WEBVTT - Drugs

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Ephemeral is production of iHeart three D audio. For full exposure,

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>listen with that phones. This episode of Ephemeral talks frankly

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:16.919
<v Speaker 1>about drug history, policy, study, and use. These views do

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily represent those of iHeartMedia, Protozoa Pictures, or their

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>executives and employees, and should not be construed as medical

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>advice or encouragement to use any type of psychoactive substance.

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Flow whooa always late, local tests, fired, phone calls, a

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>formal morning rund line rund run und doing drugs right

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>at your mind? Answer the question, brandom, you're doing drugs?

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>This exploration has led into a new and dangerous career.

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Smoking rash, popping Manny's, shooting speed or dropping acid is

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>running one out there who still isn't clear about what

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>doing drugs does. Okay, last time, this is your brain,

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>This is drugs. This is your brain on drugs and

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>questions drugs, drugs, drugs. From pot to cot, alcohol to

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>adderall crack, cocaine to caffeinated coffee, almost all of us

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 1>use one form of drug or another. And even though

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a constant flow of drug commentary coursing through our

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>news media and entertainment. It can be an uncomfortable subject

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, amplified by the fact that rhetoric on

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>drugs can be difficult to trust. And that's a shame.

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, they are so fascinating. Almost every department at

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a university could have an entire course about drugs. If

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you look in the social sciences, you could have of

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>course all about drugs, anthropology, in criminology, of political science,

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and in sociology, and in history and in economics, all six.

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>In the arts, you could have it in music, you

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>could have it in literature, you could have it in

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the visual arts. So you were talking about one of

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>the great interdisciplinary subjects that exist out there. Hi, I'm

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Ethan Nadelman. I've devoted most of my adult life to

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>working to end the war on drugs. Started off doing

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that as a professor at Princeton and started an organization

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>called the Drug Policy Alliance, and gentleman looked up to

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Ethan Nadelman, which became the leading organization of the world

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>advocating for an end to the war on drugs. And

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>then about four years ago I stopped doing that and

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>took a little time off, and now I've started my

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 1>own podcast called Psychoactive. How much do you know about drugs? Well,

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you, Alex, I'm no expert on the sort

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of biochemistry farm a college aspects of it, but apart

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>from that, I know a lot about drugs. I've been

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>reading and studying and talking to people and using drugs

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>for most of my adult life. I sometimes joke that

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>growing up Jewish, my first taste of alcohol was when

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I was seven days old at my brists. I remember

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>being nine ten years old and going to synagogue on Saturday,

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and at the end of services, they would lay out

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the little mona chevits wine and these little tiny plastic cups.

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>My friends and I we would have a few of these,

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and we knew if we had four or five of

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>them we would feel a little tipsy and maybe fall

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>asleep at lunch. And then there was the whole bar

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Mitzvah scene when I was thirteen, where we all started

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>getting drunk. We weren't supposed to, but you know, we'd

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:51.119
<v Speaker 1>be drinking Vika tonics with screwdrivers. In the Jewish community

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>in a suburb of New York, basically most people drank,

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>but I don't remember anybody who would drink to excess

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the most powerful drug education I remember getting. I must

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>have been in junior high school. It was actually an

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>anti smoking set. The Surgeon General has determined a cigarette

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>smoking is dangerous to your health. They brought in one

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of those fake lungs is a machine, and they connected

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a cigarette to it and showed what happened to the

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>stake long when it got all yellow and disgusting. One

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>thing about this machine, it will never get heart disease

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>or cancer from smoking. But when it came to the

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>other anti drug stuff, I gotta admit I don't have

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>any recollection if they even did it back in the

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>late sixties early seventies. They must have, but I don't recall.

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>With marijuana, I remember being about seventeen and seeing a

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 1>bunch of my friends who were getting high and just

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>noticing they all kind of fell asleep. So that was

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>not that appealing, So it wasn't really I started college,

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and I distinctly remember the first off getting high there.

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I was moving from one apartment to another. The marijuana

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>is coming on and we're moving a refrigerator, and you know,

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing starts to become eighteen year olds laughing

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and almost dropping a refrigerator down a flight of stairs.

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>So that was the start, and then I became a

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>regular marijuana consumer, but never a daily user. Had a

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of almost anti addictive personality where you hear a

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>lot in the context of drugs, And indeed, the title

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>of Ethan's podcast is psychoactive basically means mind altering. You

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>think there's a whole host of drugs. The drug I

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>take every day I deal with my cholesterol that's not psychoactive.

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 1>Psychoactive suggests that and somehow it's altering consciousness. Now, that

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>could be in obvious ways, like psychedelics or like with cannabis,

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>but it could even be true of things like coffee

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and tobacco, where when we consume them we're somewhat aware

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of their subtle psychoactive effects, but we don't really notice

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 1>them until we stopped doing that. The single most common

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>one is caffeine. Something like the world consumes caffeine, either

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>in the form of coffee or tea or some other

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 1>plant products that contain it. Probably the second most universalist alcohol. Obviously,

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>there are prohibitions on it in the Islamic world, but

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, it's a fairly universal thing. And if you

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 1>go back historically, you have indigenous groups all around the

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>world having no contact with outer societies that somehow figured

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>out that that piece of food or that thing, if

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>left to ferment and then consumed, would have quite a

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>bank Marijuana has a history going back ten thousand years,

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's not been as universally used. And then, of

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>course tobacco one came out of the Americas and made

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>its way to Europe and then to the rest of

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 1>the world, and because it was so remarkably addictive, really

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:13.239
<v Speaker 1>got a kind of global use. So I would probably

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>say caffeine's first alcohol, second tobacco products, third cannabis for

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>oi and that heroin morphine other pharmaceutical opioids that are

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>made from it would probably be in fifth place. Then

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you work your way down and a whole lot of

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>other things that may be used by tens or hundreds

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of millions of people, like cot or cava from South Pacific,

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>or beetle nut used in South Asia, so there are

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>more localized ones that haven't sort of spread around the world.

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>One of the most traditional, if sometimes over exaggerated, applications

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of psychoactive substances is to stimulate one's creative mind. I

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>know people who are artists and find the Meryl want

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it really does help them on the creative side. On

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the end they hand. I'll tell you when it comes

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to the intellectual stuff, I'll beginning all these great ideas,

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>they don't seem as such value the next day when

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>looked at in the light of day when I'm straight interesting. Though,

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>with psychedelics, there are insights that I've had on doing

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>those the psychedelics that were almost life transformative for me,

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'm more likely to remember it coherently in a

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>way as well. You think about some of the famous people,

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Nobel Prize winners, the jobs and others

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>who say that but for psychedelics, they never would have

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>invented with the invented or discovered what they discovered. And

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't hear that as often with marijuana or any

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>other drug. You know, there have been indigenous people's using

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>these drugs throughout history. Ayahuasca, mushrooms, payot or mescaline, the toura,

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the plant which can be actually deadly poisonous, but in

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>minimal doses can be a very high at least psychedelic

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>type of drug l s D where the key ingredient

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>or good comes from a mold. There are histories in

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Europe of these outbreaks of the town going crazy, and

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.599
<v Speaker 1>it appears to be when this mold took off in

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the local wheat or rye fields. Albert Hoffman sort of

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>accidentally invents ls be protectively and then that thing has

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>its kind of heyday in the fifties and sixties, first

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:37.199
<v Speaker 1>among the sort of elite strata, and then Timothy Learry

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>turn on tune and drop out, drop out of becomes

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the thing used by millions, drop out of junior executive.

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Many people benefit enormously, other people just do it for yucks,

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and some minority of people get really hurt by this.

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:57.439
<v Speaker 1>And then you go into the kind of quiet age

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of psychedelics, and I say, now we are in this period,

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary period in the history of human beings and drugs,

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 1>where we're having this sort of psychedelic renaissance. Part of

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it is because of the work of organizations like MAPS,

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the Multidiscipinary Association of Psychedelic Studies created by Mike Buddy

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Rick Doblin back in the eighties. Psychedelics, when used wisely,

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.839
<v Speaker 1>have the potential to help heal us help inspire us

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps even to help save us. Part of it

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>because of a range of academics that have just kept

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>pushing to get this going. Part of it because Michael

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>pollan sort of breakthrough book, Changing Your Mind. What happened

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to psychedelics in the sixties that they became so stigmatized

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that research stopped. Now you have all these companies trying

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to create new psychedelic products. So you have this sort

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of psychedelic renaissance where the media is mostly focused on

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the upside layout the case for legalization of psychedelics and

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and why this is an opportunity of investors. We're used

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>numbers of people are having positive experiences where people understand

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the significance of setting like using these drugs in the

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>right type of environment. So I think we're probably in

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>a period in history where more people are using these

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>things than ever before. And I also expect that there's

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna be some tragedies. There are going to be some

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>people who get hurt. The media is gonna jump on that,

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna start to see the pendulum swing backward. But

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a level of consciousness and awareness and

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>acceptance and normalization happening both with cannabis and with psychedelics. Now,

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>unlike anything we've seen before, medical use of psychoactive drugs

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>can be rife with complications. Take for example, the array

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>of pharmaceuticals derived from the opium plant. In the United States,

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>our medical system prescribes opioids, so most people have had

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>some form of opioid in their life. We come out

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of getting our wisdom, teeth removes, we come out of

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:09.439
<v Speaker 1>some minor surgery, so the doctor may prescribe like an oxycodon.

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Go to place like Japan, I think, where it's very low.

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>You go to parts of the developing world where it's

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>under prescribed and many people die in pain. Opioids one

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:24.839
<v Speaker 1>of these things where interestingly, if you have access even

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to heroin, to pharmaceutical grade heroine, and you know the

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>dose and you're using the same dose, you can basically

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>consume heroin every day of your adult life and live

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to be years old. You can have a job, you

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>can have sex with your partner, you can drive a car.

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>You can do it all because your body develops a

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>certain tolerance. If you stop using it, you'll feel sick

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and feverish or even worse. While your body goes to

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a racking withdrawal of it. But the fact that there is,

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>if you have a reliable dose, the worst side effect

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:06.959
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes it's instipatient. When you combine heroin with alcohol or

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>with a benzodiazepine type drug, in modest amounts, it can

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>be a really great high. But the problem is if

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:19.599
<v Speaker 1>you double or triple that dose, you stop breathing. We

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>think about people dying give an alcohol overdose, but the

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>deadly thing is that alcohol is oftentimes the hidden thing

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that's causing an overdose with another drug where the media

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 1>headline says heroin, but it was actually heroin plus booze.

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>And it was only with the recent emergence of ventonyl

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>taking the opioid epidemic to a new level of urgency.

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>This synthetic opioid that's fifty times more powerful than heroin,

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Graham prograam. That's the first opioid where people just take

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>it all by itself and they can just stop breathing.

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, with marijuana, you can have fifty times the

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>amount you need to get a hundred times and it's

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>not going to kill you. It appears that if you're

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 1>on an opioid prescription and you combine it with Marriwana,

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you can cut your prescribed dose in half just by

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>having a little bit of marijuana with it, because the

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>marijuana potentiates it. There's a bunch of research studies out

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>there that showed that in states that are approved medical marijuana,

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>they appear to have lower overdose rates than did other

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>places because people were either substituting the marijuana for the

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>opioids for pain relief, or they were combining it with

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the opioid and therefore taking less of the opioid because

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>they didn't need as much. I know, I get totally

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>lost on it, but I didn't want to ask about

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>opium classic you know, smokable opium, you know, like I

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>feel like I see most of like media with like

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>opium then and I imagine it was a scene in

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the US at some point, and it's not really anymore. Well,

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you. I mean, I feel I've been a

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>bit professionally negligent and never having actually smoked opium. I mean,

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it's on my two do list, my bucket list. You know,

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I got to do this if I'm really going to

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>be a serious, you know person talking about drugs. But

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>by and large. The opium dent was a common thing

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in Asia, and then it came to America when people

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>came from China in the middle of late nineteenth century.

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>They then became incredibly demonizes. The first opium prohibition laws

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>were in the eighteen seventies and eighties in the Data

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and in California, very racist laws, and the fear that

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese were basically addicting and seducing and turning white

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>women into sex slaves. Works wonders. When heroin gets invented,

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>actually by Bear Pharmaceutical as a cost sur president, what

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>happened was you had a some of the switch going

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>on from opium to heroin, and then people begin to

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>realize that if you want to smuggle this stuff, it's

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot safer to smuggle a white powder like heroin

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>than it is to smuggle opium. And if you want

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to consume it, opium gives off a distinct a roma,

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>whereas heroin, especially if you're injecting and not smoking, it

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>no aroma, so it's easier to hide from the cops.

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>It's what we call the perverse consequences of prohibition, where

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>when you prohibit a drug like opium or coca or

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>some other things like that. People tend to say, Okay,

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>let's synthesize it, let's make it easier to smuggle, easier

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to consume discreetly, and we push people away from the

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>less dangerous, more natural plant product towards a much more

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>compact and potent version. And that brings us to one

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of the most controversial polemics about mind altering substances. That

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>for decades, the US and by extension, the world, has

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>been waging a war on drugs. America's public enemy Number

0:16:55.840 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>one in the United States is drug abuse. Nixon declared

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a war on drugs fifty years ago. In order to

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>fight and defeat this enemy, it is necessary to wage

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a new all out offensive. That rhetoric, those ideas, the

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:17.199
<v Speaker 1>huge growth in the enforcement agencies, and then it kind

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>of quieted down during the Jimmy Carter days when you

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:23.439
<v Speaker 1>actually had a fairly progressive mindset for a few years.

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Then Reagan and that Reagan generation pushed it to the max,

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>making a final commitment not to tolerate drugs by anyone, anytime,

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>any place. And unfortunately it was very much of a

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan effort. I mean, Tip O'Neill the very famous influential

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Speaker of the House, Liberal Democrat Massachusetts. He was

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>totally on board the war on drugs too. You know,

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you look a little like Tip O'Neill. Mhm. A lot

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of people say that then under the first George Bush

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>took off like crazy. All of us agree that the

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 1>this domestic threat facing our nation today is drugs. The

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>first drugs are was a guy named William Bennett say

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the War on drugs was a failure. It was not.

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 1>It was not, It was not who really was masterful

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:17.360
<v Speaker 1>at advancing a right wing, reactionary political agenda in America

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:21.120
<v Speaker 1>by playing on the fears around drugs among middle class

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 1>American parents. Talk to your kids about Office of Drugs.

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Help your children to just say no. But you know,

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the truth is you can go back to the refor

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>madness days of the third mat Juana, the burning weed,

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>with its roots in Hell. In this film you will

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>see the ease with which this vicious plan can be

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>grown in your neighbor's yard, ruled into harmless looking cigarettes

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>hidden in an innocent shoe. Some people say that what

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>brought us alcohol prohibition was the War on drugs, but

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it was focused on alcohol Americans praise passing of the

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>dry law and then promptly perceived by every possible means

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 1>to repeat eighteenth Amendment. You can go back even further

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>in history and see other war on drugs happening in

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.479
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the world. There were times in Europe

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>when there were efforts to crack down tobacco. China launched

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>its own warrn opium in the nationalist phase in only

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century. If you look at what's going on the

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Philippines right now, in some other Asian countries, they have

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.679
<v Speaker 1>sometimes vicious wars on drugs. They don't exceed ours in

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of mass incarceration, but in terms of the brutality

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and authorizing police to conduct extrajudicial killings the President of

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>the Philippines do to day. He gave his cops a

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>green light to just go and shoot people. So wars

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>on drugs are not uniquely American phenomenon, but the United

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>States took it the furthest in terms of mass incarceration.

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>We also had our kind of prohibitionists abstinence only mentality,

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>and we became the chief proselytizer and promoter of global

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>drug prohibition from the early twentieth century until the early

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 1>years of the Obama administration. Substance abuse generally legal and illegal.

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a problem locking somebody up for twenty years. It

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>is probably not the best strategy. Domestically, the issue has

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes been tied up with race. If you ask why

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 1>are some drugs legal and other drugs illegal, it has

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>relatively little to do with the relative dangers of drugs

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and almost everything to do with who use it and

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>who is perceived to use particular drugs. So that connection

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:37.640
<v Speaker 1>in the American consciousness of drugs with black people, brown people,

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>especially with Chinese people in the late nineteenth century, that's

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>always been a very prominent element. And that same racism

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and discrimination based on ethnicity has played out not just

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in the US but many other countries around the world

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 1>as well. Because most of these drugs were being imported

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>from abroad, you saw that become a big issue in

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy met to cult for example, at one point

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Nixon closed the border. It's become a big issue with

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>cocaine coming out of Olivia, Peru, oft times via Colombia

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and in Mexico. So it became a number one issue

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 1>in our relationships with some of those countries. Sometimes there

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 1>were countries like Paraguay where you basically had the narclas

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>takeover government. It was a complicated issue in Afghanistan. So

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>there's always been that international dimension where to appeal to

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the renter if we've gotta stop drugs from coming into

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>this country. When it comes to keeping drugs away from kids,

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 1>people worry about, oh, we legalized marijuana for adults, more

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>kids are gonna be using it. But that was bullshit.

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Throughout the last fifty years, if you ask who's had

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 1>the best access to marijuana in America, it's always been

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the kids, the adolescent. Even as marijuana he's went up

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and down, up and down, up and down, always eighty

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.400
<v Speaker 1>percent of high school kids. We're saying marijuana is easy

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to get. And in fact, since we started legalizing marijuana,

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, beginning with Colorado Washington in twelve, there's been

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>almost no increase in analysts and marijuana use. The big

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 1>increase has been among people in their forties, fifties, sixties, seventies,

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and eighties. The ones who did have access to it,

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the ones who because it was illegal, didn't want to

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:09.439
<v Speaker 1>use it. We're the ones where that you see a

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>double trippling quadrupling abuse. All of this begs the question

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>how effective is the war on drugs or has it

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>been effective at all? I mean, it's very hard to

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 1>find any examples of success. Fifty years ago when most

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>heroin was coming from Turkey through what was called the

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>French Connection into the US, and there was a period

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>when we were able to crack down on Turkey and

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>crack down the French connection, and there was a brief

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>shortage of heroin in the US. Or there was another

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>moment when there was a laboratory in Mexico brucing FENTONYL

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and d e A, and Mexican police succeeded in shutting

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it down and that cut off the flow of ventinel briefly.

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 1>But apart from a couple of rare examples, there are

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>thousands of cases of trying to reproduce their success and

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>failing simply because where there is a demand, there's going

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to be suppot and you crack down in one place,

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna pop up somewhere else. You knock out disproduction area,

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna pop in another production area. You pop out

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of this drug traffic and you network that's gonna pop

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in another drug trafficking network. You make it harder to

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>expert the stuff to us, and Americans are gonna start

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 1>producing and stuff you cracked down on nest labs in

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the US Mexico, that's gonna step up. And of course

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it's ludicrous because our borders are so open that if

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>there were a market for heroin in this country of

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 1>ten times what's currently coming in, it would come in.

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 1>There's no way to stop it. Not when you have

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>endless numbers of shipping containers and boats and planes and

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you name it, and people coming in. There's no way

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to keep drugs out of the country. But it always

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 1>appealed to politicians sense of playing on people's fears around

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:54.679
<v Speaker 1>what was coming in from abroad. I just think the

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>evidence of the drug war in terms of reducing the

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>use of drugs or making them less of available, they've

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>made them less available than if they were fully legal.

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>But the negative consequences in terms of incarcerations, in terms

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of now maybe one to one and a half trillion

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars wasted on the War on drugs over the last

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty years, in terms of people using drugs that are

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>more dangerous because they come from the black market, in

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of violations of civil liberties and human rights in

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>terms of empowering gangsters. Never Mind the millions and millions

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and millions of people, disproportionately young men of color, who

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 1>have been locked up and arrested and have their lives derailed.

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Never Mind the hundreds of thousands of people who have

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>been fired from their jobs for testing positive for marijuana use,

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 1>even though it was having no impact on their job

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>performance at all. America was profoundly irrational around drugs, and

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>much the same way we were with alcohol prohibition. We

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:51.199
<v Speaker 1>understood that these drugs could be problematic and dangerous. We

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>then made this silly assumption that if we banned them,

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the problem would go away, maybe reducing the number of consumers,

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>but dramatically increasing the broad or set of problems that resulted. So,

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 1>if you can't stop drugs from being made, bought, shipped,

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>or consumed, and the battle for those efforts is just

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 1>as costly as any war with no end in sight,

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:27.919
<v Speaker 1>what should we be doing instead? Re Educating people on

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>issues of drug regulation by separating political rhetoric from actual

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>data was to become the subject of Ethan's life's work.

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>In I finished my PhD, I got a job teaching

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>at Princeton Politics and Public Affairs, and interestingly, the dean

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>invited me to teach a class on drug policy there,

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>and then I wrote it three articles and as a

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.879
<v Speaker 1>result I got catapulted into like these two bursts of

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minutes of faith and tonight's great debate is the

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 1>war on drugs of failure. We have eight hundred thousand

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Americans arrested last year simply for possessing a joint where

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I was all over the national media, all over television

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of this. Ethan Nathan, specialist today,

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Ethan Nathan, thanks so much for joining us this morning.

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Ethan Nadelman, Thanks very much for being here. Ethan Aedeman,

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Democracy Now. Ethan, it's a pleasure. Welcome to

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Freedom Watch. Ethan Nadelman, Welcome to our show. That was

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>only in my young thirties and I was speaking around

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the world and a major events. This feels like a

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>serious altered state of consciousness around But there was a

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>single moment that cemented it all for Ethan, a clarity

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:42.719
<v Speaker 1>about where he fit in this world of drug discourse.

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.199
<v Speaker 1>And it just so happened to come while he was

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>tripping I did mushrooms in nine for the first time

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in seven years. It wasn't really an epiphany. It was

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>more a kind of realization that this was my calling

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in life to teach people about drugs, and that it

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>did not matter if I was going to stay in

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 1>academia or go into journalism or writing or politics or

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>run an advocacy organization. And out of the blue I

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 1>got a phone call from a guy named George Soros,

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>prominent financier who was not yet well known it He

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:24.400
<v Speaker 1>was interested in this issue, and we hit it off

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and he said to me, well, look, I'm a busy man,

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 1>but as substantial resources. So let's assume I want to

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 1>empower you to accomplish our common objectives. George's instincts on

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the issue are right. I then educated about harm reduction

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and needle exchange and medical neural want and all the issues,

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>and we have formed an effective partnership which resulted in

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>my setting up this organization, first within this foundation and

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>then independently in what became the Drug Policy Alliance. I

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>support the Drug Policy Alliance because it fosters debate on

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>drug policy. Because the world were under represents an extraordinary

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>violation of human rights, because whether you use drugs or not,

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you deserve to be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity.

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:12.439
<v Speaker 1>The Drug Policy Alliance or d p A is a

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>New York based nonprofit that is still in existence today.

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Ethan would serve as the organization's executive director. Initially, it

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>was just about putting out the ideas, but beginning around

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we realized that there were a few issues were a

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>majority of Americans thought that the war on drugs had

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 1>gone too far. One of those was that a majority

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of Americans had come to believe that people who use

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>marijuana as a medicine with a doctor's recommendation should not

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>be treated as criminals. And the other was that most

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Americans believed that if somebody got arrested for possessing any drug,

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>even heroin and meth amphetamine, and they had a drug

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>problem and they weren't violent, they should be given at

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:55.479
<v Speaker 1>least a few opportunities for drug treatment before they got

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>put away. And that gave us a foot in the

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>door to pass other ballot initiatives. Time to vote on

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>recreational marijuana is here, so we began to get much

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>more political, beginning in late es to see how do

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>we pass these reforms through the ballot initiative process, through

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>state legislation, through Congress, and then of course the public

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>education side, and bit by bit I built up the organization.

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>So when I stepped down that we're about seventy five

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>people working at Drug Policy Alliance. We had a budget

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of or fifteen million, offices and about half a dozen

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>states around the country, some doing some work internationally as well.

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Really saw myself as building not just an organization, but

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>really a political movement to end the war on drugs

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and to promote alternatives that were grounded in science, compassion, health,

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and human rights. Because issues around drugs are so complex.

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Part of making the Drug Policy Alliance an effective resource

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>was keeping its objectives clear. I'd say one third of

0:29:56.320 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>our work focused on ending marijuana prohibition, first from article

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and then more broadly. The second third focused on rolling

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>back the role of the War on drugs and mass incarceration,

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and the last third focused on treating drug use and

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>addiction truly as a health issue, not a criminal issue.

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>It was basically those three things and seeing myself engaged

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>in sort of the first generation of a multi generational struggle.

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>The d p A also drew a diverse crowd of supporters,

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>each with their own agendas. I relished when I was

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 1>building drug policy alliance did have people coming from every perspective.

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I could look at the audience and see in one

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>row there was a guy who had hemp leaves in

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>his hair. It was something for your couple. Next to

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>them was somebody who was anti marijuana, but anti incarceration.

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I think a man working outdoors. She feels more like

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a man. You can have a bottle of suns. Sitting

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>next to them was a guy who had been incarcerated

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>for fifteen years on a minor cocaine charge and now

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>comate dads. We can see that's not duck walk anymore.

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Sitting next to them was a guy who's been a

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement officer for twenty five years and realized the

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>drug war resute tile. I hate this job. I hate

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 1>this job, and I don't need it. Sitting next to

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>them would be a young woman from Vietnam who was

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>doing needle exchange programs and pushing in city. You're gonna

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>give it, You're gonna give the shot. Sitting next to

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>them would be a person working for a labor union

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to persuade the labor unions to embrace marijuana legalization.

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>MR we have on this strike we wanted the minute

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>we started across this railroad car. Sitting next to them

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>would be somebody who's a leading psychedelics researcher. Like knocking

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 1>at the door with a brick. When the door is opened,

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't carry the brick inside. Sitting next to them

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>would be somebody who was going from the coca growers

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>union in Latin America? Where did you get this stuff?

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>And for me, the challenge is how do you take

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>all of those people and understand that they are in

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>a common struggle. The line I used to use is

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>who are we did of Policy Alliance? Who are we

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the drug policy reform movement? We're the people who love drugs,

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 1>we're the people who hate drugs, and we're the people

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>who don't give it damn about drugs. But every one

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of us believe that the war on drugs is the

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>wrong way to go, and that therefore what matters is

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 1>not your relationship to drugs, which might be fantastic or horrific.

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>It's about understanding that a punitive, criminalized, moralistic approach is

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 1>inevitably going to result in more harm than good, and

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>what we need is rationality, compassion, respect for human rights,

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 1>respect for science. Even though the vantage points on this

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>issue are innumerable, there's no point in preaching to the choir.

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 1>The really interesting conversations for me are sometimes with people

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>who may not fully share my set of values, who

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>are more instinctually conservative or don't agree with some of

0:32:56.360 --> 0:33:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the human rights elements, but they're open, and for me,

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 1>it's like, how do I get past their instinctive defenses

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to try to open them up to seeing things in

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a new way. You know, there's twenty percent of the

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>country which is just ideologically on the other side. They

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>move in, they're invested in it, But then there's a

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>big part of the country which is just part of

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the conventional anti drug discourse. And the challenge therefore is

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 1>how do you bring him to a new way of thinking.

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 1>How do you get a parent whose kid died of

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 1>an overdose and whose first instinct is to just go

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>out and execute all the drug dealers, how do you

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 1>get them to understand that that's not going to solve

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>anything and there's another way to deal with this. How

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>do you get cops to understand why legalizing is actually

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be good not just for the broader society, but

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 1>from where they sit. One of my challenges is talking

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to people in the marijuana psychedelics world and getting them

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to understand that the same principles they bring to marijuana

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 1>psychedelics also have to apply in some way to the

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>drugs like opioids and no antheta means not that we

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>would make them letally available in the same way, but

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 1>that the principles around sovereignty of your own mind and

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:14.879
<v Speaker 1>body have to extend even to those growing The Drug

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Policy Alliance didn't leave a lot of time for much else.

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 1>A lot of my time was consumed with basically building

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>an organization. I used to write a lot in both

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:30.479
<v Speaker 1>academic and popular publications, but at some point my most

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>creative writing goes and interacting with billionaires. So I'm trying

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to raise money from the amount of time I was

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 1>spend interacting with media I had to balance with running organization.

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I could also only accept so many public speaking engagements,

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.399
<v Speaker 1>so there were the things that I decided to pull

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 1>back from in order to build an organization and to

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:51.879
<v Speaker 1>empower young people so that they could becoming the next

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 1>generation of leaders in this area. In January, after more

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 1>than two decades at the Helm, Ethan stepped down from

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the dp AM. When I stopped bringing drug policy alliance,

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I was just happy not to talk about drugs for

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a while, because I was talking about drugs around the

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 1>clock forever and ever. I go on a vacation, start

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:16.359
<v Speaker 1>chatting with some people you meet and they say, oh,

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>what do you do? Instantly I'd be bla, la la

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 1>la la lah, you know, same thing over and over again.

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>So it was nice to just kind of shut up

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>for a while, and so retired. Ethan took a turn

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 1>living the quiet life until one day he got a

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 1>call from a filmmaker friend of his. When Darren Aronovski

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>first reached out to me, he asked me if I

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:42.400
<v Speaker 1>want to do a podcast at psychedelics, and my response

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>was nope, I want to do it on all drugs. Psychoactive,

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 1>which debuted in July, features one on one interviews with

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 1>leading minds from across the ideological spectrum and frank discussions

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 1>about drugs, from signs to policy, and even stories of

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 1>personal drug use. The thing about the podcast was it

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 1>gave me a reason to re engage with the whole

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>issue of drugs and drug policy. So it's given me

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a reason to touch base again with people who I missed,

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and I like, you know, I can talk with the

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 1>former president of Columbia. President Santo's welcome. Thank you so

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:23.879
<v Speaker 1>much for joining me. Thank you, and I'm very very

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>glad to be here with you. But I've known him

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand and twelve and not with him when

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>he was president. One of the challenges is are they

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna peet the people who want to tune in one

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:37.799
<v Speaker 1>week to hear about the latest and psychedelics research, the

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:41.320
<v Speaker 1>next week about the overdose problem, the next week about Afghanistan,

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the next week about the latest book by Michael Pollan,

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we're gonna see. Will it be an

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 1>audience where the common link is it's me as a

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 1>host PSYCHOEDDI drugs the subject, But that's going to cover

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:57.440
<v Speaker 1>incredibly wide spectrum of issues. I got one more question.

0:36:57.480 --> 0:36:59.919
<v Speaker 1>I know You've been asked this before, but I said,

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like I need to, Like, I mean, what is

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 1>the upshot of it look like? Like? What's a better

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 1>world look like? What's a better America? Is that all

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:09.359
<v Speaker 1>drugs being legal? I mean, I think, first of all,

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:13.840
<v Speaker 1>simple possession of any substance for your own use should

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 1>not be a crime, even if it's messa amphetamine, heroin,

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 1>some synthetic drugs. If you're only using it for your

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 1>own use, it's a matter of personal freedom, human rights, sovereignty, civilibrities,

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you name it. None of the governor's business, none of

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 1>my employer's business. That's that when it comes to how

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:32.360
<v Speaker 1>we make it available and whether we make it legally

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>available over the counter, we need to come up with

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 1>the balanced, sensible taxation policies, regulatory policies. But I think

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>ultimately it boils down to accepting that there's almost never

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 1>been a drug free society in human history. There's certainly

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 1>not going to be one in the future. And that's

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the challenge is not how to get rid of drugs.

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not how to build a moat between drugs and ourselves,

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 1>or even between drugs and our children, because that's impossible.

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 1>It's really how to learn how to live with these drugs,

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:04.240
<v Speaker 1>these plants and chemicals. So they call us the least

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:07.720
<v Speaker 1>possible harm and in many cases the greatest possible benefit,

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 1>where we can turn what's been this kind of big crisis,

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:16.240
<v Speaker 1>ugly problem involving people dying of overdose and vast numbers

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of people getting arrested incarcerated into a small problem, whereas

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 1>people still get hurt, but not as severely or as

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 1>frequently as they do now, and where people still go

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to jail because they're not obeying the rules around legally

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 1>regulated markets, but if they do, it's a much smaller

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>number and not for so long. Where we have honest

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:38.719
<v Speaker 1>drug education, where young people learn that there's no such

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 1>thing as a good or bad drugs, they're only good

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 1>or bad relationships with drugs, and more responsible or less

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 1>responsible ways to use that say that, you know, the

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 1>great blessing in life is to find a way to

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:54.800
<v Speaker 1>get paid for something you're passionate about and then you

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 1>enjoy doing. Not many people get that, but I looked

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 1>into that by finding my only in an early age

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 1>and effectively getting paid to do what I wanted to

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 1>do with my life, whether it was my appreciation of

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 1>marijuana or my anger at seeing people getting busted, or

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 1>my mushroom trip or what have you. No regrets. This

0:39:28.560 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 1>episode of Ephemeral was written an assembled by Max and

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Alex Williams, with producers Trevor Young and Matt Frederick Ethan

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Nadelman's weekly podcast is Psychoactive, a co production of iHeart

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Radio and Darren Aronofsky's Protozoa Pictures. Find out wherever you

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:50.959
<v Speaker 1>listen to podcasts and find us at e Fhemeral Dot Show.

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from iHeart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Act Apple Podcasts. Wherever you listen to your favorite ships

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:05.240
<v Speaker 1>wo