WEBVTT - Occulture, William S. Burroughs, and Generative AI

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Cools Media.

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Tricker treader. I heard, ah, hello, welcome to it could

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 2>happen here the Spooky Special. I'm your host, Garrison Davis.

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Once again, there has been far too many important world

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 2>events taking precedents that we here at the show are

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 2>unable to provide listeners with an entire spooky week's worth

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 2>of themed episodes. But I know how important Halloween is

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 2>for many millennials, so I've taken it upon myself to

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 2>produce two spooky episodes to book and the Holiday, this

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 2>episode that you're listening to right now, as well as

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 2>another that will release Monday morning or Sunday night. As

0:00:56.080 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 2>the world is becoming an increasingly spooky, scary play, I

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 2>needed to up the ante to exceed the weird and

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 2>eerie fright that comes from living in America and the

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 2>world in general in twenty twenty five. So last week

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 2>I traveled from New York to Brussels, briefly caught up

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 2>with my close personal friend and colleague Hinton, and then

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 2>took the train to Germany. Very scary indeed, once in Germany,

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 2>I was confronted with seemingly occult words and symbols people

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 2>spoke in odd incantations. I came across a map that

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 2>appeared via my black scrying mirror the iPhone, which, upon deciphering,

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 2>led me to an old power plant warehouse in East Berlin.

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 2>I entered this dark, looming building and inside the air

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 2>was thick with smoke and incense. Figures dressed in all

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 2>black emerged from the fog, witches, wizards, and magicians. I

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 2>followed them into a candlelit room where hooded A cultists

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 2>conducted a ritual welcoming us to the twenty twenty five

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 2>A Culture Conference. A Culture is a bi yearly conference

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 2>that's once every two years, focusing on the intersection of

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 2>occultism and culture, pop or otherwise. This is arguably the

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 2>most prestigious occultism conference in the world. I have been

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 2>wanting to attend four years, and I was finally able

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 2>to go this go round on the condition that I

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 2>make four podcast episodes. The two that I'm releasing this

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 2>week and next will cover some of the core magical

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 2>and topical currents throughout the conference, mostly via a panel

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:48.639
<v Speaker 2>discussion between myself and three other attendees, and then before Christmas,

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 2>I'll have two fully scripted episodes interrogating these concepts further

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 2>and discussing the use of a cult practice in twenty

0:02:56.360 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty five. So to start, let's meet our panel lists.

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 2>I should introduce my magical travel team for this conference.

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with Delta, a Belgian magician and artist which

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 2>I recruited to join me in this wacky adventure. Delta

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 2>say hi, Hello, what do you do Delta? What's your

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 2>magical specialty?

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 3>I suppose, Well, it's kind of.

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 2>A mix into the microphone.

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:29.399
<v Speaker 4>It's kind of a mix of things where.

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Part of it is just into the microphone. I'm sorry,

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 2>how you can you can you can get you can

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 2>get ptty close to it?

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 4>It's a kind of a mix of things really between

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 4>conventional chaos magic and more theoretical like weird theory stuff

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 4>like Mark Fisher and the CCRU adjacent things.

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 2>We talk a lot about Mark Fisher, some landstuff, meta fiction, theory, fiction, hyperstition,

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 2>and Delta myself talk about magic through the Internet quite

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 2>a bit and how it combines with cultural theory, which

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 2>is relevant to this conference. Let's move over to my left.

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 3>I've been recruited along on this magical journey. I'm Ryan.

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 3>I practiced the Vajrana, a Greco Egyptian magical practice, and

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:27.280
<v Speaker 3>also am involved in a Haitian voodoo house. Prior to that,

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:30.359
<v Speaker 3>I was also an academic for a good period of

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 3>time where I studied Renaissance rhetoric and political theory, philosophy

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 3>and economics. So my contributions are going to be wide

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 3>and varied.

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 2>We've been making a lot of hegel jokes this weekend,

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 2>so many hegel jokes to our last crew member, which

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 2>people may have heard before on various shows.

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 5>Hi'm my name is Elaine, and I make art and

0:04:54.839 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 5>research a lot of Renaissance script mark magic, and so

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 5>most of the things I do are a lot of

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 5>idiosyncratic practices and based on various folk magic and chaos

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 5>magic and Balcan folk magic.

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Before we continue the conversation between myself and my three guests,

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 2>let's start by discussing the word a culture, the namesake

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 2>of the conference. Obviously, this is a combination of the

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 2>word occult and culture, and it describes how the two

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 2>influence and possibly undermine one another. To read a quote

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 2>from the person who originated the term quote, a culture

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 2>is a word that was inevitable during the hyperactive phase

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 2>of the Temple of Psychic Youth. In the nineteen eighties,

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 2>we were casting around for an all embracing term to

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 2>describe an approach to combining a unique, demystified spiritual philosophy

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 2>with a fervent insistence that all life and art are indivisible.

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 2>At any given our sensory environment is whispering to us,

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 2>telling us hidden stories, revealing subliminal connections. This concealed dialogue

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 2>between every level of popular cultural forms and magical conclusions

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 2>is what we named a culture that is from Genesis. B.

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Purreage a musician, magician, artist, cult leader, and hashtag slightly

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 2>problematic queer icon. In the seventies, they started the band

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Throbbing Gristle, pioneered industrial music, and later started the Chaos

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 2>magic organization, the Temple of Psychic Youth and its associated

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 2>band Psychic TV. Though a culture did not just describe

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 2>this sort of personal spiritual movement, it carried a strong

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 2>offensive element targeted against society and perceived systems of control

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 2>through their many projects, including Throbbing Gristle Psychic TV. In

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 2>the Temple of Psychic Youth, Purage utilized art and magical

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 2>practice to conduct a quote unquote war on culture. Similar

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 2>to another figure that will soon get to william S Burrows,

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 2>a culture describes a process of cultural osmosis. The occult

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 2>bleeds into and morph's culture, affecting everything from pop culture

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 2>to politics and philosophy. But as a part of this osmosis,

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 2>the occult becomes increasingly commodified, knowable, safe, territory, marketable. The

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 2>hidden occult loses its very essence of being hidden despite

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 2>its use as a tool of attack against mainstream culture.

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Like most countercultural forms, the occult has been largely recuperated.

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Even creative works which are genuine explorations into the occult

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 2>fall into this recuperation herodigm They get turned into products

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 2>consumed by a mostly secular audience, the works of Dueling wizards,

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Alan Moore and Grant Morrison. Now, some occultists rejoice, knowing

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 2>that this wide exposure will influence more people to become

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 2>interested in or adopt occult practices of their own, while

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 2>others bemoan this dilution and commodification of what to them

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 2>is an important spiritual practice. As the modern occult revival,

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 2>along with a heavy helping hand of scientific advancement, deterritorialized

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Christian hegemonic religion. Now the occult itself has been re territorialized,

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 2>which is not to say that the occult is no

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 2>longer a field of play, which is what this conference

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 2>attempts to assert. Let's go back to the panel.

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 3>In terms of the conference itself, as we'll get into later,

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 3>the term a culture very specifically seems to be focused

0:08:54.559 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 3>on the study of the interrelation of magical practic and

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 3>the material aspects of a cult culture and its influence

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 3>and appropriation by wider society. So in terms of political

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 3>projects or social projects, you can probably relate this. I

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:16.439
<v Speaker 3>think that it would be fair to say that it's

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 3>something like culture jamming if we're looking for some familiar

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 3>concepts for people to map onto. That is to say,

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 3>a focus away from simply solitary practice in the ways

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 3>in which occult elements influence broader aspects of our society

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 3>or are appropriated, whether that's through consumerist forces or through

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 3>various artistic practices, or even the production of for example, film,

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 3>television movies. So I think that's a fair assessment of

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 3>the impacts of a culture.

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 2>And relevant to our discussion later. It's influenced in the

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 2>tech sector and the emergence of AI, which the current

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 2>manifestation of has some heavily occult origins regarding around a

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 2>whole bunch of people in the nineties who were writing

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 2>about AI as this as this occult project, and that

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 2>influenced many a AI engineer and coder who are now

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 2>building this stuff and it's becoming an ever present part

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 2>of our lives, and the occultists now are trying to

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 2>incorporate it into their own practice, which we will discuss

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 2>in a sect any other notes on a culture as

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 2>a concept or what this conference is doing with the concept.

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 5>I think a culture is a concept is something that's

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 5>basically been around as long as there's been magical practices,

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 5>just looking at so much of things, like you know,

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 5>the concept of the British Empire being invented by John

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 5>d because of conversations he was having with angels. So

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 5>I think that naming it and calling it something is

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 5>also very much felt like an attempt to sort of

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 5>regain control over the ways that magical practice and greater

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 5>society seemed to influence each other there as opposed to

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 5>a more unintentional way that they have been going back

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:10.319
<v Speaker 5>and forth for hundreds if not thousands of years.

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 3>There may also be one other aspect that's important for

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 3>our American audiences. Given that we're recording this in Deutscheland,

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:24.839
<v Speaker 3>this conference varies significantly from other American equivalents, or something

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 3>that might be an American equivalent formerly Panthea Con in

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 3>and around San Francisco and San Jose specifically, or Paganicon

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 3>in the Twin Cities, which specifically has much more of

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 3>a New Age neopagan reconstructionist And so most academic discussion

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:46.439
<v Speaker 3>is viewed with some suspicion. And I'm hesitant to say

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 3>that there's an anti intellectual trend because I don't necessarily

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 3>think that's true. However, there is a resistance to the

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of academic styling that we saw very prevalent at

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 3>this conference to talk about the occult, but more generally

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 3>as an area of study in addition to just idiosyncratic

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 3>practice or part of a larger social neopagan movement, which

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 3>is again very much the focus of most US based conferences.

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 2>As an editorial note, when we're talking about magic, to clarify,

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 2>we're not talking about stage magicians. We're referring to magic

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 2>with a K that is rituals and practices based on

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 2>occult knowledge. It seeks to cause change in accordance with will,

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 2>whether that's change within yourself or in our consensus reality.

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Occult magical practice can also serve as a form of spirituality, mysticism,

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 2>an alternative religious practice, or an alternative to religion, with

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 2>its beliefs in practice largely influenced by historical esoteric orders,

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:58.559
<v Speaker 2>mystery traditions, paganism, witchcraft, herbalism, astrology, hermetic philosophy, and alchemy,

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 2>and all these things are influences. I'm not saying that

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.839
<v Speaker 2>the actual historic manifestations of these things are the same

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 2>as the modern occult practices that are influenced by these things,

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 2>because often these can be wildly varying, especially when you

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 2>talk about things like witchcraft and alchemy, which have been

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 2>misinterpreted or reconstructed into completely new forms than what the

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 2>historical manifestation of them actually contained. But a lot of

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 2>modern day ocultism has manifested as an individually mediated spirituality

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 2>containing some of the group ritual or ritual aspects of

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:41.559
<v Speaker 2>something like Catholicism, but with the individuality of Protestantism. Many

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 2>conferences have an opening ceremony and as I previously mentioned,

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 2>A Culture had an opening ritual. This accomplishes a very

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 2>similar goal to any opening ceremony, to get attendees in

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 2>a certain headspace, to prepare them for the rest of

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 2>the conference, and set a certain mood in which the

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the events will kind of follow suit.

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 2>The A Culture opening ritual called upon the attendees demiurgic capacity,

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 2>how they are part of creating the reality of what

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 2>this conference is and how it will continue for the

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 2>next few days. Back to the panel, The framing of

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 2>the ritual was a blindfolded woman holding the scales of balance,

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 2>and each person put a intention for the week, or

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 2>for the conference, or for themselves into a stone, which

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 2>was handed out to each person who entered the ritual,

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 2>and at certain point these stones were placed on to

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 2>the scales of balance to create an equilibrium between the

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 2>two sides of the scale. Along with the you know, chanting,

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 2>meditation and a lot of incense.

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 3>A significant deal of incense given that we were in

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 3>a former German forge warehouse. The you know, billowing smoke

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 3>that existed throughout the conference, from fires to incense to

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 3>various other inflammatory items was rather impressive, but in terms

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 3>of actual ritual design, it met several elements that I

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 3>found to be rather impressive. One it was encompassing of

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 3>all of those elements that we would later expect to

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 3>see in the actual body of the conference itself. In

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 3>terms of like the artistic performances, the musical you know,

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 3>metal goth music that was played, but also a very

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 3>practical and open approach to ritual. It was highly inclusive.

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Everyone who was there participated. It did an exceptional job

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 3>I felt of actually bringing setting intention and adding to

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, at risk of sounding to new age,

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 3>the vibrations that we all felt as we engaged and

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 3>were present. The theatrical quality, I have to say was

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 3>also very much dark and spooky. Dark and spooky, but

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 3>something to be admired. They did a very good job.

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Definitely one of the more high effort rituals of the

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 2>weekend in terms of the sort of aspect, with there

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 2>being little less than a dozen hooded cloaked figures stationed

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 2>at different points, either holding specific positions in a meditative

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 2>state for probably over half an hour, standing still in

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 2>a decision that would become uncomfortable and swinging incense or

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 2>holding torches or lights. Setting intention specifically is usually you

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 2>talk to these people. The first step of any kind

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 2>of magical working is setting your intention for what the

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 2>work is supposed to do or accomplish in you or

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 2>out into the world. Mirroring the opening Ritual Culture twenty

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty five little booklet has a few paragraphs on the

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 2>concept for this conference, talking about the cosmic craftsmen as

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 2>the demiir to shapes matter and spirit alike embodies creation

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 2>and transformation, revealing both the light and the hidden, the

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 2>shadowed face of the divine, as well as having cosmic

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 2>balance and balancing instruction with creation and order and chaos

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 2>and the hidden and the scene. The last paragraph in

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:11.360
<v Speaker 2>which I will read I think relates specifically to this

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 2>show and the cultural political aspects quote. In the age

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 2>of relentless acceleration, the craftsman becomes a figure of resistance.

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 2>His patience and ritual discipline reclaim sacred time, restoring a

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 2>rhythm beyond the acceleration of modern life. A Culture twenty

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty five invites us to dwell in this threshold where creation, intuition,

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:36.159
<v Speaker 2>and the hidden divine converge, and with that we converge

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 2>on an outbreak, Welcome back to the it could Happen

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:56.400
<v Speaker 2>here Spooky special on the Culture Conference. The figure name

0:17:56.480 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 2>dropped the most throughout this conference might surprise some people,

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 2>because I'm assuming most do not consider him to be

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:09.679
<v Speaker 2>an occultist or really a serious occult figure. The most

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 2>discussed individual, at least in my experience of the conference,

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:19.400
<v Speaker 2>was not Alistair Crowley, John Dee, someone like Lena Blovatsky,

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 2>but in fact william S Burrows. And now we'll return

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 2>to the panel to discuss the Barosian current. Let's talk

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 2>about what I would argue was the strongest current throughout

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 2>this conference, what I'm gonna call the Burrosian current, relating

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 2>to writer, beat poet, and mystic and occultist in his

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 2>own right, william S Burrows and the magical technology that

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 2>he either invented or popularized in the second half of

0:18:56.600 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 2>the twentieth century and played a significant role in influencing

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 2>successor movements such as chaos magic and even the work

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 2>of the CCRU and Land and Fisher. The very first

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 2>talk that we attended was specifically on Burroughs, and Burroughs

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 2>ghost haunted the remainder of the conference thereafter and introduced

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 2>a few of the key tensions throughout the rest of

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 2>the conference, which we will discuss as specifically technology in AI.

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:30.639
<v Speaker 3>So our first talk by Castor Obstrop, who I believe

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 3>was Swedish one of those.

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 4>He was working at the University of Copenhagen, the.

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 3>University of Copenhagen certainly Scandinavian of some flavor of variety,

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 3>focused on William S. Burrows and Brian Geyson. I think

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.959
<v Speaker 3>that it's important and I appreciated this claim on the

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 3>outset that they argued that both Geyson and Burroughs are

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 3>actually closer to the late Surrealists rather than to the

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 3>beat poets generation which we typically associate them with, which,

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 3>interestingly enough, I made both of these figures far more

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 3>compelling to me my understanding of them. I mean, despite

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 3>my familiarity with the cut up method, and you know,

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 3>several of the things that Burrows had written, I always

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:16.239
<v Speaker 3>considered them far more beat and therefore less less of

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 3>interest to me specifically. But this proximity to the Surrealists,

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 3>especially the latter Surrealists, I found particularly compelling, and I

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 3>think that brings us to the real focus of this

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 3>talk was Burrows's cut up method and another book that

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 3>he published on the third Mind, which gave way to

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 3>the latter discussions on artificial intelligence and large language models.

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 2>So Burrow's definitely popularized the cut up method which Guyson originated,

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 2>that Burrows changed its different forms of manifestations to various

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 2>mediums of art like the tape recorder and his own

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 2>writings and just words and language. And I guess the

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 2>reason why I think talking about this current is important

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 2>to start is also revolves around this idea of magic

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 2>as this form of like resistance or this like a

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 2>culture jamming practice which Burrows framed his own work in

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 2>his like a you know, work that we could could

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:11.719
<v Speaker 2>we could just describe as like esoteric or inspired by

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 2>esoterism or achieving esotericals is specifically for this cultural infusion

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 2>to to disrupt mainstream culture in some capacity, to go

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 2>against the one God universe, sometimes in an anarchic way,

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 2>sometimes in a libertarian way. Some there's a mix of

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 2>a mix of like uh motivations that play here same

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 2>thing with like Robert Anton Wilson, which I'm sure you've

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 2>heard Robert Evans talk about before. These were contemporaries, These

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 2>guys were friends and operating under like similar goals of

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 2>disrupting culture through these techniques which which they thought literally

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 2>like disrupted the linear flow of culture or the mechanisms

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 2>of control such as like language and linear time, which

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 2>later gets developed on by Land and Fissure.

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. I think looking at some of my notes, some

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:07.439
<v Speaker 5>of the things that stuck out to me, especially in

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 5>view of the fact that the other classes going on

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:13.679
<v Speaker 5>at the time began with Alistair Crowley, but we're diving

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 5>into a lot of more classical and historical magical traditions,

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 5>was that language can shape reality, which is something that

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 5>would also be held up by a lot of the

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:29.919
<v Speaker 5>classical magical ideas that sound and image have occult power,

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:33.120
<v Speaker 5>which is very true in a lot of magical traditions

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 5>dating back to the Piatrix and more ancient texts, and

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 5>that tech available at the time can be a magical instrument,

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 5>which the tech available currently and for William Burrows is

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 5>very different than classical tech, but is something that has

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 5>been done for a very long time as well. What

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 5>really changes is stepping out of the idea of a

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 5>linear representation of it into something that could be edited,

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 5>cut and reprogrammed, specifically using technology that allowed that as

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 5>opposed to something that you're trying to control solely through

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 5>say more spiritual magical acts. It's something that you can

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 5>do with a tape recording.

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 2>And this is like, you know, based on forms like

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 2>social engineering and the manipulation of the reproduction of reality,

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 2>which Burrows believes a language plays a key role in,

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 2>even though I might disagree with him in a few

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 2>ways on like the nature of like a language as

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 2>a as a human concept versus this like alien concept

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 2>which it's like infected the human delta. You should explain

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 2>what the cut up method is.

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 4>Yes, well the name itself kind of is self explanatory,

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 4>but the idea of being essentially too thick any form

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 4>of texts or writing, cut up the words or pieces

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 4>of sentences, jumble limup in a hat or a bucket

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 4>or whatever, then kind of like play a jigsaw puzzle

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 4>with language, reshifting sentences into new ideas and new forms

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 4>of poetry, especially which I'm just looking at my own

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 4>cutups right in front of me.

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 2>To force like randomized combinations of words that you would

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 2>not choose to combine on your own volition, and seeing

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 2>what sort of thought that generates what kind of meaning

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 2>can be constructed through that combination.

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.679
<v Speaker 5>Exactly, we're on some of the first cutups done with

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 5>books and just making holes, cutting out words and seeing

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 5>the other words that would appear underneath, and if new

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 5>meaning would arise through the surprise combinations.

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Words from like the future or the past presenting themselves

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 2>into a current present within the book.

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 4>I think one of the Borough's quotes is when you

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 4>cut into the present, the future leaks out, which.

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 3>Is related to the concept of time sorcery that was

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:58.360
<v Speaker 3>talked about towards the end of that discussion. I think

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 3>another element to the cutup mesas that's important, especially as

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 3>it was framed in this a culture context is as

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 3>the we quoted from the or as I wrote this

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.120
<v Speaker 3>quote down from the actual lecture itself, reality is made

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 3>of words, images and vibrations, and sounds and images have

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 3>occult power, and therefore these sounds and images and words

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 3>can be marshaled or used, edited, cut through, rearranged for

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 3>the purposes of reprogramming. It's fascinating. I think that this

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 3>really is something that carries through to the whole conference,

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 3>and not just the Burrow's method, but what this Burrow's

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:45.439
<v Speaker 3>method or the Barossian current of the conference. It seems

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:48.479
<v Speaker 3>that there was a problematic I mean, we started basically

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 3>with dari Da and we ended with dari Da with

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 3>discussions of like critiques of the master narrative that we

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 3>get from you know, Deluze and Leotard and Baudriard and

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 3>these people. But the goal of this method was to

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 3>rewrite the master narrative. So again back to that concept

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 3>of culture jamming. As Gerre said, this concept of the

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:12.919
<v Speaker 3>one God universe, this cut up method is meant to

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 3>interrupt the linearity of words of language, that is a

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 3>process of control. So I take issue with this concept

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 3>of language as a virus because that implies that it's

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 3>a foreign body, and I mean it's true post structuralists.

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:33.640
<v Speaker 3>I guess that I am. There is no outside to language,

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 3>and I think that that's actually something that shines through

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 3>in this third mind concept.

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 2>As two people work together on something, there's a composite

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 2>mind that like emerges and affects the work. Is the

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 2>concept there.

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 3>So when two people collaborate, a third mind or intelligence

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 3>communicates with you through the revelation of the new that

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 3>was already present. And I think that that's really important

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 3>to point out because it's it's not as though there's

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 3>this this outside thing. The implication is from this method

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 3>is that the new reveals itself through this process that's

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 3>already present in language. Because this is a question that

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 3>I had throughout, is that if if language is this

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 3>foreign entity that dominates us through control, and the method

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 3>itself is language, then how are we not just re

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I guess it's a kind of inoculation if

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:29.439
<v Speaker 3>we have a you know, a theory of language that

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 3>is based in you know, what what do we call this?

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 3>What is it that we all just got during COVID

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 3>Kevin fever? No, No, the things that we inject into

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 3>our body that created the INDI vaccines. There we go.

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 3>That's the ticket inoculations.

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Not all, not all of us got vaccines.

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 4>Okay, care.

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 3>You heard it here first vaccine did not know where

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 3>was it going with this? Okay?

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of methods of speaking of methods of control.

0:27:58.840 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 5>I mean a lot of it.

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 3>The new just came out there. Wait just one moment, Sorry, Elane,

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:09.120
<v Speaker 3>I likened this to this process of dialectics. But that's

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 3>because I couldn't shut up about Hegel the entire time.

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 3>We were there because I don't think enough occultists are

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 3>talking about Hegel. Why is no one talking about Hegel?

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Everyone should be talking about Hegel.

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, as fun as it is to think about this,

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:28.120
<v Speaker 2>like third mind as like an egg grigor figure, which

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:30.439
<v Speaker 2>we've we've mentioned before, is like it's like a group

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:34.719
<v Speaker 2>thought form, like a being or a force that is

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 2>generated through through multiple people believing in it.

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 4>You make up an imaginary friend in a way.

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 2>That's what a severtre but true in a grigora is

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 2>as a is, yeah, a form of thought that they

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 2>gained its own, like an autonomy, and becomes kind of

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 2>like a like a little tiny god.

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 3>I guess.

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Or they also combined the third mind idea to like

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 2>net work consciousness. The one last thing I will say

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 2>on this before we get to the AI aspect, I guess.

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 2>On this culture jamming nonlinearity is the concept of the

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 2>circuit jump, which was playing back words from politicians in

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 2>different contexts as a sort of like a Uno Reverso

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 2>psychic attack, which I don't know if that actually works

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 2>considering the current's political situation, but this is certainly a

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 2>tactic to which I have employed many such cases and

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 2>we see a lot of people attempt attempt to do this,

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 2>and I think there are certain figures who have their

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 2>own very strong magical force field protecting them, which has

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 2>been pretty evident through the past ten years, including the

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 2>President of the United States. But as a as a

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 2>circuit jump is playing something from the wrong the wrong

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 2>time in a different context as as a form of attack.

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 2>The most famous version of this, which isn't necessarily for

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 2>political ends, so this was for personal ends. It's the

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Burroughs cafe incident, which I've been a fan of for years,

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 2>in which he was slighted by a cafe so then

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 2>he started recording.

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 5>All that happened was they changed their menu and he

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 5>couldn't order the one food that he ordered every day.

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 2>There's been some menus that have changed that I would

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 2>continue using this tactic where he recorded sounds from from

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 2>outside of like people talking or arguing or walking by

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 2>or plates dropping, and then played them back outside of

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 2>the cafe for a series of months until the cafe closed.

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 2>And this is like the funniest, the funniest form of

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 2>this sort of magical obsession, because this really is just

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 2>a crazy guy playing loud sounds in front of a

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 2>cafe until they close. I mean it worked of yeah,

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 2>playing back sounds of you know, arguing, fighting, plates smashing,

0:30:55.200 --> 0:31:00.080
<v Speaker 2>which would probably create a negative aura around around in

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 2>this building. But that is the most most funny of Burrows,

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 2>the circum jump moment. Although I mean Burrough's life is

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 2>full of these humorous and sometimes worrying of anecdotes.

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 5>There's one other thing that stuck out to me, given

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 5>what a lot of the other talks in that space

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 5>ended up dealing with, along with AI and stuff, was

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 5>really the speaker talking a lot about the fact that

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 5>for Burros and Geyson, the reproduction of reality is how

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 5>control occurs, and so the goal was to manipulate the

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 5>reproduction of reality, because if you can manipulate the reproduction

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 5>of reality, you are also manipulating reality itself, which I

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 5>don't think anyone went into nearly as much, but is

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 5>something that we're seeing with say even the Republican Party

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 5>releasing deep fake videos of Democratic politicians.

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and this is something our materialist friend me does

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 2>talk about, is how there's a quote from some neo

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 2>cons about how how like democrats just have to kind

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 2>of like you know, like react to reality versus the

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Republicans who generate it and they like decide what reality is.

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 2>And you can see this with all of the sort

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 2>of like moral moral panics which have spread across the

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 2>United States and around the world the past few years,

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 2>whether that's gender ideology, whether it's immigration, whether that's this

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 2>non existent crime wave where it is a genuine like

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 2>creation of of reality. And then this this this goes

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 2>into you know, the Burrows ideas later get developed by

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 2>a group of academics and occultists that formed the c

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 2>c R. You this included say plant Nick Land who

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 2>then turned to the dark side and uh the since

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 2>past Mark Fisher, who put a name to some of

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 2>this sort of phenomenon called the hyperstition, which is Robert

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 2>has talked about before in the show. But it is

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 2>it is a self fulfilling prophecy. It is a fiction

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 2>that becomes true through the creation of the fiction and

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 2>the dissemination of the fiction. And this is part of

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 2>how reality can get formed, is through these falsehoods that

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 2>that through through repetition and dissemination, become self manifest.

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 4>The thing about that, though, is that the high perscisional

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 4>model itself requires to the acceptance of the idea that

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 4>everything is a fiction?

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 3>Yes, like well, yeah.

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 2>A lot of most things go through a process like this, yes, yes, yes,

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 2>but doing doing such a thing like intentionally and like offensively? Right?

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Which is which is the idea that we're discussing here

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 2>in like a political context? Is this this this offensive

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 2>reality formation where you literally decide what is real and

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 2>like what isn't And you know, if you have hundreds

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 2>of millions dollars in like a news company at your disposal,

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 2>this can become easier.

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 5>Are you saying that media companies are currently cutting up

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 5>reality to shape it in the image of the people

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 5>who fund them.

0:33:57.160 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I mean they are. They are much It's

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 2>it's funny because like occultists, I think, are the people

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 2>who are often.

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 5>The clips are you going to use from the conference?

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 2>And I will later in my written work, But I

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 2>think on that note, I think occultists are a class

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:19.360
<v Speaker 2>of people who are maybe the worst at doing magic,

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 2>because the people that are really good at this sort

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:27.720
<v Speaker 2>of thing are perhaps way better at the occult element

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 2>of hiding their their you know, awareness of what they

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:32.320
<v Speaker 2>are doing, because they a lot of a lot of

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:34.839
<v Speaker 2>them know what they're doing that you just actually keep

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:38.439
<v Speaker 2>it a more cultic whereas the magicians will not shut

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 2>the fuck up because there's always a there's always a

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:41.919
<v Speaker 2>new book to sell.

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:45.240
<v Speaker 3>That was an excellent segue to an ad break Lane.

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for that, and now a word from our

0:34:46.920 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 3>sponsors on this note, though, Gary with you completely as

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 3>a former academic and just a healthy level of skepticism

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:09.240
<v Speaker 3>going into any magical conference. I sat down, I listened,

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 3>and I've been to enough conferences listening to magicians attempt

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:19.360
<v Speaker 3>to map on rather poorly magic onto a cultural figure,

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 3>and I think Burrows is really unique here. But my

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:24.840
<v Speaker 3>academic pretense was to sit here and to listen and

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 3>think about, you know, language as a pharmicon, think about

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:31.360
<v Speaker 3>dry Da, Delouze, Baudrard, Leotard when they're discussing the master

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 3>narrative or rewriting the master narrative. But what's unique about

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Burrows and why I gave up that, you know, academic

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 3>mapping of philosophy and asking myself, why are we having

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 3>this conversation. We could just go read these texts. They

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 3>talk about similar things. But the point is is that

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:49.959
<v Speaker 3>those texts talk about similar things. And what's unique about

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Burrows is that he's actually doing the doer. He's a doer.

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 3>This is fundamentally the difference between the vida activa and

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:58.839
<v Speaker 3>the vita contempt of taiva. Like I'm thinking in terms

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 3>of philosophers, and it took me half of this talk

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 3>to be like, no, he's actually doing shit as soon

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 3>as we get out to like, you know, him actually

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 3>standing out in front of the cafe and doing this.

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 3>He's not just developing a method, but by virtue of

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:13.320
<v Speaker 3>the fact that he's inviting other artists, like the slides

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 3>upon slides that we saw of him, you know, working

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:20.240
<v Speaker 3>with new machines that he was creating and trying these things.

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:24.239
<v Speaker 3>He was actively involved in this practice, which again makes

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 3>him far more magical than most occultists. Don't come for

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 3>me absolutely.

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 2>AI specifically be discussing debates and uses of generative AI

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 2>in this conference because the last A Culture conference was

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty three, as these large language models and

0:36:44.400 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 2>image generation platforms were just just starting to gain popularity

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:52.280
<v Speaker 2>and now they have a stranglehold over at the stock

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 2>market and many people's imagination. The first I guess real

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 2>debate around AI happened as the three of you stayed

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 2>to listen to a panel after the Willly mess Burroughs panel,

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 2>as well as a Austin Osman Spare panel, a proto

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 2>cast magician from the twentieth century. It was a contemporary

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 2>of Alistair Crowley. I left to go listen to a

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 2>mathematical thelemic ontology talk, which was probably less interesting than

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 2>the panel. I'd like to hear you guys talk about

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 2>the debates around AI and how they emerged in this panel,

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 2>and then also juxtassing that to the different forms of

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 2>like AI in discussions are an AI that dominated a large

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 2>part of the rest of the conference.

0:37:35.760 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, actually AI came up because the initial discussion question

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 5>for the panel was what does it mean to talk

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:44.800
<v Speaker 5>about art as magic in the digital era? So everyone

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 5>was very specifically being asked to discuss the differences between

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 5>the creation process is magic when you can use AI,

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 5>when you can use large language models to just generate things,

0:37:57.000 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 5>and if the generative method using AI I was at

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:05.800
<v Speaker 5>all related to say, the cut up method or other things.

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:09.560
<v Speaker 5>So that was the initial conversation that began that whole panel.

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, and that was certainly a topic that was begged

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:15.240
<v Speaker 3>by the other two talks that we didn't really discuss

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 3>the Austin Osmond spare was about automatic drawing. So this

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:27.320
<v Speaker 3>conception and of you know, this drawing that is coming

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 3>from the outside, coming from the subconscious, coming from within,

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:35.360
<v Speaker 3>with all within one line. But more than that, it

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 3>was a very traditional kind of European nineteen seventies lecture.

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:41.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, you had a lovely Italian man who stood

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 3>in the front that was ready to smoke a cigarette

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 3>while trying to get through, you know, a very well formulated,

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 3>well argued essay, while a series of images presented to

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 3>us behind him that covered an overview of artists that

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 3>are doing very similar things. He argued, exist in a

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:04.040
<v Speaker 3>similar kind of vein and the occurrences of not just

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:08.880
<v Speaker 3>magical tropes, but cultural influences that happen independently, so artists

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:12.360
<v Speaker 3>all over the world. The third talk by I believe

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Kate Lady. Yeah, the ritual transformation and hybridity in Leonora

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:21.279
<v Speaker 3>Carrington's Judith, which was a stage production which happened in

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Mexico City, I believe, So we had a few pictures

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 3>of this, but Leonora Carrington's art very specifically has to

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 3>do with this like hybrid of like animals and mythical

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 3>figures and creatures, and the stage production was incredibly intense.

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:39.280
<v Speaker 3>I really appreciated this talk a lot. But then focus

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:42.960
<v Speaker 3>on talking about, you know, generative artificial intelligence in these

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 3>large language models and the role of art or what

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 3>it means to do art in this era was related

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:52.760
<v Speaker 3>to this idea of the third mind, of automatic drawing,

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 3>of this concept of hybridity, of this like transformative or

0:39:56.239 --> 0:40:01.000
<v Speaker 3>this discovering of the new through a synth putting together

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:07.839
<v Speaker 3>of different elements or images, words, sounds, costume ry, these

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:09.760
<v Speaker 3>kinds of things, So that it was a natural question

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 3>to lead, but the audience members took it in a

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:15.880
<v Speaker 3>very strange direction that I would like you all to

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:16.440
<v Speaker 3>talk about.

0:40:17.200 --> 0:40:21.440
<v Speaker 5>I mean, the initial question was really that people started

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 5>asking after the panel topic was proposed, was so, what

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:30.320
<v Speaker 5>did the panelists think about AI art? Do the panelists

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 5>think AI art is magic? Do the panelists think that

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:36.759
<v Speaker 5>AI art is channeling? Do the panelists think that, you know,

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:39.360
<v Speaker 5>putting a prompt in a language model is the same

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 5>as doing some sort of trans state automatic writing. There

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:47.239
<v Speaker 5>was a lot of variations on functionally that all of

0:40:47.280 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 5>the panelists reaction was no, it's not and a lot

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 5>of them did not immediately really want to even dive

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:57.280
<v Speaker 5>into that topic and were very annoyed at the question.

0:40:57.480 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 3>That's actually not true, because I got triggered almost immediately

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 3>because it was our first speaker that responded not to

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 3>that first question, but to the second question. And the

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:09.799
<v Speaker 3>second question had to do with the role of technology

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:14.360
<v Speaker 3>and whether we see that there's a possibility for these tools,

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, as a technology a techne in magical practice.

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 3>And our first speaker's reaction was to sit back and

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:25.839
<v Speaker 3>give us a tentative yes to.

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:27.320
<v Speaker 5>The tech, to the tech.

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 3>That's correct.

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 5>To AI, they were like, their initial reaction was still

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 5>also no, but.

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes they they indeed got there, but it was unclear

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 3>at first, and I was a little raw about it,

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:42.360
<v Speaker 3>given that seemed completely contrary to the talk that you

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:45.480
<v Speaker 3>know that he had mentioned before. There was a question

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 3>about NFTs. Do you remember this question?

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 5>Oh, I tried to put it immediately out of my head. Yes,

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:56.279
<v Speaker 5>that was the fact that it started with, like, well,

0:41:56.440 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 5>NFTs failed because people like weren't ready to embrace the

0:42:01.080 --> 0:42:06.240
<v Speaker 5>blockchain as a generative idea for making art, as opposed

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:08.760
<v Speaker 5>to the fact that why would I own an NFT

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:10.400
<v Speaker 5>if I can screenshot the picture.

0:42:10.560 --> 0:42:14.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, it was this idea that like NFTs themselves

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 3>were part of this breaking up of the control process,

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:23.239
<v Speaker 3>the linearity of money and financial systems, that somehow it

0:42:23.320 --> 0:42:25.759
<v Speaker 3>was related to the cut up method. It was one

0:42:25.800 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 3>of those questions that was a narrative before it finally

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:31.240
<v Speaker 3>got to your question that really just invited the readers

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:34.319
<v Speaker 3>to respond. There were others that talked about this too

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:37.640
<v Speaker 3>and related their own personal experience to the generative AI

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:41.000
<v Speaker 3>process that you know, they approach AI not with the

0:42:41.040 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 3>expectation that will provide sense, but it'll almost have this

0:42:44.320 --> 0:42:47.880
<v Speaker 3>oracular or again this they related to the third mind.

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:53.919
<v Speaker 3>They this idea that again you and the AI come

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:57.480
<v Speaker 3>together and somehow reveal the new which I at this

0:42:57.560 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 3>point was absolutely seething.

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:01.319
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. I think the closest actually that we had to

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 5>some really like someone even trying to approach it was

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 5>asking about, if you're making this art, if you're generating

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:14.440
<v Speaker 5>these new things, does it matter that corporations are controlling

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:18.439
<v Speaker 5>the algorithm by which you're doing so, Which started to

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:21.760
<v Speaker 5>touch on some of the problems, but still was definitely

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 5>relying on the base assumption that using a large language

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:28.799
<v Speaker 5>model to produce stories or art that you're interacting with

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:32.279
<v Speaker 5>something else that's actually capable of creating it all.

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:35.239
<v Speaker 3>And to her credit, my girl Kate Lady, who was

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 3>talking about Leonora Carrington, the one that seemed to be

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:41.320
<v Speaker 3>kind of tangentially separate from the other two, but the

0:43:41.400 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 3>hybridity really made it was the one that just gave

0:43:44.320 --> 0:43:47.319
<v Speaker 3>us a great straight Marxist answer of like, no, this

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:50.359
<v Speaker 3>is bullshit. Let's actually look at the material implications as

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 3>to where this is coming from and the environmental costs

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:58.279
<v Speaker 3>of running these programs of server farms, the destruction of

0:43:58.360 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 3>space of you know, livable areas throughout the United States.

0:44:04.160 --> 0:44:06.279
<v Speaker 3>That these are questions that we need to ask and

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:09.680
<v Speaker 3>are not separate from these questions of magic. So really

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:12.040
<v Speaker 3>shout out to her. I appreciated that response because it

0:44:12.080 --> 0:44:14.600
<v Speaker 3>was instant, and it was it was heated.

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:17.760
<v Speaker 4>It is also, like I mean, from from my perspective,

0:44:17.800 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 4>it's also a labor is she write because these large

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:26.239
<v Speaker 4>language models and generative AI just scrape like so much

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 4>data that that's like writing from real artists and create

0:44:30.920 --> 0:44:35.319
<v Speaker 4>created by real like painters and whatever. And it is

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 4>the appropriation of human labor. To shout out some advertising

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:46.920
<v Speaker 4>essentially that is like my main well, aside from all

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:50.960
<v Speaker 4>the ecological and the political issues with it, it's like

0:44:51.160 --> 0:44:55.360
<v Speaker 4>very much that labor angle to it that frustrates me.

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, in the context of the talk, it's really important

0:44:59.719 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 3>to the ground. And this is the comment that I

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:05.239
<v Speaker 3>made that the panel broadly seemed to agree with, although

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:07.800
<v Speaker 3>I didn't really leave them much opportunity to disagree with me.

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 3>You're right, thank you. Go on. So this burrows concept

0:45:15.480 --> 0:45:17.399
<v Speaker 3>of the third mind this book that he wrote, right,

0:45:17.719 --> 0:45:22.560
<v Speaker 3>when two minds collaborate, a third mind or intelligence communicates

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:28.120
<v Speaker 3>with you, again, not about creating the new, but about

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:32.719
<v Speaker 3>revealing itself in what was already present. Yes, but the

0:45:33.480 --> 0:45:36.960
<v Speaker 3>idea is that you have to have two minds in

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:41.440
<v Speaker 3>order to get this dialectical third mind that was inherent

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 3>in the conditions, the situation, the language of the two.

0:45:46.520 --> 0:45:52.080
<v Speaker 3>When one interacts with any form of large language model

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:55.440
<v Speaker 3>or chat GBT, I in my mind and with what

0:45:55.560 --> 0:45:58.840
<v Speaker 3>I carry sit in front of a computer and type

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:03.239
<v Speaker 3>my input. That's one mind. Can you tell me where

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:04.000
<v Speaker 3>the second is?

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:08.880
<v Speaker 5>Because even if you're cutting up a book, there's a

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:10.960
<v Speaker 5>mind in the book. There's a story, there's an actual

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:13.680
<v Speaker 5>thing there. There's a thing that you are interacting with

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:18.200
<v Speaker 5>that were thoughts that were produced by someone that you

0:46:18.200 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 5>are cutting up. You are not just scraping the toilet

0:46:23.080 --> 0:46:25.160
<v Speaker 5>bowl of human production.

0:46:26.080 --> 0:46:28.520
<v Speaker 3>But even if we're going to be generous and say

0:46:28.560 --> 0:46:31.319
<v Speaker 3>that these large language models are the ones that are

0:46:31.320 --> 0:46:34.040
<v Speaker 3>doing the cut up process and you are secondary or

0:46:34.400 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 3>tertiary or even further down the line to it, I mean,

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:42.000
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't involve a human intelligence at that point. So

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:45.960
<v Speaker 3>just in terms of the you know, the Barosian current,

0:46:46.520 --> 0:46:51.280
<v Speaker 3>it's just not a third mind. It's the material conditions

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:54.399
<v Speaker 3>are such that it is not and cannot be a

0:46:54.440 --> 0:46:55.160
<v Speaker 3>third mind.

0:46:55.840 --> 0:46:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Where I would like to take this discussion is actually

0:46:58.200 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 2>the very next talk that I attended was part of

0:47:01.200 --> 0:47:04.200
<v Speaker 2>a three talk series called the Politics of Taro, and

0:47:04.480 --> 0:47:07.799
<v Speaker 2>the specific one that I think continued on this line

0:47:07.800 --> 0:47:10.879
<v Speaker 2>of thought and even stuff like automatic writing was from

0:47:11.120 --> 0:47:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Icon to Index by Thomas Leak the Generative Logic of Taro,

0:47:17.440 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 2>in which he discussed I will have to check his

0:47:21.000 --> 0:47:23.920
<v Speaker 2>name later, but discussed an author in the eighties who

0:47:24.000 --> 0:47:26.560
<v Speaker 2>was trying to use Taro as a way to remove

0:47:26.760 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 2>the human element of writing, try to create an automatic

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:35.239
<v Speaker 2>story using the Tarot archetypes assembled in a randomized shuffling

0:47:35.920 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 2>to generate a story based on the linkages between each

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:42.600
<v Speaker 2>of the cards and remove his own agency and directing

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:45.520
<v Speaker 2>where the story goes except for trying to bridge each

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:52.479
<v Speaker 2>card one to another. And the presenter was discussing if

0:47:52.520 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 2>this bears any similarity to like generative text models. The

0:47:56.640 --> 0:48:00.840
<v Speaker 2>presenter said no. The presenter said, this actually is not

0:48:01.719 --> 0:48:07.000
<v Speaker 2>like llms, which purely operate on a people pleasing probabilistic

0:48:07.480 --> 0:48:11.560
<v Speaker 2>capacity to follow one word after another in accordance with

0:48:11.600 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 2>whatever the prompt of the person who's operating the AI

0:48:16.040 --> 0:48:19.440
<v Speaker 2>wants it to generate. Though the presenter stated that this

0:48:19.480 --> 0:48:21.920
<v Speaker 2>author who was using Tarot probably would have loved using

0:48:22.000 --> 0:48:24.880
<v Speaker 2>an LLM to try to accomplish this goal of his

0:48:25.239 --> 0:48:27.160
<v Speaker 2>trying to access. Kind of like a form of automatic

0:48:27.160 --> 0:48:30.480
<v Speaker 2>writing similar to Mike Astn Honsman's Beare, but without human input.

0:48:30.840 --> 0:48:33.279
<v Speaker 2>The shuffling of the cards and forcing the human brain

0:48:33.320 --> 0:48:36.440
<v Speaker 2>to make connections between these archetypes still contains a creative

0:48:36.480 --> 0:48:39.920
<v Speaker 2>human process based on randomness in the shuffling of the

0:48:39.960 --> 0:48:46.760
<v Speaker 2>deck versus the people pleasing probabilistic generative text that lms produce.

0:48:50.239 --> 0:48:54.200
<v Speaker 2>This concludes the first episode of My Culture twenty twenty

0:48:54.200 --> 0:48:58.440
<v Speaker 2>five coverage, in part to releasing Sunday Night. The panel

0:48:58.520 --> 0:49:04.440
<v Speaker 2>will discuss digital technomancy, traditional magical practice, and why people

0:49:04.480 --> 0:49:09.040
<v Speaker 2>are doing accult practice in twenty twenty five. See you

0:49:09.120 --> 0:49:11.000
<v Speaker 2>on the other side.

0:49:11.080 --> 0:49:13.600
<v Speaker 1>It Could Happen Here is a production of cool Zone Media.

0:49:13.760 --> 0:49:16.840
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website

0:49:16.880 --> 0:49:20.480
<v Speaker 1>coolzonmedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:49:20.560 --> 0:49:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever.

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:23.440
<v Speaker 2>You listen to podcasts.

0:49:23.880 --> 0:49:25.799
<v Speaker 1>You can now find sources for It Could Happen Here,

0:49:25.840 --> 0:49:28.760
<v Speaker 1>listed directly in episode descriptions. Thanks for listening.