WEBVTT - Kings/Lakers Postgame Spaces

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Mmmmm, all right, welcome to the state of the Lakers.

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Does that if I dash? Reddio? Thank you guys so

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>much for coming to hang out on a Tuesday. The

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Lakers used to be a team that would come out

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and play a bad game of basketball, where their effort

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>would be poor and their stars would look lethargic and

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>they would lose. And so for them to have a

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>similar type of game tonight and to get a win,

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take as a huge positive. Rods. First

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 1>of all, how you doing, buddy. How's your week going

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>so far? It's going good. Yeah. Three games in a row,

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>three wins in a row, I think for the third

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>time this season. I think we won four in a

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>row one time. But man, it's good to stack a

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>couple of these together. It looked a little shaky early

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth. I thing we went about we went

0:00:57.920 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>down seven. Oh yeah, man, this is a good one.

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>This is a fun one. A lot of threes back

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and forth. But I'm well, man, how are you? I'm

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>doing good? Um, It's been a day full of basketball

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>for me. I played a little bit this morning. I

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>coached my high school kids. They gotta win tonight as well.

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>And then the Lakers gotta win. So it's been a

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>good day of basketball. But I'm excited to break this

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>one down with you. It was an interesting game because

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers clearly came out lethargic. In my opinion, their

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>health defense was horrible. They were missing a lot of

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>box outs. The Kings looked more energetic. Lebron in particular,

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:34.759
<v Speaker 1>looked a little bit apathetic, and then he drove into

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Alex lenn and what need a knee with him? And

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you could tell, like for the next long stretch of

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the game that that really bothered him physically. You could

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>see him favoring it. You could see him kind of

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>continuing to miss box outs and rotations, just trying. It

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>seemed like he was just trying to make it to

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the final buzzer. Lakers had a little bit of a

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>stretch there at the start of the second quarter where

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>they looked amazing, and we'll get into the reasons why later.

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Hin and th h teams white, but it was nice

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to see that even though for the most part they

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.239
<v Speaker 1>look lethargic and pour on both ends of the floor,

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>they hit the gas at the end of the game.

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>And when they hit the gas, they were better, and

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that is what good teams do. And I know people

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>want to undersell and and try to undercut beating bad teams.

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>But the Laker team, this Laker team has lost too

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.359
<v Speaker 1>bad teams a lot this season early on, and so

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I look at it more as taking care of business.

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>The Lakers took care of business tonight in a funky game,

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>made plays on both ends of the floor down the stretch,

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and they deserve to win. Yeah. Man, we are in

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>no position I keep saying to be picky about wins,

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>especially where we are in the standings. Memphis just keeps winning.

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>They don't look like they're gonna slow down. They look

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>like they might lock up that fourth seed pretty soon. Here. Yeah, man,

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a good win, and you have to

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of stack some of these wins together, and they

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>were able to do that tonight. I thought Sacramento hit

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of tough shots as well. We lost Buddy

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>healed a few times off screens. That's gonna happen, But

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I thought you hit a few tough ones. Deer and Fox,

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they said, I don't know if they have

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>if this number is correct, If I heard it right,

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>he sho from three. I'm not sure if that if

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I heard that correct. Yeah, yeah, and he hit a

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>bunch of them to night. He had a bunch of

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>step back threes. I thought the Tyrese Haliburton one over

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Mellow was a tough one. We had a four point.

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>We missed a lot of layups where like it could

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>have changed the tide of the game. Right, Like, we're

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>on a big run, we're up like six, and we

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>get like a turnover. I think Russ had a block

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and he went the other way and miss the Mr

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Russ no turnovers tonight, I believe he finished with no turnovers, right,

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and again you texted me like he had some bad shots,

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's true. There are a bunch of bad

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>shots that you can kind of convert over to turnovers.

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's nice to see him have just a good

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>no turnover floor game, even if the shot selection a

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>few times wasn't great. But I mean it was a

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>it was a win. That's nice to stack them together

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully we can win the next one as well

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to to make it four. But yeah, we're in no

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>position to be picky. Uh. This team is still trying

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to figure each other out. We lost a starter tonight

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>due to contractual reasons that help. We'll get back. Yeah,

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll get back on Friday. Um, So it was nice

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to kind of get gut this one out. I thought,

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I thought Frank pushed a lot of the

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>correct buttons tonight. Like every lineup decision, I thought it

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>was correct. I thought he made, you know, a bunch

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of good tactical decisions. He wasn't rigid with his lineups

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>like he was in the last game. I thought, you know,

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>mirroring Dwight minutes, and we'll get to Dwight obviously later

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>mirroring his minutes with Alex Land. I thought that really

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>changed kind of the course of the game as well.

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>But this was a good way. It was a good,

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>good game to get a win. Went on. Yeah, so

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>let's let's start with Dwight, because we had an interesting

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>discussion after the last game going over this idea that

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Frank refused to fold under pressure to go bigger. Um,

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and I talked about how I personally disagreed with that

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>right and I had mentioned that Dwight is a quality

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>NBA player. He is a good backup center in this league,

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and so I disagreed with the philosophy of leaving him

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 1>on the bench for the sake of your i've out identity,

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>when talent has been somewhat of an issue so far

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>this season. However, in in the last part, I explained

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that I understood Frank's rationale in that it seemed like

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:16.159
<v Speaker 1>his I hit the goal was to train yourself to

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>stay small and have that be the permanent identity. And

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>so that's why I was genuinely confused when they went

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:27.359
<v Speaker 1>to Dwight tonight, because the same rationale for going to

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Dwight tonight was the rationale they needed last game, and

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason, he couldn't get their last game mentally

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>as the coach, but tonight he could. And you know,

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I tend to think the reason why I was there's

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 1>two parts to it. Yes, it's Dwight being a good

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>NBA player, but it's also a versatility Raj like I

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>like the ability to be able to play multiple styles

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of basketball, and leaning one thousand percent into playing five

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>out ball is just as detrimental, in my opinion, to

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>leaning one thousand percent to playing two big ball the

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>way they did last year, which I thought was a

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>departure from the previous season. And it was a problem

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>for many reasons because then when they went to a

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>d at the five in the very rare stretches where

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>they did, it felt unusual, and there were some struggles,

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>namely Game one against Phoenix, where things didn't go super well.

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Point being, you know, having versatility, being able to play

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>multiple styles of basketball is is one of the one

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of the hallmarks of a championship team. And Dwight is

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a good basketball player that can make plays on the

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>offensive glass. He can make plays defensively in pick and

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>roll coverage. He can finish lobs and drop off passes

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>from guys who can make plays off the past, even

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>guys who aren't great and making plays off the past,

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>like Moleague Monk for instance, who hit Dwight for a

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of dunks tonight. Point, being Dwight's a good player,

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>it made sense to play him, even if it goes

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>against the style of play that you have in your

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>other lineups, because you need that versatility. You need to

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to call an audible in a playoff series,

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and Dwight's a really good audible. And so I thought

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that was impressive, and I heard a lot of people

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>bringing up like, Okay, Dwight looked springy because he had

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>some time off, and I'm not debating that, Like, I

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>definitely don't think Dwight should be a big minute guy. However,

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the bad games Dwight had recently were

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>more related, in my opinion, to the COVID suspension and

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>him losing his conditioning. So I tend to think as

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>long as Dwight is in a small role, maybe a

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>two shift player or one shift player, then he can

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>play every night for us if we need him to.

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's physically incapable of doing that, right,

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I thought even I just like I

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>used the word ridgid a lot with it because I

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>just don't think we're in position like we had a

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>nice lead, or we were up in the standings, or

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>even if a d was healthy. And yeah, you can

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>go to this full no center as they call it,

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>right because Local used to wear no center and when

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>he includes Aunt Davis in that as well, you could

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>do that. You can experiment, But I think we are

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>in still win collection mode here and we can't give

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>up nights and we can't have what nas redid the

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>other night. And I thought this game was kind of

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>tilting towards that, because the whole point of going small

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>right is to get an offensive advantage, Like that's what

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>we're doing when we go small, and I thought tonight

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>we were getting killed on the boards while also not

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>getting the offensive punch. I think we had Russ and

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>tailing in. I don't remember if Lebron was also on

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the floor when Dwight Howard checked any might or might

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>have not, but I thought that kind of changed the

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>flow of the game. Sacrament And went up nine to two,

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I believe, and then we caught them at four teen.

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>But then Alex Lann came in and I thought he

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>again took control of the game for Sacramento. He was

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>getting offensive rebounds. You talked about our health defense early

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it was really bad. I thought Lebron wasn't wasn't there

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>on the help early. I'm not sure if that's just

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>him kind of load managing through or just didn't want

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to whatever it was, or the physical battles download that

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't want him doing all game. I thought all

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 1>of that was part of it. And I love just

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>putting Dwight in there to kind of nullify the Alex

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>land matchup, and I thought that changed the whole floor

0:08:57.840 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of the game. He came in like the middle of

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the first and know we kind of took back. I

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>think we were up thirty to twenty seven or something

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>after the first quarter. But yeah, do I can play

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>here and there. I'm fine. He doesn't have to play

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 1>every night. I would like him to be like ten

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>or fifteen minutes. I don't think you're gonna get fourteen

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen as he put up tonight in twenty two

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>minutes every single time that you play him. But it's

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>just a nice switch up, Like you talked about the versatility,

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think we're in the mode to be

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>able to give games away. And I feel like that

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>was it was kind of going there with the with

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:27.439
<v Speaker 1>alex Lyn starting to dominating a similar fashion than nos READD.

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:29.839
<v Speaker 1>But Dwight still you talked about a good NBA player.

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:31.959
<v Speaker 1>He's not DeAndre Jordan, and you don't need to cut

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>him out the rotation. He can still move his feet,

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>he can still jump to block shots, he knows how

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to roll correctly. I thought him and Malik Monk had

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a good chemistry earlier in the year. I thought you

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>saw that again tonight. Their screen role game was nice.

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Um leaked through him some lobs. It's just a solid

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>NBA player that we can he can be our backup center.

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>But thought again, Frank, I thought he just pushed the

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 1>right buttons. He uh, Alex Lann came in, I believe

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth. Then he put Dwight Howard in as well,

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Like he mirrored their minutes really nicely, and I think

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:57.719
<v Speaker 1>that's what you have to do right now. But yeah,

0:09:57.760 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Dwight was really good tonight. Man. I thought he kind

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of say our first quarter and that kind of energized

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>us to the rest of the game. Mm hmmm. I

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted to move on to Russ for a second because

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I've been pretty hard on Russ recently, and I think

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I've done a good job. I hope if I'm wrong,

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you guys can let me know. But I think I've

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna done a good job of explaining exactly what worries

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>me about Russ. It's not so much the day to

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>day stuff, because he's been good for some stretches of

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the season and he's been bad for some stretches of

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the season. He was bad to start, then he had

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a stretch there for about a month or so where

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>he actually was really good and only some uninformed people

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>outside of the Laker fan base were particularly negative towards Russ,

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and then he kind of went back into a slump

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>here recently where he hasn't been shooting the ball well,

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>he's make more defensive mistakes, he's been missing everything around

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the rim um, and so that that to me, is

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>separate from my concerns with Russ, which have always been

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>late game decision making, particularly in a playoff setting. You

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:58.959
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean, That's what I've I've said, but

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to be clear, like I do think Russ

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:05.079
<v Speaker 1>dos a ton to help this team. He's the definition

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of a good play, bad play, got type of guy,

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and there are a lot of nights, especially during the

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>regular season, where he brings a lot of good and

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>very little bad, and today was one of those games.

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>He had some pull up midrange shots that I thought

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:22.839
<v Speaker 1>were ill advised early in the game, but other than that,

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>other than that, he did a really good job. I

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>thought he carried the team in the third quarter when

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Lebron was in that funk um that we described earlier,

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and that was an example of a basketball game where

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.599
<v Speaker 1>if Russ isn't there, you probably lose, you know what

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, because that's what you need for various stretches

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of the game. You need somebody that can carry you

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 1>when things aren't working. And Molikue Monk, if you remember,

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>was hot to start the game, but then kind of

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>went cold there for the second and third quarter. So

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you had Lebron and Monk, the two guys who brought

0:11:55.760 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the game home. Those two guys were mostly cold and

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>off during the middle portion of the game, and Russ

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>carry then. And so that's an example of some of

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the good that that Russ springs to the table. But

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>above that, I wanted to because you actually brought this Upfrage. Yeah,

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was interesting late game how they basically

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>started spamming the Lebron Monk pick and pop there on

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the right wing, which I think is a good play.

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>But it was interesting how Russ basically got relegated to

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>being in the dunker spot. Now, there was a play

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 1>where he did get an offensive rebound at one point,

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>but that kind of thing does concern me potentially in

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 1>the long run, and you may feel differently about it,

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>but you know, for a player of Russ's caliber, in

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 1>terms of reputation to basically be relegated to being Ben

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Simmons at the end of the basketball game, there's a

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>huge diminishing return there offensively, um, and that scares me

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>for a playoff series because then you start to look

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 1>at the situation and go, Okay, would we be better

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>off with another guy there who can shoot, so that

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe Lebron and Monk are running that with a true

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>five out, or maybe Anthony Davis isn't that dunker spot instead,

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean? Like that, that's kind of

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the It was an interesting end of the game there,

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>because again, if if Russ can't have the ball in

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>his hands, what is he really doing aside from grabbing

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the occasional offensive rebound. But I wanted to hear I

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted to hear your opinion on that sequence, Yeah, because

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I know because you and not It's not just you,

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of people who have, you know, expressed

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>concern for the late game offense with Russ right with

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>his decision making throughout the game. Kind of lends to

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on him in high level situations. And I've

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>always thought that he's, like you said, what are you

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:47.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna do? What's the point of having Russ on the

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>floor if you can't have the ball in his hands.

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>But you don't want the ball in his hands, right,

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you want the ball on Lebron James hands in those situations.

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>And I've always said, uh, to kind of have Russ

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in those situations. It's not to like control him or

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>try to bring him down, it's just to lower the usage.

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>And I thought, this is what it's gonna look like

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs. He saw this when they played Cleveland

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>earlier and it was a close game. Anthony Davis was

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>also on the floor. He was kind of the screener.

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of how I see Russ in those

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of moments in the dunker spot. And to me,

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not relegating relegating him there in a bad way

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>because it kind of puts what he's good at into

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the forefront. Right. He is a good offensive rebound or,

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and you talked about him getting one tonight, and putting

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>him there kind of puts those in. It puts him

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>in those situations. He also gotta I think he also

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>got a basket off the cut. He's a good cutter

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>in those spots, and he doesn't always have to be

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>in the dunker spot as well. He can be a

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit more on the weak side where it's not

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>all the way to the three point line, it's right,

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>it's right about halfway and that's usually where players cut

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>from the baseline on. And we saw that again tonight

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and it was Lebron and Monk too man game screen

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>roll late, right, And that's to me what our late

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>game offense is going to be. Even when we had

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Davis on the floor in the playoffs, are late

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>game offense was a guard screen action. It was k

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>CP and Monk is a lot more versatile than Cap

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>is a better shooter, better off ball handler. It reminded

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>me a little bit and I hope this isn't like terrible,

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>but it reminded me a little bit of like Kyrie Irving,

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and of course Monks not the talent of Kyrie Irving,

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>had just me and the archetype of a three level

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>score right where you have to guard a monk off

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the dribble. You have to guard him as a spot

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>up guy and he can float, and he has a

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>floater game like he has the whole offensive package. And

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not always on every night, but I just think

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're gonna see. And that's why I'm not

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>too worried about Russ in those kind of situations. If

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a d is on the floor, to me, he's probably

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the screener or he's in the dunker spot, and maybe

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Russ is a screen and there's things that you can do.

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think Russ would have the ball in

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>his hands in those situations. So I was gonna ask

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you that does that seeing that like late game offense.

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess does that kind of temper your your worries

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit? Because it did, at least for me.

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I've seen this a couple of times now late game offense,

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>but Russ just does not have the ball at the

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>top of the key in late game situations, Like that's

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>just not what we run. It's Lebron James with the ball,

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>screen action whatever, whoever he wants to come set the screen,

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Wayne Ellington to be Dallas, right to be Dallas.

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>We went Wayne Ellington straight screen roll tonight. It was

0:15:57.080 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Malik Monk against the Calves. It was Anthony Davis to

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>get mobile on him, like it's gonna be whoever he

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>wants to mismatch hunt and it's not going to be

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>rusted with the basketball, which is why I'm not as worried.

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think putting him in the dunkers again, stretch

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 1>weak side, not all the way to the corner, but

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>on the baseline where he can cut through. I just

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that's how I see us playing late game offense. So

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I see that side of it. I do, And I

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>want to be clear like I I do. I try,

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>like I said from the beginning, with this rust thing,

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I go out of my way to try to see

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the positive. I really do. Where where I concern myself

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>primarily has to do with a situation where that's not

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Damien Jones and Buddy Healed guarding the Malik monk Lebron action.

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>So so let's say we're playing Phoenix or playing Golden State.

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>If it's if it's Phoenix in all likelihood, if that's

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a Malik Monk, it's Devin Booker guarding him, right, and

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>probably Michael Bridges on Lebron. That's just they're they're gonna

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>switch that every time. And yes, Steven Booker is is

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>someone Lebron can attack. But the point is is that's

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be Lebron having to beat Devin Booker off the dribble,

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:12.479
<v Speaker 1>and it's gonna be DeAndre Ayton and you know, probably

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Cam Johnson or Ja Crowder on the on the week

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>side and CP three. It's just all those windows get

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 1>way tighter against a really, really good defense. And the

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:25.719
<v Speaker 1>same goes with Golden State. That's probably gonna be someone

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 1>like Andrew Wiggins on Lebron and someone like Clay Thompson

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:30.919
<v Speaker 1>on Malik Monk, and they're just gonna switch that action

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and forced Lebron to either post up or drive to

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the basket. And again, like having a guy like Russ

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>in the dunker spot doesn't show some of the downsides

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of that diminishing return I'm speaking of against a bad team,

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>but it will against the top tier teams, especially on

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the defensive end of the floor. So that's kind of

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>like what I visualized. They're like, Okay, would we be

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>better off, you know, not having to occupy that spot

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to give Lebron a better chance to come to consistently

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>beat someone like Clay Thompson off the dribble or Devin

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Booker off the dribble. The playoff series with enough of

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>an advantage to where he can finish over the inevitable

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 1>rotating defender that's going to be someone like Draymond Green

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.239
<v Speaker 1>or Deandret like, it's just everything I look at it

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>is through with Russ, is through the lens of what

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna look like on the biggest stage, and that stuff.

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:23.159
<v Speaker 1>That stuff does worry me a little bit. I'm not

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>saying it's not gonna work, because it might, but that's

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>where it gets concerning. That's why I prefer the idea.

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>As great as the Monk Lebron screening actions are, I

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>prefer the idea of getting Russ involved in the action

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 1>because you know, in all likelihood there you're more likely

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to have them double Lebron than to switch, because they

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>probably would prefer to not have Lebron um you know,

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>go against your point guard, which is in this case

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 1>to be Step or CP three. And then also Russ

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>is so quick off the dribble, you know, and more athletic,

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>better athlete than Monk, that he has a better chance

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>to punish a bigger defender off the dribble. So that

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>probably ends up being some sort of trap which puts

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Russ in a situation where he can attack four on three,

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and I almost like our chances better there, so, accepting

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the reality that Russ is going to be in this picture,

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I tend to like him more as a screen and

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>screener than in the dunker spot because I think the

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>dunker spot thing works better against bad teams than it

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>would against good teams. But that's just me kind of

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>like in the moment, trying to visualize what it might

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>look like against the very best teams. If that makes sense, Yeah,

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 1>for sure, And it doesn't have to be like he

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't always have to be there, and it doesn't have

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to be Malik Monk as well. And if it's against Phoenix,

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>they probably want to involve Eighten in the matchup, right.

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I think Lebron actually kind of likes the aiden matchup

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 1>able to attack him. It's how they're defending. If if

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 1>a team is switching everything, then Lebron can kind of

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>miss much miss mismatch hunt that way. And yeah, like

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 1>I think Russ can be the screen in a lot

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of these situations as well. I think he's still a

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>good four on three attacker. If Lebron is getting trapped,

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>there's just other places on the or you can put him.

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>He's just not going to be the spacer or the

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.719
<v Speaker 1>guy doing the main attack really, and that's your worry, right,

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't want him as the main isolation attack. He's

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not gonna like I think a lot of people

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 1>before the season started thought it would be kind of

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>turn base, right, where Lebron and Russ kind of take

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>turns running ball screen actions. That's just not how it's

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>been this season, and nor do I think how it's

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be in the playoffs. It's gonna be Lebron,

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>James controlling, and Anthony Davis is another guy who's gonna

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>be thrown into the picture who's going to be involved,

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and almost all these actions as well, right, I mean,

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you can have a d space as well to corners,

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>but there's just stuff you can do. Why I'm not

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>too worried about it, And you're right, Russ as a

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>screener I think works really well as well. Most most

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 1>teams like to put a big onto Russ because he's

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>not a spacer, and if you can involve another big,

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>their teams don't usually want to switch their center onto Lebron,

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and you have a four on three in that way.

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 1>And again that's how we got the Austin Reeves game winner.

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Kind of it was Ellington's screen role. Russ was able

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>to attack a compromise defense and found Austin reads for

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 1>the game winner. So I'm not worried about that. I

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>just think like our worries about Russ having to make

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the high leverage kind of decision making lays just it's

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>just not what we have to worry about in my opinion,

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Like it's going to be Lebron James playing his style

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:07.959
<v Speaker 1>of basketball, which is card screens or uh in the

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>post if he wants, or you know, screen with a

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>d or whatever, and the places on the floor we

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>can put Russ, And that's what the rest of the

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.360
<v Speaker 1>season is therefore, to kind of find situations to put

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>him and I think the dunker spot, it's just one

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of uh, one kind of variety of different places

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we can place them on the floor. Yeah, And again,

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 1>like this is where I've had issues with this fit

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>is even though my basketball brain tells me that your

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>best chance to develop driving lanes is to use Russ

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>as the screener, that then puts him back in a

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>position where he's making decisions, which is exactly what I

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 1>don't want him doing at the end of game. So

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.239
<v Speaker 1>it's just tough. It's just tough like And again, this

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:48.919
<v Speaker 1>is why it's so important that I have people like

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you that are more optimistic about it. And then there

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>are a bunch of people in Laker Twitter that I

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>follow who are more optimistic about this fit because they

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 1>helped me see the other side. I'm just presenting to

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you guys, my my view on this. My view on

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>this is I just see this inevitably coming to a

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>head where in a playoff series against an elite defense

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>late game situations, Russ is going to become a liability um,

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>either as a decision maker or off the ball. That's

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 1>that that to me continues to be a concern and

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen anything this season that has dissuaded me

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 1>from that other than success against some limited teams and

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, a couple of a couple of late game

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>situations where happened to work out well, but there have

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>also been like a late game situations where it hasn't.

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's just been tough. But anyway, we've talked a

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:36.879
<v Speaker 1>lot of us recently. We can move on. But the

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>uh I wanted to talk about, I suppose because Taylor

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Talan deserves some attention, but I think we got to

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>go to the Lake Monk first here because he's just

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>been so incredible. But there's been a lot of people

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:53.919
<v Speaker 1>talking about, um the long term conundrum here, which is

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 1>that a league monk has vastly outperformed his contract, But

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>we can get to that in a minute. UM. Basically,

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>what I had pointed out in the last part was

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that sometime in recent weeks, Molik Monk seems to have

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>either been given a green light or he just snatched

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the green light, because for whatever reason, in recent weeks

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 1>he has been gunning and it's been very good for

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>our offense because we don't really have anybody because as

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>good as Mellow is, he's more of a like we

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:29.199
<v Speaker 1>talked about. He's more like if you give him an advantage,

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:30.880
<v Speaker 1>he can score. So if you get him a really

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 1>good matchup in the post, or if you get him

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>with the defender closing out at him, he can score.

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 1>But Molik Monk is basically our only non lebron player

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 1>who from all three levels is lethal. Um. Even if

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't necessarily have an advantage, he can beat you

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 1>with three point shot. He's got an arsenal of shots

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>he can go to in the mid range, in short range,

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>he's got floaters and scoops, and then he's a vertical

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>athlete above the rim. And so combining that with his

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 1>youthful exuberance in his like outrageous confidence in a green light,

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>he's really taking off for us and it's giving our

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>offense a new dynamic that we haven't had all season.

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:17.439
<v Speaker 1>And then again in this five out attack, it's just

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 1>built for him. But I mean more of the same

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that we were talking about in the last part. But

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>he's just he's just something else man like that. It's

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>like he got absolutely scorching hot in that fourth quarter

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 1>to save us tonight. Yeah. I love the way that

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>used youthful and was it what you say, exuberance, Yes,

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:38.479
<v Speaker 1>he is. It's funny because this team was, you know,

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're still old, you know, because their best player

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously is it's thirty seven, just turned thirty seven, but

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>in Russell Westbrooks thirty four. But it's funny kind of

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at the rotation, now, how many kind of youthful

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>guys there are? Right? You have? You obviously have my

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>league Monk. I think he's twenty three or twenty four,

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember. Austin Reeves is around twenty three, Stanley

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Johnson is is twenty five. Th h T obviously the

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.680
<v Speaker 1>rotation at twenty two. So you do have a mix,

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a nice mix of young guys, I guess, and that

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of pops off the screen as well. To me.

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>You kind of see them move at a little bit

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of a different pace. I think the reason is still

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>moving at his age, which you know makes sense. He

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>just kind of came back. Carmelo Anthony obviously is who

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>he is. Yeah, man, Malik has been awesome. He is

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>fearless to me, like that's kind of the word I

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 1>used for him. He's just not scared of the moment.

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 1>He'll take any shot. He doesn't have to be wide

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>open to shoot, which I think is a big thing

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>for this team, and it was kind of the trouble

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of our shooters in the past. Um

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them had to be wide open to

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of shoot. And Malik Monk, he's able to get

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 1>in his shot quickly. Again, that's kind of why I

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>think the Lebron Malik Monk game works so well. Uh,

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>even you add his ball handling, but able to pop

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 1>from three really quickly when we were down like four,

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think, uh, he had two threes that were

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of tying along with Buddy. He'll too continued to

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>come back and drain threes on us. But yeah, he's

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>been awesome. I think he has better passing ability than

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I thought over the summer, and he's kind

0:25:57.280 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of showing the ability to run scoremen actions to make

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>re it's off of it. He's a nice law passer.

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:04.400
<v Speaker 1>We saw something to Dwight like I talked about earlier.

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I just think, you know, he's a really nice player,

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 1>and I think him and we got some news that

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Kendrick Nunn is close. I'm not sure exactly what that means,

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>but hopefully he'll come back pretty soon. I think, you know,

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 1>None and Monk is a really interesting combo. We have

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of guards now playing every badly. Obviously starts

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>th HD again comes off the bench. Now it's gonna

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>be interesting how the rotation looks. But I don't think

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Milik Monk is going anywhere. Also, I'm not sure he

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>starts when everyone's healthy as well. But he's been awesome

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and him and Lebron obviously have something there. There's there's

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>something uh tangible there with their connection, and it's not

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 1>just tonight, it's just it's not just these last few games.

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:39.159
<v Speaker 1>It's been since the beginning of the season to me,

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and Lebron plays well with you know, scoring guards, and

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>I think milink Bunk fits right into that, especially scoring

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>guards that can shoot the ship out of the basketball,

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>which which moves us to the contract connundrum because it's

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's you know, I've been an advocate all season

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>for moving from th HD to try to get a

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>good starter, like a guy like Jeremy Grant, which we

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:06.159
<v Speaker 1>talked about, and obviously that type of deal would require

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>you to include Kendrick Nunn. And you know, this brings

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>up an interesting conversation about asset management because the reality

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of the situation is as Malik Monk is not a

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>minimum contract player. He's probably not a he's definitely not

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>like a twenty million dollar a year guy, but he's

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:24.919
<v Speaker 1>not a minimum contract player. So the reality is is

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>after this season, someone's going to offer him either a

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>mid level exception or something even more if they're a

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 1>team that's operating like they have cap space. So you know,

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 1>the interesting rules about the way the CVA works, and

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Roger you can correct me if I'm wrong, But as

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 1>long as Kendrick Nunn is on the roster, which could

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 1>be this year and next year depending on whether or

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>not he uses his player option, he technically occupies the

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>mid level exception spot, which means the the Lakers would

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>not be able to offer uh Kendrick excuse me, Malik

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>Monk anything other than a very slight phrase over the

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 1>minimum contract. So that's another positive angle to look at

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:06.160
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about potentially moving th HD and Kendrick Nunn,

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>because if you move th HD and Kendrick Nunn in

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a trade for a player like Jeremy Grant, you open

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>up an exception slot to use to retain a player

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 1>like Molik Monk. So you got to now look at

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:22.879
<v Speaker 1>that potential trade as it's not just trading Kendrick Nunn

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and th h T for a wing. It's trading Kendrick

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>Nunn and th h T for a wing and possibly

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>keeping Malik Monk when you probably wouldn't be able to

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 1>keep him otherwise. So that's another Molik Monk's recent play

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>is now adding another interesting wrinkle to the decision making process.

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>This coming off season, you know, like I understand us

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of discussing this and I see, you know, not

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>just you and everyone on the time and talking about,

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, I hope we can keep the League Monk

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>next year. I can't even like get entertained with that,

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, Like I can't even like

0:28:56.280 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 1>get into emotionally there. I'm so much into this in

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>but I understanding League Monks played really well, Jason. This

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>roster has turned over like three times. I feel like,

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, emotionally, attaching ourselves to a guy who's not

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>named Lebron James or Anthony Davis to me is kind

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of kind of like fool's goal, just with just with

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>how the roster has turned over, how the you know,

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>GM has operated the last few years, Like if this

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>team doesn't win a title, even even when winning a title,

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>they still flipped all the roster like, so that's kind

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>of where I can't really get to invested in that.

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the you know, trading Kendrick Nunn thing is

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>an interesting conversation. I think they do want to see

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>him play first before moving on from him. Uh. I

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of people you know and like yourself

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>want to move him for move Taylor as well in

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>combination with none. I think that's interesting. But Leek's playing

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 1>so well, man, I can't even really move on to

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>next year. I hope they can keep him. I don't

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna make the minimum next season. Like you

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>talked about, he has definitely outplayed his contract, and that's

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 1>what you need to do. When you have a team

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>full of minimum guys, you need a few of them

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to outplay the other contract I think Carmelo has outplayed

0:29:57.760 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>his contract. I think you know, I think the league

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Monk has definitely outplay as contract um and you need

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that when you have a team full of guys um

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>making when you only have minimums to give out, and

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>our other guy who makes who makes like who makes

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>money that's not the minimum has not played a single

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>second this year in Kendrick not so it'd be interesting.

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, Molaksen's been awesome. I hope he stays. But

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I can't even get entertained, honestly, with that conversation you

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>were asking me about the c b A. I am

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>probably one of the last people to ask about that

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>as as well. I'm so just into this season. People like, oh,

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>can we keep Lake Monk, I have no idea. Other

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>people do a great job with that. Eric Pink is

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the best. Um, definitely, not for sure. I

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 1>don't forget trying to be a part of that wheelhouse either,

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I hope lake Monk is back. I just

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, like I said, getting emotionally attached to a

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>player not named Lebron or Anthony Davis. It seems kind

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of foolish to me, with how the roster has turned

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>over the last few years. Yeah, it's it's funny because

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually very thankful that there are people in our

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 1>business who takes time to learn that stuff, because, like

0:30:56.920 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I live and breathe the game of basketball

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>every day of my life as a player, as a

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>coach and as a guy who covers the Lakers and

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 1>just as a fan. And I may or may not

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>be able to offer something of value in that department,

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>But when it comes to something that literally lawyers drafted,

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>yeah that's that's that's hirely above my pay grade. Um,

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:16.959
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's get th h D really quick and

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>then I want to rant about Stanley Johnson for a

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>second and then we'll call it a night. So so

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been heavy behind th HT this year, which is weird.

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>You and I've kind of flip flopped because last year

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I was the one that was down on him, and

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:32.719
<v Speaker 1>now I'm the one to tie on him. But like

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the I I pointed out all season that you know,

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>he's been in an unfortunate circumstance surrounding his role. You know,

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>get go through training camp and then break your thumb,

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>then you come back and play, and it's roster volatility

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>between you know, wings and guards dropping with injury to

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Lebron and Anthony Davis missing time, him going in and

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>out of the starting lineup, and then Bamy gets COVID,

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and so he's just been in a really inconsistent role.

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>And I predicted that he would play better as he

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>got just more consistency in the lineup, and it seems

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>now that he's going to consistently be coming off the bench.

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>And also they're the Lakers are leaning into a style

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and sticking with it, the style that is more conducive

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to th hts skill set. And you know, obviously it's

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 1>just one game, but I think he's been trending in

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>this direction over the last few games, starting to show

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>some signs of confidence on the offensive end and starting

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to make some plays on defense. And tonight I thought

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>he played one of his best games as a prom

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>because even though he had a couple of twenty point

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>games early in this season, they were in losses if

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I remember correctly, um and kind of I won't say

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>garbage time because they were't garbage time, but they weren't

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>as impactful a statistical performances as his was tonight. The

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>shots he made were all huge and important to the game.

0:32:57.680 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>That little one leg a fadeaway he made tonight in

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 1>e lane was monumental superstar playing yep, and he had

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a handful of those plays today. Rose that that weird

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>scoop shot he had in the first half going around

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Damien Jones like literally like like caught on his pivot

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>foot underneath the basket with the massive human towering over him,

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and he just kind of like chicken winged them and

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>stuck his arm out and and made that little scoop shot.

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 1>But tonight he was all over the place defensively as well,

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 1>blowing stuff up and causing problems. Did I thought he

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 1>did a pretty good job chasing, but he healed around

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 1>when he had to and I know open he shot amazing,

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>but he healed. His game was more of like I

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>made a couple of easy ones early and then I

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 1>got crazy hot started making the tough ones, which is

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>something we talked about a lot. But point being th HD,

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna be like this every night because he's

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a young player, and consistency is the number one thing

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that young players struggle with because they're bad at replicating

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 1>what they're good at and minimizing what they're bad at.

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>So you're gonna see some more bad th HD in

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the near future, I'm sure. But this is a lot

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 1>of what you saw tonight. Translates. This wasn't just oh

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>he made shots tonight, No, that's not what this was.

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Stuff that he did is stuff that's easy to replicate.

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:14.720
<v Speaker 1>His ability to finish around the basket when he's given

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>space to operate, when he's confident and using his strength

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to his advantage, that will work as long as he's

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 1>in the league. A lot of those little floaters and

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 1>scoops and stuff around the basket, those are pretty high

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>percentage shots for a guy like th HT. This isn't

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a guy that's going out there taking a ton of

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:34.359
<v Speaker 1>jump shots. That's not that's not his game. Uh. If

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm not mistaken, he only made one three tonight, so

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not like he was out there bombing away from three.

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>And then obviously everything he does defensively that absolutely translates forward.

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So this is why I've been so optimistic about th ht.

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>This stuff that you saw tonight, that's replicable, that can

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:55.280
<v Speaker 1>be done over and over again soon, and so that's

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 1>why I've I've been such a believer in what he does.

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 1>And here's the thing. It's really this simple. If sometime

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>before January, if he can consistently do this, meaning if

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 1>he can, I won't even say January fifteenth, I'll just

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 1>say the trade deadline, because the Lakers can obviously kick

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>the can down the road if you're not ready to

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 1>make that decision. But if he can get to a

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>point where two out of three nights he's pretty impactful

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 1>on both ends of the floor, I don't want Jeremy Grant.

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I want th D because because because this is an

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>impactful basketball player who projects to get better and better

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 1>each year. But if it's clear that he's still a

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of years away from getting to the point where

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>he can consistently have this type of two way impact,

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:42.399
<v Speaker 1>then you have to make the move, which, for the record,

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 1>roads just exactly what I said a couple of months ago.

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Things just got complicated by the a D injury and now,

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:51.879
<v Speaker 1>like we talked about adding the leak monk thing in there.

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Teach, he's a really good basketball player

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and so that's gonna be an interesting decision the Lakers

0:35:57.440 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>are gonna have they have to make now. My prediction

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>is that tonight is somewhat of an outlier, that he

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>will have more limited games than games like this, and

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:10.399
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers will end up moving him. But I'm glad

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:12.800
<v Speaker 1>she had a game like tonight where he put together

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those things that he does well into

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:18.399
<v Speaker 1>one night, so people can kind of see why I've

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>been so optimistic about him. Yeah, and to your point,

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>really quickly, um, leak monk, not note monk. I think.

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Frank Vogel said that he felt like both Dwight and

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Taylor looked like they broke out after struggling physically from COVID,

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 1>so that could, you know, be a part of it

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>as well. I thought, you know, Taylor, this is the

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 1>third trade game where he came off the bench, and

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that really helped him. I always said that

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 1>him playing with both Russ and Lebron was a little

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>bit of a struggle. You pair that with how many

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:47.319
<v Speaker 1>minutes he played next to DeAndre Jordan's as well, like

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 1>he was just never in lineup that kind of were

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>conductive to him. But even with all that said, he

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 1>needs a guy to have somewhat of a jumper to me, like,

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have to have a good jump shot. It

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 1>can be below average, but it has to be something

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the teams at least respect. And I thought, you know, tonight,

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:03.279
<v Speaker 1>he had a few he hit his He had like

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a mid range pull up or something like that and that,

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and he had a few layups at the rim. He

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 1>was able to attack Alex Land off the dribble. I

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 1>thought playing him with Dwight was a nice thing. I

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:12.919
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you've noticed that as well. I thought

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 1>giving him a big screener was just nice. And the

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>King's kind of run a drop back coverage because Alex

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Lan obviously yeah advantage, yeah exactly, And we got him,

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting downhill and he missed a layoup, a

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:26.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of layers, but he got to the rim, he

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 1>got he got to be he was able to be

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 1>physical at the basket, and that's just stuff he can do.

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 1>He saw his footwork kind of come into play as well.

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:35.919
<v Speaker 1>And defensively, man, he was. I thought he was really good.

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought his health defense was nice. His wingsman came

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>into play um on the pick and roll defense where

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>he knocked away a bunch of balls where he was

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the help guy helping the helper on the roll. Man.

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>He was good tonight. And again, you're not gonna see

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the point point level that it was tonight. You don't

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:51.279
<v Speaker 1>have to see that. You just need a little bit

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>more finishing at the rim. I still want him to

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:55.840
<v Speaker 1>shoot his open threes. I think he's a better shooter,

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 1>way better shot than he showed. I don't think he's

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>like the worst shooter in the league, which is the

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>percentages that he's kind of throwing up right now. He's

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 1>been in his head and maybe the physical stuff is

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>what it is. The trade stuff. Like again, I'm a

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:08.839
<v Speaker 1>guy who doesn't really like to get into that. That's

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:11.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be an interesting topic for the next few weeks.

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:14.399
<v Speaker 1>We'll see if that that manifests into anything. But yeah,

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think thh is important for this team.

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 1>He's the second he's the second only non minimum player.

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 1>The other guy, obviously Kendrick Not hasn't played, and she's

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 1>the guy they've invested in, put a lot of money

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>into him as well. We'll see if that kind of

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 1>bears out and he plays a lot and he plays better.

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>But I thought him coming off the bench is huge, man.

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:32.279
<v Speaker 1>I think that just gives him a little bit more

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 1>freedom to kind of run actions They let him is

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 1>so as well we run on, we run him off

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:38.359
<v Speaker 1>a little pin downs to kind of get him, get

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 1>him going downhill, um, just him catching and be able

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to go to the basket. I still wish he uses

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 1>his left hand a little bit more. He still does

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of flip shots that kind of missed all

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 1>but he's a confident him and I think he'll he'll

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 1>figure it out and this is kind of the blueprint

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>for him. And obviously that turnaround jumper he had again tonight,

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of his go to shot. It's been airballing

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:57.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot recently, but that was the shot he was

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>making I think last year, and we'll see if that continue.

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 1>But it was a good game I don't expect this

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>every night, like you talked about, but it's kind of

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:05.759
<v Speaker 1>the blueprint for him attack the basket, you know, when

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 1>when he gets his minutes, I like his minutes not

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 1>next to both Russ and Lebron. I think you're seeing

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>the kind of fruit of that. Yeah, that's exactly what

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I was just gonna say, is getting him where Lebron

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 1>or Russ are off the floors that he can kind

0:39:19.560 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of actually feel free being aggressive, because that's that's really

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the hard part of it, right, is like how do

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you feel confident as a young offensive basketball player when

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that's Lebron and Russ standing off the ball? Like that's tough,

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you know. But if if one of them is off

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and then the other guy, Lebron is kind of like

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 1>desperate for somebody other than him to make a play,

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:44.239
<v Speaker 1>then there you go. There's your opportunity. But I wanted

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:47.279
<v Speaker 1>to quickly before we call it a night here, I

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:49.760
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk about Stanley Johnson for a second because

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 1>this has been somewhat of a uh a kind of

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a confusing situation for me. So first, starter's upfront. I

0:39:57.080 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 1>understand the financial predicament that the Lakers are in, I

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 1>understand that Jennie Buss doesn't have a ton of money.

0:40:03.360 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I understand the fact that saving a few hundred thousand

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:09.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars here or there because of the compounding effects of

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the luxury tax are pretty significant. But I also understand

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that the Lakers haven't had a huge problem with continuity

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>this season. I understand that the Lakers have struggled all

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 1>season with having somebody on the wing who does the

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:28.080
<v Speaker 1>dirty work, who has some good size and athleticism. Those

0:40:28.080 --> 0:40:32.919
<v Speaker 1>two things, to me, are very very much relevant here,

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:37.760
<v Speaker 1>even as we consider the financial ramifications of potentially signing

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 1>another basketball player on this team. And what bothers me is,

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:44.919
<v Speaker 1>given that lack of continuity, the fact that we were

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 1>willing to let a player miss a practice, miss a game,

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>even though he's been what raj our fourth or fifth

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 1>best player over the course of the last ten days.

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:58.400
<v Speaker 1>He was starting. He was starting. He was starting a

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 1>starter for us who was our fourth or fifth best player,

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:05.399
<v Speaker 1>legitimately gave us a chance to win on Christmas Day

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 1>when I didn't think we did have a chance. This

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 1>is a good basketball player that fills a very specific

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:14.960
<v Speaker 1>need for the Lakers, and the Lakers are playing a

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:19.240
<v Speaker 1>weird financial game with him right now. And quite frankly,

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:23.320
<v Speaker 1>this is where the basketball gods get involved here, because again,

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:25.719
<v Speaker 1>this might all be written in there where they're like, Hey,

0:41:25.719 --> 0:41:27.959
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna wake up tomorrow, it's January five, We're gonna

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 1>sign Stanley. But I think this is just bad process.

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:34.360
<v Speaker 1>And if I was Stanley Johnson, I would feel insulted

0:41:34.920 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 1>because given everything that he's brought to the table over

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the last ten days, to do something like this, to

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:42.359
<v Speaker 1>just try to pinch pennies, like if they signed him

0:41:42.400 --> 0:41:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to another ten day contract, that that, to me is

0:41:45.840 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 1>insulting to Stanley. Do you have used for Stanley? Yes? Absolutely,

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:51.840
<v Speaker 1>he's been your fourth or fifth best player over the

0:41:51.840 --> 0:41:54.840
<v Speaker 1>course of the last ten days. Is Stanley an asset? No,

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily, but on a minimum contract. He's shown enough

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:00.439
<v Speaker 1>over the last ten days that if he did get

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 1>thrown into a trade, there's gonna be someone out there

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:06.839
<v Speaker 1>who would want him. I guarantee you he's proved over

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the last ten days that he's an NBA player, Okay,

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:11.360
<v Speaker 1>like not a guy who should be on on his

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 1>couch or playing in the G League. So I just

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:18.840
<v Speaker 1>don't see the I don't understand the rationale of pinching

0:42:18.880 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 1>pennies to this extent, Like even with Alex Caruso, it

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 1>made more sense to me, which I hated the Alex

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Crusoe decision, but at least you could tell me, like, hey,

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:31.359
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about thirty million dollars here right, Like that

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 1>was an entirely different type of math equation. You're talking

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:38.600
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a very small amount of money relatively

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 1>right now that we are pinching and missing a player

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:45.279
<v Speaker 1>for for for a game, especially game like tonight where

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 1>energy was an issue. Stanley would have been a big

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:50.160
<v Speaker 1>help tonight, And I just I just don't understand it,

0:42:50.200 --> 0:42:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and it to me, it's it's it's a difficult process

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 1>as a fan of the team to try to justify Yeah,

0:42:57.600 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's the human human element of it. And obviously,

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 1>for Stanley Johnson, you would like the full roster, but

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:04.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, I always go to other guys for this,

0:43:04.840 --> 0:43:07.319
<v Speaker 1>and Eric Pinkins obviously, who does a great job with

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the cap stuff, and we're lucky to kind of have

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 1>him be one of the Lakers, you know, be do

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 1>so much for the Lakers in terms of letting us

0:43:14.000 --> 0:43:17.080
<v Speaker 1>understand this stuff. He says, it's more for flexibility kind

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of concerns instead of tax. It's not really a tax thing.

0:43:19.800 --> 0:43:21.840
<v Speaker 1>It's that, you know, if they want to have a trade,

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe a trade maybe won't go down by tomorrow, but

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:27.680
<v Speaker 1>just to have the roster roster spot. Me and you

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:30.400
<v Speaker 1>both thought that trading Rondo was the roster spot to

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 1>get Stanley Johnson on the team. That's obviously wasn't correct. Um,

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:36.319
<v Speaker 1>they just opened up a roster spot and they can

0:43:36.360 --> 0:43:39.719
<v Speaker 1>sign Stanley Johnson again tomorrow to another ten day which

0:43:39.880 --> 0:43:42.440
<v Speaker 1>looks which looks like this is what's gonna happen. Um,

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:44.759
<v Speaker 1>hopefully Santy john I don't know. I don't think he'll

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 1>get signed to a team before then, and I think

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>David mcmaniman also said that they have mutual interest to

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 1>come back, So this is probably all going to work out.

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:54.880
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, you know, this isn't great process. You'd like,

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, a guy who's kind of started for his

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:00.319
<v Speaker 1>tenure here. I think he started more games that he's

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:03.000
<v Speaker 1>come off the bench, if I have that correct. Um,

0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 1>he's I believe. So you would like a guy like

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that to you know, have earned a roster spot. But

0:44:07.600 --> 0:44:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that's just not how it works. They obviously want the

0:44:10.440 --> 0:44:12.640
<v Speaker 1>flexibility to be able to keep a roster proud open,

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's more what it is as well.

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's saving money as much, which obviously

0:44:17.960 --> 0:44:19.879
<v Speaker 1>they will. They also they also save money, I believe

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Rondo trade as well, but again that's neither

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:23.839
<v Speaker 1>here and there. I think this is more to key

0:44:23.840 --> 0:44:26.600
<v Speaker 1>flexibility as well. Like Eric, Eric Pink has talked about,

0:44:26.840 --> 0:44:29.280
<v Speaker 1>UM so we'll see, but hopefully he's back. He's definitely

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:31.960
<v Speaker 1>earned a spot. He's been great. He's been a power forward,

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a power wing that this team has desperately needed. You've

0:44:34.680 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about it's bad process. Probably you know, to just

0:44:37.040 --> 0:44:39.319
<v Speaker 1>let him sit out there, miss practice, missed the game.

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:41.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, you start three games then you just miss.

0:44:42.160 --> 0:44:44.520
<v Speaker 1>You just missed. To be resigned to another ten day.

0:44:44.560 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not great. You would like him to have earned

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that spot, but it just looks like what it's going

0:44:48.600 --> 0:44:50.799
<v Speaker 1>to be. Hopefully after the second ten day they do

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:54.359
<v Speaker 1>eventually sign him. Hopefully they maybe they cut someone else

0:44:54.360 --> 0:44:56.520
<v Speaker 1>will We'll see what happens. But I think that's more

0:44:56.600 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 1>what it is as well. At least that's what Eric

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:00.600
<v Speaker 1>winkis believes it to be. But you're this isn't a

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:03.080
<v Speaker 1>great process. You want a guy who's who's played well

0:45:03.160 --> 0:45:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to earn a spot on the team, for sure. So Roger,

0:45:05.400 --> 0:45:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you're my guy, and I appreciate your perspective, but I'm

0:45:08.600 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna call BS on you, well, not on you, but

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 1>on me, not even on Eric Pinkus, but just on

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the idea that the Lakers are valuing the roster spot

0:45:16.640 --> 0:45:22.000
<v Speaker 1>because they could the rock. The Lakers could create a

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:27.000
<v Speaker 1>roster spot anytime they want. The the DeAndre Jordan contract

0:45:27.120 --> 0:45:30.920
<v Speaker 1>because it was fully guaranteed. That money's lost, it's gone,

0:45:30.960 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it's into the ether of of of whatever NBA salary

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Captain Land is h If you have no intention of

0:45:38.120 --> 0:45:40.880
<v Speaker 1>playing down to Jordan against the season, which appears to

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:43.880
<v Speaker 1>be the case, cut his ass, cut him, get him

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:46.800
<v Speaker 1>out of there, and if you do, bam open roster spot.

0:45:47.400 --> 0:45:50.320
<v Speaker 1>That okay. I understand that you don't like the idea

0:45:50.400 --> 0:45:53.640
<v Speaker 1>potentially of having a player that you invested in on

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the streets, but it's clear that he has. He barely

0:45:56.920 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>made sense when we were trying to play big. He

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:01.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly doesn't make sense with our current style of play.

0:46:01.960 --> 0:46:04.719
<v Speaker 1>So I think and just in general, man like, with

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 1>this kind of stuff, you can you can find somebody

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:12.120
<v Speaker 1>out there to help you facilitate just about anything. I mean,

0:46:12.200 --> 0:46:15.240
<v Speaker 1>look at the was it at the Wizards who helped

0:46:15.280 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 1>us facilitate getting that third max slot when we were

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:21.120
<v Speaker 1>going after Kauai. It's like you know when when everybody

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:22.759
<v Speaker 1>in the league, when all those guys are like, oh,

0:46:22.880 --> 0:46:24.520
<v Speaker 1>they can't do it, there's no way they're gonna get it,

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Well guess what they did. Like you, you can like

0:46:28.560 --> 0:46:31.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of finagle this stuff if you're if you're diligent

0:46:32.120 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 1>enough about it as a front office. And so the

0:46:34.719 --> 0:46:37.319
<v Speaker 1>way I look at it as all of this is

0:46:37.360 --> 0:46:42.640
<v Speaker 1>smoking mirrors to cover for yet another example of penny

0:46:42.680 --> 0:46:46.880
<v Speaker 1>pinching from the Lakers recently. And again this to me,

0:46:47.200 --> 0:46:52.480
<v Speaker 1>this specific instance is absolutely insane because again we're not

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:56.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about a thirty million dollar commitment like it would

0:46:56.640 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 1>cost to retain Alex Caruso. We are literally talking about

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:04.600
<v Speaker 1>out I'm pretty sure for his years of service and

0:47:04.680 --> 0:47:07.440
<v Speaker 1>for him being this far into the season, and for

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:10.719
<v Speaker 1>it being pro rated for a veteran minimum deal to

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:13.399
<v Speaker 1>guarantee Stanley Johnson to come back, I'm pretty sure it's

0:47:13.440 --> 0:47:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a very small number, and I think it's under a million.

0:47:17.160 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 1>So even with luxury tax, even with UH you know,

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:26.439
<v Speaker 1>factoring an extra couple of days to to bring him back.

0:47:26.560 --> 0:47:29.719
<v Speaker 1>I think this is just to to literally get a

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:35.600
<v Speaker 1>guy to willingly subject yourself to another starting lineup, a

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:40.160
<v Speaker 1>flip over to another UH day where one of your

0:47:40.200 --> 0:47:43.160
<v Speaker 1>important swing men is missing practice and missing a game.

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:48.120
<v Speaker 1>This is just I think it's unacceptable personally, And I

0:47:48.200 --> 0:47:51.200
<v Speaker 1>understand some people disagree with me and look man like like,

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I I appreciate your perspective, and I'm not saying you're

0:47:54.760 --> 0:47:58.279
<v Speaker 1>wrong necessarily, I'm just saying I I I struggle to

0:47:58.320 --> 0:48:01.200
<v Speaker 1>see that rationale. I you're know, you're right in like

0:48:01.280 --> 0:48:03.759
<v Speaker 1>a vacuum, like in a right world, Stanley Johnson would

0:48:03.760 --> 0:48:05.799
<v Speaker 1>be on the team. But you know, and you're gonna

0:48:05.840 --> 0:48:07.279
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna aid me for this one as well. You

0:48:07.280 --> 0:48:09.160
<v Speaker 1>can call BS on this one as well, but I

0:48:09.200 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 1>believe you know. Eric Winton's pink is kind of talked

0:48:11.560 --> 0:48:14.200
<v Speaker 1>about the deandr Dornan situation as well. He said, there's

0:48:14.200 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 1>no need to cut him when you can kind of

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:18.399
<v Speaker 1>use him for salary filler. It's not much salary, but

0:48:18.560 --> 0:48:20.920
<v Speaker 1>using for salary filler in the trade. And again if

0:48:20.960 --> 0:48:22.799
<v Speaker 1>that time comes where you can then you can cut

0:48:22.880 --> 0:48:25.360
<v Speaker 1>him later. And again it looks like it's going that direction,

0:48:25.440 --> 0:48:27.960
<v Speaker 1>right Deandi Jordan has not played We're going to no

0:48:28.120 --> 0:48:31.040
<v Speaker 1>center plus or one center lineups, and he's been so

0:48:31.080 --> 0:48:33.879
<v Speaker 1>far out the rotation for this long. It looks like

0:48:34.120 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that's where and going where it's going. Uh it's funny

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 1>because you keep you bring up the Carusoe stuff. To me,

0:48:38.640 --> 0:48:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that is the more unacceptable thing. I don't care the

0:48:42.080 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 1>luxury text, you know, savings and stuff like that. Ask Cruso.

0:48:45.160 --> 0:48:46.920
<v Speaker 1>You you sign him and then you trade him later

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:48.719
<v Speaker 1>if you have to, or you do what you know,

0:48:48.760 --> 0:48:50.239
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, you don't let a guy

0:48:50.280 --> 0:48:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that you've built up. And I've gone into Cruso too much.

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna rent again on Caruso. To me, that's

0:48:54.520 --> 0:48:58.160
<v Speaker 1>more of a uh an offense than this. But yeah,

0:48:58.480 --> 0:49:00.560
<v Speaker 1>it looks like Stanley Johnson is going to get signed though,

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:02.680
<v Speaker 1>back with the team. So this looks like it will

0:49:02.719 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 1>go go. You know, the process will work out, even

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:07.719
<v Speaker 1>if it is in great process. But you're entitled to that.

0:49:09.560 --> 0:49:11.600
<v Speaker 1>You know. I'm not in the office. I don't know

0:49:11.640 --> 0:49:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the inner workings the exact situation, but I believe that's

0:49:15.480 --> 0:49:17.520
<v Speaker 1>eventually what's going to happen. Though Santay Johnson will be

0:49:17.600 --> 0:49:20.560
<v Speaker 1>back on another ten day. Hopefully he gets resigned again.

0:49:20.600 --> 0:49:22.799
<v Speaker 1>You would like him to have the roster spot now,

0:49:23.120 --> 0:49:25.400
<v Speaker 1>but it looks like they're going to keep it open

0:49:25.800 --> 0:49:28.520
<v Speaker 1>for now, so we'll see how it goes. But yeah,

0:49:28.960 --> 0:49:30.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I can't change your mind on that.

0:49:30.960 --> 0:49:32.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going by what you know, people who kind

0:49:32.719 --> 0:49:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of who talk about this, what they kind of believe

0:49:35.280 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 1>be You're allowed to believe that it's it's for savings

0:49:37.200 --> 0:49:39.800
<v Speaker 1>as well well. But we'll see if Stanley Johnson doesn't

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:41.480
<v Speaker 1>make you know, it doesn't if he doesn't pass the

0:49:41.480 --> 0:49:43.319
<v Speaker 1>second ten day, we can come back and have this

0:49:43.360 --> 0:49:47.239
<v Speaker 1>conversation again. But but hopefully he does. For sure, I

0:49:47.320 --> 0:49:49.720
<v Speaker 1>get I get the idea of retaining and for salary Ballace.

0:49:49.960 --> 0:49:52.279
<v Speaker 1>My point is is like you could cut him if

0:49:52.280 --> 0:49:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you needed to. So if you're in if you're in

0:49:54.400 --> 0:49:56.719
<v Speaker 1>the trade market and your trade dictates that you need

0:49:56.760 --> 0:50:00.359
<v Speaker 1>salary filler, Bam, there's DeAndre Jordan's and get what they're

0:50:00.360 --> 0:50:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Stanley Johnson. If you have no room for him on

0:50:02.800 --> 0:50:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the wing, and maybe if the team is like, hey,

0:50:05.160 --> 0:50:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I want him in the deal, then saying there you go,

0:50:07.160 --> 0:50:09.560
<v Speaker 1>there's an asset, right, Or if you're in a situation

0:50:09.600 --> 0:50:11.480
<v Speaker 1>where you're making a trade and you need roster spots,

0:50:11.520 --> 0:50:14.200
<v Speaker 1>like let's say it's break class in case of emergency

0:50:14.239 --> 0:50:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and we're trading in Russell Westbrook came from bringing back

0:50:16.800 --> 0:50:18.719
<v Speaker 1>a twenty million dollar guy, AI million dollar guy and

0:50:18.760 --> 0:50:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the twenty million dollar guy or whatever, then yeah, we

0:50:21.040 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 1>would need to cut somebody, but you have you have

0:50:23.880 --> 0:50:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that permanent flexibility. Like what I disagreed with was like, okay,

0:50:27.920 --> 0:50:30.799
<v Speaker 1>we're we're not signing Stanley Johnson yet because we we

0:50:30.880 --> 0:50:33.120
<v Speaker 1>might need this open roster spot. No, no, no, if

0:50:33.160 --> 0:50:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you actually needed an open roster spot in a predicament,

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you can literally create when in a moment's notice, So

0:50:40.520 --> 0:50:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that that's where I I juste But yeah, but like regardless,

0:50:44.520 --> 0:50:47.319
<v Speaker 1>no matter what, Like I just don't like playing with

0:50:47.360 --> 0:50:49.239
<v Speaker 1>fate on this kind of the stuff, on this kind

0:50:49.280 --> 0:50:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, right, because if you look at this, if

0:50:51.000 --> 0:50:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you look at this Laker predicament, like part of what

0:50:53.120 --> 0:50:55.920
<v Speaker 1>happened this summer is we traded a lot of depth

0:50:56.440 --> 0:51:01.440
<v Speaker 1>for Russell Westbrook. Right now, what happened by the grace

0:51:01.520 --> 0:51:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of our scouting department and just some good luck. We've

0:51:04.640 --> 0:51:08.600
<v Speaker 1>had some hits, right, like Austin Reeves bam, that fills

0:51:08.600 --> 0:51:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in some of that depth that we lost, right, like

0:51:10.840 --> 0:51:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Malik Monk being a betteran minimum guy who, by the way,

0:51:15.920 --> 0:51:18.640
<v Speaker 1>somehow no one in the league offered a contract like

0:51:18.840 --> 0:51:23.200
<v Speaker 1>what in the world, but like but like Malik Monk materializing,

0:51:23.239 --> 0:51:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and then Stanley Johnson literally from your G league team

0:51:27.640 --> 0:51:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to come up and be a very very important basketball

0:51:30.600 --> 0:51:32.600
<v Speaker 1>player for you over the last two days, Like you've

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:35.680
<v Speaker 1>come into a stroke of luck here where now the

0:51:35.719 --> 0:51:38.640
<v Speaker 1>only concerns about the rust thing are genuinely just fit,

0:51:38.960 --> 0:51:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, like is this going to work in the playoffs?

0:51:40.719 --> 0:51:43.400
<v Speaker 1>But the death thing really isn't a concern anymore. We

0:51:43.480 --> 0:51:47.879
<v Speaker 1>have depth. We through Austin Reeves, through Malik Monk, through

0:51:47.920 --> 0:51:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Stanley Johnson, we've recreated at least a significant portion of

0:51:52.520 --> 0:51:55.239
<v Speaker 1>what Kuzma and KCP brought to the table. Right we

0:51:55.360 --> 0:51:58.480
<v Speaker 1>have now. Whether or not that one of those groups

0:51:58.520 --> 0:51:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is better than the other, that can be argued by

0:52:00.000 --> 0:52:03.200
<v Speaker 1>someone else. But my point is is you have somehow

0:52:03.280 --> 0:52:06.719
<v Speaker 1>tripped and fallen into getting some of the best of

0:52:06.800 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 1>both worlds here. If your desire was to have Russ,

0:52:09.200 --> 0:52:12.880
<v Speaker 1>so why would you play with that by by playing

0:52:12.960 --> 0:52:15.920
<v Speaker 1>this game with Stanley Johnson over a couple hundred thousand

0:52:15.960 --> 0:52:19.600
<v Speaker 1>bucks Like that, to me is just foolishness, But it

0:52:19.680 --> 0:52:21.319
<v Speaker 1>is what it is. That I that's all I had

0:52:21.320 --> 0:52:22.759
<v Speaker 1>for the night, Roger, was there anything else you want

0:52:22.760 --> 0:52:25.759
<v Speaker 1>to hit on before we get out of here? Uh? No,

0:52:25.920 --> 0:52:27.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that was pretty much it. I'm not sure

0:52:27.880 --> 0:52:29.879
<v Speaker 1>if we did shout it out, I don't remember, but

0:52:30.200 --> 0:52:32.799
<v Speaker 1>Russell Westbrook no turnovers tonight. I think that's you know,

0:52:33.040 --> 0:52:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that's great. I think we only have like

0:52:34.960 --> 0:52:37.440
<v Speaker 1>five as a team. So again we talked about the

0:52:37.440 --> 0:52:40.640
<v Speaker 1>misshots there, but no turnovers. That's a positive here. Uh

0:52:40.640 --> 0:52:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the Kings play some pretty good premiery defenders.

0:52:43.360 --> 0:52:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Davian Mitchell. To me, we didn't get to him either.

0:52:45.640 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 1>He's he's special. I think he's gonna be an awesome,

0:52:48.040 --> 0:52:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, defender player in this league. But yeah, no turnovers,

0:52:50.440 --> 0:52:52.439
<v Speaker 1>prop Uss. Hopefully that kind of keeps up. But yeah,

0:52:52.440 --> 0:52:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that's all I had as one man. Cool. Yeah, and look,

0:52:55.719 --> 0:52:58.759
<v Speaker 1>Russ again, I'm glad he had no turnovers tonight, but

0:52:58.880 --> 0:53:02.680
<v Speaker 1>let's I want to see him show a consistent commitment

0:53:02.719 --> 0:53:04.399
<v Speaker 1>to that part of his game. I was. I did

0:53:04.440 --> 0:53:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a little rant for on this for my Twitter page,

0:53:07.840 --> 0:53:11.960
<v Speaker 1>but like you know, the idea of Russ being Russ,

0:53:12.000 --> 0:53:15.239
<v Speaker 1>there's a limitation to that on this team, in his

0:53:15.280 --> 0:53:18.960
<v Speaker 1>specific role. I actually think he needs to change in

0:53:19.080 --> 0:53:22.040
<v Speaker 1>some ways. That doesn't mean, hey, Russ stop driving to

0:53:22.080 --> 0:53:23.719
<v Speaker 1>the basket now, That's not it at all. That's not

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:26.000
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying. I'm not saying Russ stop being aggressive.

0:53:26.160 --> 0:53:29.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just Russ does need to change in the sense

0:53:29.560 --> 0:53:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that he does need to devote more attention and effort

0:53:32.719 --> 0:53:35.160
<v Speaker 1>towards cleaning up some of the margins of his game.

0:53:35.360 --> 0:53:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Because when he was younger and more athletic, you know,

0:53:39.400 --> 0:53:42.080
<v Speaker 1>he had the ability to overcome a lot more of

0:53:42.120 --> 0:53:44.760
<v Speaker 1>his mistakes than he does now. So he actually does

0:53:45.239 --> 0:53:49.560
<v Speaker 1>actually need to change. And and so it's it's not

0:53:49.600 --> 0:53:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a matter of of you know, trying to get out

0:53:52.160 --> 0:53:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of Russ's way and let rusty Russ. It's about Russ

0:53:55.160 --> 0:53:57.200
<v Speaker 1>does have to try to fit in a little bit more.

0:53:57.239 --> 0:54:02.399
<v Speaker 1>I think. Um, But that's like, yes, tonight, big positive step.

0:54:02.440 --> 0:54:04.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not easy to get zero turnovers the game, especially

0:54:04.840 --> 0:54:07.040
<v Speaker 1>with Dave on Mitchell's up in your air space all

0:54:07.120 --> 0:54:09.759
<v Speaker 1>night long. Yep, and I think it is his first

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:12.279
<v Speaker 1>zero I read him. Let me see if I can

0:54:12.320 --> 0:54:15.439
<v Speaker 1>go to the tweet first turn first zero turnover games

0:54:15.440 --> 0:54:19.799
<v Speaker 1>since the March fourteen, two thousand sixteen wow, which which

0:54:19.840 --> 0:54:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is you know, quite a quite a while. So this

0:54:21.680 --> 0:54:24.000
<v Speaker 1>is good to see. We probably most players don't get

0:54:24.000 --> 0:54:26.600
<v Speaker 1>no turnovers with the ball handling that Russ has obviously

0:54:26.680 --> 0:54:28.640
<v Speaker 1>gets more than most players. But yeah, it's a good

0:54:28.680 --> 0:54:30.560
<v Speaker 1>good thing to kind of celebrate. Hopefully it's something we

0:54:30.640 --> 0:54:33.880
<v Speaker 1>get going forward as well. All Right, everybody, thank you

0:54:33.960 --> 0:54:35.880
<v Speaker 1>guys so much for coming to hang out. This is

0:54:35.920 --> 0:54:38.640
<v Speaker 1>going to air on DASH Radio tomorrow morning at seven

0:54:38.640 --> 0:54:41.960
<v Speaker 1>am Pacific Standard time, and we'll be on our podcast

0:54:42.000 --> 0:54:45.239
<v Speaker 1>feed here in about twenty minutes or so. Thank you

0:54:45.239 --> 0:54:48.040
<v Speaker 1>guys as always for your support for rocking with Roger,

0:54:48.040 --> 0:54:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm excited to see what we got for the

0:54:50.480 --> 0:54:52.480
<v Speaker 1>rest of the season. I believe we play again on

0:54:52.680 --> 0:54:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Friday night, if I'm not mistaken at eight I think, um,

0:54:57.120 --> 0:54:59.399
<v Speaker 1>so we will see you guys for the postgame show

0:54:59.480 --> 0:55:02.560
<v Speaker 1>then appreciate your own thanks,