the former director seems to be acting as a partisan pundit,
Speaker 1: selling books and earning speaking fees while speculating about the
Speaker 1: strength of my character and the fate of my immortal soul.
Speaker 1: I kid you not. That is disappointing. A little beyond disappointing.
Speaker 1: I mean, Jim Comey, is you know the great paragon
Speaker 1: of virtue is in more trouble than anybody I think
Speaker 1: in all of this, and I think Rosenstein was right
Speaker 1: to unload on him. Rosenstein's problem and all of this
Speaker 1: is how is he going to answer why he signed
Speaker 1: the fourth FISA application, the third renewal. And of course
Speaker 1: the cowardly shift is predicting this country won't survive another
Speaker 1: four years of President Trump. I think we'll survive. Whether
Speaker 1: he can survive four more years of you lying, though,
Speaker 1: would be a whole different question, wouldn't it. Now. What's
Speaker 1: interesting is we had Trey Gaudy on last night and
Speaker 1: people like Trey Gaudy. Let me play with Trey Gaudy said,
Speaker 1: because it's people like him and Lindsey Graham. They're all
Speaker 1: saying that there are these sensitive documents never before seen,
Speaker 1: that are going to prove many things that we have
Speaker 1: put out there. Listen, are you convinced that there was
Speaker 1: a fraud committed against the FISA court withholding that Hillary
Speaker 1: paid for that Nassier and that in fact the bulk
Speaker 1: of evidence was unverifiable, and that they never verified whether
Speaker 1: anything Steel Road is true, and that they do it
Speaker 1: to spy on the Trump campaign. Sir Sean, I can
Speaker 1: tell you it is even worse than what you described.
Speaker 1: It is what you described in addition to the withholding
Speaker 1: of his culpatory information, which is what has Johnny Ratcliffe
Speaker 1: so exercised. And they made no effort to corroborate the
Speaker 1: dossier until after it had been used in the application
Speaker 1: and a renewal. No effort. It's not that they failed,
Speaker 1: they made no effort to ask questions. So whoever is
Speaker 1: investigating this, tell them to look for emails between Brennan
Speaker 1: and come in December of twenty six type there's something there.
Speaker 1: He's obviously seen it? Who else may have seen this? Now?
Speaker 1: Lindsey Graham, He too wants to classify the sensitive documents
Speaker 1: that prove the FBI knew the Steel dossier lack credibility.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna tell you something. I'm assuming these guys saw
Speaker 1: something here and if they did, and it sounds like
Speaker 1: what I think it is withholding of exculpatory information, everybody
Speaker 1: that's signed is gonna go to jail if we, of course,
Speaker 1: have equal justice and application of our laws. What's up, everybody?
Speaker 1: Linda from the show on Hannity Show here to talk
Speaker 1: about your money, retirement. Your money. It's like your health right.
Speaker 1: You know, you don't think about it until you don't
Speaker 1: have it. And a lot of people are making really
Speaker 1: bad mistakes, especially with their retirement. They're not retiring with
Speaker 1: enough money. You know what, It's just wrong. But have
Speaker 1: no fear. Meet one of the most incredible financial minds
Speaker 1: in America, doctor Richard Smith, and rich It's extraordinary tools
Speaker 1: are trusted by thousands of Americans. It tracks over twenty
Speaker 1: billion dollars in the stock market, and his tools can
Speaker 1: help you reset your retirement. You're gonna be hearing a
Speaker 1: lot from Sean and me about Richard and literally we
Speaker 1: have never endorsed any financial software tool until now. Why
Speaker 1: because we've never seen anything like this before. So see
Speaker 1: it for yourself. Go to Hannity dot com Retirement, that's
Speaker 1: Hannity dot com forward slash retirement and check it out.
Speaker 1: All right, A great roll along Sean Hannity Show eight
Speaker 1: hundred ninefold one. So guys like Trey Goudy and Lindsey Graham,
Speaker 1: they've they've seen something. What that sounds to me like
Speaker 1: is exculpatory information evidence that is going to trickle out
Speaker 1: because they're demanding that it get out now. The other
Speaker 1: thing that they're finding is there is a nexus with
Speaker 1: Comey and Brennan. I really want to find out what
Speaker 1: the involvement of Brennan and Clapper are in all of
Speaker 1: this as well, because you know, just Comey alone seems
Speaker 1: to be the nexus of all of this Comy. You know,
Speaker 1: then with the FBI, you've got McCabe and you got Struck,
Speaker 1: and you got Paige, and you got Baker. You know,
Speaker 1: there's sort of voll in his web and his relationship
Speaker 1: too with the Attorney General at the time, which would
Speaker 1: be Loretta Lynch. Here's what Congressman Ratcliffe said, to make
Speaker 1: this point, Democrats are scared to death. They were in
Speaker 1: a panic about evidence of collusion quickly unraveling. And he's
Speaker 1: a member of the House Judiciary Committee, explaining these congressional
Speaker 1: Democrats were on the offensive over Bill Barr and his
Speaker 1: refusal to comply with their demands given they were concerned
Speaker 1: that the claims of collusion were unraveling. That's only a
Speaker 1: part of the story, though, And Comey is contradicting himself
Speaker 1: left and right. He actually contradicted his own memo on
Speaker 1: the Trump Oval Office meeting. And you know, there a
Speaker 1: number of discrepancies that he's put on record now because
Speaker 1: he keeps talking and he's keeps putting his foot in
Speaker 1: his mouth. And the FBI steals story, as we said,
Speaker 1: has fallen apart because everybody knew, and everybody knew before
Speaker 1: the first FISA warrant was even signed to spy on
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign. And Carter Page, I'm gonna give you
Speaker 1: these new details about Bill Barr, his new appointment. What
Speaker 1: this means, We have Greg Jarrett much more coming up
Speaker 1: as we continue. Hey guys, it's Linda the executive producer
Speaker 1: for the Sean Hannity Show. You might also know me
Speaker 1: as Shaun's daily sparring partner, and now that he's a ninja,
Speaker 1: of course, and every day we argue about all sorts
Speaker 1: of things and talk about lots of stuff, including the
Speaker 1: incredible economy that the President has given everyday Americans. And
Speaker 1: just like that, well, we want to tell you about
Speaker 1: how to fight for your retirement. And that's right. Fight.
Speaker 1: There's a huge crisis in America. Millions of people are
Speaker 1: retiring and without enough money. And if that's not shocking enough,
Speaker 1: even if you think you've got your financial act together,
Speaker 1: chances are there a retirement killers out there that you
Speaker 1: don't know anything about. Have no fear. We have one
Speaker 1: of the brightest financial minds in America to help make
Speaker 1: sure your investments for your future retirement are on the
Speaker 1: right track. I'm talking about doctor Richard Smith, the founder
Speaker 1: of Trade Smith, and his mission is to help Americans
Speaker 1: be more financially literate. That's right, put the power, put
Speaker 1: the knowledge back in your hands, make better investment decisions,
Speaker 1: and avoid catastrophic mistakes that could cause your retirement to
Speaker 1: be a disaster. That could cause your retirement to be
Speaker 1: a disaster. Thousands and thousands of people trust Doctor Smith's
Speaker 1: investment tools to track over twenty billion dollars in the
Speaker 1: stock market, and I'm telling you you should too. When
Speaker 1: we're talking about your retirement. You're in a financial fight
Speaker 1: for your future. Please do yourself a favorite, folks, register
Speaker 1: right now for Doctor Smith's special online event, the Great
Speaker 1: Retirement Recess. Go to Hannity dot com forward slash retirement.
Speaker 1: That's Hannity dot com forward slash retirement. Eliminate the stress,
Speaker 1: eliminate the worry of investing in the stock market. Register
Speaker 1: now Handity now dot com forward slash retirement. All right,
Speaker 1: breaking news, Acasio Cortez climate change will destroy the earth
Speaker 1: in twelve years. That claim was not literal, like literally,
Speaker 1: Why did you think it was literal? Anyway? Suggesting that
Speaker 1: people who believe the suggestion that the world will end
Speaker 1: in twelve years have the intelligence of a c sponge.
Speaker 1: She made the claim in January. Sorry, we're just quoting you.
Speaker 1: Guess we're all c sponges and you're, you know, a genius. No.
Speaker 1: I think she's probably been dressed down by more than
Speaker 1: a few liberals over in Washington about the whole thing. Um.
Speaker 1: I think that the part of it that is generational
Speaker 1: is that millennials and people and you know, gen Z
Speaker 1: and all these folks that come after us are looking
Speaker 1: up and we're like, the world is going to end
Speaker 1: in twelve years if we don't address climate change. And
Speaker 1: your biggest issue is biggest issue is how are we
Speaker 1: going to pay for it? And like this is the war.
Speaker 1: This is our World War two? Okay, our World War two.
Speaker 1: Now it's time to pop out, bring out the popcorn.
Speaker 1: Because Biden and Sleepy Creepy you know, Uncle Joe and
Speaker 1: Alexandria Cossio Cortez oac are now publicly feuding over the
Speaker 1: New Green Deal, and last week, Biden's aides told Reuters
Speaker 1: that the Democratic presidential candidate was exploring quote middle ground
Speaker 1: option for tackling climate change, and Acasio Cortez seized on
Speaker 1: the remark during a Green New Deal rally in DC
Speaker 1: on Monday yesterday. And try to paint Biden as the
Speaker 1: centrist that is out of touch with the progressive vanguard
Speaker 1: of the Democratic Party. I will be damned if the
Speaker 1: same politician Asians who refused to act are going to
Speaker 1: try and come back today and say we need a
Speaker 1: middle of the road approach to save our lives. That's
Speaker 1: too much for me, Biden. Well, then he fired back,
Speaker 1: I've never been in the middle road on the environment.
Speaker 1: And I tell her to check, you know, uh, the
Speaker 1: statement that I made, and look on my record. She'll
Speaker 1: find that nobody has been more consistent about taking it
Speaker 1: on the environment and a grain revolution than I have.
Speaker 1: And so look anyway, but I so I can't. I
Speaker 1: don't think she's talking about for this idea that I
Speaker 1: haven't done anything. Take a look at the record, That's
Speaker 1: what I'd say. I'm sure she will get time to
Speaker 1: look at it. You noticed Biden doesn't really have the
Speaker 1: high level of energy that I think a presidential candidate needs.
Speaker 1: He sounds like he's exhausted already and it's just getting started.
Speaker 1: You know, this is not for the faint hearted. I've
Speaker 1: been out on the road. You've got to have that
Speaker 1: inner drive that is pushing you. Not that it's my time, mom, due,
Speaker 1: what do you want? What's the question? I mean, not
Speaker 1: a good idea. So let me tell you more about
Speaker 1: John Durham, appointed by bar pretty extensive background prosecuting high
Speaker 1: level government corruption. So when it comes to him, it's
Speaker 1: hard to imagine that there is a prosecutor out there
Speaker 1: with a more extensive background and cracking high level government corruption.
Speaker 1: Durham was prosecuted during the He prosecuted the Boston mob
Speaker 1: and he's a former acting US Attorney Deputy US Attorney,
Speaker 1: was the Chief of the Criminal Division, also once headed
Speaker 1: the New Haven Field Office and the Boston Strike Force
Speaker 1: or on Organized Crime. Was involved in special investigation projects
Speaker 1: under four attorney General Attorneys General. In two thousand and two,
Speaker 1: Durham helped secure the conviction of retired FBI agent John
Speaker 1: Connolly Junior, who was sentenced to ten years in prison
Speaker 1: on federal racketeering charges tied to his relationship with the
Speaker 1: well known mobster Whitey Bulger. And then he led investigators
Speaker 1: into a former Connecticut governor. And he helped prosecute the
Speaker 1: former Republican Connecticut governor John Rowland, who served two prison
Speaker 1: stints for not paying taxes and accepting one hundred and
Speaker 1: seven thousand dollars in gifts from people doing business with
Speaker 1: the state. And he was also responsible for prosecuting mobsters
Speaker 1: in the Boston area and led an inquiry into allegations
Speaker 1: the FBI agents in Boston police had ties with the
Speaker 1: MOP he investigated the CIA. That was in two thousand
Speaker 1: and nine. Then Attorney General Eric Holder, a Democrat, appointed
Speaker 1: Durham to lead the Ustice Department investigation into the legality
Speaker 1: of the CIA's use of enhanced interrogation techniques. Apparently he
Speaker 1: cleared the CIA on the media's hysterical torture allegations, since
Speaker 1: there's no mention of any prosecutions. I remember three people
Speaker 1: were waterboarded. One of them was Khalee Chek Muhammad. That's
Speaker 1: how we found the courier that gave us Bin Laden. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and you know when they do this, and I had
Speaker 1: to explain to us people in the room at the time, Well,
Speaker 1: when they're doing that to people, you have doctors standing by.
Speaker 1: They had very strict rules about how to do it,
Speaker 1: how to scare the living daylights out of these guys,
Speaker 1: and they did sing. And if you have knowledge that
Speaker 1: will save American lives and you're keeping it inside and
Speaker 1: we're just trying to be nice to you, you're not
Speaker 1: going to get the information that can protect Americans lives.
Speaker 1: I wonder what people would do in this day and
Speaker 1: what they would think if it was World War two,
Speaker 1: beating back the forces of fascism, Nazism, and imperial Japan,
Speaker 1: the unprovoked attack on Pearl Harbor, and you have President
Speaker 1: Truman deciding to drop the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Speaker 1: What would the liberal reaction be to that? Now, did
Speaker 1: innocent people get hurt? Yeah? Is it a tragedy, Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's horrible. War is awful. But how many American lives
Speaker 1: ultimately were saved by ending that war? It's not an
Speaker 1: easy question to answer. But they started it when they
Speaker 1: invaded an attack Pearl Harbor unprovoked. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: they were lying to us at the time the Japanese
Speaker 1: were Then we've got other information as it relates to
Speaker 1: Bill Barr, the Attorney General. Now this was in the
Speaker 1: Washington Post. Since the Russia Gate investigation began with Comey's FBI,
Speaker 1: Brennan CIA, and Clappers was the Director of National Intelligence
Speaker 1: overseeing the whole thing. It's only fitting I think that
Speaker 1: Barr's investigation into the Russia Gate hoax returned to the
Speaker 1: scene of the crime. And even CNN fake News reported
Speaker 1: the Attorney General William Barr is now working in close
Speaker 1: collaboration with the CIA director Gina Haspell, Director of the
Speaker 1: National Intelligence Dan Coates and the FBI Director Ray, and
Speaker 1: there had been speculation as to why Haspell has been
Speaker 1: spotted at the Justice Department in recent weeks. Ray testified
Speaker 1: last week that he was assisting bar John Durnham is
Speaker 1: also working with the Justice Department's Inspector General, Michael Harrowitz
Speaker 1: as well. After a hearing last month, Barr said, I
Speaker 1: think spying occurred, and the media had a collective freak
Speaker 1: out because it did occur. It's not even in dispute
Speaker 1: anymore at all. Is it in dispute anyway? John Hoober
Speaker 1: of Utah no longer involved on Russia issues. It had
Speaker 1: originally been tasked with looking into allegations of surveillance abuse
Speaker 1: by former Attorney General Sessions, but has been in a
Speaker 1: holding pattern as the Inspector General completes the review of
Speaker 1: the FISA issue and surveillance warrants the FBI obtained on
Speaker 1: Trump campaign foreign policy advisor Carter Page and Hoober's review
Speaker 1: of other issues related to Hillary Clinton and the Clinton
Speaker 1: Foundation apparently nearing completion. According to one source that the
Speaker 1: Niicia didn't respond for comment in that case, but it
Speaker 1: is interesting Sarah Carter came out with a piece that
Speaker 1: the leading Russia Gate hoaxter James Clapper hit the panic
Speaker 1: button yesterday when he found out that John Durham had
Speaker 1: been appointed to find out whether Brannan and Comy Well
Speaker 1: whether they concocted bogus intelligence to try and frame Trump.
Speaker 1: You know, I think we're going to also discover at
Speaker 1: some point just too many sources are going too close
Speaker 1: to this. I don't have it buttoned up yet that
Speaker 1: we're going to find out that certain intelligence gathering techniques
Speaker 1: that would be illegal in this country without a warrant,
Speaker 1: or probably outsourced to allies and friends. In other words,
Speaker 1: you know, you have the five spy, you know, in
Speaker 1: other words, we have relationships with Great Britain and Italy
Speaker 1: and Australia and other countries. I'm just keeping an eye on.
Speaker 1: I'd want to see where that ends up going, anyway,
Speaker 1: So Clapper's upset. Clapper never complained when Congress was conducting
Speaker 1: multiple Rushigate investigations. He didn't seem to mind when ninety
Speaker 1: percent of the media not to mention the special prosecutor
Speaker 1: with a posse of Hillary donors, were chasing down every
Speaker 1: anti Trump allegation under the sun. But now he says,
Speaker 1: we don't need Durham's investigation because the DOJ's Inspector General
Speaker 1: is already probing the same territory. Nope. So Clapper said
Speaker 1: this in an interview on Fake News CNN where he
Speaker 1: gets his paycheck, and he was asked about the Attorney
Speaker 1: General's appointment of Durham for the job to investigate how
Speaker 1: the FBI Russia investigation started. And Clapper clearly didn't like
Speaker 1: the idea You're gonna have to stand in line and
Speaker 1: take a number to do the investigation of the investigators. Oh,
Speaker 1: if that's what it takes, I'm not in disagreement with that.
Speaker 1: We have to stand in line. Let's stand in line.
Speaker 1: So anyway, Durham, it just has a reputation as being,
Speaker 1: you know, a pretty hard charging bulldog, according to some quotes.
Speaker 1: And there's a piece in Fox News Today Foxnews dot
Speaker 1: Com that the US attorney appointed by a bar to
Speaker 1: examine the origins here have been working on his review
Speaker 1: for weeks. Of person familiar with the process telling Fox
Speaker 1: News and all the intelligence collection activities related to the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign during the twenty sixteen presidential election, sounds like
Speaker 1: he's hitting their ground running that He's been doing this
Speaker 1: for some time. Durham, known as a hard charging bulldog prosecutor,
Speaker 1: according to a source, will focus on the period before
Speaker 1: November seventh, twenty sixteen, including the use and assignments of
Speaker 1: FBI informants, as well as alleged improper issuance of Foreign
Speaker 1: Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants. See this is what makes me
Speaker 1: think that I'm beginning to think that Harowitz has done
Speaker 1: really I'm thinking it might even be handed over to
Speaker 1: the Attorney General. I'm just a total gas speculation on
Speaker 1: my part, but it would fit based on the timing
Speaker 1: and the naming of Durham. Another source told Fox News
Speaker 1: the bar is working collaboratively on the investigation with the
Speaker 1: CIA director Gina Hospital and the Director of National Intelligence
Speaker 1: Dan Coates. And Meanwhile, President Trump praised Bar for appointing
Speaker 1: Durham and maintained that he did not request that the
Speaker 1: Attorney General do so. I think the President is being smart.
Speaker 1: He's staying out of it and let's he's letting the
Speaker 1: people do their job, which is the best way to
Speaker 1: handle anything like this. Otherwise he'll be accused of politicizing it.
Speaker 1: In two seconds now, he can probably rightly focus on
Speaker 1: the economy and some of the other issues that you know,
Speaker 1: the country's facing. How about maybe we focus in on
Speaker 1: the idea this may sound novel, that America is no
Speaker 1: longer a hackable nation, and we build the defenses so
Speaker 1: that these foreign entities and foreign countries can hack in
Speaker 1: and rob us of our top secret information. Because that's
Speaker 1: been going on for four decades. Never mind election interference,
Speaker 1: it's just a small aspect of it, which we were
Speaker 1: warned about in twenty fourteen by Devin Nunez, and nobody
Speaker 1: paid attention in the Obama administration to his admonitions and
Speaker 1: his warnings. By the way, it was really funny this
Speaker 1: morning over at Trump Tower today, Comrade build the Blasio.
Speaker 1: You know, maybe it's a preview of coming attractions. He said,
Speaker 1: he's gonna you know what he's gonna face if he
Speaker 1: decides to run for president. He was pretty much boot
Speaker 1: off the stage at a Green New Deal rally by
Speaker 1: a crowd of people chanting and shouting, you suck and
Speaker 1: you're the worst mayor ever. Anyway, he was growing a
Speaker 1: little horse shouting over the cranked up sound of Frank
Speaker 1: Sinatra in Trump Tower's lobby I don't know why they
Speaker 1: had it there as he tried to promote his Green
Speaker 1: New Deal. Anyway, the Trump Tower staff turned up the
Speaker 1: dial on the PA system moments before the mayor entered
Speaker 1: the Fifth Avenue building, and there was Tony Bennett, Stranger
Speaker 1: in Paradise and Frank Sinatra I've Got You under my
Speaker 1: Skin blasting through the speakers during the big event, according
Speaker 1: to the New York Post, and Trump's supporters joined in
Speaker 1: on the noise and started booing and saying you suck
Speaker 1: as he tried to shout over the music and the protesters.
Speaker 1: I don't know what's not really sure why he was
Speaker 1: there anyway, what he's looking for? All Right, we got
Speaker 1: a lot more to get to. This is a big deal.
Speaker 1: This is a huge deal, and I think it is
Speaker 1: based on something more profound than anybody's picked up on yet.
Speaker 1: And we won't know probably for oh we couldn't know
Speaker 1: any day, but if this may take a week, two weeks,
Speaker 1: and then we're all going to find out. So I'm
Speaker 1: not playing the former director for being angry. I wouldn't
Speaker 1: be too if I were in his shoes. But now
Speaker 1: the former director seems to be acting as a partisan
Speaker 1: pundit and earning speaking fees while speculating about the strength
Speaker 1: of my character and the fate of my immortal soul.
Speaker 1: I kid you not. That is disappointing. We finally have
Speaker 1: somebody outside of politics, and I want to give mister
Speaker 1: drms at his name, I don't even know him, dispace
Speaker 1: to his job. I'm a Republican judiciary chairman. He now
Speaker 1: got a prosecutor. I don't want to get in their way.
Speaker 1: I don't want to mess up his criminal investigation, and
Speaker 1: I don't want to put people at risk. Simill back off.
Speaker 1: Are you convinced that there was a fraud committed against
Speaker 1: the FISA court withholding that Hillary paid for that Nassier
Speaker 1: and that in fact the bulk of evidence was unverifiable,
Speaker 1: and that they never verified whether anything steel Road is true,
Speaker 1: and that they do it to spy on the Trump campaign.
Speaker 1: Sir Sean, I can tell you it is even worse
Speaker 1: than what you described. It is what you described in
Speaker 1: addition to the withholding of his culpatory information, which is
Speaker 1: what has Johnny Ratcliffe so exercised, And they made no
Speaker 1: effort to corroborate the dossier until after it had been
Speaker 1: used in the application and a renewal. No effort. It's
Speaker 1: not that they failed, they made no effort to lask questions.
Speaker 1: So whoever is investigating this, tell them to look for
Speaker 1: emails between Brennan and Come in December of twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: All right, that was Trey Gaudy, who was on with
Speaker 1: me last night on Hannity, and he's now bringing up
Speaker 1: things I'm beginning. I'm beginning to put two and two together,
Speaker 1: because what he's saying is that there is a document.
Speaker 1: There are documents, and I always thought it was the
Speaker 1: Gang of Eight documents where the FBI actually did their
Speaker 1: own internal review. And when we see their own analysis
Speaker 1: of their own work, it's not pretty. And Lindsay Graham
Speaker 1: and others are now working to declassify the sensitive documents
Speaker 1: that proved that the FBI knew, they all knew that
Speaker 1: Steele lacked all in any credibility. I'm getting some of
Speaker 1: my little Birdie's sources telling me that if Horowitz has
Speaker 1: not turned over the report he was doing on FISA
Speaker 1: applications and FISA warrants and committing fraud before the FISA court,
Speaker 1: he's very near the point he's doing so some people
Speaker 1: that I've been talking to are speculating very strongly today that,
Speaker 1: in fact, the Attorney General William Barr appointing this new
Speaker 1: US attorney John Durham from Connecticut is a direct result
Speaker 1: of the fact that the FISA abuse findings are devastating.
Speaker 1: We bring in Diana West, nationally syndicated columnist, author by
Speaker 1: the way of a brand new book called The Red Thread,
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett, Fox News legal analysts, author of the number
Speaker 1: one New York Times bestseller The Russia Hoax. I don't
Speaker 1: know if you're hearing the same thing that I'm hearing,
Speaker 1: but this did not happen in a vacuum, meaning the
Speaker 1: appointment of mister Durham. And from all I can read
Speaker 1: and see about this guy, he apparently is a tough
Speaker 1: nosed prosecutor that gets the job done. William barn knows
Speaker 1: what the Inspector General has already come up with. And
Speaker 1: I think you've nicely summarized it, that there was lying
Speaker 1: going onto the fisiquard, a fraud on the court, concealing
Speaker 1: of evidence, deceiving the judges. And you know, William Barr
Speaker 1: is the Attorney General, knows where this is headache to
Speaker 1: a grand jury, and he needs a top prosecutor to
Speaker 1: be able to present that to a grand jury. So
Speaker 1: he's picked mister Dunham, who I know quite well since
Speaker 1: he's the US attorney where I live, and you know
Speaker 1: he is a hard charging, no nonsense bulldog of a
Speaker 1: prosecutor with an excellent track record of uncovering corruption at
Speaker 1: the FBI, And so he's the perfect pick to get
Speaker 1: to the bottom of this. Well, yes, yes, there's an
Speaker 1: interesting question here that needs to be asked and thought about.
Speaker 1: And this is really what I was trying to do
Speaker 1: in the Red Thread, which is the subtitle, is a
Speaker 1: search for ideological drivers inside the anti Trump conspiracy. And
Speaker 1: that question is why would all of these top officials,
Speaker 1: these top level powerful people at the head of the
Speaker 1: Justice Department, the FBI, throughout the Obama administration and elsewhere
Speaker 1: in Washington risk everything when all we do in America
Speaker 1: the basis of the admiration of our political system is
Speaker 1: the peaceful transition of power. In other words, why didn't
Speaker 1: they wait till next time? And I think what's an
Speaker 1: important question here is to get to motivation, to try
Speaker 1: to understand the thinking of these people who do not
Speaker 1: believe in democracy small d. I mean, this is sort
Speaker 1: of the overriding theme that I am finding inside the
Speaker 1: anti Trump conspiracy in terms of a hard left ideological
Speaker 1: drive to take down not just a generic Republican president,
Speaker 1: but this Republican president who is a counter revolutionary feak.
Speaker 1: Here analysis of all this, if we're gonna do this right,
Speaker 1: and I have every belief that bars going to unravel
Speaker 1: the mess that he inherited. Because this we need to
Speaker 1: remind people too that this all happened under Biden Obama.
Speaker 1: All of this Russian interference. They were warned many many
Speaker 1: times by the intelligence community. They were warned in an
Speaker 1: article in twenty fourteen by Devin Nuness. It seems like
Speaker 1: they wanted this to happen at any point, the FBI
Speaker 1: or the Obama administration. They were at liberty, They could
Speaker 1: have pulled Donald Trump in for a private, secure meeting
Speaker 1: and said, look, we're worried about what the Russians are
Speaker 1: trying to do with the election, and I imagine Donald
Speaker 1: Trump would have asked, well, what can I do to help?
Speaker 1: He was never given that opportunity, just like when he's
Speaker 1: having a private meeting with Komey, you know, Coomey could
Speaker 1: have said, it serves a little bit different than what
Speaker 1: you understand in your past life as a business person.
Speaker 1: But you know, just so you know, the depart I'm
Speaker 1: gonna justice is separate and apart the FBI, separate and
Speaker 1: apart on all the decision making as a means of
Speaker 1: being able to be a fair broker and discerning the
Speaker 1: law and upholding the law. They didn't want that because
Speaker 1: they wanted to set them up, Greg Jarrett. They wanted
Speaker 1: that response and Callmey either lied in October twenty sixteen
Speaker 1: when he signed the first phony FAISA with Russian lies
Speaker 1: that Hillary paid for, or he lied when he said
Speaker 1: it was silatious and unbeverified, And my guests as he
Speaker 1: probably lied in both instances, if at all possible, just
Speaker 1: to keep the president off track. Well, James Coney signed
Speaker 1: not just the first, but the second and the third
Speaker 1: FISA applications. So you're talking about a period of one
Speaker 1: hundred and twenty days in which they clearly knew that
Speaker 1: what they had presented to the court they had been
Speaker 1: unable to verify, even belatedly. They have an affirmative duty
Speaker 1: under the law to immediately notify the FISA judges if
Speaker 1: they uncover information that's beneficial to the target, which was
Speaker 1: Carter Page. So they didn't do any of that. And
Speaker 1: what was very revealing in your interview, excellent interview last
Speaker 1: night with Trey Gaudi said, look for the document exchange
Speaker 1: between James Cobey and John Brennan. The lines were blurred
Speaker 1: between the CIA and the FBI and indeed the White House.
Speaker 1: I think in the end we'll find out that all
Speaker 1: three were involved, not just in spying an unlawful surveillance,
Speaker 1: but an attempt to stop Donald Trump from becoming president.
Speaker 1: And to answer Dina's question, why why would they do this?
Speaker 1: Because it's the arrogance of power, and they never thought
Speaker 1: they'd get caught because they assumed. So we have a
Speaker 1: situation and Hillary would win. We have a rigged Democratic
Speaker 1: primary against Bernie Sanders, then a rigged investigation to keep
Speaker 1: Hillary in the race, because after all, Trump is lonesome,
Speaker 1: bast them and should lose one hundred million zero. So
Speaker 1: they take care of Hillary even though the evidence is
Speaker 1: overwhelming and incontrovertible, as is the obstruction thereafter, as she
Speaker 1: tried to destroy the evidence. Then you're gonna try and
Speaker 1: use the phony, unverified, uncorroborated dossier, leak it to the
Speaker 1: press as a means of disseminating the salacious information to
Speaker 1: the American people visa the Washington Post, David Korne, Michael Izakoff,
Speaker 1: and probably others. And then you're going to use the
Speaker 1: same dossier to spy on the Trump campaign while simultaneously
Speaker 1: taking away the constitutional rights of an individual, but also
Speaker 1: all the individuals where they spied on when they got
Speaker 1: into that network, while simultaneously using spies in Europe to
Speaker 1: go and have meetings with the likes of Popadoppolo's Carter
Speaker 1: page Sam Clovis, and just for a little icing on
Speaker 1: the cake, they even throw in a hot thirty year old,
Speaker 1: flirtatious model spy that wants to basically telegraph the George
Speaker 1: Popinoppolo she's available as long as he gives her information. Yes,
Speaker 1: they went to a lot of trouble, didn't they. But
Speaker 1: again it's this wondering of what they were afraid of.
Speaker 1: Maybe is a better way of getting into this What
Speaker 1: were they afraid that Donald Trump would do? As president?
Speaker 1: And here is where I think we again get to
Speaker 1: this hard left bias driving them, which is Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: this counter revolutionary figure, was going to restore the nation's state,
Speaker 1: which is the biggest and most important weapon against the
Speaker 1: whole liberal, so called liberal world order, the socialist international
Speaker 1: order that has never really been tried ever since it
Speaker 1: really got started after World War Two. And I think
Speaker 1: that their desperation is what caused them to take these
Speaker 1: tremendously reckless measures, these lawless measures. And because Donald Trump one,
Speaker 1: as you both have told us and explained, this is
Speaker 1: why they were possibly caught. And we're at this point
Speaker 1: of exposure that is truly of a magnitude we've never
Speaker 1: really seen before. So it's a very very important moment
Speaker 1: where I do think again getting to the sort of
Speaker 1: notion of what inspires them is very important. What I
Speaker 1: discovered in this little book, the Red Thread, is that
Speaker 1: you see in many of these figures inside the anti
Speaker 1: Trump conspiracy, by their own words, an affinity, a connection
Speaker 1: to Marxist ideology, to communist beginnings. James Comy himself discussed
Speaker 1: being a communist in college. You have John Brennan openly
Speaker 1: discussing his vote for Gus Hall in the bregnev nineteen seventies.
Speaker 1: I mean, these are hard left biases and looking at
Speaker 1: Nellie or she is someone who as an academic, was
Speaker 1: very fond of Joseph Stalin. She saw terror, yes, but
Speaker 1: excitement literally those are her words, the terror and excitement
Speaker 1: of the Stalin era. And this is when she was
Speaker 1: a professor at Vassar in the nineteen nineties, when another
Speaker 1: Fusion GPS contractor, Edward Baumgartner, was a student there. So
Speaker 1: this connection, this thread, if you will, this continuity among them.
Speaker 1: Ideologically speaking, I don't believe it's accidental and could be
Speaker 1: very very illuminating. And what's your final word on to
Speaker 1: say that. I think it's It may be ideological, but
Speaker 1: I think it's more personal and visceral. Donald Trump promised
Speaker 1: to drain the swamp. People like Coomee and Brennan and Clapper.
Speaker 1: They were all the swamp and they knew they were
Speaker 1: going to get drained. Hillary Clinton allowed them, upon her
Speaker 1: election as president to keep their jobs and their power.
Speaker 1: They would likely all stay on. I think that's what
Speaker 1: drove them. Yeah. Well, the question is do you believe
Speaker 1: Barr will hold well he do the whole job or
Speaker 1: does he start after the exoneration of Hillary, Because I
Speaker 1: I don't think if the Clintons get a pass in
Speaker 1: this again, and they've gotten many many passes over the years,
Speaker 1: I think there's not going to be the confidence that
Speaker 1: needs to be restored for people to have the rightful
Speaker 1: respect of America's premiere law enforcement and intelligence agencies. But
Speaker 1: if we do get the whole thing right, I think
Speaker 1: that confidence will be restored. And I also think we
Speaker 1: send a loud message that it's never going to be
Speaker 1: tolerated again, and we ought to put in a system
Speaker 1: of checks and balances, Greg, to make sure it doesn't
Speaker 1: happen again. I mean, it's pretty stage I Greg, you wholeheartsholetely.
Speaker 1: And the problem for the Justice Department is some of
Speaker 1: the statute of limitations or five years on the alleged
Speaker 1: crimes that Hillary Clinton committed. Not all of them have run,
Speaker 1: but many of them have, so that's an obstacle for them.
Speaker 1: But I do believe there is an investigation going on
Speaker 1: at the DOJ into Hillary Clinton's activities on uranium, one
Speaker 1: that has a longer statute of limitations of ten years,
Speaker 1: and so that's not a prohibition. But I agree with
Speaker 1: you they need to look at all of it. Nana,
Speaker 1: where do you see this all ending in. You know,
Speaker 1: how soon do we get the horrow It's report, and
Speaker 1: how devastating you think that's going to be. Well, I
Speaker 1: hope it's devastating. If it were to be an honest reckoning,
Speaker 1: I think it would be one of the most devastating
Speaker 1: documents in American history. I'm of a mind right now
Speaker 1: that the best way to get this thing really moving
Speaker 1: forward is the complete declassification of as much of the
Speaker 1: FISA documentation and other pieces of information that have been
Speaker 1: withheld from us all of this time as possible. I
Speaker 1: think that that is the place where you will not
Speaker 1: see spin and you will get the real information about
Speaker 1: how this attempted coup went down. Oh good point. Last word,
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett. I think the IG report will in the
Speaker 1: end be shot that there will inevitably be criminal referrals.
Speaker 1: Evidence will be presented to a grand jury by Dunham
Speaker 1: and others at the Department of Justice, and I think
Speaker 1: in the end there may be some indictments, as there
Speaker 1: should be. All Right, thanks so much both of you
Speaker 1: for being with us wide open telephones when we come
Speaker 1: back eight hundred and nine for one, Sean, if you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program. We have
Speaker 1: Kaylee McKinney, Jeff Lord, they'll check in with us. We'll
Speaker 1: talk about the constitutional crisis the Democrats the media keep
Speaker 1: reporting when in fact, the only constitutional crisis is the
Speaker 1: one they missed. We'll have a lot more is the
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity Show continues. So now you hear the term
Speaker 1: constitutional crisis. You know, you hear this word constitutional crisis,
Speaker 1: A little constitutional crisis. What exactly counts is a constitutional crisis?
Speaker 1: Are we in a constitutional crisis? Is this a constitutional crisis?
Speaker 1: I think it's a constitutional confrontation, constitutional stress test, constitutional showdown,
Speaker 1: constitutional confrontation, confrontational crisis. Do you agree with him and Natler?
Speaker 1: Country is currently in a constitutional crisis. Yes, it's a
Speaker 1: constitutional crisis. Okay, constitutional crisis because we have the option
Speaker 1: of impeachment, and we think this is a constitutional crisis.
Speaker 1: Start impeachment proceedings. Why not pursue impeachment? Why are you resisting?
Speaker 1: Some people would argue, we've been in a constitutional crisis
Speaker 1: since Donald Trump was elected president. Oh yeah, is it
Speaker 1: a constitutional crisis? Yeah, well, we have an informational crisis.
Speaker 1: I can tell you about that because all the voices
Speaker 1: pretty much you just heard there. Well, they're known liars,
Speaker 1: they're known conspiracy theorist. They have pushed the biggest hoax
Speaker 1: that I think most of us have ever seen in
Speaker 1: our life. Anyway. Kaylee mcinny, National press secretary for the
Speaker 1: Trump twenty twenty campaign. Jeff Lord his new book coming out,
Speaker 1: Swamp Wars, Donald Trump and the New American Populist Populism
Speaker 1: Versus the Old Order, and you can order it early
Speaker 1: on Amazon dot com. Welcome both of you, Thanks so much. Look,
Speaker 1: there is an informational crisis, is not the only constitutional crisis?
Speaker 1: Is how did they rig a primary so Bernie had
Speaker 1: no shot of winning, How did they rig a criminal
Speaker 1: investigation so Hillary had no chance of being indicted? How
Speaker 1: did they try to rig a presidential election using of
Speaker 1: all things, Russian lies to bludgeon Donald Trump and disseminate
Speaker 1: false information through their media friends. And then what about
Speaker 1: the constitutional crisis of some of the top people in
Speaker 1: our government trying to unseat the duly elected president and
Speaker 1: setting him up for such You're exactly right. Those are
Speaker 1: all the crises that are actually happening and are actually
Speaker 1: on the horizon. It's incredible. You know, only the Democrats
Speaker 1: can rig a primary, rig it for Hillary Clinton. She
Speaker 1: was in de facto control of the DNC and get
Speaker 1: away with it. Only Hillary Clinton could take sledgehammers to
Speaker 1: her blackberries, bleach bid her server, and she gets away
Speaker 1: with it despite it active violation of the law. She
Speaker 1: has the FBI and jem Comey and Loretta Lynch coverings
Speaker 1: for her, who, of course we know, met Bill Clinton
Speaker 1: on the tarmac. But nevertheless, here we are. They're declaring
Speaker 1: constitutional crisis after two years of investigating the president and
Speaker 1: absolute total exoneration. But yet nevertheless, today pair at the
Speaker 1: DNC talking points, That's exactly what we were just hearing.
Speaker 1: Jeff Lord, you're back with us. What do you think, Sean,
Speaker 1: The only constitutional crisis here is at a silent pool.
Speaker 1: It's a test pulled off by these people like James coming.
Speaker 1: They played the same kind of games with Bernie Sanders
Speaker 1: and the Democratic primary. You know, Sean, I keep listening
Speaker 1: to every time you say that James Colemy should just
Speaker 1: be quiet and save his advice, you know, give him advice.
Speaker 1: I'd like, I'm telling me he has the right to
Speaker 1: remain silent, and he's not listening to me. And I
Speaker 1: think it's dumb. I watched that CNN thing and I
Speaker 1: thought to myself, man, this guy is getting himself in
Speaker 1: seriously deep trouble. Oh, I think it's even worse than that.
Speaker 1: I mean, the one thing that I really am watching
Speaker 1: very very closely, we see the liberal anger towards the
Speaker 1: Attorney general. I mean the idea Kaylee mckinanny, that some stupid,
Speaker 1: dopey congressman on the House Judiciary Committee are talking about
Speaker 1: the sergeant of Arms handcuffing the Attorney General of the
Speaker 1: United States because the Attorney General refuses to break the
Speaker 1: law and saying that they're going to force him to testify.
Speaker 1: And then they want to break a two hundred and
Speaker 1: six year precedent and history and rather than have duly elected,
Speaker 1: accountable lawmakers ask questions of the attorney general, well for
Speaker 1: the first time, as I said, in two hundred and
Speaker 1: six years, they'd rather the lawyers do that work because
Speaker 1: obviously they're not capable of questioning the Attorney General in
Speaker 1: a way that's going to be most effective for them. Now,
Speaker 1: they're still gonna have the lawyers right out the questions.
Speaker 1: The problem is, well, if you don't know the law,
Speaker 1: and he does, you're likely going to look pretty stupid
Speaker 1: in the end, and I think that's what they fear
Speaker 1: more than anything that's exactly right. And here's what they're
Speaker 1: counting on, and they're counting on this incorrectly, is they're
Speaker 1: counting on the American people to turn to blind eye,
Speaker 1: to ignore the facts, to ignore the idea that this
Speaker 1: hasn't been done in two hundred and seven years, but nevertheless,
Speaker 1: we're demanding it now. They're counting on the American people
Speaker 1: to be ignorant to the fact that they're asking Bill
Speaker 1: Barr to break the law by delivering grand jury testimony,
Speaker 1: which we know is illegal under the very laws of Congress.
Speaker 1: They're counting on the American people to be ignorant on this.
Speaker 1: But they're the American people, aren't They're smart. They see
Speaker 1: through these antics, they see through this political theater and
Speaker 1: the games of Democrats, and they see that there is
Speaker 1: no collusion and they don't want more investigating, which is
Speaker 1: why sixty percent say let's move on. So Democrats proceed
Speaker 1: at their own peril here. What do you think I
Speaker 1: mean now that Muller really is dead, I mean, the
Speaker 1: Attorney General couldn't be any more clear. Mueller had the
Speaker 1: time and the resources, and and he had all the
Speaker 1: ages that he wanted, and he was thorough in his search,
Speaker 1: and he came up with no collusion and no obstruction,
Speaker 1: And in spite of what other people say, that that
Speaker 1: is the conclusion. And do you think this matter is closed,
Speaker 1: mister Attorney general? Do you think you'll change your mind
Speaker 1: on the Mueller report? He says no, But he is
Speaker 1: interested in looking into, well, how did Hillary's criminal investigation
Speaker 1: get rigged, who was involved, why would it have happened.
Speaker 1: Then he's interested in getting to the FIS abuse issue.
Speaker 1: I think we're getting very close to hearing from Michael
Speaker 1: Harrowitz and his report. And I think one of the
Speaker 1: early signs that that is happening is the appointment by
Speaker 1: the Attorney General topping tapping a prosecutor to investigate the
Speaker 1: origins of the FBI Trump Russia probe and the specific spying.
Speaker 1: And the guy's name is John Durham, who apparently has
Speaker 1: a stellar record, and people say that he is as
Speaker 1: thorough as they come. I can't imagine that those that
Speaker 1: relied on Hillary's dossier and didn't tell the court that
Speaker 1: Hillary paid for it, and that Steel had an agenda.
Speaker 1: I can't assume any other outcome except what the obvious
Speaker 1: would be, Jeff Lord, and that is they committed a
Speaker 1: fraud on the court. Well, that's right, and you know, Sean,
Speaker 1: I took a look back. In twenty eleven, the New
Speaker 1: Republic ran a list of the most unfamous people in Washington.
Speaker 1: One of them was John Durham, and it goes into
Speaker 1: great detail in this about how he handled quote unquote
Speaker 1: some of the most sensational FBI trials in history. And
Speaker 1: not only that, he's been in charge in previous times
Speaker 1: with investigating CIA abuses. So he is exactly the person
Speaker 1: you want here, somebody who knows exactly what he's doing,
Speaker 1: who knows where to look for the buried bodies as
Speaker 1: it were. Well, I mean, I don't think they're going
Speaker 1: to get what they want. Now. There's another strategy emerging too,
Speaker 1: with all these people that have had to pay thousand
Speaker 1: dollars an hour for lawyers to go before the Senate
Speaker 1: and House committees, and they've answered every imaginable question, and
Speaker 1: many of them also got brought before the the Democratic
Speaker 1: hit squad of the witch hunt team of Robert Muller,
Speaker 1: and what are we now going to start dragging them
Speaker 1: back one by one? What is Senator Burr of North
Speaker 1: Carolina Republican thinking, Kaylee mckinnanny, because that sounds like the
Speaker 1: dumbest idea I've ever heard from a Republican in all this. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that is a pretty dumb idea, And I'm not entirely
Speaker 1: sure as to why you went down this path. It's
Speaker 1: nonsensical and it's playing right into the Democrats' hands. You know,
Speaker 1: these were many innocent Americans who were dragged into this,
Speaker 1: who had human sources placed on them bis in other words,
Speaker 1: I know Democrats won't use that word, but that is
Speaker 1: exactly what they were. They were spied on. They were
Speaker 1: then dragged through legal proceedings exactly as you set millions
Speaker 1: of dollars in some cases, certainly hundreds of thousands when
Speaker 1: you aggregate it all together, all of this money spent.
Speaker 1: Why were they targeted simply because they had an R
Speaker 1: behind their name and because they worked and more affiliated
Speaker 1: with President Donald Trump. That is a scary day in
Speaker 1: America when the American intelligence community can be earned against you,
Speaker 1: and the legal community weaponized, the DOJ weaponized against you.
Speaker 1: How does this play out? In twenty twenty, as all
Speaker 1: these new Green Deal candidates are trying to make the
Speaker 1: case for greater socialism, more government control of our lives,
Speaker 1: they'd want to alter the lifestyle of the American economy
Speaker 1: at a literally at its core, Jeffrey Lord, and you know,
Speaker 1: by eliminating the lifeblood of the economy with oil and gas.
Speaker 1: Do you really believe that there's enough people out there
Speaker 1: in a Democratic primary that would buy into some of
Speaker 1: these nutty ideas that are being put forth by all
Speaker 1: of the candidates. Yeah, I do think there are some.
Speaker 1: You know, this reminds me increasingly of nineteen seventy two,
Speaker 1: when the Joe Biden of the day was Senator Edmund Muskie,
Speaker 1: the establishment favorite. He was supposed to win this going away,
Speaker 1: and he was upended by George McGovern's pass an army
Speaker 1: of you know, like college kids and far left, these
Speaker 1: anti war types. I think this is right to happen
Speaker 1: to Joe Biden. I see that the congresswoman Ocasio Cortez
Speaker 1: has already attacked him for trying to play to the
Speaker 1: middle on climate change. She's furious about it, and she's
Speaker 1: going after him. I think he is going to have
Speaker 1: an increasingly difficult time. Yeah, what do you think? I mean,
Speaker 1: how's this play out? And I can't ask both of you, Kelly,
Speaker 1: I'll ask you first. Who do you think emerges as
Speaker 1: the leader and the person that ultimately wins the nomination. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's a great question. I think people right now are
Speaker 1: saying Joe Biden's running away with this, but I think
Speaker 1: they're making a real mistake here when Bernie Sanders stands
Speaker 1: beside him on that debate stage, looks in an eye
Speaker 1: and says, under your leadership, we lost two hundred eleven
Speaker 1: thousand manufacturing jobs because of you, because of NATO, because
Speaker 1: of the TPP. That was a million jobs hemorrhage. Another
Speaker 1: half million had TPP got through. I don't see how
Speaker 1: Joe Biden survives. I don't see how he survives is
Speaker 1: the failed Obama record. I don't see how he survives
Speaker 1: the radicalism of the far left that demands he embraced
Speaker 1: a Green New Deal. So I think you're going to
Speaker 1: see a far left Jisiphernie, a Warren, a far less
Speaker 1: to submerge, a socialists take the range. So you agree
Speaker 1: with Kaylee, it's not going to be creepy, crazy sleepy
Speaker 1: Uncle Joe. Yeah, I do. I think he's got a
Speaker 1: big problem. You know, we're distracted by the number of
Speaker 1: people here in this race, but if it all starts
Speaker 1: to focus on one of these far left people, then
Speaker 1: the other one sees that they can't win, they'll go
Speaker 1: with that person and it will basically be Joe Biden
Speaker 1: against all of these people supporting one of them. That
Speaker 1: kind of helps him in them bide in the beginning,
Speaker 1: But as you whittled down the field, I mean, look
Speaker 1: at Acasio Cortez's comments going after Biden on climate issues.
Speaker 1: I will be damned if leaders try to sell middle
Speaker 1: ground of middle ground approach, who's talking about Biden? There
Speaker 1: you go, that's what I saw. That's that's exactly right.
Speaker 1: He is going to have a serious problem. And the
Speaker 1: other problem here that he's also going to have is
Speaker 1: all this attention to Don Junior is bringing attention to
Speaker 1: the activities of Hunter Biden, and I think that is
Speaker 1: going to prove to be a serious problem for it.
Speaker 1: I think it's a big problem. And we got him
Speaker 1: on tape bragging how he withheld a billion dollars of
Speaker 1: American aid until well, they had a six hour deadline
Speaker 1: to fire the prosecutor that we now know is investigating
Speaker 1: his own son. Then we've got Peter Schweitzer's chronicling the
Speaker 1: Bidens moves in China, where you know, literally it's a
Speaker 1: field he's not even engaged in at all. And as
Speaker 1: we continue, Kaylee mcinanny is with US National Press Secretary
Speaker 1: for the Trump twenty twenty campaign, Jeff Lord. His upcoming book,
Speaker 1: Swamp War, is Donald Trump and the New American Populism
Speaker 1: versus the old order, well, the old Daughter also, and
Speaker 1: I think this is important to make this distinction, is
Speaker 1: also Republicans. Jeff, Yeah. Absolutely. One of the things I
Speaker 1: talked about in the book are the never Trump Republicans
Speaker 1: and their attacks on Donald Trump and you as a
Speaker 1: matter of fact, I mean they are just you know, candidate,
Speaker 1: I mean you mean people attack me. I've never known
Speaker 1: that before. Linda, did you ever hear about this? When
Speaker 1: did that start? But these people are so wedded to
Speaker 1: the establishment and the old ways of doing things that
Speaker 1: this is the problem here is that they feel that
Speaker 1: Donald Trump and his supporters, I might add, are you
Speaker 1: a problem for them? And will end their reign as
Speaker 1: it were with the Republican party, they're right, Well, I haven't.
Speaker 1: So if the Republicans and this is a problem, Kaylee
Speaker 1: mckin any you're working for the Trump twenty twenty campaign.
Speaker 1: There are a lot of Republicans in the Senate, every
Speaker 1: House members also, you know, up for reelection. And then
Speaker 1: the question is these the senators, these House members that
Speaker 1: haven't supported the president and a successful agenda, where do
Speaker 1: they go? Yeah, they're in trouble in their district. And
Speaker 1: it's something we saw play out through the primaries. If
Speaker 1: you don't support the president, you're in trouble with your constituents.
Speaker 1: Because here's the secret. And I know that Jeff would
Speaker 1: agree with me on this, both of us having worked
Speaker 1: at CNN. These so called never Trump Republicans only exist
Speaker 1: in the media and the swamp. It's a very small
Speaker 1: group of elected officials. It's a very small group of
Speaker 1: punnits over at CNN and an SNBC who are not
Speaker 1: at all reflective of where this party stands with nineties.
Speaker 1: There's a little secret Jeff and I have. Jeff would
Speaker 1: be up there. Let's see against Axel, Rod Van Jones,
Speaker 1: Donna Brazil, you know, Anderson Cooper, Um, Amanda Carpenter, I
Speaker 1: think would be on those panels and like, you're the
Speaker 1: only conservative supporting Trump, the only one. Oh yeah, they'
Speaker 1: on leave out a navarrow up And so I'd be watching,
Speaker 1: and I'm like, I watch only because Jeff is my
Speaker 1: friend and I'm watching. The funny part is he gets
Speaker 1: ninety percent of the airtime because all of the attention
Speaker 1: is fixated on when the same with you, Kaylee, because
Speaker 1: all the attention would be on the two of you
Speaker 1: because not one person there could stand you, and they
Speaker 1: just hated everything that you said and they couldn't be
Speaker 1: They were shocked, you know, forty thousand times an hour.
Speaker 1: Why don't you believe that chucking shocking, shocking? Um no one.
Speaker 1: Remember when you sent me an email on one occasion
Speaker 1: in the middle of this and I looked down at
Speaker 1: it said I can't bear to watch. I walked away.
Speaker 1: I abandoned you in the battlefield. They said, I can't
Speaker 1: handle it anymore. That enough is enough? All right, thank
Speaker 1: you both people on our side. That's true. Yeah, all right?
Speaker 1: Eight hundred and nine four one sewn. You want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program News Round Up, Information
Speaker 1: Overload Hour at the top of the next hour and
Speaker 1: much more coming up straight ahead and a lot of
Speaker 1: your calls eight hundred and nine four one Shawn if
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program, and
Speaker 1: awesome Hannity tonight at nine on Fox Straight Ahead. Coming
Speaker 1: up next, our final news round up and Information Overload Hour.
Speaker 1: What it's too much for me is the fact that
Speaker 1: in nineteen eighty nine, the year that I was born,
Speaker 1: the year that I was born, the year that many
Speaker 1: of us were born, and in years after and right
Speaker 1: before that, politicians were first informed by NASA, that Congress
Speaker 1: was first notified by NASA that climate change was going
Speaker 1: to threaten my life and everyone hears life to come,
Speaker 1: and they did nothing. That is too much for me.
Speaker 1: The critics have lined up to take their shots at
Speaker 1: the Green New Deal, totally bogus stories about ice cream
Speaker 1: and Hamburgs and airplanes. They call the Green New Deal
Speaker 1: pie in the sky. They call it socialism, But what
Speaker 1: about what about the oil and gas industry tax rates
Speaker 1: that are a permanent part of the tax code, some
Speaker 1: of which have been on the books for over one
Speaker 1: hundred years. But Republicans only call it socialism when we
Speaker 1: try to help the things we like. So here's what
Speaker 1: I say for wind and solar and all electric vehicles
Speaker 1: and clean energy, give us some of that socialism that
Speaker 1: the oil and gas industrate has had for a century.
Speaker 1: Trump's buildings in New York City produce as much greenhouse
Speaker 1: gases at fifty eight hundred cars a year, and we
Speaker 1: won't allow him to go on like that. So we
Speaker 1: have a message for President Trump and all the other
Speaker 1: big building owners in New York City. Cut your emissions
Speaker 1: or we will cut something you really care about. We
Speaker 1: will take your money, we will find you, we will
Speaker 1: hold you accountable. Road. I've never been in the middle
Speaker 1: road on the environment, and I tell her to check,
Speaker 1: you know, the statements that I made and look at
Speaker 1: my record. She'll find that nobody has been more consistent
Speaker 1: about taking it on the environment and a green revolution
Speaker 1: than I have. And so look anyway, but I so
Speaker 1: I can't. I don't think she's talking about this idea
Speaker 1: that I haven't done anything. Take a look at the record.
Speaker 1: That's what I say. I'm sure. All right, News round
Speaker 1: up in information Overload our on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: This this is what now modern liberalism, the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: has evolved into. I mean, it is just it's it's
Speaker 1: off the rails, you know, and so ironic because we're
Speaker 1: at a point where it's a tipping point moment. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's no doubt about it. Twenty twenty is going to
Speaker 1: be a choice election year. At stake, it won't be
Speaker 1: any more clear. I mean, Biden is going hard left
Speaker 1: because he wants to get the nomination, and you know,
Speaker 1: even if he were to win, this is the party
Speaker 1: that will push him, even in the presidency, further left.
Speaker 1: It is not based on the science that they are saying.
Speaker 1: There's no other country on Earth that is cut back
Speaker 1: on CO two emissions than this one. Yes, we should
Speaker 1: be good stewards of the gifts that God gives us,
Speaker 1: the greatest country God gave man. Nobody wants dirty water,
Speaker 1: nobody wants dirty air. Nobody wants to also go back to,
Speaker 1: you know, the Fred Flintstone era and you know, use
Speaker 1: rocks as means of transportation in a phony car. I mean,
Speaker 1: it just becomes absolutely insane. And as we go forward,
Speaker 1: this is what they want now all Cassio Cortez gotta
Speaker 1: give her a little credit. She did back off the
Speaker 1: well the planet is dead in twelve years. Thing is
Speaker 1: that correct, Linda, Well, she says she was kidding. Now
Speaker 1: she's just kidding. It's all big joke, all big joke.
Speaker 1: She was kidding. I guess you have made fun of
Speaker 1: enough that that's the only reason. Well know, what happened
Speaker 1: was was she went on her little, you know, talk
Speaker 1: show spree, and everywhere she went, even the liberals were
Speaker 1: confused by what she was saying because she makes no sense.
Speaker 1: She talks in circles. She literally gets handed a script
Speaker 1: by her chief of staff and he says, these are
Speaker 1: your talking points. But the problem is, if anybody asks
Speaker 1: a follow up question, it's done. It's over because she
Speaker 1: doesn't have any answers. He has no answer, she can't
Speaker 1: spell answer. It is a problem. This woman is running
Speaker 1: around screaming and yelling, and you know what, she is
Speaker 1: a gift. She is a gift to Donald Trump because
Speaker 1: you know what, she never would have gotten past the
Speaker 1: first leve They're all Donald Trump. I mean, because this
Speaker 1: is where the party is. I mean, that's why Biden wants,
Speaker 1: you know, free healthcare for illegal immigrants. That's why that's
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris. Now that she's taken over that no, well,
Speaker 1: Biden's right there with her. That's why they want to
Speaker 1: eliminate private insurance. Right. But the thing that bothers me
Speaker 1: more about Kamala Harris is, here's a woman who's in California.
Speaker 1: You're seeing what's happening to your people. You're seeing what's
Speaker 1: happening to your constituents. You're seeing needles in the street,
Speaker 1: You're seeing illegal immigrants taking jobs away from people that
Speaker 1: could be working them that are American citizens, and you
Speaker 1: don't care. I mean, how much more money do you
Speaker 1: want to take away from the average American? Yeah? I
Speaker 1: think that's the last thing they're concerned about. When you
Speaker 1: ask anybody how to pay for it, they have no answer. Right,
Speaker 1: let's get to our phones. A lot of you be impatient.
Speaker 1: Daniel is in Georgia eight hundred nine four one. Sean
Speaker 1: told free telephone number. You want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program News Round Up, Information Overload Hour. How
Speaker 1: are you, sir? I'm doing great, Sean? How are you good?
Speaker 1: What's happening? Well? First I got to say, Sean, you're
Speaker 1: a great American. Hadn't heard anybody tell you that in
Speaker 1: a long time. Thank you. I appreciate it, So are you, sir? Well?
Speaker 1: Thank you well, Sean, I really I had actually called
Speaker 1: yesterday was but we were talking about Rashida Talib and
Speaker 1: everything that's going on. Sean. Here's this thing. I'm thirty
Speaker 1: years old, right, and I do not understand, well, how
Speaker 1: in the world people my age are so heavily voting Democratic.
Speaker 1: I mean I am, and this whole thing, this all
Speaker 1: this stuff about paying for healthcare for illegals and everything.
Speaker 1: Who's going to pay for that? I mean, I work. Listen,
Speaker 1: it isn't what they are. What they are putting forth
Speaker 1: Medicare for all, for example, that in ten years it's
Speaker 1: going to cost ninety four billion dollars. The GRNW Green Deal,
Speaker 1: the numbers are staggering. You know, they're already saying they
Speaker 1: want a seventy percent personal individual tax rate, then they
Speaker 1: want a ninety percent corporate rate. It'll stifle and stop
Speaker 1: and its tracks all economic growth in this country. We
Speaker 1: will have negative GDP growth. We will not we will
Speaker 1: not have and become the prosperous society we can be.
Speaker 1: We're literally on sitting on the verge of more wealth
Speaker 1: creation ever in American history because of new found sources
Speaker 1: of energy, meaning natural gas. You know, we are the
Speaker 1: entire Middle East of natural gas, clean burning gas. On
Speaker 1: top of that, our oil reserves are massive. Anwar is open.
Speaker 1: We have two pipelines being built, and production is continuing
Speaker 1: in states like Texas and Oklahoma and even off the
Speaker 1: Gulf Coast, the Pacific Coast, and of course the eastern
Speaker 1: coast of our country. You know, we have the ability
Speaker 1: now to be the biggest net exporter of energy in
Speaker 1: the world. And the difference between us doing this and
Speaker 1: other countries doing this is it's not going to be
Speaker 1: in the hands of a you know, Hugo Chavez or
Speaker 1: a Vladimir Putin or a bad actor. You know, in
Speaker 1: this case, this can be wealth that literally lifts every
Speaker 1: single solitary American out of poverty into a new standard
Speaker 1: of living that we maybe never envisioned that would be,
Speaker 1: that would happen for everybody, or at least everybody that
Speaker 1: chooses to work, everyone that wants to put in the
Speaker 1: time and have the nice house and a nice car,
Speaker 1: and the nice vacations and go out to eat the
Speaker 1: simple things in life. And hey, Sean, can I jump
Speaker 1: in here for one quick second. Yeah, so job is
Speaker 1: already sent me an article this morning. I don't know
Speaker 1: if you saw it. He had not beat in Fox
Speaker 1: News and he literally breaks apart this Green New Deal
Speaker 1: that these dems are talking about, and he's like, it's
Speaker 1: going to cost ninety three trillion dollars on the first
Speaker 1: ten years. And he said, that's six hundred thousand dollars
Speaker 1: for every household according to the American Action Form, So
Speaker 1: six hundred thousand dollars for every US household. Listen, retro
Speaker 1: fitting every building in every home in America. They don't
Speaker 1: even answer how you're going to pay for that? How
Speaker 1: do you build a skyscraper? And I'm sure there's a way.
Speaker 1: How do you build skyscrapers in New York without stealing
Speaker 1: without glass? What are the materials going to be made of?
Speaker 1: And maybe they've come up they're not going to use plastics,
Speaker 1: They're not going to be able to use wood, so
Speaker 1: what do they use? That then stops all progress in
Speaker 1: building in New York City, and New York City begins
Speaker 1: to stagnate, and then New York City loses population as
Speaker 1: they already are because of the you know, confiscatory tax
Speaker 1: rates and the burdens and regulation on everybody. And the
Speaker 1: one funny thing that Joe points out, is that what
Speaker 1: they want to do will literally only reduce and this
Speaker 1: is insane, will literally only reduce the rise in global
Speaker 1: temperatures by point not one point oh one degree celsius one.
Speaker 1: That's insane. It's not discernible even that's the point. All right,
Speaker 1: let's get to our phones. Mary Jane is in Ohio.
Speaker 1: How are you, Mary Jane? Glad you called? I am
Speaker 1: glad I talked to you, you know, I just to me.
Speaker 1: I'm just like amazed that these people are so out
Speaker 1: of touch. What news do they listen to? How what
Speaker 1: is there? What's the motivation for them to continue this?
Speaker 1: I mean, what does they get out of it? Are
Speaker 1: they getting paid off or they what do they get
Speaker 1: out of this listening they're protecting criminals. It's a great question.
Speaker 1: You ask. What they get is their power? Remember it's
Speaker 1: all about power. It's much power. If they'd switch and say, man,
Speaker 1: I don't believe this, he's at all, you know, I
Speaker 1: think it's really crazy and switch the whole thing that
Speaker 1: could be on top of the world. America can be
Speaker 1: the best richest country on the face of the earth.
Speaker 1: And then you know, America has been kind of throughout
Speaker 1: its history and very generous country. Then we'll share that
Speaker 1: wealth with other people. You know, it's amazing. If we're
Speaker 1: having job seminars in prisons in Pennsylvania, I think that's
Speaker 1: a pretty good sign that our economy now needs other workers.
Speaker 1: And if you can prove that, we can vet you,
Speaker 1: you're safe. You want to be a part of our family.
Speaker 1: You want opportunity and you can take care of yourself.
Speaker 1: That's got to be mandated as well. You can't come
Speaker 1: to America then be a burden on the system because
Speaker 1: you got one of the highly coveted positions. Anyway, thank
Speaker 1: you for the call. Appreciated it. Right as we continue
Speaker 1: back to our busy telephones. Eight hundred and nine four one, Sean,
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the program,
Speaker 1: Bruno Dallas, Next, Sean Hannity Show. What's happening, Bruno? How
Speaker 1: are you? I'm doing well, Sean? How are you all right?
Speaker 1: What's going on? Well? Listen. A couple of weeks ago,
Speaker 1: middle of April, I believe it was in New York
Speaker 1: Times came out with an article talking about Russian disinformation
Speaker 1: is what fed into the Christopher Steele dossier, and as
Speaker 1: a paralegal, went to college and studied and worked independently
Speaker 1: for years. The very first thought that entered my mind is,
Speaker 1: if we don't challenge every time they say information and
Speaker 1: say prove it, we may be giving everybody who is
Speaker 1: culpable criminally in any way. With the dossier and the
Speaker 1: entire debacle against the campaign and the presidency of Donald J. Trump,
Speaker 1: we are giving them a get out of jail free card. Potentially,
Speaker 1: it's all true. I mean, that's why you can't give
Speaker 1: You can't have a dual justice system in America. You
Speaker 1: can't have let's start with the surveillance, unmasking, leaking, raw intelligence.
Speaker 1: We can't use the powerful tools of intelligence, and they're
Speaker 1: more powerful than they've ever been. We entrust people to
Speaker 1: use it to protect us. You can't turn those powerful
Speaker 1: weapons on us. Number one. Number two, we are a
Speaker 1: constitutional republic. We do have protections. And when one family
Speaker 1: breaks the law and the evidence is overwhelming and everybody
Speaker 1: else would go to jail, well then we really don't
Speaker 1: have a constitution, you know, equal justice under the law
Speaker 1: or equal application of our laws. That's why getting this
Speaker 1: right and going back and fixing everything that was done wrong,
Speaker 1: everything that was rigged or attempted to be rigged, and
Speaker 1: holding those people accountable it's going to be good for
Speaker 1: everybody in the end, because the rank and file special
Speaker 1: agents that I know are disgusted at what the upper
Speaker 1: management ranks did. Within the FBI, same in the intelligence community.
Speaker 1: You know, you gotta understand that if you're an intelligence officer,
Speaker 1: if you're an FBI agent, you love your job. I've
Speaker 1: never met a guy that did these jobs that didn't
Speaker 1: love it. They embrace it, they work hard at it,
Speaker 1: they're proud of what they do. They know things that
Speaker 1: would blow the minds of the average American, and they
Speaker 1: know it's necessary and needed because there's a lot of
Speaker 1: dark forces in this world. But they do it because
Speaker 1: they want us to remain free. And to then use
Speaker 1: it against certain people because of their political point of view,
Speaker 1: or even weaponizing the irs for that matter, is an
Speaker 1: extraordinarily dangerous thing. I mean, this is what happens in
Speaker 1: these banana republics, these dictatorships, and that's how freedom erodes,
Speaker 1: and fundamentally, it's one of the most important things that
Speaker 1: we've got to do. And let's get to the bottom
Speaker 1: of it all. And as we can see, we're getting closer.
Speaker 1: And what we saw yesterday with the appointment by the
Speaker 1: Attorney General he tapped a prosecutor to investigate the origins
Speaker 1: of the FBI Trump Russia probe. We're getting rumblings that
Speaker 1: the IG report is coming very very soon. My gut
Speaker 1: tells me, and I don't know for sure, but my
Speaker 1: gut tells me past experience, the IG may have already
Speaker 1: handed over his report, and that may have been what
Speaker 1: triggered the decision by the Attorney General to grab this
Speaker 1: top federal prosecutor in Connecticut and look at the origins
Speaker 1: of the twenty six encounter intelligence investigation that conducted you know,
Speaker 1: we know, spying on the Trump campaign, because that would
Speaker 1: also fall under the umbrella of FISA abuse and committing
Speaker 1: a fraud on the FISA court. So I think all
Speaker 1: of that is relevant here. This was a big day yesterday.
Speaker 1: This wasn't It was massive. This is a day where
Speaker 1: you know it. But it shouldn't be a surprise because
Speaker 1: we've been telling you this is all coming. It's a
Speaker 1: surprise to the media because they're still waiting for the
Speaker 1: Muller report to find collusion and they can't believe it
Speaker 1: didn't come out the way they had predicted for two
Speaker 1: years it would come out, and they're not going to
Speaker 1: admit there wrong. They're just going to double down on
Speaker 1: the next whatever it is to hate Trump on. Do
Speaker 1: you think seattle't have a homeless problem? Yes, I see
Speaker 1: it every day when I walk to work. In the
Speaker 1: last five years, it's gotten steadily worse, with the numbers
Speaker 1: of people actually living on the streets rising at an
Speaker 1: exponential number. Would you say there's a homeless problem with Yeah,
Speaker 1: there is a homeless problem. It's a big, big time
Speaker 1: homeless problem. Subscribe to me. What you see intends on
Speaker 1: the sidewalk, debris and let are like everywhere. I actually
Speaker 1: see a lot of marijuana smoke. I've found needles in
Speaker 1: the park. I've seen heroin deals go down in my backyard.
Speaker 1: Called the police and they never showed up. They said,
Speaker 1: there's just no same drug deals in your backyard. I've
Speaker 1: seen them heating up the heroine in a spoon in
Speaker 1: my backyard. What all the tech companies coming to Seattle?
Speaker 1: Do you actually think it's the money problem or do
Speaker 1: you feel like the people that are elected here are
Speaker 1: focused on other issues? I think, sadly looks like they
Speaker 1: don't catch But I don't think the city is really
Speaker 1: doing their job on I think they're they're putting their
Speaker 1: efforts into the wrong place. The big companies Amazon, Starbucks, Microsoft, Boeing,
Speaker 1: even the small tech companies could really do a little
Speaker 1: bit more humunity service. Do you feel safe with all
Speaker 1: of this more? Now? I try not to make eye contact.
Speaker 1: Could I walk as fast as I can? Be a
Speaker 1: partial ancestry? All right? That was? You know, you can't
Speaker 1: make this stuff up. Lawrence Jones is in Seattle. We've
Speaker 1: been sending Lawrence and our producers out across the country
Speaker 1: to some of the more liberal cities. Uh. One of
Speaker 1: the first ones we went to was San Francisco. And
Speaker 1: it's amazing because in the distance between Nancy Pelosi's office
Speaker 1: and Nancy Pelosi's multi million dollars, you know, guarded neighborhood,
Speaker 1: gated neighborhood, walled up house in the middle of all
Speaker 1: of that, Well, you have a crisis that she can't
Speaker 1: she can't possibly avoid seeing, and that is that these
Speaker 1: liberal cities in San Francisco in particular, their big problem
Speaker 1: is needles from drug addicts are everywhere. And that's a
Speaker 1: mile from her office a mile from her home, and
Speaker 1: then people are literally defecating on the streets and human
Speaker 1: feces are pretty much everywhere. How do you feel about,
Speaker 1: Nancy Belows's leave the sweep in the zool. Things need
Speaker 1: to change a little bit here. I've been around here
Speaker 1: a little bit. I've seen needles, feces, and where. How
Speaker 1: do y'all feel about the state of y'all community? It's
Speaker 1: pretty bad. I mean, especially you work in We work
Speaker 1: around this building right here in here city. All it's beautiful,
Speaker 1: nice scenery and beautiful weather. Kind of makes it a
Speaker 1: drab when you walk around and you see needles and
Speaker 1: close to a playground and just feces everywhere, having the
Speaker 1: smell of it all. When you have needles and bloodstained
Speaker 1: clothing in the streets, that can't be safe for anyone.
Speaker 1: Does an increase of poverty, drugs, needles on the street,
Speaker 1: feces everywhere? How do you feel about they? That's really
Speaker 1: crazy because you know that I do see like a
Speaker 1: lot of needles and then you know feces everywhere. So
Speaker 1: the quack the homelesseners has not become the new normal
Speaker 1: in San Francisco. Absolutely. Nancy Pelosi she's a representative of
Speaker 1: this area. Do you blame her for some of these issues?
Speaker 1: I think Nancy Pelosi has done a pretty fine job
Speaker 1: to date. I you know, I that's she's been in
Speaker 1: office for over twenty years. Does she have some type
Speaker 1: of responsibility and that kids there to say, yes, Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi is your leader in the area. How do you
Speaker 1: feel about her leadership. I think that she's great. I
Speaker 1: think that she's strong. I think she's a fantastic negotiator.
Speaker 1: I think that she gets a bad rap because probably
Speaker 1: because she's a one. What about the leadership? Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: is the leader here, She's about to become the Speaker
Speaker 1: of the House. I feel about her leadership. I think
Speaker 1: that she's the old blood and any from new blood
Speaker 1: in there. I definitely don't feel very good about her leadership.
Speaker 1: You know so, I don't think she's being a very
Speaker 1: I think she's status quo. She has to do a
Speaker 1: lot better. I think we actually need new blood, new faces,
Speaker 1: people with a little bit different ideas and fresher ideas. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there's species everywhere, homeless people needles. Is that the norm
Speaker 1: around here? Unfortunately it is, It's devolved. The city has
Speaker 1: become so much worse than the last ten years. That's
Speaker 1: a disgrace. I could see a lot of people in
Speaker 1: the area that were and they were all like, you know, needles,
Speaker 1: you know, pumping up in their arms just outside. Everybody's
Speaker 1: shooting up right up the street. They don't care something dope,
Speaker 1: crack whatever. It's a bad situation. I don't really know
Speaker 1: what the solution is going to be. So what do
Speaker 1: you see on a typical day with people drug use?
Speaker 1: People shoot up right in the middle of the street.
Speaker 1: It's great while the kids are crossing, families are going
Speaker 1: and everything excrements all over the floor, all over the ground.
Speaker 1: Isn't really safe for kids to play in the playground
Speaker 1: when you see all this way human waste and needles everywhere.
Speaker 1: I wouldn't bring my kids to the playground. I wouldn't
Speaker 1: bring my kids here. About how many pounds of specs
Speaker 1: at least five became and the needles ten twenty every
Speaker 1: day every day. Man, that can vary. It could be
Speaker 1: anywhere from five to ten or ten to twenty. Devis
Speaker 1: on what route she's changing and pasapoop man. And that's
Speaker 1: the biggest thing, is the sneal. My grandkids here. You know,
Speaker 1: I'm scaring on a walk on severody. You know, I
Speaker 1: sometimes I have to pick up and carry him. I
Speaker 1: don't want him to step on the needle with our
Speaker 1: political leaders are not dealing with this, ya, they're not
Speaker 1: dealing with But I think it's correct. This is a
Speaker 1: normal This is a normal jays. And then they got
Speaker 1: a worse problem. You have mental illness and you got
Speaker 1: drug addiction. It's it's just all over the place. And
Speaker 1: I just sit here and I scratched my head and
Speaker 1: I'm wondering, Okay, Nancy Pelosi or how many decades now
Speaker 1: has she been in the Congress and been in the
Speaker 1: leadership of the Democratic parties? Maybe now she's just speaker
Speaker 1: in name only. But you know, forget about the government.
Speaker 1: Why do we always have to look to the government.
Speaker 1: She lives in one of the richest parts of the country,
Speaker 1: San Francisco. May it sound like it's something defense fighting
Speaker 1: words don't tell, but San Francisco values, that's what we're about.
Speaker 1: I mean, all the Silicon Valley money and big tech
Speaker 1: money that live in the adjoining neighborhoods. You can't get
Speaker 1: together and say, all right, I'll kick in a million.
Speaker 1: You'll kick in a million, right, I got another one.
Speaker 1: We have fifteen, all right, let's go for twenty million.
Speaker 1: Do some fundraisers, and all of a sudden, maybe you
Speaker 1: build something pretty spectacular for the people of your own city,
Speaker 1: your own neighbors, and maybe within that facility you can
Speaker 1: give out, you know, a couple of warm meals a
Speaker 1: day to the people that don't have any money. Maybe
Speaker 1: you can allow people to take a shower. Maybe you
Speaker 1: can even offer drug counseling of some kind, maybe a
Speaker 1: cot on a cold night with blankets off. These people
Speaker 1: are freezing and it does get cold sometimes in San Francisco.
Speaker 1: They're never gonna do it, and if they ever decide
Speaker 1: they want to do it, they're gonna say we the
Speaker 1: people have to step up and pay for it for them,
Speaker 1: because they're only generous with other people's money. Linda, did
Speaker 1: you see the video from last night? These ten cities
Speaker 1: that all these homeless people in Seattle live in. It's disgusting.
Speaker 1: It's disgusting. I mean now I get it that, you know, Pete,
Speaker 1: the same liberals don't want to control the border where
Speaker 1: all the heroine and fentenall is coming across but heroin
Speaker 1: is the is the main drug that people are using
Speaker 1: when they're using needles to shoot up with. And on
Speaker 1: top of that, now they're lacing heroin with fenton All.
Speaker 1: That's why we have what three hundred people on average
Speaker 1: a week dying from these overdoses in small towns, big
Speaker 1: cities all across America. I am telling you. I was
Speaker 1: in Denver a few weekends ago for our friend Israel
Speaker 1: del Toro's retirement from the Air Force, and I was
Speaker 1: very exciting because I'd never been to Denver other than
Speaker 1: our very brief stint when we were there for the
Speaker 1: vice presidential debate, and that was Joe Biden and Paul Ryan.
Speaker 1: So I get to Denver and the minute that I land,
Speaker 1: the airport looks like a third how do you say it,
Speaker 1: the Minnie Land, Yeah, the Midland Land. Okay, keep going
Speaker 1: whatever anyhow, So get to the airport. It's a complete debacle.
Speaker 1: I'm like, hmmm, this looks lovely. I don't know what
Speaker 1: they're doing. It's their idea of renovation. It'll probably take
Speaker 1: them twelve years because they're all stoned. So get into
Speaker 1: the town. The city's nothing but tents everywhere. The homelessness
Speaker 1: is rampant. You don't want to know why, because everybody's
Speaker 1: allowed to sit around on the street it's smoke pot.
Speaker 1: So everybody's sitting around smoking pot bonds there. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's like ridiculous where people vape their cigarettes here in
Speaker 1: New York and they have like you know, the jewel
Speaker 1: or whatever. These people are vaping weed. Then you go
Speaker 1: around when they vape weed. The kids are doing it
Speaker 1: in school because it doesn't smell like we it is
Speaker 1: that exactly right, So they're using the water vapor to
Speaker 1: cover up the smell of pot, which absolutely reads the way.
Speaker 1: You cannot walk through the streets of New York and
Speaker 1: I they're about to, I guess make pot legal in
Speaker 1: New York, right, that's one of the agenda. Well, they
Speaker 1: no longer prosecuted. So if a police officer walks by
Speaker 1: you and you're, you know, you're in the middle of
Speaker 1: the street smoking a dube, he'll just keep it moving.
Speaker 1: The thing is, it smells like a dead skunk, but
Speaker 1: you smell it every single day you walk past, and
Speaker 1: I'm like, you know what, there are so many other
Speaker 1: things that I would rather smell than someone smoking pot,
Speaker 1: like like a like a rotting dead body would be
Speaker 1: preferable over somebody's smoking pot in the middle of the street.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying it's absolutely disgusting. But to go back
Speaker 1: to your original point, when I when I saw your
Speaker 1: piece last night on Seattle, it literally could not hold
Speaker 1: a candle to what I saw in Denver Denver Um.
Speaker 1: It's sad, though, Look, I I understand that pot is
Speaker 1: in a different class of itself. One of the big
Speaker 1: problems is is, you know, when criminals put their mind
Speaker 1: to something, they're really good at what they do sometimes
Speaker 1: and what they have done, as it relates to weed
Speaker 1: in particular, is they've made it stronger and stronger and
Speaker 1: stronger and stronger. It's not like what it was in
Speaker 1: the seventies or eighties. I mean, this is a powerful drug, yeah, people,
Speaker 1: depending what it's laced with, even hallucinating. And now they're
Speaker 1: I guess the criminalizing the use of psychedelic mushrooms. Well,
Speaker 1: what's the equivalent between that and do an LSD? Is
Speaker 1: there much of a difference? Don't you go on a trip?
Speaker 1: But see, that's not the point. The point is what
Speaker 1: you have always said, which is that weed pot whatever
Speaker 1: you know, this is the gateway drug. People say, oh,
Speaker 1: there's no such thing as a gateway drug. Oh really,
Speaker 1: let me tell you something. Go to any of these
Speaker 1: cities where they've legalized pot. Right here in New York City,
Speaker 1: you will sleep. You will see people. They go from cigarette,
Speaker 1: they have a couple of drinks at a bar, they
Speaker 1: come outside, they smoke a little pot. Then maybe somebody
Speaker 1: else says, oh, you should try this drug. Oh, this
Speaker 1: is atterall, this is methamphetamine. Just snored a little coke.
Speaker 1: You know, they got some really good coke coming in
Speaker 1: right now, and before you know, you're doing all sorts
Speaker 1: of things that you never should have been doing because
Speaker 1: you tried one stupid drug and that's pot. Yeah. Well,
Speaker 1: now I will say the artis gateway drug because I
Speaker 1: think once you like drugs, you like drugs, and then
Speaker 1: I get excited by the next whatever next drug there
Speaker 1: happens to be. If we can extract the medicinal properties
Speaker 1: like Charlotte's Web, which they use young children with epilepsy,
Speaker 1: then I'm down. That works great, wonderful. Well, and they
Speaker 1: do do that Linda's talking about. They'll like extract from
Speaker 1: the hemp plant certain oils that are affected in effective
Speaker 1: and not curing but managing certain diseases that people have.
Speaker 1: But it doesn't have the THHC content in it which
Speaker 1: would get you high, which I think is great. I think,
Speaker 1: you know, that's a good use of marija, right, I
Speaker 1: think I think medicinally people that argue, well, we needed
Speaker 1: for medicinal purposes, there's a thousand different better drugs for that.
Speaker 1: The biggest problem, though, is the rampant prescriptions given to
Speaker 1: people like I had this root canal on what Friday
Speaker 1: of last week? And I mean, yeah, it was Friday
Speaker 1: before and I was doing the radio show, so I
Speaker 1: was in the chair for three hours, and it was
Speaker 1: it was a major, major job on molars in the
Speaker 1: back of my lower jaw. It felt like I broke
Speaker 1: my jaw so I couldn't get my mouth numbers or
Speaker 1: you know. I hate that feeling too. I know a
Speaker 1: lot of people like it, all right, So I let
Speaker 1: the guy do it. He put a couple of drops
Speaker 1: of novocaine in the hole when he finally drilled the hole,
Speaker 1: and then he takes these like long needles and twist
Speaker 1: them and twist them and twist them until eventually you
Speaker 1: can scoop out the actual nerve. There were three different
Speaker 1: routes he had to go down and they were really
Speaker 1: deeply embedded pretty much into my jaw, and I mean
Speaker 1: I was I felt pain that it's indescribable, and I
Speaker 1: took it. I didn't really care that much, but literally tears.
Speaker 1: I wasn't crying, just like flowing down the side of
Speaker 1: my eyes, and I remember seeing stars. That hurt so
Speaker 1: much because imagine a needle going straight into a nerve
Speaker 1: inside of your sensitive mouth and it's it's not the
Speaker 1: greatest feeling in the world. And at one point that
Speaker 1: the dentist even said, I can't do this anymore. I'm like,
Speaker 1: why not. Nobody does it this way? Why are you
Speaker 1: making me do it this way? I said, because I
Speaker 1: got a radio show. Just finish up. It's fine. And
Speaker 1: you're looking at me like I'm crazy. Well, that's completely insane.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's just what it's really not. I kind
Speaker 1: of it's because you know, at the end of the day,
Speaker 1: what you could have done is what normal people do,
Speaker 1: which is just have a little bit of novocaan or
Speaker 1: have them knock you out for this for a very
Speaker 1: brief moment, get it done, bought a being bought a boom.
Speaker 1: You're done, all right, Hannity. Tonight at nine, we have
Speaker 1: some breaking news with John Sloan and Devin Nowness. Also
Speaker 1: will be joined by Greg Jarrett, Andy McCarthy, Dan Bongino,
Speaker 1: Haraldo Rivera and Rudy Giuliani and Jesse Waters. That's nine
Speaker 1: Eastern tonight on Hannity. Thanks for being with us. We'll
Speaker 1: see it tonight. Back here tomorrow