WEBVTT - Square Working With Government to Speed Up Small Business Payments

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl podcast. I'm Paul swing you.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahma Waits. Each day

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:22.119
<v Speaker 1>that Bloomberg dot com. There's a huge focus right now

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>on the fate of small businesses. Is their hard hit

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>by the shutdowns from the coronavirus pandemic. Someone who's very

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>clean clued in to exactly how these businesses operate and

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>how they can survive and thrive going forward. As Jim mccalvey,

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>co founder of Square, that incredibly popular payment system electronic

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>payment system used by many small businesses, also the author

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>of a new book, The Innovation Stack, Building an unbeatable business,

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>one crazy idea at a time. He has a former

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>glass blower who ended up founding one of the pre

0:00:56.080 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>eminent mobile online payment systems. Jim, thank you so much

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>for being with us today. I wanted to start with

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>just anecdotally, given your conversations with small businesses, how hard

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>hit have they been from this whole episode? Oh my god, Lisa,

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 1>They've been tremendously hard hit. UM, and everybody knows it

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, but nobody knows the extent of it. We

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>are watching, uh, some businesses closed, We're watching employees and panics. UM,

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>It's it's bad. And I'm actually still in the art

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>world and I still run a small studio and my

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>staff was terrified, UM, because we had to shut down.

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>So why is this time different than other times when

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you talk about financial downturns? So this is the first

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 1>time there's been a voluntary shutdown of a healthy economy.

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.479
<v Speaker 1>So I'm also a director of the St. Louis Federal Reserve,

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and so I get to see the economic data almost

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in real time. And we had a very healthy economy

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>going in UM, and we elected to voluntarily closed down, uh,

0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the economy to solve a medical problem. Uh. This is

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>different than most recessions. Most recessions just happened because there's

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>some structural problem in the economy. There was none in

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>this case. What happened was we had this medical emergency

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and to fight the disease, we had to close the economy.

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's different. So yes, you you do run an

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>art studio and you are a glassblower, I believe based

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>on your bio. Yet you did also found co found Square,

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>which is one of the key technological advances for a

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.519
<v Speaker 1>lot of small businesses. And I'm just wondering the role

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of tech at this moment when so much business is

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>going online. How are you seeing this sort of transformative

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:42.399
<v Speaker 1>moment for small businesses in the relationship with their tech infrastructure. Well,

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>they're super defended on the tech infrastructure. As a matter

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of fact. Square has been rolling out new products almost

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>every day to help small businesses adapt, and we're putting

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>new products in their hands. Uh, you know, probably one

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a week now, allowing restaurants to turn to a delivery

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and pick up, uh, making our software free for companies

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that need it, and basically look um, this in some

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 1>ways helps companies that have modernized their processes to use

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>electronic payments, to use electronic record keeping, to use electronic meetings,

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to use distributed workforces, and it's forcing a lot of

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>other companies to get with the program going forward. I'm

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>just wondering, do you expect a lot of these smaller

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>businesses to go out of business completely or do you

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.239
<v Speaker 1>think that they'll just be a sort of transformation as

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>far as weeding out the most successful successful ones. Well,

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's certainly going to be a winnowing down

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of companies that were not well prepared for this, But

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the real tragedy is that there were a lot of

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>healthy businesses that are getting caught in it. The government's

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to step in. One of my great concerns is

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that the government is doing a lot of their aid

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>through uh sort of antiquated paper based systems, and it's

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>not going to get the money to the people that

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>need it and the businesses need it fast enough. So

0:03:57.480 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>at Square we're working diligently to try to give them

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the tools for instantaneous or near real time um action

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>if the government chooses to do that. Wait. So, in

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>other words, you're working with the government right now to

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>try to make these payments electronic. Yes, so, I'm Jack

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>said a tweet about this a couple of weeks ago.

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>But basically, our whole company stands ready to give whatever

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>aid we can because we've had the electronic rails working

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>for several years, and they work with millions of businesses

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and scaling for millions to tens of millions or hundreds

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of millions is not as difficult as scaling from nothing

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to you know, project number one. Jim McKelvey, thank you

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with us and for sharing your insights.

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 1>Jim McKelvey as co founder of Square based in St.

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>Louis author of The Innovation Stack, Building an Unbeatable Business,

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>One Crazy Idea at a Time, a new book that's out.

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>He also is a glassblower, which I really love as

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody who used to do sculpture a long time ago.

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>One of the key questions for markets going forward is

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>whether inflation will actually start to pick up this time. Typically,

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>in the past, the idea has been theoretically, when governments

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>print money that leads to inflation. It didn't happen in

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine. People are expecting it not to happen again.

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 1>But are they wrong. Maria Murphy joining us now vice

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>president and portfolio manager at Lomas Sales, which oversees nearly

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 1>three hundred billion dollars and is based in Boston. Mara

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.799
<v Speaker 1>Maura there This to me is one of the most

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>important debates at a time when people are basically shrugging

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>off the concept of inflation. Going forward, even as governments

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.799
<v Speaker 1>and central banks unleash some of the biggest financial packages

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>ever to hit markets. Do you think this time is

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>different the two nine financial crisis and that this actually

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>will spurf inflation? Hi, Lisa, thanks for having me. Um.

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's certainly different this time, and that the

0:05:55.360 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>pace and the size that the FED is is going

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and buying right now is drastically different than any of

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the other quei's we've ever seen. They're really doing this

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>at what I'd call a sprint pace, and we need

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to get ourselves into this marathon mindset rather than the

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>frint we've been in, because they need As you see

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>this week, they're already starting to taper the pace of

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>their purchases and we'll see how the market responds to that.

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>So far, as you mentioned that break evens are off

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>their lows um which suggests that the market is no

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>longer pricing that real fear of deflation or disinflationary risk,

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.799
<v Speaker 1>but we're still well off the levels of being afraid

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 1>of inflation to come. I think the thing to watch

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that will be key to see if we do good

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>inflation this time with all the easing, is what happens

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>with the dollar. We need to watch for that excess

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 1>dollar liquidity in the market, and given the amount that

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 1>we've seen with increased swap lines from the FED, a

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>weaker dollar would finally perhaps give us that impotence for

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>inflation pressure. But I think that's a lot further down

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the line, and right now we need to be focused

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>on the pace of the seed byon Alright. So, I

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>guess inflation is sort of a hard concept to to

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>get your mind around because there are a lot of

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>different components to it, and there are a lot of

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>potential scenarios in terms of whether the financial package from

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the FED continues to accelerate or if it does slow down.

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>As you talked about, there is a much more concrete

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>issue of bond yields, and we're looking right now at

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>tenure yields at at three quarters of a percent, and

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing people expect that rate to actually go down

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>over time, even as the US prints unprecedented amount amounts

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of these securities. At what point will that increase in

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>supply lead to higher yields. That's the ultimate question here,

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>right is timing on all of this, And I think

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately we still have too many unknown to really have

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>a good sense of when that actually might occur. The

0:07:55.440 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Fed is talking about issuing T bills right now for

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>um supply to pay for this stimulus, but eventually they

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>may need to issue on the back end of the curve,

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>which I don't think we have a lot of natural

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>demand there right now with levels as low as you mentioned,

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>because people are starting to step into some of the

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>new I G issuants rather than to day in the

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>safe case incursory assets, but volatility remains really high in

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>this asset class. The set has improved liquidity, but ball

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is still there. And so I think, you know, given

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that we're likely to see bigger move in per day,

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and the range of yields that we're going to be

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>in will likely be wider than we've been used to.

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>So when we used to trade in a range of

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty to thirty basis points on ten or thirty year yields,

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>now I think that range could be a lot wider

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>while we try to figure out where the right level

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is based on the supply that's coming and based on

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 1>the buying that's happening. The volatility has pretty significant consequences,

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>not only for the Treasury, market, but also for credit.

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>And I'm wondering what this does for investment grade bonds

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>even as they're back stopped by the Federal Reserve, given

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they're more sensitive than ever to the

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>fluctuations in the volatility and treasury yields. Yeah, one of

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the patterns we've seen over the last week is that

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.439
<v Speaker 1>all of this new ig issuance that's come to market, Um,

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you have deals that are highly oversubscribed. Um. I'd liken

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>it to all of us right now, rushing to get

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that online order. We all wake up early and we're

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to, you know, secture that online delivery for our

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>groceries every day. And are you are you actually succeeding,

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 1>by the way, are you? Are you? It's so hard,

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't this? I have I've failed every single day. I

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>actually have to go out, get get geared up in

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>my hasmat suit and go to the grocery store. But

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>carry out please. So you know, if we think of

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>it like that, we have this rush for everyone going

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to the same space right now because that's where the

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>FED is supporting. So you know that old adage of

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>don't fight the bed persist here. So you want to

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 1>be in i G and that UM demand for these

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>high quality, large deals is really persisting and I think

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that will continue UM and we've only probably just seen

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the start of that, and I think to strengthen the

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>secondary will be the next order of operations after all

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of this new issue. So it sounds like you're overweight

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>investment grade? Is that right? Yeah, We're We're constructive on

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the new issuants here, and we like the level of

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 1>yields after the backup, and I think given the natural

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>buyer and the stead it's a place we definitely like

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:35.559
<v Speaker 1>and we'll be adding to What about high yield UM,

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit harder to source high heeled paper

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>right now. Uh, We're we're having we're seeing that UM

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>i G with that excess supply is a little bit

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>easier for us to be buying right now UM in

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a high yield. I'm just not sure we have a

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 1>good sense yet, UM. Given the unknowns with the recovery

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of you know, how how long will this last? We

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>how fast can company is really resume normal operations and

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>how big and how you know, what's the magnitude of

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>this recession and not knowing those unknowns, it's hard to

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>really assess recovery values and highlo companies, and so I

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 1>guess we're just not ready to say that the uh,

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the bounce is real here yet, so we're not adding

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to their respectors at the mall. That's really compelling to me.

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>You said it's difficult to source paper. In other words,

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:30.439
<v Speaker 1>has a dramatic move that we've seen been largely on paper,

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and nobody really wants to solidify their losses by actually

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>selling the underlying bonds. Is that is that what you're saying.

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Liquidity is definitely improving across the board across most markets,

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's it's perhaps not necessarily people stepping

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in to buy yet in large size. UM, this this

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>sell off has happened very quickly. I think, you know,

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>less than a month, or just about a month is

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>how long it took for us to hit the bottom

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>here if we did hit the ball them, And that's,

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the fastest pace we've seen in a long time. UM.

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.319
<v Speaker 1>Back in eight seven, it took about seventy five days

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>for the peak to trough to occur, and this time

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it took less than thirty. So given that it just

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>happened so quickly, I'd be shocked if there isn't more

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>downside to come, and I think in light of that,

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's unwise to be stepping into risk here. Maura Murphy,

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. Mor Murphy,

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>vice president and portfolio manager at Loomis Sales with almost

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollars under management, based in Boston. I'm Lisa Abramoy.

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>It's by co host and colleague Paul Sweeney Off today

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>from New York. This is Bloomberg Markets. There's a keig

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>question in the transformation of the US economy right now

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that's going on in the heels of the coronavirus, and

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that is what is the state of the consumer? Will

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 1>they be able to maintain the recovery that we saw

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that will have to happen yet again and may not

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 1>happen yet again for another couple of years. Joining us

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>now is David Coudla, chief executive officer and chief investment

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.439
<v Speaker 1>strategist at Mainstay Capital Management. David, this has been a

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of key talking point for years that the American

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>consumer is very strong. Right now we are seeing an

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:27.719
<v Speaker 1>absolute demolition in confidence among American consumers. How pivotal are

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>they in the recovery from this period of time that

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at, it will be very pivotal highly. So

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the consumer is two thirds of the

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>U S economy. And how the consumer uh comes out

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of this in terms of their UH, purchasing habits, the

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>consumer sediment, consumer confidence, how soon consumers are willing to

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>re engage the economy, how unemployment affects their behavior coming

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>out of this, how pay cuts because some of the

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are different impacts on different parts of

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>different demographics across the US. We have some that are

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be unemployed for a certain period of time,

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and the fiscal stimulus packages addressing some of that, uh

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.959
<v Speaker 1>in a meaningful way. UH. There are others that are

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>going to just have haircuts in their pay A lot

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of the automotive industry here in Michigan have pay deferrals

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>um that or pay cuts just straight pay cuts that

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>will go on for months, and so that's going to

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>be affecting, you know, consumer discretionary activity. So UH, it's

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>yet to be seen, you know, so much of this

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>is unknown, but it will be key and how the

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>consumer behaves coming out of or on the other side

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of the coronavirus restarted the economy. Yeah, I was looking

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>at a story out of the Financial Times, the survey

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>that they conducted this. It came out today that nearly

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>three quarters of Americans say that coronavirus pandemic has reduced

0:14:59.880 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the family's income nearly a quarter. So their household income

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>had been cut very significantly, according to this poll. And

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you're very much at the epicenter of that when you

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>look at the auto industry in Detroit and how much

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>has just come to a complete halt. How much long

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>term damage will that do? I mean, that's sort of

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a key question. I'm wondering how quickly can people revive,

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>not just from a balancee perspective, but from a confidence perspective.

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Is there any kind of historical precedent. I don't know

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that there is. You know, this is the first recession

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that's been brought on by um, a pandemic that's been

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>brought on by any kind of disease or virus. So

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it's unknown in that regard um. You know, we have

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>some predictability and that you know, we came into this

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>with a really an economy on pretty good footing in

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of being at fifty year unemployment, we had rising wages,

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>we had a strong relatively strong consumer coming into this,

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and then the economy didn't shut down or slow down

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>under normal business conditions are a normal business cycle. It

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>was an artificial restraint. We the government actually shut down

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the economy and we're then we're going to fire back up.

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>But there's some natural things or natural or human factors

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that have to happen for that to reoccur. So there

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of unknowns in that. As an investor,

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>how do you trade around this? Well? I think for now,

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, these last two days, there

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of optimism about you know, what we

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>saw over the weekend in New York City, the improvement

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of the last several days in Europe, specifically in in

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>France and Spain, in Italy, um, and so there's confidence

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>about the number of new cases slowing. But uh, you know,

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>we know that there we have a long way to

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>go here and the economic impacts are still to be realized.

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think that investors need to be careful about

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking that this is this is behind us, and we

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>think that it's still important to have, you know, some

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>defensive posturing in play, some hedges, in place in your portfolio,

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>because there's there's still volatility ahead. We still got some

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>some pretty bad ecademic numbers to come out, and uh

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>first quarter earnings and even second quarter earnings that are

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be pretty abysmal. So do you think that you'd

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>be uh selling this rally and that you expect the

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>US equity markets to test new lows. I don't know

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I full test new lows, but I think we've certainly

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>got a down draft, uh more of a down draft

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 1>from from some point here. I don't know how much

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>further this rally can go. We're seeing it fade a

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit as we get into trading today. You know,

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>very strong rally yesterday, Futures were strong again this morning,

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 1>started to fade a little bit. It's it's it's uh,

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, come and go today through trading this morning.

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know, we we see, you know, we're

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>in a what we're calling right now an event driven

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>bear market, not a not a secular bear market, not

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a you know, we don't think that this is a

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>more than too an O eight O nine top type

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of bear market, that this is still just an event

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>driven beer market that will just last a few short

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>months and not a couple of years or or or

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>uh a year or longer. We think that we're coming

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.360
<v Speaker 1>out of this and by the end of the year

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the economy and stock market will be on pretty good

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>footing again. Um, that's yet to be seen, but that's

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that's our forecast right now. The economy and the stock

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>market are two very different things. And there's a feeling

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that the stock market might recovery, but the economy the

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>economic hit. Very few people at this point are are

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>putting conviction behind a V shaped recovery in the economy.

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 1>What gives you confidence that this will just be a

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of months and then all those jobs will come back.

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's it's it really comes down to, and

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't know right it. It comes down to how

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 1>long the social distancing needs to go on, um, how

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the data coming in relative to the number of new cases.

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And then what we talked about earlier on how uh

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the consumers re engage the economy, how people get back

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to work. Um, the the uh you know, continuation of

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 1>or the continuation of unemployment for a period of time.

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>The longer goes, the more businesses to go out of business,

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the more people that are suffering that much longer makes

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>it that much harder to restart the economy and and

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>starts to manifest into longer term effects. That's the that's

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the risk. So the sooner we restart the economy, and

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm not suggesting we do that, it's got to be

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>health and safety first. But the sooner we restart the economy,

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:45.199
<v Speaker 1>the less the effects will be. If you look at

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>China as a model, um and as much as we

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.239
<v Speaker 1>believe the data and the recovery, but there's you know,

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>there's measurements that we're taking that are being taken to

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to see that what the real recovery rate is there

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and how much factories are actually running and so forth.

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 1>But they really did have somewhat of a V shaped

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>recovery in a matter of a few months from the

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 1>time they went down to come back up. They're not

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>running it full production now. It's questionable as to what

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>market sign ship too, but you know there's a model

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>where it all happened literally in a few months. Yeah,

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:17.959
<v Speaker 1>David Couldla, thank you so much for being with us.

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:21.159
<v Speaker 1>David Couldla, chief executive officer and chief investment strategist at

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Mainstay Capital Management with nearly three billion dollars joining us

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>from Michigan. There's a question right now about the progress

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:34.919
<v Speaker 1>of the coronavirus and some of the measures put in

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>place to limit a limited spread in Europe. They appear

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to be working. However, we did see an increase in

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the number of deaths in Spain, and there is a

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 1>question right now around the leadership of the United Kingdom.

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Is Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister is still in the

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>hospital and in an intensive care unit being treated for

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus. For some insight on what we should take

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 1>away from this episode, let's bring in to raise Raphael Bloomberg,

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>opinion editor covering European politics and economics. Trace, of course,

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>our thoughts are with Boris Johnson, hoping that he does

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>recover from the virus. On a bigger level, though, is

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 1>there anything that we can take away in terms of

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the leadership of the United Kingdom throughout this epidemic as

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>well as beyond and what the future brings in terms

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 1>of Boris Johnson's government, Well, the UK does not, like

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the US, have a vice president or vice prime minister role.

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>There's no constitutionally designated number two at present. Foreign Secretary

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Dominique rob a cabinet member and one time rival to

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:46.679
<v Speaker 1>Boris Johnson, has been designated as his stand in for

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>day to day policy meetings, and the cabinet is says

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>it's taking decisions by consensus now that can continue for

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a while. Should Johnson become UH seriously incapacitated, should he

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>sign UH, then it's a different process. The Cabinet would

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>then choose a member to recommend to the Queen to

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 1>become prime minister. There's no acting prime ministerial role in

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the UK constitution. They would simply become prime minister. But

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's sort of getting ahead of ourselves. Johnson,

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the news out this afternoon is in good spirits and stable.

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>He's not on a ventilator, as you said in your introduction,

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:27.919
<v Speaker 1>so the hope is that he will be able to

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:31.479
<v Speaker 1>return to full work. Um whether that will happen in

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a few days or much further into the future isn't clear.

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 1>And Soris forgive me for being I don't want to

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 1>say cynical, but cynical. We got communication out of the

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>United Kingdom the forest Johnson was totally fine, they were

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>mild symptoms. Then we got information that he was just

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>brought to the hospital for a precautionary check. It was

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>just a precautionary measure. Stopped getting your nose. A lot

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 1>of joint about it. It's no big deal. Then we

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>hear he's in the ICU, but he's not an a ventilator.

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>He's fine in everything is copasetic. Is there a trust

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>issue here or you know, is this just sort of

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a protocol for a leader of a nation. Yeah, I mean,

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I wish I could answer that with any great certainty.

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>There are moments when it has felt a little bit um,

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, like uh, you know, like watching the old

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Soviet leaders and wondering what's happening. I think what we

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>have to bear in mind is that this virus um

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>operates in in sort of strange and mysterious ways. There

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>are cases where a COVID nineteen uh suffer will the

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>experiencing fairly moderate symptoms that persist and within hours it

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 1>gets much worse. So it may be that uh, the

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the Downing Street was putting a positive spin on things.

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>And it may also be that the Prime Minister, who

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>we know, uh, you know, we know from his biographer

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that he doesn't believe in illness. He tends to work

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>through illnesses. He doesn't really tolerate it in his staff

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 1>that he may have just been pushing himself, not being

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>quite um, you know, as as uh as careful about

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, looking after himself and resting, and things might

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 1>have deteriorated quite quickly. I think we're not going to

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>know that for a while. The Downing Street is going

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>out of its way right now to say that they

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 1>are being transparent. They're updating the media regularly. Um. But

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 1>that's a legitimate question and many here are asking it.

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Just shifting gears to the continent of Europe, there is

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 1>some talk about reopening parts of certain economies as the

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>virus does appear to be plateau ing when it comes

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:35.199
<v Speaker 1>to the account of deaths in new cases in certain hotspots,

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering what the latest is on that. Well, the

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>epidemiological curve is at a different place, or let's put

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it at this way. Different countries are on a different

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>places on that curve, and those that have taken earlier

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:56.360
<v Speaker 1>measures or whose um death rates and infection rates are slowing,

0:24:56.400 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 1>are now starting to contemplate um loosening those measure us.

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 1>But it's a very uh, it's a very finally balanced

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>decision because there is no vaccine. As we know, there

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 1>won't be a vaccine most likely for a while, and

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>there's always a risk that in loosening UH controls you

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>see another surge of infections, and then it then becomes harder,

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 1>as the a team that advises Boris Johnson keeps saying,

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it becomes harder to re reimpose those controls after people

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, get a taste of of having

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>some freedom. So I think we're likely to see this

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>progressing by fits and starts. Perhaps some schools will reopen,

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 1>or certain um you know, still fairly essential businesses will

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 1>be allowed to operate, not but people will still be

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>encouraged to work from home and that sort of thing.

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>There's also discussion of issuing immunity passport, so those who

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>have tested positive in the past, have had COVID nineteen

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:57.360
<v Speaker 1>or who antibody tests show UM have had it, even

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.360
<v Speaker 1>if they didn't experience symptoms, would be given so kind

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of certification so that they could use public transport, return

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to work, and communicate to you know, to anyone that

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>they are not UM, that they are not infectious. But

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:14.479
<v Speaker 1>that depends on getting the disease being a sort of

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>one and done rather than something that can you can

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:22.199
<v Speaker 1>be reinfected within a short period afterwards. Torereas Rafael. We

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>are all living in a science fiction novel at Toreas Rafael,

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg opinion editor covering European politics and economics. It does

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like it is a scene out of some sort

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of surreal science fiction when everybody is being tested for

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>their immunological defense mechanisms to this virus going forward. Thanks

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:45.439
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg pen L podcast. You can

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.239
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney and Lisa A. Bramoids I'm on Twitter at

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Lisa A. Bramoids one before the podcast, you can always

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio Monty