WEBVTT - Surveillance: Diversification in Botswana with Min. Kenewendo

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane Jailely.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. Of course,

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>we can rip up the script with Brian Levet of

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Oppenheimer Funds. I mean, see if a one oh one

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>rates start going up and every CFO says to the CEO,

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>let's get going. I mean that's what happens, right. So

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>rates are going up, but you also have companies with

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of access to cash given the new changes

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 1>in the tax policy, given a prolonged period of economic activity,

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>so businesses are utilizing that cash. I think the bigger

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>question for investors, when you think about it from a

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>broad odd investment strategy, is whether or not this leads

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to new, higher sustained levels of growth in the United States. Uh.

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm somewhat skeptical. So while you might see some steepening

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in the yield curve and a rotation as we've seen

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit to the more value oriented stocks, I

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think that that's gonna be prolonged. I think ultimately

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 1>the US will slow within this environment, and um, we'll

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>go back to the environment of flatter yield curve, more

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>growth oriented names out performing well. Brian. If you believe

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that that's the case, where should you put your money?

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Should you be looking to Europe for example? I mean

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>European stocks have been languishing the last couple of months.

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I suppose it depends on the time horizon. I mean,

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>we probably have a last leg of US strengthen here

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in US dollar support and here. You know, ultimately, if

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>you're looking over a five to seven year time period,

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you should consider that US equity returns are likely to

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>be more modest than they are outside of the United States.

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>And I know a lot of investors after a prolonged

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>period of US out performance are gonna have a hard

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>time reasoning what qualifies as modest. Because we've got the

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>SMP up nine and a half percent this year. Yeah,

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it's been a prolonged period of US you and that's

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>not bad. Half ten percent? No, No, I mean, I

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.119
<v Speaker 1>think you're a hero. I think I think US equities

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 1>over the next five to seven years probably returned something

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>more like five percent rather than the eight percent average

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that investors have expected. You're likely to do better outside

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>the United States, simply given where valuations are and where

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 1>growth is likely to take. I think this is to me, folks,

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the arch decisions of Q four and and

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>into two thousand nineteen. And I understand, you know the

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>international it's a different feel. But Brian, we've all got

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to admit how humbling it's been that the single digit

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>crowd has been so wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, for

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>pushing ten years. We're only going to grow five or

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>six percent. Maybe we'll get well as long as people

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 1>have that kind of can't you be a contrarian and

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>trade against that? Well you could. I mean, we we've

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>we've been of the mind that this is the longest

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>this was gonna be the longest cycle on record. Investors

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>needs to own equities, um, and we were not of

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the view that this was going to be a prolonged

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>period of modest returns in the United States. I mean,

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>this is secular bull market that started at very low

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>valuations and a zero interest rate. Where you are now

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>or valuations are higher. I don't think they're excessive, this

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>is not. But valuations are higher and the Federal Reserve

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 1>is raising interest rates. So it's a different part of

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the cycle, and you might again get some last leg

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of US strengthen here. But I'm talking more looking out

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>over the next five seven years. Think about what happened

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>in the late nineties, the the U s c O

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>curve was flattening. You've got another great period of of

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of um US equity returns. Ultimately you had a recession

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and in the years like go three oh four, oh five,

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>oh six, oh seven, emerging markets outperformed the United States considerably.

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So is that where you want to go right now?

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you want to look for things that people

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>on that the crowd is not interested in buying, So

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>move out of US equities, take your profits, pay your taxes,

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and find something better again. I think we're gonna have

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a last leg of dollar strength. What we would we

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>would favor is what's going to continue to be in

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>our mind, growth in a slow growth world. So people

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:19.359
<v Speaker 1>viewing this as a new you know, higher sustained growth

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, and that's gonna persist forever. It's

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>not so what kind of stocks, what kind of companies

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>are industries? I mean I would favor I would continue

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to favor technology and discretionary in the United States and

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 1>outside of the United States, it's a it's a growth

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>story as well. I mean what we're looking at is,

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, particularly places like China, which has been on

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>loved recently, you're looking at four hundred million millennials that

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>are that are shop. It's lunning. I mean, that's bigger

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>than the Later America of millennials. Just in China. It's

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>bigger than the labor force of the US, Canada, and

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Europe combined. So how do you buy a bear market?

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>If we say Shanghai's creator, Shanghai tech is created, how

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>when do you know to buy? Or do you just

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>with your time frame of five to seven year hold?

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>That solves a lot of problems, right, I think too

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>often investors are trying to time these things. We need

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that we we can't do this back

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>tober First, we need to make sure we've got our

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>policy statements right, we know why we do what we do,

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and if we're looking for long term growth as investors,

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that's going to be an emerging market.

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>What do you do on your I mean, there's all

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the focus on Europe and of course it's overarching theme

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of immigration and migration. But how does Oppenheimer Funds find opportunity,

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>particularly in Eastern Europe. That's very different than inn Asia analysis, right,

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the big story in Europe is going to

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of the you know, a lot of

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the brand names that we all love UM, So it's

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a more of a company specific story than

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 1>a broad macro story. Yeah, we had some synchronized growth

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in UM in seventeen. That's more of an abnormality than

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>the norm and that a lot of that was based

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>on Chinese stimulus. So we shouldn't expect UM significant economic

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>growth out of Europe because of the demographic issues, because

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of some of the structural issues in the periphery. But

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 1>it really comes down more to brands and luxury and

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>so what are we talking about LVMH. I mean, do

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to be buying LVMH because of those four

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:20.919
<v Speaker 1>million millennials, You probably not want to. Maybe Michael Core's

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you heard the news today, Michael core is buying. That

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:28.359
<v Speaker 1>is a big growth story UM in the world is

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that citizens in the emerging markets are are starting to

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>wear wealth like we do in the United States. Did

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you see how Oh Michael Barr walked into the studio

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>different than the Michael Barr. We all need something to

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>do with a football. Oh he was just like you were,

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>just looking like you know, the distant days, I would

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 1>have played a theme song. How much money did you

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>make on this game? You bet like your middle child? Right,

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, tell people, come on, I could tell Detroit

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 1>that Detroit Tom Brady, that's all that matter. That's the

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>New York Giants won a game, and we're talking about

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Lions. Well exactly. You see how he wears Detroit

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Lions blue. Not only is it blue, but it's a

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>correct Thanksgiving Day blue. I got my red and blue time, Michael,

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>like forty of those, forty of these shirts worn just

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to give the Detroit Lions feel. How did they do this?

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>So wise? One? Well we look secondary for the Patriots,

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not all that great, so careful not good morning

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>one of six weeks. I know, listen, and I love

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you guys out in Boston. But like I said, I'm

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a native Detroit and I guess Matt Patrician those a

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:48.239
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the Patriots. That's where I was heading.

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Is this coaching advantage had to be tangible. Yeah, yeah,

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>well we liked the kid that found a ten dollar

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>bill on the curb. And it's now a later for everybody,

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and so later on, you know, we'll come back to

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>earth the next one. Michael Barre say, good morning SEM

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Boston FM, Washington, Good morning at Bay or PIM. We

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>gotta go back to gridlock. This is the week where

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I get cut and chiseled everywhere. Don't worry about it.

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>You're tall. Well that's true, but just say hi to

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the came down here. You know, the Sikorski was down

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>because of the clouds of the rain, and I took

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the car down Fifth Avenue and you just stop at

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>sixty Street. They won't let you buy so a little walking.

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Never heard anybody. I had to walk three blocks store. Goodness,

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna wear out the shoe leather on those loafers. Right.

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>You want to talk giants football. That's why you haven't

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:47.079
<v Speaker 1>talked to the last giants football. I do want to

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>talk giants. I mean I worked downtown, so the gridlock.

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I can't add much to the conversation. Brian Levitt, thank

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you so much for and I have friends coming up

0:08:54.280 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>one hour on the New York football giants. Right now,

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Vers Yorks joins US with the National Foreign Trade Council

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:19.199
<v Speaker 1>messaging of course on trade and all uh ruvers. Wonderful

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:22.079
<v Speaker 1>to have you with us. How fragile is our trade

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:26.079
<v Speaker 1>right now? Well, obviously we're in a period where we're

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>having significant fights with a number of countries. The biggest

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>one now, of course, this US China fight. But you know,

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:38.439
<v Speaker 1>concerning that, we've also had restrictions imposed on a number

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of other countries in sectors like steel, wominum talk about

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>doing on tariffs retaliation by those countries. For the time being,

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>we've had retaliation on about two hundred and fifty billion

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars of US exports. Uh increases on imports, increased tariffs

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>on imports. Of course, in the nineteen trillion dollar economy,

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's not major mat eco economic effects. Economy

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>is still strong, but long term there's a lot of

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:10.479
<v Speaker 1>concern about how this will impact our international trade relations.

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 1>US raising terrace for a number of other countries are

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>making deals. Well, it's different this time around. Perhaps, is

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the idea of intermediate processes of all the back and

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>forth between nations is I think it's identified that the

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>President and his team is simplistic about a true bilateral

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>trade debate which involves many different nations that many different

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 1>back and force of a given product. Within your National

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:39.559
<v Speaker 1>Foreign Trade Council, do you see that UH constituent to

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a constituent, that they're all dealing with these complex processes

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>versus the president's simple message. Yeah, I think that's the

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>biggest concern. You've hit your You've hit the mark very

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>well there, because you know, if you have global rules

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and they're strong and they reflect us kind of market

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>based principles, which obviously we're concerned about China not meeting

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>those standards. But if you can strengthen the international rules

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>multilaterally and business knows what the rules are, they can

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>plan their global supply chains. You know, it helps both

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:15.839
<v Speaker 1>our exports and the costs of our imports. But if

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>those rules start to break down and you start having

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:22.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bilateral tit for tat fights and bilateral agreements,

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the rules become murkier. It's a more mercantilist environment for

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>companies operate and they're not certain where to move their

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>supply chains to UH, and that becomes you know, kind

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of a longer term uncertainty that undermines their their their

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>competitiveness and their cost structure. Rufus, you are previously Deputy

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Director General of the World Trade Organization also US Ambassador

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. Do you

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>feel that those various bodies were effective in dealing with

0:11:55.600 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>what many countries have said is unfair trade practices by China.

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not just talking about pricing, I'm talking about

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>things like intellectual property theft. Yeah, I think there's a

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 1>consensus that, you know, the rules have not been as

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>effective as we had hoped they would be on China.

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're totally ineffective. I mean, China has

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>reformed in a number of areas since the nineteen nineties,

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>for example, but recently under Sijan thing there's obviously been

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>more of a trend towards a harder edged economic nationalist approach,

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>things like force technology transfer. Like you say, still very

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>big problems in the intellectual property realm. Concerned that even

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese state is involved in helping companies with theft

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of trade secrets and things like that. So clearly we're

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>not satisfied with how the rules are working. But the

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>question becomes how do we best get China to begin

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to abide by those rough as the President has just

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>started speaking at the United Nations with Secretary and that

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of Hailey rather and Secretary of State Pompeo and

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Mr Bolton sitting next to them, what should he say

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to the U n about trade? Well, hopefully from our

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>point of view, he would say, we want to work

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>with a number of countries in strengthening rules and disciplines

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and do it in a way that's convincing enough that

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.559
<v Speaker 1>we gained the support of Japan, of Europe, of other

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Asian countries. Uh impressing China to play more within the

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>rule book of of sort of you know, market principles.

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>But I'm fearful that it's going in the other direction,

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that he's starting a bilateral fight with kind at the

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>same time that we're fighting with the Europeans over automobiles

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in Canada and Mexico. We're not building the global coalition.

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Mr Years, So thank you so much, greatly, greatly appreciate that.

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 1>This morning, Rufus, he said, the National Foreign Trade Council,

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>if you move north from Pretoria and we begin really

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>our coverage here of United Nations week across South Africa

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and into Botswana and pim I I said this earlier

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.319
<v Speaker 1>to the Minister. I've never known anyone who's going to

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Botswana that was just not absolutely blown away by the

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>beauty of the country, the wildlife, Kalahari desert. Yeah. I mean,

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm waiting for someone to give me a negative vibe

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>in Botswana and hasn't happened. And also since nineteen sixty

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>six after its independence from Britain has been a well

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>run electoral based democracy and there it is. And that's

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>two and a half to earn a quarter million people.

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Someone messaging the Botswana word is boholo kind of window. Uh.

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>She is up Botswana Minister of Investment, Trade in Industry

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and joins us from New York where she is here

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>for the week. What do you hope to accomplished, Minister

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>as you come to UH in New York? What do

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to accomplish for your Botswana? Thank you very

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>much and a very good morning to earth of you.

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>We are here to share the Bozana story. We are

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>having by a lot of bilateral meetings, but most importantly

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>we want to ensure that by the time we leave

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>New York we have left Bosana in people's minds and

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in people's tongues that you're talking about it and where

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>of our story and that those that would like to

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>come in and invest in Bosana because it is a

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>fantastic investment destination and an even more fantastic tourism destination.

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I know that, and I hope that no one will

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>ever give a negative review about the visit to Bosana.

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering, Minister, if you could just share a little

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>bit of your background so people can understand your perspective.

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>You are the youngest minister ever in Botswana's cabinet. Congratulations,

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. I am youngest minister in Bozonna's

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>cabinet and I joined parliament two years ago and I

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>have been given this responsibility of head in the Ministry

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of Investment, Trade and Industry. And I am from one

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of the most remote areas in Bosana, but very much

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a very beautiful part of Bazana along the river. And

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I pride myself with my heritage and having been a

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>diamond baby. And in that I mean you know, I

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>was born in a government hospital, went to government school,

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I was sent to university by the government and I

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>think I'm very much the Bozona diamond story. Can you

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>tell people a little bit about the economy of Botswana

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and how it has changed over your thirty one years

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and the competition that exists not just in natural resources

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>but in the banking industry, and how that has helped

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the economy of Botswana. Right well, about thirty years or

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty one years ago or Bosana was heavily dependent on

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>our agricultural base. It used to contribute to well over

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:10.199
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent of our very small g d P. But

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>there was a rev up in the economy when diamond

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:21.199
<v Speaker 1>revenue started increasing and then we became heavily dependent on

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 1>our diamonds. We produced and I'd like to say the

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>world's best diamonds um And we have since managed to

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>diversify to some extent into financial services and the banking

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>industry has really driven very good growth in the economy

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and we are seeing investment and good productive sectors that

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 1>we are hoping will continue to increase the wealth in

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Boslana end uplift the lives of Bosana. But most importantly,

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the opportunities remained vast and we're aiming at increasing our

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>GDP growth from four percent to eight percent, so that

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 1>we can see that transition from a middle income country

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to a high income country by twenty thirty six. Can

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I interrupt the show to just the standout effort you did,

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:14.120
<v Speaker 1>which you were single handedly, Uh, you got it done, minister.

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Kind of window that the Duchess of Sussex has on

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:22.199
<v Speaker 1>her left hand abouts Wana diamond. Is it true that

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Princess Megan has a Botswana diamond on her left hand?

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>She she she does have a Bosona diamond on her

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 1>left hand, and we're very proud of that, and we're

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:36.439
<v Speaker 1>very proud that we've played a part in that love story.

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>In that day it said that they fell in love

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>in Bosona and most importantly and where I'm from, so

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel very proud to have contributed. I saw you

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>at the wedding. I understand that. But seriously, this is

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Kimberly Process certification and it's about conflict free diamonds. How

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>does bots want to do that? The conflict free diamonds,

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>And what we keep saying is a piece as so much,

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>very much and economic issue. And when you are able

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to keep increasing the piece of cake and the pressures

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>on that national cake are not that strong, then you

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:22.439
<v Speaker 1>have stability, and that stability comes from good governance and

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>being able to provide equitable distribution of our resources. And

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 1>over the years we've managed to reinvest the rents that

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>we're getting from our diamonds, so that that very much

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>people centered and they are not blood diamonds. And like

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I said earlier, i am a Bazona diamond. Sorry, and

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>so many other Bazana share that history with me. Now,

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>just to note that democratic self government in Botswana was

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>established in the mid sixties and it has continued. What

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 1>would you say to business leaders that may want to

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:02.360
<v Speaker 1>participate in the growing tool is some industry in Botswana?

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 1>What kind of incentives and what kind of government support

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 1>is there for foreign investment? Well, we you're right to say,

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>we've had in democracy since nineteen sixty six, and we

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>are proud to say that we have the longest running

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 1>stable democracy in the continent and an open economy without

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>any exchange controls. And we have a lot of incentives,

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>including corporate text at five percent for some industries and

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>ten per cent for others. And we have land banks,

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:41.360
<v Speaker 1>particularly in my ministry, to facilitate investors that come in

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that they are able to set up, and

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>we also have an office at one stop shop that

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>facilitates from registering all the way to markets. And we

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>consider ourselves a very well centered economy that is lend

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>linked to the rest of the region. And we are

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>able to facilitate trade two countries like Zambia, Zimbabwe and Golambia.

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>That's our neighbors and we we we see to it.

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>That's all um foreign investors that come in. As a

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>government we rule out that red COPT Minister, thank you

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>so much. As we look at the United Nations week

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 1>in the Bloomberg form, Botswana's Minister of Investment, Trade and

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Industry Bhola kind of window joins us this morning. We

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>now turned what is completely and totally in entirely consumed

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the Beltway, and that is the Kavanaugh hearings plural that

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>we're moving forward and rather than the politics and all that,

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we talk about the long term damage or I guess

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it's stands to be fair of the Supreme Court. There's

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>no one better to do that within Greg's store of Bloomberg,

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 1>a student and reporter of all Supreme Court. Gregg, is

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>there any damage that will come out of this to

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>this most important American institution. Oh, absolutely, Tom, And that's

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>really no matter how this comes up comes out. The

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Court has tried to over the decades keep itself out

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of politics. It has been harder and harder to do

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that as court appointments have become more political. This nomination

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>at Brett Havanaugh was already intensely political beforehand. Uh. Now

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 1>you have this specter of of the sexual assault allegations

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>against him. If he is confirmed, it will be probably

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>with entirely Republican votes. Uh. And there will be opponents

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>will say a big cloud over him. If he is

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>not concerned, we're gonna have a whole another fight coming

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>up soon. Does it go into let's say he is confirmed.

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Does it go into the operations of the Supreme Court.

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Does this whole debate in fact, the choosing of cases,

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the debate of cases, the outcome of cases. It could,

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:14.239
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of that depends on something we don't know,

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>which is what effect is this having on Brett Kavanaugh

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>if he is confirmed. Um. You know, personally, we've seen

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>with uh, some of the other Justices Clarence Thomas, certainly

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Justice sam Alito as well, who had somewhat difficult confirmation fights.

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>That they've gone on the court and they have really

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>dug in. Uh As as you know, they were always

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be conservative justices, but but uh, you know,

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>it's possible they are are even more conservative now. It

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>could happen to Brett Kavanaugh too, if he has confirmed.

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>We we don't really know now. One other possibility is

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that some of the other justices, like Chief Justice John Roberts,

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>may say that, at least for the time being, we

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 1>need to try to not get ourselves in the middle

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of controversial and take fewer really controversial cases so that

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>we can kind of lay low a little bit um

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and get ourselves out of the political spotlight. Greg Store,

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about the political spotlight, can you give us an

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 1>update on what Senator Diane Feinstein notified the FBI about

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and how this plays into the ongoing hearings. The uh,

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I may not have the very latest information

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>on that. Um. She she has called for an FBI investigation. Uh,

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>these new allegations that were published in The New Yorker

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:34.640
<v Speaker 1>last night, the um uh you know, Democrats have been

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>saying throughout that they want an FBI investigation of the

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>earlier allocations involving Christine Ford Uh, the Republicans have resisted,

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and at this point there is no indication that there

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:53.679
<v Speaker 1>will be an FBI investigation. Would there be an investigation

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 1>just generally, I mean for anybody that is coming up

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>as a potential nominee, would there be some kind of

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.640
<v Speaker 1>background check and so on? There is always a background check,

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>But as a general matter, the FBI is gathering information

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:15.120
<v Speaker 1>for the the White House. And it's not something where

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the FBI is investigating as they would in a criminal case,

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>where they are determining whether there is probable cause to

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>determine whether you know something happened, whether a crime was committed.

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>There they would be gathering facts and they will do that.

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>They have done that on Brick, with Brick having off

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 1>on many issues, and they will do that on any

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>future nominee. But they're not they're not equipped or they're

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>not prepared in a situation like this to sort of

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>get to the bottom of us and tell get to

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of it and tell us all what what

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the correct answer is. Is there any way that this

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>makes or creates even more bad blood between Republicans and

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Democrats in the Senate, or is it just so bad

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to begin with that nothing's going to change it. It's

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>hard to imagine it could be even worse. And you know,

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>with these new allegations, Senator Grassley, the Republican chairman, was, uh,

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, is accusing Democrats of withholding information. The New

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>York report indicates that some Democratic staff members were aware

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of the allegations, and Grassley says, we didn't know about these.

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh So there there is certainly mistrust and it may

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>well explode if if indeed we do have the hearing

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that currently is scheduled for for Thursday of this week,

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 1>if Kevana steps aside in some form, how does that

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>change the process for the president in nomination? So you know,

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the president, of course we get to nominate somebody knew

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 1>the kind of the wild card in here are the

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 1>two wild cards together? Or that we have the midterm

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>election coming up. Uh, it seems impossible that somebody could

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>get confirmed before the midterm election, which means we move

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>into the the lame duck Senate period and Republicans would

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>still have a majority no matter what happens in November. Uh,

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 1>it is at least theoretically possible that especially Republicans, uh you,

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>maintain or enlarge their majority. In the Senate that we

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>could have to push this into next year in the

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and the new Senate that starts in early January. Alright,

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>So if that's part of the plan, don't they need

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to actually vote on a variety of other measures. And

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:32.719
<v Speaker 1>I know that's outside of your wheelhouse, really, but they

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>need to get the government funded. They do need to

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>get the government government funded. You know, that is still

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>on the table. Um. There are plenty of other issues

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>out there. I mean, Kavanaugh is the Kavanaugh issue is

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>attempting to suck all the year out of the room.

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>But but you're correct that there's some uh, you know,

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:54.400
<v Speaker 1>traditional business that needs to be needs to be done.

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's like it's like there's a lot more

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that they can disagree on and and mess up. Yes, absolutely, well,

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean the prospect of a government shutdown is is

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>hanging out there. Um, and uh, you know there are

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of senators who would like to leave town

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and go campaign as well. Let's move one them forward

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>before you let you go. Greg Noah Phelbin, Professor Phelman

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of Harvard has a terse essay out Rosenstein must go

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>so Mueller can stay. It's a gamble but it's at

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>least the least bad option for continuing the Trump investigation.

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you just presume a Supreme Court guy, that the

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court gets involved as they did with Nixon slash,

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Watergate and all this Rosenstein's sessions Trump festivities. I don't

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>presume it is certainly know there's some issues out there,

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>like if Mueller decides the subpoena as the president, that

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>is an unresolved legal issue that could get up to

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court. In terms of you know, just say

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that the question of Ken Robert Mueller be fired. I'm

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>not sure that that is a Supreme Court issue. This

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>is not a case like um, you know, Ken Starr,

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>who was an independent council. It's it's clear that Bert

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Mueller could be fired through the proper channels, UM, and

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that would be a huge political controversy, but it wouldn't

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>necessarily be something that would rise to the Supreme the

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>level of the Supreme Court. There's a good chance something

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to the Supreme Court involving the Mueller investigation,

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>but but but very hard to say that it's imminent

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>or or to say what it is. Greg S, thank

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you so much greatly, appreciated, of course, on edge of

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>legendary and Supreme Court balance and coverage. Thanks for listening

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer.

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast. You

0:29:48.040 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio m