WEBVTT - Retailers Pivoting To ’What’s Your Walmart Strategy?’ in 2018: Ed Yruma

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:35.239
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. This

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>year has been one of relative pain for the retail industry,

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>at least outside of Walmart and Amazon, with a lot

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of brick and mortar stores closing, companies reconsidering their balance sheets.

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>What will next year bring with us to discuss his

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Eddi Ruma. He's an equity research analyst covering retail in

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>e commerce for key Bank Capital Markets in New York

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and just comes from the Key Bank but the Market's

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Consumer conference which went from through today and ed, we're

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>so happy to have you and what are you looking

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>for for next year? Glad to be here. Look, I

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>think one of the things that's been an interesting takeaway

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>from the conferences that results seem to have gotten a

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit better towards the end of this year, and

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.400
<v Speaker 1>so we think that you know better demand plus hopefully

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>inventory levels that are aligned should drive a much better alright,

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a much better that's a very general statement. What are

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the pressures that you see afflicting the retailers on a

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>day when we find out that Walmart is even taking

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the words stores out of their name. It is an

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting move by Walmart. I mean certainly, Um, you know,

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is the innovator in retail today and we've seen,

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>as you pointed out, a Walmart that has been incredibly

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>innovative as well, and you know is racing to catch up.

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think what we've been hearing from retailers here

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>at the conference and even prior to the conferences that

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>continued focus on e commerce, right, this is a business

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that requires a constant investment the consumers. No of what

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>e commerce is or should be is changing. Uh. And

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly those best in class competitors like an Amazon or

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Walmart continue to get better. Okay, But did you say,

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>did you hear anything at your conference that made you think, gee,

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>this is something I hadn't thought of before, or these

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 1>guys have really figured out a way to do something

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that no one else has. What have you learned from

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>the conference? You know, one thing that we've heard that's

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty interesting is there's been this rush of companies to

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>sell on Amazon, and I think there's a lot of

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 1>discussions today on is that actually the right decision for

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>my business? And what I mean by that specifically is

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.959
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is a great place if you're not seeing promotions

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>other places in the market, but if one competitor promotes,

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Amazon matches it and that drives down price. So we're

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>now hearing retailers and apparelmenters rethink whether having their product

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 1>in having that on the Amazon platform is the way

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to go. Well. Having said that, though, I was reading

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a story today that Publicist, w PP and Omnicom, these

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>are the big ad firms. They plan to boost ADS

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>spending with Amazon between forty and one hundred percent next year.

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:08.519
<v Speaker 1>WPP says that it's currently spending around two hundred million

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:13.119
<v Speaker 1>that could increase about fifty Publicists spends anywhere from two

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to three hundred million on Amazon, and on the COMES

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>spends about a hundred million dollars a year. They say

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>they could double that amount next year. So I mean,

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>is that something that the companies at your conference didn't

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>recognize or are they going in another direction? I think

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly recognized that Amazon is the dominant force in retail.

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>The question is is it best to have your products

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon or is it best to try to have

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>them be sold directly on your website. I'd also had

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>We've heard a lot of conversation here about Walmart and

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing with Lord and Taylor and whether it

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>makes sense for more partners to uh be on that

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Walmart platform that quite frankly is in a much earlier

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>stage of development. What they say, I think they're very

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>open to it, you know, I think they clearly like

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Lord and Taylor, Lord tailors, lots of existing relationships, and

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to be on that Walmart platform, which traffic could be

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>very exciting. So I heard from numerous companies here that

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>this is something that they were actively involved in discussions around.

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>So you hear constantly what's your Amazon strategy? We think

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>next year you're going to hear more of this, what's

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>your Walmart strategy? So just shifting gears a little bit,

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 1>are more people going to be wearing yoga pants to

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>work next year? Certainly, comfort is a big theme that

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>we're continue to hear. What's interesting is that that comfort

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that used to only get in the yoga pant is

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>now you're able to get that in denim that stretches,

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 1>You're able to get that in other types of apparel,

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.919
<v Speaker 1>and so a certainly comfort is going to continue to

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>be big. Is that specifically yoga pants? Time will tell, Well,

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking specifically at leisure because I know there were

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>some pretty disappointing earnings this year from the likes of

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Nike and under Armor. And you're gonna get Lulu Lemon

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>results after the market closes today, So we'll be watching

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>for that some of those transparent yoga pants. But what's

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 1>your what's your sense for at leisure? But there's certainly

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of pressure, you know. I think this

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>has been a great growth market for almost ten years now,

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and certainly as the market's load, we've we've seen a

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.559
<v Speaker 1>little bit of change and performance. Um. We had Kevin

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Plank doing a talk yesterday and I think he was

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty forthrighting the challenges that his businesses faced both in

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>seventeen uh and as his market continuous see that level

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of disruption. So uh, no all clear yet in in

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 1>sports and and and athletic um, but you know, we

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>are hopeful that at least this very very well. Seventeen

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>uh ends up being leading a path to hopefully I'm

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 1>more calm eighteen ed. Where are we with respect to

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.919
<v Speaker 1>brick and mortar store closures? How many are you expecting?

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Are people in the industry expecting next year? Uh? This

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>is one area where the train is likely not to change.

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>We continue to hear retailers talking about store closures, examining,

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of what's the optimal store footprint? UM

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and so I think eighteen will be a repeat of seventeen.

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I I continue to think that we're going to see

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.799
<v Speaker 1>focus shift to eat com I think though the offset,

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 1>and this we did hear quite frequently, it's that the

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>store fleet that you do have should be compelling, it

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>should be engaging, it should bring a sense of community.

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>So we had companies like Shinola, which is um largely

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>direct brand, talking about the strength of having a store fleet.

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>So clearly the number of stores are coming down, but

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>hopefully the stores that remain in existence are more interesting.

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Just quickly, Harmon International, which is owned by Samsung, they

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>announced that they've got a combination with under Armor for

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>what's called the U A sport wireless flex headphones. Is

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 1>that the kind of thing that under Armour and companies

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 1>like that apparel makers should be focused on. Obviously, the

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>convergence of technology is impacting all industries, but certainly in

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>apparel um under Armor understands, you know. They they've got

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a great data platform, so they know how long your

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>run is, they know what you've been eating, and sort

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 1>of capitalize on that by giving other tech products around

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:00.040
<v Speaker 1>that I think are really important. But ultimately, what's to

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:02.679
<v Speaker 1>drive the success of underarmers selling more shirts and shoes

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and that that's been a that's been a challenge for them.

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>The shares of under Armore down more than fifty so

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>far this year, Thanks very much. Eduma. He is equity

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>research channelists covering retail and e commerce for a key

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>bank Capital Markets. President Donald Trump is set to make

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a statement on Jerusalem from the Diplomatic Reception Room in

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the White House that will take place at one pm

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Eastern time. Will of course bring that to you live

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and to speak more about the topic of foreign relations,

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>we have with US Caitlin Weber or Bloomberg News, government

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, and Nick Wadhams are foreign policy reporter. Nick.

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's be again with you, what do we expect the

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>president to say in any detail about Jerusalem as the

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>capital of Israel. Well, he will say that the US

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>recognizes Jerusalem as Israel's capital, and he will also direct

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the State Department to begin the process which is expected

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to take many years, you know, at least four or

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>five years of the process of building an embassy there. Um,

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>he will continue to sign a waiver as required under

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>US law, Um that he'll keep the embassy for now

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 1>in Tel Aviv. But really this is a symbolic move

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>where he will declare that the US recognizes that Jerusalem

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>is the capital of Israel. Nick and Caitlin, I'm going

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to get you at one in one second. But Nick,

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you say it's a symbolic move, but it's one that's

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>gotten a lot of attention worldwide. Of course, the Middle

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>East has been a spot of incredible tensions, and the

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>U s allies are coming out sharply critical of this move,

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>saying that it will hinder any attempts to broker a

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>peace agreement just quickly. Uh, do you think that this

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 1>could have a much bigger consequence that it might seem

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>just based on its sort of symbolic nature. Yeah, I mean,

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the concern about from allies UM about this move is

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that it will basically pre judge negotiations over the status

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of of Jerusalem has worked out in any negotiation. And

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 1>then also it would UH sort of cast doubt on

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.439
<v Speaker 1>the idea that the US is a neutral uh and

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 1>unbiased arbiter in these negotiations, that the US is willing

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to recognize Jerusalem is the capital as Israel's capital, than uh,

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it is biased towards Israel and against the Palestinians in

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>these negotiations and can't be seen as a sort of

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>an honest and neutral broker. So it's it's important also

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to think that the relationship that the US has with

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.959
<v Speaker 1>its allies will also UH dictate some of the path

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of the ongoing tensions with North Korea. Kaitlin, can you

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>just bring us up to up to speed with respect

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to the state of play in North Korea, the UH,

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the sort of exercises that have been going on with

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>South Korea and the US and kind of where are

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>allies stand right now. Yeah, over the past year, we've

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.439
<v Speaker 1>really seen tensions between the West and North Korea kind

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of ebb and flow. UM. Earlier, this fault looked like

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>they were sort of um decreasing. They had been, you know,

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of months, but when North Korea didn't launch

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 1>any any missile tests, that all changed last late last month, UM,

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>when North Korea really escalated, UM it's test launching. They

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>they potentially the furthest reaching I CBM missile it had

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>UM had so far. So you know, looking sort of

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you know to next year, we think it could be

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>potentially a really decisive year in that conflict. UM. Some

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>people think it might be the sort of the last

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>chance to prevent North Korea from becoming really a full

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:00.839
<v Speaker 1>fledged nuclear weapons power. And there's an number of released

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>sensitive events on the on the calendar next year, UM,

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>including the Olympics in South Korea in February, and then

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 1>also the the end of the the the anniversary of

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the end of the Korean War, and the anniversary of

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the founding of North Korea. Those are both events that

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>are often marked with missile tests. Caitlin, if you could

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>comment on the perhaps not bipartisan and the more unilateral

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>approach on the part of US foreign policy under President

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, because I believe that allies such as UK

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister Theresa May coming out and offering negative comments

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:40.079
<v Speaker 1>about the upcoming speech that President Trump is going to

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>make detailing a Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. So

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>he's got allies who do not agree with that stand.

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I think in terms of North Korea, UM, the Trump

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 1>administration has sort of gone back and forth between whether

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>or not they want to UM work with China and

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.079
<v Speaker 1>the U N in terms of pressuring Piong Yang I

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.959
<v Speaker 1>sort of come into line. UM. You know, the there

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>was un sanctions about six months ago that went into

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>place UM, and since then the US has passed UM

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>much stronger unilateral sanctions, something that was really looked at

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>UM negatively by the Chinese government. It's it's unclear, UM.

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>You know what going forward what the Trump administration stands

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>will be, whether they want to continue to go it

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>alone or or work sort of more multilaterally. I think,

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you know North Korea, before it agrees to talks, is

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it's likely going to you know, going to have to

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>be a high level multilateral effort. Nick, come on in here.

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about just generally the U S

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy. I know there's been a lot of criticism

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>aimed at Rects tillersting questions about whether he will remain

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>in place as Secretary of State. I'm just wondering, is

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>there behind the scenes more cohesion among the foreign policy

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>walks in this administration than perhaps it might seem from

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:03.719
<v Speaker 1>the outside It My impression is there is not cohesion.

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And and one of the challenges that we've faced in

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>reporting out the foreign policy priorities of this administration is, uh,

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.839
<v Speaker 1>you never really know who is calling the shots or

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>or what the priorities are. I mean, if you look

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>at North Korea, for example, Uh, you saw the U. S.

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Investador to the UN, Nicky Hamley, make remarks at a

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Security Council meeting last week where she basically gave a

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of policy prescription that was different from what the

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>State Department said. She said, country should cut off all

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>ties with North Korea and uh, sever all diplotic ties.

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 1>When we question the State Department spokeswoman on that um

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a day later, she said, uh, she wouldn't go that far.

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>She said that essentially they're encouraging countries to reduce ties,

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>but she wouldn't say they wanted countries to cut off

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 1>all ties. So, I mean, that's just a small example

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:55.959
<v Speaker 1>of something we face all the time. Where you never

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>quite know who is speaking for the President, who is

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>speaking for US US policy, because in the different branches

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:07.839
<v Speaker 1>and the different agencies there are substantive differences on what

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>various people say the US is doing and should be doing.

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Is there is there any surprise that the oil prices

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>are actually lower today as a result of this. I mean,

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>normally you would say, all right, there's turmoil in the

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Middle East and they're going to be problems because of

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>some policy change on the part of the United States.

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>You don't see any any reaction in the market. Well,

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we will see. I think we really have

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to wait until after the President speaks. Everybody I've been

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>talking to it the State Department says, wait till you wait,

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>wait till you hear what he says. It will be

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a more nuanced speech than you than you think. Um.

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>But so far, yes, there people are saying that they

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>have not seen a great deal of protests outside US

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>embassies on the street in places like Cairo. Uh So

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a muted response so far. But the real test will

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>be after the President delivers his speech. And of course

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>we're also looking at what the trade ramifications will be

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>with some of our allies stemming from the tax plan,

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>because it evidently is not being met with some criticism overseas.

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Caitlin Webber, government analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence focusing on US

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>trade policy, as well as well as Nick Waddam's foreign

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>policy reporter for Bloomberg News. Both of you thank you

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>so much for your insights. Definitely a lot of moving

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>piece is hard to get your arms around, but really,

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Pim and when we talk to people, what's going to

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>affect the markets? Are some of these trade tensions that

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>are picking up. Well. The company is Transao, and it's

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>chief executive is Chris Poppas, and he joins us here

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>in our eleven three oh studios and Transio Well, it

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>has its fingers in many different industries, automotive building as

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>well as electrical medical packaging. It's in the plastics business

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>as we remember. Chris, thank you very much for being here.

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Much appreciated. I wanted to just skip ahead to Hurricane

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Harvey and the rebuilding efforts that have gone on because

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I know that several of your facilities were affected by

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the hurricane, and I wonder if you could just give

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>us a quick update on what's going on. Well, we

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>had in our case actually no real impact on our facilities.

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>We were a distance from the hurricane and Louisiana, So

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>in our case, UM we had a short term lift

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>because our facilities are up and running while others were not.

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>But more broadly, the hurricane, while devastating a course for

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the region, UM is going to stimulate construction activity post

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>for rebuilding and automotive you know, something like a million

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>cars will have to be replaced over the course the

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>next year or so, so aside from blips or sort

0:16:59.920 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of temporary effects from the hurricanes. I'd love to get

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>your take just overall of what you're seeing with respected demand,

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>because Trina really has a pretty amazing view of the

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 1>economy since the products are and everything from automake automobiles

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to smartphones to anything else that you buy that has

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>plastic components. Right. We we cross over many applications as

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, you know, including carpet construction, packaging, and we

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>do it globally, so we have a good view. Now

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>sixty sixty two percent of our sales are in Europe,

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>so I have a better view of Europe, of course

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>than the Americas. We have twenty in Asia, but you know,

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty constructive on all of those segments. Um. And

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>when we gave our guidance, for example, for next year,

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>which we just just came out with about seven dollars

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and ninety cents of share of earnings, we did not

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>forecast any real uplift in the economy from seventeen to eighteen.

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.199
<v Speaker 1>We generally felt the economy of eighteen would be similar

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to seventeen, which is pretty modest actually in terms of

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>actual growth. And you're talking global here, and we're talking

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>global here, so we're thinking in a two two and

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>alf Uh, you know, economic growth agenda to drive our

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>earnings growth. But if we had more than that, if

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the economies in fact grew faster, because we're in so

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>many different segments, we would generally see a rise across

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.479
<v Speaker 1>all those segments. I'm fascinated by this because we've been

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>hearing from a number of strategists saying that the FED

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to hike four times next year, that we're

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 1>reaching the synchronized global growth story. Uh, this forecast that

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you just gave out their flies in the face of that,

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Why are you bearished? No, we're not bearish. We're saying

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that we can see a rise in our earnings this year.

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 1>We forecast about seven sixty a share next year seven nine.

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>We're saying that we can see a rise in our

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>earnings independent of whether there is in fact a global lift.

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>So we gave our guidance. We were just saying that

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>on the basis of today's economic activity, we could see

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.399
<v Speaker 1>earnings next year of seven dollars ninety cents. If in

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>fact the economy grows globally, then we would in fact

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>have generally higher earnings in that so we're not barished.

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 1>We just wanted to make that reference to our forecast,

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to our earnings guidance. I just want to make it

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 1>even simpler. You make the plastic that makes lego blocks,

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't that right? Well, that's an application that we are in,

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, along with many, many, many many others. No, No,

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I clearly, but I mean you know everybody knows. Or

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>yogurt cups would be another example. Very good, Um, tell

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>us about a business in China, because I know that

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>you've just really started production there at a new plant.

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>We have a new plant. We've been in China for years.

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>We're in China, or in Korea, we're in Indonesia with

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:45.119
<v Speaker 1>with assets with plants and sales, of course, but we

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>just started up a new plastics facility and ABS plant

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 1>we call it, which is used in engineered applications, automotive

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>apply and smartphones, and we put it in China, and

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>we just started up a month ago on time, on

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>budget because of the growth in that particular region for

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>those markets and the kind of material we make there

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>is relatively unique compared to others, and our customers, mainly automotive,

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>want us to be where they're going to be building

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>their cars, which of course is in China. So in

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that scenario, it made sense for us to put that

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>asset in China, which we did. Which product do you

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>think will be the biggest growth story next year? I

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>think too are rubber products for high performance tires, where

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>we also have a new plant coming up in January

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>in Germany, and our engineered performance plastics where we have

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the new plant in China. Those two will be our

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.479
<v Speaker 1>growth story for next year. Now. We on our investor

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Day about a year and a half ago, we suggested

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a hundred million dollars of EBITDA growth in performance plastics

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and we outline investments that would drive that. Two of

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>those are the rubber plant in in Germany and the

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>A B. S plant in China. So we're delivering on

0:20:56.720 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>those investments as we described in November of two thousand six.

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Is it easy to raise money we have, Well, we

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>have a fantastic balance sheet, you know, we're our leverage

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>is one point three times. We're generating. We have the

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:12.719
<v Speaker 1>highest free cash flow yield of anybody in the chemical

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>space at about so we have very strong cash flows.

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>We just refinanced our balance sheet just a few months ago. Um,

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>we have a terrific balance sheet in our case. But

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the answer your question is it is easy to raise

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>money if you need to raise money. In our case,

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>we have a stellar balance sheet, lots of free cash flow,

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>lots of capability to grow anymore without having access the

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>capital markets. We just complete our first acquisition successful nice

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>comping in in Italy that makes some term plastic glastomers.

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Very nice product line. We're looking. But it's hard, it's

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>really hard. Valuations are high, very hard to do acquisitions.

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>In our view, in today's market, high valuation is tough

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:56.479
<v Speaker 1>to do. Chris Pappas, thank you so much for joining us.

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>A pleasure speaking with you. Chris, Pappas is chief executive

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:03.360
<v Speaker 1>officer of Trinco, which is based in Pennsylvania but has

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>plants and sells products all over the world. It's amazing

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>how big the market is for all this stuff that

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you buy, all the components, the plastics, uh and and such.

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>A year ago, if you asked too many credit fund managers,

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>they would say, we're in the eighth, maybe ninth inning

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>this year. Perhaps we're in the seventh inning, or perhaps

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>we're in the eleventh inning. We're gonna go extra innings

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen. Here to talk about that. As Frank oh

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>c No. He has senior portfolio manager at new Fleet

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Asset Management, which oversees twelve billion dollars and it's based

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 1>in Hartford. Thank you so much of Frank for joining us.

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with how close we are to

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the end of this credit cycle, because we have gotten

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple of calls recently from some pretty high profile

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:04.120
<v Speaker 1>credit investors that were getting towards the end. Yeah, sure,

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. I would say we're in a

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>very long seventh inning right now. Whenever we have a

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 1>benign credit environment, historically, it's very easy to say that

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the end is two years out. Uh, you know five

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about two in fifteen, we were talking

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:22.880
<v Speaker 1>about two thousand and seventeen being the end. What we're

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 1>seeing right now is fundamentally, uh, we're in good shape.

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>It's still a benign credit environment. The faults are low,

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.199
<v Speaker 1>balance sheets are in good shape, there's not a lot

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of debt do an. Interest coverage is strong. Um, we

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>are starting to see some late cycle behavior, aggressive terms

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>loosening of credit standards, but by and large a two

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent GDP. You know, environment is good

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>for fixed income in and for credit. So are you

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>holding less cash than you had been perhaps a year ago?

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.879
<v Speaker 1>We are, We are fully invested. Our view is that

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>this fundamental environment is good for credit. Layer onto that

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a strong technical environment. There is a strong bid for

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>yield globally, and so when there are investors looking for yield,

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>there are buyers of loans and high yield, which is

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>where we traffic, and so we want to take advantage

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of that by being fully invested. Have you also gone

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>further down the credit spectrum into lower rated high yield

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 1>dead like triple C, single B. That's a good question.

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 1>We are a fundamental bottoms up credit shop at New fleet.

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:34.239
<v Speaker 1>We started adding credit risk in the summer of two

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand sixteen. We were risk off in fifteen and late fourteen.

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Started adding risk around the summer of sixteen when valuations

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>we were attractive, not only in the loan market, in

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:48.919
<v Speaker 1>the high yield market as well. We added single bs

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and some triple cs. We started adding energy. UM Today,

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I would say that we're UM less risk on a

0:24:56.920 --> 0:25:01.120
<v Speaker 1>pure relative basis, but I'm gonna stick with our credit quality,

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>UH band Right now, what if you could tell people

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the vertics new fleet dynamic credit

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>et F and how if you're an issuer, how do

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you get your attention to actually buy some debt to

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>go into that e t F. Sure. So that's an

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>e t F that we launched last December h b

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 1>l H wise the ticker symbol UH. That is a

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>product that was born out of a few things. UH. First,

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll take the market. What we found was that the

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>loan market, in the high yield market has slowly been converging.

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>If they're not brothers and sisters are definitely cousins. Uh.

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 1>There are loans now that look like bonds. There are

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>bonds that the bond market, the high yield market, for example,

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is secured now and soft of the borrowers have both

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a loan and a high yield security. And so our

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>view was that we ought to have a product that

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:00.880
<v Speaker 1>can look at the entire capital struck sure of a borrower,

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>rather than a fund that can just buy loans and

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a fund that can just buy bonds. If we like

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a particular part of the capital structure, we want the

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>ability to buy it. What we also found was that

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the client was moving in this direction as well. Clients

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>are not willing to outsource the complexity of allocating between

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the two. They want to put a dollar into leverage finance,

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>allow us to do the allocation, and then allow themselves

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to frankly, run their run their practice. Frank in the

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>notes that you sent over, you said that it's important

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 1>for this asset class to be a permanent part of

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>people's portfolios. How do you square that idea of investing

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 1>truly investing in a company for the long term with

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>an e t F that is frequently used for traders

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:50.360
<v Speaker 1>who want to be able to get in and out. Yeah,

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 1>the e t F that we manage is active, and

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:55.439
<v Speaker 1>so from our perspective, we manage the t F very

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>similar to we do then we would a mutual funds, right,

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 1>but so it is active and it's un clearer at

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>any given time with the underlying composition will be the

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>way that'say, H, Y, G or J and K would uh.

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>But the point of an e t F in large

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>part is taking in this case assets that don't trade

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 1>all that frequently and UH sort of pulling them together

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and then having them sort of backing a share that

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 1>trades like a stock and people can get out quickly.

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Does that concern you? It's not too dissimilar than the

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>mutual fund market. Right. Every morning we come in and

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>we have an inflow or outflow from the day before.

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>The real difference is that we can create units on

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the e t F side at any time of the day.

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:39.479
<v Speaker 1>But if there is an environment where people are selling

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>loans in high yield, will have an outflow in the

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>mutual funds and we'll have a redemption unit in the

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>e t F. So from my perspective, we're managing liquidity

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the liquidity risk UH really very similarly in both products.

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if you could just go back to the

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>Vertus new Fleet Dynamic Credit e t F because I

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 1>just want to understand what guides your action? How do

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you know what to buy? What do you need to

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Speaker 1>know to put? You know, different different issues in there.

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Because you've got one Walter Investment Management, right, that's currently

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in bankruptcy, that's right, right, But then you've got others

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 1>like Gates Global that's I believe a Blackstone deal. How

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>what what sort of drives your decision making? Sure? So

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>we have a team of eleven credit analysts UH and

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>those analysts look at the entire capital structure of a borrower.

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>So the banks, the arranging banks syndicate whether it's a

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 1>loan or a high old issue, and we do our

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 1>own fundamental credit analysis. What makes us different is that

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Walter Investment Management is a great, great example. We own

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the loan rather than the hot than the bond issuance.

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>The bonds in the fifties. The loan is in the

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>mid nineties and will be a part recovery. So we

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>actively decided to be up the capital structure in that name.

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Um As as an example, there are borrowers that don't

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>have bonds there, you know, on the shores that don't

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>have loans. We now have the ability to look at

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the entire opportunity set to trillion plus of loans in

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>high yield rather than individual markets. I'm looking at the

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>composition of the fund and there is a certificant proportion

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that's rated triple C or lower or single B or lower.

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just wondering. You know, we've seen that, say

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>with UH with third avenue, right, the idea of what

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>happens if there are a sudden rash of redemptions, even

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>if it's a mutual fund. UH, what's your sort of

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>game plan if there were to be some kind of crisis. Yeah,

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I would not categorize the single b's and triple cs

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that we own here as the third avenue. Event um,

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>these are single b by and large loans. The triple

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>cs might be larger loans Walter Investment Management, for example,

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>it would would be one of those stress situations UM.

0:29:56.640 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>In et F form, UH, there are liquid the guidelines.

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>We need to have a certain market cap public market cap,

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the loan issue has to be a certain size. We

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>manage a similar product on the mutual fun size that

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:14.719
<v Speaker 1>has roughly seventy of the issues are over a billion dollars,

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and so we're actively managing that type of liquidity rather

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>than a one off distress situation. Uh like like many

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of the names that maybe we're in the Third Avenue deal.

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for being with us, much appreciated, very educational. Franco

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Sino is the senior portfolio manager for New Fleet Asset Management,

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>helping to manage about twelve billion dollars in assets. They

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>are a bill. They are based in Hartford, Connecticut. Thanks

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo.

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Blueberg Radio.