WEBVTT - Hot Sheet: NL Central Top Prospects

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:01.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think you look at a guy that has,

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, excellent bats of ball skills, really good on

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>base ability, works at bats, is really cerebral about his

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>at bats, and.

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 2>He probably has more power than Breckman does.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Time to at the Saint Louis Cardinals top prospect. This

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>is your BA prospect profile. The name is JJ Weatherhilt.

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>It's Scott bron with JJ Cooper and Jeff Pond's from

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Baseball America. But Jeff, you start by telling us about

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the JJ that the Saint Louis Cardinals have and felt

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>very fortunate to pick.

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 2>In last year's draft.

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Some thought he could go number one overall and the

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals were like, whoa, We're at seven and we land

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>this guy. Yeah, this was one of those kind of

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>all time draft slides. I think, I mean, we'll see

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 1>if the proof is in the pudding here, but this

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is almost like a guy that could have gone number

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>one in the NFL Draft. But think about like Aaron

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:53.599
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers sitting in that room forever in that draft and

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Smith going on and then him dropping drop and dropping

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>down the board. It kind of almost felt like that

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>with Weatherhole. We had heard us prior to the draft

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>as early as that morning that the pick could be

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>weather Halt instead of set of Bazaga at one. I

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>think you kind of look at some of the Guardian's

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>tastes and weather Hal fits that, and what do I

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>mean by that? Weather Halt has a great combination of skills.

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>He's an outlier sort of bat to ball guy, has

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>excellent approach, and there's some impact there as well. But

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy that you know, was the the

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>batting champ of Division I baseball as a sophomore, dealt

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 1>with some injuries as a junior. But I think we're

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 1>going to really see weather Halt and sort of all

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of his glory again in twenty twenty five. This is

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a guy that was getting consistent fifty five to sixty

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.119
<v Speaker 1>run times from scouts across the industry. And I kind

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of circled back and pulled some guys that had seen

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>him in the summer and sort of late fall and said,

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is he running better now? What's going on? And the

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>run times were back up, which was great to see.

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think you look at the all around player here.

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>It's somebody who could maybe profile at shortstop or multiple

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>spots in the infield. Maybe isn't a shortstop long term,

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>has the tools to profile at third base or at

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>second base, certainly has the bat to fill in at

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>third base, and the comp that I typically put on

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>him is very similar to Alex Bregman in terms of

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the player. They're a different mentality, but I think you

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>look at a guy that has, you know, excellent bats

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of ball skills, really good on base ability, works at bats,

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>is really cerebral about is at bats, and he probably

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>has more power than Bregman does, but maybe not as

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>clean of barrels as Bregnant catches, which is kind of

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>his superpower. But it's a similar type of player, and

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I think could maybe in the end, we could be

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>looking back in five or six years and say this

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 1>is the best hitter that got drafted this year.

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 3>I think the other similarity you can pull here is

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 3>when Alex Bregman was drafted is like, well where is

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 3>he going to play? And in his case, it was like, well,

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 3>you're not going to move Carl's career off a shortstop.

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 3>I think the kind of the same thing applies here.

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Weatherholt should move really quickly. He's not going to move

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 3>Mason Win off short stop either, because Mason Win that's

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 3>kind of his calling card and that absolute, real gun

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 3>of an all. But that versatility, that that batting ability

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 3>that Weatherhold has kind of makes it where this isn't

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 3>a problem because you would love to have a plus

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 3>defender at third to go if a plus defender at.

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 4>Short, that's kind of the dream scenario.

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Let's be honest. The Cardinals kind of have had a

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 3>lot of guys in recent years. Obviously Aeronado is non

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 3>example of this, but no, they've had a lot of

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:25.959
<v Speaker 3>guys kind of playing up at positions where they're a

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 3>little bit stretched. You look at Nolan Gorman, you look

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 3>at Jordan Walker, you look at a couple of these

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 3>positions where you look at really at catcher with contraras

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 3>last year or at least that's what they kind of

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 3>clearly felt like afterwards that they need a little bit

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 3>of help on the defense, and I think that Weatherhol

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 3>fits in that very well, that ability to play third.

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 3>I think he could probably play second if that was

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 3>the position they needed. Probably is going to be more

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 3>of a need at third in the short, medium, long

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 3>term when the Cardinals are kind of clearly saying that

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Nolan Aernaudo is not their third basement of the of

0:03:57.000 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 3>the future. I do think that he could move quite quickly.

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 3>And I think the other thing that really does stand

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 3>out is the Cardinals needed something like.

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 4>This to happen.

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 3>They need kind of guys, a new kind of young

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 3>foundation to build around. When can be part of that,

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Weather Holp very much can be part of that. They

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 3>do also have kind of some arms like a tink

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 3>hence that really you're just hoping for the durability and help.

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:26.239
<v Speaker 3>But Jeff, I think that it really kind of does

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 3>stand out that the youth movement that started last year

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 3>in Saint Louis, Victor Scott hopefully becomes a part of

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 3>that as well. We may see a lot more of

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 3>that in twenty five, in twenty six, should.

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 1>We You listen to some of the things that were

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the winter like warm up or whatever

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the heck they call it there in Saint Louis. I

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>was kind of tuned in. They had some jaz they

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>had Jordan Walker and some of these other guys talking.

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, Mazellak had kind of really really leaned into

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the Aeronaudo trade that it'd sort of priority won two

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and three. That opens up a spot for Weatherhul. I

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>know that they kept them at Part Beach to start

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the season. There was no reason to sort of force

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>him up. Some of that was roster restrictions. It wouldn't

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>shock me if he starts the season at Double A springfield.

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Once you're in Double A, you can move pretty quickly.

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>A mid season eta on weather Halt that they're able

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>to move aeronauto and they're kind of leaning into that

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>youth movement and a little bit of a slide back

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>bridge rebuild type of year. It wouldn't shock me if

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>weather Halt moves that fast, especially when you consider, you know,

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>how advanced he is as a hitter. Kind of going

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>back to this Bregmann comp that's how Bregman moved. If

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you remember, you know that first half of that season,

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Bregman was crushing the minor leagues.

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 2>They had to keep moving him up.

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>He kept on producing until you know, he forced his

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>way into the major leagues by the end of that season.

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 1>It wouldn't be unremarkable to see whether Halt have a

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of similar trajectory and move next year.

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:52.919
<v Speaker 3>The other thing I think that we do want to

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 3>note here is that if you look at the Cardinals.

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 3>It's not the best farm system in baseball right now,

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 3>but it definitely weather Hold helps this a lot. Yiro Padilla,

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 3>who's kind of a name to kind of file away

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 3>a little ways away, but a really interesting prospect who

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 3>will probably be coming to the States this year. They

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 3>do have kind of some of these guys to kind

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 3>of filter in where they've got a little bit more

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 3>of a higher impact back. But concern I may have

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 3>is are there the higher impact arms to go with

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 3>that as well or has that kind of been a

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 3>little bit of an issue for the Cardinals.

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think this is probably the first time that

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you can look at the top of that list and say, hey,

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>there's some power pitching in the Cardinals organization. It's been

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 1>a long time since you've been able to say that.

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Probably harken him back to the days of Jack Flaherty

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>at this point. But you look at Quinn Matthews, you know,

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, our Minor League pitcher of the Year in

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four, the big jump that he took. There's

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>not many left handers that have that fastball profile, that

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>throw that hard, that also have two above average secondaries

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 1>and have a track record of handling innings. I think

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty good armed to have up top. You

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 1>have tink Hens. He's got some durability concerns, but in

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of being electric, the man is an electric factory.

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>When he's on the mound and things are right, he

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>is exciting of an arm to watch as anybody in

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the minor leagues. And the sleeper here is to Coo Robi.

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>He's dealt with some injuries, he's dealt with some ineffectiveness

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of years. I do think he's

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a guy that the organization believes in heavily. And if

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you look at some of the pitching development stuff that's

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>going on in the background, some of the things that

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>him Bloom has been tasked with, I think as a

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals fan, you probably have to enter this season with

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more hope regarding the pitching development and

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>what could be coming up through this system, because the

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>pitching is the issue. If you look at that lineup,

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>it's all homegrown at this point and they're really just

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>waiting for someone to take a step forward into superstart him.

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to end with this with a more global

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>look at the team.

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 2>JJ.

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean this might be a whole topic of its

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>own that we hit at some point on Hot Jade,

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and I encourage everyone to watch the show. But I

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>think the two things that bother Cardinals fans as far

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>as development right now are one, Jordan Walker has not

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:06.119
<v Speaker 1>developed into anything close to a star yet. And to

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the report from Katie Woomen the Athletic about how they

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>really dumbed down a lot of their instructional coaching, development,

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>all that kind of stuff there, they used to be

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of a leader on that front. So your thoughts

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>on that whole view of the Cardinal system and if

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you think that's going to change.

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 3>I do think that's what heim Bloom's job is this year,

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 3>kind of as his get ready to take over everything,

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 3>but in first you need to help us fix this.

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 3>And the thing that just jumps out with that is

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.959
<v Speaker 3>we talked about Nolan Gorman, Jordan Walker. You know, these

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 3>guys who are kind of playing at the upper ends

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 3>of their position, you know, defensive spectrum where they could

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 3>possibly play, and that used to be the Cardinal strength.

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 3>But if you look at it in recent years, it

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 3>is kind of hard to say that the Cardinals have

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 3>stayed on the on the front end on the cutting

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:57.559
<v Speaker 3>edge of player development.

0:08:58.080 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 4>They have had a number of.

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 3>These guys who in some case, I would say also

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 3>the MLB development of these guys kind of seems to

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 3>go backwards. Dylan Carlson was better as a rookie than

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 3>he was in year two or year three, and then

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 3>he's kind of out the door.

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Again, maybe this is what Matthew Libertore is. But Matthew

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Libertor has not really taken a step forward since he

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 3>reached the major leagues. Jordan Walker has not. Nolan Gorman

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 3>had a pretty good twenty three and then kind of

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 3>really took a step back in twenty four. They need

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 3>to see some of these guys take those steps and

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 3>get better in the big leagues. Victor Scott hopefully Victor

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Scott just really struggled in his debut. But they need

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:39.199
<v Speaker 3>some of these guys to kind of regroup and then

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.319
<v Speaker 3>get better, not just kind of keep getting worse year

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 3>after year.

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, well said, And if you want more on

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals, of course we cover them on hot sheet

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and encourage you to check that out. If you want

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>more on a different team, we release one of these

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 1>every day during spring training. So come back to the

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Baseball America YouTube channel. Get yourself a BA subscription as

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>well at Baseballamerica dot com and we'll see it or

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>another prospect profile.

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Which'all will hit for a high average.

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>He's also going to walk more and as I said,

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:07.319
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy that does know how to elevate,

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know how to hit the ball hard in the

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>air to his pull side. Matt Shaw is the top

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>prospect for now in the CUB system, as he could

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>be a big contributor to this team in twenty twenty five.

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 2>That's hit a prospect profile.

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 1>Scottie Brown along with Baseball America's JJ Cooper and Jeff Ponce.

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>What do you think, Jeff Matt Shaw a Rookie of

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:31.559
<v Speaker 1>the Year candidate in the National League. Yeah, I mean

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I would say, you know the odds on favorite prior

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to probably rookie Sasaki signing, I would say that it's probably,

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the two of those guys. Certainly from a

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 1>positional player side, I think Shaw falls squarely into that category.

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>There were some offseason moves made, of course. That Kyle

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Tucker trade not only added Kyle Tucker to this lineup,

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:52.599
<v Speaker 1>but also freed up a spot by trading Isaac Barredes,

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and then also Cam Smith, who was behind Shawn the

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>packing order and in terms of when he would get

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.679
<v Speaker 1>to the major leagues, but competition at third base, and

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I think you can look at sort of this lineup

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>right now. Roster resources had it projected as Matt Shaw's

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the potential starter for quite some time, and I think

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the upper minor success and just

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the track record of this player, it's pretty easy to

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>see why the Cubs would be so invested in this

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>player and believe that he'd be able to sort of

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>handle it. We heard talk coming into twenty twenty four

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 1>that Shaw was spending the offseason working out at third base,

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>not at second or shortstop, or I think a lot

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of us had projected he would end up long term.

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>This is also a guy who has a long track

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>record of hitting against high level competition dating back to

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:36.719
<v Speaker 1>when he was in high school, dating back to when

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 1>he was the Cape Cod League MVP, and really sort

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of ran the table from beginning to end in terms

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of the best player in the Cape Cod League in

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that summer, won a championship with Bourne. He's a big

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>time player, ultra competitive type. I think in some ways

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 1>probably compares to Alex Bregman in that sense, not the

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>defender that Alex bregmant is, but I do think he

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>has some other tools, particularly physical, that Bregman doesn't have.

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>He hits the ball harder than Bregman ever has. This

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>is a guy that does have sort of twenty twenty upside.

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.959
<v Speaker 1>He's quicker and a better base stealer and actually has

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>base stealing acumen that I think goes above and beyond

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>just his sort of home to first run times, really

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>knows how to read pitchers. He's a very cerebral player,

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of guy that you know, if you watch Cubs

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.839
<v Speaker 1>games every single day, you're probably gonna fall in love

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>with this guy.

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 3>I can't help but just think about the fact that

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 3>when you look at the Cubs and you look at

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of one of the ways that they have had

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 3>success over the last decade. They had the wave that

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 3>obviously led them to the World Series, but after that,

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 3>they've always kind of loved drafting their their productive college

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 3>infield bats. Now, Ian Happ kind of always faced some

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 3>questions about whether he's going to where he's going to

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 3>play defensively, but he always could hit Nico Horner kind

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 3>of followed after that. I kind of also view Matt

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Shaw's maybe a slightly better version kind of following in

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 3>those footsteps where you're talking about these guys who have

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 3>a long track record of production the upper levels of

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 3>college baseball, you know, top level programs, who then go

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 3>to the miners and do the same thing and just

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of earn that being plugged in, Like, Okay, you're

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 3>the guy. We're not counting on you to be the

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 3>star from day one, but at the same time, you're

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 3>a regular from day one that you arrive, and let's

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 3>see if you can blossom into kind of being a

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 3>cornerstone piece and at worst kind of a very good

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 3>complimentary piece. Jeff, when you kind of look at Shaw

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 3>speaking of for Cubs fans, like comparing him to guys

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 3>that they know that have been up on the big

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 3>league club already, if you compare him to say, like

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:33.439
<v Speaker 3>a Nico Horner, how's he different, How's he better, How's

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 3>he worse?

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't think we're ever going to see Matt

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Shaw put up the sort of valuable defensive seasons that

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Nico Horner had put up when he was playing shortstop

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>prior Dancey sponsor coming over. Now, he's one of the

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>best defensive second basement in baseball. It's a really talented

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>defensive middle infield. So he's not going to have the

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>same impact on that side of the ball the other side.

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>The big question, I think, dating back to when Horner

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>was at Stanford and sort of one of the last

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of remaining guys with that Stanford sling, he likes

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to go inside out. It's you know, keeping the ball

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>in the ballpark, hitting them where they ain't. That is

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 1>not Matt Shaw's game. Shaw can do that. Shaw will

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.199
<v Speaker 1>hit for a high average. He's also gonna walk more.

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:17.079
<v Speaker 1>And as I said, this is a guy that does

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>know how to elevate, does know how to hit the

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>ball hard in the air to his pull side.

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 2>And I think, you know, Wrigley is probably.

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>The perfect sort of park for him where it's not

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>super high fences, they're not super deep out there.

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 2>There's certain days where the ball travels a little bit more.

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think that you know, you're looking at a

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>player that has more like twenty thirty upside when horners

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly have the stolen base acumen.

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 2>We've seen that time and time again. Throughout his professional career,

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 2>but is a.

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Little bit more of like a speed, contact and defense

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>guy where I've used Shaw as you know, more of

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>like a two three four hitter. Ultimately, all right, so

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll spin us to a global approach here on the

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Cubs farm system, JJ seems like it's pretty good,

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>especially on the position player side, and we might even

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>get ourselves a little bit of a log jam at

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>some point if some of these prospects do work out.

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Is that fair to say? And do you feel like

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Matt Shaw.

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Will be the first here in a litmus test to

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>see how that goes.

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 3>I would say that's completely fair to say. And I

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 3>would say that if you look at the outfield, I

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 3>feel like that the logjams here we've seen Owen Casey

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 3>is that.

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying that one Casey.

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Couldn't use a few more at bats in the minor leagues,

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 3>But Owen Casey's knocking on the door. Kevin Alcontra uh

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, is knocking on the door. So these are

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 3>guys who have already reached the upper levels of the miners.

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 3>And if the Cubs were earlier in this rebuild, that

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 3>they'd never have called a rebuild. I would say that

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 3>you might just say, okay, that they're just going to

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 3>plug in it and get at bats. But you look

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 3>at this team right now. I mean, that's why the

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Kyle Trucker trade was made. You've got Kyle Tucker, You've

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 3>got Piker Armstrong, You've got you know we talked about

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 3>have you've got, say a Suzuki. You've got a number

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 3>of guys where I think Shaw is very well positioned

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 3>here because he's kind they've kind of cleared out a

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 3>spot for him just to take it. But now going forward,

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 3>they have a lot of guys who already have double A,

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 3>already have triple A time. But Jeff, I'll look at it.

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Who's the next guy up, Who's the next guy who

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 3>can really like there's a clear path or who is it?

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Pretty much everyone else going to be waiting for an opportunity,

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 3>whether it comes by injury, whether it comes by trade

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 3>in effectiveness, whatever it is.

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>It's probably you know, of course Shaw is number one.

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he's the one that has the clearest path

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the playing time, But when we talk about the more

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>global picture of the system, it's probably Kate Horton.

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 2>If Kate Horton can.

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Show that he's back, he's healthy, He gets, you know,

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>some of that feel and shape back on his fastball

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and his slider, and can really be sort of that

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>nasty two pitch guy that we saw.

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 2>He could fit into a bullpen roll.

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>He could be a spot starter guy, somebody that fills

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>in for an injury on the rotation. I really think

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>when you look at this logjam in the outfield, it's

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>going to have to be an injury to one of

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>those four guys you just mentioned. They made a big

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>trade with Tucker, They're going to play that guy. And

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>then you have a bunch of productive major leaguers and

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>then a young, outstanding defensive center fielder and Pete crow Armstrong.

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 1>It's tough for me to imagine that any of those

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 1>outfielders are going to be up I think there's maybe

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>even a chance that between now and the beginning of

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the season that we could even see the Cubs swing

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a trade and maybe move one of those outfielders or

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple for an upgrade somewhere else in the roster.

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the dark horse here though, is probably Moises

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Ballistero's if he takes a step forward in terms of

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>his receiving and sort of catch and throw elements behind

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the plate. The bat is there. It's a mature hitter,

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a guy that doesn't give away at bats, bats of

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>ball skills or elite. I mean, you could see it

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in game. But we were at the Futures Game last

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>year when they were doing some of those skill competitions,

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and there was really nobody who had the level of

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>barrel control amongst some of the best hitting prospects in

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 1>baseball that had that level of barrel control that Ballistero showed.

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think just as a catcher and Billy to

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:04.239
<v Speaker 1>play some first base, maybe there's some opportunity there, but

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it is a true logjam with these outfielders. And I think,

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're Kevin al Kintara, who debuted last year,

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>owned Casey, who spent the full season in Triple A,

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of like if I was in you know,

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty other organizations, I probably am in the major leagues

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>at this point and looking at entering the season with

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a full time job.

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 3>One last question on that though, when we talk about Casey,

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 3>when we talk about al Kantara, are those guys ready

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 3>right now or is it like is there one of

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 3>these guys who you would say is basically there's nothing

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 3>left for him to prove in the miners because I

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 3>kind of feel like with other than maybe Matt Shaw,

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 3>all these hitters are guys who might benefit from another

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 3>half season or more in Triple A.

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you can make the case for Casey. He's

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of upper Minors success. I think you

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>saw how he sort of evolved last year, and particularly

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>in a more challenging environment now, the strike zones and

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>all that sort of thing. We can quibble about that

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in Triple A, but he's facing better competition. He showed

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>improvements as a contact hitter as well as his approach.

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 2>We know he has the underlying power.

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>It's just a matter of sort of getting to that

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>in the best possible way in terms of bad at

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:12.919
<v Speaker 1>ball angles, consistently hitting the ball in the air to

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>his pull side and getting the most out of those

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>big evs and that big power that he possesses in

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>his body.

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 2>He's a good corner outfielder.

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that there's a ton more experience that

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>he needs at the Triple A level. I think it's

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>really going to be the litmus test of how does

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>he adjust once he is challenged by the best pitchers

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Al Kintara, on the other hand, has

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 1>less time elite defender in center field. If it wasn't

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>for pie Crow Armstrong, he would probably be the best

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>center field defender in the organization.

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 2>He's a great athlete.

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I still think that, you know, three hundred to four hundred,

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 1>five hundred played appearances a triple A are probably going.

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 4>To do him some good.

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>So we know, at least for now, until that status

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>goes away and Cubs fans are hoping that starts right

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>on Opening Day where he becomes a big leaguer. Matt

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Shaw is the top prospect in the organization according to

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the smart minds over at Baseball America. We're going to

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>keep doing this every single day. We'll release another top

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>prospect video here per organization. So come on back or

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>keep scrolling through if you missed any and we'll see

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 1>you for the next one.

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 2>Name anybody.

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:17.959
<v Speaker 1>This guy is really special and like I said, if

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>he was an American, he'd probably be the number one

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 1>pick in the draft going away. The top prospect in

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the Milwaukee Brewer system is Hayzus Motte.

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Here you go.

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>We're helping you out with the name, and now we've

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 1>got some information for you too, as we hit a

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:35.199
<v Speaker 1>prospect profile Scott Braun along with Baseball America's JJ Cooper

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>and Jeff Ponce. So let's dive in, gentlemen, Jeff hayesus

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 1>Mota is the name that we might not here in

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the big leagues anytime soon, but I do want to

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>remind everyone how much of an impact Jackson Cheerio made

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>at such a young age in twenty twenty four. So

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>do you have an ETA in mind and what do

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you think about this prospect? Yeah, I'm probably about us.

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>It's excited about hey, Zusmadi, as I've been on any

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>player coming state side in the last five to six years.

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's it's really was elite stuff. In terms

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 1>of what we saw last year in the DSL. I

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>think it was a one sixty nine WRC plus sixty

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>nine percent better than his competition. The underlying data is

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>really good and we'll probably chat about that in a little.

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Bit, but I'm thinking, you know, we're probably.

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Looking minimum twenty twenty seven comes over this year, even

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>if he sort of follows that Churio path of jumping

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>both A ball levels and you know, skipping over the

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Arizona complexly, which I think is totally reasonable and probably possible.

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Then it's double A, triple A.

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>The next year, maybe he signs an extension, and you know,

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>we sort of see him in twenty twenty seven. I

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 1>would say that would be the earliest. That's probably still

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>somewhat optimistic. As his player, you know, a year ago

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>was just sixteen years old and wouldn't be eligible for

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 1>the draft as an American player until this year, so

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of puts into perspective just how young he is.

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I know, Jay and I have discussed

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>this player quite a bit. He was a hot name

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>during our top one hundred process, and you know, of

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>course our number one Brewers prospect and a pretty dang

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>good system.

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 3>This is this is why we send someone to the

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Dominican Summer League and go to the All Star Game

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 3>and all is to see guys like Hayesus Moday and

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:20.919
<v Speaker 3>to come back and say, man, everyone down there is

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 3>raving about Hayesus Moday. This is really kind of how

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 3>you draw it up. Like when we talk about it's

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 3>hard not to compare him to Jackson Turio, even though

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 3>Turia is an outfielder, although he was a shortstop as

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 3>an amateur, but an outfielder, you know, for the Brewers,

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 3>where as opposed to Made should stay.

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:37.880
<v Speaker 4>In the dirt.

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 3>But the reason it's kind of not it's hard not

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 3>to compare them is is that this is that kind

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 3>of that ceiling, that kind of potential impact where you

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 3>look at Maday and say, Okay, this is a player

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 3>who really could have some pretty special back to ball skills,

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 3>power for his age, strike zone, discipline, all these things

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 3>that are usually kind of the the things that you

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 3>add as you mature, as you kind of get more

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.400
<v Speaker 3>at bats, Made already has a lot of those. Now,

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to go over on this. He's a

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 3>teenager who's yet to play in the US, So this

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 3>is not something where he's knocking on the door and

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:15.400
<v Speaker 3>goes to spring training going I'm going to show those

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Brewers and find a spot in the big league lineup

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 3>or anything like that. But it does kind of explain

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 3>why he could be on a faster track than most,

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 3>much like what we saw with with Jackson Turio, who

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 3>skipped over went straight to a loway to Carolina and

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 3>then kind of showed he was too good for that league,

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.360
<v Speaker 3>so he kind of earned a Midwest League assignment, gets

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 3>to double a the next year turn around, he's in

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 3>the big leagues before you know it, barring injury, if

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 3>he keeps it up like we's done so far. That's

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 3>something that you could also see kind of that kind

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 3>of track with made. But the other thing I would

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 3>say with this is this is how the Brewers. This

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 3>is one of the explanations for why and how the

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Brewers have kind of managed to stay at the top

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 3>of the NL Central year after year, even though they

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:02.199
<v Speaker 3>don't really have a whole lot of financial advantages or

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 3>market advantages.

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Over the Cardinals or the Cubs or.

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 4>Some other teams in that division.

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 3>But they've been really good on the international market, they've

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 3>been really good at hitter development, they've been really good

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 3>at picture development, and Jeff, I mean, you just put

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 3>it all together, they're kind of rocking and rolling here

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 3>as far as just year after year after year, this

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 3>is putting him number one wasn't easy because this is

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:27.360
<v Speaker 3>a system that has a number of guys who are

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 3>very plausible number one candidates.

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, And you know, we have a task that we

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:35.360
<v Speaker 1>do during our Top one hundred coverage. Go and check

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:37.919
<v Speaker 1>that stuff out on the site. But one of my

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 1>favorite articles that we work on every year is who

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>could be the Number One prospect in twenty twenty six?

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>And when I came to this, and you know, I

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 1>was thinking about writing to this article, there was no

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:50.120
<v Speaker 1>other option for me. It was pretty much either Sebastian

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Walcott that I knew other guy who was going to

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 1>write about.

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 2>But for me, it was Jesus made.

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>And the reason that I say this, I think, if

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you're going to put a player comp on this guy,

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>it's probably like Ronald kun if you could stick in

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the in the infield. It's that sort of level of

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>other worldly skills. And there's probably even a case to

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:09.360
<v Speaker 1>be made that he's more advanced than Akunya was. At

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:13.120
<v Speaker 1>this point there was one player throughout the entire minor leagues,

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think this really showcases his dominance that had

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 1>this trio of numbers, a mis rate below twelve percent,

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a chase rate below fifteen percent, and a nine eighth

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.679
<v Speaker 1>percentile exit velocity of one hundred and four miles problem,

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>which by the way, is major league gaverage. He did

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>this when he turned seventeen a month prior to the

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>start of the Dominican Summer League season. It's just so outlier,

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think it sort of showcases just how dominant

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>he was. There was no player in the minor leagues that,

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>from an underlying data perspective, was more dominant in twenty

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty four against his average age of competition than Maddi was.

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>That includes Christian Campbell, that includes Roman Anthony, name anybody.

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>This guy is really special and like I said, if

0:25:57.359 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>he was an American, he'd probably be the number one

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 1>pick in the raft going away and setting like Bonus

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Pool records. He would probably beat Charlie Condon and Chase

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Burns numbers. It's just that outlier. We'll see how it

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>translates when he comes over at first. But haven't looked

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>at DSL data going back years. I've never seen anybody

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that approaches this, including guys like Junior Cameron Arrow.

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, now I want to provide like that. I want

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 3>to because we've got everyone very understandably heated up about

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Jesus made so now before we wrap this up, I

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 3>want to kind of pour a little bit of cold water,

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 3>just tamp it down a little bit. There's a reason

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 3>he's not our number one prospect yet. Jeff, what would

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 3>be a scenario where it's like, okay, because we know

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 3>the DSL, the tricky part of the DSL, hitting the

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 3>ball hard, not chasing, all these things are really good,

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 3>but we also know that that league is much more uneven,

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 3>I would say, than like a US, like a full

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 3>season league especially, there's it's really hard to nitpickus made

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 3>right now.

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 4>Maybe he's not a short stop long term.

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 3>But is there something, Jeff, that you look at and say, Okay,

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 3>this is what could slow him down.

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 4>Other than injury?

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 3>What could slow him down in twenty twenty five as

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 3>he continues as a scent up our rankings.

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, just probably optimize batted ball contact,

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:17.719
<v Speaker 1>and we're looking at how often is this guy going

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 1>to put the ball in the air. How often is

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>he going to hit the ball in the air to

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>his pull side. Could get some bad batted ball luck.

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>He does still hit the ball on the ground a

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:28.199
<v Speaker 1>fair amount. A lot of his hardest hit drives are

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 1>still on the ground. You know, technically that leads to

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>higher batting averages, but it could maybe call into question

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.360
<v Speaker 1>what the overall power upside is and put him more

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 1>in like that eighteen to twenty two sort of upside

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>range for home runs versus the thirty plus that we

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 1>look at when we see a kid who's sixteen, seventeen

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>years old hitting balls as hard as the average Major

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>leaguer on a particular metric. So I would say that's

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>probably the big one. The other one is, you know,

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 1>if the defense does continue to slide down and it's

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>more of a question of can he stick in the

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>infield at second or third base, I don't think that's

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. I think it's really more of a

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:05.159
<v Speaker 1>question of is he an everyday shortstop, which you know,

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>when you think about there's only thirty of those jobs

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in the entire world, there is obviously a very high

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 1>threshold you have to meet in terms of defensive ability

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to stick there. So I think those are the question marks.

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>There aren't many guys that I go into every year

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 1>where I'm like, three years from now, this guy is

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be a superstar. And I really do feel

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that in terms of my gut but also my head

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 1>when I look at sort of all the pieces of

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the puzzle on how it comes together.

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 2>You know my job.

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>My job is to take the class haf full listen

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to that and be like, did we just find the

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>next superstar coming up to Major League Baseball who could

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 1>be a Rookie of the Year a couple of years

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>from now and show us, you know what Jackson Cheerio did,

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>who will be a seasoned VET by that point, so

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 1>it could be heyzous, my day, Jackson Cheerio. And if

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you actually spell that out without knowing how to pronounce

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the name, it would be kind of interesting. So anyway,

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be very very fun for Brewers

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>fans if it pans out the way that they think

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 1>it could. Okay, so obviously you need to stay locked

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>on Baseball America coverage. Get yourself a Baseball America's subscription

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>so you can follow this storyline and either say I

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>knew about this a while back and expected this, or

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can get after us a couple of

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>years from now too. So thanks for watching this one.

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>That's the top prospect right now in the Brewers organization,

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see it for more of these as we go.

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Team by team.

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Chandler could really ascend to sort of that number two

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>role behind schemes in the next couple of years. He's

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a bigger guy, he's super athletic. We're hitting the top

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>prospect in the Pirates organization. According to Baseball America. It's

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>called a prospect profile. It's a fun name too, so

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you want to see him thrive. Bubba Chandler in the

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Pirates organization, just pitching JJ, What do we have here

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a potential number? What in a rotation if it all

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>pans out?

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay, you could say a two. This is the Pirates,

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 3>So like, I think the Pirates will be thrilled. I

0:29:57.320 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 3>feels their number three this year or their number four,

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 3>even because let's give credit to the Pirates on this one.

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Paul Skiing is Jared Jones, Mitch Keller. If Bubba could

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 3>be their number four, that's a really good rotation. Okay,

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 3>It's maybe not Dodger's rotation where it's like, if you

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 3>might you must have cy Young votes to enter this rotation.

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 3>But it is really good and Bubba fits very well

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 3>in that. Like, it is not something where when we

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 3>talk about those guys that you would say, oh, Bubba

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 3>Chandler is the kind of the outlier of that group. No,

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 3>I think if it all comes together, it wouldn't surprise

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 3>me at all. He's not gonna be Paul Skans. If

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Paul Skins is healthy, that's your ace. But if you

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 3>told me that Bubba Chandler ended up being the number

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 3>two on this staff and Jared Jones.

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 4>Kind of slots behind him, wouldn't shock me.

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 3>You got to give Jones the credit for he's already

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 3>done it at the big league level.

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 4>Bubba hasn't.

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 3>But Jeff, when I look at Bubba Chandler, I see

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 3>a whole lot here to think this guy could be

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 3>a rotation fixture and a really kind of impactful rotation

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 3>fixture for years to come.

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>When I was sort of going through the process of

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>doing my annual best pitches in the top one hundred,

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of candidates for best fastball. Guys like Chose,

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Chase Dolander and others that throw really, really hard with

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>great movement, had great results throughout the season. When you

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>look at the combination of factors on Bubba Chandler's fastball,

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>ninety five to ninety six can ramp it up to

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>one hundred miles per hour when he needs it. He's got,

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, above average induced vertical break. He's getting above

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>average horizontal break, and he's doing all that from a

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 1>really low release height.

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 2>It's almost similar.

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 1>To like a Garrett Cole sort of fastball in terms

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of the movement profile. But also those release traits, and

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>those release traits are important because they pore ten deception

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and the ability for hitters to not be able to

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>get on plane with that pitch. And oh, when it's

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>sitting ninety six to ninety seven and can touch ninety

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>nine one hundred miles per hour, it takes them even

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>longer to adjust to that. There's probably some stuff that

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>can come along In terms of what the slider is.

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a hard cutterish slider. There's been some

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:58.479
<v Speaker 1>questions from scouts as to how well he manipulates that

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>pitch and how frequently he land. That will be a

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>question that will be answered at the major league level.

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>And then he has a pretty good change up as

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>well that plays well off of the fastball, so it

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>might be more of a fastball change up sort of

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>first profile, which obviously is going to put him in

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a good position to handle heavy left handed lineups. But

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>he does have the smoke and you know, a good

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 1>enough sider to still get right handers out consistently. We

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>saw great results when he was up in Triple A

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 1>last year, and I think when you just you look

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 1>at a player like this, he kind of fits directly

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:34.719
<v Speaker 1>into that Pirate's window of this like elite rotation that

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 1>they could potentially build. And I even think pound for

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>pound when you think about the body, some of the

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 1>durability concerns that you might have with a guy like

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Jared Jones, which I think are totally reasonable, and just

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>even looking at some of the comparable arms to Jones,

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:50.719
<v Speaker 1>like a strider, you know there's going to be some

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>injuries and some wear and tear and some shutdowns over

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that period of time. I think that Chandler could really

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>ascend to sort of that number two role behind Skens

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in next couple of years. He's a bigger guy, he's

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>super athletic, he can handle some innings. He's proven that

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>he's been able to do that. I think it's really exciting.

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that you know this, this guy is

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 1>every bit up there with Jackson Job and Roki Sasaki

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and some of the other Andrew Payn or some of

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the other top top pitching prospects and that's why he's

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 1>inside our top ten. That sounds promising and also kind

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of leads me to think about why the pirates want

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>him to just pitch. But JJ, you can tell us

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>more as I'm coming in here as the No Fund

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Police to try and bring more fun to our sport,

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>which means more two way sensations. Bubba Chandler can swing

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the bat. Why can't we see him continue that.

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Because unfortunately we haven't proven that anyone in the US

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 3>knows how to develop guys like that as pros. I mean,

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 3>I wish that was the case. It'd be a lot

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 3>of fun. But Mason Wynn was a two way guy,

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 3>and they're like, wait a second, we got to figure

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 3>out how do we get him to pitch and not

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 3>shn eng Linn got to remember who is kind of

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 3>still a two way guy for the reds Now but

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 3>he's also again kind of coming from Asia. Shoeyotani has

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 3>proven you can do it. But go back to Brendan

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 3>McKay with the Rays a few years ago, who was

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:10.840
<v Speaker 3>a top five pick, and they're like, oh no, no,

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 3>he can hit enough that we're going to use him

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:15.879
<v Speaker 3>as a picture slash first base with slash DH and

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 3>he broke he couldn't do it. He could not do both,

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 3>and it ended up they could do neither because of

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 3>it because he kind of broke down his shoulder injuries

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 3>and all, and and Brendan McKay's kind of been bouncing around,

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 3>but nothing like the prospect he was a few years ago.

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 3>I think we're going to see it with the Royals

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 3>with Jack hagleone where we had Jack on the Hot

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Sheets show a couple weeks ago, and I think we

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 3>tried to ask every way we possibly could about the

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 3>two way, and he really didn't want to answer it,

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 3>which I think can translate to the Royals aren't closing

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 3>the door, but they're really saying, we want you to

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 3>hit home runs, we don't really necessarily need you to

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 3>be striking guys out in the later innings.

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:56.320
<v Speaker 4>I just Michael.

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Lorenzen's another guy. There have been guys like this, but

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 3>it's just really hard to figure out in the US

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 3>system how to get a guy to develop as a

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 3>hitter and a pitcher at the same time. And I

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:11.320
<v Speaker 3>really struggle to come up with an example of anyone

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 3>other than Shoeyotani, who's pulled it.

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 4>Off, Jeff.

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and there's just not anyone else on earth, or

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:21.840
<v Speaker 1>probably since Babe Ruth who is as dominant on both

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 1>sides of the ball with those with those jobs. And

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, that is probably part of the

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>reason that sho Heyo Tani is able to do this

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>for as long as he is, because he is such

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 1>a good pitcher, maybe one of the top fifteen most

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:38.719
<v Speaker 1>talented pitchers in the world, while being one of the

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 1>top five best hitters in the world. We haven't seen

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>anybody else that's been comparable to that, even coming from

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:47.720
<v Speaker 1>these American institutions that had track records like Brendan McKay

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 1>or a guy like Jack Caglian cagnia One. It's it's

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a bat over pitch profile. He wouldn't have gone in

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the first round if he was a pitcher. Where we

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:00.880
<v Speaker 1>can sort of look at Shoeyo Tani pretty easily, he

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>would have been the one to one pick as a

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:04.600
<v Speaker 1>hitter or as a pitcher or as both.

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 2>It really doesn't matter.

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:08.399
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's similar with Boba, where the bat

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't as far along as how special he was

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 1>as a pitcher.

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 2>When you're the pirates.

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 1>There's probably nothing more valuable than getting really good starting

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 1>pitching on the cheap and controllable for a couple of years.

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>That it was a prudent decision for the organization, even

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 1>though it does sort of sap the fun out of

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 1>a player like Bubba a little bit.

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 3>I will point out that Paul Skins, Aron Jared Jones

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 3>also were two way guys. Paul Skeens was was a

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:36.800
<v Speaker 3>college freshman All American for US for his catching in

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 3>d H before he basically went to LSU and moved

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:43.279
<v Speaker 3>to the mound full time. So it's not just him, like, man,

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 3>can you imagine Paul Sking. Paul Skins really had legit power.

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 3>It's just hard to pull it off. But the other

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 3>thing I do think that happens when you have these

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 3>guys make this transition. Bubba Chandler's talked about it that

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 3>he was a two way guy, which meant he really

0:36:56.719 --> 0:37:00.799
<v Speaker 3>never kind of had that starting pitcher's mentality, that way

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 3>of prepping for starts, and so a guy like Bubba

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 3>kind of needed that transition to Okay, here's how you

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:11.400
<v Speaker 3>treat your week, Here's how you treat your days before

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 3>the start, here's how you treat your day of the start,

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 3>because he was a two way guy before, and so

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:19.800
<v Speaker 3>I do think it was useful that he's gotten a

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 3>chance to kind of get into a regimen, get into

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 3>a mentality of here's how I prep to start today,

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 3>Here's how I go through my entire day to be

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:34.840
<v Speaker 3>ready to do this without kind of some of the

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 3>other stuff like oh, I need to get some swings

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:38.799
<v Speaker 3>in the cage and things like that.

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:43.280
<v Speaker 1>And here I'll just summarize the conversation about the Pirates,

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 1>which we can obviously cover on our weekly show more

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:49.759
<v Speaker 1>as this season goes on. It's called Hot Sheet. Check

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:54.439
<v Speaker 1>it out every Monday Live at three thirty Eastern time.

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Can the Pirates develop enough to make themselves contenders? Because

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:01.800
<v Speaker 1>we know they're not going to get the free agency support.

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 1>It's just not in their playbook. They do not have

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 1>permission from ownership to go after players. We talk about

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 1>this year after year. It doesn't matter if they're in

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 1>tank mode or right now where they should be in

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 1>competitive mode. It didn't really change much as far as

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the final product last year. We'll see what a fresh

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 1>slate looks like with Skeins at the start of the season. Obviously,

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:25.839
<v Speaker 1>this is very exciting to talk about what Bubba can

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 1>bring to the mix eventually, but it is the lurking

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 1>question with the Pittsburgh Pirates. Can they do this without

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 1>adding much around them in Major League Baseball as far

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 1>as free agent signings. So anyway, if you want to

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:40.439
<v Speaker 1>hear more on that, you can definitely check us out

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:42.400
<v Speaker 1>on a weekly basis so you can read more in

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Baseball America, get yourself a subscription. And if you're a

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:46.919
<v Speaker 1>fan of another team, we just want to hear about

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:49.359
<v Speaker 1>other prospects, then just keep rolling here. We'll go team

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 1>by team on this series. There are some things that

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 1>just don't come across on the radar gun or the

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:56.799
<v Speaker 1>stat sheet or you know, the track man device that

0:38:56.880 --> 0:38:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I think make this guy, you know a dog. Let's

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 1>hit the top prospect for the Cincinnati Reds. The name

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 1>is Rhet Louder. It's a prospect profile Scott Braun, Baseball Americans,

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>JJ Cooper and Jeff Ponce JJ. The Reds have been

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:14.319
<v Speaker 1>trying to stack high end pitching talent. Rhet Louder up

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:14.799
<v Speaker 1>next here?

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:16.880
<v Speaker 3>What do you think I think that they've got another

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:19.239
<v Speaker 3>guy knocking on the door here I'd be shocked we

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 3>saw Red Louder at the end of twenty twenty four,

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 3>and I would be shocked if we don't see him

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 3>produce quality innings for the Reds in twenty twenty five.

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Although to the Red's credit, they've kind of loaded their

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:31.880
<v Speaker 3>rotation enough where well, we'll see, you know, through we'll

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:34.319
<v Speaker 3>see on opening day or in the lead up to

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 3>opening day, whether he's going to crack that roster, that

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 3>rotation from day one, or get a little bit more seasoning.

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 3>But this is as we thought when he was.

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 4>Coming out of a forest. This is an extremely polished pitcher.

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:50.719
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, I almost want to say, like almost apologize

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 3>as I lay this out, because it's gonna sound like

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:56.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm kind of damning him with faint praise, and I.

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 4>Don't mean it that way.

0:39:57.239 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 3>There is no pitch for Rhet Louder that jumps out

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 3>as like, oh, that's like a Paul Skiing's eighty, that's

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 3>like a Rokie Sazaki splitter or anything like that. What

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 3>really does stand out is just how all this fits together.

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:14.200
<v Speaker 3>He's got a good enough he's got this arsenal pitches

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:16.719
<v Speaker 3>that all are kind of like fifty five maybe it's

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:19.360
<v Speaker 3>a sixty. Maybe it's a plus pitch, an above average

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 3>pitch if you'll really like it. But the key to

0:40:22.040 --> 0:40:25.319
<v Speaker 3>all of this is you watch how he pitches when

0:40:25.360 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 3>he's on, and he was on pretty much throughout his

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 3>little MLB sin at the end of twenty twenty four.

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 3>His command, his control is really advanced. He doesn't miss

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 3>with bad misses. If he misses, he generally is going

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 3>to miss in a spot where okay, ball two, let's

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 3>do this again. He doesn't miss where it leaks over

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 3>the middle of the play and gets crushed. He did

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:49.839
<v Speaker 3>that over and over. He's done that kind of going

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:51.879
<v Speaker 3>back to his college career at wake Forest, where if

0:40:51.880 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 3>you do remember, he matched Paul Schemes pitch for pitch

0:40:55.080 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 3>in Wake Forest versus LSU in one of the greatest

0:40:57.440 --> 0:41:00.680
<v Speaker 3>College Rule Series games we'll probably ever see. You put

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 3>it all together, and I would say that this is

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 3>more like this is a kind of a some of

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:08.440
<v Speaker 3>the of the parts guy where maybe the stuff just

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 3>keeps getting a little bit better.

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:10.960
<v Speaker 4>I look at a guy.

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Like the path that, like Aaron Nola had with the Phillies,

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 3>where Nola doesn't have blow you away velocity, doesn't really

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:20.919
<v Speaker 3>have blow you away pitches, but it works year after

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 3>year after year because he really knows how to pitch.

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:26.280
<v Speaker 3>He's really durable, he's really smart. That kind of describes

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Rhet Louder. I would say as well. But I will

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:32.279
<v Speaker 3>also say it agonized as we did this Red's list,

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 3>because you could go Reht Louder, you could go Chase Burns,

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 3>by the way, another wake Forest first round pick for

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 3>the top of the draft. They've done it two years

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:44.479
<v Speaker 3>in a row here, and Jeff, I think, like again,

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:47.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm going with the guy who's basically big league ready,

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:50.239
<v Speaker 3>but I think you could also make the case for

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Chase Burns, who's yet to really pitch in pro ball.

0:41:53.040 --> 0:41:55.959
<v Speaker 3>But on the ceiling side, I would have one hundred

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:58.840
<v Speaker 3>percent agree that if Chase Burns hits his ceiling and

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Rehet Louder hits his sealing, Chase Burns's gonna end up

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:02.240
<v Speaker 3>being the better pitcher.

0:42:02.280 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you think, Yeah, I think you know, just

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:09.319
<v Speaker 1>as the resident stuffest in house here, meaning I care

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:11.400
<v Speaker 1>more about stuff than I do necessarily about it.

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:12.439
<v Speaker 4>I used to be that guy.

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 1>You stole that from me, and pitch ability, I would

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:18.360
<v Speaker 1>lean on Burns. I think there's maybe some other elements

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of Burns with profile that we haven't totally seen against

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:25.759
<v Speaker 1>high level competition. Some of the talk around him, you know,

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:27.759
<v Speaker 1>in the fall and some of the workouts that were

0:42:27.760 --> 0:42:29.960
<v Speaker 1>happening in Arizona where that he was only throwing with

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a major league ball. So this could be another player

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 1>just like Louder last year that we see sort of

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:37.880
<v Speaker 1>streamlined right into that big league rotation as early as

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the end of this season. That being said, I do

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:43.360
<v Speaker 1>want to sort of give Brett laud to his flowers.

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:46.879
<v Speaker 1>When you look at execution, when you look at pitchability,

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think you sort of nailed it with the

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Nola comp of somebody who's going to go in there,

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:54.240
<v Speaker 1>they're going to understand their opponents. They're going to understand

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the spots and the zones that they need to land

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:59.759
<v Speaker 1>particular pitches, how they have to sequence certain guys. He's

0:42:59.760 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 1>going to do all that work and sort of dating

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 1>back to, you know, talking to his former pitching coach,

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Corey Muscara at Wake Forest when I was, you know,

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 1>doing some sort of draft work for us in my

0:43:10.000 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 1>early days here at BA. That was something even as

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 1>an underclassman when he pitched here at Boston College that

0:43:15.200 --> 0:43:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Corey really called out. This guy just has a very

0:43:17.440 --> 0:43:20.759
<v Speaker 1>cerebral understanding of pitching that he doesn't have to have

0:43:20.800 --> 0:43:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the biggest stuff because he knows how to hit his spots.

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:25.800
<v Speaker 1>He knows how to make everything sort of dovetail nicely

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 1>within his arsenal. So he does execute, He does get

0:43:28.680 --> 0:43:31.840
<v Speaker 1>those outs, and it can get through lineup sufficiently without

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:34.919
<v Speaker 1>having to just forcibly try to strike everybody out, which

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:36.759
<v Speaker 1>I think at times that can be sort of the

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 1>knock on Burns. So when we compare the two, I

0:43:39.480 --> 0:43:42.280
<v Speaker 1>think when you're looking at Louder, he's just a more polished,

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:45.400
<v Speaker 1>more major league ready. But that's not to say that

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have upside when he finally does face you know,

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 1>major league competition over his thirty plus starts and sort

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of gets his feet. Weapon, has major league coaching and

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 1>access to all of the know additional things, nutrition, whatever

0:43:59.040 --> 0:44:01.320
<v Speaker 1>it might be that could take his game up another level.

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that you could see that because of the

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.960
<v Speaker 1>type of sort of individual and makeup that you have

0:44:07.120 --> 0:44:09.399
<v Speaker 1>with a guy like Louder. So there are some things

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that just don't come across on the radar gun or

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the stat sheet or you know, the track man device

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that I think make this guy, you know, a dog.

0:44:17.200 --> 0:44:18.840
<v Speaker 3>The things that stand out for me, we saw it

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:20.920
<v Speaker 3>last year, like at the start of the season, Louder

0:44:21.120 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of got beat around for the first time. I

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:25.360
<v Speaker 3>would say, really, I don't know, maybe this life, but

0:44:25.480 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 3>especially like his first time really as an you know,

0:44:29.280 --> 0:44:30.600
<v Speaker 3>high level amateur.

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 4>As a pro. And he made adjustments.

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:35.120
<v Speaker 3>He kind of realized, Okay, that four seamer that I've

0:44:35.160 --> 0:44:38.760
<v Speaker 3>really relied on isn't kind of going to be my

0:44:38.920 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 3>calling card, got the seat, start using the sinker more.

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:43.799
<v Speaker 3>I think that that's one of the things that we're

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:45.680
<v Speaker 3>going to be looking at with a guy Likerhet Louder.

0:44:46.040 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 3>And that's what makes kind of projecting pitching so fun

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:52.400
<v Speaker 3>but also so challenging. Is what he is right now?

0:44:52.800 --> 0:44:54.440
<v Speaker 3>Is what he is right now. We know that he

0:44:54.480 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 3>had one of the best strike percentages in the miners

0:44:56.719 --> 0:44:59.320
<v Speaker 3>last year. He throws a ton of strikes he can locate.

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:02.759
<v Speaker 3>But if you told me that three four years from

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:05.239
<v Speaker 3>now one of his best pitches is a pitch he

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:08.759
<v Speaker 3>doesn't throw right now, wouldn't shock me. Because I think

0:45:08.840 --> 0:45:10.839
<v Speaker 3>as he goes through the hitters are going to show

0:45:10.920 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 3>him what he needs to improve, saying Wather, He's going

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:16.120
<v Speaker 3>to show hitters what they need to improve at. And

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:18.359
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be kind of this point counterpoint. This

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:20.160
<v Speaker 3>isn't a guy who's just going to rear back and

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 3>blow guys away. So if you told me that he's

0:45:22.520 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 3>going to tinker, that he's going to add this pitch,

0:45:24.840 --> 0:45:26.960
<v Speaker 3>maybe it's a cutter this year, or it's a slider,

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 3>it's a little different, or you know, split whatever it is. Like,

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:35.000
<v Speaker 3>I think that he has the way to kind of add, subtract,

0:45:35.360 --> 0:45:38.480
<v Speaker 3>do different things, and he has the aptitude to do that.

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:40.800
<v Speaker 3>We saw that again to take it to an extreme

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:44.160
<v Speaker 3>example because the guy he faced in Omaha, But we

0:45:44.200 --> 0:45:46.719
<v Speaker 3>saw that with Paul Skeens last year, who kind of

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 3>perfected and refined a pitch that he barely threw in

0:45:50.239 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 3>college to kind of help, you know, take him to

0:45:53.520 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 3>a Rookie of the Year status. If you told me

0:45:55.680 --> 0:45:57.840
<v Speaker 3>the Red Louder is going to kind of keep tinkering

0:45:57.880 --> 0:45:59.680
<v Speaker 3>over the next few years, he's smart enough that would

0:45:59.680 --> 0:46:00.880
<v Speaker 3>not be all feeded that.

0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and if you're excited as a Reds fan about

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the rotation that you have, but you feel like you

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:09.880
<v Speaker 1>want a little bit more, especially of top end talent.

0:46:09.920 --> 0:46:12.719
<v Speaker 1>And here we're talking about Ladder getting you excited, and

0:46:12.920 --> 0:46:16.400
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about Burns getting you excited. And this helps

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:19.799
<v Speaker 1>to tell the story of why the Reds have been

0:46:19.800 --> 0:46:22.480
<v Speaker 1>going in this direction early in drafts JJ. They also

0:46:22.600 --> 0:46:28.959
<v Speaker 1>have trouble, understandably recruiting pitchers to Cincinnati as free agents.

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 3>I will say also, though, if you're a Reds fan

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:33.399
<v Speaker 3>and you're saying that, and I'd say, like, well, Hunter

0:46:33.480 --> 0:46:35.760
<v Speaker 3>Green is kind of like that's about as high octane

0:46:35.760 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 3>as it gets, so like you got one, like you know,

0:46:38.200 --> 0:46:40.399
<v Speaker 3>so now we're hoping to add two and three to that.

0:46:40.719 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 3>But no, this is what the Reds are doing really

0:46:42.480 --> 0:46:45.279
<v Speaker 3>well right now. They need helping the lineup. Ellie de

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:47.279
<v Speaker 3>la Cruz can't do it all by himself. But if

0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:50.120
<v Speaker 3>you look at this rotation, it's going to be deeper

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:53.360
<v Speaker 3>than five man deep. A five man rotation with guys

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:56.920
<v Speaker 3>who should be very plausible starters. Nick Martinez can kind

0:46:56.920 --> 0:46:58.719
<v Speaker 3>of do whatever they want with him because he can

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:01.319
<v Speaker 3>swing back and forth. And then you add go a

0:47:01.400 --> 0:47:03.480
<v Speaker 3>year from now, and you add back in a Brandon

0:47:03.480 --> 0:47:06.319
<v Speaker 3>Williamson and a Julian Agiar who kind of fit into

0:47:06.320 --> 0:47:08.800
<v Speaker 3>that as well. As they come back from injury that

0:47:09.040 --> 0:47:11.959
<v Speaker 3>the pitching staff wise, Red's looking up look looking pretty

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:12.759
<v Speaker 3>promising right now.

0:47:13.160 --> 0:47:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's good news for the long term for this team.

0:47:15.760 --> 0:47:18.320
<v Speaker 1>So if you want more on the Cincinnati Reds, you

0:47:18.360 --> 0:47:21.840
<v Speaker 1>can obviously check out Baseball America. Get yourself a subscription

0:47:21.880 --> 0:47:24.120
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have one already subscribed to this YouTube

0:47:24.160 --> 0:47:27.320
<v Speaker 1>channel check us out weekly on our show called Hot Sheet,

0:47:27.400 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and we'll keep rolling out top prospects team by a

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:31.920
<v Speaker 1>team as we go through the offseason.

0:47:31.920 --> 0:47:32.120
<v Speaker 4>Here