WEBVTT - The Utilities Analyst Who Says the Data Center Demand Story Doesn't Add Up

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the ath Thoughts Podcast.

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe Wisenthal.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Joe, imagine you are a utilities analyst.

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Fun, and for years you are laboring in the utility

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 2>analysis mind. Yeah, and you know, we like talking about utilities,

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 2>We like talking about energy. We find pretty much anything interesting,

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 2>that's right, equal opportunity interest people we are. But yes,

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 2>you got to say utilities. For a while, some people

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 2>would say it was a.

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Little POORI no, that's right. I mean for most of

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 3>our careers. I think if you were utilities analyst, a

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 3>really big part of your job. And maybe I'm wrong,

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 3>but I just didn't the popular discourse was like talking

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 3>about yield relative to treasuries. Right, they were seeing a

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 3>sort of bond like instruments, et cetera. Maybe a little

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:08.119
<v Speaker 3>bit of growth, but real.

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Reliable, safe haven ish dividend plays.

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 3>I guess totally. And since I know where we're going

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 3>with this conversation, one of the themes of the last

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 3>few years has been what I would say is the

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 3>old industries that were either stable or cyclical becoming secular

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 3>in the way they grow.

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 2>I think that's right. So what is happening now is

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 2>if you were I don't want to say, a lowly

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 2>utilities analyst, but you know, maybe a sort of forgotten

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 2>utilities analyst outside of your sector, suddenly you are very

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 2>in demand, right because all you hear about nowadays is

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 2>the AI build out and energy constraints on that, and

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 2>so obviously a lot of people want to look at

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 2>it from a utilities perspective.

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Totally. I always think, like, what a great luck that

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 3>some people have in their careers. You know, you could

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 3>be an analyst and learn modeling skills and all kinds

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 3>of stuff, and then you get allocated and someone gets

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 3>allocated I don't know, farm equipment, and another person gets

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.399
<v Speaker 3>allocated to they wind up in utilities in twenty twenty two,

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:12.639
<v Speaker 3>and it's like, man, they're on TV all the time.

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 3>My old boss at Business Insider, Henry Blodge, it it's

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 3>like he was there as an Internet enalyst in like

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 3>the late nineties. What amazing timing and luck and.

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 2>So it's like journalism and the Yeah, it's it's the

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 2>exact same thing. I started out covering airlines, yeah, of

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 2>all things, but those were interesting. Anyway, I'm glad to

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 2>say we do, in fact have the perfect guests. So

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 2>we're going to be speaking to a utilities analyst, someone

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 2>who happens to have a very contrarian take on the

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 2>data center build out and how much energy is actually required.

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 2>We've been hearing a lot from people who are very,

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 2>very bullish on the data center build out, so this

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 2>will be a useful I love their point.

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 3>I love it.

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So, without further ado, Andy Devreese, head of Investment

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Grade Credit and head of Utilities and power over at

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Credit Sides, thank you so much for coming on all thoughts.

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 4>Thank you the pleasure mine.

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 2>So is it great to be a utilities analyst right now?

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Even better?

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 4>Well your your Bloomberg News reporter Josh Saul wrote an

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 4>article about the how much it's changed for being a

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 4>utilities analyst now the data centers are here. But to

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 4>push back, we did have the largest bankruptcy of all

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 4>time in Enron, Oh yeah, the largest LBO of all

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 4>time in TXU, which then went bankrupt, and the largest

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.679
<v Speaker 4>private equity return ever in Calpine twenty five billion, which

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 4>exceeds Apollos, Lioned, l Trade and Blackstones Hilton Trade. So

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:29.239
<v Speaker 4>we have had a lot of fun along the way.

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Have you been a utilities analyst throughout that entire timeline?

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 2>How long have you been doing it?

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 4>I started with the first packcast bankruptcy and then went

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 4>through the second and here we are with data centers,

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 4>so twenty five years.

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Wow, So you really have seen it all. It is

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 3>fair to say. So, you're absolutely right. There have been

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 3>some disasters and home runs and utilities. You know, they

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 3>do get central in the news, obviously with the fires

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 3>that we saw for example California several years ago, and

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 3>the court trails about allocation of risk in those situations.

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned ron et cetera. But it is also fair

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 3>to say that much of the discourse in day to

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 3>day has been like these are sort of bond like instruments. Absolutely,

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 3>before we get into that, just like sort of like

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 3>talk to us about what a normal day is like,

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 3>and when you're thinking about you til.

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 4>It before you know, pre data centers, yeah, pre.

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Data centers, five years ago, whatever, Pre data centers.

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 4>You're looking at a lot of rate cases of studying,

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 4>a lot of local news. You're looking at legislation, you're

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 4>reading you know, dry regulatory documents, and then you're tracking

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 4>natural gas prices because that's setting the price of power.

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 4>And then on the federal level you obviously have the

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 4>renewables displacing coal and that's obviously having a big impact now.

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 4>So it's a lot I actually think it's a lot

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 4>of fun.

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 2>My impression was always the policy aspect of it seemed

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of the most important thing to keep track of.

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:52.799
<v Speaker 4>Is that right, absolutely, and that's down to the state level,

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 4>but also the federal as well.

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we've done a few energy episodes, still trying to

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 2>wrap my head around the sort of patchwork of that

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 2>seem to cover our energy infrastructure. But anyway, who should

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:03.919
<v Speaker 2>be a.

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Little aspy about the way? Like you talk to people

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 3>in this space and you're like, well, how is this

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 3>get priced? And they're like, well, are you talking about

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.359
<v Speaker 3>market or central? It's like, okay, I don't know, you know,

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 3>it's like are you talking about a rate board or

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 3>you talk about market prices.

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 2>It's so hard anyway, especially in a forty minute podcast,

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 2>to try to generalize that.

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 3>But I love the people, don't get me wrong, those

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 3>are my favorite people.

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, Andy, what is the mood like at the moment?

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Among utilities, people, analysts, investors. Wasn't there a conference recently?

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 4>Everyone's gung ho on this. So the biggest conference of

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 4>the year is EI in November and it was packed.

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 4>I was standing and rolling for some of these presentations. Wow,

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 4>your competitors at CNBC were broadcasting from the floor the

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:49.799
<v Speaker 4>first time. That has probably a sign of a top.

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, people are very happy, and it just to

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 4>quantify it. Utilities have generally grown around four or five

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 4>six percent a year, and then that's moved to five

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 4>to seven percent a year, and now certain names which

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 4>we'll talk about later are up to eight percent a year,

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 4>and that's driven by data center growth.

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Talk to us a little bit more about that. So

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 3>what is the I mean, I'm like looking at a

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 3>chart of the xl U ETF. I don't think it's

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 3>like done insane, But talk to us a little bit about,

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 3>like maybe quantify the exuberance for us. So it's like, okay,

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 3>we we are no longer just in the business of

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 3>measuring bond proxies and looking at policies, et cetera. There

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 3>was a secular growth driver. Talk to us about like

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 3>the bowl case, and then also how we would see

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 3>the ball case sort of like how it's manifesting into

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 3>tradable instruments.

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 4>Sure, and you pulled up the graph of the XLU.

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.039
<v Speaker 4>Obviously it's still a very interest rate sensitive section. Yeah,

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 4>that's dividends. You can find higher yields and other fixed

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 4>income instruments. So you know, maybe didn't do so well

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 4>last year. But the industry argues that as this EPs

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 4>growth rate goes up to the high single digits, mid

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 4>to high single digits, that it shouldn't be as interest

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 4>rate sensitive. So that's the big debate going on with

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 4>investors right now. And this talk.

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the exo you has done well to ya.

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 2>If you zoom out, it looks pretty good. That's my

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 2>impression of a bitcoin investor, by the way, zoom outoom.

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 3>All right, think about you've gotten the end. You've gotten

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 3>that coupon, right, so like you get so like you

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 3>might in normal time, just be happy with a coupon.

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 3>You're getting coupon plus.

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it worked out the Fed zero interest rates

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 4>for so long, so utilities are the place to be.

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 4>That's just math. And then as soon as the Fed

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 4>starts jocking uprates, chat TBT comes on the scene and

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 4>all of a sudden there's data centers. So now, all

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:31.679
<v Speaker 4>of a sudden, you're taking the leg up on growth

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 4>when you don't need to be so interest rate sensitive.

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. So one of the reasons we wanted to talk

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 2>to you is because you have that contrarian take on

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 2>the data center build out, and we wrote it up

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 2>in the All Thoughts newsletter, which everyone should subscribe to.

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 2>It got a lot of attention. Your analysis, interestingly, is

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 2>just based on some pretty simple math. So why don't

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 2>you just to start out with why don't you walk

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 2>us through the calculations that you're actually making to try

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 2>to analyze how much capacity the utilities are taking on

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:07.239
<v Speaker 2>to actually power data centers.

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 4>Sure, so, as you said, it's pretty simple math here,

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 4>so utility, it's so data centers now are consuming around

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 4>forty five gigawatts of power, and you can switch between

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 4>capacity and throughput. I'm going to stick with capacity, so

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 4>forty five gigabats of power. And then there's lots and

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 4>lots of third party estimates for where they're going to

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 4>be in twenty thirty and they center around this, you know,

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 4>ninety ninety five gigawatts, so you need to add fifty

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 4>for two thousand and thirty five, there's a lot fewer estimates.

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 4>You come around one sixty. Now, these estimates, they you know,

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 4>they're all over the place. They come from sell side banks,

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 4>they come from consultants, they come from everyone. Bn EF

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 4>has one there, I think, one of the best out there,

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 4>so we use them a lot. So that's on the

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 4>demand side and where you're going to come out of these.

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 4>And then you look at the supply, and everyone talks

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 4>about the demand, right, But then you look at the

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:01.079
<v Speaker 4>supply and all these tech are too cool to actually

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 4>look at the supply and do utility analysis, right, Who

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 4>wants to be a utility analysts? You were making fun

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:07.959
<v Speaker 4>of us before, but if you look at this.

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 3>But when we realize our pity is misplaced. But we

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 3>were not making fun anyway, it's great.

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 4>So you look at the supply and these utilities are

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 4>tracking all these data centers connecting to the grid because

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 4>they've got to do a lot of work, spend a

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 4>lot of money and transmission distribution, new substations, transformers. It's

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 4>a lot of work, but a boost the earnings growth,

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 4>so they're happy to talk about this. And so you

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:30.959
<v Speaker 4>look at where they're at and where they see things coming,

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 4>and they've got around one hundred and forty gigawatts a

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 4>near term supply. Now, kudos to the utilities. They break

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 4>out what's firm committed, signed, contracted versus pipeline behind it,

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 4>because there's a lot of double, triple, quadruple counting. So

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 4>if you're gonna build a data center in the Southeast,

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 4>you're gonna tell Duke, You're gonna tell Southern, You're gonna

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 4>tell Dominion you're gonna build one. So that's the pipeline potential.

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 4>But looking just at the firm committed whatever they want

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 4>to call it, you around one hundred and forty gigawats.

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 4>Now that's you got a pe adjust So when you

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 4>connected data center, yeah, when you connect the data center

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 4>to the grid, you've got lights, you've got cooling. Those

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 4>third party estimates I gave you are just for raw compute.

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:11.319
<v Speaker 2>Why did you split those out though, because I mean,

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 2>all data centers are going to need to be cooled

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 2>down right, what's the point of splitting it out.

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm not splitting out, I'm just adjusting it downward. Because

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 4>the third party estimates are just compute. So if you're

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 4>connecting to the grid. You're going to ask the lights,

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 4>the cooling and everything. So I want to go apples

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 4>to apples.

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 3>Versus the third party, So what power usage effectiveness or

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:31.439
<v Speaker 3>power usage efficiency?

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 4>So they're at one forty, so that PUE is down

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 4>to one ten on apples to apples. So just to

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 4>go back, you only need fifty on the demand side

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 4>between now in twenty thirty and the utilities are working

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 4>at connecting one ten. So the utilities are working on

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 4>already connecting almost as much as you need by two

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 4>thy thirty five. So again just to make sure, on

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 4>the same page, third party estimates forty five gigabatser data

0:10:56.200 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 4>centers now going to ninety fives. That's fifty of these

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 4>are working on one to ten. They don't give timing

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 4>for that. Some of it's going to be past twenty thirty.

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 4>What I'm starting to say is there is a lot

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 4>of supply of data centers coming and it's very unclear

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 4>if there's going to be demand for this. So that's

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.199
<v Speaker 4>the issue there, and then it might be worth pausing

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 4>that and just saying how we're tracking these things. Yeah,

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 4>So what we do for the demand side is we

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 4>use the original AI agent, you know, that is a

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 4>Gmail alert the best. So anything that's not on our

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 4>trade pubs, not on Bloomberg News, we get picked up

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 4>by a Gmail alert and so then we get all

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 4>that in a spreadsheet. So that's on the demand side.

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 4>And then on the supply side we use Diego and

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 4>that's not a large language model. That's my junior sitting

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 4>several blocks best of us right now, so he tracks

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 4>all this on utility calls. Just yesterday, next to Era

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 4>moved another two gigawatts from the potential into the committed.

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 4>And these utilities are chopping at the bit to sign

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 4>more and more of these deals, and I think it's

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 4>just going to be oversupply. We're going to overbuild these things.

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:02.079
<v Speaker 2>Just to be clear, the commit the firm commitments, those

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 2>are signed agreements to actually build this capacity. Yes, okay.

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 4>And so I was talking with the CFO of Encore

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 4>and they made these comments on their call as well.

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 4>They're owned by Sempra, and I said, you know, no

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 4>one really believes these DAMA and estimates. Texas is a

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 4>wald off market, as you guys know, eighty seven gigawatt

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 4>peak market.

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 3>It is the one thing I know about energy Texas.

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Is it market?

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>There?

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 4>You go, so eighty seven gigap peak market and the

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 4>demand estimates or they're going to add thirty gigawatts by

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 4>twenty thirty. And I said to the CFO of on cars,

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 4>there's just no way. He said, it might not be thirty,

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 4>but it's going to be closer to thirty than it

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 4>is zero. And I said, I just the forward power

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 4>curves don't reflect that at all, and he said, then

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 4>they're mispriced. So just for the entire market, just for

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 4>the benefit of your users, you cannot trade forward power

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 4>in Texas on interactive brokers. I know that. Oh that's fair, audience,

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 4>That's too bad. Everyone's like looking up there, That's what

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 4>I said.

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 3>Great, And this gives us a bunch of technical questions

0:12:56.240 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 3>to get into. Let's just keep talking about Texas. Explain

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 3>to us kind of what the forward power curves are

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 3>and how you can back out the implicit assumptions that

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:29.199
<v Speaker 3>traders are making based on those forward power curves about

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 3>how much demand there's going to pay.

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 4>Sure, So I mean, obviously, if you're gonna go from

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 4>eighty seven and you're gonna add fifteen or thirty whatever,

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 4>it is you'd expect that curve to go higher?

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.319
<v Speaker 3>How much the curve measuring? Okay, you say there's a

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 3>forward power, so the forward.

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 4>Power curve is a round the clock peak or off peak.

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 4>There's three separate curves, and the difference between peak and

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 4>off peak is actually you know, narrowed because data centers

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 4>run twenty four to seven, so it depends on your

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:53.559
<v Speaker 4>North Texas or South Texas and those are in the

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 4>high fifties.

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 3>But what would we be seeing in the curves for like,

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 3>or is there trading happening every twenty ten.

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 4>Thirty might not be so liquid, but twenty seven and

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 4>twenty eight certainly are.

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:08.719
<v Speaker 2>But there's other energy markets. So if you look at

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 2>nat gas for instance, although exactly gas traders are really

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 2>weird about the future's curve in gas, which I don't

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 2>really understand. But if you look at that, you point

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 2>out that over the longer term it's downward sloping, which

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 2>suggests that there isn't going to be as much demand

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 2>or maybe there's going to be more supply out in

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 2>the future.

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 4>I love it we're morphing into natural gas because that

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 4>is the main driver of power prices, especially in Texas

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 4>and the forward curve for gas is much more liquid

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 4>than it is for power, and the forward curve for

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 4>gas is inverted. It goes from three seventy to three

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 4>sixty by the end of the decade. So, as my

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 4>energy unlest Charles Johnson points out, the bigger driver there

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 4>isn't data center demand. We're at six pcf day there

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people are at at ten twelve. We

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 4>can get into that. But LNG exports. We're exporting eighteen

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 4>bcf day. Now we're going to add another twelve. Like

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 4>you'd think that curve would be at least upward sloping

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 4>by twenty five cents. Cents by the way, you can

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 4>trade that and your attractive broker's account. So that goes

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 4>into is there going to be a lot of LNG.

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 4>It starts getting outside of the expertise. But that's what

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 4>we heard from a lot of clients last week when

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 4>we went on the road all over New York City.

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 3>This is very interesting. Actually want to ask another question

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 3>about the pure power curve. But since we are on LNG,

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 3>and then we can get back to the power curve,

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 3>just setting aside data centers, et cetera. Intuitively, you would

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 3>think that what is a growth business in the United

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 3>States LNG exports. And in fact, one of the sort

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 3>of policy debates around the whole question of building out

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 3>LNG terminals is it's going to make gas more expensive

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 3>for American consumers because now we're going to be competing

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 3>with European buyers, Whereas when we didn't have LNG export terminals,

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 3>we were just swimming in it because it had nowhere

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 3>to go, nowhere to go. So it's very interesting to

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 3>hear that, even with everyone acknowledging a booming domestic demand

0:15:56.120 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 3>and be the expansion of international demand that downward sloping

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 3>gas curve.

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 4>Yes, maybe, I don't know. Maybe there reflecting world peace

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 4>in Europe and Russia, LNG isnunacceptable to the rest of

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 4>the world. That could be a driver.

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Then they'd have to rebuild that pipeline there.

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 4>But but back to our visual conversation on demand. The

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 4>reason I was talking to the Encore CFO and asking

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 4>him about this is he said he's holding two and

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 4>a half billion dollars of cash collateral postings from some

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 4>of that demand. And he's like, you're not some you know,

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 4>Joe Schno startup. I'm gonna build a data center and

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 4>connect to your grid if you're posting two and a

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 4>half billion dollars, and he says, and this is what

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 4>he said on their earnings call as well. You know

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 4>that's real demand that is coming. It's it's it's material.

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, just now to go back to the power curve,

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 3>which I get is much less liquid out there. But

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 3>there are trades that happened. These are price, like, how

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 3>do you infer volume from price? Because these are price, we.

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 4>Don't get the volume. But it's a it's a yearly curve,

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 4>and then right before the year starts us listen to

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 4>twelve month curves and then it goes into weekly before.

0:16:58.160 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 3>What I'm saying is, how do you infer what it

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 3>expected volume in twenty twenty eighty. It goes from a price.

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 4>Curve, Sure it's flat, it goes up a dollar from

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 4>here to twenty thirty. Whereas if you're going to add

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 4>twenty percent to your group demand and you'd expect it

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.360
<v Speaker 4>to go up, okay, several dollars a right gas side,

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 4>I'd want to see forty cents fifty cents.

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 3>I assue what you're saying, okay with pat.

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:18.719
<v Speaker 4>And then just to go back to the fore your

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:22.679
<v Speaker 4>upper fifties in Texas, low sixties for peak, and the

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 4>data center companies are paying ninety five. So Vistra just

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 4>did a deal off tenny five dollars a megab an hour, okay,

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 4>for round the clock. So Vistra contracted out its commandche

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 4>peak plant Texas ninety five dollars a megab an hour.

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.919
<v Speaker 4>So big Tech is paying a very pretty penny. You

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 4>can argue some of that's for the CO two free

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 4>aspect of it, and some of it's just a lock

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 4>and the supply.

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 2>So just to go back to the math and your

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 2>overall argument, I mean, you're basically saying that utilities are

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 2>already committed to building out. I guess twice as much

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 2>capacity as is forecast to be needed by twenty thirty.

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 2>So wildcard to me seems to be the demand forecast, right,

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:04.479
<v Speaker 2>and we're already seeing those change pretty wildly. I know

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned Bloomberg NEF, but you know they've raised their

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 2>forecast because of the data center build out, so they've

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 2>raised their forecast of how much energy is actually needed.

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 2>How much confidence do you have in those demand numbers

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 2>and how could they change over time?

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 4>Moderate confidence. But like, look where we're at now, Like

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:28.120
<v Speaker 4>open Aye built all of CHATCHYBT using two gigawatts. All

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 4>the big tech hyperscalers they haven't given their twenty twenty

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 4>five volumes yet, but if you take their twenty twenty

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.479
<v Speaker 4>four volumes and then double it, and this is output.

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 4>So I'm going to transfer it back to capacity and

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 4>you assumer sixty percent capacity factor. All the hyperscalers combined

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 4>around fifteen gigawatts, and that's got to be over half

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 4>the data center demand. So to talk about ninety five gigawatts,

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's a staggering number. And then you get

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 4>more advances in you know, Navidia chip efficiency. Yeah, obviously

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 4>Jevins paradox kicks in. You've had numerous guests talk about that.

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 4>It's just a lot of power, a lot of power.

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Can you just remind us one gigawatt is enough to

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 2>power what I like these comparisons.

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 4>There's a million homes, but it depends if you're in

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 4>Florida or the Northeast, but generally speaking that's.

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Where you're at. Not only do I find electricity markets,

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 3>so in market structure and electricity very difficulty at my head, around.

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 3>Even after all of these conversations, I have built no

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 3>heuristics or intuitions for what these A gigawat kill a

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:27.919
<v Speaker 3>lot mega like you say these things, and I know

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 3>gigawats bigger than a kill a lot like what does

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 3>actually mean? And then the fact that even there we're

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 3>talking about the difference between a gigawatt and a gigwot

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 3>hour and the like, I've yet to develop the sort

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 3>of intuitions that I haven't.

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 4>Haven't you seen back to the future, Yeah, oh, there

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 4>you go.

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 2>We got to print out, you know, a little tape

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:49.439
<v Speaker 2>like the way we used to do for credit ratings

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 2>the financial crisis. We need that up there. And actually

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 2>credit ratings are going to be interesting from a utilities

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 2>perspective as well.

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 3>Could I just ask, you know, obviously one of the

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 3>sensitivity is in general with all of thics, data center

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 3>and utilities, is this view, and I think it's kind

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 3>of overstated. Is the average ratepayer going to end up

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 3>paying for a lot of data centers or we'll raise

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 3>our electricity bill? And I understand, like these are complex

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 3>questions and the math isn't so clear. And also from

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 3>what I understand, the emergence of a data center can

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 3>actually lower the consumer's electricity bill because there's just that

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 3>simple math, which is, if there's more buyers splitting the

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 3>cost of the buildout, than actually your price tag can

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 3>go down. But in the scenario you're laying out in

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 3>which there's a bunch of upfront capital investments and everyone

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 3>is very excited to build it out and at cart

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.199
<v Speaker 3>wires and you have to buy transformers and gear and

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 3>all this stuff, if the demand does not materialize is expected,

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 3>that does sound like conditions in which we could see

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 3>consumer rates.

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 4>Go up absolutely. So that's what we're spending all our

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 4>time on. And it's state by state, and even within

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 4>the same state, you've got numerous jurisdictions. So is it

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 4>legislatively mandated or is it done by a rate case

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 4>or in the case of Northern Indiana, have the companies

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 4>themselves data center companies themselves gotten ahead of it and

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 4>said we're going to put in a solution where rate

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 4>payers are absolutely protected and get money back. So you

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 4>look at nice source with Midwestern Utility. They own Northern

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 4>Indiana Public Service NIPSCOE, and they've got a deal where

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 4>they've got an inside rate base they've got a separate

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 4>gen Co. So they and that Genco is doing a

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 4>deal with Amazon and they're going to kick back a

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars over fifteen years two rate payers. So rather

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 4>than have a debate, oh who's funding what it's like

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 4>done and you get sixty seven million dollars a year

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 4>and that's the blueprint, that's the gold standard.

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 4>I keep in mind, six months before that Genco was launched,

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 4>nice Or sold twenty percent of Nipsco to Blackstone. So

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 4>you could argue Blackstone said, hey, let's go ahead and

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 4>do this. And then the utility right north of Indiana

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 4>or northeast of the Indiana is Ohio, and the CEO

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 4>of First Energy is a next black Stone guy, So

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 4>maybe they look at doing a GENDO or something like that.

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 4>That's pure speculation. I have no idea pack gas specific

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 4>gas electric. They've done a deal where they've got rates

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 4>in place that protect presidential rate payers Amerin has, but

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 4>a lot of utilities don't. They don't have these protection.

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 3>The point is someone if it turns out that there's

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 3>an overbuild and there's not as much demand for it,

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 3>someone's paying for it, and it either it's going to

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 3>be the customers or perhaps the utility shareholders.

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you just the political risk of having mom

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 4>and pop bail out, you know, Mark Szuckenberg, Jeff Bezos

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 4>is just you can't have that happen. But again, six

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 4>months ago this was coming up on the tail end

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 4>of conference calls, and now these utility CEOs are having

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 4>in the prepared remarks, so I'm pretty confident they're going

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:39.360
<v Speaker 4>to figure it out.

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned Blackstone just then. I do want to talk

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 2>about who is currently making a lot of money from

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.120
<v Speaker 2>the data center build out, but just to stress test

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:50.719
<v Speaker 2>the thesis a little bit more, because it is a

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 2>contrarian take, and so I think we should ask a

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 2>bunch of questions about it. But does it take into

0:22:56.160 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 2>account time lags for projects? So I think, you know,

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 2>capacity build out in the energy sector is notoriously bureaucratic.

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 2>That is one thing that Joe and I do actually

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 2>know about the sector. Is it possible that a lot

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 2>of these committed projects actually take much longer to get

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 2>working on the ground than currently forecast.

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 4>I think the delays will be on building the new generation,

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 4>not the data center. So data center takes two three years,

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 4>Even if that slips to four or five years. The

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 4>power plants take six seven years, and as you know,

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 4>you can't get a g Rnova gas turbine for years

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 4>and years, which is obviously a bullish backshop here.

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, talk to us more about that element of it

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 3>all because building out that let's if you overshoot on production,

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 3>then that's a problem in itself. If you overshoot on

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 3>production at a time when it's gotten really expensive because

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 3>there's massive inflation in the construction sector, that's an even

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 3>greater problem. Talk to us just about like, per any

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 3>giving unit of productive capacity on the utility side, how

0:23:57.359 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 3>much more expensive is it gotten and what do you

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 3>think we're casting for that?

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 4>Sure, so to build a combined cycle gas plant ten

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 4>years ago is one thousand and twelve hundred kW to build.

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 4>Then it got to two thousand. Then utility analysts like myself,

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 4>I was like, WHOA, that's insane. Now we're up to

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 4>three thousand, and then it's like, who's actually spending this?

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 4>But that three thousand dollars a kW for a new

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 4>gas plant compares to the data center itself that cost

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 4>forty thousand dollars. So for Big Tech to spend another

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 4>three to lock in their gas price, its their fuel source.

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 4>It's like it's nothing. Oh, it's to Minimus, which goes

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.679
<v Speaker 4>back to the output four powers fifty five sixty and

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 4>pick TeX's paying ninety five in the grand scheme of things.

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 4>So the cost of the data center, it's nothing. So that's

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 4>why our utility and just jaw dropping on how shocking

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 4>it is Big Tech's willing to pay these amounts.

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 3>What about if you don't measure production of new plants

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 3>and dollars, but new plants in time and again, if

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 3>you're talking about okay, well we can't get this turbine

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 3>that is several years ago we could have got delivered

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:00.040
<v Speaker 3>next month. How much longer are these projects taken?

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 4>So if you can figure this out, I think you're

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 4>lusing this. If you figure this out, you can make

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 4>a lot of money. Because obviously Inflation Production Act had

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 4>enormous I'm going to vibe.

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Code a thing to figure it out.

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:14.719
<v Speaker 4>Keep going an inflation Production Act, enormous tax credits for renewables,

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 4>and then the one big beautiful bill. Obviously clip those

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 4>if you're not aligned by a certain date. So all

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 4>this data center numbers are weighted towards the end of

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 4>the decade, whereas the new solar is right here, right

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 4>now rushing power prices. So you actually want to be

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 4>a little short power for the next few years and

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 4>then flip to being long. And if you can figure

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:37.959
<v Speaker 4>out when that flip is, you can make a lot

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 4>of money in either the forward power curves or the

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 4>natural gas curves. But as far as your original question,

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 4>as I said, data centers two three years to build

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 4>new power plants, four five, But then you don't need

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 4>as many new power plants as everyone's saying. So Constellation

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 4>CEO set on a call the other day he said

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 4>he used the Texas market. He said, eighty seven gigawat

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 4>peep market. You could add ten gigawatts to Texas tomorrow,

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 4>which would be the equivalent of sending every single Navidia

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.439
<v Speaker 4>chip for an entire year to Texas and running them

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 4>twenty four to seven. That's ten gigawatts because you can

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 4>run it right now, existing grid, existing plants, for all

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 4>but forty fifty hours a year. We stress tested it.

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 4>There are some coal plants that can ramp up capacity factor.

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 4>There's plenty of gas plants that can. So I don't

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 4>know if it's forty hours, one hundred hours, one hundred

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 4>and fifty hours, But it makes more sense to pay

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 4>someone else not to run their chemical company, their refinery

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 4>company for forty fifty hours a year, rather than have

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 4>the utilities go out and spend ten billion dollars connecting

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 4>far away wind farms. That's the argument. We're sort of

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 4>come in the middle of it. But there is plenty

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 4>of existing capacity on the grid that could ramp up

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 4>to meet it and then have other guests to point

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 4>it out on the odd bots, you know, the peak

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 4>demand of the grid is eight hundred and fifty gigawatts,

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 4>the overall size of the grid is are twelve hundred gigawatts,

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 4>and then you're adding fifty gigawatts a year of solar,

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:57.119
<v Speaker 4>and then you're gonna start adding twenty gigawatts of gas.

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we're gonna handle it. I'm not really worried

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 4>about any rochesters or anything.

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, talk to us about regional transmission, because this

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 2>is something that we hear a lot. It's not necessarily

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 2>the power generation that's an issue here. It's the transmission,

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 2>which the US you know, seems to struggle with to

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 2>put it mildly.

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 4>So there's regional markets MISO, Midwest, the Mid Continent.

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 3>ISO.

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 4>These guys are tired the most amount of coal, so

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 4>I think they're going to be in the worst shape.

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 4>And then Texas, and then it depends if anyone builds

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 4>anything in New England. New England's got the faraway more

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:32.880
<v Speaker 4>expensive power prices seventy dollars the rest of the countries.

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'm well aware.

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 4>Yes I have two because I live in Connecticut. So

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 4>if anyone builds a data center in New England, they're

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 4>going to be the tightest. But after that it's really

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:42.120
<v Speaker 4>MISO and.

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 3>No one's building data centers in Vermont where they occasionally

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:46.880
<v Speaker 3>have to switch over to oil and wood, right.

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean they ISO New England app, which we all

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 4>have on our phone. Right, they were getting forty percent

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 4>of their power from oil.

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the cold snap the other day and it's tough

0:27:57.720 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 4>to talk about New England power without talking politics, and

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:03.439
<v Speaker 4>we're not going to go down that. So transmission is

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 4>very important because you've got to connect all these far

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 4>away renewables to the grid.

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 3>You said something that I think is actually kind of important.

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 3>There's this narrative meme you know, people talking about the

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 3>AI race US versus China, and that one of the

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:19.120
<v Speaker 3>things I've seen people say China is going to win

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 3>because they could just build out power more easily than

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 3>we can. It sounds like, I know you're not an

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 3>ai an list, but sounds like from your perspective, we

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 3>don't know like what it means or who's going to

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 3>win US versus China. But then from your perspective, power

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 3>is not going to be the decider.

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 4>Here, not in China. It's not, but it doesn't.

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 3>You said, like, you know that we could ship every

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 3>current with existing capacity. We could put every in video

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 3>chip in Texas today and we could run them for

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 3>fifty hours for all the all exception of a few

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 3>really hot hours in the summer.

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 2>I like the imagery of all the invidio chips going

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 2>on a field trip to Texas, Texas.

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 3>But it sounds like to your view, that really isn't

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 3>going to be from the US perspective, that won't be

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 3>the binding constraint.

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 4>It's it's going to be a little tight. But I'm

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 4>not one of these dooms theors. Oh, it's the absolute

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 4>gating factor. It's all going to stop. I was in Shenzhen,

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 4>China last year, and a robot got in one floor

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 4>and the elevator went up and got off another one, Like,

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 4>what is going on here?

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 2>There's another reason we wanted to talk to you, aside

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 2>from your capacity analysis, which is one of the interesting

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 2>things that's been happening in the credit market is obviously

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 2>private credit has been a big story for the past

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 2>few years, but now private credit is getting in on

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 2>the data center build out as well. There's sort of,

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 2>I guess, getting on your turf a little bit in

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 2>the public bond market, But what sort of activity have

0:29:58.720 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 2>you seen there?

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Sure, so we think that's where the risk is going

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 4>to is going to happen. And frankly, Bloomberg News broke

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 4>the story and Pimco made two billion dollars on day

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 4>one loaning to the Meta data center in Louisiana. So

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 4>they priced twenty five billion dollars debt debt at two

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 4>twenty over treasuries and it immediately started trading at one

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 4>forty and handed Pimco two billion. Great for Pimco, but

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 4>then everyone else nice to be Pimco. Is nice to

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 4>be Pimco, especially the weather in Newport Beach. But everyone

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 4>else in private credit is like, oh, these guys just

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 4>made two billion dollars, we need to start lending to

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 4>data centers. And we all know how this ends. Covenants

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 4>start falling, great start falling. And again, if you're big tech,

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 4>who cares if you overspend? Like you think AI would

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 4>be all end all, you've been overspend. It's when you

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 4>get down to the second tier. The QTS is the

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 4>vantages of the world, and then you get down to

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 4>sort of the ones below that, and you get like,

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, the core weaves and the nebiuses of the world,

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 4>and you know there's a lot of shorts going out

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 4>on Equinix, and obviously your guest Jim Chanos, and it's

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 4>all about the chips. I'm not going to get into

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 4>the chip debate, but it's interesting you look at a

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 4>core even they got a fifty billion dollar market cap.

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 4>That's a real company. You're gonna be around for a

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:06.959
<v Speaker 4>long time. But the bond market is saying we want

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 4>a ten percent yield to win you twenty and thirty paper.

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 4>You might not be a real company. And if you

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 4>look at our supply demand outlooks, we're kind of in

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 4>the camp of the bond market. But timing, which you

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 4>mentioned earlier, Joe, is so key because this data center

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 4>is you're gonna ramp for a couple of years, and

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 4>the oversupply is really a twenty thirty event. So good

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 4>luck timing that one.

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 3>You said something you talked about that Pimco Meta deal,

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 3>and this question has come up, and I still don't

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 3>think got a totally satisfactory answer to it. Meta is

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 3>a very highly rated company as you see it as

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 3>a credit analyst. What is it about the private credit

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 3>you know to talk about, Oh, it's flexible, et cetera.

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 3>But your two twenty spread over treasuries is not nothing

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 3>at all and is real? Is that two twenty spread

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 3>really like worth it for like a little bit more flexibility,

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 3>et cetera? Like what are they paying for exactly in

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 3>the private credit market that they couldn't get it cheaper?

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 3>I would think in the public bond market.

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, but I could speculate. There's okay, couple

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 4>if the metal question is why did you put this

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 4>off balance sheet? Yeah, so you've got the state of

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 4>the art data center with the best Navidia chips out there,

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 4>and you're a tech company in AI is the be all,

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 4>end all for everything. Did you kick it off your

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 4>balance sheet because you didn't want to damage your balance sheet?

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 4>But the agencies are imputing it, but maybe quant funds

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 4>running their screens, they don't impute that, So maybe that helps.

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 4>Or maybe you didn't want the depreciation running through your

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 4>income statement, maybe that helps, or maybe you want to

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 4>walk from this thing in five years. I don't know,

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 4>but one of those is definitely the reasons, because why

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 4>else would you pay that much bigger spread one hundred

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 4>and fifty BIPs over their borrowing costs.

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 3>But so the key thing is here when you talk

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 3>about that pimcoat meta deal, technically this is not meta debt.

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 3>It is not it's okay, right, okay, So they create

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 3>a vehicle, they're not gonna okay, that's I think that's

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 3>an important element that they're not just arbitrarily paying a

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 3>lot more for like a sort.

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 4>Of and if you read the credit docs, they've guaranteed

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 4>this debt even if the data center shuts down. But

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 4>our understanding of the docks is if they sell it,

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 4>then the guarantee goes away, and so that would create

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 4>a little risk. But back to my utility routes. What

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 4>happens that the data center shuts down for rate payers,

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 4>and they actually have an explicit guarantee from META to

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 4>protect rate payers, So they have that a lot of

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 4>other utilities don't, so a lot of states Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Texas,

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 4>they need to do better job protecting their rate payers.

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 4>And by the way, that's just one line in the

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 4>dock that could fall away in other new data centers.

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 4>And that's what we spend our time looking at.

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned the credit ratings just then, So the rating

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 2>agencies they look at the off balance sheet vehicles, even

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 2>though it's not officially part of the company's.

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 4>Debt, they impute the least payments and include that as debt.

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 3>I see, and.

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 4>For Meta specifically, they won't do that until the least

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:01.479
<v Speaker 4>starts when it comes online, but everyone's doing it.

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 2>And then I was just thinking, I don't mean to

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 2>labor this analogy too much, but you know, you started

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:10.839
<v Speaker 2>out by talking about all the exciting moments in the

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 2>history of being a utilities analyst, and one of those

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 2>was Enron, which I assume means you know, you have

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 2>some experience with circular deals. But what do you think

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:25.399
<v Speaker 2>about all the sort of incestuous financing deals that seem

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 2>to be happening between all the various players in the

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 2>data center industry.

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:31.399
<v Speaker 4>You mean, we'll buy your equity so you can buy

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 4>our chips.

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 4>Again, I'm on the side of bondholders in that one.

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 4>Just look at the market caps, look at the bond yields, and.

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:41.399
<v Speaker 3>Explain what you mean by that. For so, like people

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 3>who don't have a Bloomberg, so we've goes people like

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 3>me who have a Bloomberg but are too lazy.

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:49.439
<v Speaker 4>So these names are going out and yeah in either

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 4>open Ai or Navidia is going out and buying equity

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:55.759
<v Speaker 4>in these neocloud companies. So then they can go out

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 4>and either supply the compute to open Ai and buy

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 4>the chips from Navidia. So it's all very circular. And

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 4>I think the example people used twenty years ago is

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 4>Nortel was doing this called the vendor financing. So there's

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 4>a little lot of skepticism on that.

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we can't do a utilities episode. I know

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 2>we've been focused on data centers, but we can't do

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 2>a utilities episode without mentioning nuclear power. What's it going

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 2>to take to actually get some capacity from nuclear sure.

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 4>So obviously the Vogel plant was the last big nuclear

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 4>plant in the line. Was supposed to cost fourteen billion.

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 4>It ended up costing thirty two billion. It came online

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 4>ten years late. No utility wants to take that risk.

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 4>Now everyone's talking about these small modular reactors, and I

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 4>think that's what you're going to start seeing is more

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:40.959
<v Speaker 4>talk of these. The only way we think a small

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:44.800
<v Speaker 4>module actor goes final investment decision FID is if big

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 4>tech agrees to do two things. They agree to buy

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:52.240
<v Speaker 4>some SMRs and they invest equity in those SMR manufacturers

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 4>to give them the capex to build.

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Which sounds like something they would do to be honest

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 3>for sure.

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:58.839
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's the only way you get one

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 4>of these off the ground. And I think if those

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:03.719
<v Speaker 4>stocks rally on that deal, they're all shorts because they're

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 4>already reflecting several of those deals happening. So the big

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 4>ones are our new Scale and Oaklow and Sam Outman

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 4>of open AI used to be the chairman of Oaklow

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 4>and then he stepped down so they could do a deal.

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 4>So something along those lines would happen. That being said,

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump has talked about doing work with Westinghouse and

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 4>taking equity ownership to build another AP one thousand and

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 4>Obviously President Trump is all about taking equity, but none

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 4>of the utilities in my coverage are going to build

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 4>something without some sort of backstock.

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 3>We did an episode recently with an infrastructure investor and I,

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, I'm a journalist. I look at the past.

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't talk about the future. But I was put

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 3>on the spot and I said, I think off the

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:45.879
<v Speaker 3>next twenty years. Gun to my head, we will never

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 3>have another local We're not going to have another project

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:52.800
<v Speaker 3>like that in America. And sounds like you agree.

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:56.240
<v Speaker 4>I agree. I do think you see some SMRs. I mean, frankly,

0:36:56.280 --> 0:36:58.959
<v Speaker 4>our country has been making nuclear submarines for sixty seven years.

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 4>That's an SMR there. So I think that's the way

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:04.040
<v Speaker 4>it happens, is big tech goes in and does that.

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:06.840
<v Speaker 2>For sure, in twenty years, we'll have you back on

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 2>to see whether or not both of you.

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 4>This is my only writer.

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Wrong, I don't nothing about the future. This is my

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 3>only one call. And I just don't think we're going

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 3>to ever get them right. That's we're not going to

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:16.959
<v Speaker 3>get a bunch of those times.

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm with you on that, and in twenty years hopefully

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 4>I can dial in from the beach.

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 2>All right, we see you in twenty years then, no,

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 2>probably before because this was a fantastic, this is great conversation.

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much for coming on off of Thanks

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 4>for having.

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Me, Joe. That was a really fun conversation.

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 3>That's super fun. I love that.

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:49.319
<v Speaker 2>My the opinion or framing that I'm sort of coalescing

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 2>around is that AI can be simultaneously under hyped and overvalued,

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 2>right and actually throughout history, that's kind of what we've

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:02.400
<v Speaker 2>seen with transformative technology, right, Like think about the Internet bubble.

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:05.240
<v Speaker 2>The Internet changed the world, but it was a bubble.

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Think about railroads. Railroads in the eighteen hundreds changed the world,

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 2>but also a bubble. So I think that's kind of

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:14.479
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of what I think. The key issue, which

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Andy and you both touched on is the timing, right.

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:20.799
<v Speaker 3>The timing, And yeah, I mean I think it's it's

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 3>very interesting because of course his argument doesn't even you know,

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:29.319
<v Speaker 3>doesn't even rest on any valuations right now. It's like

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 3>there's all of this expectation for build out there is

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, as he put it, there is a number

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:37.840
<v Speaker 3>for the amount of the volume of data centered demand.

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 4>There is an.

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Amount that's being built up, and he's like, the second

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 3>number looks bigger, and that's going to be a that's

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:48.359
<v Speaker 3>going to be a problem. Yeah, and the time to

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:51.840
<v Speaker 3>your point, like I thought, you know, really interesting observation

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 3>he had was a little bit not tangential to his

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 3>core idea, but this idea that some of our energy

0:38:57.680 --> 0:39:00.960
<v Speaker 3>policies are encouraging a lot of production right now, particularly

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:04.040
<v Speaker 3>the expiring solar credits. At the same time, a lot

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 3>of this demand is going to come online in the

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:10.360
<v Speaker 3>back end, et cetera. I do think, you know, it

0:39:10.400 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 3>seems like a really definitely seems like a fun space.

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 3>It's very far from when we were just talking about

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 3>like utilities as raat proxy. So I think for old

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:21.440
<v Speaker 3>people to get income.

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, the other thing I was thinking about on the

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:28.879
<v Speaker 2>demand side is I think there's a tendency among AI

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 2>bulls vibecoders such as yourself that's right to think that

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 2>demand is just going to go one way, right, So

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:38.360
<v Speaker 2>there's going to be more demand for AI because I

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 2>don't know every piece of software is going to be

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:45.320
<v Speaker 2>replicated through clod code or whatever, and so power demand

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 2>is going to go up as well. But what we've

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 2>seen so far is that these things are getting more

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:51.920
<v Speaker 2>and more efficient.

0:39:51.960 --> 0:39:54.360
<v Speaker 3>They're definitely getting right, more and more efficient.

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:56.399
<v Speaker 2>Like faster than anyone expected.

0:39:57.200 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, this is a little bit tangent to

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:02.759
<v Speaker 3>the point, but I do think like one of the

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:07.319
<v Speaker 3>recurring phenomenons that we're seeing across this industry is that

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 3>every I mean and this is I guess it's a

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 3>bowl case, which is that you know, even the optimist

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 3>keep getting turned out to be too pessimistic. The pace

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:23.280
<v Speaker 3>of say like efficiency gains for the cost of processing

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 3>a token dropping faster than people expected this morning, recording

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:31.360
<v Speaker 3>to this January twenty eighth ASML the big chip equipment company,

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 3>way better than expected. The emails, the benchmarks for the

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 3>models where it's like the optimists say, like maybe it

0:40:38.560 --> 0:40:41.280
<v Speaker 3>could code at this level by twenty twenty seven, turns

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:43.760
<v Speaker 3>out it hits there by like you know, early twenty

0:40:43.840 --> 0:40:46.320
<v Speaker 3>twenty six, etc. So like if you want to just

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 3>make I'm not making any case here, but if you

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 3>just want to make a bowl case, it's like even

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 3>the optimists keep getting surprised to the upside. On the

0:40:54.760 --> 0:40:58.880
<v Speaker 3>other hand, it's fascinating to hear him say, look at

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 3>what the markets are saying. They're not pricing in any

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 3>of these expectations. And I was particularly surprised because I

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:08.399
<v Speaker 3>didn't realize this that even like you know, for all

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 3>of the talk of LERG export terminals, et cetera, that

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:13.879
<v Speaker 3>gas is expected to be cheaper a few years. Yeah,

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 3>no than it is right now. Very interesting dissonance between

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 3>that and the popular narrative.

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Maybe gas traders just aren't vibe coders yet.

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Then they would understand exactly how much more of this

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 3>UH plan going.

0:41:27.600 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 2>To Just from an energy perspective, though, there is a

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 2>push and pull factor here, right, So on the one hand,

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 2>everyone could use AI and demand goes up, But on

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 2>the other hand, maybe it gets super super efficient and

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:41.879
<v Speaker 2>then demand goes down. I think that's that's the difficulty, or.

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 3>It's just there is a number that's out there. It's

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 3>like some sort of like some reasonable inferences about where

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 3>it's going to go, and it's very high. And it

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 3>was actually very striking listening to him talk about some

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:58.879
<v Speaker 3>of those super the hyperscaler numbers, because it's like where

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:01.280
<v Speaker 3>is it at up right? As he pointed out, Okay,

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:04.280
<v Speaker 3>chet GPT like came out two gig loots, et cetera,

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 3>Like there are a ton of chet GPTs out there, right,

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 3>and that's one of the most computationally intensive things. Like

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 3>maybe there are reasons to think this is all going

0:42:14.680 --> 0:42:16.359
<v Speaker 3>to go great, there's gonna be a ton of money

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:19.359
<v Speaker 3>made in AI, but you can't really just like get

0:42:19.400 --> 0:42:21.879
<v Speaker 3>to the number. I don't know, I think he it

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:24.719
<v Speaker 3>was this was a very useful perspective, just sort of

0:42:24.760 --> 0:42:27.320
<v Speaker 3>on some of this simple math, and the math sounds

0:42:27.360 --> 0:42:29.399
<v Speaker 3>like a subtraction, like this sounds like what the sun

0:42:29.480 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 3>is learning about.

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:32.319
<v Speaker 2>The other thing I thought was really interesting was the

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:36.440
<v Speaker 2>response to your question about why would you finance these

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:39.320
<v Speaker 2>things off balance sheet if you're you know, this massive

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:44.240
<v Speaker 2>cash rich technology giant, and the suggestion there was, well,

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:47.880
<v Speaker 2>maybe at some point in the future, like five years

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 2>down the line, you need to get rid of this liability.

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 2>You don't want to deal with it.

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 3>This is why we did that episode with the guy

0:42:55.239 --> 0:42:58.080
<v Speaker 3>who has you know, the company doing the legal docs right,

0:42:58.080 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. This is why it's pretty crucial to understand

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 3>some of these things, because some of the questions sound

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 3>like Facebook's or Meta's option to walk away. Right, there's

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 3>some call option implicitly to walk away, et cetera. And

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 3>they how they what they could do, what scenarios, and

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 3>what they would allow it to be do is obviously

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:23.840
<v Speaker 3>going to be pretty crucial for any investors in this

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 3>off balance sheet paper. I did not know until you

0:43:26.480 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 3>asked this whole idea that the ratings agency is, well,

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 3>they don't look at his debt, they do back out

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:36.440
<v Speaker 3>a lease cost, and therefore it can inform their overall

0:43:37.000 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 3>credit sustainability.

0:43:38.360 --> 0:43:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, the other thing, you know, we touched on this,

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 2>but there's more and more demand from investors for data

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:48.279
<v Speaker 2>center debt, right, like the space is getting more for

0:43:48.320 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 2>some reason, the space is getting more competitive, and so

0:43:51.360 --> 0:43:54.800
<v Speaker 2>naturally what you see in any other credit cycle throughout

0:43:54.840 --> 0:43:58.360
<v Speaker 2>history is as demand pros and people are competing for deals,

0:43:58.960 --> 0:44:02.240
<v Speaker 2>the documentation and the protections tend to be weird.

0:44:02.400 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:44:03.120 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 3>I find the existence of hype cycles for debt to

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 3>be a little bit weird because I get like, oh,

0:44:09.080 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 3>I really want to get into AI equity, right, because

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:14.399
<v Speaker 3>that could one hundred x next year, right, And it's

0:44:14.440 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 3>like I'm really excited about getting into data centered debt

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:20.360
<v Speaker 3>because it might maaybe fifty BIPs more I find to

0:44:20.400 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 3>be very strange, or one hundred BIPs more. It's like,

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:25.879
<v Speaker 3>if I haven't fixed look, I'm a simple, simple guy.

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 3>But if I have a fixed income allocation, all I

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:32.600
<v Speaker 3>care about is minimizing downside and I don't really care,

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 3>like what sector it is. I'm not participating in the upside.

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:36.719
<v Speaker 2>You're not going to get greedy, You're not going to

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 2>get rich.

0:44:38.160 --> 0:44:40.239
<v Speaker 3>I gotta get super rich. I'm like, I just don't

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:41.920
<v Speaker 3>want to lose my like for fixing COF. I just

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 3>don't want to lose my money.

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:45.319
<v Speaker 2>Fair enough, all right, shall we leave it there?

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Let's save it there.

0:44:46.080 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 2>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:51.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:52.759
<v Speaker 2>and I'm Joe Wisenthal.

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:55.840
<v Speaker 3>You can follow me at The Stalwart. Follow our producers

0:44:55.880 --> 0:44:59.319
<v Speaker 3>Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen armandsh Oll Bennett at dashbod and

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:02.360
<v Speaker 3>kill Brooks at Kelbrooks Now. For more odd Laws content,

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:04.719
<v Speaker 3>go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots for the

0:45:04.800 --> 0:45:07.319
<v Speaker 3>daily newsletter and all of our episodes and you can

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 3>chat about all of these topics twenty four seven in

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:12.959
<v Speaker 3>our discord discord dot gg, slash.

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Od lots And if you enjoy all lots, if you

0:45:15.440 --> 0:45:17.719
<v Speaker 2>like it when we talk about the data center build out,

0:45:17.719 --> 0:45:20.280
<v Speaker 2>then please leave us a positive review on your favorite

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:23.880
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform. And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber,

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 2>you can listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free.

0:45:27.520 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 2>All you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:33.800
<v Speaker 2>on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.