Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome back to another episode of The Mark
Speaker 1: Mos Show, where we talk about, of course, the decentralized Revolution.
Speaker 1: And you know, I'm out here trying to help you
Speaker 1: change the way you think about money, is what I
Speaker 1: like to say, because almost everything you've learned is wrong,
Speaker 1: and so I like to bring to you some educational
Speaker 1: pieces to kind of help you learn history and think
Speaker 1: things through a little bit differently, and some of the
Speaker 1: latest breaking news headlines so you can be caught up
Speaker 1: to date. And that's what we're going to cover. I
Speaker 1: have some of the latest breaking news headlines, and it
Speaker 1: is it's like feast and famine. Man. I remember a
Speaker 1: couple of years ago, there was like nothing to talk
Speaker 1: about it. Now there's just a NonStop flow of just
Speaker 1: change happening, and it's just important to keep up with.
Speaker 1: And if you want to understand how the world is
Speaker 1: changing more more specically, what do we want to know
Speaker 1: that information for? Well, hopefully we use that information knowledge's
Speaker 1: power to actually make some changes in our life, to
Speaker 1: protect ourselves and benefit as this all happens. You know,
Speaker 1: one of the things I've been talking about the last
Speaker 1: couple of weeks is this banking collapse and it's a
Speaker 1: big deal. It's a real big deal for any number
Speaker 1: of reasons. The banking collapse is, as I'm saying, it's
Speaker 1: probably just getting started. We haven't even yet to begun
Speaker 1: to see all the damages from the banking collapse. You know,
Speaker 1: I've talked about this extensively. You can go back and
Speaker 1: just search my past episodes the Markmas Show or on
Speaker 1: YouTube under the Market Disruptors channel to see what I've
Speaker 1: been talking about. But you know, I've covered it. We
Speaker 1: had Silvergate Bank go down, we had a Silicon Valley
Speaker 1: bank that's the big one that everyone's been talking about,
Speaker 1: went down. And of course then we had then it
Speaker 1: went to Signature Bank. Now we're seeing, like you know,
Speaker 1: all these all these different bank crisis. But one thing
Speaker 1: that I thought was interesting and it fits in with
Speaker 1: my thesis which we always talk about, which is of
Speaker 1: course looking at the world decentralizing through the lens of politics, finance,
Speaker 1: and technology. But we talked about how it was technology,
Speaker 1: of course that always changes the world the most, and
Speaker 1: these banks, they're old institutions and they haven't really caught
Speaker 1: up with the change in technology. And so one of
Speaker 1: those is that today you know, I could post something
Speaker 1: on Twitter or Instagram or Facebook or whatever, and it
Speaker 1: can go to millions of people, and then those same
Speaker 1: people could pull out their phone, open their app for
Speaker 1: the banking app, and click a button and move all
Speaker 1: their money out of the bank, which is what happened.
Speaker 1: Forty billion dollars was taken out of the bank in
Speaker 1: one single day. You can't do that by going and
Speaker 1: waiting in line and pull in a couple of thousand bucks.
Speaker 1: It was done through pushing a button on app. But
Speaker 1: what was interesting is that they started to blame social
Speaker 1: media for the banking collapse. Supposedly it was it was
Speaker 1: social media's fault. The problem is is that people started
Speaker 1: talking about the banking collapse happening, and so then everyone
Speaker 1: panicked and pulled their money out, which is partially true. Yes,
Speaker 1: people panicked and pulled their money out, but to blame
Speaker 1: it on social media is absurd. I mean to think
Speaker 1: about that if the banks had the money, it wouldn't
Speaker 1: have mattered. The fact is that the banks didn't have
Speaker 1: the money, and of course everybody's waking up to that.
Speaker 1: So I thought it was insane. What scared me is that,
Speaker 1: you know, as I say, all the time, and as
Speaker 1: we're starting to see in real time where we're going.
Speaker 1: I did an interview with doctor Robert Malone, an amazing interview.
Speaker 1: Go back and check it out search the Mark Mass Show.
Speaker 1: In Search of Robert Malone. We talked about the fifth
Speaker 1: generation of warfare and how we've gone now into this
Speaker 1: age of psychological warfare, a war of information. And so
Speaker 1: in a war of information, in order to win the
Speaker 1: war of information, you either have to have truth on
Speaker 1: your side, because truth will be found out through open
Speaker 1: and honest dialogue. But if you don't have truth on
Speaker 1: your side, then the only way you can win the
Speaker 1: war is by controlling the flow of information. And so
Speaker 1: that's of course what they're going to resort to is
Speaker 1: control and information. And so when they start talking about, well,
Speaker 1: it's social media's fault that caused the banking crisis, then
Speaker 1: they start to go well public, for your safety, you
Speaker 1: don't want your bank to collapse, you don't want all
Speaker 1: your savings to collapse. So for your safety, we have
Speaker 1: to be able to control the flow of information because
Speaker 1: you don't want some random guy to post about a
Speaker 1: bank collapse and then you lose all your money. So
Speaker 1: in order to protect you where you're good. Of course,
Speaker 1: for your safety, we have to control the flow of information.
Speaker 1: Everything's for your safety. Now. I could see them already
Speaker 1: starting to angle for that. However, there was this a
Speaker 1: recent report that came out that said, nope, that's not it.
Speaker 1: It's not social media. So they said social media had
Speaker 1: nothing to do with svb's implosion. A bunch of factors
Speaker 1: were looked at, including the fact that they had you know,
Speaker 1: a lot of this money had already been moving out
Speaker 1: long before the bank had collapsed, so they could see
Speaker 1: that no, no, no, this this actually started before, which
Speaker 1: to me he seems like a complete waste of time
Speaker 1: and stupid because, like I said, if the banks had
Speaker 1: the money, it would have never been a problem in
Speaker 1: the first place. But you know, that's where we're at.
Speaker 1: It's it's also it's also interesting to see I put
Speaker 1: out a tweet this morning. If you're not following me
Speaker 1: on Twitter, you should just at one Mark Moss. But
Speaker 1: actually I replied to a tweet by Preston Pish, and
Speaker 1: he was saying, how the problem right now is that
Speaker 1: as all these banks are going down, it's use these
Speaker 1: small banks are starting to go down but the problem
Speaker 1: is that these small banks were really the ones that
Speaker 1: were providing the money for the energy sector, which is
Speaker 1: a big problem. I'm going to try and pull this
Speaker 1: up exactly. The banking crisis following the Silicon Valley bank
Speaker 1: that I was just talking about has now put us
Speaker 1: l G, that's natural gas projects at risk. And the
Speaker 1: reason why is because the as the equity wanes, all
Speaker 1: these banks going down, this banking crisis is blocking the funding. Now,
Speaker 1: what's interesting about this is that the FED is trying
Speaker 1: to fight inflation. They're trying to fight prices going up.
Speaker 1: So in order to combat the rising prices, what do
Speaker 1: they do? They raised interest rates. But when they raised
Speaker 1: interest rates, it made the banks go bankrupt, which is
Speaker 1: why Silicon Valley and Signature Bank, etc. Their bond yields.
Speaker 1: As the interest rates went up, their bond yields went down.
Speaker 1: So then the banks, all this money they had parked
Speaker 1: in treasuries lost value. So when customers want their money,
Speaker 1: they didn't have it. So the FED, trying to fight inflation,
Speaker 1: raised rates. When they raised rates, they made the banks
Speaker 1: go bust. When the banks went bust, the FED had
Speaker 1: to print a bunch of money to fill the whole,
Speaker 1: which is inflationary. So to fight inflation, they caused inflation.
Speaker 1: And then as the banks went under, they're causing a
Speaker 1: shortage of energy. When there's a shortage of energy supply
Speaker 1: and demand, the price goes up. When the price of
Speaker 1: energy goes up, the price of everything goes up, which
Speaker 1: is inflationary. Do you see the irony here. They're trying
Speaker 1: to fight inflation by raising rates, but all they did
Speaker 1: was cause more inflation. It's sort of like you can't
Speaker 1: push a single button or a single lever in a
Speaker 1: complex system. Our human body, our world, our globe, our environment,
Speaker 1: our markets are what's called complex system. There's millions or
Speaker 1: billions or trillions of interconnected levers that all work off
Speaker 1: of each other. You can't just push on one without
Speaker 1: expecting tens or hundreds or thousands of other things happening,
Speaker 1: unintended consequences, as we call it. It's exactly why this
Speaker 1: whole climate change narrative is so idiotic and insane, as
Speaker 1: if you could control the entire world's environment with carbon apparently,
Speaker 1: now let's not even get into what carbon is good for,
Speaker 1: or I don't even want to get into the debate,
Speaker 1: but the insanity that you could control the most complex
Speaker 1: system in the entire world. I mean, it is the world,
Speaker 1: one that we know almost nothing about. And we can
Speaker 1: control the thermostat by controlling carbon. I mean, it's insane.
Speaker 1: I don't want to get into that confort, but this
Speaker 1: is basically, this is what the FED does. They can
Speaker 1: control the entire globe, the entire globe's economy and markets
Speaker 1: and investment cycles and business cycles with one lever interest rates.
Speaker 1: I mean, the insanity. So here we are to fight inflation.
Speaker 1: They've caused inflation, They've caused a banking collapse. Now they're
Speaker 1: causing an energy shortage. And my, what a world that
Speaker 1: we live in. I got more headlines to cover When
Speaker 1: I come back. I'm gonna take a very quick break
Speaker 1: and I'm gonna come back with a whole lot more.
Speaker 1: You don't want to miss it. It don't go away.
Speaker 1: I'll be right back, all right, Welcome back. If you're
Speaker 1: just tune in, you're listening to the Mark Moss Show.
Speaker 1: We're talking about, of course, each and every week, the
Speaker 1: decentralized Revolution. Like we always do, We're running through some
Speaker 1: of the latest breaking news headlines this week, and of
Speaker 1: course you know, as I say, we look at through
Speaker 1: the lens of politics, finance, and technology, and it's always
Speaker 1: technology that changes the world. And the technology that's changing
Speaker 1: the world more than anything right now has been Bitcoin
Speaker 1: and the decentralized ledger. Yes, AI is also really important
Speaker 1: and it will, it's just in its mfacy right now.
Speaker 1: I believe these open communication networks like nosters also, but
Speaker 1: really Bitcoin has been this driving force and it's been
Speaker 1: amazing to watch. And really it's really a battleground. It's
Speaker 1: really a battleground, which is insane to me, the battleground
Speaker 1: that's forming. You know, I saw this morning. I tweeted
Speaker 1: about it. The insanity of this is Elizabeth Warren. Elizabeth
Speaker 1: Warren put out she's all over the internet and on
Speaker 1: Twitter saying, quote here, Elizabeth Warren is building an anti
Speaker 1: crypto army. Warren for Senate. So she's running for Senate
Speaker 1: saying that she is going to build an anti crypto army.
Speaker 1: She is running on a campaign to say she wants
Speaker 1: to shut down cryptocurrency. Now, what is cryptocurrency. Cryptocurrency is
Speaker 1: a decentralized ledger. You've probably heard it called that blockchain.
Speaker 1: What is blockchain? Blockchain is a decentralized database. So instead
Speaker 1: of having one database, you have multiple databases that achieve consensus.
Speaker 1: It's like having a Google sheet that all of us
Speaker 1: can report onto on the Google sheet. So imagine running
Speaker 1: on a campaign saying that you want to ban Google sheets. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's that stupid. Like literally, it's a decentralized database that
Speaker 1: achieves consensus, and she's running her whole campaign on stopping that.
Speaker 1: Imagine running on a campaign in the nineties on I'm
Speaker 1: gonna shut down the Internet. I mean, it's just insanity.
Speaker 1: Especially as I tweeted out this, I said, basically, we
Speaker 1: have a high ranking leader of the United States, the
Speaker 1: quote Land of the Free, supposedly running on a campaign
Speaker 1: to take away your freedom and private property rights. Hmm,
Speaker 1: that's what she's running on. That's her campaign. Pretty insane.
Speaker 1: That's the problem with having these old people running politics.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry if you're old, but if you're somewhat realistic
Speaker 1: with yourself, you know that your kids probably technology better
Speaker 1: than you do. It's just the way it goes. Kids
Speaker 1: were born with it, you know, Like I've seen little kids.
Speaker 1: Remember even when my kids were little, they'd walk up
Speaker 1: to any TV or screen and just start thinking they
Speaker 1: could touch it and swipe on it. That's just what
Speaker 1: they know. And so old people just don't jump on
Speaker 1: they don't get technology as fast. It's just just I'm
Speaker 1: sorry if that offends you, just the way it is.
Speaker 1: So when we have all these eighty year olds in office,
Speaker 1: how oldes Elizabeth Warren Dan Google that for me. I
Speaker 1: don't know how she is, but I know Nancy Pelosi,
Speaker 1: I know Joe Biden. You know all these old seventy
Speaker 1: three okay, she's seventy three. Are these the ones that
Speaker 1: should be campaigning to shut down technology when we know
Speaker 1: it's technology that changes the world. We need to shut
Speaker 1: down a decentralized ledger? How dare you set up databases
Speaker 1: that can communicate with each other? I mean, how dare you?
Speaker 1: And that's not all we have probably one of the
Speaker 1: worst things that I've ever seen, called the restrict Act.
Speaker 1: They're calling it the TikTok Act. They want to shut
Speaker 1: down TikTok. Now I'm not a fan of TikTok. By
Speaker 1: the way, I do have a TikTok account. So if
Speaker 1: you're on TikTok, check it out. Mark Moss on TikTok.
Speaker 1: But I'm just gonna be honest with you. I don't
Speaker 1: use it. My team takes my content and chops it
Speaker 1: up and sticks it on there for me so we
Speaker 1: can reach that audience. I don't personally use it. My
Speaker 1: kids use it. I don't like them using it, but
Speaker 1: that's a whole nother story. I think TikTok is bad
Speaker 1: for any number of reasons. Specifically, most importantly, I think
Speaker 1: it destroys your focus. But so does Twitter, and so
Speaker 1: does Instagram. So from that standpoint, it's like eating junk food.
Speaker 1: It's not good for you, but we do it anyway.
Speaker 1: But supposedly TikTok is bad because it steals your data
Speaker 1: and gives it to the Chinese Communist Party, supposedly, and
Speaker 1: so now they want to create this restrict Act to
Speaker 1: fight back against TikTok. Supposedly they're gonna shut down TikTok. However,
Speaker 1: I dug into this and it is not what it seems.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, this is the most dangerous
Speaker 1: piece of legislation I have ever seen put forth through
Speaker 1: the United States. And that is not hyperbole. It is
Speaker 1: a trojan horse that will take away more freedoms with
Speaker 1: one swell fell swoop than anything I've ever seen before.
Speaker 1: I called it the Patriarch on Steroids, and I did
Speaker 1: a whole video on my YouTube channel breaking this down,
Speaker 1: what it says, why it's bad. If you want to
Speaker 1: check it out, go to my YouTube channel just search
Speaker 1: Mark Moss and watch that. But basically they're saying, like
Speaker 1: I said, that China is still in our data. Well,
Speaker 1: first of all, all the apps track our data, and
Speaker 1: all of that data is for sell to anybody, including China.
Speaker 1: Your data is already being collected by any of the
Speaker 1: number of thousands of apps you probably have on your
Speaker 1: phone right now, and it's already being sold to everybody.
Speaker 1: All your movement data, all that. I don't know if
Speaker 1: you guys saw what was that forget what It's called
Speaker 1: the something Mules, and it was about the election interference
Speaker 1: that happened, and they showed they got the data. They
Speaker 1: bought it. They bought the data for these different people's
Speaker 1: cell phones and they could see them moving around. All
Speaker 1: of that information is available already. Now. I don't like it.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying that's a good thing, but it's already
Speaker 1: for cell to anybody, including China. So to blame this
Speaker 1: as like China could get your data. They already have
Speaker 1: your data. It's a ridiculous. It's a ridiculous jojan horse
Speaker 1: that they're trying to call. But basically what they're trying
Speaker 1: to do like it is they want to make it
Speaker 1: where the government has one hundred percent power, and not
Speaker 1: just the government as in like the government we vote in,
Speaker 1: unelected leaders inside the government will have full authority and
Speaker 1: immunity to do whatever they want to you with no
Speaker 1: due process. They could say you violated this. There's no
Speaker 1: due process, which means that you would go to court
Speaker 1: and have a fair trial. You get none of that.
Speaker 1: You're automatically found guilty, you get imprisoned for twenty years,
Speaker 1: you're find a million dollars, and all of your property
Speaker 1: is taken away. All of it. Sounds like something you
Speaker 1: might here in like North Korea. So somebody that's not elected,
Speaker 1: just unilaterally could decide that you're a bad actor, could
Speaker 1: seize all your property, put you in prison for twenty years,
Speaker 1: find you a million dollars, and no due process. That's
Speaker 1: not America. Come on, that's not America. This is the
Speaker 1: most ridiculous bill that I've ever heard of. I don't
Speaker 1: want to say it's ridiculous, it's the most dangerous. And
Speaker 1: the reason why it's dangerous is because they reason why
Speaker 1: they want this is exactly what you think they want
Speaker 1: it for, to shut you up. As I've kind of said,
Speaker 1: if we're in a war of information, then the way
Speaker 1: that you win the war is by controlling the flow
Speaker 1: of information. As I've been talking about. Last week, I
Speaker 1: did a whole episode on these open monetary and open
Speaker 1: communication protocols. These are outside the hands of the government.
Speaker 1: They cannot be stopped. So since they can't shut them down,
Speaker 1: since they can't control them, since there's no longer you know,
Speaker 1: obviously with the Twitter files, we saw how the FBI
Speaker 1: and the Biden administration directly was telling Twitter what to censor. Well,
Speaker 1: as we moved to these decentralized protocol calls, they can't
Speaker 1: do that. There's no CEO to squeeze, there's no way
Speaker 1: to control it. So they pass a bill like this,
Speaker 1: which says, great, we can't control so here's what we're
Speaker 1: gonna do. If we catch you using it, We're gonna
Speaker 1: put you in prison for twenty years. We're gonna find
Speaker 1: you a million dollars and take away all your property.
Speaker 1: That's what we'll do since we can't control it. If
Speaker 1: we just catch you, we'll just kill you. How about that?
Speaker 1: How you like that? Well, I don't like it, which
Speaker 1: is why I don't live in North Korea. I don't
Speaker 1: like it, which is why I live in the United
Speaker 1: States of America. I mean, this can't stand. If you
Speaker 1: want full breakdown of this, go, like I said, go
Speaker 1: to my YouTube channel, Mark Moss and watch that video
Speaker 1: I just put up on that and you can understand
Speaker 1: there's some serious calls to action. It's time to stop
Speaker 1: being the silent majority. It's time to start being a
Speaker 1: noisy majority. And unfortunately, yes, you have to deal with
Speaker 1: the politics. Yes, you need to call your leaders, your politicians,
Speaker 1: your senators, your congressman, and you need to tell them
Speaker 1: that you vehemently oppose this. Not in the America that
Speaker 1: you live in, not the America that my father and
Speaker 1: my grandfather fought and shed blood and tears for. All Right,
Speaker 1: if you're just tuning and listen to the Mark mos
Speaker 1: show runs through some of the biggest news headlines of
Speaker 1: the week. I got a whole bunch more to cover
Speaker 1: when I come back. I gotta take a quick break
Speaker 1: and come back. Don't go away. We're back, all right,
Speaker 1: Welcome back. If you're just tune in, you're listening to
Speaker 1: the Mark Moas Show, talking about, of course, each and
Speaker 1: every week, the decentralized Revolution. Now breaking down some of
Speaker 1: the latest breaking news headlines this week that continue to
Speaker 1: help us prove that this thesis is coming true. Now.
Speaker 1: I made a lot of noise, potentially a lot of
Speaker 1: people that didn't like me when I started talking about
Speaker 1: after the FTX collapse happened, did a bunch of videos
Speaker 1: on that, and I made a case that there would
Speaker 1: not be another crypto bull run because of the regulations. Well,
Speaker 1: I said that there won't be another crypto bull run.
Speaker 1: I wasn't talking about bitcoin. Bitcoin is going to go parabolic.
Speaker 1: I'm talking about crypto and I said there won't be
Speaker 1: another crypto bull run. Of course, all these crypto advocates
Speaker 1: did not like that. They all want to challenge me.
Speaker 1: They wanted me to come on for debates on Twitter,
Speaker 1: which I did. I went on a bunch of shows.
Speaker 1: I talked about it a bunch And the reason why
Speaker 1: I said that was going to happen is because I
Speaker 1: said that the the SEC, whatever you want to call it,
Speaker 1: the CFTC, the government, the regulators, we're going to come
Speaker 1: out so hard and so heavy handed that they were
Speaker 1: going to try to shut this crypto industry down. And
Speaker 1: I said that was going to happen. People said, Mark,
Speaker 1: you don't understand. Even if that does happen, it's going
Speaker 1: to go overseas. The US is just going to force
Speaker 1: it overseas. The US will lose its place as a
Speaker 1: technology leader. I said, yes, it could go to overseas,
Speaker 1: but the US will still have jurisdiction even overseas. And
Speaker 1: if they go to some small little jurisdiction where the
Speaker 1: US doesn't, then no money can flow there. Okay, So
Speaker 1: that was my That was my crystal ball reading if
Speaker 1: you will. It turns out my crystal ball works pretty
Speaker 1: dang good. Yes, I have called lots of things. Two
Speaker 1: and a half years ago, I made a video saying
Speaker 1: warning an energy crisis coming the world. I talked about
Speaker 1: when the FED was saying inflation wasn't a problem. I
Speaker 1: talked about how inflation was going to be a big problem.
Speaker 1: I kind of called the bitcoin bottom on that. We'll
Speaker 1: see if that holds. And yes, I'm right about this
Speaker 1: again and we see it. So let's see, it's just
Speaker 1: going to go overseas, right, Well, you might be aware.
Speaker 1: If you're not, then you are. Now that Binance, which
Speaker 1: is the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the world, was bigger
Speaker 1: than FTX and it is not a US company. They
Speaker 1: do have Binance International, and then they have Binance US,
Speaker 1: which is a US division. Now Binance is under suit
Speaker 1: from the CFTC Communities Futures Exchange, but also potentially even
Speaker 1: from the Department of Justice. Now the reports are that
Speaker 1: Binance hit extensive links to China. Remember when Russia was
Speaker 1: the bad guy, Russia, Russia, Russia? Will they still now
Speaker 1: it's China, China, China again. So supposedly Binance hit extensive
Speaker 1: links to China for years. How dare they? Well, they
Speaker 1: were a foreign country, they're a foreign company. They're not
Speaker 1: an American company. It doesn't matter. The long arm of
Speaker 1: the United States government doesn't doesn't care about borders. They're
Speaker 1: coming after that, and they're saying that the Binance CEO
Speaker 1: Zoo sued they called him cz had willful evasion of
Speaker 1: US laws. He sold unregistered crypto derivative projects and so
Speaker 1: they're coming after him, not just trying to sue him
Speaker 1: into oblivion for violating commodities rules and laws. But like
Speaker 1: I said, even with criminal penalties, now there's some interesting
Speaker 1: pieces in here to talk about. I think coin base
Speaker 1: is chief legal officers said that there's a lot to
Speaker 1: unpack in this case. And some of this is like
Speaker 1: the SEC is the Securities Exchange Commission. Our cryptocurrency is
Speaker 1: considered securities. Well, apparently the CFTC, which handles commodities, thinks
Speaker 1: they're not securities, thinks they're commodities. So now we have
Speaker 1: the s CFTC, which pursues commodity infringements or whatever. The
Speaker 1: CFTC is making a case that these are commodities and
Speaker 1: we're going to come and to regulate you for that
Speaker 1: or we're going to punish you for that. But the
Speaker 1: SECS are here going wait a minute, wait a minute,
Speaker 1: but these are securities, and so we're gonna witness this
Speaker 1: playoffs should be pretty interesting. The sec and the CFTC
Speaker 1: are now go to government regulation. Regulatory body is going
Speaker 1: to try to fight each other for who has jurisdiction
Speaker 1: over this. But beyond that side show the important thing
Speaker 1: to think about here, is that to the point I made,
Speaker 1: and I'm correct, the US government, the regulators are going
Speaker 1: to come for Crypto and shut it down, and they're
Speaker 1: certainly trying to do that to everybody's argument to that, Oh,
Speaker 1: but they're just going to go overseas. Well, that's certainly
Speaker 1: not helping finance. Going overseas hasn't helped them one. As
Speaker 1: a matter of fact, it looks like it's actually penalizing
Speaker 1: them in the fact that, like I said, they're saying
Speaker 1: that now Binance has hit extensive links to China, so
Speaker 1: having the fact that they have ties into another country
Speaker 1: is actually working against them and not helping them. Interesting
Speaker 1: turn of events now I've been talking about. I made
Speaker 1: a video on my main YouTube channel, Mark Moss, talking
Speaker 1: about this choke point. Two point zero choke point. The
Speaker 1: original choke point was under the Obama administration, they weaponized
Speaker 1: the banking system. They weaponized the IRS against the oppositional
Speaker 1: political party at the time. It was against what they
Speaker 1: considered Tea Party which was conservative movements, lowest learners. The
Speaker 1: IRS was forced to step down in disgrace and admit
Speaker 1: that they had unfairly targeted political opposition, and they shut
Speaker 1: off access to banking to legal businesses, legally recognized businesses
Speaker 1: in the US, but they didn't matter. They still shut
Speaker 1: them down, and that was choke point. Now we have
Speaker 1: kind of this checkpoint two point zero choke point two.
Speaker 1: I know where it looks like they're starting to choke
Speaker 1: off access to cryptocurrencies. That's part of these banks that
Speaker 1: have been taken down. I talked about Silvergate Bank, then
Speaker 1: it was Silicon Valley Bank SPB, then it was a
Speaker 1: Signature bank, And what all three of those have in
Speaker 1: common is that they were all crypto friendly banks. So
Speaker 1: it looks like there's there's choke point two point er.
Speaker 1: They're trying to take down exchanges like Binance, they're trying
Speaker 1: to take down the banks that control them. They're coming
Speaker 1: after crypto yellot from the mountain top. But remember what
Speaker 1: I said, Crypto as a category may not see another
Speaker 1: will not see another bull run, but bitcoin will. So
Speaker 1: when I'm talking about choke point two point zero, when
Speaker 1: we're talking about Binance, we're talking about the banks being
Speaker 1: taken down. These are banks that we're dealing with crypto.
Speaker 1: This is Binance that's dealing with crypto. This is not
Speaker 1: affecting bitcoin. Bitcoin is not under attack. Companies that deal
Speaker 1: with only bitcoin, like swan Bitcoin that I use if
Speaker 1: you want to buy bitcoin, check them out. Swan Bitcoin,
Speaker 1: I think slash Mark and you can get ten dollars
Speaker 1: free your bitcoin if you use that unchained capital who
Speaker 1: I use for like my bitcoin security. These companies are
Speaker 1: not under attack. Even Gemini sent out an email saying, hey,
Speaker 1: we're not involved in any of these banks that are
Speaker 1: being taken down. Here's the list of banks that we use,
Speaker 1: and it's all top to your banks. It's not bitcoin
Speaker 1: that's under attack. It looks like it's crypto that's under attack,
Speaker 1: and crypto's under attack because they're trying to stop a
Speaker 1: lot of very very fraudent activity it's happening in there.
Speaker 1: I know a lot of people don't like me to
Speaker 1: say that. Like I said, I took a lot of
Speaker 1: heat for coming out and saying that. The unfortunate truth is,
Speaker 1: if you would just take off your blinders, the reality
Speaker 1: is that most of crypto is fraud and scam. Just
Speaker 1: the reality. It's unfortunate, and it's tainted this whole industry.
Speaker 1: It's even tainted bitcoin. But that's why people like myself
Speaker 1: are pretty pretty are pretty vocal about saying bitcoin not crypto,
Speaker 1: and we don't. We're not saying that bitcoin is not
Speaker 1: a cryptocurrency, which it is. But when we talk about bitcoin,
Speaker 1: bitcoin is different than all the other cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin is
Speaker 1: a commodity. There's no company, there's no head, there's no
Speaker 1: marketing department, there's no one there to do fraud. It's
Speaker 1: the piece of coat, it's the piece of protocol. If
Speaker 1: you want to run the protocol and you're on your computer,
Speaker 1: you can. If you don't, you don't. No big deal.
Speaker 1: It's not like any of these other tokens like Ethereum
Speaker 1: that constantly manipulates the supply, not only in how many
Speaker 1: they produced, their inflation numbers that have been changed I
Speaker 1: think three times in the last couple of years, but
Speaker 1: the amount of circulation by forcing people to lock them
Speaker 1: up and not giving them the coins back and all
Speaker 1: those things. But there's and that's not even the gross
Speaker 1: offender here. Lots of you hear about the rug bolls
Speaker 1: happening all the time, so there's a lot of fraud
Speaker 1: that happens there, and that looks like that to me.
Speaker 1: That's what the regulators are going for they're trying to
Speaker 1: shut down the fraud in crypto, and they don't seem
Speaker 1: to have a problem letting bitcoin run. As a matter
Speaker 1: of fact, the head of the SEC, Gary Gensler, has
Speaker 1: said many times bitcoin is a commodity, probably nothing else.
Speaker 1: The previous head of the SEC, J Clayton said the
Speaker 1: same thing. And so we'll continue to watch this, I'll
Speaker 1: continue to report on, I'll continue to develop it. Just
Speaker 1: know that if you have a lot of crypto, specifically
Speaker 1: on binance, you might want to think about what you're
Speaker 1: gonna do with that. Remember, not your keys, not your coins.
Speaker 1: Always pull your assets off the exchange. They are not banks.
Speaker 1: That is not yours, it's thoors. They owe it to you,
Speaker 1: but you may not get it back. If you're just
Speaker 1: tuning in listening to the Mark Mos Show, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: take a very quick break and I'll be back with
Speaker 1: more headlines in a second. Don't go away, I'll be
Speaker 1: right back, all right, Welcome back. If you're just tune in,
Speaker 1: you're listening to the Mark Mass Show. We're talking about
Speaker 1: the Decentralized Revolution, and we're running through the play by
Speaker 1: play the weekly headlines that show that this thesis is
Speaker 1: in full effect and it's happening faster than ever. You know.
Speaker 1: I talked about how we are in a war of information,
Speaker 1: and again, man, I can't I can't recommend him enough.
Speaker 1: Go back and watch the interview I did with doctor
Speaker 1: Robert Malone. Just go search on your podcast player. Just
Speaker 1: search the Markmas Show and you'll find the podcast with
Speaker 1: doctor Robert Malone. We talked about the fifth generation of warfare. Basically,
Speaker 1: we talked about how warfare has changed throughout the ages.
Speaker 1: The first stage was man on man, second stage was
Speaker 1: like organizing armies. The third stage was then like industrialized armies.
Speaker 1: This was aircraft carriers, ships, tanks, etc. Fourth generation of
Speaker 1: warfare really probably started in Vietnam, and it started with
Speaker 1: like guerrilla warfare, so little guerrilla wars would come out
Speaker 1: in attack and they had retreat and they'd kind of
Speaker 1: come from everywhere. It's hard to find. That then led
Speaker 1: into like terrorism as we know it. Terrorism is like
Speaker 1: a bunch of independent sales like the Taliban or ISIS
Speaker 1: or whatever, and it's He points out that since we've
Speaker 1: entered the fourth generation of warfare, like I said, since Vietnam,
Speaker 1: the United States has never won a war pretty interesting.
Speaker 1: You've seen Biden talking about, oh, you guys with your guns,
Speaker 1: how you're going to defend against an F sixteen. Well,
Speaker 1: it worked out pretty good for Afghanistan. They ran America
Speaker 1: out of their country, tell tuck between their legs. We
Speaker 1: had to abandon I think hundreds of Americans and eight billion,
Speaker 1: eight billion dollars of weapons we had to leave for
Speaker 1: them because we couldn't get it out, and they had
Speaker 1: pickup trucks and machine guns. So worked out pretty well
Speaker 1: for them. We haven't been able to beat that. And
Speaker 1: the reason why it's because you have all these decentralized
Speaker 1: cells that aren't being controlled by one leader. There's no
Speaker 1: head to cut off, the head of a snake. All
Speaker 1: these cells work independently with a shared ideology. But anyway, now,
Speaker 1: the fifth generation of warfare is one of information. It's
Speaker 1: a psychological warfare. And he talks about how in that
Speaker 1: fifth generation of warfare, you are in this war. You're
Speaker 1: under attack from everywhere all the time, but you don't
Speaker 1: know where the attacks coming from, you don't know why
Speaker 1: it's coming. And it's really it's a war of information.
Speaker 1: It's a propaganda, it's manipulation. But it's all fought over information,
Speaker 1: and so that's the battleground. That's why free speech is
Speaker 1: under attack. That's why you're constantly being pounded with misinformation
Speaker 1: and malinformation and disinformation. You're being constantly warned that that
Speaker 1: you're under attack from that, and that you need someone
Speaker 1: to protect you from that, and so of course the
Speaker 1: government should be the one to protect you from all
Speaker 1: that misinformation and malinformation. Of course, we continue to find
Speaker 1: out over and over and over and over that it's
Speaker 1: actually the government that's the one spreading the misinformation, malinformation, disinformation.
Speaker 1: We see it all the time, over and over and over.
Speaker 1: It's always the government that does it. But of course
Speaker 1: they're telling us that we can do it now. I
Speaker 1: talked about a little while ago talking about this restrict
Speaker 1: Act that's being put forth. As I said, it's probably
Speaker 1: the most dangerous, the most scary piece of legislation I've
Speaker 1: ever seen come out of the government. And that's saying
Speaker 1: a lot. The Patriot Act was probably the biggest one
Speaker 1: that we've ever seen that lost in most amount of freedom.
Speaker 1: This is the Patriarch time a thousand and they're they're
Speaker 1: using it in the guise of TikTok. All right, like
Speaker 1: I said've already kind of covered it. I'm not gonna
Speaker 1: go super deep into it. If you want to get
Speaker 1: a full detail of what's going on with that, check
Speaker 1: out my main YouTube channel, Mark Moss and check that out.
Speaker 1: But I want to just I want to kind of
Speaker 1: move on past that and show you that while that
Speaker 1: is the biggest and the most scary piece of legislation
Speaker 1: we have, it's part of a bigger initiative. It's part
Speaker 1: of the bigger war and again, this fifth generation of warfare,
Speaker 1: it's being waged on you. It's we the people versus
Speaker 1: these technocratic leaders that want to control us in some
Speaker 1: sort of you know, dystopian nightmare, technologically driven dystopian nightmare,
Speaker 1: what I call the battle for the fate of humanity.
Speaker 1: That's what's being waged. And so this is happening, and
Speaker 1: we see it, and it's and it's happening from every
Speaker 1: single angle one. They want to control the information anyway
Speaker 1: they can. Now one is by using something like this
Speaker 1: TikTok band. They call it that. The restrict Act, which
Speaker 1: is basically makes it where if you use any tools
Speaker 1: that they don't deem approved, you can go to prison,
Speaker 1: you know, for the rest of your life and lose
Speaker 1: everything basically. But we see that as being attacked from
Speaker 1: other angles as well. So you might remember I've talked
Speaker 1: about extensively here how Elon Musk released all the records,
Speaker 1: all the data, the emails, the text messages, et cetera,
Speaker 1: between the federal government, the Biden administration, and Twitter, and
Speaker 1: how the Biden administration, I believe maybe the FBI as well,
Speaker 1: we're basically coercing forcing Twitter to silence and take down
Speaker 1: accounts and tweets they didn't like to push the narrative
Speaker 1: up that they wanted to decrease the visibility of narratives
Speaker 1: they didn't want. And it's all. I suppose it's called
Speaker 1: the Twitter foles. Just go google it. Of course, news
Speaker 1: channels were media blackout. They don't want you to know this.
Speaker 1: Fox is probably the only one that talked about it
Speaker 1: other than smaller channels like myself. When I say smaller
Speaker 1: like myself, I think Joe Rogan's talked about this quite
Speaker 1: a bit, and he's way bigger than any of these channels.
Speaker 1: But what's interesting about it is Elon Musk gave these
Speaker 1: files to a couple of reporters that he knew would
Speaker 1: actually talk about it, that would actually push it out.
Speaker 1: Barry Weiss is one of them. Matt Taiebee was one
Speaker 1: of them. And of course the government didn't like that.
Speaker 1: They didn't like being exposed, and so they drummed, They
Speaker 1: dragged Matt Taiebee up, Michael Schallenberger up before a committee.
Speaker 1: You have to come to the government. You need to
Speaker 1: answer for this. How dare you expose our secrets? You
Speaker 1: better come answer for that. You need to tell us
Speaker 1: who gave you the information all these things. And of
Speaker 1: course reporters don't give up their sources. That's not that's
Speaker 1: not happens. And so as they're getting grilled there, as
Speaker 1: they're being you know, basically read the Riot Act for this.
Speaker 1: Interesting enough, while that was happening, just you know, coincidentally, coincidentally,
Speaker 1: the IRS decides to make a strange house call to
Speaker 1: Matt Taiebee. M Now, you know, the IRS doesn't just
Speaker 1: mysteriously just show up at people's houses. And I referenced
Speaker 1: earlier in a in an earlier segment about how choke
Speaker 1: point two point choke choke point one point the original
Speaker 1: one was the weaponization of the IRS against political enemies,
Speaker 1: but at that time it was against conservable It's always
Speaker 1: against conservative enemies. At the time, it was against the
Speaker 1: Tea Party specifically. And here we have the IRS specifically
Speaker 1: targeting out a journalist because it appears that he provoked
Speaker 1: the ire of Democrats by releasing information on the Twitter
Speaker 1: records that they didn't want, says. This effort has already
Speaker 1: inspired government bowling, with chair Lena Kahn's Federal Trade Commission
Speaker 1: targeting new Twitter owner Elon Musk and demanding the company
Speaker 1: quote idea entify all journalists. So the FTC is coming
Speaker 1: after Elon Musk and Twitter. How dare you give this information?
Speaker 1: We need to see all the journalists like, No, that's
Speaker 1: protected under our government. The reason why that's protected is
Speaker 1: because we, you and I are private citizens. Private citizens
Speaker 1: that means our lives are to be private. The government
Speaker 1: are public servants. That means they are representing the public.
Speaker 1: They are our servants for the public. Everything they do
Speaker 1: should be known and public. We as private citizens, should not.
Speaker 1: And so the reason why we have these laws and
Speaker 1: rules that protect journalists is so they can constantly tell
Speaker 1: us what's happening in the public sphere. So they can
Speaker 1: expose this, so we as private citizens can know this.
Speaker 1: But of course they don't want that through the Restrict Act.
Speaker 1: They want everything they do to be private. As a
Speaker 1: matter of fact, in the Restrict Act, what they can
Speaker 1: do unilaterally with no due process is protected. It can't
Speaker 1: even be exposed in a Freedom of Information Act in
Speaker 1: a four our request. But here they're demanding that they
Speaker 1: identify all this, and of course the battle raged on.
Speaker 1: It was pretty pretty good conversation with Matt Tiebe there.
Speaker 1: But then, yeah, like I said, now IRS just happens
Speaker 1: to show up at his house. What do you think
Speaker 1: the IRS one to hire eighty six thousand more agents
Speaker 1: for Do you think it was so they can answer
Speaker 1: the phone when you call, so you don't have to
Speaker 1: wait on line for three or four hours. No, it
Speaker 1: was so they could build their own private army so
Speaker 1: they can go out and harass people like Matt Taiebee,
Speaker 1: potentially people like me, and probably at one point even
Speaker 1: people like you. Because in a war of information, if
Speaker 1: you can't control the information and you don't have truth
Speaker 1: on your side, then you're gonna lose. So the only
Speaker 1: thing they have is they have a monopoly on violence
Speaker 1: and they ain't afraid to use it. If you just
Speaker 1: tune in and listening to the Mark Mass Show talking
Speaker 1: about the decentralized revolution, this world's breaking apart and we're
Speaker 1: giving you the play by play. Hopefully enjoyed that. Hit
Speaker 1: me up on social media at one Mark Moss let
Speaker 1: me know if you listen to it, and that's what
Speaker 1: I got. Thanks so much for listening to Day