WEBVTT - Who was Jacob Bronowski?  Tim The Lawyer talks to Armstrong & Getty

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>So we don't yet Tim the Lawyer, as he was

0:00:03.720 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>known when he was a regular caller on the Armstrong

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and get A show many many years ago. We don't

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>get Tim the Lawyer, Tim sandifor in studio as much

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>as we used to. But since you are in studio today,

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Tim Sandi for yeah, I love what you've done with

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the place. You are still bearded. I am. You know,

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it's been eight years that i've been that I've had

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a beard, and you asked me every time, what an

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>idiot you know? And you're not carrying a trash can size?

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>No soda? Yeah, I used to to. I used to,

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and time caught up with me. I'm off carbonated beverages.

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm a yeah, I been taking blue a gasket or something.

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Congratulations on the beard. End de soda. Before we get

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 1>into the substance of our conversation with Tim about his

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>fabulous new tome and other constitutional issues in America, do

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>things number one, and I think this will be good

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>for you to hear. You know, those warnings like McDonald's pie,

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the hot apple pie that says content caution, content maybe hot, filing,

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 1>maybe hot. And we've always asked, who are those four well,

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>there for me for the second day in a row.

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I've gotten a brand new hot cup of coffee, gotten

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>into a brief conversation with somebody, then swigged down an

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>enormous mouthful and burnt my tongue in my mouth and

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and cried out in pain, fury, and humiliation. So those

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>warnings are for me. I sympathize man. I drew blood

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>eating shrimp twice in a row a few weeks ago.

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>It was how do you how do you manage to?

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I cut my hand with shrimp tails at two separate

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>meals on two successive days, until there was blood running

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>down my hand. How does somebody do that? I don't know,

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.759
<v Speaker 1>but I've never thought of prawns as a weapon. You're

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer. Why didn't just sue somebody? Second thing, do

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you agree with Jack and my interpretation of the Eighth Amendment.

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>It's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. If something is

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>merely cruel or merely unusual, like being berated by clowns,

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>that would be unusual. It's permitted under the Eighth Amnut. Okay, alright,

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>so it's gonna be unusual, right, So listen, I have

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>intentionally and it's taken some self control not looked up

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the name Jacob Bronowski, Tim's latest book. And Tim is

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the author of a number of absolutely fabulous books about

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>constitutional rights and property rights, and and fairly recently Frederick

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Douglass Self Made Man, which is just terrific about that

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>great great American um. So when I saw your new

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>book is the assent of Jacob Bronowski, I've never heard

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of this human in my life. I intentionally did not

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>look it up. It sounds like a Coen Brothers character.

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Who who is this human? And why did you take

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>your valuable time to write a boy? I was looking

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>for a subject that absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with law,

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm speaking today later today at noon, I'm

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>speaking to the Federal Society about my new book and

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I the assignment is to find some way to relate

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>it to law, which is going to be very challenging.

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>But no, so you need to sub I you considered

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>most as lack, but you decided that well, his name

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is almost as exotic. Jacob Arknowski was a scientist and

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.919
<v Speaker 1>philosopher who lived from eight to nineteen seventy four, and

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>those few people who remember him still today will remember

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>him for his classic nineteen seventy three television miniseries The

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Ascent of Man, which aired on PBS. And it's this

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>lavish thirteen hour documentary on the history of science. And

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I I watched it when I was in college, and

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I got interested in in Bernofsky himself. And it turned

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>out that he was a fascinating person who knew everybody

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>or was involved with everything interesting that happened in the

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century. He was the head of the British mission

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>sent to assess the effects of the atomic bombs at

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He was best friends with Leois Allard,

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>who invented the atomic bomb, but also with Samuel Beckett,

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>who was he The two of them wrote a book together.

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>He was friends with people like T. S. Eliott and

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Thomas. He co founded the sac Institute in Lahoya

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>with Jonah sok. Held is a fascinating guy, he wrote.

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>He wrote a radio play that it won the equivalent

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of an Emmy in nineteen fifty. He wrote an opera.

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>He proved that Australia Epithecus afrikaanus is a human relative

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>by using a sophisticated mathematical algorithm, because that was his

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that was his specialty. It was mathematics. And he revolutionized

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the understanding of the eighteenth century poet William Blake. So

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>he was one of these these Renaissance men who just

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>was a fascinating figure. And I thought nobody's ever written

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a biography of him, so I should. Wow. It's interesting

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>how some people want regularly when I'm reading history and

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I do it at all the time, he come across

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a story or a person and you think, how come

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard this? People? Some things just get lost

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to history. Amazing people in amazing stories that just for

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, don't make the The underdisgust and overdiscussed how

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>much do we know about Marilyn Monroe his contemporary seriously

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>compared compared to somebody Mickey Mantle for them, and Bernowski

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:56.919
<v Speaker 1>was a celebrity in his day. He was. He was

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 1>a big enough name in Great Britain for twenty or

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty years that you know, taxi drivers would hail him

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:04.720
<v Speaker 1>on the street. He's even mentioned in a Monty Python skit,

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>The Exploding Penguin, when one character says to another, uh,

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, why is there a penguin on the Telly

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and the other says, who am I blood Dr Bloody

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Brunowski because he was that well known. Wow, I was

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 1>totally wasted on The problem was he died in August

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 1>of seventy four, only months before his show aired in

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the United States, and so right when he was on

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:30.039
<v Speaker 1>the cusp of becoming a really famous figure in the

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>United States, where he had lived for a decade, by

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that time, he was gone, and so he vanished from

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the scene, and everybody forgot about him. And I think

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a real shame. So I thought, I decided. I

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 1>decided to try and bring more interest to what he

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>did and analyze his philosophical writing and his literary work

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. The problem was, he was involved in so

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>many things and knew so many things that it took

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that it took a long time for me to learn

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>enough about those things to be able to talk intelligently

0:05:57.520 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>about it. So I've been working on this book for

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty years since I was a senior in college, and

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it is finally done and finally published, and it's called

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>The Ascent of Jacob Bronowski, and I hope you'll all buy.

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of getting published, was it difficult to go to

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>somebody and say, I want to write about this person.

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>They said, who can't you write about a founding father

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>or something. Fortunately I found the publishers who who did

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>remember who Bernofsky was and that that that worked out.

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, there was some difficulty in that. Uh. A

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of the people that he knew are gone. Now.

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I did have the good fortune of interviewing some of them.

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>M The coolest one was I got to have lunch

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>with Francis Crick, who won the Nobel Prize in the

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifties for discovering the structure of DNA, the only

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Nobel Prize wenter ever to buy me lunch, And that

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>was that was by far the coolest part of the research.

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>And did you find the old chap to be a

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>stimulating wonderfully? It was? This was this was while the O. J.

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Simpson trial was going on, and I asked him what

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>he thought about people ignoring DNA evidence in trials. He said,

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>he said, well, I guess you have to knew how

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the American legal system works. And he had so much

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>scorn in his voice and he said the word legal.

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>But I didn't mention that I was in law school

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>at the time. Um, but he was. He was a wonderful,

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>wonderful gentleman. And he remember very distinctly on the way

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>back from the restaurant him explaining to me the then

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>newly discovered eyelis gene, which is the gene that if

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you knock it out, uh, the fruit fly or whatever

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>will be born without eyes. And this is one of

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the oldest genes in the genome. It's called the hawks gene.

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>It's been around since the dawn of evolutionary time. And

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>it's the same gene that we have in our own

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>bodies to control the development of eyes in the embryo.

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>So years later, I was reading a book about genetics

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and I ran across this, the discussion of the eilis gene.

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought, wait a minute, that Francis Crick himself explained

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that to me. That that's a really amazing experience in

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>my life. But Crick and Bronowski were good friends. In fact,

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>before his death, Krick was using the same office that

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Bernowski had used down at the Sauk Institute in San Diego.

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>This just flitted into my head. I'm like an eyed

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>fruit fly in terms of our ability to pay attention.

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>This just flitted into my head, what do you when

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you get up in the morning, what do you what

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>do you check news wise, like for what's going on

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>in the world, Like what's your first thing? Twitter? And

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>then like, well, what how do you structure your feed?

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>How many people do you follow? I followed quite a

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of people I don't remember, somewhere maybe a thousand

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>something like that. What tends to be at the top

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:31.119
<v Speaker 1>of the year? Listen they news publications or people? I yeah,

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>people primarily in fact, just uh, just this morning, I

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>was thinking of writing a tweet about what who I

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>would recommend for the Nobel for the Pulitzer Prize if

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I were in charge of the of the Pulitzer Prize.

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>And the three names are are John Ziegler Um, Elizabeth

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Nolan Brown at Reason, and Robbie Save at Recent The

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>three of them are just are the real journalists that

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:55.839
<v Speaker 1>are still working today. And of course Dan Walters. Since

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm in Sacramento, I need to mention the only remaining

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>journalist in the state of California. Dan is legendary. He's amazing.

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>He's one of the great clear eyed writers. I just wish,

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I just wish his articles would be three or four

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Times as long as they are. Did you read the

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>transcript of what the editor there at the New York

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 1>Times said last week to his crowd. Yes, it's it's

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>just incredible word that that might be the most important

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.559
<v Speaker 1>newspaper in the world, or at least formally was, and

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in the direction they're willing to go, it's it's troubling

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and expecting a newspaper that recently ran articles such as

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>women in the Soviet Union had better sex under communism

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and the Soviet space program was better for women's equality.

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Expecting a newspaper or even calling it a newspaper and

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>when it runs articles like that, I think is excessive.

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I think The New York Times has clearly gone off

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the deep end into not just leftist partisanship, which you

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>know is kind of expected in the media, but in

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the most extreme form of it. And the same is

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>true of CNN. I mean, I love I love CNN,

0:09:56.679 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's like, day after day, it's just it's become partisan,

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>uh enterprise. I can't stand of absurdity in my opinion.

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just you can't even take it serious.

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's as bad for the left as it is

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>for the right. Absolutely absolutely. Over time, of course it

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to be. And it's just it's it's surprising

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to me that people of that caliber. I assume you

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:22.079
<v Speaker 1>have to have, uh, you know, some pretty good credentials

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to end up being in the newsroom at the New

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>York Times. I would hope, but I don't know. And

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and you're willing to abandon journalistic principles because you hate

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump so much. It's so cheap and and and easy

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to do to make everything be about Donald Trump. I mean,

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm everybody who follows me on Twitter knows my

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>views on the president. But the it's so easy to

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>just make it a series of not even often not

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>even accurate slams on the president, day after day after day,

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>instead of the kind of sophisticated, in depth research and

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>reporting that takes a lot of work and and is

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a is sometimes very frustrating when you're doing it, because

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to fact check everything twice in three times.

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>And when you see people who do it well, like

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>the people I've mentioned Elizabeth Brown and Robbie Suave and

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>John Ziegler, it's it's a testament to the continuing art form.

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>There's no market for that eggs. Well, it does relate.

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>It relates to Bronowski in the sense that I I

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>think there's I think there are people out there who

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>have a hunger for the kind of sophisticated, intelligent discussion.

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't have to be eggheaded craziness, but but something

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that has some degree of smarts to it, is really

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 1>good at not idiotic start. There is that too much

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to ask? Well, you believe in a self government? Do

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you think we've reached a point where we can't govern

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.439
<v Speaker 1>ourselves because there's not a hunger for people who take

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the time to figure out what's real, whether it fits

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 1>with what you want it to be or not. Are

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you talking about California or the nation? Okay, well, then

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't think we've I don't think we've

0:11:56.760 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>reached bottom there California. I don't know. I I honestly,

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm really impessimistic about the possibility of any kind of

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>reform in California. I think California has gone so far

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>in the direction of taking the easy, emotionalistic, sound good

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>answer over hard realities and is so unwilling to face

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>reality that I think it's going to be a long,

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>hard struggle before California is able to right itself. But

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm a pessimistic person. Maybe I'm wrong. I

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>mean you you you talked to Tom McClintock, and he'll

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>always say, oh, California, there's no reason the world, the world,

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>why California couldn't change tomorrow and become a you know,

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>a livabole thriving economies. But I don't buy it. Why

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>don't we? Why don't we? Talking about a couple of

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the big stories in the news today with Tim Sander

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>for Vice President for Litigation the Goldwater Institute. Is new

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>book which sounds fascinating is The Ascent of Jacob Bronowski.

0:12:48.120 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>More to come stay with us the Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>You think we have something other than the law and

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:15.319
<v Speaker 1>owner family lawyers on we can do? Tim Sander first

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>with us, Tim the Lawyer, Vice President for Litigation the

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Goldwater Institute. His new book is The Ascent of Jacob

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Bronowski somebody had had heard of but hadn't realized I'd

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>heard of because I was familiar with these sentiment. It

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>sounds like absolutely a fascinating read about a fascinating guy. Um.

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>But to talk about some of the things that are

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>in the news right now again, though we are nationwide

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>these days and happy to be Uh. Cal Unicornia continues

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to make news, including the idea of letting children vote,

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>beginning with seventeen year olds. Now, I know my way

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 1>around a sentence. I know some pretty words, but your

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>way better than me. What do you think of extending

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the vote to teenagers? Well, I a part of me says,

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>let him, because the teenagers aren't gonna vote. I mean

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>every year, it's the same thing. Every election is the

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>same thing. It's rock the vote and get the get

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the young vote out, and they would go registered to

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>vote and everything and and and especially the Democrats get

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>very excited about all of this, and then then they

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>don't show up to vote because they've got an other

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>things they're worried about. Um. But as you've said, and

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.559
<v Speaker 1>I think it's totally true, is that the effort to

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to round up people who are too young to know

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>how the world works and get them to vote is

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>very indicative of the worldview of those who are who

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>are behind that effort. It's precisely because leftist political philosophy

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>is so emotionally appealing, but is in fact, Uh, both unworkable,

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and in the last analysis, immoral that the there's an

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.479
<v Speaker 1>effort to recruit people who have not had enough experience

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>or education in the world to understand its shortcomings, because

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>they'll inevitably vote for that, for that goal, that which

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>makes them feel good. We got on the topic of

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>being a pessimistic and I wonder how you're not pessimistic

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of what's going on. But you said

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>your your own book, uh touches on that. Yeah. Well.

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Ronofsky was living at a time during the rise of

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the hippie movement. He was very worried about the rise

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of the hippie movement because he thought it was a reactionary,

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>anti technology, anti progress ideology that really threatened to undermine

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the future of the West. Bernovski himself was actually a socialist,

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>but he was one of those old fashioned, technologically technical,

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>progressive kind of socialists, not not like a throwback anti

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>technology type. And he was very worried about about this,

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and in fact he talked about it in in the

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>last episode of The Ascent of Man. If you haven't

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>seen this documentary, you really mut I think it's the

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>best documentary everybody. It's It's available on DVD and you

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>can find yeah very much. So the costumes are litt

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>funny because his envy three. But yeah, but absolutely And

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>in the last episode, I mean almost the entire episode

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>was filmed as a spontaneous one hour monologue by Bernofski

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>because he was such a good speaker that he he

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>could just talk to the camera and they would write

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>down what he said. And that was the book version

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of the documentary because he was so interesting thing and

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>he talks about this in the last episode and he says,

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>he says, I have it here. He says, I feel

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I am infinitely saddened to find myself suddenly surrounded in

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the West by a sense of a terrible loss of

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>nerve and a retreat from knowledge into into what into

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>zen Buddhism, into falsely profound questions about are we not

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>just really animals at bottom, into extrasensory perception and mystery

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that do not lie along the line of what we

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>are able to know if we devote ourselves to an

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>understanding of man. Roski is really worried about this, this

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>backlash against science and reason that he saw beginning in

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the late sixties and that have taken over large parts

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of our society. Wow, that is that is great. So

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you can get a book version of the which is

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>basically a transcript of the documentary. We want people to

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>read your book. Yes, The Ascent of Jacob Bronowski available

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>where fine books are traded. Tim the Lawyer Tim Santavor,

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Vice President for Litigation the Goldwater Institute, a fan and

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>co host favorite for many many moons, along with his

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>delightful and brilliant bride. Good to talk to you, Tom,

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'll be talking about the book today in Sacramento, California.

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>If you happen to be in town. Go to Tim

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the Lawyer dot com to find information about absolutely fantastic

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Big On Marshall's News Next, a couple of different polls

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>have come out today. We ought to take a look at,

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>among other things, on The Armstrong and Getty Show.