WEBVTT - After Selling Patron, John Paul DeJoria  Turns To Rok Mobile

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P and L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. But Cardi,

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.959
<v Speaker 1>they have acquired the shares of Patron Tequila that they

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 1>already didn't own. But this is a deal that values

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Patron at about five billion dollars. It's expected to close

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>in the first half of the year. Joining us now

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in a studio is a co founder and chairman of

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the board of John Paul Mitchell Systems and co founder

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of Patron Tequila. John Paul Or thanks very much for

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>being in the studio. Oh, my friend, always always a

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>joy interviewing with. All Right, let's just I want to

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:04.839
<v Speaker 1>get to set this stage because let's go back to nine.

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>You are interested in having a friend of yours bring

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>back a bottle of tequila from Mexico and he brings

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>back a hand blown bottle and you and Martin Crowley, Yes,

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that's correct. You guys decide, oh, we'll make twelve thousand

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>bottles and priced him at thirty seven bucks a bottle,

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>very very close. He came back with a couple of

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>bottles of what I said, Martin, when you go down there,

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 1>bring back whatever the aristocrats drink. So he found these bottles,

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>very slim, good bottles, and it was the smoothest I

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>ever drink. He said, But JP, I met this guy

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>named Francisco Alcarez and he could make it even smoother.

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>And then he had this bottle he showed me that

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>was out of blown glass he got in some uh

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, gift shop. He says, we could do this,

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and I said, can we do it out of recycled glass?

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>He goes yeah. I said, well what that, Let's make

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>twelve tho bottles and uh, you know it's gonna be

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>very expensive. Well, it was very expensive. We had to

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>sell it for thirty seven ninety five in nine when

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the average tequila I think was four or five dollars

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and the best one around was fourteen. So we actually

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>started in the United States altar premium tequila. But we thought,

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:12.679
<v Speaker 1>you know what a great thing like tequila you could

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>sip and not have to put into Margarita of that quality,

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't get that big hangover the next day. Not bad.

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>So we want to come out with quality. We be

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>in reorder business. It started out very slowly, by the way,

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>but then people realized, wow, I want to treat myself.

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>This is really good. And with a lot of friends

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>that kind of pitched in to lend a helping hand,

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>is started to take off and off and off, and

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 1>then zoom. And then unfortunately, uh oh beckon about two

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand and three, my partner had a little bout at

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.799
<v Speaker 1>heart attack. Uh and Ed Brown took over as our president.

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>He was in sales at the time. It should have

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>been the president. Great guy, and it went just straight

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>up in the air. It's really a phenomena. But it

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>shows you that America still works. And if you go

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 1>for a high quality in any product and you don't

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.920
<v Speaker 1>lessen that quality and give people what they really would like,

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.239
<v Speaker 1>you've got one of a chance of making it well

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and you keep that quality going. And that's gonna happen,

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>by the way, even with the sale to Bacardi. Uh

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that's it's gonna happen because they've agreed to keep everything

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>exactly the way it is keep our staff in place

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and work with me on philanthropy and the good conditions

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and the high quality that we have and not step

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>away from it. And you self funded, patron, Yeah, self

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>fund it, totally self funded. So why did you decide

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to sell now? A couple of reasons. One, we've taken

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it where no one's ever gone before with any tequila,

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>let alone Altar Premium tequila were there and it was

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun. Well, I'd like to take it

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to the next stage right now. And someone like Baccardi

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that has their own and they've been our distributed in

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>many parts of the world, but now that they have

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a piece of it, they could double what we're doing

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>right now. And I know that because the product is

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that good. So I'm excited to see this product that

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I was the father of continue to grow and grow

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and grow. Uh. And it's just the ideal time to

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>do it. I get more involved in my philanthropic work,

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>which I love. And I'm also working on another major,

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>major thing, which will announce with you guys another two

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>or three months through through rock r Okay Mobile that

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>is going to change the whole world for the better

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>for all people. So involvement. So I'm just wondering, do

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you think that it would be harder for an entrepreneur

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to start a business today than it was back in No,

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>not at all. I think it's so much easier today

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>because when I started Paul Mitchell in night seven, inflation

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in the United States was twelve and a half percent,

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 1>unemployment ten and a half percent. If you could get alone,

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>if you could get a loan, prime rate in one

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:38.359
<v Speaker 1>was seventeen percent. I mean, it was very difficult, and

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>we have computers. In those days, we were to set

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>time to make a business card. So today you can

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>make it, I believe a lot easier. But the two

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>things you've got to do if you start a business

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is make sure that your product or your service is

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>so darn good. You're not in the selling business. During

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the reorder business. When they get it, they would like

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>it so much they want to reorder it. Make sure

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 1>that quality is the and at the same time, be

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>sure that you could overcome rejection. You're gonna get a

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of rejection, and if you know you're gonna get it,

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 1>it's not gonna hurt you so much. You're not gonna

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.239
<v Speaker 1>give up after a hundred doors are slamming your face

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 1>like I did when I sold Encyclomphedias door to door.

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>You just keep on going to vet. You're gonna get it.

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 1>One of the things you do have, though, is competition.

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I note that just acquired George Clooney's a high end

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Casa Amigos tequila brand. I guess that deal was reported

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to be worth about a billion dollars. Valuing Patron at

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>five point one billion, that's pretty high. Well, if you

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 1>valued Patron the same way, uh, the group with their

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>one of them, a couple of friends find that they

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>were part of the owners with them. If I did

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>it that way, Patron would be twenty four billion dollars

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>right now. So if you go on what you do

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the abada and how many cases you sell. But that's

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>just crazy, you know. But because Clooney was involved, and

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they could use it for a lot of

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>publicity to them, it made sense. I would love to

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>get that, but you know, and but you know, no

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>one's gonna pay that kind of big money. However, I

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>think at five billion, one million, we did extremely well.

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm very very happy and as you know and have

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>said many times, for seventy of a cumpany top that's

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a home run. Congratulations. Think I could do a whole

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>lot more to help change your world with us. Thank

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being with us. It really is fascinating,

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.359
<v Speaker 1>and I want to care about selling Encyclopedia's door to

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>door and we'll start sometime because you're fascinating and maybe

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>perhaps can be an inspiration for my two little sons. First,

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to first have to explain to them what

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>our encyclopedias, Yeah, they don't actually true. It is that

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:39.840
<v Speaker 1>we are not around anymore. And tell them to watch

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Good Fortune the movie. It was just reallyas you get

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it on you know, Amazon iTunes. What a good Fortunately

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the movie. Let your kids watch it shows you how

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 1>to go from homeless and no money, no influence, being

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>fired many times, and make it in America and you

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>can still do in other countries too. John Paul Gagoria,

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. John Paul

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Gagoria as billionaire, co founder and chief executive officer Pau

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Mitcher and the owner of Patron Spirits, which was just

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>sold to stocks. Gold and oil are up, bonds in

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the US dollar are down. Jim Bianco is the president

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and founder of Bianco Research. He joins us from Chicago. Jim,

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>always a pleasure. Do you think that the dollar weakness

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>will continue? I think over the very short term it

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>will continue because it's got momentum, it's got the Treasury Secretary,

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it's got a lot of that going. But I do

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>think we're in the late stages of this move. The

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars at uh significant highs. Speculation, you know, what we

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>call the crowded trade is getting pretty frothy right now.

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's in this trade. There's not a lot of people

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that are actually still long the dollar, and among the

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>speculative categories in words, they're they're long. There's a crowded

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>trade to short sell the dollar, correct, right the crowded

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>trade is there short to dollar or long currencies? Right now?

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>If you dial up your favorite billionaire at Davos or

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>your favorite hedge fund manager, they're all going to sound

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the same when it comes to the dollar. It's just

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna keep going down. That's why I think it's at

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the late stages. Doesn't mean that today or tomorrow, this

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>week is the high, because it's got the momentum going,

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>but it is getting old. This rally speak currency rally

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>dollar weakness, what's gonna make it strengthen? What's the catalyst

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and when strengthened against which currency? And which is an

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>important sort of cross to look at. Isn't the US

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>euro the dollar euro? Or is it dollar again? Dollar? Bitcoin? Yeah,

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it's all our bitcoin, the key indicator that you watch

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>every morning. I watch it, but it's not yet to

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 1>a key indicator yet. Uh No. But I think one

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of the things is to your question, you're right that

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>what what crush you'll be looking at right now? Because

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the currency should have their own cycles. Some of them

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>should be going up against the dollars, some of them

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>should be sideways, some of them should be down. But

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>right now, as a sign of the speculative frost, the

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>dollar is going down against pretty much everything. Um for

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>now you can so I look at the d X, Y,

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the the index or the euro understanding that this is

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a dollar trade. What's gonna change it? I think when

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>we get off of focusing on the dollar, remember with

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the currency, there's two sides of the trade. There's what

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>is U s policy? What are US rates? Oh? Yeah,

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>but then there's also what are European policies? What are

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>European rates, and that those are being largely ignored and

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>everything has been focused to US centric. When I think

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>we start focusing on what our Japanese policies and rates,

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and what are European policies of rates, and what are

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>British policies and rates, I then think that this dollar

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>weakness will start to peter out. But we're not doing

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that right now. Well, the rally in stocks peter out.

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>The only in stocks is a little different animal altogether. UM.

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Following the tax hike or excuse me, following the tax cut,

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>analysts have aggressively hiked their earnings forecast. So for all

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of seventeen, they're expecting about twelve to fourteen percent gained

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>year over year in earnings. For all of eighteen, they're

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>expecting another eighteen percent. If you had to two together,

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that's thirty six percent between last year and this year,

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>justin earnings. The stock markets up twenty eight percent. Maybe

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>with today's rally, UM, it hasn't even caught up to earnings.

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>There has been no multiple expansion at this point. That

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>will come once we get beyond the thirty six percent

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>rally from the beginning of last year. We're up twenty

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>nine right now, if and this is a critical list,

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the analysts expectations are right. But I think what's got

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the market going right now is these aggressive um increases

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>in earnings estimates. All of the companies that have been

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>giving very positive guidance. Right now, you could actually make

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the case that after rally that we've had, evaluations are

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>really not much different than they were eighteen months ago

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>because there's been such an aggressive uptick in earnings. It's

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>all about that right now. The earning story seems to

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>be working, So I think the stock market is going

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:21.719
<v Speaker 1>to continue to work for a while. All right, So

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>let's turn to bonds. Uh. There is a lot of

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>talk that yields are heading higher, potentially much higher. And uh.

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>We saw Ray Dalio, the founder and the head of Bridgewater,

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>come out and say that if the tenure treasury yield

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>moves up by another hundred basis points, by another one

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>percentage point, Uh, this will be the biggest bond bear

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>market since the early eighties, and it will sort of

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>affect markets accordingly. What's your take on this? Um. What

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>he's explaining there is the simple math of the bond market,

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a phrase that will make everybody fall asleep as positive

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>convexity that as yields get very very low, the sensitivity

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that a bond has to interest rate movements sensitivey bond

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>price has to interestrate movements. Is that a record high.

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>So when you get a one percent move in bonds

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>right now, you get an enormous move in price. Different

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>than when you had a one percent move in interest

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 1>rates when we were at ten percent thirty years ago,

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you got a very smaller price. Uh. He's mechanically correct

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>on that. But now that that said, there's only one

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 1>reason that we would have a hundred basis point rise

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>on the long end of the yield curve. And I

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>think that that's if we had solid evidence of inflation returning. Now.

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>The problem with that is everybody's got models and indicators

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and they all say inflation is gonna return. They also

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>said that last year. They also said that three years ago,

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 1>they said that five years ago, and they said that

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>seven years ago. Uh. The models that inflation should have

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:58.559
<v Speaker 1>returned five years ago, it has not. The Federal Reserve

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Janet Yelling herself has even thrown her hands in the

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>air and said they're not sure why inflation has it returned,

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and the data dependent FET is now using words like

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>guess when it comes to where inflation is going to

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>go next, because their models don't work anymore on this.

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>If we get inflation, then yes, we could see a

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 1>bond route. I'm fully in that camp. The problem is

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the indicators that say that it will return are there,

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>but they've been there for five years and it's still

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>has it returned, So maybe this is the year it's right,

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>or maybe this isn't just yet another false start, So

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>we're all back to guessing on inflation, and I don't

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>like guessing. I'll stick. If I had to push your pull,

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, you're gonna probably see yields creep up

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more in the next month or two

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>on the fear of inflation. But I think by the

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>time you get into the later half of this will

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.719
<v Speaker 1>probably be another false start. Maybe those inflation measures are

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 1>just playing wrong. Maybe they need a new inflation measure.

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I think they need. I think they need a new understanding.

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the effect of Amazon and the Internet on

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>inflation is profound. The problem is the FED wants to

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.319
<v Speaker 1>know when it's going to go up forty basis points.

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>We know that that the internet in Amazon is holding

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it down. We just don't know by how much and

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>how to model that yet. Maybe they need to include

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>food and energy in their inflation estimates. But let me

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>ask you about the tenure treasury right where at two

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>six how much uh further does the yield have to

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>move in order for Jim Bianco to say I'm done

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>with stocks. I'm buying ten years, Thank you very much.

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll take my two point uh. I think that you know,

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>it actually doesn't one of two things. Either, it moves

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to near three percent thirty the ten year. Excuse me.

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>If we get a three percent yield on that, I

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>think that that could be damaging for the stock market

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>in the economy if we were to get that. But

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I think to get that we would need inflation. If

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>we don't get inflation, then I think what happens is

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be at Defet's going to raise rates. The

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>yield curve is going to flatten quite a bit. Uh.

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>The yield curve has forecasted correctly every recession since nineteen sixty.

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>We get that flatten yield curve, it's gonna freak everybody

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>out that a recession is coming. That could be damaging

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>for the market. To Jim Bianco, thank you so much

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>for joining us, President and founder of Bianco Research, also

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg profit. The shares are General Electric are down

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>three tenths of a percent right now, and the company

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>has revealed that the Securities and Exchange Commission is looking

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>into the way that it has accounted for some of

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>its past insurance businesses as well as its revenue recognition program.

0:15:57.080 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Here to tell us more, Brooks Sutherland our m and

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a columnist and Bloomberg gad fly when it comes to

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>all things g E and Brooke can be followed on

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at b L Seth s U t h Alright,

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>b L Suth, g E and the SEC. What does

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the SEC want to know about? So they're reviewing two

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>things is what we learned today. So they're looking into

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the process leading up to UM. You know gees announcement

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>last week that it's taking a six point two billion

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>after tax charger and its insurance business is paying fifteen

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>billion over seven years to shore up reserves there. Now,

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that is a business that you know, g E largely

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>divested between two thousand and four and two thousand and six,

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>so it's been in runoff, they haven't been issuing new businesses,

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and they've done this review annually ever since. So then

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to all of a sudden see this need to you know,

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>put fifteen billion to shore up their reserves. I think

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously raises a lot of questions. So to me, it

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>would be more surprising if the SEC wasn't looking into this.

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>But the interesting thing is the second part of this

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that they're also looking at gees revenue recognition practice and

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>its controls around its long term service agreements. Now this

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 1>has been it's a little complicated, but it's been a

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>big sort of watch item for analysts because gees contract

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.919
<v Speaker 1>assets have searched over the past couple of years. And

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>what those are are, you know, agreements that ge signs

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>with clients and it goes ahead and books the earnings

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>but not the cash, which then you know is delivered

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>when these service agreements are sort of completed. Now, the

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>concern is that when those agreements were signed, the underlying

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of profitability assumptions may not have been conservative enough.

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>When you look specifically at the power market and how

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 1>significantly that's deteriorated. I think you have to wonder, you

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:44.360
<v Speaker 1>know what we're sort of the baseline assumptions when those

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 1>agreements were made and those earnings were booked, and so

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that was something analysts were very concerned about.

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Now the SEC is looking into it again, not totally surprising,

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>but I think, you know, that's certainly going to be

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:59.199
<v Speaker 1>important to watch. So frankly, it's sort of shocking that

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the shares aren't own more because if you start talking

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:07.159
<v Speaker 1>about potential accounting I don't want to say fraud, but

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>malfeasance over years or at least, you know, some kind

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of fudging of the numbers over years and years that

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>calls into question a lot of things about this company. Sure,

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and I want to be clear, I mean, I don't

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>think we're talking necessarily about fraud here, but if the

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>baseline assumptions were too optimistic, then they have to be rethought.

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean it, we still have a lot to learn

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>about this, the SEC investigators in still very early days.

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>But yes, I mean it certainly does raise a lot

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 1>of questions. I think the reason why the stock is

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>not down more is that people have been worried about

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>this for a while, that this issue, you know, is

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>now sort of playing out because we have this sec headline,

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>but the contract bassets have been something that have been,

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of on analyst radar for a very

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>long time, and it's a big reason why g had

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:52.479
<v Speaker 1>the cash shortfall that it did because again it's you know,

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of booking these as earnings but not getting

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the cash, and that's why you've seen the divergence and

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>its actual earnings and free cash flow. So one thing

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm struggling with, so General Electric has a hundred and

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty six billion dollars of debt outstanding. They're at investment

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>grade rated company in the A rating sphere. I'm trying

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.199
<v Speaker 1>to understand at what point do they get downgraded and

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, those borrowing costs just surge, piling

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:21.640
<v Speaker 1>on yet another concern, another big worry for investors right now.

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>And the rating agencies came out and they did affirm

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.439
<v Speaker 1>ges credit ratings after it took that charge and insurance. Now,

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:28.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they're going to be reevaluating that

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 1>as we get more information, but that is certainly something

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that investors and analysts are worried about, and you know,

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>I think they're concerned because a lot of times when

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you see companies take these charges to to shore a preserve.

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 1>Usually the first number is not the last number. And

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>if you start talking about maybe g E Capital needing

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>more reserves for the insurance business as well as other

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:51.919
<v Speaker 1>liabilities that they have. They have this subprime mortgage business

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that's still laying around and some other potential issues, then

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you start to get into a question of cane Capital

0:19:57.920 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>pay all those bills on its own, does it start

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>eating money from the parent company, and then that becomes

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>a really serious concern for the credit rating. You also

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about, you know, goodwill on the Alston

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>acquisition that they did in fifteen is very high. That

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 1>acquisition is obviously disappointed. Could there be a good will impairment,

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>which you know that's a non cash charge, but that

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>would play into credit rating concerns. Alright, Just to go

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:22.959
<v Speaker 1>back for a second, because I want to understand this

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 1>in detail. G E Power signed a recently signed a

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty five year, three and thirty million dollar maintenance service

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>contract with the owners of a new power plant in Mexico.

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just south of El Paso at Cirez. How would

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>this contract relate to this investigation if indeed that was

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:48.120
<v Speaker 1>part of it. What would be an example of how

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that would work. Well, if it's a new contract, that's

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 1>probably less of a concern because the underlying assumptions for

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 1>that probably stuck a better relative to the current dynamics

0:20:57.400 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in the market. I think the concern is some of

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 1>these contracts. But all right, so a legacy contracts. So

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>let's say you had a legacy contract and you're in

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>year ten of a twenty five year contract. You then

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 1>you made certain assumptions about how much that was worth,

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and now it turns out that contract is not worth

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 1>that much because power markets have deteriorated. What is deteriorated,

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:24.479
<v Speaker 1>so the demand for the products that GE produces has

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>significantly dropped off. And that's you know, been seeing not

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>just a GE but at Semens. But what we're also

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing is very increased competition in the service markets. And

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.360
<v Speaker 1>now that is a concern because service is where companies

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>like GE, Siemens, you know, really make all of their profits.

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is the lucrative revenue stream. It's more predictable.

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>But when you start having a lot of competition and

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>low demand, then you get into a question of what

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>prices can you really charge for those services and customers

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 1>are pushing back on price and ge. You know, having

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the most market share has the most to lose and

0:21:56.600 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>that Brooke Sutherland, thank you so much. This is a

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 1>fascinating issue. Really laid it out tremendously well. Brooks Sutherland,

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg gad Fly columnist, UH covering the industrial space, UH,

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about general electric and a lot of questions to

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>be answered. The SEC is looking for some answers as well.

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>There's growing interest and investing in cryptocurrencies as well as

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 1>the technology underpinning cryptocurrencies like bitcoin, and that is blockchain.

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>And here to talk to us about that is Dr

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Steve Waterhouse, CEO and co founder of orchids Labs in

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. He comes to us from Davos, Switzerland. Uh. Steve,

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. First, I

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>just want you to tell us a little bit about

0:22:54.880 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>what orchid Labs is. Is a new blockchain based approach

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to UM anti surveillance, anti censorship on the Internet UM.

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>It's an incentivized network where participants are paid to provide

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>bandwidth to other users UM and people pay a small

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>amount to access the Internet in the fashion. It's funded

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 1>by a number of the top French of Apple firms

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco and around the world. UM, and we

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>have a star team of open source experts from the

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>blockchain world and also other areas early units and SDA.

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 1>Which is the job. I can see iPhone, but can

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you just tell us a little bit exactly what it

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>does it do? Is this just a conduit for investors

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>in these new technologies or is it itself participating UM? Well,

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's certainly a way to invest in the space.

0:23:56.040 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>But the purpose of the system is to sit above

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 1>the regular Internet and below applications such as WhatsApp and

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>provide a new UM mechanism to access the Internet in

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.880
<v Speaker 1>which are not being tracked by your carrier or by

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>corporations or by the government. So the idea here is

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>basically that if somebody doesn't want to be tracked, they

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>could buy bandwidth from somebody else, use their bandwidth and

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:32.679
<v Speaker 1>thus not be seen as themselves, but rather sort of

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>be viewed as the other person or the other bandwidth user. Correct, UM,

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not so much for that purpose. Is actually more

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>an anonymization technology UM in the form of UM allowing

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>people to access this UH, not necessarily as someone else,

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>But in our system there's no real way of tracing

0:24:55.560 --> 0:25:00.360
<v Speaker 1>UM the information back to the originating requester UM by

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the website or the other resource on the Internet which

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>they're accessing. Thus also go ahead. I was just gonna say,

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:11.919
<v Speaker 1>who would be the main user of this, Well, I

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>think obviously there's countries like China which have very strong

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>markets for this, where there's heavy surveillance of the population. UM.

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 1>The Middle East, where we have you know, very significant

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 1>human rights issues now is also a very strong market

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>for this. But increasingly, with things like net New Charity

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>being over termed, the US is becoming a major opportunity

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>area too. And who would be the provider of the bandwidth? Well,

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:41.679
<v Speaker 1>it could be you. Um, you could set up your

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:45.360
<v Speaker 1>computer and run one of our clients and I provide

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that you could potentially do it with your iPhone in

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 1>a smaller capacity, or people could use server farms to

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>provide this kind of capability and contry such as Cleanland,

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 1>which have incredibly strong data privacy laws. Our targets for

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 1>data centers like this, and we're in talks with a

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>number of people, including VPN providers, who want to partner

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>with us to provide this enhanced capability to their customers.

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:12.719
<v Speaker 1>And how do you make money? So our systems actually

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>free UM from us. In other words, people pay other

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>people in the network to get that band red allocation.

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Our approaches a little bit like the creators of bitcoin,

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:27.919
<v Speaker 1>who we still don't know or ethereum in that we

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>create a new currency UM, which we believe, as the

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>network increases in usage, might drive in value. I can't

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 1>obviously provide investment advice here, but that is the belief

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of our system. Just like currencies, when they increase in

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the utility become valuable. What backs the currency We'll walk

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>back to the full faith and credit of the US

0:26:56.440 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>government and its ability to tax its citizens. Very good

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>UM economics mondel one, Right, UM. I mean we could

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>argue for a while about what does intrinsic value you mean?

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>And if anything really does UM? But you know, I

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>think since we moved back past the gold standard UM,

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not an economist, I'm more of a computer scientist,

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>then gold, which really doesn't have that much intrinsic value either,

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:28.440
<v Speaker 1>UM was the capability to back things. What backs our

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>network is utility, just like the backing of the cloin

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 1>or etherium. In using these new types of occurrencies, would

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you have to register with a government if indeed a

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>transaction took place outside the jurisdiction of let's say Greenland. Um. No,

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 1>in our system, there's no way to trace who's using

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the network at all. We don't keep records. We can't

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>be subpoena to release those records on like BP and

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 1>companies UM. And that's basically the whole idea of the

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:05.880
<v Speaker 1>system is, maybe we should have a system in which,

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>in a world in which information is free to accessible

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and in which it's not, there's no capability to track people.

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that should read the default. All right, well, interesting stuff.

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much for joining us. Steve Waterhouse, co founder

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 1>of Orchid Labs, on the future perhaps of blockchain technology

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and cryptocurrencies, joining us from Davos, Switzerland. Thanks for listening

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud or whatever

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Pim Fox. I'm on Twitter

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>at pim Fox, I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>one before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio