WEBVTT - Old Clubs, New Courses, & Stephen Curry’s Future in Golf

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>And when I find my.

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Ball in a fried egg Friday egg, the dreaded Frida egg,

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Friday Frida Egg, Brian Egg, fridagg Bride egg Lie.

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm about ready to run off of the hump course.

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to the Friday Golf Podcast. I am your host,

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Andy Johnson, and today I am.

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Joined by Henry Shimp.

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Henry is one of the co founders of the Tie Podcast,

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 3>a podcast that talks about golf, specifically competition and golf

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 3>course architecture, as well as he talks a lot about

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 3>food too. He's a He's a big foodie. Henry was

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 3>on the Stanford men's golf team. He was a co

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 3>captain on the twenty nineteen twenty twenty team, and he

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 3>was on the five man Stanford team that won the

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:20.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty nineteen NCAA National Championship. So Henry's quite the player.

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 3>I apologize I lost my voice. I don't know if

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 3>I have a cold or not, but I've been I've

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 3>been voiceless for a couple of days.

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 3>I want to get this episode done apologies for the voice.

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 3>It definitely sounded better, I hope. Anyways, Henry played in

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 3>our event last week at Brambles. We hosted an event,

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 3>well the Brambles hosted the event, but it was a

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 3>event where we had teams from Tree Farm, Brambles, Friday

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Golf Club and the and we competed in a match

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 3>play event using equipment that was made before two thousand

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 3>and four. So Henry I found a very interesting discussion

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 3>with Henry as he is somebody who had never played

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 3>the equipment that he played in the event, and is

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 3>a player that is a I would say an elite

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:27.239
<v Speaker 3>am still at this stage, but you know, someone who

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 3>competed against and had the game to play in a

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 3>national championship at Stanford. So he's competed against some of

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 3>the best players in the world and still can really

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 3>get it around. So I thought it would be an

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 3>interesting conversation to talk about playing really for the first

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 3>time with significantly less forgiving equipment than he has played

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 3>his entire life, and the things that he noticed from that.

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 3>On top of that, we get into a couple other

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 3>topics that he had some thoughts. So before we get

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.920
<v Speaker 3>to Henry, let's take a quick moment to talk about

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 3>our friends over at Repsodo and their MLM two Pro,

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 3>a launch monitor and simulator that's seriously impressive. This is

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 3>a great product. It is one of the things I

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 3>love about it is just its cost. It is six

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.079
<v Speaker 3>ninety nine. It's what you pay for a new driver,

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 3>and this launch monitor gives you like very high, highly

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 3>detailed data numbers at tracks fifteen, key metrics, spin rate,

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 3>club path, attack angle, all the good stuff. Unless you

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 3>play over thirty thousand courses virtual courses. So whether you're

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 3>working to actually improve your game or just looking for

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 3>an excuse to play more golf, this thing does both.

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 3>I really should have fired this up before we play

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 3>the retro clubs. I could have been really dialed in.

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't.

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 3>I went to this golf course and to start hitting

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 3>them and try to figure out the distances on the fly.

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>It was tough.

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 3>My first t shot was at par three, just thinking

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 3>I hope this nine to iron goes the right number.

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 3>If I had to use my MLM two Pro, I

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 3>would have been able to get that dialed in right now.

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 3>You can grab the mL M two Pro Holiday bum

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 3>Bundle at rap Sodo that's r ap s o d

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 3>o dot com, which comes with twelve titles or callaway

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 3>RPT golf balls and if you use add the code

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 3>frieda Egg that's Frida Egg one word at checkout rap

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 3>sodo will throw in another dozen golf balls for free.

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 3>That's twenty four free golf balls in total. So head

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 3>to rapsodo dot com, use that promo code Frida Egg

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 3>and check out the MLM two pro to play more

0:04:56.320 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 3>golf this winter. All right, let's get to Henry shim

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 3>All right, Henry shimp I, guess founder, co founder the

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 3>Taie Podcast, a fellow takesman of golf Internet.

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a pleasure to have you on. It was a pleasure.

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I spent this week or last week with you.

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 3>At Brambles for our event, and I thought it'd be

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 3>fun to just check golf for a little bit. We

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 3>played an event called the Vintage, which was fun. It

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 3>was like an expansion of an event we had last

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 3>year where we did a hickory match. This year it

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 3>was pre two thousand and four equipment and we had

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 3>four clubs and we played a match and you competed.

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 3>You played golf at Stanford and you were playing equipment.

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 3>You're dating, you know, I'm dating myself. I played this

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 3>equipment when I was in high scho cool. You had

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 3>never played this equipment, this type of equipment, smaller heads,

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 3>a little bit, smaller sweet spots. I would love, you know.

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 3>I thought this was fascinating. We played our first match

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 3>against each other. The idea of somebody playing equipment that

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 3>they had never played before in a match. What what

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 3>was it? What were your grant takeaways of playing the

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 3>equipment you played? You had a nine to seventy five

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 3>j driver and then you had some some seventies played irons,

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 3>which which seemed like they were a struggle.

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's correct. For first of all, Andy, I appreciate

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 2>you having me on. It's fun being together last week

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 2>and fun to break it down now. And yeah, so

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 2>the the equipment definitely quite a bit older than I was.

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 2>The driver actually was from a I guess a teammate.

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, we were each representing clubs there. I rolled

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 2>in with a putter, a sand wedge that I swear

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 2>this sand wedge was six inches shorter than a standard

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 2>sand wedge. I had to like get on my knees

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 2>to hit with this thing. A pitching wedge through two iron.

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 2>The two iron like you know people use the term

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 2>butter knife. I mean genuinely, the ball was six times

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 2>larger than the head of this two iron. And then

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 2>I originally had this it was like a per Simin

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 2>sort of situation. And I got out there and looked

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 2>at this thing, and I was like, I actually don't

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 2>know if I'm gonna have a club that I think

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 2>might go halfway straight that flies over two hundred yards.

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 2>And so fortunately that nine to seventy five j came in,

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 2>which was really that was not that difficult to hit.

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, certainly if you miss it, it's you're gonna

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 2>lose some yards and it goes a bit offline, but

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 2>it's not nearly like a Percimon where the ball might

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 2>just go backwards if you don't hit the center of

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 2>the club face. You know, one thing that comes to mind,

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 2>I had a fleeting thought midway through the first round.

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 2>I hit an iron shot that was, you know, not

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 2>the greatest, and I was like, man, I wonder what

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 2>the I wonder what the li ankle is on these things.

0:07:58.000 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 2>And I was just like, you know, sometimes ignorance is

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 2>and things that are in your mind are going to

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 2>hurt you more, so I decided to just throw that away.

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, it was. It was quite an interesting experience,

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 2>but a ton of fun. I think Friday Golf Club, Well,

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 2>he got the match, and I'll get it on the

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 2>record now because you know, I'd rather say it myself

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 2>than you. You, you know, with your partner getting some

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 2>some generous help from the pencil. Let's say, you guys

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 2>did in fact take the match, so I'll give you

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 2>the nod there. Uh, but you know, you guys picked

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 2>a great golf course to do it on.

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 3>So you guys, you guys were you guys were talking

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 3>about your visit at the Oval office, getting your with

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:45.359
<v Speaker 3>your your national championship rings from your years at Stanford,

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 3>while while my partner was collecting as his dots and

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 3>exactly destroying it, destroying it with six foot bar putts

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 3>for verdie.

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Which I have to say those. I mean, you know,

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 2>there's kind of a way that people are supposed to

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 2>look based on what they're handicap is over a six

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 2>foot or to win a to win a hole, and

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 2>I feel as if a five, a four or five handicap,

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 2>you're supposed to see a couple of dicey strokes, and

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean your boy Kevin like dead center every single

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 2>he looked like John Rahm with a putt to win

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 2>each of those holes. So it really had me questioning

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 2>the stroke situation. But it's water under the bridge. It

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 2>was a fun match, and uh, and here we are.

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, I got to say after you left, I had

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.559
<v Speaker 3>I had a group of my college friends come play

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 3>and we played, and I was I was dolling out

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 3>a shot a hole and it was excruciating A shot

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 3>a hole like it. It is so hard even against

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 3>like they, you know, they just managed to make you know,

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 3>like you're just always having to make better than par

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 3>to win a hole like and oftentimes you're making birdies

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 3>to have like that. That is an exhausting format. When

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 3>you're giving up so many dots, you know, you're when

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 3>you're double dotting a lot of holes. That was that

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 3>was challenging.

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 2>What is the worst number of strokes? Let's say that

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.319
<v Speaker 2>it's between one and eighteen. What's the worst number of

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 2>strokes to give up? I have you know that? You said,

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 2>fellow take Smith takes mean I have a take here.

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 2>What do you think the worst number is to give up.

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, like eighteen is bad. I do feel like

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 3>it depends what type of match.

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>It is, right.

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 3>I do think like if you play a singles match

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:38.839
<v Speaker 3>against a high handicap, I feel like you are immediately

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 3>as a lower handicap, you are immediately going to just

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 3>there's a real chance that they are just going to

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 3>be completely overwhelmed by the moment and it's over before

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 3>you even Like, as long as you hit a really

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 3>good T shot off of one, it's over, Like you

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 3>can end the match on the first T. I would

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 3>I would say that I think like eight is a

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 3>dangerous spot because that means that the player is like

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 3>pretty good.

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, that's where I'm at. I think it's like,

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 2>let's call it, you know, ten with plus or minus

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 2>two basically because what I where I go there is

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 2>it because I agree with you there on the someone

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 2>might be overwhelmed by the moment, you know, if it's

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 2>one or two or three, it's like you're just kind

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 2>of not that far apart. But what I don't like

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 2>coming at it from the other side, if you were

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 2>the person that's giving the strokes, which I think you

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 2>and I are probably in that situation more often than not.

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't like not knowing where the strokes are coming,

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 2>because I'm not one that's really like looking at the

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 2>card and all that stuff. And you know, typically you

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 2>also find cagy competitors. I will say your partner was

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 2>one of them.

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>They'll cut they'll kind of just drag them through the

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>mud here.

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 2>They'll let you know when they have, like you know,

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 2>when you have a ten footer for birdie and they

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:59.199
<v Speaker 2>have twenty feet for par they're like, oh, by the way,

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm popping here, and you're like, you gotta be kidding me.

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 2>So what you're telling me is now I don't even

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 2>have a putt to win this thing. And so I

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 2>like that if it's like two, you know, it just

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 2>comes in a couple times. If it's eighteen, you just

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 2>know where you're at. You're just giving a shot every

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 2>single time. But it's when you're like, oh god, now

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 2>I have to give one. Oh now we're square. I

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 2>don't like the uncertainty of win or the strokes coming.

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 2>So anyway, we're going to talk the whole time here

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 2>about dotting cards.

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean the other thing about this and match play.

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 3>I think this is like a misnumber I think match

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 3>play should be played at like sixty percent handicaps and

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 3>this and now high handicappers are going to come at

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 3>me and say, this is just low handicap, you know, professing.

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 3>But what makes a low handicap a low handicap is

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 3>they don't make big numbers. What makes a high handicap

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 3>a high handicap is that you make triples and quads

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 3>in tens, and those things just destroy your rounds, destroy,

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 3>just like mass destruction in stroke play and in match play.

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>That only counts for one.

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 2>One of the takes that I've had on handicapping. And

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 2>tell me if you feel differently here, but if you

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 2>play with someone who, let's say you're giving fewer than

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 2>about six strokes, something that I've come to realize over

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 2>the years is that what the handicapping is doing there.

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 2>I've always had this take, you know, you say sixty

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 2>percent of handicap. I've always had this take that there

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 2>should be a bunch of half shots given rather than

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 2>full shots, which I know is kind of ticky tacky,

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 2>and it doesn't really work within the way the game is.

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 2>But if I'm playing someone who is up a two

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 2>or three handicap and they're not getting a ton of shots,

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 2>but they are getting some. Basically what those call it

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 2>five six however many shots are going to do is

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 2>say you're that person's supposed to win certain holes, and

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 2>then I'm supposed to win certain holes because handicapping is

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 2>a bit convoluted where it has so much to do

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 2>with the yardage. So they happen to get them on

0:13:58.040 --> 0:13:59.719
<v Speaker 2>par fives, and then they don't get them on two

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 2>four par threes. And so what happens there is someone

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 2>who's you know, a two or three, They're going to

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 2>be in the hole for the most part on a

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 2>par five, and all of a sudden, they're hitting the

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 2>equivalent shot that I'm hitting from two to seventy from

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 2>seventy yards. They're just supposed to get that hole. But

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:16.719
<v Speaker 2>then the script flips when we go into a long

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 2>par three and we're both inting a three iron and

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 2>they're not getting a stroke. And so realistically, when they're

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 2>only a small number of shots given, it feels like, hey,

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 2>I just need to get those like hard par threes.

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 2>They need to get those par fives, and then the

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 2>match kind of washes in between. But it does feel

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 2>like tight, like if it's sub five. It would honestly

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 2>be a lot more fun to just give a half

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 2>shot on like every other hole or something like that.

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I can see that. I do like I like

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 3>small spreads. I feel good if I'm giving two or

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 3>three shots, Like I feel like there's so much pressure

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 3>on the person that if you're giving two or three shots.

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 3>And I didn't anticipate talking about this for this length,

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 3>but I feel like when you only get a couple pops,

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 3>the gravity of the pop holes then often make them

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 3>crumble on the popoles correct, if that makes sense.

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>They know they have to be de Yeah, it's like

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a huge deal.

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 3>And if you if you happen to sneak out and

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 3>win one of the pop holes, it is like extra devastating.

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>It counts as two holes.

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Almost psychologically, where they're like, I can't believe I just

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 3>lost the hole that happened with me in one of

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 3>our matches, the singles match, was I won two of

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 3>the five pop poles and or maybe three of the

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 3>five popoles. And when you do that, it's just like,

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 3>well like I don't know if I could beat I

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 3>can win you know, five or six of the non

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 3>stroke hooles against somebody you know.

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 3>The matchplay psychology though, is like what makes the game

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 3>special so much so and why there should be like

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 3>way more match play in golf. Uh with Let's get

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 3>back to the equipment. This is what I wanted to

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 3>talk about. You you obviously you played at Stanford, you played,

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 3>You've played in multiple usams, You've made match play at

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 3>the US AM.

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, you've played a very high level of golf.

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:32.479
<v Speaker 3>What do you feel like when you were playing, particularly

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 3>the Irons, How was your mindset different with this older

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 3>equipment than the equipment that you've played the rest of

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 3>your whole life.

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Have you heard the term chaffua before for short game? Yeah,

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 2>I feel like schaffua soft hands been an FU attitude

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 2>applies to like, especially when you talk about like really

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 2>legitimate golfers, actually legitimate golfers, Rory macelroy, guys like that.

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 2>It applies to every part of the game. I mean,

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:05.719
<v Speaker 2>I think about, you know, some of the best shots

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 2>that I've ever witnessed on TV or non TV, but

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 2>like you know, Rory shot on fifteen or AUGUSTA this year,

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 2>obviously that comes to mind. You know, DJ's drive on

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 2>the eighteenth and the twenty sixteen us open to me

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 2>and at a much much, much lesser level. Kind of

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 2>feel like I can relate to that in terms of

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 2>how I've thought about different shots I've had, Like there

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 2>is that just like Okay, I'm I'm going to take

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 2>that f you mentality, stare down the flag and just swing,

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 2>because I feel that anyone who's really a single digit

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 2>or better sort of golfer, it's amazing with where equipment

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 2>has gone that contact take away, like a soft handed

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 2>pitch shot where you're thinking about hitting a spinner or

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 2>a lie out of the rough. Contact is not a

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 2>variable in the game of golf anymore. No, Like I

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 2>think if you asked Rory McElroy how many times out

0:17:57.240 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 2>of the fairway with a seven iron in his hand

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 2>in the last ten years, has he actually thought about contact,

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 2>I feel pretty confident in saying he would say, it's

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 2>just not something I'm thinking about at all, unless it's

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:09.719
<v Speaker 2>in a divid or hitting a backfoot drat. I don't know,

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 2>but I just do not think people consider contact. Whereas

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 2>you take an iron from the sixties that you know

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 2>has a li angle that who knows what we're looking

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 2>at here, and you just simply can't say, you know what,

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm just going to turn the shoulders extra hard here

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:26.679
<v Speaker 2>because I'm a little bit nervous, and the way to

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 2>handle nerves is to just be an athlete and actually

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 2>be even more aggressive and swing harder at the ball.

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 2>It's like, it's quite the opposite. Your mind really does

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 2>first go to contact and just making a good clean

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 2>move at it and trying to hit the ball out

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 2>of the center because everything is just multiplied so massively.

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Where with a modern seven iron for a scratch golfer,

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 2>let's say, you know, if they hit a not a

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:56.199
<v Speaker 2>terrible shot, but like a bottom coure tile shot somewhere

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 2>in there, you know, instead of landing the ball within

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 2>twenty feet of the whole, they probably land it within

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 2>fifty or sixty feet of the hole. Whereas with this

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 2>old equipment, I mean, you can miss it by not

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 2>all that much, and all of a sudden, like one

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 2>seventy eight can become one p fifty two. And you know, Brambles,

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 2>the course that we played was very generous to this,

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 2>and that not that it's not a difficult golf course

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 2>for it, because around the greens and sort of getting

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 2>your ball to stop near the hole was certainly a difficulty,

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 2>but there weren't all that many penalty shots to be taken.

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, imagine going out to a golf course where

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 2>there are a lot of forced carries, you're hitting over water,

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 2>they're creaks, there's o b all over the place. Then

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden it's just magnified by God knows

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 2>how much, because then you're just taking penalty shots left

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 2>and right. So I think from a psychological standpoint, that's

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.120
<v Speaker 2>the biggest thing I'd call out is rather than like

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 2>being more athletic, being more aggressive anytime you're extra nervous

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 2>or have you know, a longer shot in hand, whatever

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 2>the case may be, it certainly goes the opposite way

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:00.479
<v Speaker 2>where you just focus on being smooth trying to make

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 2>a contact. And you know, people people talk about the

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 2>values of swinging a person and driver or something like

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 2>that here and there, and when you do it, you

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 2>understand what that means. When when your mind goes back

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 2>to just the let's make a clean move and try

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:15.919
<v Speaker 2>to hit the center of the face.

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I just I notice it, like when you're looking down.

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 3>At the club, you your mentality with a modern driver,

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 3>it's just like I'm gonna move my body in a

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 3>manner to create the most explosion, and with it, with

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:41.199
<v Speaker 3>the smaller head, it starts to become like I'm going

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 3>to move my body to ensure that I have the

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 3>best chance to hit the center of the club face.

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 3>And those are two very different thoughts, and there's like

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 3>way more care. Ironically, I think swinging the smaller, smaller

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 3>headed clubs with some regularity, even if it's like once

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 3>every couple months, dramatically helps the other one.

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>But what I've what I've seen and I think you

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>hit on this.

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Is that what with the modern clubs now, it doesn't

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 3>feel like you miss distance wise, it's never been easier

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 3>to hit the same distance because that sweet spot's just

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 3>gotten so big and the the the off center hits

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 3>have gotten so for the forgiveness is just through the

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 3>roofs where where it's never been easier to hit shots

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 3>pin high, and it's never been easier to hit drives

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 3>like a similar distance no matter where you hit it

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 3>on the face. But when you introduce like older equipment,

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 3>what it does is that forgiveness goes away and all

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden, like you have distance variability, which I

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 3>mean that's how you get really far away from targets

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 3>because you might miss. You know what you said, it

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 3>might be fifty feet if you're but you're fifty feet

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 3>pin high right as opposed to fifty feet right and

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 3>fifteen yards short. You know, like that that compounding effect.

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:20.639
<v Speaker 3>And I think you something you said it was like

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 3>very illuminating, like in.

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>A way.

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 3>The best test of solid contact and the sport that

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:32.120
<v Speaker 3>remains is pitching.

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely yeah, I mean going off of that, but also

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 2>some of what you're saying there, like it shows you

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 2>very quickly that I feel what manufacturers have really solved

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 2>in the last fifty years or perhaps just come up

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 2>with altogether, is a concept of gearing the number of

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 2>shots that I hit, where you know, we've all hit

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 2>plenty of golf balls in your life, and you sort

0:22:55.960 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 2>of have an expectation at contact of what's going to happen.

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:02.159
<v Speaker 2>You know, if you hit a four iron and you

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 2>catch it on the toe basically the way it works

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 2>these days that probably has to do with the club

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 2>face being a little bit open at strike and therefore

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:11.880
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna start a little bit right and you caught

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 2>it on the toe, and the concept of gearing is

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 2>such that the fore ironm is gonna start a bit right,

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 2>and it's gonna draw back, and maybe it flies seven

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 2>yards shorter, but it spins a little bit less and

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 2>then it chases out and all things being equal, the

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 2>shot turns out not too dissimilar, whereas back in the

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 2>day these clubs, actually it was quite the opposite, where

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 2>the fact that toe hits actually they start writing and

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 2>go right is such a crazy concept, and it really is.

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 2>It is illuminating on the way that people used to

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 2>swing the club and what that meant for delivery. We

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 2>talked about this, and you joke about this here and

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 2>there on pods. It's wild that not only is there

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 2>less of a premium place these days on center contact,

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 2>there are actually times when you're not even look looking

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 2>for center contact. You know, you like to joke about

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Bob McIntyre, how he talks about towing his driver, and

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, we all know that a high toe is like,

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 2>maybe I don't bet I'm nearly good enough to be

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 2>trying to high toe the ball, but we know that

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 2>that's like the best hit in the game. It takes

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 2>spin off of it. It launches a bit higher, it's

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 2>going to turn over and it's going to go forever,

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Like that's the best t ball you can hit. I

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 2>also feel like, like when I feel like I'm really

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 2>really hitting my wedges properly, if I'm able to hit

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:31.400
<v Speaker 2>a seventy five yarder that's bouncy, not a super deep

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 2>divot and off the toe, that's like the best shot

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 2>you can hit, because it's that sort of low, tight

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 2>draw that skips in there and then spins really nicely.

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not going to I had this ridiculous theory

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 2>in college. I used to joke with my teammates about that.

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 2>I just I truly don't think I can go there

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:49.199
<v Speaker 2>on this podcast. But basically what the theory was is

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 2>that you actually don't want to hit a wedge shot

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 2>out of the center of the face because you fly

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 2>it the right distance and it spins too much, Whereas

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 2>if you fin it a little bit, it spins less

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:02.919
<v Speaker 2>than it flies shorter you chunk it a little bit,

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 2>it also flies shorter, spins less like center contact is

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 2>actually these days, it's like too good to hit it

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 2>out of the center, and it can actually be convenient

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 2>to miss.

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 3>It well it's where if you can get really shallow

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 3>with the wedges, it's like you know where your contact

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 3>is coming in really shallow. It's so beneficial because you

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:26.919
<v Speaker 3>it's not going to spin that much. But then also

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 3>and it comes out lower. But also if you catch

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 3>it just a little thin, there's no repercussion, right, It

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 3>just it's going to come out of a similar window

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 3>the margin for error. It's like a different swing that

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 3>maximizes it. And like, yeah, like a lot of cases

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 3>you don't want it, especially tough pins that if you

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:49.239
<v Speaker 3>miss it just a little bit and you get a

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 3>little bit less spin, you can get up onto shelves

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 3>a little bit easier.

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely. What do you think about This is something

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 2>that I spoke with a few guys with at the event,

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 2>and I think you and I might touched on it briefly.

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 2>But what do you think about how newer equipment has

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 2>informed pace of play? Obviously a big topic of conversation

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 2>in the game today. Do you think it slowed things

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 2>down sped it up?

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 3>This is this isn't a very I think this would

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 3>be most people would say it increases the pace of

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 3>play because of it helps players. I think it's done

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 3>the opposite, because one of the things that I notice

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 3>when I play older equipment is my missus just like

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:37.360
<v Speaker 3>get on the ground faster. They don't just like fly

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 3>into oblivion. And when balls fly into oblivion, that's when

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 3>you have really long searches for golf balls. And you know,

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 3>the other aspect of it is that the equipment has

0:26:52.600 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 3>made modern golfers better. And what the what the knee

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 3>jerk reaction of, Like, Okay, golfers have gotten better, agronomy

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 3>has gotten so much.

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Better in order to challenge golfers.

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 3>And I think like the biggest thing that slows down

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 3>pace of play is green speeds and the effort to

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 3>push green speeds. You know, if you I you know

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 3>when I played growing up, like green speeds like you

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:28.440
<v Speaker 3>if you played on a ten, it was like fast,

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 3>you know eleven. I remember there's a junior tournament in

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Illinois when I was like, you know, thirteen that everybody

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 3>used to talk about they got their green stone eleven.

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 3>Like now you play like a junior tournament and it's

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 3>like a big junior tournament. If they're going to talk

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 3>about green speeds, it's gonna be a fifteen, you know.

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 3>So that is all centered around combating technology in my opinion,

0:27:54.160 --> 0:28:00.080
<v Speaker 3>and obviously there's there's advances in in agronomy, but like

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 3>when your greens are ten or eleven, you can leave

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 3>putts dead. When they're fourteen or fifteen, you there is

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 3>no such thing as just like leaving a thirty foot

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 3>or two feet away, like they just run run away

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 3>from you, and that those two footers turn into three

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:23.679
<v Speaker 3>or four footers all of a sudden.

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Those take a lot more time. And so I think,

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>like technology, like the misses.

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 3>When when the ball doesn't go as far, the misses

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 3>aren't as big, so you don't look for as many

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 3>golf balls.

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what do you think?

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know the word that I had in my

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 2>head all week playing this equipment, I'll dress it a

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 2>little bit more, just directly on the equipment itself, because

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 2>you're exactly right on how it's informed setups. But the

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 2>word I had in my head all week was just analog,

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 2>like you grab these putters. They didn't have lines, they

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 2>didn't have dots, And I'll a lot of this stuff

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 2>like like linear versus non linear putting, You kind of

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 2>can't split the difference. You either have a line on

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 2>your potter, you have a line on your ball, you're

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 2>seeing things with generally straight lines and trying to put

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 2>that way or you're not. But if you don't have

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 2>a line on the putter, but you do line the

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 2>ball and you're trying to see linear but it doesn't

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 2>really you can't really do it that way. And so

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 2>with this old school equipment there's a little bit more

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 2>of a sense of just like, hey, you got to

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 2>throw it down, take a look and feel it out,

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 2>you know. Now, speaking on like iron play back in

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 2>the day when it was more about just like hey,

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 2>can you hit the center of the club or not,

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 2>it just it felt for me like I wasn't thinking

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 2>quite as much about like is a is it a

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 2>three quarter seven iron with like a little cut that

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 2>maybe takes a little off and spins a little extra

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 2>and holds up into the wind? Or do I hit

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 2>like a tight draw with less club or do I

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 2>do this? It was more of I could kind of

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 2>hit any of these three clubs that are somewhere in

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 2>the ballpark, but ultimately if I don't hit it, well,

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 2>it's just not even close. So I found myself hitting

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 2>a lot more where I was like the last shot

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 2>went a little bit shorter, so I'll take extra here

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 2>and swing a little easier shots don't. There are no

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 2>nuclear shots. You don't just happen to hit one forever.

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 2>It's just not really how the old equipment worked. And

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 2>so again, it's like, you know, when you take away

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 2>the variable of contact as has been done today, it

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 2>introduces like eleven different variables. And so that's why you

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 2>see these guys. I mean, I think people can pace

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 2>the play. I understand it, but I why people don't

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 2>like it. But I also understand it from the other side.

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, when you're Scotty Scheffler like, and I don't.

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:39.479
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Scotty is a particularly slow player, but

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 2>I was going to say, when he's sitting there, when

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 2>he's calculating eleven different things on an eight iron, it's

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 2>because he's optimizing for like eleven different variables. These guys

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 2>actually are that tuned. But you know, if they're just

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 2>focused a little bit more on I just got to

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 2>like fundamentally like hit this ball pretty well, as opposed

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 2>to knowing that that's the case. I personally felt like

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 2>it took away a lot of the decision making and

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 2>just made you say, line target club swing.

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, yeah, I hear.

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 3>What you're saying is because your focus becomes more singular

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 3>on just making solid contact rather than all the other

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 3>things you do. Become more singularly focused on just solid contact.

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I think.

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 3>One of the aspects of the game that never gets

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 3>brought up in the technology debate that you brought up

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 3>is the putter. Putters aren't so much easier to hit

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 3>today than they were years ago. There's so much more forgiveness.

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 3>You were using a very old blade putter and what

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, like if you don't hit that dead in

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 3>the sweet spot on a lag putt, you're looking, you know,

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 3>it's an embarrassing putt. I think like today's putters are always,

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, fly under the radar of like how have

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 3>we de skilled the game putters?

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean to that point, like there's there's basically

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 2>no one that I can think of, hardly that putts

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 2>with something even close to take away the exact putter itself,

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 2>but putts in the style of of what it was

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 2>like to put forty years ago. I mean, so like

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 2>at the the Cameron Studio, I'm blanking on the guy's name.

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Have you ever been there before Andy to get fit

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 2>and go through the whole deal.

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I have not. I have not.

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 3>I've gone through a Putter fitting. I know how it

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 3>works generally. Yeah, you know, it's it's wild. I think

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 3>I think there's an important conversation point here.

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>A lot of of this.

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Technology I think has been really good for like average players,

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 3>but I don't think it's necessarily been good for the

0:32:57.360 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 3>elite level of players in the the elite game and

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 3>showcasing how talented players are.

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I think I think that's right. I mean,

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 2>I was gonna say briefly on the like the fitting

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 2>studio that they do, the guy who does it there,

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 2>it's like it's like almost a one man operation when

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 2>it comes to the fitting, and you know, he's seen

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 2>every great stroke in the game, and it's kind of

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 2>cool that the four if I'm not mistaken that he

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 2>calls out or like Tiger Ricky Anthony Kim and can't

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 2>lay are the four strokes that he looks at. And

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 2>it's just like these guys simply do it differently. And

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 2>you know this has changed a little bit. Ricky's done

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 2>some different stuff and AKA, I guess he is technically

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 2>doing something these days, Andy, I'd be lying if I

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 2>said I know what.

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>He's doing hutting incredibly too.

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly, we just don't know. I wouldn't know the stats.

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 2>I you know, I haven't seen I can't say I

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 2>have seen what he's what he's game in these days.

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, let's let's go back to you know, when

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 2>these guys were, like early twenty is when you know,

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 2>these strokes are on camera that he likes to use,

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 2>and those guys use you know, basic blade putters that

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 2>are more modern, but they stroke it in such a

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 2>way that they didn't necessarily need all of this new technology.

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 2>But you know, kind of hearkening back to the pace

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 2>of play. It's like, you know, I think about the

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 2>way I putt and I can't say I do all

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:22.839
<v Speaker 2>this stuff anymore. Andy. I kind of I'm a little

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 2>bit more of a just throw it down and let

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 2>it rip these days sort of guy. But I mean,

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 2>I've got the superstroke with a claw. I like, I'm

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 2>a linear guy. I like to put the line on

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 2>it and all of that stuff. Regardless of how quickly

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:37.319
<v Speaker 2>you go through it, it just simply slows the game down.

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 2>The ultimate version of this is and it's like, he's

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:43.399
<v Speaker 2>my favorite guy to watch putt and slowly but surely

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 2>becoming maybe my favorite guy to watch play golf in general.

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Bryson Shambell, he does like the full thing, and I

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 2>think he is the one that like, I just watch

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 2>him and what comes to mind is just simply the

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 2>standard deviation feels. And it's not that he's a fantastic putter.

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 2>It's not that he's necessarily the best putter out there,

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 2>but it feels like he has eliminated the most variables,

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:11.360
<v Speaker 2>and it really does feel like it's just simply a

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:14.760
<v Speaker 2>product of how well did he go through his calculations,

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:17.879
<v Speaker 2>because I just don't see him miss putts that are,

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 2>oh god, he just hit that way too hard, or

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 2>he just missed the line by a mile, or I

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 2>guess even more so, oh he just made a bad stroke.

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 2>It's much more of a sense of, hey, he just

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 2>like he misread that by a ball and the pace

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 2>was right and he just happened to miss the putt

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 2>by a bit. But it has become such a calculated thing,

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 2>and that goes all the way down to the equipment,

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:43.040
<v Speaker 2>where if you're just giving a little stick in a

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 2>ball which is what it feels like using that old stuff.

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 2>Like I immediately grab that putter you're referring to, and

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:50.799
<v Speaker 2>I was like, I can't claw this thing. I can't

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 2>put a line down. I can't I can't hardly read putts,

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:56.400
<v Speaker 2>like I'm gonna throw the ball down. I'm gonna look

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:58.439
<v Speaker 2>at the hole and not. I wasn't doing the heads

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 2>up putting thing, but I'm gonna a look or two

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 2>and just kind of let it fly. And I am

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:07.399
<v Speaker 2>not at all one that's going to advocate for Oh,

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 2>that's how it should be, you know, like that's our

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 2>soft to pace a play, because that's just simply not

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 2>realistic with where the game is gone and all the

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 2>R and D and all those things. That just wouldn't

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 2>be something realistic to say in my mind. But it

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 2>is illuminating to play with that stuff and see what

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 2>it looks like. It would be absolutely fascinating to see

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 2>a match, like I mean, if we wanted to go

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 2>down a PGA Tour rabbit hole on the product and

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 2>just trying things in this new format of the PGA Tour,

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 2>like do a match, do one of these one off

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Scotty Rory things and have them have them play. I mean,

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, sponsored by the Fried Egg Andy play with

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:48.319
<v Speaker 2>old stuff and let's see how but let's see what

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 2>those gets what it looks like out there. I don't

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 2>think that they would have the yardage books out, you know,

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 2>with the pencil and like writing down every single number.

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:58.360
<v Speaker 2>And maybe that's a product of it being just some

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 2>little silly match, but I just can't imagine that it

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 2>would look quite the same as someone.

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:07.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, you played against a lot of the younger

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 3>players on tour. You know, with this equipment. Do you

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 3>think there are certain players that you know of that

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:19.760
<v Speaker 3>would would be better, be more rewarded, and then certain

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 3>players that you know, maybe I wouldn't be thought of

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 3>the way they are thought of now if if you know,

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 3>I think for the most part, what we've talked about,

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:32.800
<v Speaker 3>if if clean contact was the ultimate reward.

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a really good question. I hadn't really thought

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 2>about that. But for whatever reason, Colin wore Cow does

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:44.799
<v Speaker 2>seem to come to mind of a guy that it

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 2>feels like he just he hits the ball and he

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 2>just plays the game. You know, he's not been on

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:53.880
<v Speaker 2>his best form the last year or so, but everything

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 2>with him is just like very proper. I feel like

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 2>more Cow is a guy that would probably be moderately

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 2>elevated with the game. You know, you and I had

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:03.399
<v Speaker 2>this conversation when we were out at Brambles. I think

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 2>it's easy to say, like, oh, you know, you give

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 2>this driver to Rory and like, you know, the superpower's

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 2>taken away. I think that's complete BS. I think he'd

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 2>blow your mind with any any golf club you give him.

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 2>And that's not just because there's a poster you can't

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 2>quite see on my wall of Rory. Here's a funny one.

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 3>I think that's the It would have the opposite effect

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:27.320
<v Speaker 3>of Rory in terms of I think his superpower grows.

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 3>I think so too, Yeah, because if you look at

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:33.280
<v Speaker 3>how much he used to gain early part of his career,

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 3>drivers have gotten more forgiving over time. There are more

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 3>high speed players than early in his career. But the

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 3>other factor is, like he's gone from a one point

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 3>four off the T to like a point six off

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 3>the T over the last ten years. And you think

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:55.719
<v Speaker 3>about that, the tense of a shot per round or

0:38:55.760 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 3>so you know, and he he's diminished there, but he's

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 3>still like a top fight player. But like a lot

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 3>of that I think is the forgiveness of the driver's

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:13.680
<v Speaker 3>gotten so insane from twenty fourteen to twenty twenty five

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 3>that you can swing harder with reckless abandon more reckless

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 3>abandoned than you could in twenty fourteen. Now there are,

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 3>on the other hand, a lot more players that could

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 3>swing at a high speed, which would you know, But

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:30.279
<v Speaker 3>I think that number would be a lot higher if

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:31.720
<v Speaker 3>the drivers were less forgiving.

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I will say this is kind of going just

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 2>a little bit deeper perhaps on swing mechanics and like physics.

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:43.360
<v Speaker 2>I do believe that particularly with the driver, the older

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 2>stuff gives rise to a hitting up on the ball,

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 2>not down and be cutting the ball as opposed to drawing.

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 2>I found that the draws it just gets like much

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:55.479
<v Speaker 2>much more dicey quickly. I think JT would be really

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 2>nice with the old equipment. I think the finesse in

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:00.719
<v Speaker 2>his game also, like you can't really hit those sort

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 2>of finesse shots if you're not really consistently out of

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 2>the middle the way that he's able to hit his wedges,

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 2>and he seems to use tempo as a variable in

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 2>his golf game that not a lot of guys do,

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 2>and I think that the older equipment probably works better

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 2>with that stuff the one that I had in my

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:19.719
<v Speaker 2>head that I really, I truly don't know what to

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 2>do with this. On one hand, I think Scotty finds

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:25.800
<v Speaker 2>the center of the face better than anybody in the game.

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 2>I sometimes feel as if the way in which he

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 2>does it, the way he finds the center, you don't

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 2>know how it's going to happen, and I simply have

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 2>no clue what to make of it. I think I

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 2>would probably like, if you, if you maybe bet on it,

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:43.440
<v Speaker 2>I'd say good is good, and he'd probably beat people

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 2>by even more with the old equipment. But there's a

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 2>possibility because I at least felt like, you know, sometimes

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 2>say you get a little bit too steep with a

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 2>seven iron or something like that, but you know, you

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:57.880
<v Speaker 2>still deliver the club pretty well and you're able to

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 2>just like be a little bit steeper, take a bigger it,

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:01.959
<v Speaker 2>and you still had a really nice shot. Scotty seems

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 2>to do stuff like that a lot. It doesn't seem

0:41:04.120 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 2>like it works very well with the old equipment, So

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 2>that makes me think maybe that it could be a

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:12.319
<v Speaker 2>little strange to see him play with old stuff. But again,

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 2>if I had to bet on, I would say that,

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, good just becomes better and he probably beats

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:17.319
<v Speaker 2>people by even more.

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:21.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it seems like people are trying to spin

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 3>up golf content ideas left and right.

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:27.719
<v Speaker 1>The best ones are not.

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Being explored, which is have these guys play with different

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:37.360
<v Speaker 3>eras of equipments. The most fascinating, you know, question in

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:41.280
<v Speaker 3>golf that remains unanswered is what would these different players

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 3>look like?

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Could we do a tournament that was that.

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:48.959
<v Speaker 3>Obviously there's a lot of money and equipment and that's

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:52.279
<v Speaker 3>probably what's prohibiting all of this from happening, but it

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 3>remains like.

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:54.440
<v Speaker 1>A huge question.

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's take a quick break and talk about

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:09.920
<v Speaker 3>our partner, Club Champion. They aren't going to get you

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:14.359
<v Speaker 3>dialed in on clubs of yesteryear, but what they can

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:16.920
<v Speaker 3>do is get you dialed in on clubs of today.

0:42:17.239 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 3>All the forgiveness, all the benefits of scoring with the

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:27.920
<v Speaker 3>modern clubs. Club Champion is going to be the ones

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 3>that do that best. We're excited to have them as

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:33.960
<v Speaker 3>a partner again in twenty twenty five, and if you're

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:36.479
<v Speaker 3>looking to improve your game this year, Club Champion has

0:42:36.600 --> 0:42:39.160
<v Speaker 3>the most highly trained fitters in the world and in

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 3>the house university that trains every fitter.

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:43.239
<v Speaker 1>And continued education for.

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:47.279
<v Speaker 3>Manufacturers to stay up to date on all the latest innovations.

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:52.680
<v Speaker 3>Every store has sixty five brands. Over sixty five brands,

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 3>which equates to nearly seventy thousand different head and chaft combinations.

0:42:58.040 --> 0:43:01.000
<v Speaker 3>If you want to go check out Club Champion, you

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 3>will get a free driver or iron fitting with a

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 3>club purchase using the code Frida Egg at Club Champion

0:43:08.040 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 3>dot com slash Frida Egg. All right, let's get back

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:22.840
<v Speaker 3>to Henry Shimp. I had I had you prepare a

0:43:22.840 --> 0:43:26.320
<v Speaker 3>couple other takes. I know you're you've got your golf takes.

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 3>I had to prepare three takes to go with this conversation.

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 1>What let's hear of the three takes?

0:43:34.120 --> 0:43:35.800
<v Speaker 2>He's rapid succession or conversation?

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, okay, okay, so we can let's unpack each one.

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:43.239
<v Speaker 2>I fear that this first one could we might take

0:43:43.280 --> 0:43:46.359
<v Speaker 2>this thing to the two hour mark or something. But okay, okay,

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:47.719
<v Speaker 2>first one architecture.

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if my voice can handle two hours.

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:54.279
<v Speaker 2>Architecture oriented, So Andy, you are truly ground zero when

0:43:54.320 --> 0:43:58.279
<v Speaker 2>it comes to the development of golf these days, and

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:00.759
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of cool stuff going on. There's a

0:44:00.800 --> 0:44:02.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of cool stuff that's been done in the last

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:04.319
<v Speaker 2>five to ten years. There's a lot of cool stuff

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:06.080
<v Speaker 2>that's going to happen in the next five to ten.

0:44:06.680 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 2>This is partially wishful thinking, or perhaps where I just

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:12.839
<v Speaker 2>want to see the game go, the game of golf

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:15.040
<v Speaker 2>course development, partially where I think it will go, and

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:18.720
<v Speaker 2>what we're already seeing to some degree. But the model

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 2>for that was basically informed by sand hills and band

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:24.479
<v Speaker 2>and dunes. You could say the model for the last

0:44:24.520 --> 0:44:27.680
<v Speaker 2>fifteen twenty years has been fine, sand doesn't matter how

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:31.839
<v Speaker 2>remote it is, find unbelievable property, tons of acres. If

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 2>you build it, they will come. And there's been a

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:37.440
<v Speaker 2>lot of cool stuff that's come of that. Now. I

0:44:37.480 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 2>don't know if we're in the sixth inning. This is

0:44:38.920 --> 0:44:41.000
<v Speaker 2>not financial advice for anybody. I don't know if we're

0:44:41.000 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 2>in the sixth inning, eighth inning, or midway through the

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 2>ninth on the state of the market. But I do

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:49.360
<v Speaker 2>not think we're in the second inning of a bull market.

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:52.879
<v Speaker 2>And so you're already starting to see some really neat

0:44:52.960 --> 0:44:57.279
<v Speaker 2>projects come more urban, not purely urban, but closer to

0:44:57.360 --> 0:45:02.719
<v Speaker 2>city centers. And I think that's contingency planning on if

0:45:02.719 --> 0:45:05.480
<v Speaker 2>a project doesn't do well. You know, the game in

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:07.400
<v Speaker 2>the last ten or so years has been, hey, just

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:10.200
<v Speaker 2>go deeper into super deep pockets and keep it afloat,

0:45:10.280 --> 0:45:12.359
<v Speaker 2>because all of a sudden, if you have a really

0:45:12.360 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 2>remote project that people can't travel to and they're not

0:45:15.760 --> 0:45:18.520
<v Speaker 2>interested in because of the golf course, you don't really

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:21.680
<v Speaker 2>get to solve that by going half public or something

0:45:21.680 --> 0:45:24.239
<v Speaker 2>of that nature, especially if it's super remote. But if

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 2>you keep it closer to the city centers, then you

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 2>know you have a better opportunity there. So I think

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 2>that we're going to continue to see more of that.

0:45:31.360 --> 0:45:34.000
<v Speaker 2>A project like Rodeo Dunes that's only forty five minutes

0:45:34.040 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 2>outside of Denver. You know, there's some things in Texas.

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how much of these projects are being

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:42.840
<v Speaker 2>shared yet, so I'll just leave them incognito. But some

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:45.239
<v Speaker 2>things that are pretty close to the city centers as

0:45:45.280 --> 0:45:48.359
<v Speaker 2>opposed to super far away, and you know, it gives

0:45:48.440 --> 0:45:50.760
<v Speaker 2>me hope that maybe more of that will happen. I think,

0:45:51.640 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, some of the architects that are starting to

0:45:53.520 --> 0:45:56.440
<v Speaker 2>become much more in vogue the ocms of the world,

0:45:56.600 --> 0:45:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Franz. You know OCM for example, like being on

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Australian guys those Melbourne sand Belt courses. They get a

0:46:03.560 --> 0:46:05.760
<v Speaker 2>golf course in a range one hundred and twenty acres

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:07.640
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of the stuff that's been in the

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:10.440
<v Speaker 2>game the last ten years plus is it's built on

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:13.279
<v Speaker 2>thousands of acres. And so anyway, I'll close this one

0:46:13.320 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 2>out by saying, I would love to see a push

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 2>to you know, the first line item. I've done a

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:24.080
<v Speaker 2>little bit of real estate development in my days. If

0:46:24.080 --> 0:46:28.560
<v Speaker 2>the first line item on the budget is more so

0:46:28.760 --> 0:46:32.640
<v Speaker 2>allocated to the land, a little bit more expensive land

0:46:32.719 --> 0:46:35.520
<v Speaker 2>closer to the city centers, something that's a bit more

0:46:35.560 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 2>accessible on smaller acreage, is where I think the development

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:42.080
<v Speaker 2>world could be going.

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think this is well.

0:46:45.640 --> 0:46:49.319
<v Speaker 3>I think we have to look at the whole market

0:46:49.480 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 3>as a you know, kind of a it's a bell curve,

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:59.680
<v Speaker 3>right and you have the most courses in the middle,

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:03.799
<v Speaker 3>and if you use like just Tom Doaks scale of

0:47:03.960 --> 0:47:08.840
<v Speaker 3>zero through ten, the most courses are like threes and fours.

0:47:10.160 --> 0:47:15.359
<v Speaker 3>And right now, with the way like land costs and

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:20.480
<v Speaker 3>where great sites are for the most part, they're remote.

0:47:20.760 --> 0:47:24.239
<v Speaker 3>Where sites are great sites are available, and I think

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:26.799
<v Speaker 3>people are like gung ho, I'm building. You know, if

0:47:27.080 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 3>you're going to spend the amount of capital to build

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:34.680
<v Speaker 3>a golf course, you want to build a nine or ten,

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:38.080
<v Speaker 3>or at least believe you have the opportunity to build

0:47:38.080 --> 0:47:40.840
<v Speaker 3>a nine or a ten. And I think like a

0:47:40.840 --> 0:47:42.800
<v Speaker 3>lot of that comes down to, like a great site,

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:46.880
<v Speaker 3>but great sites for the most part, and there are

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:52.279
<v Speaker 3>there are absolutely exceptions to this rule. Great sites for

0:47:52.320 --> 0:47:55.040
<v Speaker 3>the most part are far away. You know, that's where

0:47:55.080 --> 0:47:57.320
<v Speaker 3>you're going to be able to find one thousand acres

0:47:57.320 --> 0:48:02.240
<v Speaker 3>of land, sand dunes, and and you know, sometimes they're closer.

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:06.080
<v Speaker 3>I think what's interesting is that there's a hole in

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:14.480
<v Speaker 3>the market for America in general, could use like American

0:48:14.480 --> 0:48:17.719
<v Speaker 3>golf would be so out of this world if you

0:48:17.760 --> 0:48:21.600
<v Speaker 3>could just wave your magic wand and add three hundred

0:48:22.280 --> 0:48:28.799
<v Speaker 3>sixes or sevens to within market major metro markets, and

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:33.319
<v Speaker 3>that's totally feasible with the golf courses that exist right now.

0:48:34.520 --> 0:48:38.760
<v Speaker 3>So to me, one of the things I think about

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:44.880
<v Speaker 3>is like people have become so die hard devoted to

0:48:45.280 --> 0:48:47.919
<v Speaker 3>like finding the greatest site in the world, and they're

0:48:47.960 --> 0:48:51.800
<v Speaker 3>building like exceptional golf courses. I think I was talking

0:48:51.840 --> 0:48:56.839
<v Speaker 3>with somebody recently about a new golf course, Hey, where

0:48:56.880 --> 0:48:59.399
<v Speaker 3>do you think this is? And they were talking about

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:02.920
<v Speaker 3>the world or the US Top one hundred, and I

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:06.880
<v Speaker 3>was like, yeah, But like in the last ten years,

0:49:07.680 --> 0:49:12.880
<v Speaker 3>there's probably been thirty golf courses built that are American

0:49:13.040 --> 0:49:16.680
<v Speaker 3>Top one hundred contenders. So the bar for the top

0:49:16.719 --> 0:49:20.239
<v Speaker 3>one hundred in America has gone up significantly because of

0:49:20.320 --> 0:49:22.839
<v Speaker 3>all the new development. And I think like it goes

0:49:22.840 --> 0:49:26.920
<v Speaker 3>a little under the radar, like how good some of

0:49:26.920 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 3>these golf courses are. You know, We've almost become numb

0:49:30.280 --> 0:49:33.400
<v Speaker 3>to it. And it's you have these Sacred Cows, which

0:49:34.320 --> 0:49:37.640
<v Speaker 3>are historically the the you know, the greatest golf courses

0:49:37.640 --> 0:49:41.600
<v Speaker 3>in America. Everybody knows them. They aren't moving out of

0:49:41.640 --> 0:49:44.840
<v Speaker 3>their spots, if you like the rankings, They are not

0:49:44.960 --> 0:49:49.000
<v Speaker 3>going anywhere, right, Like, nobody's gonna say that there are

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:51.480
<v Speaker 3>better baseball stadiums than Fenway and Wrigley.

0:49:51.680 --> 0:49:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Nobody's going to say.

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:57.960
<v Speaker 3>That they're just you know, pts shrugging. He believes otherwise,

0:49:58.000 --> 0:50:00.880
<v Speaker 3>But nobody's going after the Sacred Cows. And it's the

0:50:00.920 --> 0:50:06.240
<v Speaker 3>same with golf. And I think like the reality is

0:50:06.239 --> 0:50:10.840
<v Speaker 3>is it's going to be exceptionally hard, exceptionally hard to

0:50:10.920 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 3>build a top thirty golf course in America because of

0:50:16.239 --> 0:50:19.279
<v Speaker 3>the competition, right, like you're starting to knock out, like

0:50:19.320 --> 0:50:22.600
<v Speaker 3>the places you're knocking out. Is like not like you

0:50:22.600 --> 0:50:24.960
<v Speaker 3>have to build a golf course that's better than Garden City,

0:50:25.400 --> 0:50:27.920
<v Speaker 3>but you also have to eclipse the history, Like the

0:50:27.960 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 3>golf course has to be so much better to eclipse

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:32.759
<v Speaker 3>the golf course plus.

0:50:32.480 --> 0:50:34.280
<v Speaker 1>The history of these places.

0:50:34.680 --> 0:50:38.239
<v Speaker 3>So I think like where there's like a genuine hole

0:50:38.320 --> 0:50:44.200
<v Speaker 3>in the market is like, well, there's like a huge,

0:50:44.400 --> 0:50:49.319
<v Speaker 3>huge need for really good golf and really good golf architecture,

0:50:49.440 --> 0:50:52.960
<v Speaker 3>but not exceptional can be built on any type of site.

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Like all you need is.

0:50:54.520 --> 0:50:59.319
<v Speaker 3>Clever golf architecture, which you know, the modern architect at

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:03.560
<v Speaker 3>this point, like we've never seen such educated and talent

0:51:03.880 --> 0:51:07.720
<v Speaker 3>as many talented golf architects as now. And I think

0:51:08.040 --> 0:51:11.319
<v Speaker 3>that to me is what you know, a lot of

0:51:10.800 --> 0:51:14.960
<v Speaker 3>the projects I'm most interested in. I think they'm interested

0:51:14.960 --> 0:51:17.560
<v Speaker 3>in some of the far flowing destinations like and how

0:51:17.600 --> 0:51:20.880
<v Speaker 3>great they could be. But to me, what's more interesting

0:51:21.040 --> 0:51:25.760
<v Speaker 3>is like, how how do we get more good golf

0:51:26.120 --> 0:51:28.960
<v Speaker 3>because the vast majority of the golf in America is

0:51:29.040 --> 0:51:29.600
<v Speaker 3>not good?

0:51:30.080 --> 0:51:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Like from a golf architecture standpoint, how.

0:51:32.400 --> 0:51:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Do we get more good golf that's readily accessible to

0:51:36.560 --> 0:51:43.120
<v Speaker 3>the general public in major metro markets. Yeah, like people

0:51:43.200 --> 0:51:48.280
<v Speaker 3>poo poo like sixes on based off of Tom Dooks scale.

0:51:48.520 --> 0:51:50.040
<v Speaker 1>But if you outside of.

0:51:49.960 --> 0:51:56.439
<v Speaker 3>If you took out New York and maybe Philadelphia, in

0:51:56.520 --> 0:52:01.080
<v Speaker 3>almost every other city, a top ten golf course in

0:52:01.120 --> 0:52:02.600
<v Speaker 3>that city is a six.

0:52:04.040 --> 0:52:06.359
<v Speaker 2>I really like the way you're putting it with like

0:52:07.560 --> 0:52:11.680
<v Speaker 2>putting them on the bell curve. What you're trying to accomplish.

0:52:11.760 --> 0:52:14.359
<v Speaker 2>Everyone obviously is trying to They're trying to do a ten.

0:52:14.440 --> 0:52:16.160
<v Speaker 2>They want a nine or a ten. And that's why

0:52:16.200 --> 0:52:20.719
<v Speaker 2>I think we we pursue these far flung destinations. It's

0:52:20.760 --> 0:52:24.160
<v Speaker 2>a really interesting concept to say. So I'll go two

0:52:24.200 --> 0:52:26.120
<v Speaker 2>really specific sites. I think you'll know both of them.

0:52:26.440 --> 0:52:28.719
<v Speaker 2>I've always had in my mind like you could do

0:52:29.040 --> 0:52:31.279
<v Speaker 2>and you could absolutely do an eight, not as like

0:52:31.320 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 2>a restoration, not as a renovation, but like a full

0:52:33.640 --> 0:52:37.880
<v Speaker 2>blown by the land redo the golf course at now

0:52:37.920 --> 0:52:41.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm blanking on my two sites, the one in Charleston

0:52:41.840 --> 0:52:44.959
<v Speaker 2>that's very low Patriots Point. You can do an unbelievable

0:52:45.040 --> 0:52:47.239
<v Speaker 2>in town golf course there. And have you ever seen

0:52:47.239 --> 0:52:51.479
<v Speaker 2>Crystal Springs, Like halfway between San Francisco and Palo Alto area,

0:52:52.040 --> 0:52:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Crystal Springs like this unbelievable site. It's a it's a

0:52:55.200 --> 0:52:58.799
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven dollars or something municipal that like sits right

0:52:58.880 --> 0:53:01.040
<v Speaker 2>up above the bay. It's it's unbelievable. It's sort of

0:53:01.040 --> 0:53:03.880
<v Speaker 2>across the way from Halfman Bay. Two very specific but

0:53:04.000 --> 0:53:07.560
<v Speaker 2>random sites. But you know, it'd be really interesting to say, hey,

0:53:07.640 --> 0:53:10.680
<v Speaker 2>let's do some great stuff urban and try to print

0:53:10.719 --> 0:53:14.560
<v Speaker 2>some sevens and eights, like really really good stuff. And

0:53:14.719 --> 0:53:17.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, rather than having to allocate so much towards

0:53:18.840 --> 0:53:22.560
<v Speaker 2>all the new stuff and buildings and all of those things,

0:53:22.960 --> 0:53:27.840
<v Speaker 2>take the same or possibly less capital and simply apply

0:53:27.920 --> 0:53:32.000
<v Speaker 2>it to other things with a little bit different, you know,

0:53:32.000 --> 0:53:35.320
<v Speaker 2>a little bit different agenda. Now, Andy, you and I,

0:53:35.320 --> 0:53:37.080
<v Speaker 2>if we had nine figures to go through at golf course,

0:53:37.160 --> 0:53:39.279
<v Speaker 2>you and I could just go do this. But here

0:53:39.280 --> 0:53:41.520
<v Speaker 2>we are. So that's why we're on a podcast talking

0:53:41.520 --> 0:53:42.960
<v Speaker 2>about takes.

0:53:42.480 --> 0:53:44.400
<v Speaker 1>That's why we get to talk about it.

0:53:44.440 --> 0:53:47.600
<v Speaker 2>And not do it exactly. Now, should that take us

0:53:47.600 --> 0:53:48.319
<v Speaker 2>to take number two?

0:53:48.760 --> 0:53:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:53:49.080 --> 0:53:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Take numbers, take number two. This is like seventy five

0:53:52.719 --> 0:53:55.680
<v Speaker 2>percent serious, maybe even more. To be honest with you,

0:53:55.719 --> 0:53:59.400
<v Speaker 2>I've only watched one break fifty. It was the most recent.

0:54:00.080 --> 0:54:02.960
<v Speaker 2>I think we're going to see We're going to see

0:54:03.000 --> 0:54:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Steph get more than ten PGA Tour starts, and I'm

0:54:07.640 --> 0:54:13.839
<v Speaker 2>here for it if he does. And well, I want

0:54:13.840 --> 0:54:20.799
<v Speaker 2>to say I was extremely impressed with Steph's game, Like

0:54:20.840 --> 0:54:23.640
<v Speaker 2>it's just good. He's one of the few guys that

0:54:24.320 --> 0:54:26.319
<v Speaker 2>and you know you're in the barrier, you've probably seen

0:54:26.400 --> 0:54:29.000
<v Speaker 2>him swing live before I've gotten the chance of time

0:54:29.080 --> 0:54:31.080
<v Speaker 2>or two, and it's like he's one of those guys

0:54:31.120 --> 0:54:33.839
<v Speaker 2>that I would say a lot of professional athletes. Tom

0:54:33.880 --> 0:54:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Brady is one that comes to mind. Swing's actually pretty

0:54:36.280 --> 0:54:40.040
<v Speaker 2>good and the product is like really really horrific. Steph.

0:54:40.120 --> 0:54:44.160
<v Speaker 2>The swing doesn't blow you away, but he hit some shots.

0:54:44.680 --> 0:54:47.920
<v Speaker 2>But I think, particularly with the PGA Tour being a

0:54:47.960 --> 0:54:51.040
<v Speaker 2>for profit entity, like when he first started getting those

0:54:51.040 --> 0:54:54.600
<v Speaker 2>sponsors exemptions to the Stonebray thing, the Cornferry event, I

0:54:54.640 --> 0:54:56.440
<v Speaker 2>was like, what on earth are we doing here? I

0:54:56.480 --> 0:54:57.960
<v Speaker 2>was kind of a like, hey, there's a guy out

0:54:57.960 --> 0:55:00.160
<v Speaker 2>fighting for his job, which is still the case. But

0:55:00.560 --> 0:55:03.320
<v Speaker 2>when we're when we're talking dollars and cents, it makes

0:55:03.520 --> 0:55:06.759
<v Speaker 2>a lot of sense spelled another way. And with the

0:55:06.760 --> 0:55:10.080
<v Speaker 2>PGA Tour being for profit, if he continues to do

0:55:10.120 --> 0:55:14.120
<v Speaker 2>stuff like break fifties on YouTube, it does probably make

0:55:14.200 --> 0:55:17.480
<v Speaker 2>sense to happen. And unless he goes out and starts

0:55:17.480 --> 0:55:22.120
<v Speaker 2>shooting nineties, which he certainly could, but I think that

0:55:22.120 --> 0:55:26.040
<v Speaker 2>that would be realistic. So again, seventy five eighty percent serious,

0:55:26.080 --> 0:55:27.200
<v Speaker 2>We're going to see some stuff.

0:55:29.680 --> 0:55:32.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't disagree. I'm old enough to remember the Tony

0:55:33.000 --> 0:55:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Romo era.

0:55:33.880 --> 0:55:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh goodness that came to mind.

0:55:35.800 --> 0:55:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, and they came hard and fast, and

0:55:39.680 --> 0:55:43.320
<v Speaker 3>like you know, I know Tony Romo is a great

0:55:43.440 --> 0:55:46.839
<v Speaker 3>Cowboys starter. Maybe not great, but like, you know, a

0:55:46.880 --> 0:55:51.520
<v Speaker 3>beloved starter for the you're talking with Steph Curry, like

0:55:52.400 --> 0:55:57.359
<v Speaker 3>all time superstar pantheon of NBA players, you know, which

0:55:57.400 --> 0:56:01.080
<v Speaker 3>is you know, the most recognizable super star driven league

0:56:01.760 --> 0:56:06.040
<v Speaker 3>and like genuinely like beloved by everybody that's ever encountered

0:56:06.080 --> 0:56:10.120
<v Speaker 3>the man. I don't I don't disagree. I think ten's

0:56:10.239 --> 0:56:13.120
<v Speaker 3>on the table. I wouldn't be surprised if he made

0:56:13.120 --> 0:56:16.439
<v Speaker 3>cuts like you think about the Stonebrak thing he did

0:56:16.440 --> 0:56:18.200
<v Speaker 3>this in twenty seventeen.

0:56:20.000 --> 0:56:25.439
<v Speaker 2>Four, Like that is like that's really it's really really good.

0:56:25.640 --> 0:56:29.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'll say this that there's a you know,

0:56:30.680 --> 0:56:34.279
<v Speaker 2>some people probably watched that video and said, I don't

0:56:34.320 --> 0:56:37.759
<v Speaker 2>know that that Bryson played any better than Steph. If

0:56:37.800 --> 0:56:41.600
<v Speaker 2>you right now, if Steph and Bryson both pegged it

0:56:41.760 --> 0:56:45.840
<v Speaker 2>together first round of the US Open at Shnnacock and

0:56:45.840 --> 0:56:51.399
<v Speaker 2>and Bryson lay's thirteen shots out no fifteen shots, I'm

0:56:51.400 --> 0:56:54.200
<v Speaker 2>hammering Bryson like in a US Open setting on a

0:56:54.239 --> 0:56:57.160
<v Speaker 2>real like it's it's gonna be. This is This is

0:56:57.200 --> 0:57:00.399
<v Speaker 2>true regardless of the level of the game. Like if

0:57:00.480 --> 0:57:03.440
<v Speaker 2>if a scratch and a ten or scratching a five,

0:57:03.920 --> 0:57:07.279
<v Speaker 2>go play a muni, who knows what might happen If

0:57:07.320 --> 0:57:09.800
<v Speaker 2>a scratch in a five go play Shinnecock. The scratch

0:57:09.880 --> 0:57:12.919
<v Speaker 2>with giving ten is going to hammer them.

0:57:13.520 --> 0:57:15.200
<v Speaker 1>But yes, you know.

0:57:16.000 --> 0:57:19.080
<v Speaker 2>The Black Desert, which I know people have taken to

0:57:19.360 --> 0:57:21.760
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's cool event as well, But an

0:57:21.800 --> 0:57:24.120
<v Speaker 2>event like that or there, you know, there are a

0:57:24.120 --> 0:57:27.760
<v Speaker 2>million examples we can go with here, Like they Craig

0:57:27.840 --> 0:57:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Ranch like they can they can use the boost. I mean, shoot,

0:57:32.360 --> 0:57:35.840
<v Speaker 2>even even though the I don't know what they're calling

0:57:35.880 --> 0:57:38.800
<v Speaker 2>it these days, but whatever's played at Kuaile Hollow, even

0:57:38.800 --> 0:57:41.440
<v Speaker 2>though that's always been the truest I guess, even though

0:57:41.440 --> 0:57:43.480
<v Speaker 2>that's the you know, even an elevated event, which I

0:57:43.480 --> 0:57:45.880
<v Speaker 2>guess that that probably goes a little too far here,

0:57:45.920 --> 0:57:48.000
<v Speaker 2>but that's always been let's just call it like a

0:57:48.840 --> 0:57:51.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, upper level PGA Tour event. Like Steph's a

0:57:51.720 --> 0:57:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Charlotte guy. Put him in. I mean, you're gonna sell

0:57:54.160 --> 0:57:54.720
<v Speaker 2>the tickets.

0:57:55.880 --> 0:58:00.920
<v Speaker 3>The the issue with this from a competitive standpoint is

0:58:01.000 --> 0:58:03.840
<v Speaker 3>that Steph's going to get all these starts when he's

0:58:03.880 --> 0:58:07.600
<v Speaker 3>forty years old. Yeah, and I would have been interested,

0:58:08.360 --> 0:58:10.600
<v Speaker 3>and you know, you can't do this because he was

0:58:10.640 --> 0:58:12.280
<v Speaker 3>one of the greatest basketball players ever.

0:58:12.680 --> 0:58:13.640
<v Speaker 1>He did the right thing.

0:58:14.240 --> 0:58:18.800
<v Speaker 3>I would I would genuinely be interested in. Like you know,

0:58:18.840 --> 0:58:22.520
<v Speaker 3>it's the divergent path. Like everybody talks about if Lebron

0:58:22.560 --> 0:58:25.400
<v Speaker 3>played football, what would you have been? You know, I

0:58:25.440 --> 0:58:27.320
<v Speaker 3>don't know if Lebron would have liked to getten hit

0:58:27.680 --> 0:58:31.680
<v Speaker 3>So that's like a big, you know, question mark in

0:58:31.720 --> 0:58:36.400
<v Speaker 3>the Lebron football camp, But like, what would Steph's career

0:58:36.920 --> 0:58:39.960
<v Speaker 3>in golf look like if you legitimately tried. I don't,

0:58:40.920 --> 0:58:44.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I think he I'm interested to see.

0:58:44.200 --> 0:58:47.720
<v Speaker 3>I could see him playing amateur stuff? Would he can

0:58:47.800 --> 0:58:50.480
<v Speaker 3>he become a midam menace? Is he good enough to

0:58:50.480 --> 0:58:51.440
<v Speaker 3>be a mid aam menace?

0:58:51.880 --> 0:58:54.520
<v Speaker 2>So we'll close it out here. That's exactly where I

0:58:54.560 --> 0:58:56.280
<v Speaker 2>was going to go, kind of zagging from the whole

0:58:56.320 --> 0:58:59.680
<v Speaker 2>PGA tour starts thing like when I watch stuff, I'll

0:58:59.680 --> 0:59:03.360
<v Speaker 2>go back to the whole upset that he's he'll.

0:59:03.160 --> 0:59:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Get his a.

0:59:03.760 --> 0:59:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, now we're going into status stuff. But like I'll

0:59:06.640 --> 0:59:08.680
<v Speaker 2>go back to the whole Hey, like if he's playing

0:59:08.760 --> 0:59:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Rory and Bryce in big events, like they're they're going

0:59:11.760 --> 0:59:14.440
<v Speaker 2>to run nine circles around the guy and there are

0:59:14.440 --> 0:59:16.160
<v Speaker 2>no two ways about that. I don't care how much

0:59:16.200 --> 0:59:18.240
<v Speaker 2>time he puts into it. That's just that's just the

0:59:18.240 --> 0:59:21.880
<v Speaker 2>fact of the matter. But I watch him and say, like,

0:59:22.200 --> 0:59:24.880
<v Speaker 2>could he, you know, make a us am and mid

0:59:24.880 --> 0:59:28.240
<v Speaker 2>am and like maybe you know, maybe do some stuff

0:59:28.840 --> 0:59:30.640
<v Speaker 2>I could. I could be convinced of that, So I

0:59:30.680 --> 0:59:34.600
<v Speaker 2>would I would rather see him do that than you know,

0:59:34.680 --> 0:59:36.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of go because I mean, could he make a cut,

0:59:36.960 --> 0:59:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Like you said, that's that's within the realm of possibilities,

0:59:40.160 --> 0:59:43.720
<v Speaker 2>but it's still very unlikely. I think it would be

0:59:43.720 --> 0:59:46.680
<v Speaker 2>more fun, and I mean, shoot, it would be more

0:59:46.760 --> 0:59:49.200
<v Speaker 2>fun for like amateur players. You know, it'd be pretty

0:59:49.280 --> 0:59:51.200
<v Speaker 2>darnk cool if he's out there pegging in the Western

0:59:51.240 --> 0:59:53.640
<v Speaker 2>amateur like, because Romo used to do that, which is

0:59:53.640 --> 0:59:55.760
<v Speaker 2>like cool, but it's not. It's just not Steph. And

0:59:55.800 --> 0:59:58.520
<v Speaker 2>I know that there's some like there's some cowboys fans

0:59:58.520 --> 0:59:59.840
<v Speaker 2>that are gonna think that's ridiculous.

0:59:59.880 --> 1:00:04.520
<v Speaker 3>But you know, dude, I used to play the will

1:00:04.600 --> 1:00:10.400
<v Speaker 3>County Am in Chicago South South Side of Chicago in

1:00:10.440 --> 1:00:13.200
<v Speaker 3>April and Tony Romo would play in it.

1:00:13.200 --> 1:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>It was wild.

1:00:14.920 --> 1:00:18.120
<v Speaker 3>You're talking about County Am and Tony Romo would play

1:00:18.280 --> 1:00:21.960
<v Speaker 3>and there'd be like hordes of cowboy fans out watching him.

1:00:22.040 --> 1:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's like this was I'm in my like mid twenties.

1:00:26.280 --> 1:00:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Charlie Woods anyway, So Steph, I think it's uh, I

1:00:31.160 --> 1:00:34.320
<v Speaker 2>guess it's just like it has me. It has me

1:00:34.440 --> 1:00:37.920
<v Speaker 2>curious after seeing him put like real stuff on tape

1:00:38.240 --> 1:00:41.760
<v Speaker 2>because that was like, uh, no two ways about it. It

1:00:41.760 --> 1:00:44.160
<v Speaker 2>was YouTube golf. The guy hit some shots and it

1:00:44.440 --> 1:00:46.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, it made me. He's talked about the whole Hey,

1:00:46.800 --> 1:00:48.360
<v Speaker 2>I want to go lean into it when I'm done

1:00:48.360 --> 1:00:50.720
<v Speaker 2>playing basketball. And I've known that, like the guy can

1:00:50.760 --> 1:00:52.640
<v Speaker 2>play a bit. But I was like, ah, you know,

1:00:52.760 --> 1:00:58.120
<v Speaker 2>that's that's cute. But this is this is something I'm monitoring.

1:00:58.200 --> 1:00:59.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm monitoring the stuff situation.

1:01:00.920 --> 1:01:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Also, the the Corn Faery Tour start was super incredible,

1:01:06.480 --> 1:01:08.680
<v Speaker 3>like like in the seventy four to seventy.

1:01:08.360 --> 1:01:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Four middle career. Yeah, this is not like Jordan rides

1:01:13.280 --> 1:01:15.800
<v Speaker 2>the bus, went and took a sabbatical to focus on golf.

1:01:15.840 --> 1:01:20.200
<v Speaker 2>This is like middle of winning NBA championships, shooting real

1:01:20.240 --> 1:01:21.040
<v Speaker 2>scores out there.

1:01:22.160 --> 1:01:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, like not not embarrassing, and I think, like that's

1:01:26.600 --> 1:01:31.160
<v Speaker 3>that's the thing like made And it wasn't like sixteen parts,

1:01:31.200 --> 1:01:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Like he made birdies every round. That's like I think

1:01:33.680 --> 1:01:36.600
<v Speaker 3>one of the barometers of like you know, like he

1:01:36.840 --> 1:01:41.440
<v Speaker 3>created scoring opportunities for himself. And I'd be I'll be

1:01:41.560 --> 1:01:44.920
<v Speaker 3>really curious. I My question is does he carve out.

1:01:44.760 --> 1:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>The time to do the amateur stuff.

1:01:46.520 --> 1:01:51.640
<v Speaker 3>I think he might just like have too many obligations

1:01:51.680 --> 1:01:55.840
<v Speaker 3>in life to really give it a go, yeah, yeah,

1:01:57.640 --> 1:01:59.320
<v Speaker 3>it's what's your last one?

1:02:00.400 --> 1:02:02.720
<v Speaker 2>All right, final thing here, Andy, I'm going to double

1:02:02.760 --> 1:02:06.720
<v Speaker 2>preface this one and say, A. I really want to

1:02:06.760 --> 1:02:10.440
<v Speaker 2>be wrong about this take and b. Tiger Woods has

1:02:10.480 --> 1:02:13.520
<v Speaker 2>made me cry more in my adult life than anything.

1:02:13.560 --> 1:02:17.200
<v Speaker 2>And this is globally, this is not just sports. But

1:02:17.240 --> 1:02:19.240
<v Speaker 2>we sit here and talk about the Ryder Cup conundrum

1:02:19.360 --> 1:02:22.440
<v Speaker 2>and how the US we just have this like, oh,

1:02:21.800 --> 1:02:24.560
<v Speaker 2>he was a major champion, so he's captain. You know,

1:02:24.600 --> 1:02:26.960
<v Speaker 2>he's a great players, he's a captain. And then we

1:02:27.040 --> 1:02:30.720
<v Speaker 2>just completely own goal ourselves and say, well, the savior

1:02:30.800 --> 1:02:33.640
<v Speaker 2>to this all is for Tiger to be the captain. Like,

1:02:33.680 --> 1:02:37.560
<v Speaker 2>in the same sentence, someone says, what are we doing

1:02:37.920 --> 1:02:40.520
<v Speaker 2>just because he won two majors? ZJ was the captain?

1:02:40.560 --> 1:02:42.920
<v Speaker 2>He was the worst captain of all time. Yeah, so

1:02:42.960 --> 1:02:45.200
<v Speaker 2>we've got to get this straight. We've got to get

1:02:45.240 --> 1:02:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Tiger to do twenty seven. And I'm like that it

1:02:49.440 --> 1:02:52.120
<v Speaker 2>doesn't quite compute in my mind. So, like I said,

1:02:52.160 --> 1:02:56.240
<v Speaker 2>I want to be wrong. I love Tiger Woods, but

1:02:56.440 --> 1:03:00.439
<v Speaker 2>I just don't know if that is quite making sense

1:03:00.480 --> 1:03:03.400
<v Speaker 2>in my mind that just because he was the greatest

1:03:03.400 --> 1:03:06.200
<v Speaker 2>player of all time that he's going to be it.

1:03:06.840 --> 1:03:08.800
<v Speaker 2>I guess if you look at the Luke model, which

1:03:08.840 --> 1:03:12.240
<v Speaker 2>feels like it has become a model, this doesn't exactly

1:03:12.320 --> 1:03:14.040
<v Speaker 2>feel completely analogous.

1:03:15.640 --> 1:03:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I think Luke Donald is like a unicorn. People

1:03:19.240 --> 1:03:22.440
<v Speaker 3>are like, use the Luke model. He was number one

1:03:22.480 --> 1:03:26.560
<v Speaker 3>in the world, but he was a thoughtful number one

1:03:26.600 --> 1:03:28.720
<v Speaker 3>because how he had to get to number one was

1:03:28.800 --> 1:03:32.000
<v Speaker 3>different than everybody else, which is like just relying on

1:03:32.120 --> 1:03:35.360
<v Speaker 3>like pure physical traits. And Luke Donald was an exceptionally

1:03:35.400 --> 1:03:40.240
<v Speaker 3>talented player, but he got there by using his using

1:03:40.320 --> 1:03:44.440
<v Speaker 3>analytics to realize, like I have to maximize my approach

1:03:44.760 --> 1:03:47.520
<v Speaker 3>short game and putting, and he did it over a

1:03:47.640 --> 1:03:51.160
<v Speaker 3>two year window where he became just out of this world.

1:03:51.240 --> 1:03:53.920
<v Speaker 3>If you go back and look at the data on

1:03:54.040 --> 1:03:58.280
<v Speaker 3>his approach play, short game, and putting, like out of

1:03:58.280 --> 1:04:01.280
<v Speaker 3>this world. You know, he was basically like every year

1:04:01.440 --> 1:04:03.200
<v Speaker 3>for a couple of years, it was like four to

1:04:03.280 --> 1:04:08.080
<v Speaker 3>third second, you know, in those categories. And he's the

1:04:08.200 --> 1:04:12.240
<v Speaker 3>unicorn in this and you know, Tiger is going to

1:04:12.280 --> 1:04:15.520
<v Speaker 3>get it because people are, oh, he's a tactician, you

1:04:15.520 --> 1:04:17.960
<v Speaker 3>know Call of Duty, like he loves playing Call.

1:04:17.840 --> 1:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Of Duty strategy.

1:04:20.160 --> 1:04:23.760
<v Speaker 3>He obviously was an exceptionally smart player on top of

1:04:23.840 --> 1:04:27.200
<v Speaker 3>how talented he was with moving targets and all of that.

1:04:27.720 --> 1:04:31.880
<v Speaker 3>I will say something I noticed in his return to golf.

1:04:32.160 --> 1:04:35.680
<v Speaker 3>For a period of return to golf, he was ultra

1:04:35.800 --> 1:04:38.760
<v Speaker 3>conservative off the tee, Like, you know, he was someone

1:04:38.800 --> 1:04:42.040
<v Speaker 3>that did not like I don't I think he probably

1:04:42.160 --> 1:04:44.520
<v Speaker 3>like laughed at people that were like, hey, hit driver,

1:04:44.640 --> 1:04:46.760
<v Speaker 3>you have like such an advantage if you hit driver here.

1:04:47.000 --> 1:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>He's like, no, we hit iron here, you know. And

1:04:50.680 --> 1:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I could see him looking at data.

1:04:52.840 --> 1:04:56.080
<v Speaker 3>That somebody gave him of optimal pairings and he's just like, no,

1:04:56.960 --> 1:04:59.720
<v Speaker 3>this doesn't work. The other aspect of Tiger as a

1:04:59.800 --> 1:05:04.920
<v Speaker 3>right like he was never a great Ryder Cup player. No,

1:05:05.040 --> 1:05:10.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, my entire life lifetime was marred with like Tiger,

1:05:10.800 --> 1:05:13.280
<v Speaker 3>who could that we can't figure out who to pair

1:05:13.360 --> 1:05:18.280
<v Speaker 3>with Tiger? Like Tiger's disappointing at the Ryder Cup. And

1:05:18.360 --> 1:05:22.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm I'm just I don't know, I don't know if

1:05:23.000 --> 1:05:25.520
<v Speaker 3>if he's always cracked up to be. I'm a big

1:05:25.560 --> 1:05:30.479
<v Speaker 3>believer in you know, the better coaches in almost every

1:05:30.520 --> 1:05:37.000
<v Speaker 3>sport were not uber successful players exactly the oftentimes the

1:05:37.040 --> 1:05:42.960
<v Speaker 3>best analysts, like look at Brandal Randall agree, disagree. I

1:05:43.000 --> 1:05:45.680
<v Speaker 3>know there's a lot of people that dislike him. I

1:05:45.680 --> 1:05:47.680
<v Speaker 3>mean Brandal, and I don't see ey'd eye on a

1:05:47.680 --> 1:05:52.920
<v Speaker 3>lot of things, But damn I respect Brandal. I mean

1:05:52.960 --> 1:05:58.880
<v Speaker 3>the guys maasball tape, that's sure for twenty plus years now,

1:05:59.680 --> 1:06:02.440
<v Speaker 3>and he was a nothing burger PGA tour player, and

1:06:02.440 --> 1:06:04.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's disrespectful to say that he made

1:06:05.000 --> 1:06:07.280
<v Speaker 3>it to the mountaintop. He was a great college player,

1:06:07.760 --> 1:06:10.600
<v Speaker 3>he won the Beef, the Open. But you know what

1:06:10.680 --> 1:06:13.320
<v Speaker 3>he does, he puts in the fricking work. And the

1:06:13.400 --> 1:06:17.080
<v Speaker 3>problem with Tiger as your captain is Tiger has a

1:06:17.120 --> 1:06:20.080
<v Speaker 3>lot go even though he's not playing. Tiger's got a

1:06:20.120 --> 1:06:24.080
<v Speaker 3>lot of stuff going on in his life. And you

1:06:24.120 --> 1:06:28.960
<v Speaker 3>know that's foundation stuff, design stuff, Like you need somebody

1:06:29.360 --> 1:06:34.160
<v Speaker 3>who can devote their life for two years to the

1:06:34.240 --> 1:06:37.840
<v Speaker 3>process of being a Ryder Cup captain and all that

1:06:37.920 --> 1:06:41.800
<v Speaker 3>goes into it, and thinking about the championship, talking to

1:06:42.720 --> 1:06:46.840
<v Speaker 3>a lot of smart people, not using those people as

1:06:46.960 --> 1:06:50.240
<v Speaker 3>like the Bible for various things, but rather like taking

1:06:50.280 --> 1:06:53.000
<v Speaker 3>things from all of them. Is kind of similar to

1:06:53.080 --> 1:06:56.480
<v Speaker 3>go to golf architecture as the way Crump put together

1:06:56.640 --> 1:07:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Pine Valley. He brought in all the smartest minds on

1:07:00.720 --> 1:07:04.280
<v Speaker 3>golf course design, had him come out, talked to all

1:07:04.360 --> 1:07:09.960
<v Speaker 3>of them and used little pieces of everybody's work. And

1:07:10.520 --> 1:07:12.560
<v Speaker 3>that's what you need to do if you're the Ryder

1:07:12.600 --> 1:07:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Cup captain is you need to assemble a very talented team

1:07:16.320 --> 1:07:19.840
<v Speaker 3>of people and consultants or whatever you want to call them.

1:07:20.080 --> 1:07:22.840
<v Speaker 3>Consultants probably the wrong term because then they're probably.

1:07:22.600 --> 1:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Just stealing from you. Sorry, consultants everywhere.

1:07:30.640 --> 1:07:34.480
<v Speaker 3>But you you bring, you enlist a lot of smart

1:07:34.480 --> 1:07:40.800
<v Speaker 3>people and you listen and you take the time to

1:07:40.920 --> 1:07:45.120
<v Speaker 3>hypothesize and come up with your own strategy. But like

1:07:45.240 --> 1:07:48.280
<v Speaker 3>it requires a thoughtful person with a lot of time

1:07:48.720 --> 1:07:52.480
<v Speaker 3>to have that super success. And it ain't Kegan Bradley

1:07:52.760 --> 1:07:56.640
<v Speaker 3>who spent two years trying to make the team. It's

1:07:56.680 --> 1:08:01.120
<v Speaker 3>not Zach Johnson who lacked the super thought fullness part

1:08:01.480 --> 1:08:05.120
<v Speaker 3>of it, and as Zach Tiger was. Because I think

1:08:05.160 --> 1:08:07.480
<v Speaker 3>Tiger's thoughtful enough, I just don't think he has the

1:08:07.560 --> 1:08:12.960
<v Speaker 3>time available to devote to make really thoughtful decisions that

1:08:13.000 --> 1:08:14.280
<v Speaker 3>the other side's are doing.

1:08:14.760 --> 1:08:16.680
<v Speaker 2>The way I see, you know a ton of great

1:08:16.680 --> 1:08:20.759
<v Speaker 2>points there, the way I would see it working working

1:08:20.800 --> 1:08:23.840
<v Speaker 2>as in The way that it could work out positively

1:08:24.760 --> 1:08:27.479
<v Speaker 2>is if someone said to Tiger, you're the captain. You

1:08:27.560 --> 1:08:30.120
<v Speaker 2>know that you already have all the respect of the players.

1:08:30.120 --> 1:08:31.639
<v Speaker 2>They want to run through a wall for you, et cetera,

1:08:31.640 --> 1:08:35.280
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. What we want you to do is think about, Okay,

1:08:35.320 --> 1:08:38.400
<v Speaker 2>what separated you in your career from a preparation standpoint.

1:08:38.560 --> 1:08:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Are what are the behind the scenes things no bad

1:08:41.479 --> 1:08:45.519
<v Speaker 2>jokes here, that you were doing that helped you be

1:08:45.520 --> 1:08:47.960
<v Speaker 2>better than everybody else at the game of golf. The

1:08:48.000 --> 1:08:51.479
<v Speaker 2>way that Zach has seemingly thought excuse me not Zach,

1:08:51.680 --> 1:08:54.720
<v Speaker 2>the way that Luke has thought about every aspect of

1:08:54.760 --> 1:08:58.280
<v Speaker 2>what it takes to perform and go lean into that stuff,

1:08:58.520 --> 1:09:00.680
<v Speaker 2>and then when it comes to everything else, just you

1:09:01.200 --> 1:09:03.360
<v Speaker 2>can sign it if you'd like, but let other people

1:09:03.360 --> 1:09:06.920
<v Speaker 2>focus on it. And I actually I think Tiger I

1:09:07.000 --> 1:09:08.920
<v Speaker 2>have heard some things. I'm sure you've heard a lot

1:09:08.960 --> 1:09:11.439
<v Speaker 2>more Andy, but when it comes to how he's been

1:09:11.479 --> 1:09:14.400
<v Speaker 2>involved with I don't know what they're calling it, but

1:09:14.400 --> 1:09:18.280
<v Speaker 2>the board, you know, these negotiations, I've heard really positive

1:09:18.320 --> 1:09:20.840
<v Speaker 2>things on. He is a guy that wants to say, hey,

1:09:21.000 --> 1:09:23.599
<v Speaker 2>like you understand the business of sport at a deeper

1:09:23.680 --> 1:09:26.160
<v Speaker 2>level than I do, help me understand it better. And

1:09:26.280 --> 1:09:30.040
<v Speaker 2>he is a question asker. He's someone that he by

1:09:30.080 --> 1:09:33.240
<v Speaker 2>definition has a massive ego, but I think he equally

1:09:33.320 --> 1:09:35.760
<v Speaker 2>can let the ego down in the right settings to

1:09:35.920 --> 1:09:39.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, try to be a great captain. So it

1:09:39.160 --> 1:09:42.120
<v Speaker 2>could work, But I don't I don't have faith. Maybe

1:09:42.160 --> 1:09:44.080
<v Speaker 2>where I would go is then I don't have any

1:09:44.120 --> 1:09:47.040
<v Speaker 2>faith whatsoever in the US Ryder Cup team system. To

1:09:47.360 --> 1:09:49.800
<v Speaker 2>approach it that way, they would say, Tiger, the rains

1:09:49.800 --> 1:09:52.280
<v Speaker 2>are yours, you're the magic man, Go go wave the

1:09:52.320 --> 1:09:56.080
<v Speaker 2>wand in which case I think we're just as well

1:09:56.080 --> 1:09:59.520
<v Speaker 2>off with don right just captaining the ships.

1:10:01.760 --> 1:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>It wouldn't be crazy.

1:10:03.040 --> 1:10:06.800
<v Speaker 2>That might mean it's Uh, it's been a it's been

1:10:06.840 --> 1:10:07.400
<v Speaker 2>a good chat.

1:10:08.520 --> 1:10:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Uh, Henry.

1:10:10.560 --> 1:10:14.840
<v Speaker 3>People can find you in your podcast, the Tai podcast. Uh,

1:10:14.960 --> 1:10:18.519
<v Speaker 3>it's on wherever you get your podcasts. Big thanks for

1:10:18.880 --> 1:10:22.360
<v Speaker 3>coming chatting. It was fun, fun spend some time with

1:10:22.400 --> 1:10:25.519
<v Speaker 3>you this week at Brambles And Uh, I'm excited to

1:10:25.520 --> 1:10:27.599
<v Speaker 3>give my my voice a rest here.

1:10:27.680 --> 1:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:10:27.880 --> 1:10:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Andy, And uh we'll be back for the Vintage

1:10:31.160 --> 1:10:33.439
<v Speaker 2>next year. Look forward to pegging it again with those clubs.

1:10:33.439 --> 1:10:34.760
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I don't know if we said it

1:10:35.000 --> 1:10:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Team Frida Egg did, did you know? Take They took

1:10:38.120 --> 1:10:38.800
<v Speaker 2>the crown, So.

1:10:40.600 --> 1:10:42.559
<v Speaker 3>Of course, Correer, you guys can work on your roster,

1:10:43.560 --> 1:10:48.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, and maybe Enlissa captain next year and start

1:10:48.320 --> 1:10:50.839
<v Speaker 3>to start to plan, plan, plan, now.

1:10:50.760 --> 1:10:53.559
<v Speaker 2>That's the goal. Thanks Andy, cheers.

1:11:04.080 --> 1:11:07.160
<v Speaker 3>All right, big thanks for listening to another episode of

1:11:07.160 --> 1:11:12.000
<v Speaker 3>the Friday Golf Podcast. I am once again very sorry

1:11:12.040 --> 1:11:15.519
<v Speaker 3>for my voice which was causing me some problems during

1:11:15.560 --> 1:11:16.240
<v Speaker 3>this episode.

1:11:16.880 --> 1:11:19.439
<v Speaker 1>Big thanks for PJA. That was a bigger lift than usual.

1:11:20.120 --> 1:11:22.960
<v Speaker 3>I had to cut out a lot of coughing and there,

1:11:23.320 --> 1:11:27.840
<v Speaker 3>and I'm gonna stop talking now because it hurts, and

1:11:28.560 --> 1:11:31.320
<v Speaker 3>we'll talk to you next week. Thanks again for listening

1:11:31.360 --> 1:11:31.760
<v Speaker 3>to the show.