WEBVTT - Cultivating Excellence vs. Crystallizing Mediocrity

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to focus in on what's going on with

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you at home now and at work. Whenever you're online.

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>True online privacy is in the past. Your online data

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>always seems to be under the magnifying glass by big tech.

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>There's anxiety from not having control of your online data

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>while it is being manipulated and sold to advertisers. But

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 1>now there's a new way with the ultimate privacy and

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>cybersecurity communications tool in your hands. Introducing Secure, an instant

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>messaging and email platform hosted in Switzerland, protecting your data

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>with the strictest privacy laws in the world. Secure is

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>spelled sek you are and uses proprietary encryption technologies and

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>independent platform and Swiss privacy laws to ensure complete privacy

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>and security of your data on desktop and in transit.

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>This is secure and private instant messaging and email. It

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>assures your conversations, messages, and data are kept completely safe

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and private. Secure does not mine your data and is

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>not subject to the Cloud Act. Take back your freedom,

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>privacy and online security with Secure by going to seku

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>are dot com. That's sek you are secure dot com.

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you use the coupon code buck that'll tell

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>them you heard about them here on the show and

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>also get you one week free and twenty five percent off.

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a great deal. Please use that coupon code buck.

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Just go right now seku are dot com. That's the website,

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>secure dot com and regain your privacy. Use coupon code

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 1>buck when you go to secure seku are dot com.

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Regain your privacy, protect yourself online. The following is a

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>prerecorded program. You are entering the Freedom Hunt, a place

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>liberty and patriotism call home, Shoulder to shoulder, need to

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>come together, shield time, you need to protect America. This

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>is the Sexton Show. Buck Sexton joins us now we analyst,

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:11.079
<v Speaker 1>former NYPD intelligence officer, Now Buck Sexton. Welcome to the

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton Show. This is Ben Winegarden in for Buck Sexton.

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Here on an action packed Thursday from the not so

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>free New York City, but the Freedom Hut hidden high

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a top Lower Manhattan. Again, this has Ben Winegarden in

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>for Buck Sexton. Been here all week, really had a

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>privilege and it's been an honor and a pleasure to

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>spend this week with you as there are so many

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>things going on in the world of such substance and

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, before we jump in again. I'm a senior

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>contributor at The Federalist, a columnist at Newsweek and The

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Epic Times, a fellow at the Claremont Institute. You can

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>find all my work at Winegarden dot substack dot com

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>or ben Winegarden dot com, and I encourage you to

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter, where I speak too frequently at

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>b H. Winegarden. And before we jump into today's episode,

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>just a programming note as well. The Clay Travis and

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:08.519
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton Show starts at noon next Monday, the twenty first,

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and then Jesse Kelly will be filling in Buck Sexton's

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>slot from six to nine pm the following Monday, June

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighth. We're going to jump all around the world

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>today and we've got some exceptional guests. We'll be speaking

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>with Congressman Jim Banks, a Republican from Indiana on the

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>chair of the Republican Study Committee, this sort of in

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>house think tank of the GOP in the House about

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of issues, from the threat of communist China

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to January sixth disparate treatment versus sixteen nineteen rioters. We'll

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>be speaking with Christian Witten about Joe Biden's excellent adventure

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>overseas and the misadventure that it really is for America

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and our national interests. We'll speak with Professor Scott Jenner

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>about taking on critical race theory and what CRT and

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the cult of diversity, equity, and inclusion are really all about.

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>And last, but not least, will also speak with my

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>friend Rachel Bovard, who's done some exceptional work and reporting

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>on sort of the conservative case for antitrust and taking

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>on big tech and really concentrated power in all of

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>its forms, and in particular woke concentrated power in all

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of its forms, public and private. To get into these issues,

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go an indirect route. But bear with

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.359
<v Speaker 1>me here because you're listening to someone who listened to

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>sports talk radio since the time he was about five

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>years old. And I'm a huge sports fan, a huge

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>baseball fan, unfortunately, a huge New York Mets fan, and

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 1>last night I had the pleasure of going to see

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Jacob deGrom pitch. And bear with me if you're not

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 1>a sports fan, but Jacob Degram right now is the

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>dominant pitcher in Major League Baseball, having arguably the best

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 1>season ever, not just in modern era, but in the

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>history of the game, absolutely dominating to an unprecedented extent.

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Every single start that he makes health provided is just

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a massive spectacle. The turnout has been tremendous at a

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 1>stadium in New York where it seems that people are

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>still a little bit fearful with the pandemic sadly, and

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.280
<v Speaker 1>so turnout has not been exceptional all around. But it's

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a winning ball club and it's the most dominant pitcher

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>in the game, maybe the most dominant player at any

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>position in the game, and having one of the most

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>dominant seasons, if not the most dominant season of all time.

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Why do I talk about Jacob deGrom Besides the fact

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that I love the Mets. Last night was a beautiful

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 1>night for a ball game. The return to normalcy of

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>going to a ballpark in America is something that we

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>take for granted. I mean, from my perspective, I'd go

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to about a dozen games a year in a typical year,

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 1>and it's been over a year since going out to

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the ballpark and just seeing a scenario of people just

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>generally happy, acting normal. None of this. You know, why

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>aren't you wearing your mask and people dodging you and

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>running to the other side of the stadium. No, it

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>was as if we were America again, a free and

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>independent people, not governed by bureaucrats and technocrats with their

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>asinine decrees on our necks. So hopefully that's a positive

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>little vignette, and I encourage everyone to get out to

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the ballpark. It just felt liberating. And I know most

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 1>of you probably live in free America, but here behind

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the iron curtain in the Northeast, this was a real

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 1>treat at the baseball game. What we saw on display,

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and unfortunately only for three innings because Jacob deGrom is

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>battling injuries this season, but what we saw in three

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>innings were told strikeouts of eight of nine batters one

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.799
<v Speaker 1>person all of one batter put the ball in play

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:44.039
<v Speaker 1>against Jacob Degram. We're seeing someone someone who's excellent at

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>what they do, at the absolute pinnacle of their game,

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>with chance of MVP Most Valuable Player raining down from

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the crowd, and an electric atmosphere from before the first

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>pitch of the game. What does this have to do

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>with all of the issues we're facing as a country

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>right now. Wide contrast Jacob deGrom and athleticism broadly athletics

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>broadly with what we see in our ruling class. Let

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>me explain, in sports, we still celebrate excellence, achievement. The

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>only thing that matters at the end of the day

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>in sports are wins and losses. It's binary. You can't

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>sugarcoat it. You can say a team made a great effort,

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a player made a great play, had an exceptional season.

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, wins and losses

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>are the only thing that matters. And it does not

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>matter who you are, where you're from, what your limitations are.

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>All the matters ultimately is performance. In other words, even

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>though wokeism is pervading all of our sports in ways

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that are maddening, and yes, at the stadium, you know

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a Coca Cola sign that's in rainbow colors for

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Pride Month. So you can't escape the politicization even at

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a sporting event, even if it's not Lebron James telling

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you to bat down to communist China. Nevertheless, the game

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>is still the game. It's still about results at the

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, and excellence and achievement is is

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>something that is loved and cherished and relished at the

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>end of the day. It's also worth noting that excellence

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>can be very fleeting. In the case of a pitcher,

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.319
<v Speaker 1>pitcher can break down. Jacob Degraham throws one hundred and

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>one miles an hour consistently. No one pretty much in

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the history of the game has ever done that. He's

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>had some injuries this year. It's incredibly disconcerting as a fan.

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>No matter what team you're root for, greatness is fleeting.

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>It requires constant tending to nurturing, recognizing threats to greatness

0:08:55.440 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and competition, and proactively countering them. Cultivating excellence is what

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>sports are all about. There's no affirmative action in sports.

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>There's no equity in sports. If you cultivate excellence, you

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>bring it excellent. If you cultivate mediocrity, you crystallize mediocrity.

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>And what we're seeing across pretty much every domain that

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a ruling class has its hands on again, setting aside athletics,

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is the cultivation of anything but excellent and a celebration

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:49.199
<v Speaker 1>really at the end of the day of failure. Traditional

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>values like hard work, prudence, humility, virtue, Judeo Christian morality,

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that is morality traditionally understood civic duty, patriotism. If we

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>instill those values and principles in our people. Nothing can

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>stop America. American greatness will proceed for generations. But American

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>greatness can also be quite fleeting. And we are a

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>very young nation. If you look at world history and

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>our adversaries, be it Communist China or anyone else, they

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>preceded us in some cases by many hundreds of years.

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>They're more patient than we are. In some cases, they've

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>dealt with more hardships than we have. They've experienced tyranny

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>in a way that we haven't, although many of our

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 1>ancestors may have fled it. The memory of a nation

0:10:54.240 --> 0:11:02.559
<v Speaker 1>is short. Achieving and maintaining is not written into the stars.

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:07.079
<v Speaker 1>We talked earlier in the week about New York and

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>New York is returning to the bad old days, all

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>after the tenure of a single mayor and a bad

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 1>governor at the same time, too, it took decades to

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>get New York out of its doldrums. And just like that,

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it can all turn quickly. Just like the career of

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>an excellent athlete, it can fade for any number of reasons,

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>just like you can work a lifetime to build a reputation,

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and it can be tarnished and destroyed with a single

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>bad tweet or misstatement, But with respect to the country,

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the surest way to ensure America loses its luster, squanders

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>it's greatness, becomes a decadent and decaying rump of a

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>four leader of Western civilization, of the free world, the

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>last bastion of freedom, the only place in the world

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>where anyone who desires to live in liberty and justice

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>will give anything to immigrate to. The shortest way to

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>mess it all up is to reject, to repudiate, all

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of those values and principles I just discussed. And if

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 1>we're taught to hate our country from the commanding heights

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of society, from our government itself, from our corporations, from

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>our tech companies, from our schools, from all of our

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>civil society institutions, how could we possibly defend that country?

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Who would want to defend that country? It would be

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 1>immoral to defend that country to promulgate the vision and

0:12:53.760 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the policies necessary necessary to maintain it. If we're taught

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that measures of excellence, any kind of measure of excellence,

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>are racist and bigoted, we will reward people for everything

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>but excellence. Politics will trump merit. What that's a recipe

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 1>for are not just individuals failing upward. It's a recipe then,

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>for failure across the board. Our ruling class fails again

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and again to adequately represent us. It doesn't represent us.

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>It makes us subservient to it. It exists, essentially like

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 1>all bureaucracies, exist to perpetuate its own power and privilege,

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to squander the very values and principles that allowed the

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>individuals who can eyes our ruling class to have to rise,

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to ascend to such a position in society. Isn't it

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>remarkable that the very ruling class responsible for propagating the

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>America Last Agenda, for embracing critical race theory, for embracing

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>racial division, eskewing excellence, not fighting back when standardized tests

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>are called racist. They've been the greatest beneficiaries of this

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>system and cynically, and I think rightly, if you look

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>at all of their actions at the end of the day,

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes there's cowardice, Yes there are some true believers. Yes

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>there are people, as we've talked about, who are trying

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to feed the woke crocodile so it spares them at

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, which will be a recipe

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of disaster for them, by the way, just so we

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>deserved Ultimately, what are these policies about dividing and conquering

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>so that they crystallize their positions in society? If you

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>want to keep competition at Bay Pit Americans against each other,

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>stop kids in public schools from being able to take

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>advanced classes that allow them to reach their full potential

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>while your own kids can go to private schools and

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>not have to worry about those issues. Put politics over

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>merit to protect your own position in society. Make politics

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the number one thing because the incumbents and politics have

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the advantage. So how do I take this back to sports. Well,

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>when you have to defend values and principles that we

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about, it makes you hungry. It keeps you hungry,

0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>It keeps you committed to a cause, It keeps you

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>debticated to American greatness. When you become weak and fat

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and decadent, like the leaders on display at the G seven,

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you become a rump of a society. It's like a

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>bad athlete resting on his laurels or formerly great athlete

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>resting on its worlds. And oftentimes you see great athletes

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in retirement completely out of shape, barely a shadow of

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>what they were. A country has to appreciate greatness, cultivate greatness.

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>If it wants to be great, it has to celebrate achievement.

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>It has to prioritize merit above all else. And in

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>particular when all of the adversaries facing that country care

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day about results, about performance,

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>even if they're hobbled by their own corruption and misdeeds,

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>as we'll talk about with Congressman Jim Banks in just

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a bit teaching the military Ebramex Kendy racist philosophy, an

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>America loathing worldview. How could you possibly defend a country

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're told it's terrible. It's a recipe for mediocrity.

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>We have to cultivate excellent instead of crystallizing mediocrity. They's

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 1>been wandering in for Buck Sexton back after a short break.

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>President is an experienced statesman. Our one on one conversation

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>took almost two hours. It's not every world leader that

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess this amount of attention. I mean, his predecessor

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>was asked the same question. He evaded this. This President

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:54.199
<v Speaker 1>decided to respond to the question directly, and in this

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>he is very different from President Trump. That's wadermer Putin

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about Joe Biden, and I think it's important to

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>note experienced statesmen, experienced statesmen by today's standards, our mediocrities.

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Experienced statesmen have overseen policies for decades that have put

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>America last and allowed people like Vladimir Putin to run

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>circles around them. All of our adversaries love experienced statesmen.

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Think about the position that America has squandered since the

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>end of the Cold War, the blood and treasure we've spilled,

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>while our adversaries have enriched and empowered themselves and threatened

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:40.400
<v Speaker 1>us in ways that we haven't been threatened in decades.

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>If ever, so, when I go back to excellence or mediocrity,

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:48.120
<v Speaker 1>experienced statesmen or the definition of those who have been

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 1>cultivated in mediocrity on the basis of the results for

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the country, Are we a richer, stronger, more powerful country

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>as a consequence of our political establishment embodied personified by

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>President Joe Biden. No, we are not. And then the

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 1>rest of the episode today where we speak with Congressman

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Jim Banks and Christian Witten and Professor Scott Jenner and

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Rachel Bovard We're going to touch on national security and

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy, domestic policy, big tech, and what's going on

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 1>in education. And if you look, the running theme through

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>all of these areas is cultivating mediocrity, crystallizing mediocrity, not

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>pursuing excellence and pursuing American greatness and our national interests

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>first and only. This Ben Wangarten in for Buck sex

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>And on the Buck Sex and Show. And we'll be

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:41.199
<v Speaker 1>back with Congressman Jim Banks right after this. You're in

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 1>the Freedom Hunt. Thanks for listening to the Buck Sexton

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Show podcast. Get the latest from Buck at buck sexton

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Father's Day is around the corner. And if

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 1>your dad or grandfather served this great country of ours,

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>how cool would it be to give him something meaningful

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>this year, something that recognized what he gave to this country,

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>something like the American flag. If you know your father

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 1>grandfather would be moved by a gift like this, then

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 1>let me recommend you to my friends at Allegiance Flag Supply.

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Everything this country means your dad is reflected in the

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>quality of the craftsmanship Allegiance Flag Supply puts into all

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>their flags. And these are flags that are made in America,

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>which is actually really uncommon, believe it or not. They

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>are hands sown by seamstresses in Charleston, South Carolina who

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>had lost jobs previously, the company's outsourcing overseas, and they're

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.959
<v Speaker 1>made with materials that do not allow for cutting corners

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>in the manufacturing process. All of this translates into a

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 1>flag that waves proudly outside your father's home, his dock,

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>or on his boat and won't get tangled, torn or shredded,

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>which happens to so many other flags in the marketplace

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>because they're cheaply made, they're made in China, and honestly,

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the people making them don't care. Allegiance Flag supply cares

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 1>about this country, about patriotism, and about getting you the best,

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>highest quality, made in America flags you'll ever see. This

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>is the way to say thank you to Dad on

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>multiple levels this Father's Day. Go to show Allegiance dot

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>com and enter promo code buck to get ten percent

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>off your order that also lets them know you heard

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:14.880
<v Speaker 1>about them here on the show. Go to show Allegiance

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com that's the website and enter promo code buck

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>for ten percent off your order and get yours in

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>time for Father's Day. On June twentieth that show Allegiance

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>dot Com enter promo code buck for ten percent off.

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>So yes or no Racism in the United States Navy, Admiral,

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you recommended every sailor in the United States Navy read

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 1>this book. So yes or no question. I'm not forcing

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:39.919
<v Speaker 1>anybody to read the book. It's on a recommended reading list. Admiral,

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 1>did you read the book? I did, Admiral. Department of

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Defense undertook the standown because they understand that extremism detracts

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>from military readiness. So if sailors accept Kennedy's argument that

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>America and the United States Navy are fundamentally racist, as

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you've encouraged them to do, do you expect that to

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>increase or decrease rall and cohesion or even recruiting into

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the United States Navy. Our strength is in our diversity,

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and our sailors understand that race is a very Racism

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>in the United States is a very complex issue. That

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>was Congressman Jim Banks, a Republican from Indiana and chairman

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Republican Study Committee, having a somewhat heated exchange,

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>at least on one side of it, with the Chief

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 1>of Naval Operations Michael Gilday regarding the Navy's endorsement of

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 1>its leaders reading the likes of ibramex Kendy, and I

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>believe Michelle Alexander as well. And here to talk about

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that and so much more from China to January sixth

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and beyond is Congressman Jim Banks. Thanks so much for

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>coming on the program. Hey Ben, good to be with you.

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having Me's my pleasure. And let's start right

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>there with that exchange. What was your takeaway? Are you

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>any more confident in the state of our navy and

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 1>as a particularly as a naval reservist as well. Are

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 1>you satisfied with that exchange? Far? Far from it? You

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>know it. It's not been a several weeks when I

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:10.120
<v Speaker 1>first wrote Admiral guild A, drawing attention to him putting

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>this outrageous and Unamerican book on a reading list that

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>he pushes out to every sailor in the United States

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Navy and encourages them to read. If you know anything

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>about Abrahm X Kendy, you know that it's not his

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.199
<v Speaker 1>book How to Be an Anti Racist. It's it's his

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 1>entire body of work that is inherently just that it

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>is racist. It is Unamerican. And the thought that the

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>most powerful, the highest ranking admiral of the United States

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 1>Navy would push out a book to every sailor to

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>read that says that America is evil, inherently racist. The

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>United States Navy and other institutions in our country our

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>racist is exactly. It's not just counterproductive, it's completely Unamerican.

0:23:57.400 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>And in that exchange you can hear that, I mean,

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>my my guess is that some junior officer I thought

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 1>this was a good idea. Now he's in a position

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>where he has to defend it. When I asked him

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the exchange, I mean, did you

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>actually read it? He said, he did. To give me

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>one redeeming quality of this book that makes it something's

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>appropriate to put on the list. He couldn't answer it.

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>He got defensive instead. And you can hear more of

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>that exchange. I know you played it, but throughout the

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 1>exchange you get a sense that he knows he can't

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 1>defend it. And it's really remarkable. He goes to the

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>diversity is our strength response, and yeah, of course you

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>need a diversity of opinion when you're talking about dealing

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 1>with our worst adversaries. You need experts in other languages

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and other cultures, but there can be no diversity when

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes to love of country and patriotism. There have

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to be certain unifying values and principles to have the biggest,

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 1>baddest fighting force in the history of mankind and deal

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>with all these adversaries that we face. Given that, I mean,

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>what are the consequences in terms of moral for future

0:24:57.040 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>recruitment and for fielding the strongest fighting force given wokeism

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>seemingly pervading not just the military, but also the intelligence

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>community and beyond. Yeah, I mean, you said it well,

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>But for the United States Military to adopt critical race theory,

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and for the United States Navy, on top of all

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:18.679
<v Speaker 1>of the other branches, to instill CRT into the ranks

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>is exactly the opposite of the stand down on extremism,

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of the mission of the Biden administration to root out

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 1>extremism in the ranks. It's doing exactly the opposite of

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>what the Democrats with the Biden administration, with Admiral Guilday,

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 1>what the secretary, what others the leaders at the Pentagons

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 1>say that they're trying to do with the extremism stand

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>down and I would argue even further, Ben, I mean

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to that point, how do you recruit the next generation

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 1>of young men and women of the future leaders in

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>our country to raise their right hand, to defend the

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>constitution and to potentially die for this country out of

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the next On the other side, on the other hand,

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>or at the other side of your mouth, you're talking

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 1>about how America endorsing a book. We're talking about how

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>America is racist and evil and inherently um the up

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:11.479
<v Speaker 1>the upbringing of our great country is somehow just that

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:13.120
<v Speaker 1>evil and racist. I don't I don't think you can

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 1>do it. I mean this, This affects morale, It affects retention,

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 1>it affects recruitment. And I hear every day as a

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>member of Congress and as a as a Navy reservist,

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 1>having served with with hundreds of sailors along the way

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>who are still in uniform and still serving, they feel

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 1>very uncomfortable with what the what the Navy and what

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:37.959
<v Speaker 1>what overall the military is becoming as they take this uh,

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>this this crash course into crt It's unhealthy. It's an

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 1>American It's got to stop. But with admirals like guil

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Day in charge of the Navy. I don't have high hopes.

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>And as we saw in the meeting between Secretary of

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>State Anthony B. Lincoln and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and their counterparts at Anchor Jawaska, or in the most

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>recent meetings between Vladimir Putin and Joe Biden. Of course

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 1>this is a propaganda coup for our worst adversaries who

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>loved to guaman to this America loathing sort of narrative.

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>So of course there are national security implications that go beyond, again,

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 1>just fielding the strongest fighting force. On the subject of China,

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you've been critical of the US Innovations and Competition Act,

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>which has been framed as a sort of bipartisan anti China,

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 1>tough on China sort of bill, a layout sort of

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:27.640
<v Speaker 1>your critique of it, Well, at the end of the day,

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>this is just a massive spending boondoggle that Democrats are

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>really good at this. I hate to admit it, but

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:37.719
<v Speaker 1>they're good at at taking an issue like China and

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>then writing a bill has nothing to do with it,

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>but saying it's about China, and then getting a couple

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of Republicans to come along and make it by partisan

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's what this bill has become. I mean, this

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>is a big boost and funding to universities around the country, who,

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>by the way, don't protect their research from being infiltrated

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>by Chinese espionage their campuses, which happens every day. I

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>wrote a bill about this a few years ago to

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 1>protect sensitive research that that our taxpayer dollars are funding

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>for national security purposes at universities. We don't protect intellectual property,

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 1>but we're gonna go We're gonna go pour billions of

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 1>dollars into these institutions that the China, that the Chinese

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Communist Party is already infiltrated, so that it doesn't make

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:24.160
<v Speaker 1>any sense there Also, there are also some pretty strong

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 1>pro life concerns about what type of research we are

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>we are funding, you know, so there are more There

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 1>are moral angles to this as well, but at the

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, has nothing to do with holding

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 1>China accountable. As absolutely this bill does nothing to hold

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>China accountable for what they've done to steal our jobs

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>where they've done to at least the COVID nineteen and

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, and not just on the United States of America,

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>but on the rest of the world. It just pours

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:51.719
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of money into places um that that we

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>already know where that that that that's not a wise

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>investment of our taxpayer dollars, at least without the kind

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of safeguards that we've been advocating for us. There's there's

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>nothing in the bill that does anything to be tough

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>on China or to hold them accountable. And that's why,

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that's why it's been so easy for most conservative Republicans

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 1>on Capital Hell to oppose it. Some of the policy

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>documents put out by the Trump administration cover something approximating

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>at least at least the makings of a grand strategy

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>with respect to taking on the Chinese Communist Party, which

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you agree is the greatest foreign adversary that

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>we face. What do you believe the legislative branch's role

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>ought to be in executing such a strategy, and how

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>do you what do you believe that strategy should consist of. Well,

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it's both economic and it's military. And I participated something

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>called the China Task Force last year that Kevin McCarthy

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>set up. It was supposed to be by Parson in

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, and then Pelosi pulled the Democrats off of

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it because it was before election day and they didn't

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>want to appear like they were on the same side

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of a big issue with Trump because Trump was I

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 1>continue to argue, I'll always maintain it's the first president

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that has stood up to China and identified China as

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a threat. In fact, the first thing that President Trump

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>did when he came to office was rewrite the National

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Security the National Defense Strategy, the names China and Russia

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>as as great great power competition that we need to

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>divert away from the Middle East and focus more on

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>great power competition with China and Russia. China being the

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>greatestisential threat that we face economically and militarily. So, but

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot that goes into that. I mean, if

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>we were serious about combating the China threat, we would

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>unwind the massive amount of investments coming from Wall Street,

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>from from pensions, pension dollars from almost every state in

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the country, and from the federal government that go to

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 1>fund our greatest adversary, China's military build up of ships

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:48.479
<v Speaker 1>and fighter planes, of sophisticated weapons and technologies that are

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 1>being funded by through through a funnel through through the

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street types I mean, that's one way that we

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>hold China accountable. You won't find that anywhere in the

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>so called Endless Frontier Act or the man subspending boondoggle

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Research Funding Bill. That's that's not designed to

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>do anything to hold them accountable. So that that's one

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>area that we've been focused on a Republican study Committee

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in my office for a couple of years, sort of

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>turning off the spicket of money that goes from the

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>United States, from taxpayer dollars from pigeons through Wall Street

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to Wall Street's biggest friend in China. If you want

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to if you want to hold if you want to

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:29.239
<v Speaker 1>block China's rise, that's that's the first place to go

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>before we get to sort of the domestic policies that

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to touch on on the other side, I

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's worth stating that, in my view, at least,

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the living representation of the way that our political class

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>has been compromised with respect to communist China, and it

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>also impacts as you speak about the investment aspect of things.

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 1>The living personification of the problem is Diane Feinstein, Senator

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>from California, and I wrote at length several years back

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and have continued to write about her family's own personal

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>interest with respect to communist China and the soft policies

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that she's promoted throughout her entire career in Washington There,

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and of course that it was the alleged spy in

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>her office. And I believe you were the only member

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of the House that actually put out questions regarding who

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 1>this individual in that office was and what the implications were.

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Did you ever get a substantial response, a response that

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 1>was satisfactory on that question. Yeah, of course not. And

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm embarrassed that we didn't continue to fight for those

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 1>types of answers. I mean we did, We kept reaching

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>out and and I don't think that you or any

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of your listeners would be surprised to know that we

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>never received any response. In Diane Feinstein's still United States

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Senator today. So what we do know is that for

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty years she had a high ranking member of her

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>staff who was a Chinese. A spark to counse is

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>this is, this is why the China threat is so

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>realist right in front of us. I mean, I could

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 1>go on and on with other examples of the Chinese

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Communist Party's tentacles that are spread all over places like

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Capitol Hill, Silicon Valley, Wall Street through through their United

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Front efforts. But the fact that Diane Feinstein was never

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 1>how held accountable or forced to answer for for keeping

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a spy on her staff, a Chinese Communist Party spy,

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 1>should tell you should make everyone scratch their head at

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 1>least well more with Congressman Jim Banks right after this

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>quick break, welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show. Ben

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Winegarden in for Buck Sexton, and we were talking with

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Congressman Jim Banks before the break about US China policy,

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and now I want to transition to domestic policy. You

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 1>recently wrote a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland raising

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 1>what you believe to be or reach, the implication being

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that there's disparate treatment between the law enforcement's efforts to

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 1>pursue those associated with the events at the Capitol on

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 1>January sixth versus those who participated in the sixteen nineteen

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>riots of last summer. What do you hope to achieve

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>from that way? And do you believe there's disparate treatment there? Well,

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously there is. I mean, as I pointed out in

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the letter been to Merrick Garland, if you if you

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 1>just compare the number of charges and the number of

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 1>charges that were dropped between the Portland Riders and the

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>January six riders. I mean, it sort of tells a

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty significant story. I mean, three hundred times more often

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that charges were dropped against the Portland Riders then against

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the Capitol Writers. So check this out. So Garland charged

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 1>eighty six Portland Riders and he dropped fifty eight out

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of the eighty six cases. That's about sixty percent of

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the cases that he dropped against the Portland Rioters. But

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 1>if you if you look at the four hundred and

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:46.720
<v Speaker 1>sixty five cases that Garland charged against the Capitol Writers,

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 1>He's only dropped in one case, So that's about point

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 1>two percent. So you do the math and you and

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you realize that there is there really is a different

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>set of rules, a different set of standards in both

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of these cases. That's not the itemize the rioters on

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>January sixth. I'm not advocating the charges to be dropped

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>for either one of them, but it's pretty clear that

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>the department that Joe Biden's Department of Justice cares not

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 1>at all about about the rioters from last summer. In

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the sixteen nineteen riots. But they've they're focusing all of

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 1>their resources and attention somewhere else. I think if you

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>if you draw that comparison, it's a pretty powerful statement

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 1>that the American people deserve to know. January sixth is

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 1>cited as one of the events that underpins the administration's

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>new Countering Domestic Terror strategy, which I think the Department

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:41.279
<v Speaker 1>of Homeland Security has actually called for a whole of

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:43.440
<v Speaker 1>society efforts. I'm not sure they've called for a whole

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of society efforts to counter the Chinese Communist Party, but

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that's neither here nor there. There's a really troubling aspect.

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are many troubling aspects of that document,

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:53.759
<v Speaker 1>but I want to read part of it and get

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>your take on it. The document reads, in part, tackling

0:35:57.480 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the threat posed by domestic terrorism over the long term

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:03.359
<v Speaker 1>demand substantial efforts to confront the racism that feeds into

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 1>aspects of that threat. We are therefore prioritizing efforts to

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:08.879
<v Speaker 1>ensure that every component of the government has a role

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:12.799
<v Speaker 1>to play in rooting out racism and advancing equity. So

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 1>is this just a backdoor Let's impose effectively critical race

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>theory on the country via government under the guise of

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 1>national security, And why should we be confident that our

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>rights are going to be protected with this administration executing

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 1>this strategy. Well, you can't be confident of that. You

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 1>can't be confident that Joe Biden's Department of Justice can

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>be can be trusted at all to impartially define what

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>domestic terrorism means, because to them, it means that you

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:41.479
<v Speaker 1>supported Donald Trump. It means that you that you have

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that views that are on the right and not on

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the left. And that's the that's the bottom line here.

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:50.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is basically, if you think about it's

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>basically what the Biden administration is rolling out of this

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 1>domestic terrorism strategy. It's basically like the Patriot Act, except

0:36:56.440 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 1>for instead of targeting foreign terrorists, it targets American citizens.

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's sort of ironic because if you remember, the

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>left was always up in arms about how the Patriot

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Act would violate foreigners civil liberties, like as if that

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>was a thing. But they have no issue with violating

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Americans constitutional rights or civil liberties as they as they've

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:19.839
<v Speaker 1>rolled out, which is why this is all targeting Trump supporters,

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and that That's why the letter that I wrote to

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Meeric Garland about the I mean clearly, clearly the dropping

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:30.800
<v Speaker 1>all those charges for against Portland rioters, for those on

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the left, but not but the disparity for what for

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 1>those who were charged on January six. I mean, you

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:40.959
<v Speaker 1>see the difference in their approach. This is all about

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 1>targeting Trump supporters, and that that's something that I know.

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I know it is concerning, but it should be concerning

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to any American on the center right, which is the

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 1>majority of the country. Conisman Jim Banks, Republican from Indiana

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>and chairman of the Republican Study Committee, Thanks so much

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 1>for coming on the program today. Really appreciate it. Great

0:37:58.280 --> 0:38:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to be with you. This is the Fuck Sexton Show Podcast.

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Join the conversation and message buck on Facebook, Instagram, or

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 1>email Team Bucket. iHeartMedia dot com. He may read it

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:12.760
<v Speaker 1>on the show. Why are you confidence whole? Change his behavior?

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Mister president, I'm not change what are you doing? So?

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I said it was confidence six. That's kind It's great,

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I said, we will change your behavior. Is the rest

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of the world reacts to their name adminishes experience of

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the world. I'm not confident of anything. I'm just stating

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact forgetting his past behavior has not changed, and

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>is that prest conference After sitting down for several hours,

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>he denied any involvement in cyberd He dail played human

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:47.520
<v Speaker 1>rights abuses, even produced to say a lesson of all

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 1>his name. So how does that account to a constructive

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:56.280
<v Speaker 1>meeting as president? I don't understand that it's just someone

0:38:56.320 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 1>with ve who are we come on? Pretty much? I'll

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 1>take your questions, and as usual, folks, they gave me

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a list of the people I'm going to call on,

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 1>so Jonathan associated Press, Well, those were some of the

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sounds of Joe Biden's excellent adventure over to Europe for

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the G seven and then as much bandied about meeting

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 1>with a Russian president, Vladimir Putin. And someone has been

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 1>keenly attuned to everything going on overseas and including on

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:28.800
<v Speaker 1>issues much bigger than this most recent trip is Christian Witten.

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 1>He's senior Fellow for Strategy and Trade at the Center

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:33.760
<v Speaker 1>for the National Interest, and it served as a senior

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 1>advisor as well in the George W. Bush and Donald

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump administrations. Christian joins us, now, thanks so much for

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:42.440
<v Speaker 1>coming on the program. Great to be here, Ben. Thanks.

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:46.239
<v Speaker 1>So let's start with this set aside all of the

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 1>optics of and really, in my opinion, sort of the

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 1>pathetic questions about who should speak first, and you know,

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 1>all of the kind of back and forth interplay between

0:39:57.000 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Puddin and Biden, which, if America was in a strong position,

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 1>would be asking about the optics, they'd be talking about

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:05.719
<v Speaker 1>the substance, substantive way. Did anything change with respect to

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>US Russia relations as a consequence of the trip, and

0:40:09.200 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 1>what were your takeaways from the G seven as well?

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I'd say probably not. You know, there are two things

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 1>that came out of it was a working group on

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 1>cyber attacks and the agreement to send ambassadors back to

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:25.880
<v Speaker 1>each country. John Sullivan, or ambassador, was back in the

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 1>United States after Putin recalled his ambassador after Biden flippantly

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 1>called Putin the killer. So they're sending him back, but

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it's up to each country to decide whether that's real

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:42.399
<v Speaker 1>or not. Will those ambassadors have access to a foreign

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 1>minister in Russia, the Secretary of State here, or if

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:46.880
<v Speaker 1>need be, the head of government, or are they just

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 1>going to go and preside over irrelevant bureaucracies as they

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 1>did before? They put the working group on cyber attacks.

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:56.239
<v Speaker 1>I have very low expectations for that. You know, it's

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a very important issue, but it's one that Biden has

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 1>already fumbled early in his administration, and he, his National

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Security advisor others said basically, we were going to retaliate

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:09.840
<v Speaker 1>in cyberspace, have a cyber counter attack for the solar

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 1>winds hack in the United States that has been attributed

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to Russia. Well that never came. I mean the National

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Security Advisor Sullivan said there would be seen and unseen consequences.

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Well the consequences were so unseen that no discerned them anywhere.

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 1>So not high expectations. They give some credit for at

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 1>least trying to restore some relations with Russia after the

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Democrats spent the last five years trying to tank them successfully.

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:38.319
<v Speaker 1>And then on the G seven, I thought that was

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 1>just a complete joke. The G seven itself is obsolete.

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 1>It's the economic powers of the world as they appeared

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:47.800
<v Speaker 1>in the mid nineteen seventies. I mean, Italy and Canada

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:51.239
<v Speaker 1>are really going to throw their economic weight around and

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 1>make a difference in the world. And if you just

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 1>juxtaposed people like Jijin King the strong man in China.

0:41:56.640 --> 0:41:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Are Putent, who has been on the job for twenty years,

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:01.399
<v Speaker 1>is at the top of this game, knows what he's doing,

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 1>compared to Boris Johnson fist bumping Trudeau, the sock model

0:42:06.200 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 1>turned Prime Minister of Canada, and Bojo up there with

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 1>President Biden saying that we're going to build back better

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and greener and more feminine and more gender neutral. It's

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:20.719
<v Speaker 1>just a joke that the idea that these people are

0:42:20.719 --> 0:42:24.919
<v Speaker 1>in charge of our fate is just very depressing. Yeah,

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:27.799
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a perfect representation of the sort of

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 1>decadent and decaying West that are purported leaders are overseeing.

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't have to be that way, but of course

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:39.239
<v Speaker 1>ideas have consequences. My take, and I'm curious what you

0:42:39.280 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 1>think about this, is that the G seven was in

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:43.799
<v Speaker 1>effect and really the whole trip when you look at

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the NATO communicate as well, that was put out which

0:42:46.520 --> 0:42:49.319
<v Speaker 1>we talked about on this program on a previous day

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:53.719
<v Speaker 1>this week, which has a couple of lines regarding China. Basically,

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the G seven was a pep rally for communist China.

0:42:56.040 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>If we're going to go down the Enviro radicalism agenda,

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:05.440
<v Speaker 1>hamstring areomy, of course, outsourced European energy to Russia and beyond.

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:08.279
<v Speaker 1>China stands to be one of the greatest beneficiaries of

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 1>America being back so called that is back to what

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I would term an America last strategy policy. I wonder

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:18.000
<v Speaker 1>what your take is on that. You're right, you know,

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the G seven and NATO both padded themselves on the

0:43:20.719 --> 0:43:25.759
<v Speaker 1>back for including statements about China. You know, when has

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a statement from a G seven ever made a difference

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in the real world. It's sort of sad. You have

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:36.920
<v Speaker 1>diplomats from all these countries, different ministries who travel around

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:39.239
<v Speaker 1>the world. It's a whole lot of diplo tourism, but

0:43:39.520 --> 0:43:43.720
<v Speaker 1>they work on changing colons, the semi colons, and words

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 1>going and words go out of these enormously long statements,

0:43:47.040 --> 0:43:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and you're called. During the Trump administration, not having one

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of these statements was seen as some huge transgression, like,

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:55.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, will the sun come up tomorrow because we

0:43:55.760 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have a statement from the G seven. I think

0:43:59.040 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 1>as soon as the ink dry on these things, as

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 1>soon as the door was closed on Air Force seven,

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the G seven statement was gone, forgotten, irrelevant, And the

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:10.840
<v Speaker 1>same with NATO. NATO it seems basically to have become

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a mechanism. I mean, it's always a mechanism to keep

0:44:13.080 --> 0:44:16.319
<v Speaker 1>the Americans in, as it was called, Americans in, the

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Russians out, the Germans down. That mission became obsolete in

0:44:20.080 --> 0:44:22.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety one with the collapse of the Soviet Union.

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:25.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, will this make any difference in the real world.

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to see France's aircraft carrier applying the

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 1>waters of the Western Pacific to give us some relief

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:36.560
<v Speaker 1>for it to butcherous American power? It just seems extremely unlikely.

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:39.360
<v Speaker 1>In the meanwhile, NATO, what does it do. It seems

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to continually draw in our power. I mean, we have

0:44:42.800 --> 0:44:47.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty five thousand, five hundred troops in Germany, Wish armies

0:44:47.200 --> 0:44:50.799
<v Speaker 1>between Russia in Germany. It's just this tremendous waste of money,

0:44:50.840 --> 0:44:52.400
<v Speaker 1>but I think distracts us from the real mission at

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:54.880
<v Speaker 1>hand with China. Yeah, and to segue a little bit

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:58.360
<v Speaker 1>further into China, I think it's always worth remembering that

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the Obama Biden ad Ministry had an agreement a sort

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of no cyber warfare pact with General Secretary she and

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:08.719
<v Speaker 1>that pack of course, was not worth the paper it

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 1>was printed on. So why we would think that Vladimir

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Putin would be any more respectful of whatever comes out

0:45:14.000 --> 0:45:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of a strategic dialogue. I think we should be beyond

0:45:17.280 --> 0:45:21.160
<v Speaker 1>skeptical of it. And you've been writing and speaking often

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:26.000
<v Speaker 1>about the Chinese Communist Party is Malian efforts worldwide, including

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:28.000
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong. I believe you had a substack post

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:31.240
<v Speaker 1>today on what's going on with respect to Apple Daily,

0:45:31.760 --> 0:45:36.239
<v Speaker 1>a news periodical in Hong Kong, and efforts to persecute

0:45:36.280 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and prosecute its owner as well. Tell us a little

0:45:39.560 --> 0:45:44.319
<v Speaker 1>bit about that and why it's relevant for everyday Americans. Well,

0:45:44.320 --> 0:45:47.239
<v Speaker 1>it speaks to the point that you just can't trust

0:45:47.320 --> 0:45:50.160
<v Speaker 1>China on an agreement, whether it's that twenty fifteen agreement

0:45:50.200 --> 0:45:52.560
<v Speaker 1>not to attack us in cyberspace, for the agreement they

0:45:52.600 --> 0:45:54.920
<v Speaker 1>had with the Brits that was enrolled at the United

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Nations to respect Hong Kong's autonomy and the freedoms that

0:45:59.480 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 1>they had under the British, including freedom of the press.

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:04.640
<v Speaker 1>With Apple Daily, which is basically like the New York

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Post of Hong Kong, very pro democracy, boisterous tabloidy, but

0:46:10.480 --> 0:46:14.280
<v Speaker 1>also serious news and very starting support from the people

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:19.279
<v Speaker 1>of Hong Kong and a very profitable business. Heretofore, that

0:46:19.400 --> 0:46:21.400
<v Speaker 1>is something that the Chinese wanted to do away with,

0:46:21.560 --> 0:46:25.520
<v Speaker 1>so they have under this sony national security law charged

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Lay, the publisher. Jimmy has been through this before

0:46:28.840 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 1>with the Chinese. He arrived in Hong Kong as a

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:34.799
<v Speaker 1>poor kid, basically was just a shirt on his back.

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:37.880
<v Speaker 1>He made it and got rich in men's apparel with Georgiano,

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:41.160
<v Speaker 1>sided with the students in Cenim and Square in nineteen

0:46:41.160 --> 0:46:43.160
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine and was pushed out of his business as

0:46:43.160 --> 0:46:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a result of that. Then became a huge success and

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 1>entirely different business media and is now you know, basically

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:53.399
<v Speaker 1>being being pushed out of that. And it's not just him.

0:46:53.520 --> 0:46:58.240
<v Speaker 1>It's overnight this morning Hong Kong Time, the Chinese rounded

0:46:58.400 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 1>up all of the top editorial staff of Apple Daily.

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:05.799
<v Speaker 1>So it really is a strong move against the free

0:47:05.840 --> 0:47:10.360
<v Speaker 1>press there. And it was just laughing. City Bank upgraded

0:47:10.680 --> 0:47:14.440
<v Speaker 1>HSBC recently saying they have great prospects for wealth management

0:47:14.480 --> 0:47:16.319
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong, and I think this is City Bank

0:47:16.680 --> 0:47:19.000
<v Speaker 1>just covering its own decision to go very deep in

0:47:19.040 --> 0:47:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong, hiring thousands of bankers there now, And that's

0:47:21.960 --> 0:47:24.359
<v Speaker 1>a ludicrous decision because anyone who can move money out

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of Hong Kong's it's not a torrent, but it's a

0:47:26.920 --> 0:47:30.400
<v Speaker 1>steady drip. And as far as wealth management on the mainland,

0:47:30.440 --> 0:47:33.200
<v Speaker 1>no one on the mainland who's using City Bank or HSBC.

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:36.560
<v Speaker 1>But I think there's a naive to tay about how

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:39.279
<v Speaker 1>this movement against freedom is somehow going to be just

0:47:39.360 --> 0:47:42.959
<v Speaker 1>limited to the elected pandemocrats in Hong Kong or the

0:47:43.000 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 1>pro democracy media. It's going to be bigger than that.

0:47:45.600 --> 0:47:47.680
<v Speaker 1>If you're an equity analyst and you write something bad

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:50.480
<v Speaker 1>about the state owned enterprise on the mainland, how do

0:47:50.520 --> 0:47:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you know these guys aren't going to come a knocket.

0:47:52.360 --> 0:47:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the chances are they probably will. That economic

0:47:55.760 --> 0:47:59.719
<v Speaker 1>freedom is also deteriorating rapidly in Hong Kong. Got just

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:01.279
<v Speaker 1>about a minute and a half before we have to

0:48:01.280 --> 0:48:03.719
<v Speaker 1>seek a quick break and before we get there. If

0:48:03.760 --> 0:48:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you could summarize it, what do you make of President

0:48:06.920 --> 0:48:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Biden's China policy to date and the personnel he's selected

0:48:11.120 --> 0:48:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to implement and executing. It's a mixed bag so far.

0:48:15.200 --> 0:48:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we really know that China policy. You know,

0:48:18.000 --> 0:48:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of described that you have super doves like

0:48:22.120 --> 0:48:24.880
<v Speaker 1>John Kerry the climates are who eventually is going to

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:27.920
<v Speaker 1>want some deal of the century on climate out of China.

0:48:27.960 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And will you know, they say ludicrous things like climate

0:48:31.239 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 1>change is a national security issue. No, no, no, it isn't.

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:38.799
<v Speaker 1>It just isn't. But the idea there is that you

0:48:38.840 --> 0:48:44.440
<v Speaker 1>will basically subsume all other issues beneath below climate change.

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:46.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, on the flip side, you have Kurt Campbell,

0:48:46.800 --> 0:48:49.600
<v Speaker 1>who is a long time Democrat but from the Hillary

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:51.799
<v Speaker 1>Clinton wing of the party, considered more of a hawk.

0:48:52.239 --> 0:48:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the jury's out on that. Over at USTR,

0:48:56.920 --> 0:49:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Katherine Tie at Taiwan, he's American who is I think

0:49:01.920 --> 0:49:05.239
<v Speaker 1>the eyes wide open. And it's very interesting so far,

0:49:05.560 --> 0:49:08.840
<v Speaker 1>almost all across the Biden administration they want to pretend

0:49:08.880 --> 0:49:12.160
<v Speaker 1>like twenty sixteen that never happened, the Trump administration didn't occur.

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:15.160
<v Speaker 1>With China policy, they're not quite willing to do that yet.

0:49:15.200 --> 0:49:18.440
<v Speaker 1>But we haven't really seen sort of the coherent policy

0:49:18.440 --> 0:49:21.120
<v Speaker 1>on trade in defense, and we certainly haven't seen any

0:49:21.200 --> 0:49:26.800
<v Speaker 1>defense increase in naval aviation histill nuclear presence in the Pacific.

0:49:26.840 --> 0:49:29.960
<v Speaker 1>To follow some of the rhetoric from both parties of Arshington,

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:31.919
<v Speaker 1>and I do think it's worth noting on that point

0:49:31.960 --> 0:49:35.560
<v Speaker 1>about maintaining many of the Trump administration's policies that when

0:49:35.560 --> 0:49:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I interviewed President Trump last week, he noted that Biden

0:49:39.280 --> 0:49:41.760
<v Speaker 1>can't take the tariffs off from China. They're too politically

0:49:41.760 --> 0:49:44.719
<v Speaker 1>popular and they're too effective. So it's interesting how he

0:49:44.760 --> 0:49:47.480
<v Speaker 1>was boxed in certain of these areas. We're speaking with

0:49:47.800 --> 0:49:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Christian Witten, Senior Fellow for Strategy and Trade at the

0:49:50.120 --> 0:49:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Center for the National Interest and wove more with him

0:49:52.120 --> 0:49:55.759
<v Speaker 1>right after a quick break. You're listening to the Buck

0:49:55.800 --> 0:49:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Sexton Shoe podcast. Make sure you subscribe to the podcast

0:49:59.200 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeart Brade Eat or wherever you get your podcasts.

0:50:03.600 --> 0:50:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Back with Christian Widden here on the Buck Sexton Show.

0:50:06.280 --> 0:50:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Van weine Garden in for Buck Sexton, and before the break,

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:14.040
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about US China policy, and obviously something that

0:50:14.080 --> 0:50:18.719
<v Speaker 1>ought to loom hugely bigly over US China policy are

0:50:18.840 --> 0:50:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the origins of the coronavirus and ultimately what the response

0:50:22.760 --> 0:50:25.279
<v Speaker 1>is and really what the response should be, regardless of

0:50:25.320 --> 0:50:27.279
<v Speaker 1>whether or not it came from a wet market, which

0:50:27.320 --> 0:50:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I think is pretty clear is becoming less and less

0:50:30.200 --> 0:50:32.719
<v Speaker 1>legitimate and less and less viable, or it was a

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:35.319
<v Speaker 1>lab leak, and whether or not that lab leak, whether

0:50:35.400 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 1>or not it was intentional or unintentional with respect to

0:50:38.560 --> 0:50:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the leak of the pandemic out of that U Hunt

0:50:41.640 --> 0:50:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Institute of Virology, one question that I have is how

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:49.640
<v Speaker 1>could we possibly find any smoking guns now? And should

0:50:49.680 --> 0:50:52.000
<v Speaker 1>it really matter either way whether we find those smoking

0:50:52.080 --> 0:50:55.360
<v Speaker 1>guns given China's acts subsequent to the spread of the virus,

0:50:56.160 --> 0:50:58.640
<v Speaker 1>then I think it'll be very difficult. Now we have

0:50:58.719 --> 0:51:01.760
<v Speaker 1>an intelligence bureau for steed, that costs US eighty billion

0:51:01.840 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year, who you know, really ought to be

0:51:05.680 --> 0:51:08.160
<v Speaker 1>able to get to the bottom of this, you'd think

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:13.160
<v Speaker 1>with their mass combination of signals intelligence and human intelligence,

0:51:13.160 --> 0:51:16.480
<v Speaker 1>which I'm dubious of as far as the quality of

0:51:16.520 --> 0:51:19.799
<v Speaker 1>what they may have um So hopefully we can get

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:22.799
<v Speaker 1>more information that's available, but you're right, the Chinese aren't

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:25.440
<v Speaker 1>going to make it easy likely, as you also I

0:51:25.440 --> 0:51:31.560
<v Speaker 1>think implied that is a very strong symbol and signal

0:51:31.719 --> 0:51:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of guilt. After all, if this really was something that

0:51:35.239 --> 0:51:38.759
<v Speaker 1>happened naturally, or even if it was just negligence, as

0:51:38.760 --> 0:51:43.080
<v Speaker 1>opposed to crimes of commission that had leaked, the Chinese

0:51:43.080 --> 0:51:47.520
<v Speaker 1>would have an interest in making that known, because if

0:51:47.560 --> 0:51:51.319
<v Speaker 1>it's the alternative, then I mean they're they're they're on

0:51:51.360 --> 0:51:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the hook potentially for damages that result from this. But

0:51:54.000 --> 0:51:56.880
<v Speaker 1>if they were innocent, they would be making the staff available,

0:51:56.880 --> 0:51:59.640
<v Speaker 1>they would be making the medical records of the people

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:03.600
<v Speaker 1>who became sick in late twenty twenty excuse me, in

0:52:03.680 --> 0:52:06.480
<v Speaker 1>late twenty nineteen available, And they haven't done any of that.

0:52:06.520 --> 0:52:08.799
<v Speaker 1>They've done quite the opposite. In fact, one person who

0:52:08.840 --> 0:52:13.919
<v Speaker 1>filed a patent for a coronavirus vaccine who worked at

0:52:13.960 --> 0:52:18.160
<v Speaker 1>this lab died under very mysterious circumstances didn't die from

0:52:18.200 --> 0:52:21.719
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen incidentally, so you know the implication he was

0:52:21.760 --> 0:52:26.960
<v Speaker 1>bumped off by the Chinese. You know. Basically, I think

0:52:26.960 --> 0:52:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the onus of proof is on China to show where

0:52:29.680 --> 0:52:31.839
<v Speaker 1>this came from, and the assumption is that it came

0:52:31.880 --> 0:52:34.839
<v Speaker 1>from them otherwise. But I think many in the West

0:52:34.880 --> 0:52:39.080
<v Speaker 1>are just just hesitant because they're frankly afraid to understand

0:52:39.120 --> 0:52:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and to pursue where that conclusion would go, which is

0:52:42.560 --> 0:52:45.279
<v Speaker 1>that China owes the world and owes us trillions and

0:52:45.320 --> 0:52:49.120
<v Speaker 1>trillions of dollars of compensation, and given the ambiguity that

0:52:49.160 --> 0:52:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the intelligence community typically gives when asked for an assessment

0:52:52.640 --> 0:52:55.640
<v Speaker 1>on something as major as this, I mean, should we

0:52:55.680 --> 0:52:59.040
<v Speaker 1>have any confidence that punting to the ICA wasn't anything

0:52:59.080 --> 0:53:01.640
<v Speaker 1>but a political decision to take it sort of out

0:53:01.640 --> 0:53:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of the hands of Joe Biden essentially? Right, Well, it was,

0:53:05.200 --> 0:53:08.399
<v Speaker 1>and partly it was a political decision by Biden. You're right,

0:53:09.280 --> 0:53:13.239
<v Speaker 1>because Pompeo, terms Secretary of State, had an investigation. I'm

0:53:13.280 --> 0:53:16.319
<v Speaker 1>just going you know, State issued a grant from the

0:53:16.440 --> 0:53:20.759
<v Speaker 1>NIH too, this Wuhan Institute. State had a diplomat go

0:53:20.840 --> 0:53:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and take a look around. He was not impressed by

0:53:22.960 --> 0:53:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the security procedures and sent a cable back to main

0:53:25.560 --> 0:53:28.279
<v Speaker 1>State in twenty eighteen to that effect. But Biden put

0:53:28.360 --> 0:53:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the kibosh on that investigation, and the political blowback from

0:53:32.239 --> 0:53:34.799
<v Speaker 1>that is why he turned it over to the intelligence bureaucracy.

0:53:35.160 --> 0:53:37.719
<v Speaker 1>You're right, you know, I think Biden even already telegraphed

0:53:37.719 --> 0:53:40.200
<v Speaker 1>when he announced this that some agencies think one thing.

0:53:40.320 --> 0:53:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Some agencies searched together with you know, so called moderate confidence,

0:53:44.920 --> 0:53:48.640
<v Speaker 1>which means they're guessing it's sad that our intelligence gacacy

0:53:48.800 --> 0:53:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is is this ineffective on something so important? But it

0:53:53.040 --> 0:53:56.399
<v Speaker 1>goes back to this deep state, this intelligence garacacy. It's

0:53:56.600 --> 0:54:01.719
<v Speaker 1>chief virtue, it's chief capability is covering its own But

0:54:02.480 --> 0:54:05.640
<v Speaker 1>rather than helping the president do his job, and rather

0:54:05.719 --> 0:54:08.840
<v Speaker 1>than getting the truth out to the American people in

0:54:09.000 --> 0:54:10.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds. And this is a tough one to do

0:54:10.880 --> 0:54:13.120
<v Speaker 1>in that short period of time. But is there any

0:54:13.160 --> 0:54:17.360
<v Speaker 1>alternative ultimately to decoupling from China, at least in every

0:54:17.360 --> 0:54:21.240
<v Speaker 1>strategically significant area, if we are to ultimately not become

0:54:21.600 --> 0:54:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a vassal of communist China or at least continue to

0:54:24.200 --> 0:54:28.960
<v Speaker 1>be compromised to devastating effect. I think not. I think

0:54:29.000 --> 0:54:33.440
<v Speaker 1>we need to choke off technology, know how, in capital.

0:54:33.760 --> 0:54:36.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the chief threats in the world today. You know,

0:54:36.160 --> 0:54:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Russia dous things we don't like, and certainly Iran is

0:54:38.560 --> 0:54:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a very serious throat in the broader Middle East. But

0:54:41.160 --> 0:54:44.880
<v Speaker 1>China is the big tahuna. It's the chief competitor economic

0:54:45.000 --> 0:54:48.000
<v Speaker 1>model to ours and in political model, and it's great

0:54:48.040 --> 0:54:52.120
<v Speaker 1>at political warfare, economic warfare. We don't know about military warfare,

0:54:52.160 --> 0:54:55.480
<v Speaker 1>but they're sertainly good at buying everything that money can buy,

0:54:55.680 --> 0:54:58.160
<v Speaker 1>so I think you're right. The implication is that we

0:54:58.280 --> 0:55:01.399
<v Speaker 1>have to get much more serious about the Christian Thanks

0:55:01.400 --> 0:55:03.200
<v Speaker 1>so much for coming on the program. Really appreciate it,

0:55:04.640 --> 0:55:07.279
<v Speaker 1>my pleasure. Thank you, and well Moore right after this,

0:55:07.880 --> 0:55:11.239
<v Speaker 1>we're happy to have abandoned in Florida. It's not going

0:55:11.280 --> 0:55:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to be allowed in Florida classrooms. Spending tax dollars to

0:55:15.080 --> 0:55:20.440
<v Speaker 1>teach kids that America is a rotten place is absolutely unacceptable.

0:55:20.920 --> 0:55:23.759
<v Speaker 1>If you'll look at how some of this stuff manifests

0:55:23.800 --> 0:55:27.000
<v Speaker 1>itself in classrooms that we have seen examples of. It's

0:55:27.040 --> 0:55:31.080
<v Speaker 1>not a conspiracy theory, dividing kids based on race, trying

0:55:31.120 --> 0:55:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to say some are oppressors and some are oppress based

0:55:34.080 --> 0:55:38.560
<v Speaker 1>on race, attacking law enforcement and saying law enforcement attack

0:55:38.719 --> 0:55:42.520
<v Speaker 1>people based on race, those things are poison. That is

0:55:42.600 --> 0:55:44.360
<v Speaker 1>not what we should be doing. What we should be

0:55:44.400 --> 0:55:48.400
<v Speaker 1>doing is solid curriculum based on the actual facts of

0:55:48.440 --> 0:55:51.360
<v Speaker 1>American history and teaching kids what it means to be

0:55:51.400 --> 0:55:53.520
<v Speaker 1>an American and part of what it means to be

0:55:53.520 --> 0:55:56.680
<v Speaker 1>an American as we judge people not on the color

0:55:56.719 --> 0:55:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of their skin, but on the content of their character.

0:55:59.440 --> 0:56:03.600
<v Speaker 1>That was Governor Ronda Santis, Republican from Florida speaking about

0:56:03.680 --> 0:56:08.920
<v Speaker 1>critical race theory and its infiltration of classrooms around the country.

0:56:08.960 --> 0:56:10.799
<v Speaker 1>And you can't really put it much better than that

0:56:11.000 --> 0:56:16.360
<v Speaker 1>taxpayer funded anti americanism is intolerable. Should be roundly rejected

0:56:16.360 --> 0:56:20.560
<v Speaker 1>by everyone, as should the idea that content of character

0:56:20.600 --> 0:56:23.520
<v Speaker 1>should not trump anything else, including color of skin. And

0:56:23.560 --> 0:56:27.200
<v Speaker 1>this goes back to my running theme of excellence versus mediocrity.

0:56:27.320 --> 0:56:31.480
<v Speaker 1>If you want mediocrity, place anything but content of character first.

0:56:32.360 --> 0:56:36.600
<v Speaker 1>But really, the racialists, the racial Marxists, the imbibers of

0:56:36.640 --> 0:56:39.600
<v Speaker 1>critical race theory and diversity, equity and inclusion, I mean

0:56:39.640 --> 0:56:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the true believers, the ideoogs here, they fundamentally reject the

0:56:44.680 --> 0:56:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Martin Luther King ethos of content of character over color

0:56:49.040 --> 0:56:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of skin. And we could talk about this in the abstract,

0:56:51.800 --> 0:56:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and with our next guest, we will talk at length

0:56:55.640 --> 0:56:57.319
<v Speaker 1>about what is going on in our school is what

0:56:57.400 --> 0:57:03.400
<v Speaker 1>these ideologies are actually all about. How conservatives, patriots, traditional Americans,

0:57:03.880 --> 0:57:06.480
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's a gas at what they're witnessing in our

0:57:06.520 --> 0:57:10.920
<v Speaker 1>schools can go about combatting them practically. There's a story

0:57:10.960 --> 0:57:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that caught my eye this week on a micro level

0:57:13.040 --> 0:57:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that just speaks to the effects of the brainwashing that

0:57:17.920 --> 0:57:21.400
<v Speaker 1>we've seen, and it comes from teachers, and of course

0:57:21.400 --> 0:57:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the teachers are far more radical than the parents on

0:57:23.520 --> 0:57:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the average. So you've got that inbuilt disadvantage in academia

0:57:28.600 --> 0:57:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of academics being disproportionately leftist, or at least and not

0:57:32.720 --> 0:57:36.120
<v Speaker 1>only disproportionately leftist, but then having a percentage a minority

0:57:36.160 --> 0:57:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of those disproportionate leftists who are really radically leftists. There's

0:57:39.800 --> 0:57:43.280
<v Speaker 1>an article at the Post millennial white Spanish teacher cancels

0:57:43.320 --> 0:57:48.680
<v Speaker 1>herself because quote unquote white isn't right. Subtitle dismantling white

0:57:48.680 --> 0:57:52.040
<v Speaker 1>supremacy in society looks like dismantling in my heart. First

0:57:52.160 --> 0:57:55.120
<v Speaker 1>it means I'm not going to teach Spanish. Accountability is

0:57:55.120 --> 0:57:59.120
<v Speaker 1>ongoing because there is not end to the process. So

0:57:59.160 --> 0:58:01.840
<v Speaker 1>this teacher, during what can only be described as a

0:58:01.920 --> 0:58:05.400
<v Speaker 1>struggle session there's actually a women in Gender Studies conference

0:58:06.280 --> 0:58:10.200
<v Speaker 1>for professors. Her name is Jessica Bridges, shared that she

0:58:10.280 --> 0:58:12.840
<v Speaker 1>stopped teaching Spanish to K through twelve students because it

0:58:12.880 --> 0:58:15.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't right for a white woman to teach Spanish. I

0:58:15.080 --> 0:58:18.400
<v Speaker 1>guess that's cultural appropriation. But stop right there for a second.

0:58:19.000 --> 0:58:22.000
<v Speaker 1>What the hell it does it matter? Your skin color,

0:58:22.000 --> 0:58:25.320
<v Speaker 1>your background, or anything else. If you are a competent teacher,

0:58:26.280 --> 0:58:29.800
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't our schools be about getting the best education, which

0:58:29.880 --> 0:58:34.040
<v Speaker 1>means not only learning a non Marxian version of history,

0:58:34.480 --> 0:58:38.120
<v Speaker 1>but learning how to think. Clearly, the leftist don't believe

0:58:38.160 --> 0:58:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that they want you to think what they want you

0:58:39.920 --> 0:58:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to think, and they don't want you to have their

0:58:41.480 --> 0:58:45.400
<v Speaker 1>critical reasoning skills to see right through it. This article

0:58:45.480 --> 0:58:48.360
<v Speaker 1>goes on to say that this teacher had this revelation

0:58:48.520 --> 0:58:50.760
<v Speaker 1>after taking a course she found on Instagram about how

0:58:50.760 --> 0:58:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to become a better white ally and anti racist co conspirator.

0:58:54.960 --> 0:58:58.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is the language that the left speaks. They

0:58:58.040 --> 0:59:02.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about toxic word and you're allowed to fight toxic

0:59:02.040 --> 0:59:06.560
<v Speaker 1>if not harmful, actually harmful words with actual violence justifiable.

0:59:06.960 --> 0:59:09.640
<v Speaker 1>They talk about being an ally. The way to be

0:59:09.720 --> 0:59:11.440
<v Speaker 1>an ally to a person is to treat them as

0:59:11.480 --> 0:59:16.800
<v Speaker 1>a human being, regardless of identity. Explicitly, the left needs

0:59:16.800 --> 0:59:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to bake identity in everything because they need to pit

0:59:19.120 --> 0:59:21.840
<v Speaker 1>us against each other because that's part of their political strategy.

0:59:22.000 --> 0:59:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And at the end of the day, that's what this

0:59:23.400 --> 0:59:26.600
<v Speaker 1>is really all about. What is CRT. It's not just

0:59:26.640 --> 0:59:31.040
<v Speaker 1>about brandwashing kids, demoralizing generation, turning kids against their parents

0:59:31.040 --> 0:59:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and their country, and basically, in effect a revolution of

0:59:34.000 --> 0:59:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the mind that will lead to a revolution in the country. Ultimately,

0:59:38.600 --> 0:59:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it's about tearing us apart at the seams. It's about

0:59:42.120 --> 0:59:45.400
<v Speaker 1>indoctrination and creating an army of social justice warriors in

0:59:45.440 --> 0:59:48.200
<v Speaker 1>perpetuity that gets worse every single generation. And it has

0:59:48.280 --> 0:59:51.440
<v Speaker 1>gotten works every single generation because what was considered incredibly

0:59:51.520 --> 0:59:54.880
<v Speaker 1>radical forty years ago then becomes, you know, thirty years ago,

0:59:54.920 --> 0:59:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the norm, and it continues on and on. It's only

0:59:57.040 --> 0:59:59.960
<v Speaker 1>accelerating with social media. So our next guest will take

1:00:00.080 --> 1:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>this micro example and move to the macro of what

1:00:03.480 --> 1:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is CRT and diversity, equity inclusion all about how do

1:00:06.800 --> 1:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you combat it? And then after that we'll talk about

1:00:08.680 --> 1:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>another area of concentrated woke power in big tech with

1:00:12.080 --> 1:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Rachel Bovard. We're back right after this. When we look

1:00:15.600 --> 1:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>at what these laws are doing, you know a lot

1:00:17.640 --> 1:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of people kind of scoffed at them when you read

1:00:20.320 --> 1:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the language of them, they appear very silly, But when

1:00:23.400 --> 1:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>you think about what this is actually trying to do,

1:00:26.000 --> 1:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>we know that it is narrative that allows us to

1:00:29.360 --> 1:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>enact really dangerous policies. It is narrative that allows citizens

1:00:33.240 --> 1:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to kind of accept these erosions of civil rights. So

1:00:36.040 --> 1:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not incidental that the same states that are introducing

1:00:39.920 --> 1:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>these anti critical race theory, anti sixteen nineteen project laws

1:00:43.880 --> 1:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>are also introducing voter suppression laws. These things are going

1:00:47.040 --> 1:00:49.520
<v Speaker 1>hand in hand. Well, you just heard the dulcet tones

1:00:49.720 --> 1:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of Nicole Hannah Jones, creator of the Insidious sixteen nineteen Project,

1:00:55.840 --> 1:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>talking with Joy Read and trying to equate the efforts

1:00:58.880 --> 1:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to root outtical race theory in schools across this country

1:01:02.320 --> 1:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and anti American critical race theory with the broader efforts

1:01:05.240 --> 1:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to quote unquote suppress the vote, or as we talked

1:01:07.880 --> 1:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>about yesterday, Stacy Abrams saying, voter integrity efforts are part

1:01:11.520 --> 1:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of the rolling insurrection. So this is the state of

1:01:14.920 --> 1:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric on the left today, and I'm pleased to be

1:01:17.280 --> 1:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>joined by someone who's countering that rhetoric and the policies

1:01:21.320 --> 1:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>as well. Professor Scott Jenner. He is the professor of

1:01:24.200 --> 1:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>political science at Boise State and a Washington Fellow at

1:01:27.200 --> 1:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the Claremont Institute, where phot disclosure, I too, am a

1:01:30.280 --> 1:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>fellow and do some work as well. He's also the

1:01:32.480 --> 1:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>author of the book The Recovery of Family Life, Exposing

1:01:36.320 --> 1:01:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the limits of modern ideologies. Scott, thanks so much for

1:01:39.360 --> 1:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>coming on the program today. Thanks for having me. It's

1:01:41.520 --> 1:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure to be here. Well, pleasure to have you.

1:01:43.600 --> 1:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>And let's start right there with the left's recent freak

1:01:48.000 --> 1:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>out about and this is in the media and beyond

1:01:50.880 --> 1:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>as well academics as well. This freak out over conservatives

1:01:54.520 --> 1:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>having the goal to seek to educate, legislate critical race

1:01:58.720 --> 1:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>theory out of our public school is. What do you

1:02:00.720 --> 1:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>make of that freak out? Well, I mean, it seems

1:02:03.160 --> 1:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>like they're really trying to just make it the official

1:02:05.120 --> 1:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>ideology of the country, and any effort to fight against

1:02:10.600 --> 1:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>social justice ideology, critical race theory, any kind of critical

1:02:14.040 --> 1:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>theory is trying to be labeled as an Americans as

1:02:19.680 --> 1:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a basis for hate speech and canceling those people. So

1:02:25.080 --> 1:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it's all the more important to really fight back against

1:02:27.760 --> 1:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>it because they're trying to rule it out as a

1:02:29.840 --> 1:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>legitimate position in politics. And it is a legitimate position

1:02:33.680 --> 1:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in politics, darn't it. I Mean, the idea that all

1:02:37.160 --> 1:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>disparities between all groups are traceable to some sort of

1:02:40.200 --> 1:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>systematic discrimination is just bunk. And if we can't say

1:02:45.400 --> 1:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that it's bunk and a disgusting line meant to silence us,

1:02:49.880 --> 1:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>then we're really in position where we, you know, we

1:02:52.480 --> 1:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>can't govern ourselves and we have to submit. So it

1:02:56.160 --> 1:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>looks to me like part of a long term strategy

1:02:59.720 --> 1:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to at a new ideology governing the country and everyone

1:03:03.600 --> 1:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to submit to it. I think the simplest summary of

1:03:07.080 --> 1:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>what critical race theory is essentially racial Marxism, not even racialists,

1:03:12.680 --> 1:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>or you could call it racist Marxism, racial Marxism, or

1:03:15.840 --> 1:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>racialist Marxism. But you come at this from the perspective

1:03:19.080 --> 1:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of an academic. What's your best explanation as to what

1:03:22.600 --> 1:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>CRT consists of and what does it am ultimately to achieve.

1:03:26.560 --> 1:03:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think CRT is part of a larger

1:03:29.680 --> 1:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>movement that's been going on for about fifty years. It's

1:03:33.000 --> 1:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a late child of multiculturalism, and it's an attempt to

1:03:37.560 --> 1:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>try to explain differences between groups in terms of discrimination,

1:03:43.000 --> 1:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>not in terms of group difference. So it began in

1:03:47.280 --> 1:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the late sixties with multicultural education and the attempt to

1:03:54.880 --> 1:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>stop assimilation, to stop holding all groups to the same

1:04:00.280 --> 1:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>standards of behavior, and to start respecting what it's called

1:04:04.560 --> 1:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>cultural difference. Some groups don't achieve as well in school,

1:04:10.920 --> 1:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>we're not supposed to try to raise them to the

1:04:13.200 --> 1:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>level of achievement, but rather to respect their difference. And

1:04:19.200 --> 1:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you know that ends up having this kind of paternalistic

1:04:21.960 --> 1:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>aspect to it, but it also ends up taking the

1:04:24.840 --> 1:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>standard that we have used as a country and undermining

1:04:28.080 --> 1:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>it or making it not a standard. And so I

1:04:31.280 --> 1:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>just look at critical race theory as totally in line

1:04:34.520 --> 1:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>with this long line of ideological positions that include multiculturalism,

1:04:40.840 --> 1:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>affirmative action, set asides as policies, but just the latest

1:04:46.040 --> 1:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>flower of it. The difference in critical race theory seems

1:04:50.080 --> 1:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to be that they really don't believe that progress can

1:04:53.000 --> 1:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>be made on any of these avenues. It's just a

1:04:56.520 --> 1:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>permanent struggle between groups, and it's not necessary to stigmatize

1:05:01.680 --> 1:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>one group in order to so that it will lose

1:05:03.840 --> 1:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>its confidence so that a different group can rule and

1:05:07.160 --> 1:05:11.600
<v Speaker 1>set set the tone. And so critical race here, I

1:05:11.640 --> 1:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>think adds to the idea that all discrimination is traced,

1:05:15.560 --> 1:05:19.439
<v Speaker 1>all disparities are traceable to discrimination. With this idea that

1:05:19.480 --> 1:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>no progress can be made on it, and that different

1:05:23.920 --> 1:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>different groups in the case in our case, I think

1:05:27.880 --> 1:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>it means blacks and women need the rule, and whites

1:05:31.680 --> 1:05:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and men need to submit to that rule. And so

1:05:36.240 --> 1:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>so I think it's not didn't just come out of nowhere.

1:05:38.920 --> 1:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>It's been growing for a long time, but it's just

1:05:41.280 --> 1:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>added certain accesses over the course of the last few years.

1:05:45.520 --> 1:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's tactically brilliant to try to cover the agenda

1:05:48.960 --> 1:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that you always wanted with the patna of sort of

1:05:53.200 --> 1:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>racial justice and defending those who are perceived to be

1:05:57.960 --> 1:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the underdog or treated as the underdog, but in case

1:06:00.280 --> 1:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a perpetual underdog that can only be helped through the

1:06:02.640 --> 1:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>implementation of these sorts of policies. I mean, it's technically

1:06:06.480 --> 1:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>very smart. And you've sort of, in your own wife

1:06:09.040 --> 1:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>fought fire with fire. What have you been aiming to

1:06:11.800 --> 1:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>do to combat CRT in your home state of Idaho. Well,

1:06:16.240 --> 1:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not acting as a professor at Boise State, but

1:06:19.160 --> 1:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>rather just as a citizen. We've tried to write some

1:06:22.800 --> 1:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>reports on how far the ideology of critical theory, or

1:06:28.840 --> 1:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>social justice as we call it, has penetrated our universities

1:06:33.400 --> 1:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and here with another group called the Ido Freedom Foundation,

1:06:37.760 --> 1:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I have helped to write a couple of reports, one

1:06:41.080 --> 1:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>on Boise State University and another on Idaho University, Idaho,

1:06:45.760 --> 1:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>about how the structure of diversity, inclusion and equity is

1:06:49.920 --> 1:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>beginning to be built and to infiltrate all of the

1:06:52.760 --> 1:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>policies at the school. We're not as far built out

1:06:56.280 --> 1:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>as other schools like Berkeley or Ohio State, but we're

1:06:59.360 --> 1:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>still in the earth early stages of the building what

1:07:01.640 --> 1:07:06.160
<v Speaker 1>we call the adolescence of the of the attempt to

1:07:06.200 --> 1:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>build a structure on the university. And this is happening,

1:07:09.400 --> 1:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, under the nose of the legislature. No one

1:07:11.720 --> 1:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>knows that it's happening. It's it's not really under the

1:07:15.680 --> 1:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>purview of the legislature normally to pay attention to these things.

1:07:19.480 --> 1:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>But if we think that this ideology is something that

1:07:22.640 --> 1:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>really undermines the ability for us to have a common

1:07:25.200 --> 1:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>good and for us to have representative government and for

1:07:28.040 --> 1:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>all groups to thrive in the United States, it needs

1:07:32.080 --> 1:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to be you know, it needs to be rooted out

1:07:33.880 --> 1:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>or prevented from taking over our public institutions. So here

1:07:37.600 --> 1:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>in Idaho, you know, with the help somewhat of our reports,

1:07:42.000 --> 1:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>there have been laws that are passed that prevent indoctrination

1:07:47.760 --> 1:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>on the basis of the social justice ideology. And also

1:07:51.160 --> 1:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>there's been some defunding of the universities that has absolute

1:07:54.640 --> 1:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>cuts in their budgets from the state and all and

1:08:00.280 --> 1:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in the name of this, because this is being built,

1:08:03.560 --> 1:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the legislature has cut the budget. And you know, I

1:08:07.760 --> 1:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>think that's one of the only ways that only tools

1:08:10.120 --> 1:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that a legislature has to do something about this, and

1:08:13.600 --> 1:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>here in Idaho at least some of the legislators have

1:08:16.400 --> 1:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>found it necessary to start using that tool. And I

1:08:19.439 --> 1:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>take it the rationale for developing those reports was to

1:08:22.320 --> 1:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>just first get the basic facts of how widespread these

1:08:26.000 --> 1:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>efforts are, how deep they go, to sort of quantify

1:08:29.080 --> 1:08:33.519
<v Speaker 1>and qualify the problem before using whatever remedies necessary to

1:08:34.439 --> 1:08:37.839
<v Speaker 1>overcome that problem. Yes, I mean that's exactly the rationale.

1:08:37.840 --> 1:08:41.799
<v Speaker 1>And the places we looked in the university are, for instance,

1:08:41.960 --> 1:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>what are the strategic plans in the university say about

1:08:44.320 --> 1:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>their efforts to build diversity, equity and inclusion infrastructure. Who

1:08:48.280 --> 1:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>have they hired to build it, What kinds of policies

1:08:51.479 --> 1:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>have they adopted as they've attempted to build out the infrastructure,

1:08:55.680 --> 1:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>What kinds of policies when it comes to hiring or

1:08:58.520 --> 1:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>contracts at the university, grant or free speech policies, for instance,

1:09:03.240 --> 1:09:06.519
<v Speaker 1>bias response teams and things on campus. How far has

1:09:06.560 --> 1:09:10.559
<v Speaker 1>it infiltrated the curriculum, the general ed which departments are

1:09:10.600 --> 1:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>really taken over by this social justice ideology? How is

1:09:15.120 --> 1:09:18.479
<v Speaker 1>it infiltrated into student life and residence halls? Is it

1:09:18.520 --> 1:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the basis for hiring residence hall directors? How does it

1:09:21.280 --> 1:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>affect university programming? I mean, who has a chance to

1:09:24.800 --> 1:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>overlook all of those things? So our reports just encapsulated

1:09:30.160 --> 1:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>all of those aspects into one tight, little twenty four

1:09:34.360 --> 1:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>page document and well sourced here in Idaho, and it's

1:09:40.080 --> 1:09:44.519
<v Speaker 1>being you know, it's being reproduced in other states as

1:09:44.560 --> 1:09:47.719
<v Speaker 1>people have seen the importance of having a good factual

1:09:47.800 --> 1:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>basis for understanding what is going on in universities. Other

1:09:50.760 --> 1:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>states have approached us to write such report. And I

1:09:54.200 --> 1:09:57.599
<v Speaker 1>think it's a good basis, a factual basis from which

1:09:57.880 --> 1:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>good criticisms of universities can be made. What are the

1:10:00.840 --> 1:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>lessons from your experiences thus far for the rest of

1:10:04.640 --> 1:10:07.439
<v Speaker 1>the country, if you're going to encapsulate them, well, I mean,

1:10:07.479 --> 1:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>first of all, it's difficult, I think to root out something,

1:10:11.520 --> 1:10:15.439
<v Speaker 1>it's easier to stop it from growing. That legislators can

1:10:15.680 --> 1:10:20.559
<v Speaker 1>affect the behavior of universities if they use the tools

1:10:20.600 --> 1:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that they have at their disposal, the most important of

1:10:23.800 --> 1:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>which are the levers of budget. Not so much, I

1:10:26.760 --> 1:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>think the regulation of universities, which universities can get around

1:10:31.400 --> 1:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>by just naming things differently or such. You have to

1:10:35.080 --> 1:10:37.679
<v Speaker 1>make it so that universities don't want to do this

1:10:37.960 --> 1:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>or pay a price if they do it, and so

1:10:41.000 --> 1:10:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I think those are important lessons. Also, I think it's

1:10:44.240 --> 1:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>crucial informed legislators do not have tons of time to

1:10:48.160 --> 1:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>do this themselves. Just a concentrated effort to provide a

1:10:53.960 --> 1:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>systematic account, well sourced account of what's going on on

1:10:57.080 --> 1:11:00.559
<v Speaker 1>universities can have an effect on how legislation there's view

1:11:00.640 --> 1:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the public institutions. And I guess the fourth thing I

1:11:04.840 --> 1:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>would say is that it's also true that state boards

1:11:08.200 --> 1:11:12.799
<v Speaker 1>are pretty useless when it comes to overseeing universities because

1:11:12.840 --> 1:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>state boards themselves are pretty much captured by the education establishment.

1:11:18.120 --> 1:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>In any particular place, they come from the education establishment

1:11:21.960 --> 1:11:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're there to protect it. So really only political

1:11:25.000 --> 1:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>institutions can have an effect, and those political institutions are

1:11:29.280 --> 1:11:32.439
<v Speaker 1>the executive and the legislature. It's probably best to have

1:11:32.479 --> 1:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>executive leadership. This would be a fifth point instead of

1:11:35.200 --> 1:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>legislative leadership. But in the absence of executive leadership, and

1:11:38.880 --> 1:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we have effective executive leadership here in Idaho,

1:11:42.520 --> 1:11:46.439
<v Speaker 1>the legislature can you can step in and at least

1:11:46.439 --> 1:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>prevent budgets from passing, and that only requires half of

1:11:51.040 --> 1:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a bicameral legislature. They're prevented from going forward. So if

1:11:55.280 --> 1:11:58.599
<v Speaker 1>there's a conservative House, the Conservative House can stop things

1:11:58.680 --> 1:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>from happening. And that's what happened here. Well more with

1:12:02.080 --> 1:12:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Professor Scott Yenner. Right after a quick break, Welcome back

1:12:05.680 --> 1:12:09.799
<v Speaker 1>to the Buck Sexton Show. Ben Weingarten in for Buck Sexton,

1:12:09.920 --> 1:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and we're talking with Professor Scott Yenner. He teaches political

1:12:14.280 --> 1:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>science at Boise State and he's a Washington Fellow at

1:12:16.920 --> 1:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the Claremont Institute, where I too am a fellow and

1:12:20.000 --> 1:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the author recently of the book The Recovery of Family Life,

1:12:23.400 --> 1:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Exposing the limits of modern ideologies. And before that break,

1:12:27.240 --> 1:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about critical race theory and they're sort

1:12:31.280 --> 1:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of an related area in the sort of cult of

1:12:35.080 --> 1:12:38.559
<v Speaker 1>wokedom taking over, of course, like every bad idea starts

1:12:38.560 --> 1:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in the schools, but then takes over every other aspect

1:12:40.960 --> 1:12:44.839
<v Speaker 1>of our culture and society, obviously our corporate boardrooms and beyond.

1:12:45.200 --> 1:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's the notion of diversity, equity, and inclusion. And

1:12:48.840 --> 1:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you've written at some length about what these words actually

1:12:52.840 --> 1:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>mean translated into woke speak, what our diversity, equity and

1:12:57.360 --> 1:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>inclusion really about. Yeah, I mean, I try to provide

1:13:01.280 --> 1:13:07.080
<v Speaker 1>just very simple translation of these words. Equity is the

1:13:07.120 --> 1:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>idea that each group should be represented in its population

1:13:12.600 --> 1:13:17.559
<v Speaker 1>population proportion in each institution. So since blacks make up

1:13:17.600 --> 1:13:20.759
<v Speaker 1>thirteen percent of the population, they should be thirteen percent

1:13:20.800 --> 1:13:24.719
<v Speaker 1>of engineering students. Whites are fifty five percent of the population,

1:13:24.760 --> 1:13:27.799
<v Speaker 1>they should make up fifty five percent of the engineering students.

1:13:27.800 --> 1:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that number is right, but I

1:13:29.360 --> 1:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>know thirteen percent is right. So equity is proportionality, Diversity

1:13:35.120 --> 1:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>is equity is a step forward. Diversity. Diversity is the

1:13:42.400 --> 1:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>values of the university. We are made so that underrepresented

1:13:47.479 --> 1:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>minorities can succeed and set the tone. And you can

1:13:53.040 --> 1:13:56.599
<v Speaker 1>never have quite an set the tone and the forms

1:13:56.680 --> 1:14:01.639
<v Speaker 1>of rule on the university. And then include the pleas

1:14:01.920 --> 1:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that are necessary in order for diversity to happen. So

1:14:07.560 --> 1:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>things like going after what is called unconscious bias, offering training,

1:14:14.439 --> 1:14:19.879
<v Speaker 1>trying to solicit more community partnerships with left wing groups

1:14:20.360 --> 1:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>will help diversify the university. That as make the forms

1:14:24.479 --> 1:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and rule of those underrepresented minorities more and ever more

1:14:31.320 --> 1:14:35.439
<v Speaker 1>the ruling doctrine of whatever institution you're talking about. So,

1:14:35.520 --> 1:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>equity is proportionality, inclusion. Our policies to be friendly to diversity.

1:14:41.520 --> 1:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Diversity is underrepresented groups set a tone and rules in

1:14:47.320 --> 1:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the institution. So what is your best explanation If a

1:14:51.920 --> 1:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>friend or colleague comes to you and says, what's your

1:14:54.439 --> 1:14:57.479
<v Speaker 1>beef with diversity, equity and inclusion? Are you some kind

1:14:57.479 --> 1:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of racist and bigot? How do you respond to them?

1:15:00.040 --> 1:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Give us some news you can use here? Yeah, I

1:15:02.600 --> 1:15:06.479
<v Speaker 1>mean I think that I would respond with things like this.

1:15:07.120 --> 1:15:09.759
<v Speaker 1>That is, if we're going to rule ourselves as a people,

1:15:11.120 --> 1:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>we can't have administrative agencies setting the rules. The people

1:15:15.040 --> 1:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>need to speak that there is no way that all

1:15:18.960 --> 1:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of the differences between groups are traceable to discrimination. The

1:15:23.040 --> 1:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>groups are different. Men and women have different values, Blacks

1:15:26.960 --> 1:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and whites have different values and customs. So we should

1:15:30.880 --> 1:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>expect there to be differences between the groups. So the

1:15:33.920 --> 1:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>whole project of trying to equalize according to group outcomes

1:15:39.200 --> 1:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>is a preposterous one given what we know about the

1:15:42.200 --> 1:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>differences in groups. That it's impossible to get from critical

1:15:48.040 --> 1:15:51.759
<v Speaker 1>race theory or social justice ideology to the point where

1:15:51.800 --> 1:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>all citizens are welcomed equally in a political community and

1:15:57.080 --> 1:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>can be friends with one another. The ideology itself is

1:16:02.040 --> 1:16:06.519
<v Speaker 1>corrosive to civic friendship. It creates suspicion, it creates anger

1:16:06.640 --> 1:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and resentment in all of the groups. And when you

1:16:10.040 --> 1:16:12.439
<v Speaker 1>have a country that is defined by those things, that

1:16:12.479 --> 1:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>country will not be able to act. It will not

1:16:14.880 --> 1:16:16.639
<v Speaker 1>be able to act on the world stage, it will

1:16:16.680 --> 1:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>not be able to act internally, and will end up

1:16:19.400 --> 1:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>being governed by unaccountable bureaucrats who who are imposing some

1:16:26.200 --> 1:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of foreign vision on our society. So I think

1:16:30.240 --> 1:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>it's bad for republican government. I think it's bad for

1:16:33.200 --> 1:16:37.559
<v Speaker 1>common citizenship and bad for national action. And it's based

1:16:37.600 --> 1:16:41.559
<v Speaker 1>on a lie about the nature of group outcomes, and

1:16:41.600 --> 1:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of course to execute it, and that's all, you know,

1:16:44.880 --> 1:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>not that big a deal, And of course to execute it,

1:16:47.640 --> 1:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's implicit in your answer, but you have to

1:16:49.880 --> 1:16:53.559
<v Speaker 1>impose totalitarianism essentially on the country, leaving aside that the

1:16:53.560 --> 1:16:56.559
<v Speaker 1>country would collapse by tearing itself apart in the interim,

1:16:56.720 --> 1:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>as the totalitarianism is being imposed upon the country a

1:17:00.040 --> 1:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>real quick in thirty seconds or so, can you burn

1:17:02.479 --> 1:17:05.640
<v Speaker 1>down the strawman argument being raised about how taking on

1:17:05.720 --> 1:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>CRT in schools as an attack on academic freedom. Yeah,

1:17:08.840 --> 1:17:11.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean the purpose of academic freedom is to serve

1:17:11.560 --> 1:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the common good. If there is an ideology that undermines

1:17:15.640 --> 1:17:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the common good, like CRT, it's crucial to show that

1:17:20.720 --> 1:17:24.920
<v Speaker 1>there is a limit to academic freedom. Academic freedom is

1:17:25.000 --> 1:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>only valued because it serves the common good, and if

1:17:28.240 --> 1:17:32.360
<v Speaker 1>we have certain kinds of ideologies that undermine it, academic

1:17:32.400 --> 1:17:35.479
<v Speaker 1>freedom must at some point give way to a concern

1:17:35.760 --> 1:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that the public has to make sure that its institutions

1:17:39.040 --> 1:17:41.880
<v Speaker 1>actually serve the common good. We've been speaking with Professor

1:17:42.000 --> 1:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Scott Jenner of Boise State, where he teaches political science.

1:17:45.040 --> 1:17:47.680
<v Speaker 1>He's also Washington Fellow at the Cremin Institute. Thank you

1:17:47.680 --> 1:17:49.559
<v Speaker 1>so much for coming on the program. Really appreciate it.

1:17:49.720 --> 1:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me. Have you ever wanted to

1:17:53.200 --> 1:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>invest in real estate? But you don't have the time

1:17:55.040 --> 1:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>to do it on your own. I thought exactly the

1:17:57.280 --> 1:17:59.360
<v Speaker 1>same way as you until about a year ago. I've

1:17:59.400 --> 1:18:01.519
<v Speaker 1>always loved the idea of real estate investments, but I

1:18:01.520 --> 1:18:03.479
<v Speaker 1>didn't know how to invest in real estate. While staying

1:18:03.479 --> 1:18:06.360
<v Speaker 1>committed to my professional I do five hours of original

1:18:06.400 --> 1:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>programming and content every day. How could I possibly take

1:18:09.400 --> 1:18:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the time to invest in real estate on my own?

1:18:11.880 --> 1:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Then I met my friends at Done for You real Estate.

1:18:14.479 --> 1:18:16.120
<v Speaker 1>They took all of the guests work out of it

1:18:16.240 --> 1:18:18.599
<v Speaker 1>for me. They found me an awesome property, they rented

1:18:18.640 --> 1:18:20.719
<v Speaker 1>it out for me right away, They managed the tenant

1:18:20.720 --> 1:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>for me, and now I get a check every month

1:18:22.720 --> 1:18:25.559
<v Speaker 1>like clockwork. Don't wait another second to see if my

1:18:25.600 --> 1:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>buddies It Done for You real Estate can do for

1:18:27.800 --> 1:18:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you what they did for Mets. It done for you

1:18:30.439 --> 1:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Buck dot com to see how it works. Is it

1:18:33.080 --> 1:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>done for you Buck dot com? Today? You will not

1:18:35.800 --> 1:18:48.920
<v Speaker 1>be sorry. Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show. This

1:18:49.080 --> 1:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>is Ben Weingarten in for Buck Sexton. And while we've

1:18:54.000 --> 1:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>covered a lot this week in the way of the

1:18:57.080 --> 1:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>woke takeover of pretty much every aspect of our society,

1:19:00.439 --> 1:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess we've gone a little bit soft so far

1:19:02.360 --> 1:19:04.880
<v Speaker 1>on big tech. We haven't given it its due yet.

1:19:04.920 --> 1:19:08.120
<v Speaker 1>And someone who's been keenly focused on the ways in

1:19:08.160 --> 1:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>which concentrated private power in the way of big tech,

1:19:11.360 --> 1:19:14.640
<v Speaker 1>which I've called sort of an auxiliary of the administrative

1:19:14.640 --> 1:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>state being used hand in hand with the federal government

1:19:18.280 --> 1:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>at times, and also of course federal officials cajoling big

1:19:22.120 --> 1:19:24.479
<v Speaker 1>tech to do its bidding with respect to speech. It

1:19:24.560 --> 1:19:27.920
<v Speaker 1>does not like someone who's been keenly focused on these issues,

1:19:27.920 --> 1:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>in particular again that concentration of power in the public

1:19:32.120 --> 1:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and private spheres, is Rachel Bovard. She's senior director of

1:19:35.960 --> 1:19:40.479
<v Speaker 1>Policy at the Conservative Partnership Institute, formerly served in roles

1:19:40.560 --> 1:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>under the likes of Senators Rand Paul and Mike Lee.

1:19:43.439 --> 1:19:45.599
<v Speaker 1>She's a senior tech columnist at the Federalists, and we'll

1:19:45.600 --> 1:19:47.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about one of her recent articles there in just

1:19:47.920 --> 1:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>a second. And also, I should say a co panelist

1:19:50.640 --> 1:19:53.679
<v Speaker 1>of mine on the weekly show the nat Con Squad,

1:19:53.720 --> 1:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>which is a project of the Edmund Burke Foundation, and

1:19:56.720 --> 1:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I urge everyone to check that out for all the

1:19:58.880 --> 1:20:03.160
<v Speaker 1>latest and greatest and policy politics and ideas in this

1:20:03.240 --> 1:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of new national conservatism movement. Rachel, thanks so much

1:20:06.960 --> 1:20:10.360
<v Speaker 1>for coming on the program today. My pleasure. Thanks for

1:20:10.400 --> 1:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>having me. Sure. So first let's do some level setting here.

1:20:15.400 --> 1:20:19.160
<v Speaker 1>You've been writing at length about antitrust. You had a

1:20:19.200 --> 1:20:22.679
<v Speaker 1>great peace in the American Conservative which sort of goes

1:20:22.720 --> 1:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>into in part practically how antitrust ought to be wielded

1:20:27.680 --> 1:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>given the concentrated power in big tech and elsewhere, but

1:20:31.120 --> 1:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>also that it really is a conservative policy at core.

1:20:35.040 --> 1:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>So what are the conservative underpinnings of antitrust rightly used?

1:20:42.120 --> 1:20:46.400
<v Speaker 1>So our antitrust statutes in America are over a century old,

1:20:46.479 --> 1:20:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and they grew out of this you know, shared concern

1:20:49.880 --> 1:20:52.599
<v Speaker 1>for concentrated power in the market, you know, born out

1:20:52.600 --> 1:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of this idea that it's you know, to have a

1:20:55.080 --> 1:20:57.479
<v Speaker 1>free market that works, you know, it has to be

1:20:57.960 --> 1:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>vigilantly protected. And that was really a conservative impulse. You know.

1:21:02.400 --> 1:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>John Sherman, the Senator who gave his name actually to

1:21:05.320 --> 1:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the founding anti trust lawsuit or grounding Antstrius Statute, was

1:21:08.360 --> 1:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a Republican signed by Benjamin Harrison, also a Republican president,

1:21:12.640 --> 1:21:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and it really grew out of this classical liberal traditional

1:21:15.160 --> 1:21:20.120
<v Speaker 1>conservative tradition which says, look concentrated power wherever it exists,

1:21:20.240 --> 1:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>can be a threat to liberty. I went into a

1:21:24.040 --> 1:21:26.559
<v Speaker 1>recent essay I wrote into sort of the thinking of

1:21:26.600 --> 1:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Friedrich Hyak around this concept. And you know, we usually

1:21:30.200 --> 1:21:33.680
<v Speaker 1>think of Hyaks as the great champion of the unfettered marketplace,

1:21:33.800 --> 1:21:37.120
<v Speaker 1>but even Hyak was very aware that, you know, a

1:21:37.160 --> 1:21:41.880
<v Speaker 1>concentrated corporate power, particularly when it fused with government power,

1:21:42.120 --> 1:21:44.160
<v Speaker 1>could be a tremendous threat. And you know, that was

1:21:44.200 --> 1:21:47.839
<v Speaker 1>the fascism that he fled from, you know, in Europe

1:21:48.680 --> 1:21:50.880
<v Speaker 1>at the dawn of World War two. So there really

1:21:50.960 --> 1:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>is a conservative impulse, I think, to be wary of

1:21:53.360 --> 1:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>concentrated power wherever it resides. And that was initially how

1:21:57.960 --> 1:22:01.360
<v Speaker 1>conservative's approach to anti trust. You know, that changed over

1:22:01.479 --> 1:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>time as progressives began to use antitrust to sort of

1:22:05.600 --> 1:22:08.759
<v Speaker 1>impose their own values on the market. The jurisprudence around

1:22:09.160 --> 1:22:11.639
<v Speaker 1>how anti trust was interpreted began to sort of swing

1:22:11.720 --> 1:22:14.439
<v Speaker 1>in all kind of ideological directions, and so you had

1:22:14.479 --> 1:22:18.360
<v Speaker 1>conservatives that said, look, antitrust needs an anchoror it needs

1:22:18.360 --> 1:22:20.439
<v Speaker 1>something that makes a coherent and so that was the

1:22:20.479 --> 1:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>birth of the consumer Welfare Standard, which fuses sort of

1:22:23.760 --> 1:22:27.160
<v Speaker 1>economic metrics around how anti trust should be enforced. So

1:22:27.200 --> 1:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it says, you know, enforcers should look at things like

1:22:30.080 --> 1:22:34.120
<v Speaker 1>our prices changing, how is innovation doing, Is it being harmed,

1:22:34.520 --> 1:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Is you know, quality of goods being harmed? Consumers have

1:22:37.880 --> 1:22:40.400
<v Speaker 1>adequate choice in the market. So it's a framework that

1:22:40.479 --> 1:22:43.559
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. But I think over time, you know, has

1:22:43.600 --> 1:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>become so narrowed as to be interpreted as just this

1:22:47.479 --> 1:22:51.439
<v Speaker 1>exclusive focus on price, and that's really diminished the role

1:22:51.479 --> 1:22:54.839
<v Speaker 1>of antitrust because it becomes so difficult to even enforce

1:22:55.360 --> 1:22:57.519
<v Speaker 1>anti trust in the marketplace as it exists. So I

1:22:57.520 --> 1:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>think some conservatives are now waking up to the fact

1:23:00.120 --> 1:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that hey, maybe we should broaden the mandate back to

1:23:02.960 --> 1:23:06.519
<v Speaker 1>that original aperture that the consumer Welfare Standard had when

1:23:06.520 --> 1:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>it was implemented in the eighties and late seventies and

1:23:10.320 --> 1:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>go back to that interpretation. But as you might imagine,

1:23:13.960 --> 1:23:16.439
<v Speaker 1>there's a pretty big establishment consensus built up around the

1:23:16.439 --> 1:23:19.160
<v Speaker 1>way things that are currently being done. So there's a

1:23:19.160 --> 1:23:21.599
<v Speaker 1>lot of debate and dissent around this idea. Yeah, So

1:23:21.640 --> 1:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>with respect to that establishment consensus versus growing on the

1:23:25.840 --> 1:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>left and right and really generally on the more ideological

1:23:29.479 --> 1:23:33.599
<v Speaker 1>members of Congress on either side, and beyond Congress, as well,

1:23:34.360 --> 1:23:38.759
<v Speaker 1>one of the cynic might say, well, are politicians leveraging

1:23:38.800 --> 1:23:42.439
<v Speaker 1>the big tech issue essentially to extort these companies into

1:23:42.479 --> 1:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>giving them paying them more money for their campaigns, increasing

1:23:45.880 --> 1:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>contributions to pay for the protection of the federal government,

1:23:49.080 --> 1:23:51.879
<v Speaker 1>or do you think that there's been a genuine shift

1:23:52.200 --> 1:23:57.360
<v Speaker 1>among our legislators. So, of course, you know, there's always

1:23:57.360 --> 1:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a level of cynicism, I think in politics, but I

1:24:01.000 --> 1:24:04.400
<v Speaker 1>do think, you know, there is a genuine effort among

1:24:04.840 --> 1:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>some Republican lawmakers to actually look at this problem as

1:24:08.080 --> 1:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>it exists, not even just in the big tech space,

1:24:10.360 --> 1:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>but across the economy at large. It was really fascinating

1:24:13.560 --> 1:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to watch last week when Senator Mike Lee, former boss

1:24:16.960 --> 1:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of mine but also very well known, you know, with

1:24:19.200 --> 1:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the libertarian in the sort of more libertarian leaning legal

1:24:23.080 --> 1:24:27.400
<v Speaker 1>movement itself, he even acknowledged, you know that across the economy,

1:24:27.920 --> 1:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it's possible that's you know, our anti trust enforcement enforcement

1:24:31.439 --> 1:24:34.400
<v Speaker 1>isn't working. And again this goes back to this idea.

1:24:34.560 --> 1:24:37.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think oftentimes people on the right unfairly

1:24:38.080 --> 1:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps you know, with an agenda, conflate anti trust

1:24:41.240 --> 1:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>enforcement with regulation, but the two are very very distinct.

1:24:45.200 --> 1:24:47.679
<v Speaker 1>And I think Senator Lee makes this distinction well anti

1:24:47.720 --> 1:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>trust enforcement his law enforcement right, It's not illegal to

1:24:51.080 --> 1:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>be a monopoly, but it's illegal to be predatory. You know,

1:24:53.920 --> 1:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it's illegal to undercut competition in the marketplace. And if

1:24:56.760 --> 1:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that's not being adequately policed, that's a problem because again,

1:24:59.800 --> 1:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>then you don't actually have the free market working as intended.

1:25:03.200 --> 1:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>So you know, even he I think, is acknowledging that

1:25:06.120 --> 1:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>there's the status quo is not working here, and that's

1:25:09.200 --> 1:25:12.360
<v Speaker 1>really the debate to be had. You know. Of course,

1:25:12.400 --> 1:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there's there's people motivated by cynicism, but I

1:25:14.800 --> 1:25:17.120
<v Speaker 1>would say, more than any other issue I've seen recently,

1:25:17.400 --> 1:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>there is really a genuine effort to adjust this here. Yeah.

1:25:20.640 --> 1:25:22.640
<v Speaker 1>And of course, and we've dowed into this on that

1:25:22.760 --> 1:25:27.360
<v Speaker 1>con squad at length, there's ample legal and historical precedent

1:25:27.400 --> 1:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>for this. Justice Thomas has probably written the most succinctly

1:25:30.640 --> 1:25:33.719
<v Speaker 1>and clearly sort of the reasons leading up towards maybe

1:25:33.720 --> 1:25:37.439
<v Speaker 1>a potential rolling down the road that would justify treating,

1:25:37.520 --> 1:25:40.680
<v Speaker 1>for example, big tech like under a common carrier a

1:25:40.800 --> 1:25:43.559
<v Speaker 1>sort of regime. And of course there's been a number

1:25:43.600 --> 1:25:46.479
<v Speaker 1>of bills put up in Congress lately, and you've written

1:25:46.520 --> 1:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>about them at length. Tell us a little bit about

1:25:48.920 --> 1:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the substance of the legislative proposals on the table and

1:25:52.360 --> 1:25:57.120
<v Speaker 1>how it's relevant to the everyday lives of Americans. Yeah,

1:25:57.160 --> 1:26:00.400
<v Speaker 1>so this is a really interesting development out of House

1:26:00.479 --> 1:26:04.559
<v Speaker 1>Judiciary Committee run by Democrats, who have over the last

1:26:04.880 --> 1:26:10.920
<v Speaker 1>year and a half embarked on this legislative investigation into Apple, Amazon, Google,

1:26:10.920 --> 1:26:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook. And they this resulted in like a six

1:26:13.320 --> 1:26:16.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred page report on all of the areas in which Democrats,

1:26:17.000 --> 1:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, found these companies to be acting in non

1:26:19.320 --> 1:26:23.439
<v Speaker 1>competitive way. Days now, no Republican joined that report, although

1:26:23.520 --> 1:26:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you did see the Republican ranking member of the Antitrust Subcommittee,

1:26:26.960 --> 1:26:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Kent Buck, put out his own report saying, you know,

1:26:29.400 --> 1:26:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't really agree with my Democratic callings on what

1:26:32.120 --> 1:26:34.120
<v Speaker 1>they want to do, but I do think that there

1:26:34.120 --> 1:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>are some issues here. There's definitely some flashing red lights.

1:26:37.960 --> 1:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>And as a result of that investigation, the Subcommittee's put

1:26:41.040 --> 1:26:44.599
<v Speaker 1>out five legislative proposals. And this is a big deal

1:26:44.680 --> 1:26:47.439
<v Speaker 1>because you know, for a long time, you know, all

1:26:47.479 --> 1:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>we saw from people concerned about big tech was sort

1:26:50.040 --> 1:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of these hearings where members would go and yell about

1:26:53.080 --> 1:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>things or you know, letters, but no real substantive legislative effort.

1:26:57.760 --> 1:26:59.439
<v Speaker 1>And so I want to highlight it in that regard

1:26:59.520 --> 1:27:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that this is this is a pretty big next step.

1:27:02.080 --> 1:27:05.519
<v Speaker 1>And so these five different bills deal with different parts

1:27:05.560 --> 1:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of the market that lawmakers feel big tech has been

1:27:09.160 --> 1:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>unfairly entrenched, and they really go into how big tech competes.

1:27:13.960 --> 1:27:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So probably the two biggest proposals would that would really

1:27:17.240 --> 1:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>change how things work are One is a straight up

1:27:20.240 --> 1:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>merger band, so specific to these big tech companies. You know,

1:27:24.200 --> 1:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>instead of the government having to prove that when they

1:27:27.200 --> 1:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>buy up their competitors, the government having to say, no,

1:27:29.439 --> 1:27:32.679
<v Speaker 1>that's anti competitive, the presumption has flipped. The big tech

1:27:32.720 --> 1:27:34.559
<v Speaker 1>companies would have to prove to the government that what

1:27:34.600 --> 1:27:37.679
<v Speaker 1>they're doing is not anti competitive. And then the second

1:27:37.720 --> 1:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>big bill that I think would have really long ranging

1:27:39.960 --> 1:27:44.400
<v Speaker 1>effects is a structural separation about self preferencing. And this

1:27:44.600 --> 1:27:47.919
<v Speaker 1>really gets at the idea that you know, Google can

1:27:48.040 --> 1:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>promote its own products and in its massive platform and

1:27:51.880 --> 1:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>downgrade its competitors. And you know that really is a

1:27:55.240 --> 1:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>problem when Google is the only game in town, right

1:27:57.760 --> 1:28:00.479
<v Speaker 1>when Google filters information for ninety percent of the world.

1:28:01.880 --> 1:28:04.479
<v Speaker 1>When they downgrade a competitor, it really sort of has

1:28:04.880 --> 1:28:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a large impact on their business. So those are the

1:28:07.720 --> 1:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>two really big bills that I think, of the five

1:28:10.360 --> 1:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>would have the longest ranging effects. You've written at Lance

1:28:13.760 --> 1:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>as well. We've got about a couple of minutes and

1:28:15.240 --> 1:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>then we'll be up against the commercial break. But you've

1:28:17.760 --> 1:28:22.120
<v Speaker 1>written as well and certainly spoken about Facebook's oversight board.

1:28:22.240 --> 1:28:24.880
<v Speaker 1>And you look at the composition of this I guess

1:28:24.880 --> 1:28:27.599
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court on Speech or sort of the anti Supreme

1:28:27.640 --> 1:28:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Court on speech in some respects. And you look at

1:28:29.920 --> 1:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the composition and a disproportionate percentage of the members of Facebook,

1:28:34.280 --> 1:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>supposedly impartial and neutral objective a technocratic board, are not Americans.

1:28:40.680 --> 1:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>And of course the rest of the world has a

1:28:42.840 --> 1:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>very different standard in terms of free speech and conceptions

1:28:47.280 --> 1:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of what is beyond the pale and what is acceptable

1:28:50.360 --> 1:28:53.599
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the content of speech. Do you believe

1:28:53.680 --> 1:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that essentially we are being subjected to, and are supposedly

1:28:57.479 --> 1:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>free digital public square foreign conceptions of speech. I think

1:29:03.920 --> 1:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly what the Facebook Oversight board is. You know,

1:29:06.800 --> 1:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>it's made up of largely foreign members, right, people who

1:29:11.840 --> 1:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>aren't raised in our speech traditions making decisions about what, how,

1:29:16.000 --> 1:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, how speech should be carried out in America.

1:29:18.000 --> 1:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's entirely inappropriate, particularly when you know Facebook

1:29:22.120 --> 1:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>oversight board has placed itself over and above the speech

1:29:25.360 --> 1:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of democratically elected government officials, you know, President Trump being

1:29:28.720 --> 1:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>probably the most famous example of this. I think it's

1:29:31.280 --> 1:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>highly inappropriate and really kind of has a chilling effect

1:29:34.880 --> 1:29:37.439
<v Speaker 1>in our public square when you consider that Facebook, with

1:29:37.560 --> 1:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>its two point seven billion global users, really does not

1:29:41.040 --> 1:29:44.240
<v Speaker 1>only represent a public square for voter engagement for many

1:29:44.240 --> 1:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>elected officials, but it's also a market access point for

1:29:47.200 --> 1:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>millions of small businesses in America. So it's much much

1:29:49.720 --> 1:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>more than just a speech platform, and I think when

1:29:51.960 --> 1:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>it wields its power ideologically, it has a long ranging

1:29:54.880 --> 1:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>effect not only on the speech, but on the marketplace

1:29:57.520 --> 1:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace as well. So we're going to take a

1:30:00.000 --> 1:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a quick commercial break in just a second, but I

1:30:02.320 --> 1:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's worth emphasizing a couple of things before you

1:30:04.840 --> 1:30:09.679
<v Speaker 1>were talking Rachel about the corporate wealth. The essentially lowest

1:30:09.720 --> 1:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>price is all that matters when it comes to anti trust,

1:30:12.320 --> 1:30:14.639
<v Speaker 1>how it's been interpreted over time. But of course we've

1:30:14.640 --> 1:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>paid a substantial price for these falling costs, which is

1:30:18.040 --> 1:30:22.439
<v Speaker 1>our privacy, our most personal information, and of course we've

1:30:22.520 --> 1:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>essentially sacrificed our right to free speech to save the

1:30:24.880 --> 1:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>public square of free speech. And I think that that's

1:30:27.080 --> 1:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>something that's worth emphasizing every time that rationale comes up

1:30:31.000 --> 1:30:34.240
<v Speaker 1>for not using anti trust in a prudent and measured

1:30:34.280 --> 1:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and proper way given what we're facing today. This has

1:30:36.920 --> 1:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>been wagering in for Buck sexon well More with Rachel Bovard.

1:30:39.479 --> 1:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Right after this, we're back with Rachel Bovard, senior director

1:30:42.960 --> 1:30:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of Policy at the Conservative Partnership Institute, senior tech columnists

1:30:46.840 --> 1:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>at the Federalist or I should know it. I'm a

1:30:48.640 --> 1:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>senior contributor as well, and someone who's worked under the

1:30:51.320 --> 1:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>likes of Senators Rand Paul and Mike Lee, which have

1:30:54.160 --> 1:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of become at least at the high level you

1:30:57.160 --> 1:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>would think kind of strange bedfellows at least Senator Lee

1:31:00.160 --> 1:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>with respect to the conversation today, which is using government

1:31:04.240 --> 1:31:08.719
<v Speaker 1>power against concentrated corporate power, and I think it's worth noting,

1:31:08.920 --> 1:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of high level context of that conversation,

1:31:13.320 --> 1:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of course, power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, whether

1:31:16.760 --> 1:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>it's in the public or private spheres. It's just human nature.

1:31:20.400 --> 1:31:22.679
<v Speaker 1>And it's also worth noting that there's a difference between

1:31:23.160 --> 1:31:28.479
<v Speaker 1>free enterprise and business and free enterprise and corporatism. And

1:31:28.920 --> 1:31:32.400
<v Speaker 1>businesses start out small and grow as a consequence of

1:31:32.439 --> 1:31:35.639
<v Speaker 1>an open and free marketplace. But as businesses grow bigger,

1:31:35.640 --> 1:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of course, they always want to halt their competition, buy

1:31:39.320 --> 1:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>up their competition if they need to cement their place

1:31:41.840 --> 1:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>as dominant powers. And so I think we always have

1:31:44.280 --> 1:31:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to keep that in the back of our mind when

1:31:45.880 --> 1:31:48.879
<v Speaker 1>we talk about how we think about protecting and preserving

1:31:48.960 --> 1:31:53.879
<v Speaker 1>a true free marketplace versus protecting and preserving corporatist positions.

1:31:53.880 --> 1:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if you had any thoughts on that sort

1:31:55.439 --> 1:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of deeper, more philosophical point. Yeah. I think this gets

1:31:59.880 --> 1:32:05.519
<v Speaker 1>to the you know, intellectual sort of ideological positioning of

1:32:05.600 --> 1:32:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the right over the last you know, thirty years years,

1:32:08.320 --> 1:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>because you know, as I referenced earlier, the conservative tradition

1:32:12.080 --> 1:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and classical liberalism has always acknowledged that threats to liberty

1:32:14.960 --> 1:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>can reside in concentrated power wherever it is, right in

1:32:17.800 --> 1:32:21.479
<v Speaker 1>the corporate space or in the government. But over time,

1:32:21.520 --> 1:32:24.679
<v Speaker 1>I think conservatives have come to believe that the only

1:32:24.720 --> 1:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>threat to liberty is in the government itself, and they've

1:32:26.760 --> 1:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>ignored this the free market, you know, and then they've

1:32:30.080 --> 1:32:32.240
<v Speaker 1>just assumed everything is fine and then there's nothing to

1:32:32.240 --> 1:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>see here. But I think what we're seeing now is

1:32:34.800 --> 1:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that vigilance is required there as well, because I think,

1:32:37.560 --> 1:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially when government policies are prioritizing certain things

1:32:40.880 --> 1:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>about business, because that's the real reality of the marketplace,

1:32:43.479 --> 1:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>right it reflects the policies that we are selves set

1:32:46.360 --> 1:32:48.519
<v Speaker 1>for it. So when we talk about the tech companies,

1:32:48.560 --> 1:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>for instance, they often get, you know, well, why would

1:32:51.040 --> 1:32:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you interfere with a private business? These businesses benefit from

1:32:54.439 --> 1:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>tremendous government policy across the board, you know, the likes

1:32:58.280 --> 1:33:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of which of Section two thirty for instance, which is

1:33:00.720 --> 1:33:05.200
<v Speaker 1>its big carve out a big immunity from liability, which

1:33:05.200 --> 1:33:08.519
<v Speaker 1>it's tantamount to a huge financial substitute to these companies,

1:33:08.680 --> 1:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, their First Amendment actors, but their activity is

1:33:11.040 --> 1:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>privileged over and above other First Amendment actors like newspapers

1:33:15.439 --> 1:33:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and movies and things that would be subject to lawsuits.

1:33:18.400 --> 1:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>So we do really need, I think, to change this

1:33:21.280 --> 1:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>binary way of looking at things where it's only the

1:33:23.880 --> 1:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>government's the problem, and you know, massive corporate power is

1:33:27.240 --> 1:33:29.559
<v Speaker 1>never a problem. That's just not true. And I think

1:33:29.560 --> 1:33:32.519
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that very very well demonstrated in this moment.

1:33:33.240 --> 1:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>If you were drafting up the next contract with America

1:33:37.479 --> 1:33:39.720
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, that document may or may not end up

1:33:39.760 --> 1:33:41.759
<v Speaker 1>being called to the extent the party is even thinking

1:33:41.760 --> 1:33:44.719
<v Speaker 1>this way, which is of course always questionable. What would

1:33:44.760 --> 1:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>your principles look like and your sort of campaign look

1:33:48.400 --> 1:33:51.920
<v Speaker 1>like for taking on big tech to ensure that the

1:33:51.960 --> 1:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>pre am vota section two thirty is actually served by

1:33:55.000 --> 1:33:58.280
<v Speaker 1>our laws, which is promoting free and open discourse and

1:33:58.320 --> 1:34:03.639
<v Speaker 1>intellectual inquiry. You know, I think a guiding heuristic here

1:34:03.840 --> 1:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is actually something very Goldwater set a long time ago,

1:34:06.800 --> 1:34:10.639
<v Speaker 1>which is that, you know, the champions of freedom will

1:34:10.960 --> 1:34:14.559
<v Speaker 1>you fight against concentrated power wherever it resides. They will

1:34:14.600 --> 1:34:18.639
<v Speaker 1>take on monopolies, corporate and union. And so I think

1:34:18.680 --> 1:34:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that has to be the guiding heuristic for how we

1:34:21.000 --> 1:34:23.599
<v Speaker 1>do things in both the government and in the private sector,

1:34:23.680 --> 1:34:27.320
<v Speaker 1>because one of both of these transact on each other

1:34:27.360 --> 1:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in very powerful ways, and I think it's a mistake

1:34:30.160 --> 1:34:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to put them into separate spheres when they aren't anymore when,

1:34:33.000 --> 1:34:35.439
<v Speaker 1>especially with these big tech tech companies, we now see

1:34:35.479 --> 1:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>them working hand in glove with, you know, a democratic

1:34:39.520 --> 1:34:42.799
<v Speaker 1>ideology to use the levers of power to shut down dissent,

1:34:43.000 --> 1:34:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to shut down criticism, and to shut down speech in

1:34:45.840 --> 1:34:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the public square. We are in a situation now where

1:34:49.320 --> 1:34:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the government does have a role, and it is, like

1:34:51.920 --> 1:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you said, to preserve this open space for ideas, for

1:34:57.160 --> 1:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>small business, for all these things that we as republic

1:35:00.000 --> 1:35:03.599
<v Speaker 1>aikins cherish, but we're so hesitant to say the government

1:35:03.640 --> 1:35:06.880
<v Speaker 1>has any role here. But that limited role for the

1:35:06.920 --> 1:35:09.400
<v Speaker 1>government is now, and so I think that has to

1:35:09.439 --> 1:35:12.320
<v Speaker 1>be a guiding principle for Republicans going forward in a

1:35:12.360 --> 1:35:14.599
<v Speaker 1>way that it hasn't really been for the last thirty years.

1:35:15.040 --> 1:35:17.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's worth knowing again that there, of

1:35:17.080 --> 1:35:20.080
<v Speaker 1>course national security implications to this as well. We spoke

1:35:20.120 --> 1:35:23.879
<v Speaker 1>at length on yesterday's episode about the Biden administration countering

1:35:23.920 --> 1:35:28.040
<v Speaker 1>domestic terrorism strategy, and of course the administration talks about

1:35:28.080 --> 1:35:31.679
<v Speaker 1>partnering with private sector actors, including and they've intimated this before,

1:35:32.120 --> 1:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>big tech, to police their platforms for whatever the thought

1:35:35.080 --> 1:35:37.720
<v Speaker 1>police of the Biden administration deemed to be legitimate to

1:35:37.760 --> 1:35:41.440
<v Speaker 1>be policing, and that strategy also talks about combating disinformation

1:35:41.439 --> 1:35:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and misinformation, which you can only believe in practice will

1:35:44.760 --> 1:35:50.759
<v Speaker 1>mean more filtering and bands and censorship of any opinion

1:35:50.840 --> 1:35:53.639
<v Speaker 1>that is just not above board according to the party line.

1:35:53.720 --> 1:35:56.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's something that we'll have to be quite vigilant about.

1:35:56.120 --> 1:35:58.639
<v Speaker 1>We'll have to demand that our lawmakers are vigilant about

1:35:58.640 --> 1:36:00.599
<v Speaker 1>it as well. And I know that you, Joe Bovard,

1:36:00.760 --> 1:36:02.600
<v Speaker 1>will be on top of this and urge everyone to

1:36:02.680 --> 1:36:04.519
<v Speaker 1>check out all of your writings wherever they're found in

1:36:04.560 --> 1:36:08.599
<v Speaker 1>federal as USA Today, American Conservative, American conservative and beyond.

1:36:08.920 --> 1:36:10.519
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for coming on the program today

1:36:10.520 --> 1:36:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and for all your exceptional work. Really appreciate it. Thanks

1:36:12.920 --> 1:36:15.639
<v Speaker 1>so much, Ben, Thanks and Wolf more on the buxx

1:36:15.720 --> 1:36:29.519
<v Speaker 1>and show right after this on Sunday, June twentieth, Joe

1:36:29.520 --> 1:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Biden will have been president for exactly five months. And

1:36:33.120 --> 1:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in these five months, we've seen crisis after crisis after crisis.

1:36:39.080 --> 1:36:42.559
<v Speaker 1>We've experienced a gas crisis where we had gas lines

1:36:42.840 --> 1:36:46.559
<v Speaker 1>and skyrocketing energy prices. We're on the verge of an

1:36:46.600 --> 1:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>inflation crisis. We're everywhere we look, prices are rising on food,

1:36:52.200 --> 1:36:56.120
<v Speaker 1>on housing, on lumber. We've already had a war in

1:36:56.160 --> 1:37:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East, and we've got a border crisis that

1:37:00.200 --> 1:37:03.760
<v Speaker 1>has been raging so intensely that we're on pace to

1:37:03.920 --> 1:37:08.360
<v Speaker 1>see two million illegal immigrants come through our unsecured border

1:37:08.439 --> 1:37:12.280
<v Speaker 1>this year. Just last month, one hundred and eighty thousand

1:37:12.760 --> 1:37:17.479
<v Speaker 1>and thirty four illegal immigrants crossed the border. To put

1:37:17.479 --> 1:37:20.880
<v Speaker 1>that in perspective, that number is a six hundred and

1:37:21.080 --> 1:37:26.480
<v Speaker 1>seventy four percent increase over the number of illegal immigrants

1:37:26.479 --> 1:37:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that crossed the border last May, a six hundred and

1:37:31.040 --> 1:37:35.839
<v Speaker 1>seventy four percent increase, and that number is a twenty

1:37:35.880 --> 1:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>one year high. The reason for this is simple. The

1:37:39.960 --> 1:37:45.240
<v Speaker 1>crisis that has unfolded is the direct result of political

1:37:45.280 --> 1:37:50.519
<v Speaker 1>decisions made by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. That was

1:37:50.840 --> 1:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Senator Ted Cruz lambasting the Biden administration. And it goes

1:37:56.000 --> 1:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>back to the running theme that we open this episode

1:37:59.479 --> 1:38:04.439
<v Speaker 1>with has run through the substance of the various interviews

1:38:04.439 --> 1:38:09.000
<v Speaker 1>we've had on big tech, on the schools, on US

1:38:09.120 --> 1:38:14.400
<v Speaker 1>China policy, dealing with Russia, energy, and on and on

1:38:15.200 --> 1:38:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruz talking about massive money printing and spending in

1:38:19.960 --> 1:38:22.800
<v Speaker 1>effect in terms of the massive inflation and prices that

1:38:22.800 --> 1:38:24.280
<v Speaker 1>we've seen, and if you look at a chart of

1:38:24.320 --> 1:38:27.439
<v Speaker 1>the money supply, it's absurd. What's happened over the last year,

1:38:28.400 --> 1:38:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the explosion in the Middle East with respect to I

1:38:31.840 --> 1:38:38.320
<v Speaker 1>ran back, to proxies attacking Israel, the border crisis. What

1:38:38.640 --> 1:38:44.559
<v Speaker 1>unifies these policies or these outcomes? Rather, these outcomes are

1:38:44.600 --> 1:38:52.559
<v Speaker 1>a direct consequence of rejecting basic, fundamental, core American values

1:38:52.560 --> 1:38:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and principles. If you reject those values and principles, you

1:38:59.400 --> 1:39:05.160
<v Speaker 1>get these kind of results. You cultivate mediocrity. Massive money

1:39:05.160 --> 1:39:09.360
<v Speaker 1>printing and spending. What is that a reflection of, beyond

1:39:09.800 --> 1:39:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the self imposed economic suicide that we committed over the

1:39:14.200 --> 1:39:20.920
<v Speaker 1>last year, arguably needlessly not wanting to deal with reality.

1:39:21.560 --> 1:39:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Money printing is done to paper over problems and to

1:39:24.479 --> 1:39:27.240
<v Speaker 1>kick the can down the road on dealing with those problems.

1:39:27.280 --> 1:39:29.720
<v Speaker 1>The massive spending is about a government that can't live

1:39:29.800 --> 1:39:34.440
<v Speaker 1>within its means, and it's a reflection of a percentage

1:39:34.439 --> 1:39:36.439
<v Speaker 1>of the public that believes we shouldn't live within it

1:39:36.600 --> 1:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>within our means as a nation that does not, I

1:39:39.400 --> 1:39:42.760
<v Speaker 1>guess care about the consequences ultimately of massive debt and

1:39:42.800 --> 1:39:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the interest on that debt and the money printing that's

1:39:44.880 --> 1:39:47.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be used to try to inflate it away,

1:39:47.280 --> 1:39:50.720
<v Speaker 1>so that of course prudent people and then of course

1:39:50.720 --> 1:39:53.400
<v Speaker 1>those who are unfixed income are left with the bill.

1:39:55.120 --> 1:40:01.000
<v Speaker 1>It's irresponsibility that's inherent to the massive money renting and

1:40:01.120 --> 1:40:04.160
<v Speaker 1>spending on a government that can't even do, can't even

1:40:04.160 --> 1:40:06.800
<v Speaker 1>execute its most basic functions, but it sure as heck

1:40:06.880 --> 1:40:10.080
<v Speaker 1>weaponizes itself against anyone who dares call the government on

1:40:10.120 --> 1:40:14.120
<v Speaker 1>those issues. What about the explosion in the Middle East.

1:40:15.360 --> 1:40:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I've done a big monologue on this, which you can google.

1:40:18.280 --> 1:40:21.240
<v Speaker 1>It's on YouTube and elsewhere, I believe as well. On

1:40:21.520 --> 1:40:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the method to the Biden Administration's Middle East madness, the

1:40:25.240 --> 1:40:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration basically reversed the Trump administration policy with respect

1:40:29.720 --> 1:40:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to the world's greatest state sponsor of jihad, Iran. Biden

1:40:34.160 --> 1:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>reverts America's back. Biden reverts the Obama Biden agenda of

1:40:38.840 --> 1:40:41.479
<v Speaker 1>seeking to make the world's leading state sponsor of jihad,

1:40:41.640 --> 1:40:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the strong course in the Middle East, the dominant power.

1:40:45.240 --> 1:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>What does Joe Biden do? It basically says, without preconditions,

1:40:48.040 --> 1:40:50.240
<v Speaker 1>we're going to go back to the so called negotiating

1:40:50.280 --> 1:40:52.360
<v Speaker 1>table and we want to get back into the Iran

1:40:52.439 --> 1:40:56.680
<v Speaker 1>nuclear deal, which made that regime flush with well over

1:40:56.720 --> 1:40:59.800
<v Speaker 1>one hundred billion dollars in cash to fund its malign

1:41:00.400 --> 1:41:04.720
<v Speaker 1>while it's people suffered. What is it rooted in? What

1:41:04.840 --> 1:41:07.800
<v Speaker 1>is the policy rooted in of the Biden administration of appeasement,

1:41:09.360 --> 1:41:15.719
<v Speaker 1>cowardice or self loathing, both traits that, of course result

1:41:16.560 --> 1:41:20.880
<v Speaker 1>in mediocrity, in failure the border crisis. What is the

1:41:20.920 --> 1:41:26.400
<v Speaker 1>border crisis all about? It's not just an unwillingness to

1:41:26.560 --> 1:41:31.280
<v Speaker 1>defend sovereignty. Again, one of the most basic duties that

1:41:31.360 --> 1:41:36.400
<v Speaker 1>are purported. Representatives are charged with ensuring, protecting, defending. You know, obviously,

1:41:36.880 --> 1:41:39.599
<v Speaker 1>as the Vice president Trump said any number of times,

1:41:39.720 --> 1:41:41.400
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have borders, you don't have a country.

1:41:41.680 --> 1:41:49.800
<v Speaker 1>So basic, so core should transcend ideology and politics. But

1:41:49.920 --> 1:41:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. Why Well, of course, the Biden administration advertised

1:41:55.960 --> 1:42:02.519
<v Speaker 1>open borders well before its election. What is that open

1:42:02.560 --> 1:42:05.240
<v Speaker 1>borders policy rooted in? Well, the true believers, of course,

1:42:05.280 --> 1:42:08.639
<v Speaker 1>will say, I guess that sovereignty is racist and bigod

1:42:08.720 --> 1:42:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and that everyone should be able to come in, and

1:42:11.240 --> 1:42:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that our laws are essentially optional. And some of them

1:42:16.400 --> 1:42:20.760
<v Speaker 1>call ice a tyrannical terrorist like entity and want to

1:42:20.760 --> 1:42:26.840
<v Speaker 1>abolish it. Think about that those tests with ensuring our

1:42:26.920 --> 1:42:30.439
<v Speaker 1>sovereignty are the bad guys, not the people whose first

1:42:30.479 --> 1:42:33.040
<v Speaker 1>act if they step foot in the country is breaking

1:42:33.040 --> 1:42:37.200
<v Speaker 1>our laws and violating our sovereignty and spitting in the

1:42:37.200 --> 1:42:42.560
<v Speaker 1>face of our people. The cynical aspect, of course of

1:42:42.640 --> 1:42:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the border crisis is never let a crisis go to waste.

1:42:45.760 --> 1:42:49.120
<v Speaker 1>In fact, create a crisis which you can ultimately use

1:42:49.240 --> 1:42:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to leverage for political power. And as I've talked about

1:42:52.040 --> 1:42:56.240
<v Speaker 1>before guest hosting this show, even just having illegal aliens

1:42:56.240 --> 1:42:58.920
<v Speaker 1>in the country, even if they're not mass amnestied, and

1:42:59.479 --> 1:43:03.000
<v Speaker 1>thus a major voting voc for the people supporting the amnesty,

1:43:03.240 --> 1:43:08.640
<v Speaker 1>namely Democrats. Population numbers matter. Population numbers are counted in

1:43:08.680 --> 1:43:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the census, even illegal aliens, and that leads to direct

1:43:12.439 --> 1:43:16.200
<v Speaker 1>increased representation for those areas with large illegal alien populations

1:43:16.200 --> 1:43:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and billions of dollars being allocated to those areas as well.

1:43:21.400 --> 1:43:25.320
<v Speaker 1>So how does this tie into again, cultivating mediocrity or failure? Well,

1:43:25.320 --> 1:43:27.600
<v Speaker 1>when you reject an American value and principle, when you

1:43:27.640 --> 1:43:30.519
<v Speaker 1>reject a principle of any nation that wants to survive

1:43:30.640 --> 1:43:33.679
<v Speaker 1>on this earth of sovereignty and respect for the rule

1:43:33.760 --> 1:43:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of law, you get failure and disaster. Once again, if

1:43:41.000 --> 1:43:44.439
<v Speaker 1>you reject, you repudiate American values and principles, you are

1:43:44.479 --> 1:43:52.480
<v Speaker 1>actively cultivating not just mediocrity, but failure. Excellent countries, serious countries,

1:43:53.479 --> 1:43:59.679
<v Speaker 1>are frugal, they're responsible, they treat the laws with respect,

1:43:59.760 --> 1:44:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and they make the laws respectable. Their leaders don't lord

1:44:06.000 --> 1:44:08.519
<v Speaker 1>over the people, and they don't hold themselves to a

1:44:08.560 --> 1:44:10.680
<v Speaker 1>separate standard from everyone else. We're not supposed to have

1:44:10.720 --> 1:44:12.679
<v Speaker 1>a class system in this country, but the ruling quass

1:44:12.720 --> 1:44:16.360
<v Speaker 1>shore has created one and seeks to do everything it

1:44:16.439 --> 1:44:21.120
<v Speaker 1>can to insulate itself cement its position. And of course,

1:44:21.120 --> 1:44:24.840
<v Speaker 1>when you cement essentially a monopoly power, of course it

1:44:24.880 --> 1:44:31.120
<v Speaker 1>becomes deconent and decayed and mediocre and fails. Ultimately, our

1:44:31.200 --> 1:44:35.679
<v Speaker 1>ruling class is a failure. And again, seventy four million

1:44:35.720 --> 1:44:39.760
<v Speaker 1>plus people voted against that failed ruling class last time.

1:44:39.800 --> 1:44:43.479
<v Speaker 1>And that is why the effort is being pursued right now,

1:44:43.520 --> 1:44:45.919
<v Speaker 1>as we talked about in this episode and past episodes

1:44:45.960 --> 1:44:50.320
<v Speaker 1>as well, to target smere chill, censor, and potentially use

1:44:50.400 --> 1:44:52.479
<v Speaker 1>the full force not just of the government but all

1:44:52.520 --> 1:44:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of society to try to scare into submission. The population

1:44:57.920 --> 1:45:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that sees through it, all sees through the gas, understands

1:45:01.720 --> 1:45:05.559
<v Speaker 1>when they're being propagandized too, and lord it over and

1:45:05.720 --> 1:45:08.439
<v Speaker 1>cause the failure out for what it is. And that's

1:45:08.479 --> 1:45:10.639
<v Speaker 1>why they have to go so hard at anyone who

1:45:10.760 --> 1:45:14.080
<v Speaker 1>dares break from the narrative. Akin to the Chinese Communist Party,

1:45:14.400 --> 1:45:21.919
<v Speaker 1>cannot allow dissenting viewpoints, cannot allow alternative narratives, cannot account

1:45:21.920 --> 1:45:26.640
<v Speaker 1>for facts that would dare threaten the hollow facade of

1:45:26.760 --> 1:45:31.439
<v Speaker 1>legitimacy that a rolling class has. And earlier in the week,

1:45:31.479 --> 1:45:34.240
<v Speaker 1>by the way, we talked about just a brief side note,

1:45:34.280 --> 1:45:36.320
<v Speaker 1>we talked about what was going on in Georgia with

1:45:36.400 --> 1:45:39.759
<v Speaker 1>this audit on topic you are forbidden to talk about.

1:45:39.800 --> 1:45:42.759
<v Speaker 1>And you'll probably find many people being censored on social

1:45:42.760 --> 1:45:44.960
<v Speaker 1>media as they continue to follow what's going on in Georgia.

1:45:45.040 --> 1:45:47.439
<v Speaker 1>And wait on Arizona, and we'll actually talk to a

1:45:47.520 --> 1:45:52.320
<v Speaker 1>legislator from Arizona who's been instrumental in pushing forth the

1:45:52.360 --> 1:45:54.320
<v Speaker 1>audit that's going on there. We'll talk to him about

1:45:54.360 --> 1:45:59.160
<v Speaker 1>what's going on there. Just the news reported today Georgia

1:45:59.200 --> 1:46:03.479
<v Speaker 1>audit document expose significant election failures in state's largest County.

1:46:03.520 --> 1:46:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Fulton County records suggest more than one hundred

1:46:06.680 --> 1:46:09.880
<v Speaker 1>batches of absentee ballots in Fulton County could be missing.

1:46:10.760 --> 1:46:12.639
<v Speaker 1>One hundred batches. In each of those batches, I believe

1:46:12.720 --> 1:46:15.160
<v Speaker 1>may have at least one hundred ballots. Some experts see

1:46:15.200 --> 1:46:18.720
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote election tabulation malpractice as state officials seek to

1:46:18.760 --> 1:46:23.600
<v Speaker 1>remove county's top election supervisors, and I'd urge you to

1:46:23.680 --> 1:46:27.320
<v Speaker 1>check out this article to see what's going on there. Basically,

1:46:27.360 --> 1:46:30.719
<v Speaker 1>some of the administrators there argue that you really can't

1:46:30.800 --> 1:46:35.879
<v Speaker 1>have confidence in the results because what they're auditing itself

1:46:36.000 --> 1:46:40.000
<v Speaker 1>is an incomplete data set. As this official says, an

1:46:40.000 --> 1:46:42.439
<v Speaker 1>audit is only good as good as the data that's input.

1:46:42.479 --> 1:46:45.120
<v Speaker 1>And in this case, Fulton Counties records are so problematic,

1:46:45.200 --> 1:46:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure a reasonable person can trust them. When

1:46:47.760 --> 1:46:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you add in the reports of ballots magically appearing under

1:46:50.200 --> 1:46:53.400
<v Speaker 1>tables or being moved out of the counting center, they're legitimate,

1:46:53.439 --> 1:46:58.200
<v Speaker 1>outstanding questions. You want to ensure that a country is

1:46:58.240 --> 1:47:02.719
<v Speaker 1>not only mediocre, but fails erode the consent of the governed,

1:47:03.960 --> 1:47:07.000
<v Speaker 1>destroy the integrity of elections, make it so that no

1:47:07.000 --> 1:47:12.040
<v Speaker 1>one can trust that they're adequately represented by their purported leaders.

1:47:12.960 --> 1:47:16.719
<v Speaker 1>The running theme ought to be overturning this ruling class

1:47:16.880 --> 1:47:19.160
<v Speaker 1>or making it live up to the standards that we

1:47:19.280 --> 1:47:22.439
<v Speaker 1>all love and believe in, and that's how we cultivate

1:47:22.479 --> 1:47:27.479
<v Speaker 1>excellence instead of mediocrity and failure. There has been Ben

1:47:27.479 --> 1:47:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Weingarten in for Buck Sexon on The Buck Sexton Show,

1:47:30.280 --> 1:47:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and we'll close out the week tomorrow. Have a great evident.

1:47:34.320 --> 1:47:39.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Follow Buck on Facebook,

1:47:39.120 --> 1:47:40.599
<v Speaker 1>Instagram and Twitter.