WEBVTT - Mini Crush #29

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, welcome to movie Crush. The Mini crush A

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>dish with knol whatever on my left. Kidding, I just kidding.

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I could never be mad at each chuck whatever Chuck. Now,

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>we'd work it out. Yeah, we'd hug it out. Duke

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>get out and then hug it out. We'd hug it

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>out over some beer and Pott brownies. You keep saying

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>that it still hasn't happened yet. I don't like alcohol

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>with sweets unless it's like wine and chocolate. You know.

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I saw the other day it was a van outside

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of Whole Foods and it was alcohol infused sweets, and

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>my kid looked at it and said, that's weird. Who

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>would want that? And I said, I agree, Yeah, I'm

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>not into it. Like, like I said, some red wine

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and chocolate is perfect together. But anytime I'm like at

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a birthday party and I see someone eating cake and

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>drinking beer, it just is so gross to me. Right,

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>beer and cake? Do you like like chocolate stouts or

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>any kind of fruity beer? I mean, I like the

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>occasional of hint of fruit in an I p a. Yeah,

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>what about a sour you like a tart sour bear?

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Not not a sour guy. I don't get it. I

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>like it. People like sours. I don't get it. I

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>know it tastes like spoiled beer to me. Wow, that's

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>where you're wrong, Chuck, taste like the fruit of the gods.

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're gonna get going. Everyone with a social

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>studies query. I threw out social studies movie, very simple one.

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Who's your favorite director, all time favorite director? And we

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>heard from everyone. I might have to follow this up

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>with the part two because I'd really like to get

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to all these My good old bud Joe Garden Um,

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:01.919
<v Speaker 1>he's active on the page, which makes me super happy.

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Joe was a writer for The Onion for many years

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and hung out with Joe sim in New York. And

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>he's just a great, great dude who is one of

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:15.959
<v Speaker 1>a kind. They broke them old, Joe garden says. I'd

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>say the directors who have proven they have a unique vision, uh,

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and I want to follow would be the Cohen Brothers

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and David Cronenberg. But George Miller has made some of

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>my favorite movies Road Warrior, Mad Max, Fury Road and

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Babe Pig in the City. And I'm always curious to

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>see what he does next, Joe, great answer, David Cronenberg, Man,

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>what a what a filmmaker he is? I like these

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>all over the place too, Like he's got these body

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>horror pictures and I want him like an old man

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>from the twenties, call him pictures chopping on a cigar.

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>And then he's got like these epic like crime movies

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>like Eastern Promises. So he's he's got a really really

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>broad ubra. Yeah, but boy, when David Cronenberg goes into

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>just full funked up Cronenberg mode, I'm always interested in

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that even a weird movie like exists Ends. Did you

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>ever see that? That literally is the one that just

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>popped into my head because it's sort of like a

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>like a spiritual successor to Naked Lunch. It's got a

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of the same weird little nipples things and weird

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>rubbery penises. I don't know, it's it's it's good. I

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>love it. David Frey says Wes Anderson probably most consistency

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to movies. I like, good answer any

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>bellio uh BeO leo preaching from my home province. Dennis Villeneul,

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>He's he's the stuff. She loved Arrival. Um, I'm with

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you there, man. He's great. He's doing the New Dune

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's gonna make like two movies out

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of the first book, which is which is huge. I

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>saw that looks good. Jane Savage toss up between Guillermo

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>del Toro and Kevin Smith. There's a range between those two,

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>but that's what Jane likes. Megan Johnson Frucci says, I

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>don't care about his inconsistencies or smaltiness. I'm going with Spielberg.

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>His films have a grandness and Hark can do the

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>early days of cinema in which going to the theater

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>was an event. I tried watching Ready Player one the

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>other night. I didn't like it. I wanted to like it,

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and I liked it it first because it seemed fun,

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, but then it got like really snoozy, pretty

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>click it was just okay, And I didn't like the

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 1>fact that it looked like Avatar, like it just stayed

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in the c G I world. That that bugged me. Yeah,

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I didn't love it. Dan still Hard to Browdy says

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>close call between the Cohen Brothers and Edgar Wright, both

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>very detail oriented, have unique visions and do great things

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>with music in their films. But I've had to choose

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>just one. Maybe Edgar Wright, because I like his movies more,

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the Cohen brothers. Hey, Edgar right, he's putting on

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>a good movies. Oh no, he's great. He's great. But

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it called me in fifteen years. The Cohens are just

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>just cannon man, They're just I agree Rick Broider pound

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>for pound. I think Spielberg, Uh, he's had his misfire,

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 1>but a few directors capture movie magic the way he does.

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Rob Johnston Robert to Be says, I wish I could

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>say something more high falutin, but I gotta go with Tarantino,

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>or maybe let's be honest. Kevin Smith up through and

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>including Red State. Red State was interesting. I didn't see it.

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 1>It was okay. Danielle Ferlito, says Dennis Villeneu again, Um

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Enemy Arrival, Blade Runner great, so good. Jessica Foley not

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>super hip on directors other than the big names. But

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with John Hughes because I love those

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>old teenage angst movies. Yeah, Rebecca Nunn, I'm not ashamed

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to say, Wes Anderson, you should not be ashamed. He's great.

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I still never saw I love Dogs. It's good. Yeah,

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it's really really really pretty. Don't have as much time. No, Oh,

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I know, dude, you know, I know, I know. I

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>just went and saw the new Mission Impossible. So if

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you're into that, Sarah let her running, We'll crush Tom

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Cruise is one of the best runners. Yeah, let's crush

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that one out. Judge it, judge it, and crush it

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>will Thomas, says Spielberg. Ron Howard Francis Ford Coppola. But

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>lately Scott Cooper, who directed the movie that Chuck like

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>called Hostiles. He also did Black Mass, Out of the

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Furnace and Crazy Heart. Oh wow, those are all really good.

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that was the same guy. Yeah, good movies.

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you there, Jenny, and toss up between Christopher

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Nolan and Dennis Villeneux. All right, Interstellar and Arrival are

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>two the best sci fi movies in recent years. Yeah,

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Interstellar I had problems with I had big problems with it. Yeah.

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh Kayla mh. She's always on. I normally don't pay

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 1>attention to directors, but looking back, consistently, like Chris Nolan

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and J. J. Abrams. Will Burke directs her isn't something

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I always consider when I think of favorite movies. But

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>John Hughes from Will Burke Jack Hale's says, hard to

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>say of all time, I mean gonna go with Edgar

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Wright as a really creative director. I don't want to

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>see more from him. Brett Giles, Christopher Nolan, Memento, Insomnia, Inception,

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>movies like that. Aaron Lee. Aaron at Lee says Wes Anderson.

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Dave Naga Kawa says Kevin Smith, Well, he's getting a

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of love here. What do you think of Kevin Smith?

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Clerks is great. I think Chasing Amy's okay,

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>all right. I think Mall Rats is fun. Yeah, Clerks

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>is great though. Yeah. Uh. Peter Kimmler says, I can't

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>go wrong with the Legend Steven Spielberg. He's getting a

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of love here too. Uh. Bo D Stuckey says

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the directing duo Powell and press Burger. They made some

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of the most arresting and unique films in cinema history.

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>The Red Shoes, Matter of Life and Death, Black Narcissus,

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>bizarre British films that had a massive influence on Scorsese,

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>plain countless ellers. Well, bo, I don't know about these movies,

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>so I'm gonna have some homework to do. I've heard

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of I've heard of red Shoes. Yeah, I'm sure probably

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>our buddy Casey Pegram would be all over it. Yeah,

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Casey's probably has a Powell in Pressburger tattoo. Yea at

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the very least blu ray copies of all of the films,

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the aforementioned films. You should get Casey in here too.

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah for an interview, say why not do it? We

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>went saw eight and a half, the Fellini film. It

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>was It was really good. I like the sequel nine. Yeah,

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>classic classic joke too, is it? I'm sure it's been

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>made many many times. Emily Bauer Richard link Ladder. Oh yes,

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree with you, Emily. I've shown my love

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:44.319
<v Speaker 1>for that man on this show for sure. Let's get

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to a couple of more and you know what, we

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>are going to continue this one because I feel like

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:49.679
<v Speaker 1>everyone should get hurt, so we might do this one

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>a couple of more times. Abby's echoes, Uh, pretty big,

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Darren Aronofsky Fans movies are so well done and subtly

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>off putting he's a master at his craft. I agree

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>with you, Abby, he knows how to push the buttons

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of an audience and that is tough to to learn.

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>You gotta be good at that. Uh mayka, I'm sorry. MARKA.

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Salo says Tarantino, no doubt, and Giammo del Toro also

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:15.599
<v Speaker 1>had some brilliant movies. J. J. Arbino, Tim Burton or

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Terry Gilliam Scott Murby says Xavier Dolan, French independent film director.

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>All Right, I'll have to check that out, and let's

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>go with one more. A. J. Middle Stett says Cohen's

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>for sure. Being from Minnesota, I'm proud to have to

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of Hollywood's best represent our state. All Right, that's social

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>studies best or favorite all time director. And I am

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely going to continue with that thread on future shows

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>because that's a good one. I think we're gonna move

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>on to the whole truth. This is when I put

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>out some poles on Facebook and then we talk about them,

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I put these out this morning, and I'm

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna start doing these more in advance. But I'm a

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 1>busy dude, and I am really sorry that these don't

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>get more. You don't get more of a heads up

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 1>on these everybody, and big thanks to the Movie Crushers

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>page who always alert people that that these polls and

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>things are up. So thanks as always to the Movie

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Crushers for being the super super fans. Super cool. They

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>are super cool, all right, pull time, I'll go in

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 1>reverse order here preferred movie watching DVD, Blu Ray or streaming,

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>And out of five and thirty four votes, we got

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and seventy nine for DVD Blu Ray and

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>three and fifty five for streaming, so about double the

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>number for streaming, but pretty good representation there for DVD

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Blue Ray. Not bad. It's im curist out there, good stuff.

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>The next poll remakes, and the two options you got

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>were yeah they can be okay or no never. And

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I know this is broad and you will not be

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.559
<v Speaker 1>satisfied with only those two answers, but we got four

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy people said yeah they can be okay

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and a hundred and thirty nine people said no never.

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>M and I'm I'm sort of a yeah they can

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>be okay. Um, generally, I think come on, be a

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>little more creative and get out there and make new movies.

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>But there are a lot of movies that are remakes

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people don't even know are remakes

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that are great, great movies. So I'm definitely going with yeah, um,

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>they can be Okay, what's a good remake for you?

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Chuck a good remake? I loved The Departed. The Scorsese

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>movie was a remake of an uh I think maybe

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 1>a Japanese film. Is it a John wu film? John?

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>But it was older, right, not even that older. I

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>think the movie is called Infernal Affairs, and it was

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>one of those remade not too long after for an

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>American audience. Interesting, But I love The Departed. So that's

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>where I think remakes can be really good. But then

0:11:58.000 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>it's weird though, because you have sometimes you have these

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Prestis drectors that do these remakes that are just utter

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.599
<v Speaker 1>a horse ship, like what's his name? Who did the

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Psycho remake? Fu? That movie remakes? Who cares what? He

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>just go masturbate and come on man, terrible awful, And

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and then the Old Boy remake from Spike Lee did

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>not see that. I did not either, but I did

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>not need to because Old Boy is a perfect film

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's just like why why bother. Why do that? Yeah,

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>there's the shot for shot remake of Psycho. The only

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>thing I want to say about this is I thought

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>it was an interesting experiment, an interesting filmmaking experiment to

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>do a shot for shot remake of a classic like that.

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>And I thought that was I would have rather seen

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>an experimental shot for shot remake of Psycho than just like,

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:48.839
<v Speaker 1>here's our modern take on Psycho, uh, with C g

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I and ramping up the horror. So I'll give that

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>one a pass, but I get it. I still think

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of masturbatory. I'm with you, but you're talking

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>about masturbation like it's a bad thing that from No, no, no, no,

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying they're no. I'm saying it's a better way

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of using your time. The next poll funnier movie, and

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 1>I just gave two choices. These movies are often lumped

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>together as the male female versions of the same thing,

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>The Hangover or Bride'smaids. Very evenly split here, folks. Two

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty two people said the Hangover, two hundred

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and fifty three people said Bridesmaids. Bridesmaids wins out by

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:33.439
<v Speaker 1>a narrow margin. Uh, I don't I would have to

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.199
<v Speaker 1>flip a coin, man, I think both of these movies

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>were really funny. Well, surely that poll is just half

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>entirely men, half entirely female. I mean, that's obviously what's

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>going on. Might have to give the edge to Bride'smaids

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>because totally joking, I agree Bridesmaids is. I know, I

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>think brides Maids is a smarter movie. There were a

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of moments in that from Kristen Wig that just

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>like have me doubled over laughing every single time I

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>see it. Um, But I did really think the first

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Hangover was pretty good, and I think maybe I'm suffering

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit from hangover hangover with those two bad sequels,

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>whereas Bride'smaids was smart enough just to do one movie

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>so far. I'm sure there's a remake in the work, though,

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>because it's a cash cow, I think you would have

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>seen it by now, though you would think so too.

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>But truly, one of those other ladies will get married,

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Melissa Carthy will be the bride and the next one, right,

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.479
<v Speaker 1>that's true, I guess. I guess sometimes you get the

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the the immediate sequel, and then sometimes you got the

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>delayed reaction sequel, like the sequel that no one wanted,

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>or the sequel Bridget Jones movie that sometimes it's the

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>sequel that it takes a little time for the public

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to be like, we we insist upon this sequel. Good point.

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Good point. I'm trying to get Melissa McCarthy on the show, everybody.

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>She's in Atlanta, and I adore her, so tweet at her,

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>told her to come on the show. All right, let

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>me see. I think we've got two more polls, or

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe more boxing movie cage match, Rocky or Raging Bull.

0:14:56.000 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Only two votes here. Two one people said Rocky and

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight for Raging Bull. Oh boy, that's a little surprising.

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought it might be a little more even than that.

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Rocky is a great movie, though they're both really good.

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>That's a tough one. Who is scarier Jason Vorhees or

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Michael Myers? Who do you? Who do you think scarier?

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't not talking about better movies. Which character is

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>scarier to you? Who would you least like to be

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>chased by? Well? I think we were talking in the

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>last episode about how Michael Myers has mystical powers of

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>slow walking, but so does Jason, I guess I don't

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>remember him running around a lot. No, he's a little numbers.

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see a ton of those movies. They're kind

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of lumbering. I don't know. I think that, I think

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that Michael Myers, I don't know. It's tough. Well, Jason

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>vorhees uh did not get as many votes now he

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>got a hundred and forty three votes to Michael Myers

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to sixty four. Okay, I'm gonna retroactively go with the

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>group one. Michael Myers is that's a pretty scary character.

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>And Michael Myers is just a really I mean, the

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>hockey mask is one thing, but man mask that Michael

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Myer's mask, is any anything scarier? You know what that is? Right,

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>William Shatner? Right, and i'd heard that. Man, if you

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>look at it up close, it makes sense. Just but

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>it was tweaked, William Shatner. Man the art department took

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and then they made it white. Yeah, yeah, yeah, it's

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>not flesh flesh colored. William Shatner. He probably wants some

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>money for that. Did you see him arguing with people

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter about autographs? And he's a nightmare. Now, He's

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>basically like listen. Uh, don't don't bug me for an

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>autograph ever, Like I don't give him. I don't do pictures.

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>If you want it, come and see me at these

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>events where I make money off of doing this. And

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>he said, I'm with my grandkids. I've got not much time,

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm out with my family, Like, please just leave

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>me alone with the autographs. And people got all on them.

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>But I was like, Uh, that's William Shatner's life. People

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>leave him alone if he wants to be left alone.

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Was up in the Hollywood Hills for the cartoon podcast

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I do with Holly Fry for history classes. We're hanging

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>out with this Disney animator legend guy and he was like,

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>and over there he's William shat this house. Leave him alone,

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Leave him alone. Uh do you stay through the credits

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>most of the time? Are almost never? And wow, this

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 1>is more even than I thought. Three thirty seven stay

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>most of the time, three nine almost never. There should

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 1>have been a third category. That's only if it's a

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Marvel movie. Yeah, of course, and you're guaranteed that post criticye.

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>But even I sometimes forget to stay for those as well.

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>All Right, one last poll, everybody uh, and I'm and

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 1>I tease this out in the last episode, better decade

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>for movies seventies or eighties, And out of nearly five

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred votes, a hundred and fifteen people said the seventies

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and three hundred and seventy nine and the eighties. Interesting result. Indeed,

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:52.919
<v Speaker 1>eighties wins out. I've said it before. Just go look at, like,

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>get on your computer and type in the movies of

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty three with the movies of nineteen eighty two,

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and just look at the quality films that were being

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:06.400
<v Speaker 1>pumped out every week. And it's really pretty remarkable. Uh.

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>This was long before the days of reboots and remakes

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and comic book movies and sequels. I mean they had sequels,

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>but not like now. And it's just amazing the quality

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>films that were coming out on a regular basis. Your

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>favorite canine sidekick Kujo came out that year. Good one, Noel.

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 1>All Right, what else do we have here? We're gonna

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>finish up with stream this and then Comic Card. I've

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>been watching Sharp Objects on HBO. Have you seen it?

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I watched the first one. I liked it. I was intrigued. Yeah,

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>so this is the show. Um, I believe from the

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>writer of Gone Girl. Yeah, it was Jillian Flynn, and

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.199
<v Speaker 1>it very much has that vibe. Uh. If you like

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Gone Girl, which I did, I thought it was good.

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I read the book too, and stars Amy Adams and

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it is oh and well. It starts the great Patricia Clarkson, um,

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>who long long been a fan of. She's wonderful and

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>everything she's in and she is uh. Patricia Clarkson is

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 1>so good at playing like the sweetest uh sweetest sweetest

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>person in the world, or like the scariest, most reprehensible

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>lady you could ever want to meet, and in this

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>case she's playing a bad lady. But also stars Sophia

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Lillis from it and Eliza Scanlin someone I haven't heard

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of but she's really great in it, Chris Messina, Elizabeth Perkins,

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Matt Craven, a really great, great cast of side characters.

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>But this show is all about Amy Adams. She has

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 1>really become this character to me and his just uh.

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>She is an alcoholic, functioning alcoholic, has a lot of

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>problems from her past that are teased out as the

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>show goes on through flashback. She's a reporter. Yeah, with

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 1>Sophia Lillis as her as the young heir, which is

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>great casting. That's the girl from it. Yeah, she looks

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>like a young Amy's fantastic and um, it's just a

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>really it's a show filled with unease as the story unfolds,

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Um as a reporter going back to her town to

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>investigate these murders of young girls. A lot of good

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>cross cutting between the present and the past keeps you

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of in the dark about who knows what, when

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>where very much. I did see a funny headline that says,

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Amy Adams in Sharp Objects is the world's shittiest reporter,

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>never takes notes. Well, it's all about her head. Yeah,

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>she's like the jay Z of crime reporting. Yes, she's

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 1>not to give me any notes, that's for sure. But uh.

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I love about it is its

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>use of music, and led Zeppelin features very prominently. I

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know how much money they're paying led Zeppelin, but

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 1>she listens to led Zeppelin constantly in this movie and

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>or in the show, and they've used probably I've watched

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>up to date, so I've seen the first four or five.

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like they've played fifteen led Zeppelin songs so far.

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Just can't be cheap, no way, but it's HBO. Yeah,

0:20:57.040 --> 0:20:59.439
<v Speaker 1>they got deep pockets, that's true. But you don't think

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>there's some like savvy you know, penny pension producer being like,

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>can you guys use like moby grape instead or something?

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>You know? I mean, well, what they may have done

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>was gotten some kind of discounted deal, like like a

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>bulk deal. Yeah. And the fact that they're featuring led

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Zeppelin prominently, like it's not just happenstance, like led Zeppelin

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 1>is a through line through this show, and so they

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>may have said, hey, listen, it's prominent. It's you're gonna

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>be featured a lot, so maybe give us a deal

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>on like your catalog would be my guess. It's probably

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>how they did it. But good show. Um, can't wait

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to see where it goes. It's a limited run. I

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's kind of thing that's gonna have a

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>season two. Um, but just really quality stuff out of HBO.

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Highly recommended so far, and nold. We're gonna finish up

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:53.199
<v Speaker 1>with Comic Card. We don't have much time here, so

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go through these five pretty quickly. Um. Kayla

0:21:57.480 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>mh She's always on the board. What's your favorite movie

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>from your least favorite genre? Good question, what's your least

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>favorite genre? No, I think we've talked about this. Yeah,

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if we both go with rom com

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a fan of rom coms. Are take them

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>or leave them? Yeah, I'm generally not a fan. So

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say my favorite rom rom com is is

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>probably When Harry met Sally. Yeah, do you mean when

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Harry met Potter? We we did not work in a

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Harry Potter reff to the last episode. Well, we can

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>go back and post. I like that. We already already

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>have our running jokes and all. It's good stuff. It

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't take long. Chad at Madison says, you're hosting a

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:36.640
<v Speaker 1>movie night for people of all ages, and you want

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to show a lesser known film. What's your pick for

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>a great movie that kids will enjoy as well as adults.

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>It isn't one of the obvious films the kids have

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 1>seen a million times already. I just had something pop

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 1>into my head. It's a movie from the nineteen eighties

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>called My Bodyguard with Chris make Peace and Martin Maull

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and Ruth Gordon. I know we're rucording like from Haroln Maude. Yep,

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 1>she plays his wacky grandmother. Um. It's a i would say,

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty little known film, but a really good movie in

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the eighties about a kid that's being bullied and the

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you know how every school has the one scary kid

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that was like he murdered somebody and he left, and

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>how he's back, when in fact it's usually like the

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>kid just transferred for a year and came back. That's

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the deal. This guy comes back, everyone's scared of him.

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And this young kid who's getting bullied by Matt Dylan

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and his gang, he hires this guy is his personal

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 1>high school bodyguard and they form a friendship. It's very sweet,

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>sweet good movie. I've been my kid. She she hasn't

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>really taken to reading for fun. Um she's nine, but

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>she reads great. But yesterday she's cool. She was here

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>all fucking day. Um, but I mean I mean that

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>as a testament to her patients and my shit and

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>hittiness as a parent. But um, she started reading The

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Witches and rolled all books and now she loves reading.

0:23:56.320 --> 0:24:00.160
<v Speaker 1>So The Witches I've forgotten how dark it is, how

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>intense and kind of like creepy and the movie um

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:05.239
<v Speaker 1>doesn't pull on your punches either, with Angelica Houston as

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the Grand High Witch. And so that's a good one

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>for kids. That's from the nineties, and it's got that

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:12.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of schlocky almost got like an evil Dead quality

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 1>too with the goal, with the makeup effects and stuff.

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>It's really really good record. That would be my pick.

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>That's a great thing about reading, man, when you just

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 1>got to find something your kid will like and then

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden the world has opened up. It

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>was rolled all for me to actually, now that I

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>think about it, and I really loved all those James

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 1>the Willy Wonka books and James and Giant Peach and

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff I read. I read those ravenously. Have

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>you ever read any of his more body adult books.

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I have not, but we did do an episode of

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:37.919
<v Speaker 1>Ridiculous History about how he was basically the archetype for

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:42.719
<v Speaker 1>James Bond is a super spy slash badass fighter pilot

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and new Ian Fleming I r L and Ian Fleming

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of probably based James Bond on Roll Doll. That

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool story, alright. A couple of more. Nick Kelly says,

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 1>do you ever listen to soundtracks just to get yourself

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 1>in the headspace of a movie where you like the tone,

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>like if you're melanchol Uh, you listen to Lost in Translation, Yeah,

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of, And you know that's a good example. I

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:09.359
<v Speaker 1>listened to that soundtrack. It's a great soundtrack when I'm

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>in a mellow mood. I don't know about melancholy, but sure, yeah,

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:15.919
<v Speaker 1>it's got a melancholy kind of like. Yeah, I picture.

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 1>That's a good soundtrack that really does match up with

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the feel of the of the movie. That's got all

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>those Kevin Shields tracks on it, like the Air. Yeah.

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I actually saw my Bloody Valentine over the weekend in Chicago.

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I told you it was absurdly loud. That's what I heard.

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>It was punishingly loud. Their legendarily loud. Yeah, I just

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>gotta When I was in Chicago, I got a great

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>soundtrack for a movie I've never heard of. Maybe you've

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>heard of this, Chuck. It's called Foxes with a very

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>young Jodie Foster. I guess I'm not sure what's about.

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>But it's a Georgio Morodor soundtrack, who I love. You know,

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>he did all the synthy stuff for like Donna Summer

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>like I Feel Love and all that stuff and did

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Midnight Express And I'm a big fan of his soundtrack.

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>So but I just like them cat people, cat people

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>doing the room that he did. So I just get

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>the soundtracks because I like listening to him nice good stuff,

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>or any of any of what's his name's work? John Carpenter, Oh,

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>for sure, he's one. He's one of your synth hero

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm a fan. Uh. And finally John Bick, not John Wick,

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>but John Bick says, if you could embody the life

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:17.479
<v Speaker 1>of any actor during any role, what would that be?

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:23.199
<v Speaker 1>Like Paul Newman is Butch Cassidy h interesting? Does he

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 1>mean to be that actor or to be that? To

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>be Butch Cassidy thinks to embody the character? Right, embody

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the life of any actor during any role. Oh, you

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>mean maybe like the period in that actor's life when

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 1>they were playing that particular role, like Paul Newman in

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>the era of Butch Cassidy. I guess that's tough. All right.

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with a couple of things. I'm gonna

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>say Burt Reynolds in his heyday, let's say during Uh,

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I you can go a little later than say, Cannonball

0:26:55.920 --> 0:27:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Run Days, that'd be a lot of fun. And um, mean,

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 1>is there anyone cooler than Steve McQueen in The Great Escape?

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>That those would be my picks. Those are my off

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>at the top of my head picks. So thank you,

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>John Bick, Thank you everyone else to uh who posted

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 1>your questions on Facebook? Who I just wanted to say,

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>for a minute ago, I think you had a guy

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:19.120
<v Speaker 1>named Chad Madison, right, Yeah, I don't know. I think

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I had it right. But if he was a friend

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of mine, I would make fun of him and I

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.360
<v Speaker 1>would call him mad Chadson. What did you get that?

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Just transposing the letters in his name, I had to

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>make n We're friends Now? I like that? Ol, nice

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:34.360
<v Speaker 1>non sequitor. All right, everybody, your homework for this week

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is a Popeye, the Robert Altman movie. Mike Hollingsworth the

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>an animator and you might know his work on the

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:47.119
<v Speaker 1>Great Great Netflix show bow Jack Horseman. Mike came in

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>here and we talked about Popeye, a movie that he

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:54.640
<v Speaker 1>said he feels like was made expressly for him, and um,

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I had loved, loved, loved that movie as a kid.

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Good soundtrack on that one, to Harry Nilson. Have you

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>listened to it? Is it not good? Well, it's weird

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the whole movie. As an adult seeing it, it was

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a weird experience because it is a strange movie. It

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>is a strange soundtrack. The songs for a musical quote unquote,

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 1>none of the songs are catchy or singabowl. They're all

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>very downbeat and minor chords. And apparently Harry Nelson was

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 1>just wrecked on alcohol and drugs. Well, there's that one

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>song in it that's used in um Punch Drunk Love,

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>So like, what is it? Team needs me, needs me?

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:33.239
<v Speaker 1>He needs me? Yeah, he needs me, he needs me,

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 1>he needs olive oil singing that one I'm getting Yeah,

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it's Shelley Duval. It's a weird movie and a very

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>weird songs, and it was very cool seeing it as

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>an adult from someone who was a kid just thought

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it was the greatest thing ever. And it's still great.

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>It holds up, but it holds up in a in

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>it's great in a different way to me. Did you say,

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Robert Altman, that's interesting for him to write, Yeah, it was.

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>It was a strange movie. Won if it was a

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>passion project where he just always had a thing for Popeye. Well,

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we answer these questions in the episode. I

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>can't wait to hear it. All right, everyone, thanks for listening,

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and we will see you next week. Look out on

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Facebook on the movie crush page and the Movie Crushers page,

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and check us out on social medias on Twitter and

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>everything and follow us. I think I'm supposed to ask

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever and stuff. Click the things, click all the things,

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>turn on the notifications, do all that stuff. Man uh,

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 1>And thanks for hanging in there. We'll see you next week.