WEBVTT - Could the Chinese Yuan Ever Replace the US Dollar?

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Former President Donald Trump

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>says the US dollar is under attack and.

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:16.639
<v Speaker 2>We will keep the US dollar as the world's reserve

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 2>currency and is currently under major siege.

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:21.760
<v Speaker 3>Many countries are leaving the dollar.

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Since the spring, Trump has been expressing concern over the

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>idea that other countries may want to move away from

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the dollar, and he's announced plans to try to keep

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that from happening. This is from a rally he held

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in Wisconsin this month.

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.480
<v Speaker 2>They're not going to leave the dollar with me. I'll say,

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 2>you leave the dollar, you're not doing business with the

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 2>United States, because we're gonna put one hundred percent tariff

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 2>on your goods. Sir, We would like very much to

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 2>get back to the dollar immediately, Thank you very much.

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 2>It's so easy.

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 4>Trump he pioneered new ways of using tariffs as a

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 4>weapon of stay craft during his first presidency.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>The most is Bloomberg Senior Washington correspondent and host of

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Our Big Take DC podcast.

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.839
<v Speaker 4>And he is already promising to go full board next time,

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 4>even deploy this giant tariff to protect apparently the US dollar.

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Big Take Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm Wanha.

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Every week we take you inside some of the world's

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>biggest and most powerful economies and the markets, tycoons, and

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>businesses that drive this ever shifting region. Today on the show,

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>could the US dollar really lose its special status as

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the world's reserve currency and could the Chinese yun replace it? Sileia,

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you have this new book out all about the dollar,

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>paper Soldiers, how the weaponization of the dollar changed the

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>world order. Remind us how the dollar became the world's

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>reserve currency in the first place.

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 4>So the owner of the world's reserve asset is always

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 4>the world's largest economy. So before the US, it was

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 4>Great Britain, and in the eighteen eighties the US outstripped

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 4>Great Britain in terms of sheer economic size. But it

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 4>didn't happen so quickly. It was nineteen forty four, after

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 4>two World Wars, when the economic policymakers of forty four

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 4>Allied nations gathered together for what later became the Bretonwoods Agreement,

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 4>and they all decided that the best way to avoid

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 4>another World war would be to create an economic brotherhood

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:37.799
<v Speaker 4>where the world economy is knitted close together around shared

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 4>economic goals and They decided at that meeting that the

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 4>US dollar, because of the US's economic size, and also

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 4>because of the US is very good fiscal trajectory at

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 4>the time, that the US dollars should be the anchor

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 4>currency for the global financial system. And two other important

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 4>things happened. The World Bank was created and the International

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 4>Monetary un recreated, and all of that put together made

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 4>the US and its dollar become the world's reserve asset.

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:12.519
<v Speaker 1>And of course, the dollars maintained its strength it has

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the dollar is still strong.

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 4>Now. There are two definitions of a strong dollar. There's

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 4>strength in terms of foreign exchange rate, how it compares

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 4>to another currency, the yen that you on the euro.

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 4>The second definition of a strong dollar is its sheer dominance.

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:32.239
<v Speaker 4>The whole global financial system is underpinned by the dollar.

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 4>That gives the dollar a lot of strength and power.

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 4>And that is another definition to a strong dollar.

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>And how is it, or actually, why is it that

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>other countries are incentivized to use dollars.

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 4>There's a couple of reasons. One, it's a safe investment.

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 4>You will always get a return on that investment. You

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 4>can park your cash a foreign central bank, a foreign

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 4>multinational company, a foreign individual can buy US government debt

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 4>or have any of their asset in American stocks, anything

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 4>that is denominated in dollars coming out of the US,

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 4>you are going to get a return on your investment

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 4>because the US has a lot of economic innovation that

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 4>is driven by its very huge fiscal deficit. It is

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 4>also the owner of the world's most powerful military, which

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 4>is also driven by our huge fiscal deficits.

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.559
<v Speaker 1>But now we have Donald Trump out there basically saying

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>the dollar is in danger of losing its special status,

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and he's saying that other countries are actually leaving the dollar.

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Why is he saying that now? I mean, are there

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>other countries actually thinking about trading less with the dollar?

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 4>He has since March been publicly showing that he has

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 4>paid attention to the d dollarization discussion and actions that

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:54.840
<v Speaker 4>have launched since the US led economic sanctions on Russia.

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 4>It was really the economic sanctions package in February twenty

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 4>twenty too when they invaded Ukraine, and that was a

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 4>massive package, and what it did was heavily curtail Russia's

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:10.280
<v Speaker 4>access to the dollar, including its central bank. It really

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 4>put allies even and then a lot of adversaries on

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 4>guard that the US is willing to go quite far

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 4>to fight a proxy war with another country in terms

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 4>of weaponizing the dollar. And so you see the bricks

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 4>plus economies. It's Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:35.679
<v Speaker 4>it's a growing club of economies coming together saying let's

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 4>put our heads together and find a way to trade

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 4>less with the dollar and have our own shared currency

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 4>so that we're less beholden two US economic sanctions in

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 4>case we run a foul of whoever the sitting president

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 4>might be.

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Now, Trump has said he'll answer those concerns about trading

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>less with the dollar with some really big, sweeping new tariffs.

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>He said, if he wins a second tur he'll put

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>in place a ten percent across the board tariff and

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>on goods imported from China, it's going to go as

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>high as sixty percent. That sounds like a real ramp up,

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly from his first term as president. What do you

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>make of that?

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you know, he's noticed the economic sanctions fatigue that

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 4>is out there. He talks about how you need to

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 4>be judicious in use of economic sanctions, and maybe tariffs

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 4>is the way to go, because if you're using tariffs.

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 4>On the surface of it, it looks like you are

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 4>leveraging the US consumer market rather than leveraging the strength

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 4>of a dollar to sort of carry out your economic

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 4>policy goals.

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Isn't Trump himself responsible for some countries looking to dedollarize

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>with his threat of tariffs and sanctions.

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 4>Trump is not the only president who bears responsibility. I

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 4>would say every president since nine to eleven has used

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 4>economic sanctions to achieve foreign policy goals. And if you

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 4>get a chart of the use of economic nations, the

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 4>line just goes straight up. And they went up a

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 4>lot under Obama as well, they went up even more

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 4>under Trump and then even more under Biden.

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>After the break, how the US and China have tussled

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>over allegations of currency manipulation in the past, and could

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese yun replace the US dollar as a world's

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>reserve currency. We've been talking about former President Donald Trump

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and concerns that the US dollar could be replaced as

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a world's reserve currency, and when it comes to the

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>dollar in global trade, Trump's also accused other countries of

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>currency manipulation, and one country he's pointed the finger at

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly is China.

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 3>But that's happening, and it's happening even worse with China.

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 3>They manipulate their currency better than any country in the

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 3>history of the world in history history. And we are

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 3>now working on a new trade deal with China, but

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 3>it must include real structural change to and unfair trade practices.

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 3>Not only has China declined to adopt Promise reforms, it

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 3>has embraced an economic model dependent on massive market barriers,

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 3>heavy state subsidies, currency manipulation product.

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>And besides China, there are other Asian countries that the

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>US Treasury Department says it's monitoring for currency practices, places

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>like Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, Vietnam, and Japan was added to

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the list this summer. What is the US's concern overall

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>about what could happen with these other currencies.

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 4>The general concern is just that countries will meddle with

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 4>the terms of trade, with the natural laws of supply

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 4>and demand, and keep down the value of their currencies

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 4>against the dollar in order to capitalize on the US

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 4>consumer market. And that is not good for American manufacturers

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 4>and companies and blue collar workers. In the mid two

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 4>thousands and around, the global financial crisis. There allegedly was

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 4>a case to be made to charge China with actual

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:30.079
<v Speaker 4>currency manipulation, but the US decided not to do it

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:33.839
<v Speaker 4>because they wanted China's cooperation and they were trying to

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 4>sort of use backdoor channels and talks to slowly wean

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 4>China off that habit.

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>And of course that relationship between the US and China

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>has been a symbiotic one, right, which you also talk

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>in the book as well. I mean, how does that

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>work through currency?

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and it's a chapter that I call a turbulent

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 4>marriage because the US and China they need each other.

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 4>They are deeply entrenched with each other still, but they're

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 4>at odds with each other. Now. The example that I

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 4>can give is that in the aftermath of the global

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 4>financial crisis in two thousand and eight, you know, it

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 4>was an American made crisis that spilled into the rest

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 4>of the world. Everyone suffered, and the Chinese had a

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 4>humongous holding of assets in US dollars, whether it was

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 4>shares or ownership stocks and Fanny and Freddy or in

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 4>US treasuries are US government bonds. So if treasuries and

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 4>the US economy was not doing well, it was bad

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 4>for China because of their investments. And so China couldn't say, Okay,

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 4>we're pulling out of the US economy because as they

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 4>would pull out of this massive stake, you know, the

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 4>first ten percent, maybe you'd win, and then the next

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 4>ninety percent, prices would just plummet and you would take

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 4>a loss. Right, And the US also realized that we

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 4>need to keep in close contact with China because we

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 4>need their support. We don't want them to pull out.

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 4>And that relationship, just that one tiny example, it tells

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 4>you how deeply integrated the two countries are.

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>We've talked a lot about Trump and his plans to

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>try to protect the US economy and its status as

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a world's reserve currency. What do we know about what

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>his opponent, Kamala Harris has said or has in mind

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to you know, around the dollar.

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 4>We don't know anything we have not heard. There is

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 4>an absolute paucity of policy when it comes to Harris's

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 4>campaign right now. We don't know much about her foreign

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 4>policy or her international economic diplomacy and plans. Part of

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 4>that has to do with the fact that she launched

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 4>her campaign veryy late. Part of it has to do

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 4>with the fact that she could rely on the Biden

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.119
<v Speaker 4>administration and lean on some of those policies.

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so we've talked a lot about concerns that the

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>dollar could be replaced as a world's reserve currency. But

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>based on your reporting, how likely is it that this

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>could actually happen.

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 4>One thing to point out is that the tide is turning,

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 4>but only in terms of rhetoric. No one has abandoned

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 4>the dollar. There is slightly less trade in the dollar

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 4>compared to before, but it will be very hard to

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 4>actually supplant the dollar. There's three main reasons for that.

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 4>It's because the dollar is big, it's stable, and it's entrenched.

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 4>So the dollar rules because the US economy is the biggest.

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 4>It is almost biggest, as numbers two, three, and four

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 4>on that list. China, Japan, and Germany combined banknotes have

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 4>the words in God we trust printed on them. But

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 4>it's the strength of American institutions that underpin investors faith

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 4>in the dollar, rule of law, independent institutions, pre and

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 4>fair elections, and as I illustrate in paper soldiers, the

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 4>Treasury secretaries in the way they've dealt with foreign governments.

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 4>The dollar has this power of incumbency on its side.

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.680
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's like trying to say the English is

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 4>not going to be the world's universal language. So that's

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 4>sort of a starting point. But there is death definitely

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 4>more discussion about de dollarization. It's a lot of rhetoric,

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 4>a few small moves. Now, nothing would happen quickly. This

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 4>could take a decade, maybe two decades to actually play out.

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 4>But it would mean that multinational companies, smaller emerging markets,

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 4>frontier markets, and mid size economies would need to consider

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:26.719
<v Speaker 4>how they trade. So it's really hard to say exactly

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 4>how this would play out. In the past, it's taken

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 4>an economic crisis for a world's reserve asset to be dethroned.

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, it would have huge ramifications for the global economy.

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>But you know, you do have China, the world's second

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.599
<v Speaker 1>largest economy. Could China Could the yon be a currency

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that supplants the dollar potentially? I mean, is there a

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:51.959
<v Speaker 1>contender to supplant the dollar?

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 4>There really isn't contender. A lot of people talk about

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 4>the Chinese run. Now, China's economy is the world's second largest,

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 4>but it is still second play a long gap. The

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 4>other thing is that investors are really tied to the

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:11.719
<v Speaker 4>world's reserve asset being backed by a democracy, an open democracy,

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 4>and that is not what China has. And the reason

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 4>investors want democracy underpinning the anchor to the world's financial

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 4>system is because that comes with transparency, which is also

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 4>something that the Chinese yan doesn't offer.

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>This is The Big Take Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>wan ha. This episode was produced by Jessica Beck and

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Young Young. It was mixed by Blake Maples and fact

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>checked by Thomas lou It was edited by Kaitlin Kenney.

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Our senior editor is Elizabeth Ponso, Nicole Memester Bower is

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>our executive producer, and Sage Bauman is Bloomberg's head of Podcasts.

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>So Lea's book Paper Soldiers, How the Weaponization of the

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Dollar Changed the World Order is now available in Korean

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and Chinese translations. Please follow and review The Big Take

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Asia wherever you listen to podcasts. It helps new listeners

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>find the show. See you next time.