WEBVTT - Weirdhouse Cinema: The Thing from Another World

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Stuff to Blow Your Mind Radio

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>Hour is brought to you by Thermite. If you need

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a high temperature burst of heat, then this pyrotechnic composition

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 1>of metal powder and metal oxide is for you. Metal refining, fireworks, munitions,

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>burning through the ice to retrieve down spaceships and alien beings.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Thermite does it all. Thermite asked for it by name.

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of My

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Weird House Cinema. This is

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Rob Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and it's finally time

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>on the Weird House Cinema podcast to cover the Thing. No,

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>not that the Thing, not the one you're thinking of,

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the horror classic, the other the Thing, the Thing from

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>another world. Yes, uh this Uh. This is a film

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that I had never seen prior to this week, and

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 1>I think part of it was because John carpenter two film.

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>The Thing is just this, this masterpiece of science fiction

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and horror for so many of us. It's it's visceral

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>but intelligent. It's it's well acted, it's effectively scored, it

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>makes great use of sets and locations, and of course

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>just features a bounty of legendary and grotesque practical effects, totally,

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>without a doubt, an absolute masterpiece, one of the best

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>horror movies ever made. Can't say enough good stuff about

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Carpenter's The Thing. Yeah, from from the effects to the

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>acting to the music, it's just it's pretty much pitch perfect.

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>But of course, one of the things we always have

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to remind ourselves, especially perhaps if we're becoming getting a

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>little too judgmental about remakes and reboots and so forth,

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>is because I have to remind myself of this is

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that John Carpenter's The Thing is also essentially a remake

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>or a reboot, if you will, based on the story

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Who Goes There by John W. Campbell Jr. Um an

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>author from like the sci fi so called you know,

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Pulp Golden Age, and Carpenter's film is the second official

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>adaptation of this story, but the first is the film

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about here today, n The Thing from Another World.

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I had also never seen this movie in full before,

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>though I had seen some scenes from it, and I

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>had seen it because it is briefly featured on a

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>television in John Carpenter's Halloween. Oh that's right, I forgot

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 1>about that. Yeah, one of the kids who's being babysat

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>is is watching it. I think he's I think maybe

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>he's not quite old enough for this movie. So this

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>is a film I've always known this was around. I

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, at some point, after being exposed to Carpenter's

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>The Thing, I learned about this older version and maybe

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I would even occasionally see it in the schedule or

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>catch part of it on like Turner Classic Movie vis

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>or something. But I never sat down and watched it. Uh.

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>And we'll get into some of the reasons why. But

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>basically they all rolled down to me thinking, oh, this this,

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>this film is a modern film. I don't want to

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>see this earlier like proto Thing vision. I'm gonna stick

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>with perfection. But then I was looking through Michael Weldon's

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>in the author of the Psychotronic Video and Film Guides.

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at his right up on first on

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>John Carpenter's The Thing, which was glowing and you know,

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and says, oh, you know, this is this is a

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>wonderful grotesque monsters film. Not surprised that he would he

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>would love that one. But of course Weldon is also

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a fan of older genre films as well, and I

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>was reading this really high praise for this nineteen fifty

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>one film, talking about it having intelligent dialogue and a

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>strong female lead, and so that that really got me thinking, well,

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe I should give this a look. You know, the

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>strong female lead being sort of doubly interesting because on

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>one hand, it's nineteen fifty one, You don't you know

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that you don't necessarily think of this being the of

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>this being the era of strong female leads. And then

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>also you think about John Carpenter's adaptation, and there are

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>no women in it at all. It's an entirely male cast. Yeah,

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and Carpenter's version, the all male cast of characters somehow

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 1>fits the miserable bleakness of the Antarctic base in the movie.

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>But I would say that having watched it now, I

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>know what Michael Weldon is talking about, though um, I don't.

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it might be slightly overselling Margaret Sheridan's role

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>in the movie, though she is fantastic and I really

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>like her character. She does a great job with it.

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>But I was expecting her to be the main character

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of the movie based on this, which she is not.

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>But in her scenes she is great. Yeah, and we'll

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into this a bit later. It basically comes

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>down to this idea of the Hawksian woman, and we'll

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you'll find out what that means. But in terms of

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>differences between the Thing and the Thing from Another World,

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 1>I think we're sort of burying the lead because the

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>one major way in which the Thing from Another World

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>ninety one differs from Carpenter's movie is that the original

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 1>film does not involve impersonation. People who are familiar with

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Carpenter's movie will remember the main thing about it is

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that the alien can assume the forms of the humans

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>or the animals that it kills. So it is this uh,

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>this polymorphous being that can that can sort of uh

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>sample the tissue of an organism it comes into contact with,

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and then make its own body into a copy of

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that being, which is a wonderful plot device. The central

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 1>mechanic of of Carpenter's movie gives rise to the paranoia

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't really exist in the original or maybe there

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is a kind of sense of paranoia, but it's powered

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>by different factors that I want to discuss in more

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>detail as we go on. But in this movie, the

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Thing is simply a big, hulking alien that thaws out

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>of a block of ice and then attacks the base

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>where where all the characters are stationed. It doesn't assume

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the form of anyone if you're actually able to get

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>a good look at it, which you're not really in

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the movie, And in fact, that's a really good thing

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>about the movie. The movie obscures the form of the

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>monster for for most of the runtime in a highly

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>effective way. But if you were able to get a

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>really good, well lit, uh gander at it, it just

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>looks kind of like James r. Ness in a big

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 1>creepy Frankenstein makeup and space suit. Yeah. And this was

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a huge reason why I had never checked out the

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>film before, because I'd see that that famous publicity shot

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of James Arnez in the Thing costume, and I would think, well,

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that that looks kind of lame. I don't really want

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to see a movie about that, especially when John Carpenter's

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>version of it is this amorphous, ultimately formless thing that

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 1>takes on just a number of just grotesque and shifting forms. Yeah.

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, I mean I've said this on the

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.919
<v Speaker 1>show before. I think one big mistake a lot of

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>horror movies make is letting you get two of a

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 1>look at the monster. I mean, horror movies should be

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>sparing in in letting you see the monster. Is it's good,

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>it's good to heighten the tension and make it more

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>mysterious by usually keeping the monster off screen. I'd say

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Carpenters the Thing is a movie that breaks that rule

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>to great effect. You get tons of great shots of

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the monster and it looks fantastic. So you know, if

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you're the kind of the thing about rules with artistic

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>media is is you have to obey the rule unless

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just really good anyway. Um, but but yeah, I

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>know what you're talking about. With the way the monster

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>looks in this movie. This is a major thing I

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk about. I was shocked how scary the

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>creature was in this movie. H And I really mean that,

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>like movies of this era are I I really appreciate them,

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>but they're rarely viscerally disturbing on a visual level to

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>modern audiences. And that's not a knock on them. And

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>in fact, like at the time, they might have had

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>people fainting in the aisles, are falling out of their

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>cars that drive in, but makeup effects from before roughly

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the I don't know. The seventies or so, I think

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>rarely pack a strong punch with audiences today, we've just

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of standards have been updated, and so even if

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the way Boris Karloff looked in his Frankenstein makeup was

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>was terrifying to people at the time, I think it

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>looks beautiful. I think it looks amazing. I love to

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>look at it, but I don't find it really really terrifying.

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>And I would say that the baseline monster in this

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>movie is no exception to that rule that if you

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>just look at the makeup effects of the time, they're

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>usually not going to pack a very strong punch. If

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you look at well lit still photographs of of James Arness,

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the the actor who plays the monster in the Thing,

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>in his alien makeup and costume for the movie, I

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>think he looks goobery. He just looks kind of like

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a like an EGA guy. He looks like Frankenstein, sort

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of in a in a in a space, in a jumpsuit,

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and yet somehow on the screen, within the narrative, he

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>is so much more than that. This is a movie

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>monster that benefits immensely from really strong staging, lighting and

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>camera work. More so than makeup effects. So most of

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the time you see the monster in the movie, his

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>appearances sudden or brief or obscured in some way. So

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe the characters are looking out at him through frosted

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>glass on a snow field, or he or somebody opens

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a door and he suddenly reaches out through it as

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>they try to slam it shut, or he's just a

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>menacing silhouette at the end of the corridor, you know,

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and his features are covered in shadow. So really hats

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>off to the team that came up with the staging

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>for all these scenes and the lighting and the framing

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 1>and all that, because even though the makeup effects kind

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of fall short, the monster on screen within the narrative

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>looks wonderful. He's really frightening. Absolutely, Like, for instance, in

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the movie, you never get a sense that this character

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>is wearing partially ragged space pajamas, but if you look

0:09:56.880 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>at the still, you're like, those are space pajamas, clearly. Yeah. Yeah,

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>So they took a kind of goober Frankenstein and turned

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>him into this truly menacing being really excellent excellent filmmaking technique. Well,

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to get into this more. Let's go ahead

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and just give give the basic elevator pitch of the plot,

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>especially for people who you know, did they just know

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the Carpenter version. They maybe don't know how much in

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 1>common this one has with that film, aside from the

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>details of the monster. Okay, well, maybe I'll do the

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>straight elevator pitch first, and then we'll see if we

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>have any variations on it. The straight plot description, I

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>would say is a mysterious object from space crashes near

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:42.679
<v Speaker 1>a remote Arctic research base. When a team of scientists

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and military men go to investigate, they find a humanoid

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>body frozen in the ice, and they have to bring

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>it back to the base with them, And I guess

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 1>you just better hope it doesn't throw out. I like that.

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's go ahead and listen to a little bit

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of that trailer audio. M the thing from another world.

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the spot where it was first seen. And

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>these are the first people who saw the thing. How

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>did it get here? Where did it come from? What

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>is it that people that I saw it? I shot

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>it and and I hit it. I know it. Nothing happened

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to a clear, immediate noise like I can't hear. Captain.

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>It was awful. You could see those hands and those eyes,

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and you've got it to tell me about it? You can't.

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 1>Is it human or inhuman? Earthly or unearthly? Baffling questions,

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>astounding questions that not even the world's greatest scientific minds

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 1>can answer. Gentlemen, do you realize what we've found being

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>from another world is different from us, is one pole

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>from the other if we can only communicate with it?

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>All right? So I want to come back to something

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you were just talking about, and that was the idea

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of doors opening. So yes, the the research base in

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>this movie feels it's more or less in keeping with

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the spirit that Carpenter had in his version of the film.

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, there are these a lot of these long corridors,

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 1>their doorways, separating different sections of it. Everything feel it

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel supermodern. It feels very very rough in places.

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>There's this idea that outside of this compound there's just

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>frozen death awaiting any creature, and it's inside that we

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:35.839
<v Speaker 1>have this slim, artificial version of of life, sustaining temperatures.

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>And that makes actually for a killer twist later in

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.839
<v Speaker 1>the movie where you haven't even really been thinking about

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>this while they're coming up all these different ways of

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>battling the thing. The thing is sort of laying siege

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to the humans in the base, and then at a

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:54.319
<v Speaker 1>certain point they're like, oh no, somebody turned off the heaters. Yeah.

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's a wonderful set piece in which to engage

0:12:57.120 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>with this monster. But one of the things that it's

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I was really taken by watching it it's just how

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.439
<v Speaker 1>scary all the doors are. There's a lot of characters

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 1>going in and out of doors in this film, often

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>very quickly, and even before a monster the monster jumped

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>out from behind a door, I was feeling anxious whenever

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:20.439
<v Speaker 1>a door would open like it was it was really effective. Uh.

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And then eventually a monster is coming out from behind

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 1>the door, and there's worry about things jumping out from

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>behind doors. I don't think doors have ever been quite

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 1>this scary. Percent agree, Yeah, this movie does something really

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 1>special with like portals, openings, doors, windows. It's it's really good. Also,

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>lots of scenes where like the door to the outside

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>has been opened, and you know there's a sense of

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>all that that crushing cold coming in. So it works

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.839
<v Speaker 1>on several levels. I think since we're not going to

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>do a scene by scene breakdown, on this one, I

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 1>guess to make more sense for people who haven't seen

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>especially either movie, it it might make sense to do

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a quick, fuller rundown on the plot. So the basic

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>cast of characters is that you have a journalist and

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>then a group of of military commanders who fly by

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>plane up to a remote Arctic research base where there

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>is some scientific research going on. And then, like I

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>said in the elevator pitch earlier, there is a crash

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of some kind of object near the base, and the

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>scientists and the soldiers go out to investigate it and

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it looks like what they have encountered as a crashed

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>flying saucery crash daily and spacecraft, and then they're frozen

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in the ice on the ice field is a humanoid figure.

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>So they chip that they dig that out of the

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>ice with with ice axes and with thermite. This movie

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>as a big fan of thermite, of course, and the

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the thermite thing kind of goes wrong. I think they

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>end up sort of melting the ship by accident while

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to get it up out of the ice.

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>But they do get this body out of the ice

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and they bring it back to the base and then

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>through a series of mishaps, this body and a chunk

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of ice is accidentally thought out, and what they come

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to discover is that this is a being from another

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>planet that is not an animal, but is in fact

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>an animated vegetable. They they sort of explore the alternative

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary history of this creature and say, what if plant

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>life on Earth had evolved the ability to move quickly

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and have intelligence and and uh and and have a

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>have a mobile body instead of animal life and and

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>so uh and so that's sort of what we're dealing with.

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>And there's a lot of discussion about the creatures mindset

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>toward humans. It apparently needs to consume us, it wants

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to drink our blood, but it doesn't have any uh,

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really have any remorse for us or understanding

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of us as fellow creatures. Instead, as as one character

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>so eloquently puts it, he regards us the same way

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>we would regard a field of cabbages. Yeah. Yeah, this

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>idea that the dog is just like the short, furry

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>blood container, and then the humans are just the larger,

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>hairless blood containers and it just needs the blood. It's

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>just calories. Yeah. Yeah. But so within this plot, a

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>number of interesting themes emerge, and and maybe we can

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>talk more about those as we go on. But I

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>guess here's where we typically get into some of the

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>people involved in this and talk about some connections. Now, Rob,

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you might have read more about the production of this

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>film than I did. I'm to understand. I think there's

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>some uh disagreement or confusion about what the level of control,

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>like who who basically was in charge of making this movie?

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Who was the director, and what was their relative level

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of control. Yeah, there's there's there's kind of it's kind

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of an open question or in a matter of debate

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that will probably never be fully settled, especially since I

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>think everybody involved with this film or most of them

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>have have passed on um. But the basic situation, I'm

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about who is the credited director first?

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>So the credited director on this is Christian Nibe, who

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 1>lived nineteen thirteen through nineteen He is a TV and

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 1>film director who served as editor on such films as

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Howard Hawks nineteen forty six adaptation of The Big Sleep. Uh.

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 1>This had Humphrey Bogart in it, and William Faulkner actually

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>co scripted this adaptation of the Raymond Chandler Philip Marlow novel,

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>which is a really good novel by the way. Interesting

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I've actually never read it. However, this film, The Thing

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>from Another World is nibies. It was his first directorial credit.

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>It's easily the biggest film, or at least biggest you know,

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the most well remembered film, uh, that he did, although

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>he worked an entire career afterwards as a TV director

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>up until the mid nineteen seventies. Okay, so Nibe is

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>credited as the director of the film, but for some reason,

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 1>I've always heard this described as having been directed by

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Howard Hawks, who, of course is an acclaimed filmmaker of

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the time. So what's the with that? Okay, So Howard Hawks,

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>who we just alluded to, had had worked with Nibe

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:09.640
<v Speaker 1>ninety was his his editor. Um So, Hawks was also

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 1>known as the Silver Fox, and if you look at

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>pictures of you can see why, you know, dashing sort

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of silver looking here, I guess, directs like somebody who

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>would be in like a whiskey Scotch commercial on TV

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>in the fifties or something. Absolutely and the dashing character

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 1>and director of such films as Red River, Rio Bravo two, Scarface,

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>El Dorado, and Hatari, as well as the aforementioned The

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Big Sleep. He was nominated for an Academy Award for

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>nineteen forty two Sergeant York, and he receives an Honorary

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Academy Award in nineteen seventy four. He's considered a legend

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of the classic Hollywood era. And while he was not

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:52.199
<v Speaker 1>the credited director or the credited co writer on The

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Thing from Another World, UM, you'll often see look like,

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>for instance, you'll see him listed on IMDb is uncredited director,

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>uncredited writer. Um. Basically, various accounts indicate that he was

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the director, and he, for some reason or another, let

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Christian Nibe take the directing credit, which again would be

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>his first. John Carpenter, among others, have echoed this view. However,

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>various other folks, including some people involved with the actual

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>production of the film, have said otherwise. And they say, no,

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Nibe was the director. So ultimately, you know, how can

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you say one way or the other. It does seem

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>like Hawks greatly valued Nibe, and and it said that

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Nibe was an instrumental editor in many of his films.

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's been argued that perhaps Hawks thought that sci

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>fi was beneath him and didn't want his name on it,

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and or he gave the credit to Nive so that

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>he could get into the director's guild, you know, like like,

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>let's you go ahead and put your name on this

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>film and this will help your career. Um, It's it's

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:57.919
<v Speaker 1>hard to say what exactly was going on here, but

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I doubt we're going to get a a a definite

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>answer on it ever. But it does not say, I

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>want to stress though, I've seen no accounts that indicate

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that this was some sort of this was a situation

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of animosity or like one director being replaced. We often

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>see that in this in production stories where this guy,

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>this guy's on the outs bringing this guy no. It

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>seems like something else was going on here. Um, and uh,

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, if anything, it was probably Hawks helping out Nybe.

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Or it's just been a situation where Hawks was involved

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in the production and Nybee was still the director, and

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe people were were more inclined to give Hawks more

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>credit than than he perhaps deserved for it. I mean,

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I don't know what the answer is here. Sure,

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess we'll have to leave that one sort of unanswered.

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>That being said, folks that are familiar with Hawks, they

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>do point to various things about this film that have

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 1>his fingerprints on it. So and you you can of

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 1>course explain that, explain. You can explain that away a

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>bit by saying, well, Hawks and Ibi worked together so much.

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, they had similar interests, they worked together to

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>make these previous films. So who knows. We're not going

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to reach an answer today. Well, I will emphasize yet

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>again that I think, pretty much across the board in

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 1>terms of technical filmmaking, this is an excellently made movie,

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>especially for science fiction films at the time. I mean,

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>they're there are definitely things that you can criticize about it,

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:24.919
<v Speaker 1>and we will as kind of kind of like quaint

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 1>or products of their era, But a lot of that's

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.679
<v Speaker 1>in the actual sort of story content. In terms of

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a technical exercise and filmmaking, I think the Thing from

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Another World just is awesome for nineteen fifty one. Absolutely. Yeah.

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>If you're hesitant to watch this just because it is

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 1>an early nineteen fifties film, um, just know that it

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.719
<v Speaker 1>is in many ways ahead of its time. Alright, So

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:49.640
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned already that this was based on a short

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>story based on a short story by John W. Campbell Jr.

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Who lived nineteen nineteen through nineteen seventy one. Pulp era

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.080
<v Speaker 1>sci fi writer and editor of Astounding Science Fiction, and

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.880
<v Speaker 1>he wrote numerous short stories and several novels, though Who

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Goes There? The story that this is based on is

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 1>perhaps his best remembered, and I believe it was recently

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>re released in an expanded form, like they went back

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 1>to an old manuscript, and there's there's stuff in that

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>original manuscript that in some cases is actually president in

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the film version, but not in the original story, if

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.199
<v Speaker 1>if I'm correct on that. Now, having read only a

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit about Campbell, it seems to me that his

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>life sort of breaks into a couple of different parts.

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>That like, early on, it seems like most of what

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:32.719
<v Speaker 1>you read about him is that he's just sort of

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:36.879
<v Speaker 1>like an output machine, like he's just writing tons and

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 1>tons of very influential science fiction and editing tons of

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>people and like cultivating the early careers of a lot

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of people who would become later science fiction writers. And

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>then it seems like the other half is that he

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>descends into increasingly bizarre interest in pseudoscience and right wing politics. Yeah, Yeah,

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that's that seems to be the case of you know,

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>some in accounts ink that he could always be a

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of a blowhard and would was prone to just

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 1>talk a lot, like if you were going to go

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>in and chat with him about anything he was, you

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>were going to get a monologue. But yeah, in life,

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:15.400
<v Speaker 1>he apparently increasingly aspounded ideas that did not set well

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 1>with more progressive sci fi authors of his time, such

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 1>as Isaac asm Of. Yeah, the main things I've seen

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>picked out are increasing interest in hard right politics and

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>then like belief in like psychic powers and stuff, and

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>being uh into sort of the dionetics nexus of of

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>alternative psychiatry. Yeah. Plus, I was reading about him in

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.199
<v Speaker 1>a two thousand nineteen piece in The New York Times

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>by Peter Libby about the renaming of a science fiction

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>writing award that had been named for Campbell and how

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 1>they changed it because for and the reason was it

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>like Campbell supported racial segregation during his life, and he

0:23:55.840 --> 0:24:00.239
<v Speaker 1>aspounded numerous racist and inflammatory viewpoints like the a kind

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of guy who would not only hold the whole hold

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 1>like it was a racist viewpoints but also would like

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>seemed to go the extra step and just trying to

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>rile people up and shock people with his opinions. So um,

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, that's that. That is John W. Campbell Jr.

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Now do you know if Campbell does he have any

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>involvement with the film or was it just that he

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>wrote the story and then it was adapted to a

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>screenplay with without his involvement. I don't know the details

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of his his involvement, but I know that he's He's

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>not credited with any screenwriting credits on this um. Instead,

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>we have the credited screenwriter is Charles Letterer, who lived

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eleven through nineteen seventy six. This is a This

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>is somebody who's a screenwriter on Hawks as Gentleman preferred

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Blond's as well as the original Oceans eleven in nineteen

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 1>sixty That was that was not a Hawks film, but

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>just another credit for Letterer here. Uh. There's also an

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>uncredited writer listed on IMDb, Ben Hesched, who lives lived

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>through nineteen sixty four. And this is a guy who

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>also worked with Hawks writer on Scarface as well as

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Hitchcock's film Notorious. Now, I guess we're about to

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about the cast a little bit, and uh, again,

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:16.719
<v Speaker 1>I will say, as great as this movie is, one

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>of the top criticisms I would lodge about it is

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it has way way too many characters, way too many characters.

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>This movie could have had seven or eight characters at

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the base, I think, and achieve the same factional dynamics. Instead,

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it has like thirty seven characters as way too many.

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 1>I could not keep track of who was who among

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the minor characters, you know, I could recognize like like

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>three or four people, and then everybody else. I was

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.439
<v Speaker 1>just getting mixed up. Oh yeah, Like you're immediately just

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>thrown into a cast of a very interchangeable looking like

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>clean cut white military guys, and and you're just scrambling

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to figure out for a little bit, because again the

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>writing is really tight on this thing. You've pretty quickly

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>figure out who you're main character is, and you can

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of tell who matters and who doesn't. But there

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of they are a fair number of

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>characters on the screen who ultimately don't matter, and they're

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 1>they're not even there to be cannon fodder for the

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>monster or anything. Right, Like, most everybody survives this thing.

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the monster only kills like two or three people, right, yeah. Yeah.

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you you see this many people and you're like, oh,

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a blood bath. No, no, it's it's

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>not even the smaller teams like Team Science. We'll get

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:27.959
<v Speaker 1>get into that in a bit. But they were like

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 1>three characters that stood out. Well, there were two that

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 1>were important characters, one who stood out and two that

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>we're just interchangeably in the background. Yeah, so maybe we

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>should talk about the actor playing our hero. All right,

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>this is Kenneth Toby playing Captain Patrick Hendry. Patrick Hendry. Uh,

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.199
<v Speaker 1>this is our hero. This is the all American lug.

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>He is a handsome, blonde man of action who holds

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>his liquor. He thinks fast, and he brooks. No sympathy

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>for blood sucking aliens or any such an nonsense. Yeah, yeah,

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>he's Uh. It doesn't take long to realize this guy's

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>our lead. Um, he's an interesting actor. The two twenty

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>three acting credits on IMDb. Um. I'm not sure if

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 1>I gave his dates yet, nineteen seventeen through two thousand

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and two. Uh he he. In his later career, oh,

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>he played air controller new Bauer in nineteen eighties Airplane

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:26.879
<v Speaker 1>the the parody film, but back in the day. He

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>was in nineteen fifty five. It came from Beneath the Sea.

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:33.439
<v Speaker 1>And he has quite a few interesting cameos and uncredited bits,

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 1>especially from later in his life, including playing a hologram

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 1>priest and hell Raiser Bloodline. He was a projectionist in

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Grimlins too. He had another cameo in Gremlins playing a

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>different character. He was in Big Top Peewee, he was

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 1>in The Howling, he was in Inner Space. You know,

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 1>I'll say, I think he very much fits the mold

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of a leading man character of these nineteen fifties sci

0:27:57.520 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>fi movies, where the leading character is often just the

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>this kind of lug this uh you know, macho cigarette

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:07.120
<v Speaker 1>ad man. But but you know what, he's good. He's

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>good with this role. Yeah. Yeah, And it seems to

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>be the like he was in a lot of stuff

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 1>before these, uh, these more recent films I'm naming here.

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>But what seems to be the case is that he

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:20.239
<v Speaker 1>had a long career, so he was still active by

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen eighties. But also he was he was in

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the Thing from Another World. He was part of this, uh,

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 1>this era of TV that this new generation of directors

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:33.440
<v Speaker 1>had grown up on. So you see folks like Joe

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Dante using him a lot. John Carpenter used him in Um,

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to say star man. Uh So you know

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>they look back and they're like, this is the star

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of the thing from another world. If if he if

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>he's looking for work, I want to I want to

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>put him in my film. Have him. I'll just give

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>him a cameo something. Let's get him on the screen.

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I just want to be in his presence. Now we

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that in this movie he's a ruggedly handsome lug.

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>He is also the love interest of Margaret Sheridan and

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>this movie playing a character named Nicki Nicholson. Is that right? Yep? Yeah.

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>So Sheridan's interesting. She lived through two Hawks apparently discovered

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>her while she was still in college, and Hawks was

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>just convinced that this that this was going to be

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the next big start, that she was like a once

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>in a generation talent. So he wanted to cast her

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 1>in ninety eight Red River, that's the Hawks film, but

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 1>apparently she was pregnant at the time. She passed on it,

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and she she ended up being in this film, which

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, depending on you know, whether Hawks directed it

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 1>or not. It's it's still very much a Hawks film,

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you know. Um, but her career ultimately didn't take off

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>quite like Hawks had imagined it. She was in uh

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.959
<v Speaker 1>five more films, and she did some TV, but this

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>is the one she's best remembered for. Um. Other credits

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>include nineteen fifty three's I've a Jury in nineteen fifty

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>four's The Diamond Wizard. I like that name. It's a

0:29:57.960 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>cool name. I think I looked at it. I think

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's a diamond heist kind of a film. So

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing that stands out to modern viewers perhaps so much. Well,

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Margaret Sheridan is wonderful in this movie. She she has

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>such a rye jolly energy. I love the way that

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>she so when Kenneth Toby's uh talking and she's got

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>scenes with him, I love the way she's constantly either

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of laughing at him or visibly trying to hold

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>back laughter while he's speaking. There's something kind of powerful

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and almost kind of threatening about the way she just

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>laughs at him. But and I love it. But then

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>also it's very clear that she does like him. Uh So, Yeah,

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>she's got a wonderful screen presence. Yeah, you can see

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 1>what Hawk saw in her. She she has this great

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>energy and and the role is is really good for

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a really well written for n one. Uh. You know,

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 1>she's not a damsel in distress. Um, she's not a

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>film fatale. Uh you know, she is this this strong,

0:30:54.880 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>capable professional woman in this you know, outrageous scenario. Um

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and uh and she you know, stands toe to toe

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>with with her male counterparts in the film. And this

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>is where we get to to something that was apparently

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>one of hawks trademarks. And I have to admit I

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen any other Howard Hawks film, so I can't

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>really speak to this personally, but apparently in film theory

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>this is known as the Hawksian woman, an archetype of sort.

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know, a tough talking or fast talking woman

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that converbally spar with male counterparts. And that's certainly something

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>we see in this in this role his girl Friday. Yeah, yeah,

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess so. Um. You know. It's not to say,

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to be clear, it's not like there are

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>no nineteen fifty sensibilities uh, in the in this character

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>or in the film entirely, but I feel like it's

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a shockingly strong role for a film from this

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>time period. Certainly a genre film. Yeah, so far we've

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>spoken about two characters in depth here uh and uh,

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and Nikki is very much on team science and and

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Toby is is one of the military men you off

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Mike here, you have talked about this film essentially being

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 1>about jocks versus nerds. Oh, totally. Yeah, this is a

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>jocks versus nerds movie, though there's some crossover because ultimately,

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I would I would say that while Margaret Sheridan is

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 1>playing a scientist, she her real loyalties are more on

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the jock side. She's with the military military guys in

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the end. But yeah, this is a this is a

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>movie in which the jocks the military represent tough common

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>sense and the nerds the scientists represent an unhealthy and

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 1>ill advised curiosity, you know, a mind that is a

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>little too open for its own good. And this brings

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>us to the next character that that we wanted to

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about in the actor who plays him, and that's

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 1>if this movie has a human villain, this is the

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 1>human villain. This is doctor Carrington. I would say he

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>is the main figure in the movie representing the villainous

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>potential of the nerds among us. He's so curious to

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>know more about the life forms from other worlds that

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>he forgets his loyalty to this one. And I think

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a good jumping off point to talk about

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the historical political context of the film. Uh So,

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to be clear, I do not know if

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>it was intended this way by the filmmakers. This could

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>be something that is just an artifact of interpretation. But

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to see how this has been interpreted as

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a Cold war paranoia movie. You know, it was released

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>early during the Second Red Scare, and it involves sort

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of comy coded intellectuals who betray their loyalty to the

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>home team in a spirit of suicidal interplanetary cosmopolitanism. So

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Dr Carrington there's something kind of off about him in

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 1>his aesthetics. He dresses in these strange slacks that look

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't I'm not sure what they were. They look

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of like pajama pants with a strange pattern on them.

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And he wears a turtleneck sweater and a double breasted jacket,

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and he has a pointy beard, so he looks almost

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>like the classic Looney Tunes caricature of the Freudian psychiatrist.

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, what I'm talking about. He looks like the

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the archetype of an untrustworthy, godless intellectual, like somebody that

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 1>John Wayne would slug in the mouth and big Jim McClain,

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah like almost like like a stereotypical communist sympathizer intellectual

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of the day. Yeah. Yeah. There are a number of

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 1>sci fi movies of this time interpreted as Cold War

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 1>paranoia movies, and they tend to feature plot devices of

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 1>either one of two mechanisms, either mind control or body snatching.

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>And what this means is that you end up with

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>enemies who look like your friends and neighbors, but secretly

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:01.439
<v Speaker 1>they're working for the other side. And you can see

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>examples of this in the nineteen fifty six Invasion of

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the Body Snatchers, the original Invasion of the Body Snatchers.

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 1>There was a remake in uh in seventy eight that

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I think is absolutely fantastic. If you've never seen the

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight version, that that's another remake from I guess

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a few years before, but around the same time as

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 1>as Carpenter's Thing remake. That is a remake that is

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>at least as good as the original, and probably better.

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen the seventies remake. I've only seen the

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty six version, which as a child like scared

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the crap out of me at bet. It's something about

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>just the black and white nature of it and just

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 1>how just frenzied Kevin McCarthy's character is towards the end,

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 1>like he's just completely losing it with Uh, it's not

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>even paranoia in the context of the film, because people

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>are being replaced by pod people and he's the like,

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the only sane man left trying to warn us. Well,

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you really should see the seventy eight Body Snatchers because

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it's also just fantastic. It's it's got a great cast,

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Donald Sutherland, Brooke, Adam Veronica Cartwright, Jeff Goldblum, Leonard Nimoy,

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>there are Yeah, it's a wonderful cast and and excellently scripted,

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 1>like really good. So. But anyway, in those cases, especially

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the original fifty six invasion of the Body Snatchers, because

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it's in this sort of red scare period of the

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 1>fifties after World War Two. Um, it's it fits into

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:22.400
<v Speaker 1>this mold. You've got people who look like your friends,

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 1>but actually they work for the enemy, and on the

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Hammy or b movie side of things, You've also got

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:29.320
<v Speaker 1>movies like it Conquered the World, which I think you

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 1>could say the same thing about also came out in

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:35.799
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty six, a Corman special Roger Corman, And how

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 1>would you describe it Conquered the World. It's a movie

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 1>where like a giant communist mind control artichoke from Venus

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 1>conquers a military base in a nearby town by like

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>making a brain thrawl out of Levan Cleef. Yeah, it's

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 1>an interesting film. It has has a ridiculous monster in it,

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of it revolves around um, around Peter

0:36:56.280 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 1>graves is character having these conversations with Levan Cliff's character,

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of like it just a philosophical arguments about how

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 1>we should be treating the aliens that are invading the world,

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you know with Lee Van Cliffe, Uh, you know, since

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:12.399
<v Speaker 1>he tends to play the more villainous roles though he's

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:15.479
<v Speaker 1>not really an outright villain and not an unsympathetic villain

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 1>in this um he comes through in the end. Yeah,

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>he comes through in the end, but he also seems

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to be he has a very logic based approach to everything,

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 1>uh into why he is essentially siding with the aliens

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 1>um And that's kind of the heart of it, Like

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the the the alien threat exists, and it's about how

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 1>are we as a as a as a as a

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:38.760
<v Speaker 1>culture responding to it, and are we engaging in dangerous

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 1>um sensibilities and dangerous ideas regarding the treatment of alien beings.

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 1>Will we learn only too late that man is a

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:49.759
<v Speaker 1>feeling creature, right, And that's a big that's a big

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 1>theme in all of these, right, the idea that this

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 1>this dangerous ideology or you know, or alien presence, whatever

0:37:57.360 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the infection happens to be, it will rob you of

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 1>your individuality. You're just going to be made into You'll

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:05.880
<v Speaker 1>be a pod person, You'll be uh, you know, or

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever the thing is. You're going to be robbed of

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 1>your individuality and your personality. And that this alien persuasion,

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 1>this alien frame of mind, or the sympathies to the

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 1>enemy are not visible from the outside, right, that the enemy,

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it's mind control or body snatching, either way, the

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 1>effect is the same, which is that the enemy is

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:27.799
<v Speaker 1>among us, blending in, you know. And and this is

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 1>very much in the political spirit of the age. It's like,

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, McCarthy speech when he stood up in nineteen

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 1>fifty and he said he had a list of Communist

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:39.319
<v Speaker 1>spies who were secretly working in the State Department, as

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 1>they're just blending in with everybody else. And and so

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the main mood or theme of these movies, a little

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 1>bit less than outright terror, is instead paranoia. Right. It's

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:52.799
<v Speaker 1>this thing of like who can I trust? Who is

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:55.760
<v Speaker 1>not what they seem? And there's an irony here because

0:38:55.800 --> 0:39:00.319
<v Speaker 1>I think Carpenter's adaptation of the Thing accomplishes this theme

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of paranoia much more powerfully than the original Thing from

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Another World, even though I don't think Carpenter's version has

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 1>any of that red scare political DNA, I don't. I

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's it's concerned with that at all. It's

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 1>just sort of like more free floating paranoia. And I

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>think it accomplishes that because specifically it involves an alien

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>who impersonates people who can look like your coworkers, and

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't know it was actually an alien until you

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 1>test their blood. Unlike this movie, instead of having somebody

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:33.880
<v Speaker 1>who's an alien body snatcher or someone under alien mind control,

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it has just the suspect loyalties of the scientists and

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the intellectual because they're hungry for knowledge and they're open

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:45.759
<v Speaker 1>minded to a fault, and because and because of that,

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:49.399
<v Speaker 1>they will flirt with dangerous forces from outside the zone

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of safety. And that's who that's the role that Dr Carrington,

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:55.720
<v Speaker 1>this character plays in the movie. And for the record,

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:58.759
<v Speaker 1>the actor Robert Corinthwaite is great in this role. I

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 1>love him as the god less, untrustworthy nerd. Yeah, he's

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:05.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty great, even even though at times, yeah, it feels

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 1>like they're laying out a bit thick with him. But

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, yeah, it's a little cheesy. Yeah, because he said,

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:12.279
<v Speaker 1>he's like, everyone else is like this, this thing is

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:14.440
<v Speaker 1>murdering people in his drinking blood. And he's like, yes,

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 1>but I think we should reason with it. There's so

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 1>much we could learn from this murderous carrot u And

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:22.359
<v Speaker 1>even right up there at the end, you know, they're

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to lure it into a high tech trap

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:27.879
<v Speaker 1>to shock it to death, and he's like, wait, let

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:30.919
<v Speaker 1>me speak to the creature. It must not be heard,

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, And we get to see the nerd get

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 1>punished for his foolishness. You know, he's so naive that

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:38.799
<v Speaker 1>he thinks he can, he can form a relationship with

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the alien, you know, unlike he doesn't have the rough

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 1>common sense of the of the captain in the army

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 1>who's like, well, you just gotta kill this thing. Um.

0:40:47.400 --> 0:40:51.800
<v Speaker 1>So he gets smacked down. I think they say that

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 1>he survives. I think they say that he just ends

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:58.320
<v Speaker 1>up with some broken bones, broken bones, in a wounded spirit.

0:40:58.360 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 1>But perhaps he'll he'll Now he knows that he shouldn't,

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 1>he shouldn't put science first. So this actor Um karnth Waite.

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 1>He was born in nineteen seventeen died in two thousand

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:12.959
<v Speaker 1>and six. He did a lot of TV and film

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>work throughout his long career, including Future World, that was

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the one of the sequels to West World. He was

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:22.920
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen fifty threes, War of the World's nineteen sixty

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 1>two is whatever Happened to Baby Jane. He was in

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 1>The Ghost and Mr Chicken and that we don't know

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the ghost of Mr Chicken. I do not know the

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Ghost just like it was a Don Nots comedy, Okay,

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I I saw it a lot as a

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:38.960
<v Speaker 1>kid for some reason. But anyway, this actor was on.

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:40.920
<v Speaker 1>It was on tons of famous TV shows, from the

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 1>old day stuff like Andy Griffith, Twilight Zone, Alfred Hitchcock Um.

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:48.759
<v Speaker 1>This was his first credited film or TV acting gig, though,

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and he he often played lawyers and scientists because he

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 1>had that kind of like intellectual air, you know, that

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:57.440
<v Speaker 1>intellectual delivery that that lent itself well to those roles.

0:41:57.920 --> 0:42:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe a nasal voice and a point he eard and

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:02.719
<v Speaker 1>you just look at that guy and you're like, I

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't know if I can trust him now.

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:08.839
<v Speaker 1>We also have a very amusing journalist character who has

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of screen time. It's our character Ned Scott,

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:14.919
<v Speaker 1>and I enjoyed this character a lot because he's he's

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 1>very stereotypical in many ways, but is so well written,

0:42:19.560 --> 0:42:23.399
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of snappy dialogue, fast talking journalist, has

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 1>some extremely cheesy lines. He he gives the final the

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>final speech at the end of the movie. So this

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:32.759
<v Speaker 1>movie's version of the he learned too late that man

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:36.719
<v Speaker 1>is a feeling creature is instead him like talking over

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the military radio to I don't know, some command post

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and like dictating a news story off the top of

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 1>his head. It starts off with some line like, uh, well,

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 1>thousands of years ago a man named Noah save the

0:42:48.400 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Earth with an arc made of wood. Today with a

0:42:51.239 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 1>man named Captain Whatever saved the Earth with an arc

0:42:54.480 --> 0:43:01.239
<v Speaker 1>of electricity. Yeah, yeah, greatly great lead, ned really really good. Uh.

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:03.360
<v Speaker 1>The interesting thing about that ending with the keep watching

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the skies is I sometimes having never seen it before,

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:10.520
<v Speaker 1>but but being familiar with that ending line. I kind

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of combined that knowledge with the ending to um Invasion

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Body Snatchers, where there's like a crazed urgency

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to it, and there's no crazed urgency here. He's not like,

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:24.239
<v Speaker 1>for God's sake, keep watching the skies because this is

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:26.799
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen again and again. He's just kind of like

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:29.600
<v Speaker 1>in generally saying, keep watching the skies just in case,

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:31.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, there might be who knows, Just keep

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:37.000
<v Speaker 1>watching the sky. Watch those guys, keep watching them. Anyway, This,

0:43:37.000 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 1>this character though very amusing Ned Scott um Uh. He

0:43:41.200 --> 0:43:43.759
<v Speaker 1>was played by Douglas Spencer, who of nineteen ten through

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:47.360
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixties, so you know, ultimately didn't it didn't have

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:50.200
<v Speaker 1>his long career as um as he could have given it.

0:43:50.280 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 1>His His life was a bit cut short there. But

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 1>he was in, among other things, this Island Earth, The

0:43:55.680 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Diary of Anne Frank, and the classic Western Shane And

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:02.319
<v Speaker 1>speaking of what Western's, let's talk about Team Monster here.

0:44:02.480 --> 0:44:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, now you mentioned already the James Arnez plays

0:44:05.920 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the Monster, and it is indeed James Arnez lived through

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:12.800
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eleven. This is the guy that's mostly

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 1>mostly well known and well remembered for for one or

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:18.520
<v Speaker 1>two things. First of all, he played the lead character

0:44:18.600 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Matt Dillon on the long running gun Smoke Western TV show.

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:26.160
<v Speaker 1>That show aired nineteen fifty five through nine seventy five

0:44:26.560 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and then was just always uh in syndication afterwards. It

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:32.600
<v Speaker 1>seems like I remember my grandpa would watch it like

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 1>every day on TV. I've never seen gun Smoke. I

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:37.759
<v Speaker 1>really don't know anything about it. I mean, I know,

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:40.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I ever actively watched it, because I

0:44:40.280 --> 0:44:42.120
<v Speaker 1>mean I was a kid. I wasn't interested in in

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:44.920
<v Speaker 1>gun Smoke so much. But it was on and he

0:44:45.000 --> 0:44:47.440
<v Speaker 1>was like a you know, cowboy sheriff or whatnot. And

0:44:47.680 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 1>he's like, let me guess, is he the new sheriff

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:52.960
<v Speaker 1>who's comes into a lawless town and has to fix everything?

0:44:53.520 --> 0:44:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess, But it's I mean, the show ran for

0:44:55.920 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 1>like twenty years, so you think he'd get into a

0:44:58.320 --> 0:45:01.200
<v Speaker 1>pattern there after watch that. People would be like, you've

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:04.759
<v Speaker 1>had fifteen years to fix this town and it's still lawless. Yeah,

0:45:04.800 --> 0:45:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Like does he have to run for re election? How

0:45:06.520 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 1>does it work? I don't know, gunsmoke fans let us know. Um.

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 1>But it wasn't just Western's for James Arnaz. He was

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:16.280
<v Speaker 1>also a nineteen fifty four Is Them a Giant Bug movie?

0:45:16.320 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen this one? Actually? Shame to say no,

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I have not. I know it's a classic. The other

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:25.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing about James ar Nez is that he was

0:45:25.080 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 1>born James king our Nest and he was the older

0:45:29.120 --> 0:45:32.480
<v Speaker 1>brother of a guy by the name of Peter Doosler

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:36.880
<v Speaker 1>ar Ness who acted under the name Peter Graves. I

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:39.799
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned, Yeah, so this is Peter graves brother. So

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you could have literally had a brother to brother conversation

0:45:42.560 --> 0:45:44.440
<v Speaker 1>about how you learned too late that man is a

0:45:44.480 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 1>feeling creature. Yeah. Yeah, it's interesting though, I mean this

0:45:49.160 --> 0:45:51.440
<v Speaker 1>is often the case with siblings, right, I mean, this

0:45:51.560 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 1>is nothing remarkable, But you don't think of James r

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Ness and Peter Graves as being is playing the same

0:45:57.719 --> 0:46:00.680
<v Speaker 1>source of characters there's like a there's a ruggedness to

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:03.280
<v Speaker 1>James Arnez, like he's just always going to be that cowboy.

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:06.319
<v Speaker 1>And Peter Graves, on the other hand, often played these

0:46:06.360 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 1>more you know, these thoughtful characters that sometimes villainous, but

0:46:11.160 --> 0:46:13.800
<v Speaker 1>there's like a sternness to that is just sternness of

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:16.399
<v Speaker 1>both actors. But I don't know Peter Graves different type

0:46:16.400 --> 0:46:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of roles. I can't imagine them ever, like competing for

0:46:19.000 --> 0:46:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the same character and in being like the same character.

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:24.360
<v Speaker 1>If if either of them played it, well, if it

0:46:24.360 --> 0:46:26.840
<v Speaker 1>had been Peter Graves as the thing from another world,

0:46:28.280 --> 0:46:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, you know, I wonder. I don't know

0:46:30.560 --> 0:46:32.839
<v Speaker 1>if Peter Graves ever played a monster. He might have

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:34.839
<v Speaker 1>early in his career, and I'd have to I'd have

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to go through his filmography. Now another going back to

0:46:46.600 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Team Science, there's one guy that stood out to me.

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I was just gonna, you know, skip over all the

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:53.440
<v Speaker 1>rest of them. But there's a character by the name

0:46:53.440 --> 0:46:55.839
<v Speaker 1>of doctor Stern. Did he stand out to you, Joe,

0:46:56.360 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember which one he was. Wait, was he

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:01.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the scientists who had black hair? He was, no,

0:47:01.880 --> 0:47:03.840
<v Speaker 1>he well, he might have had black hair. He was

0:47:04.280 --> 0:47:07.279
<v Speaker 1>tallish and and was I had kind of like a

0:47:07.320 --> 0:47:10.759
<v Speaker 1>subdued but seemed like thoughtful delivery and had some good

0:47:10.800 --> 0:47:14.040
<v Speaker 1>lines here and there. Um played by this actor by

0:47:14.040 --> 0:47:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the name of Edward Franz. He lived through three again,

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:22.440
<v Speaker 1>not a main character, but his screen presence impressed me,

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 1>so I thought i'd include him here. A stern faced

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:29.400
<v Speaker 1>character actor whose mini credits include The Ten Commandments. Um.

0:47:29.440 --> 0:47:33.240
<v Speaker 1>He was in Hatari Johnny got his Gun and also

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:36.520
<v Speaker 1>he was in Twilight Zone the movie. So the sequence

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:38.080
<v Speaker 1>with the you know about the monster and the wing

0:47:38.080 --> 0:47:42.759
<v Speaker 1>of the plane was John lithcow Uh. Edward Franz plays

0:47:43.000 --> 0:47:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the old man on the flight. Okay, now I just

0:47:46.560 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 1>looked him up. I do remember him, but I don't

0:47:49.200 --> 0:47:54.400
<v Speaker 1>remember what he did in the movie. In just in

0:47:54.480 --> 0:47:58.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the science conversations, he kind of was a

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:01.840
<v Speaker 1>voice of reason in and skepticism. I kind of I

0:48:01.880 --> 0:48:05.640
<v Speaker 1>liked his presence there Again, the dialogue is is pretty

0:48:05.640 --> 0:48:08.000
<v Speaker 1>tight and in in this uh, in this movie and

0:48:08.120 --> 0:48:11.080
<v Speaker 1>uh and and even like bit characters like like him,

0:48:11.320 --> 0:48:13.920
<v Speaker 1>he has a chance to shine. Okay, one more actor

0:48:13.960 --> 0:48:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to include, and that's Uh. The character the

0:48:16.640 --> 0:48:19.320
<v Speaker 1>character Dr Vorhes was played by this guy Paul Free

0:48:19.520 --> 0:48:23.000
<v Speaker 1>who lived nineteen twenty through nineteen eighty six. And I'm

0:48:23.000 --> 0:48:24.680
<v Speaker 1>including him because he had a long career as a

0:48:24.760 --> 0:48:27.640
<v Speaker 1>voice actor, so he played a radio reporter in the

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:30.440
<v Speaker 1>World of the Worlds. He did several voices and the

0:48:30.480 --> 0:48:34.600
<v Speaker 1>animated The Last Unicorn. Other credits include The Wind and

0:48:34.600 --> 0:48:37.759
<v Speaker 1>the Willows, Uh, the animated version of The Return of

0:48:37.760 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the King and the Hobbit. Then also just various ranking

0:48:41.120 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and bass holiday specials. And then finally we'll get to

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the music here. The music was provided by Dmitri Tiomkin,

0:48:48.760 --> 0:48:53.800
<v Speaker 1>who lived eight four through nineteen seventy nine. The music

0:48:53.840 --> 0:48:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in this film is largely what you'd expect from the

0:48:56.160 --> 0:49:00.560
<v Speaker 1>time period, but um, this Russian born composer, it was

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:03.920
<v Speaker 1>a major name during this era. Here in twenty two

0:49:03.920 --> 0:49:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Academy Award nominations and won four oscars um and most

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:11.440
<v Speaker 1>notably for this film. Again it's it's very standard and

0:49:11.480 --> 0:49:14.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of brass in it, but you do hear

0:49:14.920 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the theoreman from time to time to provide a little

0:49:17.560 --> 0:49:20.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of sci fi intrigue. Um. And I've seen this

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:23.800
<v Speaker 1>score singled out as one of the works that helped

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:27.880
<v Speaker 1>cement the electronic musical instruments place in sci fi cinema.

0:49:27.920 --> 0:49:31.120
<v Speaker 1>The other big one was The Day the Earth Stood Still,

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:34.920
<v Speaker 1>scored by Bernard Herman. Oh that so that's interesting. I

0:49:34.920 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize that these two movies came out the same year,

0:49:37.200 --> 0:49:38.839
<v Speaker 1>The Thing from Another World and The Day the Earth

0:49:38.880 --> 0:49:41.799
<v Speaker 1>Stood Still, And I think it would also be interesting

0:49:41.880 --> 0:49:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to kind of compare them. I haven't seen The Day

0:49:45.480 --> 0:49:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the Earth Stood Still nearly as recently, but I would

0:49:48.160 --> 0:49:50.920
<v Speaker 1>say that The Thing from Another World is probably a

0:49:51.040 --> 0:49:54.880
<v Speaker 1>much better movie, just on a technical level in terms

0:49:54.880 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of like how how effective and scary, like the shots

0:49:57.640 --> 0:50:00.040
<v Speaker 1>and the horror and everything is in it. But it

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I think The Day the Earth Stood Still is probably

0:50:02.680 --> 0:50:07.799
<v Speaker 1>a more thematically interesting movie. Yeah. Yeah, I think they're

0:50:07.840 --> 0:50:10.280
<v Speaker 1>both examples of sort of you know, the high minded

0:50:10.320 --> 0:50:14.239
<v Speaker 1>early nineteen fifties sci fi film um and this was

0:50:14.280 --> 0:50:18.120
<v Speaker 1>in an era where, I the genre films of this

0:50:18.200 --> 0:50:21.680
<v Speaker 1>caliber were not generally elevated at that level. They certainly

0:50:21.719 --> 0:50:24.880
<v Speaker 1>weren't getting nominated for Academy Awards and so forth. But

0:50:24.960 --> 0:50:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you know what should have been nominated for an Academy

0:50:27.360 --> 0:50:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Award is the opening title of The Thing from God,

0:50:31.640 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 1>absolutely ballistic. Best Opening title I've ever seen. Probably of

0:50:37.680 --> 0:50:40.600
<v Speaker 1>course it inspired I think some things that came afterward,

0:50:40.680 --> 0:50:42.440
<v Speaker 1>But it's the one where it starts with, you know,

0:50:42.480 --> 0:50:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the black screen and then you just see the word

0:50:45.280 --> 0:50:49.839
<v Speaker 1>thing lettered in a large, jagged script that burns through

0:50:49.880 --> 0:50:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a black sheet like it's been like like spelled in kerosene,

0:50:54.200 --> 0:50:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and then set ablaze. Absolutely amazing. I love it, and

0:50:58.680 --> 0:51:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I imagine Carpenter loved it as well, because they didn't

0:51:01.600 --> 0:51:05.560
<v Speaker 1>they basically recreate the same title card for that decision

0:51:06.000 --> 0:51:09.400
<v Speaker 1>where burning through the screen. It's it's beautiful. I have

0:51:09.480 --> 0:51:11.640
<v Speaker 1>no idea how they did it. It's beautiful. Though. There's

0:51:11.680 --> 0:51:13.880
<v Speaker 1>another thing before we wrap up that I wanted to

0:51:13.920 --> 0:51:16.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about with this movie, which is that it has

0:51:17.360 --> 0:51:21.319
<v Speaker 1>uh interesting dialogue. So this film has what you might

0:51:21.360 --> 0:51:26.600
<v Speaker 1>call naturalistic dialogue or overlapping dialogue. So maybe there are

0:51:26.680 --> 0:51:29.759
<v Speaker 1>other examples of of movies like this from the time,

0:51:29.800 --> 0:51:31.840
<v Speaker 1>but if so, I'm not really aware of them. I

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:37.120
<v Speaker 1>think filmmaking conventions of the early fifties would have overwhelmingly

0:51:37.280 --> 0:51:42.319
<v Speaker 1>favored the clear, crisp delivery of stage drama conventions, where

0:51:42.320 --> 0:51:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, one character speaks at a time and you

0:51:45.000 --> 0:51:48.120
<v Speaker 1>can hear every word they say, because the lines are important.

0:51:48.160 --> 0:51:51.040
<v Speaker 1>They're meant to develop the character or move the plot along.

0:51:51.680 --> 0:51:55.200
<v Speaker 1>But this movie is trending toward a more and more

0:51:55.480 --> 0:52:00.560
<v Speaker 1>naturalistic and atmospheric approach to dialogue, where characters sometimes mumble,

0:52:00.800 --> 0:52:04.279
<v Speaker 1>sometimes talk over each other at the same time, more

0:52:04.360 --> 0:52:07.320
<v Speaker 1>like you'd get in a later movies like Robert Altman movies,

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:09.840
<v Speaker 1>where a lot of the dialogue is it's clear that

0:52:09.880 --> 0:52:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you're not supposed to hear and take in every single word,

0:52:12.880 --> 0:52:15.799
<v Speaker 1>but get a mood or get an atmosphere from the

0:52:15.880 --> 0:52:19.480
<v Speaker 1>chatter of the characters as they go about their business. Yeah,

0:52:19.640 --> 0:52:22.480
<v Speaker 1>like sometimes they are just incomplete thoughts, like one character

0:52:22.520 --> 0:52:25.560
<v Speaker 1>is talking about something they're interrupted, or yeah, there's cross

0:52:25.600 --> 0:52:27.840
<v Speaker 1>talk and you don't you don't always make out what

0:52:27.960 --> 0:52:31.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the characters are saying it, so it feels, yeah,

0:52:31.080 --> 0:52:33.960
<v Speaker 1>it has this very natural feel to it and also

0:52:34.040 --> 0:52:37.719
<v Speaker 1>just moves right along. It's like it's snappy. It's snappy dialogue,

0:52:37.760 --> 0:52:40.799
<v Speaker 1>you know it uh uh. It keeps you engaged and

0:52:40.840 --> 0:52:44.879
<v Speaker 1>it feels relatively real. Though of course, at the same time,

0:52:45.200 --> 0:52:47.480
<v Speaker 1>it's nine one reel, so you know there's gonna be

0:52:47.560 --> 0:52:50.399
<v Speaker 1>a bit of like Dames and Cigarettes you know, that's

0:52:50.440 --> 0:52:53.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing going on. Another aspect of the dialogue

0:52:53.360 --> 0:52:57.479
<v Speaker 1>that instantly reminded me, there's one shot in particular of this. Uh,

0:52:57.640 --> 0:52:59.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a nice walk and talk sequence A

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:02.719
<v Speaker 1>and we have these long hallways between these rooms and

0:53:02.760 --> 0:53:05.920
<v Speaker 1>this and this snowy bass, and we got some scenes

0:53:05.920 --> 0:53:09.560
<v Speaker 1>where like scientists or military men walking down the hallway

0:53:09.719 --> 0:53:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and the cameras in front of them filming them talk

0:53:12.120 --> 0:53:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to each other. And of course this would this just

0:53:14.239 --> 0:53:17.719
<v Speaker 1>becomes a staple, especially of like police procedurals and uh

0:53:17.760 --> 0:53:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it shows like the West Wing and here it is

0:53:20.760 --> 0:53:23.200
<v Speaker 1>president and thing from another world? What's that guy who

0:53:23.200 --> 0:53:26.520
<v Speaker 1>does the Aaron Sorkin loves to walk and talk, which

0:53:26.600 --> 0:53:31.759
<v Speaker 1>I I frankly personally often find irritating. Imagine if Aaron

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Sorkin did a remake of the Thing, I think I

0:53:34.600 --> 0:53:38.640
<v Speaker 1>would hate that all walk and talk, I never even

0:53:38.640 --> 0:53:43.440
<v Speaker 1>see the monster. I bet it would have a great cast. Though. Yeah, okay, Robert,

0:53:43.440 --> 0:53:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I know we can't finish without talking about the number

0:53:46.680 --> 0:53:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of scenes in this They're so good. But one that

0:53:49.120 --> 0:53:52.520
<v Speaker 1>just had my jaw on the floor was the fire

0:53:52.600 --> 0:53:56.480
<v Speaker 1>attack scene. Oh my god, this scene is so solid

0:53:56.640 --> 0:54:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and and terrifying. Uh. Like afterwards, I'm just I was

0:54:00.400 --> 0:54:03.120
<v Speaker 1>just like, like, I think I audibly said something like,

0:54:03.160 --> 0:54:06.680
<v Speaker 1>oh crap, like that that sequence was it was literally

0:54:06.719 --> 0:54:09.760
<v Speaker 1>on fire because it's a scene where the thing busts

0:54:09.760 --> 0:54:12.759
<v Speaker 1>into a room and they what they throw some kerosene

0:54:12.760 --> 0:54:15.040
<v Speaker 1>at it, and then they throw some fire at him.

0:54:15.520 --> 0:54:18.600
<v Speaker 1>They figured out that it's invulnerable to bullets. Yeah, yeah,

0:54:18.680 --> 0:54:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that shooting it didn't work earlier, so they're using fire

0:54:21.360 --> 0:54:26.480
<v Speaker 1>against it, and it's just it's rampaging and it's on fire. There,

0:54:26.520 --> 0:54:29.879
<v Speaker 1>like from an effect standpoint, terrifying, you know, because it's

0:54:29.880 --> 0:54:32.520
<v Speaker 1>like there's all this visible, real fire on the set.

0:54:32.840 --> 0:54:35.560
<v Speaker 1>There are multiple shots of somebody doing a man on

0:54:35.640 --> 0:54:39.239
<v Speaker 1>fire stunt. Uh. And then within the context of the film, Yeah,

0:54:39.239 --> 0:54:43.879
<v Speaker 1>it's just this intense feeling of of danger, both the

0:54:44.000 --> 0:54:47.200
<v Speaker 1>environmental danger of of their of of where they are

0:54:47.239 --> 0:54:49.239
<v Speaker 1>in the world, but also the fact that now things

0:54:49.320 --> 0:54:52.880
<v Speaker 1>are increasingly on fire and there's a rampaging, you know,

0:54:53.120 --> 0:54:57.759
<v Speaker 1>blood drinking alien that's also on fire. Tremendous. Yeah, and

0:54:58.000 --> 0:55:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it something about that scene and the

0:55:01.920 --> 0:55:05.160
<v Speaker 1>way that it's scary heightens something that's a sort of

0:55:05.160 --> 0:55:08.080
<v Speaker 1>progressive tension throughout the plot, which is that the characters

0:55:08.080 --> 0:55:13.120
<v Speaker 1>are having to make strategic decisions really fast that you know,

0:55:13.160 --> 0:55:16.359
<v Speaker 1>they're not given time to like compile everything they know

0:55:16.600 --> 0:55:19.799
<v Speaker 1>and and try and figure out what's going on. I

0:55:19.880 --> 0:55:22.279
<v Speaker 1>recalled that the set up to that scene is just like,

0:55:22.360 --> 0:55:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we think he's attacking the door. Okay, what are we

0:55:24.560 --> 0:55:27.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna do? You know, the bullets don't work, what if

0:55:27.000 --> 0:55:30.080
<v Speaker 1>we try fire? And so they just like arranged this

0:55:30.200 --> 0:55:33.040
<v Speaker 1>fire trap for it in real time pretty much. It

0:55:33.080 --> 0:55:36.120
<v Speaker 1>happens really fast, and then it all goes to hell,

0:55:36.200 --> 0:55:38.279
<v Speaker 1>and it becomes clear that you can't kill this thing

0:55:38.280 --> 0:55:40.880
<v Speaker 1>with fire, or at least maybe you hurt it with fire.

0:55:41.000 --> 0:55:43.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's like, it's not like us. Each of it

0:55:43.840 --> 0:55:46.080
<v Speaker 1>sells as kind of independent, so you might be able

0:55:46.080 --> 0:55:48.279
<v Speaker 1>to burn its outer layer, but it's ultimately going to

0:55:48.360 --> 0:55:52.000
<v Speaker 1>be okay, yeah. Yeah. And and then afterwards they've lost

0:55:52.000 --> 0:55:54.319
<v Speaker 1>an entire room of the facility and they have they

0:55:54.320 --> 0:55:57.279
<v Speaker 1>have finite resources there, which I thought was also a

0:55:57.280 --> 0:56:00.640
<v Speaker 1>great touch. You know, it's an old standby, but I

0:56:00.680 --> 0:56:04.360
<v Speaker 1>gotta admit I'm really a sucker for setting a trap

0:56:04.440 --> 0:56:06.919
<v Speaker 1>for the monster. That's just a kind of set piece

0:56:06.960 --> 0:56:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that I always enjoy. Yeah, and that's where we wind

0:56:09.760 --> 0:56:14.160
<v Speaker 1>up towards the end. Here they develop a trap, they

0:56:14.200 --> 0:56:16.840
<v Speaker 1>explain how it's gonna work, and so you know, you

0:56:16.840 --> 0:56:18.600
<v Speaker 1>know that this is always the case if if a

0:56:18.640 --> 0:56:22.040
<v Speaker 1>trap is fully explained, something is going to go wrong,

0:56:23.160 --> 0:56:25.480
<v Speaker 1>or if a plan is fully explained, something is going

0:56:25.520 --> 0:56:27.799
<v Speaker 1>to go wrong. So, yeah, it doesn't quite go off

0:56:28.480 --> 0:56:31.719
<v Speaker 1>as there is they're they're planning it to, but it

0:56:31.800 --> 0:56:35.360
<v Speaker 1>also is not doesn't go off the rails disastrously. I

0:56:35.400 --> 0:56:38.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think that would have been allowed in No, I

0:56:38.600 --> 0:56:41.160
<v Speaker 1>guess not. No, you couldn't. I don't know at the time.

0:56:41.200 --> 0:56:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Could you have an ending like you having Carpenters thing?

0:56:44.239 --> 0:56:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Yeah, I don't know how would How

0:56:47.400 --> 0:56:49.880
<v Speaker 1>would audiences have reacted to that? I don't know the

0:56:49.880 --> 0:56:52.680
<v Speaker 1>answer to this question, listeners right in are are there

0:56:52.719 --> 0:56:55.840
<v Speaker 1>examples you can think of of sci fi or genre

0:56:55.920 --> 0:57:00.759
<v Speaker 1>movies from say the fifties with utterly blieke ending just

0:57:01.360 --> 0:57:04.879
<v Speaker 1>ending where the alien winds and earth loses. I mean,

0:57:04.920 --> 0:57:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the main example that comes to mind instantly, and perhaps

0:57:07.880 --> 0:57:09.719
<v Speaker 1>part of it because we already talked about it, is

0:57:09.760 --> 0:57:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the fifty six Body Snatchers film, Like at the end

0:57:13.200 --> 0:57:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of that film, it's like, we have one sane man

0:57:16.520 --> 0:57:19.200
<v Speaker 1>left and everyone thinks he is insane. And I guess

0:57:19.240 --> 0:57:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you could also look to various like short form Twilight

0:57:22.960 --> 0:57:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Zone Twilight Zone type stuff where yeah, you'll definitely have

0:57:25.480 --> 0:57:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the downer ending and and and and all. But yeah,

0:57:28.320 --> 0:57:30.680
<v Speaker 1>this one, this one does not. This one leaves things

0:57:30.680 --> 0:57:33.600
<v Speaker 1>on a positive note. Humans were tested, and they were

0:57:33.720 --> 0:57:37.240
<v Speaker 1>they were up to the test. It's easier to end

0:57:37.240 --> 0:57:39.600
<v Speaker 1>on a downer note. I think after like a sub

0:57:39.680 --> 0:57:42.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty minute story than it is to end on a

0:57:42.560 --> 0:57:45.400
<v Speaker 1>downer note after a ninety minute story. You know you've

0:57:45.400 --> 0:57:48.120
<v Speaker 1>got more investment on a feature length and so people

0:57:48.160 --> 0:57:51.080
<v Speaker 1>are going to feel really mad. If if you get

0:57:51.080 --> 0:57:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a downer ending at the end of a movie, yeah,

0:57:53.560 --> 0:57:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you gotta gotta send him home happy. Yeah, and if

0:57:56.280 --> 0:57:58.439
<v Speaker 1>what this film does, I was. I was happy with

0:57:58.600 --> 0:58:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the film after after we were on here. It has

0:58:00.840 --> 0:58:04.640
<v Speaker 1>some terrific sequences. Uh, you know, great dialogue, a lot

0:58:04.680 --> 0:58:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of interesting things about it. So you know, older films

0:58:07.760 --> 0:58:09.840
<v Speaker 1>like this are not everybody's cup of tea, But I

0:58:09.840 --> 0:58:12.360
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't if you're it all attempted, I encourage you to

0:58:12.440 --> 0:58:15.280
<v Speaker 1>give the thing from another world a chance, I'm still

0:58:15.280 --> 0:58:17.600
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this thing I just talked about. Wait a minute,

0:58:17.760 --> 0:58:20.240
<v Speaker 1>this might be developing into a broader theory, Rob, would

0:58:20.240 --> 0:58:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you generally agree then, when it comes to horror literature,

0:58:24.360 --> 0:58:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it's way more common to have horror short stories where

0:58:29.360 --> 0:58:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the monster or the the evil entity wins in the end,

0:58:33.240 --> 0:58:37.640
<v Speaker 1>but horror novels where the hero wins in the end. Yeah. Yeah,

0:58:37.680 --> 0:58:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I would say, by and large that's the case. Um.

0:58:40.480 --> 0:58:43.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, and I've seen, I've certainly seen examples where

0:58:44.480 --> 0:58:49.240
<v Speaker 1>longer works that have dark endings, those dark endings are

0:58:49.280 --> 0:58:53.200
<v Speaker 1>not always that well received, even if the audience tends

0:58:53.280 --> 0:58:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to be into darker, grittier stuff. You know, I've I've seen,

0:58:57.680 --> 0:58:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I've seen that time and again. So I think that

0:59:00.080 --> 0:59:03.080
<v Speaker 1>probably holds true. Um And I don't know how much

0:59:03.120 --> 0:59:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of that is yet investment uh in a longer work,

0:59:06.560 --> 0:59:10.040
<v Speaker 1>or sort of expectations of a longer work or um

0:59:10.600 --> 0:59:13.120
<v Speaker 1>or also just like effective storytelling, if you stick with

0:59:13.160 --> 0:59:16.160
<v Speaker 1>it that long, like you you're rooting for the good

0:59:16.160 --> 0:59:18.800
<v Speaker 1>guys or what or whoever is you know, the protagonists

0:59:18.800 --> 0:59:21.800
<v Speaker 1>happened to be like you want them to overcome the

0:59:21.800 --> 0:59:24.959
<v Speaker 1>the adversary. UM And generally, I guess in those longer

0:59:25.000 --> 0:59:27.920
<v Speaker 1>works you tend to have a protagonist that that you

0:59:27.920 --> 0:59:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you're genuinely rooting for and and not like in short fiction,

0:59:32.080 --> 0:59:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you sometimes have, you know, very problematic characters and you

0:59:35.000 --> 0:59:37.400
<v Speaker 1>know something terrible is going to happen to them. Basically,

0:59:37.400 --> 0:59:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the Tales from the Crypt model short stories, bad people,

0:59:41.360 --> 0:59:45.920
<v Speaker 1>bad endings. Yeah. Yeah, Tales from the Crypt exactly is

0:59:45.960 --> 0:59:48.840
<v Speaker 1>short enough that you don't need to like anybody. Yeah,

0:59:49.080 --> 0:59:52.400
<v Speaker 1>like I hate everybody in this. I know something bad

0:59:52.480 --> 0:59:54.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to happen. I'm probably gonna celebrate it when

0:59:54.360 --> 0:59:56.840
<v Speaker 1>it does. Uh. And it's and it's a short ride

0:59:56.840 --> 0:59:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to get there. Well, I guess we got kind of

0:59:58.720 --> 1:00:02.280
<v Speaker 1>sidetracked there, But I'll come back to my my original recommendation.

1:00:02.280 --> 1:00:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I say, Thing from Another World. Yeah, this one's This

1:00:04.520 --> 1:00:09.960
<v Speaker 1>one's really really good horror filmmaking, especially for absolutely And

1:00:10.000 --> 1:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>if you would like to see this film, you're in

1:00:11.680 --> 1:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>luck because it, like I think our last one that

1:00:14.560 --> 1:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>we covered, is widely available. You can you can easily

1:00:18.480 --> 1:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>pick up a DVD or Blu ray of it. You

1:00:21.240 --> 1:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>can also digitally rent or buy it pretty much any

1:00:24.320 --> 1:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>place you you digitally buy or rent films. Watch the guys.

1:00:31.040 --> 1:00:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I know that there was also a colorized version of

1:00:33.520 --> 1:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>this film. I can't imagine watching it colorized. Uh. I

1:00:39.240 --> 1:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>feel like the black and white is essential. Yeah, yeah,

1:00:42.320 --> 1:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, we're gonna go ahead and wrap it up there.

1:00:45.360 --> 1:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>But hey, if you would like to listen to other

1:00:47.600 --> 1:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>episodes of Weird House Cinema, you'll find it every Friday

1:00:51.160 --> 1:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Stuff to Blow your Mind podcast feed. We

1:00:54.040 --> 1:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>have core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays. We have a

1:00:57.920 --> 1:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>listener mail on Monday's artifact on winds D and a

1:01:00.480 --> 1:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>rerun on the weekends. And and hey, keep watching the

1:01:04.800 --> 1:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>skies out there. If you've got a sky, keep watching it.

1:01:09.200 --> 1:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>But what would that have done if you've seen it?

1:01:11.800 --> 1:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>You just said, you'd be like, I see something crash landing.

1:01:15.640 --> 1:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Then you learn lear decided, so I guess you're like, oh,

1:01:18.240 --> 1:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>we gotta get all the thermite really quick. Uh. That

1:01:21.960 --> 1:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>is one more thing. It's this terrible time in the

1:01:24.120 --> 1:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>episode to remember it. But we have some great sequences

1:01:26.560 --> 1:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>too of plotting where the character is trying to track

1:01:29.480 --> 1:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>it with like a Geiger counter. Oh yes, closed space.

1:01:32.520 --> 1:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Very reminiscent of films to come much later, like like

1:01:36.560 --> 1:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Alien and Aliens. Yeah, yeah, totally so. Yeah, this film

1:01:41.160 --> 1:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>feels ahead of its time in a number of ways. Okay,

1:01:44.080 --> 1:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>we gotta stop gushing about the thing, Okay, okay, uh yeah,

1:01:47.800 --> 1:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>so what were we saying? Oh yeah, we're ending the

1:01:50.240 --> 1:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>episode all right. Well anyway, thanks as always to our

1:01:52.720 --> 1:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>wonderful audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you would like

1:01:56.160 --> 1:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to get in touch with us with feedback on this

1:01:58.200 --> 1:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>episode or any other, to suggest topic for the future,

1:02:00.880 --> 1:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>just to say hello, you can email us at contact

1:02:03.880 --> 1:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. Stuff to

1:02:13.640 --> 1:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind is production of I Heart Radio. For

1:02:16.240 --> 1:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts for My Heart Radio, visit the i heart

1:02:18.520 --> 1:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

1:02:21.280 --> 1:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.