WEBVTT - BI Weekend: Nvidia, Retail Earnings, Anthropic Investment 

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio, Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>with Scarletfoo and Paul Sweeney.

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 2>How do you think the FED is looking at tariffs?

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 2>The uncertainty of terriffs.

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's take a look at the sectors and how.

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 2>They performed a lot of investors getting whip saled every

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 2>day by news events.

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Could we see a market disruption of market events?

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 2>So people just too exuberant out there?

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 3>You see some so called low quality stocks driving this

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 3>short term rally.

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarletfoo and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>YouTube and Bloomberg Originals.

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 2>On today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 2>business story is impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Each and every week we provide in depth research and

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 3>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries are analysts covered worldwide.

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Today, we'll look at earnings reports from some of the

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 2>world's largest retailers.

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Plus look at why the Danish drug maker Novo Nordisk

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 3>will be further lowering the prices of its obesity drugs

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 3>for cash paying patients first.

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 2>We'll begin with earnings from chip Giant and Video.

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 3>This week, the company reported third quarter earnings that topped

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 3>analyst estimates, and Vidia also delivered a surprisingly strong revenue

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 3>forecast and pushback on the idea that the AI industry

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 3>is in a bubble.

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 2>For more, we were joined by Kunjohn Sabani, Bloomberg Intelligence

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Senior Semiconductor analyst. We first asked Kunjohn for his take

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 2>on in Vidia this week.

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 4>This was one of the more bullish earnings we have

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 4>seen from this name in a while, not just on

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 4>the numbers of the three Q four Q guide, which

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 4>they blew past even the loftiest Byside targets, but just

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 4>beyond that the long term the twenty six sort of

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 4>and going into twenty seven demands signals that they showed,

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 4>namely the half a trillion of the pipeline, which we

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 4>think now is a conservative number given the number of

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 4>deals they have announced. If supply keeps on coming up

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 4>as it has, and if their customers continue executing on

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 4>these bills without any missteps, we think their significant upside

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 4>to the current numbers.

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, just looking through the numbers, clearly a beaten Rais report,

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 3>but you know, the scale at which it can be

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 3>in race is impressive. Although within the third quarter numbers,

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 3>I did see that chips used in gaming PCs missed

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 3>analess estimates, and I know that that's a shrinking part

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 3>of the business, or at least it's not as big

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 3>a part of the business, given that the data center

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 3>is where the growth is really at. Are there any

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 3>flaws in this earnings report? Conjohn?

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 4>Not really? I mean, look, the gaming is becoming so

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 4>unimportant for analysts that the reliability of the predictability of

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 4>those numbers against which we are comparing the bet and

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 4>miss for gaming is no longer as reliable. So no

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 4>real flaws to really point out in this. We did

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 4>see their supply commitments go up quarter work quarter and

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 4>inventory is rising. I don't think that's a negative. While

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 4>it might seem on the face that's just them getting

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 4>up and getting ready for that next wave to supply

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 4>the chips in the next year.

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 2>So could John what's the latest and Gentin want about

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 2>how he've used China going forward?

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 4>Nothing has changed on the China side. They still don't

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 4>assume any revenues when it comes to data center AI

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.959
<v Speaker 4>China GPUs or the H twenty has been shipped into

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 4>They do have the clearance licenses so they could, but

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 4>it seems because of the geopolitical issues, China has basically

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 4>been shut down for American GPU providers or AC providers

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 4>to be able to ship in the country. There isn't,

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 4>to be honest, no demand. So it seems, you know,

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.519
<v Speaker 4>because of geopolitical issues, the customers in China are not

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 4>just reading and getting up to buy in media chips

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 4>right now.

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Jensenhang said that he from his vantage point, does not

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 3>see anything like an AI bubble. We see something very different,

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 3>and he says competitive pressures remain fairly low because this

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 3>is a company with more than ninety percent of the

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 3>market for those high end super fast AI chips. Who

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 3>is the closest competitor if there is one t Invidia.

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, in terms of the size of the markets, the

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 4>next closest competitor would be the AIA six chips, So

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 4>Broadcome is one of the biggest providers of AI six chips,

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 4>namely the TPU that Google uses. Another example would be

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 4>Amazon's Treanium chips, which are on different AI asic designers supply.

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.479
<v Speaker 4>So in terms of revenues, or units in terms of

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 4>the market that those are the next closest competitors within

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 4>Nvidia's realm, which it sells merchant gipus, AMD would be

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 4>the second closest competitor in that our Thanks.

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 3>To Kunjan Sabani, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior semiconductor analyst.

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 2>We continue in the tech space.

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 3>This week we heard that the tech giants Microsoft and

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Nvidia are committing to invest up to a combined fifteen

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars in the AI research and development company Anthropic.

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 2>We heard the investment will be part of anthropics next

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.919
<v Speaker 2>funding round. The companies also said Anthropic has committed to

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 2>purchase thirty billion dollars of computing capacity for Microsoft's Azure

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 2>cloud service.

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 3>So of course we had to enlist. Mandeep Singh, global

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 3>tech research head at Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 2>First asked man Deep to tell us a little more

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 2>about Anthropic and what it does well.

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 5>Anthropic is one of the five frontier lms that are remaining,

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 5>I mean, and they are leading the charge when it

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 5>comes to generative AI. So it's one of the five.

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 5>The other one are Google, Open Ai, Meta and XAI.

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 5>And so look, when it comes to these commitments, it's

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 5>pretty obvious that open Ai has raised the bar by

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 5>announcing they're going to spend one point four trillion. So

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 5>the question is what are the other LLM companies going

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 5>to do? And Entropic is also a pure play LLLM,

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 5>and in their case, they don't have the funding. I mean,

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 5>they don't have the balance sheet like Google or Meta have,

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 5>so they have to raise the money either in the

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 5>private markets or from someone like Nvidia, or get into

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 5>an agreement with Microsoft, which also has an agreement with

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 5>open Ai. So that's where you know. Llms need compute.

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 5>That's how you serve billion plus users, and that's where

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 5>you know the numbers get bigger and bigger when it

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 5>comes to the tie ups with cloud provider.

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 3>This is like the popular click in high school, where

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 3>everyone knows each other and everyone's messing around with each other.

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 3>Just give us a little bit of background here on Anthropic,

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 3>because my understanding is that it was founded by folks

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 3>who used to work at open Ai and some of

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 3>the early investors like big stakeholders include Alphabet and include

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Amazon and now you've got Microsoft in there. I mean,

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 3>is there anyone who's not part of Anthropic and not

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 3>committed to investing in this company.

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 5>Well, you could say Meta, they're doing things.

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 3>They're doing their own thing.

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 5>They are doing their own thing in terms of, you know,

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 5>using the computer internally, and they don't have a cloud business.

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 3>Is that a problem for them that Meta's out there

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 3>on its own I know, it doesn't have its own

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 3>cloud business, but it's not buying stakes or committed to

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 3>invest up to five billion or ten billion in any

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 3>of these AI companies.

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean so far, just to go to Meta, it

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 5>feels like, you know, investors were okay with them using

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 5>the GPU compute for their own family of apps. But

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 5>the fact that they're talking about one hundred billion plus

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 5>in capex for next year without having a substantial ROI

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 5>and what I mean by rois in the case of Microsoft,

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 5>yes they're raising their CAPEX two hundred and twenty billion,

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 5>but they're winning deals like the one with Nthropic thirty

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 5>billion dollar in commitment from Entropic, so somebody is paying

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 5>for that compute. In the case of Microsoft, you don't

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 5>have that with a Meta. How are you generating ROI

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 5>outside of your family of apps? And over there you

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 5>have to show a really substantial increase in engagement to

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 5>convince investors it's worth hundred billion plus in capex.

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Any of these open aies anthropics, are they going to

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 2>ever come public? Do you think?

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 5>I mean, in the case of Entropic, look, I know

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 5>the numbers are getting big, but their gross margins at

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 5>this point are probably better than open AI, which is

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 5>doing too much any things. I mean, the biggest risk

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 5>I see for Opening Eyes they feel they can get

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 5>into any business, whether it's chip business, whether it's you know,

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 5>obviously LLLM is their turf, any type of applications, and

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 5>that's where there's a possibility of a misstep. You can

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 5>end up wasting time because you just don't have, uh,

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, the capability. Yeah, the focus Entropic is more.

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Focused our thanks Toman deep saying, global tech research head

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 3>at Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 2>We move next to some earnings from some of the

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 2>world's largest retailers.

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>This week.

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Target posted a drop in third quarter sales due to

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:38.319
<v Speaker 3>intense competition and a weakening economy, with shoppers pulling back

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 3>on apparel and home goods.

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Separately, Walmart reported third quarter earnings that beat analysts expectations.

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 2>The retailer also increased its outlook for sales in the

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.959
<v Speaker 2>full year. It's a sign Walmart is winning over priced

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 2>sensitive shoppers while digesting costs it expects to rise in

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 2>the coming months.

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 3>For more, we were joined by Jennifer bartashis Bloomberg Intelligence

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 3>senior analysts covering retail staples and packaged foods.

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 2>First test jenf for her take on the most recent

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 2>results at Walmart.

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 6>You know, Walmart had another good quarter, and I think

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 6>that it's very easy to attribute a lot of their

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 6>success to just the value seeking behavior of consumers in

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 6>this environment. But I think that would also be overlooking

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 6>a lot of the investments they've made in things like

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 6>convenience that is really spurring the e commerce growth. And

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 6>that was really a notable takeaway.

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that e commerce aspect helps draw on higher income shoppers,

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 3>so it's a larger pool of customers at Walmart now

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 3>has access to and in our Bloomberg News reporting we

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:33.959
<v Speaker 3>indicate that the digital offerings now include luxury items like

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:37.079
<v Speaker 3>pre owned Chanel bags. I had no idea that that

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of stuff was available on walmart dot com.

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, Walmart has done a lot to really

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 6>expand its marketplace, and that includes bringing in items that

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 6>you know, will appeal to that higher income consumer, you know,

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 6>And the tactic behind all of this is that the

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 6>more people are integrated with e commerce in going to stores,

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 6>they become sticky and they become loyal customers, so that

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 6>when the macre can comic backdrop fades, it really increases

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 6>Walmart's ability to hang onto these customers going forward, and

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 6>that just drives future growth. So it's a really interesting

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 6>play out of how they're applying that tactic.

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Jen, I also want to get your take on Walmart transferring.

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 3>It's listing to the NASAC that's going to happen on

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 3>December ninth, and that of course is to reflect as

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 3>focus on being a tech forward company. But I'm wondering,

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, how much of this is really just about

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 3>being included in the Nazak one hundred and therefore the

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.559
<v Speaker 3>qqq etl Oh.

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, there's certainly part of that scarlet where you know,

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 6>that's that's probably part of the motivation. I think that

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 6>there is. You know, obviously there's a perception with regards

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 6>to being perceived more as a tech company, which Walmart

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 6>in all truthfulness, has evolved into a tech company, especially

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 6>amongst other retailers. By being listed at NASDAK, you know,

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 6>long term, maybe it helps their valuation, you know, just

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 6>in terms of having that perception of being more you know,

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 6>aligned with peers. You know, Amazon listed on Nasdaq, things

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 6>like that. So I think that there's a lot of

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 6>those components together combined, are really behind the move.

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Jen nobody arguably has a better finger on the pulse

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 2>of the consumer than Walmart. What are they saying these days?

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 6>Actually, they seem relatively optimistic. You know, they talk about

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 6>you know, spending, holding study for kind of that middle

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 6>income consumer, high end consumer seemed to be spending pretty freely,

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 6>a little bit of concern about some of the lower

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 6>end consumer, but it does seem to be sort of

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 6>evening out. And so when they were looking forward to

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 6>the holiday season, which is you know, the most important

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 6>thing with regards to the retailers that I cover, they

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 6>seem cautiously optimistic that there will be a pretty good

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 6>holiday season this year. We do think that they're going

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 6>to people will prioritize spending on kids. That's usually what

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 6>happens first if they're holding back in other parts of

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 6>their budget. But all indicators right now seem that we're

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 6>headed towards a reasonably solid holiday season.

0:11:56.840 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Are thanks to Jennifer Bartash's Bloomberg Intelligence senior analysts covering retail,

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 3>staples and packaged food. Coming up, we'll take a look

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 3>at why the global payments services provider Klarna reported record

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 3>revenue in its first quarter since going public.

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries.

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:17.559
<v Speaker 3>You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via Bigo on the terminal.

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm Scarlet Foo and.

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm Paul Sweeney, and this is Bloomberg.

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarlet Foo and Paul Sweeney

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio.

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 2>We move next to earnings from some of the world's

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:35.319
<v Speaker 2>largest home improvement retailers.

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 3>This week, Low's reported third quarter profit that topped analyst estimates.

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 3>This was a result of online sales and demand from

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 3>professional contractors.

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Separately, we heard from Home Depot, who cut its full

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 2>of your guidance. This come as a company warned that

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 2>some unsteady consumers are hitting the pause button on big

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 2>ticket home purchases.

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.319
<v Speaker 3>So we spoke with Drew Redding Bloomberg Intelligence US home

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:54.559
<v Speaker 3>building analyst.

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:56.559
<v Speaker 2>We first Saske Drew to break down this week's results

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 2>from Low's and how they compare it to Home Depots.

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 7>So, I think Loew's result could be best characterized as

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 7>better than feared, particularly in light of what we heard

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 7>from Home Depot. They did fall short of consensus estimates

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 7>on same store sales, but I think the buy side

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 7>was probably looking for something flat to lower, so a

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 7>little bit better than they were looking for. Now that

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 7>being said, they did trim their four year outlook. Now

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 7>they're looking for four year comp sales to be flat

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 7>from flat to up one percent, So that would imply

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 7>that four Q is relatively flat. But you know, similar

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 7>to what we heard from Home Depot, they had about

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 7>one hundred basis point impact from hurricane activity that was

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 7>not replicated this year. So again, if you were to

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 7>back that out, it looks like the underlying trends in

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 7>the business are pretty stable.

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 7>That being said, they're still grappling with the same consumer

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 7>uncertainty and you know, the same weak housing market that

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 7>their competitors, so you know, still challenges out there in

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 7>the market.

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Drew, I think I understand it. Correctly that Lows has

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 2>a lower percentage of sales to professional contractors than does

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Home Depot If so, are they trying to narrow the gap?

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Are they targeting that segment a little more?

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, great question. So Low's is about thirty percent professional

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 7>contractors seventy percent DIY. Home Depot is about fifty to

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 7>fifty maybe even a little bit higher on the pro front.

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 7>What's interesting, and to your point on investment, is the

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 7>pro space, especially in building products distribution, has really become

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 7>a battleground among home improvement retailers. You had Home Depot

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 7>recently do acquisitions for srs and gms, and then you

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 7>have Lows who recently acquired foundation building materials, So it's

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 7>certainly an area where they're making a concerted effort to grow. Now.

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 7>Lows has historically focused on the small and medium sized

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 7>pro and what this acquisition does is it gives them

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 7>exposure to larger pros who do more complex projects, so

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 7>they're able to be the supplier of choice across more

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 7>building product categories and at a larger scale.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 3>So basically directly competing with Home DEEPO in many ways.

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 3>Is this going to become a duopoly or are there's

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 3>still a lot of other places that professional contractors can

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 3>go to.

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so the building products distribution space is still very

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 7>highly fragmented, you know, I wouldn't be surprised to see

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 7>further consolidation within the industry, you know, across different categories.

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 7>Home Depot and Lows are certainly, you know, two of

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 7>the behemoths in the industry who have, you know, the

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 7>scale and financial flexibility to further consolidate the industry. But

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 7>there's some other players as well, like QXO. So it

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 7>is a mented industry, but I would expect, you know,

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 7>in the coming years, it's something that continues to get consolidated.

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 2>I can't keep track of where all the tariffs are

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 2>these days on all the different products, but I'm just

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 2>guessing if I'm a Low's or Home Depot, my plywood

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 2>from Canada that's probably being tariff A power tool from

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 2>somewhere in Asia that's probably subject to tariff's. How are

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 2>these companies dealing with it? What have they been telling

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 2>you guys?

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 7>So, Lows gets about sixty percent of its products from

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 7>the US, so their exposure internationally is maybe not as

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 7>high as you would expect. China's probably around fifteen to

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 7>twenty percent. You know, there hasn't been a whole lot

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 7>of talk. I think we have seen their average ticket

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 7>increase this quarter was up about three percent, and part

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 7>of that is in response to tariff related price increases.

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 7>Loose told us that they were only modest increases, and

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 7>you know, they'll take a portfolio approach to how they

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 7>increase prices. They'll look at their product line up and

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 7>see where they have more elasticity. But I think the

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 7>impact of costs will start to come in a little

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 7>greater as we look into Q four in early twenty

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 7>twenty six. And you know some of the areas that

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 7>we're looking at. You mentioned plywood so lumber tariffs from Canada.

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 7>We also had the implementation of tariffs on cabinetry both

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 7>the kitchen and bath, which to go up to fifty

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 7>percent in January. So I do think that the impact

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 7>gets a little greater as we look at the next year.

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 7>So I would expect further price increases from both retailers.

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 3>Are Thanks to Drew Reading Bloomberg Intelligence, US home building analyst.

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 2>We've moved to third quarter earnings from the global payment

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 2>services provider Klina this week.

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 3>Kliner reported record revenue that beat analysts estimates on Wall Street.

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 3>The firm also set aside more provisions for credit losses

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 3>in its first set of earnings since going public.

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 2>For more, I was joined by Anthony Hughes, Bloomberg Equity

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Capital Markets reporter. I first asked Anthony to talk to

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 2>us about Cliner's most recent results.

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, Well, klan is a company that's actually been around

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 8>for about two decades. It's just that since about twenty

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:28.640
<v Speaker 8>and nineteen they've really expanded quickly in.

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:29.880
<v Speaker 2>The US and by now.

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 8>Pay Later is a lending slash payments product which basically

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 8>allows people to buy products and obviously pay for them

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 8>over time. And this is an alternative to the credit

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 8>card in a credit card option. So really a lot

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 8>of Klana's growth really reflects the fact that this product's

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 8>becoming more popular relative to credit cards and for a

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 8>lot of consumers, it's a good way to manage your

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 8>cash flow and you know, obviously buy a product and

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 8>not have to pay for over time, and that suits

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 8>a lot of people, and it is a fast growing

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:02.199
<v Speaker 8>part of the fintech or say consumer lending space.

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 2>And as a consumer, how does Clorina make money on

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 2>my one hundred dollars purchase that they put on their system. Yeah,

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:12.640
<v Speaker 2>well they trudge me interest.

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 8>No, well, this number of different products that some of

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 8>the longer term lending products do have interests associated with them.

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 8>But that paying for product they talk about, which is

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 8>paying in four installments over a few months, that is

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 8>an interest free product. And really the source of revenue

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 8>in this in that instance is from the merchant, and

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 8>merchants pay merchant service fee. It's high for them, it's

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 8>higher than they pay on a credit card transaction. But

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 8>basically they see the benefit of Klana bringing in extra

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 8>customers so they can sell more product. And you know,

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 8>people will ask themselves, well, who actually pays the merchant

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 8>service fee? While the merchant does pay that to Klana,

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 8>but the merchant does incorporate that as a cost of

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 8>doing business into the products that these sells to you

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 8>and I. So we in the sense we all pay

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 8>for the fees that are hidden within the payment system

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 8>and really merchants passed on to the consumer depending on

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 8>how you pay the interesting you pay for.

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:09.679
<v Speaker 2>Your who's a typical Klarner consumer out there? Like what

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 2>what's and what's kind of a typical transaction for a

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 2>buy nine.

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well, these are mainly small transactions of you know,

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 8>can be a few hundred dollars or you know, not

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 8>not not large transactions. And and you know, this obviously

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 8>suits a younger audience, and that's where a lot of

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 8>the you know, a lot of their customer bases come from.

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 8>But they've built a large business which globally has something

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 8>like one hundred and ten billion of what they call

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 8>gross merchandise volume, and that's you know, it's a fast

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 8>growing business in the US. It's been growing pretty fast

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 8>for them, forty fifty percent in this recent quarter. And

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:45.159
<v Speaker 8>obviously there's a couple of other companies that are in

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 8>this area as well, so it's a competitive area as well,

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.679
<v Speaker 8>with a firm which is another company went public perhaps

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 8>about five years ago.

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 3>That was Anthony Hughes, Bloomberg Equity Capital Markets Reporter.

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 2>We moved to some news in the biotech space this week.

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 3>We heard that the Danish drug maker Novo Nordesk will

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 3>be further lowering the prices of its obesity drugs for

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:03.120
<v Speaker 3>cash paying patients.

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 2>It's in an effort to call back a larger share

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 2>of the US market from arch rival Eli Lilly. Nova

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 2>said introductory doses of its blockbuster drugs we Govi and

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 2>ozembic will be available for one hundred and ninety nine

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 2>dollars a month.

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 3>That price applies to the first two months of treatment.

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 3>After that, Nova will offer the drugs through its Novocare

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 3>direct to consumer portal for three hundred and forty nine

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 3>dollars a month, that is thirty percent less than the

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 3>current self pay price.

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 2>For more, we were joined by Michael Shaw, Bloomberg Intelligence

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Senior pharma biotech analyst. Well first asked Michael to break

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 2>down what exactly Nova nord Disk is doing.

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 9>And this is obviously ahead of the White House tales.

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 9>So you're seeing starting dice is being reduced two hundred

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 9>dollars per month and then doses thereafter being charged at

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 9>an average of three hundred and fifty dollars per month

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 9>compared to five hundred dollars previously. So, I mean, you know,

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 9>those prices kind of align to, you know, the pricing

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 9>in the White House statement coming from Trump RX, but

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 9>compared to Lily, I mean they're under cutting them by

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 9>about you know, hundred dollars at each dose. And this

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 9>is basically a ployed to basically compete for new patient starts.

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 9>As we know, Lee's got the more effective product in

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 9>terms of weight loss profile, and they're also you know,

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 9>executing better on the launchers. And I think that's clear

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 9>from three Q results where we saw contrasting fortunes between

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 9>those two particular drug makers.

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Mikey, give us a sense of this marketplace here, what

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 2>percentage of the addressable market is actually taking these obesity

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 2>drugs versus because it seems like as the price comes down,

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 2>more and more people will be able to get access

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 2>to them.

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 9>Yeah. Absolutely, I mean it's a highly priced sensitive market.

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 9>When we look at penetration rates in the US, you know,

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 9>low single digits, that's obviously going to accelerate as these

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 9>drugs become cheaper. Looking outside the US, penetration rates are

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 9>even lower, So there's you know, still significant kind of

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 9>you know patient runway out there in terms of US penetration.

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 9>I mean, the White House pricing deal on GLP one drugs,

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 9>you know, supports kind of use of these these GLP

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 9>one drugs in medicare you know there we think that

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 9>it can unlock you know, seven to eight million patients

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 9>according to a White House statement. I think they said

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 9>ten percent of Medicare beneficiaries would become eligible for GP

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 9>one drugs based on the pilot program, and that's going

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 9>to be introduced in twenty six, and I think it's

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 9>going to become mandatory in twenty seven. And then they've

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 9>also you know, loaded the price in Medicaid too. I

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 9>think the uplift in terms of patients there is a

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 9>bit harder to deduce or to kind of model, given

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 9>that you know, coverage is going to be on a

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 9>state by state basis, and there's also kind of different

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:41.880
<v Speaker 9>qualifying criteria, which again is state dependent.

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 3>What does this mean, Michael? For the companies like Hymns

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 3>and Hers, the companies that make compounded copycat versions of

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 3>these anti obesity drugs, they've done very well. And I

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 3>know those stock for Hymns and Hers has been kind

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 3>of all over the place, but it is modestly higher

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:58.160
<v Speaker 3>from where it was at the start of the year.

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean I think that whole well, you know,

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 9>the compounding situation. I believe that you know, one point

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 9>two million patients from compounding GLP one at the moment.

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 9>That's based on kind of comments and Novo made during

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:13.120
<v Speaker 9>their three key results obviously loaning down the price. Would

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 9>kind of of the branded treatments would basically well, I

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 9>mean it would it would you know, lessen the delta

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 9>between you know, coffycats and branded treatment. So I guess

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 9>it's a negative for for for these you know, compounded

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 9>GLP one drug makers.

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 4>Mikey.

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 2>When I look at the big cap farm of names,

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 2>is it as simple as I want to own the

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 2>ones with exposure to obesity market and not own the

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 2>ones that don't. Because I'm looking at your your slate

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 2>of stocks and you either up thirty percent or you're down.

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean I think you know, there's a there's

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 9>a few large farmer names which which has entered the space.

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 9>You know, in the in the recent years you've seen

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 9>kind of deals with Ross and Zealand for an Amlin drug.

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 9>Most recently you've obviously got the fires and met Sarah

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 9>an a deal. I mean, I think obesity is obviously

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 9>appealing given you know the size of the target population,

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:09.360
<v Speaker 9>how underpenetrated it currently is, and you know, if you're

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 9>looking to you know, offset patent expirations later in the decade,

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 9>you know there's an abundance of of kind of Jill

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 9>point on products out there as well as other assets too.

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 9>So I think that's the appeal of the space. It's

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 9>a large market, it's underpenetrated, and there's high demand for

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 9>these treatments too.

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned M and A, And of course we know

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 3>that JANJ is making a purchase to increase its pipeline

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 3>to get away from relying on these older drugs that

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 3>have lost patent protection. Is every farmer company doing the

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 3>same thing. Is that you know they're not only strategy,

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:44.959
<v Speaker 3>but is that the way they move forward? Is there

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 3>anyone who's kind of like in a good position and

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 3>doesn't need to make a deal.

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I think that's always been part of the

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 9>large farmer model. They supplement kind of in house innovation

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 9>with extern of innovation, particularly if they want to get

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 9>into areas perhaps outside of their cool competency. But I mean,

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 9>I think that's just that the model in general. Biotechs

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 9>always been the pipeline for large farmer companies, or at

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 9>least help Bell cault that pipeline.

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Our thanks to Michael shop Bloomberg Intelligence senior pharma biotech

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 3>analyst coming up a look at why the global sports

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.400
<v Speaker 3>company a Maorsports raised it's full your guidance.

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries.

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 3>You can access Bloomberg Intelligence through Bigo on the terminal.

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm Scarlett Foe.

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Paul Sweeney, and this is Bloomberg.

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarlett Foo and Paul Sweeney

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio.

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 2>We move next to earnings from the department store TJX.

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 3>The off price retailer reported third quarter sales that beat

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 3>analyst estimates. It also raised its guidance for comparable sales

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 3>this year.

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 2>It's a sign that your shoppers are turning to cheaper

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 2>options as economy shows signs of d for more. We

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 2>were joined by Mary Ross, Gilbert, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Equity Analyst.

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 3>We began by asking Mary for her take on this

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 3>week's results and whether she is a fan of TJX.

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 10>I'm a fan too, and they it's because they carry

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 10>such a variety of brands and it appeals to all

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 10>income groups. So if you have a luxury consumer, you

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 10>can get Balanciaga you can get Chloe low. So they

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 10>carry all of the brands. And then if you're more

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 10>oppressed and you're really a valued consumer, they have Steve Madden,

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:35.400
<v Speaker 10>they have Theory, so they really they have Puma, they

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 10>have Nike, Adidas, so they have all the brands that

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 10>consumer want and that's why they're Marmax, which is tj

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 10>max and Marshall's division, reported a comp sales increase of

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 10>six percent, and that's why. You know, if you look

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:53.399
<v Speaker 10>at the overall results, they were up five percent, so

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 10>a lot of strength there within the Marmas home goods

0:26:56.880 --> 0:27:01.640
<v Speaker 10>and of course Canada. Canada was up eight So we're

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 10>seeing consumers flock to get the brands that they want

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 10>and they've had some amazing buying opportunities, so their margins

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 10>were higher.

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 3>So the way that TJX stocks at stores is that

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:19.880
<v Speaker 3>they get inventory that hasn't sold at full price stores.

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:23.360
<v Speaker 3>But if all these merchants, all these retailers are managing

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 3>their inventories better and don't have a lot of excess inventory,

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 3>where does tj X get its inventory. I mean it

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 3>has to have another option, right.

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Scarlett, you raise a good question, But the fact

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 10>is is that some of the retailers, but also the

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 10>brands themselves. So if you think of for example, PVH,

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 10>which has the Tommy Hill Figure and Calvin Klein brands,

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 10>we see those brands pretty prevalent throughout off price. So

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 10>that's been a good channel for them to sort of

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 10>release some of that excess inventory, and when they work

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 10>with some of their wholesale partners, including the department stores,

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 10>So were you have product that's not selling off price

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 10>is just a natural fit to be able to release

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 10>that inventory. So you want to keep your inventory fresh

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 10>in the stores, especially when you're a full price operator,

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:16.719
<v Speaker 10>and there hasn't been any slow down in terms of

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 10>that excess inventory. And that's why even on the luxury side,

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 10>where typically you wouldn't think you'd find markdowns, it's been

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 10>pretty prevalent, especially with overall weakness and luxury.

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:32.919
<v Speaker 2>So what does the folks at Cheak, TJ Max, what

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 2>are they saying about the consumer these days?

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 10>Well, the consumer, I mean they're really seeing strength. So

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 10>it's interesting because when you sort of read the take

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 10>on Target with their results and they sort of cited

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 10>you know, the consumer is very cautious, but that caution

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 10>I think what's really going on is that they've got

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 10>the brands that consumers want. So those that are executing

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 10>are the ones that are getting the sales, because even

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 10>some retailers that are more full price oriented are generating

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 10>sales or they may be promotional, so the consumer is

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 10>flocking to value, There's no doubt about it. But we

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 10>do see some you know operators. You've got Ralph Lauren

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 10>on the luxury side. They continue to outperform and their

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 10>sales are always topping expectations too. And consumers there are

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 10>willing to pay full price, so there are a lot

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 10>less promotional every year. They seem to be less promotional

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 10>for that reason, they're able to sell at full price.

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 3>So clearly TJX has a strategy that works well given

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 3>the current environment, and even when the economy is doing well,

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 3>I would argue it has a strategy that works well.

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 3>At what point do investors want more from the company

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 3>than just executing on the strategy? Well, they want I

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 3>don't know, am an age or do they want consolidation?

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Do they want innovation from TJX?

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Well, so that's the reason why TGX is focused,

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 10>you know, internationally, so they're going to be entering Spain

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 10>in twenty twenty six, so coming next year. And of

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 10>course they've had some They have two joint venture investments,

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 10>one in Mexico and then one in the Middle East,

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 10>and they're both off price retailers that they've invested in,

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 10>So they're basically taking their talent and providing them a

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 10>platform to leverage their talent in these joint ventures and

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 10>to grow that way. So they're always looking for ways.

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 10>Because Scarlett, you bring up a good point. TJX trades

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 10>at a pretty high premium in the off price space,

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 10>and generally it's a pretty big premium that is due

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 10>to their very consistent execution. But you're right, consumers keep wondering, well,

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 10>how can they keep growing on top of all this growth,

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 10>and yet they keep doing it. But as they talk about, look,

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 10>they have drops several times a week. There's not a

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 10>lot of retailers that offer fresh merchandise several times a week,

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 10>and they curate the merchandise by location, so they're very

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 10>cognizant of the demographics for each location.

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Mary Ross Gilt at Bloomberg Intelligence, senior ecody analysts.

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 3>We moved next to news from the Global sports company

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 3>a mere Sports.

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 2>This week, the company raised it's for your guidance for

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 2>the third time this year. That's after a strong demand

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 2>for its Solomon footwear drove quarterly sales to a record.

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Sales growth at the group's other two units, including the

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 3>technical apparel segment and the ball and Racket sports unit,

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 3>also surpassed estimates, and overall group sales they hit a

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 3>new high.

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 2>For more, we were joined by Abigail gil Martin Bloomberg

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence at leisure and footwear analysts on amer sports earnings,

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 2>the first to as Abigail to break down amer sports

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 2>most recent earnings report.

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 11>They did really well, you know, sales up thirty percent,

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 11>broad based strength across regions, across channels, and across brands.

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 11>I think the key thing people are looking for was China.

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 11>Arctics recently had some controversy in China with fireworks display

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 11>in the Himalayas that what fireworks display.

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Displayed fireworks in the Himalayans.

0:31:55.720 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 11>Arctics for set off fireworks exactly. It was definitely a

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 11>misstep for an outdoor brand that's really focused on sustainability,

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 11>and there was definitely some concern that there would be

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 11>a little backlash in China. There's definitely a lot of

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 11>people upset about it, and they were fined by the

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 11>Chinese government and working to restore the ecology there. But

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 11>Greater China was up forty seven percent, momentum is continuing

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 11>into four Q so I think that was really a

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 11>big takeaway, just quelling investors' concerns about potential backlash in China,

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 11>especially because they're the number one outdoor sports brand in China.

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 3>Arctereric So, I had no idea that they have such

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 3>strong brands. I mean, a Mare Sports on its own

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 3>is kind of it doesn't it's not memorable the name,

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 3>the parent company name, right, but the brands of course

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 3>are Solomon, Arctic, so Wilson. As you mentioned, what does

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 3>the tariff picture look like for this company.

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think it's very similar to most of the

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 11>other companies. I think for them, what benefits them as

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 11>their premium positioning. They're able to raise prices and they're

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 11>not seeing any from consumers or pullback. They're still seeing

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 11>very strong full price sell through, so they're able to

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 11>offset some of those tariff costs with that, which I

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 11>think is really helping. And we're seeing that with a

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 11>lot of more of the premium brands are able to

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 11>kind of navigate through the tariffs since their consumers are

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 11>willing to pay upper KU, upper.

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 3>K of the K shaped economy.

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 2>I guess I know that's I guess where you want

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 2>to be there. Talk to us about the footwear market here.

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 2>I think you know, Nike, Adidas, all that kind of stuff.

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 2>What's going on there?

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think you know, we're in store for a

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 11>very interesting holiday season. I think that we're going to

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 11>continue to see the premium brands continue to do well

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 11>on holdings. Recently just reported and did phenomenal, and they

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 11>also said they're not seeing any backlash on raised prices

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 11>and they'll continue to do you know, limited discounting through

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 11>the holidays. So we may see some differences between the

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 11>two companies, but we just had our recent BI survey

0:33:56.560 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 11>and Nike continues to let I think there's been concerns overnight,

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 11>but they still are the major shareholder and still a

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 11>favorite brand of millennials. Gen Z's everyone for the holidays,

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 11>so they should continue to do well too.

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 3>What is the maorsports distribution strategy? Do they have a

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 3>DTC offering or are they going through third party retailers.

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:17.280
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, that's a great question. So it's a little different

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 11>for each brand. For Arctics, they're leaning a lot more

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 11>into DTC. They've changed their distribution strategy from basically nine

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 11>eighty percent wholesale to eighty percent DTC over the last

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 11>three years, and they're really focusing on growing their store

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 11>base because I think not a lot of people know

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 11>about Arctics. It's really going to help the brand awareness.

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:39.799
<v Speaker 11>So even in the US, they're looking to double their

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 11>store account by twenty thirty so that through Solomon continues

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 11>to be wholesale, especially for footwear, we're seeing this holiday

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 11>season consumers strap for cash.

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 5>They're wanting to.

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 11>Go into the stores and try on their shoes and

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:56.839
<v Speaker 11>make sure it's the right fit and buy them versus

0:34:56.920 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 11>you know, buy five pairs and return them. Yeah, so

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 11>the wholesale distribution for Solomon and is really key, and

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 11>they're in a lot of key premium partners, I would say,

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 11>and you know the running specialty stores as well.

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm looking at your report here research your

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 2>reportal on the sneaker business. I didn't know there were

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 2>so many shoe manufacturers. I mean, Nike's the dominant one,

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 2>as you said, but there's like fourteen in your survey here. Yeah, yeah, No,

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 2>that's a competitive marketplace.

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 11>Definitely, it's getting even more competitive as consumers with AI technology,

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 11>you know, there's just such more of a breath of discovery.

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 11>So that's where product is really coming into play this

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:39.280
<v Speaker 11>holiday season. I think, you know, the innovation, product and style.

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 3>If there's one thing to be worried about when it

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 3>comes to amre sports, what would it be? I mean,

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 3>what's an area that they're not executing on?

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 11>So I think the China thing was the one uncertainty

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 11>for this quarter that we were Definitely it could have

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 11>gone either way, so that would be the biggest thing.

0:35:57.120 --> 0:36:00.160
<v Speaker 11>But honestly, they're executing on most of their things as

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:04.279
<v Speaker 11>drivers are, DTC, Women's and China and all of those

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 11>were up double digits and more. And they're really gaining

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 11>share in women's which I think is a big new

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 11>opportunity for them as more women joined the outdoor market.

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, which have you purchased in the last twelve months?

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Sneaker brands for baby boomers? Sketchers?

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:24.239
<v Speaker 2>What what Sketches continues to win?

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 5>It is Honestly, they're.

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 11>So comfortable, they're like the price point, the quality. I know,

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:32.399
<v Speaker 11>I know, I know, I know, but.

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 3>This is not something that they market out there, that

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 3>they put out there.

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 11>No, and they're the third largest footwear brand globally. Really, yeah,

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 11>I think right behind Adidas.

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 3>Next, you're going to tell me that, you know, the

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 3>boomers are using the shoes with the little wheel in

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 3>the back of.

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 2>The No, the wheelers, the wheels.

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:50.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, No, they're doing the step ins.

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 11>You don't even have to bend down exact it.

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 2>That's what I think it is. I think you're right,

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:57.320
<v Speaker 2>all right, Yeah, there you go. I mean the kids,

0:36:57.400 --> 0:36:59.839
<v Speaker 2>the gen z, the millennials, they're still in that Nike.

0:36:59.840 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 2>You yet, brands still audience.

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 11>Or Hokahs, yeah, ka Hoka and on are gaining, but

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 11>they're you know, they're still small, and I think people

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 11>don't realize that just because there's been such a big boom,

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 11>they're still very like West Coast East Coast oriented, you know,

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:16.919
<v Speaker 11>they still have a lot more room to grow brand

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 11>awareness in the US, especially in the middle of America.

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:22.840
<v Speaker 3>That was Abigail Gilbart and Bloomberg Intelligence at Leisure and

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Footwear Analysts.

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 2>That's this week's edition of Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio,

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:29.280
<v Speaker 2>providing in depth research and data on two thousand companies

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 2>and one hundred and thirty industries.

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:33.319
<v Speaker 3>And remember you can access Bloomberg Intelligence via b I

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 3>go on the terminal. I'm Scarlett Foe and I'm Paul Sweeney.

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. Today's top stories and global business headlines

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:41.400
<v Speaker 2>are coming up right now