WEBVTT - Even Our Economy Is Gamified Now

0:00:15.564 --> 0:00:29.564
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making

0:00:29.604 --> 0:00:32.164
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kanakova.

0:00:31.924 --> 0:00:35.124
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Nate Silver. Earlier this week, you've heard us

0:00:35.164 --> 0:00:38.524
<v Speaker 2>talk about hopefully you're listening every episode, Yes, right, listeners.

0:00:38.644 --> 0:00:40.644
<v Speaker 1>If not, what are you doing with your life?

0:00:41.164 --> 0:00:42.724
<v Speaker 2>What are you doing with you You heard us talk

0:00:42.724 --> 0:00:45.444
<v Speaker 2>about Las Vegas and the kind of literal casino economy.

0:00:45.444 --> 0:00:48.524
<v Speaker 2>We want to be a little bit more figurative about

0:00:48.564 --> 0:00:53.444
<v Speaker 2>that today, the casinofication of the American economy of frankly,

0:00:53.524 --> 0:00:55.124
<v Speaker 2>everyday life in lots of ways.

0:00:55.404 --> 0:00:59.284
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So there was an op ed in The New

0:00:59.364 --> 0:01:04.004
<v Speaker 1>York Times on October twenty sixth from Kyla Scanlon that

0:01:04.404 --> 0:01:08.924
<v Speaker 1>talked about kind of this casino economy and what does

0:01:08.964 --> 0:01:12.964
<v Speaker 1>she mean by that? We have gamification of almost I

0:01:13.044 --> 0:01:15.924
<v Speaker 1>mean gamification has been something we've talked about before, but

0:01:16.404 --> 0:01:23.004
<v Speaker 1>casinoification specifically is that we are fueling speculation, we're fueling

0:01:23.324 --> 0:01:26.684
<v Speaker 1>risk taking, and we're kind of placing bets on a

0:01:26.724 --> 0:01:29.644
<v Speaker 1>lot of things, and you know, we're betting that this

0:01:29.804 --> 0:01:32.364
<v Speaker 1>all works out well for the US. Except instead of

0:01:32.404 --> 0:01:35.164
<v Speaker 1>gambling with your own money, you're gambling with the United States,

0:01:35.244 --> 0:01:38.164
<v Speaker 1>with US currency, with the way that the US is

0:01:38.204 --> 0:01:42.004
<v Speaker 1>perceived abroad with you know, how our economy is going

0:01:42.044 --> 0:01:46.804
<v Speaker 1>to do, and we're you know, you're seeing the government

0:01:46.844 --> 0:01:50.084
<v Speaker 1>placing these big bets and we don't actually know, Nate,

0:01:50.124 --> 0:01:52.484
<v Speaker 1>whether they're smart gamblers or not, right, We don't know

0:01:52.924 --> 0:01:57.084
<v Speaker 1>what went into that, whether they are people who are

0:01:57.124 --> 0:01:59.364
<v Speaker 1>like advantage players where like, oh, you know, there are

0:01:59.764 --> 0:02:02.964
<v Speaker 1>some edges here that we can exploit, or whether they're

0:02:03.004 --> 0:02:05.484
<v Speaker 1>just djens who are like I like to take risk

0:02:05.524 --> 0:02:07.364
<v Speaker 1>and I hope it works out. I'm betting it all

0:02:07.404 --> 0:02:12.124
<v Speaker 1>on black Come on, baby, US go service. I was.

0:02:12.444 --> 0:02:16.364
<v Speaker 2>I was checking my invidias dot and my Bitcoin and

0:02:16.964 --> 0:02:19.604
<v Speaker 2>the DraftKings bets I have for the midday night game.

0:02:19.804 --> 0:02:23.004
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, yeah, that's at a little distracted by by

0:02:23.044 --> 0:02:25.124
<v Speaker 2>all these you know, on the poly market price. You

0:02:25.204 --> 0:02:28.524
<v Speaker 2>can't see a bdega without seeing a count sheep or

0:02:28.564 --> 0:02:32.004
<v Speaker 2>poly market billboard in the New York City area anymore. So,

0:02:32.124 --> 0:02:34.524
<v Speaker 2>this is all around us. I enjoy some of it,

0:02:34.564 --> 0:02:36.564
<v Speaker 2>in profit from some of it, but like, I can

0:02:36.604 --> 0:02:42.204
<v Speaker 2>imagine how it becomes overwhelming to a more normy American.

0:02:42.604 --> 0:02:45.004
<v Speaker 1>Oh, absolutely, And I think that there are two different

0:02:45.004 --> 0:02:48.644
<v Speaker 1>spheres here, right, there's the like rise of prediction markets,

0:02:48.644 --> 0:02:51.404
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Trump himself is getting into the prediction

0:02:51.524 --> 0:02:54.004
<v Speaker 1>market business, you know, crypto, and the fact that Trump

0:02:54.084 --> 0:02:57.604
<v Speaker 1>himself got into crypto, like the actual gamifications. But then

0:02:57.724 --> 0:03:00.804
<v Speaker 1>there are also things like we're going to you know,

0:03:00.884 --> 0:03:04.484
<v Speaker 1>have the government invest in like invest in Nvidia and

0:03:04.564 --> 0:03:08.004
<v Speaker 1>do all these different things. Try to play a game

0:03:08.044 --> 0:03:10.804
<v Speaker 1>of chicken with tariffs to see like who's going to

0:03:10.804 --> 0:03:13.324
<v Speaker 1>blink first? Right, who's going to swerve first? Are we

0:03:13.404 --> 0:03:15.564
<v Speaker 1>going to end up in a trade war? Are we

0:03:15.644 --> 0:03:19.044
<v Speaker 1>going to end up with better concessions for the United States.

0:03:19.124 --> 0:03:22.924
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing it at every single level of society, and

0:03:23.004 --> 0:03:25.884
<v Speaker 1>I think that higher level is people are focused on

0:03:25.924 --> 0:03:28.244
<v Speaker 1>the lower level. They're like, oh, you know, you know

0:03:28.364 --> 0:03:31.564
<v Speaker 1>Calshian prediction markets, and they're getting into like sports betting

0:03:31.644 --> 0:03:34.644
<v Speaker 1>and all this stuff. This is terrible, but maybe they

0:03:34.644 --> 0:03:37.564
<v Speaker 1>should actually be looking more at that higher level, which

0:03:37.604 --> 0:03:41.404
<v Speaker 1>is saying, well, okay, but we're also you know, pouring

0:03:41.564 --> 0:03:47.364
<v Speaker 1>us government money into meme coins, and we're also trying

0:03:47.404 --> 0:03:51.724
<v Speaker 1>to see like can we levy one hundred percent tariffs

0:03:51.884 --> 0:03:54.844
<v Speaker 1>on some countries and have them still want to do

0:03:54.964 --> 0:03:59.164
<v Speaker 1>business with us? Like what can I get away with basically,

0:03:59.564 --> 0:04:02.444
<v Speaker 1>and so that that might be even though it's harder

0:04:02.484 --> 0:04:05.324
<v Speaker 1>to pinpoint and it's harder to make a nice headline

0:04:05.364 --> 0:04:08.484
<v Speaker 1>about that, those might be some of the more worrisome

0:04:08.844 --> 0:04:09.404
<v Speaker 1>elements of.

0:04:10.364 --> 0:04:12.124
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and look, in some ways, I'd like to see

0:04:12.164 --> 0:04:15.684
<v Speaker 2>the American government be a little bit more market driven

0:04:15.764 --> 0:04:17.524
<v Speaker 2>in some things. I mean, the government isn't paying a

0:04:17.564 --> 0:04:19.924
<v Speaker 2>lot of people in market rate salaries. That's a big problem.

0:04:19.964 --> 0:04:23.804
<v Speaker 2>And like, you know, there were debates years ago about

0:04:23.804 --> 0:04:28.084
<v Speaker 2>like should Americans be allowed to invest their social Security savings.

0:04:28.724 --> 0:04:31.364
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure that they shouldn't. It's probably not a

0:04:31.364 --> 0:04:34.484
<v Speaker 2>popular position among progressives, right, But like, but you also

0:04:34.484 --> 0:04:38.884
<v Speaker 2>face things like if all these risks become correlated, right

0:04:39.004 --> 0:04:43.044
<v Speaker 2>then in the United States, felt then social scurityholders would

0:04:43.084 --> 0:04:45.804
<v Speaker 2>bear more geopolitical risk. I mean, look, I mean there

0:04:45.804 --> 0:04:49.644
<v Speaker 2>are a few dimensions, right. One is like exhaustion of

0:04:49.844 --> 0:04:54.244
<v Speaker 2>like you feel like every decision that you make you're

0:04:54.284 --> 0:04:58.564
<v Speaker 2>battling some algorithm or there's some way to optimize. And

0:04:58.604 --> 0:05:01.844
<v Speaker 2>I guess if you're have high agency and our experience

0:05:01.964 --> 0:05:04.404
<v Speaker 2>and have money and don't have to worry about as

0:05:04.484 --> 0:05:07.604
<v Speaker 2>much of this stuff, right, then maybe it leads to opportunities,

0:05:07.604 --> 0:05:10.004
<v Speaker 2>but where it feels like everything is game of everything

0:05:10.164 --> 0:05:15.484
<v Speaker 2>is complicated, right, I mean we haven't had Natlsha Shull

0:05:15.604 --> 0:05:19.284
<v Speaker 2>on the show. She's an anthropologist who wrote Addiction by Design,

0:05:19.284 --> 0:05:20.684
<v Speaker 2>which is about similar.

0:05:20.764 --> 0:05:21.644
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting book.

0:05:22.324 --> 0:05:25.564
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, between literally slot machine design and like social media

0:05:25.564 --> 0:05:34.284
<v Speaker 2>apps continue with scroll the complete absorption that you're in constantly, right, yeah, can.

0:05:34.164 --> 0:05:36.044
<v Speaker 1>I want to take a step back with that because

0:05:36.044 --> 0:05:39.924
<v Speaker 1>this is some of the most fundamental work in twentieth

0:05:39.924 --> 0:05:42.844
<v Speaker 1>century psychology, and I just want to give people a

0:05:42.884 --> 0:05:45.364
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a refresher if it's been like a

0:05:45.364 --> 0:05:49.164
<v Speaker 1>little while since they're psych one oh one. Everyone kind

0:05:49.204 --> 0:05:53.244
<v Speaker 1>of has heard about Pavlov's dogs, Right. If I bring

0:05:53.844 --> 0:05:57.084
<v Speaker 1>food to a dog and it gets used to kind

0:05:57.084 --> 0:05:59.244
<v Speaker 1>of the food, it salivates because it knows it's about

0:05:59.284 --> 0:06:02.124
<v Speaker 1>to eat, right, And if you ring a bell every

0:06:02.164 --> 0:06:05.844
<v Speaker 1>time before you bring the food, now the dog learns

0:06:05.844 --> 0:06:08.884
<v Speaker 1>to associate the bell with the food. Now we take

0:06:08.924 --> 0:06:11.724
<v Speaker 1>away the food food, and the dog hears a bell

0:06:12.084 --> 0:06:17.164
<v Speaker 1>and the dog salavates. That's called associated learning. Now, what

0:06:17.244 --> 0:06:20.564
<v Speaker 1>Pavla found was then you can extinguish it. Right if

0:06:20.644 --> 0:06:23.604
<v Speaker 1>after a while you keep bringing the bell and no

0:06:23.684 --> 0:06:28.244
<v Speaker 1>food comes, Eventually the response will be extinguished and the

0:06:28.284 --> 0:06:32.044
<v Speaker 1>dog will stop salivating. Now fast forward to be of Skinner,

0:06:32.524 --> 0:06:35.764
<v Speaker 1>who kind of took behaviorism to the next level and

0:06:36.324 --> 0:06:42.164
<v Speaker 1>realized that basically the single best way to get rats,

0:06:42.564 --> 0:06:46.404
<v Speaker 1>guinea pigs, humans to do what you want them to

0:06:46.444 --> 0:06:49.964
<v Speaker 1>do is not just through reinforcement learning, which is, you know,

0:06:50.004 --> 0:06:52.764
<v Speaker 1>you reinforce a behavior that you want with something positive,

0:06:53.084 --> 0:06:59.564
<v Speaker 1>but through a cycle of intermittent reinforcement. So regular reinforcement learning,

0:06:59.884 --> 0:07:01.764
<v Speaker 1>you press a button and you get a pellet, or

0:07:01.804 --> 0:07:03.524
<v Speaker 1>you get a coin that you can use for a

0:07:03.564 --> 0:07:06.204
<v Speaker 1>slot machine or whatever. It is, like, I don't know

0:07:06.204 --> 0:07:08.284
<v Speaker 1>if we're talking about a human or a guinea pig,

0:07:08.644 --> 0:07:11.084
<v Speaker 1>but if sometimes when you press the button you get

0:07:11.084 --> 0:07:14.924
<v Speaker 1>a pellet, sometimes you don't, Sometimes you get two pellets,

0:07:14.964 --> 0:07:17.044
<v Speaker 1>you know, sometimes you don't. Then all of a sudden,

0:07:17.204 --> 0:07:19.044
<v Speaker 1>there is nothing you can do to get that rat

0:07:19.084 --> 0:07:21.604
<v Speaker 1>to step away from pressing the button. If that pellet

0:07:21.644 --> 0:07:24.884
<v Speaker 1>is compelling enough, it will just keep pressing because that

0:07:25.044 --> 0:07:31.124
<v Speaker 1>intermittent cycle of reinforcement is something that is just inherently appealing. Right,

0:07:31.204 --> 0:07:34.644
<v Speaker 1>It's that gamble, Right, Oh, maybe I won't get anything,

0:07:34.684 --> 0:07:36.284
<v Speaker 1>but maybe I'll get a lot, and maybe I'll get

0:07:36.284 --> 0:07:38.604
<v Speaker 1>more than I ever got before. Maybe I'll get like

0:07:38.684 --> 0:07:43.924
<v Speaker 1>an extra sweet, amazing treat. And that is how animals

0:07:43.964 --> 0:07:47.604
<v Speaker 1>including humans learn the best, but also how they start

0:07:47.804 --> 0:07:51.044
<v Speaker 1>engaging in compulsive behaviors. And all of a sudden, you

0:07:51.204 --> 0:07:54.604
<v Speaker 1>see you know, rats, guinea pigs, humans who are just

0:07:54.684 --> 0:07:57.724
<v Speaker 1>pressing that pressing that button over and over. So now

0:07:57.844 --> 0:08:02.284
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing how powerful that psychology is and what happens

0:08:02.324 --> 0:08:04.324
<v Speaker 1>when you take the guardrails off of it, and when

0:08:04.324 --> 0:08:07.564
<v Speaker 1>you start seeing the US government engaging in that sort

0:08:07.564 --> 0:08:08.084
<v Speaker 1>of behavior.

0:08:08.324 --> 0:08:10.684
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look at slot machines, like, there are a

0:08:10.684 --> 0:08:12.404
<v Speaker 2>couple of things you can learn from st machines in

0:08:12.484 --> 0:08:14.924
<v Speaker 2>terms of reinforcing behavior that can be compulsive.

0:08:15.124 --> 0:08:15.324
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:08:16.684 --> 0:08:22.004
<v Speaker 2>Number one is this combination of small and big rewards. Right,

0:08:22.044 --> 0:08:24.764
<v Speaker 2>if you play a slot, then you spend for five

0:08:24.844 --> 0:08:27.924
<v Speaker 2>dollars and no, there's a churn, ch changing, and you

0:08:27.964 --> 0:08:30.364
<v Speaker 2>win three dollars back, right, or ten dollars back or

0:08:30.404 --> 0:08:33.444
<v Speaker 2>two dollars back or something right, And then you have

0:08:33.524 --> 0:08:36.884
<v Speaker 2>the occasional big jackpot where it attendant comes and pays

0:08:36.924 --> 0:08:39.004
<v Speaker 2>you and it creates a big scene.

0:08:39.084 --> 0:08:39.324
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:08:40.244 --> 0:08:43.884
<v Speaker 2>That combination seems to be pretty powerful, right, But The

0:08:43.924 --> 0:08:47.644
<v Speaker 2>other thing these machines do. They have complicated game modes

0:08:47.684 --> 0:08:49.404
<v Speaker 2>where you feel like you almost win, like, oh, if

0:08:49.404 --> 0:08:54.004
<v Speaker 2>you get five reels all turned in the same direction right,

0:08:54.044 --> 0:08:57.324
<v Speaker 2>then you trigger some bonus mode in a buffalo stampede

0:08:57.404 --> 0:08:59.084
<v Speaker 2>or a wolf howl or whatever else. They all have

0:08:59.124 --> 0:09:01.604
<v Speaker 2>like animal themes or the prices right or weel afford it.

0:09:01.724 --> 0:09:03.884
<v Speaker 1>I see the buffalo one everywhere, so I'm assuming that's

0:09:03.924 --> 0:09:06.524
<v Speaker 1>a high margin one for casinos. I have no idea.

0:09:07.004 --> 0:09:09.804
<v Speaker 1>I know that different machines have different you know, different

0:09:09.964 --> 0:09:13.084
<v Speaker 1>value for casinos, but the buffalo ones everywhere please continue.

0:09:13.484 --> 0:09:16.244
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, you feel like, oh, man, if I just

0:09:16.284 --> 0:09:18.284
<v Speaker 2>got this one more real to turn, I would trigger

0:09:18.324 --> 0:09:21.164
<v Speaker 2>stampede mode and make lots of money. And so they

0:09:21.204 --> 0:09:24.204
<v Speaker 2>show you. You're kind of like they dramatize your near

0:09:24.444 --> 0:09:26.844
<v Speaker 2>misses if you're like, oh, I came so close last

0:09:26.884 --> 0:09:30.524
<v Speaker 2>time that like, how could I give up on this case? Yeah,

0:09:30.604 --> 0:09:32.204
<v Speaker 2>all these when you and by the way, you don't

0:09:32.244 --> 0:09:37.604
<v Speaker 2>know the payouts for slot machines are not posted anywhere

0:09:38.244 --> 0:09:40.524
<v Speaker 2>easily viewable by anybody. Right.

0:09:40.844 --> 0:09:43.684
<v Speaker 1>By the way, a really good illustration of this without

0:09:43.684 --> 0:09:46.924
<v Speaker 1>getting into kind of the innards of a slot machine

0:09:47.084 --> 0:09:50.844
<v Speaker 1>is if you've ever kind of seen a game show,

0:09:50.884 --> 0:09:53.564
<v Speaker 1>which I'm sure everyone has, where they spin the wheel, right,

0:09:53.644 --> 0:09:57.204
<v Speaker 1>and there's always like the huge prize is always in

0:09:57.244 --> 0:10:02.564
<v Speaker 1>between like tiny prizes. Yeah, exactly, and you see kind

0:10:02.604 --> 0:10:05.524
<v Speaker 1>of that drama of like the needle almost going to

0:10:05.564 --> 0:10:08.364
<v Speaker 1>the huge prize and then not, and it almost never doesn't.

0:10:08.404 --> 0:10:10.444
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Like I assume that it's not rigged,

0:10:10.684 --> 0:10:13.244
<v Speaker 1>but if you ever do that at a carnival, don't,

0:10:13.484 --> 0:10:15.044
<v Speaker 1>by the way, because then it is rigged.

0:10:15.204 --> 0:10:18.004
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I don't know what the regulations are on like

0:10:19.404 --> 0:10:22.604
<v Speaker 2>onslop mission, but like in general, the reporting different. A

0:10:22.644 --> 0:10:26.604
<v Speaker 2>book suggest that like the computer within milliseconds microseconds determines

0:10:26.644 --> 0:10:28.524
<v Speaker 2>what the payout is, it's according to a fix schedule,

0:10:28.764 --> 0:10:30.684
<v Speaker 2>and if you don't abide by that schedule, then you

0:10:30.924 --> 0:10:33.804
<v Speaker 2>get in a great deal of trouble with the gaming board, right.

0:10:34.244 --> 0:10:36.604
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they're regularly as much how they represent

0:10:36.724 --> 0:10:39.444
<v Speaker 2>that outcome to you and so like, so you are

0:10:39.444 --> 0:10:41.884
<v Speaker 2>manipulating people not only with the payout schedule, which has

0:10:41.924 --> 0:10:45.724
<v Speaker 2>been optimized by MT engineers to figure out what gets

0:10:45.764 --> 0:10:50.084
<v Speaker 2>people to be most compulsive, right, but also the way

0:10:50.324 --> 0:10:54.644
<v Speaker 2>in which a given result is shown can also contribute

0:10:54.644 --> 0:10:58.964
<v Speaker 2>to anxiety. Excitement, yes, the feeling of just having missed

0:10:58.964 --> 0:11:01.364
<v Speaker 2>out on an amazing, life changing jackpot.

0:11:01.564 --> 0:11:05.404
<v Speaker 1>The visual is so important. The visual is so important.

0:11:05.404 --> 0:11:07.324
<v Speaker 1>That's why I gave the example of the game show

0:11:07.404 --> 0:11:09.724
<v Speaker 1>right where you spin the wheel, because when you see

0:11:09.764 --> 0:11:12.204
<v Speaker 1>like cherry, cherry cherry, and then like it's almost a

0:11:12.324 --> 0:11:14.804
<v Speaker 1>cherry and that it just like misses by a half, right,

0:11:15.244 --> 0:11:17.284
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, oh damn.

0:11:17.244 --> 0:11:19.044
<v Speaker 2>Now there's something that's moving from the analog to the

0:11:19.284 --> 0:11:22.084
<v Speaker 2>so like a lot of uh, most of the tennis

0:11:22.124 --> 0:11:27.364
<v Speaker 2>tournaments now now use electronic eye judges, line judges. Right,

0:11:28.404 --> 0:11:31.604
<v Speaker 2>So go to the US that's good, right, Well, it

0:11:31.644 --> 0:11:33.364
<v Speaker 2>depends on how accurate. But you'll go to the US

0:11:33.404 --> 0:11:36.844
<v Speaker 2>Open and Hawkeye I think it's called, will show one

0:11:36.844 --> 0:11:39.004
<v Speaker 2>of the ball is in or out right, and then

0:11:39.564 --> 0:11:43.204
<v Speaker 2>they'll show the replay and the replay is computer generated.

0:11:43.204 --> 0:11:45.164
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, that's not a fucking replay, right, it's not.

0:11:45.204 --> 0:11:47.564
<v Speaker 2>Actually you can't verify when the computer was right or wrong,

0:11:47.564 --> 0:11:50.204
<v Speaker 2>and it's very close called by showing the computer's input.

0:11:50.324 --> 0:11:52.764
<v Speaker 1>No, that's that's actually it's really annoying. Yep.

0:11:52.924 --> 0:11:54.724
<v Speaker 2>But like feeling like you never kind of were able

0:11:54.764 --> 0:11:57.724
<v Speaker 2>to like touch grass and get something real. I think

0:11:57.804 --> 0:11:59.724
<v Speaker 2>is a feeling that's a little bit a little bit

0:11:59.964 --> 0:12:04.004
<v Speaker 2>frustrated too, for sure, something that's and I guess people

0:12:04.004 --> 0:12:06.884
<v Speaker 2>are verifiable are used to that. I mean us kind

0:12:06.884 --> 0:12:09.564
<v Speaker 2>of gets into the seging we taped earlier and we

0:12:09.564 --> 0:12:12.604
<v Speaker 2>had earlier this week about like the feeling of constantly

0:12:12.684 --> 0:12:17.324
<v Speaker 2>being manipulated by the algorithm. You know, there has been,

0:12:17.364 --> 0:12:23.164
<v Speaker 2>for example, a big increase in like fast food revenues

0:12:23.284 --> 0:12:26.764
<v Speaker 2>per order per customer in recent years. And part of

0:12:26.764 --> 0:12:28.764
<v Speaker 2>this is that, like part of this is at like

0:12:30.324 --> 0:12:33.924
<v Speaker 2>now people are ordering on kiosks most of the time,

0:12:33.964 --> 0:12:39.404
<v Speaker 2>even at physical locations. So number one, number one, you

0:12:39.564 --> 0:12:43.684
<v Speaker 2>were just stopping costs, right, Number two people you have

0:12:43.724 --> 0:12:45.804
<v Speaker 2>all types of up cells. Oh here's an extra sex

0:12:45.844 --> 0:12:47.964
<v Speaker 2>you can add for just forty nine cents. Right, I'm

0:12:47.964 --> 0:12:50.524
<v Speaker 2>sure the margin is very high or whatever, and like

0:12:50.604 --> 0:12:53.084
<v Speaker 2>and like just that constant fatigue from being you know,

0:12:53.164 --> 0:12:55.964
<v Speaker 2>sometimes my little my partners, you're like, which you got

0:12:55.964 --> 0:12:58.444
<v Speaker 2>like a simple restaurant, Yeah, tonight one of these it's

0:12:58.484 --> 0:13:01.084
<v Speaker 2>like not corporate own. It's like, well it's actually this

0:13:01.124 --> 0:13:02.404
<v Speaker 2>other place was like, yeah, I just don't want all

0:13:02.404 --> 0:13:05.644
<v Speaker 2>the fucking option. I want to b plus plain of

0:13:05.684 --> 0:13:09.004
<v Speaker 2>spaghetti without any fuss and without feeling like everything is

0:13:09.044 --> 0:13:10.604
<v Speaker 2>being golden dying for me.

0:13:10.804 --> 0:13:14.924
<v Speaker 1>You know, yeah, no, absolutely, And it's psychologically speaking, you know,

0:13:15.124 --> 0:13:17.684
<v Speaker 1>once again we've were talking about kind of thin lines

0:13:17.724 --> 0:13:21.404
<v Speaker 1>between a frustrating experience and one that actually works in

0:13:21.524 --> 0:13:25.004
<v Speaker 1>terms of nudging the consumer to the type of behavior

0:13:25.004 --> 0:13:27.124
<v Speaker 1>that you want. So, yeah, when you're at a Kidoska

0:13:27.124 --> 0:13:28.764
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, oh, like, do you are you sure

0:13:28.804 --> 0:13:31.044
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to, like, for fifty cents upgrade this

0:13:31.124 --> 0:13:34.364
<v Speaker 1>to like an extra large right, which would normally cost

0:13:34.444 --> 0:13:36.764
<v Speaker 1>this much more, but you get kind of you get

0:13:36.764 --> 0:13:40.804
<v Speaker 1>an extra deal, and it's so interesting. So I flew

0:13:40.844 --> 0:13:45.724
<v Speaker 1>to Vegas this past weekend and took a lift from

0:13:45.764 --> 0:13:50.244
<v Speaker 1>the airport and got my little statement, you know, the

0:13:50.284 --> 0:13:54.284
<v Speaker 1>little email that they send you and something I think

0:13:54.324 --> 0:13:57.164
<v Speaker 1>my lift was, I don't remember, twenty five dollars something

0:13:57.204 --> 0:13:59.804
<v Speaker 1>like that. And then I see the statement and it's

0:13:59.884 --> 0:14:04.844
<v Speaker 1>like forty eight dollars plus a thirty percent discount for

0:14:05.004 --> 0:14:07.924
<v Speaker 1>this and this and this, so that and so twenty

0:14:08.004 --> 0:14:10.444
<v Speaker 1>five dollars. So they present the exact same amount in

0:14:10.564 --> 0:14:13.044
<v Speaker 1>very different ways and all of a sudden, you're like, oh,

0:14:13.124 --> 0:14:13.804
<v Speaker 1>I got a deal.

0:14:13.924 --> 0:14:14.844
<v Speaker 2>It was supposed to.

0:14:14.764 --> 0:14:17.284
<v Speaker 1>Be forty eight dollars, but really I got it for

0:14:17.364 --> 0:14:20.004
<v Speaker 1>twenty five dollars. It wasn't supposed to be forty eight dollars.

0:14:20.044 --> 0:14:21.804
<v Speaker 1>They just make that shit up so that you don't

0:14:21.844 --> 0:14:25.284
<v Speaker 1>feel like you're being taken advantage of. And but that

0:14:25.404 --> 0:14:28.364
<v Speaker 1>works with fast food, that works with everything door dash.

0:14:28.444 --> 0:14:31.164
<v Speaker 1>So when you know, I order from delivery apps and

0:14:31.204 --> 0:14:32.844
<v Speaker 1>you get that sort of thing all the way all

0:14:32.884 --> 0:14:34.844
<v Speaker 1>the time where you're like, oh, get a credit, like

0:14:35.684 --> 0:14:37.244
<v Speaker 1>do you want to double dash? Do you want to

0:14:37.284 --> 0:14:40.644
<v Speaker 1>add this from another store while you know with no

0:14:40.724 --> 0:14:43.284
<v Speaker 1>delivery fee? Right? Do you want some ice cream? You

0:14:43.404 --> 0:14:46.484
<v Speaker 1>ordered Italian and this will pair well from Gelato, no

0:14:46.644 --> 0:14:49.364
<v Speaker 1>extra delivery fee. Your dasher can stop buy and get Gelato.

0:14:49.404 --> 0:14:51.564
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't planning to get Gelatto, but uh, you know,

0:14:51.604 --> 0:14:53.364
<v Speaker 1>it does seem like a great deal because I don't

0:14:53.404 --> 0:14:55.444
<v Speaker 1>have to pay two delivery fees. Maybe I will get

0:14:55.484 --> 0:14:58.924
<v Speaker 1>Gelatto after all. Right, that kind of so the way

0:14:58.964 --> 0:15:01.164
<v Speaker 1>that you present it can actually turn it from something

0:15:01.204 --> 0:15:05.684
<v Speaker 1>that's either annoying or really cool. And there are when

0:15:05.684 --> 0:15:08.404
<v Speaker 1>it comes to consumers, When it comes to advertising. They

0:15:08.404 --> 0:15:10.844
<v Speaker 1>are very strict regulartions on this, but that's not true

0:15:11.004 --> 0:15:14.524
<v Speaker 1>across every industry, and that's certainly not true when it

0:15:14.524 --> 0:15:16.684
<v Speaker 1>comes to kind of the US government because it's the

0:15:16.684 --> 0:15:19.804
<v Speaker 1>one that's supposed to be regulating. So there are few

0:15:19.804 --> 0:15:22.484
<v Speaker 1>things other than the Constitution that regulate what it can

0:15:22.524 --> 0:15:26.604
<v Speaker 1>do when it comes to kind of gamifying different experiences.

0:15:26.164 --> 0:15:27.644
<v Speaker 2>And now and then you can like actually get an

0:15:27.684 --> 0:15:31.604
<v Speaker 2>offer that's like actually pretty good. These typically happen in

0:15:31.684 --> 0:15:34.044
<v Speaker 2>times and places when the environment can be a little

0:15:34.044 --> 0:15:37.884
<v Speaker 2>bit recessionary, right, Like, so, Maria, I am going to

0:15:37.924 --> 0:15:40.244
<v Speaker 2>be out with you playing the napt in Vegas this week.

0:15:40.364 --> 0:15:43.444
<v Speaker 2>There's also various poker tournaments in December. It's a good

0:15:43.484 --> 0:15:47.564
<v Speaker 2>month for poker. The World Chairs of Poker is offering

0:15:48.444 --> 0:15:52.644
<v Speaker 2>a twenty five thousand dollars bonus if you were eligible

0:15:52.764 --> 0:15:54.924
<v Speaker 2>because you cash the main event or had enough cashes

0:15:54.924 --> 0:15:56.804
<v Speaker 2>in the summer World Chairs of Poker and the s

0:15:56.804 --> 0:15:59.364
<v Speaker 2>Bahamas event they have right if you catch their main event.

0:15:59.364 --> 0:16:02.044
<v Speaker 1>There By the way, the main event in the Bahamas

0:16:02.084 --> 0:16:04.324
<v Speaker 1>is twenty five thousand dollars, so it's.

0:16:04.164 --> 0:16:08.004
<v Speaker 2>A serious event. However, if you cash, you basically get

0:16:08.044 --> 0:16:12.204
<v Speaker 2>your buy in back for free and like fifteen percent,

0:16:12.244 --> 0:16:15.084
<v Speaker 2>twenty five thousand maybe premium, you know, a fe little

0:16:15.124 --> 0:16:17.644
<v Speaker 2>bit for a skilled premium if I'm being generous with myself, right,

0:16:17.844 --> 0:16:20.244
<v Speaker 2>Like that's actually worth real money, you know. But the

0:16:20.284 --> 0:16:26.204
<v Speaker 2>reason why is because like they're trying to get people

0:16:26.244 --> 0:16:28.524
<v Speaker 2>there and out compete these other tournaments. They actually are,

0:16:28.644 --> 0:16:33.124
<v Speaker 2>they're actually really spending real marketing budget. And you, if

0:16:33.164 --> 0:16:34.964
<v Speaker 2>you want to participate in that, have the optimist consumer

0:16:35.004 --> 0:16:39.124
<v Speaker 2>to benefit from that. Right, That's usually not true. Usually

0:16:39.124 --> 0:16:43.004
<v Speaker 2>you're being squeezed on the margin and every nickel that

0:16:43.044 --> 0:16:45.164
<v Speaker 2>you think you save is coming out of your pocket

0:16:45.484 --> 0:16:47.244
<v Speaker 2>at some other point in time. I mean you see

0:16:47.244 --> 0:16:50.164
<v Speaker 2>it in politics too, or like for years Democrats in

0:16:50.204 --> 0:16:52.764
<v Speaker 2>particular would send all these emails Nancy Pelosi says it's

0:16:52.844 --> 0:16:56.684
<v Speaker 2>urgent and us contribute today this fucking fund, right and

0:16:56.764 --> 0:16:59.484
<v Speaker 2>like and people get fed up with that, and like,

0:16:59.524 --> 0:17:03.004
<v Speaker 2>we have this problem in myopia. When of you design algorithms,

0:17:03.004 --> 0:17:07.364
<v Speaker 2>we're like, an algorithm can often tell you what, given

0:17:07.484 --> 0:17:11.804
<v Speaker 2>current conditions in the short term, will maximize revenues.

0:17:11.964 --> 0:17:12.164
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:17:12.724 --> 0:17:18.004
<v Speaker 2>They do not adjust enough for consumer fatigue, They do

0:17:18.084 --> 0:17:21.484
<v Speaker 2>not just enough for like the long term balance sheet

0:17:22.084 --> 0:17:24.884
<v Speaker 2>of the consumer. Right, they do not just enough. For

0:17:25.004 --> 0:17:28.084
<v Speaker 2>like with political messages, a message that was once fresh

0:17:28.124 --> 0:17:32.844
<v Speaker 2>can become stale. Right, being the fourth or fifth iteration

0:17:32.964 --> 0:17:35.084
<v Speaker 2>of Obama is not the same as the first version

0:17:35.564 --> 0:17:41.004
<v Speaker 2>of Obama or whatever else. Right, And yeah, I think

0:17:41.044 --> 0:17:43.044
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking to guys just who like makes films, Like, yeah,

0:17:43.044 --> 0:17:45.204
<v Speaker 2>I don't use this algorithm shit for like making picking

0:17:45.244 --> 0:17:47.604
<v Speaker 2>films at all, Right, we just make films that are

0:17:47.644 --> 0:17:52.644
<v Speaker 2>derivative and and and a lot of algorithms they become

0:17:52.724 --> 0:17:57.044
<v Speaker 2>inferior out of sample. And like also, you know, with

0:17:57.044 --> 0:18:02.444
<v Speaker 2>with AI, I mean I assume within could happen now, right,

0:18:02.804 --> 0:18:05.164
<v Speaker 2>I assume that with some of the services, you'll say, okay,

0:18:05.204 --> 0:18:07.684
<v Speaker 2>here's you know, here's an ad from the gap or whatever, right,

0:18:07.844 --> 0:18:11.044
<v Speaker 2>And here's how you would look in this nice new

0:18:11.284 --> 0:18:12.404
<v Speaker 2>T shirt from the Gap.

0:18:12.484 --> 0:18:12.604
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:18:12.644 --> 0:18:15.324
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's probably a little flattering to your dimensions and

0:18:15.364 --> 0:18:18.204
<v Speaker 2>whatever else. But like people are gonna begin to feel

0:18:18.244 --> 0:18:22.124
<v Speaker 2>correctly very manipulated, and that makes lead to like, you know,

0:18:22.324 --> 0:18:26.044
<v Speaker 2>I mean, even with Trump, right, I would argue there

0:18:26.204 --> 0:18:31.164
<v Speaker 2>is some degree a boy who cried wolf syndrome with Trump,

0:18:31.164 --> 0:18:33.204
<v Speaker 2>where like everything is seen as an outrage and therefore

0:18:33.204 --> 0:18:35.324
<v Speaker 2>the things that actually are outrages, which there are many

0:18:35.364 --> 0:18:39.964
<v Speaker 2>outrages in my opinion as the American citizen, Right, people

0:18:40.044 --> 0:18:42.684
<v Speaker 2>are just so fucking sick of the message and they

0:18:43.044 --> 0:18:45.244
<v Speaker 2>and they tune out and they lose their serotonin response

0:18:45.284 --> 0:18:48.364
<v Speaker 2>and whatever else, right, And yeah, it's pretty pretty bad.

0:18:52.044 --> 0:18:53.444
<v Speaker 1>And we'll be back right after this.

0:19:08.324 --> 0:19:11.284
<v Speaker 2>Do you have any tips for help people navigate the stuff, Maria.

0:19:11.884 --> 0:19:19.284
<v Speaker 1>Oh Man, Yeah, well, you know, try to uh oh,

0:19:19.644 --> 0:19:21.204
<v Speaker 1>try to get out of it a little bit. Like

0:19:21.284 --> 0:19:24.524
<v Speaker 1>people need to like just take a step back and

0:19:24.844 --> 0:19:27.164
<v Speaker 1>try to reclaim We haven't talked about this at all

0:19:27.204 --> 0:19:31.164
<v Speaker 1>on the episode, but like reclaim some semblance of their attention, right,

0:19:31.164 --> 0:19:33.924
<v Speaker 1>like get off social media, stop like reacting to things

0:19:34.244 --> 0:19:36.524
<v Speaker 1>all the time, and try to like just try to

0:19:37.484 --> 0:19:40.084
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know, and just try to take a

0:19:40.124 --> 0:19:42.964
<v Speaker 1>step back and get some perspective. What I try to

0:19:43.004 --> 0:19:46.044
<v Speaker 1>help people through their decision making and they're about to

0:19:46.084 --> 0:19:48.204
<v Speaker 1>make kind of a big purchase, a big decision or whatever.

0:19:48.244 --> 0:19:50.724
<v Speaker 1>It is something I often do, as I say, okay,

0:19:50.884 --> 0:19:55.004
<v Speaker 1>before you look at anything, before you buy anything, before

0:19:55.084 --> 0:19:57.524
<v Speaker 1>you kind of do anything like that, why don't you

0:19:57.564 --> 0:20:00.724
<v Speaker 1>take a pen and paper and write down, like what

0:20:00.764 --> 0:20:03.204
<v Speaker 1>are the most important things to you, right, Like what

0:20:03.244 --> 0:20:07.244
<v Speaker 1>are you looking for? What is in this particular decision,

0:20:07.324 --> 0:20:09.604
<v Speaker 1>Like what are you optimizing for? What do you care

0:20:09.604 --> 0:20:11.844
<v Speaker 1>a little bit less about how much are you willing

0:20:11.924 --> 0:20:15.404
<v Speaker 1>to kind of spend and give yourself kind of answer

0:20:15.484 --> 0:20:18.364
<v Speaker 1>those questions and give yourself firm limits, because then you

0:20:18.804 --> 0:20:23.164
<v Speaker 1>think a little bit less susceptible to those nudges that

0:20:23.244 --> 0:20:26.964
<v Speaker 1>happen to behavior in the moment, because in the moment,

0:20:27.004 --> 0:20:30.364
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to make good decisions, especially if you're tired. Right,

0:20:30.404 --> 0:20:33.764
<v Speaker 1>this is like poker, This is like trying to play

0:20:33.804 --> 0:20:36.724
<v Speaker 1>well at the poker table. Think through all of these

0:20:36.724 --> 0:20:39.564
<v Speaker 1>scenarios ahead of time, because in the moment when it

0:20:39.604 --> 0:20:41.764
<v Speaker 1>comes up, if you haven't thought through, you're going to

0:20:41.804 --> 0:20:44.364
<v Speaker 1>tilt and you're going to make a poor decision because

0:20:44.524 --> 0:20:46.964
<v Speaker 1>you don't actually know how to react in the moment.

0:20:47.324 --> 0:20:49.444
<v Speaker 1>And so I think taking that time and taking those

0:20:49.444 --> 0:20:53.324
<v Speaker 1>steps back can be really really important for just solid

0:20:53.364 --> 0:20:56.964
<v Speaker 1>decision making, especially as we acknowledge that our attention is

0:20:57.004 --> 0:20:59.124
<v Speaker 1>limited and we are getting tired.

0:21:00.044 --> 0:21:04.724
<v Speaker 2>The other thing I'd add is that like people make

0:21:04.764 --> 0:21:08.844
<v Speaker 2>this mistake of spending the most time on the most

0:21:08.884 --> 0:21:12.084
<v Speaker 2>marginalis instead of the most place takes decisions right where

0:21:12.084 --> 0:21:17.724
<v Speaker 2>it's like, okay, I can optimize this or that by

0:21:17.764 --> 0:21:20.684
<v Speaker 2>picking the six different versions of uber or lyft take

0:21:20.724 --> 0:21:22.324
<v Speaker 2>me to the airport, right, and one's a little bit

0:21:22.324 --> 0:21:24.284
<v Speaker 2>more expensive, and once they're a little sooner, it's like,

0:21:24.804 --> 0:21:28.164
<v Speaker 2>if it's like reasonably close, just pick one and don't

0:21:28.164 --> 0:21:30.364
<v Speaker 2>worry about it, because the mental effort of worrying about

0:21:30.364 --> 0:21:33.604
<v Speaker 2>it outweighs the marginal gain that's within some margin of

0:21:33.684 --> 0:21:38.724
<v Speaker 2>uncertainty anyway, right, equilibrium, Often you're indifferent between different options.

0:21:38.724 --> 0:21:40.964
<v Speaker 2>I mean, likewise, like if there is something that like,

0:21:41.204 --> 0:21:46.964
<v Speaker 2>you know, don't buy a bundle of things that aren't

0:21:47.004 --> 0:21:51.124
<v Speaker 2>interesting to you personally, right. You know, if you're paying

0:21:51.204 --> 0:21:53.564
<v Speaker 2>some extra fee when you check in a hotel for

0:21:53.604 --> 0:21:56.884
<v Speaker 2>a bigger room and you're planning on having a crazy

0:21:56.924 --> 0:21:59.844
<v Speaker 2>twenty four hours in Vegas and being in your room

0:21:59.884 --> 0:22:02.564
<v Speaker 2>just to sleep, but probably is not a good piece

0:22:02.564 --> 0:22:04.124
<v Speaker 2>of advice for you. Whereas for me, if I'm spending

0:22:04.164 --> 0:22:06.124
<v Speaker 2>hours working, which I often do, then it might be

0:22:06.164 --> 0:22:08.964
<v Speaker 2>worth the upgrade. It's kind of common sense stuff, and like,

0:22:09.964 --> 0:22:12.604
<v Speaker 2>you know, even things like airline frequent flyer moules like

0:22:12.684 --> 0:22:15.684
<v Speaker 2>the average person probably have a lot of airline optimizers

0:22:15.684 --> 0:22:18.484
<v Speaker 2>in the risky business audience, right, But like there's a

0:22:18.604 --> 0:22:21.084
<v Speaker 2>cost to all this. Some people think it's fun to

0:22:21.124 --> 0:22:24.924
<v Speaker 2>maximize this kind of thing, but like you just have

0:22:25.004 --> 0:22:26.444
<v Speaker 2>to simplify some decisions.

0:22:27.124 --> 0:22:31.044
<v Speaker 1>So I think that it's it's really interesting, but everything

0:22:31.044 --> 0:22:34.804
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about on a consumer level actually plays

0:22:34.804 --> 0:22:37.444
<v Speaker 1>out on the government level as well, and on how

0:22:37.484 --> 0:22:40.364
<v Speaker 1>Trump is trying to kind of play right and take

0:22:40.404 --> 0:22:43.164
<v Speaker 1>these take these risks and play these games of chicken.

0:22:43.404 --> 0:22:47.764
<v Speaker 1>So that actually goes both ways. You know, as as

0:22:47.804 --> 0:22:50.804
<v Speaker 1>citizens of the United States, we do have this reaction

0:22:50.844 --> 0:22:53.244
<v Speaker 1>where he's trying to flood the zone and like get

0:22:53.244 --> 0:22:57.244
<v Speaker 1>everyone to just not respond anymore because it is you know,

0:22:57.324 --> 0:22:59.684
<v Speaker 1>it's just one thing after another after another. You get tired.

0:23:00.044 --> 0:23:03.764
<v Speaker 1>But he's using very similar tactics, not on think, not

0:23:03.884 --> 0:23:06.604
<v Speaker 1>on purpose, but when he's trying to kind of place

0:23:06.684 --> 0:23:09.764
<v Speaker 1>all of these bets with the US economy on different

0:23:09.764 --> 0:23:13.804
<v Speaker 1>activities like levying tariffs. And I mean this is the

0:23:13.884 --> 0:23:18.804
<v Speaker 1>Taco effect, right, the fact that Trump will always chicken

0:23:18.884 --> 0:23:20.324
<v Speaker 1>out at the end where he says, oh, I'm going

0:23:20.364 --> 0:23:22.204
<v Speaker 1>to put one hundred percent tariffs on you I'm going

0:23:22.284 --> 0:23:24.564
<v Speaker 1>to do this. I'm going to do that. And as

0:23:24.564 --> 0:23:27.164
<v Speaker 1>a negotiating tactic, when you're trying to kind of take

0:23:27.204 --> 0:23:29.964
<v Speaker 1>this calculated what you think is a calculated risk, because

0:23:30.004 --> 0:23:31.804
<v Speaker 1>you're like, I'm never actually going to have to follow

0:23:31.844 --> 0:23:34.404
<v Speaker 1>through on this, because I know that this person will

0:23:34.444 --> 0:23:37.404
<v Speaker 1>back off first, right, I know that she will want

0:23:37.444 --> 0:23:39.284
<v Speaker 1>to negotiate with me because they don't want to get

0:23:39.284 --> 0:23:42.884
<v Speaker 1>into a trade war. I know that Canada will kind

0:23:42.884 --> 0:23:44.804
<v Speaker 1>of do what I want because they don't want to

0:23:44.804 --> 0:23:47.684
<v Speaker 1>get into a trade war, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

0:23:48.084 --> 0:23:50.484
<v Speaker 1>It works until it doesn't, right, because what happens with

0:23:50.564 --> 0:23:53.644
<v Speaker 1>other countries is exactly what's happening with a consumer, where

0:23:53.684 --> 0:23:57.324
<v Speaker 1>like you've actually flooded the zone, right, and where you've

0:23:57.364 --> 0:24:00.444
<v Speaker 1>done this so many times, and you've been erratic so

0:24:00.484 --> 0:24:02.964
<v Speaker 1>many times, and you've made these threats so many times

0:24:03.004 --> 0:24:05.244
<v Speaker 1>and then pulled them back that at some point, as

0:24:05.244 --> 0:24:06.684
<v Speaker 1>a leader of a foreign country, might be you know what,

0:24:06.764 --> 0:24:09.164
<v Speaker 1>screw this, Like I'm tired, right, We're not going to

0:24:09.204 --> 0:24:12.324
<v Speaker 1>keep repeating this cycle, and I'm actually gonna, you know,

0:24:12.364 --> 0:24:14.444
<v Speaker 1>stand my ground. So it has a very different effect,

0:24:14.604 --> 0:24:18.484
<v Speaker 1>but it's the exact same sort of reinforcement mechanism that

0:24:19.004 --> 0:24:21.524
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing on a domestic level, but you now see

0:24:21.524 --> 0:24:26.764
<v Speaker 1>it abroad with very large economic circumstances where you kind

0:24:26.764 --> 0:24:30.004
<v Speaker 1>of you keep taking those risks, and then eventually the

0:24:30.084 --> 0:24:33.484
<v Speaker 1>risk calculus changes and you have to realize that what

0:24:33.564 --> 0:24:36.124
<v Speaker 1>was a calculated risk is now just a pure gamble,

0:24:36.404 --> 0:24:39.724
<v Speaker 1>probably a negative ev gamble. And unless you're a very

0:24:39.804 --> 0:24:43.364
<v Speaker 1>very smart player, you often, especially when you're in it

0:24:43.404 --> 0:24:47.444
<v Speaker 1>and you're so enamored and kind of in love with

0:24:47.524 --> 0:24:51.164
<v Speaker 1>your own success, right, and you're almost like you're riding

0:24:51.244 --> 0:24:54.164
<v Speaker 1>high because you think you've been successful at doing all

0:24:54.204 --> 0:24:56.564
<v Speaker 1>of these things, can be very difficult to have an

0:24:56.644 --> 0:25:00.444
<v Speaker 1>objective reality check and realize, hey, the risk has actually changed,

0:25:00.444 --> 0:25:02.764
<v Speaker 1>the risk proposition has changed, I should change the way

0:25:02.764 --> 0:25:03.284
<v Speaker 1>I'm betting.

0:25:03.964 --> 0:25:07.604
<v Speaker 2>And look, when people feel like they've been manipulated for

0:25:07.604 --> 0:25:09.724
<v Speaker 2>a long period of time, right, and and then the

0:25:09.844 --> 0:25:13.924
<v Speaker 2>exit situation, they tend to I mean, you can probably

0:25:14.484 --> 0:25:17.804
<v Speaker 2>tell me if I'm if there's some studies here like

0:25:18.084 --> 0:25:20.684
<v Speaker 2>they rebel against that a lot, right, So like I

0:25:20.724 --> 0:25:23.644
<v Speaker 2>am so fucking through with this. I mean again, I

0:25:23.844 --> 0:25:25.604
<v Speaker 2>you know, I cover politics a lot, so I can't

0:25:25.604 --> 0:25:27.164
<v Speaker 2>help but make like politics analogies.

0:25:27.204 --> 0:25:29.404
<v Speaker 1>But like, well we're talking about politics now, so it's

0:25:29.404 --> 0:25:30.164
<v Speaker 1>again you know, but.

0:25:30.084 --> 0:25:32.044
<v Speaker 2>Like I feel like people might have felt with the

0:25:33.564 --> 0:25:35.724
<v Speaker 2>you know a lot of people getting mad. I mean,

0:25:35.764 --> 0:25:38.604
<v Speaker 2>the Democratic Party has it's rebounding slightly now, right, but

0:25:38.684 --> 0:25:44.884
<v Speaker 2>has like lower voter registration numbers and lower party identification numbers,

0:25:44.884 --> 0:25:46.804
<v Speaker 2>and it has in a couple of decades, right, it's

0:25:46.964 --> 0:25:48.564
<v Speaker 2>toward toward a low point.

0:25:50.084 --> 0:25:50.284
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:25:50.364 --> 0:25:52.524
<v Speaker 2>Part of it is like this is party, it's kind

0:25:52.524 --> 0:25:55.364
<v Speaker 2>of supposed to be upstanding, irresponsible, but like they kind

0:25:55.404 --> 0:25:56.644
<v Speaker 2>of fuck up some shit and they kind of like

0:25:56.644 --> 0:25:58.564
<v Speaker 2>Tony that they fuck up some shit, and like, you know,

0:25:58.644 --> 0:26:01.044
<v Speaker 2>if you like thought it was a bad idea, like

0:26:01.084 --> 0:26:04.324
<v Speaker 2>I did to run Joe Biden again and felt like

0:26:04.364 --> 0:26:06.644
<v Speaker 2>you were gas lit by the Democratic Party, which I

0:26:06.724 --> 0:26:11.724
<v Speaker 2>also did, Right, then it's very easy to say, fuck

0:26:11.844 --> 0:26:17.444
<v Speaker 2>these guys. They're wrong about immigration, they're wrong about trans rights,

0:26:17.444 --> 0:26:20.484
<v Speaker 2>they're wrong about economics, they're wrong about everything, because like

0:26:20.924 --> 0:26:25.164
<v Speaker 2>there's that reputational halo effect and then the rebellion effect.

0:26:25.164 --> 0:26:28.524
<v Speaker 2>They're probably better terms for this, right, But like, you know,

0:26:29.044 --> 0:26:33.044
<v Speaker 2>any relationship, and in a personal relationship, a business between

0:26:33.084 --> 0:26:37.604
<v Speaker 2>two countries, Like resentment building up, you can tolerate a

0:26:37.604 --> 0:26:39.724
<v Speaker 2>lot of it in the near tournament almost always comes

0:26:39.724 --> 0:26:44.204
<v Speaker 2>out in the long term, and often the the rebellion

0:26:44.364 --> 0:26:48.204
<v Speaker 2>afterward is worse than the Martians you would have lost

0:26:48.244 --> 0:26:49.964
<v Speaker 2>in a piecemeal base in the short run.

0:26:50.404 --> 0:26:53.564
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and if you go even more globally, if we're

0:26:53.564 --> 0:26:56.684
<v Speaker 1>talking about kind of some of these risks for US

0:26:56.724 --> 0:27:00.844
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy, for alliances, for what the future of the

0:27:00.884 --> 0:27:06.084
<v Speaker 1>world order looks like down behind, like, that's actually not

0:27:06.324 --> 0:27:09.564
<v Speaker 1>very encouraging, right, because it's one of these things where

0:27:09.764 --> 0:27:13.124
<v Speaker 1>you casino ify, you know, the US government, and it

0:27:13.164 --> 0:27:15.044
<v Speaker 1>takes a long time for these effects to build up.

0:27:15.084 --> 0:27:17.644
<v Speaker 1>But then the resentment is such that the backlash is

0:27:18.004 --> 0:27:20.964
<v Speaker 1>much harder and undoes any economic games you might have

0:27:21.004 --> 0:27:23.844
<v Speaker 1>picked up in the immediate term, and your long term

0:27:23.844 --> 0:27:27.604
<v Speaker 1>economic future suddenly looks a lot bleaker. Now if we

0:27:28.004 --> 0:27:30.604
<v Speaker 1>if we think that that's what's happening in the US

0:27:30.684 --> 0:27:33.244
<v Speaker 1>government right now, we're not seeing some of these effects yet,

0:27:33.284 --> 0:27:36.524
<v Speaker 1>but we will, and they're probably the backlash is going

0:27:36.564 --> 0:27:39.404
<v Speaker 1>to be a lot worse than people imagine it's going

0:27:39.404 --> 0:27:39.604
<v Speaker 1>to be.

0:27:41.644 --> 0:27:43.924
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, the other suspicions people have is that

0:27:43.964 --> 0:27:46.804
<v Speaker 2>when you're gamifying things, that things are kind of subtly rigged,

0:27:46.804 --> 0:27:51.684
<v Speaker 2>and yeahs and vansage right, which they usually are, which

0:27:51.724 --> 0:27:53.804
<v Speaker 2>they often are usually are, Which is you know, all

0:27:53.804 --> 0:27:58.924
<v Speaker 2>these heuristics are basically correct, right that usually if there's

0:27:58.964 --> 0:28:02.244
<v Speaker 2>some complication then although some people might be able to

0:28:02.284 --> 0:28:05.684
<v Speaker 2>take advantage of that complication even just being you know,

0:28:05.764 --> 0:28:08.844
<v Speaker 2>price discrimination, being tiered into different regions. I mean it's

0:28:09.164 --> 0:28:11.644
<v Speaker 2>if you go to Europe, you notice there's less tiering

0:28:11.764 --> 0:28:15.124
<v Speaker 2>of different types of services. Right, you take business class

0:28:15.164 --> 0:28:18.124
<v Speaker 2>in Europe and all this difference there's the middle seat

0:28:18.204 --> 0:28:20.964
<v Speaker 2>is empty basically, and you board like slightly sooner. Right,

0:28:21.004 --> 0:28:24.604
<v Speaker 2>there's less tiering in general, there's more kind of nominal equality.

0:28:24.804 --> 0:28:28.164
<v Speaker 2>And whereas in the American economy there are so many

0:28:28.444 --> 0:28:32.364
<v Speaker 2>hyper dimensions. And you notice it in New York City especially,

0:28:32.644 --> 0:28:34.724
<v Speaker 2>Even people who are objectively really well off in New

0:28:34.804 --> 0:28:36.804
<v Speaker 2>York are like, why can't I have an even nicer apartment?

0:28:36.884 --> 0:28:39.324
<v Speaker 2>Or why can't a sushi place like cost four and

0:28:39.364 --> 0:28:42.724
<v Speaker 2>fifty dollars ahead or whatever? Right, Like, you notice it

0:28:43.124 --> 0:28:45.044
<v Speaker 2>a lot more. It probably works to make people like

0:28:45.124 --> 0:28:49.244
<v Speaker 2>extremely competitive, right, But it is a certain equilibrium that

0:28:50.524 --> 0:28:54.764
<v Speaker 2>creates cumulative fatigue and burnout and maybe maybe worse decision

0:28:54.764 --> 0:28:56.844
<v Speaker 2>making in the long run. I mean, we've both been

0:28:56.964 --> 0:29:00.324
<v Speaker 2>enough situations where like, you're playing poker terminal day, you

0:29:00.364 --> 0:29:02.364
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of other life decisions, and you're optimizing

0:29:02.404 --> 0:29:04.324
<v Speaker 2>some travel shit, and you're like, Oh, I'm just fucking

0:29:04.404 --> 0:29:06.364
<v Speaker 2>sick and tired of this, right, I just like to

0:29:06.364 --> 0:29:09.044
<v Speaker 2>sit down and have a nice, mildly over priced burger

0:29:09.444 --> 0:29:11.284
<v Speaker 2>and not have to make all these fucking decisions anymore.

0:29:11.684 --> 0:29:14.484
<v Speaker 1>Yep. And it's one thing if you're you and it's

0:29:14.524 --> 0:29:17.844
<v Speaker 1>a burger and it's poker decisions. It's another thing if

0:29:17.884 --> 0:29:21.524
<v Speaker 1>you're a government leader and you've just had this stuff

0:29:21.684 --> 0:29:23.764
<v Speaker 1>kind of lobbied at you over and over and over.

0:29:27.204 --> 0:29:32.084
<v Speaker 2>And we'll be right back after this break.

0:29:46.884 --> 0:29:48.764
<v Speaker 1>By the way, as we talk about kind of the

0:29:49.844 --> 0:29:54.044
<v Speaker 1>downstream effects, it's both on a personal resentment level, but

0:29:54.124 --> 0:30:00.164
<v Speaker 1>it's also where like behavioral incentives will sometimes take a

0:30:00.204 --> 0:30:05.044
<v Speaker 1>long time for the math to play out. So, for instance,

0:30:05.084 --> 0:30:08.724
<v Speaker 1>with tariffs, you have kind of this situation where people

0:30:08.764 --> 0:30:11.324
<v Speaker 1>are like, oh, well, you know, inflation isn't going up.

0:30:11.364 --> 0:30:14.124
<v Speaker 1>It's not that bad, And it's because companies have the

0:30:14.164 --> 0:30:17.644
<v Speaker 1>ability to shield consumers. For some there's some buffer, right,

0:30:17.884 --> 0:30:20.764
<v Speaker 1>there's a period of time before it actually like we'll

0:30:20.804 --> 0:30:24.124
<v Speaker 1>start hitting. And so it's incorrect to say, oh, there's

0:30:24.164 --> 0:30:27.764
<v Speaker 1>no effect, no negative effect, just because you can't see

0:30:27.764 --> 0:30:30.444
<v Speaker 1>it immediately. And so too, I would say it's incorrect

0:30:30.484 --> 0:30:34.564
<v Speaker 1>to say that there's no kind of international order negative

0:30:34.604 --> 0:30:37.924
<v Speaker 1>repercussions of some of this kind of gamifications just because

0:30:37.964 --> 0:30:40.444
<v Speaker 1>we can't see all of them yet, because those are

0:30:40.484 --> 0:30:43.244
<v Speaker 1>going to take a longer time to play out. And

0:30:43.524 --> 0:30:45.844
<v Speaker 1>you have these institutions in place that have been in

0:30:45.884 --> 0:30:50.244
<v Speaker 1>place for decades and they're designed to kind of be

0:30:50.324 --> 0:30:53.044
<v Speaker 1>resilient and to be able to withstand a lot of pressure.

0:30:53.084 --> 0:30:54.964
<v Speaker 1>But at some point, like if you keep if you

0:30:55.044 --> 0:30:57.804
<v Speaker 1>keep hammering on it, like those cracks are going to

0:30:57.844 --> 0:31:00.564
<v Speaker 1>start to appear, and we're going to see some of

0:31:00.564 --> 0:31:02.804
<v Speaker 1>those effects, not now, but you know, in five years

0:31:02.924 --> 0:31:06.604
<v Speaker 1>or whatnot. But the problem with gamification is that if

0:31:06.644 --> 0:31:08.644
<v Speaker 1>you're the gambler who's making the risk now and you're

0:31:08.644 --> 0:31:11.084
<v Speaker 1>getting it a reward, you don't particularly care if you're

0:31:11.124 --> 0:31:13.204
<v Speaker 1>going to bring the house down five years from now,

0:31:13.244 --> 0:31:15.284
<v Speaker 1>if you're not going to be there to get the backlash.

0:31:15.404 --> 0:31:19.724
<v Speaker 2>Gim Pooker. We have like long term equilibriums called game

0:31:19.724 --> 0:31:23.044
<v Speaker 2>theory optimal solutions or GTO, where like if everybody is

0:31:23.044 --> 0:31:27.644
<v Speaker 2>optimizing their strategy, what results And GTL strategies actually are

0:31:27.684 --> 0:31:30.884
<v Speaker 2>not supposed to be exploitive quote unquote, right, they're actually

0:31:30.924 --> 0:31:32.844
<v Speaker 2>kind of defensive. They're like, we assume that everybody else

0:31:32.924 --> 0:31:36.324
<v Speaker 2>is smart and playing optimally within the constraints of the

0:31:36.404 --> 0:31:38.884
<v Speaker 2>rule set, right, and so therefore here's where we wind up.

0:31:38.884 --> 0:31:42.164
<v Speaker 2>And it's kind of in some ways like a fair solution. Right,

0:31:42.204 --> 0:31:44.324
<v Speaker 2>you're bluffing but not too much. You can be greedy

0:31:44.364 --> 0:31:46.244
<v Speaker 2>but not too greedy, and if you debate from that,

0:31:46.244 --> 0:31:48.284
<v Speaker 2>then you can be exploited. Yeah, you know, I mean

0:31:48.324 --> 0:31:53.204
<v Speaker 2>how how customers feel when they're when they're disempowered in

0:31:53.284 --> 0:31:56.764
<v Speaker 2>our relationship by you know, I don't know, but like

0:31:56.804 --> 0:31:59.364
<v Speaker 2>all that algorithm, price discrimination, all that stuff is like,

0:32:00.164 --> 0:32:02.884
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think contributes to people feeling like they're

0:32:02.884 --> 0:32:06.804
<v Speaker 2>getting the short end of the deal, right, and that

0:32:06.924 --> 0:32:09.324
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's a big debate over inflation. People have

0:32:10.084 --> 0:32:13.044
<v Speaker 2>been spending down their paychecks more and more and more.

0:32:13.084 --> 0:32:15.284
<v Speaker 2>She look at nervous about the crimea actually decrease people

0:32:15.364 --> 0:32:17.324
<v Speaker 2>might save more if they're more nervous, right, but certainly

0:32:17.364 --> 0:32:19.644
<v Speaker 2>in the kind of the boomears after COVID, and there

0:32:19.684 --> 0:32:22.764
<v Speaker 2>are big debates about like how bad is inflation and

0:32:22.764 --> 0:32:24.924
<v Speaker 2>if you look at kind of like how much people

0:32:24.964 --> 0:32:28.724
<v Speaker 2>are spending per basket of goods, how the Bureau of

0:32:28.764 --> 0:32:32.524
<v Speaker 2>Labor cists define it, Inflation was already pretty bad, but

0:32:32.524 --> 0:32:34.964
<v Speaker 2>they're also spending more on shit they don't necessarily need

0:32:35.084 --> 0:32:38.124
<v Speaker 2>sir manipulated into purchasing it. And you remember that the

0:32:38.124 --> 0:32:40.444
<v Speaker 2>second time. I guess we're repeating ourselves, right. It's just

0:32:40.484 --> 0:32:43.204
<v Speaker 2>like you know, I, you know, I probably wouldn't endorse

0:32:43.884 --> 0:32:47.764
<v Speaker 2>everything in Kyla Scanlon's argument. I don't think she's guilty

0:32:47.844 --> 0:32:51.284
<v Speaker 2>of this. I think sometimes progressives can be really fucking

0:32:52.124 --> 0:32:58.604
<v Speaker 2>prudish about this stuff. But I directionally, I totally understand.

0:32:58.284 --> 0:33:00.524
<v Speaker 1>The complaint, so do I, so do I, And she

0:33:00.644 --> 0:33:04.044
<v Speaker 1>actually I want to find this original quote because I

0:33:04.044 --> 0:33:07.004
<v Speaker 1>don't remember what it originally says. But she reminds us

0:33:08.124 --> 0:33:11.044
<v Speaker 1>and she doesn't have the original quote either. She paraphrases

0:33:11.404 --> 0:33:14.044
<v Speaker 1>what John Maynard Keynes, who is kind of one of

0:33:14.084 --> 0:33:18.924
<v Speaker 1>the fathers of economic thought, you know, free market economics,

0:33:18.964 --> 0:33:22.764
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Et cetera. That he warned that markets can

0:33:22.804 --> 0:33:26.244
<v Speaker 1>stay irrational longer than most people can stay solvent. And

0:33:26.284 --> 0:33:30.524
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's a really kind of valid concern

0:33:31.044 --> 0:33:34.524
<v Speaker 1>and one of the reasons why sometimes kind of the

0:33:34.564 --> 0:33:38.204
<v Speaker 1>gamblers thinking doesn't actually work in the sense that, like

0:33:38.564 --> 0:33:40.844
<v Speaker 1>things work until they don't, they go up until they don't,

0:33:40.964 --> 0:33:43.524
<v Speaker 1>and you have to avoid risk of ruin in the meantime, right,

0:33:43.564 --> 0:33:46.284
<v Speaker 1>you cannot go broke. That's why the Martin Gale strategy

0:33:46.284 --> 0:33:48.844
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work for people when they're gambling. And by the way,

0:33:48.884 --> 0:33:52.084
<v Speaker 1>that Martin Gale strategy, which we've talked about before, is

0:33:52.484 --> 0:33:55.084
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you place ten dollars on a bet

0:33:55.084 --> 0:33:57.244
<v Speaker 1>and you lose, the next time, you need to place

0:33:57.284 --> 0:33:59.764
<v Speaker 1>twenty so that you can you know, get back your losses.

0:33:59.804 --> 0:34:02.164
<v Speaker 1>So basically, if you double all the time, you just

0:34:02.204 --> 0:34:04.044
<v Speaker 1>have to lose one. You just have to win once

0:34:04.084 --> 0:34:06.484
<v Speaker 1>and you'll be fine. But what happens if you're you know,

0:34:06.564 --> 0:34:08.364
<v Speaker 1>suddenly in the millions and you don't have that money,

0:34:08.444 --> 0:34:11.124
<v Speaker 1>like you're fucked. You don't know how how long that's

0:34:11.124 --> 0:34:14.204
<v Speaker 1>going to go. So, yeah, markets can stay irrational longer

0:34:14.204 --> 0:34:16.124
<v Speaker 1>than most people can stay solvent. And I think that

0:34:16.124 --> 0:34:20.124
<v Speaker 1>that's something that should be worrisome to us as we

0:34:20.164 --> 0:34:22.404
<v Speaker 1>look at all of these behaviors, as we look at

0:34:22.444 --> 0:34:25.884
<v Speaker 1>all of this increased pushing edges, risk taking, and see

0:34:25.924 --> 0:34:28.204
<v Speaker 1>that it's coming on the part of you know, our

0:34:28.244 --> 0:34:30.764
<v Speaker 1>commander in chief of the government, of the policies that

0:34:31.604 --> 0:34:34.724
<v Speaker 1>are being undertaken, and the fact that you know, we

0:34:34.844 --> 0:34:39.324
<v Speaker 1>have things that are actually kind of tied into highly

0:34:39.364 --> 0:34:42.244
<v Speaker 1>speculative ventures and if you're betting on all of them

0:34:42.244 --> 0:34:44.804
<v Speaker 1>to do well, you better hope that those are all

0:34:44.844 --> 0:34:48.244
<v Speaker 1>plus e V bets and that the calculus hasn't shifted

0:34:48.244 --> 0:34:50.644
<v Speaker 1>on you, which because of the way that you know,

0:34:50.684 --> 0:34:53.884
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the reinforcements changing and the behavior is changing,

0:34:53.924 --> 0:34:56.644
<v Speaker 1>and how kind of a ratic it's been. I think

0:34:56.684 --> 0:35:01.164
<v Speaker 1>that both you and I have raised issues on why

0:35:01.564 --> 0:35:03.604
<v Speaker 1>some of these bets may no longer be plus V

0:35:03.724 --> 0:35:08.604
<v Speaker 1>and why that risk calculus may have changed. And after that, Nate,

0:35:08.644 --> 0:35:11.964
<v Speaker 1>whether it's resent like you've been talking about, and like rebellion,

0:35:12.044 --> 0:35:17.204
<v Speaker 1>whatever we choose to call it, that might be a

0:35:17.204 --> 0:35:25.204
<v Speaker 1>bigger backlash than you bargained for. Let us know what

0:35:25.244 --> 0:35:27.164
<v Speaker 1>you think of the show. Reach out to us at

0:35:27.284 --> 0:35:31.524
<v Speaker 1>Risky Business, at Pushkin dot FM. Risky Business is hosted

0:35:31.564 --> 0:35:33.444
<v Speaker 1>by me Maria Kanakova.

0:35:33.164 --> 0:35:35.924
<v Speaker 2>And by me Nate Silver. The show was a Cool

0:35:35.924 --> 0:35:39.924
<v Speaker 2>production of Pushing Industries and iHeartMedia. This episode was produced

0:35:39.924 --> 0:35:44.244
<v Speaker 2>by Isaac Carter. Our associate producer is Sonya gerwit Lydia,

0:35:44.364 --> 0:35:47.244
<v Speaker 2>Jean Kott and Daphne Chen are our editors, and our

0:35:47.284 --> 0:35:51.124
<v Speaker 2>executive producer is Jacob Goldstein. Mixing by Sarah Bruger.

0:35:51.644 --> 0:35:53.884
<v Speaker 1>If you like the show, please rate and review us

0:35:53.924 --> 0:35:56.564
<v Speaker 1>so other people can find us too, But once again,

0:35:56.724 --> 0:35:58.524
<v Speaker 1>only if you like us. We don't want those bad

0:35:58.564 --> 0:36:00.724
<v Speaker 1>reviews out there. Thanks for tuning in.

0:36:09.524 --> 0:36:09.684
<v Speaker 2>Ka