WEBVTT - Silicon Valley Bank Fallout, a Rally in Chip Stocks and Calls for a Pause in Artificial Intelligence

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where Innovation of Money and Power

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:09.040
<v Speaker 1>COLI in Silicon Valley, NBR. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Caroline Hide and Ed Ludlow Ed Lovelow here in San Francisco.

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Carola Hide off this week, this is Bloomberg Technology. Coming

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>up on the program. The banking fallout continues. We'll bring

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you the details on spob's bankruptcy as hearings continue in Washington.

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean for Silicon Valley founders and vcs

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 1>and more than a thousand tech heavyweight call for a

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>pause on the artificial intelligence boom to implement safety protocols.

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll break down what's inside the petition, plus chip stocks

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>getting a boost as analyst upgrade and video and Micron issues.

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>An upbeat forecast will discuss what's driving momentum. But first

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>let's going to take on the ARC. It's technology a

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>big driver. We're fully in risk on mosing out performance

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>in the NASA one hundred, but the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>in particular. Why a pretty bullish outlook for the fiscal

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>third quarter from Micron, which we'll get into later in

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the show. Yields also coming back a little bit of

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the US ten yere at three point six percent. Bitcoin

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:20.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of caught up in this risk on rally above

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight thousand. It's highest level in dollar terms since

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>June of last year. Look, it's been a good run

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:29.279
<v Speaker 1>for tech stocks in particular. Look at the NASA one hundred,

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>very tech heavy index. We're heading for a pretty blockbusters

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>quarter that's just gone. Of course, we're getting towards the

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 1>end of the march, a few sessions left to go.

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>As we bring up this Bloomberg terminal, please miss the

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>director to visualize the point that I'm trying to make.

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:46.759
<v Speaker 1>Whether we continue that momentum is all about the FED.

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Remember that Thursday core PCE the Fed's main measure that

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>they're looking to that will answer a lot of questions

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the direction of travel for rates. That's

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the macro picture. Here's the micro Kitty Greyfer, New York.

0:01:58.120 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>What you got, hi? Add why I have a lot

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>green behind me. Let's start with Micron, like you said,

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>issuing an upbeat outlook for the fiscal third quarter. Sales

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>expected about three point nine billion dollars, that is above

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the average analysts estimate. You could see Micron shares up

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>about six percent almost six percent. Other chip stocks rising

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>as well, including a video shares are hired by about

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>two percent. You had Piper Sandler come out and raise

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>their price target on this stock to three hundred dollars,

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>so giving shares of boost. Moving on outside the chip space.

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Carnival also cruising today. They got an upgrade from Susquehanna

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>ahead of get this wave season. Apparently that's when the

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>cruise industries offers discounted rates. I didn't know that. Pretty interesting.

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Paychecks also rising as well, up about five point seven

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>percent or so. But let's talk about the banks, because

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that was the big story today. What happened in Europe overnight.

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>You have Sergio or Mandi coming back as UBS CEO

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>starting in early April to oversee that acquisition of credit.

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>See in this chart behind me shows that in the

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>eight days since that acquisition was announced, we've seen shares

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>rally getting another bounce today. Ed Katie gray Fell with

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the Movers will track those throughout the hour. Turning from

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 1>UBS to the banking crisis here in the United States,

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be looking at live pictures of the

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>House Financial Services Committee hearing day two of the Regulatory

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>consideration of the biggest banking failure since the financial crisis.

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Here with the details. Bloomberg's Katanga Johnson out in dc

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>FED supervision Chair Michael Barr basically acknowledging for a second

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>day that there were lapses in oversight, Right, Katanga, of

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>what happened with Silicon Valley Bank, we'll be heard today. Yes,

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>was Bar acknowledging that there was a lack of oversight,

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>not just from his particular office at the fair, but

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>even from the supervisors who were on the ground, who

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>knew months before he was made aware of the issues.

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And lawmakers on both sides of the hour. Will he

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>drill down on the timing around when Barr was first

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>alerted and how quickly he acted even once he learned

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of these lapses. You consider the questions from lawmakers right,

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>senators yesterday, congressional representatives today. A lot of them focus

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>on individual people, the pain that was suffered by depositors.

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>You have to remember the customer based Katana, right, Many

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>of these were vench capitalists and startup founders. So we

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>actually have any answers of kind of what the next

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>step is, either to prevent this in the future or

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>some sort of restitutions what happened a few weeks ago.

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Regulators are really mulling whether there might be a need

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>for them to drill down on existing rules and perhaps

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 1>potentially pushing lawmakers to consider new rules around whether they

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>should be able to mitigate some of the risks of

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>this issue in the future. Bar in particular, really emphasize

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he's open to in reviewing his toolkit.

0:04:56.720 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 1>Have regulators sort of were collaboratively in that way, but

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>then also he's open to really having Congress or perhaps

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:08.679
<v Speaker 1>the government kind of bil the office really dig in

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to the ways in which the rule book can be enhanced.

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, bloom bes Katanga Johnson out in DC. Thank you. Look,

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about what the SVB bankruptcy means for those depositors,

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>start up founders, vench capitalists, tech businesses of all sizes

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and bringing Gregory Jermaine, Professor of law at Syracuse University

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and also the director of the Bankruptcy Clinic. First of all, professor,

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the program. Your assessment of what you've heard

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:38.679
<v Speaker 1>over the last twenty four hours from both panels, Well,

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>not very interesting, right, I mean, a lot of repetition

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of stuff we already knew a lot of political pasturing,

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>but really no new information coming out of this of

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>these hearings. The only thing i'd i'd say is that

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, every time someone asks an interesting question, the answers, well,

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>our report is going to be out on May first.

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>So until we get the report on May first, I

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think we're going to learn a lot more about

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>what was going on in the regulatory environment. Yes, so

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 1>that was kind of my general overview of listening to you.

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>A few hours of the testimony, we broke the news

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of what was happening on Silicon Valley Bank on this

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>program the friday it collapsed and into the Monday, the

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>discussion among venture capitalists was that they wanted a reincarnated

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>form of SVB to survive what ended up happening. Of course,

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>his first Systems came in and took some of the

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>deposit book, but not all of it. There were lots

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of questions in these hearings about why an outright savior

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't come in that first weekend. What's your assessment of

0:06:54.360 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that this law happens very fast these days, you know,

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean the run on the bank, you know that

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>took place over a couple of days and and and

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody's panicked and you know, and trying to get a

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>new institution to come in, uh and take this over

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>is not an easy and an easy task, especially because

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the full scope of you know, what their

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>what their loan book looks like, and what it's worth

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>isn't known, and so the government kind of sold it

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>with some backstops in place, uh to protect First citizens

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>is the buyer um. So it's it's not easy to

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, to to to figure out what's going on

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>in a huge institution like all of these large banks

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>are today in such a short period of time and

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>get someone to take it over. Well, here's the main point.

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>They wanted it to survive and reincarnated form in some

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>sense it is you know, many vcs point to SVB

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>being a spiritual Paul Silicon Valley literally that you know,

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the first institution to write a check or bank a

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>founder when others would in what is the risk here

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>with First Citizens taking on some of the books, Well,

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I think for citizens wants the business. I mean they're

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>they're taking over the branches, They're they're going to keep

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the employees that have all the relationships and so you know,

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I think they want to they want to keep it. Um,

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>So my guess is that they're going to be working

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:33.079
<v Speaker 1>very hard over the next year or so to to

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>try to shore up trust within the community. But you know,

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the handover is going to take a period of time

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and I expect they're going to be some

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>bumps in the road for a short while as they

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:48.719
<v Speaker 1>as they ramp up to taking over all these assets

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and providing better supervision than Silicon Valley Bank did of

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the situation. But yeah, well I just want to jump in, Hey,

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you are an expert in the field of bankruptcy. You've

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>looked closely at the situation as it unfolded its Silicon

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Valley Bank. How do we fix it? What happened? How

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>do we prevent it from happening again? Well, I don't

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>think there's other than providing a government backstop against all deposits,

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>which could be extremely expensive to the public. You know,

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>there's there's always going to be the possibility of bank runs,

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>even just rumors. Banks are subject to, you know, rumors

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>spreading so quickly that people get scared. Even we've had

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>bank runs of ensured deposits, which you know makes no

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>sense they're not at risk, but people get nervous because

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, they don't trust that they're going to be

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>able to get their money out. And so the banking

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>system is based on confidence, and when confidence breaks down,

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the system, the system is starts to starts to shake apart.

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>And so the government's real job here is to provide

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>as much confidence as they can that the banking systems slovent.

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Gregory Jermaine of Syracuse University, thank you for your insight.

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll keep on tracking the story. Now, all of the

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 1>TERMO in Silicon Valley maybe having a chilling effect on deals.

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Sachs just lost three partners in the investment bank

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>who exiting the Wall Street firm amid a slump in

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:31.079
<v Speaker 1>deal making specifically focused on tech. Wall Streets saw a

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>hit to their compensation last year as that drop in

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>deal making took its toll. Some Goldment banking partners face

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>pay cuts of more than fifty percent. But these are

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>three high profile bankers that Bloomboa's reporting have left really

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>focused on the tech sector, and we'll continue to track

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>where they've gone. Onto time for talking tech first, CrowdStrike

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>investing ten million dollars in abnormal Security, a startup that

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>helps businesses cope with compromised emails after highlighting the attack

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>method as a fast growing threats the largest amount of

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>cash the cybersecurity firms ever funded through its venture arm,

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the CrowdStrike Falcon fun. The two companies also will work

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:18.319
<v Speaker 1>together as part of a close partnership. Let's turn to

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Chips and Videos, seeing its price target raised that Piper

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Sandler from two seven five to three hundred dollars. The

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>analyst they're saying the company has the ability to create

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>new and lucrative market opportunities with its software footprint, which

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>is still in the early stages of growth and adoption,

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and rounding it out. Also with Micron receiving a price

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>target upgrade at Susquehanna Financial, boosting its target from sixty

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>five dollars to ninety dollars, the analysts saying they think

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the May orter represents the worst case operating losses, but

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>believes the near to medium term risk raw profile's attractive

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>given the updated price target. Now, let's stick with Micron

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 1>giving an upbeat forecast for the fiscal third quarter, sending

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>shares higher. Bloomboz and King on set with me in

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. This was interesting because what they're saying is

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>our customers have been working through inventories, but there are

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>signs that that kind of glots or downturned that people

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 1>are calling it. There might be a different trajectory on

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the other side. Yeah, I think the way to sort

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of look at this, to frame this is things aren't

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>going to get that much worse. You've got to bear

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in mind this is a company that is on course

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to have its worst ever net loss in terms of revenue.

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>It's half the size of where it was last year.

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>So this isn't a victory parade by any stretch. But

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 1>if you believe that the chip industry is on this

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>long term growth path, then you're looking for points like

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>this where things aren't going to get that much worse.

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>The editors of Bloomberg Opinion wrote an editorial in the

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>last twenty four hours about the Chips Act and the

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>money that is being lined up from the public sector

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to onshore manufacturing capacity in this country. The conclusion that

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>they reach is that actually it's a plan that's racing

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>towards failure. They talk about red tape, they talk about

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the time it actually takes to set up a manufacturing

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>facility from scratch when it comes to chip fabrication. Ironically,

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>when you spoke to the Micron CEO last night, he

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>is kind of asking for the opposite to increase capacity.

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>He's saying, we and our peers need to cut down

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 1>our production right now. Explain that one to us. Yeah,

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a couple of really really important things

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>at play here. The chip industry is as old as

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I am, which is pretty old. Right throughout its history,

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>your words, economic forces have determined whether you build a plant,

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>whether it makes sense to build a plant, whether you

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>put capacity online. Now we've got government saying, hey, here's

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a check, build a plant here, that's what we want.

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>So the concern there is that we'll have this systemic overbuild.

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Micron was saying was a bit more short term, which

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 1>is saying, look, we can all get back to profitability.

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>We can all make money if we all up putting

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>less to looking into the front of these production lines.

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>That's a great idea, and it's certainly there some evidence

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that that has happened. But really the sort of the

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 1>thing that wasn't said directly was that Samsung the biggest

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>part of the memory ship industry hasn't been doing that,

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>so the outlook for profitability there is still a little

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>bit dim outlook for prosability. I'm looking at the shares.

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>We're higher by around five and a half percent, so

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>positive reaction. This kind of terminal chart tells the story though,

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>if you look at this sort of deficit that Micron

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>faces this year, this is a big hit to profit,

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a big loss going back to the eighties. Why has

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that happened? It's a memory thip industry. This is the

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>most brutal PRAM and nand exactly the storage basically in

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>your mobile devices, in your computers. The problem that Micron

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>has and all of the other membership makers have is

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a commodity, right. You can buy these things in

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>these exchanges. You know what the price is. What happens

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>when you have a glut is you end up making

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>chick and then you have to go out and sell

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>them for less than it costs you to make them.

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's where Micron is. Yeah, I mean that chart

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>says it all really that, you know, the leg's kind

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of taken out from under them just very quick finally,

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and we've just got a few seconds. End markets basically

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>this is about smartphones. The data center business bottomed out

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>in fiscal second quarter. What did the broad hopes for

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the smartphone market in the second half of this year. Yeah,

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that basically that it's not as bad as it was.

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>And Micron gave us a picture that said, maybe smartphones

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to collapse as badly as we'd feared, and

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>also maybe PCs won't be as badly as we'd feel

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>we've had Micron. Everyone is over the moon with Nvidia.

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Nvidia can do no wrong as far as sell side

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and this at least are concerned. Why do people think

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that Nvidia is going to be the main beneficiary from

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>investment in artificial intelligence because so far they have been

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>so far they've they've mechanically how does that work? What

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>is it that's exciting? Well, the workloads that you need

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to run and system to have these recommendation engines basically

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:09.119
<v Speaker 1>reward the ability to do multitasking, to do parallel processing

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in Video's processors do that arguably better than anybody else.

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's sold that story very well. All right, Bloomberg

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>zan King not quite as old as the chip industry,

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>but he's covered it a long time and we're grateful

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to have him. Now, coming up, we're watching shares Valley

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Barber surge for the second day after news that the

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>company is splitting up up one point eight percent on

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the USADRS. Right now, we're bringing the details of that

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>plan next. This is Bloomberg. Ali Barber's massive overhaul plan

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>boosted Chinese tech stocks overnight, with investors betting the sectors

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>in for an overdue reevaluation. Is the regulatory environment improved?

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Shares Valley Barber surge earlier by the most since November

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>out in Hong Kong after the news that the company

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>will be splitting it's too hundred and fifty billion dollar

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>empire into six business units. Bring bags Isabel lead back

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:07.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours ago is about we were talking about

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>the kind of fresh news this is happening al in Asia.

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>They've had time to digest what's going on. And also

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing about development of how they'll present that plan

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>right exactly. And it's interesting actually because this is the

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>second rally in two days, and it really just means

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 1>investors are liking what they see because to your point,

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Ali Baba, it's a two hundred twenty billion dollars empires

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>will be split into six and analysts really like this

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 1>for two reasons. In fact, overnight some analysts have upgraded

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Ali Baba from AD to buy. So the first reason

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is it'll just allow Ali Baba to be more nimble

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>because China has cracked down on these two big detect

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 1>two big to failed tech companies, and Ali Baba was

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 1>one of them. So now with the six units, there'll

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit more flexible in adjusting that a

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>regulatory landscape, and a lot of analysts are really liking that.

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 1>And the second reason is it will unlock up valuations

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>because these six units were given the discretion into raise

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>funds however they see so ipo is one of them,

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and we know that the ipo industry has been kind

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of lackluster these days, so that will also help revive

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 1>the IPO market. If you go on tli V, go

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal, I know that we're going to

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>be covering Ali Baba briefing on their plan to kind

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 1>of walk investors through how this would look. Remind us

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of what the business of Ali Baba looks like these days,

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, we think of it on the Bloomberg Technology Show.

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of an e commerce giant. It's much more

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>complicated than that. It definitely is. It's so sprawling, which

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:34.919
<v Speaker 1>makes it a bit more complex. So a lot of

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>traders have been trading Ali Baba like a utility, when

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 1>in fact it's more than that, and in fact, compared

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to its rivals like ten Cent, Ali Baba is way cheaper,

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>which is why some of the analysts are saying this

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>will help Ali Baba kind of reshape its image, break

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>it up into six and if among those is ten cents,

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>so this can also this breakup can be a blueprint

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>not only for China actually, but for the broader industry

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>here broader world. Rather here in the US, we also

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>have two big to fail companies that US regulators have

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 1>been scrutinizing. But back to China, ten Cent is one

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 1>of them. And it's hard to imagine that this happened

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>without the permission or the blessing of the Chinese government.

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of people are also saying that this

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>might be a signal that, you know, the crackdown in

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the past two years, it's done and dusted. And I

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>also will bring up that jackmar returned at least to

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the public knowledge on Monday, so one can just back lit.

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Whether that's coincidence or that's planned, who knows. We're showing

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:31.679
<v Speaker 1>a chart of Vali Barber's share performance relative to its valuation,

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>essentially earnings per share EPs. Unsurprisingly, looking at the Bloomberg

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a number of analysts upbrading price targets, but also looking

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 1>at the bonds trading volumes very high. A lot of

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:46.640
<v Speaker 1>interest in Ali Baba right now. What happens next? Right?

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Does this happen overnight? Is the investor community bracing for

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>an instant split in instant IPO or is this something

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that is going to be protracted. I think now investors

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>are just really on a weight and ce mode. But again,

0:19:57.720 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>this likely happened with a blessing of the Chinese government.

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I think more than Ali Baba, they're looking to see

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>whether this will affect other companies. So Ali Baba isn't

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the only big company out there. There's also ant There's

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>also ten Cent JDS, so it'll be kind of Ali Baba.

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to call it guinea pig. It's the

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>only thing I could think of right now, the only word,

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>But it's the pioneer. There's the first company in China

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to do this at least in recent memory, so it'll

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>really be a blueprint, and that's what investors are seeing.

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>How this will affect the broader industry in China. All right,

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Isabel Lee on the China Tech Beat, Thank you

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>so much. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'med Lovelow in

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. It's going viral art fish intelligence experts, industry

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 1>leaders and research is including Elon Musk and Apple co

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>founder Steve Wozniak, calling on developers to hit the pause

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 1>button on training powerful AI models. More than eleven hundred

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>people in the industry signed a petition calling for a

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>six month break from training AI systems that are more

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>powerful than the latest iteration behind open aiyes Chat GPT.

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.719
<v Speaker 1>The idea is to allow for the development of shared

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 1>safety protocols. Joining me on set to discuss technologist Sarah Gaw,

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a former general partner at Greylock now founder of early

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>stage AI focus VC firm Conviction. I'm really happy that

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you're here. Thanks. You know this space many signatories to this.

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>They're basically saying we've come quite far. Stop we need

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to rethink the parameters around this your immediate reaction to that. Yeah,

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:41.199
<v Speaker 1>so I would start with, like, AI is just an

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 1>advanced form of computing. So it's like saying we're going

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to stop development on computing until we can guarantee sort

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of a writing code perspective from a layman's perspective, Yeah,

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>just from it's a general technology that's a tool that

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 1>can be used for like huge value creation and also

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 1>buy bad actors. Right, But you draw comparison to computing

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 1>or the Internet. The move is not to call a

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>moratorium on the Internet. It's to develop like safety protocols

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:11.719
<v Speaker 1>and be transparent about access. So you're somebody that's investing

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>actively in AI related startups will get to that in

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 1>a second. How realistic is it to ask founders like

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the ones that you back to just stop. How does

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that even work? Yeah, So there's certainly a question on

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>enforcement here, right, because most of the research that would

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>be related to developing a model more capable than something

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>like GPT four is very expensive to do. So the

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>number of labs that are capable of it, of funding

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:44.679
<v Speaker 1>an effort like that is very few, and you know

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>they're staffed with teams that are very focused on alignment

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and responsible development. But if a set of like largely

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>these signatories do not belong to those labs, and so

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 1>it's not as if you have people generally at the

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>City of the Art calling moratorium. You have people who

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>are not part of those state of the art adverts. Right,

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>They've already done something in the field, And that's why

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to have you on the program. Correctly if

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm wrong, But your investment thesis is basically we should

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>be funding and backing those that are working on technological

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>breakthroughs that are not yet solved, right, and putting pause

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 1>on development kind of goes against that thesis. Yeah, and well,

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 1>fund basic research efforts, but I know the thesis of

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the fund is much more on the applied side. And

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you a few examples, But to me, it's

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 1>hard to argue that we don't want to give more

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>people the superpowers that we're developing now. So if that

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 1>is the ability to have any person ask questions of

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>business data and natural language like seek, that feels like

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a useful thing. If it is to decrease the cost

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 1>of high quality legal work like Harvey, that feels like

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 1>a useful thing. I'm super excited about giving people more

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 1>creative skills. Right, So you have people who don't know

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>how to draw using mid Journey, or people who don't

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>know how to code using Copilot to write code. All

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of these are democratizing capabilities, Sarah, I just want to

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>update the audience that we've reached out to open ai

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>multiple times an open Ai have not responded to our

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 1>requests for comment. In the letter which was written in

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the petition which I've got here, I mean they directly

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:24.360
<v Speaker 1>call out open Ai, so you can see why we're

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 1>trying to get them to respond. The question is this

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really work unless open ai engages with them, does it?

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>It does not because they're ahead, right, And I think

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>like this is a nuanced point. But alignment or the

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>idea of like let's make the AI do things that

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>humanity or users want, it's it's a very it's very

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 1>intertwined with like advancing capabilities. There's not really a way

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to make them models more governable if we don't understand

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>their capabilities. Right in the petition or the letter, they

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>basically talk about the idea that powerful AI system should

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 1>not be developed until we're confident that their effects will

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 1>be positive and the risks are manageable. My question to you,

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>say you had a founder proposal deck in your desk,

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and how on earth would one quantify or codify those

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>two targets. Yeah, I think again, like computing and the

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:24.959
<v Speaker 1>Internet are really good analogies, right, I think there are

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely real risks and once we already see today right,

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>disinformation used by bad actors like I'm a longtime cybersecurity

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>investor as well, like people use the Internet to do

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>bad things. That doesn't mean like no internet, right or

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's the conclusion most people would draw

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the other risks. You know, I really care about access

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and also a reinforcement of bias. But but the thing

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to do is to address these concerns in like a

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>open and transparent way, not to call for a halt development.

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>You know many of the or know of quite well,

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>many of the signatories to this letter, to this petition.

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Were you surprised by any of the participants, I would say,

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I genuinely believe that you know there are signatories who

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>care about democratis that you should of access because I

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:19.719
<v Speaker 1>think you know, a monopoly structure for advanced AI capabilities

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 1>is good for no one. But I think the most

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>cynical read of a letter like this could be that

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a strategic competitive move so that people can catch up. Right,

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>And some of the signatories have been on the wrong

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>side of a technical architectural revolution in favor of transformers,

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>which are sort of sort of a fundamental architecture that's

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>making these AI's work so well. You and I have

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>discussed and on this program, we've discussed where we're at.

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>We're generative AI, and from a consumer perspective, I can

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>go on chat GBT or Bard and I can ask

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 1>questions and get relatively detailed and informed responses. There's much

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>more to generate to AI than that. And I wondered

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>which areas you think we should a well in the

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:08.439
<v Speaker 1>first instance, really be focused on, for example, in the

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 1>legal field, and think areas that you're interested in. Yeah, again,

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 1>like i'd probably put like some of the areas we

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>care about into sort of new skills capabilities and then

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>new knowledge. Right, So example, as you describe would be

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>new skills as giving people the ability to code, to draw,

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to create video, to do legal work. New knowledge, I

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>think is even more interesting. So you've seen fundamental advances

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>in for example, the life sciences around a protein generation,

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>protein folding. I think the idea of reducing the cost

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to deliver a new drug to less than two billion

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars a shot feels quite important to humanity. That's a

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 1>very specific example. How does AI help us do that? Yeah,

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>without getting into too much of the technical detail, there

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 1>are tasks within the drug discovery process that are basically

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:03.479
<v Speaker 1>approached by the industry in very expensive experimental ways today,

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and being able to get better understanding of biology and

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>chemistry with these models makes the process of drug development

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 1>potentially much cheaper. You are a venture capitalist, but I

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>know that you work deeply with and have done for

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a long time with the founders that you've backed in

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of the operation of their business, your research driven.

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I know that you read a lot from the world

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 1>of academia. Who should be driving this? You know, Elon

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Musk is a signatory. He reportedly started his own startup

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>right in the field of generative AI. It's very messy

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>right now in terms of the leadership in this field. Yeah,

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think like in the end we should

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>have people from academia, from the state of the art

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>research labs, like a more inclusive discussion including like nation states, Like,

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard for me to see a governance framework

0:28:57.360 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that matters in the end that does not include a

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>international nation state participation. This has been a quite tense

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and serious conversation because there are risks that we're concerned about.

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>When you woke up this morning before you knew about

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>this initiative, how do you feel about where we stand

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>withmentum in this field? You know, actually most of the

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>conversations we've had been very positive in recent weeks and months. Yeah,

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm just genuinely very excited, right, And it's

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>not that I don't see the risks again long time

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>cybersecurity investor people doing a lot of bad things in

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:35.239
<v Speaker 1>the Internet as well. But you know, my waking up

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>experience today was my five year old daughter saying, make

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>me a three hunded cerberus unicorn dragon, right. And the

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>reason she believes that's possible is, like we play with

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>using a generative AI, using a generative AI tool. She

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know those words yet, she's five, But the idea

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that she can create these images and tell a story

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:58.719
<v Speaker 1>using her creativity with all these new skills, I think

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>it is quite inspiring. You had a decade at Graylock.

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Just tell me really quickly about Conviction. Yes, this is

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a new initiative for you. Yeah, so as of last year,

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I started a new venture, fun focused on early stage AI.

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the largest value creation opportunity we're going

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to see this generation, and it's a very immature field.

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>So the early stage focus and being able to understand,

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>as you said, like the translation from research is our focus.

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>You're busy. You're also, of course the co host of

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the No Priors AI focused podcasts, which you should all

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>check out. Conviction founder former Graylock general partner Sarah Bell,

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Now coming up, the Golden State

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Goes Green, how Silicon Valley is trying to tackle the

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>climate crisis. Plus, let's take a look at shares of

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Lulu Lemon, which are frankly surging. As Boombow's Katie Greifeld

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 1>put it, the explanation is there is intense interest right

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>now in athleisure, a lot of that story, the e

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>commerce story. But those gains around thirteen and a half percent,

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the biggest jump on the stock since March of twenty twenty.

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Company giving an annual outlook really above street expectations, high

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>demand as I said, for those leggings and active where

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>more of that? Next? This is Bloomberg. So last night

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>we hit the road and towards climate tech in the

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>heart of Silicon Valley. I hosted a panel with top

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 1>names from the industry about what's really driving growth in

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>venture backing for climate solutions at the Teconomy Climate Summit

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three. Alongside me, Sophie Purdham of Climate Tech VC,

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Nekakaboulet of Aligned Climate Ventures, and PMP Power of Ahead

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:47.959
<v Speaker 1>of c Lab America's Male have a listen. The dollar

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>value going into climate related venture plateauing between twenty twenty

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>one and twenty twenty two, driven entirely by the decrease

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>in the growth rounds. Right, so many of us invest

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:03.959
<v Speaker 1>quite early, but those large five hundred million dollars plus

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>private rounds, those fell off a cliff kind of right,

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 1>as this fack market also froze. Well, that goes back

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to the original quick fire around. Were they overvalued? The

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>original twenty twenty one was nuts. Right, Yes, yes, and

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 1>yes second quick fire around. Does the private sector or

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the public sector drive investment into climate tech? I'll give

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you an opportunity to expand in a second private, private private.

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I was hoping you disagree with Mr, and it didn't

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>really work. So that brings me to my actual question,

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>which is the impact of the IRA, because I want

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to keep this focused in the news agenda as well.

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you all agree that the IRA, through a

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>trickle down effect, will see dollars flowed earlier stage startups. NKA.

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>How does that kind of manifest itself to your mind? Yeah,

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>for us, we're looking at how can we support our

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 1>startups that they don't have to continuously get into that

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of hedonistic Silicon valley treadmill of raising more and

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>more corporate equity. So for us, that means tax credits.

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Those are kind of non deluted funding dollars that are

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 1>going directly into my startups so that they can pause,

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>whether between fundraising rounds, or maybe not even have to

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>raise another round. So that's really exciting there. I think

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:24.719
<v Speaker 1>the other piece is the IRA funding is hitting a

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 1>number of parts of the infrastructure ecosystem, and the White

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>House report just got White House budget just got released

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and they put aside, I think about two hundred and

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty million for interconnection and permitting environmental permitting support, so

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 1>For me, it's not just direct cash that might come

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>into my companies. It's cash that might make it easier

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>for them to do their jobs, and also additional cash

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 1>for their customers to get basically a discounted product as well.

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Met A big part of what you do is data driven,

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>research driven. How do you interpret the broader impact of

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the IRA. I think it's a beyond the actual dollar money,

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 1>which is huge as well. Talking about android of billions

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is also a very strong signal for the private sectorals

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Europe was very concerned that you know, maybe they actually

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I was they were coming out because as you must remember,

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 1>it was just one of good shots I will say

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 1>on the good side, but it's a very strong signal

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>for the private sectors saying it is a good time

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>twin verse. That was quite a lively discussion at the

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Teconomy Climate Summit twenty twenty three. Diverse range of views

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 1>on why we should be back in climate startups and

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>where the money is coming from, very candid takes from

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:38.879
<v Speaker 1>those panelists. We should get him on the show very soon.

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Federal regulators in front of the House Financial Services Committee

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:54.359
<v Speaker 1>today to testify for a second day about recent bank

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 1>failures at SVB and Signature Bank selling by with us

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 1>for the latest on the hearing is RAMP CEO Eric

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Glenman and Eric I find RAM fascinating corporate card automated finance.

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:10.880
<v Speaker 1>We've had discussions with the CEO of Mercury, for example,

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 1>talked about brex your company did it benefit from the

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>days and weeks that followed the SVB collapse? First, thanks

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>for having me on ed and look, our whole mandate

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and commitment to customers is to help them spend less

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 1>money and spend less time. You know, we're happy to

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 1>announced today that last year RAMP grew by four times

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>year over year, and it all comes down to our

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>unique approach. By helping customers spend less, we help them

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:40.720
<v Speaker 1>spend over four hundred million dollars less than the otherwise

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 1>would have, automate five point eight million hours of work

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately drive a better bottom line. And so you know,

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 1>we think events like last week, earlier this months with

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:56.240
<v Speaker 1>spob's failure, obviously folks go out and look for solutions

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:58.839
<v Speaker 1>and dependable partners like RAMP, But ultimately we think it's

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 1>about what we do day and day of helping customers

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and businesses have a better bottom line is why we

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:09.440
<v Speaker 1>are growing. I think the root of my question is

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that not just diversifying banking, but many startup founders and

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 1>bench captists came to quickly realize they wanted to modernize

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 1>how they conduct their finances. And what I'm asking you

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 1>is what lens did you have into that in the

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks. Certainly so a couple of sets of things.

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, first, so our primary product is really around credit,

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and so when we are effectively allowing companies to continue

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:39.799
<v Speaker 1>spending no matter where they're banking. Part of how we

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:42.759
<v Speaker 1>sprang into action is as thousands of our customers were

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 1>moving banks, we were a continuous lifeline of support to

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:50.160
<v Speaker 1>make sure that as they were moving from smaller institutions

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:54.239
<v Speaker 1>to whether it's lawyer's institutions, sify as you name it,

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 1>their service on RAMP was continuous and they also were

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:01.240
<v Speaker 1>evaluating tools like Ramp that can help me get more value.

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:04.320
<v Speaker 1>In addition to that, because we work with a diverse

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 1>array of financial partners, we were able to support customers

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 1>in moving over a billion dollars in deposits in the

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 1>first forty eight hours of the bank failure, and so

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:14.839
<v Speaker 1>we were there as a partner. We were there as

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a support to make sure there was more valued of

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>every dollar of spend. And last, our product was a

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:22.760
<v Speaker 1>bridge and a lifeline where other products were less certain

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>or unable to provide services. There's a lot of discussion

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 1>right now around US sort of de facto tightening of

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 1>financial conditions, literally being able to access capital, whether it's venia, debt, venture,

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 1>traditional loans. Is that an area where you come in

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:43.799
<v Speaker 1>and try and fill If indeed there is a tightening

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 1>of financial conditions when interest rates go up and the

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>cost of capital is higher, I think what's top of

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>mind for every whether it's started founder, small business owner,

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 1>or ultimately CFO, is what am I getting out of

0:37:57.040 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>every dollar and that hurdle for a return knee to

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 1>be that much higher. I think for US, I mean

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously part of our products, whether it's in the corporate

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>card or in flexible finance solutions. Of course we do

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 1>offer credit, but ultimately ramps advantage to customers is helping

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:16.720
<v Speaker 1>them reduce their spend by four percent. When you compare

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 1>this to what most others in the industry are doing

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of coming up with increasingly collaborate rewards programs and trying

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to incentivize companies to spend more. We think something like RAMP,

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 1>which does the inverse. It actually helps companies spend less

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and get more of every dollar. Are not just useful

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 1>in every kind of time, but frankly that much more

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 1>valuable when capital does not come cheap anymore. Let's talk

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about RAMP. And actually, you as a

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 1>found a CEO, right you're backed by some pretty big

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 1>names Goldman Sachs, City found as fund Stripe to name

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 1>but a few eight point one billion dollar valuation. Sales

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:56.719
<v Speaker 1>grew four x last year. Are you struggling right now?

0:38:56.760 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't sound like it in this environment. Look, I

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.880
<v Speaker 1>think part of I think, going back to what's on

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 1>top of mind for founders is can I find software

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:09.359
<v Speaker 1>that's focused on my business that helps me spend less

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and helps my dollars go further and so will Certainly

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 1>customers are spending less and we love that, and we're

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 1>here to help them. It is accelerated the interests and

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:23.279
<v Speaker 1>demand from customers for solutions like this last I mean,

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you talk about even the events of this month, failures

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of other banks. Over a third of our customers actually

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 1>come from word of mouth. And recommendations from others, and

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 1>so in terms of new business growth, this has been

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:37.759
<v Speaker 1>among the fastest years of growth and certainly even over

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the past month month of growth that we've ever had. Eric,

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 1>as a final question, and indeed a point of clarification,

0:39:44.560 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 1>did the company bank with SVB or you yourself personally

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and by extension, what do you make about the sort

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of the first citizens coming in and saving what was

0:39:54.920 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a really influential institution among the tech community. First, so

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>RAMPED not bank with ask to be your have direct exposure,

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately we're here to support. We work with over

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 1>fifteen thousand businesses and several thousand of them did and

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:12.760
<v Speaker 1>so we were there to support them through that tough period.

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 1>You know. As far as for Citizens in the acquisition,

0:40:15.680 --> 0:40:18.719
<v Speaker 1>we certainly wish them lucky. They are I think a

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 1>fantastic institution there to serve a lot of companies. But

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:24.399
<v Speaker 1>no matter what, our rule as a partner to these

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 1>companies is to serve them no matter where they choose

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 1>to bank and help them get more of every dollar

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:32.240
<v Speaker 1>an hour. All right, Thanks to RAMP CEO Eric Glyman

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 1>joining us from New York. That does it for this

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:38.400
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Technology. Make sure to tune in tomorrow

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Twilio CEO Jeff Lawson joining me live. You don't want

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to miss it, and there's also a lot to recap

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:46.480
<v Speaker 1>from the last few days. To check out the podcast

0:40:46.560 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 1>wherever you take your podcast, you can find it on

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal as well as on Apple, Spotify, iHeart,

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and our other Bloomberg platforms. Really risk on mode in

0:40:56.880 --> 0:41:01.359
<v Speaker 1>these markets with technology outperforming. We get that PC core

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:03.879
<v Speaker 1>PC data coming Thursday. That will tell us a lot

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:06.800
<v Speaker 1>about the FED, the impact of higher rates or otherwise

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 1>on valuations. But for now, out here in a very

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 1>soggy San Francisco, thank you for listening. This is Bloomberg