WEBVTT - P&L: The Restaurant Industry Is in a Perfect Storm of Problems

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Fox along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>for you and your money, whether at the grocery store

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P L Podcast

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. I want

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to take a deeper look at what the potential on

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the ground implications are regardless of who wins this election.

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>It is my honor to bring in Jonathan Seagal, founder

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>and CEO of the One Groom and St. K restaurants. Um,

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>this is you can find them uh in the meatpacking

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 1>district and uh, you know, across the country. Uh. Jonathan,

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>are you expecting to see any kind of meaningful change

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>either in your customers or the amount of money people

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>are willing to spend um in your restaurants or other Well,

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>good morning to you, good money. I certainly think there's

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>been a change up until now with the election, people

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>tend to be a little bit more cautious about going

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>out and spending money, and I think, I think, to

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>be honest, people are going to wait and see what happens.

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Can you back up because a lot of people have

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>said this, A lot of companies have said that people

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>have been more cautious. Really, people don't go out to

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>eat because of the election. I think people it becomes

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it becomes a mainstream event that people are focused on

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>amongst themselves, and they tend to become more isolated, and

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>they're more focused on what's going on. And whenever any

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>major event happens, whether it's a sport event and the Olympics,

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>World Series, anything that's major that really embraces the a

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>great many people, it has an impact on people's expenditure

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>because they also become aware of the implications of the results.

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's also part of what affects their decision to

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>spend money. Do they think the economy is going to boom,

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>they think it's not going to boom. Do they need

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to save more money? Is look what's happened this morning.

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Obviously the small in the market things that Clinton is

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna win, and and the markets up two hundred fifty

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>seven points. So there's absolutely a correlation between economics and

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>spenditure and investment and and and obviously uh election results.

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, I can tell by your accent that you

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>come from the heartland of America in the center. How

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>how did you did you call the brexit? I mean,

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, so I have connected the completely got the

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Brexit wrong. I thought that we would stay um And

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>what is unbelievably interesting now that seems to have been

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>washed over is what occurred last Friday in London where

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the part of the High Court ruled that there has

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to be an Act of Parliament in order to exit

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to enforce Article forty. You think that we washed over

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that were bloomberg. So this is an unbelievable constitutional will

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that affect your business? With that affect you because I know,

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.799
<v Speaker 1>for example, you've got projects in the lands. You've got

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>business in London, Toronto, or land on Miami, Chica. I mean,

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I want you to tell people about some of these places.

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 1>So let's just talk about that for a minute, because

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>this is a great question in the Again, in the

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>lead up to the Brexit, our business was impacted. Following

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 1>the Brexit, our business returned to where it was. It's

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty that creates cautiousness. Once that uncertainty has gone, it

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily have to gone the way you wanted it.

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>To go. But once that uncertainty has past us, people

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>become a little bit more relaxed. If you look at

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>our businesses, particularly in the United Kingdom where we operate

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>seven facilities, seven venues in two facilities. In the lead

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>up to Brexit, we were impacted and post Brexit business

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to kind of return and in fact is up and

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>where it was at this time last year. Restaurant, we

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>just gotta make sure food restaurant hospitality, right, I just

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>giving example some people understand. So so we have a

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>number of venues in England we operate as part of

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>our business we go into hotels and run their entire

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>food and beverage. So we do that in the Mere

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Hotel in London. We also have an STK restaurant. We

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>also have a rooftop bar, and then we have a

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>facility in the Hippodrome casino. So really in our London

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>is a snapshot of what we do globally as a company.

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's also training across the board of people that

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>are at all different levels of disposable income. We're sitting

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>with someone who lives much better than I do. I

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>am sure with all of the food and the entertainment

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and the beautiful hotels that you can go visit. One

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>thing I am wondering once the uncertainty settles, there are

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>some policies that could make a big difference. Another word

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 1>for one, in particular minimum wage. Do you think that

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>if a minimum wage was lifted in the US that

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>would affect your business at all? So it definitely affects

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 1>our business, and and part of the problem that's driving

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 1>this minimum wage issue is a very complex arena. Part

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of the problem. For first, you have to split out

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the beneficiaries of it. People that earn money in fast

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>casual or in fast food restaurants are not benefits of

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 1>the tip structure, so minimum wage is a really important

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>asset for them. The people that work in in casual

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 1>or in fine dining our benefit from the tip structure.

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>So you have situations where as you systematically increase minimum wage,

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you're still you're paying your waste weight staff more. And

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>whilst tipping still exists, they're still going to twenty percent tipping.

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that the tipping structure should go away? Well,

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>tipping needs to change. One of the ways. It either

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>needs to change or the laws that impact it need

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to change. The biggest problem with the tipping sits and

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>which is I don't understand why the authorities haven't really

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>worked out because it doesn't take a brain surgeon to

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>work it out. The rules require that the only people

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that can benefit from the tips and the people that

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 1>actually touched the consumer, So the the the servers, the

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>bar staff, et cetera. But if you work in the kitchen,

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>or if you work in the back of house, or

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>if you work at any other areas where you don't

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>impact the guest, you don't actually get to share in

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the tip pole. Now, the truth is you can't sit

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and arrest on and have a meal and this there's

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a kitchen cook in it. But because we can't share

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the tips round amongst everybody, you have this terrible imbalance.

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 1>So certainly at the fine dining and the casual dining

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>in arena, one of the areas to fix the the

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>split or the or the differential between the back of

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>house and front house is just enable everybody down for

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 1>managers to share in the tip pole. That one little

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>fix will change that whole category of income, and then

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you can really start to focus on people that are

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily in a tip pool in the in the

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 1>in the fast food restaurant, where obviously people are entitled

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and should should earn a living wage. The cost of

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>doing business. Maybe speak a little bit about that, whether

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>it's the input costs, or the real estate costs, or

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>just the cost and the risk of going bus Because

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the restaurant industry, as I heard, well not a short thing. No, no,

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Well listen, the restaurant industries in recession at the moment.

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 1>There's no question of doubt about that. And it's it's

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>based on all that. It's we're in the perfect storm.

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 1>We have rising rents. You know, every year our rent

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to go up three five, the landlords do not put

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>them up. We have increased food costs and we now

0:06:55.640 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>have increased labor costs. We have uncertainty, we have increased petition,

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>We have competition from disruptors. You know, you have situations

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>with the seamless and the internet food delivery service that

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>impact what's going on in the actual restaurant. Sure that

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>those that will argue to say, well, you're still getting

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you're selling a meal if you sell it through seamless,

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>if you sell it in store. But the truth is

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you're not getting the liquor sales that help to add

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to the profitability of the company, of the of the business,

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.239
<v Speaker 1>and therefore, as a result, we're in a perfect storm,

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>in a perfect storm of problems. And the and the

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>authorities need to wake up to this because if you

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>start to to marginalize the restaurant industry that has overwhelming

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>imployments are mostly self inflicted. Yes and no, the rents

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly are not. Food costs are certainly not. Um I

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>think you know, the let the register, the the legislation

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that we work under, and the and all the enforcement

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>rules are crazy. I mean, if you're sitting and understand,

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>here's a crazy enforcement law. How about this, It's going

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to give you a five seconds. Okay, if you don't

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>see your patios the way they're supposed to be seen,

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.559
<v Speaker 1>but move them to put two fours together, you're breaking

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the law. Charlathan Siegal, thank you very much, Founder, chief

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>executive the One Group and S t K Restaurants. This

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg, all right. Thirteen hours, seven minutes and fifty

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>six seconds until the first poles open in the clearly

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>three towns in New Hampshire are set to vote at midnight.

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>So Lisa Brahmins, I think he'll be staying up quite

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a late night, and I think that Mark Niquett also

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>better it gets some sleep in the afternoon because he'll

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.959
<v Speaker 1>be spending the night watching. He's our politics and national

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 1>government reporter. Normally he joins us from Columbus, Ohio, but

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 1>he joins us here in our studios in our global

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>headquarters in New York. Thank you very much for being here. Mark.

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.199
<v Speaker 1>So what are we supposed to take What's going to

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>happen in the next thirteen hours that is going to

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>matter to the outcome of the election. Well, we're gonna

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>see sort of the final push by the campaigns. We

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>have Hillary Clinton with rallies all the way up to midnight,

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>her last rallies in Raleigh, North Carolina at midnight. Donald

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump will be doing the same and this is sort

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of the last push to get you know, the final late, late,

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>late deciders, the people who are actually going to the

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>polls tomorrow who haven't already early voted, you know, maybe

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:21.439
<v Speaker 1>sway just the last few folks that could make a

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>difference in some of these key battleground states that could

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>decide the election. So you wrote a story basically saying

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that even though James Comey, the FBI director, came out

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and said that he wasn't going to charge any charge

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton with any crime and that the new review

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of emails did not change the FBI's deliberations. This clears

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the cloud. But you're saying the damage is done. Yeah,

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>on a couple of levels. I mean, one, you've had

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>millions of people casting early votes at a time this

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>cloud was sort of hanging over her head, and to

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the extent that it affected votes, you know, there's no

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>way to change those, of course, but I think fundamentally

0:09:57.600 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it really did change that, you know, the trajectory of

0:09:59.920 --> 0:10:02.959
<v Speaker 1>the race. You know, think about before the first um

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.719
<v Speaker 1>FBI letter came out from Director came Um, I was

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 1>actually was aboard the Clinton campaign plane, you know, when

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that news broke. We were in mid air and they

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>were doing a press conference on the plane talking about

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 1>how we can't be complacent, you know, complacencies our enemy.

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Because the polls at that time looked like she was

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>headed toward victory and maybe a decisive victory, and that

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, letters just sort of reset the race where

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it reinforced you know, questions that people might have had

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>about her use of emails. It gave Donald Trump, you know,

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>something to to talk about on his campaign rallies. And

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>it also you know, what we're seeing is maybe affected

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>independence or you know, even Republican leaning independence or um

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>suburban women who you know, maybe weren't enamored of Trump,

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>but we're you know, unsure about Hillary Clinton, and this

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of made them pause about supporting her. So it

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>made the race tighten, no question. But why wouldn't they

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 1>reverse that. I mean, if it had such a big

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.559
<v Speaker 1>effect in the other way, why wouldn't people say, all right, this,

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing to see here. Well, I think the people

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>were talking to say it will have some of that

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>effect that Again, these are late, late deciders, you know,

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>who may have had concerns about Clinton. Maybe this removes

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that cloud and they go ahead and vote for her.

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>But I think the feeling was the race was already

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>tightening with Republicans coming home is what they say. You know,

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're a Republican and maybe you're not sure about

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, but you're not sure about her either, you

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>still vote Republican. So this could help on the margins

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>with you know, a really really close race, but you know,

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the feeling is a lot of it's already baked in.

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>If you cared about this issue or didn't care about

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>this issue, you know this isn't gonna change your opinion.

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Mark Niquette, the use of polling data and projections. Uh.

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Major news organizations do not call elections until after the

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>polls have closed, but using projections during the election day

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:47.959
<v Speaker 1>is something that apparently is gonna gonna happen. There's a

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>something called vote Caster, and they're going to team up

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>with Slate and Vice, I believe, and they're gonna be

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>giving information out about the polling while the election is

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>still taking place. Right, And traditionally we've also had exit polling.

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>This is somewhat similar to that, where you know, they

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>take a slice of the electorate coming off the you know,

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>from from voting and get a sense of, wow, the

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:13.679
<v Speaker 1>vote's going to break down. Uh. And it is always

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit you know, dicey, from the standpoint of

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>people are still voting, and like you say, there's sort

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of a tradition it might discourage people. It might discourage

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 1>people from actually going to the polls if they think

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that their vote doesn't matter because of these early estimates.

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>For example, Right, and you've got people on the West

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Coast voting after you know the race has been called

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>or some states have already come in, And you know

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that that's always been a sort of attention in terms of,

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, we want to get the information as quickly

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 1>as we can, and we want to see what the

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>trends are. But you know, ultimately all that matters is

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>what's the final vote count when you know when all

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the ballots are counted. So since I want to get

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a sense of who's winning and I wanted the information, Now,

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>what are the early polls saying, Well, the polls suggests

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that the race has stabilized, that you know, Hillary Clinton

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>still has a structural advantage. What about the actual early voting, Well,

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the early vot voting. Again, I think the the early

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>voting suggests that you know, Clinton had an advantage there,

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:05.959
<v Speaker 1>but she had to have an advantage, I mean the

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>way that traditionally works, as Republicans are better at election

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 1>day turnout. You know, even if you know Republican like

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Mitt Romney and twelve loses the election, he'll often win

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the vote that actually comes out on

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.679
<v Speaker 1>election day. So the idea for Democrats has been and

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.719
<v Speaker 1>certainly the last three cycles. Bank your votes early, get

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>your supporters to cast their ballots early, and sort of

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:29.439
<v Speaker 1>build up a lead that can't be overcome on election day.

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's what you're seeing in states like Nevada, where

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the Clinton campaign, for example, estimates Donald Trump would have

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to get ten percent of all of the ten percentage

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>points of all the election day votes to overcome the

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 1>lead that Clinton has built with early voting. Mark Niquette,

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining. I just ask, where's Hill?

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Where's Hillary Clinton going to vote? Yeah, that's a good question.

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen any announcement. I'm assuming it's New York,

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>but also Donald Trump obviously New Yorkers. Mark Niquette, Limberg

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Politics reporter, thank you so much for joining us. Market

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>cat has a full party ready to go just to

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>celebrate the end of the election season. He cannot wait.

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>An Lisa bram Waits. I am here with Tim Fox.

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. You know who we call on when

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>we want to know everything about the retail industry, our

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>own pun. I'm Goyal, senior US retail analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Great to have you with us. Tell us about the

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>big department stores and they're upcoming all important holiday selling season.

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>So the department stores have been struggling, as you know,

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>at least to most of them, are many of them,

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think there will be any different this

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>holiday season. Um. They're all slated to report earnings this week,

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>beginning Thursday with Macy's North German Cold and then UM

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>we have DC Penny reporting on Friday. Now, what I

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>can tell you here is that sales likely suffered for

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>many of them UM in third quarter, and that's not

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a good sign heading into holidays because it shows the

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>lack of customer interest in big box retailing and the

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>lack of desire to go to a mall. That said,

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>we think margins will likely hold up better because they

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>are managing their inventory well, and from what I can

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>see in the space, the promotional cadence has somewhat moderated.

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Now that doesn't mean that there aren't any more promotions,

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>but they're being very strategic with them and they're more planned. Held.

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>One second, when you say that you're talking about how

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>much discounts they're giving. That is right. So you know,

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>typically you've seen sixty seventy percent clearance racks and many

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of these retailers, and that's largely because of lots of

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>inventory left over. So they're watching their inventory, they're keeping

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>an eye on how much they're selling, and they're cutting

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>back orders just to make sure that they don't get

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>into that position they did last year where they had

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>way too much, couldn't sell it and had to discount

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it aggressively to make room for new merchandise. Right. Well,

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>these are not all the same either. I mean, Nordstrom

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>usually caters to a higher end UH clients help were

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>whereas Coals is more um of sort of middle or

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>lower h tier of shoppers. Correct, I mean there's there

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>there is a split here. So which do you which

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>do you expect to do better? So for a third quarter,

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I think nord Storm will do, but better only because

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>they have that one week of their anniversary sale moving

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>into the third quarter, and even in general. You know,

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the problem that Nordstrom has right now is tourism and

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>just that the luxury consumer that's coming from abroad isn't

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>hitting those key tourist areas, whether it's Miami, New York City,

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles, or so forth. If that starts to come back,

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll do better. But when you look at

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the Macy's, the Colds, the Dillards, the more mid tier

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>retailers that are essentially overstored. I mean I feel like

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a Macy's they have a hundred stores. Coals has over

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a thousand. Too many stores. Uh, no real place of

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>why I should come here. I mean, there's little differentiation,

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>so consumers are just opting to go elsewhere. T j X,

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Ross Stores, Burlington's stores, these are the thrifty retailers. Fort

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>off retail prices. Are they going to benefit Absolutely, They've

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>been benefiting for the last at say seven eight years,

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>and they continue to do so. And it's not so

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>much about the discount Well, the discounts great, it's not

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>when you walk in there, you'll always find something new.

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>So customers like that element of surprise when I walk in,

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I grab it. If I don't get it, it may

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>not be here. And that's really what's been helping these retailers.

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>These retailers don't have an online presence. T j X

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>is very small, so all the business that they're doing

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>is in the store and they're getting customers to come

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to that store. So we've heard a lot of excuses

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>over the quarter as We've heard about whether that was

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>too warm, We've heard about whether that was too cold.

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.880
<v Speaker 1>We've heard recently about the election and how that's crimping

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>people's expenditures. What do you expect to be the excuse

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>this time around and maybe whether again, um, you know,

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's very important, as much as we'd like to

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>call it an excuse, but apparel retailers needed to get

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>cold and for key to self sweaters and cold weather accessories.

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>So as of right now, temperatures are i'd say, you know,

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>have so many degrees here last week, so they're not

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that cold where it would prompt you to get a

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>coat or a sweater. But if they don't turn cold,

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>we will have another excuse, and it will be whether

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>if temperatures do cool, though, I think they'll all be

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>positioned for a very good fourth quarter because last year

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>November was just very bleak. I don't think that the

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.199
<v Speaker 1>weather really affects anything in the cosmetic industry, or am

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 1>I wrong? Maybe I'm wrong there. You know that's the

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>one industry that's on fire. Okay, I want you to

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>tell me about Alta salon. I want you to tell

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 1>me about the details because there are all new ways

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that cosmetics are now being introduced into the marketplace, whether

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 1>it is dry bars, whether it is all kinds of

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 1>services combined with products. So I don't cover cosmetics closely

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 1>outside of Sapphora, which is in J. C. Penny, but

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you our hardlines there. Analyst that does

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>UM had just mentioned in our holiday preview that Alta

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>us on fire growing um double digits for the last

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>few years and will continue to do so. And that's

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>largely because it kind of fits back into the experience.

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you want to dress up because you

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>want to go out, you want to have nice makeup,

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you want to have your hair done, and you want

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to have the right products to do so. So the

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>whole shift that we're seeing from buying things to spending

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 1>money on experiences beauty just sits right into that. Well.

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>They talk about things like salon services including hair, brow

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and skin bars, as well as prestige boutiques, and also

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 1>the point is made that their share of the wallet

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and the shopping frequency at an ALTA salon sets them

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>apart from their rivals. Yeah, I mean, speaking to ALTA,

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't follow it. Once again, I was closely, but

0:19:57.480 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you that, you know, it's cheaper right

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>to go there, So it kind of fits into the

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>discount the value chain, and that's something that the customer

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>is looking for right now. So the more expansion that

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>they can have, or the more bread that they can

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>have in the types of seauty services they offer should

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>continue to help them. So what about currency? Does the dollar?

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to hear anything about the dollar strengthening

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and the potential for that, especially as the Federal reserve

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>hikes or is that sort of over? It's not over,

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 1>it's still there. But given that we've seen a lot

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of the surge already with the dollar strengthing in the

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.199
<v Speaker 1>past twelve d eighteen months, I think the pressure is

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>somewhat abate heading into four Q and next year. That said,

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>if the dollar materially strengthens again, it's it's definitely a

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>headwind at least for the retailers with international presence. What

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>is your most contrarian belief Who do you think is

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>going to outperform who everybody else is discounted or the

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>other way around. You know, um, we don't give recommendations

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>that I can tell you that J. C. Penny, which

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>has been a turnaround story for some time has had

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 1>mixed reviews on you know, whether they'll fall at prey

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to the h broader trends ever seeing in the department

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>store space, which is lack of traffic, lack of disinterest

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in buying apparel, and I think they're doing interesting things

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>up their stories, like adding appliance so as they are

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>also focusing in on their InStyle boutiques, the centered core

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and differentiating themselves from the rust. So while still a

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>department store, they're making a lot of headwind headway into

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>getting the consumer back into their doors. Punamgoyle, thank you

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Punamgoyle, senior US retail analyst

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 1>breaking down earnings from Macy's, coals Nords from j C. Penny.

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get them all this week and we will

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>be keeping track of the uh frankly somewhat beliegaled, beliaguered

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>retail industry that has really been uh bearing the brunt

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of the lack of wage increase set is finally starting

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to take ups or perhaps we'll see some better earnings

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>there coming from there. And Lisa Brahmoys, I'm here with

0:21:53.640 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 1>my co host Pim Fox. This is Bloomberg. I want

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to take a look at what I think is probably

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the biggest casino UH in the past three days, and

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that is gold. I mean, gold has been bouncing around.

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>First touch funds were piling in putting long bets on gold,

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>UH to sort of offset the chance of a Trump victory.

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Now gold is falling the most in a month. I

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 1>want to get some more insight on this, UH. Mike

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 1>mclaughn commodity strategies from Bloomberg Intelligence. What's your take on

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:35.640
<v Speaker 1>all this? Well, I think today is a good example.

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>It's with you know, the highest probability of events with

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:41.719
<v Speaker 1>a Trump election would be gold going up. So obviously

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing the opposite today with gold going down. You know,

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:47.239
<v Speaker 1>it seems unlikely it will happen. But the key thing

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to remember for gold is still on the year and

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 1>why global interest rates negative interest rates US might be tightening.

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 1>The dollar hasn't increased as much. So as far as

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>an election relation, I think it's the highest probability in

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>commodities that gold would go. But you know, knocking around today,

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean the news was pretty significant. Look at the

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>stock markets up, it's up, the opposite of gold being down. Today.

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of like are you Are you a

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>popular guy now, because I mean, boy, you were not

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>popular at the beginning of the year anything to do

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with commodities. Everyone wanted to stay about a hundred and

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>fifty feet away if we wanted to be in your neighborhood.

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>That is very true. And that's part of the reason

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm a Bloomberg is because I was at a firm

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>name for the last three years and the commodity aum

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>just went straight down and finally they hit their stop

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and I ended up in a better place. But I'm

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>becoming more popular, I guess. And it's a discussion we

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.199
<v Speaker 1>had earlier. But you know, you look at gold a

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>few years from now, and I you know, we all

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>hope gold would be down because everything is doing better. Commanities,

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the commanity, the economy is doing better, and the Fed

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to you know, we don't have to, like

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.199
<v Speaker 1>stock markets doing better. But gold is still the the

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>attractive hedge, and partly you see it in negative interest rates.

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Now we can move on the other commodities for instance, Like,

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>what's really would be a big problem I think if

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.959
<v Speaker 1>Trump were to be elected, is his anti trade status

0:23:56.000 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>so you think of commandities that US really exports corn, wheat, soybeans,

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 1>that would be a problem there because that extra it

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>would kind of hurt that export market. Well, but wouldn't

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it be the same for Clinton because she's sort of

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>taken an anti TPP stance as well. I think so,

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>But it's already kind of factored in. Any Any type

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of anti trade for things we export will be bad,

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>but Trump more so. Um well, okay, So going back

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 1>to gold, I mean you said, you know it's up

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 1>the year regardless of who wins. Do you think that

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 1>there's a direction for gold? Uh, it's really independent of

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>this latest bout of volatility, Yes, exactly, And um it's up. Well, good,

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it's up for now. But it's all commondities and gold

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:39.239
<v Speaker 1>has just been one of the leaders. It just got

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a little expensive relative of the commanities. But it's also

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>look at the environment. Their interest rates are near negative

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and what's the next step If the central banks are

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>successful in creating inflation, that's traditionally the best thing for gold.

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>So so in other words, I didn't mean stay glad

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to hear it because I have one a bet one way.

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Um No, it's more just you know, generally up is

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>a positive, but in this case it actually might be

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a negative with respect to the global economy. I mean,

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>do you think that that the bets on gold and

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the and the gains that gold has has experienced really

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>is a vote of of lack of confidence in the economy. Yeah, exactly.

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Gold is generally the inversion of the U. S. Dow.

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>It's it's the inversion of the stock market. Gold really

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>stopped going up and started going down in two thousand

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen when the stock market started making new highs,

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know, and it's it's done the opposite there.

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>This year it's done well even though the stock market

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:35.120
<v Speaker 1>has gone up. So it's still it's the ultimate quintus.

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:39.479
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could say the diversified acid, you know,

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 1>the the free, the the the clear asset that you

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>can use to diverse it your but your other your

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>other other other investments. Still is I want to just

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>go through a bunch of commodities. Give me the bullet

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>bear case and that, you know, give you five seconds,

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>because I want to get through a bunch of them.

0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Silver best performing assets so far this year thirty one

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:04.880
<v Speaker 1>percent gain year today, Silver bullish bush bullish. Why it's

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>um down from the highest and the supply demand turns

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:09.479
<v Speaker 1>are very positive. All right, we did go that's up

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:11.919
<v Speaker 1>more than Tell me what's going on with things like

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>palladium and platinum. I always here that they're tied to

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the auto somewhat different. Palladium definitely much more tied to

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>gasoline vehicles. Demand is still picking up, most notably from China,

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 1>So still somewhat bullish. Platinum a little different, more focused

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>on diesel vehicles and what happened with Volkswagen is pressuring it.

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>But although platinum is still three still less than gold

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>historically it's very cheap. Tell me about soft commodities, things

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>like corn weed. I know we've got a big ethanol

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:41.199
<v Speaker 1>issue having to do with corn, and we've got a

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of well, we had a good harvest corn and

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.439
<v Speaker 1>wheat just made ten year lows and because of that,

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>demand is really picking up. So they've been down for

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>quite a while. It's just how sustainable are these trends.

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Demand is quite strung, specifically in wheat, corn, soybeans. Soft commodities,

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 1>if you want a specific soft command to speak of, sugar,

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and sugar is up in the air, coffee, also coffee

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to which we have to drink. But the thing about sugar,

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a direct relationship to corn because of ethanol, so

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>it might pull corn prices up. Anything that you want

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 1>to tell us about the energy complex that we need

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to know, natural gas, heating oil, gasoline, overall glut. We

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>still have a glut. Range trading. It got a little expensive,

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit, a little bit overweight above fifty when crude

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>oil is fifty recently, but getting near forty it might

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:30.400
<v Speaker 1>do the opposite. Was stuck in a range, still a glut,

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and at some point that was going to change. But

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 1>you talked about technology earlier, and that's the key thing

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that's impacting energy conservation more supply, and it's the opposite,

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:41.439
<v Speaker 1>and things like silver word technology is creating more demand

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and not increase in supply. I was going to get

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 1>that for Lisa. I was going to get it as

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a gift. Always just gonna ask real quick, what is

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the one commodity that we're gonna be talking about most

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:55.199
<v Speaker 1>next year? Good question. I still I still think it's silver,

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>partly because it's not really widely watched and this supplied

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to mentor the supply demand trends are very positive. Mike McLoone,

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. Mike McLoone, Commodity

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence and All Things Commodities. We got

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a lots, We got a lot there, Pim, I like that,

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I like the list. This is Bloomberg. Thanks for listening

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg pen L podcast. You can subscribe and

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>at pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter at Lisa Abramo.

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio. Thank