WEBVTT - Animals Throwing Stuff, Part 1

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>My Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>My Heart Radio. Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:18.240
<v Speaker 1>your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick.

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.479
<v Speaker 1>And today we're going to be kicking off a series

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of episodes about examples of throwing in non human animals.

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>We may also talk about the evolution of throwing in

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>humans as well, But this is a subject I recently

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>became interested in, specifically because of a paper that was

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>published in November. Some of you might have seen science

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>headlines going around about this. There was a publication in

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 1>the journal Plus one about octopuses throwing objects, or at

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>least potentially throwing objects. The whether or not it should

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>count as debatable, and we'll talk about some of the

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>arguments for for and against um. But octopuses at least

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>allegedly throwing objects potentially deliberately and potentially deliberately aiming those

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>objects at other octopuses. Uh. Though, of course, the exact

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>nature of their motivations is is somewhat mysterious. It's hard

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:21.199
<v Speaker 1>to to suss out exactly. And I thought it would

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>be good to to start off our series by looking

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>at this example that first got me interested in this

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>um and then maybe we can branch out to other

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>examples of throwing in the animal world in subsequent episodes. Interesting,

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I just assumed that your interest in this topic was

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>because you had become a father and you were already

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>feeling the poll You already were longing to throw ball

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>with your child, which which is something that that I

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>felt when when I became a father, I was like, well,

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I've I've got to get a ball, right, I've got

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to get a mit. I have no other connection to

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>baseball at all, or softball or any of these sports,

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>no attachment to them. I don't play of them or

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>watched them. But there's something about throwing that that must

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>be done with the child. I do like throwing a ball.

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm more into like a tennis ball in

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the hand than a baseball. But um but that's a

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>dog thing, that's for dogs. I guess that's true. Also,

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Um No, I'm not talking about with like the scoop.

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean the roller ball scoop. I mean tennis ball

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>straight in the hand. Okay, all right, but no, that's

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>not the reason. And if I were to go with

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the the the motor activities, I've been thinking of more

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>since becoming a father would be the act of knocking

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>things over after they've been set up. I think that's

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>an interesting impulse that we could study. Oh yes, definitely.

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>But onto the octopus study. So this paper was by

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 1>Peter Godfrey Smith, David Sheiel, Stephanie Chancellor, Stefan Linquist, and

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Lawrence, and it was called in the line of

0:02:56.000 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Fire Debris Throwing by wild Octopus is published published in

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Plus one. And so first I'm going to talk about

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>what the author's report and argue in this paper here,

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:10.799
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll talk about some context as well as

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>some criticism or or differences in interpretation. Now, for for

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>background on this subject, I think we can safely say

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that not a lot of animals throw things at all.

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Throwing is a relatively unique behavior, and the authors of

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>this study say, quote, a throw can be distinguished from

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>other phenomenon by the ballistic motion of a manipulable object

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>or material, where ballistic describes free motion and momentum. So

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>when I think of throwing, I think of taking a

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>free external object or material, so not part of your

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>own body, and projecting it through the environment toward a target.

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Throwing is so unique that it has sometimes been characterized

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>as exclusively the domain of humans. But there are a

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>number of animal behaviors that I think should count as throwing.

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about them throughout the series. Uh, some very

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>clear examples that I don't think anybody would really dispute,

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>like the throwing behaviors of primates like chimpanzees and capuchin monkeys,

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>right right, Yeah, there are plenty of examples of this

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>occurring both in the wild and in captivity. Not to

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>not to say they're not interesting. We may come back

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:28.799
<v Speaker 1>to some of them, but but yeah, they're very well documented. Yeah,

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and also some very interesting ones in like

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>elephants and mongooses and birds and so forth. Now, if

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you were to expand the definition of throwing to include

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the projection of parts of the animals own body or

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>substances produced by the animal's own body, then the number

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of examples really expands. Then you get all kinds of things,

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Like you get spitting, which would include snakes. They're snakes

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that project venom out of their mouths, out of their glands.

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 1>You have, of course, camels famously spit. All kinds of

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>animals spit, uh, and then you also have examples like spiders,

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>such as New World tarantulas. These spiders famously uh kind

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of kick or shoot a little fibers known as urticating

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>hairs off of their bodies, and these are a defense

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 1>mechanism because the hairs can cause severe irritation to the

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>skin and mucous membranes of vertebrate animals that might threaten

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the spiders. And you know, I've always thought of this

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in the context of like tarantula itching powder, like it's

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>just an irritant. It's unpleasant, it gets on your skin,

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it causes itching, makes you want to retreat. But apparently

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>in some cases of like the tarantulas with with more

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>severe hairs, this can even cause death in the cases

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of some small animals when the when the hairs get

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in their mucous membranes. Tarantulas are fascinating. I'd yet for

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a return to the world of tarantulas again. But there

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>are other spider examples too. You know, some other spiders

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>are known to project or throw threads of silk produced

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.599
<v Speaker 1>again by their own bodies at prey to capture them.

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think we probably don't want to count substances

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:15.479
<v Speaker 1>produced by an animal's own body for throwing, because that

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>seems like a kind of that's a different class of

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>behavior than what we usually think about with throwing, because

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>when it comes out of the animal's own body, I

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>would think that usually tends to be an instinctual defensive

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>or predation mechanism. That's something that's probably just a wrote

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>behavioral program that exists. You know, it's evolutionarily coded into

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the animals a nervous system, so they just kind of

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 1>do it automatically. Whereas the throwing of free external objects

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>found in the nearby environment, I would argue that indicates

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a very different kind of underlying mentality, a much more

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting and versatile type of tool use. Well, of course,

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>it's easy for us to say since our bodies don't

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>really produce weapons. Um it might be a different scenario

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:07.840
<v Speaker 1>if human beings, say, produced and shed some form of

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>horn or antler or um or I don't know, had

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>had some other you know, let your imagination go wild.

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>But one might well imagine some sort of a humanoid

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>being that had some sort of evolved feature like this

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>That might blur the line. But but I, but I,

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I do agree, yeah, with certainly with the human factor involved. Uh,

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>humans are are not really going to do much with

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>anything that their own body produces. They're gonna have to

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>turn to the things in the environment around them. Yeah,

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>it would be interesting if a human could like cough

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>up darts from their stomach on command. Now what now,

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm trying anything how to make that plausible? Okay? Now,

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>imagine you've got an animal that has a sort of

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>gizzard and they keep gizzard stones down there, and when

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>they need a weapon, they just vomit up a gizzard

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>stone and then they can throw that there. You go,

0:07:57.440 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>surely somebody's had done something like that. That would that

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>would that would be terrific. You have some sort of

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>like a kaiju bird and one of its attacks is

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>vomiting stones at you, and these stones could perhaps you know,

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>be used it as some sort of a siege weapon. Okay.

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's the distinction between like an instinctual throwing or

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>projecting of part of your body or something that comes

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>out of your body versus throwing of things found in

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the environment. Another distinction I would like to make about

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>throwing is the important, the important difference between throwing away

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and throwing at. For one example of this contained within

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 1>one animal. I think you could possibly make the argument

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that the ant lion might exhibit both types of throwing

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>because it certainly at least does one. So the ant lion,

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>at one stage in its life cycle, it it lives

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>down at the bottom of a pit that has steep

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>sloped sides with uh. You know, the sides are lined

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>with sediment of a certain grain size, and a prey

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and see falls in it can't climb back out, and

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>then the ant lion kicks sediment or sand up at

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the insect, and the insect falls down into its jaws

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and it eats them. And then after it's done, it

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>is typically known to fling the body out of the

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>pit by a similar motion to what it used to

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>fling the sand up at the insect falling in. Now,

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.199
<v Speaker 1>I think you could definitely make the case that it

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>shows throwing away behavior because it's just rejecting the desiccated

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>exoskeleton of the of the ant that it has drained

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of delicious juice. Is once it's done, right, yeah, absolutely,

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>But it may also display throwing at behavior, arguably because

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>as the ant is falling down, it will kick sand

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>up at the ant and uh, and you could argue

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>about whether that's actually at the ant or whether it's

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>just kind of generic sand throwing behavior that because the

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>real purpose, I think is not for it to land

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>on the ant, but to de ableize the walls of

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the pit and cause them to avalanche downward, bringing the

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>ant further towards the bottom with the sand. Yeah. I

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>believe we talked about the ant line a bit in

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>our episode on the star lac Um, comparing the star

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>lacks imagined biology to the Antlin's very real biology, and yeah,

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:21.559
<v Speaker 1>they're fascinating little creatures. But the authors of this paper

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>also mentioned in the background how in some cases throwing

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>is a kind of tool use that also sort of

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 1>contains information. Like a projectile can be not only aggressive

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and violent, but it can be a communicative social tool

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>between animals within a social species. And that brings us

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to the example of the octopus. Is because one thing

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>it's really important to realize about octopuses is that they

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>are for the most part, not social. They are incredibly

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 1>anti social as far as animals go. With perhaps a

0:10:56.720 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>few notable exceptions, octopuses and really do not socialize with

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 1>other octopuses. They don't flock together they don't form groups

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>usually or have very complex social relationships. For the most part,

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>octopuses are solitary hunters, and when they do encounter one another,

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>they practice avoidance or sometimes outright violence. They will fight

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.719
<v Speaker 1>one another and sometimes even cannibalize one another. Yeah, that

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that seems to be the extent of octopus politics. However,

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>despite their usual antisocial nature, there is some previous evidence

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that octopuses might be able to communicate with or signal

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>information to one another. And an example that the author's

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>pick here is one that has some of the same

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>authors as this this studying question. It's by David Shield,

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Peter Godfrey Smith, and Matthew Lawrence called Signal Use by

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Octopuses in Agonistic Interactions, published in Current Biology in twenty

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>six and this study looked at the same species as

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:01.439
<v Speaker 1>our main studies going to be looking at here, one

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>called Octopus tetricus, and this species can change color pigment,

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>can change the color patterns on its skin in a

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>number of ways, and this report found a correlation between

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>color displays on this octopus skin and intra specific behaviors

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>behaviors showing interactions between members of the species. The author's

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>right quote. Here we show by field observation that in

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a shallow water octopus Octopus tetricus, a range of visible

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>displays are produced during agonistic interactions, and these displays correlate

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>with the outcome of those interactions. Interactions in which dark

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>body color by an approaching octopus was matched by similar

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>color in the reacting octopus were more likely to escalate

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to grappling darkness, and an approaching octopus met by paler

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 1>color in the reacting octopus accompanied retreat of the paler octopus.

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.839
<v Speaker 1>So this is interesting. It raises the stability that even

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>though these octopuses are not very friendly with one another

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and they don't they don't really want to hang out

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and interact, they might still be communicating. They might be

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>using color displays to at least communicate information about their

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>intentions with one another, and that could be beneficial to

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>both parties because it could help them avoid unnecessary violent conflict.

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Like if you can change your color patterns to signal

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>like I mean business, I'm not going to back down,

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>or okay, okay, I'm not going to fight like that

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 1>can help you avoid a fight that would have happened otherwise.

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>M M yes, yes, this of course, a topic that's

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>come up recently on the show and a couple other episodes.

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>We talked about the Galapagos tortoise, about the showdowns between

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>these big males and how uh it is almost, if

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>not exclusively, non violent in that they just have these

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 1>showdowns with their neck, who's the who's the tallest, and

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>whoever is the judge to be the tallest winds and

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>there's no need for actual violence to take place. Uh.

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>It also reminds me of the the episode idea with

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burger while you were out talking about goats and

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>rams getting into conflict over mineral resources, and part of

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the issue there it does come down to how goats

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>deal with this sort of conflict between each other, how

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>rams deal with the sort of conflict with each other.

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>But then when you have goats and rams, there's can

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>be kind of a communication breakdown. It's really interesting. Yeah, well,

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean it makes you think about how much apparent

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>uh conflict and violence within the natural world actually doesn't

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>come to violence because animals are often looking for a

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>way to avoid a fight. They just want to know

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>who would win and like find a way to sort

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>it out without having to do the violence. Yeah, even

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of human combat, whether you're dealing with

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>individual level or more complex scenarios involving um uh, civilizations

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and so forth, there's uh, you know, there so many

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>different way there's a lot of posturing. But then they

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 1>are also the the fights or battles one might get

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>into with the intention of being stopped by others before

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the battle can take place. Like, there's so many different

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>things to consider though. I also want to come back

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to this example I mentioned about the changing color patterns

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>on on these octopuses. I think you could also have

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>non communicative interpretations of this as well, that that's possible,

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's one good interpretation of that might be that

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>these animals are communicating with each other, they're sharing information,

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>even though they're not really a social species. Now, we

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>also know that octopuses are able to manipulate objects in

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>their environments using the surprisingly deft touch of the eight

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>octopus arms raising the specter always of you know, possible

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>tool using intelligence and even maybe one day technological evolution

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>in the octopus. And we've seen many great examples of this.

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>One that I always think of is in octopus nest

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>building behavior. You r sometimes you'll find examples where um,

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>an octopus will be able to pull an an object

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>over the opening of its din in order to essentially

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>close the door, which I love. But also this study

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>mentions veined octopuses or anti octopus marginatus, which they say

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>quote carry can carry shelter in the form of nested

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>coconut shell haves that are then reassembled. You may have

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>seen video of this. Yeah, this is this is remarkable footage.

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>And I know just the just look watching an octopus

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in the wild or in captivity. It seems to have

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>inspired many to imagine what it would be like if

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>they actually use tools and weapons. Um. I was I

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>was trying to remember where I had specifically seen an

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>image of an octopus with like a hatchet in one

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>of its tentacles. I imagine this was maybe an old

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Dungeons and Dragons illustration or something. But I did an

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>image search and I found that numerous people have have

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>painted some sort of scenario in which an octopus is

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>carrying a spear. I saw one where there's like a

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 1>spear wheel wielding octopus battling a samurai octopus. So there

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 1>is something about the the the octopus arms that we

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 1>we can't help but imagine them doing truly or weapony

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.199
<v Speaker 1>things with them. I'm not sure exactly why, but that

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of the doom ba meme where people would

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>just like tape a knife to the top of their room. Ba.

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I saw that one, but that

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 1>sounds sounds dangerous. Thank thank thank, Okay, Well, anyway, these

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>two different threads we've been talking about the use of

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>materials or arguably tools from the environment by octopuses and

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 1>behavior that might constitute social signaling between con specifics. These

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 1>two things come together in this studies. So the animal

0:17:56.400 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in question in this paper is the species to Pus tetricus,

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>also known as the gloomy octopus. Now why are they

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>called the gloomy octopus? Well, just look at their eyes.

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Some people think that these animals have eyes that look

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>perennially unhappy. I don't know what I think about that.

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.880
<v Speaker 1>It's it's hard to it's hard to read too much

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>human emotion into octopus eyes. But then again, I get

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to staring at this and I don't know, maybe I

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>do feel kind of the mood coming down a little bit.

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Maybe I mean, I get kind of

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a calm vibe off of this particular octopus. It looks cozy. Well,

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 1>they do like to be cozy. They like to to

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.439
<v Speaker 1>hide in their dens. So the gloomy octopus is a

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>medium sized ben thick octopus ben thick meaning they live

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>on the sea floor and they occupy the waters around

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Australia and New Zealand. But the particular population of animals

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>observed in this study live in a special zone along

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of Jervis Bay, Australia, which is the coast

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of New South Wales as it's south of Sydney. And

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>in this area along the bottom of Jervis Bay, many

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 1>individuals of the gloomy octopus live in very close proximity

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>to one another, high density, especially for octopuses, making dens

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>sometimes just right smack next to one another. Now, is

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>this a change and they're normally solitary antisocial nature, It

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>does not seem like that. There's no indication that these

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>animals like being near one another. Instead, it's a case

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of octopuses trying to cram into a

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>spot that has both food abundance and excellent benthic strata

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 1>for making dens. So it's good real estate to make

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>homes in, and it's lots of great food, and it's

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>surrounded on all sides by terrible real estate, just sort

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of featureless mud flats, which sort of prevents these octopuses

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>from spreading out. So for a human analogy, imagine a

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of tiny island in the middle of the ocean

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>with of food on it, lots of great stuff there,

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's just swarming with antisocial introverts who don't want

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:07.919
<v Speaker 1>to talk to each other. I think I've had this

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 1>experience on most road trips I've taken. You know, you

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>find that one exit that has that one chain coffee

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>store that you need and can depend on. Um and Yeah,

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>an alien observing you might say, look at all these people.

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>They all love each other there, they love being around

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>each other. Oh that's good. So these spots in in

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Jervis Bay have been nicknamed things like octo Lantis or Octopolis.

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:37.640
<v Speaker 1>A lot of just a lot of these antisocial non

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>buddies squeezing into a relatively small area. Naturally, there's gonna

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>be some conflict here. The octopus is regularly get in

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 1>one another's space, and this leads to the creatures poking

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and grappling, grabbing, generally harassing each other. Now, it was

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in studying this Jervis Bay population of Tetracus that the

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>author is first observed what they called a throwing behavior.

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>And the team collected many hours of video footage from

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>emplaced cameras from a couple of different sessions. I think

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 1>there was some footage from and from and uh and

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>they write quote here we provide the first report for

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:23.679
<v Speaker 1>any octopus species of a behavior frequently seen at these aggregations,

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the throwing or projection of debris, both in social interactions

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and in other contexts. Ballistic motion of manipulable objects is

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 1>possible through water, albeit against greater resistance than through air.

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>These throws by Octopus tetricus sometimes hit other octopuses, So

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:47.679
<v Speaker 1>they are throwing debris sometimes hitting other octopuses. And the

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>big question is are they doing it on purpose? Are

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>they targeting one another on purpose? And if they are,

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is that a social signal of some kind? Now, I

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:02.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's important to first just describe exactly what's going

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>on here. When when an octopus is said to quote

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>throw something, octopuses do not throw the way humans do.

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>By building momentum with an arm motion and then releasing

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>or at least not most of the time. The team

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 1>apparently documented one case of an octopus throwing what looked

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to be a bivalve shell by holding it in its arm,

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>quickly straightening the arm, and then releasing the shell. Uh. Instead,

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>what happens is most of the time the octopus would

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>throw by way of its siphon, and the siphon, also

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>called a funnel, is kind of a tube shaped organ

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that octopus is used to swim. You can think of

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it as an organic water jet. It's sort of a

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:46.239
<v Speaker 1>pump that pumps water out the back and allows the

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>octopus to to by reaction, push its body forward. Interesting,

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>so in in these in these cases of an octopus

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 1>throwing it, depending on what is being thrown, you could

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 1>think of it as being like they they've load did

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>their their biocannon, their their fluid based biocannon with like

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a piece of shell, and are firing it. Or it's

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>just kind of like loaded with debris yet well sort of,

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean that is good, I think, except actually what

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the cannon is loaded with is just water as usual.

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 1>It's more like they've loaded a cannon and they have

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>put the thing they want to throw right in front

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of the cannon so that when the cannonball comes out,

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>it hits the thing they want to throw. The cannonball

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>just being water and propels it towards the target. Again,

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>assuming that these are targeted throws. We don't know that

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 1>for sure, but going with that for a minute. So

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a several step procedure. It goes like this. So

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>this octopus, Octopus tetricus, it will gather external material. And

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>there were three main types of material that the author's

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>observed being thrown in the study. One is shells, generally

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 1>mollusk shells, so like scallop shells, which also would be

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>shells of things that the octopuses are eating. And then

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the other one is algae, and then finally silt or

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>sediment from the seafloor, so just you know, sand, that

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. This sounds like dirty Fighters. It sounds

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>like like the scene in so many movies, especially like

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Sword and Sandal movies, where there's some sort of a

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 1>gladiatorial combat going on, and what does the villain do. Oh,

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna get a little sand off the battleground floor

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>throw it in the eyes of our hero, except the

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>gloomy octopuses are all dirty fighters. They love to shoot

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>this silt, so you scoop that up in your arms,

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 1>So they're actually using their arms for this part, scooping

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 1>up the thing, whatever it is, shells, algae, or silt,

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and then they hold it underneath the body. They hold

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it underneath the body with their arms, and then they

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>position their siphon underneath the body, which is not normally

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 1>where it is. They kind of hook it under so

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that it lines up behind this stuff, and then they

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>release the stuff with their arms at the same time

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that they blast it with a jet of water from

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 1>the siphon, and then that jet of water carries the

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>sediment toward its target. So again, this is very different

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:08.120
<v Speaker 1>than human throwing. I think for a rough analogy, you'd

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:11.719
<v Speaker 1>have to imagine that you could throw a baseball, not

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>by extending your arm rapidly and releasing it, but by

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>like holding the baseball in front of your face and

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly releasing it from your hand and at the

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 1>same time blowing on it. Really hard to shoot it

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>off where you want it to go. And of course

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in order to do this we need to have far

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>more lung capacity and diaphragm power than humans actually do have.

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>But just imagine you could briefly create like a little

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>jet engine exhaust port with your mouth. And this is

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 1>interesting because it reminds me of stories I've read elsewhere

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of octopuses using directed siphon jets, but without any like

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>material being propelled other than the water itself. Like the

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>main thing is something of their stories of octopuses in

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>captivity squirting their handlers with water from their siphon, often

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in the context of the handler believing at least that

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the octopus is annoyed with them or being defensive. And

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of course this is also reminiscent of of squid uh

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 1>using their ink in various ways, though of course that

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>would would obviously be an example again of an animal

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>using something created by its own body, rather than in

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>this case, using something from their environment. Right exactly so,

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>when the researchers watched the gloomy octopus do this throwing

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of of shells, weeds, and silt, some of the instances

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 1>were obviously cases of simple rejection behavior, the throwing away

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>we talked about earlier, and a great example of this

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>would be what they classified as eating based throwing behavior.

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>So sometimes the octopus is going to eat, you know, uh,

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a bivalve or something. Maybe it eats a scallop, and

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 1>then it throws the shells away. When it's done, it

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 1>actually projects them away from the body. Other examples of

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 1>throwing away behavior would be the classification they called den cleaning. Uh.

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>The octopuses actually do tidy up their dens. So they're

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>going to try to make a little hidy hole to

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>settle into on the sea floor. And sometimes I guess

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it gets dirty in there, so they want to basically

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>blast a bunch of stuff out of there. And so

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>they will they will do this with their dens to

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 1>get things out of the hole. Yeah, you don't want

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>your midden to get out of control there with the

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:31.159
<v Speaker 1>bones of your many kills or the shells of your

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>many kills. Other times, uh, they showed apparent throwing behavior

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that the researcher said was anomalous. There was no apparent reason.

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe an octopus is just kind of like rippling arong along.

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Nothing's really going on. It's not eating, it's not in

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 1>its din, nothing else is around, but it just kind

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of throws something that didn't happen a lot. But occasionally

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>it did. And then finally, the last category they said

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>was was what they called interactive throwing. This is when

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:02.479
<v Speaker 1>the octopus was interacting with another octopus or in a

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:05.919
<v Speaker 1>few cases, another animal or objects such as a fish

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:09.479
<v Speaker 1>or a camera. And these are the ones that are

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>really interesting because in this case, the researchers said, it

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>really looks like not just throwing away behavior, but throwing

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>at behavior. It looks like the octopuses are intentionally throwing

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 1>things to try to hit or discourage other octopuses in

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 1>their vicinity. So what proportion of throws are represented by

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 1>these different categories. Well, to read from their results, quote,

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>over half of all throws, or fifties three percent occurred

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in interactive contexts, thirty six percent in interactive, only sevent

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>in interactive mixed. And that's where they're interacting with another octopus,

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>but also something else is going on, like maybe they

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>also just finished sheeting, or they're also cleaning out their den. Uh.

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Thirty two percent occurred during den cleaning, only eight percent

0:28:56.280 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>after eating, and eight percent without a parent context. Oh,

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and this total is more than due to rounding. But

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:08.719
<v Speaker 1>they say that the material thrown and so, and then

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>there's another distinction they make throw interactive throwing, where they're

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>basically interacting with another octopus and they throw in that

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>octopus's direction, and then they make the distinction of, well,

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>did the stuff they threw actually hit the other octopus

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>on the footage they captured, and they said that the

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>material throne hit another octopus in seventeen cases that they documented.

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>In two other throws the material hit a fish, and

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>so co author David Shield said, speaking to the media,

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it seems like there's a target and they're not throwing away,

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>they're throwing at But it is a difficult question, like

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>how can you prove that they're actually intending to hit

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>another octopus with this stuff when they do it. Of course,

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>it's possible they're just accidentally or maybe inconsiderately hitting one

0:29:56.440 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>another with these water jet payloads while they're doing somethinging else.

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we don't know why they're doing it, and the

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>researchers aren't sure that these throws are intentionally targeted, but

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>they argue that on balance that is the more likely interpretation,

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and that it possibly is some kind of social signal,

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 1>And they give a few arguments why they think it

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is the more likely interpretation. So for one thing, Uh,

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you might imagine that interactive throws are targeted and social

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>if you notice some patterns, like patterns of differences between

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>interactive throws versus other types of throws. And the researchers did,

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 1>in fact, documents some differences specifically between throws that hid

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>another octopus and throws that did not. One difference was

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>which arms are the octopus using. I thought this was

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>really interesting because it wasn't exactly what I would have expected.

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>But here's what they say. Okay, they say a total

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of fourteen throws out of ninety eight that could be

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>assessed as anomalous arm throws, and these would be throws

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>using one of the side arms instead of just the

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 1>two front arms. Uh. They say, quote, anomalous arm throws

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>were more likely to hit other octopuses than L one

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 1>R one throws, and L one and R one are

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the two frontal arms. So it seems like if you're

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>just cleaning out your den, you're just kind of throwing

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff wherever you use the front two arms, but way

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>more often if an octopus throws something and it hits

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a different octopus, they're using their side arms. Isn't that

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of strange, and they found that the side arm

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>throws were less common overall, but more common if the

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 1>material hit another octopus. So something about this pattern of

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>arm choice could indicate maybe a type of aiming behavior

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>with hostile intentions. It's hard to know for sure, but

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that is an interesting difference. They also write quote in

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>three cases of hits, a thrower also altered their body

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 1>orientation towards another octopus, but these movements were very slight,

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and the effects of arm choice other than L one

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 1>R one were more marked. Okay, so that's one difference

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>between between throws that hit hit other octopuses and throws

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>it down. Second second difference body patterns and throw vigor.

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>These octopuses, as we mentioned earlier, can change their external appearance,

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, they might even change their external appearance

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 1>in order to signal to other octopuses, maybe to help

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 1>avoid aggressive encounters. Uh And remember before when an octopus

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>displayed a uniform dark coloration, that was usually a sign

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that they were displaying kind of like dominant aggressive behavior,

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>whereas maybe like turning paler might indicate that they were

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 1>willing to back away from a fight. The authors here

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>found that UH that throws that hit another octopus more

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>often took place when the thrower was displaying a uniform

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and especially uniform dark body color. Quote. We note that

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>that throws by octopus is displaying uniform body patterns, especially

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>uniform dark patterns, were more often thrown with high vigor. Further,

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>throws by octopuses displaying uniform body patterns also hit hit

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>other octopuses significantly more more often than those in other

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 1>body patterns. And then also they say, in addition, high

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>vigor throws more frequently hit another octopus. However, with that

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 1>last point, they want to clarify, and I think this

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is good to point out. High vigor throws, of course,

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 1>are because they're higher vigor, meaning thrown harder, they go longer,

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and they have a wider range, which could explain more

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 1>frequent hits even if they're not deliberately targeting somebody like

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a a random throw that goes farther and spreads farther

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>is more likely to hit something randomly than one that doesn't.

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Another thing, they noticed material chosen when when octopuses through

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>something that hit another octopus, it was way more likely

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to be silk as opposed to the other materials, which

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>appeared more often in other context. So maybe an octopus

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>is eating or cleaning its din, it's going to be

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 1>more likely to throw shells around. When an octopus gets

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>into a gets into an aggressive interaction with another octopus,

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it seems more likely they will throw silt at them.

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>M hm. Back to the dirty fighter point. Yeah, yeah,

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>And there's something about, you know, the throwing of the

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>silt to that that I don't know that a lot

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of this is just the human perspective and all, but

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I know it makes me think of of things like

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>another trope from films, throwing a single pedal pebble at

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:39.839
<v Speaker 1>a at a window pane to get somebody's attention. Uh,

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, like you know where it's You know clearly

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you're not you're actually trying to to harm anyone, but

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to. You're creating a message. You're you're you're

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 1>sending a signal and in a different way. Uh that

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 1>there is a difference between pelting somebody with sand and

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>throwing a rock at them, like even in the human scenario, Um,

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:02.720
<v Speaker 1>these are two These are two acts with rather different

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:04.880
<v Speaker 1>messages if they were to happen, say at a beach

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 1>between two people, Yes, that that that's correct. Uh, So,

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:11.839
<v Speaker 1>I think the material may make a difference there, though

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 1>they did say that the difference that they found in

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 1>material choice was not statistically significant because they're dealing with

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a small number of samples here. There was a difference

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 1>in the numbers, but it didn't make statistical cut. Now.

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 1>One thing, they did also observe repeat offenders and aggressive patterns.

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:34.320
<v Speaker 1>They say some particular octopuses would repeatedly throw and strike

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 1>another one again and again and again, and this kind

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of repeated hit behavior would seem to indicate a deliberate,

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:46.959
<v Speaker 1>targeted pattern more than an accidental one. The authors also

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>say quote hits in many cases occurred within sequences of

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>interactions that featured ongoing mild aggression, including arm probes and

0:35:56.400 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 1>momentary grappling. So they're saying we saw throws that hit

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 1>another octopus, often when octopuses had already been tussling a lot.

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm okay, And in another way of stating it,

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:12.799
<v Speaker 1>some octopuses might just be jerks. One last thing, they

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 1>say there were defensive behaviors. Uh. The apparent victim of

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:20.759
<v Speaker 1>the throw often reacted by either holding arms up to

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>block the jet of material flying their way, or by

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>ducking and dodging out of the way. Uh. And they

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>said sometimes octopuses who had been hit altered their behavior

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:35.800
<v Speaker 1>in some other way, by say, like pausing or halting

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 1>or redirecting their movements. And this last point I think

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 1>is really important because the authors say, you know, even

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:45.800
<v Speaker 1>if these throws are not actually socially intended, they do

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>appear to have social effects, Like if they cause redirected

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 1>movement in the victim, that would seem to be a

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 1>socially relevant behavior. Even if you would I don't know

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly what it would mean in this case though, to

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 1>say that they were not intend to be social signals

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 1>by the by the individual throwing. Yeah, it's so. I mean,

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:09.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's an impossible task to try and do, to

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 1>try and put yourself in the mind of an octopus,

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 1>but you can't help. But wonder, coming back to some

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of what you said earlier, like is it is it

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 1>potentially indeed like a directed action where the octopus, in

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 1>its own octopus way, is quote unquote thinking I don't

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:27.959
<v Speaker 1>like you, I want you to go away, or something

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I will throw sand at you. Or is it like

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the octopus is throwing sand while having a certain hostility

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 1>towards other octopuses or a particular octopus, and in doing so,

0:37:41.640 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 1>these things kind of a line and maybe there's there's

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 1>less intention there. I don't know. Oh no, that I

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's a really good point, and that comes up

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in one of I think the better criticisms of the

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 1>study that I want to get to in just a minute.

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 1>But just before I do that, I want to mention

0:37:57.800 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>a few other things that the author's highlights several things

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 1>they did not see. Uh, and I think it's worth

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to what these are. They say, you know what,

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:09.759
<v Speaker 1>we never saw an octopus quote return fire, So they

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:13.840
<v Speaker 1>never saw a throw hit initiate any kind of violent

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:16.960
<v Speaker 1>retaliation by the target. That they did see the targets

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:19.239
<v Speaker 1>like it might make them sort of go away or

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>redirect their movements. Thank thank They also say, and I

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 1>thought this was quite interesting quote. Some throws in what

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 1>appeared to be fairly intense interactions were not directed at

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:43.360
<v Speaker 1>another octopus but into empty space. So octopuses might be

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:47.279
<v Speaker 1>tussling pretty strongly, like they're fighting each other, but then

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:52.360
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of that, you know, prolonged aggressive interaction,

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the octopus just kind of like throws some material but

0:38:56.360 --> 0:39:01.400
<v Speaker 1>not at another octopus just throws something. Almost invites comparisons

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of just like throwing things in a huff. But I

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you could say that's what's going on

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 1>with an octopus. Yeah, yeah, no, you can't help. But

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 1>but but think that again putting the human lens over everything.

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 1>But anyway to come back with some uh, some criticisms

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of this type of interpretation, I was reading an article

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:23.319
<v Speaker 1>in the Atlantic by Marina Corn called everyone has an

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Octopus opinion and uh. This article collects some arguments that

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:30.840
<v Speaker 1>there might be less than meets the eye when it

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 1>comes to the octopus throwing footage uh and saying that

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the interpretation of socially targeted throwing might just simple simply

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:43.320
<v Speaker 1>be anthropomorphization. So a few things that that are collected

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:46.720
<v Speaker 1>in this article. One is that Coren documents a dissenting

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 1>opinion from an evolutionary biologist at San Francisco State University

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 1>named Robin Crook, who questioned whether this behavior really counts

0:39:56.680 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 1>as quote throwing because of the physical processes in oolved noting, again,

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 1>like we talked about earlier, that while octopuses will grasp

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 1>things and pass them around with their arms. They don't

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 1>use their arms to throw the way we do. Instead,

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 1>they use this this siphon blasting maneuver, which to Crook

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:18.959
<v Speaker 1>does not constitute throwing. I don't know if I would

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:21.360
<v Speaker 1>really like make this distinction. It seems to me like

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the important part of throwing is like the intentional ballistic

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:28.399
<v Speaker 1>projection behavior of objects from the environment, not so much

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:31.480
<v Speaker 1>like the muscle movements you use to do that. But

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what you think. Yeah, I mean a

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of it's just gonna come down to the body type, right, Um,

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:39.239
<v Speaker 1>and uh, what kind of tools you have to to

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:43.719
<v Speaker 1>to send stuff fly in at another creature? Really? I

0:40:43.840 --> 0:40:45.880
<v Speaker 1>keep coming back to children and all of this. Um,

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I can't can't wait for you to take everything in

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 1>this episode with you when you start taking your your

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:57.800
<v Speaker 1>child to the beach, because um, yeah, a human child

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 1>is is certainly an education and all the ways that

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you can you can send sand flying in the wrong

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 1>directions as well as as various other objects. They can

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:08.960
<v Speaker 1>kick it, they can throw it, they can shake it

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:13.960
<v Speaker 1>from from towels. That's wonderful. I have so much magic

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:16.759
<v Speaker 1>of that kind of look forward to. Um, But no,

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 1>but so so so, Krook says. Another thing is that, uh,

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, like we were talking about there, there are

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 1>other contexts in which octopus is clearly show this kind

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of like siphon blasting behavior, such as cleaning up their

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 1>dens after a big meal, you know, blasting a bunch

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of mollusk shells out, and Kirk argues that maybe that's

0:41:34.040 --> 0:41:36.920
<v Speaker 1>all that's happening in the footage that's examined in this paper.

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they're just blasting their dens out or doing a

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 1>behavior that they do when they blast their den's out

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and hitting other octopuses by accident. In the total footage,

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:51.800
<v Speaker 1>this article claims that only seventeen percent of the throws

0:41:51.840 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 1>actually hit another octopus, So a majority of what we

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 1>see either way is just throwing away behavior, not throwing

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 1>at the question is whether this minority of cases where

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 1>it was interactive throwing, and especially the ones where it

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 1>looks like interactive throwing and it actually hit the other animal,

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 1>those are the minority we're looking at. That's just seventeen

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 1>percent of all the throws. Yeah, I mean, I again

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 1>come back to something you mentioned earlier about again the

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the octopus is generally a solitary creature, and this is

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a scenario in which they are living in close proximity

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to one another due to the restraints of the of

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:33.799
<v Speaker 1>the environment itself. So you could just simply look at

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it like, look, these octopuses are are violent slabs, and

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 1>normally they're on their own being violent slabs, but now

0:42:42.680 --> 0:42:45.719
<v Speaker 1>they're forced to live together, and this is this is

0:42:45.760 --> 0:42:48.760
<v Speaker 1>what happens when occopuses, I don't know, stop being polite

0:42:48.760 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and start getting real. Now, there are several things raised

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 1>in this article, but one I thought was actually a

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 1>pretty good point to make was that even if the

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 1>octopuses are trying to hit one another with the throwing,

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 1>so maybe you can say, like half of the equation

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 1>is true. Maybe it is targeted throwing. They are throwing

0:43:07.200 --> 0:43:09.759
<v Speaker 1>at the other octopus. But at the same time you

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 1>could say it might still not be social octopus signaling

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:18.799
<v Speaker 1>exactly because in the words of Piero Amodio, a biologist

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:23.600
<v Speaker 1>who has specialized in octopuses at anton Dorn Zoological Station

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in Italy, it maybe quote used more broadly towards annoying

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 1>or threatening stimuli. So maybe it's not a thing about

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 1>octopuses communicating with octopuses, but it's just like something is

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 1>bothering them, so they throw They just squirt object, they

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 1>squirt material at it. Uh And evidence for this would

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 1>include octopuses were also observed in a couple of instances

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 1>in the study throwing debris at fish uh and at

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:52.800
<v Speaker 1>a camera emplacement in a couple of cases. So it

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 1>could be less interspecific social signaling and more like, I

0:43:57.040 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know what that is, I don't like that object

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in my space. Squirt some dirt at it for this objection,

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I think fair enough. Like in that case, I think

0:44:05.640 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it would definitely count as directed throwing. It would be

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:12.080
<v Speaker 1>throwing at rather than throwing away. But this might limit

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:16.480
<v Speaker 1>what kinds of interpretations we could make about the relationships

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:21.600
<v Speaker 1>between gloomy octopuses specifically. The article makes uh sites. One

0:44:21.680 --> 0:44:24.279
<v Speaker 1>last argument that I thought was pretty interesting, and this

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 1>comes from Christian now Roth, who is a researcher on

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the behavior of goats at the Research Institute for Farm

0:44:32.480 --> 0:44:36.759
<v Speaker 1>Animal Biology in Germany. And the point that Narrowth makes

0:44:36.840 --> 0:44:40.400
<v Speaker 1>here talking about goats is that, yeah, even goats have

0:44:40.560 --> 0:44:43.759
<v Speaker 1>lots of mysteries about them. Quote, they sneeze when they're

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:47.440
<v Speaker 1>spooked or frustrated, and there is actually nothing on how

0:44:47.520 --> 0:44:50.360
<v Speaker 1>often goats show this behavior, how often they use it,

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:53.799
<v Speaker 1>in which contexts they use it. Uh And I thought

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that was really interesting because it, of course is especially

0:44:57.840 --> 0:45:01.480
<v Speaker 1>hard to figure out the motivation for animal behavior when

0:45:01.520 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you're studying them in the wild as opposed to in

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the lab. Like in the lab, you can strictly limit

0:45:06.680 --> 0:45:10.239
<v Speaker 1>variables to some degree, but in the natural environment there

0:45:10.320 --> 0:45:13.640
<v Speaker 1>might be thousands of variables to disentangle, and you might

0:45:13.680 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 1>not even recognize what some of them are. And the

0:45:16.320 --> 0:45:20.720
<v Speaker 1>specific example about okay, so goats sometimes sneeze when they're spooked,

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:23.440
<v Speaker 1>but like, why do they do that? What exactly are

0:45:23.480 --> 0:45:26.160
<v Speaker 1>they trying to do with the sneezing. Is it a

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:29.120
<v Speaker 1>directed behavior or just to kind of tick or what?

0:45:29.840 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 1>It reminds me of our recent discussion on the Galapagos

0:45:34.239 --> 0:45:38.719
<v Speaker 1>marine iguana. Do they sort snort salt out of their

0:45:38.760 --> 0:45:42.320
<v Speaker 1>salt glands at an attacker defensively, like when something is

0:45:42.360 --> 0:45:45.239
<v Speaker 1>approaching them, when when a Charles Darwin is approaching them,

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:49.359
<v Speaker 1>as Charles Darwin thought he observed, or is the salt

0:45:49.440 --> 0:45:53.560
<v Speaker 1>snorting not actually correlated with with defensive behavior? Is it

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 1>not actually motivated by defensive considerations at all. It's hard

0:45:58.520 --> 0:46:01.839
<v Speaker 1>to tell. Yeah, again, it is so hard to step

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:06.200
<v Speaker 1>outside of the um of of the human lens here

0:46:06.440 --> 0:46:08.760
<v Speaker 1>when when trying to imagine what any of these creatures

0:46:08.800 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 1>are doing. Um, because some of these things, like we

0:46:12.320 --> 0:46:15.399
<v Speaker 1>we want to interpret them and think about them as

0:46:15.480 --> 0:46:22.240
<v Speaker 1>being deliberate actions as opposed to say, in the human scenario,

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of uh, incidental signalings of hostility that we might have.

0:46:28.200 --> 0:46:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Like someone can look hostile and say a bus without

0:46:33.040 --> 0:46:35.279
<v Speaker 1>actively thinking like, oh, I'm going to show everybody on

0:46:35.360 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 1>this bus how I feel about them. Check out my hostility.

0:46:38.320 --> 0:46:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Don't come near me or or violence happens next, like

0:46:42.040 --> 0:46:44.279
<v Speaker 1>you could. That person could just genuinely be and say

0:46:44.320 --> 0:46:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a bad mood or be thinking about something that's bothering

0:46:47.120 --> 0:46:50.480
<v Speaker 1>them and their their posture, that the way their their

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:53.239
<v Speaker 1>their look, their expression on their face could take on

0:46:53.320 --> 0:46:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a hostile energy that would then be picked up on

0:46:55.560 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 1>by other people. And that and that kind of ambiguity

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:03.480
<v Speaker 1>exists even with in our very finely tuned ability to

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:06.920
<v Speaker 1>suss out the motivations of other humans. These are on specifics.

0:47:07.040 --> 0:47:09.359
<v Speaker 1>We're right in that human meal you you know, we're

0:47:09.800 --> 0:47:12.640
<v Speaker 1>used to that when looking at another species. I mean,

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:16.200
<v Speaker 1>it's like several orders of magnitude more difficult to figure

0:47:16.239 --> 0:47:18.719
<v Speaker 1>things out right, right, Because again, that same dude on

0:47:18.760 --> 0:47:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the bus that you're thinking looks hostile, he could just

0:47:22.239 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about a really cool episode of some TV

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:26.719
<v Speaker 1>show that he watched, you know, and that's just all

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you because you think, oh, somebody who looks weird on

0:47:30.040 --> 0:47:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a bus must have hostile intentions. Uh, they must have

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:35.680
<v Speaker 1>something negative going on, and they don't just have an

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:37.799
<v Speaker 1>intense look because they're trying to figure out the plot

0:47:37.880 --> 0:47:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of of I don't know, some Netflix show. Now, I

0:47:41.920 --> 0:47:44.880
<v Speaker 1>think when it comes to the ambiguity behind animal behaviors,

0:47:45.160 --> 0:47:48.720
<v Speaker 1>there might be other kinds of considerations that would come in, Like, okay,

0:47:48.840 --> 0:47:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is the marine iguana even if you could show, wow,

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it does, uh, you know, snort salt out of its

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:57.680
<v Speaker 1>salt glands more often when a human is approaching it,

0:47:58.320 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 1>That would show a correlation with the proximity of a

0:48:00.600 --> 0:48:04.000
<v Speaker 1>larger land animal. But it wouldn't, Uh, it wouldn't still

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:05.719
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't show it was defensive in some way. I mean,

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:09.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's snorting like that because it's trying to I

0:48:09.719 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know, like clear, some kind of gland blockage in

0:48:12.680 --> 0:48:14.880
<v Speaker 1>case it needs to move quickly or something like that.

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's part of the kind of fight or flight uh,

0:48:17.920 --> 0:48:22.839
<v Speaker 1>physiological internal regulation of the iguana's body. Who knows. I'm

0:48:22.880 --> 0:48:25.640
<v Speaker 1>just speculating there, But you could imagine other things for

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:29.920
<v Speaker 1>this octopus throwing behavior. Maybe the throwing is part of

0:48:30.360 --> 0:48:33.960
<v Speaker 1>something that's going on internally with the octopus that is

0:48:34.120 --> 0:48:38.719
<v Speaker 1>related to aggressive interactions with other octopuses, but is not

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:42.080
<v Speaker 1>about hitting them with the objects, though it's hard to

0:48:42.520 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 1>figure out what that other purpose would be. Then again,

0:48:46.600 --> 0:48:48.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe it is just about hitting them with the silt.

0:48:48.480 --> 0:48:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that seems like a perfectly plausible explanation to me.

0:48:51.880 --> 0:48:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Either way. A fascinating look here, another fascinating consideration of

0:48:56.320 --> 0:48:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the world of the octopus. And this episode is also

0:48:59.320 --> 0:49:01.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of a stealth goat episode two, since we get

0:49:01.719 --> 0:49:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to get in a little bit of goat pondering here

0:49:04.160 --> 0:49:06.640
<v Speaker 1>at the end. I like that. But we're gonna be

0:49:06.760 --> 0:49:10.960
<v Speaker 1>back with more interesting examples of throwing behavior and animals,

0:49:11.000 --> 0:49:14.480
<v Speaker 1>so these questions will continue, that's right, so be sure

0:49:14.520 --> 0:49:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to join us for the next one. Um, let's just

0:49:17.280 --> 0:49:20.440
<v Speaker 1>remind everybody that's stuff to Blow your Mind publishes in

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:22.319
<v Speaker 1>the Stuff to Blow Your Mind podcast feed with our

0:49:22.360 --> 0:49:27.560
<v Speaker 1>core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays. On Wednesday's we do

0:49:27.640 --> 0:49:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a short form artifact or monster fact episode, on Monday's

0:49:30.600 --> 0:49:32.640
<v Speaker 1>we do listener mail, and on Fridays we set aside

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:34.959
<v Speaker 1>most serious concerns to just talk about a weird film.

0:49:35.760 --> 0:49:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Huge thanks to our audio producer Max Williams. If you

0:49:40.360 --> 0:49:42.280
<v Speaker 1>would like to get in touch with us with feedback

0:49:42.360 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 1>on this episode or any other, to suggest a topic

0:49:44.680 --> 0:49:46.880
<v Speaker 1>for the future, or just to say hello, you can

0:49:47.000 --> 0:49:49.719
<v Speaker 1>email us at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind

0:49:49.960 --> 0:50:00.719
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of I

0:50:00.840 --> 0:50:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. For more podcasts for my Heart Radio, visit

0:50:03.719 --> 0:50:06.239
<v Speaker 1>the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:50:06.320 --> 0:50:07.560
<v Speaker 1>listening to your favorite shows.