WEBVTT - Graham Allison on the Risks of a US-China War

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Thoughts podcast.

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe.

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Wasn't thal Joe?

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 2>In preparation for this conversation today, I sat down this morning.

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 2>We're recording on what is it? November twentieth, that's correct,

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 2>and I typed US China into Google news results. Here's

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 2>a selection of headlines. US Commission says China could invade

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Taiwan with little advance warning, China leveraged India Pakistan conflict

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 2>to trial and tout its military strengths, Pacific Islands on

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 2>frontline of future US China war, and then finally the

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 2>US China Chip War. Are we ready?

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 3>I was just gonna say, I feel like the Chips

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 3>in particular, or every other day, there's a different headline

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 3>about what's allowed or what's not. But to your point,

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 3>this is the story. I mean, there's Ai, there's a

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 3>couple other things, and then the US China relationship.

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, and it seems almost inevitable at this point that

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.759
<v Speaker 2>we talk about US and China in competitive terms, right

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 2>and also in militaristic terms. And this has been going

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 2>on for as long as I can remember.

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 4>At this point, it's building up right, Like really in

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 4>the last decade. You know, when we were younger, thought oh,

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 4>we're just going to trade together and maybe they'll even

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:32.680
<v Speaker 4>liberalize it become a liberal democracy.

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 3>One day, it didn't happen. But in the last ten

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 3>years or nine years, it's really picked up. How much

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 3>people are framing this in military terms.

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 2>Well, I wrote that paper back in like two thousand

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 2>and two that China was going to invade Taiwan by

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 2>the two thousand and eight Olympics. So my view of

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 2>this might be different to yours. My view has also

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 2>been proven to be incredibly incorrect, So I'll leave it

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 2>at that. But you know, we recorded this episode with

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Henry Wang a few months ago where we were talking

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 2>about US China relations and he mentioned one person, Yeah,

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 2>and he said, you got to get him on the show.

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 2>You got to get his perspective on this view of

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 2>US China competition and are we doomed destined to end

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 2>up in a military conflict. So here we are, We're

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 2>going to do it.

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 3>We're in his office. Let's do it, all right.

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 2>We have, in fact, the perfect guest. We have Professor

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Graham Allison. He is the Douglas Dylan Professor of Government

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 2>at Harvard University, and he, of course is the one

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 2>who coined the term the Thucidities trap to describe the

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 2>potential outcome of US China competition. So really the perfect

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 2>person to speak to about this, Professor Allison, thank you

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 2>so much for coming on all thoughts.

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 5>Thank you so much for having me.

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 2>So I mentioned the thucidities trap, and I think a

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 2>lot of listeners will know what it is, and probably

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 2>a substantial portion of our listeners are really into ancient

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.959
<v Speaker 2>Greek history and know all about it. But when you

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.399
<v Speaker 2>first came up with that term, was there a light

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.679
<v Speaker 2>bulb moment in your head where you thought like, this

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 2>is the way to characterize the future of US and

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 2>China relations.

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 5>So thank you and answers. Yes, I think I had

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 5>actually speaker Kevin McCarthy here at the Forum event a

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 5>couple of nights ago, and he was reminding me that

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 5>when he was trying to figure out what was happening

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 5>with China, he called me up and he said, would

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 5>you give me a tutorial? I said, of course, I'd

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 5>be under too. We've started this conversation and his first

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 5>question when we began was what the hell is going

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 5>on here?

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 2>That should have been my first question.

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Good question.

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 5>Basically here, every day and every way, somehow or another,

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 5>there's a story about China, threat, China, competition, China, China,

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 5>and China, I said in a word, if you're trying

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 5>to capture this from a phrase, this is a classic

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 5>lucidity and rivalry. So China is a meteoric rising power

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 5>never before in history as a nation risen so far,

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 5>so fast, on so many different dimensions. A country that

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 5>we couldn't even find in our review mirror at the

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 5>beginning of the century because it was so far behind us.

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 5>It's very hard to find in our rearview mirror today

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 5>because it's either beside us or ahead of us if

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 5>you think about arrival. So a meteoric rising power. The

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 5>US is a colossal ruling power. Never since Rome has

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 5>a country been so powerful in so many different dimensions

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 5>for such an amazing period of time. In fact, I

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 5>just have a peace. They'll be in foreign affairs next week.

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 5>On the longest piece, this is the longest period without

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 5>great power war since Rome eighty years. We celebrated in

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 5>September without great power war. Historically, every generation or two,

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 5>for the last few thousand years, there's been great power

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 5>or wars, so amazing, colossal ruling power who's not only

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 5>been good for itself, but actually good for an international piece.

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.919
<v Speaker 5>So Thucydides, when he was trying to understand what the

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 5>hell was going on in ancient Greece, wrote about what

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 5>he called the rise of Athens and the fear that

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 5>this instilled in Sparta that made war virtually inevitable. So

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 5>think about a seesaw on a kid's playground, and one

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 5>heaviest on the one end and one lightest on the other.

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 5>And the heavy is kind of in control. I can

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 5>jiggle you if I want to, blah blah blah. Now,

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 5>all of a sudden, the light starts heavy weight, and

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 5>he gets a little bigger and a little bigger. Pretty

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 5>soon I'm feeling Wait a minute, I maybe I have

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.679
<v Speaker 5>only one foot on the ground. Maybe maybe I'm feeling less.

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 5>So when you see this tilt of the sea saw

0:05:56.720 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 5>and the tectonics of power, this concretes a discombobulation for

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 5>both parties. The ruling party thinks, hey, wait a minute,

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 5>what's happening here? I used to look down on you.

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 5>Now you're looking me straight on. And maybe even so

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 5>my perspective. I used to be able to push a

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 5>button and things would happen, and now I push the

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 5>button and the things don't happen because my relative power

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 5>has changed. Psychologically, I'm accustomed to being at the top

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 5>of every backing order Americans. My wife says about me, wa,

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 5>wash the cosmetics off my chest, and it says, USA

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 5>is number one. Number one is who we as our identity.

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 5>If you do the television, they scan you know whatever

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 5>people hold up there, number one for their team, whatever, whatever.

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 5>So the idea that somehow somebody is challenging my position,

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 5>as I used to be the biggest economy. Now I've

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 5>an economy. I used to be the main trading part

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 5>of it. Yet now I used to be everything that

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 5>was made was made by us, that was made. So

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 5>as this happens, historically, we've seen over and over this

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 5>discombobulation that leads into lots of misperceptions, miscalculations, misjudgments, and unfortunately,

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 5>in about three quarters of the cases, this sends up

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 5>in war, often a catastrophic war. So sorry, that's a

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 5>long version.

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 3>Of that's perfect.

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:31.239
<v Speaker 2>Sparta ended up attacking Athens, right because they were scared

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 2>of the rising power.

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 5>Well, basically what happened, I mean, it's a little more

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 5>complicated than that, but yes, basically, as the discombobulation was

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 5>occurring and Athens became more and more full of itself,

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 5>as the rising power always does, and the ruling power

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 5>become more and more fearful, then it turns out that

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 5>some third party activity in Corsera that wouldn't have mattered

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 5>to the two parties otherwise. So something that's otherwise incidental

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 5>or easily managed with throwing a layer of misperceptions and

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 5>miscalculations and you get there. Another wonderful example, I think

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 5>the one that's closest to what we're now seeing is

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 5>the period from nineteen hundred to nineteen fourteen that led

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 5>to World War One. So if you ask yourself, how

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 5>in the world could I assassinate an archsdooke in Sarajevo,

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 5>which was so inconsequential that it didn't even make the

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 5>front page of the newspapers in New York. Within five weeks,

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 5>all of Europe was caught up in a war. And

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 5>when you looked afterwards, people said how did you guys

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 5>let this happen? And as Beulau, the chancellor for Germany,

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 5>he said, ah, if we only knew.

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 3>So, the rising distrust and the anxiety about status position,

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 3>it's not that it directly provides the impetus for war

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 3>per se, but that it creates the conditions such that

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 3>reserve as an incident or an and that oh, because

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 3>there's no trust, because there's all this concern. It can

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 3>be that random thing, an large duke, some people in

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 3>a third city.

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 5>Something happens in Taiwan, something happens here, something happens here.

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 5>And because as this seesaw is shifting as the rising

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 5>and ruling, the technonics or moving, the mis perceptions or magnified,

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 5>and miscalculations multiply, and the impact of third party incidents

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 5>or accents amplified, so things that would otherwise be manageable.

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 5>This is just nonsense. Let's deal with this problem. All

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 5>of a sudden, I see it as you doing something,

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 5>and then when I see that you see something, one

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 5>thing leads to the other. So if you look in

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:53.439
<v Speaker 5>the case of Athens and Sparta Corran a city state,

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.599
<v Speaker 5>that neither of them cared much for it. In particular

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 5>trusted at all gets involved with Era, which is now Corfu,

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 5>and there's a fear that they're going to have a

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 5>navy that will be able to challenge Athens, so that

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 5>the Athenians get more excited. So one thing leads to

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 5>the other. You get kind of a vicious cycle of

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 5>misperceptions and miscalculations that then all of a sudden, certain happens,

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 5>and once they something happens, oh my god, I have

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 5>to react that action and reaction, and there you get

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 5>to somewhere you don't want to go.

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 2>We don't talk about ancient Greek history enough on this podcast,

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion, but I do need to bring it

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 2>up to date. So you know, some people would argue

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 2>that China has been on the rise for decades now,

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 2>and I'm sure people have different starting points, but let's

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 2>say since the nineteen nineties, and you know, now thirty

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 2>or forty years later, we're at a point where there

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 2>is competitive rivalry both militarily and economically, but we haven't

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 2>had war so far. As you just noted, we've had

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 2>eighty years of peace between the great powers, which is

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 2>our good news story of the day. But why is

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 2>that and doesn't mean that you need to reconsider the

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:04.479
<v Speaker 2>throcidian framework.

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 5>Well, again, Thucydites is very thoughtful about this. He didn't

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 5>say that there was a specific moment or point in

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 5>the story. And in the book that I wrote called

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:19.839
<v Speaker 5>a Destined for work in the US and China, Escape

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 5>through Cynities Trap, I looked at the last five hundred

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 5>years and find sixteen incidents or sixteen cases in which

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 5>a rising power seriously threatens a ruling power, the World

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 5>War One being one interesting and dramatic example. So in these,

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 5>sometimes before the rising power has actually overtaken the ruling power,

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 5>something happens sometimes after. So it's that is not about

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 5>some specific moment in time. It's about a dynamic that

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 5>then when something happens, something happens. So if you look,

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 5>for example, at the Cold War, which is one of

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 5>the so in the sixteen cases, twelve in the war.

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 5>If you want to model for war, think World War One,

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 5>but four in the No War. So that's good news,

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 5>one of which is called Cold War. So it's called war,

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.079
<v Speaker 5>but it's not war. It's war on every four bullets,

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 5>bombs and bullets. So in the Cold War we had

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 5>several very very close calls, for example, the Cuban missile crisis,

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 5>about which I read a book, and that if you

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 5>look at that chart over there on the wall, that's

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:38.559
<v Speaker 5>Kennedy's doodles during the Cuban missile crisis. Thinking about the

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 5>choices that he's making, he thought that was between a

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 5>one and three and even chance this was end in

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 5>the nuclear war. That it ended in a nuclear war,

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 5>we would have had a couple hundred million people killed.

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 5>We wouldn't be doing this interview. So it could could

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 5>he could have happened in that insence, but it didn't.

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 5>How did it come not to happen? First, there was

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 5>some brilliant state craft, for example, to get out of

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 5>it so that they could otherwise there was a great,

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 5>great glob of grace and good fortune, I say, But

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 5>also there was a rivalry that went on for long

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:16.839
<v Speaker 5>enough in which one of the parties, the Soviet Union,

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 5>ended up holloway being hollowed out by the contradictions that

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 5>were part of a Soviet command and control system turned

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 5>out not to be commitative of the lower So that's

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 5>how one story ended that successfully, and that could be

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 5>a possible analog for the current US China rivalry, and

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 5>which Chinese would say, we see in your divisions, in

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 5>your society and in your come up decadent of you know, whatever, whatever, whatever,

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 5>maybe you'll be the one.

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:49.119
<v Speaker 3>They perceived us as the Soviet Union.

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 5>And we many Americans trying to tell our side of

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 5>the story, say well, they're going to be sort of

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 5>like the Soviet Union because actually they were coming us

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 5>and blah blah blah.

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, obviously we look to the US Soviet relationship

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 3>for perhaps lessons from history. China feels in many ways

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 3>very different from the Soviet Union in some ways with

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 3>respect to foreign policy, you know, like I read Henry

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 3>doctor Kissinger's book on China, and he starts off by

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 3>pointing out that China has never never been particularly interested

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 3>in people beyond its borders, outside of the territorial questions, say,

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 3>related to Taiwan or Tibet, and even still today, it's

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 3>not obvious that China's interest with the rest of the

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 3>world expands much beyond the goods trade at all. Does

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 3>that affect your calculation the sort of internal when you

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 3>think about these statistics, the fact that yes, there are

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 3>these patterns of history, but also countries are different internally

0:14:57.880 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 3>and may have different motivations.

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, I mean a can you can take it at

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 5>the kind of level one, level two, level three, level four. Obviously,

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 5>each of the country's story is different. If you look

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 5>at Portugal and Spain, which is the first of these

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 5>sixteen cases, back of the time of Christopher Columbus, they

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 5>both were Catholic and there was a pope, and so

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 5>when the conflict got to the edge of a conflict,

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 5>the pupe said, I got a solution. Here's a line.

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna draw the line down here. This side is

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 5>going to be Portuguese, this side is going to be Spanish.

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 5>Then that's why people in Brazil speak Portuguese, because they

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 5>got on the Portuguese side of the line. But you

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 5>had a situation which you had a kind of a

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 5>ruling guru who could make a declaration. Unfortunately there's no

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 5>such person today to do that. But looking at the

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 5>Chinese cases, as you say, China's history has been one

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 5>in which historically it is wanted to be and thinks

0:15:56.080 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 5>of itself as the sun around which everything else rotates.

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 5>They've got a line about there can be only one,

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 5>you know, tiger in.

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 2>The valley, but It's literally called the Middle Kingdom right

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 2>in the Middle Country, and.

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 5>The Middle Kingdom was the meaning of it was the

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 5>middle between the Earth and heaven. So we're the We're

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 5>the that. But not about the Soviet not like the

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 5>Soviet Union wanting to convert everyone.

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Right, China's never had a come intern.

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 5>Fort and they haven't been trying to take over territories

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 5>of other parties other than just you know, they're in

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 5>their periphery and they haven't had an aspiration. Enry actually

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 5>has a good line about this. He said, you know

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 5>that the Americans and Chinese are very similar in that

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 5>both of us have a superiority complex, but only one

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 5>of us is a missionary. The other one doesn't think

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 5>people are even good enough to be Chinese, so they'd

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 5>like for you to mimic their behavior. But they don't

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 5>think you're ever going to become Chinese, and they don't

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 5>wanted you to become Chinese. I want you to rule

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 5>your country the way Chinese do. They want to They

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 5>want you to have respect, yeah, and they want to

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 5>be in their own domain. I would say that's roughly right.

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 5>Leak On you was the best, the most insightful China

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 5>Watcher and she China Watcher was leak On You. Leak

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 5>On You was the founder and father builder of Singapore,

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 5>and he was one of my mentors. I wrote a

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 5>little book about him. And uh Hey said about China,

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 5>this is going to be the biggest player in the

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 5>history of the world. It's going to be very uncomfortable

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:36.119
<v Speaker 5>for Americans to get used to it, especially the idea

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 5>that some smaller yellow ration. There's a racial element in

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 5>the history and orever, he said. But he believed that

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 5>it was possible that the US in China could find

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 5>the way if they were smart, to share the Pacific

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 5>in the twenty first century. And I would say that,

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 5>you know, that would be the good news home.

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 2>So both Joe and I did international relations, I guess

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 2>in the early two thousand, yeah, around that time, and

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 2>a line of thinking back then was that globalization was

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 2>going to save us all and we were going to

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 2>have our economies so enmeshed with each other that the

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 2>idea of going to war or military competition would just

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 2>be completely insane because it would mean mutual self destruction,

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 2>not with bombs, but with I don't know, consumer goods

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 2>like La booboos. So I had to throw that in there.

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Do people still believe that, because on the other hand,

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 2>it seems like the central conflict between the US and

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 2>China right now is economic. But on the other hand,

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 2>we haven't had outright military war.

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 5>So good to remember how the cycles go. And I

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 5>think I remember that period since I've been teaching for

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 5>a long time. The theory that somehow economic entanglement would

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 5>prevent war was a famous theory in the beginning of

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 5>the twentieth century as well. So the biggest, the best

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 5>selling book in the decade before World War One was

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 5>Norman Angels book I write about this actually in Destined

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 5>for War, called the Great Illusion, and he said, there's

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 5>not going to be wars anymore because the cost of

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 5>war will so greatly exceed the benefits that the winner

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:26.400
<v Speaker 5>will be a loser. And if you asked Andrew Carnegie,

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 5>who was the richest man of the time in nineteen fourteen,

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:36.479
<v Speaker 5>for the Christmas nineteen thirteen fourteen, he sent out Christmas

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 5>cards to his favorite four thousand people, who included the

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 5>pins of every state, and he said, there's not going

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 5>to be war anymore because now we have this.

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, Merry Christmas, No more war.

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 5>Exactly, and he said, and I have built the peace

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 5>Palace at the Hague where people can go and resolve disputes,

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:58.199
<v Speaker 5>So it's not going to be necessary to have the

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 5>fighter war. I would say that's a grand delusion. It

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 5>turned out out to be right. Now, what's right and

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 5>wrong about it? Interesting? So is it true that the

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 5>US and China, both financially and in terms of supply

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 5>chains and in terms of economy are so entangled today

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 5>that this should provide some counterbalance to the geopolitical and

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:31.199
<v Speaker 5>military impulses for confrontation. Absolutely right. And this is what

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 5>you can see in Trump and She at their recent summit.

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 5>I mean, of the people in the current foreign policy world,

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 5>Trump is a far, far, far outlier in this respect,

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 5>in that he thinks it's possible that the US in

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:53.640
<v Speaker 5>China can actually both be involved in such a kind

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 5>of economic relationship that will be beneficial to both parties. Now,

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 5>partly that's because I think he's so some of the

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 5>people who are pessimistic about this have kind of given

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 5>up on American competitiveness and thinking, you know, maybe we're

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 5>not as competitive. Trump has I think a romantic view

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 5>that the US can win, you know, every race. But

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 5>on the other hand, he also has a businessman's view

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 5>that's possible for people to be entangled in ways in

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 5>which they can be fierce rivals and can also be

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 5>somehow cooperating. So I've been stretching for silver linings because

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:34.880
<v Speaker 5>there's as many, many, many things. Nothing like about true,

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:39.439
<v Speaker 5>but I think it's conceivable if you look look at

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 5>see what he said after the summit, when he tweeted

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 5>at first he said it was great success for us

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 5>on a ten point scale, that was a twelve. Actually

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 5>what he understood was he came up against somebody who's

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 5>as strong and has as many cards as he does,

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 5>so you have to find a way to cooperate with him.

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 5>But if that's true, if the both of the parties

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 5>are searching for ways to cooperate, could this be a

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 5>stabilizer in what would otherwise be I would say yes

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 5>it could, and could it just end up in some

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 5>kind of a a So Henry, who was my other

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 5>most mentor about China, kept saying, Henry Kissinger, sorry that

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 5>we need a new strategic concept that's that's comprehensive enough

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 5>to encompass the fact that we're going to be the

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:35.360
<v Speaker 5>fiercest doucinity in rivals at all times, each of us

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:37.479
<v Speaker 5>really really does want to be number one, and it

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 5>matters in many many But at the same time we're

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 5>so entangled that we require cooperation or the other for

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 5>our own survival. So this sounds like a contradiction. It is,

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 5>But we managed a version of that a little bit

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 5>in the Cold War. This one's much more complicated because

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 5>the Soviet Union was never really a serious economic rival.

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 5>By the time you go to high codeor in the

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 5>Chinese case, China is media. But is there something in

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 5>that space? I think there is. How did this might be?

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 3>So you mentioned that like compared to many others, Trump

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 3>is a US unto optimist and maybe even a dove

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 3>venu measures, which is a little weird given that, But

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 3>it clearly is how did this happen? Like how did

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 3>so much of the foreign policy elite in the US

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 3>over the last several years, it feel like, becomes so

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 3>doumor jaded, pessimistic about the prospect of peaceful coexistence.

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 5>I think I think the main driver was structural in

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 5>the thucidityan story. Okay, so if you look at the

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 5>British in the period from nineteen hundred to nineteen fourteen.

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 5>They become to be more and more shocked by the

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 5>fact that the Germans are doing things that are supposed

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 5>to be ours. They're producing something that we're supposed to

0:23:56.640 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 5>be in charge of. Actually, it's interesting, and I can

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 5>describe this in the book as a famous document called

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 5>the crow cr W Memorandum. So the King of England

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 5>asks his foreign minister. He says, why is it that

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 5>we're being so nasty about the Germans? This is my cousin.

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 5>Guys are ruined.

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 2>They literally his cousin.

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 5>They go on vacation together in the summer, and he says,

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 5>but every time I read anything, every time I see anything,

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 5>everybody is blaming them for everything. Why is this? And

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 5>Crow explains to him the sea shock is shifting, and

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 5>as the seashell shifts, everybody's perspective is impacted and they exaggerate.

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 5>And this is kind of like normal. And I think

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 5>if you look at that Athens Sparta story, you can

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 5>find a very similar thing. The Athenians are doing what

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 5>they're doing, and the Spartans are talking to said, these

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 5>guys are hopeless. Look and see what they do every

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 5>day they get up and they think of some other

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 5>thing to be bishopous.

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 3>Just real quickly, if we zoom forward to World War

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.439
<v Speaker 3>two in that scenario, is the US the rising power

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 3>that that Hitler was completely anxious about?

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 5>Is that?

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 3>How you fitted into that?

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 5>I'll say that World War two cases a complicated one,

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 5>and they've been a good question where Hitler is attempting

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 5>to become a rising power in a situation that's already stabilized,

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 5>but then he has actually such territory. Mostly in most

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 5>of the cases, the rising powers don't have great territorial

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 5>or imperial aspirations in the in the in the Cold War,

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:38.680
<v Speaker 5>in the Soviet Union, I mean, the Soviet Union did

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 5>really believe in their ideology that every country should be

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 5>ruled by a communist government and that they needed to

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 5>have a continuous expansion in order to basically legitimize their

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:56.880
<v Speaker 5>own rule. Fortunately, most of most.

0:25:56.760 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 2>Cases, how much of the current tension between the US

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 2>and China, tension, discomfort, discombobulation, How much of that is

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 2>down to China rising as a power versus the US

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 2>declining as a power.

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 5>I would say, in the good question, So in the

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 5>China's meta narrative, who ask Chiesian paying or when they're talking,

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 5>it's the inexorable rise of China. So there is confident

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 5>and he's just confident that they're rising into what will

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 5>be a Chinese century, as Teddy Roosevelt was if you

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 5>take the equivalent period in American history. But the other

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 5>component of this, which was not part of Teddy Roosevelt's,

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 5>is that the US is irreversibly declining.

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 2>That's what she believes.

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:08.400
<v Speaker 5>That's what she believes. And the person who works for him,

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:13.239
<v Speaker 5>who's is number four, and this closest idealogical person is

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 5>one Hu Ni. Now by some accident of good fortune,

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 5>have become one of their people, whom they one of

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 5>the people whom they enjoy talking to. I think mainly

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:29.120
<v Speaker 5>because Kissinger I'm you know, his mentor or mintee, and

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 5>because I introduced them to Ducydities. I mean, is what

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 5>I said as the best publicity agent for a author

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:44.199
<v Speaker 5>than ever in China, because they've sold more copies of

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 5>Thucyddy's Plopannian War in Mandarin since my book than in

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:55.199
<v Speaker 5>the previous two thousand years. So in any case, one Hu

0:27:55.280 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 5>Ning is a serious thinker. He was a political scientists

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 5>in Originally he came to the US in nineteen eighty

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 5>nine on American Political Science Association fellowship or something to

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 5>study at the university or to be a fellow at

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 5>the university. And then he traveled all around the US

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 5>and he wrote a book that's called America Against America,

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 5>and you could go and it's in English. You can

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 5>see the English comic and it's a as the analysis

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:29.360
<v Speaker 5>of the factors that we're going to splinter the country.

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 5>It's pretty good for the time, pretty hotel, and they

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 5>clearly continue thinking about that. I was there just before

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 5>the Trump She summit in Korea talking again to a

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 5>couple of people in the first circle, and they were

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 5>saying about the US. You know, the US. I mean,

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 5>here's one he was this stranger than we thought. I said,

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 5>what strang And she said, well, let me just let

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 5>me give you this to start that the list, he says,

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 5>New York is the city is the largest Jewish population

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 5>in the world, and they're gonna elect a Muslim mirror.

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 5>New York City is the YEMPI center of global capitalism.

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 5>They're gonna like somebody who's a socialist. It we're socialists.

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 5>The US is the government is providing food for one

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 5>in nine people in the US, and now they're talking

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 5>about with all theygat we used to do that, you

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 5>know when when when we had people who were poor,

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 5>but that we think that's one of our great achievements.

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 5>We don't. We don't hand out food and people have food.

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 5>The US is sending troops to cities. Said, we remember tenement.

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:02.959
<v Speaker 5>Is this like tenement? This is not like you know,

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 5>the division of income has now become so great. They said,

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 5>you know, we saw this. This is data that two

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 5>thirds of the consumption is now by the top twenty

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 5>percent of the income owners. Well, excuse me. In most societies,

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 5>the people who were not that were being left out

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 5>with riot or you know that that would be that's

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 5>why we say we have to be a modern socialist state,

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 5>because they have to so you know, they're going down

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 5>all this like that. I said, what do you have

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 5>to remember is this is a strange country. It's absolutely.

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Contradictions.

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 5>Contradiction. I sometimes I kaleidoscope of contradictions, because every time

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 5>you move it it's another one. On the other hand,

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 5>it's been remarkably resilient and no other society with no

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 5>other governing system has been as successful over so long

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 5>a period of time, is this one? And then I

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 5>usually do my lines about God looks after drug so

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 5>children in the USA I love. But I would say

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 5>reasonable person could look at the country today and say

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 5>this looks pretty strange. Yeah.

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So obviously there are the big structural questions that

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 3>will last for a long time, both China's economic rise,

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 3>US internal tensions, et cetera. But this year in particular,

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 3>Tracy started episode with all these headlines and that's daily

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 3>and Trump himself is you know, there's the contradictions within

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 3>the White House, et cetera. But just the events of

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 3>this year. Have they from today from January first to

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 3>today or from the inauguration today? Have your views changed?

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Are you more optimistic less optimistic?

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 5>Like?

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 3>How what have you learned in twenty twenty five?

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 5>That's a good question. So I would say two thirds

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 5>or eighty percent of the story is baked into the structure.

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 5>So if and as China continues rising, which I believe

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 5>it will, and growing at about twice the rate we do,

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 5>which I think it will, and advancing in technologies the

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 5>way it has been, which I think it will, even

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 5>though it has many many, many problems, but I think

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 5>they will manage more or less on that path, and

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 5>Americans will wake up more and more every day that

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 5>China is in your face doing something or whatever. So

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 5>that's point two in this doucentity and rivalry. Again, it's

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 5>natural for the ruling power to blame the rising power

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 5>for everything, and blaming China or hyping China threat or

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 5>demonizing China is kind of normal. And I would say

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 5>that Spartans were demonizing the Athenians, maybe not quite the extent.

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 5>So for Americans, we do it our way, But I

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 5>would say that that part is right. Those are the

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 5>negative components. While it may seem strange, especially in Cambridge,

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 5>for somebody to look for some signs of hope or

0:32:55.960 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 5>or silver linings in Trump, I think Trump understands that

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 5>nuclear war would be catastrophic and really really worries about

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 5>that in a way that the only other person in

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 5>the foreign policy establishment equivalent lately that has done that

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 5>was Biden, not Obama, not you know, eighty percent of

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:18.719
<v Speaker 5>the others. So that's number one. More, he understands per

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 5>a bit. Secondly, he somehow he has this respect for she.

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 5>He admires China some of what he admires. Is there

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 5>autocratic rule? He says, how in the world did you

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 5>managed to rule one point five billion people with so

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 5>little objection? I wish I could manage my press the

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 5>way you do. You know, bab Baba, you've got a

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 5>lease on life. I mean, he's leader for life. Is

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 5>anybody any suggestions for me? So he admires that he

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 5>wants to be a great peacemaker. So I think it's

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 5>not inconceivable that we might come to have a strategic

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 5>concept that would be something like a partnership, which would

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 5>then balance. I think, will the thucydity rivalry continue in

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 5>every case? Yes? I believe it will, And will it

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 5>mean that this feeds of fear and all the things

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 5>that will be normal? But if it's also the case

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:20.240
<v Speaker 5>that my survival as a country depends on a degree

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 5>of cooperation with you, so that we don't have a

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:24.839
<v Speaker 5>nuclear war, because at the end of a nuclear war,

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:28.800
<v Speaker 5>my country's caught, so that Hei doesn't end up ruling

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 5>us all with the two AA leaders. So could we

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 5>find so financial system in two thousand and eight, we

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 5>would have had the financial crisis, would have become a depression,

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:42.360
<v Speaker 5>had it not been for a joint US China state

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:45.879
<v Speaker 5>no trade. I mean, if we look at the rare

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:48.120
<v Speaker 5>earth story, I mean that's what those are there?

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, metal on Graham's table.

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 2>We were going to ask, so there are a bunch

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 2>of these are mission coins?

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 5>Is that right? These are just from from services. But

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 5>this here, see if you can separate it, these are

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:11.800
<v Speaker 5>rare earth magnets. And you can seet careful, okay, in

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 5>any case, because we'll get it. We have become dependent

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 5>upon China for how many things in our supply chain,

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 5>and they fortunately depend in honice for how many things.

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 5>So part of the reason why they got the stale

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 5>made in the current. What would otherwise be? You know,

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 5>Trump's bullying another country is that he comes up against

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:34.720
<v Speaker 5>somebody as strong as we are. So in that case

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 5>he's adapting and adjusting. No, I would say, you know,

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:42.320
<v Speaker 5>if I'm looking for silver linings, I'm looking in that space.

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 2>I hate to end on a down note, and I'm

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 2>conscious of the time and you have to run off.

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:49.720
<v Speaker 2>But in terms of the US China cold war turning

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:52.839
<v Speaker 2>into a hot war, what should we be looking out for?

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Because as we started this conversation, every day, there's a

0:35:56.960 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 2>new headline about, you know, China's moving this naval vessel

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 2>into this particular body of water, and there's propaganda airing

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 2>in China that's prepping the population for an imminent Taiwanese invasion.

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 2>That sort of thing. What would you actually look for

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 2>as a warning sign.

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 5>So I think most of the news lines that we

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:24.239
<v Speaker 5>hear or statements from people are China hype. And you

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 5>cannot accuse China of anything today in the US without

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 5>getting a residence. So nobody, I mean, I get blamed

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:40.320
<v Speaker 5>it Casley for being the China sympathizer by simply saying

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 5>what you're asserting is false. Yes, of course there's many

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 5>many things Chinese doing, but it does so. For example,

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 5>one of the favorite cluses out China has the fastest

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 5>nuclear build up in the world because they're going from

0:36:56.600 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 5>about five hundred weapons to about one thousand weapons in

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:04.799
<v Speaker 5>twenty which answers, well, that's a historical statement. And if

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 5>you look at the number of warheads we went to

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 5>from in the Eisenhower period or the Kennedy period, in

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 5>both cases there were more that just happened not to

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:17.360
<v Speaker 5>be true. Not there'll be many, many, many accusations of

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:20.799
<v Speaker 5>that kind, and I think those will continue because so

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 5>China has developed a manufacturing ecosystem. It basically can produce

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 5>anything at scale that half the price that we can

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 5>well lo and behold. If you go to Walmart, sort

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 5>to home depot, half the stuff or more is made

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 5>in China. Well, people will complain about that. So that

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 5>part of seems right, But I would say that most

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 5>of this is just hype. Where you find danger is

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 5>where there are third parties whose initiative might in this

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 5>like the story of Coursera, produce a set of reactions,

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 5>and they're the most The leading candidate of Taiwan and

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 5>the current president of Taiwan Lie who done taking many,

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 5>many dangerous actions. I think fortunately, both in the Biden

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 5>administration and in the Trump administration, they've had conversations at

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:13.840
<v Speaker 5>that leader level about not letting this person by some

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 5>irresponsible action. Dragosoptism. You know there is that the Chinese

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 5>rules of engagement in their exercises in the Straits and

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 5>in the South China Sea are now such that it's

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 5>not very difficult to imagine a collision of a ship

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 5>or a plane. We saw that at the beginning of

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 5>the Bush administration when they collided with one of our spyplanes,

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 5>and so could that escalate? And I think that's why

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:50.320
<v Speaker 5>again getting back to communication channels between the two parties

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:54.279
<v Speaker 5>where they can talk candidly and privately in order to

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:57.759
<v Speaker 5>have a circuit breaker if some accident happens, which I

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 5>think on the current path would be likely to happen.

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:02.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to ask one more very quick question because

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 2>you brought up manufacturing just then, and something else that

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 2>we've been noticing lately is there's a tendency among a

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of Western economies, especially to talk about building up

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:16.759
<v Speaker 2>their own manufacturing capacity, including in terms of munitions and

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 2>rare earth minerals. As you just mentioned. There was a

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:22.839
<v Speaker 2>headline I think just yesterday about the UK wanting to

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:27.320
<v Speaker 2>build ammunition within its own borders instead of relying on allies.

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 2>What's the underlying motivation there, Because most people would look

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 2>at a headline like the UK wants to make its

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:37.960
<v Speaker 2>own bullets as you know, a predecessor maybe to some

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of military conflict.

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 5>Well it's good. I mean it is puzzling, and there

0:39:43.680 --> 0:39:45.319
<v Speaker 5>are a lot of puzzling things. But I would say

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:50.840
<v Speaker 5>that whenever it's pointed out that people that you're dependent

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 5>on some other party for supply of something. So for example,

0:39:55.840 --> 0:40:00.800
<v Speaker 5>for the US, rare earth magnets are required for almost everything,

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:08.400
<v Speaker 5>so for cars, for iPhones, for laptops, for f thirty fives,

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 5>for comahook whistles or whatever. So how would we allow

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 5>ourselves to be dependent on China because that gives them

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 5>something that they can squeeze that supply chain and be coarse.

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 5>So I would rather be independent on that. And so

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 5>any politician would then make an announcement, Okay, we're declaring

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:33.399
<v Speaker 5>they were going to be independent, asking what would be

0:40:33.440 --> 0:40:36.320
<v Speaker 5>required to be done in order to reach that stage?

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:38.840
<v Speaker 5>People are not asking, so that would be at the

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 5>next level. Similarly, if you look, for example, for most pharmaceuticals,

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:46.799
<v Speaker 5>most of the pharmaceuticals and the pharmaceutical precursors that we

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 5>use for any medicines come from me, the China, or

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:53.319
<v Speaker 5>from Indian. Well maybe we should do these ourselves. Munitions

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 5>we shouldn't be giving out a So the fact that politicians,

0:40:57.520 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 5>when they see somebody says here's it been, it's your vulnerability,

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 5>declared that we're going to be independent, as I would say,

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 5>predictable if you look and see what behaviors follow from that,

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 5>the answer is not very many. So I'm almost thready

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 5>to accept the proposition that we're going to be inextricably

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:24.759
<v Speaker 5>entangled in supply chains and economics, in which case some

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 5>version of mutual deterrence of the sort that we found

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:32.279
<v Speaker 5>in the nuclear balance maybe where we end up. Now.

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 5>Is that a good place to be compared to the elsewhere? No,

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 5>I've read to be independent, but compared, I mean, is

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 5>that something we can manage if you have competent governments

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 5>and managing And I would say, you know, yes.

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, Professor Allison, thank you so much for coming

0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 2>on all lots and inviting us to your office here

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:54.880
<v Speaker 2>at Harvard. Thank you so much. Yeah, a lot to

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 2>look at to have you here.

0:41:57.320 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 5>Glad to be on the problem. I thank you good questions,

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 5>and I'm glad to see two serious students with international there.

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 6>We took our background and went and took final highest

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:22.319
<v Speaker 6>praise I got, Joe.

0:42:22.520 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 2>That was a real treat.

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 3>It was a real treat. Just being in doctor Ellison's

0:42:27.760 --> 0:42:30.799
<v Speaker 3>office was really nice. I just I could go You've

0:42:30.880 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 3>heard me already say this, But like being a professor

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:39.000
<v Speaker 3>at an elite American professor Tess so sick and then

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:41.840
<v Speaker 3>like it would say, such a it's like such a

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:43.600
<v Speaker 3>dream career they have.

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 2>You know what bothers me is you and I both

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:49.320
<v Speaker 2>did international relationship. Yeah, and I think we have a

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:52.319
<v Speaker 2>similar complaint. But like that conversation that we just had

0:42:52.440 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 2>with Professor Allison was what I thought international relations was

0:42:56.080 --> 0:42:57.759
<v Speaker 2>going to be. You know, we were going to sit

0:42:57.840 --> 0:43:01.800
<v Speaker 2>there and pontificate about US China relations and then compare

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 2>it to Sparta versus Athens in ancient Greece. And instead

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 2>it was basically all philosophy. It was like game theory. Yeah,

0:43:10.040 --> 0:43:12.440
<v Speaker 2>I know it's and like it was so abstract, Like

0:43:12.719 --> 0:43:15.319
<v Speaker 2>I think I had entire courses where we didn't even

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:18.200
<v Speaker 2>name a single country like by name. It was just

0:43:18.280 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 2>if country A does this, what does country be do?

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:24.359
<v Speaker 3>It's such a weird discipline for that reason, and as

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:27.760
<v Speaker 3>an adult, I've tried to read some international relations books

0:43:27.800 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 3>and it's all this like weird game theory and tables

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 3>and stuff like that and just not my thing. I

0:43:33.120 --> 0:43:35.520
<v Speaker 3>think there's there's probably I know we're going off on

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:37.640
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a tangent here. It feels a

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:42.359
<v Speaker 3>little bit like, you know, the same phenomenon in economics,

0:43:42.480 --> 0:43:45.319
<v Speaker 3>for example, Like you study economics, you're you're gonna think

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 3>about like, well, what's gonna happen to the unemployment rate,

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:51.160
<v Speaker 3>what's gonna happen with the stock market, cetera, And then

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 3>you read academic economics, and I'm not as like, you know,

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, as I've grown older, as I've matured, I'm like,

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, I've like I appreciate academic econ more than

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:04.880
<v Speaker 3>I did when I was in my youth, and I

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:07.320
<v Speaker 3>was like, this is done with all these equations and

0:44:07.320 --> 0:44:09.239
<v Speaker 3>stuff like that. It's all fake. I don't think that

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:12.080
<v Speaker 3>isn't much anymore, but it does feel like kind of

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:16.239
<v Speaker 3>disconnected from like, wait, I thought economists talked about, you know,

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:18.239
<v Speaker 3>the unemployment rate and stuff like that, and then you

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:19.399
<v Speaker 3>read what a paper is about.

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:20.759
<v Speaker 2>It's very abstract.

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:21.239
<v Speaker 5>You're right.

0:44:21.400 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 2>One thing that did surprise me was when the professor

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:27.840
<v Speaker 2>was talking about his latest trip to China. Was it

0:44:27.920 --> 0:44:29.880
<v Speaker 2>his latest trip, well, one of his trips to China

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 2>where he was talking and trying to or hearing from

0:44:33.680 --> 0:44:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Chinese policymakers about how they're very confused by America and

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:42.120
<v Speaker 2>in particular the example of capitalist New York electing a

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 2>socialist mayor, and I thought like, if anyone can understand

0:44:46.440 --> 0:44:50.840
<v Speaker 2>socialism with capitalistic characteristics, it must be the Chinese.

0:44:51.080 --> 0:44:52.920
<v Speaker 3>It should be it should be very intuitive. No, I

0:44:52.960 --> 0:44:55.560
<v Speaker 3>thought that was like just overall though very I mean,

0:44:55.600 --> 0:44:59.000
<v Speaker 3>it was a little bit grim, the idea that almost

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 3>like we're kind of a borrowed time here. It's like,

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 3>it's been a really long time since a Great Powers

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:08.800
<v Speaker 3>war by historical standards, and so it's already been a

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 3>long time. Historically, they come along work frequently, and now

0:45:11.640 --> 0:45:14.239
<v Speaker 3>the conditions are in place for this, you know, the

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:17.719
<v Speaker 3>so called a Thucididy's trap as he sees it. I'm

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:20.560
<v Speaker 3>not thrilled that in the best case scenario, for the

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 3>rest of my life, there's always going to be a

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:25.080
<v Speaker 3>risk of that being right around the corner the moment

0:45:25.239 --> 0:45:28.319
<v Speaker 3>some third party country does something, you know.

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:32.439
<v Speaker 2>Well the leash the other thing. And again this goes

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 2>back to why I'm so frustrated with IR as an

0:45:35.080 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 2>academic discipline. But like the emphasis on good state craft,

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:41.920
<v Speaker 2>good state craft makes a difference. Yeah, right, you know,

0:45:42.400 --> 0:45:45.719
<v Speaker 2>he talked about the Cuban missile crisis and JFK and

0:45:45.800 --> 0:45:48.759
<v Speaker 2>we came very very close to absolute disaster there, but

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:54.120
<v Speaker 2>it was ultimately averted by the individual actions of human beings,

0:45:54.719 --> 0:45:57.239
<v Speaker 2>both in Russia and in the US. And I feel

0:45:57.280 --> 0:46:00.200
<v Speaker 2>like that's kind of what's missing in ir It's that

0:46:00.480 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 2>like emphasis on individual choice and motivations and incentives and

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:07.719
<v Speaker 2>how to actually do good state craft rather than just

0:46:07.840 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 2>like look at everything through the prism of either neoliberalism

0:46:11.560 --> 0:46:14.880
<v Speaker 2>or realism power. Yeah, or did you ever do gender theory?

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:16.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't think I took that.

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:18.880
<v Speaker 2>There is an interesting one. The reason we had the

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Cuban missile crisis is because men and large objects.

0:46:23.640 --> 0:46:27.360
<v Speaker 3>I've but it I am really interested in this idea

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:30.320
<v Speaker 3>that unlike the US, So he used the term I

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:33.320
<v Speaker 3>think he said missionary sort of to characterize how the

0:46:33.480 --> 0:46:38.719
<v Speaker 3>US sees and spread democracy and liberalism and capitalism. And

0:46:38.840 --> 0:46:42.200
<v Speaker 3>of course the Soviet Union also had this impulse to

0:46:42.360 --> 0:46:46.400
<v Speaker 3>spread communism, and everywhere there was a communist party, it

0:46:46.480 --> 0:46:48.759
<v Speaker 3>felt some tug to back them up, and that's how

0:46:48.800 --> 0:46:52.480
<v Speaker 3>the Soviet Union got mired in Afghanistan for years and years.

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:56.520
<v Speaker 3>China doesn't really seem to have that. It wants to trade,

0:46:56.640 --> 0:47:01.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean outside of it wants to consolidate it's physical territory.

0:47:01.640 --> 0:47:03.920
<v Speaker 3>But it does not seem you know, like, you know,

0:47:03.960 --> 0:47:07.760
<v Speaker 3>there's a great story several months ago, apparently the Cubans

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 3>came to China, And as for advice, I said, well,

0:47:10.080 --> 0:47:13.440
<v Speaker 3>have you tried liberalizing your economy? Have you tried basically

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:16.239
<v Speaker 3>not being communists? Like it doesn't have that impulse the

0:47:16.280 --> 0:47:19.080
<v Speaker 3>same way the Soviet Union did, and nor does they

0:47:19.120 --> 0:47:21.200
<v Speaker 3>have it like the US does. So I'm curious, like,

0:47:21.719 --> 0:47:25.120
<v Speaker 3>as China truly becomes a global power, is a great power,

0:47:25.760 --> 0:47:28.680
<v Speaker 3>it seems fairly rare historically for it to have so

0:47:28.800 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 3>little interest in how other countries manage their affairs.

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:32.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I did.

0:47:33.040 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 2>I enjoyed the line about, you know, like, it's not

0:47:35.760 --> 0:47:38.960
<v Speaker 2>really about getting more people to be Chinese, because it's

0:47:39.000 --> 0:47:41.160
<v Speaker 2>special to be Chinese in the first place.

0:47:41.239 --> 0:47:42.720
<v Speaker 3>We're not good enough to be Chinese.

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, shall we leave it there at Chinese.

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:46.839
<v Speaker 3>Joe, let's leave it. Let's leave it there.

0:47:47.160 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 2>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:47:49.600 --> 0:47:52.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:47:52.600 --> 0:47:54.840
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at The

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:58.920
<v Speaker 3>Stalwart follow our Guesst Graham Allison. He's at Graham t Allison.

0:47:59.239 --> 0:48:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Follow our produce users Kerman Rodriguez at Kerman armand Dash'll

0:48:02.640 --> 0:48:05.919
<v Speaker 3>Ben at Dashbot and Kilbrooks at Kilbrooks. From more odd

0:48:06.000 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 3>Loots content, go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 3>were the daily newsletter and all of our episodes, and

0:48:11.560 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 3>you can chat about all of these topics twenty four

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:17.040
<v Speaker 3>to seven with fellow listeners in our discord discord dot

0:48:17.200 --> 0:48:18.799
<v Speaker 3>gg slash od lots And.

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:21.120
<v Speaker 2>If you enjoy od lots, if you like it when

0:48:21.160 --> 0:48:24.160
<v Speaker 2>we travel to Boston to interview Harvard professors, then please

0:48:24.239 --> 0:48:26.960
<v Speaker 2>leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform.

0:48:27.239 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 2>And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can

0:48:29.760 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 2>listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:34.840
<v Speaker 2>you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on

0:48:34.960 --> 0:48:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening,

0:49:02.640 --> 0:49:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Stood in a