WEBVTT - Tesla's Job Cuts and Apple's iPhone Slump

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>From Marhard where Innovation of Money and Power Collie in

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlove.

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hyde a Bloomberg's World Headquarters in New York

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 3>and I met Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 5>Coming up. We'll bring you the latest updates from the

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 5>Middle East.

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 3>That's after Iran launched missiles and roans over the weekend

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 3>into Israel, the US, and Europe.

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 5>They ramp up calls for Israeli restraint.

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 6>Full coverage ahead plus shares of Tesla slump amid the

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 6>company's plans to slash ten percent of its global workforce,

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 6>prompting senior executives to depart the company.

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 4>We had the details and Apple.

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 3>It faces its worst liphone slump since Covid as a

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 3>company faces increased.

0:00:58.120 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 5>Competition in China.

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 3>We'll discuss that and so much more throughout this hour,

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 3>but first we turn our attention to a complex geopolitical

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 3>and macroeconomic picture that's being painted today.

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 3>The pullerhead really is the fact that Naslak is currently

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 3>back in the red. We were managing to push higher

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 3>on stocks but certainly the bond market field or full

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 3>effect of actually a stronger, more resilient macroeconomic picture in

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 3>the United States coming from retail sales that were far

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 3>faster than had been anticipated. But on the flip side

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 3>is geopolitics is a concern about, of course, an unprecedented

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 3>attack coming from Iran to Israel and what that really

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 3>means in terms of actually dialing up or cooling of

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 3>some of those geopolitical anxieties, notably oil is on the

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 3>lower side that drags the Bloomerg commodity index down. But

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 3>remember there's actually added sanctions on Russian movement of metals

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 3>into the LME at the moment, and that's been moving

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 3>around aluminium and some other.

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 5>Key metals to be keeping it on.

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 3>So complex going on in the commodity space as well,

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 3>but let's move it on as we try to really

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 3>anticipate which way risk assets are going to be going.

0:01:57.400 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 3>One that was in full effect because ultimately it was

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 3>the when you ascasset that was really able to be

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 3>traded at the time of those initial reports, as many

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 3>had anticipated an attack coming from Iran into Israel. But

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 3>we see the volatility that was in display when it

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 3>came to bitcoin on Saturday afternoon plumbting.

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:14.519
<v Speaker 5>We now recover some of that.

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 3>We're still off by more than four percent over the

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 3>course of a three day trading period ed. We're currently

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 3>at sixty three nine hundred of thereabouts.

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 6>But what are you watching on the micro Tesla? It's

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 6>a big one. I broke the story this morning that

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 6>Drew Baglino, who led powertrain and energy at Tesla, one

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 6>of only four named executive officers, has resigned and left

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 6>the company. The stock near session lows down three point

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 6>three percent. We also confirmed Elon Muskers told staff that

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 6>ten percent of the workforce will be cut in pursuit

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 6>of cost reduction, productivity, and what he called duplicate rolls.

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 6>We'll get all the details later from the Bloomberg team.

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 6>The other big one is Apple. IDC data showed shipments

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 6>of about fifty million iPhones in the first quarter, but

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 6>that's down ten percent year on year.

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 4>Now that's third.

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 6>Party data, and it's not just an Apple story. With

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 6>the stockdown eight tens of one percent, it's a story

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 6>about China's domestic smartphone makers having success growing market share

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 6>in a really key market. We will speak to bloom

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 6>those Mark German because it's complicated, but Apple is lower,

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 6>whether that's cause or not.

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 4>Who knows.

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 6>A lot going on in the world of technology this morning,

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 6>but also a lot of news around the world.

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and let's get back to it, ed, because Iran's

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 3>attack on Israel is what many are talking of. Israel

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 3>and its allies intercepted the overwhelming majority of more than

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 3>three hundred missiles drones fired by Iran. Joining US now

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 3>from Tel Aviv is Our Israel. You're O chief and

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 3>senior editor Ethan Rohner, and we thank you for your time.

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 5>Ethan.

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, probably how is it being felt and digested in

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Israel right now?

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's a great question.

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I think that the overall senses of relief because,

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 8>as you said, of three hundred and fifty projectiles, including

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 8>one hundred and twenty ballistic missiles that come here in

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 8>eight or ten minutes from around the vast majority, the

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 8>overwhelming majority, were stopped before they got here. They were

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 8>about half a dozen that got through to a military

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 8>base in Israel. They didn't do much damage, but they

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 8>did hit and so there's a kind of a mixed

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:23.359
<v Speaker 8>feeling of well, we got them, we don't nobody was killed.

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 8>But but there's a seven year old girl fighting for

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 8>a live shrapnel that hit her in the south. But

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 8>the general senses this could have been much much worse.

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 8>So we can we Israel can take its time to decide.

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 5>What to do next.

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 8>But there is a a rubicon that's been crossed. I mean,

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 8>we we have for the very first time in nearly

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 8>four decades as Israel taken direct hits from missiles of

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 8>this kind, and the first time ever in Thish what

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 8>has been a shadow war between Israel and Iran emerged

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 8>from the shadows. So we're in a new era, and

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 8>it's not clear what that means.

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 6>Ething late to the program, we're going to talk a

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 6>little bit about the sort of coalition response. You know,

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:08.679
<v Speaker 6>Israel made those interceptions in conjunction with the United States

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 6>and the United Kingdom. I'd also like to learn a

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 6>little bit about the kind of operational response on the

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 6>ground in Israel, what it is happening in the streets,

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 6>what the government is telling its citizens of where we stand.

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 8>So at the moment, in fact, there is a sense

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 8>of calm. The government issued a statement that they were

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 8>going to reopen the schools and the sort of day

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 8>camps that they had closed on Saturday night in anticipation

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 8>of this attack. So everything is back to normal, I

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 8>think it's fair to say. And by the way, the

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 8>Iranians also reopened their airspace, so there is no sense

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 8>that there's going to be a continuation of this war

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 8>in the coming three days. On the other hand, the

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 8>Israeli cabinet met last night and met again tonight in

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 8>order to discuss what kind of sponse it needs to have,

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 8>and those on the far right are urging a very

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 8>vigorous response, a crushing attack, as they put it. It's

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 8>not clear if they're going to have their way. It

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 8>doesn't seem so, because it does feel that the embrace

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 8>of the United States, the United Kingdom in France of

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 8>Israel at this point has been a warm bath for

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 8>Israelis after many weeks of hostility because of their war

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 8>in Gaza. At the same time, you see, the Israelis

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 8>have two audiences. They worry about these that we just

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 8>talked about, and then their enemies that it's just Balahamas

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 8>and Iran, and they fear that any lack of reaction

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 8>will be perceived as weakness, and so there is a

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:42.239
<v Speaker 8>sense that they must react.

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 7>The question is when and.

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 6>How Bloomberg's even brunna on the ground until they're really

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 6>grateful for your time on the ground reporting as well,

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 6>and we have a big audience in this show in

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 6>Europe and the emir regionable broadly. I point out the

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 6>easy Jet, one of the airlines is an example, has

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 6>canceled flights to his through April twenty first, so there's

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 6>a kind of business impact.

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 4>There as well.

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 6>Let's go from Israel to Washington, DC and bring in

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg National security reporter Nick Wadhams. Nick I was talking

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 6>to Ethan about the kind of coalition response that United

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 6>States was involved. The United Kingdom was involved in part

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 6>because Iran had given heads up almost on their actions.

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 6>My understanding is Biden has been in touch with the

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 6>Israeli government quite frequently. What we know from the US

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 6>side at this stage.

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 9>Well, what we're hearing from the administration is essentially that

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 9>they want Israel to put the brakes on any sort

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 9>of response. So we've been told the view from the

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 9>White House is listen, Israel, take the win. Your air

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 9>defenses did an extraordinary job deflecting and rebuffing about ninety

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 9>nine percent of those incoming drones and missiles, and there

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 9>is no need for an immediate response. Obviously, as Ethan

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 9>just said, the pressure on Prime Minister Benjamin Netnya, who

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 9>is coming very much from the other direction as well.

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 9>So looking ahead for the next few days, what we're

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 9>really going to see here is a good reflection on

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 9>the limits of US leverage over Prime Minister Netnya, who

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 9>President Biden could not have been more clear about what

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 9>he wants.

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 4>To see next, which is de escalation.

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 9>The US does not want to be pulled in deeper

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 9>into this conflict. They don't want this to turn into

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 9>even a bigger conflagration, and they want Prime Minister Benjamin

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 9>Netnyah to hold fire. Whether he listens to that advice

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 9>is another thing entirely.

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 3>For now, rightly or wrongween the market, and that is

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 3>often what we focus in on here.

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 5>A Boomberg has.

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Been deeming this to be something that's containable. As of

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 3>the moment, Nick, where do we have to align our

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 3>sites now? Is it thinking of the next statement that

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 3>we do get from Biden. We anticipate a conversation a

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 3>press conference as soon as twelve o'clock that's right.

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 9>So I mean, will really be looking at what the

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 9>tone is from the president and from other officials in

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 9>the administration. Are they projecting unity? Is there more sense

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 9>of those fractures that had emerged in recent weeks with Israel?

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 9>Do we have a sense that these two governments are

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 9>diverging in their perspectives on what the outcome will be here?

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 9>I mean, the attack by Iran could have been so

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 9>much worse. I think you're seeing in the market in

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:27.959
<v Speaker 9>some ways a sense of relief that Israel repelled those

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 9>As Ethan mentioned, there had been no deaths and fairly

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 9>limited destruction. But what happens if Iran decides to respond

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 9>yet again in response to a potential Israeli retaliation. So

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 9>there's a lot of fear that there could be an

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 9>escalatory spiral that gets to a situation that neither side

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 9>can control.

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 3>N it Wardens, thank you for giving us the context

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 3>and keeping us up to speed.

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk about Tesla.

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 6>The ev maker is going to cut ten percent of

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 6>its workforce after a slowdown in demand, Elon Musk preparing

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 6>the company for the next phase of growth.

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 4>We also reported this.

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.439
<v Speaker 6>Morning that two key executives have left Tesla in the

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 6>last twenty four hours. Drew Baglino, who's been at Tesla

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 6>for eighteen years and led everything to do with powertrain

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 6>energy storage, resigned, is what I'm told by a source,

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 6>and he confirmed that later on in a post. Rowan

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 6>Betel is basically the public policy chief in many ways

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 6>the kind of devacta facto voice piece of Tesla on

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 6>social media. He has also left the company. Let's bring

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 6>in Bloombog's Global Autoza Craig Trudell.

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 4>Craig.

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 6>It was a bit of a long night or an

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 6>early morning, depending on where you were around the world,

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 6>but let's start with Drew Baglino, one of only four

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 6>named executive officers at Tesla. I thought this was a surprise,

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 6>and what sources told me is that he resigned. He

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 6>wasn't laid off off as part of the ten percent

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 6>KA What else do you unite?

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I know less than you, you know, but I

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 10>do have to sort of speculate about, you know, the

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 10>extent to which this may be about, you know, a

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 10>difference of opinion on the direction of the company. This

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 10>you know, this these this news comes shortly after reports

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 10>that the company is you know, maybe putting aside its

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 10>work on a cheaper vehicle and focusing efforts on a robotaxi.

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 10>I think Elon Musk, you know, at first called that

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 10>a report by Reuter's false, and then you know, seem

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 10>to sort of lend credence to it by scheduling an

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 10>introduction of a robotaxi months from now, which you know,

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 10>sort of suggests that you know, he's focused on that,

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 10>and you know that raises questions about whether whether Baglino

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 10>thought that's the right move, whether Rohan Patel thinks that's

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 10>the right move. After all, he's going to be the

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 10>person or would have been the person in Washington who

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 10>would have to sort of justify that to regulators, and

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 10>whether or not Tesla is really ready to put that

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 10>forward is a question after years and years of the

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 10>company talking about having robotaxis, or at least Musk talking

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 10>about having robotaxis yes, when they haven't.

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 3>All of this is sort of trying to be a

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 3>level of prioritization or anxiety that is among investors at

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 3>the moment. Many would say, Okay, cutting down on expenses,

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 3>on costs is something that is necessary in the context

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 3>of EV sales. More broadly, Craig. What could be therefore

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 3>be really unnerving the investor.

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 5>Base right now when you have SVPs leaving. Is it

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 5>more the.

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Concern about the handing over of power ultimately any sort

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 3>of fact that Musk currently leads and has done since

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and eight.

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean, I think it's this concern about, you know,

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 10>not knowing what the plan is, right, and this is

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 10>not just a store that has only surfaced lately.

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 11>You know.

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 10>We go back to the Walter Isaacson biography months ago,

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 10>and one of the more compelling bits within that book

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 10>was this idea that there was real difference at the

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 10>top of Tesla as to whether or not, you know,

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 10>they should design this next generation vehicle with or without

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 10>a steering wheel.

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 7>And you had.

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 10>Within that book, you know, this really compelling section of

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 10>you know, executives having to kind of talk Musk out

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 10>of this idea that they could just you know, design

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 10>the car without a steering wheel and count on the

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 10>idea that the technology was ready.

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 7>And I think that's something.

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 10>That you know, we've seen for for some time, This

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 10>idea that you know, Musk has has really sort of

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 10>been out on a limb in terms of how quickly,

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 10>this company will be able to put self driving cars

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 10>on the road. And what other executives have said, including

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 10>you know, engineers that have had to testify in lawsuits

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 10>related to people losing their lives because they too much

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 10>trust into Tesla's driver assistance system. So this is something

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 10>that's really tricky if you're an executive who has to

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 10>kind of, you know, square that circle.

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Craig, quickly, I think let's just re recap the basics.

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 6>Ten percent of the workforce to be cut. How many

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 6>people is that?

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:18.839
<v Speaker 4>Where is it?

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So this is a company that ended last year

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 10>with over one hundred and forty thousand people. So assuming

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 10>this is company wide, we know it's a global according

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 10>to Musk's email to staff, that would be more than

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 10>fourteen thousand people. We're careful on that because Musk has

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 10>been a little bit all over the place with his

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 10>messaging in the past when he's made job cuts.

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 3>Craig Trudell, we thank you so much. It's just been

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 3>a phenomenal amount of reporting coming from both of you, gentlemen,

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 3>and so thank you very much for setting the context. Meanwhile,

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 3>coming up, Apple iPhone shipments falling ten percent in the

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 3>March quarter, making it the worst sales slump since COVID.

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 3>We're going to bring you the details next. Another key

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 3>points drag on these benchmin Edward. You're watching on the

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 3>micro level.

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 4>Two little bit of MNA.

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 6>Monday, Bloomberg reported that sales forces, according sources, looking at

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 6>a deal for Informatica, and it's all about data capabilities.

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 6>The stock down more than five percent on it. The

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 6>street kind of likes it, but it's a deal. We're

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 6>waiting on confirmation on Bloomberg said it could be reached

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 6>this month, so let's stay tuned for that as we go.

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 6>This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Apple, it's facing its worst iPhone slump since COVID as

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 3>competition in the Chinese market really does heat up now.

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Third quarter shipments are apparently sliding worse than expected, almost

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 3>ten percent, as the tech giant delivered fifty point one

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 3>million phones, falling shy of Anna estemates of fifty one

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 3>point seven mins. And Bloomberg's Mark Gumman joins us now

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 3>with the context of who's providing us this data and

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 3>what it means about Apple versus the other competitors.

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so itc puts up their quarterly reports on smartphone shipments,

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 11>and of course these are their analysis based insights into

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 11>how many units for ships, so they don't know for sure.

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 11>We'll get a better idea on May second, when Apple

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 11>announces its earnings report, and then we'll get a better

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 11>idea from the other phonemakers when they announce their earnings reports.

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 11>But IDC is usually on target in terms of a

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 11>general range or in terms of the overall theme, and

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 11>the overall theme this time around is a nearly ten

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 11>percent shipment decline on an annual basis for Apple. It's

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 11>the most significant decline of any of the phonemakers they track.

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 11>It indicates that Samsung is back in the number one

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 11>global smartphone sales position, and it indicates that sales from

0:16:56.280 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 11>some Chinese brands, one called Transition into particular, within over

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 11>eighty percent year of a year sales increase, are really

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.439
<v Speaker 11>taking steam from Apple at this point. So if I

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:10.640
<v Speaker 11>were an Apple shareholder, it would be a little bit

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 11>concerning to see the slump going on right now for

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 11>the company, and it seems like most of it is

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 11>China based, so we'll have to wait until May two

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:20.440
<v Speaker 11>to know for sure.

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 6>However, all right, I believe most Mark, German chief correspondent

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 6>covering Apple.

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 6>Let's keep the conversation going and bringing in Fionas and

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 6>Kotta now who's senior market analyst at City Index, for

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 6>her take on Apple, and Mark summed up the IDC

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 6>data very well. You either put emphasis on the Apple

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 6>specific data or you put emphasis on the market share

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 6>data coming from the Chinese handset makers and how they

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 6>had gains in sales. Where does your mind goes to first, Fiona, do.

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 4>You know what?

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a really good idea to actually look

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>at these two bits of data together because if you've

0:17:55.800 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>got Apple falling and yet global smartphone shipments elsewhere increasing,

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that makes it an even more dramatically difficult

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 1>position and picture for Apple. I mean, it really does

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>highlight I think the extent of the problems that the

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:15.159
<v Speaker 1>Apple is facing, particularly surrounding the iPhone.

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 5>And I think I mean, obviously.

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>China here is a very big story. There is a

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of competition that Apple is facing in China.

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 5>But I think there's also another side to this as well.

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I just feel that Apple is really behind just as

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Sara as Innovation is concerned, as Sarah's AI is concerned

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and all that's also playing out in the share price,

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>which has really had a tough start to twenty twenty.

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 3>Four two point seven trillion dollar market cap still but

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 3>as along with Tesla are two key stories today, these

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 3>two names in this so called Magnificent seven have been

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 3>anything but magnificent. It feels like in the last month

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 3>or so, certainly beginning of this year, Fiona, can Apple

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:58.679
<v Speaker 3>win back yours and other investors' hearts and minds if

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 3>they are going to be able to show, look, we've

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 3>got AI within the M four process, that we're going

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 3>to be able to have it and you know, sometimes

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 3>they're known to be a little bit slower but getting

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 3>it right.

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's right.

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, definitely a little bit slower. They feel like

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>they're very slow to the AI party right now, and

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 1>that's been sort of you know, punished by They've been

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>punished by investors, and that I think, you know, has

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 1>been part of that sell off that we've seen. I

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>think there is a potential for this to turn around.

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this is the end of the line

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>at all for Apple. I think, you know, we could

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>see a good turnaround as long as they get their

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>AI products really spot on. I think also sort of,

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the geographical diversification into India is an area

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.439
<v Speaker 1>that again could be very interesting for Apple as it

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>moves away from China. But at the end of the day,

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>China is a massive in market and it's also a

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 1>very important market. So it's going to be very interesting

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to see whether Apple can actually turn this around quickly

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>without any support from really from China.

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, if you last night, Caroline and I regroup with

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 6>a team and we're like, you know, what's the story

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 6>going to be Monday? It looked like Apple, we had

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 6>the geopolitics of what's happening in the Middle East, and

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 6>then Tesla, and I'm trying to find a commonality between

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:17.439
<v Speaker 6>all of them. I think that the commonality is should

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 6>we be talking more about the health of the global

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 6>economy right now, particularly for consumer facing technology?

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 5>Yes, exactly.

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's a really really important point here as well.

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the macro backdrop for these stocks is just

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>not ideal right now. You know, if we have a

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>look at where we are speaking as far as macro

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>picture is concerned, it's not smooth sailing at all.

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 5>For the consumer.

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've got the prospect of the Federal Reserve

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>keeping interest rates high for longer after we've seen those

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.199
<v Speaker 1>hotter than expected inflation figures last week. But then saying that,

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>we've also seen that the retail sales in the US

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>are holding up. But I think, you know, when you've

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>got financing costs so high in the US, that does

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:01.439
<v Speaker 1>obviously impact those that are purchasing cars their ability to

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 1>be able to get financing or even desire to get financing.

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>But also when you've got squeeze on households, you know,

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:10.479
<v Speaker 1>big expensive items such as the latest iPhones are going

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to be perhaps items which aren't necessarily top of the list.

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I do think the macro backdrop has

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot to play here as well.

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 3>If you if a client cause right now, do you

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 3>say take risks off the table or do you say

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 3>stay in equities even though they're near records.

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it's a good question, you know. I think there

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>is the potential for things to go higher if we

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 1>start to see that inflation starts to cool again, if

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>we start to see geographic geopolitical tensions start to calm again,

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>then I think there is a potential there. But you know,

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>we've got earning season. We're just ramping up earning season now,

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's going to be a good distraction

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:52.199
<v Speaker 1>for the market to be able to sort of have

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a look what's actually going on, to see whether the

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>lofty valuations are actually supported by the fundamentals.

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Gold and Sachs example, managing to be and talking up

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 3>AI City Index Senior market analyst Fiuna Sincota.

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 6>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 5>Karen Hid right here in New York.

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Let's get you quick check on these markets, because there

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 3>is a complicated context to what's going on in the

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 3>markets right now. Whether it's a macro picture that shows

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 3>resiliency in a US economy, those retail sales still showing

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 3>real strength of a US consumer. And then the geopolitical

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 3>situation we currently find ourselves trying to understand get a

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 3>grips as to where we push forward with Israel and Iran,

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 3>an unprecedented attack coming from Iran on Israel. Over the

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 3>course of the weekend, NASDAK pushing back into the green.

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 3>We had been in the red a little bit on

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 3>the Nasdaq benchmark. More broadly, as some of the anxiety

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 3>was still there to be seen within the markets. But

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 3>Apple actually and indeed Tesla key points drags on the

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 3>Nasdaq one hundred. More broadly, Apple ORF by six ten percent.

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:59.719
<v Speaker 3>We're worried about market share, particularly as competition builds up

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 3>over in China, and the IDC numbers show that Apple

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 3>has had its worth quarter in terms of sales since

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 3>back in the COVID days. Tesla off by two point

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 3>eight percent. This is down to your reporting ed more

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 3>broadly on the fact that executives are leaving an indeed

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:16.360
<v Speaker 3>ten percent of the workforce looking to be removed as

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 3>they really try and focus on a market that has

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 3>been under pressure of late.

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 5>That's off by two point eight percent.

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 3>But we want to move on to what happened when

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 3>it comes to risk assets over the course of the weekend.

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 5>This is a geo political story that we need to

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 5>shine a.

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.439
<v Speaker 3>Light on in terms of Bitcoin sold off hard on

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:34.439
<v Speaker 3>Saturday afternoon. Why it's one of the only risk assets

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 3>that you were able to trade when you first learned that. Indeed,

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 3>Iran has lived up to it to what it had

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 3>been telling certain members of leaders across the world that

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 3>they would indeed be looking to attack Israel, and we

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.959
<v Speaker 3>saw it hit some sixty one thousand dollars at one point.

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:51.880
<v Speaker 3>We're off by three point six percent over the last

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 3>three trading days, and I think that's where we try

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 3>to dissect there is ongoing volatility in an asset like

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 3>crypto and bitcoin, But then where are the applications in

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 3>the here and the now fabian assets here drill down

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 3>on what he's seeing, is Managing director and global headed

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:08.479
<v Speaker 3>Digital Economy over at Moody's Ratings.

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 5>You're someone who's been thinking about.

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 3>The harving the so called fundamentals of bitcoin, the way

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 3>in which we can adopt blockchain technology. But when you

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 3>look at the volatility as it it's still not a

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 3>store of value but ultimately a risk asset.

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 5>How does that make your conversations harder?

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's actually very hard to guess the direction of

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 7>travel for bitcoin overall, because when you think about it,

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 7>it's the value of it is not driven by clear

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 7>economic drivers and like other assets, so trying to predict

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 7>the value of bitcoin is like trying to predict people's start.

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 7>So it can be a lot of things. It could

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 7>be the macro environment, could be the dro political environment,

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 7>that could be many other things, And it could be

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 7>the having that's coming up probably at the end of

0:24:55.920 --> 0:25:01.479
<v Speaker 7>this week, which affects behaviors in particular people right now

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 7>bidding up or down, and it creates more volatility, which

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.239
<v Speaker 7>is to be expected, and it has nothing to do

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 7>with kind of the long term evolution of the price,

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 7>but at least as of now you're seeing volatility.

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, many would say, look, if it's meant to be

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 3>a store of value, if it's meant to be in

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 3>some way fight against inflation, you would have thought, in

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 3>a risk averse worrying time and geopolitics, you will be

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 3>in bitcoin rather than setting off. But then people say, look,

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 3>this is a risk asset that you could say, show

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:28.959
<v Speaker 3>your anxiety and for the course of the weekend. So

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 3>when you say that you shouldn't be predicting it on

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 3>a day to day basis, How then do you ensure

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 3>that people are thinking about digitization, about real world assets

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 3>becoming tokenized when people are still fundamentally trying to work

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 3>out whether they should even be having one or two

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 3>percent of their wealth in cryptocurrency.

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 7>So that's a great question, and those are very different things.

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 7>So I would say cryptocurrencies per se are essentially very speculative.

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:57.360
<v Speaker 7>People are bedding up down, as I said, with probably

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 7>some upward pressure post having at least you believe that

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 7>the past is a good proxy for the future. But traditionally,

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 7>I would say it started with crypto. It started with

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 7>bitcoin and ether and others, and then what we observed

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 7>was that financial institutions and institual investors in general were

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 7>very cautious traditionally about cryptocurrencies per se. So you started

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 7>to see like a different segment of the digital finance ecosystem.

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 7>There was more about using the technology underlying bitcoin and

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 7>other assets and reusing the technology to repipe financial markets

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 7>and the global economy to make it potentially better, faster,

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 7>and more efficient. So crypto was mainly for retail investors,

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:48.439
<v Speaker 7>and the rest of digital finance mainly for institual investors.

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 7>And that's really what we've been keeping an eye on

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 7>and what we'll probably reshape financial markets going forward. Now

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 7>what's interesting is recent the use of convergence in the

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 7>sense that institutional investors, again that were cautious, would say

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 7>instinctively it was not even regulation, even though it played

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 7>a part of it. This suddenly decided that it was

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 7>time to get into the crypto sphere as well, in

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 7>particular with the approval of bitcoin ETFs recently, and so

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 7>now you're seeing institutional investors in both that kind of

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 7>took anization space, which has many benefits, and also in

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 7>the crypto currency space where they were not involved for

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 7>a long time A Fabian.

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 6>I'm fascinated by the credit rating perspective on this. You

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 6>talk about harving and then you think about the limit

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 6>on supply long term infinitely of bitcoin, but in moments

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:53.120
<v Speaker 6>like the weekend, in geopolitical crisis or risk of sentiment,

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 6>there's just clear evidence it's a liquid market. So if

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 6>you are approaching this from a credit rating, the effective

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 6>what is the conclusion you draw?

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 7>All right, So let me clary if at one point

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 7>here a cryptocurrency enough itself and become in particular, there's

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 7>no credit risk associated with it. There's no promise associated

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 7>with the cryptocurrency, so you can't really rate whether the

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 7>issue of a cryptocurrency will meet its promise and if

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:26.640
<v Speaker 7>it doesn't, by how much you gould miss it, which

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 7>is what credit ratings are intended to do. So there's

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 7>no there's no credit risk persuit with the cryptocurrency. The

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 7>reason we're keeping an eye on them and on Becoming

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 7>in particular, is because you know that institutions out there, governments, corporations,

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 7>and others are invested in cryptocurrencies. So we want to

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 7>keep track of whether it could impact their credit risk

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 7>because they have that asset in their portfolio, for instance.

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 7>And we also want to keep track of things like

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 7>market contagion risk that could affect one way or the

0:28:57.240 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 7>other from the crypto world into traditional finance, or even

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 7>the other around, from traditional finance into a crypto currency.

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 7>So it is an asset class that is, you know,

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 7>that's been very resilient. It has no credit risk per se,

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 7>but indirectly others could see their credit risk profile affected

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 7>by the movements in the bitcoin market.

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 6>But there is a connection for secondary markets and the

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 6>underlying technology, which is blockchain. That's something you look at

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 6>very quickly. Explain your work.

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 7>There, correct, So the financial markets are likely being reshaped

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 7>by technologies that look like bitcoin, that look like that

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 7>looks technologies that look like blockchain. Sorry, And the reason

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 7>is that those technologies make processes a lot more efficient.

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 7>So I'm going to give you an example to illustrate

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 7>asset organization Caroline mentioned that a minute ago. It's really

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 7>the process of turning real world assets into a digital

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 7>stamp on a blockchain PLO. And because it's become a

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:06.239
<v Speaker 7>digital step, it's very easy to manage to trade. And

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 7>those assets that are being tokenized could be anything from

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 7>a bond or stock, or real estate or art, and

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 7>so you transfer all the legal rights, in particular the

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 7>ownership rights that come with the assets. You push that

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 7>into that digital token that you can trade and manage efficiently.

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:27.479
<v Speaker 7>So it makes it a lot more efficient to manage

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 7>and trade. In particular, you can settle super quickly, it

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 7>could be even just a immediate or fraction of a

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 7>second to settle payments on that blockchain. You can track

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 7>and control everything that's happening, So it makes it better

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 7>from a risk and complainants perspective, and also yes, really

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 7>creates extra liquidity and new opportunities to find funding and

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 7>to invest overalls. Think about a building, for instance, You

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 7>can be very hard to buy that building alone. But

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 7>if you can tokenize and cut these talkings into small

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 7>trunks that many people can invest in suddenly, right, and

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 7>it makes it as easier to access.

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 6>FABI anastic deep analysis Managing director and global headed Digital

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 6>Economy at Moeting's ratings.

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 4>We're grateful with your time.

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 6>Coming up on the show, we're going to be joined

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 6>by Google Clouds lean more on the company's new training

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 6>initiative in generative AI, cybersecurity and data analytics analytics. That's

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 6>coming right up. Stay tuned. This is Bluebird Technology. Okay,

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 6>quick talking tech. There's a lot going on in the news.

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 6>First start, the BIND Administration plans to award Samsum as

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 6>much as six point four billion dollars in grants.

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 4>To increase chip production in Texas.

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 6>This is part of US efforts to bolster domestic semiconductor manufacturing.

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 6>The southern Korean company plans to invest more than forty

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 6>billion dollars overall. Plus Entry and Horowitz close seven point

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 6>two billion dollars for its newest set of funds on Friday,

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 6>According to an Axios report, the firm beat its own

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 6>fundraising goal of six point nine billion, with that capital

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 6>aimed for its growth fund. And open Ai named the

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 6>former president of aws's Japan to Down Nagasaki to spearhead

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 6>its push to enterprise clients in the world's fourth largest economy.

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 6>Open Ai is opening an office in Tokyo, is it

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 6>releases a custom GPT form model.

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 4>Catering to Japanese language users.

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Caroline, and let's get two more broadly in AI context

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 3>right now, because we're all thinking about how to reskill

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:39.959
<v Speaker 3>and companies are thinking about how to reskal their own employees.

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 3>At the moment, it's also been the focus of Oh

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Google Cloud, it's been thinking about its own role within this. Today,

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 3>the company is announcing a new tech training initiative is

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 3>in partnership with institutions like the US Department at the Treasury,

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 3>like rax Space as well to prepare the workforce with

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 3>generative AI skills and much more, a police to welcome

0:32:57.200 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 3>only more global Google Cloud Consulting Vice President Lee, I'm

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 3>really interested in this because you're working with the public sector,

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 3>think of the Treasury Department and thinking of educational foundations

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 3>and institutions as well as private companies.

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 5>You're offering this all for free. Are you going to

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 5>be charging? Where is the reward for you?

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 12>Well, for us, we see that we're really in this

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 12>enterprise AI era and we have the most amazing cloud technologies.

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 12>But it's beyond the technology. It's also about the people

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 12>and in my organization, we're responsible for skilling up the

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 12>workforce and skilling up our customers, and we see this

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 12>huge demand for skills and jobs. And if you look

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 12>at the job data out there, you can see there's

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 12>many hundreds of thousand, seven hundred thousand open roles for

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 12>cloud analysts, five hundred thousand roles open for cybersecurity, and

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 12>the World Economic Forum is quoting a million roles in

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 12>AI coming up. So it's a huge, huge opportunity for

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 12>individuals and we believe launching these programs we are today

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 12>both and the on ramps to further education and the

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 12>on remps to employment is our role in the middle

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 12>of that ecosystem.

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 6>Lead just mechanically. How does this work in simple terms?

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 6>If you're working with a Treasury department.

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, So individuals can go over to Google Cloud Skills Boosts,

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:21.839
<v Speaker 12>they can register and take these training programs in data analytics,

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:26.800
<v Speaker 12>in cybersecurity, and in generative AI. When they pass those qualifications,

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 12>they're able to then jump start the first step in

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 12>the recruiting process for their partners. We've signed up with

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:37.319
<v Speaker 12>so far so US Department of Treasury, Jack Henry and

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 12>rag Space. They enable them to get through that first

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 12>round of interviews in a kind of consolidated way and

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 12>move on through their process beyond that.

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Lee, What's really interesting some of the statistics the data

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 3>showing that the C suite.

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 5>Has a lot of anxiety about this.

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:53.799
<v Speaker 3>They're worried about the lack of talent that they can

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 3>get their hands on and the roles you just articulated

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 3>that still need to be filled. How much dare I

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:01.760
<v Speaker 3>ask does a C suite have the AI skills necessary

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 3>at the moment?

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 12>You think, Yeah, very interesting question. We also run c

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:08.839
<v Speaker 12>suite training programs here in Google Cloud, and we've been

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 12>the takeup of those has been immense in the past

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 12>six months. We're finding that is really progressing well. Now

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 12>this initiative is much more about a kind of grassroots

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 12>next generation of skills as people either coming into the

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 12>workforce or looking to transfer from their existing roles. So

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 12>we see a lot of people, you know, early in

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 12>their career looking to reskill. These programs are really, really, really,

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 12>really useful for that. The example I've got in my

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 12>head is one where you imagine Caroline, you're just exiting

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 12>the services, You're twenty five years old, you don't quite

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 12>know what you're really do you know you could if only, hey,

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 12>you could, you know, you could take these programs, you

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 12>could move into cybersecurity and these are really really good jobs.

0:35:51.080 --> 0:35:53.840
<v Speaker 12>The average, the median salary of a cybersecurity role in

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 12>the US is one hundred and thirty five thousand dollars.

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:58.839
<v Speaker 12>You know, they are the sorts of roles that are

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 12>game changing for families and their ecosystem.

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 6>Lee, I get yours roots explanation, but public sector cloud

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 6>is such competitive marketplace for you guys, right, Aws and

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 6>Azure also putting a lot of emphasis on public sector

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 6>spend does kind of literally grassroots training help you grow

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 6>some market share there. Jensen one talks all the time

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:26.799
<v Speaker 6>about sovereign AI, but I'm yet to see any evidence that,

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:29.320
<v Speaker 6>you know, government departments know they've got to get the

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 6>checkbook out.

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 7>Well.

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 12>I think what we're seeing is demand across the commercial sector,

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:38.839
<v Speaker 12>the public sector, and from individuals for skills. And you know,

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 12>when I'm recruiting, you know, I'm looking for people that

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 12>have energy and passion and googling this, but I'm also

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 12>looking that they have the fundamental skills in AI or

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 12>data or cybersecurity, whichever the role is. So these programs

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 12>are really geared for the individual, and then obviously every

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:58.439
<v Speaker 12>organization needs to determine what skills they need in their group.

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 6>Energy more, passion, lean more, Google Cloud consulting. Vice President

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:06.239
<v Speaker 6>appreciate the time of the conversation.

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:20.240
<v Speaker 13>The President was very direct that this was a huge success,

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 13>that Israel can be proud that it doesn't stand alone

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:27.280
<v Speaker 13>and that it has superior military capability. Iran utterly failed

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:29.880
<v Speaker 13>in what they were trying to achieve, and that that

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 13>success alone sends a strong message to Iran and to

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 13>the region about Israel's place there.

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:41.000
<v Speaker 6>That was US National Security Council Communications Advisor John Kirby,

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 6>speaking earlier on Bloomberg Television. Were waiting for more remarks

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:47.799
<v Speaker 6>from the White House as President Biden holds a bilateral

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:50.760
<v Speaker 6>meeting with the Iraq's Prime minister joining us from Washington.

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg's Balance of Power hosts Joe Matthew and Joe, I mean,

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:58.319
<v Speaker 6>the messaging from the administration to Israel has been take

0:37:58.360 --> 0:37:58.719
<v Speaker 6>the win.

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 4>What else are we hearing? That's right?

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Take the win, and if you do decide to do something,

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 2>particularly if you want to overreach and attack Iran directly,

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 2>the US may not.

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 4>Be there to support you.

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Having seen the US provide concerted support over the weekend,

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 2>it was quite remarkable, and this does require perspective, and

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 2>on both sides of things. John Kirby is right, this

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 2>was an extraordinary success. I'm not sure that all the

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:25.960
<v Speaker 2>parties involved. Even though it was capable to block ninety

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:27.840
<v Speaker 2>nine percent of the hardware that was thrown up in

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 2>the air by Iran the other night, not a single

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:34.320
<v Speaker 2>UAV managed to infiltrate Israel. Of the thirty Iranian cruise

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:37.959
<v Speaker 2>missiles launched, none of them broke into their airspace. But look,

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 2>it also requires some perspective on the other side as well.

0:38:42.080 --> 0:38:44.760
<v Speaker 2>The people of Israel now know that Iran is willing

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 2>to attack Israel directly, and they do believe in many

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 2>quarters that that justifies a response. Certainly benjaminett Ya, who

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 2>is hearing that from the right domestically here, the question

0:38:55.760 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 2>is whether the White House can keep Benjaminettania, who in

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 2>his government, restrained in whatever response it does pursue.

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:03.879
<v Speaker 5>Joe Matthew, we thank you so.

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 3>Much, really important ability to break down the story and

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 3>push it forward for us. Meanwhile, look, we're going to

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 3>turn on focus to what's actually currently underway in New

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 3>York because Donald Trump has arrived at the courthouse this

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 3>morning where his first criminal trial is underway. She's expected

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:19.280
<v Speaker 3>to last six to eight weeks. Let's get the latest

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 3>on the ground with re Meg's Kaylee lines. And it

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 3>is another first for Trump.

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:28.239
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, this is the first time in US history a

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 14>former president has been under criminal trial. These proceedings, of course,

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:35.279
<v Speaker 14>begin today. He's charged with thirty four felon accounts of

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:38.439
<v Speaker 14>falsifying business records related to alleged hush money payments made

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 14>to foreign star Stormy Daniels ahead of the twenty sixteen election.

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 14>Trump has pleaded not guilty. He denies all of these allegations,

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 14>and he right now is sitting upstairs in the fifteenth

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:51.080
<v Speaker 14>story courtroom at the defense table as there is a

0:39:51.160 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 14>number of motions that they are dealing with. And actually

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 14>the judge has denied several motions already, including a motion

0:39:56.239 --> 0:40:00.319
<v Speaker 14>for a refusal and also the defense's attempts to block

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 14>entering certain things related to Trump's alleged extra merit to

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 14>affairs into evidence.

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:05.239
<v Speaker 5>The judge has.

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 14>Ruled that the jury will be able to hear a

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:09.920
<v Speaker 14>lot of that evidence that said, the jury is not

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:12.280
<v Speaker 14>assembled yet. Once they get the role of these motions,

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:14.759
<v Speaker 14>that is when jury selection will begin, and they'll try

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 14>to find twelve jurors and six alternates who can be

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:22.280
<v Speaker 14>impartial unbiased in assessing this case, which of course relates

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 14>not just to a former president but the current presumptive

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 14>Republican presidential nominee. So highly consequential what begins today, But

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:31.919
<v Speaker 14>this is a process that could last six to eight

0:40:31.920 --> 0:40:34.319
<v Speaker 14>weeks in total. It could take about two months for

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:34.920
<v Speaker 14>this trial to.

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 7>Reach a conclusion.

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 5>Haiti Nines outside the courthouse in Manhattan. We thank you.

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 3>And what's so interesting, Ed is almost as a proxy

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 3>for that betting on Trump potentially being the nominee and

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 3>indeed future president again in the United States, has been

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:50.360
<v Speaker 3>his own social media company, which you are able to,

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 3>of course by shares and exposure to. But that social

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:55.480
<v Speaker 3>media startup, Trump Media, has been down a lot today.

0:40:56.320 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:40:56.600 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 6>Part of that I think is partly due to an

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:01.320
<v Speaker 6>offering in some markets. But I was listening to the

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 6>radio and Bloomberg Radio surveillance on the way in, and

0:41:04.440 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 6>it's like a proxy. I think you're right that whatever

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:10.320
<v Speaker 6>happens in that trial and Kaylee will be on the

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 6>ground for us. You kind of infer your thinking about

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 6>President Trump from it in this race.

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, parent are Truth Social, which is Trump Minia and

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 3>Technology Group filed to register shares we understand, so which

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 3>of course are including those link to warrants. That's why

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 3>you're getting a supply side pressure coming on in the

0:41:27.600 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 3>share price. But notably, it has been down about what

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:32.879
<v Speaker 3>sixty percent from its highs after it did did des

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 3>back and has been publicly trading as Trump Media and

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:36.399
<v Speaker 3>Technology Group.

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 5>Meanwhile, though, we've got to go back to.

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Some key technology stories, and you're the person behind one

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 3>of the main ones, Tesla, just bringing us, as you

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 3>raced in this morning, the ability to report on what's

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 3>happening with executives leaving.

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's hard to know if the downward pressure on

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:51.719
<v Speaker 6>the stock is the ten percent layoffs. Actually I'm hearing

0:41:51.719 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 6>it's much deeper than ten percent, or Drew Baglino and

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:58.280
<v Speaker 6>Rowan Beateel leaving. Think about the intellectual capital that's left

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:02.399
<v Speaker 6>Zach kirk Cohn last August, the Chips leadership that left

0:42:02.440 --> 0:42:03.279
<v Speaker 6>earlier this year.

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 4>Musc's taking an X to talk about it.

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:08.879
<v Speaker 6>Caro, you know that It's interesting why did they time

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:10.840
<v Speaker 6>it this way, the executives if it wasn't linked to

0:42:10.840 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 6>the layoffs. I don't have the answer for that.

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:16.440
<v Speaker 3>And this next phase of growth that everyone keeps harnessing

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:17.600
<v Speaker 3>the idea that we are.

0:42:17.440 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 4>In between these new between two weeks.

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but then are.

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:22.839
<v Speaker 3>We if we were likely to be pulling back from

0:42:22.840 --> 0:42:25.520
<v Speaker 3>a cheaper model and more focusing on robotaxis.

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 6>But what I did here is that whatever the reasons

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:30.799
<v Speaker 6>for Baglino's departure, things are actually.

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 4>Going very well in planning for that next stage of growth.

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:36.760
<v Speaker 6>I heard forty six eighty, for example, is really ramping nicely.

0:42:37.200 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 6>So again, people's reasons are their own, but clearly the

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:43.320
<v Speaker 6>market and our readers are paying attention this morning.

0:42:43.840 --> 0:42:47.719
<v Speaker 3>There's also, of course, the ongoing ev context. That is

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:50.400
<v Speaker 3>not a putty picture right now? That does it for

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 3>this edition of blueg Technology.

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:52.800
<v Speaker 5>Boy, it was a big one.

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:55.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so much to recap on the podcast. You know

0:42:55.480 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 4>where to find it. We're publishing into Apple's Spotify and iHeart.

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:01.680
<v Speaker 4>Of course the pod is all also on the Bloomberg platforms.

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:03.759
<v Speaker 6>Day one of what is going to be a big

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 6>week from New York City and San Francisco.

0:43:06.600 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology,