WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: April 8th, 2026

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordern. Join us each day

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Here's the latest, the US and Iran agreeing to a

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>two week ceasefire, with Tehran vowing to reopen the street

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>for moves. Joining US now is someone who's worked in

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the Defense Department, who's worked with military forces in the US,

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>has extensive experience in this entire region. Seth Jones of CSIS,

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. I want

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to start with your response to the ceasefire. How realistic

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you see it holding for after that two week and

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>even entire two week period.

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, look, I think it's helpful that there has been

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 3>there have been negotiations between the US and the Iranians.

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:15.320
<v Speaker 3>I think it's helpful and a step forward that we

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:18.919
<v Speaker 3>are at a ceasefire. I just think even in talking

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 3>to Israeli officials recently, I think they do not expect

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 3>the Iranians or Iranian partner forces to abide by any

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 3>deal over the medium to long term. There were already

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 3>sirens going off in Tel Aviv last night for potential

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 3>incoming Iranian rockets. So I do have low expectations that

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 3>this is going to stick over the next two weeks.

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think has actually been accomplished, Seth.

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's hard to say. I mean, when I look

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 3>at the ten point plan that the Iranians have put together,

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 3>most of those, at least many of the points are

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 3>completely unacceptable for the US of the long run. They

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 3>are the withdrawal of all US forces, particularly combat forces

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 3>from the region, Iranian control of the Strait, and a

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 3>number of other things, allowing Iran to have missiles and

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 3>drone programs, and then compensation for the damage that Iran

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 3>has incurred over the past several weeks of the conflict.

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I don't think any there's no realistic expectation

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.639
<v Speaker 3>that the US is going to provide compensation probably worked

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 3>off states along those lines.

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 4>I think there's a lot to hammer out seth on

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 4>that point, in terms of a lot to hammer out realistically,

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 4>what do you think could be achieved from that ten

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 4>point plan? What do you think of the lowest hurdles

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 4>to be too.

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think the lowest hurdles would be some kind

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 3>of a joint arrangement involving countries in the region, particularly

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 3>ones that are on the Straight of Hormuz that share.

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 4>Any tolls that.

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Are charged to commercial ships going through the region, and

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:12.239
<v Speaker 3>potentially also some security of commercial vessels that go through

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 3>the region. So it's not all on the US's shoulders,

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 3>but it'll hinge on really how much trust any of

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 3>these countries, including the US, have that the Iranians want

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 3>fire on commercial vessels, and I think we'll have to see.

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 4>And then you obviously talk about the toll, the toll,

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 4>this tollbooth not being a realistic prospect, can maybe could

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 4>you talk a little bit about what's on the sanctioned

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 4>relief side or also the offshore frozen funds as well,

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 4>which could maybe provide some compensation in Europe that toll

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 4>booth instead.

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean it's possible that there could be some

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 3>sanctions relief for Iran. I mean, the challenge is that

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 3>both the current Trump administration and even the Biden administration

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 3>had pretty tough sanctions against Iran. I find it unlikely

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 3>that the vast majority of those sanctions are going to

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 3>be relieved with the prospect of Iran continuing to have

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 3>a range of partner forces and pretty significant capabilities. But

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 3>there could be some sanctions relief that comes with any

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 3>kind of longer term deal.

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>So a few percents of how closely aligned the US

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>is with the GCC, with Saudi Arabia and United Arab

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Emirates and cutter and the other nations in the region.

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:38.039
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think they are aligned in some ways. I

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 3>think that, you know, one challenge right now is some

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Golf states appear to have openly called for the end

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 3>of the regime in Iran. That does not look like

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 3>it's going to take place. The Supreme Leader Son is

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 3>in power at the moment, the regime is largely the

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Islamic Polutionary Guard is still in place. But I do

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 3>think there is a joint viewed get the straight open.

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think it's a single most important issue.

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 3>I think that the US shares it's a common interest

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:10.239
<v Speaker 3>between the Gulf states.

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>In the US, is there a sense of what it's

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>going to take seth in terms of have we actually

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>taken ground troops off the table? Have we actually taken

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a further more aggressive stance in the region and put

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that aside for the time being.

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't think we've taken the prospect of using either

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 3>ground or naval forces completely off the table. They're still

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 3>in the region. The US has naval ships that could

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 3>be used. The US also has ground forces that could

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 3>be used, whether it's to take islands in the in

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 3>and around the Straight of Foremus or on the shoreline

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 3>of Iran. So I think if the US wants to escalate,

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 3>if it does not feel that Iran is abiding by

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 3>any kind of a deal, it could use those forces,

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 3>either naval or ground, as a back. I mean the

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 3>problem is there would be risky. You do risk naval

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 3>forces getting shot at. I think I should cruise missiles

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 3>coming from around, So there are some risks involved.

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Stay with US mulblinderg surveillance coming up after this.

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm readercent of energy aspects writing. Even after Hormo's flows restart,

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 1>most producers will need will need several months to restore production.

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm readacent, joins us now, I'm I would love to

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>get your sense of just how much has changed given

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the truth that was Now it's last night.

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 5>I think I completely agree with what Javier said. If

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 5>you read the statements, they're actually two quite different statements.

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 5>We're hearing from refiners and lifters who are trying to

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 5>kind of get a ship in. Firstly, the cost is prohibited.

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 5>You know, you're talking about more than forty dollars a barrel,

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 5>even if you can get insurance. There's a huge amount

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 5>of confusion with regards to whether they need to pay

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 5>the Ranians, how they're going to pay the Ranians, because

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 5>payment to be made to Theirranians is not easy given

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 5>the sanctions. The Iranians are actually sending out messages to

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 5>vessels outside the strait saying that you know, if you

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 5>are actually going to pass the straight or if you're

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 5>going to come in, you need our permission. So this

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:23.679
<v Speaker 5>is by no means a straight that's open for business.

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 5>To be very clear, what I would say is that

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 5>we are likely to see the ships that are within

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 5>the Strait right now whether they're empty or whether they're

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 5>loaded with crudent products. We've counted, our cargo tracking team

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 5>counts about two hundred and fifty vessels. Those over time

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 5>could potentially move out with Iran's permission, but I don't

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 5>think you'll see vessels moving in, and I think that's

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 5>going to be the critical thing unless you actually have

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 5>a complete cease far, not just a two week one.

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 5>But we know that hostilities.

0:07:55.240 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 6>Have ended, Amrita. When thinking about the growth versus inflation

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 6>trade off, I'm just wondering, have you seen any evidence

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 6>of demand destruction in these last several weeks?

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 5>Great question, because you know, and you guys were just

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 5>talking about the divergence between actual kind of physical prices

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 5>and futures prices. The problem is everything is being reflected

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 5>in the physical price, right. You know, dated Brentons trading

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 5>above one hundred and forty dollars do buy traded back

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 5>in a few weeks ago at one hundred and sixty

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 5>dollars per barrel, and that's actually being reflected in products prices.

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 5>If you look at diesel, if you look at jet fuel,

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 5>they've been trading over two hundred dollars for barrel, even

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 5>in the US, and yes, we have seen some demand

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 5>destruction in parts of Asia, partly also because governments have

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 5>stepped in and asked for rationing in advance or as

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 5>kind of the crisis has progressed. So we have definitely

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:52.319
<v Speaker 5>seen about a million barrels per day of reduction, mostly

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:55.359
<v Speaker 5>in jet fuel also, you know, given the flight cancelations

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 5>in the Middle East, but also in like NAFFA, LPG,

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 5>so steam crackers, you know, things or units that would

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 5>actually make plastics effectively.

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 5>So again the challenge we have in this is that

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 5>because this is hitting Asia first, it's a really long

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 5>time lag before it hits the West, right, whether it's

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 5>the products itself jet fuel, gasoline, diesel, or the end

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 5>products it's you know, the clothes we're wearing or all

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 5>the kind of plastic goods that we consume, and that's

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 5>why there's so much complacency in the market. But yes,

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 5>we have seen the demand destruction and I don't think

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 5>it's over.

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Yet, Rita, How long is that lag time before maybe

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you're going to say ongoing higher oil prices and higher

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>products product prices, even if the cease fire were to

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>hold today.

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Look, the damage in some ways has been done.

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 5>We were all kind of talking about this big surplus

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.319
<v Speaker 5>in oil markets. Our surplus was definitely not as big

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 5>as some of the US investment banks out there, but

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 5>still it was a big surplus that's been wiped out.

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 5>All that Russian oil that was on water floating around

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 5>that's now gone. India's taken all of that. So for

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 5>the market, we're pretty much starting from scratch, right, so

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 5>we are going to be trading in a higher range.

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 5>But more importantly to your question that when do we

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 5>see that impact. It's about a two and a half

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 5>month lag because Asia would be buying the crude in

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 5>March that arrives in April, they process the or they

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 5>make the products, and then they send it west. So

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 5>the earliest the West is going to feel the real

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 5>pinch is mad really into June. So we haven't seen

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 5>the actual shortages being felt yet.

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. Mulplinberg surveillance coming up after this.

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Julian Emmanuel of Evercore is I joining us here in

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the studio. Julian, Before we get into it, what's your

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>response to the ceasefire and how much you can really

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>buy into it?

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 6>Well, so I think we just have to step back

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 6>and say two things here. Number one, there's a huge

0:10:56.520 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 6>sire of relief that the incendiary language and and the

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 6>inflamed rhetoric of the last three days on all sides

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 6>is being set aside for hopefully at least two weeks,

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 6>perhaps longer. But then when you think about where the

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 6>markets were and are you know, taken individually the degree

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 6>of hedging in stocks, credit bonds all bearish, and oil

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 6>all bullish were at extremes going back to the pandemic.

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 6>Taken collectively, the amount of hedging, and I've been doing

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 6>this for a while. I was a junior trader on

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 6>the floor during the First Gulf War. There is no

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 6>precedent for the collective amount of hedging. So from that perspective,

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 6>you know, this is a sigh of relief that we

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:47.079
<v Speaker 6>do think has some staying power. But again, as we've

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 6>been saying, the devil will be in the details over

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 6>the next several weeks.

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>So if it has staying power, that means it's something

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that is tradable and that you do see upside here

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.599
<v Speaker 1>in a number of different markets. How much is it

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>concentrated in the United States versus say, Europe versus say,

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Southeast Asia.

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 6>Well again, if you go back to the oil price,

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 6>which is essentially the lynchpin for everything here, the sigh

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 6>of relief being breathed in Europe this morning is proportionately

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:21.439
<v Speaker 6>larger because the effect on elevated oil prices on Europe

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.719
<v Speaker 6>is also proportionally larger. But when you think about it,

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 6>our view has been that the bull market that started

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 6>in October of twenty twenty two has further to go.

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 6>We thought that a week and a half ago as

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 6>you were plumbing back towards sixty three hundred and frankly,

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 6>what we find in bull market history is the stocks,

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 6>themes and geographies that lad and US tech has been.

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 6>All of those end up leading. So from our point

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 6>of view, the biggest thing is the fallen yields here

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 6>telling you that that is an endorsement of higher multiple equities.

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Clearly what is gaining the most this morning. You can

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>see this sort of this rush into big tech seeing

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>valuations is more attractive after the selloff. I wonder more

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>broadly though, about the drop in yields, because you aren't

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>seeing necessarily yields going all the way back to where

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>they were on February twenty seventh, and you're not seeing

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>oil prices go all the way back to where they

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>were on February twenty seventh. And even if this deal

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>isn't acted in some form and a prolonged ceasefire, it

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 1>takes hold unclear how much oil prices go back to

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>where they were. Does there have to be a higher

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 1>inflationary understanding going forward that will affect those bond yields?

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 6>No, And look, to be clear, our has few is

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 6>that the landing zone for oil is certainly going to

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 6>be much higher than it was. This is a structural

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 6>change that will take years to work through the system.

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 6>So we're looking at a brand price that ultimately lands

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 6>in the mid to high eighties, WTI the low to

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 6>mid eighties, and for stocks, both of those are perfectly

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 6>fine given the fact that over the course of years

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:08.719
<v Speaker 6>and decades the reliance on oil for equity markets has diminished.

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 6>Obviously it is still quite significant, as we've seen by

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 6>the threat, but again here for us, it is not

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 6>if you continue subsiding from here, is not at all

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 6>a material headwind for either growth or the equity markets.

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>How much of a linchpin will potentially earnings be even

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>more so now given the fact that that has been

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the one aspect of the market that has upheld all optimisms,

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>starting off with delta later this hour.

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 6>So if in the middle of February, before the conflict began,

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 6>I told you that earnings would be revised higher between

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 6>here and then, you'd have called me a fool. Earnings

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 6>have been revised higher, and actually we are below consensus

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 6>projecting an earnings growth rate of over eleven percent for

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 6>twoth thousand and six. And the history of double digit

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 6>earnings growth is incredibly powerful. Since nineteen ninety six, eleven

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 6>years of double digit earnings growth, the market has been

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 6>up ten out of eleven years.

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, bringing you the best

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 2>in markets, economics, angiopolitics. You can watch the show live

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am to nine

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app.