WEBVTT - Moderna: We Can Change Vaccine 'Code' To Fight New Variants

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com Slash podcast. Certainly the conversation of

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the morning for us. It's been quite a year with

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>this pandemic. I think now most people around most of

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the world can see a light at the end of

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>the tunnel. It's because of the extraordinary science coming out

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of the biotech and pharmaceutical industries. UH. And the next

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>guest is certainly right there, and we appreciate getting some

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>time from Dr newbar Afian. He has chairman and co

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>founder of Moderna is a publicly traded stock m r

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>n A on the NASDAC uh DRFA and it's also

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>founder and CEO of Flagship Pioneering based in Cambridge, Massachusetts. UH.

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Dr Afaian, thank you how much for joining us. We

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate your time, UH and we appreciate the extraordinary

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>work coming out of Moderna. The world is certainly thankful

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>for the good work from the good folks at MODERNA.

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Give us an update of where you are with the

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:21.559
<v Speaker 1>vaccine in terms of global distribution and production. Well, first,

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me and for the kind words. And

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:27.119
<v Speaker 1>it has been uh, you know, twelve months that seems

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>like we're still frozen left in left March when we

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>started going down this path, and the progress that has

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>been has been really great to witness. And with all

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the work downstream of distributing the vaccine, we're beginning to

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>see the impact that we all hoped for. In terms

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of where we are right now, there's a lot going

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>on across many fronts. Production front, we were initially heavily

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>focused on the US production. We've now wrapped up our

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>European production in Switzer and through our partners, and that

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>distribution is enabling us to get volumes throughout the world

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>where we've had early orders from from various countries that

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>we've announced um. Second, we have announced a couple of

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago that we're that we've both been testing our

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:15.079
<v Speaker 1>current UH initial vaccine that's already being deployed, but also

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>testing some vaccines that that also have additional variations to them.

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>In one case, a variant that is designed to tackle

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>more directly the South African variant, because well, we don't

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:35.119
<v Speaker 1>know whether that variant will oppose problems a long term,

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>we want to be ready if it does. So, so

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>our technology lends itself to a very rapid response and

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>we can change essentially the code of the of the

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>m R and A we use and very quickly have

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a slightly different immune response. We also have announced going

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>into younger populations to have to eighteen and just yesterday

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>we are now starting our trial phase two three trials

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that will be a careful trial going from twelve down

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to six month old. We think it's very very important

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that that piece of the population be protected as well,

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 1>because that's where much of the damage in terms of

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>learning loss and school attendance has been felt, and we

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>very much want to make sure that we can also

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.679
<v Speaker 1>get an effective and safe vaccine. There so a lot

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of different activities going on. How many doses doctor, do

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you think you can produce max this year and how

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>many can you produce next year? I mean, what are

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the biggest head winds and tail winds? But what are

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the numbers you think you can hit? Um But Durna

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>has announced publicly that we have ramped up our productions

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>such that we think that we'll be able to get

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>up to a billion doses this year. Certainly feel comfortable

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>with the seven eight million dollars somehow many million dose numbers,

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>but we've put in place and have many investments to

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>enable production going up to a billion doses. That's just

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>this year. I'll run mind your audience. That are vaccines.

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Since it was developed first and most rapidly in the beginning,

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>we basically decided to go after the highest those we

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>could we could use and and dose twice. The reason

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>for that was to be able to get the maximum

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 1>level of protection, and that was evidenced in the efficacy

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>numbers we saw. We are, however, as we speak, also

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>testing other dose levels that are lower than the four

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred micrograms, particularly when it comes to the booster. We've

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>said publicly we're testing fifty micrograms and the found micrograms

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>in a booster shop and and and the reason that's

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>important is that should that be effective or even equally effective,

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>we just don't know until we test. Then of course,

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the production volume could increase by two to four times

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the number that I told you simply because there would

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>be the dose levels would be reduced. Again, we need

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 1>evidence for that. But but what the numbers I just

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>gave you were at the maximum two doses at a

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred microgram exture. We expect those numbers even at the

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>baseline level, even if we just stop to the same

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>high dose levels, we could probably increase that by another

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>perhaps even higher than that. UH. And we're working with

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>our partners all around the world to estimate what kind

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of demand we will have UH in view of all

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the other vaccines that also are being developed. And it

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>is a global pandemic, and we're gonna have to vaccinate

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>essentially everyone, ideally or at least as many people as

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>are willing to participate in and and that's going to

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 1>require multiple different producers. Will certainly do our part. Dr Fine,

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll love to get your thoughts on what's happening in Europe.

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean you compare that we have. You know, in

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the United States more population has received at least one dose.

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Those numbers are much much lower across Europe, frustrating many

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 1>of the folks there, And recently've had many countries halt

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the astra zeneca UH. Vaccination. What is your sense of

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in Europe? Are they being too cautious

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>with the AstraZeneca vaccine in a political issue? You know,

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I can't comment on the political side, but let me

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>just start by saying that the regulatory agencies and the

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>health agencies in each of these countries, I believe are

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>well armed to explore the facts around each of the reports,

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and they have to do that. And I think that

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 1>there is a scientific way to determine the causal links

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of of what's been observed so that we don't kind

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>of conflate what maybe correlation or a number of events

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that would happen when that many people I enter a program,

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>any vaccine program. Keep in mind, these are numbers that

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>generally we don't see, let alone in such a short

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>period of time. Maybe the flu vaccine is the is

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the most abundantly used ones, and they don't

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>compare to the numbers that we're that we're getting to

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>h and so I think that the regulatory health agencies

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>have to follow these things and get at the fact.

0:06:56.440 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, speculation about this is completely onwul and

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's rampant. There's a lot of expert speculation about

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it could be this, it could be that, and and

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I just think we have to keep in mind that

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna need multiple vaccine types in order to do

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the job. It's really important that we handle each of

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>them without in the meantime, E wrote in confidence. And

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>so I think people are doing the right thing. It

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>is up to each country to decide what they do

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>when they're gathering the fact. But I don't think anybody

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>should assume that when they suspend a distribution of vaccine

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that therefore means there's something wrong with it. What it

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>means is that the process to figure that out takes

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of time, and in that timeframe, they're

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>choosing to be safer because they're balancing the impact of

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine helping avoid infections with the potential risk that

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>is perceived. And that's the decision they make. Even though

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you're even though you founded the company and you're the chairman,

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>were you impressed with the speed of development as well?

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, um, you know you astounded the likes of

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates, who has a lot of experience in in vaccines,

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and um, I wonder if you can use what you

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>found to develop other things as quickly as you did

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>with this. Well, there, there's a couple of ways I

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>can answer that question. And so the answers, as you

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>might expect, yes and no. And here's why. First of all,

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, Madarna was founded ten years ago for the

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>express purpose of building a platform the likes of which

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:32.079
<v Speaker 1>have never existed that, for the first time, makes an

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>information molecule and code molecule, a messenger on a into

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 1>a drug. We've never seen that before. All the drugs

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>we used today are chemicals and proteins. They don't have

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the characteristic of an information molecule where you can change

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:49.439
<v Speaker 1>the code, get a different protein at will, recombine use

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the same pieces in a slightly different way. So kind

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of the notion of having a bit programmable, these are

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.439
<v Speaker 1>not things that have been available, and so speed of

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of design implementation has always been an important part of

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>our platform. The ironic part is that it almost doesn't

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>matter in normal times pharmaceutical development, because you have to

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>hurry up and wait right so you can do all

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>these things quickly, and then you have to wait for

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.319
<v Speaker 1>years and years of clinical testing and trial. But in

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:21.439
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic, when we could test it so rapidly. Actually,

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the speed of being able to offer a solution was

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>not surprising. What was surprising was that the subsequent steps

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>were done so quickly, and that took a lot of

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 1>coordination with NIH, with FDA, with many many entities. And

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>what was surprising was that the number of things that

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>could have gone wrong along the way, very little of

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>which we controlled once we made the actual vaccine product. Actually, uh,

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.839
<v Speaker 1>let's say UM complied or or or or or or

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>went our way, if you will, as well as our

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:56.599
<v Speaker 1>fiser and bantech so that we could get to the

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:58.719
<v Speaker 1>other end of the road. That is kind of the

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>more gratifying, you know, you don't want to say surprising,

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>because you of course hope that that's the case, but

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>it hardly ever ends up that way. Yeah, hey, Dcor,

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>we just you know, real quick and love to get

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on Rubious Therapeutics. I know you're on the

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>board of that company, and that's how to significant cancer

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>break there if you could briefly just kind of tell

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>us what's going on there, very briefly. Rubious is part

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of the family of companies that have emerged out of

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>flagship pioneering, as is Maderna with a common thread of

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it being based on a platform. In that case, we

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>engineered for the first time red cells, red blood cells

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that when we gave two cancer patients alert their immune

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>system and activate them to go after the cancer. And

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:40.319
<v Speaker 1>just this Monday, we announced preliminary data from our phase

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>one trial that showed very clearly in solid tumors that

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:47.959
<v Speaker 1>otherwise I have no immune uh responses, that suddenly with

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>these red cells that we've developed, we saw two of

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>them show partial responses, multiple other ones showing the markers

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:58.079
<v Speaker 1>of immune activation. And that's a whole new ray of

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 1>hope for solid tumors that we could use the body's

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:03.559
<v Speaker 1>immune system. The interesting thing is that it's the same

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>immune system that we're deploying against with vaccines against the infection,

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:11.439
<v Speaker 1>also now being trained to go after cancer, and so

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>different platforms will go about this in different ways, but

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:18.559
<v Speaker 1>quite encouraging preliminary information. All right, well, we really appreciate

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>your time. Again, I know you're very busy with things well,

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>saving the world basically, so much respect Dr new bar

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>if I, and thank you so much for joining us

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the chairman of MODERNA and also the CEO flagship. Let's

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 1>focus in on rates right now. We have Ed Alusani,

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>senior interest rate and Currency analyst at Columbia thread Needle

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and Ed we're looking at right now at UM rates

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that are all rising as investors sell off bonds. The

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>US tenure trading at one sixties six right now, the

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty year at two forty almost two forty two. UM.

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>What do you expect for Drone Powell today? Yeah, it's

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna be an interesting meeting. I mean, what markets are

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>essentially pricing is less doubt. Uh, There's less doubt around

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.319
<v Speaker 1>the growth outlook in terms of growth improving in the

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>course of this year next year. There's less doubt about

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the employment outlook in terms of the FED being able

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:22.959
<v Speaker 1>to hit the maximum employment bogies over the next you know,

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>twoss to eighteen months and and start tapering. And there's

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:28.719
<v Speaker 1>less doubt about the FED being able to meet its

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:33.479
<v Speaker 1>inflation mandate UM, getting inflation to overshoot, anchoring inflation expectations

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>higher UM, and that's moving the entire rates complex higher.

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think Power is going to have a tricky

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>communication problem here because the forecast, the economic projections you know,

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>by and large are going to reflect some of these trends.

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Particularly in employment and growth. I think there's a question

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>mark around inflation and the communication challenges. UM, how do

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you guide uh that funds rates or expectations for FED

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>funds rates in an environment where UM risks are starting

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:07.839
<v Speaker 1>to scow to the upside UM and that's that's a

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 1>difficult spot for them. Yeah. So, I mean it does

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the chairman run the risk of the market kind of

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:17.319
<v Speaker 1>moving past him. I mean, it seems like he's going

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to have to acknowledge what we're seeing in the marketplace today.

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>But I know that's a tight rope to walk. Yeah,

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's definitely a risk. You know, the

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>market participants of the way, like like ourselves, we're single

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>cell organisms. We uh, we don't we we we don't

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 1>parse this stuff, um at the level of details that

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the FED expects us too. And UM. You know,

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:44.679
<v Speaker 1>markets have started front running this in the course of

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the past you know, four to five months, we've started

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to bring forward the hiking cycle as the outlook for

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>for growth and inflation improved in in the last quarter

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of UM. Now and you see, by the way, by

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the way, you see a seventy chance that the FED

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 1>will hike at the end of two so even you're

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:11.199
<v Speaker 1>bringing it into next year. Well that those are the

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>odds that are in in the swaps. So those are

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the market odds, UM that are currently in the price. Yeah,

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>so that's market pricing. You know, from my perspective, that's

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that's quite aggressive. That leaves the Fed absolutely no room

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>for error in terms of achieving its inflation UH targets

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and UH you know, let's let's take a step back.

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>The set has not achieved them in the course of

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the past twenty five years. UM. Coming out of recession

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and being able to hit these bogies within you know,

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>twelve twenty four months of a relatively deep recession, UH

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>would would really be quite extraordinary. End. So the markets

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>are pricing an exceptionally positive scenario for the FED in

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the moment. Alright, ed, how about on the bond purchasing activity.

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>What kind of messaging do you think we will here

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>out of Chairman Pal today. I don't think we'll hear anything. Um.

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, guidance for the balance sheet has been anchored

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>by UM, you know, essentially this this this few that

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>they need to see substantial further progress in quotation marks

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>UM around improvement in the economy, both in labor and inflation. UM.

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>They've been exceptionally vague by by design around this, and

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>there's no indications that they need to adjust or that

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>they're willing to adjust this guidance UM at this stage.

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, the threshold in my mind on that front

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>really remains whether there's there's a spillover from rates markets

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>into credit. If if credit spreads start to widen, financial

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>conditions start to tighten, particularly that happens in the distorterly way. UM,

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a really good reason uh to I think engage

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in in in strengthening guidance for the balance sheet or

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe increasing purchases UM. At the moment, they have shown

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>no appetite to do that, uh, And I personally think that's, uh,

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a little bit of an error on their part.

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Bill Gross told Eric Shatzker in an interview

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>yesterday that he's been shorting the tenure um and we'll

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>continue to because he thinks the FED is gonna see

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a jump in inflation to three to four plus per

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>cent um. And his point was, look, if if Powell

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>sees that for six to twelve months, it's going to

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>be difficult to hold the line. Well, I'll say, I'll say,

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>you know two things. Um. You know, the first, congratulations

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to Bill Gross, but to um all the trades he

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>told us about, We're winners by the way. UM. Well,

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>so let let me let me give you some some

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>some weight to Powell's guidance. Powell has been pretty explicit

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>in saying that inflation will likely move up this year.

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>We have really good reasons for that to happen and

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to have cod fence around that, and that's really base

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>effects from last year and the economy reopening, and there

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>are being some some pricing power, particularly in services. UM.

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>He's also been very very clear that the Fed is

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>going to view pretty much all of the inflation developments

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:20.640
<v Speaker 1>this year as transitory. So um, you know, the Fed

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing you know, three to four percent prints over the

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>next quarter in in in headline, CPI UH is not

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>going to change their reaction function. They have three committed

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to not doing that. Now. Markets are obviously front running that.

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>We have been front running it now for the better

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>part of the last six months. And the question is

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>how much is enough? Um? The ultimate test Alright, we're

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna We're gonna have to leave it there because the

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>time but that we'll touch base with you again as

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 1>we like to do. Ed Al Husseini Senior Interest Rate

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>and Currency Annalysts for Columbia Threat Needle Investments. Not only

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>is this guy one of my favorite Bloomberg reporters, he's

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>my mom's favorite at Bloomberg Reporter. That's big. Max Abelson

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>joins us now with a piece that he has written

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>on Donald Trump's fortune falling to two point three billion.

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, Max, when I first read this, I thought,

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Pierre right, he has two point three billion dollars. You know,

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>it's really important to remember that. You know, the guy

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 1>is not like ten billion dollar worth the character he

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>thinks he is, but he really is worth something. And

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that's why it's fun to work with people like Sophie

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Alexander and Andrew Tarter uh and and the Bloomberg Data team,

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>because you know, we we use financial findings and um

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.959
<v Speaker 1>loan documents and interviews with executives to really take an

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>honest look um and you know, the reality is in

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 1>honest look shows that the man is in trouble. But

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 1>before I say another word, I just have to tell

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you how happy I'm to hear your voice and to

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:53.959
<v Speaker 1>know your mother likes my journalism, and you know it's

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:55.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's fun for me to be able to work

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>on stories like this one. We we really had a

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>good time working on this. How people take a look

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>because it's a it's a it's a deep story and

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>a detailed story, but it's also really a fun one. Yeah, Max,

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>What I love about the story not just is the

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>content and the great writing, but the use of graphics

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you guys had here, and it really break down, you know,

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the different buckets of his assets and the and the

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>debt associated with that those assets. You get a sense

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of what's happened to the value of those assets as

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>well as the income. One part of your story that

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>really jumped out of me, Max, as you talk about

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>he's got some debt coming due over the next several

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>years and uh, there's not a lot of support for

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the Trump organization in the big banking circles. How do

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you think that might play out? It is? It is

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>just so important. First of all, big shout out to

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the design and development team that worked on on this

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 1>with us. I mean, it's you know, journalism is fun,

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 1>but it's made so much more vivid and interesting when

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you get to work with data visualization specialists like the

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>ones we have a Bloomberg. It just makes it so

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 1>much fun to be a reporter when you're surrounded with

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>so much talent and and what they help us illustrate

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and bring to life and make three dimensional is that

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>he has a debt problem. I mean, not only does

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 1>he have hundreds of millions of dollars of loans coming

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>do he's personally on the hook for a for a

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty good chunk of that. And then what's really extraordinary,

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>because look, the reality is a lot of business people

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>have debt coming to a lot of business people have

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of millions of debt. A lot of business people

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>even have some personally guaranteed debt. What's so unusual about

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump is in the wake of the capital riot,

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you saw banks like Dout your bank stand up and

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:33.880
<v Speaker 1>say we are not going to do business with you anymore.

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>And that is not good. You do not want to

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>have hundreds of millions of dollars of personally guaranteed debt

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and to have major global banks, you know, holding their

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>nose and saying we're not going to work with you.

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>So Donald Trump is going to rebound and you know what,

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't discount that because Donald Trump has been in

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 1>trouble before and Donald Trump has rebounded before. So no

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:53.400
<v Speaker 1>one should count this man now, no matter what they say,

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>no one should count this man out. But if he

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to rebound, figuring out that debt is going

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 1>to be really important, and so well figuring out how

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>we can start making money, making money again in hotels.

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:05.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Trump said, you know, the pandemic would disappear

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 1>like a miracle, and it hasn't. And that is not

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:10.400
<v Speaker 1>good for someone with so much real estate and someone

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>with so many hotels. It's not just the banks that

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>have stopped working with him, right, Umkushman and Wakefield you wrote,

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>used to handle leasing for the Art Deco building downtown. Uh,

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't anymore. Steve Roth, I wonder the guy who

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>runs Bornado he um explored a sale of the company

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 1>that runs those those buildings, is he gonna still want

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to work with Donald Trump? Is the p g A

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna want to ever work with Donald Trump again? I

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.679
<v Speaker 1>mean a lot of these other parties no longer want

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to be associated since the riot. Well, you know, I

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 1>think it's helpful to do what Trump sometimes doesn't do,

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 1>which is to be sort of really specific and and

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to take things sort of one thing at a time.

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So with p G A, if you're absolutely right, the

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>PGA of America, you know, um got rid of a

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>tournament next year. Um that was going to be a

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Bedminster you know what, that's right, But you know what,

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>they had backed out of one golf tournament years ago,

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and and then and then they got back into business

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 1>with him. So when it comes to golf, maybe we'll

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>see as the years go on, maybe maybe maybe golf

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 1>golf will will get get back with him. But then

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>but then there's a question of what happens with his brand.

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>You know what, Will he figure out a way of

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 1>getting seventy four million voters to become customers in a

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>way that bullies his business? You know that that's a possibility,

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>but he's gonna have to figure it out because there

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>isn't a natural path to getting seventy four million people

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 1>into you know, very expensive hotels or very expensive clubs

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>or very expensive golf courses. And then when you asked

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 1>about Tornado, you know the reality is that Lornado has

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 1>not thrown up their hands and said we're going to

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>stop being in business with Trump. But what they have

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>said is that they've looked at putting um these two

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>very big towers that are a huge part of Trump's

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>net worth on the market. So one thing that that

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg leaders and listeners should be on the lookout for

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>is what happens to those tornado towers wanted to Francisco

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and one in New York. They may hold the key

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to the future of Trump's business. Fascinating. Hey, Max, thank

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. Kudos to you and

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 1>your team for putting this great piece out. Max Abelson, uh,

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>he is Bloomberg finance reporter. Really a detailed look at

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the finances former President Donald Trump. Again pegging the value

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>it's something about two point three billion dollars net worth

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>UM and that's you know, partially done by the Bloomberg

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Billionaires Index, which is rich go one of my favorite functions. Met.

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I actually got to say, you know, I love scrolling

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 1>through Max's ticker. I remember about six years ago you

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:46.719
<v Speaker 1>did a story on an undocumented woman from Mexico who

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>made it all the way through, jumped to every hoop

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and became a star employee at Goldman Sachs and it's

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>just written so well and researched so well. Um, it's

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 1>just it's really touching work. And and then of course

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>these fun pieces like the one he's written on Trump.

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:07.199
<v Speaker 1>You can check that out on Bloomberg dot com. All right,

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>we are going to talk about something pretty exciting for

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 1>from my point of view, from from your point of

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:17.239
<v Speaker 1>view as well. M Paul. You're a car guy, so um.

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>We've got Chris Bryant coming on. He's one of my

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>favorite opinion calumnists and he writes a lot about cars.

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking forward to that. All right, let's go to

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>a Chris right now. Chris uh, Chris bryan he's colums

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 1>covering industrial companies for Bloomberg Opinion. Chris, thanks so much

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here. Talk to us about the news

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 1>coming out of Germany. Volkswagen is the latest of the

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>traditional auto companies to really put their chips in the

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 1>middle of the table on EVS. Tell us what's going

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:51.880
<v Speaker 1>on there, chips, Well, high, guys, and and and long

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:54.880
<v Speaker 1>story short, it's you know, folks bag into the moon,

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>absolutely extraordinary. Remember this is you know, one of the

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Germany's most established an important industrial companies in it Saffrance

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:06.399
<v Speaker 1>has pretty much done nothing over the last decade or so,

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly, uh, you know, just this year, and in

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>particular in the last few days, it's been off to

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the races. And so far this year the stock now

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>up fifty percent or so, billions and billions of market

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>cap added after Herbert Dee the CEO, announced some pretty

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>exciting electric vehicle plans, really taking the battle to Tesla.

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.159
<v Speaker 1>And I was writing today as well, also sort of

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>copying some of the ways that Mask has managed to

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>attract excitement for his own company. And what you've seen,

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>as to say, is is Fox barking off to the

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>races now and Tesla suffering a bit real reversal of

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the trend we've seen over the past year or so.

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to Herbert DEECEE as well, No big deal,

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>We talked sometimes, and um, you know the interesting thing is,

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I I asked him, does it make sense that you're

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>only worth a hundred and thirty billion only? Uh? And

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and Tesla is worth six hundred and sixty billion dollars

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 1>in market cap. I mean, Tesla only sold half a

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>million cars last year and Folkswagen is gonna sell a

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 1>million evs this year among the I don't know how

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>many ten twelve million cars they sell in total. So um.

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>But the question I had, Chris, do you think that

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:27.959
<v Speaker 1>Folkswagen's market cap rises to that of Tesla or does

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's market cap just need to come down? Oh? If

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I need to the answer to that, I'd be a

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 1>wealthier man than I am. I bet you have I

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 1>bet you have a view though, right, I mean, is

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>is a car maker really going to be worth that much?

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Where are the margins coming from? I think you know

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>what's been remarkable after the last few years is a Folkswagen,

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 1>as you say, huge the uh you know, massive company

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 1>acques revenues, big profits, cash flows, and it's valued at

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>about nine times earnings. And yet you have a company Heller,

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:05.400
<v Speaker 1>which in all fantasies company is really great technology, really

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>fast growing, not a lot of profit and and valued

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that's totally different multiple and and this divergence has existed

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:15.120
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, and I think people who bought

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 1>shares in the established European car makers kind of assumed

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that it would never change. And that's the exciting thing

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 1>that's happened over the last few days that really have

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:25.360
<v Speaker 1>seen to change now, and even you've got some retail

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>buying of folxwagon stock out of the United States, which

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>might be influencing the The out performance of the ordinary

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>share has a bit compregated, but analysts do think that

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>actually some retail buying is going on here, and that's

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>pretty extraordinary, isn't it. You know, Reddit type amateur invested

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:45.679
<v Speaker 1>in the United States buying Folx Wagner ship. I mean,

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>who'd have thought it, but it's happened. Maybe Cathy would.

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:52.159
<v Speaker 1>Actually there's a little um E t F that follows

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the same formula as ARC called Moon. It's called Moon,

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 1>right because Wall Street bets guys like to the Moon.

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>And actually it's outperformed art by ten times this year. Hey, Chris,

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.880
<v Speaker 1>what's the I guess what a lot of these traditional

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>auto companies are trying to gauge and have been trying

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to gauge, is just how big is the demand for

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles? Give us your sense of what you're hearing

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and seeing in Europe. Well, obviously in in Europe the

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>market is really taken off over the past year, and

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that's partly because you've had governments, you know, sort of

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>demanding that happened, and offering incentives and so forth, and

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you've seen that, you know, the market responded, and for

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 1>a long time there's there was a perception, I think

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in the investment world that Tesla was the only game

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>in town. But what we've seen as the European car

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>make has really come out with a lot of models

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>recently in order to meet their Redditstree compliance obligations in

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of emissions and as such. You know, Tessler really

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't you know, number one in Europe last Yeah, I

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 1>think folks about group as a whole was the biggest

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and now expects I think, you know, analysts is saying

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>within a couple of years will probably be the biggest

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:01.719
<v Speaker 1>globally and that thus shouldn't really surprise you. I mean,

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a company that sells ten million vehicles a year.

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>It's said that you know, half of those are going

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to be electric byty, and if that's the case, and

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>with the kind of muscle and financial power that this

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>company has, then then really, you know, they should be

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a competitive Testler. The problem has always been that they

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>were a little bit you know, pre occupied with themselves,

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too caught up with the government's problems,

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>And for a long time, you know, I didn't really

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>take electric vehicles seriously, and and now they are. They're

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:30.959
<v Speaker 1>putting the finance shot muscle behind it, and and frankly,

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's quite impressive what they're promising in terms

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of battery spectories and models over the next few years. Chase,

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>if you your long lost uncle dies leaves you fifty

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>grand right now, you need a car, would you buy

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicle or or um would you buy a hybrid?

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you think? Very difficult question, you know, I

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I'll be in the market for a car

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>over the next couple of years. Right now, I live

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in an apartment building, so recharging it's going to be

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>an issue. And that was something that part was talking

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>about yesterday. To really need expansion of the public charge

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in network, and it's hoping to do that, all right.

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Chris yep absolutely. Chris Bryant columus covering industrial companies for

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinion. You can read all of his work and

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that of all of our good folks with Bloomberg Opinion

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com, slash Opinion, or on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>By typing an O p I n GO. Thanks for

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Miller three. Put on Fall Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney Before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>worldwide at Bloomberg Radio