WEBVTT - China Balloon and Ford's Michigan Plant

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:16.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline hired a Blomberg's World headquarters in New York

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>and imed Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the market risk on when it comes to tech. Caroline

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>not too hung up on all the talk about UFOs

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>had geopolitics not front and center for many an investor

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of a risk capasite. Let's get to it

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a geopolitics at least coming up this our ed Secretary

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>of State Blincoln's widely considering a meeting with China's top diplomat,

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the first face to face talks as the US shot

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>down a Chinese by balloon. We talked tech security plus

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>in spite of those rising tensions with China, Ford teaming

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>up with a Chinese company to build a giant EV

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>battery plant in Michigan. Our conversation with Lisa Drake, Ford's

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>vice president of EV Industrialization, and the continued crypto crackdown

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>is putting a binance link token in the crosshairs. More

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>on the potential regulation later this hour, but first we

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:07.479
<v Speaker 1>check in those markets and as you say, enthusiasm when

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>it comes to stocks. At least said I'm looking at

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>one and a half percent higher on the NASAC. Now,

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:13.839
<v Speaker 1>remember last week it had its worst sell off this year,

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>so now we're back on it seems as though some

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of the forward looking consumer expectations for inflation just starled

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>down a bit the data today. We all look for

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that CPI print, that inflation print tomorrow, ms CI or

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Country World the next up eight tenths of percent. Europe

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 1>had a good risk on rally as well. Two year

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 1>boring costs basically flat, but we did see some elevation

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of two your boring costs, mainly thinking that

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the Fed is going to have to still tackle inflation

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>that's above six percent as we anticipate for tomorrow. Flick

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it on one risk asset that did not get much love,

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and it has been crypto. Look, we're down over the

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>course of two days. I'm looking at the Bloomberg Galaxy

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>INDEXUS looks at the most crypto as a whole, not

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>just of course Bitcoin, but some of the other major

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>traded currencies, and it was on the downward trajectory. The

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>reason ed we all know some worries about the crackdown, yeah,

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and looking at single names across and as I think

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.559
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority a t of names were in the green,

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>but there are some interesting stories kind of buried within that.

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft up three percent, continue momentum, but you saw a

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>number of analysts out with notes syfel or Steve Fell

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>for example, out with a by rating and upgraded price target,

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>basically saying this is a transformational year. AI is a

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>part of that. But four year twenty four is when

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>we'll really see Microsoft start to flex twily, up two percent,

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>layoffs another round of cuts seventeen percent, which we'll get

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>into later in the show. But the market cheering that

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>despite it being an unpleasant conversation you alluded to. It

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 1>Forward up two point eight percent, finally confirming that scoop

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>from Friday that it is Michigan and it is a

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>partnership with c at L for their latest battery plant

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>for e VS moved to the downside. Tesla down just

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>one percent this Monday, but on a two day basis

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>carrying over from Friday, it's the biggest two day drop

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in six weeks. And I just flagged that out because

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of voices in the market, Caroline kind of

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at that as a as a sort of treading

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>water stock ahead of that CPI print on Tuesday, Well,

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>not treading water at the moment, ed is a lot

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of the tension our UFOs and before we get to

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>our own Twitter poll around and let's just get your

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>speed with the fact that the US has just shot

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>down it's forth flying objects since China's allegends by balloon

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>last week, although Secretary State Anthony Lincoln is considering a

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>meeting with China's Foreign Minister Wangi at a security conference

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>later this week. This as Native Secretary General that's En

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Stolnberg says, China and Russia are increasing surveillance and intelligence

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 1>against the Alliance. China, but those Russia are increasing their

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>intelligence as activities against natile hours with many different platforms.

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>We see it with satellites, more and more satellites, and

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>we see them with balloons. That highlights the importance of

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>our vigilance are increased presence, and also that we ramp

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>up and step up how we share intelligence and how

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>we monitor and protect our airspace. A's the international reaction.

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's get the reaction of Bloomberg's Alex Wayne out of Washington.

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Alex just tell us is this untoward? Is this weird?

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Or is it the fact that finally people are starting

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to shoot them down. We don't have a lot of

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>answers about about what's going on and why US fighter

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 1>jets are suddenly shooting so many weird objects out of

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>the sky so far. UM. The White House Press Secretary

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Crane Jehan Pierre did say today that there is quote

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>no indication end quote that it's aliens. So I suppose

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that explanation is ruled out and we should look for

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>for a more mundane source for these objects. UM. The

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said in Europe today that they

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>have not yet recovered any debris from the objects that

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:49.919
<v Speaker 1>were shot down over the weekend, and they were shot

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 1>down in some pretty remote areas over Lake Huron and

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in Alaska and our Canada as our as our graphics

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>shows there, these are gonna be difficult places to get

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to get to recover the reece. I think it's gonna

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>be a while. So we have any answers, that's what

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>as to what these things are. UM. We do know

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that they were shot down because they presented a threat

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to aviation. UH. That's that comes from John Kirby, the

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>U s National Security spokesman, who also spoke at the

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>White House Press briefing today. I guess in part the

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>news flow around this story is driven because for the

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>first time, we're actually all going out and looking for

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>these things. You know, That's the sense that I get

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>from your team's reporting in d C. I mean, there's tie,

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it's the broader context, the U S. China relationship. What

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.799
<v Speaker 1>is happening there? What is the latest on the actions

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the US have taken and how they viewed that relationship

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>with China. Yeah, well, it's not helping relations with China obviously.

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.919
<v Speaker 1>The Chinese, of course, accused US of using balloons to

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>spy on them. That was firmly denied by the White

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>House earlier today. I do think these things are are

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>being discovered because since the Chinese that the alleged Chinese

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>by balloon floated across the US UH North American air

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>defenses have started looking for the objects, and sure enough

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>they're finding them. Um, that doesn't mean they're they're all

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>spied devices from from China or Russia or elsewhere. Um.

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>There there could be more, you know, much more ordinary explanations.

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps there are some sort of commercial aircraft or research

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>aircraft or something that that just got off course. I

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 1>guess floated too high in the air and and the

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:25.679
<v Speaker 1>the Air Force felt like they had to be removed.

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's alex Wayne Top reporting out of d C. Thank

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 1>you very much, and Caroline, I've been up for a

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>long time today. I've covered a lot of stories and

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of shows and as well, I just I

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>just didn't think Monday would have me uttering you fo.

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>And as you know, we're trying to keep our audience

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>out there in the loops. We asked, you know, what

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>do you guys think about UFOs? Are you worried? Are

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you concerned? This is the response. This is humanity for you.

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Of what was a lot of respondents saying not bothered,

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>not bothered. They're more bothered about Rhianna. They're more bothered

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>about Manchester United potentially being brought by Kata they potentially, though,

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>are also realistic head how much is this actually tip

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>for tap? How much is this generally going on over

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the skies? How many these sources of objects potentially of

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>being sent over various from US, over to other countries

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and then back to US surveillance we know is kind

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of something we live with. Yeah, juries out until they

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>actually find the objects which were shot down. Then then

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about UFOs. But let's continue the conversation

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>nonetheless and broaden it to the risks in technology moving forward,

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>which could become a major headwind for the sector. According

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to Bank of America. Take a listen. I think the

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>other shooter drop for tech is just the regulatory background

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>when you think about cyber attacked data privacy. This is

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>an issue that's affecting the man and woman on the street.

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>M let's bring in John holt Quist, vice president of

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence analysis at Mandy and Security um Google Cloud. John,

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>you've heard all the preamble, the geo political tension UFOs

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>out there. Three, the year of bracing for risk in

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>whatever form it comes. Well, we see a tremendous amount

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of you know, activity from all kinds of all the

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>kinds of corners of the earth. We see stuff from

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese actors, Russian actors, North Korean actors, and they're

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>increasingly aggressive and increasingly targeted everyday people. Right We see,

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>for instance, North Korean actors now are carrying out a

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>campaign it's affecting hospitals in the United States and the

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>globe where they're trying to ransom those hospitals for money, right,

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>John Manny and specializes in cybersecurity intelligence, seeing what's out there.

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>What conversations are you having with customers, big corporate customers

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>about the risk they face. What are they most worried about? Well,

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think we see a lot of you know,

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of our customers are actually pretty pleased

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>with the intelligence we've been able to give them these days.

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.719
<v Speaker 1>We were much better than we used to be at

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing what these actors are up to. The problem really

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>is is how do you change your posture, your security

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>posture and actually you know, adapt to the adversary. And

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a tough job, right. It takes a lot of

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>It takes a lot of work to actually, you know,

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 1>shift shift your posture every time you actor developed, something

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>like new ransomware or a new tactic is developed. And

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that's precisely what we have to do. We have to

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>evolve ahead of of these of these actors. John, how

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>much when you're asking your clients and people you talk

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 1>with when you're going and putting fort leadership out there

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>with reports that you just have done today, for example,

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>how much is this self inflicted from some companies? How

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>much is it that actually we have the right security

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to put in place, it's just people aren't putting it in.

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:57.359
<v Speaker 1>We're still leaving holes and vulnerabilities. Well, you know, it's

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really hard to always be perfect in this

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>in this space. And you know, adversaries absolutely take advantage

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of the smallest mistakes, right. I think that's in many

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of the cases we've seen they have you know, for instance,

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>they take advantage of users who may not understand what

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>they're looking at, or or they may take advantage of

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>misconfiguration for instance. That happens all the time. But really,

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, these are very advanced adversaries and in many

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>cases these are state actors, these are spies. They are

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>not easy targets. Uh. And we we have we have

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>been forced to essentially continue to raise our game against

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>an adversary that, uh, we shouldn't really have to face.

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>But we do talk to us about how people, how

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>clients feel about their security levels. What are they most

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>worried about? Is it nation state actors or is it activists?

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Is it just people wherever they might be based, wanting

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to do some financial run somewhere in some way runk

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it for us the anxiety amongst people, Uh, I think,

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think it's what's really interesting is that, uh,

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>for every organization, the threat picture has is entirely different, right,

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's why the intelligence is so important. You have

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to determine who matters the most to you, right uh.

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Right now, for instance, we're seeing this campaign of North

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Korea against hospitals and and and I think hospitals probably

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't consider these actors a threat before, but now they

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:30.079
<v Speaker 1>have to reconsider their their entire security posture because of this. UM.

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 1>I've seen many time, and many times I've seen organizations

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>who thought that Russian State actors were gonna be the

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, be the ones who went after them, and

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the reality is was Russian criminals were the ones that

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>caused him the real pain. Uh, using intelligence to actually

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 1>make those decisions is what gets you ahead of the adversary.

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Don hold Quest, vice president of Anteligens Andnalysis, and Mandy

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and just terrific and time the conversation. Thank you so

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:59.199
<v Speaker 1>much for coming on the show. Now coming up, could

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that be a man extinction event coming up for early

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>in mid stage companies. That's what I VPS Tom Laverry thinks.

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>And we'll ask him next why this is Bloomberg. The

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>inflation will come down, but I think it will stay

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>persistent for a period of time, probably longer than we

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>originally anticipated um when they started bringing interest traits up.

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I personally am optimistic that we will find a balance

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>point in the five percentage range. That's my personal view.

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Of course, I'm at this from one person's view, but

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I also think that that we will end up staying

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>there for longer. That was Nasdack, chair and CEO Adina

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Freedman speaking at the Saudi Capital Market Forum in readd

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and giving her take on rate hikes, inflation, and the

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I p O pipeline. I want to stick with this

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>conversation and get the private markets take with i VP

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>general partner Tom Lavero and about his prediction for start

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.839
<v Speaker 1>ups in this landscape. I VP has eight point seven

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of assets deployed or under management. Tom, you

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>tweeted at the end of January that late twenty three

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>would be a mass extinction event for early to midstage startups.

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>We've had one FED meeting since and we have an

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>inflation print tomorrow. Look we're showing it on the screen. Now.

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you stick with that thesis? Right? Now in this moment, absolutely,

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the trends that I was talking about in

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that threat are going to persist for at least a

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. LP capital pulling back, a fewer adventure

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.719
<v Speaker 1>dollars going out. I've heard some things out in the marketplace,

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and my question, she is, what do these startups do

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>then if they face a mass extinction event. I've heard,

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>for example, some going to their bankers and saying, get

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>someone to buy me because I can't raise funds. My

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>valuation has come down. Is that what's happening right now?

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of startups in the past couple

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of years that were kind of marginal got funded and

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that was an easy money environment. That change, and so

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to get out there and tell founders the

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>world has changed, be conservative with your cash. Raise sooner,

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and you're absolutely right, there's gonna be a lot more

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>M and A as the valuations on these startups come down.

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>The public markets, buyers, the pe buyers are taking notice. Okay,

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>raise sooner in this current environment, Tom, what does that

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>look like? What sort of foundations can you hope for?

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>What are you being pegged to? Is it profitabilities at

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>revenue it's a good question. It depends on the given startup,

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>but I think as a rule of thumbs, startups go

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>into the red zone on how much cash they have

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>left when they've got about twelve months of cash. So

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you should be raising before then, ideally, and certainly have

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>your round close by, say six or seven months of

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>cash left at the latest um. And in terms of valuations, listen,

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the public markets have reset to a place that we

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>think we view as healthy. It was unhealthy. We had

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>public private companies going fifty a hundred times revenue. Those

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>days are gone, and now if you look at the

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>public markets growth, adjust those and that's a good benchmark

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>for startups. Tom I VP has more than forty years

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in this game, and you stick around for forty years

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>by being sort of collaborative, by working well with other

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>players in the space as well. I'm interested in your

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>perspective of what it's like right now when people are

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>coming to you for a check, and how you're treating

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the earlier investors. I'm hearing time and time again that

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>some of the first checks that are being written and

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>then when you go to the second round, they're they're

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>losing a lot of their power those first early money

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>in their being diluted enormously if they haven't got the

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>money to be able to put in at the same

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>time as your second round or third round. How are

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you seeing that evolve. Who's losing out who's winning here? Tom,

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a great question. Our style of investing, we tend

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:54.119
<v Speaker 1>to invest in the things that are growing the fastest,

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and we try and partner with those early stage investors.

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think the early stage investors are paying attention

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to the markets. They have portfolio companies that are later

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>stage that are about to go public or maybe went public.

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're generally on the same page. Where

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>it gets tricky, of course, is when startups have to

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>raise a new round below the valuation of their last round.

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>That's called a down round, and that's where incentives can

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>diverge from early investors and late investors. We haven't done

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>one of those down rounds because we're really focused on

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the companies that are growing, But I think we're going

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to have to grapple with that here in the next

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of years as well. The whole industry. There's those

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that delayed funding from last year. I'm hearing that in

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>some cases Series B investors want to see evidence of

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>profit and then you have structured deal. You have a choice,

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>do a structured deal and avoid a downround or do

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a down round. How do you handle all of those situations? Yeah,

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and to be clear, we're not looking for profitability. We

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>want companies to be efficient but also grow and so

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>for us we do mostly Series B and C investing,

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and we expect companies to be taking pretty significant losses.

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But what we're focused on is the unit economics. And

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>so what we tell companies is get those unit economics right,

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and if they get the unit economics right, we can

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>evaluate whether we want to fund them. Tom always such

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>great analysis. Thank you for bringing that Twitter storm onto

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the real life of television with us. Tom Lavero, We

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you, my VP general partner, stay well. Meanwhile, Amazon

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 1>squeezing more money from its own two million small businesses

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>at sell products on its online marketplace. Now for the

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>first time, Amazon's average cut of each sale surpassed fifty

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>two that's going to a study one marketplace Pulse, which

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:44.679
<v Speaker 1>sumples sell the transactions going back to and with online

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 1>shopping not as strong after pandemic era lockdowns ended, many

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>sellers are now struggling to make money, prompting some to

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>handle shipping themselves and to spend less to advertise on

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 1>Amazon sites. Plus matters. Chief business officer Marmy Levine stepping

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>down after more than twelve years with the company. Metro

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>announced that earlier today. Levine has held several possessions at Meta,

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>including head of Global Policy, chief operating officer over at Instagram.

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Levine will leave her post later this month and depart

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the company this summer. Her exit, of course, comes at

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a time of transition. Let's called it for Meta, which

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>announced in November that it would be cutting more than

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>eleven thousand jobs in the first major workforce production Twilio,

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it's the latest tech company to slash jobs and sing

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it again. The software maker is saying it will cut

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>about sevent of workers, just months after a previous major

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>round of layoffs. Now the CEO also is saying they're

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:46.959
<v Speaker 1>planning to reduce office space and pair back benefits as

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the focus on profitability. Here for more is

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Roodie Ford and it is notable that they've had

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to come back and do a second call here. Yeah,

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>this is frightening if you're a tack worker, right, because

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I think most of us assume that if you get

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a major layoff as they had was about eleven back

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 1>in September, you think, if you made it, I'm cool.

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:08.959
<v Speaker 1>But no, I mean this show is that if market

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:12.479
<v Speaker 1>conditions continue to worse and companies will make additional cuts.

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Today this brings it to a total of about twenty

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 1>six percent of the company, which by my math, I mean,

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>know if I'm wrong, anybody watch him, but I think

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that is larger than any other large, publicly traded tech company. Yeah,

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it is an interesting beast, isn't it? Eleven billion dollar

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>market cap even with the cuts head count at sixty

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>six thousand. What I thought was so interesting as well

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is that they have a found a CEO, Jeff Lawson,

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and he's addressing his own compensation. What do we learn

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>about the cutbacks he's making to his own compensation. Yeah,

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 1>so they didn't make a huge deal of it, but

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>he cut his compensation, and many of us are tempered

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to say, oh, understanding, ceo. But you gotta remember that's

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 1>a mounch to about point four percent of the total compensation, right,

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is not a huge reduction. Um, this

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>is he's still making Uh well, we don't know does

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>new com packages, but compared to one it's about point

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:06.439
<v Speaker 1>four percent and he made about fourteen point five million.

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>So we're seeing a lot of CEOs take cuts and compensation.

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>But you've got to remember when it comes to executives,

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not in the base salary, it's in the stock options.

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we therefore wonder what several looks like, what

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>benefits and how they support the work, is that they

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 1>do have to let go a second time. It seems

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>as though a lot of tech companies have tried to

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>be helpful in that way. Ultimately they'll give the read

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 1>across for us, Bertie, is this is twally different? Is

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>it more exposed than others or could this be a domino?

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Twilio has some uniquely unique troubles here. For example, they're unprofitable.

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean we both know that unprofitable tech has been

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:44.360
<v Speaker 1>battered in the current market. Announcer and I think they

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:48.719
<v Speaker 1>lost of market value in two But I think, no

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.199
<v Speaker 1>matter what company you are, if you're seeing this at

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a second round of layoffs is possible. That's a frightening

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 1>thing across the market, no question, Hey, Bertie, as you

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>look across the companies that you cover, what what is

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the kind of commonality between them? Is this it? The

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>layoffs are due for this year? Are we expecting more? Well,

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:10.120
<v Speaker 1>they're a handful of large companies that happened on layoffs.

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people have spectleing why Apple hasn't done them,

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Oracle hasn't done them. UM, I would say that we

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>are not done. We don't know that, but we see

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.439
<v Speaker 1>reports almost every single day of this person in the

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>company's anxious more layoffs are coming. So I think it

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>is not put to bed. I think that people should

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>continue to watch um and if market conditions continue to worsen,

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>no one knows, right Bloom Doug's Brady for great reporting,

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. A crackdown on crypto keeps coming.

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>This time authorities are taking on two pretty key pillars

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of the ecosystem. Number one, stable coins being most traded

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>crypto tokens out there, and to finance the world's biggest exchange.

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Now on this occasion, the New York Finance Regulator wants

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to stop to the issuance of b u s D

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that is the third biggest stable coin out there, and

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>also a binance related coin basically is actually issued via

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>US regulated entity called paxos. There's about sixteen billion dollars

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of them out in circulation. Stable coins keep their value

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>pegged to another asset, often one US dollar. They're about

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a hundred thirty billion dollars or stable coins out there,

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and they're often used as a way of providing you stability.

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 1>Basically a non volatile crypto asset that often used for

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>parking your funds in between trades. They're kind of like

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 1>an oil that helps grease the cogs of trading in crypto. Basically,

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>it acts as liquidity. BUSD is particularly important to Binance

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>because it gets US investors an ability to access its

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 1>exchange no wonder therefore, investors got worried. You saw Busd

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>fall off of its one dollar pegg. You also saw

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>other Binance tokens like the Binance coin for and in fact,

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other crypto assets and crypto related stocks

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>fell hard. Today. Overall, you're seeing nactually US regulators getting

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty busy this year. You've had fines handed out some

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>big exchanges like Cracking, like coin based. You've had Gemini

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 1>and Genesis, other names will know in this space that

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>are under investigation all of this as well. Regulators want

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to get on top of the crypto ecosystem and make

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>sure it's being analyzed. So unless as now are bracing

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the SERVI scrutiny. So that's so we sound let's dig deeper,

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>put in Mootionari Bassett is here for more and the

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 1>pack SAS decision tell us the backstory also around where

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>pack SASS is being eyed. That because it's not just

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the New York regulator but some bigger ones, we understand

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>to other reporting and there are a few different issues

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>at play here. Let's talk first about the stable coin issue,

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 1>because you had mentioned here this is one of the

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>largest stable coin it's the third largest in circulation, sixteen

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in circulation. And again it has to relate

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to binance itself. But again the stable coin industry is

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 1>provid adds a lot of liquidity to the overall crypto ecosystem,

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 1>so to the extent that in the past several months

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:09.199
<v Speaker 1>we saw lending attacked. Now we're seeing a source of

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>liquidity in the crypto ecosystem severely attacked. But remember this

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>is not about PASOS, a US regulated New York A

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Department of Financial Services regulated entity. It's about the relationship

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 1>between paxos and Binance. So if you look at the

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:26.479
<v Speaker 1>Department of Financial Services statement on this, they note they

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>say it's important to note that paxos and b USD

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>was authorized to be issued on the ethery and blockchain,

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>but was not authorized by the Department of Financial Services.

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Was the binance peg. It's a form of be token

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>if you well, it's a wrapped version that relies on

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the stable coin as collateral. Remember we had Emily noel

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Over at Bloomberg also reporting that Circle has also, separately,

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>according to people familiar with the matter, raised concerns about

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>binances relationship with the stable coin ecosystem. So this is

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>really one shoot to drop in a larger story. There's

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a distinction to be made between this and the staking

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 1>issue that you that we raise against in our in

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.120
<v Speaker 1>our interview last week, which seems a long time ago.

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 1>Now what is it? Yeah, the staking issue. Remember it

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:15.640
<v Speaker 1>also applies to the Ethereum network if you will as well,

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>because it's moved to proof of steak. But remember, at

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, the SEC is looking for

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 1>the ways that the crypto ecosystem falls under investor protection

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 1>laws that exist, so importantly when we're looking at a

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>separate issue as it pertains to Paxos, we're looking at

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>this issue where that they could be facing compressible lawsuit

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>from the SEC for violating potential investor protection laws. Now

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>we have not seen any SEC complaints to that effect,

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>but we have seen PASOS issue the statement saying that

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>they categorically disagree with the SEC staff that these would

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>fall under federal securities law and said unequivocentally there are

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>no other allegations. So you see two different regulators extending

0:25:56.840 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>their authority over the crypto ecosystem, and two very different ways.

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>The only thing that the Paxo situation has in common

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>with what you saw with the Staking issue is the

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>SEC putting more under their wing in crypto as it

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>pertains to the existing investor protection laws. Bloomberctionalibasse, trific reporting.

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Let's continue the conversation and bringing Clara Medally,

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>director of research at cryptocurrency market data provider Kaiko. Clara,

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 1>when we think about the pack sovice issue, you believe

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that there will be a pretty profound impact on stable

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>coins broadly. What will that impact be? Well, I think

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>one thing that's interesting about the BUSD case is that

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>today bust is mostly just used on Binance and on

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Binance smart chain, which is the blockchain operated by the exchange.

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>BUSD doesn't really have much use on other cryptocurrency exchanges.

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's why this regulatory action was very much targeted

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Binance and not necessarily stable coins as a whole, because

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Paxos was the one to issue BUSD. However, I don't

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>think this makes other stable coin issues issuers immune, specifically

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>U s t C and U S t T, although

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it will be very difficult to regulate tether Um simply

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>because the largest stable coin is not actually domicile in

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the United States. That was a part of the conversation,

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.360
<v Speaker 1>right Binance positioning b U s D is is a

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>strong competitor to tether their market shares have changed proportionately

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 1>over the last few years. Where does that leave us

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>in the relationship between b U s D and tether

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>So this morning we looked at on Binance and we

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>found that of total trade volume on Binance is actually

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>denominated in in bus D. This is up from t

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>at the start of the year, and I think Binance

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>has made a huge marketing push to actually get more

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>users of bus d, So it seems that they were

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>very much not expecting this move, this regulatory enforcement action.

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>UM and Binance is actually incentivized to have their own

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:58.880
<v Speaker 1>stable coin because stable coins are very useful within defy ecosystems.

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And what I mean by this is binance smart chain

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and any type of decentralized protocol that is part of

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the Binance ecosystem. So now that they don't have this

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>lever of growth, essentially we're now left with Tether. Tether

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>today accounts for the vast majority of all trading activity

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:18.199
<v Speaker 1>in crypto, so busd actually was a nice counterweight to

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Tether's influence UM. As we've seen in crypto, it's never

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:24.679
<v Speaker 1>good to have UM all all risk concentrated in a

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>single centralized entity. But I'm afraid that with Tether we

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of have this. Now. Tether can't be regulated in

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the US because it's not domiciled here. Now finance was

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>using pack sauce that was regulated in the US. Could

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>they issue have a different issue for a bus D

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else so that they can ensure they still have

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a stable coin, but it's not under the legal oversight

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of the United States. Yeah, theoretically yes. And I think

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that's the biggest critique with this type of enforcement action

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>is that it's not getting to the root of the problem,

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and rather what you would see is actually a type

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of regulatory arbor charge. That's what we see with all

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of the exchanges that don't have their headquarters in the

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>United States. Is there simply finding jurisdictions where they can

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>operate and do what they want. Is that going to

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>be in overall global means of regulating in the near future.

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>As anyone talking with other countries and we we've got

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>any sort of clout other than the SEC, that's a

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>good question. I know that in Europe they they've taken

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a much broader approach to regulation and actually taken the

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>path of issuing guidance rather than enforcement actions. And so

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>we can already see that there's a large difference across regions.

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>But I think for now it's going to be very

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>difficult to get a global approach because there will always

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 1>be jurisdictions that are trying to attract business first um

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and that always comes with crypto actors that are sort

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of looking for the friendliest jurisdictions. We were talking with

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Snali a few moments ago about the distinction between what

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing finance paxos and what we saw last week

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>from the SEC and cracking, And in our conversation with

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Gary Glensler, what's your read on that specific situation with

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:14.959
<v Speaker 1>the SEC basically cracking down on unlicensed security offerings. I

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>think that krack in so cracking had one of the

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>largest centralized staking providers, but it was very different from

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>what we saw on coin base. But that doesn't mean

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that coin bas is not immune from a regulatory action

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>against their staking service. But there were key differences and

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>like sort of the nitty gritty of how each one

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>was run, and I think that's what attracted the SEC

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to first go after crackings. UM. I also think coin

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>bas is likely to put up a fight. They have

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot more to lose in this case because they've

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 1>actually successfully diversified their revenue into the staking business over

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the past year. UM And I think one key thing

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to emphasize is that staking is not like

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the returns on on your assets that you got with

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the centralized lenders such as Celsius. It's a lot different.

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Staking is something fundamental to blockchain technology and specifically the

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Ethereum blockchain, and so it's actually benefiting most people that

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>are staking. There's no losers to staking today. Um when

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you're out there having conversations with players inside the world

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of crypto and those that are sort of interested by standers,

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and then those that are regulating. Ultimately, the calling card

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of many a company, particularly the US, has been we

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>want regulation. Do they like this sort of regulation that

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>they're currently saying, Well, this is regulation by enforcement. I

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think anyone really likes regulation by enforcement. But that

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that the industry doesn't like regulation. In fact,

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>after FTX, everyone's expecting this. In fact, it's much needed

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>for any centralized service provider. We're seeing after the Celsius

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the ft X collapse is that you can't really operate

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>with some degree of regulation or transparency, and it's more

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the enforcement actions that are catching the industry off guard. Clara,

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. I will i'll dare anyone and

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly can never dare myself to be as lucid and

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>as I take it as you are am local time

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>for you, so staying up late in Paris, I know

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 1>crypto never sleeps. Mcclara medally come back soon, we hope.

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Director of research at KO Yeah, a terrific interview coming up.

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>It's the first time of vehicle designed without human controls

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 1>has carried passengers on a public road. Will have more

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>on that story next And before we had to break carriage.

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>You want to take a look at Palenteer. Really interesting

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the shares surging in after hours for Palenteer. The company

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 1>recording its first ever quarterly profit in the final three

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>months to get this caroline one cent per share on

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a gap basis, and it's saying that this year four

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>year twenty three will be its first profitable year. But

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the market likes it. We're up sixt in after hours.

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Zooks, the self driving startup owned by Amazon,

0:32:56.680 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>carried passengers in its fully autonomous vehicle on public roads

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 1>for the first time last week. The electric vehicle, which

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>does not have a steering wheel, ran a marble long

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>route carrying staff staff well kind of between zoos is

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>two main buildings in Foster City, California. The firm will

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 1>now operate a shuttle for employees on the same trip

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>while it seeks additional clearances to expand that service to

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:22.479
<v Speaker 1>the public. Let's bring in the company CEO I H Evans,

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and I I think I'm right and saying you were

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 1>along for that maiden voyage on a very small stretch

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of road. I know that you're always very modest about

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>what these kind of things mean, but how close does

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>this bring you to making this a commercial service? First

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of all, thank you for having me. And look, yeah,

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>modesty is important, being humble is important. But this is

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a big moment. I'm not going to a downplay it.

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:49.479
<v Speaker 1>I was along for the ride. This is really the

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 1>beginning of that foundation that from here we add additional

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 1>operational design domains, more testing, extend our permit to carrying

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the public, and then on to our first a customer.

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 1>How much does it matter that you beat crews General

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Motors is crews to carrying passengers on a public road

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>in a purpose built autonomous vehicle. So, ed, I think

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:18.439
<v Speaker 1>you know me. Well, um, there's a reason I call

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 1>crews and others fellow travelers as well as competitors, and

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 1>so we're in a race with the business and creating it.

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:30.280
<v Speaker 1>It does feel good though it's been nine years working

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:33.319
<v Speaker 1>on this product and getting it out there, and so

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>it does feel good. But this is about zoos and

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>focusing on going to a market. Okay, so take us

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 1>there going to market. What sort of timeline are we

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 1>looking at for a paying customer? So first thing is

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:49.879
<v Speaker 1>carrying our our employees. They will teach us a lot

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 1>about the service. Anytime you carry hundreds and you know

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of thousand people, you learn a lot about

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the service. We're also seeing what's going on out there.

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>So look, we're going to continue testing. We're going to

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>continue expanding the operational design domain. We're already breaking on

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the first I can tell you that thirty five miles

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>an hour feels really great. I can tell you that

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the vehicle handle some really interesting scenarios flawlessly. And so

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it's about making sure we're already and we've said we're

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:23.919
<v Speaker 1>going to go to Las Vegas, We're going to San

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Francisco and continue from there. Oh, come to New York. Meanwhile,

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean the traffic is terrible, unfortunately, A sure, but

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not afraid of the traffic in New York. But

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's nothing called snow. Yea, that's what. We

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:38.319
<v Speaker 1>haven't had any yet. We haven't had any snow. I

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's happening with global warming, but it still

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 1>knows snow in New York and people are worried I

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>should but talk to me about you said, Look, nine

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 1>years in the making, you've been in the business in February,

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:50.319
<v Speaker 1>how many of you actually manufactured? Now, how many do

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you think you can run up too? Okay, So we've

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>manufactured like in you know, tents. Basically we're building more

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 1>as we speak. As far manufacturing, we have a manufacturing

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>facility were in in California right by our headquarters, where

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>we have enough to cover several cities. I Shay, as

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've been in that factory with you. I've

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>seen how you make them in a sort of modular

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>package Lego type way. When you came in in fabry tween,

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:22.839
<v Speaker 1>I was sort of Caribo line about this earlier. Your

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 1>principal job was to secure this company's financial future, and

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you did it. Amazon bought Zooks. What is Zooks is

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 1>access to capital like and the parent Amazon had to

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of layoffs. Is Zooks having to cut

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:40.320
<v Speaker 1>back in a similar way. So, um, Look, the partnership

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:44.319
<v Speaker 1>with Amazon has been fantastic. Obviously, we understand that with

0:36:44.400 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 1>the macroeconomic environment one needs to be prudent. We are

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:53.280
<v Speaker 1>sad that you know, folks are losing their jobs across

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the industry. It's a small type industry. We all know

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 1>each other. Zooks has always been prudent. I have actually

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>an internal phrase that I an ashayism. We don't binge

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and we don't purge. We're very prudent. We are lucky

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and fortunate to be in a situations where we're still

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 1>going to grow this year, but we will continue to

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:15.800
<v Speaker 1>be prudent. What is the next big milestone for Zooks?

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 1>What do we hold you to account on m hmm, Well,

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:24.759
<v Speaker 1>getting to the point where we're carrying non Zooks employees.

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 1>So first, all Zooks employees right now, not everybody can ride.

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:32.799
<v Speaker 1>Um by the spring, all Zooks employees will be able

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to ride on a continuous basis. And then extending the

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:39.839
<v Speaker 1>permit to be able to carry external passengers, and then

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>again that first playing customer. I've told you that that's

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:46.359
<v Speaker 1>my big, big personal milestone. You have told me that

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:48.319
<v Speaker 1>a number of times. Now will have you back when

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you achieve it. Zooks CEO Iishie Evans, thank you so

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us and bloom Lay Technology. Now staking

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>in the world of evs. Ford announced the plan to

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 1>build an EVA battery plant in Michigan in partnership with

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 1>China's see A t L, a deal that will create

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 1>about jobs, but which comes at a time of growing

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 1>tensions between the US and China. I caught up with

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Ford's vice president of EV Industrialization, Lisa Drake earlier today.

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Have listened. You know, as part of that plan for

0:38:14.800 --> 0:38:17.800
<v Speaker 1>eight percent, we've announced that will build two million units

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 1>in and if you think about it, this LP battery

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 1>plant which we have announced will build over four hundred

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand vehicle sets worth of batteries. That's about of that

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:30.759
<v Speaker 1>two million, And this battery plant will be be able

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to build one of the lowest cost types of batteries

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, especially when you take into account

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:40.280
<v Speaker 1>production tax credit. So this is a key landmark project

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 1>for US on our way to eight percent, Lisa, A

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 1>key landmark. You've had an event there today. Did you

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>invite President Biden to that event? Well, I think you'd

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 1>have to uh to refer that question to the White House,

0:38:56.560 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 1>but I can tell you we've certainly appreciated the White

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 1>House in the administration and support on the project so far.

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:04.080
<v Speaker 1>At least, so of course we know that the White

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 1>House has at least been pushing pretty hard here to

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 1>uh expand I guess the availability not only of course

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of the cars themselves, but the batteries another technology that

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 1>we need to make those cars. But of course a

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of questions also about who we partner with. This

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 1>deal with the Chinese company. I'm sure, as you know,

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:23.279
<v Speaker 1>whether it's fair or not, is going to raise a

0:39:23.320 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of questions here about what we're sharing with that

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 1>company with regards to our own homegrown technology. How do

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you address those criticisms? Well, I'd start with the fact

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that the l f P technology is very prevalent in

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the US already. It's in many of our consumer electronics devices.

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>It's actually being imported today and some of our competitor evs,

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and so the technology exists in the US. This project

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is really meant to de risk that importation strategy by

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 1>actually localizing it here, building the technology here in the

0:39:57.239 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 1>United States and in the state of Michigan. And we

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:03.839
<v Speaker 1>have the Ford industrial know how and the manufacturing capability

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that will we will bring to bear, and we're licensing

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the actual chemistry and the technology from c at L

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 1>but most of the knowledge base will reside in Michigan

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and in the United States. Just keep on coming these

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:19.839
<v Speaker 1>EV conversation for the vice president of EV Industrialization at

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 1>least a Drake there with Romaine in at earlier Meanwhile,

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Ferrari CEO Benedetto Vina told Bloomberg that the Italian supercar

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:31.520
<v Speaker 1>manufacturer is fully on track to unveil its first fully

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicle, saying electrification is a new way to provide

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:40.279
<v Speaker 1>customers with a unique driving experience. We had a clear

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:43.240
<v Speaker 1>planned We have a lot of competencies in the company

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to keep their little think it cass from more point

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:52.839
<v Speaker 1>of view, from my dynamic, from from performance, it's called

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the signed So we would the electric turn adding wouldn't

0:40:55.920 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 1>be a unique ad void did it go viral and

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:12.360
<v Speaker 1>it's still viral today. Sunday super Bowl and Tech along

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:15.280
<v Speaker 1>with Rihanna a key player at this year's game, Apple

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 1>been in big on course of Rihanna's halftime show, ed

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean she dropped the mic. Extraordinary that she was

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:23.840
<v Speaker 1>able to announce pregnancy at the same time as performance.

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, it's basically getting on what looked

0:41:25.719 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 1>like giant iPhones in the Sky. She did a little

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:31.800
<v Speaker 1>bit of product placement with a fency brand. There was

0:41:31.800 --> 0:41:33.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of product placement for a lot of other

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:34.880
<v Speaker 1>things throughout the course because we're all in it for

0:41:34.880 --> 0:41:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the ads. Yeah, electric vehicles, we knew this was coming.

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 1>The out sean combustion engine vehicles in a ratio of

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:45.840
<v Speaker 1>three to one according to Bloomberg any f analysis of

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the ads at the halftime you had Will Ferrell with

0:41:48.600 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 1>General Motors. It was it was cheeky, but we knew

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it was coming. And we'll see if there's a reaction

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 1>in this marketplace. Crypto ad in sight, but there was

0:41:57.920 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 1>actually I think Google had one for its phone work

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Day had quite a fun one coming back with what

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:06.360
<v Speaker 1>was one of the key signers and kiss like across

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the board. I always love the ads As a Brit

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm in it for the halftime. I'm in it for

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the adverts. Don't use the term rock star unless you're

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:17.239
<v Speaker 1>a rock star. Absolutely brilliant. I know you enjoyed it.

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:20.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure we all did so. Joyous viral moment. We're

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:23.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be consuming these videos for years to come. Meanwhile,

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. Tune

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>back in tomorrow C three AI, the CEO Tom Siebel

0:42:29.040 --> 0:42:30.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to be joining us live five pm New

0:42:30.960 --> 0:42:35.319
<v Speaker 1>York time, t PM San Francisco. Don't forget a lot

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to recap on the podcast apples, Spotify, I Heart, wherever

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts. For today's episode, This is Bloomberg.