1 00:00:03,520 --> 00:00:07,040 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. I'm June Grosso. Every 2 00:00:07,120 --> 00:00:09,680 Speaker 1: day we bring you inside an analysis into the most 3 00:00:09,720 --> 00:00:12,200 Speaker 1: important legal news of the day. You can find more 4 00:00:12,240 --> 00:00:16,160 Speaker 1: episodes of the Bloomberg Law Podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud 5 00:00:16,280 --> 00:00:20,119 Speaker 1: and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcasts. Turning now to 6 00:00:20,400 --> 00:00:24,400 Speaker 1: Michael Cohen's testimony. Joining me is Andrew Harris, Bloomberg News, 7 00:00:24,400 --> 00:00:29,520 Speaker 1: a legal reporter. Andrew, Let's start with Michael Cohen saying 8 00:00:29,640 --> 00:00:33,040 Speaker 1: that there was a case in the Southern District. I 9 00:00:33,080 --> 00:00:35,720 Speaker 1: am in constant contact with the Southern District of New 10 00:00:35,800 --> 00:00:39,880 Speaker 1: York regarding ongoing investigations. Is that something that President Trump 11 00:00:39,920 --> 00:00:43,000 Speaker 1: should be concerned about? Well, I think, June, I think 12 00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:45,599 Speaker 1: it would be hard for him not to be concerned. Obviously, 13 00:00:45,680 --> 00:00:48,559 Speaker 1: there's a you know, something under a large sheet up 14 00:00:48,600 --> 00:00:51,400 Speaker 1: in the Southern District of New York. Only the prosecutors 15 00:00:51,440 --> 00:00:55,400 Speaker 1: there know what they're looking at. Michael Cohen may have 16 00:00:55,760 --> 00:00:59,040 Speaker 1: more information on that than any of us, but sure, 17 00:00:59,160 --> 00:01:01,760 Speaker 1: until you know what that is when the cover gets 18 00:01:01,920 --> 00:01:04,640 Speaker 1: ripped away, Uh, yeah, I think it's right for the 19 00:01:04,640 --> 00:01:08,480 Speaker 1: president to be concerned. There was so much President he 20 00:01:08,520 --> 00:01:12,880 Speaker 1: said may have committed crimes, including campaign violations, insurance fraud, 21 00:01:12,920 --> 00:01:17,520 Speaker 1: bank fraud. What struck you as possibly the most damaging 22 00:01:17,640 --> 00:01:22,280 Speaker 1: to Trump? Well, interestingly, the President said uh, and noted 23 00:01:22,920 --> 00:01:27,280 Speaker 1: that Michael Cohen didn't give any endorsement to collusion. But 24 00:01:27,440 --> 00:01:33,399 Speaker 1: clearly the hush money payment that the President's organization CFO 25 00:01:33,520 --> 00:01:37,600 Speaker 1: Alan Weislberg may have been aware of. Clearly the phone 26 00:01:37,600 --> 00:01:41,760 Speaker 1: call from Roger Stone about information to come from Wiki leaks, 27 00:01:41,800 --> 00:01:46,920 Speaker 1: And clearly, of course the perhaps opportunistic inflating or deflating 28 00:01:46,920 --> 00:01:50,000 Speaker 1: the President's network depending on who he was trying to 29 00:01:50,080 --> 00:01:54,880 Speaker 1: convince of what those, if true, could be serious issues 30 00:01:54,920 --> 00:01:58,880 Speaker 1: for the president going forward. President Trump isn't the only 31 00:01:58,920 --> 00:02:02,880 Speaker 1: one that perhaps should be concerned. You mentioned Allan Weiselberg. 32 00:02:03,040 --> 00:02:06,280 Speaker 1: His name was mentioned several times, and two other executives 33 00:02:06,360 --> 00:02:10,000 Speaker 1: of the Trump organization were implicated by Cohen. Tell us 34 00:02:10,040 --> 00:02:15,000 Speaker 1: about that, Well, that's correct. Wislberg again the chief financial 35 00:02:15,040 --> 00:02:18,799 Speaker 1: officer for the Trump organization. He's already been given limited 36 00:02:18,800 --> 00:02:23,280 Speaker 1: immunity from prosecutors to cooperate their investigation up in Manhattan. 37 00:02:23,880 --> 00:02:26,200 Speaker 1: But Michael Cohen said that he was a witness to 38 00:02:26,240 --> 00:02:30,200 Speaker 1: the payment of the hush money check to Stormy Daniels 39 00:02:30,360 --> 00:02:33,480 Speaker 1: and Of course, Cohen proffered what he said were some 40 00:02:33,560 --> 00:02:36,799 Speaker 1: of those checks right during the meeting, and two other 41 00:02:36,880 --> 00:02:41,440 Speaker 1: Trump executives, Matthew Callamary and Ron Lieberman, who allegedly were 42 00:02:41,480 --> 00:02:44,600 Speaker 1: aware of this uh as I said, opportunistic inflating or 43 00:02:44,639 --> 00:02:48,640 Speaker 1: deflating of the president's net worth, inflating when he was 44 00:02:48,639 --> 00:02:50,440 Speaker 1: trying to get a loan from deeutgea banked by an 45 00:02:50,560 --> 00:02:55,160 Speaker 1: NFL football team, and perhaps deflating for insurance purposes or 46 00:02:55,240 --> 00:02:59,480 Speaker 1: filing his tax returns. As we've talked about before, the 47 00:02:59,680 --> 00:03:04,280 Speaker 1: Justice Department will not currently indict a sitting president, but 48 00:03:04,360 --> 00:03:09,480 Speaker 1: here you have some indications of possible insurance fraud and 49 00:03:09,560 --> 00:03:14,280 Speaker 1: bank fraud, very serious crimes. Is anything likely to happen 50 00:03:14,760 --> 00:03:18,880 Speaker 1: with regard to that, well, certainly with regard to people 51 00:03:18,880 --> 00:03:21,800 Speaker 1: that may have been co conspirators to that. They're not 52 00:03:21,880 --> 00:03:24,400 Speaker 1: the president. There's only one president. So if one of 53 00:03:24,440 --> 00:03:27,800 Speaker 1: those people named by Michael Cohen yesterday did indeed commit 54 00:03:27,840 --> 00:03:30,800 Speaker 1: a crime, they may be under some pressure to cooperate 55 00:03:30,880 --> 00:03:34,840 Speaker 1: lest they be charged with regard to not charging the president, 56 00:03:34,920 --> 00:03:38,880 Speaker 1: though that is a Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel 57 00:03:39,080 --> 00:03:42,720 Speaker 1: policy position, that is not the law that is not 58 00:03:42,800 --> 00:03:46,880 Speaker 1: anything in the Constitution, and there is some debate among 59 00:03:47,120 --> 00:03:50,000 Speaker 1: the legal community as to whether or not that's really so. 60 00:03:50,440 --> 00:03:53,160 Speaker 1: I agree that there's a debate. I don't think that 61 00:03:53,360 --> 00:03:55,480 Speaker 1: William bar will be the one to break that though, 62 00:03:55,520 --> 00:03:59,120 Speaker 1: do you? Probably not? In One of the attorneys that 63 00:03:59,160 --> 00:04:03,600 Speaker 1: I spoke with yet today, Um, a former deputy counsel 64 00:04:03,720 --> 00:04:06,120 Speaker 1: to Robert Mueller when he was the U S Attorney 65 00:04:06,160 --> 00:04:09,240 Speaker 1: in San Francisco, said, even if it's not the law, 66 00:04:09,400 --> 00:04:12,640 Speaker 1: even if it's not a requirement. He described Mr Mueller, 67 00:04:12,720 --> 00:04:15,480 Speaker 1: the special counsel, as being a fairly conservative type, and 68 00:04:15,520 --> 00:04:17,880 Speaker 1: it's unlikely that he would be the one that would 69 00:04:17,920 --> 00:04:20,880 Speaker 1: break that rule. Yeah. There was a lot of questioning 70 00:04:20,920 --> 00:04:25,880 Speaker 1: from the Republicans about whether Michael Cohen was upset because 71 00:04:25,920 --> 00:04:28,200 Speaker 1: he hadn't gotten the job in the White House he wanted, 72 00:04:28,240 --> 00:04:30,520 Speaker 1: and there's been a lot of reporting that that was 73 00:04:30,560 --> 00:04:33,960 Speaker 1: the case. He denied that. Is that a possible problem 74 00:04:34,000 --> 00:04:37,880 Speaker 1: for him? Look, he's he's obviously his credibility has damaged. 75 00:04:38,520 --> 00:04:42,240 Speaker 1: He's challenged. Is this sour grapes? Maybe it is. Only 76 00:04:42,279 --> 00:04:45,400 Speaker 1: Michael Cohen knows what's in his heart. Only Michael Cohen 77 00:04:45,480 --> 00:04:48,719 Speaker 1: knows why it was Okay, to work for the president, uh, 78 00:04:48,760 --> 00:04:51,240 Speaker 1: for as long as he did, under circumstances that he 79 00:04:51,279 --> 00:04:56,320 Speaker 1: now describes as dubious, shady pick your adjective, June. Yeah, 80 00:04:56,480 --> 00:04:58,919 Speaker 1: it was quite something and it's hard to in a 81 00:04:58,960 --> 00:05:01,880 Speaker 1: few minutes go through to all that testimony. But thanks 82 00:05:01,920 --> 00:05:04,840 Speaker 1: so much, Andrew, appreciate always a pleasure to thank you. 83 00:05:04,880 --> 00:05:11,479 Speaker 1: That's Andrew Harris, Bloomberg News Legal reporter. Thanks for listening 84 00:05:11,520 --> 00:05:14,799 Speaker 1: to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. You can subscribe and listen 85 00:05:14,839 --> 00:05:18,400 Speaker 1: to the show on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and on Bloomberg 86 00:05:18,440 --> 00:05:23,160 Speaker 1: dot com slash podcast. I'm June Brosso. This is Bloomberg