1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:12,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene 2 00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:16,960 Speaker 1: Jay Ley. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, 3 00:00:17,040 --> 00:00:23,520 Speaker 1: investment and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 4 00:00:23,600 --> 00:00:33,879 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg A 5 00:00:34,080 --> 00:00:37,080 Speaker 1: rate hike from the Bank of England as expected, coming 6 00:00:37,080 --> 00:00:40,400 Speaker 1: through at zero point seven five from zero point five 7 00:00:40,440 --> 00:00:43,920 Speaker 1: percent previously, So a twenty five basis point hike from 8 00:00:43,960 --> 00:00:46,559 Speaker 1: Governor Carney in the MPC. Let's cross over to just 9 00:00:46,680 --> 00:00:48,919 Speaker 1: outside of thread Needles Street and around the corner where 10 00:00:48,960 --> 00:00:51,720 Speaker 1: near a church is standing by Bloomberg's very own Nara 11 00:00:51,800 --> 00:00:53,400 Speaker 1: go through the headlines for us and get us up 12 00:00:53,440 --> 00:00:55,720 Speaker 1: to speed on what we're learning this morning from the 13 00:00:55,720 --> 00:00:58,080 Speaker 1: Bank of England. Yes, thanks so much, Sean. This is 14 00:00:58,080 --> 00:01:00,320 Speaker 1: a unanimous vote for that rate rise. Of course, the 15 00:01:00,400 --> 00:01:03,279 Speaker 1: rate rise was highly expected, but economists were perhaps expecting 16 00:01:03,440 --> 00:01:06,600 Speaker 1: a seven to vote. We've got nine zero on the MPC, 17 00:01:06,680 --> 00:01:09,160 Speaker 1: so perhaps that might send a little bit of a 18 00:01:09,280 --> 00:01:11,759 Speaker 1: hawkish signal to the markets. More than that as well, 19 00:01:11,880 --> 00:01:14,920 Speaker 1: what we've got is the long term trend equilibrium rate 20 00:01:14,959 --> 00:01:17,640 Speaker 1: the bo ecs that at about two to three percent. 21 00:01:17,760 --> 00:01:19,880 Speaker 1: This is interesting because remember this is the first time 22 00:01:19,880 --> 00:01:22,319 Speaker 1: we're getting that our star from the BOE might give 23 00:01:22,360 --> 00:01:24,520 Speaker 1: some signal to wear rates settle in the future and 24 00:01:24,560 --> 00:01:28,280 Speaker 1: perhaps effect that forward curve somewhat. Now, some economists, many 25 00:01:28,319 --> 00:01:30,120 Speaker 1: of them, were saying we could get a range of 26 00:01:30,200 --> 00:01:32,840 Speaker 1: one point five to two point five per cent, So this, 27 00:01:32,920 --> 00:01:35,880 Speaker 1: of course is slightly higher at two to three percent. 28 00:01:36,120 --> 00:01:38,760 Speaker 1: Is that also a little bit of a hawkish signal here? 29 00:01:38,760 --> 00:01:40,800 Speaker 1: Other things that we've had in terms of comments from 30 00:01:40,800 --> 00:01:43,280 Speaker 1: the BOE, there are tentative signs that protection is um 31 00:01:43,560 --> 00:01:46,039 Speaker 1: is affecting global growth, so that's a little bit of 32 00:01:46,040 --> 00:01:48,560 Speaker 1: a sign of some of the risks. No mentions yet 33 00:01:48,560 --> 00:01:50,680 Speaker 1: of Brexit, but no doubt Mark Carney will get a 34 00:01:50,680 --> 00:01:53,120 Speaker 1: lot of questions out of that in the news conference, 35 00:01:53,160 --> 00:01:55,560 Speaker 1: because of course, one of the questions here that a 36 00:01:55,560 --> 00:01:57,440 Speaker 1: lot of people were asking is why the Bank of 37 00:01:57,480 --> 00:02:00,640 Speaker 1: England would hike into a potential down to turn ahead 38 00:02:00,680 --> 00:02:03,440 Speaker 1: of all that uncertainty around Brexit. But nonetheless that highly 39 00:02:03,440 --> 00:02:06,720 Speaker 1: anticipated hike has come. We do still have the comment 40 00:02:06,800 --> 00:02:11,079 Speaker 1: though of limited and gradual the boecing interest rate increases 41 00:02:11,120 --> 00:02:13,960 Speaker 1: from here being limited and gradual, and of course in 42 00:02:14,000 --> 00:02:16,320 Speaker 1: the news conference, there will be a lot of questions 43 00:02:16,360 --> 00:02:19,520 Speaker 1: around the guidance of the forward curve and when or 44 00:02:19,880 --> 00:02:22,200 Speaker 1: how rate hikes might come from here. Is it going 45 00:02:22,240 --> 00:02:24,080 Speaker 1: to be a one and done? What sort of signals 46 00:02:24,080 --> 00:02:25,840 Speaker 1: will we get on that John now a chair. It 47 00:02:25,880 --> 00:02:27,600 Speaker 1: is great to cat show with you much more from there. 48 00:02:27,760 --> 00:02:31,200 Speaker 1: Through the afternoon and morning right here on Bloomberg Radio 49 00:02:31,240 --> 00:02:33,280 Speaker 1: saw a great height from the Bank of England. Guilt 50 00:02:33,360 --> 00:02:35,839 Speaker 1: yields just jump a little bit higher off the back 51 00:02:35,880 --> 00:02:37,920 Speaker 1: of this decision to unchanged on the down a ten 52 00:02:38,000 --> 00:02:39,840 Speaker 1: year and at the front end the communication for the 53 00:02:39,880 --> 00:02:43,320 Speaker 1: Bank of England policymakers agreeing that more rate hikes will 54 00:02:43,400 --> 00:02:45,080 Speaker 1: be needed. Off the back of this, a little bit 55 00:02:45,080 --> 00:02:47,920 Speaker 1: of a bounce on sterling, a stronger dollar story today, 56 00:02:47,960 --> 00:02:50,080 Speaker 1: so that kind of sort of warp in the move 57 00:02:50,120 --> 00:02:52,840 Speaker 1: here cable now almost unchanged on a session down by 58 00:02:52,919 --> 00:02:55,160 Speaker 1: just a tenth of one percent now at one dollar 59 00:02:55,320 --> 00:02:58,680 Speaker 1: thirty one. Tom Keane expected, it was expected, but the 60 00:02:58,840 --> 00:03:00,839 Speaker 1: street wondering whether this has wanted done in the bank 61 00:03:00,840 --> 00:03:03,320 Speaker 1: having the communicating that more could be coming, and then 62 00:03:03,560 --> 00:03:06,440 Speaker 1: just as remarkable is the complete opposite of what we 63 00:03:06,480 --> 00:03:09,000 Speaker 1: saw yesterday afternoon with a fed. This is some real 64 00:03:09,080 --> 00:03:13,800 Speaker 1: substance to our US listeners. There's real substance here. And 65 00:03:13,880 --> 00:03:18,280 Speaker 1: I would suggest John knock on effect to the American economy. 66 00:03:18,320 --> 00:03:22,840 Speaker 1: This is not discreetly about the United Kingdom and whether 67 00:03:22,840 --> 00:03:25,359 Speaker 1: the guy from Arsenal will leave Racy Milan. We can 68 00:03:25,360 --> 00:03:26,960 Speaker 1: get that to that a little bit. We can do that. 69 00:03:27,000 --> 00:03:29,240 Speaker 1: But we have got some really good guests coming up. 70 00:03:29,240 --> 00:03:31,840 Speaker 1: And we got two individuals that used to serve on 71 00:03:31,880 --> 00:03:34,360 Speaker 1: the Bank aving the Monekey Policy Committee, and we can 72 00:03:34,400 --> 00:03:38,160 Speaker 1: begin with Adam Poston, Peterson Institute for International Economics President, 73 00:03:38,160 --> 00:03:40,040 Speaker 1: and he joins us on the phone. Now, Adam, it's 74 00:03:40,040 --> 00:03:41,680 Speaker 1: great to have you with us. Let's just begin with 75 00:03:41,720 --> 00:03:43,760 Speaker 1: the decision itself. If you were back on the MPC, 76 00:03:44,320 --> 00:03:47,320 Speaker 1: would this have been nine zero? No, I would have 77 00:03:48,000 --> 00:03:50,120 Speaker 1: I would have voted against it. I know Danny by 78 00:03:50,200 --> 00:03:52,760 Speaker 1: char you're having on later, would vote against it. And 79 00:03:52,800 --> 00:03:56,200 Speaker 1: I would presume that a couple of the members currently 80 00:03:56,280 --> 00:04:00,160 Speaker 1: more importantly, like the speech John Kunloft gave month out 81 00:04:00,200 --> 00:04:03,040 Speaker 1: and a half ago, would vote against it. It's very 82 00:04:03,040 --> 00:04:05,960 Speaker 1: hard to justify this decision in my view. How are 83 00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:09,800 Speaker 1: they justifying it, Adam? They seem to have two things 84 00:04:09,840 --> 00:04:12,360 Speaker 1: going on as as time put up on the TV 85 00:04:12,480 --> 00:04:17,320 Speaker 1: bloom A TV surveillance um that they think that their 86 00:04:17,400 --> 00:04:20,440 Speaker 1: output gap is closing, so inflations around the corner, and 87 00:04:20,480 --> 00:04:24,440 Speaker 1: they believe their wage forecasts that there's going to be 88 00:04:24,560 --> 00:04:27,200 Speaker 1: rising wages, even though, as Blanche Flower and others have 89 00:04:27,279 --> 00:04:29,600 Speaker 1: pointed out, those forecasts going back to the time I 90 00:04:29,640 --> 00:04:33,000 Speaker 1: was on the NBC years ago, have repeatedly been wrong. 91 00:04:33,920 --> 00:04:36,560 Speaker 1: We can bring in Danny now, Danny Blanchelind Datmouth professor 92 00:04:36,600 --> 00:04:39,680 Speaker 1: and former bankinging the Monetary Policy Committee member. Danny have 93 00:04:39,760 --> 00:04:43,080 Speaker 1: got no doubt where your vote would have gone last night. 94 00:04:43,520 --> 00:04:47,599 Speaker 1: Your thoughts on the decision, well, I I completely agree 95 00:04:47,640 --> 00:04:50,360 Speaker 1: with Adam. Um. I think what's really interesting is now 96 00:04:50,360 --> 00:04:53,279 Speaker 1: we're in the world if we still thinking and guessing. Um. 97 00:04:53,320 --> 00:04:57,400 Speaker 1: I'm actually trying to read the last four paragraphs of 98 00:04:57,480 --> 00:05:01,320 Speaker 1: the decision and there's actually no day to whatsoever that 99 00:05:01,440 --> 00:05:05,520 Speaker 1: sustains they can't come up with any data. Adams right, 100 00:05:05,600 --> 00:05:09,880 Speaker 1: They seem to think the output gap has actually has 101 00:05:10,000 --> 00:05:12,599 Speaker 1: closed a lot, and the only word is based upon 102 00:05:12,600 --> 00:05:16,720 Speaker 1: is I would sencely Caclaric summarize what they've written as 103 00:05:16,720 --> 00:05:20,080 Speaker 1: the data is absolutely horrible. There's no data to support it, 104 00:05:20,160 --> 00:05:22,719 Speaker 1: but we think it's temporary and wage growth is about 105 00:05:22,760 --> 00:05:26,719 Speaker 1: to explode. Um, I think it's I think, I know. 106 00:05:26,800 --> 00:05:29,800 Speaker 1: How is it right? This is a classic Red mistake 107 00:05:30,120 --> 00:05:32,359 Speaker 1: that will be reversed. Can I just tell you what 108 00:05:32,440 --> 00:05:35,680 Speaker 1: the data looks like. There's no inflation, no wage growth. 109 00:05:35,720 --> 00:05:39,599 Speaker 1: The people are borrowing like crazy, raised uncertainty, potential trade 110 00:05:39,600 --> 00:05:43,159 Speaker 1: wars and Brexit. Commercial property values and house prices are falling. 111 00:05:43,480 --> 00:05:46,839 Speaker 1: Business confidence is low, household debts through the roof insolvent 112 00:05:47,000 --> 00:05:50,000 Speaker 1: is a rising GDP. Growth is weak, and there's no 113 00:05:50,160 --> 00:05:55,000 Speaker 1: data whatsoever. Sounds like more rate hikes on Adam Poston, 114 00:05:55,040 --> 00:05:57,559 Speaker 1: because that's the communication coming from the Bank of England today, 115 00:05:57,760 --> 00:06:01,360 Speaker 1: not just one hike, but agreeing that more is to come. Yeah. 116 00:06:01,440 --> 00:06:05,840 Speaker 1: And again, often not always, but often I agree with Danny, 117 00:06:06,040 --> 00:06:09,120 Speaker 1: and in this case, especially on wages. I always agree 118 00:06:09,160 --> 00:06:12,039 Speaker 1: with Danny because he gets right. But I mean, it 119 00:06:12,200 --> 00:06:15,479 Speaker 1: is interesting, I've said on the show before and elsewhere. 120 00:06:15,520 --> 00:06:17,640 Speaker 1: You know, I could imagine the bank aving and filling 121 00:06:17,680 --> 00:06:22,279 Speaker 1: hamstrung visa vi bregsit Because they politically have to play 122 00:06:22,320 --> 00:06:26,120 Speaker 1: it straight and just be reacting. They can't argue against it, 123 00:06:26,520 --> 00:06:29,640 Speaker 1: and because the currency could move in crazy ways, but 124 00:06:30,400 --> 00:06:32,720 Speaker 1: that's not where we are right now, and so I 125 00:06:33,120 --> 00:06:37,160 Speaker 1: do not understand. I honestly don't get it. Dr Pos 126 00:06:37,200 --> 00:06:41,000 Speaker 1: And I've I've had the privilege of attending a packed 127 00:06:41,160 --> 00:06:43,800 Speaker 1: lecture of David blanche Flower and having the privilege of 128 00:06:44,080 --> 00:06:47,799 Speaker 1: opining to the young Turks of Dartmouth. David blanche Flower, 129 00:06:47,920 --> 00:06:50,680 Speaker 1: if you were in your lecture hall right now, and 130 00:06:50,720 --> 00:06:52,719 Speaker 1: you and Pose it are having a love fest over 131 00:06:52,800 --> 00:06:56,280 Speaker 1: no rate rise. Others disagree. So if I think of 132 00:06:56,440 --> 00:07:00,120 Speaker 1: Charles Plash or the Fresh Freshwater School or others. But 133 00:07:00,240 --> 00:07:04,080 Speaker 1: Professor Blanchflower state the case of those who feel Curney's 134 00:07:04,080 --> 00:07:06,320 Speaker 1: got to raise rates to get some room for the 135 00:07:06,360 --> 00:07:11,720 Speaker 1: next slowdown, Well, the case for those folks is that 136 00:07:11,760 --> 00:07:14,200 Speaker 1: you have to ignore the data. You go and look 137 00:07:14,200 --> 00:07:16,520 Speaker 1: at the forecast that you've got wrong the last twenty 138 00:07:16,600 --> 00:07:19,040 Speaker 1: meetings in a row, and you say we need to 139 00:07:19,160 --> 00:07:23,600 Speaker 1: raise rates in case the economy slows um and pretend 140 00:07:23,680 --> 00:07:26,120 Speaker 1: that the fact that you raise rate won't cause the 141 00:07:26,120 --> 00:07:29,080 Speaker 1: economy to flow. And you're don't going to ignore the 142 00:07:29,120 --> 00:07:33,400 Speaker 1: fact that, um, there's a potential Brexit disaster coming and 143 00:07:33,480 --> 00:07:35,480 Speaker 1: there's trade wars coming. So you have to take a 144 00:07:35,560 --> 00:07:38,680 Speaker 1: huge leap of faith and stay to yourself. Um. Now 145 00:07:38,840 --> 00:07:42,960 Speaker 1: is the moment something is fundamentally changed. Um, And you've 146 00:07:42,960 --> 00:07:45,280 Speaker 1: gotta have to persuade Blanchdown Post them that you know 147 00:07:45,320 --> 00:07:47,360 Speaker 1: what it is, but you can't tell us because there's 148 00:07:47,400 --> 00:07:50,160 Speaker 1: nothing in the data that actually tells you that this 149 00:07:50,320 --> 00:07:53,440 Speaker 1: is fundamentally altered. So the risk are to the downside. 150 00:07:53,600 --> 00:07:56,760 Speaker 1: And you've been saying for the last five years that 151 00:07:56,880 --> 00:07:59,400 Speaker 1: inflation is going to take off and wage growth is 152 00:07:59,440 --> 00:08:02,040 Speaker 1: going to take off, and you're going to say that 153 00:08:02,120 --> 00:08:05,600 Speaker 1: it's really going to happen now. Um. And I'm afraid 154 00:08:05,640 --> 00:08:09,960 Speaker 1: my class is gonna get to vote Adam Post And 155 00:08:09,960 --> 00:08:12,080 Speaker 1: I want to get a final thought from you. Typically, 156 00:08:12,080 --> 00:08:14,680 Speaker 1: when a central bank hikes, especially a developed one, the 157 00:08:14,760 --> 00:08:17,040 Speaker 1: some optimism around it. It sounds like growth is going 158 00:08:17,080 --> 00:08:19,400 Speaker 1: to improve, and that's why we're normalizing. This is a 159 00:08:19,440 --> 00:08:22,080 Speaker 1: thoroughly depressing interest rate hike. Even the Bank of England 160 00:08:22,280 --> 00:08:25,160 Speaker 1: might admit that themselves, because they're talking about lower potential 161 00:08:25,440 --> 00:08:29,680 Speaker 1: for the economy and bumping up against limitations, which means 162 00:08:29,760 --> 00:08:32,960 Speaker 1: inflation pressures around the corner. How do they convince people 163 00:08:32,960 --> 00:08:35,600 Speaker 1: in the news conference that there's some optimism out there. 164 00:08:36,080 --> 00:08:38,040 Speaker 1: I don't think they do. I do want to say 165 00:08:38,120 --> 00:08:40,400 Speaker 1: that you've hit your you put your finger on the point. 166 00:08:40,920 --> 00:08:43,560 Speaker 1: The most legitimate argument they can make, and they started 167 00:08:43,600 --> 00:08:47,160 Speaker 1: making this some months ago, was an argument that potential 168 00:08:47,200 --> 00:08:50,320 Speaker 1: had fallen. And when you your estimate of potential, meaning 169 00:08:50,360 --> 00:08:53,200 Speaker 1: the trend rate of growth, is off, you are more 170 00:08:53,240 --> 00:08:55,960 Speaker 1: prone to mistakes. But central bankers, they said in a 171 00:08:55,960 --> 00:09:00,600 Speaker 1: Bloomberg list of mistakes economists are making, are two caught 172 00:09:00,640 --> 00:09:03,440 Speaker 1: up in the nineteen seventies mistake. The classic nineteen seventies 173 00:09:03,480 --> 00:09:06,960 Speaker 1: mistake Arthur Burns us fed was potential was going down. 174 00:09:07,040 --> 00:09:10,600 Speaker 1: They thought it was rising. Therefore inflation took off. In 175 00:09:10,640 --> 00:09:15,000 Speaker 1: this case, they're probably going the wrong way. They're overestimating 176 00:09:15,000 --> 00:09:16,800 Speaker 1: how much potential is down. So they're going to make 177 00:09:16,800 --> 00:09:18,960 Speaker 1: a mistake in the wrong direction and impose. And it's 178 00:09:19,000 --> 00:09:20,240 Speaker 1: great to have you with us. He's gonna stay with 179 00:09:20,320 --> 00:09:22,679 Speaker 1: us alongside Danny blanch Flower'll get their thoughts or not. 180 00:09:24,120 --> 00:09:27,240 Speaker 1: But on central banks worldwide, great starts at the morning. 181 00:09:27,320 --> 00:09:43,760 Speaker 1: Tom It was plenty to talk about with this h 182 00:09:43,960 --> 00:09:47,679 Speaker 1: Danny blanch Flower, who's got us six thousand square foot man, 183 00:09:47,720 --> 00:09:51,040 Speaker 1: it's just north to Hanover, New Hampshire with Dartmouth at College. 184 00:09:51,280 --> 00:09:54,800 Speaker 1: Danny within the good comments of the governor is truly 185 00:09:54,840 --> 00:09:58,839 Speaker 1: he makes history raising rates into a huge political debate 186 00:09:58,920 --> 00:10:02,760 Speaker 1: called Brexit. He said policy and this is very Matthew Danny. 187 00:10:02,960 --> 00:10:06,720 Speaker 1: This is something you'd say, policy needs to walk and 188 00:10:06,880 --> 00:10:11,280 Speaker 1: not run for us to stand still. Boy, are there 189 00:10:11,360 --> 00:10:15,200 Speaker 1: a lot of dynamics. Is policy needs to walk in 190 00:10:15,240 --> 00:10:18,959 Speaker 1: that run? You and Adam pose and say policy needs 191 00:10:19,000 --> 00:10:23,120 Speaker 1: to stand still in that walk in that run. Why 192 00:10:23,280 --> 00:10:28,360 Speaker 1: why can't we get a little bit of normalization in here? Well, 193 00:10:28,440 --> 00:10:31,440 Speaker 1: times are not normal? Um? I mean so that the 194 00:10:31,559 --> 00:10:34,440 Speaker 1: UK economy prior to the Brexit boat was really doing 195 00:10:34,679 --> 00:10:38,400 Speaker 1: very well. Um. And now we essentially see the forecast 196 00:10:38,440 --> 00:10:41,840 Speaker 1: showing in many senses to come the sick man of Europe. 197 00:10:42,200 --> 00:10:45,960 Speaker 1: So you see very low growth. Um. You see lots 198 00:10:46,040 --> 00:10:50,319 Speaker 1: of pieces of data flashing amber if not read. And 199 00:10:50,440 --> 00:10:54,720 Speaker 1: the MPC's answer is that the capacity of the economy 200 00:10:54,800 --> 00:10:58,520 Speaker 1: has permanently gone downwards and now we have to start 201 00:10:58,559 --> 00:11:01,440 Speaker 1: to raise rates to make things is worse. So, I mean, 202 00:11:01,480 --> 00:11:03,800 Speaker 1: I've been since we since this all started at seven, 203 00:11:04,040 --> 00:11:07,040 Speaker 1: I've desperately been trying to read the inflation reports in 204 00:11:07,080 --> 00:11:10,800 Speaker 1: the minute, and it's really completely incoherent is to actually 205 00:11:10,960 --> 00:11:14,440 Speaker 1: why they raised rates. I mean, the one thing that 206 00:11:14,559 --> 00:11:16,160 Speaker 1: really gets me is if you look at one of 207 00:11:16,160 --> 00:11:18,520 Speaker 1: the charts they have, they see, if we don't raise 208 00:11:18,640 --> 00:11:21,520 Speaker 1: rates to inflation is going to be two percent m 209 00:11:22,200 --> 00:11:24,760 Speaker 1: So you raise rates because of inflation, but the forecast 210 00:11:24,760 --> 00:11:27,520 Speaker 1: says there isn't any and you say, well, we think 211 00:11:27,559 --> 00:11:30,080 Speaker 1: it's because the economy is at full and point, but 212 00:11:30,120 --> 00:11:32,959 Speaker 1: we have no evidence to support that. So I'm afraid 213 00:11:33,000 --> 00:11:37,839 Speaker 1: that this is a sort of utter incoherence. People to 214 00:11:37,920 --> 00:11:40,000 Speaker 1: look at it and say, why the heck did they 215 00:11:40,040 --> 00:11:43,320 Speaker 1: do this when the economy is under space, is huge 216 00:11:43,400 --> 00:11:46,840 Speaker 1: uncertainty and Brexit presume it is a major downside risk. 217 00:11:46,880 --> 00:11:49,360 Speaker 1: So I think this is the most incoherent decision I've 218 00:11:49,400 --> 00:11:51,400 Speaker 1: ever seen from the banks, because they don't if you 219 00:11:51,480 --> 00:11:53,840 Speaker 1: read the thing through, you can't really work out why 220 00:11:53,920 --> 00:11:55,800 Speaker 1: they raise rates. Well, there is this concern that the 221 00:11:55,800 --> 00:11:59,640 Speaker 1: economic potential of the United Kingdom has been diminished by 222 00:11:59,720 --> 00:12:02,520 Speaker 1: the exit conversation and that the UK is about to 223 00:12:02,559 --> 00:12:05,360 Speaker 1: bump up against supply constraints. You're just flat out saying 224 00:12:05,400 --> 00:12:08,800 Speaker 1: that's not going to happen. Danny I'm flat out are 225 00:12:09,000 --> 00:12:12,280 Speaker 1: I mean, I mean, you're you're right, that's what they say, 226 00:12:12,320 --> 00:12:15,040 Speaker 1: But what's the evidence consistent with that? I mean, I'm 227 00:12:15,040 --> 00:12:18,599 Speaker 1: allowed to respond by saying, show me something that's consistent 228 00:12:18,679 --> 00:12:21,120 Speaker 1: with that. Um. And I think the big thing that 229 00:12:21,120 --> 00:12:23,559 Speaker 1: they've said that the big basis of this is that 230 00:12:23,800 --> 00:12:25,599 Speaker 1: they think that means that wage growth is going to 231 00:12:25,679 --> 00:12:27,880 Speaker 1: take off. And I've tweeted a chart from the paper 232 00:12:27,960 --> 00:12:31,120 Speaker 1: this morning. They said that the last nineteen forecast in 233 00:12:31,120 --> 00:12:34,720 Speaker 1: a road said exactly the same thing, so over nineteen, 234 00:12:35,080 --> 00:12:37,640 Speaker 1: but now they think it really, really really is going 235 00:12:37,679 --> 00:12:41,199 Speaker 1: to happen now, So essentially this forecast is based on 236 00:12:41,640 --> 00:12:45,000 Speaker 1: which we're thinking and guessing because the forecasts have been 237 00:12:45,120 --> 00:12:48,320 Speaker 1: completely worthless. So now so, I mean, you're right, I 238 00:12:48,360 --> 00:12:50,560 Speaker 1: mean I agree with you. But what what the public 239 00:12:50,559 --> 00:12:53,120 Speaker 1: and the markets have to think is well, why should 240 00:12:53,120 --> 00:12:57,320 Speaker 1: we believe them that today things fundamentally have changed. So 241 00:12:57,440 --> 00:13:01,440 Speaker 1: Danny leap of faith? What's going to come next? I 242 00:13:01,440 --> 00:13:03,160 Speaker 1: know what you think the Bank in England should do? 243 00:13:03,480 --> 00:13:05,080 Speaker 1: I want to ask you what you think the Bank 244 00:13:05,120 --> 00:13:08,720 Speaker 1: of England will do? It's the next move really going 245 00:13:08,760 --> 00:13:10,920 Speaker 1: to be a hike or do you think it could 246 00:13:10,920 --> 00:13:14,319 Speaker 1: actually be a cut. Well, I think the answer is 247 00:13:14,320 --> 00:13:18,160 Speaker 1: obviously what would at imposing a Denny branch. First, they'd say, well, 248 00:13:18,240 --> 00:13:21,040 Speaker 1: let's see what the data looks like. Let's see how 249 00:13:21,120 --> 00:13:25,360 Speaker 1: things look going forward. Um, I think the expectation. I mean, 250 00:13:25,480 --> 00:13:27,839 Speaker 1: I think what we'll see will be the data and 251 00:13:27,960 --> 00:13:30,520 Speaker 1: not really going to improve. There won't be any rising inflation, 252 00:13:30,559 --> 00:13:33,120 Speaker 1: there won't be much wage growth, and we'll start to 253 00:13:33,160 --> 00:13:36,319 Speaker 1: see some bad numbers coming and so that will mean 254 00:13:36,320 --> 00:13:39,240 Speaker 1: the pressure will be on to reverse the cart and 255 00:13:39,280 --> 00:13:41,719 Speaker 1: start to think about putting more stimulus in. I think 256 00:13:41,760 --> 00:13:43,880 Speaker 1: that's probably where we got. But I would sit and 257 00:13:43,920 --> 00:13:46,080 Speaker 1: look at the data and I would say, well, let's 258 00:13:46,080 --> 00:13:49,320 Speaker 1: see if things have things proceed. But I would be 259 00:13:49,360 --> 00:13:52,040 Speaker 1: trying to make a decision based upon the data from 260 00:13:52,040 --> 00:13:54,840 Speaker 1: the real world, rather than guessing about the world that 261 00:13:54,880 --> 00:13:57,319 Speaker 1: they're dreaming about. And I think Adam has pretty much 262 00:13:57,320 --> 00:13:59,280 Speaker 1: said the same thing. So I'd be a data guy, 263 00:13:59,320 --> 00:14:01,440 Speaker 1: and I think the mark get some people listening should 264 00:14:01,480 --> 00:14:03,199 Speaker 1: say let's look at the data. So we just had 265 00:14:03,280 --> 00:14:05,840 Speaker 1: in the last twenty minutes the construction t m I 266 00:14:05,920 --> 00:14:08,240 Speaker 1: came in quite strong. So I would be looking at 267 00:14:08,240 --> 00:14:10,600 Speaker 1: the data, and I think I think the chances are 268 00:14:10,640 --> 00:14:12,640 Speaker 1: the data is going to come in bad. If you 269 00:14:12,840 --> 00:14:16,760 Speaker 1: ever seen a divergence like we've seen in the last 270 00:14:16,760 --> 00:14:23,240 Speaker 1: eighteen hours between an American monetary forecast in a UK forecast, 271 00:14:24,560 --> 00:14:28,360 Speaker 1: well I haven't, but think about tom. Actually, let's expand 272 00:14:28,360 --> 00:14:31,560 Speaker 1: it a little further. Let's expand it to Japan. I mean, 273 00:14:31,600 --> 00:14:33,760 Speaker 1: so we saw a couple of days before that we 274 00:14:33,840 --> 00:14:38,720 Speaker 1: saw and talking about extending quee, further, buying, further, e 275 00:14:38,840 --> 00:14:42,240 Speaker 1: t s, keeping rates negative. I mean, obviously the fair 276 00:14:42,320 --> 00:14:45,440 Speaker 1: has been raising rates and put things on hold, and 277 00:14:45,440 --> 00:14:48,520 Speaker 1: I've been critical of the US, but obviously you you 278 00:14:48,560 --> 00:14:51,520 Speaker 1: would be hard to argue against the four point one 279 00:14:51,960 --> 00:14:54,800 Speaker 1: GDP growth for the first quarter. I mean that there 280 00:14:54,920 --> 00:14:58,400 Speaker 1: is some evidence that there is strength in the US economy. 281 00:14:58,720 --> 00:15:01,320 Speaker 1: I mean that that's the d That number is a 282 00:15:01,360 --> 00:15:05,000 Speaker 1: big deal. So the data for the UK, we're talking 283 00:15:05,040 --> 00:15:08,240 Speaker 1: about some probably some GDP growth for the whole year 284 00:15:08,960 --> 00:15:12,040 Speaker 1: of about what we caught for the US for one quarter. 285 00:15:12,440 --> 00:15:15,000 Speaker 1: So if you have data like that, how does a 286 00:15:15,080 --> 00:15:18,240 Speaker 1: member of the MPC vote and say we should raise weights. 287 00:15:18,280 --> 00:15:20,960 Speaker 1: The only thing they can say is, oh, it's temporary, 288 00:15:21,160 --> 00:15:24,720 Speaker 1: and I guess I'm hopeful and I guess that this 289 00:15:24,800 --> 00:15:26,560 Speaker 1: is temporary and it's all gonna be okay. So I 290 00:15:26,560 --> 00:15:29,440 Speaker 1: think the answer is the divergence, perhaps if you focus 291 00:15:29,480 --> 00:15:32,240 Speaker 1: on is driven by the data. I mean, it's hard 292 00:15:32,280 --> 00:15:34,360 Speaker 1: to say that you should be rooting for a rate 293 00:15:34,400 --> 00:15:36,920 Speaker 1: cut in the US with a four point one when 294 00:15:36,960 --> 00:15:40,360 Speaker 1: you've got a point three in Britain. Okay, Danny, thank 295 00:15:40,400 --> 00:15:42,120 Speaker 1: you so much. David blanche Flower where us? So we 296 00:15:42,200 --> 00:15:45,840 Speaker 1: greatly appreciate dr proposing of Peterson Institute being with us 297 00:15:45,840 --> 00:15:49,680 Speaker 1: as well. Professor blanch Flower holds court at Dartmouth. Colin, 298 00:16:02,040 --> 00:16:04,480 Speaker 1: why don't you bring in? I guess you do. You 299 00:16:04,480 --> 00:16:08,040 Speaker 1: you don't have a tesla because I don't have a tesla. Note, 300 00:16:08,200 --> 00:16:10,120 Speaker 1: but I can tell you I'm not church rating in 301 00:16:10,160 --> 00:16:13,440 Speaker 1: the national some some rare positive price action in a 302 00:16:13,520 --> 00:16:16,560 Speaker 1: risk aversion session. We're up by almost nine percent in 303 00:16:16,600 --> 00:16:18,360 Speaker 1: the pre market. I want to bring in Brian Johnson, 304 00:16:18,400 --> 00:16:21,160 Speaker 1: Barclay's Capital senior order analyst, to get his thoughts on 305 00:16:21,160 --> 00:16:25,200 Speaker 1: the earnings. The headline from the Barclays research this morning 306 00:16:25,800 --> 00:16:29,720 Speaker 1: boring with a touch of tech row. Brian walked me 307 00:16:29,760 --> 00:16:35,160 Speaker 1: through what that means boring, because what we had on 308 00:16:35,200 --> 00:16:38,640 Speaker 1: the phone calls compared to last quarter. Was a Mr 309 00:16:38,760 --> 00:16:43,400 Speaker 1: Musk who sounded like he's stuck to a script prepared 310 00:16:43,480 --> 00:16:48,720 Speaker 1: by professional touch of check brow because they Philipbuster to 311 00:16:48,920 --> 00:16:53,040 Speaker 1: ran down the clock with an extensive discussion of the 312 00:16:53,440 --> 00:16:57,520 Speaker 1: progress over on the Autopilot team, including three members of 313 00:16:57,560 --> 00:17:02,560 Speaker 1: the AUTOPILOTUE team, Geeky out like a podcast about neural 314 00:17:02,640 --> 00:17:07,240 Speaker 1: nets and co operates on fast chips. So what have 315 00:17:07,320 --> 00:17:12,960 Speaker 1: we learn about the capital position? Uh? You know, cash 316 00:17:13,040 --> 00:17:15,919 Speaker 1: deteriorated for the quarter, bid less than we were looking 317 00:17:15,960 --> 00:17:20,800 Speaker 1: for UM with UM and we'll wait for the kid 318 00:17:20,880 --> 00:17:23,719 Speaker 1: to see some of the pathetics on cash. But what 319 00:17:23,760 --> 00:17:26,840 Speaker 1: we learned is that they are guys we expected, continuing 320 00:17:26,960 --> 00:17:31,880 Speaker 1: to target profitability for next quarter. Capex is being potentially 321 00:17:32,520 --> 00:17:36,280 Speaker 1: produced for the second time UM and by not selling 322 00:17:36,400 --> 00:17:38,960 Speaker 1: ZEP credits, that makes it clear that they're going to 323 00:17:39,000 --> 00:17:42,920 Speaker 1: sell some next quarter to help them get there. Portia 324 00:17:43,440 --> 00:17:48,760 Speaker 1: as revenues of I'm gonna call it, I guess Tesla 325 00:17:48,840 --> 00:17:52,639 Speaker 1: is on its way to Does Elon Musk want to 326 00:17:52,680 --> 00:17:55,480 Speaker 1: be Portia? Does he want to be Forward in a 327 00:17:55,560 --> 00:17:58,399 Speaker 1: hundred and fifty seven billion or does he want to 328 00:17:58,440 --> 00:18:02,080 Speaker 1: be something? What's the scale? What's the scale dream here 329 00:18:02,440 --> 00:18:05,560 Speaker 1: for Tesla. You know that that is I think the 330 00:18:05,760 --> 00:18:10,800 Speaker 1: great um the question that this gets to, we've actually, 331 00:18:11,240 --> 00:18:13,440 Speaker 1: you know, with a two dollar price target. Well, we 332 00:18:13,520 --> 00:18:17,320 Speaker 1: think it's over valued. We're certainly not out there predicting bankruptcy. 333 00:18:17,840 --> 00:18:22,320 Speaker 1: But the Tesla could make a fine niche manufacturer along 334 00:18:22,400 --> 00:18:26,800 Speaker 1: the lines supports selling a premium brand to products globally 335 00:18:26,840 --> 00:18:30,359 Speaker 1: that yet is an expensive way well with competition getting 336 00:18:30,440 --> 00:18:33,879 Speaker 1: free to be, but brings other attributes. Um, you know, 337 00:18:34,160 --> 00:18:37,479 Speaker 1: if to compare a Porch to Toyota in terms of 338 00:18:37,800 --> 00:18:42,720 Speaker 1: practicality and economy, obviously the Toyota will win, But instead 339 00:18:42,800 --> 00:18:47,080 Speaker 1: the Aspirations seemed to be to be the next Toyota. 340 00:18:47,200 --> 00:18:50,439 Speaker 1: And I think the most interesting thing about the quarter 341 00:18:50,560 --> 00:18:53,760 Speaker 1: and the new guide is, and part of my headline 342 00:18:53,760 --> 00:18:58,600 Speaker 1: around Boring, is they're at least willing temporarily to pull 343 00:18:58,640 --> 00:19:02,000 Speaker 1: back some of their aspiration ships. China is not likely 344 00:19:02,160 --> 00:19:08,080 Speaker 1: to be in production until um you know. And I 345 00:19:08,119 --> 00:19:11,720 Speaker 1: think there's actually the YouTuber run at the end and saying, 346 00:19:11,760 --> 00:19:14,240 Speaker 1: wait a second, what about all these brand growth plans? 347 00:19:14,280 --> 00:19:18,919 Speaker 1: Still after trucks pickup trucks, dude, So we'd actually be 348 00:19:19,080 --> 00:19:22,800 Speaker 1: very happy and probably more supportive of Tesla shares if 349 00:19:22,960 --> 00:19:27,000 Speaker 1: it reigned in its growth aspirations. However, I wonder if 350 00:19:27,000 --> 00:19:31,119 Speaker 1: the tech world, which is temporarily entranced by revenue growth, 351 00:19:31,359 --> 00:19:34,800 Speaker 1: they will get supporter We actually want that. Okay, Well, 352 00:19:34,880 --> 00:19:36,600 Speaker 1: what's and I want to broaden this out with US 353 00:19:36,800 --> 00:19:41,159 Speaker 1: Brian Johnston Johnson running all of autos for Barclays. If 354 00:19:41,200 --> 00:19:44,600 Speaker 1: we broaden this out to the greater US economy, have 355 00:19:44,720 --> 00:19:47,119 Speaker 1: you done the tariff math yet? I mean John Farrell 356 00:19:47,160 --> 00:19:50,919 Speaker 1: has been great about saying BMW's in the Carolinas, and 357 00:19:50,960 --> 00:19:53,760 Speaker 1: you got the whole Detroit complex and you're making cars 358 00:19:53,760 --> 00:19:57,800 Speaker 1: out in a tent in California. What's the Barclays tariff 359 00:19:58,080 --> 00:20:03,400 Speaker 1: math for the American no industry? Yeah. Really three fronts 360 00:20:03,480 --> 00:20:09,280 Speaker 1: to the terrorist trade wars with different implications across the board. Uh. 361 00:20:09,520 --> 00:20:11,879 Speaker 1: First of all, China, which is probably the most heated, 362 00:20:12,280 --> 00:20:15,160 Speaker 1: definitely affects Tesla because it's an exporter there, as well 363 00:20:15,200 --> 00:20:19,520 Speaker 1: as BMW and Daimler because of their plants in South 364 00:20:19,520 --> 00:20:23,359 Speaker 1: Carolina and Alabama. But for the most of my US 365 00:20:23,400 --> 00:20:27,040 Speaker 1: auto parts and autos coverage, it's built in China, stay 366 00:20:27,080 --> 00:20:30,920 Speaker 1: in China. So let's there's some sort of retaliation against 367 00:20:30,960 --> 00:20:34,280 Speaker 1: General Motors and other joint ventures. They're not a major 368 00:20:34,320 --> 00:20:37,439 Speaker 1: worry U S e U not a whole lot of 369 00:20:37,440 --> 00:20:41,679 Speaker 1: either parts or trade flow for the American based automakers 370 00:20:41,720 --> 00:20:45,200 Speaker 1: and auto parts suppliers. B Chrysler is the one exception. 371 00:20:45,640 --> 00:20:48,640 Speaker 1: Watually see light at the end of the tunnel there 372 00:20:48,680 --> 00:20:54,560 Speaker 1: after last week's meeting. It's frankly in the German automaker's interest, 373 00:20:54,800 --> 00:20:58,399 Speaker 1: you know, to have low sheriffs between the US and 374 00:20:58,440 --> 00:21:01,040 Speaker 1: Europe a LA. Then take those TVs that aren't going 375 00:21:01,080 --> 00:21:04,160 Speaker 1: to China into your more prost efectively question is though 376 00:21:04,200 --> 00:21:09,879 Speaker 1: connect get through the EU bureaucracy. Third is NAFTA, which 377 00:21:10,119 --> 00:21:13,159 Speaker 1: is absolutely essential to mind US auto and out of 378 00:21:13,240 --> 00:21:16,200 Speaker 1: FIRS thage companies like General Motors are can actual top 379 00:21:16,240 --> 00:21:19,399 Speaker 1: pick um. We see some light at the end of 380 00:21:19,440 --> 00:21:25,120 Speaker 1: the tunnel there around the local content high wage um 381 00:21:25,440 --> 00:21:28,840 Speaker 1: requirements in that US and Mexico and christ Canada's high 382 00:21:28,840 --> 00:21:31,240 Speaker 1: wage and will go along. I could see an agreement 383 00:21:31,280 --> 00:21:34,280 Speaker 1: there that would be inflationary somewhat to the cost space 384 00:21:34,600 --> 00:21:37,280 Speaker 1: of the O E M S, but frankly less than 385 00:21:37,440 --> 00:21:40,200 Speaker 1: the swing we've had a year to data around stealing 386 00:21:41,800 --> 00:21:45,480 Speaker 1: Brian really appreciated, particularly early this morning as well. Brian Johnson, 387 00:21:45,760 --> 00:21:48,080 Speaker 1: Barclays and Tessa Johnfer. What are you out over there 388 00:21:48,560 --> 00:21:53,119 Speaker 1: listening to the the MPC decision and the consequences of it? 389 00:21:53,200 --> 00:21:55,680 Speaker 1: Governor Khani? In the news conference after the right Hike, 390 00:21:56,080 --> 00:21:58,399 Speaker 1: someone of the audience asked him about Danny blanche flat 391 00:21:58,840 --> 00:22:02,320 Speaker 1: and one thought about whether Danny blanch was was right 392 00:22:02,400 --> 00:22:04,480 Speaker 1: or wrong? Take a listen to this, it just took place. 393 00:22:04,920 --> 00:22:09,240 Speaker 1: A former member of this committee, Professor blanch Flower says 394 00:22:09,280 --> 00:22:11,840 Speaker 1: that the natural rate is actually a lot lower than 395 00:22:11,840 --> 00:22:15,240 Speaker 1: that could be as low as three. And given that 396 00:22:15,520 --> 00:22:20,480 Speaker 1: Professor blanch flowers predictions for labor market and particularly earn 397 00:22:20,560 --> 00:22:23,560 Speaker 1: his growth have been yeah, recently a lot more accurate 398 00:22:23,560 --> 00:22:27,080 Speaker 1: in the banks, why is he wrong? And you're right? Yeah, 399 00:22:28,680 --> 00:22:34,720 Speaker 1: where do I begin? Um um? Great respect for a 400 00:22:34,720 --> 00:22:38,560 Speaker 1: Professor blanch Flower, but his time in the MPC has passed, 401 00:22:38,680 --> 00:22:42,360 Speaker 1: and this is the judgment of this MPC. I think 402 00:22:42,480 --> 00:22:45,320 Speaker 1: I think the last glacier just smelled in the Green 403 00:22:45,400 --> 00:22:47,639 Speaker 1: and White mouse. We've got to get Danny back on, 404 00:22:47,720 --> 00:22:50,360 Speaker 1: haven't we see what's what's going on? This is really important. 405 00:22:50,680 --> 00:22:54,440 Speaker 1: Thank you, I missed completely Joan. Thanks for finding that 406 00:22:54,720 --> 00:22:57,080 Speaker 1: this is what we try to do with surveillance. And 407 00:22:57,080 --> 00:23:00,000 Speaker 1: I'm not saying they were listening to Posing Blanche Flower 408 00:23:00,160 --> 00:23:04,720 Speaker 1: or fifteen minutes ago, but we're trying to engage a 409 00:23:04,840 --> 00:23:10,679 Speaker 1: debate John that affects everybody's life. Is a lot of 410 00:23:10,720 --> 00:23:14,280 Speaker 1: people have responded to the former MPC policy maker Danny 411 00:23:14,280 --> 00:23:15,840 Speaker 1: Blanche Fly and the comments he made on this show 412 00:23:16,119 --> 00:23:19,520 Speaker 1: in the last forty minutes or so, and clearly someone's 413 00:23:19,560 --> 00:23:20,840 Speaker 1: picked it up and brought it up in the Q 414 00:23:20,960 --> 00:23:23,360 Speaker 1: and A. And I think it's fascinating and Governor Karney 415 00:23:23,720 --> 00:23:28,959 Speaker 1: clearly taking a different tack than he's got to justify 416 00:23:29,000 --> 00:23:32,240 Speaker 1: the right highs. But I think it is a different 417 00:23:32,440 --> 00:23:37,199 Speaker 1: cast and theory and not so much the mathiness of 418 00:23:37,240 --> 00:23:41,439 Speaker 1: economics as in Blanche Flowers classic book, but it's on 419 00:23:42,119 --> 00:23:46,760 Speaker 1: the behavior of people and the mystery between Carney and 420 00:23:46,840 --> 00:23:49,919 Speaker 1: Blanche Flower. Are the times we live in in the 421 00:23:50,040 --> 00:23:53,280 Speaker 1: technology that's there as well. Can we listen in more 422 00:23:53,320 --> 00:23:55,800 Speaker 1: to Bank of England. Maybe they'll bring up Adam Posing. 423 00:24:11,760 --> 00:24:15,080 Speaker 1: It's been tech, this tech that all of us, all 424 00:24:15,080 --> 00:24:17,360 Speaker 1: of our listeners, me and Pim, we're all checked out 425 00:24:17,440 --> 00:24:20,760 Speaker 1: by tex So. Well, we need more here's share over 426 00:24:20,880 --> 00:24:24,200 Speaker 1: day with us, and I want to go to what no, 427 00:24:24,280 --> 00:24:25,960 Speaker 1: you know, I've said this for years. You've heard me 428 00:24:26,040 --> 00:24:29,720 Speaker 1: blathering about it. It's about the engineering and the aesthetic, 429 00:24:29,800 --> 00:24:33,480 Speaker 1: and part of that is the A six, the A seven, ten, 430 00:24:33,960 --> 00:24:37,280 Speaker 1: and the A eleven bionic chip. So let's get out 431 00:24:37,359 --> 00:24:40,239 Speaker 1: front of this silly tech debate. What is Apple going 432 00:24:40,280 --> 00:24:43,280 Speaker 1: to show in September or in March of next year? 433 00:24:43,720 --> 00:24:46,399 Speaker 1: Is there like an A twelve chip coming that all 434 00:24:46,440 --> 00:24:50,560 Speaker 1: the nerds like you are like, O MG. I don't 435 00:24:50,600 --> 00:24:53,960 Speaker 1: know how many people are excited about Apples self designed 436 00:24:54,040 --> 00:24:59,359 Speaker 1: computer chips, because this is what makes it go totally. 437 00:24:59,400 --> 00:25:03,280 Speaker 1: It is only one of the um untold or or 438 00:25:03,600 --> 00:25:08,440 Speaker 1: I think not widely understood certainly by the consumer tech 439 00:25:08,480 --> 00:25:12,119 Speaker 1: buyers that you know. Apple's own self design chips are 440 00:25:12,160 --> 00:25:14,399 Speaker 1: a big reason the company is where it is. That 441 00:25:14,440 --> 00:25:19,760 Speaker 1: it's helped the company advance. It's um I mean the 442 00:25:19,840 --> 00:25:25,720 Speaker 1: last time around they increased part of the speed seven zero. Yeah, 443 00:25:25,720 --> 00:25:29,240 Speaker 1: and I think, look, it's not really about speeds and feeds, 444 00:25:29,280 --> 00:25:31,040 Speaker 1: which is I think the things that the tech nerds 445 00:25:31,119 --> 00:25:33,399 Speaker 1: care about. But if you look at something like the 446 00:25:33,440 --> 00:25:36,680 Speaker 1: air pods, for example, that's something that's not possible without 447 00:25:36,920 --> 00:25:41,040 Speaker 1: Apple zone. Uh work, right, And and so I don't 448 00:25:41,080 --> 00:25:45,920 Speaker 1: know what's next with you, at least in terms of you. Yeah, 449 00:25:45,960 --> 00:25:49,000 Speaker 1: it's it is that secret. And obviously there are going 450 00:25:49,040 --> 00:25:53,720 Speaker 1: to be more Apple iPhones unveiled next month. September is 451 00:25:53,800 --> 00:25:56,439 Speaker 1: the period when Apple releases its newest models of phones. 452 00:25:56,520 --> 00:26:00,600 Speaker 1: We're expecting you know, three this time. Are gonna go 453 00:26:00,760 --> 00:26:04,320 Speaker 1: we need an Apple X. I. Well, they'll at least 454 00:26:04,320 --> 00:26:06,840 Speaker 1: get you to pay for an Apple X an Apple ten, 455 00:26:07,400 --> 00:26:11,320 Speaker 1: which a racket, of course it is. That's the way 456 00:26:11,359 --> 00:26:14,199 Speaker 1: it works, right between. The two of us are monthly 457 00:26:14,320 --> 00:26:16,359 Speaker 1: fee on this gimmick they have you and I are 458 00:26:16,440 --> 00:26:19,720 Speaker 1: paying a mortgage. Well I was going to say a 459 00:26:19,760 --> 00:26:22,440 Speaker 1: mortgage jet an education. Yeah, I mean the funny thing 460 00:26:22,480 --> 00:26:26,040 Speaker 1: is that, you know, cell phone smartphones have become essentially 461 00:26:26,160 --> 00:26:30,399 Speaker 1: a commodity product except for iPhones, right, And that's really 462 00:26:30,800 --> 00:26:33,000 Speaker 1: I mean give Apple credit for doing that. That they 463 00:26:33,000 --> 00:26:36,159 Speaker 1: have convinced people to pay a lot of money for 464 00:26:36,200 --> 00:26:39,080 Speaker 1: what is essentially a product that they could buy for 465 00:26:39,280 --> 00:26:41,760 Speaker 1: less from many other vendors. Yeah, but you don't get 466 00:26:41,800 --> 00:26:44,080 Speaker 1: the you don't get an Apple operating system, but you 467 00:26:44,119 --> 00:26:48,400 Speaker 1: don't get iOS. You get Android, which is not necessarily 468 00:26:48,440 --> 00:26:56,440 Speaker 1: better or worse. It's just different. It's different. But sure, 469 00:26:56,480 --> 00:26:58,639 Speaker 1: can I just ask something about it? You've seen an 470 00:26:58,680 --> 00:27:01,720 Speaker 1: old led screen phone? Sure, yeah, I don't own one, 471 00:27:01,800 --> 00:27:05,520 Speaker 1: but I have an old, older iPhone. But okay, screens. 472 00:27:06,080 --> 00:27:08,399 Speaker 1: When you see the difference between an old ed screen, 473 00:27:08,400 --> 00:27:09,919 Speaker 1: this is like going back to people who said, oh, 474 00:27:09,960 --> 00:27:12,000 Speaker 1: I would never need a forty whatever it is inch 475 00:27:12,080 --> 00:27:14,720 Speaker 1: television flat panel, and then all of a sudden they 476 00:27:14,720 --> 00:27:17,040 Speaker 1: looked at the fifty two inch and they went, oh, 477 00:27:17,160 --> 00:27:20,639 Speaker 1: oh I that Oh no, I'm not going to get 478 00:27:20,720 --> 00:27:24,399 Speaker 1: this other thing. Yeah. Although I mean again, this is 479 00:27:24,600 --> 00:27:27,360 Speaker 1: a person. You watch a lot of video. The old 480 00:27:27,440 --> 00:27:31,560 Speaker 1: screens are amazing. Okay, I I haven't been that thrilled 481 00:27:31,720 --> 00:27:34,760 Speaker 1: by the screens, but that's just me. Maybe sim Cook? 482 00:27:36,040 --> 00:27:38,159 Speaker 1: Is Tim Cook scrilled by this? Next? I mean my 483 00:27:38,240 --> 00:27:41,119 Speaker 1: whole thing. You're we usually talk math numbers, cash flow? 484 00:27:41,440 --> 00:27:43,880 Speaker 1: What do they do in seven under twenty four dollars? Blowney? 485 00:27:44,280 --> 00:27:47,440 Speaker 1: Tim Cook's worried about popping the next toy. I mean 486 00:27:47,480 --> 00:27:50,520 Speaker 1: it's not here, it doesn't even have an I Watch. 487 00:27:50,840 --> 00:27:56,800 Speaker 1: Yeah exactly, yes, we all have watched Watch. I mean 488 00:27:56,880 --> 00:28:00,160 Speaker 1: they need to keep the beast going with a technological want. 489 00:28:00,240 --> 00:28:02,240 Speaker 1: Come on, I mean most people you walk around, you 490 00:28:02,320 --> 00:28:06,240 Speaker 1: see people with the air buds right, the airpots. You 491 00:28:06,280 --> 00:28:10,919 Speaker 1: see people with their Apple watches. This is we're like 492 00:28:11,080 --> 00:28:12,919 Speaker 1: arguing over you know, angels on the head of a 493 00:28:12,960 --> 00:28:15,680 Speaker 1: pin here, right, people are gonna want this stuff. As 494 00:28:15,720 --> 00:28:18,520 Speaker 1: far as the new phones go, all the we're gonna 495 00:28:18,520 --> 00:28:22,639 Speaker 1: have facial recognition technology. I believe that's correct. Altho, I've 496 00:28:22,680 --> 00:28:26,720 Speaker 1: now forgotten the reported specs on the new phone. Second 497 00:28:26,920 --> 00:28:29,800 Speaker 1: day I got rid of that. Why because it took 498 00:28:29,840 --> 00:28:31,760 Speaker 1: me two days to figure out how to get rid 499 00:28:31,760 --> 00:28:35,800 Speaker 1: of it. You didn't think it was it wasn't personal, No, 500 00:28:35,840 --> 00:28:37,639 Speaker 1: I just think I don't have time to screw up 501 00:28:37,640 --> 00:28:41,440 Speaker 1: with the reason I mentioned the facial recognition technology is 502 00:28:41,480 --> 00:28:44,200 Speaker 1: now you start to talk about twinning that with health 503 00:28:44,240 --> 00:28:49,520 Speaker 1: records or sensitive information that can then make your life 504 00:28:49,520 --> 00:28:53,320 Speaker 1: supposedly easier, right, Yes, I mean, look, that's that. That 505 00:28:53,400 --> 00:28:56,920 Speaker 1: is a game. The initiative that all the technology companies 506 00:28:56,960 --> 00:29:01,520 Speaker 1: are doing that they want to get deeper and deeper 507 00:29:01,600 --> 00:29:06,520 Speaker 1: into our lives. Um, you know, for reasons of helping people. 508 00:29:07,000 --> 00:29:11,560 Speaker 1: It's definitely true that, uh, if we had better access 509 00:29:11,600 --> 00:29:14,440 Speaker 1: to our electronic health records, and it was more digitized 510 00:29:14,480 --> 00:29:17,760 Speaker 1: and we had access to it without jumping through digital 511 00:29:17,920 --> 00:29:20,560 Speaker 1: gymnastics or faxing things to the doctor having to remember 512 00:29:20,600 --> 00:29:22,800 Speaker 1: your password, having to remember your password. That would certainly 513 00:29:22,840 --> 00:29:26,680 Speaker 1: be helpful. But yeah, everything in technology now involves tradeoffs 514 00:29:26,720 --> 00:29:29,080 Speaker 1: in terms of creepiness. Shore over there with us who 515 00:29:29,120 --> 00:29:32,280 Speaker 1: writes brilliantly on Apple for all of Bloomberg and Bloomberg opinion. 516 00:29:32,560 --> 00:29:34,760 Speaker 1: I thought the gimmick here was we'd share in and 517 00:29:34,800 --> 00:29:38,200 Speaker 1: it becomes a trillion dollar company? Does it happen? Agree? 518 00:29:38,280 --> 00:29:43,000 Speaker 1: But his steady, the markets down at points and apples 519 00:29:43,000 --> 00:29:45,000 Speaker 1: like a rock with green on the screen. We keep 520 00:29:45,040 --> 00:29:49,080 Speaker 1: talking also about the Apple services business, right we do, 521 00:29:49,240 --> 00:29:52,640 Speaker 1: although I think I'm a little bit more skeptical about 522 00:29:52,680 --> 00:29:57,840 Speaker 1: the services. Yeah. Maybe. Look, the thing that Apple does 523 00:29:57,880 --> 00:30:00,320 Speaker 1: not talk about but it does the school thos and 524 00:30:00,320 --> 00:30:04,760 Speaker 1: its financial reports, is that this year the biggest driver 525 00:30:04,920 --> 00:30:07,959 Speaker 1: of growth in that services business is not Apple Music. 526 00:30:08,200 --> 00:30:11,840 Speaker 1: It's not app store sales, it's not iCloud, it's not 527 00:30:11,960 --> 00:30:17,960 Speaker 1: Apple Care. It's licensing, quote unquote, which includes things like 528 00:30:18,080 --> 00:30:21,880 Speaker 1: the payments that Google makes to Apple for making Google 529 00:30:21,920 --> 00:30:25,640 Speaker 1: Search the default on its Safari web browsers, So that 530 00:30:25,680 --> 00:30:29,800 Speaker 1: has little to do directly with demand or interest for 531 00:30:29,840 --> 00:30:35,360 Speaker 1: Apple's Internet services. That's about business arrangements that Apple makes. 532 00:30:36,080 --> 00:30:40,520 Speaker 1: UM that when you use Safari, So if you use 533 00:30:40,520 --> 00:30:43,760 Speaker 1: Safari on your iPhone, which people probably do, or if 534 00:30:43,760 --> 00:30:46,840 Speaker 1: you use Safari on your on your Mac computer, um, 535 00:30:46,880 --> 00:30:50,600 Speaker 1: and you searches, the built in option to do those 536 00:30:50,600 --> 00:30:54,400 Speaker 1: searches is you can change it. Most people don't, and 537 00:30:55,400 --> 00:30:59,400 Speaker 1: Google makes payments to Apple for for making it the 538 00:30:59,480 --> 00:31:02,680 Speaker 1: default option. Four beds, three bass two thousand two and 539 00:31:02,720 --> 00:31:08,400 Speaker 1: at square feet Lebanon, driving Kupertino zero one four clocking 540 00:31:08,480 --> 00:31:12,920 Speaker 1: in at a cool two point one million dollars. A 541 00:31:13,000 --> 00:31:15,440 Speaker 1: thing looks like it could be bulldozed tomorrow. Yeah, boy, 542 00:31:15,520 --> 00:31:18,360 Speaker 1: you're looking at real estate. How do kids like you, 543 00:31:18,440 --> 00:31:21,360 Speaker 1: even if there's some fancy pants engineer live out in 544 00:31:21,720 --> 00:31:24,560 Speaker 1: San Francisco and Cupertino. I mean, look, Tom, you you 545 00:31:24,600 --> 00:31:26,560 Speaker 1: spend time in the Bay Area. You know as well 546 00:31:26,600 --> 00:31:29,400 Speaker 1: as I know that the number one topic of discussion 547 00:31:29,400 --> 00:31:32,960 Speaker 1: in the Bay Area anywhere is housing priceses. So what's 548 00:31:33,080 --> 00:31:35,720 Speaker 1: what Tim Cook could it do for the mere mortals 549 00:31:35,720 --> 00:31:38,360 Speaker 1: at Apple only making four a year? Well, I mean 550 00:31:38,400 --> 00:31:40,760 Speaker 1: I think Tim Cook would argue that he pays his 551 00:31:40,880 --> 00:31:43,480 Speaker 1: people well enough that they can afford to buy homes. 552 00:31:43,560 --> 00:31:45,920 Speaker 1: It's just the rest of the the rest of the 553 00:31:45,920 --> 00:31:50,040 Speaker 1: population to bearer that that maybe can't. Twenty seconds, do 554 00:31:50,080 --> 00:31:52,200 Speaker 1: you know the square footage at an Apple store? Is 555 00:31:52,240 --> 00:31:55,640 Speaker 1: it like cosmetics at Bloomingdale's. I have no I can 556 00:31:55,680 --> 00:31:58,280 Speaker 1: you figure this out? I don't know. You can only 557 00:31:58,320 --> 00:32:00,160 Speaker 1: come back on two accounts. You gotta figure out we're 558 00:32:00,200 --> 00:32:02,720 Speaker 1: footage at a retail store because we think it's like 559 00:32:02,760 --> 00:32:05,880 Speaker 1: cosmetics burg Do or for Bloomingdale's. And you can't come 560 00:32:05,880 --> 00:32:08,280 Speaker 1: back to it's a trillion dollar company. Okay, fair enough, 561 00:32:08,320 --> 00:32:10,520 Speaker 1: I'll take my tape measure down to fifth that okay, sure? 562 00:32:10,560 --> 00:32:19,400 Speaker 1: Over day where this with brilliance on Apple. Thanks for 563 00:32:19,480 --> 00:32:23,880 Speaker 1: listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to 564 00:32:24,040 --> 00:32:29,800 Speaker 1: interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer. 565 00:32:30,320 --> 00:32:33,680 Speaker 1: I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast, you 566 00:32:33,680 --> 00:32:37,120 Speaker 1: can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio