WEBVTT - China Banned Crypto One Year Ago. What's Changed?

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Crypto at daily Bloomberg. I heart podcast

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Stacy Marie Ishmael, managing editor of Crypto for

0:00:09.560 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. It's Friday September. This September marked the one

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>year anniversary of China declaring the crypto transactions were effectively illegal.

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>At the time, the decision triggered sharp declines in Crypto markets,

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>even though it wasn't entirely unexpected news, because it wasn't

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>the first time that China had sold to crackdown on CRYPTO.

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 1>That's been happening in one form or another since at

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>least two thousand thirteen. Still, declaration prompted some pretty swift

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and significant changes. Among the biggest of these was the

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>effect on bitcoin minors, who left China in droves. Many

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of them set up shopping places like Texas in the US.

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>To better understand the state of CRYPTO and China, we'll

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>talk to Bloomberg reporters Uihi Yang The verall takeaway is

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>China is becoming less relevant in the global cryptal community

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and David Pan the cryptal minors were definitely scrambling to

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>get their mining machines out of China and we'll hear

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>from Winston Ma. You know, China's crypto regulation is very

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 1>compressive and essentially it prohibits cryptal mining, trading and transactions.

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>A venture capitalist at cloud tree ventures and the law

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>professor at New York University Law School, David U, is

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>always a pleasure to have you in the studio. Around

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>this time last year, China decide that for real, actually officially,

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>they were going to declare all forms of CRYPTO transactions

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to be illicit. Chinese regulators of Jumato have been talking

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>tough for months, but on Friday they released a missive

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that removed all doubt. It wasn't just a central bank,

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 1>it was also nine regulatory agencies, and they specifically called

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 1>out offshore exchanges, targeting Chinese users, banning them from hiring

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>locally for roles that rang. Now, this was not the

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>first time that China had started cracking down on crypto.

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't even the second time, but it did seem

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to be the most significant, not least because that band

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>came with threats of like criminal penalties and other things

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that didn't really sound fun at all. And so, David,

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to start with you on in the days

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that followed that declaration. What happened to the crypto minors

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and why were so many crypto minors in China in

0:02:54.880 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the first place? The crypto minors were definitely scrambling to

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>get their mining machines out of China because some of

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>these local governments by enforced the law. Essentially they were

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:12.399
<v Speaker 1>literally confiscating the the mining ricks from all of these

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>mining farms. So they were rushing to like ports like

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in Shinjin in south China. You know, they they were

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to find any possible way to resell their use

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the machines to other parts of the world, you know,

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>like the US. Were even Central Asia, Eastern Europe and

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>anywhere you can possibly think of, and were they selling

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the machines where? They're trying to get those machines to

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>those places so they could use them again. Like what

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>was happening? I'm a minor in China. This declaration comes down.

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>What do I do next? First, they have to unplock

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>millions of mining machines. So that was the thing they

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>had to do because the national gride in China, the

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>regulators were able to monitor the electricity usage of the

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin mining farming, especially the large scales, large scale, big

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in mining farms, because there's really easy to spot them

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>on the grid. So they had to close down all

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of these farms first, otherwise they're going to be put

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>into jail according to this new declaration. So they did

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that and then they started thinking about how they can

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:22.679
<v Speaker 1>transfer their mining operations from China to places like Texas, Russia,

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, all of these other places. U Really I'd

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>love to get your perspective on what it meant for flows,

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>transaction volumes. You know, in addition to China having been

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>a mining hub, they were arguably, for a while like

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the center of CRYPTO transactions in the corners of the

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.679
<v Speaker 1>markets that you cover. What were some of the effects

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of this band? So we know that historically there's a

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:50.679
<v Speaker 1>like you said, there's a large community of Chinese speaking

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>crypto founders, investors, users and after the band in China

0:04:56.440 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and the correct in China and crypto volumes had tipped

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and China fell out of the top ten ranking of

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>global cryptal adoption index by train analysis. But then this

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>year China analysis said that China has re entered to

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the top ten after placing as the number of thirteens

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>in one and then this index showed that either the

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>rules in China are not strictly enforced or there are

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>just people who are still able to circumvent the rule

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>using VP N and still participate in these cryptal services.

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>So I think when we talked to Chinese cryptal founders

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and investors, the overall takeaway is China is becoming less

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>relevant in the global cryptal community, but the Chinese diaspora

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>are not. They're still very active, a lot of them.

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>There's still a lot of those folks who did move,

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>they did leave the country. Are you hearing from any

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of them that they are media plans to, you know,

0:05:57.680 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to your points about whether the rules are being less

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 1>and as the people are just getting, you know, clever?

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Are they looking at setting up again in China, or

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>is this do you feel like we're kind of at

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 1>a stage where it's like, nope, we're here, this is

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the plan, this is how we're moving forward. So I

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>think there are two groups of people making two totally

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:22.359
<v Speaker 1>different types of choices. Even though China crackdown on Crypto

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>blockchain technology is still encouraged in China and there are

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>efforts to find more use cases in blockchain in China

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 1>an F T as a digital collectible. It's also allowed,

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>even though you can't really trade them on the secondary market,

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and therefore make it just fundamentally very different from the

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>N ft in the rest of the world. But there

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>are companies and even the state media, Shinhua, they issued

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>an Ft. so there are efforts like that that are

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>still existing in China. So there's one group of people

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>who would say that I want to stay in China

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 1>and I want to bet on this parallel version of

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>webs three in China that's kind of cut off from

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world and then has its own rule.

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>The block chains are usually permissioned. And then the second

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>group will be the ones that we talked about that

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>are moving out of China. They are still active in

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the global crypto community, but they're operating from Singapore, Dubai,

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the US, Um Europe and other places. David, I want

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to go back to you. You know, a lot of

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>your reporting has been around the fact that the folks

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>running these companies got out of China, got their equipment

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>out of China, or mostly got their equipments out of

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>China and went to Lubbock or, you know, somewhere else

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>in Texas or went to Kazakhstan and other places and

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>ran into some unexpected challenges. What were some of those challenges?

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they are still facing a lot of challenges

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>as of now. One of the biggest the ones that

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>will be the connections. Like you know, they don't have

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to connects to begin with. For example in China that

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to purchase power like you know, formal like

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>agreement with the legal recourse. But like in Texas, they

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>have to find brokers, they have to find suppliers and

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>big established legacy energy companies to work with, and so

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>they have to find those kind of partners locally. In

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Texas they didn't have that kind of relationships. So that's

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a very big DISTU the meantage compared to the local miners,

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, such as riot and Marathon, all of this

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>US based mining companies. You know, it strikes me, as

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>we're having this conversation, that's so similar to what folks

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>who tried to set up like manufacturing in Michigan or

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>these other intersections where they were clearly like incumbent US

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>companies that had been doing things. And we're running into

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>differences in language, differences in you know, even just like technology,

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the ways of doing things, are any of those kinds

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of elements also affecting the ability of Chinese miners to

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>unseat the local incumbents, as it were, exactly. I think

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that is a really big problem. I think there was

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a documentary about like the Chinese factory was like a

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>culture shock between the Chinese companies and the local employees.

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>That kind of scenario is exactly playing out amount the

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Chinese mining companies as well. For example, one big mining

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>company CEO told me like when they went to like

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>mid Western states like Ohio and when they set up

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.319
<v Speaker 1>the shop there and they realized that the American workers

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>take way too many vacation days, whereas all of their

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Chinese colleagues were working around the clock and then try to,

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, finish the construction, tried to build out infrastructure.

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>So for them, I think it was definitely something they

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:57.559
<v Speaker 1>hadn't anticipated when they decided to move to the US,

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>like in the middle of the US. I help but

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>laugh at the idea that Americans have a lot of

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 1>vacation days because, having moved here from London, where it's

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>just like all vacation days all the time, I'm frankly

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>stunned that, but you know, you learn. You learn something

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 1>new every single day. I feel like this is one

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of the more interesting, kind of useful and nuanced episodes

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that we've been able to have on the show so far.

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>So thank you both for taking the time. I really

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Thank you. Thank you. You can find more

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of their reporting on the Bloomberg terminal, on Bloomberg Dot

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:35.959
<v Speaker 1>Com and on twitter. Uh is at UH underscore Yang.

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 1>That's why U E Q I underscore y a n

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>G and David is David underscore pan one. That's D

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>A v I D P A N underscore one. Up Next,

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 1>more on the consequences of China's approach to Crypto with

0:10:54.720 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Winston Ma of cloud ree ventures. Winston, what a delight

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to have you on the podcast. Thanks very much for

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>having me. Well, let's talk about two of your books,

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the one that you just published about blockchain and web

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>three and an earlier one with the kind of the

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>provocative title of the digital war, about the sort of

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the standoff, as it were, between the Chinese approach to

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>tech and the US approach to tech. How are you

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>seeing this all play out in the universe of blockchain

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:39.719
<v Speaker 1>and web three. Great question to me. You know, the

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the evolution of the titles actually represents the evolution of

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>China's tech development as well as the corresponding interaction with

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the US. You know that the book the Digital War

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>was a sequel to my earlier book book China's mobile economy. And,

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>as that suggested, right UH was a year of China's

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>mobile revolution. So the so the focus at that time

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>was all about smart phone, mobile payment and the mobile

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>e commerce. But from there, you know, China started to

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>shift its focus from Internet development into hard technologies such

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>as the Ai Blockchain, cloud computing, data centers, et CETERA.

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 1>You know that that's why my book had the title

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the Digital War. How China's tech power shapes the future

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of AI, Blockchain and the cyberspace, now relating to the

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>blockchain web three topics. So you could say that blockchain

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>web three is a new frontier of the U S

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and the China Tech Competition. Now on your earlier book,

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the Digital War, you know one of the things you

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 1>had in the cover was the logo for Tiktok, which

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>is owned by bye dance and, other than being probably

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the most popular APP in the world is at the

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>center of an escalating political battle, you know, with both

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Republican and Democrat officials in the United States sort of,

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, making loud noises around whether it's appropriate for

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Tiktok to be owned by a Chinese company. There are

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>no existing Chinese owned tech companies with a kind of

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a metaverse focus, or defi focus and n f t focus,

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that are as big in the US as Tiktok is.

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>But do you see a world in which there is

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>like sort of a crypto tiktok equivalent coming out of China?

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Not In the near term because, as this time you know,

0:13:55.880 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>China's crypto regulation is very compressive and century. It prohibits

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>crypto mining, trading and transactions. So in other words, you know,

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>in China there's a broad band Um crypto usage in

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the financial systems as well as in daily transactions. So therefore,

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the metaverse development in China is going through a very

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>different path. Mostly, importantly, it is token list or you

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>could say it cryptolists. What are the other elements of

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>being crypto less in kind of the Chinese blockchain? The

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>N F T is a good example of this cryptalist thing,

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>because n f t means nonfundable Tokens, right. So. So

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>when when the N ft term includes the reference to

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>token and the empty trading market sees exponential growth of volume,

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>it is hard to imagine that n f t s

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>can develop in China with to being associated with cryptocurrency

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and its related regulations. That's why n teas are called

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>digital collectible in China, to downplay the token aspect, the

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>currency aspect, and also, as you mentioned, the regulations limit

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the second hand trading of an F T s. One

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of the things I'm always struck by is how in

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>China and on Chinese APPS, in the Chinese APP ecosystem,

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>those are often all things you can do in like

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>one single APP, right like there's no need to have

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>exactly it's you know, here in New York I might

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>have a door, dash, an Amazon, an Uber, whereas in

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>if I'm in Beijing, I felt like one APP. I

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>can do all of those things at the same time.

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Are you seeing a similar trend with, you know, metaverse, blockchain,

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>digital collectibles being rolled into those big super apps? I

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>totally think so. In I know it's a very natural development.

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>You could say it's like a super APP going next level,

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>right because, as you said, in the early years of

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the mobile economy, Chinese companies were already focusing on building

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>up super APPs, hoping that they can keep as many

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>users in their ecosystem for as much time as possible. Right. So,

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>when you look at Ali Baba's e commerce APP, essentially

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a combination of almost like one hundred small APPs.

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>So the concept is, you know, you can do everything

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>in one APP. One kind of as a closing maybe

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>super existential question, you know, in in places like the US,

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, one of the big propositions of blockchain is

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>this resistance to government surveillance. How is that shaping how

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>people are thinking about the utility of the blockchain in China?

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I think for for users, the data privacy is truly

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>an important issue and it becomes even more urgent as

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>we move into the metaverse. So for users they have

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>to deal with the privacy issues with the big text

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>platforms as well as the digital infrastructure support suppliers. In China,

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>because of the CRYPTO regulations, the government does not support

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 1>public blood chains. So for N F T place, for

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>gaming assets place right they have to be executed blood

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>chains that are regulated by the government and now in

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 1>the in the US, right the users can use the

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>park brood chains, which tends to be less centralized, even though,

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe blood chain of the bitcoin is the

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:46.160
<v Speaker 1>only blood chain that's truly decentralized. However, we could say

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:50.120
<v Speaker 1>in general the public broad chains are more decentralized. But

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>but still, you know, you have other data privacy issues

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. For example, you know, all the data are

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>still held in three for major cloud cloud platforms like

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the Amazon, Google, Microsoft, of those guys, right. So, so

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you see, uh, it's a multi layer issues and I

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>think for the individual users not only there for their

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.199
<v Speaker 1>data privacy. You know, not only they're looking for public

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>broaches but also a more comprehensive data privacy solutions relating

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to uh, data storage and management. Well, thank you so

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 1>much for being on the podcast. I feel like I

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.120
<v Speaker 1>have certainly learned a lots and I hope our listeners

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>have as well. Really appreciate you taking the time. Thank

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you very much. That was Winston Ma of cloud reventures.

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>On the next episode of Bloomberg Crypto we're going to

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about exchange traded funds and specifically Crypto et F S.

0:18:56.280 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>There's some interesting and perhaps unhelpful stuff. That's hoping with

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>their performance these days, and you'll hear more about that

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>on the next episode. This is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>podcast from Bloomberg and I heart radio. For more shows

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>from I heart radio, visit the I heart radio APP,

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:18.679
<v Speaker 1>apple podcasts or wherever you get your podcast. Send US

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>your comments, questions or suggestions for the show to Crypto

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Dot net or find us on twitter. We're

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>at CRYPTO. The supervising producer of Bloomberg Crypto is Vicky Vergalina.

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Our senior producer is Janet Babin. Our producer is Sharon

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>burrieral associate producer is thy Butler. Desta wonder at is

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>our engineer. Original Music by Leo Sidrin. I'm Stacy, Marie Ishmael.

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Have a great weekend.