WEBVTT - Surveillance: Gen. Milley Warns On China

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferroll and Lisa Brownowitz Jay Ley. We bring

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>you insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcast, Suncloud, Bloomberg

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg Tournament we

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>sharply digressed. David Rubinstein joins us the Carlisle grew up

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>on fire with some recent interviews of course peer to

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>peer conversations with Mr Rubenstein, and I really want to

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>focus on the hockey player from Belmont Hill for those

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of you that are in the know, that is really

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>good prep school hockey, and then onto Princeton and r OTC.

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>David Rubenstein. The path of General Miley to the top

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Pentagon pecking mortar was most original, wasn't it.

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>It was We've never had a person service Chairman of

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the Joint Chiefs of Staff who had an undergraduate degree

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>from an Ivy League school. Um, he didn't expect to

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>spend his entire career in the military, but it worked

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>out that way, and he's from a military family. But interestingly,

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>his father did not want him to go into the military.

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>His father really tried to keep him out of the military.

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>How has he colored in his service colored and infantry

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>by the fact that his father truly was on the

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>shores of yo Jima. Well, his father was a real

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 1>combat veteran in the South Pacific in World War Two.

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>But his father knew the horrors of military combat and

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>he tried to keep his son from going to West Point. Uh.

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>He went to Princeton on a Hockey scholarship effectively hockey scholarship,

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and but he got into r OTC and ultimately say

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>stayed in the military. It's an unusual story. And he's

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>obviously become one of the most visible of all the

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>chairmans of Joint Chiefs of Staff because of things that

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>happened during the Trump administration. David China was very much

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>front and center with his interview, as it rightly should

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>be a ringing too many people out there. What is

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the different nature of this rivalry, of this potential cold

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>war given the fact that the strategic nature is China

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>frankly provides so much the United States by way of goods.

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>General Milly said that the biggest security threat to this

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>country is China now Historically, when I was growing up,

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it was Russia, and Russia is still a threat, he said,

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>In the course, there's North Korea. But in the end,

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>China has the the money and the manpower and the

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>technology skills to really be a complete rival to us.

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 1>And he was very worried about the hypersonic missile, for

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>which there was a test not long ago. Now we

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>probably presumably are developing our own hypersonic sonic missile. It's

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.119
<v Speaker 1>not been discussed publicly, but this is a missile which

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.239
<v Speaker 1>could um launch a nuclear weapon on us without any

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>real defense that we currently have. So how separate are

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the military concerns that the United States has with respect

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to China from the business concerns, especially as a growing

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>number of corporations in America are trying to increase their

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>footprints in Beijing in the mainland. While the business community,

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I think is interested in getting all those customers and

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>developing relationships in China. But we have to be very

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>careful in the business community because we recognize that China

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>is now making more difficult for American companies to invest

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>there or operate there, certainly more difficult than it was

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago. The military is more concerned

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>about China as a threat and less interested in getting

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>into China than making certain that China doesn't get into

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the United States. David, and talking to the general and

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 1>also within your own international view, one of the great

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>mis calls that you and I and everyone else had

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>was our dearth of intelligence on Russia when the Soviet

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Union collapsed. Do we actually have good intelligence on the

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Chinese military? I think our intelligence is probably not as

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>good as people would like it to be. I don't

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>really know the intelligence communities assessment. I think our ability

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't know what's going on North Korea is very very limited.

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I think our ability to know what's going on in

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>China is probably better, but not necessarily with the Chinese military,

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's difficult to infiltrate, and so you have to

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>rely on on technology and things like that, and sometimes

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to get technology that's going to pick up

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>exactly what's going on in China. As you point out,

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we underestimated exactly some things that were happening in Russia,

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and we overestimated other things are happening in Russia. And

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>we've had a lot of technology failures in in in

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East, with the are in ability to know

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>what was really going on in Iraq for example. And David,

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it's so important that Tom asked that question because it

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 1>really dovetails the two issues of the business community and

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the military community. How do you get visibility? Well, there

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>are people who are represent the United States in some way,

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>shape or form on the ground there. How much is

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>this a concern for business executives you speak with in

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of how much surveillance they're under, what type of

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>regulation there might be from the United States government because

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of that suspicion that they are the note of information

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>one way or another. While the business community has been

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 1>warned that it as it operates in China, everything could

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>be bugged and everything could be stolen away in terms

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of intellectual property, the Business Committee is wary about dealing

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>in things in China. But on the other hand, there

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of customers there and there's a lot

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of businesses there, So people are warned. They try to

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>be careful, but nobody can be perfect in terms of

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>our ability to protect certain information. David, with your success

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and I and I mentioned this, folks, because this peer

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to peer conversation occurs in front of our three most

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>important documents at the National Archive. David, you brought the

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 1>Magna Carta to America, the twelve nineties seven document itself.

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a little bit about that quickly, What was

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>it like to give to America the Magna Carta. While

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>they're seventeen extant copies of the Magna Carta fifteen in

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>British institutions, one of the Australian Parliament, this was the

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>only one in private hands, and I put it there

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 1>on permanent display and permanent loan. And essentially it's a

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>document that was a warm runner of the Declaration of Independence,

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 1>so it really in many ways had more impact in

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>this country than ironically it did in England. That's why

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought it should stay here. Unbelievable to see that

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 1>at the National Archive, and of course, folks, you can

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>see it at the British Library. John, I know you've

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:18.679
<v Speaker 1>done that, the British Library Museum. Just extraord wonderful. Love it, David,

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Thank you so much, David Rubinstein. That catch

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the full interview, A fascinating interview with the General Milly

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>on the David Rumistice Show, Pit to pit conversations. But

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the Democrat a Republican. One thing I know for certain

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>is later in the Trump administration all agreed that the gentleman,

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the movie producer from Goldman Sex rose to the occasion.

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>He is the former Chancellor of the Exchequer of the

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>United States and he is in Rio. Yusuf Kamal l

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 1>Dean joins us now with a conversation with Chancellor Minution

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>usef good morning, Hey Tom. I mean, for once, it's

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>not all happening in New York. People all around the

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>old CEOs and government officials come out here to read.

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>And one of them, of course is Steven Newts, and

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>he's the founder at Liberty Strategic Capital. Thank you very

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. It's a secretary. Give me a

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>bit of an overview then, all the kind of meetings

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you've been having and what have you been able to

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>secure any new deals. Well, first of all, it's great

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to be with you, and it's great to be back

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>in the region. Uh. My focus here is really to

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>be supportive to the economic transformation in the region. Uh.

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>It's it's very important, I think for economic stability that

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>all these countries transform their economies and expand them away

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>from just energy. You raised two point five billion dollars

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>in private equity investments. Did some of it come from

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the likes of the public Investment Fund? Well, I can't

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>really comment on our raising of funds. What I can

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>comment on is what we're focused in doing. So our

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>real focus is right now on technology, with a big

0:07:56.720 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>emphasis on cybersecurity, national security, and data priv to see,

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>which was an area I focused on when I was

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Treasury Secretary. I was responsible for cyber for all the

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>financial services, and it's a very big risk. So we

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure that companies and governments are are

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>taken care of and protected. Let's get to the macro

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>story for a moment, because the last time you discussed inflation,

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you said you were worried. Now quite a bit more

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>data has come through. How has that view evolved since? Well,

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I was worried because I thought we'd see inflation. We

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>have seen it. I think you know, we're we're running

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>probably in the four to five percent inflation. My guesses

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>will stabilize closer to three and a half, but that's

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that's still a significant issue. For a long time, the

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve was concerned that we couldn't get inflation up

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to two percent, but now, just given the enormous amount

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of fiscal and monetary support, I am very concerned that

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see higher interest rates and the impact

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>on consumers and antenue it treasury yields those still go

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to three point five because that's what you said last

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>That's that's still my prediction. Okay. What about the ability

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.319
<v Speaker 1>of the United States to grew itself out of three

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and post pandemic debts and the massive amounts of money

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that it's borrowed. Well, look, there's no question that during

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>this crisis we needed to have massive support. And I'm

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>most proud of the fact that we passed to the

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>two Cares bills to zero and a hundred to zero

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:31.439
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate. That was pretty extraordinary. Uh, we spend

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>four trillion dollars. I never thought I'd be saying those

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>words four trillion dollars. I think we needed to spend

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.839
<v Speaker 1>that money where we would have had a global depression,

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>not recession. But the new administration has continued to spend

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>another two trillion dollars, now more money. I'm very concerned

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 1>about the size of the national debt at twenty a

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>half trillion today, I worry it could go up to

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>thirty two trillion on a twenty three trillion dollar economy.

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>It's quite concerning. I want to stay with the fiscal

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>sign of things for a moment because the Democratic tax

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 1>plan has been controversial to some. Uh the billionaire taxes,

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>it's also called. Do you think that the it's a

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>good plan with a pass Congress. Well, let me just

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>first say, I think now is the wrong time to

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>raise taxes on anybody, whether it's billionaires or average consumers

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and spend. I think we've done plenty of spending. I

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>think the problem with the billionaire taxes one, it probably

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>won't raise much money since a lot of this money

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 1>will be given away to foundations. Uh, so it won't

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>be taxed. The other issue is it's probably unconstitutional. And

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 1>the third issue is it creates very very bad incentive.

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>How do you tax public securities and not private securities?

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Think about this. It's a complete disincentive to grow your business.

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>To basically say every year the government will take a

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit more of your business away. That's not the

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>right incentive for long term investing. A shout out to

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene for this quest, and he is looking to

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.839
<v Speaker 1>find an answer on whether there's gonna be an opportunity

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>for Republicans in twenty four to reassert a calmer policy

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>out of the prison camps, out of what the present chaos. Well, uh,

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, well, we'll see. It's uh, it's it's politics,

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you know. My guess is a lot of things will

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>change over the next couple of years. Again, my biggest

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>concern right now is we need less spending and we

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>need to worry about making sure we don't have inflation

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>out of control and the national debt is sustainable. We've

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>seen a US bend on a on a China telco

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>in many ways. One would have thought that some of

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 1>the tension between China and the United States would ease

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit with a new administration and a new

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>approach community. That hasn't happened as fast, was not happening

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 1>at all. Have you been surprised about how this is evolved. Well,

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>let me just say, Ambassador Leidheiser and I spent a

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of time going back and forth to China. I

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 1>think we probably had twenty different meetings with the Vice Premier,

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're proud of the work we did

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Phase one trade agreement. My own opinion is

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot work, more work needs to be done, that

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>there should be more dialogue as it relates to telecom. Look,

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I think there's certain areas that are national security areas

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>at least as it relates to certain telecom equipment, and

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not commenting on the specific of this. We want

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that our data integrity. On the other hand,

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>these are two large economies that have to coexist, and

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the work work needs to continue to be done.

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>On trade. China has always had the opportunity to have

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the US markets open, and we need to make sure

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>we have the same reciprocal opportunities. We have to do

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it there. Thank you very much for the time. That's

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Steven Newton is the founder of Liberty Strategic Capital TAM

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of the team. Thank you, sir, Thank

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you very much as always, catching up with the fulm

0:12:53.600 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of trenchery. Secretary that step yeah, to find out what

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Industrial America is doing and what is so advantageous here

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>is David Weston and I. We didn't look at the

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:13.719
<v Speaker 1>first generation corvette. We looked at the second generation corvette

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and said someday we'll own one of those. And there's

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a new one to you that I'm sitting at home.

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. To Tom Keane, we're delighted if

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you joined right now. By General Motors chair and CEO,

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Mary Barrow, they had their third quarter earnings out today, Mary,

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:33.839
<v Speaker 1>thank you for joining us. First of all, congratulations, you

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>did a lot better than most people thought you'd do.

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to take anything away from that, but

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>can you give us some sense how much of its

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>core operations I don't have some financing because of used

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>car sales that really were on a tear, and also

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>reimbursement for that bolt recall. Well, I think it was

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it was all of those things. I mean, g MF

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>is performed very strongly. We also saw, you know, in

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>light of the current environment China, our China earning equity

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>earnings were strong. But I think what the real story

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>is is how how well we perform from trucks and

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>full size SUVs. We're selling every vehicle we can make,

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think that along with uh uh, you know,

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the overall environment is what allowed us to have a

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>beat for the quarter. And you know, I think it

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>shows the strength of our underlying business. So I'm really

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>proud of the team and everything that they accomplished. So

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the magic words there for me where everyone you can

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>make because you can't necessarily make all the ones you'd

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>like because of the supply chain problems. We've talked about

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it before. I know that it's continuing into next year.

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess my key question for you, Mary is is

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>there anything at this point that can be done to

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>speed up the time that you can get the microchips

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that you need. Well, you know, we're seeing improvements in

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter. We had indicated that Q three would be

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the toughest for us, which is and that it was

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>further impacted by COVID, But we're seeing strong, stronger performance.

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Now we'll have a Q one will be better than

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Q four. It will linger into next year and we're

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>right now are are feeling as will be UH in

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a much better shape in the second half of two.

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>And we're also taking steps over the medium term to

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>make sure we're never seeing this kind of constraint, not

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>only with chips, but with other you know, whether it's

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>critical materials or just the overall supply chain. Because we

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>have an aggressive growth strategy in front of us, and

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>we're going to make sure that we can execute it.

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's a very it's a near term problem. Um

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that will work through in the meantime, Marerea, are there

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>places you can save some costs? Let me give you

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>one example advertising. If you can't sell as many vehicles,

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe you don't need to advertise as much. Well, you know, David,

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a great point. We are saving across the board. Uh.

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're we're seeing a strong pricing environment. Obviously

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>we're adjusting what we're doing to match. Uh, you know

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we're selling over every vehicle that we can.

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>But also through COVID and and through this crisis with semiconductors,

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>we have found ways to make the business more efficient.

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>We're working with our dealers to uh to drive an

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>increase in profitability for them as well as improving our costs.

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>And so across the word, we are always driving efficiencies

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and that that's an underlying, underlying strength of our organization

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and that supports the strong earnings. Mary, Let's talk about

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the perhaps longer term. That's electric vehicle something you've really embraced.

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>You have some very aggressive goals for General Motors going

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>out electric vehicles. We had some big news this week

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>from arrival starts with a T won't necessarily name it.

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>With some big fleet sales, particularly to HURT. I know

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>in the past you've been I think a little dubious

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>about fleet sales because the margins get down. Where are

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you on fleet sales for electric vehicles? Are they different

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>because you really want to get broad acceptance? Are you

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at fleet sales for electric vehicles? Well, you know,

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>if you look at bright Drop, you know the commercial fleet, uh,

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and what we can do from a light commercial vehicle

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>perspective with bright Drop and and the whole ecosystem that

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>will support I think is a huge opportunity, and that's

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>some of the most profitable of fleet sales. We're looking

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>at many different opportunities because with electric vehicles you can

0:16:55.520 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>really kind of re reframe how the sales will be,

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>and so we're looking at a number of opportunities. But

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I think you know what we've announced is around bright Drop.

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm very excited about that because that's just pure growth

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>for us. But as I understand, we shouldn't rule out

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the possiblity that down the road, General Motors might have

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>a deal similar Hurts deal. Well, you know, in the

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 1>past we have limited our rental cars because that generally

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>was the least profitable type of fleet sales. As UM,

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>we reimagine how the business will look. We're not ruling

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>anything out, okay. And finally, Mary, we've talked a lot

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 1>about back to the office. Since we talked last, there

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 1>have been more and more vaccine mandates. Is that affecting

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>General Motors operations? Do you anticipate it will? I don't

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.640
<v Speaker 1>think it will. You know what will work? We continue

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to encourage our employees to get the vaccine we encourage,

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>We continue to provide them the information, uh you know,

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 1>from CDC and other UM like organizations around the globe.

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And we're going to work UM to understand how to

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>implement the executive order from the President, but to do

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>so in a way that our employees and our unions

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of agree to. So once we know the details, will

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>work the execution plan. But I don't foresee it being

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>an issue for General Motors as we look at our

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 1>overall labor availability. You do have a obviously a very

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>important relationship with the U A w C. I oh,

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>as you talk with them, do you see resistance coming

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>from the union side to vaccine mandates? Well, I think

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a better question to ask a S the U

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>A W. We're just working with them to provide information

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 1>and encourage encourage all of our employees to make the

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>decision with the right information. And that's what we'll continue

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to do. And then again we'll look at what the

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 1>specifics are of the mandate and figure out how to

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>how to implement. At this point, we don't know where

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>we are in the pandemic, but it seems like it's

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>getting better again in the United States. Is it affecting

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>GM operations either on the sales side or the production side. Actually, uh,

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you know we're the biggest impact. That's UH that's gating

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 1>us right now. Is we talked about his semiconductors, but

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>we've we've seen recovery from the impact in Q three

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 1>from some of our supply eye base that caused UH

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 1>a little bit deeper impact. So I'm I'm optimistic that

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>we are through the worst of it. UM. We've shared

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>our safety protocols with our supply base around the world,

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's what gives me confidence that we're going to

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>see a stronger Q four and then a stronger Q

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 1>one and even UH as we get to the second

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>half of next year. UH continued improvement as you have

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 1>that gating function as you refer to it, Mary, with

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the semiconductors, are you seeing inflation either in the cost

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you're paying for inputs or costs you can pass along

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the consumers. Well, we definitely are seeing commodity prices increasing

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>as well as the cost of logistics, which I think is,

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, impacting almost every industry. We're working in managing

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that right now. And again because our product portfolio is

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>so strong, I really believe it's the strongest car strucks

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and crossovers we've had in my forty year career here

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>at General Motors, and that's that's what is allowing us

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to also have very strong pricing and because we have

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>strong receptivity from the customers. Okay, very really appreciate you

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>spend time and say that's Mary bar She's the General

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Motors chair and CEO. David thinks so much. We are

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>looking at advanced goods trade balances that we've never imagined.

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>We're out to a nineties six negative nineties six billion

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>dollar statistic which I would respectively suggest Diane Swonker myself

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>have never framed. Let's begin there. She is with Grant Thornton, Diane,

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>we have not talked about net exports, exports, imports, but

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>we have a goods trade balance unimaginable. What does that signal, Well,

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>it's really strong demand in the United States relative to

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world. That's just where we're at.

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.679
<v Speaker 1>And I think one of the interesting things is, of

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>course that will subtract from growth in the third quarter,

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>even as durable goods add to growth. In her investment

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing out there is really the strongest and

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 1>technology intellectual property that we've seen since the nineteen So

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.679
<v Speaker 1>we'll get some productivity growth, but it really is going

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to be the weakest growth of the quarter, which we'll

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>get out tomorrow, will be the third quarter, the weakest

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>growth since the onset of the pandemic recovery. But of

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>course we're now starting to gain more traction again as

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.199
<v Speaker 1>the delta wave fades, and we're seeing that already in

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the credit card data coming in for the

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>month of October and as we go into November. Of course,

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the biggest constraint we're going to face out there is

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>shortages and price heights. Rebecca Patterson was on earlier and

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:35.360
<v Speaker 1>she would demand that we asked the economist Diane Swank,

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Are we in a demand shock or a supply sack?

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Patterson of Bridgewater says, this is a demand shock.

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>It's all of the above. I mean, there's no question

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a demand shock out there, and we've used at

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Jamaan chock with the last round of stimulus checks. We've

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of excess savings that's being drained down.

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>Much depends on how much we get the pride sector

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:03.479
<v Speaker 1>to pick up the baton from the federal government as

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 1>we get into the fourth quarter and into two and

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>see job gains pick up again after the delta wave.

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to happen, and that is hard

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 1>for the FED because even as you're on your comparisons

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 1>get to be more difficult, which means the inflation numbers

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>should taper off a bit. In two. I think they're

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be residually higher than the FED is going

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to be comfortable with, and they're they're going to be

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 1>in the tough position of determining whether or not the

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 1>inflation that we're enduring in two is in fact going

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to be more um intracted get into the economy more.

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's something that they're going to have

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 1>to act on. And my concern is that we do

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 1>see companies out there doubling up on inventories, doubling up

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>on orders to hedge against what are these supply chain shocks.

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>But that won't abate inflation until we get well into

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:55.679
<v Speaker 1>three and that's just too long for the FED to

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:59.360
<v Speaker 1>wake Dan. Let's get into the politics of the economics,

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>because that's where it's going in Washington, d C. The

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>idea of the demand side shock versus the supply side

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>shock is frankly squarely in the Republican talking points where

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 1>they're saying it is because we passed these bills earlier

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>in the year and last year that basically gave people

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 1>checks that we're seeing the demand shock that we are seeing.

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 1>How much is that really the issue versus just the

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>difficulties and turning off an entire economy, turning it back

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 1>on and expecting it to happen without friction. Well, I

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>think you know it really is. This is you know,

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>friction upon re entry as I call it, as a

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>spaceship comes back in and you hope it doesn't bring

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>um burn up and the heat shields hold. It really

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of frictions, frictions in the labor market.

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>We've seen that. I think we're going to see more

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>workers come back into the labor force in the fourth quarter.

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 1>But the bottom line is you can't expect to turn

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>off a global economy and then just ramp it back

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 1>up overnight. And in fact, many producers expected when we

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 1>turn the lights off back in March in the US

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 1>at least some accompany countries before that, that it would

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>take quite a while for us to ramp back up.

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>And because we supported spending as we needed to, as

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 1>we paid people to go home from work, that ended

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 1>up creating in very unusual dynamic out there. And it's

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>just not not to be surprised that we're going through this.

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>That said, it's really hard to disentangle the politics from

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the economics. Economics are really all of the above. We

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>are having a demand shock because consumers couldn't spend on

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>certain things, and then when they can, they're all trying

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 1>to run through the door. At the same time, you

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>see searge pricing on hotels and airfares a minute consumers

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 1>come back. We've had a lot of disruptions out there

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 1>in addition to climate change and extreme weather events. Everyone

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>forgets Hurricane Ida exacerbated the rise in prices at the

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 1>pump in October and adding to all of this confusion.

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Day and you're talking about friction upon re entry. When

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>do we know that we've entered right? When do we

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>know what signals economic signals do you look at to

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>know that we have reached some sort of new normal

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>rather than just the waiting period for everything to equalize. Well,

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, the million dollar or a billion trillion

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:11.919
<v Speaker 1>dollar question. We have to keep going up on our numbers.

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I think quadrillion is the next one after this one.

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.719
<v Speaker 1>I actually had to look it up. But there's no

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>question that what we're looking for is some kind of

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a sort of stabilizing in underlying inflation pressures um not

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>as broad based inflation increases. I think one of the

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>things we're gonna have to be dealing with two is

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the lags on shelter and that could add a half

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>percent to underlying inflation measures alone. So even as some

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of the energy price and the surge pricing that we're

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 1>seeing right now, as we get that friction going and

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 1>the real heat that singes, that will cool down, but

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 1>not enough to sort of leave the FED on the sidelines.

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:49.919
<v Speaker 1>I really don't think we're gonna see anything about what

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 1>this economy really is like outside of a pandemic and

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>into an endemic until we get into three because we're

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about not even being able to vaccinate the world,

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 1>which is key here until well into Dane. What's so

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.640
<v Speaker 1>important here? And you've been you've really had truly national

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 1>leadership on this is don't forget the Third coast. It's

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>all about the East coast, the West coast, and there's

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>one big flyover including Frankly O'Hara in Chicago, Dan Swak,

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a bunch of Bologny. What is the tech revolution

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>right now in the third coast of America? Away from Amazon,

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>away from Microsoft? What's the tech revolution? Look across the

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>four time zones? You know, actually we are seeing a

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 1>major tech spread out across the country. And this is

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 1>really interesting to see what's going on. You're seeing tech

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>hubs in places like Boise, you know, really real places

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to see it, Charlotte, Austin obviously, but we also have

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.640
<v Speaker 1>some in Chicago. It's really been stunning to see what's

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>going on here and where the real high end building

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 1>and high end housing is going up, and high end

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>construction for office space is tech related, and so what

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing is some of that tech being spread across

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the nation. And what we've really seen is the pandemic

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>acceleratate the digitization of the US economy. You're seeing that

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:13.919
<v Speaker 1>in the car industry, the electric cars coming out, not

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>just from Tesla, but also from the traditional automakers with

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot more options out there, this movement is on.

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:22.879
<v Speaker 1>In fact, they're worried about how how they're going to

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>get um dealers to sell electric vehicles. Well, it's not

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>part of the model. The bottom line is demand is

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>driving some of the movement on electric vehicles, and dealers

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:36.719
<v Speaker 1>models are being outdated as we've moved to now buy online,

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>even cars and homes. It really is a different world.

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Of course, that digitization also creates big gaps and inequalities.

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>People who are trying to apply for jobs aren't used

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to being able to apply having to apply totally online,

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>which is where all the jobs are listed now, and

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 1>they're in broadband dead zones. We really need to expand

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>broadband to be able to increase the access of those

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>people who need jobs and or match them up to

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>where people who don't have to people who are looking

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>for workers. That's difficult as well, both in urban and

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>rural area. So this really is a massive change that

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic accelerated, and I think it will deliver a

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 1>lot of productivity growth. The problem is it's not evenly distributed.

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>The brilliant Dan Swunk of Grand Thornson looking forward to

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:23.680
<v Speaker 1>catching up again next week, hopefully around that fat decision. Dian,

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 1>thank you joining us now. Without question, our interview of

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the day is a skeptic one. Douglas Cast of Sea

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Breeze Partners and Doug the class act. You are you

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>not only quote Thomas Lee, who has nailed this bulmarket surge,

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>but you say, look, this is where Tom Lee is,

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>this is why Tom Lee's right, and boy have I

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>been wrong? Now? What for Doug Cass. You know what

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the dude said in the big lebout sometimes you eat

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the bar, and well sometimes the bar each you. Yeah,

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>but you're in the bright, Dug. I'm not going to

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>mince words here. Everybody else is out there being quiet.

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>You're like a pinata out on social because you've got

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the courage to be vocal invisible about your convictions. Now

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>what I do. I'm very straightforward. Um, I would say that,

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's the English translation of a Chinese curse.

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>May we live in interesting times? And I do believe

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that we live in the most interesting times of all. Um.

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, I embarrassed on the market. I think that

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the conditions that exist in the real economy or on

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Main Street have diverged widely from Wall Street. And it's

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>happening at a time in which valuations based upon historical

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>metrics such as my friend Robert Schiller's keep ratio or

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the market cap to g d P, which is Warren

0:29:55.240 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Buffett's favorite valuation metric, are all in the or even decile.

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>And at the core of my parish market view is

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:08.239
<v Speaker 1>a notion that inflation and supply chains disruptions will be

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>sustained for a lengthy period of time. Now I'm long

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and I'm buying cannabis stocks, but investors are smoking dope

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>if they think the supply chain issues are easily solved, solvable,

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>And as I said to John Farrow, a bunch of

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>times pull market optimism abounds even though there has really

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>been such a wide array of possible economic and market outcomes,

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and many of those outcomes are adverse and market unfriendly.

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>But when I talk about interesting times, I'm talking about

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the gamification of the market. UM speculation is hot, hot, hot,

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and that is not good good good. UM. I'm sure

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood which is the premier gamer trading site, but

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 1>when but it really has become a floating crap game

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>for speculation and digital currencies, meme stocks and weekly option

0:30:57.080 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>trading investing. It seems to meet us increasingly become hass a.

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's get Paul to jump in here with some securities analysis.

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:07.959
<v Speaker 1>Just wondering here, we're about almost two thirds away through

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the earnings reporting cycle here for the third quarter. What

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>have you learned that's kind of reinforced or maybe cause

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you a question your call. I think that there's a

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of double ordering. UM. I think um uh rates

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>are going to be rising. I think that the product

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>price increases which are occurring at every single company that

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I interview um UM will lead to demand destruction. UM.

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, I find that I use the word slugflation

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>sluggish economic growth and sustained inflation, not stay inflation. And

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that's what I think slug flash inflation lies ahead. UM.

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I recognize that I think that the UM expansion of

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>negative real interest rates has been at the war of

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bullish arguments. I think you guys will

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>both agree, and I recognize that negative real interest rates

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>are a tail went to equities. But the fact is

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that expanding negative real interest rates cripple's main street by

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 1>reducing real incomes. And there have been periods of time

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>when negative real interest rates have led to market collapses.

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 1>UM the U S stock market in the earlier mid

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>seventies UM is a good example, when the nifty fifty

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 1>collapsed and the SMP entered to bear market. Japan is

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>another example in which real interest rates have been negative

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>for several decades and investment returns have been poor. I've

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>been wrong because I've unders understated the herd strength. I've

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>understated the strength of FOMO and the inflow of money

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 1>into mutual funds and UH equity mutual funds, as well

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>as the changing market structure in which quant strategies that

0:32:55.880 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>know everything about nothing about value. The FED a reserve.

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 1>We've got Chairman Powell, you know, sticking to that inflation

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is transitorious. There's gonna be a problem for him and

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>for this FED. I think it's a big problem. I

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>think he's um put himself into a box. I think

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Powell's legacy seems to be moving in the wrong direction.

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>In the months ahead, I expect him to walk back

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>all the views of easing money and wanting high inflationer

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that he's so confidently espoused. And again, I think if

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you look at twos and thirties, there's clear message from

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the bond market. If you look at the five year

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>break evans, which hit the highest level since two thousands five,

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the Fed is making a policy mist mistake. Already there

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:41.479
<v Speaker 1>have been over twenty rate hikes globally in Russia, Brazil, UK,

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand, Australia, Accounta, Mexico. Nothing from the Fed. UM

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:50.239
<v Speaker 1>So this is this is a danger dangerous precedent at

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a time in which I believe the rate of growth

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in economic activity is going to be the out of this.

0:33:57.080 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 1>But this is a really important conversation. It's well known

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that has Cast gets the Robin Hood trade right, he

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>will click in to be one of the seven billionaires

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>in America. Doug, you live down in one of the

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:12.800
<v Speaker 1>fanciest parts of the planet. I mean, you know, I

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>think you've got the littlest house within six miles, and

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:21.279
<v Speaker 1>you've got like square feet the shadow of the former presidents. Yeah,

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean literally, you live where we're talking

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:29.280
<v Speaker 1>about this billionaire's tax you and I know these guys

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>are writing, as a generalization, big checks to hospitals, two schools, this, that,

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and the I wish they'd write me a check. But

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line is, Doug, what's your gut feeling the

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>people you hang out with every day? We'll do if

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>they're told they're gonna have confiscation of gains not taken,

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 1>how's that going to play out? Well? UM, let's first

0:34:57.200 --> 0:34:59.399
<v Speaker 1>start of the fact, let's look at the Elon Musk.

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna ans you a question directly, but let me

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 1>first mentioned that. Um, the speculation in Tesla is an

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>example of the problem in this market. Um. To paraphrase

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:15.799
<v Speaker 1>Hyman Roth what he said in the Godfather movie Leon,

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:19.280
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, Elon Muskt is far bigger than us steel.

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 1>His net work now exceeds that of Exxon Mobile, and

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 1>as wealth is two and a half times that of

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Bezos my favorite stock, Amazon, And if Bill Gates

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and Mark Zuckerberg were married, their combined assets will be

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 1>less than Musk's. And now I'm gonna give you an

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 1>amazing stat Muskets made more money in the last nine

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 1>months than Warren Buffett has made in ninety one years. UM.

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I shared now directly in response to your question, I

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 1>shared an anecdote. I hope Lee Cooperman doesn't get piste

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>off at me that I mentioned it. UM. I spent

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>two and a half hours with Lee um in a

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>research meeting of a company that we're both interested, who

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:58.800
<v Speaker 1>flew in overseas to see us yesterday. Lee lives in

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a very um tony community filled with Rose Royce's Ferraris

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and Bentley's. We move, We go out to get our cars.

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 1>The parking intendant brings Lee's car. It's a six year

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:13.400
<v Speaker 1>old Nissan. Lee as a person that has just given

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>one hundred million dollars to St. Barnabas Hospital in New Jersey,

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Lee justifiably would rather give the money to the charities

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and to the endeavors that he wants visa vi the government,

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 1>which tends to spend uh. The money's poorly. So I'm

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a progressive. I'm a progressive Democrat, but I lean away

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:41.319
<v Speaker 1>from Elizabeth lawrence suggestion of a wealth taped. We're out

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of time. We could go on on this and of

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 1>course market I want to thank you particularly for your

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 1>comment on the bull Thomas Lee within the dougcast report

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 1>this morning, Let's see Bres partners. This is the Bloomberg

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join us live weekdays from

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten a m. Eastern. I'm Bloomberg Ray DEO.

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:04.040
<v Speaker 1>And on Bloomberg Television each day from six to nine

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>am for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course on

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the terminal. I'm Tom Keene and this is Bloomberg