Speaker 1: Our two Sean Hennity Show tolfree. It is eight hundred
Speaker 1: and ninety four one Sean. If you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program. I mean, this guy never
Speaker 1: stops breaking news. It is remarkable what we have now
Speaker 1: been able to discovered. I mean a lot of issues
Speaker 1: that we have covered now for eleven years on this
Speaker 1: program on TV, full time, never ending, NonStop weaponization. Corruption.
Speaker 1: You know, look look at how Obama himself took the
Speaker 1: Intelligence Community assessment report after the twenty sixteen election that
Speaker 1: said no, no Russian interference, and then he meets with
Speaker 1: Brennan and Biden and his entire team and Clapper and no, no,
Speaker 1: Let's do another assessment that sets Donald Trump for three
Speaker 1: years of living hell. Now we find out John Solomon,
Speaker 1: editor in chief, founder, chief investigative reporter just Thenews dot
Speaker 1: Com headline DNI Tulsey Gabbert spurs probe into evidence Congress
Speaker 1: Trump or miss led on election security. According to memos,
Speaker 1: the evidence continues to stack up that the Intel community
Speaker 1: sought to downplay China's action in actions in twenty twenty
Speaker 1: as President Trump was seeking re election, and that perhaps
Speaker 1: at the cost of legal or ethical rules and John Ratcliffe,
Speaker 1: the CIA director, said that there was a false impression
Speaker 1: that Russia sault sought to influence the election and that
Speaker 1: China did not. Pulsey Gabbert now spurred this investigation into
Speaker 1: the evidence that spy agencies in fact tried to conceal
Speaker 1: US election vulnerabilities, including straight up whistleblower claims that a
Speaker 1: CIA officer was asked to alter evidence of China meddling,
Speaker 1: that President Donald Trump and Congress were intentionally kept in
Speaker 1: the dark, remember they were in office at this time
Speaker 1: about concerns involving China Venezuela. According to unclassified memos reviewed
Speaker 1: now by just thenews dot com. All right here to
Speaker 1: really give you the scoop on it is John Solomon,
Speaker 1: as I said, founder, editor in chief, chief investigative reporter
Speaker 1: justinnews dot com, Sir, how are you.
Speaker 2: Good to be with you? By the way, your interview
Speaker 2: with Cashpttel was amazing. I learned a ton of stuff
Speaker 2: from it. We did some stories off of it, but
Speaker 2: great interview. You just got so much clarity from the interview,
Speaker 2: So thank you for doing it.
Speaker 1: Oh, by the way, you and Greg together started all
Speaker 1: this and then that led to the interview with Dan Bongino.
Speaker 1: That led to the interview with Cash Battel. You know
Speaker 1: what's different is we just don't have the time on
Speaker 1: radio or TV to go into that long form hour
Speaker 1: and a half two hours, two and a half hours
Speaker 1: in some case interviews that you can just get deep
Speaker 1: in the weeds and the depth. And you and Greg
Speaker 1: did a great job laying it all out, because this
Speaker 1: is what you've been doing for the last eleven years
Speaker 1: as we have.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well it was a blast. I love the interview format.
Speaker 2: I love the long form and again, when you can
Speaker 2: get an FBI director to get that much information out
Speaker 2: of them, I learned a ton of stuff. I thought
Speaker 2: it was just a great interview. So thanks for doing
Speaker 2: it was a really fun.
Speaker 1: Well, you did a great job. All right, let's tell
Speaker 1: us what you found, okay.
Speaker 2: Yeah, So first we have to remind everybody, because time
Speaker 2: passes fast, that in December of twenty to twenty we
Speaker 2: were all told by the FBI, the Homeland Security Department,
Speaker 2: the CIA, and the intelligence community that we had a
Speaker 2: perfect election, that was the most secure election in the
Speaker 2: American history. There was one objector at the time, the
Speaker 2: d and I at the time, John Ratcliffe now our
Speaker 2: CIA director. His objections have now been proven one hundred
Speaker 2: percent right. There was significant evidence being withheld from the
Speaker 2: American public, being withheld from Congress and its intelligence committees,
Speaker 2: and more amazingly, being held from the chief executive officer
Speaker 2: of the United States, the President of the United States,
Speaker 2: Commander in Chief, President Donald Trump, that China had begun
Speaker 2: taking malign actions in America, specifically hacking into and gaining
Speaker 2: access to voter registration databases. They also discovered that some
Speaker 2: of our infrastructure was incredibly vulnerable, more vulnerable than we
Speaker 2: were led on to believe. And then there was also
Speaker 2: concerns that Venezuela was involved in some sort of malfeasans
Speaker 2: that could eventually have an impact on US election security.
Speaker 2: All of that information was downplayed, it was obfuscated, it
Speaker 2: was withheld from President Trump. According to these whistleblower documents,
Speaker 2: Tulca Gabbertt dug up. He's now sent them to the
Speaker 2: new Inspector General of the Intelligence community, and there was
Speaker 2: an active investigation on multiple items. One that the withholding
Speaker 2: of the information from the president, keeping actionable intelligence from
Speaker 2: a president in Congress, two efforts to retaliate against the
Speaker 2: whistleblower who was telling the truth, who actually was revealing
Speaker 2: in real time how this information was not Now it's
Speaker 2: amazing stuff what Tulsia Gabbert's team has found about what
Speaker 2: the nature of what was going on. In one case,
Speaker 2: they quote unquote massaged the PDB to take out all
Speaker 2: the China stuff so that President Trump wouldn't know that
Speaker 2: China was meddling and potentially those.
Speaker 1: That don't know Presidential Daily Briefing go ahead.
Speaker 2: Sorry about that. Yes, the Daily brief the thing that
Speaker 2: the president gets every day to make sure he makes
Speaker 2: the best decisions unformed and national security.
Speaker 1: All right, Can I forgive me and those that say
Speaker 1: you interupt panity, I want to digress for one second.
Speaker 1: Please that Presidential Daily Briefing. Everybody that I've interviewed, that knows,
Speaker 1: that sees it, that understands on the issue of Iran,
Speaker 1: they all have told me, without an exception, on Iran,
Speaker 1: the president had no choice based on the intelligence. Have
Speaker 1: you heard the same thing, and then we'll get right
Speaker 1: back to what you were saying.
Speaker 2: No doubt, listen, I think we did this on your
Speaker 2: show a few weeks ago. They knew that China was
Speaker 2: getting hypersonic missiles and possibly getting him to Iran. They
Speaker 2: knew that Russia had sold Stinger missiles or solder fouled
Speaker 2: missiles to Iran. They knew that there was some efforts
Speaker 2: to restore some of the nuclear weapon capabilities. Right away,
Speaker 2: all of those things point to Iran escalating in a
Speaker 2: big way and getting capabilities to strike either Europe or
Speaker 2: the United States. That intelligence has not been disputed by
Speaker 2: a single person, and that is what drove the President
Speaker 2: to make that decision. Not Israel, not all these silly
Speaker 2: arguments that have been out there, actionable intelligence. That's why
Speaker 2: they do to BDB. Now, in twenty twenty, President Trump
Speaker 2: was very concerned that China was acting badly. He was
Speaker 2: starting to put pressure on them. Imagine the intelligence community
Speaker 2: telling its people, don't tell the president about what China
Speaker 2: is doing. We don't want to help out his policy,
Speaker 2: we don't like his policy. We don't want him to
Speaker 2: know that China might be meddling in the election to
Speaker 2: help Joe Biden win in not President Trump. That is
Speaker 2: an amazing thing, but that's what's in these documents. Now.
Speaker 2: The documents are based on highly classified information, emails, intercepts,
Speaker 2: and now those are in the hands of the Inspector
Speaker 2: General of the Intelligence Committee. There's a very active investigation
Speaker 2: going on. Telsey Gabbertt I think has come into a
Speaker 2: mother load of information that shows how we knew it.
Speaker 2: In the past, intelligence agents worked with FBI agents to
Speaker 2: create false stories to hurt Donald Trump. Now we know
Speaker 2: they were withholding information from the President and from Congress
Speaker 2: that could have made presidential decisions more important, more secure,
Speaker 2: make America secure. They were willing to keep the president
Speaker 2: in the dark about national security issues and election integrity issues.
Speaker 2: That's what these new documents show. They're stunning. I mean,
Speaker 2: they're literally your numb when you're done reading them.
Speaker 1: Let me understand this. In twenty sixteen, they changed the
Speaker 1: career senior intelligence officials assessment that Russia did not interfere
Speaker 1: in the twenty sixteen election. Obama orders that personally and
Speaker 1: in this particular case, this approach that was taken at
Speaker 1: the time, and we call it called the deep state,
Speaker 1: but people that didn't like Donald Trump, that were deeply
Speaker 1: embedded in the intel community, etc. And within the FBI,
Speaker 1: and they sought to bury real evidence of Chinese government
Speaker 1: efforts to undermine Donald Trump's candidacy in twenty twenty. I mean,
Speaker 1: all of this is spectacular to me because it is it.
Speaker 1: These are people that are undermining the core principles of
Speaker 1: a democratic republic. If you remember the one infamous post
Speaker 1: on X of Dan Bongino that said, this republic can't
Speaker 1: survive based on what I just saw. This is the
Speaker 1: stuff that he saw. This is the stuff that was
Speaker 1: in the burn bags that were in a safe room
Speaker 1: that the FBI when they got there, when Bongino got there,
Speaker 1: and Cash Pattel said this in my podcast, that they
Speaker 1: didn't even know this room existed.
Speaker 2: It is stunning. And when what you just laid out,
Speaker 2: Sean is one element of that grand conspiracy case that
Speaker 2: Cash Betel wrote up last year that's now at the
Speaker 2: heart of what grand jury's in multiple states are doing,
Speaker 2: particularly Fort Pierce. If you're the Intelligence committee, your job
Speaker 2: is give an honest assessment to policymakers of what happened,
Speaker 2: and you hijacket to make it look like Donald Trump
Speaker 2: was aided by Russia and that's not what the intelligence showed.
Speaker 2: In fact, the intelligence showed the opposite. You first, you
Speaker 2: changed the intelligence in twenty sixteen to hurt Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: And then four years later, when Donald Trump's in office,
Speaker 2: you're changing the intelligence again, You're massaging it. There's an
Speaker 2: instance in these memos where an intelligence chanast was told,
Speaker 2: change your document, alter the document. We can't let people
Speaker 2: see that we know about China. You actually instruct an
Speaker 2: intelligency need to falsify an intelligence document. Now you're trying
Speaker 2: to handicap the president so he can't defend himself or
Speaker 2: the nation against actionable threats that China was conducting. It's
Speaker 2: an ongoing conspiracy. And I think that that's what Cash
Speaker 2: Mattel laid out so brilliantly on your podcast is what
Speaker 2: we've been writing about with Greg and even going all
Speaker 2: the way back to Sarah. But it is a repeated
Speaker 2: use of the intelligence community to do the opposite of
Speaker 2: what we pay our intelligence officers. We pay them to
Speaker 2: give us the truth, to give us their best estimate.
Speaker 2: In this instances twenty sixteen all the way to twenty
Speaker 2: twenty four, there is an ongoing effort to hijack intelligence,
Speaker 2: change it to false intelligence, simply to hurt Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: And and people say, John, prove it to me. How
Speaker 2: do we know that the goal of these intelligence officers
Speaker 2: was to hurt Donald Trump in the emails. That's all
Speaker 2: sie Gabett has found. There are efforts where the people
Speaker 2: who are saying, hey, let's cover this, that we're not
Speaker 2: giving this intelligence, they call Donald Trump the vulgarian in
Speaker 2: the Oval Office. They use the pejorative name, showing how
Speaker 2: much they hate it and despise them to justify why
Speaker 2: they wouldn't give the commander in chief intelligence.
Speaker 1: I'm sitting here and everybody listening to this should be
Speaker 1: stunned that that's how people working for our government refer
Speaker 1: to their elected president, duly elected president as the vulgarian,
Speaker 1: and that they purposely are setting him up left, right
Speaker 1: and sideways, and that this level of corruption, weaponization, politicizing,
Speaker 1: you know, the most important system of justice in our
Speaker 1: country is going on.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and the patterns each time are the same. Remember,
Speaker 2: in twenty sixteen, an FBI agent altered a CIA document
Speaker 2: to try to get the fake VIIs warn In twenty twenty,
Speaker 2: a CIA officer is being asked to alter an intelligence
Speaker 2: document so that Donald Trump won't know that the Intelligence
Speaker 2: Committee knows that China's doing bad things. Those modus operands
Speaker 2: create that conspiracy because you have the same tools by
Speaker 2: the same people in the same agencies over many years.
Speaker 2: And I think that's how Caspertel got to the Grand Conspiracy.
Speaker 2: And there's one other nugget in this cause I think
Speaker 2: it will give us a sense. And I think right
Speaker 2: after the Sheep summit that President Trump is going to
Speaker 2: have with the Chinese leader, when that ends, I think
Speaker 2: Telsea Gabbett will be preparing another giant release of information.
Speaker 2: And we got a little tidbit of what's likely to
Speaker 2: be in that in these unclassified documents we got last night.
Speaker 2: There is a document that says that the US Intelligence
Speaker 2: Committee assesses that between twelve and eighteen states, twelve and
Speaker 2: eighteen states had their voter registration databases penetrated by China
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty. That would be one of the largest
Speaker 2: penetrations and impacts on election security in American history. Remember
Speaker 2: what we were told five years it was perfect, most secure.
Speaker 2: It wasn't They knew in real time that twelve to
Speaker 2: eighteen voter registration databases were penetrated by China, and they
Speaker 2: also knew how China could use them. There's a whole
Speaker 2: assessment that China could go make fake ballots or they
Speaker 2: could go deregister people. So when they showed up in
Speaker 2: the polls to vote for Trump, they couldn't vote. That
Speaker 2: is amazing that all of that was happening, and it
Speaker 2: was kept from the President, kept from the Congress, kept
Speaker 2: from the American people. That is why it looks like
Speaker 2: a conspiracy repeatedly creating false intelligence to mislead the American public,
Speaker 2: the President and others.
Speaker 1: Unreal Quick break more with justinnews dot com Founder and
Speaker 1: editor in chief, chief investigator reported John Solomon. Then your
Speaker 1: calls coming up and ninety four one Sean, if you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program as we continue.
Speaker 1: You know, now that the adults are back in office,
Speaker 1: maybe we can get some work done around here.
Speaker 2: Are you ready?
Speaker 3: Welcome back President Trump.
Speaker 1: This is the Sean Hannity Show. We continue now. John
Speaker 1: Solomon is with us founder editor and chief chief investigative
Speaker 1: reporter justinnews dot com, breaking more news about how deep corruption,
Speaker 1: how wide the corruption in our government has been over
Speaker 1: the years, especially weaponized against President Trump. Now you're working
Speaker 1: on a number of other stories. What headlines can you
Speaker 1: give us? What's going to be coming out in the
Speaker 1: next number of days That you expect to have.
Speaker 2: I think there's going to be some comfortable news for
Speaker 2: Democrats who handle intelligence. Maybe some new leak information may
Speaker 2: be spurred by the National Security Agency, and keep an
Speaker 2: eye on that. I'm putting the finishing touches on that.
Speaker 2: I think next week we will get some more new
Speaker 2: documents with the FBI showing how the FBI new tactics,
Speaker 2: new people, new ways that the FBI was trying to
Speaker 2: set up the president to try to create some form
Speaker 2: of a criminal prosecution and literally trying to entrap him
Speaker 2: into crimes. And I think we'll get some new information
Speaker 2: on that. And then I think as this continues to
Speaker 2: play out and we wait for Telsea Gabbert's new election materials,
Speaker 2: I think we'll get the first documents from Round River,
Speaker 2: which I think is of the four intelligence investigations that
Speaker 2: targeted the president for ten years, Round River may be
Speaker 2: the most shocking because with criminalizing people just by what
Speaker 2: they said, and we still assume First Amendment protected us.
Speaker 1: By the way, is this like when they were spying
Speaker 1: on congressmen and senators. You're telling me they was spying
Speaker 1: on American citizens.
Speaker 2: I believe that's what we will find out we're not
Speaker 2: there yet.
Speaker 1: Well, me guess you've got to be at the top
Speaker 1: of the list. I gotta I'm just guessing.
Speaker 2: I'll see. Yeah, you know, we'll see. The most important
Speaker 2: thing for me is not to be the news, but
Speaker 2: to keep reporting it. But we'll see. Maybe there's some
Speaker 2: evidence that it does appear that in the effort to
Speaker 2: neutralize the true story about Hunter Biden and Ukraine, that
Speaker 2: the intelligence commit in the FBI may have been spying
Speaker 2: on Americans to stop them from being able to accurately
Speaker 2: report to sense to them, stop them, block them, prosecute them,
Speaker 2: whatever it would take to protect Joe Biden's viability against
Speaker 2: Donald Trump. I think that's what Round River ultimately will be.
Speaker 2: But we'll see. Let's see how the documents go. I
Speaker 2: think the next big thing that will break will be
Speaker 2: some new revelations about the leak machine that Democrats do.
Speaker 2: When they leak classified information, they put America's security at risk.
Speaker 2: I think there's a new investigation we'll be able to
Speaker 2: talk about in the next couple of days.
Speaker 1: All right, John Solomon, justinews dot com founder, editor in chief,
Speaker 1: chief investigative reporter. Thank you, sir, appreciate you as always
Speaker 1: more than you know. And I know that people ask, well,
Speaker 1: when are people are going to be held accountable? I'm
Speaker 1: hoping soon. I'm hoping that this evidence is so overwhelming,
Speaker 1: so incontrovertible.
Speaker 3: We get there, you'll hear what everyone really thinks. In DC.
Speaker 1: This is the Sean Hannity Show. One California Democrat pushing
Speaker 1: for new legislation to allow illegal alien professors now who
Speaker 1: get deported to continue to teach remotely. You can't make
Speaker 1: that up. So they had this mayoral debate and Karen
Speaker 1: Bass refuses to give a simple yes or no answer
Speaker 1: on whether non citizens should be able to vote in LA. Well,
Speaker 1: it depends, well, no, you're in the country illegally. The
Speaker 1: Internet absolutely rightly erupted after this California Democrat on the
Speaker 1: debate stage admitted the quiet part out loud. This is
Speaker 1: this lady that loves to yell at her staff. I
Speaker 1: don't yell at Linda. I should, but I don't. And
Speaker 1: if you recall, she's the one that was screaming and
Speaker 1: screeching at her staff. Oh, I said I'm sorry about
Speaker 1: that four years ago. How many times I have to
Speaker 1: say I'm sorry? Now She's do it making jokes about it,
Speaker 1: and she went on to say that the job of
Speaker 1: the California governors to protect every single California have to
Speaker 1: be an as if she would work with federal authorities
Speaker 1: to deport illegal immigrants. During this California gubernatorial debate, the
Speaker 1: sanctuary state policies designed to make sure that our state resources,
Speaker 1: taxpayer dollars, the public service servants that we have are
Speaker 1: focusing on doing their jobs, which is not cooperating with
Speaker 1: the federal immigration authorities, which, by the way, what she's
Speaker 1: saying is completely utterly unconstitutional. We do have the supremacy clause,
Speaker 1: and that means that federal laws are enforced by the
Speaker 1: federal government and the state ought not debated. States ought
Speaker 1: not be aiding in a betting and law breaking. You know,
Speaker 1: California Democrats rally around health care for illegal immigrants. You know,
Speaker 1: every Democrat asked or in this debate said that they
Speaker 1: supported providing health care coverage for illegal immigrants, which you
Speaker 1: know they took moments after the candidates spent several minutes
Speaker 1: warning the California's healthcare system is already too expensive and
Speaker 1: straining families. And you have a California immigration judge suing
Speaker 1: the DOJ alleging she was fired for being a registered
Speaker 1: Democrat a woman over forty lawsuit naming Todd Blantz, the
Speaker 1: acting Attorney General, thirty other judges who were fired or
Speaker 1: not converted from probationary periods. I mean, it just gets
Speaker 1: nuttier and nuttier. Now, on top of this debate, you've
Speaker 1: got a story of an illegal alien. Biden Harris may
Speaker 1: orchis of course, Honduran illegal indicted for murder in a
Speaker 1: deadly shooting out in Long Island at Huntington Station at
Speaker 1: a delicatessen last month. Deli's are very popular in New York,
Speaker 1: if you don't know, not as popular around the rest
Speaker 1: of the country, but they're very popular in New York.
Speaker 1: You know, bacon, egg and cheese, roast beef on her
Speaker 1: roll with lettuce, tomato, mayo, salt and pepper. A would
Speaker 1: be carjacker has been idd as an illegal after he
Speaker 1: was gunned down by a hero dad trying to protect
Speaker 1: his family of eight. Here's surveillance footage. This is out
Speaker 1: of Dallas, joing Jose Ramirez forcibly trying to carjack the
Speaker 1: man's vehicle before the hero dad fired shots at the guy.
Speaker 1: Video shows a prolonged struggle that ensued between the two
Speaker 1: men as the family bolted from the car, including a
Speaker 1: young boy, two adult females, and a baby. The father
Speaker 1: has to draw his firearm fired more than ten rounds
Speaker 1: at the suspect. Anyway, then Ice had, I mean, I
Speaker 1: can keep Goingland, I mean, I don't get time to
Speaker 1: go into all these stories. Every day we've hit immigrations
Speaker 1: so hard. Thank god Donald Trump has secured the border.
Speaker 1: But the aftermath of Harris Biden may orchis you know,
Speaker 1: remains with US twelve million plus unvetted illegal immigrants from
Speaker 1: over two hundred countries, including known terrorists and murderers, and
Speaker 1: ray and child molesters, other violent criminals, cartel members, gang
Speaker 1: members is. Another story is in the Daily Caller. Ice
Speaker 1: announced the arrest of an illegal and alleged child rapist
Speaker 1: after he'd been previously released by Fairfax County because of
Speaker 1: Virginia's sanctuary policies now put together by Governor Abigail Spanberger.
Speaker 1: I mean, it just doesn't it does not end. It
Speaker 1: keeps going. I have videos showing this father shooting as
Speaker 1: the illegal immigrant. As I told you, it's just one
Speaker 1: story after another story after another story unbelievable. Let me actually,
Speaker 1: I think this is worth playing, Linda. But you have
Speaker 1: Congressman Besarah. There's no such thing as lost kids in
Speaker 1: the Biden administration, and he's talking about illegals. Listen.
Speaker 4: Using Trump lies to try to damage your opponents is worse,
Speaker 4: and that's what we see happening. Everyone knows that Trump
Speaker 4: campaigned in twenty twenty four talking about lost kids when
Speaker 4: there were no such thing as lost kids. To hear
Speaker 4: these candidates now talk about that. If they're so concerned,
Speaker 4: why haven't they taken any action to find these lost kids.
Speaker 4: I think it's shameful for people to use Trump lies
Speaker 4: to try to gain favor with voters when you know
Speaker 4: it's not true. Use the facts. We should have a
Speaker 4: governor who relies on the facts.
Speaker 1: Then the same idiot again wants to be governor, you know,
Speaker 1: calls to prosecute and jail ICE agents. Again. We have
Speaker 1: the supremacy clause, but he's too stupid to understand it. Listen.
Speaker 5: I think we should police Donald Trump's masked mercenary force
Speaker 5: that they call ICE. I think we should prosecute any
Speaker 5: of the forces that violate the law. And I think
Speaker 5: we should jail anyone who has violated the law that
Speaker 5: goes all the way to the top. I agree, anyone
Speaker 5: has violated the law of California, they should serve time,
Speaker 5: and I'm telling you no one has.
Speaker 1: Now as part of the debate, then you have the
Speaker 1: I love to yell at my staff Katie Porter saying
Speaker 1: illegal immigration is one of the only ways California has
Speaker 1: been growing in recent years. He's kind of staying the
Speaker 1: quiet part out out loud, which is, yeah, this is why,
Speaker 1: this is why California, with all of their taxes, the
Speaker 1: highest income taxes, sales taxes, gas taxes, and they're billions
Speaker 1: and billions, tens of billions in debt, Cavin can balance
Speaker 1: his budget and Gavin doesn't care anyway, this is Katie Porter. Well,
Speaker 1: that's how they're growing their population because everyone with a
Speaker 1: brain is leaving, especially before this idiotic wealth tax vote
Speaker 1: that is not just for billionaires, that is that has
Speaker 1: smoking mirrors, h and it will tax you know, income
Speaker 1: that you haven't even realized. If you own stock, oh,
Speaker 1: we're going to tax it based on today's valuation. What
Speaker 1: happens when you sell the stock and the valuation is
Speaker 1: twenty five percent of what it was, is it?
Speaker 6: Congressoman Porter on the question itself on these farm workers,
Speaker 6: which are a big part of California's economy, what's your
Speaker 6: answer to that, as mister Hilton is saying, it's the
Speaker 6: decision of the federal government.
Speaker 7: It's the job of the governor to protect every single Californian, period.
Speaker 7: There are no qualifications on that. The job of the
Speaker 7: California governor to protect every single Californian. The sanctuary state
Speaker 7: policy is designed to make sure that our state resources,
Speaker 7: the taxpayer dollars, the public servants that we have are
Speaker 7: focusing on doing their jobs, which is not cooperating with
Speaker 7: the federal immigration authorities. These are Californians. They contribute to
Speaker 7: our economy, they pay taxes, and they're one of the
Speaker 7: only ways that our state has been growing in recent years.
Speaker 1: And then Katie Porter again, I mean, you can't make
Speaker 1: this up. He wants to fund health care for illegals.
Speaker 1: They're bankrupt, medical is bankrupt, and they can't with the
Speaker 1: highest taxes in the country, pay their bills.
Speaker 8: Listen, Congresswomen, Porter, your thoughts on the idea of funding
Speaker 8: healthcare for undocumented immigrants statewide?
Speaker 7: Yes, Yes, and that's, by the way, what I think
Speaker 7: Californians deserve as answers to these questions.
Speaker 8: Elix And for critics who say that we can't afford it,
Speaker 8: what do you say to that we.
Speaker 7: Can't afford to have people who are sick, who are
Speaker 7: making the rest of us sick.
Speaker 1: It's unbelievable. Then you have California Democrats saying, yes, the
Speaker 1: taxpayer funded health care for illegals. They said it in
Speaker 1: all during this debate. Listen to this.
Speaker 2: So this year undocumented adults can no longer rule.
Speaker 8: In medical Would you reinstate this if you become governor?
Speaker 1: Yes or no?
Speaker 7: Mister viereg yes, supporter, yes, mister.
Speaker 8: Bianco, no, mister Hilton, no, mister sire, yes, mister yes,
Speaker 8: mister Maha.
Speaker 1: Yes. Now Steve Hilton, who's now leading in the polls
Speaker 1: a Republican. Actually, the top two leading people that are
Speaker 1: polling are Republican. Steve Hilton's number one. And I think
Speaker 1: you'd be a great governor in California, although we would
Speaker 1: have a hard time with the Assembly and the Senate
Speaker 1: out there, but who cares. He can stop the bleeding.
Speaker 1: But he's vowing to work with the federal government to
Speaker 1: actually enforce federal immigration law. Listen, mister Hilton.
Speaker 6: Right now, President Trump is enacting a policy of mass deportation.
Speaker 6: As you know, roughly half of California, California farm workers,
Speaker 6: which are in an essentral part of this state's economy,
Speaker 6: are undocumented. As governor, would you push to deport them?
Speaker 9: So I'm the only immigrant on stage, I'm a legal immigrant,
Speaker 9: and Americans support immigration when it is properly controlled. And
Speaker 9: what we saw under the Biden administration open borders, undermined
Speaker 9: everybody's support for immigration. And as governor, I've made it
Speaker 9: very clear, although it is the federal government's responsibility to
Speaker 9: determine and implement immigration policy, I think it's important that
Speaker 9: all the laws are peacefully enforced, and as governor, I
Speaker 9: would make sure that we work with the federal government
Speaker 9: to enforce our laws.
Speaker 1: I will take a quick break here. I want to
Speaker 1: play one or two more of these cuts, and then
Speaker 1: we'll get to your phone calls. I promise coming up
Speaker 1: eight hundred and nine to four one. Sean. As we
Speaker 1: roll along, I mean, this is like manner from heaven,
Speaker 1: because this proves how radicalized the left is. Sean Hannity,
Speaker 1: Is he the most dangerous man in America?
Speaker 3: Well, some people think so.
Speaker 2: You are to think, Jean, you're the most dangerous man
Speaker 2: in America and you're one of the most powerful.
Speaker 3: This this is the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: Let me get back to playing the insanity from this
Speaker 1: gubernatorial debate out in California. Am I playing two bunchs, Linda?
Speaker 1: Because there's one more cut I think I need to
Speaker 1: play from this debate?
Speaker 5: Oh?
Speaker 1: No, I think it's critical you're doing what you're doing.
Speaker 1: It's critical. The work I do is critical. Don't you think?
Speaker 1: I think it is really really good critical? Anyway, the
Speaker 1: word of the day the same critic, dopey, dumb, idiotic,
Speaker 1: radicalized Democrats in this debate supporting California law to allow
Speaker 1: men to play women's sports. Can't make you can't make
Speaker 1: it up. There they all supported the same thing. Let's
Speaker 1: play that.
Speaker 8: Under in California Education Code, you perform in an athletic
Speaker 8: event K through twelve based on your eye identification by gender.
Speaker 8: Would you change that law to match the IOC that
Speaker 8: you identify based on your h or your your your
Speaker 8: birth at gender.
Speaker 2: Yes or no?
Speaker 8: Very quickly, we have thirty seconds left.
Speaker 1: Mister Mayhon Sorr, I changed which law. The current law.
Speaker 8: Says you'd identify and that's how you participate.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but at higher levels, I would let the leagues
Speaker 1: to see.
Speaker 2: Okay, mister Becerra, force the law. Okay, mister Styre, believe.
Speaker 1: Safran's athletes to participate.
Speaker 9: Mister Hilton, I have a riskbound that says save ghost.
Speaker 7: Fool Katie Porter, Yes, enforce the existing law.
Speaker 1: Unbelievable. I mean you want to talk about why people
Speaker 1: are leaving California and droves. I think this pretty much
Speaker 1: sums it up. Eight hundred ninety four one, Shawn, If
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program, let's
Speaker 1: get to our busy, busy telephones, John and my free
Speaker 1: state of Florida. John, how are you glad you called?
Speaker 10: Good afternoon, mister Anity, Good.
Speaker 1: Afternoon, Good afternoon, sir? Are you you go back?
Speaker 10: We go back to the annity and come stays?
Speaker 1: I thank you, my friend? Have I changed a lot?
Speaker 1: Am I getting a little grayer? A little older? How
Speaker 1: do I look? All right?
Speaker 10: Look grayer? But you're in good shape? Uh? To two thoughts.
Speaker 10: These democrats that that hate our country, that want to
Speaker 10: destroy it. Why can't we just let the cities burn.
Speaker 10: These democrats seem to be okay with legal immigrants between
Speaker 10: the crime. Uh stop, do.
Speaker 1: You want to let the cities burn? What? What about
Speaker 1: the innocent people, law abiding people, I know, people that
Speaker 1: deserve law and order, yes.
Speaker 10: But the innocent people are the ones electing these idiots.
Speaker 10: My second thought was, we have all these anti ice,
Speaker 10: anti prompt, anti this, anti that protest. Why can't we
Speaker 10: have some pro conservative, pro ice, pro American uh, anti socialist,
Speaker 10: anti communist protests that are organized the way these these
Speaker 10: these people like sorrows. This Chinese guy.
Speaker 1: You want to know the reason that conservatives don't get
Speaker 1: out and protest a whole lot. I mean, it's kind
Speaker 1: of cool when they show up like out of Trump
Speaker 1: prolly because most of them have jobs and we're busy.
Speaker 1: We're busy taking care of our responsibilities. What are our responsibilities,
Speaker 1: raising our families, going to work, providing for our families,
Speaker 1: you know, making sure that we have time for our kids' activities,
Speaker 1: and making sure they study, and making sure that they
Speaker 1: have good food and their bodies and reading them bedtime
Speaker 1: stories and putting them in the bed. Now that part
Speaker 1: of my life is over, you know, but you have,
Speaker 1: you know, bigger kids, bigger problems in some respects, although
Speaker 1: I'm kind of past all that, thank God. That's why
Speaker 1: we don't have time for this, Adam Shift. We don't
Speaker 1: have time, but you do raise a good point anyway,