WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2020 NFL MegaPod Week 2 Preview

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Check it down, then down then Thursdays at Temper and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Beating the Book Podcast Mega Pod Week two of the

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>National Football League season. It's Gil Alexander. Uh, this is

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:24.319
<v Speaker 1>a big deal to me today because we are doing

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>our first ever live broadcast I should say from a venue.

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's the right way to say it, on site

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:35.279
<v Speaker 1>along with Mike Palm here at the D in beautiful

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>downtown Las Vegas, the lovely d Mike. Thank you for

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>the for the hospitality, thank you for having us here.

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll do this every week yes when, oh yes, until

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Circle opens, until Circle and then we'll move this show

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>two blocks down the street to the to the three

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>story sports Book and above the Visa Studio Radio row.

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>What We'll do this podcast every Thursday. This is I

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>was just saying, this is more than you know. Obviously,

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>we love doing Vison, loved doing MSG plus with our

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>guest today, who will introduce momentarily. Uh. But I started

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>this podcast in my underwear, so to just be doing

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:09.759
<v Speaker 1>this out in public is so great that it man,

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 1>when we get to Circa, good lord, this is phenomenal.

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Our guest day. By the way, we're missing Todd wishnev

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I heard I heard he's taping the GM Shuffle for

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>next week. Is that true? I think that might be true.

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>He had a thing that he's doing, and maybe it was,

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>in fact the GM Shuffle. Uh Todd. I don't know

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>if he's trapped under a heavy object. I don't know

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 1>what the story is. But he's not here with us today.

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>UH So his antics will be missed this week, but

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll get him back next week and for the rest

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>of the season. Our guest today is my co host

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:40.479
<v Speaker 1>on a new show we do at MSG plus. It's

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:44.759
<v Speaker 1>called Primetime Action. It's Visa's Primetime Action powered by Draft Kings,

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>which is seven to ten Eastern for those who have

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>MSG plus in New York City and throughout the country.

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Matt Brown, everybody, how you doing, Matt? I'm doing great.

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I am very happy to make my debut here on

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the Mega Pod, and I too cannot wait for Circa

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to open down there. I already have a reservation Mr

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Palm at one of those cabanas out at the UH

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>at the Pool to watch the Thursday night game when

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:11.799
<v Speaker 1>you guys get going out there. So I am very

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>very much looking forward to the new venue downtown. Can't

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>wait to see it. Did I tell you I have

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Friday Cabanas as as well? Friday Cabana you have the

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>second day? He's got that. Wow, that's Carolina and Atlanta

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 1>that night, right, Matt, that's our our opening game. Oh,

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about March Madness. That's what he's doing. He's

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>doing right when we open. He's doing the first Thursday

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>night game, Carolina Atlanta. You are Friday. That's that's the

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>hottest ticket. I think the Friday of March Madness is

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be the hottest kicking at the pool. And

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>we and we figured out today that we probably will

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>have college basketball at least there's a plan in place

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for college basketball. Now that the Big Ten and the

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Pack twelve have also decided to play football. We think,

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>uh so here's how this goes. I think you know

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the format. We give our three best bets, then we

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>do any thoughts on Thursday night football games. Sometimes those

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>two things are the same thing, uh, Teaser of the week,

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>survivor play and then the final two questions of course,

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>which have to do with the big favorite most likely

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to lose out right, followed by the game that no

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>one are that anyone here wants a no part of

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>based on the spread itself, and we were in a

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:14.679
<v Speaker 1>bizarro world. You had to bet everything, but there was

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>one you just wanted to pass on before we get

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>into our best bets. After one week, circu Million and Survivor,

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>which neither had an overlay. In the end, you and

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Stevens, the P. T. Barnum of Las Vegas, the

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>both of you use, if I may say, use uh,

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:34.239
<v Speaker 1>no overlay because quite frankly, there shouldn't be one because

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you have the best contest in town, with the best format.

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Tim Fitzgerald former sports book supervisor at South Point and

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>he worked for us for a brief time as well.

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>He called this uh at the ginning of August when

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>we were still only around three entries, and he said,

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to have an overlay because the market

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>will not allow an overlay, it will not tolerate it.

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>And he was right. He was right. So yeah, we

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>got there. We got thirty one four eight and the

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>circum million two and almost four nine and the Survivor.

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the Survivor will really take off next year.

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I am. I had two of those Survivor entries. I

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>had the Colts in one of them. As we know

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>from this show that's done, thirty percent of all of

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>those survivors went out with the Colts alone, of all

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>survivor entries in your content went out week one. Yeah,

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Colts took a ton of people out, and then uh,

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles in San Francisco were the next big chunks out.

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 1>So we have we have eight oh five left out

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of thirteen nine after one week. I am more e

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and I are buddy. You and I were talking about this,

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>we were doing you know, we all had our football

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>bets going on. We all had bets and other sports.

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Our brains kept coming back to our survivor picks. It's

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>an interesting little phenomenon. Seventeen people didn't enter at all.

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>They forgot to put it in. At seventeen people did

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 1>not submit, which is almost as unforgivable as Todd not

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>being available this morning. Almost almost. I would like to

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:57.719
<v Speaker 1>laugh at those people, and maybe with a one thousand

0:04:57.720 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>dollar entry, I should laugh at them. But you know

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>what your boy forgot to do. I forgot to put

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 1>in my last man standing picks, so I I pissed

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>away a hundred dollars completely forgot about it. To scale,

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not as bad, right, But if you had five five,

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know out of the seventeen you know that

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that's seventeen entries that could have been four people technically,

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>so if you had five, that's five thousand dollars down

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the two were some circumillions. Did they fail to enter

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>eighteen there may be a correlation or eighteen did not enter.

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I think there's sixty three people had a perfect week

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>if I if I remember that, correct went five and

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>oh and then another ninety had went four oh and one,

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>So good starts there for those folks. MATEO, how do

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you do? I went Bourn one and I had the horrible,

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>horrible pick of the Browns plus eight, which was my

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>loser on the week. Yeah, that was just a man

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in retrospect. What in the hell was I thinking? But

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>outside of that, I went four and one, so started

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>off pretty strong here. I actually didn't get in the Survivor.

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 1>I wish I have. I was going to do that

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 1>if if there was some overlay as well, but you

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>guys got their way early on that one. So I

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>ended up not getting in the Survivor. But guess what,

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I saved myself a thousand dollars because I too would

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>have picked the colts, and I would be sitting here

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>talking about how after one week I was down a

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:16.919
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. Yeah. By the way, we're looking up at

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the screen because Matt's on the screen for us. What

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a set up here at the d and Bar, Canada,

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and we could we should invite people down here every

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>week at ten am to come hang out with us.

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 1>We have a crowd. By the way, Matt, you could

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>have been here too, But I didn't know what the

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>setup was. So next time. Um, But where was I

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>going with this? Oh? I don't even know where I

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>was going with it. I lost my train of thought.

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>But essentially I can't even get mad at myself. This

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is where I was going with it. Those of us

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 1>who had Indianapolis. There's there's no regret, Like, I can't

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>even bust myself or have any self loathing because there

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>was no scenario where I was never going to pick them,

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>which I think is what Matt was saying to Like,

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>So I can't even I can't even get upset with

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>myself for losing that edgery, just happy that I had

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>two of them. Uh, let's start with our Thursday night

0:06:56.120 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>before our best bets. I actually it's the same for me.

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm curious any thoughts on Thursday night, Matt, We'll

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>start with you. Yeah, I mean this is I think

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a pretty pretty good bounceback spot here for this Cleveland

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Browns team. I mean they're actually built pretty good, I

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>think to handle the Bengals in this spot. When you

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>look and you kind of dig in a little bit more.

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is gonna be a rookie quarterback and

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow, don't get me wrong, future Hall of Famer

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow, but it is a rookie quarterback on the

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>road here on a short week, and you kind of

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>dig in a little bit more. And the Browns actually

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>were able to generate pressure on Lamar Jackson at the

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>fifth highest rate in the NFL last week, and uh,

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>let me, it didn't didn't didn't help him all that much,

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>but they were able to get to him. It is

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson. Now we're talking about a rookie quarterback on

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>short week here, and I I really do like a

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>lot this spot here for this Browns team. I think

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>this would have been a full touchdown if the Browns

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>had even shown up last week. And so getting six.

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And actually there was a five and a half that

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>popped up over on the East coast a little bit

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the week, if you were able to get

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in on that one as well. But yeah, I love

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>me some Browns in this game, and I think this

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>is uh where they kind of show Look, yeah, we're

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>probably not built to win a championship quite yet, but

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>we can beat the teams we're supposed to beat. And uh, Matt,

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Matt said Joe Burrows, the future Hall of Famer, because

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that's his way of telling you. He went out this

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>U as well. We used to fly over Matt and

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>night and with along with Jay Rudeback in the day

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and day fare over the stadium at l s U.

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And Matt would tell us little things that he used

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to do in the stadium that cannot be discussed here.

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>But that's uh, that's how a trench is L s U.

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>So your thought is Cleveland or nothing? Or you made

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a bet of Cleveland? No? No, I actually when it

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>popped down to five and a half there for a

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>short amount of time, I was able to get in

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>on them under under the six, and so I was

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>able to get in on Cleveland at five and a half.

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>It didn't last very long. But fortunately I was just

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>happen to be sitting in my computer and saw it happen,

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm I'm on Cleveland five and a half

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and I actually don't hate it at the six. To

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>be perfect honest with you, is that one of your

0:08:57.800 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>three best bets? Would you say of the week or

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that's just another bet, that's just another bed. I have

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.319
<v Speaker 1>three that I like a little bit more. You it's

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:05.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna be one of my three. Go you go ahead,

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>any thoughts tonight. No, I'm not going to copy your

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>pick like Todd copied. Todd copied my teaser, and that's

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>what he's gonna do, because you want to get any

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of them right. But you know, we we all went

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>down with Atlanta there. Um, I don't know, but I'm

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>not playing this game. It's not one of my picks,

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and I don't even know if I'm gonna play it

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>in real life tonight. Um. If I did, I might

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.679
<v Speaker 1>lean a little bit under the number, just because I

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>think that Burrows showed poison week one against San Diego,

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>but they stayed in the game because Tyrod was so

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>really awful, and well, I just, uh, I I think

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that they will. They will try to, you know, keep

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the training wheels on them a little bit in a

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>short passing game. I want to play the Browns, but god,

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>they were so bad. I took him off the TV.

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I took them off the TV here at bar Canada.

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>The game was so I had to get the Clippers.

0:09:57.440 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>People want to see the Clippers, so I had I

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>had to find a TV and that game was just

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:02.839
<v Speaker 1>so out of hand. I had to take them off

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>off so we could put the Clippers up. But I

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>can't trust I just can't. I mean, new coach, and

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>it's the same old story. I know it was just

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>week one, but it's in and and and long. It's

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a pass for uh Mike. For those who don't know,

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>not only Derrek Stevens conciliary. What is your official title

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>here at presentation? Vice President Operations, which I stated last week,

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>but somehow I don't remember this week. But you're also

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the uh the TSAR of Active Content Management, so you

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>are responsible for what's on every TV. And you just

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>took off the Browns. I don't normally make Thursday night picks.

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.319
<v Speaker 1>I certainly don't normally make them in in the circu

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>million contests, nor do I in Survivor just kind of

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>steer clear of Thursday games. But today I'm making an exception.

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I am taking the Cleveland Browns minus six consensus. Uh.

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.199
<v Speaker 1>And the primary reason and I'm not disputing anything. The

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Browns were miserable against the Ravens. Getting crushed thirty eight

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to six couldn't have looked worst worse. The Bengals should

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>have probably beaten the Chargers, but a offensive p I

0:10:58.360 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>which I think was an offensive p I on A J.

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:04.559
<v Speaker 1>Green and then uh, Randy Bullock. Uh as Randy's first Yeah,

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Randy Bullock has the calf strain if you believe that

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>in Shanks the field goal that could have said it overtime.

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the calf is fine now interestingly for

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Randy Bullock. Um, but I'm on to Cleveland primarily because

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of the rookie quarterback angle. I'm going to my phone

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>here because I want to get this right. I might

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>take onf my glasses cronkite style for this, because it's

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>uh serious matter. This is from my buddy t A

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>at Cleve t A c l e v t A

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. It does a who's great follow? Uh. He

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>was talking about the Browns in this game since two

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand five. And I'm not typically a trends guy either,

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>but some trends of matter. Here's this since two thousand five,

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and we were looking for this last night, Matt Matt

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>on Primetime Action since two thousand five. Rookie quarterbacks who

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>had to play on a short week on a Thursday

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>early in the season, talking about the first eight weeks

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of the season one in six straight up, one touchdown,

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>ten picks, and an anemic five point seven yards per attempt.

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>As t A said, here, yuck taking the Browns minus six.

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm with him. I'm take in the Browns minus six.

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>That's the primary reason. And if you do a query

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>search on this, the only quarterback in that subset to

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>win a game like this was the great Deshaun Watson

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 1>in his rookie year for the Texans. Russell Wilson didn't

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>get this done in this situation, nor did the quarterbacking

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame of Geno Smith, Sam Donald, Brandon Weed

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and E. J. Manuel or Daniel Jones. We'll see, but

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll I'll bet against that. I really do think the

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>short week this early is gonna be tougher Joe Burrow.

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>So Cleveland is my number two best bet of the week.

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>How about look at you? Are you? Are you just

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>play Devil's out here? You're not all worried about the injuries?

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and Joe, who's out, Greedy Williams out, Kevin

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Johnson out, Mack Wilson out, Jacob Phillips out. Then they're

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 1>questionable with Jarvis Landry and Olivier Vernon and Jack Conklin,

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the only thing that And I'm on your

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.199
<v Speaker 1>side as well with this, But are you at all

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>worried about the how shorthanded the Browns are gonna? Sure?

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Like that absolutely enters in my thinking. But here's the thing.

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>If Baker Mayfield and the talent that this team supposedly has,

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>even even besides those injuries, is what it's supposed to be,

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>they have to win this football game, and they have

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to win it going away, seriously on a short week

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>like this. By the way, the Cleveland Browns I believe

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>will be my survivor pick this week as well. Wow,

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna use it? Yeah? Interesting, So I'll take the

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Titans was the one that got through, thankfully, after Stephen

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Gotkowski took ten points off the board that he could

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>add last week with Shanks. I think I'm gonna go

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee and now Cleveland this week. You're very strong on

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>this game, very strong on this Let's do our best

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>bets Matteo number one, number one for me. Seahawks minus

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.199
<v Speaker 1>three and a half versus the Patriots. Here, this is

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to me a classic situation of people still looking at

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>this Patriots team and feeling having having these warm fuzzies

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>about this Patriots team. And listen, it's a one game sample,

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I get it. But they finally came out and let

0:13:56.480 --> 0:14:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson be Russell Wilson from the beginning of the game.

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that they saw I think that they looked

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:05.839
<v Speaker 1>at this and they saw how much success they were

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>able to have by being able to do that. I

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>would like to think in the assumption of rational thinking

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL from a coaching standpoint, I understand is

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>death sometimes, but I'm gonna assume rational thinking here, and

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that is the fact that they're gonna go out and

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>let Russell Wilson do that yet again against this Patriots

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>team that, as we know, just absolutely ravaged by opt outs.

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Really on the defensive side of the ball, as well

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>as people leaving town to shorthanded defense. Here at home

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>with the Seahawks team, Russell Wilson throwing early and often

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>give me the Seahawks minus three and a half in

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>this game? Do you permit me to step in line?

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Mr Palm, I got the Seahawks. Is my number one pick?

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Number one number one Browns were my number two. Uh.

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Much of almost mimicking exactly what Matt is saying. That

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>was the thing about the Seahawks in prior years. They

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>just sort of did what they did for three quarters

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and then they said, all right, let's put the cape

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>on Russell Wilson and get us out of here, superman. Uh.

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>And he would more often than not. Now it looks

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>like because they have heard this this outcry for why

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>don't you just do what you do from from the

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>beginning of a game, Let's have a game plan that

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessitate an escape job. You're right, the assumption of

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>rational thinking. Maybe we die with that, Matt. But that's

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>what I'm going with the assumption of rational thinking here

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>for a guy like Pete Carroll. And by the way,

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it's also with the Patriots. I was against the Patriots

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that was one of my losses last week. That was

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a terrible pick as well on the Dolphins, as it

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>turned out. But it's also it's so funny to hear

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>people talk about the NFL. They're like, oh, the Dolphins

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>are terrible. Oh, look, the Patriots are gonna be as great.

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's always it's still Bill Belichick. Well, if

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins are that sucky, does it immediately mean that

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots are that great. I'm not going to get

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>swayed by one game. I still don't think the Patriots

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be this good this year, and I don't

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>think they showed me that much in Week one. The

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton runs all day long strategy is not a

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>sustainable offense. I will take the Seahawks minus four. Terrific, terrific,

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you. So I'm filling in as the stenographer for

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>takeing a judge injury. No, no, no, and I won't no.

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I won't tell whether people are good people. I won't

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>tell whether people are good people are bad people, or

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>where they're from I or they're blowhards or any of

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. I'll just with with the dispassion record the place.

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Can we just do this one disclaimer before you get

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>your pick. I hope Todd's okay. Is I want to

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>have this recorded and and nothing have that own record.

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>We probably shouldn't release it until we know he's okay.

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>That's probably because it might come off wrong if he

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>passed or something that's true. So I'll give you my

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>number one pick. I'm gonna take and I thought this

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>line was just too high. I'm gonna take Matt Rule

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and his Carolina Panthers plus nine at Tampa Bay. I

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>think that the score the Raiders is a little bit

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>misleading in this in in in that game, I mean

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a horror a fourth down call at midfield. Uh, when

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you have McCaffrey and Bridgewater not to try some sort

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of play action or get somebody the kid they gave

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the ball to from West Georgia three years in the league,

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>sixteen carries for twenty five yards. I mean this intrucial

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:17.679
<v Speaker 1>fourth and warrucial. You know they got behind in the

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>game because they went away from McCaffrey and then they

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>went back to him in the third quarter. On that

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 1>eighty five yard drive, he had eleven touches. They went

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 1>up and down the field. That's how they got back

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.199
<v Speaker 1>in the game and actually took the lead. I'm just

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sold that that father time has to take it.

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Its toll on Brady. I don't know that Arian said

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 1>he's you know, he plays better in practice. I don't

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>know why he didn't play so well in the game.

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I think this is Tom Brady. He was horrible the

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 1>last eight weeks of the year in New England. I

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>know he has more weapons, but I don't think he's

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>their savior down there. I don't think they're a playoff team.

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>I know it's not easy going in New Orleans, but

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans sucks the first week every year. Payton's terrible,

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>he is he all they always lose, and here they

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>come out with you know, because I was going to

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.679
<v Speaker 1>counter by saying, don't you think the pick six and

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>then that mortar kick that the Saints also recovered skews

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that result last week. But that's an interesting point about

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the SAT. So I was I was down. I was

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>higher on Tampa Bay. I thought this was a new

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>look for him and he finally had some receivers for

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the first time since moss Um. But no, and I

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>thought I thought Carolina looked decent and in a loss

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>at home. Be it to the Raiders. But this Raiders

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>team may be a little underrated as well. I just

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>thought this number would come out five and a half

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>or six, and when it was over seven, I had

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to take it. And it's going up still eight and

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a half now nine, So I'll take nine. Is my

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>number one best bet with the Carolina Panthers. Are you

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 1>taking nine? Let me just check on that, and the

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>name of Todd guishnev let me take. Here we go, okay,

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>here we go again? Do we give you? There's always

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and a half. There's always one of them still left

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>on the show. I don't know. Was it nine or

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half? Mikey, what's your sense, Agil, what's

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to say it's eight and a half. Okay,

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll take it. I'll take it. It's not gonna it's

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>not gonna sway me. Let me let me make sure

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that I'm right there. If Todd later comes back and

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>says it's nine, I think the record has to be corrected.

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:01.399
<v Speaker 1>You know what, Go with the nine, thank you, Go

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>with the nine. Thank you. It's it's teetering alright. Number two.

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>I've already given my number two, which is the Browns, Matt,

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I am going to be taking the New York Football

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Giants getting five and a half points here at the Bears.

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>The Bears played one good quarter of football. I went

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 1>back and Gil, you and I were on air whenever

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the Giants were playing, and we you get to see

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>about six sevent of the game. We're still having to

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 1>do programming. It's kind of hard to see every single

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>play that goes on. So I did go back and

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>rewatch that game, and it was a couple of pretty

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:40.679
<v Speaker 1>just unfortunate plays that that really kind of put this

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Giant's team in a position to lose as badly as

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 1>they did. And we're talking against one of the very

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>elite defenses, and all of the NFL everybody was talking

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 1>about how good the Steelers defense was going to be.

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>They didn't lose anybody from last year where they were

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 1>one of the elite defenses. And I was even talking

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>about that heading into that game, that I thought that

0:19:57.320 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 1>defense was going to get the better of the New

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 1>York Giants. It's well income the Bears, and yeah they

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>do have Khalil Mack. I do understand that, but it's

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>not it is not as complete a unit at all

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>as what you're getting in the Pittsburgh Steelers, and I

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>think that Daniel Jones and them kind of showed what

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>they can do without their best player being a factor

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 1>at all at all in that game. Se Kwon Barkley

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>completely neutralized in that game. That is not gonna happen

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in this game. He is going to be cut loosey,

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to be able to get some yardage on

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the ground, and Daniel Jones is gonna be able to

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>move the ball through the air as well. I would

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 1>love to have gotten the six where this thing opened.

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I did not, But even at five and a half here,

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I feel pretty confident. Would not shock me if when

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.199
<v Speaker 1>this game is over, if the Giants actually won this

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.719
<v Speaker 1>thing outright, but getting more than a field goal here

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>with this Giants team against the Bears team that played

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>one good quarter, that's all there is to it. And

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.719
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of unfortunate bad luck there on the

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Giant side that got them as battle loss as they got.

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Give me the Giants and five and a half Giants

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>supposed five and a half. I don't hate it. I

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>know what Mett's talking about. By the way, I will

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>I will go ahead and say, with all the coaching

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>gaps last week, Matt Patrician's decision to kick a fifty

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>five yard or with under five minutes left up ten

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 1>was the worst of the worst from a win probability standpoint.

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>That buoyed the Bears to victory. Good for Mr. R

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Bisky down the stretch in that game about the Giants,

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 1>and we were watching this again on Primetime Action, but

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:23.919
<v Speaker 1>I said this, uh this morning on a Numbers game

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:27.919
<v Speaker 1>at Visa that do you can say this about a

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of NFL games, but the way that the average

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>fan processes those games that oh, Pittsburgh destroyed them, But

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 1>really the full grub points in that game were twice

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to to to plays. The t J. Watt pick when

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the Giants were up seven in the second quarter just

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a Giant's kind of play where Daniel Jones throws it

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>into the midst of t J. Watt at the line

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 1>of scrimmage. I get it, it happened. But if that

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and the end of that long drive in the third

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>quarter where the Giants had this drive that was almost

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>nine minutes long, was almost nine yards, took up most

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of the third quarter, and it's the play where dupre hits,

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Daniel goes up in the air and Cameron Heyward grabs

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 1>it at the goal line. Those are two plays. That's

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the entire game. Those two plays don't happen, and I

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 1>get it. They happened, but the margin is not what

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it appears to be in the final score is what

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting in. So I totally totally appreciate that pick.

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Not one of mine, but I appreciate. Well, it's my

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 1>number three best bet, so I'll skip to and go

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>to three. I like the Giants in this spot. Um

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you know that drive that was what forty two plays

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and eighteen minutes. I mean, the problem is that they

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>need to be able to run the ball at the

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 1>two yard line. I mean, I know Barkley is not

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 1>in between the tackles back, but you have to be.

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>You can't roll him out all the way to his

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>left on second and go from the two. The way

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>they converted all those third downs in the fourth down

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>on that drive against that defense was very impressive to me,

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 1>and I thought, if you had Pittsburgh, it was a

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 1>really fortunate cover. I thought the Giants were the better

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>side there. I like him to win this game. I've

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>got some money line action on them, Matt. I think

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bears come out of that game, and you know

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the ineptitude of Detroit in the fourth core or the

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>decisions they made the defense they decided to play the offense.

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, with two and a half minutes of your

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 1>up three and he gets in an information runs into

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the middle. I mean, incredible. They did it last year

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 1>against the Cardinals to the Lions are horrific with a

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>lead in the fourth quarters. So I'm still I'm not

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>sold at all on this Bears team. I don't think

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be able to run the ball on Sunday,

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and I like the Giants to win. And I'll take

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the five and a half as well. Uh Sa Kwan

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Barkley of that game, Just for a clarification, fifteen carries

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 1>for six yards and one of those carries were for

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 1>was for seven. I mean, Pittsburgh's defense was everything that

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:35.679
<v Speaker 1>it was blown up to be. And as far as

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that drive, I want to get the exact number on

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>this in case anybody wants to score at home. But

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it was just fewer than nine minutes long. I'll effort that.

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 1>But just if you were than nine minutes long, um

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:50.919
<v Speaker 1>eighteen plays and uh or I believe nineteen plays as

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a matter of fact, unbelievable. And then it ends with

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the Cameron Heyward pick after the Bud Dupree hitting of

0:23:56.080 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones pick number three, man as my debut you here, Gil,

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I've got to I need some clarification. Am I able

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>to pick a total? Or do you guys only pick sides?

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Last week? I had two totals, all right, so in

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the clubhouse and one and one? Then my number three

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>here is the under in the Niners and Jets game.

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that you're probably gonna be getting forty three. Now,

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I was able to pull the trigger on this at

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:28.920
<v Speaker 1>forty three and a half, but I'll take the consensus

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>at forty three and feel pretty good about it. When

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you look at this receiver situation for the forty Niners,

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>it is really really bad right now. And now George Kittle,

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 1>they're saying he's not going to practice all week long

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>with the hopes that he is able to get out there.

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 1>So now you have absolutely nobody for Jimmy Garoppolo to

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball to for this forty Niners team. And

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>then you look at the Jets on the other side

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and We basically saw what this Jets offense is made

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>out of last week, and it is just not built

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to put up very many points at all. And so

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>uh forty three. I understand that this thing has been falling.

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I completely understand why this thing has been falling. So

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>even not getting the best of the number here, I

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>still like the under. I do not think either one

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of these offenses is in a position where they're gonna

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.360
<v Speaker 1>be able to put up any points here. So give

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>me the under on the Niners and the Jets under Niners.

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Jets Matt Brown's third pick of the week, third best

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>bet that is uh and the official number is uh. Yeah.

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a look at this thing has been This

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>thing was falling since this morning. Man, holy mackerel. Two,

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>oh boy, oh boy, you can tell you how about it.

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's take some East coast numbers here, Gil, because

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the the providing line on the prevailing numbers forty two

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and a half over on the East coast. So give

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>me the half, give me the hook. See the one

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of us might be looking in far away places. That

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>would be me. We live this show in reality, Gil,

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>we did. We don't you know it's your show. Yeah,

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>nobody's going to tell you what to do with this one.

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna go with forty two at least Mike Bob

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>never missing a moment. Push. Why don't you bet the

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 1>exact total to be forty to find that one out there?

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll give that one three. Okay, my number three is

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>actually my number two, and it's a total. I like

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the the Monday Night game over the forty nine and

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a half with the the the the debut debut of

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 1>the Big Al here in Las Vegas, with the Saints

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>coming into town. Shame we can't be there. Shame, we

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>can't be there. Um yeah, I like the way both

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 1>of these offenses played last week. Um, let's face it.

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders are susceptible to a passing game, and Kamar

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>was terrific out of the backfield as well for the Saints.

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Um this running back, this second year running back, Jones,

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Jacobe Jones is at his name, Jones incredible, Got Josh

0:26:56.640 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Josh Tea. I don't know Josh Josh Jacobs. Now we

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know anything. Now we got there. Eventually, this kid,

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Moss met him to win the rushing title like

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>fifteen to one, as if I like that Martin Napole

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Napoleon Kaufman. Now, uh, this kid is a great runner.

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I I watched that, dude. I thought that was the

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 1>best game of the weekend, actually the Raider game. And

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a Raiders fan, but I thought that was

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:30.239
<v Speaker 1>a terrific game with Carolina. I like that. I may

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.479
<v Speaker 1>even play in real life the first half over here

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>because Gruden is just so good scripting those first set

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of plays, like Walsh us to be um. I think

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>this Raiders team is gonna score a lot of points

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:42.479
<v Speaker 1>this year. I like this offense they got. They got

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Titans that can move the sticks on third down. But

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>this Chash Jacob's kid is a beast. This this kid

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:50.360
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be a good running back for a long time,

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>good in the past. Catching. Yeah, it's it's very impressive.

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>So I actually thought this number would be fifty fifty

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and a half fifty one, and it may get there

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>with the public by Monday night. It I'm I'm an

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Unders player in real life, and I'm tending to think

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that these overs are the way to go. I know

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>what did they win? The Overs fit one by three

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>or four games above the Unders this week? I think

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>they were nine and five going into going into to

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Monday or something like that. Look at there's no crowd

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 1>noise on third and Long for these visiting teams. I

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:24.959
<v Speaker 1>think that has to be a factor. It also has

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a factor that they can get off the

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Snaptow account, not just false starts, but getting off the

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 1>ball and not getting beat by the defense they fire

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>at one time. I think that's a big factor here.

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, in the NFL, third and seventh, third and

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>eight and longer, everybody's on their feet when the when

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the the visiting team has the ball, So I think

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that games will generally be overs. I'm not disagreeing with

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>your under Matt on that on the Jets game, but

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>let's go over. The total is my second best bet?

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I have forty nine and a half? Is that correct? Yes?

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>And a half? Um my number three, Call me square,

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Call me square, but I'm going with the Kansas City

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Omaha chiefs. Now here's the deal on Guessing Lines on Monday.

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>For those who are loyal listeners podcast, and thank you

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 1>so much over the years for being that. Christie and

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I did the show for week to first show of

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Guessing Lines. This year, we don't do it before week one.

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>We do before we too. And the lines that I

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 1>thought were the most off are the ones that I

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>guessed and turned out to be the most off. One

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of them was the Atlanta Falcons. I guessed four and

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a half at the time Chrissie said, I like your

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>line better, it was six and a half. Came to

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>my four and a half. Uh. The other one was

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings, which I couldn't believe. They were dogs against

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the Colts, but they have so many problems in the

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>secondary that I'm not I I steered clear, didn't want

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>any part of that. The other one was the Dolphins,

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>who I think are catching too much point, too many

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>points against the Bills. But I'll let the Dolphins show

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>me a little something before I jumped back into that pool.

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>The Chiefs giving eight and a half at the l

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>A Chargers, I don't feel in the Chiefs victory against

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the Texans on the opening Thursday night that they opened

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the playbook at all. There was only one downfield pass

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>from Patrick Mahomes that was the one that was called

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>back to DeMarcus Robinson the touchdown early in that game.

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I just think they they just absolutely coasted their way

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>through that win. Um, I don't think they showed anything.

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Clyde Edwards a lair revelation as a bell cow. They're

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>going up against the charge of the team that probably

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>should have lost, a rookie quarterback Joe Burrow and the

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati Bengals. Here's the thing with the Chargers. There was

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>nothing about that game, nothing from Torod Taylor on down.

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Joshua Kelly had nice performance as a rookie running back,

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>but there was nothing about them that scares you. And

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 1>they've got Anthony Lynn as their coach. I know that

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>there could be a situation here where it could get

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>back door because Andy Reid's not caring about our bets.

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not gonna overthink this too much. Give me

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs, lay the points and tip of the cap

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to the charges that they can prove me wrong. Some

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>bets you just have to be willing to lose. I'll

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 1>take the Chiefs, I'll give the points. There's some I

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>think Paul Howard tweeted it. Paul Howard, one of the

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>unsung stars of the VISA Network, doesn't get enough praise.

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Not really EEFs in Division games. There was some ridiculous

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>stat in the last twenty seven division games that they're

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>like twenty five and two against the spread. It was

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 1>he tweeted out about how well they do against their

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>division opponents. So I can't hate that player. I looked

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>at that Vikings game too. Yeah, it was. It was

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>weird at first, but they have nobody playing it. There

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>was sneaks. They really are. That's what we're talking about.

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>LOMBARTI yesterday, it's Michael Lombardi was kind enough to join

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>my show yesterday. I don't know if you know that

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>he was. It was. It was a very a somber, somber,

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 1>somber segments, but somber. It was somber, but but informative.

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>It's nonetheless informative. Where are we teasers of the week?

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that where we are? We all got me? What

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>did I say last week on this show? I said,

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 1>we got long? I said, I said, we're all on

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the falcons. You know what that means, boys and girls,

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>We all got crushed. Man, give us, give us your

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>factor the well. Back to the well, and I'm going

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.479
<v Speaker 1>right to the game you just talked about. And if

0:31:57.560 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you guys, if this is not part of your teaser,

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's going on here. Get that Chiefs. Get

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>get the Chiefs down from eight and a half to

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>two and a half. Get that thing under a field

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>goal against this Chargers team that did not show me

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>absolutely anything against this Bengals. The Bengals actually graded out

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it's like the seventh best defense on the week last

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>week according to for Football Focus against this Chargers team.

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Not Able to push the ball at all, not able

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to get anything going on the ground at all. This

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs team, we know, can turn it on against anyone.

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 1>It does not matter that they are playing on you know,

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>on the road. It's probably actually a bad thing for

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs. It probably would have been majority Chiefs fans

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>over there in l A anyway. So uh, give me

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs here under a field goal, and then I'm

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna pair this thing up with the Ravens. Uh down

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to one. So I will take the Ravens from seven

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>to one. And we saw what the Chiefs were able

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to do to this uh, we we saw it with

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs were able to do. We're able to do

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>on the ground against this Texans defense. And boy, oh boy, gil,

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>what do the Ravens do? Very well? They run the

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>football very very well. I think they're gonna be able

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to do whatever they want to against this Texans team

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>on the ground here. So if I can take that

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>thing off of the touchdown and get it down to one,

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll do that. So give me Chiefs and Ravens. You

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>know what's funny about that? When you said ravens first

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of all, two things happened one And I said this

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>on on the Morning Show as well. I'm starting to

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>become like Keith Morrison from from all those dateline NBC shows.

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 1>He's the guy with the gray hair who every time, no,

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>not Dayline NBC, but almost crime shows. Maybe some of

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>them are dayline where when when the story gets more

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 1>maccabre and and more grizzly, he goes, oh really, then

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>white hair. That guy Bill Hayter did a great piece

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>on it on SNL. But so when you said the Ravens,

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I reacted like that, and Mikey and I looked at

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>each other. We're like, oh, I don't know about that one.

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>You we we we sat here in judgment, didn't we?

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>What do you like? Not? That's not long? Is should enough?

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>With the road? The road? Favorite? Uh? Of course you.

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you'll have the Chiefs down to two and

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a half as well. Yes, well, I'm I'm debating on

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>taking the Titans down to two and a half was

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>one of my choices. Yeah, I'm I'm debating a little

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 1>bit there, or or if I wanted, well, what do

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you get the Packers at a straight six? Straight six? Yeah,

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:12.839
<v Speaker 1>that's really where I'm at. Either either the Packers down

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:14.839
<v Speaker 1>to a pick, I'm gonna take that. I'm gonna take

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the Titans down to two and a half. Uh in

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:21.279
<v Speaker 1>this game against UH, I don't think Gardner Minshew is

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:27.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna complete his passes nineteen. Come on, the Jaguars cannot

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>be happy with that performance, right, Like, I know they're

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:32.800
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be tanking for Trevor, but like if he

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>goes if you're the owner of the Jaguars and you're

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 1>tanking for Trevor, he goes nineteen for twenty, aren't you

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:41.399
<v Speaker 1>secretly like, oh, I'm not a Minshew guy, But yeah,

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you gotta look at the look at the performance. Um,

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Gail, I'll tell you I will. The other one,

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>it was basically interchangeable with the Steelers as well. So

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers at home against the against the Broncos, where

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you do take that seven and a half down to

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>point and a half. It was basically interchangeable. Either one

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 1>of those chief chis stas is mine. I like that

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Steelers defense against what is not technically a rookie quarterback

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 1>but might as well be a rookie quarterback. And Drew

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Lock who, despite seeming to be comfortable more comfortable in

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:14.319
<v Speaker 1>that offense that I gave him credit for, perhaps still

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't throw the ball down field and scaring anyone. So

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Judy didn't help him out. That Judy, that's the point,

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Not Fangio Foley, not Fanny peck Foley. Judy catches the ball,

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 1>they win that game. Slant pattern lay right off, his

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 1>cha action stops the class over. Yeah, I agree, Jerry Judy,

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:35.320
<v Speaker 1>rookie white out, Um, he'll be fine. So it was

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>so Kansas City, Baltimore, Kansas City, Tennessee, Kansas City, Pittsburgh.

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>You know what that means, boys and girls didn't work

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:47.479
<v Speaker 1>out last week for everybody having Atlanta? Alright, final two questions?

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Are we already there? Did miss something without without Todd?

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 1>About taking Todd and taking Brady out? I mean, you

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>cut the time in am Brady's answer. Brady starts an

0:35:56.520 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 1>answer messed up. Seriously, Brady gives very very detailed answer.

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:05.879
<v Speaker 1>He does and and and he doesn't change tones either,

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>So maybe that makes seems longer, but this is terrible.

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Four of us to talk about the previous guests for

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:14.840
<v Speaker 1>them for the week gone by. Brady is our leadoff

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>guy year after year. People. I saw the Twitter how

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 1>everybody was so happy he's still the leader. Your your

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 1>fans that have been following all ten seasons or eight seasons,

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.800
<v Speaker 1>they were so happy you kept the tradition of Brady

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:28.919
<v Speaker 1>party like it's two thousand eleven. Cannon, Oh, by the way,

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 1>has won a super contest. Really yeah, by the way,

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>they have the same number of entries this year as

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>they did when he wanted I want to say, I

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>want to oh yes, by the way, what did you

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:42.919
<v Speaker 1>say about that that contest the other day on the radio?

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Would you say, Well, look, I mean, PAULI says their

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>new sheriff in town, and you know, the group circle

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Jerk is a little too much around here for me

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that we got there. But but but listen, I mean,

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 1>we took you in what four and a half million

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars we're paying out four and a half million. At

0:36:56.600 --> 0:36:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, Derek's got a TV bill

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 1>for seventy five thousand for all the advertising we did.

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>And j and John Murray are rolling around in the

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:06.879
<v Speaker 1>back room at the West Gate. They raked off the people,

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>so who they're laughing all the way to the bank.

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 1>That's one way to put it. That's one way to

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:15.160
<v Speaker 1>put it. Uh. Let me just say this to the

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 1>to the loyal beating the book audience and those who

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 1>go back all the way to Benny dork days too.

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 1>What would you say if I invited a son as

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a guest on this podcast. I want to hear the

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 1>clamoring for that. I'm open to it. Um actually would

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 1>actually embrace that, would love it. Final two questions. We've

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 1>had these final two questions each and every week of

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:38.959
<v Speaker 1>this show Forbids Inception. The first of which is which

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of the big favorites do you believe is the most

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 1>likely to lose outright? And usually it's six and a

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 1>half point favorite or greater. I will not include Well,

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:49.360
<v Speaker 1>let's let's include them tonight, just to make it interesting.

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland six point favorites hosting the Cincinnati Bungles on Thursday night,

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee nine point favorites against the Jacksonville Jaguars. Yeah, let's

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>call it consensus. Uh. Moving down, Pittsburgh seven point favorites

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 1>hosting the Denver Broncos. Since I included six above, all

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 1>include six here. Green Bay six point favorites hosting the

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Lions, Tampa Bay eight and a half point favorites

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:19.760
<v Speaker 1>hosting the Carolina Panthers, Miami No Buffalo six point favorites,

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 1>another five and a half we can't include them. Sorry

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 1>if that's out. Uh. San Francisco seven point favorites against

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. Arizona six and a half point favorites against

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 1>this the Skins calling the Washington football team people, Baltimore

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>seven point favorites against the Texans. Man, there's a lot

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:36.719
<v Speaker 1>of these. Kansas City eight and a half against the Chargers.

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>And then, since we included the six is Noland's six

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 1>point favorites against Vegas on Monday night. Matt, Of all

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:46.719
<v Speaker 1>of those, which is the big favorite most likely to

0:38:46.880 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 1>get bounced out? Right? I think it's the Saints. Um.

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:53.800
<v Speaker 1>If you look at this, uh, they're gonna likely be

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 1>without Michael Thomas. So You're gonna have to have Emmanuel

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Sanders be your alpha when it comes to the passing game,

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the guy that just brought in and a guy that

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:04.880
<v Speaker 1>again in a weird season with COVID here, no preseason games,

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 1>not all this, the full trading camp, everything like that.

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know how long it's going to be.

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:12.400
<v Speaker 1>You could see it was all disjointed with him with

0:39:12.520 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>that offense last week. It was anyway not a real

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:17.400
<v Speaker 1>factor at all, and so now he's gonna have to

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 1>step in and be the number one here in week two.

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna take a few more weeks for

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 1>him to really get worked into this offense. And so, uh,

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, look, the Saints if if the Raiders are

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 1>able to bottle up Alvin Kamara and force Drew Brees

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to have to get it done through the air with

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jared Cook and and Emmanuel Sanders here, which

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is essentially how this is gonna have to go. I

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 1>think the Raiders have a really, really good chance of

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:44.800
<v Speaker 1>winning this thing outright, So it would be the Saints

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:47.400
<v Speaker 1>for me going down on their road trip out here

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to Las Vegas. Mikey, you have an update in addition

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to your pick so Todd. Todd has finally gotten back

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 1>to us. Okay, and I said where are you? Which

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I texted at ten sixteen. You know, we waited twenty

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:00.920
<v Speaker 1>minutes to start the taping of the show six Team Pacific.

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Todd says, huh, just finished playing tennis. We knew it.

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:08.799
<v Speaker 1>Ask you this. You do a show at a tent

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:11.759
<v Speaker 1>and Pacific for an entire year and then you say,

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:13.880
<v Speaker 1>last week, Hey Todd, just this one time, Mike, he's

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:15.400
<v Speaker 1>got a thing. We gotta do it at noon, and

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:18.720
<v Speaker 1>then he just completely he'll blame me. He'll blame me totally.

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>He'll and he'll be upset that we didn't wait perpetuity

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:25.560
<v Speaker 1>for the guy. But um, that's right, Yeah, I gotta

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 1>get I. I don't know that any of these teams

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>are gonna lose. I don't either. You know what I

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:33.880
<v Speaker 1>was like, who made up this question? Force to pick one? Geez?

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:36.920
<v Speaker 1>This is really bad? It is hell. It's the it's

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the it's the forty niners. It's the Jets beating the

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 1>forty ye Are you sure maybe that was one of

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:45.879
<v Speaker 1>them that I considered the forty Niners that bad? Matt?

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:48.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean, there's just they're just so beat

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 1>up right now. Offensive line troubles as well. I don't

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 1>like the Jets, just saying I don't think any of

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:56.759
<v Speaker 1>these teams are necessarily gonna lose, but um, you look

0:40:56.800 --> 0:40:58.879
<v Speaker 1>at this one and they're they're they're really really beat

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 1>up at the wide receiver position. A ship moving the

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>ball to the air is gonna be a problem. I mean,

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:04.839
<v Speaker 1>you kind of look back at that those stats as well,

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Gil Whenever you look at the forty Niners, what they

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 1>were able to do last week was also buoyed by

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:11.919
<v Speaker 1>that seventies six yard reception to Raheem Mostert. It wasn't

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 1>even to a receiver, it was to a back where

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:16.840
<v Speaker 1>they were able to get like so the big bulk

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 1>of the yardage that Jimmy Garoppolo was able to get

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:21.439
<v Speaker 1>was even on just a short pass to the running

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:23.320
<v Speaker 1>back and everything was done after the catch. And so

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't really like the Jets at all by any

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 1>stressing imagination. But I mean, this forty Niners team is

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 1>is really beat up right here early in the season.

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>So of of a lot of these teams, I think

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>they're they're pretty vulnerable as well. New Orleans or San Francisco.

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Then for you, officially, I'm gonna still I'm gonna still

0:41:40.920 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 1>take the problem is, I don't know the Michael Thomas

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 1>injury situation, so I guess then, yeah, I mean I

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 1>don't Yeah, they said he's gonna, you know, try to play.

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:51.799
<v Speaker 1>You know this, I'll go ahead and take the forty

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Niners then, because I don't know that Michael Thomas is

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna try to play, so I'll say the forty Niners.

0:41:57.920 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm I have one that might surprise you. Who you going? Finally,

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let me, I'm gonna go against Todd Wish

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:08.759
<v Speaker 1>and have his favorite quarterback. Um who that is? Uh

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Murray as he calls him on the number of

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the he said in the racial pandemic, he just calls

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:18.759
<v Speaker 1>him all the mar Murray. I didn't a pattern. Now,

0:42:18.880 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm I let's go with with Ron Rivera and the

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Redskins to upset to upset the Cardinals. But bold, I

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't need to interrupt you. I don't know. Maybe maybe

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 1>this is a whole different era here for the one.

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:34.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they showed a lot of resilience coming off

0:42:34.920 --> 0:42:37.759
<v Speaker 1>the deck down seventeen nothing, and I thought, but you know,

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the forty Niners really should have won that game last week,

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:44.239
<v Speaker 1>even though Arizona was able to overcome in the second half.

0:42:44.320 --> 0:42:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't like any of these I gotta be honest

0:42:46.280 --> 0:42:48.480
<v Speaker 1>with you. I wouldn't bet on any of these teams

0:42:48.520 --> 0:42:50.279
<v Speaker 1>on the money line. But if I so, I have

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:53.919
<v Speaker 1>to give one, I'm gonna give the Washington football team. Yeah.

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the Skins. For I think the Skins are

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:58.920
<v Speaker 1>exactly who the who we thought they were. Great front seven,

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Young was great. He's gonna be the defensive rookie of

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the year. But I said all offseason, if the Skins

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:07.279
<v Speaker 1>can hold their opponent to seventeen points, which ended up

0:43:07.320 --> 0:43:09.120
<v Speaker 1>being exactly what they held the Eagles to even though

0:43:09.160 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 1>they fell seventeen to nothing, fell down seventy nothing, then

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe they can win football games. But there's nothing about

0:43:15.680 --> 0:43:18.760
<v Speaker 1>their offense, the Skins offense, the Washing Football teams offense,

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that leads you to believe that they're going to win

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:22.959
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch. Yeah. The only yeah, the only problem

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I have with that one, guys, is just that, so

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals are playing at such a breakneck pace, right,

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they played at the fifth highest situation neutral

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:34.239
<v Speaker 1>rate last week and getting plays off so fast and

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:36.160
<v Speaker 1>getting up there and getting going. And as you mentioned, Gil,

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:39.239
<v Speaker 1>how this washing team is gonna go is how that

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 1>defensive line creates pressure because the offense is not gonna

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:43.840
<v Speaker 1>get it done. It's gonna be on the defense. And

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:47.600
<v Speaker 1>can they keep up with this Arizona Cardinals team as

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:50.160
<v Speaker 1>they come out and running running place as fast as

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:52.839
<v Speaker 1>they can line up with four wides every single time,

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 1>with all these different options for Kyler Murray and then

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:57.800
<v Speaker 1>even when you do pressure him, he has the ability

0:43:57.840 --> 0:43:59.719
<v Speaker 1>to escape this and get and get stuff done on

0:43:59.840 --> 0:44:03.319
<v Speaker 1>on the feet. That's my only kind of issue, uh there,

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 1>because I think the Cardinals, just with the pace by

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the time the second half rolls around, gonna be tough

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:10.800
<v Speaker 1>on this defense to just continually create havoc on that

0:44:10.920 --> 0:44:12.279
<v Speaker 1>and then I think that might be the point where

0:44:12.320 --> 0:44:14.279
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals kind of take over. Hey, can I asked

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:17.919
<v Speaker 1>a triven Jason back behind the scenes driven priduson number seven, Jason,

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:19.400
<v Speaker 1>can we see if we can hook up? Can we

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:21.440
<v Speaker 1>hook up Todd on on sky for the last question

0:44:21.680 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 1>for the final question and then just include him here

0:44:24.520 --> 0:44:27.359
<v Speaker 1>because he's crying by text. He's very upset right, he said,

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:29.759
<v Speaker 1>nobody told me what time we were doing the show.

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:32.280
<v Speaker 1>When you don't have a job, you have no structure

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to your life. You need some more structure. Toddler's need structure. Uh.

0:44:37.160 --> 0:44:41.840
<v Speaker 1>The my pick, by the way, green Bay, Okay, I

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:45.359
<v Speaker 1>actually think that. Look, there's nothing you can say bad

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 1>about green Bay. Four touchdowns, no picks and just a

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:51.719
<v Speaker 1>just a mess of yards from Aaron Rodgers. Uh last

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 1>week against the Vikings. But I mentioned that about the

0:44:55.320 --> 0:44:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Vikings secondary that you're talking about. Just this the secondary

0:44:59.520 --> 0:45:03.319
<v Speaker 1>with first of all, no pass rush, right, Daniel Hunter. Uh.

0:45:03.600 --> 0:45:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Everson Griffin gone to Dallas and god Way didn't give

0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:09.399
<v Speaker 1>them anything. He was a non factor. And with green

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Bay last week Aaron Rodgers, who by the way, was

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:14.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty excuse me, thirty two or forty four for three

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:16.800
<v Speaker 1>sixty four pardon me? Four touchdowns, no picks, He was

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 1>never sacked, first full game he played anywhere in Minnesota

0:45:19.640 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 1>without ever being sacked, five total yards of offense forty

0:45:23.719 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 1>one minutes and sixteen seconds time in possession. But green

0:45:26.719 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Bay had its way with the Minnesota defense that was

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:32.120
<v Speaker 1>renovated because they paid so much to Kirk Cousins. They

0:45:32.120 --> 0:45:34.359
<v Speaker 1>gave so much to Dalvin Cook. So you had Mike

0:45:34.480 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Hughes and Holton Hill as your top two cornerbacks last week,

0:45:38.000 --> 0:45:41.000
<v Speaker 1>with third round draft pick Cameron Danceler saying plenty of

0:45:41.040 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 1>action as well. All twenty three or younger Um No

0:45:45.880 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Xavier Rhodes, no Trey Wayne's, no Mackenzie Alexander. They all

0:45:48.719 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 1>left in the off season. So I don't know if

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 1>we can say green Bay is going to be this

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 1>great every single week, and it would be just like Detroit,

0:45:56.640 --> 0:46:00.040
<v Speaker 1>who should have killed Chicago last week, to all of

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a sudden have a completely different result against the Packers.

0:46:02.880 --> 0:46:05.440
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna say the Packers of the big favorites

0:46:05.560 --> 0:46:07.760
<v Speaker 1>most likely to lose out right, not saying it's gonna happen,

0:46:08.280 --> 0:46:10.120
<v Speaker 1>but I could. I would not be surprised in the

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:13.120
<v Speaker 1>least bit division. I was super high on the Lions

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:15.960
<v Speaker 1>coming into this season, Like I I loved everything about them.

0:46:16.040 --> 0:46:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Them not having Gola Day last week as well was

0:46:18.320 --> 0:46:20.520
<v Speaker 1>it was a pretty big thing. It looks like he

0:46:20.760 --> 0:46:23.880
<v Speaker 1>might be back this week as well, so definitely uptick

0:46:23.960 --> 0:46:25.759
<v Speaker 1>for that to have that guy out there, so I

0:46:25.880 --> 0:46:29.279
<v Speaker 1>I can definitely see it. Definitely, do we have Todd

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:34.040
<v Speaker 1>wish have available to us guys yet. Know anything, He's

0:46:34.080 --> 0:46:36.200
<v Speaker 1>not answering. He's still not hit soring. We try to

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:41.080
<v Speaker 1>incorporate him, he's still not answering. Sorry, it was never

0:46:41.200 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 1>his fault. No, it wasn't that. Uh, he'll be back

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:46.839
<v Speaker 1>next week, trusty. Alright, final question, Let's say we lived

0:46:46.840 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 1>in a bizarro world, gentleman, and we had to pick

0:46:49.000 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a side and each and every one of these uh

0:46:50.960 --> 0:46:54.919
<v Speaker 1>sixteen games except for one one game that on the side.

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:58.080
<v Speaker 1>You're like, Man, I wouldn't bet this period, even with

0:46:58.160 --> 0:47:00.520
<v Speaker 1>your money. Matt, what game do you on? No part

0:47:00.600 --> 0:47:03.239
<v Speaker 1>of the very first game? As I looked down that

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I scratched off the list the vikings in the Colts

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:08.120
<v Speaker 1>vikings on the road at this Colts team. This line

0:47:08.280 --> 0:47:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is confusing. The Colts are are favored in this game

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:15.799
<v Speaker 1>after laying an egg against the Jaguars. What is gonna

0:47:15.840 --> 0:47:17.719
<v Speaker 1>go on here? You look at this Minnesota defense and

0:47:17.800 --> 0:47:22.239
<v Speaker 1>they gave up massively high rushing success rate in week one.

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:24.880
<v Speaker 1>So now you look Jonathan Taylor and nine himes come

0:47:24.920 --> 0:47:29.480
<v Speaker 1>into town for this. Um. Yeah, this, this line, this game,

0:47:29.640 --> 0:47:32.680
<v Speaker 1>this everything you know? Let me figure out this Colts

0:47:32.719 --> 0:47:35.239
<v Speaker 1>team a little bit better and are the Vikings just

0:47:35.280 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna lay an egg this season? Sitting on that key

0:47:37.360 --> 0:47:39.919
<v Speaker 1>number three as well? That was the first, very first

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 1>game this week that I scratched off. I I completely

0:47:43.600 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 1>get it because you just don't know based on everything

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I just said about the Vikings defense, and then you

0:47:47.960 --> 0:47:50.759
<v Speaker 1>can see the Vikings just destroying them as well. You

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:53.640
<v Speaker 1>for me, it's a Sunday night game. I know that. Uh,

0:47:54.040 --> 0:47:57.160
<v Speaker 1>it's man's best bet. It's one of my best bets too. Yeah,

0:47:57.239 --> 0:48:00.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I it will be interesting. I think

0:48:00.880 --> 0:48:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that Atlanta made the Seahawks look better than they really are,

0:48:05.760 --> 0:48:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and uh, i'd like to see Camp performing in an

0:48:08.040 --> 0:48:11.759
<v Speaker 1>environment outside of New England against a division opponent and

0:48:12.120 --> 0:48:14.600
<v Speaker 1>see what kind of a game plan Belichick comes up

0:48:14.640 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 1>for this week. I think it's an interesting game. It's

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a tough number four, and I don't want any part

0:48:18.920 --> 0:48:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of it. I will say now that the well I

0:48:22.480 --> 0:48:24.319
<v Speaker 1>said I was gonna say now that the numbers four

0:48:24.320 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half. I will make it at Lanta Dallas.

0:48:26.080 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 1>But actually it's the Buffalo Miami game that flum mixes

0:48:29.239 --> 0:48:34.440
<v Speaker 1>me the most, because is Miami as bad as they

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:37.880
<v Speaker 1>were last week or are they every bit as good

0:48:37.920 --> 0:48:39.479
<v Speaker 1>as I thought they would be in the off season?

0:48:39.480 --> 0:48:42.239
<v Speaker 1>In other words, the Ryan Fitzpatrick team that closed out

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:46.480
<v Speaker 1>last year. I have Miami Dolphins over. I have them

0:48:46.719 --> 0:48:48.439
<v Speaker 1>on a future ticket for the a f C East,

0:48:48.800 --> 0:48:51.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not willing after one performance against New England

0:48:51.120 --> 0:48:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to write them off. So six points is a lot

0:48:53.320 --> 0:48:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to get. I'm not pulling the trigger on it. I

0:48:55.239 --> 0:48:58.279
<v Speaker 1>would not be surprised with either outcome. Buffalo wins by

0:48:58.320 --> 0:49:01.359
<v Speaker 1>ten or more, wouldn't be surprised. Miami wins out right,

0:49:01.440 --> 0:49:03.680
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised. That'd be the game for me. That

0:49:03.719 --> 0:49:05.279
<v Speaker 1>would be it. So what are our best best? Cat?

0:49:05.400 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>We review these here? Matt Brown in order has Seahawks,

0:49:12.239 --> 0:49:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Giants and forty Niners Jets under Yes, I have Panthers, Raiders,

0:49:20.320 --> 0:49:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Saints over and Giants and Gil You have Seahawks, Browns, Chiefs, yes, sir.

0:49:27.080 --> 0:49:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And our survivor picks? Did you take those? Now? Do

0:49:31.040 --> 0:49:33.840
<v Speaker 1>we go to survivor picks? That's what we forgot. I

0:49:33.920 --> 0:49:38.759
<v Speaker 1>got the Brown. Oh my gosh, we got Todd now too, Matt.

0:49:38.800 --> 0:49:43.960
<v Speaker 1>What's your survivor pick? Cardinals over the Washington oh As

0:49:44.239 --> 0:49:48.319
<v Speaker 1>went right? Against me. Well, I'm not betting in um,

0:49:50.040 --> 0:49:53.480
<v Speaker 1>let's see, uh, strategic on both of our parts because

0:49:53.480 --> 0:49:55.680
<v Speaker 1>we probably won't use either the Browns or the Cardinals

0:49:55.719 --> 0:49:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in another touch. Yeah, that was that went into it

0:49:59.239 --> 0:50:01.239
<v Speaker 1>as well. I didn't. Yeah, I kind of. I tried

0:50:01.280 --> 0:50:04.319
<v Speaker 1>to play it is if I were actually still in contest. Yeah, yeah,

0:50:04.640 --> 0:50:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that. I would take the Browns this week.

0:50:08.640 --> 0:50:11.239
<v Speaker 1>I like it. Ladies and gentlemen. Right at the end

0:50:11.280 --> 0:50:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of the show, while we're doing inventory, it is Todd wishnev. Todd,

0:50:15.320 --> 0:50:20.759
<v Speaker 1>what's your excuse? You guys didn't tell him I'm this week?

0:50:20.840 --> 0:50:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You just said even when we thought we had him,

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:29.960
<v Speaker 1>were you effort? Effort? Todd? Okay? And then the teasers,

0:50:30.040 --> 0:50:34.680
<v Speaker 1>we have teasers. We all have the chiefs Man's combining

0:50:34.760 --> 0:50:37.200
<v Speaker 1>them with the Ravens. I'm taking them with the Titans,

0:50:37.320 --> 0:50:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and you're taking them with the Steelers. All right, that

0:50:40.200 --> 0:50:45.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't we try to hear me literally the last sentence,

0:50:46.080 --> 0:50:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Todd Wishnev. Ladies and gentlemen, what's your excuse? Toddy? My excuses?

0:50:50.800 --> 0:50:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Nobody told me what time we were doing the megapod.

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you a question, what time did we

0:50:54.440 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 1>do it every single week last year. I don't know

0:51:00.000 --> 0:51:04.760
<v Speaker 1>ten o'clock. Maybe that's right, uh, and this way, but honestly,

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you ate it one time and then you switch it

0:51:06.840 --> 0:51:08.799
<v Speaker 1>to another time. So I didn't know that we had

0:51:08.800 --> 0:51:11.319
<v Speaker 1>an official time yet, Yes, we had an official time.

0:51:11.360 --> 0:51:14.920
<v Speaker 1>How did your tennis match go, Todd? I played amazing.

0:51:15.000 --> 0:51:17.919
<v Speaker 1>I beat this guy who I never usually beat, six, four, seven, five.

0:51:18.480 --> 0:51:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Are you ready for Matt Brown? Todd? Probably not. I

0:51:22.680 --> 0:51:26.279
<v Speaker 1>heard Matt Brown's a superstar. What did that mean? Are

0:51:26.320 --> 0:51:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you ready for Matt Brown to tennis? For tennis? Todd

0:51:29.760 --> 0:51:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to Matt Brown. Most of the audience didn't get that.

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh interesting, because I heard Matt tennis pennis superstar. I'm

0:51:36.200 --> 0:51:39.239
<v Speaker 1>just good at beating like old middle aged athletes who

0:51:39.280 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 1>have no achilles. I think he think he's referring to

0:51:43.480 --> 0:51:47.480
<v Speaker 1>sound like me. I resemble that remark, Todd next week,

0:51:48.160 --> 0:51:51.560
<v Speaker 1>also slightly portly midwesterners, Todd. Are you able to see

0:51:51.719 --> 0:51:54.320
<v Speaker 1>us our new set up here at the day? That

0:51:54.360 --> 0:51:57.240
<v Speaker 1>looks pretty cool? Dude, Get your butt back to Vegas

0:51:57.280 --> 0:51:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and we don't have to have this error again. Okay,

0:52:00.040 --> 0:52:02.839
<v Speaker 1>if my good friends Mike and Gil would hook me up,

0:52:02.960 --> 0:52:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I would be back and taking tomorrow. Oh, trust me,

0:52:05.719 --> 0:52:09.400
<v Speaker 1>we are your good friends. We are for Todd Wishne.

0:52:09.520 --> 0:52:11.759
<v Speaker 1>He'll be back next week. Thank you, Matt, appreciate it. Man.

0:52:11.800 --> 0:52:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll see you this evening, Matt Brown. Everybody from MSG

0:52:16.719 --> 0:52:18.759
<v Speaker 1>plus is primetime action. The two of us do that

0:52:18.840 --> 0:52:22.320
<v Speaker 1>with Danielle Alvari and with Kelly Bidlin. Uh seven to

0:52:22.440 --> 0:52:25.279
<v Speaker 1>ten Eastern right there at MSG plus seven to ten pm.

0:52:25.320 --> 0:52:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Wall games are going on. Thank you, Mikey, and thank

0:52:27.360 --> 0:52:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you so much. You have no idea. Again, I cannot

0:52:30.000 --> 0:52:32.359
<v Speaker 1>stress this enough. This tickles me. Is that the right

0:52:32.400 --> 0:52:35.080
<v Speaker 1>word tickles? This is terrific. I love to set up

0:52:35.239 --> 0:52:38.480
<v Speaker 1>so great come a long way? Yeah, man, sure half

0:52:38.520 --> 0:52:41.759
<v Speaker 1>was that Virginia Slims. Rginia Virginia Slims. I like to

0:52:41.800 --> 0:52:45.879
<v Speaker 1>be compared to pioneers on the Ladies Tennis Tour. Good

0:52:46.000 --> 0:52:48.000
<v Speaker 1>luck with all your bets. Hope we do better this

0:52:48.080 --> 0:52:50.800
<v Speaker 1>week than we did last. Mikey accepted. Thanks for listening.

0:52:50.840 --> 0:52:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Good luck with everything. Week two in the National Football League,

0:53:00.280 --> 0:53:03.839
<v Speaker 1>The paper Back the bo