WEBVTT - Bond Barrage Leaves Buyers Wanting More; India Risk

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to The Credit Edge, a weekly markets podcast.

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>My name is James Crumbie. I'm a senior editor at Bloomberg.

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>This week, we're very pleased to have on the show

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Kalied Matuur, who covers credit markets for Bloomberg News in

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>New York. How are you cal.

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing for a while, Jims, Thanks for having me.

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>We're very excited to get your take on the markets.

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much for joining. We're also delighted to welcome

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>back Mary Ellen Olsen, a credit analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong. We'll be talking to Mary Ellen a

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>bit later in the show about Vedanta, an Indian company

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>that's been running into trouble with a ton of dollar debt.

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>So do stay with us, But first, Khalid Matuur with

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, you've been all over the corporate bond story.

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>This month was the busiest September ever for core for

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>bond sales, with more than one hundred and ten billion

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars sold in the first week. We did expect a

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>bit of a rush. September is always busy as investors'

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>return from vacation with money to spend, and issuers usually

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 1>look to take advantage of that. But why are they

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>moving so fast now? What's the story?

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Cal Well? As you put it, James, usually September is

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 2>a very busy time, busy month for issues. And the

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 2>reason they're coming now is because if you think about it,

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 2>if you're a CFO of a company, for instance, you

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 2>have your borrowing needs for the year, you're looking at

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 2>the issues calendar, and really after September things really start

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 2>to slow down. You know, October people are starting to

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 2>report their earnings and usually around that time companies don't

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 2>sell debt. So really September is that really good window

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 2>for you to really take your business.

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>So later in the month, I mean there's going to

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>be some earnings blackouts because the FED coming up. Does

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that mean that companies have to do it before those

0:01:59.200 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>things happen?

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, and that's what they've been trying to do. We've

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 2>seen a lot of big companies, not just in the

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 2>US but globally really take advantage of this window. You know,

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.839
<v Speaker 2>last week we saw Philip Morris come to the market.

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Just this week two Mobile raised two billion. You know,

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 2>we've seen big banks two come to the market and

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 2>just there the day we had Bank of America come

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 2>to the market as well, So it's really everyone coming

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:22.399
<v Speaker 2>in and saying, you know what, this is a good

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 2>and a good window to issue that, and you know,

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 2>you might as well take care of the opportunity of

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 2>the opportunity while it's still there.

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Are these deals mostly raising money for refinancing or for

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>new projects or what are they spending that money.

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 2>On, right, right, So it's mostly refinancing. And what's really

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:43.519
<v Speaker 2>happening here. GM says borrowing costs have gone up quite

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 2>a bit. If we just step back and look at

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 2>March last year, just when FED was starting to high

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 2>rate the borrowing costs, if you look at the yield

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 2>on an average bond, it was it was around three

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 2>three three percent, and now just looked at this morning,

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 2>it's a it's nearly six percent. You're looking at five

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 2>point eight percent. So borrowing costs are almost doubled here.

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 2>And so if you're a company, you're thinking you really

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 2>want to issue deb if you really need to write,

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 2>and so it really boils down to you know, whether

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 2>you need to refinance, whether you need to push out maturity,

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 2>and then for the other reasons, the usually company borrow

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:21.239
<v Speaker 2>or you can wait you know, you can really wait

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 2>until borrowing costs go down and then you have a

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 2>much better window to issue.

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 1>So just to be clear, on that yield, you're talking

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>about six percent. That's for investment grade companies.

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Right, absolutely, that's for you know, what we call investment

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 2>grade companies, which is really just you know, these safer

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 2>companies that are less likely to default and so they

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 2>get us safer higher rating. And so we've seen a

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 2>lot of those companies come to the market. But also

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 2>the high yield market has been very, very very active.

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 2>I was just looking at the Bloomberg data this morning,

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 2>and we've had seven billion just this week, the last

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 2>three days actually, and we have another four billion coming

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 2>in and so we're having I mean, this market has

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 2>not been this busys in mid May. So that just

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 2>gives you a picture of like everyone is trying to

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 2>come and everyone is really trying to take advantage of

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 2>this window.

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>And the yields on that stuff. I mean I'm looking

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>at it, it's around eight and a half percent or something.

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>And again, you know, like investment grade is doubled over

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the last year, so it's a lot more expensive. Why

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>are they paying.

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Up the companies the companies.

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>You mean, yeah, I mean, so if it's so expensive,

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>why don't they just wait it out?

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you need to push out maturities and

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 2>then gyms, you really don't have any other option, right,

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 2>you have to really take care of that business. You

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.359
<v Speaker 2>really have to issue that And going back to what

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 2>I was saying earlier, this companies are being very, very

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 2>very strategic about their borrowing plans, right, you really need

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 2>to come to the market when if you really need to,

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you go down to high yield. You know,

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 2>we're starting to see the LBO market open up a

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 2>little bit. We're starting to see you know, more deals

0:04:56.720 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 2>come to the market, and so they're issuing for a different.

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Reason on So just on the refinancing side, I mean,

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>we have talked a lot about there is a kind

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>of a wall of maturities approaching investment grade and high

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 1>yield companies. You know that it really does get quite

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>high in say twenty twenty five, twenty twenty six, So

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>this a lot of decisues. What you're saying is that

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.919
<v Speaker 1>they are using this money to pay down some of

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that maturity to sort of iron out that hump.

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, I mean I have to say, this company is

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 2>for the most but a lot of companies did a

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 2>good job pushing out maturities, right. You know, we had

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 2>this long period of easy, easy monetary policies and rids

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 2>were quite low, and a lot of companies took advantage

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 2>of that and pushed out their maturity walls. But still

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 2>their companies that still need to do this, and those

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 2>are the companies that we're seeing come to the market now.

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.159
<v Speaker 1>The deals that we're seeing, are they going well in

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>terms of demand? Are we seeing investors really keen to

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>snap this debt up?

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 2>Right? So if I can focus a bit and just

0:05:56.480 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 2>look at IG for a minute here, kid, you know,

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 2>it's you know, the demand there is quite strong. It's

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 2>really quite strong. A good example that comes to mind.

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 2>We had this utility company, Sierra Pacific come to the

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 2>market yesterday, JYMS. This company was looking to raise four

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 2>hundred million, right, and because it was issuing on the

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 2>longer end of things, so this bonce mature entire years,

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 2>it got a huge, huge demand. We're talking about three

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 2>point four billion for a four hundred million deal. So

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 2>that just tells you how much investors are looking for

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 2>these bonds, and especially the longer deted bonds because that's

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 2>where the yield.

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Is, so the long end. You mentioned that that's interesting.

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>What are we seeing in terms of issuans. There are

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>companies locking in these high rates for the long term

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 1>right now.

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 2>It's actually quite the opposite on the most part. So

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 2>because because rates have gone up so much and borrowing costs,

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, are high, a lot of companies are choosing

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 2>to issue bonds that mature and relatively very short periods

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 2>of time. So we're talking two years, we're talking three years,

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 2>five years, some ten years. But you know, if you

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 2>just look at the deals that have come to the

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 2>market from last week, a lot of these deals are

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 2>shorter dated bonds. Now. Investors, on the other hand, are

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 2>looking for longer dated bonds, right you know, people are

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 2>just becoming more optimistic that the Fed is cutting rates

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 2>and the economy. You know, people expected, you know, a

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 2>very hard recession here and now we are starting to

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 2>talk about our soft landing. Some people have been talking

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 2>about we might not have a recession, right and so

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 2>for investors, they're becoming more optimistic about the outlook and

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 2>for them, longer debatd bondes are becoming more attractive, and

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 2>so they're looking for a lot more of these longer,

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 2>deaded bones.

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>So from an issue perspective, are they sitting there thinking, well,

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>hang on a minute, we don't want a lot these

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>high rates in for a long time, and we think

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>they're going to come down, so it's going to become

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>cheaper for us to issue at some point Soon's.

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly what's happening. You know, in my report, I've

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 2>talked to CFOs, I've talked to investors, and that's really

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 2>the thinking here. If you're a CFO, you're thinking, you know,

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to issue two years, three years, you know,

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 2>hopefully around you know, after twenty four, twenty five, you know,

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 2>we're probably going to have a totally different landscape here

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 2>and maybe that would be a good time to go along.

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 2>So for now, you know, issue short bones and just

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 2>wait for the third to blink.

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Because on the one hand, you know this is higher

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>for longer narrative seems to be really taking hope. Typically

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>on the investors side, I mean, they're keen to see

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>these rates stay up. But then with saying that, on

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the borrower side on from Corporate America, they're not buying it.

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>They're betting against it in some ways.

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 2>That's what's happening. That's what's happening. It's all of a

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 2>conundrum if you're an investor, if you're if you're a borrower,

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 2>you're thinking, well, I don't want to get locked in

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 2>this really high rates, and so I'm going to issue shot.

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 2>And then you're looking at the market. There's such a

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 2>huge demand for the long dated bonds, and so we've

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 2>started to see a little bit of issuers try to

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 2>issue long at dated bonds. A good example was the

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 2>Sierra Pacific I just gave you because there's really demand

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:02.959
<v Speaker 2>for it, and you can bring down the price when

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 2>you're issuing this boonce.

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the price. So for the market, I mean,

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>whenever there's a lot of supply, it tends to hurt

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the price. And we're seeing that a little bit on

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the high yield side right now that there is a

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of issuanes as you said, and the spreads are

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>starting to widen. Now are we saying the same thing

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>an investment grade is you know, there's all this supplies,

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.079
<v Speaker 1>it's starting to hit the price and it's starting to

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>push spreads wider.

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.559
<v Speaker 2>We've seen a few cases where deals struggle a little bit,

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 2>but Jim's for the most part, these deals are doing

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 2>really well. I mean, a a good indicator to look

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 2>at it is what we call the new issue concessions,

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 2>which is really just the extra yield premium that companies

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 2>paid to sell this bonds. It's really it's really not

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 2>that bad. You know, year to date, on average, it's

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 2>about eight points something basis points. You know, if you

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 2>look at the whole of twenty twenty two, it was

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 2>I think about thir team basis points. So that just

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:00.040
<v Speaker 2>tells you that the demand is there and actually the

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 2>stills are not doing bad at all.

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Also interesting in your reporting, I mean you say that,

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, we expect a big September for issuance. We

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 1>expect let's say, one hundred and twenty billion, which is,

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, a decent amount for a month, but if

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>we look back in history, it's still less than you know,

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, last year was a bit slow, but it's

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>still less than the average over quite a long period.

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>So you know, essentially, you know, it looks like a

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>big month, but it may not end up being. Then

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>on top of that, we've got all this what we

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>call liability management where bond bonds are taken out by companies,

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're buying them back, either in the open

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>market or through tender offers. Let me flip the question then,

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>is there enough to go around? Demand seems to be

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>fairly steady, but supply is dropping. Shouldn't that make spreads

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>even tighter?

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 2>You would you would think that, you would think that.

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 2>And to your point, supply is expected to you know,

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 2>to be low this year just because of what we've

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 2>talked about. Borrowing costs are just very prohibitive for a

0:10:56.200 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 2>lot of issues, and so people expect, you know, supply

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 2>to sort of underwhelm a little bit here. But spreads

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 2>are you know, held quite quite quite fairly well, if

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 2>you think about it. I mean, we saw them like

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of jump a bit in you know, Elia this

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 2>year when we had the bunking crisis. But they're fairly

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 2>doing well. They're fairly you know, range bound.

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>So before we talked to Mary ellen Olsen about Asia,

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>tell us cal what else is on your radar. You've

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 1>also been doing some great work on the ESG debt market,

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 1>which has suffered a bit of a political backlash in

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the US. How's that market? Doing this year. Are we

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>seeing a bit of a comeback there?

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 2>We've seen quite a huge rebound this year, James. I mean,

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 2>just if we just focus on green bones, which is

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 2>the largest part of sustainable debt market, you know, it's

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 2>expected to hit a record this year. I mean, the

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 2>most we've seen was in twenty twenty one, we had

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 2>around five hundred and twelve billion. This year we might

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 2>go past six hundred billion. And so we've seen really

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 2>quite a huge rebound globally for this kind of bonds.

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting, though, is to your point, US is kind

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 2>of struggling a little bit here. We've seen quite a

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:04.719
<v Speaker 2>bit of pushbuck you know, you know a lot of

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 2>people pushing back just on ESG strategy, you know, and

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 2>so issues are starting to be more careful, right and

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 2>so in the US they're issuing less of this once.

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 2>But for the rest of the world, it's it's a

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 2>big party.

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Great stuff. Calp Matua from Bloomberg News, thank you so

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us.

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:23.679
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>You can read all Kyl's scoops on the Bloomberg Terminal

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and of course at Bloomberg dot com. Right now. We're

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>delighted to welcome back on the credit edge. Mary Ellen Olsen,

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>who covers commodities for Bloomberg Intelligence based in Hong Kong.

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:37.959
<v Speaker 1>How's it going, Mary Ellen? Staying dry over there?

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Ah, well, it's going well, but I can't say I'm

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 3>staying dry. It's been raining here for about the past month,

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 3>I think, and it looks like it's going to continue

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 3>to reign for the next week. So other than that, yes, good,

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 3>thanks for having me.

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Great to see you again. And I know you cover

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different countries and companies, but I wanted

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to focus this time on India in particular a company

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>called Vedanta. It's a junk rated Indian mining company that

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>faces repayment of a record two billion dollars in debt

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.559
<v Speaker 1>next year. Some of those bonds are trading at distress

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>levels and we've talked about that company quite a few

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>times on this show already. But what's the latest there,

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Mary Ellen. I mean, you know, a lot of companies

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of debt due over the next few years.

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Why is this one in particular coming under so much

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>pressure right now?

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 3>I think that this one is different because it has

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 3>so much debt do in such a short short period

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 3>of time. So through twenty twenty six, it has about

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 3>three point eight billion in dollar bonds that will fall

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 3>due and right now we're looking at the next repayment

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 3>to happen in January twenty twenty four. So the build

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 3>up has been you know, how how are they going

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 3>to make the payment on this one billion dollar of

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 3>debt that's outstanding, And heading into this week, we actually

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 3>knew that the company was looking at raising new debt,

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:03.959
<v Speaker 3>potentially backed by royalties on brand fees. It was also

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 3>looking at a potential debt ext extension or a debt

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 3>restructuring initiative, and it was also holding investor meetings in

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Hong Kong and Singapore. So today I did wake up

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 3>to some new news which I was hoping I could

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 3>fill you in on.

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's great. There is some progress, but I mean

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>since we last talked about them in let's say March,

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was quite a long time ago we

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>started talking about Verdane. But how much progress have they

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>actually made?

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 3>They have made progress. They had some dollar bonds that

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 3>were due earlier this year which they have repaid, and

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 3>they've also you know, embarked or continued on an overall

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 3>debt restriction debt reduction strategy for the holding company. But

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 3>a lot of those initiatives have only kicked the can

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 3>really down the road, so they haven't really you know,

0:14:55.840 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 3>mounted the overall liquidity or the refinancing hurdles in any

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 3>one particular action since we last.

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Spoke and we talked a little bit about debt reduction.

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>But how are they funding that?

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 3>They Well, they have funded it through a variety of means.

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Most recently, they initiated a stake sale from their operating company,

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Vedanta Limited. They sold about a four percent stake and

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 3>raised five hundred million, and that that occurred in August,

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 3>and that brought in some money to the coffers, which

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 3>I think people were looking to to provide liquidity for

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 3>this upcoming debt payment in January.

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so they are getting some relief, but I mean,

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>are they selling off assets that are crucial to their

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>operating Are they selling off the crown jewels at this point?

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, they have said interestingly that the chairman has said

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 3>that they would be looking at potentially creating some pure

0:15:55.680 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 3>play investment silos from some of its divisions, which which

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 3>could happen through the oil and Gas division, also the

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 3>aluminum division and potentially some a steel company's sale. But

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that those things are necessarily going to

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 3>be happening very quickly. You know, asset sales do take

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 3>a while, and these are the at least the aluminum

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 3>and the oil and Gas division are some of the

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 3>bigger divisions they account I think for the aluminum division

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 3>is about fifteen percent of EBDEL while the oil and

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Gas division is closer to around twenty percent. So they're

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 3>pretty big companies, and you know, they're in commodity industry

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 3>and they make money, but it takes a while to

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 3>sell the asset. So I think that it really did

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 3>need to look at some other alternatives to bring money

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 3>in to bridge the liquidity gap, so it could have

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 3>some breathing room in order to affect these asset sales

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 3>perhaps later down the road.

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the meeting investors right now, the meeting them

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>we're in Hong Kong, Spole, other parts of Asia. But

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>how do you think the investors will be reacting right

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>now given that the bonds are trading at distress levels.

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, what came out from the news today, and I

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 3>haven't spoken to any investors who have actually sat in

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 3>on meetings with the companies, yet they only invited specific

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 3>investors from what I've heard, But what's come out in

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 3>the news is a couple of things which I think

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 3>are interesting to hear. The first one is that they

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 3>are looking at raising new loans, potentially packed by this

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 3>bran fee, and they are looking at debt extensions. And

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 3>they're looking at extending the twenty twenty four and twenty

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 3>five maturities and that's about three point two of the

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 3>total debt outstanding of three point eight, so they're looking

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:52.479
<v Speaker 3>at a significant debt extension. And they're also looking at

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 3>some other liability management exercises which could also extend their

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 3>debt maturity profile and improve their overall liquidity. But the

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 3>news itself actually did take me by surprise, and let

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 3>me share with you why. I think in the first case,

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:16.199
<v Speaker 3>they had wrapped up the January twenty four bonds potentially

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 3>in the debt extension, and I think that that will

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:22.880
<v Speaker 3>take those note holders by surprise because they were looking towards,

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, hopefully getting some new money into pay to

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 3>pay them off in January. So that was one of

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 3>the key takeaways from what the news that came out

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 3>today and The other major news that or takeaway that

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 3>I got was that the company actually is looking towards

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 3>a debt extension. And it's interesting because Venantez always really

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 3>made it a point that it has never defaulted on

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 3>its debt. And you know, when you look at when

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 3>you think of a debt extension, that can actually lead

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:57.479
<v Speaker 3>to a selective default designation by the rating agencies. And

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 3>so this idea that they were doing this extension, and

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 3>it did surprise me, but it does seem as though

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 3>it could be a palatable solution for the company.

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Interesting you mentioned the raising agency. I did want to

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>ask you about that. Man, how are they reacting generally?

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>They are they putting pressure on the on the ratings

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to downgrade them.

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, the only SMP rates Vedanta at the moment, and

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:24.640
<v Speaker 3>they actually have the company at a B with a

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 3>negative outlook. And I think that, you know, one of

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 3>the key things that they're factoring into their credit rating

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 3>at the moment is the company's commitment to make good

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 3>on its dead outstanding. And I believe that one of

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 3>the reasons why this kind of debt extension could be

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 3>palatable to Vedanta. It could be a solution for them

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 3>is if they're able to structure the transaction so that

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 3>that doesn't actually result in a selective default, and that

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 3>that could be possible if it does a concurrent fundraising

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 3>as well as structures the transactions so that the existing

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 3>bondholders get more value out of the new transaction. So

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 3>I think that's that could be a road that could

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 3>be interesting for them to pursue. And and you know,

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:14.959
<v Speaker 3>so it's kind of a different take on it than

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 3>what I was thinking previously.

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Do the raisings really massive of Adentro at this point?

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 3>Not necessarily that the everybody knows that the company is

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 3>under extreme liquidity pressure, of course, but I think to

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 3>one extent, you know, if it does get down to

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 3>an SD again, it goes against this mantra that the

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 3>company has put forth about making good on its debt repayments.

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 3>And I think it also could impact its borrowing costs

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 3>if it were to default or get a lower rating

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 3>than a bus, or its ability to secure long ten

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 3>or debt. So I think, you know, it does still

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 3>have an impact, you know, at least if nothing else,

0:20:57.880 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 3>for the image on a company.

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>So why is long term capital so important for a

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>company like Vedanta.

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 3>I think at the moment it's it's important because they're

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 3>in such an expansion mode. They are trying to you know,

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 3>continue to expand their capacity and these are expensive, you know,

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 3>capital intensive projects, which are you know, better financed over

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 3>a longer period of time than a short period of time.

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 3>And it also it extends their access to capital to

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 3>a certain extent too, because if all your capital is

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 3>bunched up at the front end of your you know,

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 3>over the next couple of years, it creates some liquidity

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 3>pressure as they're experiencing now.

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, commodity prices are slipping. How's that

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:49.880
<v Speaker 1>affecting the DANCA generally.

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, if you just look at the consensus estimate for

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Vedanta and coming up for the fiscal twenty four and

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 3>fiscal twenty five, they actually look okay. Some of the

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 3>commodity prices, yes, they've come off. They've also had some

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:10.199
<v Speaker 3>capacity expansion that could help them out next year. So

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 3>in general, I think the consensus view is that the

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 3>actual operating company, which is Vedanta Limited, is actually a

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 3>good asset. They have good assets and it has value.

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 3>But really the issue for the company as a whole

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 3>is the level of debt that it has and it's

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 3>short term nature.

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>So if you had to make a bet right now

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 1>based on what you know, do you think they'll pull through?

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 3>I think that their potential to pull through will definitely

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 3>be improved if they can do this debt extension because

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:47.479
<v Speaker 3>it will buy them, you know, some time. If they

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 3>extend the maturity of some of the existing bonds by

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 3>three years, they do have time to you know, potentially

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 3>make some asset sales, which could reduce the refinancing risk.

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 3>If they bring in some additional monies, they could lower

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 3>potentially the cost that they're encourring to take on additional debt,

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 3>and it could increase their access to bank capital or

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 3>other forms of fundraising. So I think that on the

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 3>one hand, why the bondholders probably it won't like to

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 3>see an extension. It could be something that could help

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:23.640
<v Speaker 3>them ultimately create more value down the road.

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 1>But given where the bondes are trading, the bonds are

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 1>trading and distress as we discussed, does that mean, you know,

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 1>if we think that they are going to pull through,

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that they could make it o their opportunities there for

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the brave.

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I think it's hard at the moment to understand

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 3>what that opportunity is though, because there's not a lot

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 3>of information out there about how any sort of extension

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 3>would work. Essentially, again, to avoid I think going into

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 3>a selective default kind of situation with an extension, they

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 3>have to you know, create some value over the original

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 3>offer to bondholders. So I think that that would have

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 3>to be factored in and would be a consideration when

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 3>bondholders consider the extension. But again the shorter data bondholders

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:13.199
<v Speaker 3>which are treating at much higher levels in the in

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 3>the late eighties, probably we're looking more towards a more

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 3>immediate payoff from you know, near term fundraising.

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>So the next thing to watch is what whether they

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>can get this extension done, how the investors reacted, what's

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the calendar look like for Verdanza, what's on your immediate radar?

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:36.640
<v Speaker 3>Probably the the it will take a couple of months

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 3>to figure out what's going to happen in terms of

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 3>this liability management exercise. Certainly it will need to get

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 3>approval for the extension from from the bondholders, and again

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 3>that you know that will depend on where you are

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 3>in the maturity curve and what you feel about having

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 3>an extended exposure to Vedanta through twenty twent twenty seven,

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 3>and I think that is a relevant point because the

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 3>company in the past has been aggressive. They've been aggressive

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 3>and making new acquisitions, especially debt funded acquisitions, so you

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 3>know that could be an issue for some of the

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 3>existing bondholders. But really the drop dead date is by

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 3>the end of the year to get some more fundraising

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 3>in in order to avert some additional rating pressure from SMP.

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 3>They've asked the company to raise at least six hundred

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 3>million by the end of twenty three and beyond that

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:39.120
<v Speaker 3>you have the boundary payment for a billion which comes

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 3>in towards the end of January twenty fourth. So those

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 3>are some of the key issues to watch it. In

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:49.959
<v Speaker 3>the meantime, I suspect they'll be negotiating with investors and

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 3>just so.

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 1>We know the importance of this in the region, Mary Ellen,

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>what's the scale? How important is this company? You know,

0:25:57.359 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>we've had a Danny blow up this year, We've had

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>all the real life state issues in China. Is this

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>just another sign of distress spreading through the Asia credit

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>markets as rates stay high and the economy start to

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>slow down.

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 3>I think you the Danta is probably a little bit

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 3>more unique. You know, it is caught up I think

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 3>in the higher rates and the very limited access to capital.

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 3>I think that it's been, uh, it's been harder road

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 3>for them because of the current environment in the in

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 3>the credit markets just to get funding. But this liquidity

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 3>issue has been ongoing for a while because they're you know,

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 3>for a long time they've had a very complex corporate

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 3>structure and they've been over leveraged. So in that regard,

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 3>it's you know, it's just progression along the same road

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 3>for the past you know, year and a half terms

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 3>and of how they're going to meet their their payment.

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 3>But what's unusual about the company in terms of its

0:26:58.240 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 3>peer group is that it does have a lot of

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:03.640
<v Speaker 3>dead outstanding compared to most of the companies that I cover.

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 3>So it still has about four billion, and that's one

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 3>of the largest company that I cover that's not a

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:13.640
<v Speaker 3>state backed then today, thank.

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>You very much Mary Ellen Olson of Bloomberg Intelligence. You

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>can read all her great analysis on the Bloomberg Terminal.

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Do check it out and hope to see you back

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>on the show soon. Mary Ellen, thanks a lot, and

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>thanks again to Kalibmetuur from Bloomberg News. Read all of

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 1>his great credit scoops on the terminal and at Bloomberg

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and please do subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 1>We're on Apple, Google and Spotify. Give us a review,

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:39.160
<v Speaker 1>tell your friends, or email me directly at jcrumby eight

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot net. That's Jay for James c r

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>O M B I E as in my surname and

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the number eight at Bloomberg dot net. I'm James Crombie.

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>It's been a pleasure having you join us again next

0:27:53.320 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>week on the Credit Ledge