WEBVTT - Markets, Elon Musk, And Bank Earnings (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney. Alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Let's check in with

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Adam Gold, founder and Chief investment Officer Acadam l L

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>c Adam Again, kind of a boring day today, but

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>when you talk to your clients, what's your number one

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>message these days? Good morning, guys, Thanks for having me

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 1>back on. We think boring days are fun. They may

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>not be fun for for the news cycles, but generally speaking,

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>things don't change that much day today in the long term,

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in the big scheme of things, any given days something

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>might change that. But generally, since we last spoke a

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>few months ago, things have gotten, you know, extremely worse

0:00:55.680 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>across so many investor sentiments, inflation numbers, interest rates, rysing

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.319
<v Speaker 1>and all of that is already priced in. We think

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that is what's caused the markets to

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>sell off here the last few months. So people who

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>talk and we speak with clients every day and they're

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>very concerned about where they are, and we say that

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the opportunity to be deploying capital. To be concerned now.

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>To sell now feels like you're a few months behind

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the curve um And somebody argue that's where the fete is.

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>But the fet is you know, trying to react to

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>to what they see every day. And so we think

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity is for people who have a long term horizon,

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>which is multi years, which is the only kind of

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>investors investors and investments we try to focus on. Then

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>we think this is a time when other people are selling,

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you should be buying. And it's not easy, it's not

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>fun day to day, and things may continue to you know,

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to get worse on a daily sort of return basis,

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>But that's where the opportunity is because long term, there's

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>still extremely large, glowing, growing trends around technology, around population growth.

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>There there's just a lot of underlying tailings here in

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the long term. So I mean, we're we I know

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that we're not trading for undred, but we are at

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>forty four D on the S and P. It's it's

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>not so far off from the high are you saying,

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>are you saying it's just um, you know, gonna look

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 1>like we'll look like in the rear view mirror five

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>ten years from now, such an opportunity that you should

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>buy now, regardless of what we do in the next

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>few weeks or months. That's our viewpoint. When I was

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>born in three the Dow was eleven hundred. When I

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>started my career in two thousand one, the Dow is

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand. We're at thirty four thousand now. And if

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you look forward a couple of years by a couple

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, a couple of decades, rather you know,

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have a Dow at a hundred thousand,

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and that keger. That annual growth rate is sort of

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in the low mid single digits. It's not in the

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:45.799
<v Speaker 1>teams anymore, because you know, when you have a large numbers,

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>there's it's hard to continue to grow at that pace.

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>But if inflation is in the mid single digits and

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.239
<v Speaker 1>fixed interest rates are in the low single digits before tax,

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>we still believe equities are the only place to be

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>invested over long term to have any chance of beating inflation.

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, So what are some of the sectors that

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you think we should be looking at here as we

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>go into or as we you know, we certainly are

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 1>in the beginning of a rising interest rate environment. Yep.

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think historically financials, you know, there's sectors. Now

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>what's now we're refocused. This is what I think generally.

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>The opportunity that people may think is well with rising rates,

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>banks can get paid more. But then of course we

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>have inflation concerns, and so there's obviously recession risk, and

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>so banks do not do very well during recessions because

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of loans and there's bad debt, revisions

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>and things that cost their earnings to go away to

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>take away some of that. You know, interest rates increased opportunities.

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So we've only focused on technology for over twenty years.

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>The reason is that innovation and new product cycles, these

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>are not priced into stocks today. The only thing that

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>analysts can do is project forward for what they see

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in front of them. I don't give the example of Apple.

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>When I started investing the company with the iPod, people

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>thought the iPod was going to go the way of

0:03:57.160 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the Mac, Windows and Microsoft, We're going to take them out.

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>And then a few years later that hadn't happened. So

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the company grew very nicely, but then they introduced the

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>iPhone and that none that there was no revenue or

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>profits based into those estimates. And we think about are

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>their innovative companies today that are doing exciting things And

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that's where the technology world is so great, because there

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>are companies working on internal innovation and new products where

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>analysts cannot price them in, and so we're starting to

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>see downgrades. You know, it's funny, is you know, back

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in November always saw our upgrades of companies, example like

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Navidia three forty share, we were seeing upgrades, analysts were

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>chasing each other with targets that were higher, and now

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>at to twenty the stocks down thirty cent, same company,

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>same business, same innovation, we're seeing downgrades. There were no

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>downngrades at three forty and so it just seems like

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street and some of the analysts that are

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>focused on generating commissions around trading, they do the exact

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>opposite of what you should do for a long term investing.

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>You guys get commissions, Paul, You we should definitely get

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you get ranked by your salesforce and stuff,

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, making some big calls and things like that.

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>So kindly. Yeah, but I think the exact opposite of

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>how to compound wealth. You want to buy low and

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>sell high. To be downgrading stocks that are down thirty

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>out of cash flows, that of, you know, exciting opportunities

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in the future. That doesn't seem like the great long

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>term decisions. I hear you, all right, good stuff. I mean,

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, I guess I kind of

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>did that back in the day on the cell side,

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Adam Gold, founder and chief investment officer Cantampent. That's the

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>sin he's telling us. That's the wrong thing, that's not

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>serving your customers. I was a big investment banker as

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>an analyst. We did tons of deals in my space.

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll mention if I'm still on, I'll mention one more

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>example of a great investor. The Oracle from Omaha has

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>deployed over thirty in the last month. Yea, I know

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 1>he's been putting money to work. We appreciate that. Adam Gold,

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Founder in chief investment Officer Cadam LLC. Matt,

0:05:55.920 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you have any idea what Elon Musk is doing with Twitter? I? Uh, well,

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, what we watched. We all watched that Ted

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>talk thing last week, and I thought it was really fascinating. Um,

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>he says this is something that he wants to do

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>for democracy, for society. It's a free speech issue and

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 1>not an economic move. Okay, A lot of people aren't

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>going to take that at face value, and especially you know,

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>on the left, there's a lot of concern that he

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>wants to I don't know why there is this concern,

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>but everyone's saying that he's kind of coming to the

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>rescue of pro Trump people or I have no idea

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>about that. He seemed genuine and uh, I think it's

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.599
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to watch. It's fascinating to watch, and fortunately for us.

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Matt Winkler, the founder of Bloomberg News, editor in chief

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>emeritus of Bloomberg News, he's paying attention to this, uh

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>so he can share his thoughts. Matt. You know, we

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>we look at Elon Muskin. I as a traditional investor

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 1>am uncom table with this guy, particularly if I were

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a shareholder of one of his companies, even though the

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>stock has done so great and he's made so many

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>investors so much money. How do you think about Elon

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>musk These days. You have to think about him in

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the context of maximizing shareholder value. And if you go

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>back to the initial public offering of Tesla in two

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand ten, Uh, to understand what has happened to Tesla,

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you have to put an exponent next to Tesla, so

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>it's Tesla to the twelfth power. So this is a

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>company that's gone from a billion dollars to UH a

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>trillion today. And um, it wasn't luck. It was if

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, two thousand and ten, virtually nobody

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>took electric vehicles seriously, today everybody does. And disclosure mat

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you are a Tesla driver owner, right I am, and

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a happy one. Yeah, And I can attribute that that

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to uh combination of meeting Musk for an interview at

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and SpaceX headquarters back in two thousand fourteen, and

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>after we got done, h he invited us to try

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a Tesla or two, and uh, you know that's where

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it started. But you know, really all kidding aside. What

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>is relevant about Tesla is that it has been very

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>methodical and very disciplined about growth and that's the something

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:33.079
<v Speaker 1>that's the one thing that gets investors excited. And Tesla's

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>had growth that has been unequaled by any of the

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>top largest companies today. And Tesla got to its one

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>trillion market capitalization in eleven years sooner, if you like,

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:48.439
<v Speaker 1>than any of the companies were familiar with, whether it's

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft or Amazon. Facebook got there briefly, but it didn't

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>last very long. This the Tesla evaluation is sticky. And

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you may have noticed that last Thursday, Uh, one of

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's champions, arc Cathy would Um, increased her target more

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>than to forty dollars a share. So that's an indication

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of just where testing she's Tesla. I mean, you point

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:16.839
<v Speaker 1>out in your column that she um forecast I think

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>it's trillion dollar valuation before anyone else did and stuck

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to her guns. Yeah and uh. And there's a reason

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>for that, is that why is Tesla done as well

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>as it done, because it actually anticipates the things that

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it needs before everybody else does. And what I mean

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:38.839
<v Speaker 1>by that is Musk was very concerned about vertical integration

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>long before COVID nineteen became a problem for every company worldwide. Uh.

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>He did things to achieve supply security, if you like

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Nicol for example, very important essential component in electric vehicles,

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:01.719
<v Speaker 1>and he made several agreements to get nick Um so

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>that the supply would not be disruptive for UH Tesla.

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>And the latest quarter, for example, show the deliveries were

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>much better than what people anticipated, even though he said

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>it was a very difficult quarter. So this is a

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:20.719
<v Speaker 1>company that actually has been very strategic in the way

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it goes about UH manufacturing vehicles. Their factories are built

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>from the ground up, whether it's Berlin, Austin, Texas, UH Fremont, California. UM.

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>And he's done incredible. Look he I still use PayPal.

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I noticed this weekend. I was like, wow, I'm still

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:43.719
<v Speaker 1>using PayPal and we saw him last week. I think

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>send for civilian citizens to the I S S which

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 1>is like mind blowing Lee, just unbelievable how well he's

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>done in SpaceX. Why do you think he um makes

0:10:55.480 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>all this noise on Twitter and challenges the SEC? I mean,

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>is it just because he can? You know, I don't

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>actually spend a lot of time thinking about what you

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:12.559
<v Speaker 1>and others would consider his eccentricities. Otherwise smoking a joint

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>on Joe Rogan's podcast, Are there other than to say

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>this that he isn't the first brilliant chief executive officer,

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>founder of a company if you like, to have attributes

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that people have considered socially questionable. And that's just has

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>been something that we've seen in history. And so what

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>is far more important, the context that I think everybody

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>misses is this company, Tesla, has transformed the world's view

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of vehicles to the extent that Tesla itself is a

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>robotic company if you like, you know it's not a

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>car company. How do you view by the way. I also,

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to sound too naive, but you have

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to give it to him that he's on so much

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to fight climate change. He at least says he wants

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to buy Twitter right now to support free speech and democracy.

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a guy who has big ideas

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>about helping the world right. So people can be cynical

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>about that because he's made so much money doing it, um,

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>but you can't deny the fact that he's changed the

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>way we think about the future of transportation. Yeah, and

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:28.439
<v Speaker 1>if you consider all the obstacles a raid against him,

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>remember a lot of states wouldn't let Tesla's sell its

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>vehicles the way it wanted to because the car dealer lobby,

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 1>if you like, was so powerful. Um, and he somehow

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>got through that. The fact that now everybody's in this

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>market and Tesla has been able to hold its market

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>share consistently even though the market has expanded dramatically tells

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you something about the quality of the vehicles that he has.

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>And and Cathy would for example, says that in battery

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>tech knowledge, he alone Tesla is at least three years

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>ahead of its competitors. Matt Um, your column today has

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>got the headline in defense of Elon Musk managerial excellence. Uh.

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Tesla CEO's track record proves he's a pretty eminent builder

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of businesses and maximizer shareholder value. He retweeted that out today.

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Did you see that? Somebody told me that your column formed.

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>He's got a couple of followers, so I'm thinking, I

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>think this might get Mr Winklers some notoriety because nobody

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 1>let's let's just founded Bloomberg News, you know, I mean,

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:40.319
<v Speaker 1>but Musk does have eighty two point four million followers.

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>That's big. I'm just a reporter trying. You're just a reporter.

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>You and Chinpeg and your team doing great stuff as always,

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>lots of data in your column here. So again, check

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>it out on Bloomberg dot com. Uh, and on the

0:13:53.480 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal and on Twitter apparently and on Twitter want

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a switch to crypto? Taxes? You have to pay taxes

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>apparently meant on your crypto gains. Tom, we'll write founder

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of Wealth Ability Joints us here. Tom, give us your overview.

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>What do you what do you tell your clients about

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>crypto and the tax implications of crypto and all things crypto? Thanks, Matt. Well,

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>what you have to realize is that every time you

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>use crypto, you've sold it and it's treated as a

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>taxabull transaction. So you have to keep track not just

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>when you actually sell it. Let's say you're you know,

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>selling to Bitcoin went up and so you're selling something,

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>but you're actually using it. When you use it, you

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>also have to pay tax on that. And losses are

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>capital losses, so they're limited. Gains are capital gains, and

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>so if you hold it for more than a year

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you actually get a tax benefits. Wait, uh, capital losses

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>are limited. They can only upset capital gains. Ah, that

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>is such a huge bummer. Um, I'm sure that no

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>one's keeping track of bitcoin. They're using when they buy something. Um.

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>In fact, this whole area is so new. Do you

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of people coming to you saying like,

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I just need uh you know crypto tax rules one

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>oh one? Because how how would you have any idea

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>what kind of tax burden coin or or an n

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>f T is going to generate for you? Well? Yeah, totally.

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Because you know, if you if you spend money, you

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:37.239
<v Speaker 1>don't typically think, oh I've got a tax taxical transaction

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>there I have to track when I spend money. You

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>don't think that. But with crypto you do. It's like

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>it's like if you actually, um use the stock. Let's

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>say you use some of your apple stock to buy something,

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>it would be the same thing. Uh. That's the way

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the I R S treats it. So tracking it is

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the actually the number one issue right now is how

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>do you track all of your crypto transactions. I'm just

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>guessing the I R S has no idea what to

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>do with crypto? Are they tracking this stuff closely? Did

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>they know what they're doing? No? I don't think so.

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I actually don't think anybody really knows what they're doing

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>from a tax standpoint. Let's never stopped the I R

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>s yep. That's the point that has never stopped the irs.

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>What However, in the in the Infrastructure bill last year,

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>they did they are going to require crypto exchanges to track.

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>So at least the crypto exchanges will have to track.

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of like back in the early um nineties. UM,

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I recall when people were day trading and they had

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to track every single day trade. But now the brokers

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>do it, right, that's what's going on in crypto. All right, Tom,

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks very much, appreciative. Tax Day wasn't confusing enough. Now

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>we've got crypto, you have to you know, track the

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>taxable uh transactions that you have with crypto. Tom will right,

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>he's a founder of wealth Ability giving us some thoughts

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>here on crypto when I don't know, I don't I

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:04.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think I've ever claimed anything on my tax returns

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 1>for crypto at this point, and I you know what,

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't plan on doing it ever. About that you're

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to do really yeah, I mean, at some

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>point it's going to become, um, just like any other asset,

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 1>or you're gonna have to have regulators to declare it

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>like a currency. Wad of cash in my pocket I'm

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>showing Matt, that's how we roll here. Matt. Back in

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 1>the summer of before between my first and second year

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 1>business school, Duke did an internship at Merrill Lynch Investment Bank.

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:38.159
<v Speaker 1>My key transaulor Meryl. My key transaction from that summer

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>was a million dollar I think that was amount liquid

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>yield option note a lion for ker McGee, the energy

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 1>company down in Texas. Uh wow, yep. We can't believe

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that you have trouble understanding crypto when you're dealing with

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>such incredibly complex transactions. I have no idea what you

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 1>just said. Yep, it was cool. Discounted the note for

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Kirman Ghee. That was pretty cool. I can't remember the

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>banker who I pitched it with, but anyway, that was

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:09.479
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. Anyway, they reported some numbers today. Uh Shali

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Bassing Joints is here in our Bloomberg in Erector Broker

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>studio Shnale. How did my friends at Bank of America

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Merrill Lynch do. It's pretty fascinating. You would not have

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>expected this to be a quarter where anything hit a record,

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 1>but advisory fees for the first quarter hit a record,

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>equity trading hit a record, and part of that was

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>because you have buy side clients of the likes of

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds and other clients, big investors still taking on

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 1>financing in order to engage with these markets, more derivatives

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>trading and so really robust trading desks there in the

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>face of expected high declines. Talk to me about compensation.

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>That's my favorite topic. We talked about these investment banks.

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>What are what are the big banks saying now because

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>they're paying their junior bankers a lot more, I assume

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that means they're paying their senior bankers more. How big

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 1>of an issue is this for the margins, Yeah, it

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>depends on who you are. For Bank of America in particular,

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 1>remember their headcount has declined steadily over the last couple

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of quarters, so you know, you can raise prices for

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 1>some bankers, but you can also not have as many

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of them. Bank of America is keeping control of costs.

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:18.120
<v Speaker 1>And remember it's not just the bankers, it's the investment

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in technology. This quarter, Bank of America generated more than

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>half of its total sales through digital means. Yes, fascinating,

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and so you are seeing they have hundreds of patents

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>out for more you know, advanced technology and you do

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>see them really keeping control over their costs at a

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>time where they're willing to invest to gain more share

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>in a tough market. So we've this is the last

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of the major Wall Street banks to report, right, if

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you step back and look at them, can you say

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 1>something universal about the banks this season? I go back

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to what Jamie Diamond and his executive said a couple

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of days ago, which is that the probability of a

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>recession went from being low to less low. So you

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>have all these banks that are, you know, not answering

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>questions necessarily on what the probability of a recession is,

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 1>but the fact that it may happen, and this is

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 1>what their businesses could look like in that scenario. Interestingly,

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 1>in the event of an interest rate rise that's more

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>severe than initially expected, Bank of America says that rates

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>would have to rise a lot more in order to

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>impact the way that people are borrowing, because right now,

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>consumers are still pretty healthy at least how they look

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>at it. Yeah, when I when I think about Bank

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>of America, I think about Wells Fargo. I think about

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, real lending to real businesses on main street,

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.679
<v Speaker 1>whether that's Main Street small town, you know, say main street,

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>big city, USA, but really lending to fund growth. What

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 1>are they saying about loan demanding? I mean, do you

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>want to mortgage a five percent? That is mortgage? I

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>mean historically, I mean it's not three percent that Matt,

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you know the mortgage arbitress. You're got just a couple

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of months. I'll spend my easter somebody talking to mortgages somehow.

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 1>But we are yes. I mean, listen, it does have

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>an impact here on residential home loan originations, and you

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:11.959
<v Speaker 1>see it a lot of the major banks. But the

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 1>thing is credit card spend and credit card borrowing is

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 1>still pretty high, So there is still borrowing. It's just

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 1>not everywhere necessarily. So in terms of assumptions, right, um,

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>do we have to assume that the FED is going

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to drive us into a recession? And I mean because

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that will change loan demand? Right, The assumption is that

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you can't look out past three months. The assumption is

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the next three months things could be okay, but after

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that things are very cloudy, and it's really anyone's guest

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>where things go. Remember, Bank of America has sold off

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty heavily this year, about four cent or so so

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:55.959
<v Speaker 1>they are rising today, but it seems like these banks

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:58.880
<v Speaker 1>are trading within a range here with not too much

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>upside on how some of those clouds leave the horizon.

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>When I think about the retail side of the business, Shannale,

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just I always read stories about Bank A poaching

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>broker from Bank B. Is that still a thing? Oh? Yeah.

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>People love the wealth business and if you look at

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the price to book ratios, that means a place that

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>they're trading at. It's really JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>trading more richly than anybody else, which shows you there's

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>a premium on wealth here. Good stuff, good stuff Wall Street.

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean some good numbers. I think coming out of

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>this first course, maybe the expectations were a little bit low,

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>but we got through most of the big financials. Shale

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>keeping us in the loop as she always does. Shanale,

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Basketball Street reporter for Bloomberg News. Thanks for listening to

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three.

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.199
<v Speaker 1>Put on False Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>before the pod cask. You can always catch us worldwide

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Radio.