WEBVTT - Toney Awards

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from my Heart Radio,

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>advice from Guillotine Leagues dot com. Here's your host. Welcome

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.119
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Football Weekly. I am Paul Charchi and co

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>host today are Scott Fish and Brian Johnson. Hello, guys,

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey Church, Oh high, Scott, how are you hey? Let's

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>go to also, yeah, back, that's been a little while

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>lost to get to. Over the course of this show,

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>we will, as always get to the nine players upon

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>whom you can take a chance. We will answer three

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>tough questions, we'll give you some premature speculation, and we'll

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>break down every matchup Fantasy Football Weekly style with letter

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>grades on all the players you care about. And we

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>begin with the Eagles taking the Colts. Scott, Eagles need

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 1>to bounce back performance here, cold Squeaky Wheel maybe a

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>squeaky Wheel game performances. I'm really glad that you brought

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that up, because yes, it could be right there. And

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>who would be the squeaky wheel player here? Yeah, I

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's probably got to be a J. Brown after

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>his kind of dud last week. But did he squeak?

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he squeaked, but I think saks. I

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>think the whole team is squeaking this. They're just not

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>doing it publicly. He's there squeaking behind the scenes, squeaking. Yes,

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>we've got an automatic A on Jail and Hurts. You

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>aren't mentioning him anyway. Colts isn't a great matchup. They

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>don't a loot of ton of yards passing, but six

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of the ten quarterbacks they faced had multiple scores. They've

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>given up three rushing scorts. Hurts tends to do that.

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>So a grade there. I got a B grade on

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>A J. Brown. You're not mentioning him. He had add

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>last week. As we just mentioned, um, I would expect

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the Colts to run a ton and try to emulate

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>what Washington did. But Brown had five touchdowns in the

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>three previous games, and Philly is angry and that that's

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>squeaky wheel man. I got it. I got He's got

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to say something could be a squeaky win. I don't know.

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 1>The Colts are number one against the slot though, which

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>is where Brown often plays. So that's why I only

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>have a B grade. I think it's gonna be a

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of running and Uh. Over to DeVante Smith. I

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>have a bench grade on him. Over the last five weeks,

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>only two wide receivers have top fifty yards on the Colts.

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>That was Terry McLaurin. We don't have Matt here for

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:32.519
<v Speaker 1>the sound or we should get that on the board.

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 1>Uh and DeVante Adams and it took eight plus targets

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>for each to get there. I think I think Brown

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>is the more likely guy to have a good day.

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>It's not outside the realm of the possibilities. But the

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>number two wide receiver has done almost nothing against the Colts.

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>The best best game from a number two wide receiver

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>against the Colts was fifty three yards and that took

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>eight targets. DeVante Smith doesn't usually get that kind of volume.

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>And Smith such a boom or bust guy, and this

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>feels like a bust game. I'm with you very day.

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>It does. It does. We don't just keep an eye

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>on what the tight end situation happens. It might be

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>six ft seven Tyree Jackson that takes that role. It

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>might be Stole. Keep an eye on it, but I

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>don't I have him on the bench for this but

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>don't you think that with Goddard out that's there are

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be a lot more targets to spread around

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>at fed that way Once again, I think, I think

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis keeps this game on the ground and keeps it

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a slow pace where maybe it's not as many targets

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>as a normal game. So you're telling me you like

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Miles Sanders a lot. I do like Miles Sanders. I

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>gotta B grade on on Sanders. The Colts d is

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>allowing the most running back touches per game against them

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>at over thirty, but only a three point eight yards

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>per carry. But the volume should be there for the

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>clear number one in a potent offense. That's already that

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>he's being very effective with his lower touch accounts and

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>getting goal line work. And the weird thing is no

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>catches for three straight for Miles Sanders. He can catch there,

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>just they don't throw. Yeah, that's part of the B grade.

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Not a lot of catching. And he's only top to

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>eighty yards twice at it took seventeen plus touches to

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>get there. So just a B grade for him. Kenneth

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Gainwell I have on the bench. I at first thought,

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>oh the Colts are fourth have allowed the fourth most receptions,

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>most receiving yards. That originally had me thinking gag Well's

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the sneaky play here. He doesn't catch that much either.

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles have under a hundred receiving yards total out

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>of their running backs in this entire season, not even

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a single performance over twenty two yards. They don't throw

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>with Godard out right right, it's possible, Yeah, it's it's possible.

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, Matt Ryan had to find against

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the easiest QB match matchups possible last week,

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>but only through times. It seems like this new Jeff

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Saturday offense is gonna run a lot like that is

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the ticket to beating the Eagles and doing it on

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the ground exactly, and Washington laid that blueprint. So with

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>low volume, I don't want Ryan in my starting lineup.

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I will say I do have se grades on both

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Pittman and Campbell because is Ryan is Ryan in his

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>last three games, is hyper targeting those two and basically

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>just those two twenty six targets for Pittman, h thirty

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:13.679
<v Speaker 1>four for thirty four for Pittman, twenty nine for Campbell

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>in those three games. Um, everybody else just fourteen total targets.

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Guys who have gotten that kind of target volume have

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>been in the mid sixties to a hundred yards against

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles. I think I think we can see those

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:32.119
<v Speaker 1>two get eight to ten targets and decent sea level games. Uh.

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know what to make of

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the tight ends. They're all switching up, and now it's

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Grandson's turns, so I have them on the bench

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>right now has been ruled out of this game. So

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're desperate for a duard threat, and I do

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>think Grandson's Grandson's starting to emerge, but it's it's one game.

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>It's one game, so I'm not gonna anoint it the

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 1>changing of the guard here in this one. When the

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>changing of the guard comes, it's coming for Gilani Woods, Okay, there,

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>it might be like he was my number two tight

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>end coming out of this of this rookie class. I

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 1>like him a lot. Automackab automatic A Automackay is that

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a thing something a guy? Doesn't it? Oh? Man? Automatic?

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>A for Jonathan Taylor, they're running a ton Washington laid

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the breuprint. We've talked about this a bunch. I don't

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>even talk about Jonathan tayl you don't, but just let

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>me say this, how great was that breakaway run from

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Taylor last week that we brought you back to

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>last year like he was doing that once a half

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 1>last year and did just finally get the breakaway touchdown.

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>We're sitting here worried that he'd be shut down, that

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that anko would bother him all year, and then you're like, oh, okay, okay,

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>all right, all right, yeah, let's go to the Brown's

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 1>taking on the Bills. Brian, This game would have been

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 1>far more interesting had it been played in Buffalo. No,

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>it would not. Respective we want points, yeah, reality football wants.

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I love the Blizzard games. Both of the Ruddy backs

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>would have been shorter than the snowfall, though, so there's

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>something to that. It would have been all Nick Chubb,

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 1>go straight ahead. I was. I was very excited. But

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>now we're gonna be in the antiseptic Ford field with

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>perfect weather conditions whatever suited first shootout. I'm much happier

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:20.119
<v Speaker 1>this way. But uh, we'll start with the Cleveland side

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and Nick Chubb, who will not be plowing through the snow,

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>giving him an a Since Week eight, the Bills are

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>allowing seven rushing yards per game to running backs, the

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>second most in the league. During that span, Chub is

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>averaging five point seven yards per carry. This year, It's

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>an eight teen carries per game, which is a lot.

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>He's only seen twenty twenty carries are more three times

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>though so far. But in each of those three games,

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland has won. And you wanna know how many wins

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland has three, So feed Nick Chubb in this game.

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Also definitely worth noting. Winebacker Tremaine Edmonds has been ruled

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>out for the Bills, which outstanding. Also very good coverage

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of linebacker and that could affect David and joke if

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>he ends up playing. Yeah, this we'll talk more about

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the Bills defense, but not as scary as it was

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the season. But I still have Kareem Hunt

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. Over his last four games, Hunt has

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>gotten double digit double digit carries just once. He's topped

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>one catch just once during that same span, and there's

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>not really a pass catching angle here. The Bills have

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>allowed one running back to top thirty receiving yards and

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>they and they've surrendered just two scores to the position

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>through the air over the wide receivers a MARII Cooper

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>gets a B. I was going to mention his horrific

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>home in a way splits, but I can't really do

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that now it's kind of a neutral site. What I

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>do know is a corner of factor. Davious White will

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 1>not make his return for the Bills. It seems like

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>we've been waiting on that weekend and week out. But

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that bodes well for Cooper as well. In Buffalo. Has

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:55.319
<v Speaker 1>surrendered five wide receiver touchdowns and toward receiver performances performances

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>over the last four games. So a B for Cooper

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and I see for Donovan people's jones might take it

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>handsome me wide receiver from last week. I think you

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>get for that yards, but we'll take five. How about

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown? He has get the score, but at least

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>seventy receiving yards in five of his last six games.

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>But most importantly, I did the research here, guys. He

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:22.599
<v Speaker 1>was born in Detroit University of Michigan. This is like

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a platinum homecoming. It's not like just the college is

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a home something born and raised. Oh yeah, you know,

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:31.959
<v Speaker 1>you're not playing in the enemy stadium. You're playing in

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a neutral site stadium where all your fans, your family

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>can come, so it's super sed. Yeah, we're moving it

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>up to a B. I'm going to A. Yeah. I'm

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>getting too excited people, I'm almost deep pantsed right now.

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm so excited about this homecoming, So a B J pants.

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna move on to the tight ends now with

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>David and Joku. Give him a sea. Sounds like he'll

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>make his return. Uh this week. The Bills are allowing

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>more than five catches per game to tight ends, which

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a mouth watering production in the tight

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>end waste land. So we'll take that. So see for

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in Joco if he goes and if he somehow sits,

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I would give that see to Harrison Bryant like I

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>did last week and lastly Jacoby Brissette borderline see, but

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I have him on the bench. The Bill steps are

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>rendered zero or one passing touchdowns in seven of nine games.

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Only Patrick Mahomes and Aaron Rodgers were able to throw

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>for multiple scores against them, but both that too, so

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>buffaloizing can allowed three touchdowns yeah this year, and mostly

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>two were one. So Prisette on the bench over the

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Bill side Devin Singletary gets a B. Over his last

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>four his volume has been on the rise, averaging thirteen

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>carries as opposed to only eight through the first five weeks.

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>The Browns were just torched for three total touchdowns by

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>by Miami's back, so Singletary should be a solid start.

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Stephan Digs as a solid start, he gets

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>an A. Even though the Browns has held Tyreek Hill

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and Jalen Waddle to combined one ten yards and no

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>loan receiver has top seventy yards against Cleveland over the

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>last four they have surrendered five wide received for touchdowns

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>during that span. So in a for Digs and for

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>those reasons, those same reasons you gotta give Gabe Davis

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to be. You play him when he's healthy, and he

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>is this week, So solid start for him. Not a

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>solid start for Dawson Knox, but I'll still give him

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>a SEA because again it's the tight end waste land.

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>There aren't many options out there. There they are. I

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>will never forget on our serious x M show, I

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>had to our producer had me sing that tight end

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>wasteland to rally Wasteland. I wasn't on that. I feel

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>like I was on the show. But anyway, anyway, we

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>don't care about serious XM radio here, so you can

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 1>roll with Knox in a pinch, but temporary expectations. The

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Browns are allowing just three catches and forty four yards

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>per game to tight ends, and they've surrendered just one

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.599
<v Speaker 1>score to the position. And lastly, Josh Allen gets in

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a the elbow doesn't seem like it's that much of

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a concern anymore. No, but no, here's the thing that

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you need to know about Josh Allen is zero designed

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>runs last week because of the elbow. None clear. You

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:02.599
<v Speaker 1>know a week later, you know, is that going to

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 1>be still in place? No design runs take some of

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the ceiling off. Josh Allen some four yards and scrambles,

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's not you know, it's not the same as

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the designed runs. And so I think a little that

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>ceiling that you normally get with Josh Allen is not

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>in place here. When we come back, take a chance

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 1>on me nine players not normally a new starting lineup.

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Any of these guys available on the waiver wire. Find

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>out who they are. When we come back to Fantasy

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly, take a chance on me nine players who

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you would not normally start many of these guys available

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>on the waiver wire. We begin at the quarterback position.

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish, Who you got? I have Jimmy Garoppolo. In

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>his last four game versus the Cardinals. Uh. Since he's

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>been with the four Niners for those interdivisional battles, he

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>averages three thirty one yards and three scores per game.

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>He blows up on them every time owns the Cards.

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Pair that with the fact that Cardinals ranked third worst

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>against fantasy quarterbacks, giving up the fourth most yards, fifth

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>most passing touchdowns, and also being bottom ten and many

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>other metrics. I got Jimmy g I like it. Brian,

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>your take a chance at me quarterback? I got Kenny

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>p Kenny Pickett at home against the Bengals, who should

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:44.199
<v Speaker 1>see the return of cornerback Mike Hilton, but corner Trey

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Flowers and safety Dax Hill are banged up, might not

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>play since he's best corner Hidobe Ausier certainly won't play,

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>so I'm liking pick it a lot. This week. The

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Bengals have only allowed multiple passing touchdowns once. That was

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield in Week nine. That's not eight. But listen

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to the quarterbacks the Bengals have faced this season Mitch Rubiskie,

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Rush, Joe Flacco, Teddy Bridgewater, Andy Dalton, Marcus Mariotta,

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and Jacoby Rissette. That's all. That's the full list. There's

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson and they knocked out too. But like basically,

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>pick it might be the best pass thrower of the

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>based season. So I like Pickett. All right, I'm gonna

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>take Danny j As might take a chance of me

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>quarterback against Chicago posing quarterbacks averaging a healthy two hundred

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>sixty six yards and almost two touchdowns against the Lions.

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>But the big angle on Daniel Jones is on the ground.

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Detroit has been housed by mobile quarterbacks like Jalen Hurts,

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Gino Smith, Justin Fields, who combined for four touchdowns against

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the Lions. Fields rolled up hundred forty seven rushing yards

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>against the Lions last week. And still I like I

0:14:56.040 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>like Jones both air and ground. This week, go to

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the running back position, Scott, I have my good buddy

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Tyler algae here. I don't know if become good buddy. Uh.

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>This is the fourth best matchup he's got this week

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>against the Bears, who just got rid of ro Kuwan

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Smith and Robert Quinn. To make it even easier, they've

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>allowed seven running back touchdowns in just the last three weeks.

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>You might think the Atlanta back field seems a bit

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of a mess, but Algier is out snapping him, out

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>out snapping Cordaro Patterson out touching him. He's getting more

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>pass game work than Patterson, who weirdly only has six

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>catches for thirty nine yards on the year. He's getting

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>nothing in the past game Patterson is. Algier is getting

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>more of the work. He gets almost thirteen touches every

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>single game. I got Tyler Algier in a great matchup

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>against the Bears. All right, you're running back. I'm going

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Warren again, who I used last week, and he

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>was serviceable. Over the last two weeks. Warren his average

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>ten and a half touches and seventies six combo yards

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>per game. He's pretty good, as further evidence by the

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>fact he's fifteenth in yards after a contact per attempt

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>among running backs and his ranked five in Pro Football

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Focuses Elusive rating. And lastly, the Bengals have softened against

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the run since Week five, allowing the sixth most rushing

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>yards per game and the second highest explosive run rate.

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Explosive output should be here for all. There's a lot

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of explosiveness here. Isaiah Pacheco is your new lead back

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Chiefs since gaining the starting work and back

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to back weeks. Last week a career high sixteen carries.

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Now you may be thinking that's not that much sixteen carries.

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>The previous starter, Clyde Edwards Despair, had topped sixteen carries

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>once in his last twenty four games. So this is

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a pretty strong statement by Andy Reid, who was clearly

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>finally shaken off the sunk cost fallacy of the first

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>round blunder that was Clyde Edwards Despair. Well got just

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>four snaps last week. Well, and the Chiefs made a

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>claim on you know, ben In They didn't, but they

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>were ready. Yeah, Ronald Jones still in roster, probably would

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>have been the guy out. Um, how is Pacheco doing

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>so far? Four point seven yards per carry is pretty good.

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:16.679
<v Speaker 1>His eighty two yards last week were the most by

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a Chiefs runner in twenty six games. Great matchup this week.

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles has surrendered one d seventy rushing yards per

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>game to running backs over their last three games and

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>they ranked twenty nine and run defense by Pro Football Focus.

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Isaiah Pochecko, Let's go to the receivers. Scott Fish, who

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you got? Yeah? In the receiving game, I have Darius

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Tony who will we will definitely talk about later. But

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>also MVS is currently Marquez Valdes Scantling is sick right now,

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Juju Smith Schuster has been ruled out already, Mikole Hartman

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:54.719
<v Speaker 1>is out, and on I R. It's basically Tony and

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Sky Moore and Justin Watson for the Kansas City Chiefs

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>going up against a Chargers defense that is bottom ten

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>in both receptions allowed and receiving touchdowns allowed to wide receivers.

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 1>All right, Brian, you take a chance for me receiver.

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't envision this. I was hoping, hoping to be

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>giving him a grades at this point in the season.

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>But I have Alan Robinson at the I'm sorry at

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the At the Saints, we all know Cooper Cup is

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 1>on I R. So there are vacated targets everywhere. I

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.239
<v Speaker 1>think it's over thirty percent of the Rams targets are

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>now vacated with Cup on I R. The Saints have

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>also been awaiting the return of cornerback Marshawn Lattimore, but

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>he has been ruled out for the remainder of the season,

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>so that's not happening. Robinson had a thirty four percent

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:44.120
<v Speaker 1>slot rate this season before Cup went down, so those

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>snaps should go up. He'll also get plenty of work

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>on the outside. I just think they get creative with

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>him where they tried to. The Saints have allowed the

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>tenth most yards per game to opposing wide receivers. Are

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a ton of wide receivers and on the rams now,

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>but Robinson's my guy. I think Deante Johnson counts as

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a g a chance of me receiver at this point.

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>He has not scored this year. It's gone nine games. Well,

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>he and Robinson were going like in the fourth round

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>late in summer draft. So if I use a rob

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>you can use I think that counts. Um. Although granted,

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>mims To Brisky and Kenny Pickett have not thrown from

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>multiple scores in any game, which so it's probably much

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>more on the quarterback position than on Johnson himself. Um

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>he was. He played Cincinnati this week's opponent a week one,

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.640
<v Speaker 1>put up a decent game, seven catches, fifty five yards

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>his primary defender, and you alluded to this earlier rookie

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>backup Cam Taylor Britt Brian, who allowed a score last week,

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and he's giving up a perfect passer rating in the

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>three games in which he has substituted for injured cornerback

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Chidobe Awuzier. So we'll try Deonte Johnson. Let's see we

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>can get him in the end zone first time this year.

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's go from a Deontay to a Deonta. As we

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>look at the Panthers taking on the Ravens. Deanta Foreman

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 1>is the Panther you care about the most three big

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>games and one dud game since the Christian McCaffrey trade.

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually a little bit worried about how much a

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>healthy Tuba Hubbard is going to work into his work

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 1>eat into his workload. But if Foreman's anywhere near his

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>average of twenty carries per game, he's gonna be just

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>fine here. And here's let me just explain a little

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>bit more about why I'm worried. So Hubbard came back.

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>He was questionable going into last week's game. That was

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a Thursday night game, and it was in the rain,

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think They just didn't want to risk the

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:32.360
<v Speaker 1>ankle injury on a slick surface when you've got a

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.199
<v Speaker 1>big power back like form and running forward, so they

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 1>gave for him and all the work. I think Hubbard's

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna eat into this workload much much more than people realize,

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 1>and I'm nervous about that with Foreman here. Baltimore has

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:46.640
<v Speaker 1>yet to allow running back to top ninety one rushing yards,

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 1>but has a lot of four touchdowns in the last

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>four weeks, So hopefully Foreman can get goal line work

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>here and he gets a B grade. Hubbard is startable.

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I've got the C grade on him for the reasons

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I just talked about. I think I think he is

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 1>going to get more used than most people realize. Um

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>also medium and basically a neutral style matchup. And the

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:06.479
<v Speaker 1>last time Hubbard was healthy, he ran for sixty three

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>yards on a touchdown. So startable here, and then the

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>only other Panther you care about is d J. Moore.

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Last week's four catch twenty nine yard performance against the

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>league's worst past defense does not give you a lot

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of confidence in starting more this week against Baltimore, coming

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:24.919
<v Speaker 1>off of by and with Baker Mayfield under center in

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 1>five full games with Baker Mayfield d J. Moore's averaging

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine yards and zero point two touchdowns. That's it, um.

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the only way you can rationalize starting more,

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>who I've got a bench grade on, is if you

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:41.120
<v Speaker 1>believe the Ravens will jump to a big early lead

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to be all passing for the rest

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>of the game. But I don't see that happen. I

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily see that happening because the Ravens offense just

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>hasn't done that much this year. So d J Moore

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:53.199
<v Speaker 1>bench great. Let's go to the Baltimore side, speaking of

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>under underwhelming offenses, as I alluded to, and I hate

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>sound like a broken record because I I do Baltimore

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and I've talked about Lamar Jackson many times

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in the show. The passing just isn't going very well

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and as rushing doesn't automatically make up for it. Get

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>this from week four forward. Lamar Jackson is quarterback twenty two.

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>That feels like a guy you should have sabotaged drop

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a three weeks ago when we were talking about absolutely

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 1>His average game since then is one hundred sixty nine

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>passing yards, one passing touchdown, sixty five rushing yards and

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>no rushing touchdowns. That's Lamar Jackson's average average grant game

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 1>over the last effectively six weeks. Pathers secondary took a

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 1>huge loss with with the injury to star cornerback Dante Jackson,

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 1>who has done for the year after suffering a torn

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 1>achilles But Baltimore's lack of wide out talent is just

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>is just so thin. I can't tell you that Jackson's

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna bounce back here. I can do no more than

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a B grade on Jackson and drop it to a

0:22:56.840 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>C grade if Mark Andrews does not play, So let's

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 1>talk through. Andrews still working his way through knee and

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>shoulder injuries. Looks like he's headed for a game time decision.

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.719
<v Speaker 1>The Ravens desperately need him, and he's got strong individual

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 1>matchups if he does play. Safety Miles hearts Field allows

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the most receptions and yards of any safety in the league,

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and linebacker Shack Thompson has allowed the sixth most receptions

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and seventh most yards of any linebacker in coverage this season.

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.479
<v Speaker 1>So if Andrews starts, I'm giving him a B grade.

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>If he doesn't go and you inject Isaiah likely will

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.679
<v Speaker 1>give him a C grade. If Andrews does not go

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, all the receivers are on the bench. What

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 1>a total disaster these guys are. Get this, The entire

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore position group is averaging sixty five receiving yards since

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Rashod Bateman's injury. Sixty divided three ways tells you why

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you're not starting Prochet, DuVernay Robinson any of those guys.

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Then let's go to the running game. Sed Words gets

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a C grade. Might not be back to a full

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>workload off his hamstring injury, but in the same situation

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.719
<v Speaker 1>we saw earlier this year, the Ravens instantly loaded him

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>up with sixteen carries, and in that one full game,

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 1>he led the running backs with four red zone carries

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and rewarded Greg Romans confidence with two touchdowns. In that game.

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>The Panthers have seen the fifth most rushing attempts, which

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>has led them to surrendering the sixth most rushing yards

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 1>and the six most touchdowns to opposing backs. Gus Edwards

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>gets a C grade on the prospects of a touchdown,

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 1>and Kenyan Drake can also be started with a C

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>grade and bumb them up to a B grade if

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 1>it turns out Gus can't go. And even if Gus plays,

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 1>though he is startable in this game, he'll need to

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>score from distance, though, as Gus likely gets goal line carries,

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Drake probably gets more total carries in this game. The

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Ravens wide receivers as a whole have eight hundred and

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>forty five yards. That's it, gosh, I mean Tyree Hill

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Marks Brown has four d eighty five yards. He's played

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in sixths. He's probably on base for the more receiving yard.

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>It's the old team you left, all right, but that

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that traded him, he didn't leave them. That sounds right, Uh,

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Scotty Falcons. Le'll see if we can knock this thing

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>down in about three and a half four minutes. Okay, well,

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Justin Fields is gonna getting a gray. The QB one

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>back to back weeks is almost an auto a right

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>now with his rushing upside. I came I figured this

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>out to this week. I've been ranking guys for twenty

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 1>five years. Don't believe I've ever ranked a Bears quarterback

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>as my number one play going into a week until

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 1>this week. First time. Yeah, against that Atlanta defense is

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 1>one quick one quick angle. Sorry no one has mentioned this.

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>The Bear or the Falcons probably could have taken justin

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>fields last year and it would have made sense. Grooving

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback of the future. Revenge took Kyle Pitts instead.

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Spike game justin fields. Spike game over there. Okay, it's

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>an easy against the bottom six past past defense. Uh Mooney,

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I gotta b grade on is still the really the

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>only startable wide receiver for the Bears. Clay was only

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 1>playing about a third of the snaps. No one else

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 1>is really uh really a good start there. This is

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 1>the number one easiest matchup for opposing wide receivers. Posing

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers specifically average seven catches for ninety six yards

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and a score against the Falcons. That's really Mooney's role

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 1>in this offense. We'll see if he gets there. But

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>he's had double digit Fantasy days and three the last four.

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>You should feel pretty good about a start here. Co

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>comet a grade. Five touchdowns in the last three games

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is totally sustainable. That's just it's absolutely gonna keep happening.

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not, but the Falcons are allowing six catches for

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 1>sixty yards to tight end tight ends on average this year,

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 1>but only just one score, so we'll see how that

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>mashes up. It's hard to tell, but four to five

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>catches and forties seventy yards feel safe in this matchup

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>here for Commet A grade over to David Montgomery. Somehow

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:56.360
<v Speaker 1>there are three A grade bears. How is this possible?

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 1>With Commet quietly or a top five offense and David

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery With Leal Herbert now on I R. Montgomery is

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 1>going to get the overwhelming majority of the backfield trust

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 1>and Ebner is the only other back they have on

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>roster who has had a touch this year. In Montgomery's

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>missed game, Herbert took it twenty plus touches. I'm gonna

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>guess it's gonna be similar with Herbert gon Montgomery is

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:20.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna flip it and take twenty plus touches. He has

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>fifteen plus touches in seven games. That extra workload against

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 1>a team that has allowed the fourth most yards in

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 1>the last three weeks, the tenth worst fantasy defense on

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the season, and eleven running back scores in ten games.

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 1>A grade for David Montgomery this week. I really like him.

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, I have a C grade on

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Mariota. Despite only averaging a hundred seventy four yards

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>per game passing, he tax on thirty to sixty rushing

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>yards nearly every game, and he needs it. He scored

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:51.880
<v Speaker 1>in all but two games, as multiple touchdowns in half

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>his games. But other mobile quarterbacks against the Bears, like

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Trey Lance, Daniel Jones, even Dak Prescott tagged the tag

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bears for forty to fifty yards and a score.

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>So he gets a C grade just and it's a

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>forty nine point over under in Vegas, it's gonna likely

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a high scoring game. I got Marioder with

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the Sea, Drake London with the CEA as well. It's

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>been rough lately. Rough. There's been random, yeah, random pop

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>offs by Cadero, Hard Hodgen, demere Bird, but London is

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:23.199
<v Speaker 1>the consistent one, getting about six targets per game. Hasn't

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>topped forty yards since Week three, that is the worry,

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>but seven wide receivers have hit that mark in just

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the last three games against the Bear or Bears over

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that span their fourth worst against wide receivers, allowing the

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>second most yards. I have a C grade on London.

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I have a C grade on Kyle Pitts. I mean,

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you aren't benching him. It's Kyle Pitts, You're not. He's

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty much I will say he's matchup proof. He's matchup proof.

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:50.959
<v Speaker 1>Though good matchup, bad matchup still get you two catches

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>for twenty to thirty yards. Uh. Given four teams on

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>buy and the injuries to Earth's and Goddard and evert uh,

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>he's he's startable C grade plus. The only two tight

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>ends that five targets against the Bears had good games

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that Pitts gets over that, and the Bears have allowed

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns to tight ends the last three weeks, so

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>there's some optimism. There were those targets catchable for those

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>other tight ends, I'm like the targets that Cowpits. You

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>couldn't let it go. Kyle Pits does not get any

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>catchable targets. But Tyler l Jeer was my running back.

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Take a chance on me player. He's the only running

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>back I'd start in this one. Not no, not Patterson,

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Not the way he's playing right now now. It's the

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>usage is inexplicable. I want to believe Patterson's gonna bounce

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>back and become more of a workhorse, but we haven't

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>seen any help. The world would be a better place

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>if the Falcons did take Justin Fields and then Kyle

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Pitts got to go somewhere else. Oh no, Tyler L Jr.

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Did not start himself this week. You want to change

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 1>your mind, I'll give you a chance. Send this. You've

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>got a whole show to go. Yeah, we'll talk about

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>when we come back. New York Jets taking on the Patriots.

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Will find out what you can do with elements of

0:29:56.360 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the Jets passing game, including Garrett Wilson in this game,

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>well the Wilson Wilson connection to help your fantasy team

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>find out when we come back. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I am Paul Charching my coast or Scott Fish. You

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>can follow Scott on Twitter at Scott Fish and you

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>can follow Brian Johnson at b t x J and

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:37.479
<v Speaker 1>I am at Paul Charching. You just gotta figure out

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>how to spell it. That's the it's the challenge. It's

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a game within the game of fantasy football. Figure out

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>how to spell my name. Back to the matchups. Jets

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>taking on the Patriots. Brian Jet side of this game,

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Michael Carter lead back against a pretty good run defense.

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>It is a great run defense. And I will mention

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'll reference this game. These teems just met in

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>week eight, so some very recent history up or down

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in that game. I'm pretty sure he was down by then.

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>He was. He was because Michael Carter and James Robinson

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>combined for forty three scoreless rushing yards on twelve carries

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in that first meeting. And the Patriots have surrender just

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 1>two total touchdowns and running backs all season. So I'll

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 1>give Carter a see if you're desperate. I got Robinson

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. Um, but I would explore other options

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>other than Michael Carter. But if you have to start him,

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. But there are other options out there most likely.

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, a soft seed for Carter, a CEE for

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Wilson. Opposing wide receivers are averaging him easily. Eleven

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>catches and a hundred twenty seven yards and less than

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:41.719
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown per game. Has a hole against the Patriots.

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 1>But Wilson had six catches for a hundred fifty yards

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>in the weekend games, so there's some glimmer of hope there.

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>So Jald Mills out there, he's awful, that's you know,

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>if you can, if you can get that matchup for

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Wilson, I like his prospects. Yeah, so he got

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the sea Denzel Mims, who has emerged as the wide

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 1>receiver to uh, he's on the and so he did

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>have seventy six yards in that first meeting, but just

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>saw three targets. I'm not chasing those numbers. So he's

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>on the bench, but Tyler Conklin is not. He gets

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a B in the tight end waste land. The Patriots

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>have surrendered the most tight end touchdowns this year. Two

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of those went to Conklin and wee Gate when he

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>also had six catches for seventy nine yards. So B

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 1>for Conklin, but a B in terms of bench for

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Zack Wilson. He did have three and fifty five yards

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and two touchdowns in the first meeting, but he also

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 1>threw three picks. And in his ten career road starts

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and this game is on the road for Wilson, he's

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 1>averaging one passing yards and has totaled four passing touchdowns.

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>So he's on the bench for me over to the

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Patriots side or Modre Stevenson not on the bench, but

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 1>just to see this week he will split time with

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Damien Harris, who looks close off the injury list altogether.

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 1>And I assumed that Harris didn't playing this Week eight game,

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 1>but he did um something like eleven carries, but he played, Um, Harris.

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, but Stevenson had a strong game regardless of

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Harris playing, finishing with one forty three combo yards uh,

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>including seven catches in that game against the Jets, the

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>most combo yards of the Jets have allowed to a

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 1>single back all season. But it's a tough matchup on paper.

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>New York is allowing just four yards per carry since

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Week three and they've surrendered three total touchdowns to oppose

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and running backs during that span. So just to see

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>for Stevenson, I got Harris on the bench, Gotta see

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>what he does, what kind of what kind of snap percentage,

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 1>he sees, all that stuff. So he's on the bench

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 1>for me this week and a bad matchup. Jacoby Myers.

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I was closely giving a bench grade two, but I

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 1>give him a CE based on expected volume. Saw twelve

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>targets in the first meeting in the first meeting and

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 1>turned them into nine catches, sixty yards and a touchdown.

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>But that touchdown was just one of two wide receiver

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns the Jets have surrendered over their last six games.

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 1>So temporary expectations for Myers, but we'll start him with

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the CE not starting Kendrick Born or Tae Kwon Thornton

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 1>there on the bench, Hunter Henry John H. Smith around

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the bench. They combined for four catches thirty two yards

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 1>against the Jets in Week A. The Jets have not

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 1>allowed a tight end touchdown all year. Easy bench for

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>them and easy ben for mac Jones. All right, let's

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:08.840
<v Speaker 1>go to the Commander's taking on the Texans and what

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>is not a particularly sexy matchup, but does have a

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 1>variety of starters in it, including Brian Robinson coming off

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:18.760
<v Speaker 1>his most impressive game of the year by a fair margin.

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:21.279
<v Speaker 1>I thought he's getting tons of work with twenty or

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:23.800
<v Speaker 1>more carries in two of the last four games, Houston

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>has been pummeled on the ground, seeing the most rushing

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 1>attempts while allowing the most rushing yards and rushing touchdowns.

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>In the last four games alone, the Texans have allowed

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>eight rushing scores and three different backs of top two

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty rushing yards against them. This as good

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:40.879
<v Speaker 1>as it gets for Brian Robinson. If you don't start

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>him here, why is he on your taking? And we'll

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 1>bring Antonio Gibson into this conversation. If I didn't mention

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it b great for Brian Robinson, I'm giving a seed

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to Gibson here. You'd probably talked me into a B

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and PPR leagues, same easy match up on the ground

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>as Robinson. He just gets fewer carries. He does chip

0:34:57.160 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in with extra receptions though, and JD. McKissick has been

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>ruled out, so we will continue to help you that way.

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>He's also managed to find the end zone in three

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of the past four games, and I think just absolutely startable,

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>especially in two weeks here for Antonio Gibson. And then

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple of the guys you care about in the

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>passing game, probably Terry McLaren first foremost probably red Hot

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 1>thanks Ever since the switch to Taylor Heineke, McLaren has

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>seen at least forty of Washington's targeted air yards in

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 1>each game since Heineke took over. That is a huge,

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 1>huge number. The Texans have allowed a league high fifteen

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 1>yards per reception to wide receivers this season. They do

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 1>have better improving cornerback play. In the last four games,

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:40.759
<v Speaker 1>Derek Stingley and Stephen Nelson have combined to allow four

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 1>receptions for thirty nine yards per game. And oh, I

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't see that that does that is helpful? Then let

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>me double check that Stingley's out. I'd consider bumping Terry

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 1>McLaren out. All right, I'm giving him an A grade.

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Heineke comes in with a C grade here. I

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>worry about out this run heavy game plan against a

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:04.319
<v Speaker 1>bad run defense, so I don't think there's a lot

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of volume to be had for Heineke. And Houston isn't

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:09.800
<v Speaker 1>going to get like way ahead and forced Heineke to

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>throw a bunch, so the game plan just doesn't feel

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>like a big game coming here. No quarterbacks top two

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in a game and only one is top three

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 1>yards since the opener against Houston. All right, let's go

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:24.399
<v Speaker 1>to the Houston side. Given up to me. The whole

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 1>rest of this segment and maybe the rest of the

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>show would just be all about Damian Pierce. Let's do it.

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:31.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm totally game for that. Since Week three, Pierce has

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:35.479
<v Speaker 1>seen at least twenty combined carries and targets every game,

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and he's put up at least one hundred total yards

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 1>in every game but one. Since Week three. Pierce has

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:43.439
<v Speaker 1>also wrapped up the sixth most red zone carries among

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>running backs, while the rest of the team has one

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>carry in the red zone to one ratio. I love

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that about Damien Pierce. Washington is, though, got a very

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 1>good run defense. Only Derrick Henry is a clip seventy

0:36:56.880 --> 0:36:59.320
<v Speaker 1>six rushing yards against them, and they give up just

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>four point two yards per carry. The Commanders have surrendered

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the fourth fewest rushing touchdowns, just four all year. It's

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a tough matchup, but Pierce's volume keeps him at a

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>B level. And by the way, is God given talent

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 1>the only other startable text and I've got his Nico

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Collins um. When Collins and Brandon Cooks have been on

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the field together, Collins has tallied more yards in three

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of those four games, and he's emerging as Houston's go

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 1>to wide receiver. He played through his groin injury last week,

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 1>but he's still very He's still maybe limited by the

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>groin injury. Houston, sorry, Washington secondary is much improved, and

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:38.880
<v Speaker 1>aside from Justin Jefferson, they've held mortals in check, including A. J.

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Brown's dud game on Monday Night. So I can only

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:43.279
<v Speaker 1>get you to a C grade on Nico Collins, and guys,

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about this? I'm already to just

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 1>drop Brandon Brandon Cooks. Um. You know, he's lost the

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>benefit of the doubt at this point. He scored one

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 1>time all year. He's disgruntled. He barely showed up in

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:56.439
<v Speaker 1>the box score last week. And I think Nico Collins

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 1>is the go to receiver now and and David support

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 1>more of the one receiver. All right, that's exactly. It's

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a dropping bread of coats. It depends on how shall

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I agree? But I'm sad about it. Yeah, that's I

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's totally fair. He went from underrated every single

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 1>year two possibly properly. Maybe they want to bump his

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 1>trade value up though in the off season, and maybe

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:23.719
<v Speaker 1>THATWN Lions take on the Giants. Scott, you know, I

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 1>know you love I'm on Ross st. Brown, So I'm

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna start with I want to start with him right

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 1>off the bat. We're seeing with since T. J. Hawkins,

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and he's we're starting to see what feels like a

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 1>repeat of last November December. You are you reading what

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I have written down here to talk about because I

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 1>literally had a series of reflecting mirrors in the studio

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 1>so I could read your notes. I was also wondered

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:50.439
<v Speaker 1>what all those cameras in my houset werefore. So wait

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a second. I'm on Ross st. Brown, the sun God

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>has thirty targets in the last three games. The volumes

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 1>back to those league winning levels um over the last

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:02.800
<v Speaker 1>three weeks. The Giants actually, let's start, he have. The

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Giants on the season have been a top ten pasty

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 1>against wide receivers, but over the last three weeks their

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 1>third worst. They've allowed six different receivers over fifty yards.

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 1>They're averaging about a hundred and eighties six yards and

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:16.759
<v Speaker 1>a score to wide receivers per game. And it's not

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 1>even like huge studs. It's the Jags and the Seahawks

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and the Texans are blowing them up, blow at at

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver position. I have an A grade, Amra.

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I do have Jared Goff on the bench. Thou Giants

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 1>allowing two in thirty yards per game. It's it's it's

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 1>not a lot. Despite what the wide receivers are doing,

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:36.720
<v Speaker 1>They've given up just ten passing touchdowns in nine games.

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh As, as for the tight ends, you're you're not

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 1>starting the broc Rights and the world. Yeah, let's go

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:46.879
<v Speaker 1>over to the running backs, where it gets a little

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 1>more complicated. I'm gonna start here. Jamal Williams missing practices

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 1>this week with an illness. I think he's likely to

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:56.840
<v Speaker 1>push through and go and he'll be fine. DeAndre Swift

0:39:57.239 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 1>logged his first full week of practice ends coming back

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 1>from injury. He's been limited in previous weeks. Even last week.

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Dan Campbell said we're gonna work him in more, and

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>so he's been splitting snaps with Justin Jackson. This week

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>is the first week none of those comments are out there.

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:17.359
<v Speaker 1>He had a full week of practice. I'm not saying

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Dandre Swift his back. I'm saying you should feel a

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:23.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit better this week finally, but still not great

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>just the way it's locked. Uh So, I have a

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:29.240
<v Speaker 1>B grade on on Jamal Williams a C grade on Swift.

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Williams scoring nine times in nine games, but the Giants

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>have only given up four rushing scores. Swift. I got

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 1>him starting because of that pass game work and how

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>efficient he is with the ball when he gets it,

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 1>but the volume is on Williams side, so I have

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the B grade on him. By the way, the Giants

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 1>allowing five point four yards per carrying eleven point two

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 1>yards per reception to running backs. Those are both bottom

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 1>five in the league. The only thing that keeps the

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Giants up high in the rankings is twenty two total

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 1>running back touches against the Giants per game. That's league low.

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 1>It's volume, That's why. That's why their rankings look good.

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:07.680
<v Speaker 1>It's volume when when they get touches, running backs get touches,

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 1>they get massive amounts of yards over on the Giant side.

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones, would zeer take a chance on me player

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 1>getting it done through the air and ground. I believe

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you said, Darius Slayton, I have a C grade on

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Despite only four targets last week, he made the absolute

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:24.799
<v Speaker 1>most of them. Uh, he's the only guy you can

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 1>really trust with targets of four, six and six in

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:29.799
<v Speaker 1>his last three. The matchup against the Lions was great

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:32.800
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the year, last three weeks not as great.

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Only Lazard sorry, Lazard top fifty seven yards and it

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:40.360
<v Speaker 1>took ten targets. Slayton plays eighty three percent outside. He

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>might see some mokuda, but I don't think they're gonna

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:44.960
<v Speaker 1>shadow him. And if anyone's going to score for them

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 1>at the wide receiver, tight ends, etcetera. If Daniel Jones

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 1>throws a touchdown, it's probably to Slayton, so we'll give

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:54.880
<v Speaker 1>him the see uh secon Barkley A grade, Yeah, Lions

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 1>allow in five yards per carry, giving up eleven rushing

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 1>tons town touchdowns in nine games. A grade. I'm I'm

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 1>neven gonna go over now. It's it goes without saying that,

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:06.320
<v Speaker 1>say Kwon Barkley is an elite start um. Talk to

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 1>me about Christian Watson. Guys five touchdowns in two games,

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know he has added a spark to and

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:14.919
<v Speaker 1>otherwise struggling passing offense. Although it would help if Aaron

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers could like throw a pass and he's doing it

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:21.759
<v Speaker 1>misfiring all over the field. What he has like what

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:24.719
<v Speaker 1>five touchdowns on eleven targets to something like which, So

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:27.879
<v Speaker 1>that makes me very skeptical. You know when you see

0:42:28.000 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that kind of you know, that's pretty out of whack

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and not sustainable if you're not getting that much that

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:35.400
<v Speaker 1>many targets. He seems legit, though he should have had

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown on like the first play from scrimmage for

0:42:37.719 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the Packers in Week one dropped a long bomb from

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Rogers and he was dealing with injuries. But when he's

0:42:41.880 --> 0:42:44.359
<v Speaker 1>been healthy, which has just been as late pretty much

0:42:44.480 --> 0:42:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks, look looks pretty legit for for

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a rookie. And you know he he went to the

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:52.480
<v Speaker 1>small school in the North Dakota state. Right, let me

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 1>ask you this, he's got the pedigree. Give me a

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:57.200
<v Speaker 1>sense of how valuable Christian Watson is from a dynasty

0:42:57.320 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 1>or Empire league standpoint is you're projecting four how valuable

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is Christian Watson? Yeah, that is That's an interesting one.

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 1>He's probably still in the third or fourth range among

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the last year's rookie wide receivers just because we don't

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:12.879
<v Speaker 1>know where Aaron Rodgers is going to be next. He's

0:43:12.880 --> 0:43:17.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly uh leap frogged the sky Moore's who were getting

0:43:17.160 --> 0:43:20.400
<v Speaker 1>drafted before him and rookie drafts, but I don't know,

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I still rank them below Pickens in London, and but

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 1>he's knocking on the door those guys for sure. Is

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:30.879
<v Speaker 1>the explosive play potential is very big for Christian wats

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Dobbs has been out to Actually he might have just

0:43:34.080 --> 0:43:38.839
<v Speaker 1>been usurped. Well hard to know yet, But when when

0:43:38.960 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Dobbs comes back, then this thing gets really really interesting

0:43:42.600 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>because he was very promising. So I don't think, I

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think. I don't think this is very clear, and

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think. Don't expect these last two games to

0:43:50.760 --> 0:43:52.960
<v Speaker 1>be representative of what Christian Watson is going to do

0:43:53.040 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the rest of It's a record, by the way, five

0:43:54.760 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in five days has to be I don't know that.

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty wide, isn't it. When we can back our

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 1>number two three Tough Questions, you can play along see

0:44:04.600 --> 0:44:06.920
<v Speaker 1>if you can go three and oh with our panel

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of experts. And if you missed any part of the

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:11.880
<v Speaker 1>show and you want to read up on our player rankings,

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:13.879
<v Speaker 1>go to Guillotine leagues dot com where you can find

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:17.160
<v Speaker 1>all the information you need to know about the players

0:44:17.320 --> 0:44:19.399
<v Speaker 1>this week, the rankings, and why we've got them ranked.

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine leagues dot com our number two fantasy football weekly.

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:40.959
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charging with you. My co hosts are Scott Fish

0:44:41.120 --> 0:44:43.719
<v Speaker 1>and Brian Johnson. This is a game we call three

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Tough Questions. You can play along try to go three

0:44:46.040 --> 0:44:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and oh against our panel of experts. We begin with

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:55.239
<v Speaker 1>tough question number one. Darius Tony's rest of season? Is

0:44:55.320 --> 0:45:00.960
<v Speaker 1>he a wide receiver one, wide receiver two, flex or

0:45:01.200 --> 0:45:05.839
<v Speaker 1>bench player. We begin with Scott Fish. Yeah, I think

0:45:05.920 --> 0:45:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Juju is going to be back after this week. I

0:45:07.960 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine that concussion keeping him out much more than

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:15.080
<v Speaker 1>this week, So so I went with flex. I could

0:45:15.120 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>see good, you know, all the way to wide receiver two.

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 1>We saw every metric about him grow from week one

0:45:19.760 --> 0:45:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to week two. Hardman is going to be out for

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:24.759
<v Speaker 1>a while. Um, it's just that the wide receiver two

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and wide receiver three in this offense has rarely been

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:30.720
<v Speaker 1>very productive for fantasy. He may be better than those,

0:45:31.239 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 1>and they're using finding ways to get him involved on

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the sweeps that he took over for Hardman. But and

0:45:37.640 --> 0:45:40.759
<v Speaker 1>Hardman had four straight double digit Fantasy days before going

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to I R. But I don't think that's going to

0:45:42.880 --> 0:45:45.040
<v Speaker 1>be very consistent. I have it as a flex, but

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get some wide receiver two games out of it. Brian.

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Darius Tony's rest of season is he a wide receiver one?

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 1>A wide receiver to flex or bench. I don't have

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:56.359
<v Speaker 1>munch to add to what Scott said. Definitely not wide

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:59.759
<v Speaker 1>receiver one. With Travis Kelsey on your team, he's wide

0:45:59.760 --> 0:46:03.279
<v Speaker 1>receive for one for the Chiefs. Um if Juju remains out,

0:46:03.320 --> 0:46:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I would go wide receiver too, but I'm going flex.

0:46:05.600 --> 0:46:08.879
<v Speaker 1>But man, he's borderline wide receiver too. You really don't

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:10.920
<v Speaker 1>see many guys who are able to like stop on

0:46:10.960 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a dime Likedarius Tony can and change direction and with

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the speed like Tyreek. Kill is the only comparable receiver

0:46:17.719 --> 0:46:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I can think of, and he fared pretty well in

0:46:19.800 --> 0:46:22.280
<v Speaker 1>his days in Kansas City. But I'm so you're officially

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:27.560
<v Speaker 1>calling to Tyree. I love he's got that, he's got

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that upside. I must say he's gonna get there this year.

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:32.600
<v Speaker 1>But he looks pretty comparable to me. I love Travis

0:46:32.680 --> 0:46:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey shaking his has his head. I don't know how

0:46:35.040 --> 0:46:39.320
<v Speaker 1>New York building well, you know, And I'm not factoring

0:46:39.400 --> 0:46:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that comment because players say that stuff all the time

0:46:42.000 --> 0:46:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't necessarily mean anything. Do you think, co host,

0:46:45.640 --> 0:46:48.319
<v Speaker 1>it was a coincidence that Kadarius Tony suddenly showed up

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:49.840
<v Speaker 1>in the box score in a game in which Juju

0:46:49.880 --> 0:46:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Smith Schuster got knocked out in the first drive and

0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:58.160
<v Speaker 1>McCole Hardman did not play even then. Even then his

0:46:58.239 --> 0:47:01.200
<v Speaker 1>snap count was just of the of the snaps, so

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't that high. And here's the thing that I

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:06.800
<v Speaker 1>really can't get past. Once everybody's back healthy, which should

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 1>be as early as next week, well McCole Hardman not.

0:47:09.160 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 1>But Juju comes back. In the Patrick Mahomes era, he

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:17.280
<v Speaker 1>will put guys on games that make them look amazing

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, oh, man, Mikole Hardman, if that guy

0:47:20.719 --> 0:47:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be a game changer for the next five years,

0:47:23.520 --> 0:47:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and you just do anything for the next five games.

0:47:26.239 --> 0:47:30.000
<v Speaker 1>So in all probability, what awaits Tony once Juju and

0:47:30.160 --> 0:47:32.239
<v Speaker 1>especially hard to come back. It's just a timeshare with

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:35.719
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent results, because that's what this position always does. I

0:47:35.800 --> 0:47:39.160
<v Speaker 1>can distinctly remember like four plays that Tony has made

0:47:39.200 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in his very short career with the Giants and the Chiefs.

0:47:41.080 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember anything that Juju Smith Schuster or Michael

0:47:44.080 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Hardman has done. But that's look, I'm taking all the

0:47:47.160 --> 0:47:49.319
<v Speaker 1>fun out of Fantasy Phone. I admit it. I am

0:47:49.400 --> 0:47:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the no fun charge. No fun flex is the correct

0:47:54.200 --> 0:48:01.400
<v Speaker 1>answer for Darius you gotta write anyway. With Damien Harris

0:48:01.520 --> 0:48:04.000
<v Speaker 1>returning to full health for the rest of the season,

0:48:04.440 --> 0:48:08.200
<v Speaker 1>is Romandre Stevenson a running back one running back to

0:48:08.880 --> 0:48:13.279
<v Speaker 1>flex or bench Brian Johnson. Stevenson averaging more than five

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:16.200
<v Speaker 1>yards per touch while Harris has averaged nearly a yard

0:48:16.320 --> 0:48:20.120
<v Speaker 1>less per touch. That's pretty significant. Stevenson also the much

0:48:20.200 --> 0:48:23.359
<v Speaker 1>better pass catcher, so we should stay more productive moving

0:48:23.440 --> 0:48:26.680
<v Speaker 1>forward even with Harris healthy. That said, Harris, we'll eat

0:48:26.719 --> 0:48:29.960
<v Speaker 1>into stevenson snaps, but New England is a top is

0:48:30.000 --> 0:48:32.880
<v Speaker 1>top eight in rushing play percentage, so there's plenty to

0:48:32.960 --> 0:48:36.400
<v Speaker 1>go around. I still think Stevenson gets his fifteen carries

0:48:36.520 --> 0:48:40.279
<v Speaker 1>with four to five targets catches per game, so I'm

0:48:40.280 --> 0:48:42.280
<v Speaker 1>willing RB two rest of the way even with Harris

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:48.000
<v Speaker 1>back Scott rest of season. With Damien Harris returning, Ramandre

0:48:48.080 --> 0:48:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Stevenson is an RB one and RB two who flex

0:48:51.400 --> 0:48:54.920
<v Speaker 1>our bench. Yes, so ram Stevenson has outsnapped Harrison every

0:48:55.000 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 1>game since Week one. Obviously, the game's Harris didn't play

0:48:58.280 --> 0:49:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the whole game or missed ram head large work hold workloads,

0:49:02.320 --> 0:49:04.839
<v Speaker 1>but he did that also in some of the games

0:49:04.920 --> 0:49:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that Harris fully played. I actually view the start of

0:49:07.520 --> 0:49:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the season to be what we may see the rest

0:49:09.760 --> 0:49:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of the season, where Harris has some games, he's little

0:49:12.440 --> 0:49:15.640
<v Speaker 1>used in some games. It's more of a split Romandris

0:49:15.840 --> 0:49:20.759
<v Speaker 1>RB twelve right now, even with a pretty decent downgrade,

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:23.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that he gets past RB twenty four

0:49:23.440 --> 0:49:25.520
<v Speaker 1>in the volume that New England runs the ball and

0:49:25.600 --> 0:49:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the goal line looks New England gives running backs. I

0:49:28.719 --> 0:49:31.799
<v Speaker 1>have him as an RB two. I love Romandri Steve, Yeah,

0:49:31.920 --> 0:49:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I love that guy, and I think he's a special

0:49:35.320 --> 0:49:36.919
<v Speaker 1>I was talking to him the other day. It feels

0:49:36.960 --> 0:49:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the same way. And he starts himself in his fantasy.

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:44.239
<v Speaker 1>But here comes Damien Harris with fresh legs in a

0:49:44.400 --> 0:49:47.440
<v Speaker 1>luxury in mid November, in the opening month of the season,

0:49:47.480 --> 0:49:50.000
<v Speaker 1>when Harris was healthy and it was a shared backfield,

0:49:50.640 --> 0:49:54.720
<v Speaker 1>he was Bill Belichick's lead back with more carries, more yards,

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:59.560
<v Speaker 1>more touchdowns than Stevenson. And we've seen belichick backfields take

0:49:59.640 --> 0:50:04.239
<v Speaker 1>on a expected weird turns many many times. Yeah, right,

0:50:04.480 --> 0:50:06.680
<v Speaker 1>And I am not ready to count out Harris at all.

0:50:06.800 --> 0:50:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And also this Damien Harris is a really good back. Stevenson,

0:50:11.360 --> 0:50:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Damion Harris a good back He's gonna knock Stevenson back

0:50:15.680 --> 0:50:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to the same flex play that he was in September

0:50:18.680 --> 0:50:20.720
<v Speaker 1>when this was a shared backfield and they were getting

0:50:20.800 --> 0:50:23.080
<v Speaker 1>roughly the same work, but Harris was getting more. And

0:50:23.160 --> 0:50:26.360
<v Speaker 1>even though I'm team Stevenson, I just think the reality

0:50:26.440 --> 0:50:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of it as when I take off my emotional cap

0:50:29.800 --> 0:50:32.440
<v Speaker 1>on this and I just look at this shared backfield,

0:50:32.920 --> 0:50:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I think Damon Harris is gonna end up eating into

0:50:35.080 --> 0:50:37.160
<v Speaker 1>too much of Stevenson's time for him to be a

0:50:37.320 --> 0:50:44.040
<v Speaker 1>sure RB two correct answer flex tough Question number three.

0:50:44.320 --> 0:50:46.719
<v Speaker 1>This is the no fun version of why am I?

0:50:46.760 --> 0:50:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Why do I have to be the wet blanket? What's

0:50:48.239 --> 0:50:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the title of this show? Wet Blankets? Uh? Should we drop?

0:50:56.080 --> 0:51:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's start over? Question number three? Should we op Dallas

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Goddard or stick it out with him on our roster? Scott, Yeah,

0:51:04.400 --> 0:51:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sticking. I'm sticking this out. Is if he's able

0:51:07.560 --> 0:51:10.359
<v Speaker 1>to heal their tight ends are terrible this year. If

0:51:10.440 --> 0:51:12.040
<v Speaker 1>he's able to heal up in a month and be

0:51:12.120 --> 0:51:15.320
<v Speaker 1>back for Week fifteen, your week Week fifteen sixteen seventeen

0:51:15.320 --> 0:51:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy playoffs, Uh, He's He's worth it. The two caveats

0:51:19.640 --> 0:51:23.160
<v Speaker 1>here are is the injury one that he may take

0:51:23.320 --> 0:51:26.279
<v Speaker 1>time getting back after that or miss more weeks than

0:51:26.320 --> 0:51:30.239
<v Speaker 1>the initial four coin flip, coin flip, it's possible. The

0:51:30.320 --> 0:51:32.560
<v Speaker 1>other one is a shoulder to catch a pass. Yes

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you do, Yes, you do, especially at the high point

0:51:34.680 --> 0:51:37.719
<v Speaker 1>team that he does a lot. Will the Eagles be

0:51:37.840 --> 0:51:40.160
<v Speaker 1>locked into a one seed by that point and they'll

0:51:40.280 --> 0:51:42.880
<v Speaker 1>keep him resting four weeks away from the playoffs. I

0:51:42.960 --> 0:51:45.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know that that's quite the case. Maybe maybe later on,

0:51:46.400 --> 0:51:49.080
<v Speaker 1>um if it takes him longer. So those are two

0:51:49.160 --> 0:51:51.880
<v Speaker 1>things that can do that. But honestly, if you're dropping

0:51:52.000 --> 0:51:54.920
<v Speaker 1>him for a guy like trust and Ebner or something, no,

0:51:55.400 --> 0:51:58.080
<v Speaker 1>if if you see it Cadarius Tony on the free agency,

0:51:58.440 --> 0:52:01.000
<v Speaker 1>sure do it. But in most cases I say no,

0:52:01.239 --> 0:52:04.000
<v Speaker 1>just told onto Dallas Goddard for this. For the moment,

0:52:04.120 --> 0:52:06.160
<v Speaker 1>your answer is no, Yeah, that was a super long win.

0:52:06.200 --> 0:52:09.800
<v Speaker 1>You're saying, hold Dallas, Hold all right, Brian, we dropped

0:52:09.840 --> 0:52:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Goddard or stick it out Holden. I don't have

0:52:15.000 --> 0:52:19.879
<v Speaker 1>much I'll say. I will say, guys come back from

0:52:19.920 --> 0:52:23.399
<v Speaker 1>shoulder injuries, running backs, wide receivers, and then they're fine

0:52:23.560 --> 0:52:25.920
<v Speaker 1>when when they come back it's the lower leg injuries

0:52:25.960 --> 0:52:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that you're really skeptical about when they come back from injury,

0:52:28.719 --> 0:52:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's not the case with Goddard. Ozar, if you

0:52:31.480 --> 0:52:34.000
<v Speaker 1>were rostering him, your team is pretty decent and you'll

0:52:34.000 --> 0:52:35.399
<v Speaker 1>have a shot in the playoffs. And if he comes

0:52:35.440 --> 0:52:37.520
<v Speaker 1>back healthy, you're gonna want to start them to hold them.

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:39.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're not doctors here, but just you know,

0:52:40.040 --> 0:52:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the reality is people have to make this decision this

0:52:42.239 --> 0:52:44.520
<v Speaker 1>week on Dallas Goddard. And you know, as you mentioned,

0:52:44.520 --> 0:52:47.279
<v Speaker 1>the early se can come back is week fifteen. The

0:52:47.360 --> 0:52:51.319
<v Speaker 1>eight and one Eagles have Super Bowl aspirations. They care

0:52:51.320 --> 0:52:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot more about having a healthy Dallas Goddard in

0:52:54.200 --> 0:52:58.200
<v Speaker 1>January than they do in December, so there's no need

0:52:58.239 --> 0:53:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to rush him back at less than full health. So

0:53:00.280 --> 0:53:03.680
<v Speaker 1>week number one he would be unrealistic. I don't know

0:53:04.280 --> 0:53:06.279
<v Speaker 1>who knows. They may even be. They may have. We're

0:53:06.280 --> 0:53:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in Minnesota right now. You know they want to I

0:53:10.040 --> 0:53:13.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think the seating makes any difference here. I don't

0:53:13.120 --> 0:53:15.440
<v Speaker 1>think it does. It's all about winning in January is

0:53:15.480 --> 0:53:17.440
<v Speaker 1>all that the Eagles should be caring about right here.

0:53:18.480 --> 0:53:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Tough call, but you know, when healthy Goddard is one

0:53:22.040 --> 0:53:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of three reliable fantasy tight ends. That's so that's so

0:53:27.640 --> 0:53:29.919
<v Speaker 1>valuable in this league. And yes, he's going to soak

0:53:30.000 --> 0:53:31.840
<v Speaker 1>up a roster spot, and maybe you would turn that

0:53:31.920 --> 0:53:36.440
<v Speaker 1>roster spot into tight end help, but you probably aren't

0:53:36.480 --> 0:53:39.600
<v Speaker 1>going to because they're probably just isn't that much tight

0:53:39.680 --> 0:53:41.600
<v Speaker 1>end help to be had out there in the waiver wire.

0:53:42.239 --> 0:53:45.319
<v Speaker 1>So while you might you might be able to drop

0:53:45.400 --> 0:53:48.160
<v Speaker 1>him and find help, I think in most cases, God,

0:53:48.280 --> 0:53:51.479
<v Speaker 1>it's just way too valuable to drop in the event

0:53:51.600 --> 0:53:55.359
<v Speaker 1>that he does come back for your fantasy playoffs. That said,

0:53:55.880 --> 0:53:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't, I don't. I think Week fifteen sounds optimistic.

0:54:00.239 --> 0:54:02.640
<v Speaker 1>So your answer is, do not dropped out? Don't drop

0:54:02.760 --> 0:54:07.279
<v Speaker 1>down there? And I think, yeah, we all did. M

0:54:07.680 --> 0:54:09.840
<v Speaker 1>on the Saints, Brian, they lose Cooper Cup, but they

0:54:09.880 --> 0:54:13.120
<v Speaker 1>get back Matthew Stafford. Yeah, so that doesn't really matter

0:54:13.239 --> 0:54:14.960
<v Speaker 1>much with the Cooper Cup. So I got Stafford on

0:54:15.000 --> 0:54:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the bench, has returned to full practice, should make his return,

0:54:18.120 --> 0:54:21.040
<v Speaker 1>but without Cooper Cup, I gotta put Stafford on the

0:54:21.080 --> 0:54:23.879
<v Speaker 1>bench because I only have one starting grade on any

0:54:23.920 --> 0:54:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of his past catchers, and that was Allen Robinson was

0:54:26.239 --> 0:54:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that might take a chance on me. Wide receiver Van Jefferson,

0:54:29.239 --> 0:54:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Ben Skorennick, Brandon Powell, and s McCutchen. They're on the bench,

0:54:32.800 --> 0:54:35.279
<v Speaker 1>and surprisingly in the tight end wasteland. I do have

0:54:35.400 --> 0:54:39.839
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Higby on the bench. The Rams offensive line, they

0:54:39.960 --> 0:54:42.560
<v Speaker 1>just had two more injuries this week. It's on life support.

0:54:42.640 --> 0:54:44.920
<v Speaker 1>So Higgy's me doing a lot of blocking. Yes, there

0:54:44.960 --> 0:54:46.960
<v Speaker 1>are more targets that are gonna be spread around with

0:54:47.040 --> 0:54:49.799
<v Speaker 1>Cup sideline, but the Saints have allowed just one tight

0:54:49.880 --> 0:54:52.600
<v Speaker 1>end touchdown all season, and not one Moon tight end

0:54:53.000 --> 0:54:55.920
<v Speaker 1>has topped fifty yards against him. So I'm benching Higby

0:54:56.080 --> 0:54:57.919
<v Speaker 1>this week, and I'm also benching all of the Rams

0:54:58.000 --> 0:55:01.960
<v Speaker 1>running backs. Darryl Henderson, Camakers, Williams. I've got some stuff

0:55:02.000 --> 0:55:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to read here, but I'm not going to do it.

0:55:03.280 --> 0:55:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Just put there on the bench. Remember last year when

0:55:05.400 --> 0:55:07.840
<v Speaker 1>we were throwing down automatic as a bunch of Rams,

0:55:07.960 --> 0:55:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and well, yeah, you Rams Saints used to be a

0:55:11.640 --> 0:55:13.680
<v Speaker 1>sound like the sexiest matchup in the world. When He's

0:55:13.960 --> 0:55:16.520
<v Speaker 1>not not in this game. A few more starting grades

0:55:16.560 --> 0:55:18.799
<v Speaker 1>for the Saints, so go over to them. Not great

0:55:18.840 --> 0:55:21.359
<v Speaker 1>ones though, Alvin Kamara, just to see the Saints are

0:55:21.360 --> 0:55:24.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be without three stars on their offensive line.

0:55:24.400 --> 0:55:27.080
<v Speaker 1>But the silver lining for camaras of the receiving angle here.

0:55:27.160 --> 0:55:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Over their last four games, the Rams have allowed seven

0:55:29.560 --> 0:55:33.320
<v Speaker 1>plus catches and nearly sixty receiving yards per game to

0:55:33.400 --> 0:55:35.440
<v Speaker 1>opposing running back. So you know what, I'll give Camara

0:55:35.640 --> 0:55:39.080
<v Speaker 1>B and PPR to see and standard for those reasons, Crystal,

0:55:39.160 --> 0:55:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm nervous, he gotta be, but man, he he can

0:55:42.040 --> 0:55:45.520
<v Speaker 1>pop off in any any matchup. Really, um, Crystal Lovey

0:55:45.600 --> 0:55:48.560
<v Speaker 1>gets to see The Rams allowed the lowest A dot

0:55:48.760 --> 0:55:51.520
<v Speaker 1>average depth of target in the league at five point

0:55:51.640 --> 0:55:54.799
<v Speaker 1>five yards, which is not bode well for a Lovey's game.

0:55:55.040 --> 0:55:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Who should also see plenty of coverage from Jalen Ramsey,

0:55:58.160 --> 0:56:00.439
<v Speaker 1>who has not allowed a touchdown in his bridge since

0:56:00.520 --> 0:56:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Week two, but over his last few games, Ramsey has

0:56:03.280 --> 0:56:06.960
<v Speaker 1>surrendered ninety two and seventy one yards in his coverage,

0:56:06.960 --> 0:56:10.120
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of they startable with the Sea Jarvis

0:56:10.239 --> 0:56:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Landry not though he is on the bench. He actually

0:56:12.640 --> 0:56:15.359
<v Speaker 1>led the Saints wide receivers and targets last week with six,

0:56:15.880 --> 0:56:18.920
<v Speaker 1>which is encouraging moving forward, but not this week. The

0:56:19.040 --> 0:56:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Rams have allowed the second fewest fantasy points to slot

0:56:21.560 --> 0:56:24.960
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers this year, over to the tight ends Taysom

0:56:25.040 --> 0:56:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Hill and Juwan Johnson got them both on the bench.

0:56:27.080 --> 0:56:29.200
<v Speaker 1>They're just gonna be doing a ton of blocking with

0:56:29.360 --> 0:56:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that banged up offensive line, and the Rams have allowed

0:56:31.640 --> 0:56:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the second fewest fantasy points to tight ends of this season,

0:56:34.520 --> 0:56:37.640
<v Speaker 1>saying that watch Taysom Hill rush for four touchdowns in

0:56:37.680 --> 0:56:39.760
<v Speaker 1>this game. But if you want to chase crazy upside

0:56:39.800 --> 0:56:41.640
<v Speaker 1>play Taston mill have fund and then Andy Alton. He's

0:56:41.680 --> 0:56:43.719
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. I think one game inside the top

0:56:43.840 --> 0:56:47.080
<v Speaker 1>eighteen quarterbacks this year. I want Jameis Winston back, even

0:56:47.120 --> 0:56:49.600
<v Speaker 1>though it doesn't bode well for Kamara. I'm tired of

0:56:50.520 --> 0:56:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I think Camara is a bench. This is an offensive

0:56:53.040 --> 0:56:56.680
<v Speaker 1>line missing three starters this week. Um, I am very

0:56:56.719 --> 0:56:59.560
<v Speaker 1>nervous that he's gonna catch ten pass. He's gonna catch

0:56:59.640 --> 0:57:01.440
<v Speaker 1>ten pa I don't know you're I think you're a

0:57:01.520 --> 0:57:03.800
<v Speaker 1>lot more optimistic on camera than I am. We'll revisit

0:57:03.880 --> 0:57:07.000
<v Speaker 1>this next week. Feel free. Uh, let's take a break.

0:57:07.120 --> 0:57:11.560
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, let's jump into Cowboys taking on

0:57:11.840 --> 0:57:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings. Cowboys Vikings plenty of fantasy implications all over

0:57:16.720 --> 0:57:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the board here, but some key injuries that could play

0:57:20.440 --> 0:57:22.800
<v Speaker 1>into the outcome here. You know what to do about

0:57:22.840 --> 0:57:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jefferson. What about some of the more fringe e

0:57:26.080 --> 0:57:29.360
<v Speaker 1>players in this game. So Dallas Goddard managers want to

0:57:29.760 --> 0:57:32.360
<v Speaker 1>root for the Vikings because the Eagles want the number

0:57:32.400 --> 0:57:35.680
<v Speaker 1>one seed regardless of you guys. I'm sure they take it,

0:57:35.760 --> 0:57:38.120
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think they're gonna put their prize tight

0:57:38.240 --> 0:57:41.280
<v Speaker 1>end at risk to get there. We'll find out, we'll

0:57:41.360 --> 0:57:43.400
<v Speaker 1>learn more about Cowboys Vikings, and we come back to

0:57:43.480 --> 0:58:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Charchi

0:58:10.600 --> 0:58:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and Scott Fish, Brian Johnson with you. We've got a

0:58:13.160 --> 0:58:16.920
<v Speaker 1>big block o matchums coming at you right now, beginning

0:58:16.960 --> 0:58:19.560
<v Speaker 1>with the Cowboys taking on the Vikings. I want to

0:58:19.600 --> 0:58:23.080
<v Speaker 1>start with Dak Prescott because this is a fantastic opportunity

0:58:23.160 --> 0:58:27.000
<v Speaker 1>for him. Vikings have surrendered three hundred or more passing

0:58:27.120 --> 0:58:31.240
<v Speaker 1>yards and or multiple passing touchdowns in four straight games,

0:58:31.600 --> 0:58:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Vikings suddenly very thin at cornerback. Cameron Danceler

0:58:35.320 --> 0:58:37.840
<v Speaker 1>placed in I r his backup with Caleb Evans has

0:58:37.880 --> 0:58:40.440
<v Speaker 1>been ruled out of this game. This is a this

0:58:40.520 --> 0:58:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is a great opportunity and a game plan that should

0:58:42.640 --> 0:58:46.880
<v Speaker 1>lean strongly to the past. Dak Prescott is a very

0:58:47.000 --> 0:58:50.400
<v Speaker 1>safe start and an A grade for him. My top

0:58:50.560 --> 0:58:53.760
<v Speaker 1>ranked wide receiver of this week is c. D. Lamb.

0:58:54.280 --> 0:58:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Now I can give him the fantasy Armpark. Who is

0:58:57.120 --> 0:59:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Ard Park? I can give Ardarks? No, everybody can use

0:59:00.440 --> 0:59:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Art Art Vark is universal this week. Over the past

0:59:07.560 --> 0:59:11.720
<v Speaker 1>five weeks, the Vikings have allowed the most receptions, the

0:59:11.920 --> 0:59:16.400
<v Speaker 1>most yards to opposing receivers along with five total touchdowns.

0:59:17.000 --> 0:59:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota has one good cornerback, Patrick Peterson. Ceedee Lamb only

0:59:21.520 --> 0:59:25.439
<v Speaker 1>runs eighteen percent of his routes on Patrick peterson side

0:59:25.480 --> 0:59:28.480
<v Speaker 1>of the field. The other two percent or against a

0:59:28.560 --> 0:59:33.040
<v Speaker 1>struggling slot corner or a third what really, fourth string

0:59:33.160 --> 0:59:37.840
<v Speaker 1>cornerback Ceedee Lamb is phenomenally suited for a big game here.

0:59:38.520 --> 0:59:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Also really like Dalton Schultz since Dak Prescott has been

0:59:43.880 --> 0:59:46.160
<v Speaker 1>back and Schultz now finally healthy and they came back

0:59:46.200 --> 0:59:49.280
<v Speaker 1>at about basically the same time at least five receptions

0:59:49.440 --> 0:59:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and fifty receiving yards in every game, plus finally got

0:59:52.680 --> 0:59:55.040
<v Speaker 1>on the scoreboard last week with his first touchdown of

0:59:55.080 --> 0:59:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the year. Vikings are middle of the pack and most

0:59:57.440 --> 1:00:00.680
<v Speaker 1>tight end metrics on the season, but lately they've given

1:00:00.760 --> 1:00:04.760
<v Speaker 1>up some big games to tight ends, Dawson Knox, zach Ertz,

1:00:04.920 --> 1:00:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Mike Kasecki all good games, Dalton Schultz B grade. Michael

1:00:09.160 --> 1:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Gallup startable here as well. He runs from the outside

1:00:12.560 --> 1:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>where sometimes he will get that Patrick Peterson matchup which

1:00:15.640 --> 1:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I meant to, which is bad. But then when he

1:00:16.880 --> 1:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>goes the other side, he'll get either journeyman Duke Shelley

1:00:21.240 --> 1:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned before, fifth stringer rookie Andrew Booth arguably also

1:00:25.240 --> 1:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a fifth stringer making a second ever start. Those are

1:00:27.960 --> 1:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>good matchups from Michael Gallups startable here for sure, and

1:00:31.280 --> 1:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>uh Noel Brown's the only receiver I'm not gonna put

1:00:33.920 --> 1:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a letter grade on, although I wouldn't be surprised he

1:00:35.720 --> 1:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>did okay, but he just hasn't gotten enough look since

1:00:37.560 --> 1:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Gallops returned. Let's talk about Tony Pollard and Ezekiel Elli.

1:00:41.640 --> 1:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Elliott expected to come back in this one, but it

1:00:44.280 --> 1:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>waters down the prospects for both guys a lot, and

1:00:47.520 --> 1:00:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a very tough matchup for either one. Um Week

1:00:50.440 --> 1:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>four was the last time a running back hit fifty

1:00:53.400 --> 1:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>yards on the ground against the Vikings, and in those

1:00:56.160 --> 1:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>five weeks, running backs are averaging less than three yards

1:00:59.400 --> 1:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>per carry. Vikings are Pro Football focuses number two ranked

1:01:02.960 --> 1:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>run defense. Polo has been way more effective than Zeke,

1:01:05.760 --> 1:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and he's healthier than Zeke, and he's my preferred starter here.

1:01:08.520 --> 1:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>But the reason I'm going to give a C grade

1:01:10.320 --> 1:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to Pollard and the C grade to Zeke is that

1:01:13.000 --> 1:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Zeke gets most of the goal line work and you

1:01:14.760 --> 1:01:16.680
<v Speaker 1>can hope for a touchdown here. So I'm gonna give

1:01:16.760 --> 1:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Zeke a C grade in a bye week in which

1:01:18.520 --> 1:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I might otherwise give him a bench grade. Let's go

1:01:21.200 --> 1:01:23.919
<v Speaker 1>to the Viking side, justin Jefferson's and obvious A grade.

1:01:23.960 --> 1:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>The toe injury appears to be okay and he's removed

1:01:25.880 --> 1:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>from the injury list on Friday, so he should be

1:01:27.720 --> 1:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>good to go. Let's talk about Kirk Cousins. Dallas has

1:01:31.520 --> 1:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>got a very talented secondary, but they are risk takers

1:01:34.360 --> 1:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's led to them allowing multiple touchdown passes and

1:01:37.160 --> 1:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>three the last four games. The main area of concern

1:01:39.680 --> 1:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>for Cousins is the pressure he's gonna take in the pocket.

1:01:42.200 --> 1:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>They do expect left tackle Christian Derrisaw to return for

1:01:45.160 --> 1:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>this game, and that's huge off the injury party, and

1:01:48.480 --> 1:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that's that's without it might have been very worried about Cousins,

1:01:51.680 --> 1:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>but as a result, I think we're okay here Cowboys.

1:01:54.760 --> 1:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys defense has average a sack every nine pass attempts,

1:01:59.240 --> 1:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>which is in saying, that's unbelievably good. They have registered

1:02:04.080 --> 1:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the most sacks among all teams. As you would have guessed,

1:02:06.200 --> 1:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins, I've got a B grade on here. He

1:02:07.960 --> 1:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>takes a thirty nine game streak of games with a

1:02:12.440 --> 1:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>touchdown pass into this matchup straight with which is the

1:02:18.200 --> 1:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>fifth longest streak in NFL. His Wow, Alright, Kirk is

1:02:22.040 --> 1:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>single handedly powered half of those games. Uh t. J

1:02:24.960 --> 1:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Hockenson's gotta be grade in this one. Since Hockinson's trade

1:02:28.200 --> 1:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to the Vikings, He's been the second most targeted tight

1:02:31.440 --> 1:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>end in the league, behind only Travis Kelsey. Pretty impressive.

1:02:34.640 --> 1:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>He also leads all tight ends in red zone targets

1:02:38.000 --> 1:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>since the trade. Unfortunately, those is a tough matchup against

1:02:42.040 --> 1:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a good Cowboys defense that has allowed the third fewest

1:02:45.080 --> 1:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy points and just one touchdown to tight ends, and

1:02:48.200 --> 1:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that turns Tockinson from what would have been an A

1:02:50.880 --> 1:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>grade into a B grade this week. Adam Theland also

1:02:54.320 --> 1:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>startable here. Vikings announcer Paul Allen told me today that

1:02:58.640 --> 1:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>he expects Theland to have a very sizeable role world

1:03:02.920 --> 1:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Internet Internet Ron James Alan, I've been bragging that I

1:03:08.280 --> 1:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>have his phone number. I won't give it out, though

1:03:10.520 --> 1:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I think you should be for the right price. He

1:03:12.520 --> 1:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>runs from all over the all over the field Ceeland,

1:03:14.920 --> 1:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>not Paul Allen runs from Lebron James probably could, but

1:03:19.080 --> 1:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>most often on the side of the field man by

1:03:22.120 --> 1:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>cornerback Anthony Brown, assuming he gets through his concussion protocol.

1:03:26.040 --> 1:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Brown's bad just like last Year's allowed the ninth most

1:03:29.640 --> 1:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards and the ninth most and he's a lot

1:03:32.400 --> 1:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>of touchdowns in back to back games. Ceiling logs in

1:03:35.400 --> 1:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>with a C here and unless you think Paul Allen

1:03:38.240 --> 1:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>has got particularly keen insight, then you could give him

1:03:41.320 --> 1:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a B grade. Uh. Dalvin Cook is the only Viking

1:03:44.280 --> 1:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>we haven't mentioned yet, a grade. He has scored in

1:03:47.000 --> 1:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>five straight games powered by big plays, more consistent chain

1:03:50.920 --> 1:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>moving plays than necessarily I'd like to get him more

1:03:54.640 --> 1:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>consistent chain moving plays. It's really the big plays that

1:03:57.120 --> 1:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>he's that he's been helped with. Dallas has given up

1:03:59.560 --> 1:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>at least one hundred rushing yards and a score to

1:04:02.160 --> 1:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>running backs in three of four games, including getting pummeled

1:04:05.560 --> 1:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred fifty rushing yards in each of the

1:04:07.840 --> 1:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>last two games. This is gonna be a very Dalvin

1:04:10.680 --> 1:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Cook heavy game plan, right, So you've got Dallas is

1:04:13.600 --> 1:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>great at rushing the quarterback. The things can go haywire

1:04:16.400 --> 1:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways again when you throw the ball.

1:04:18.720 --> 1:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook's sitting on a lot of volume in this game,

1:04:21.960 --> 1:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and I like him with an A grade. Let's go

1:04:25.680 --> 1:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to the Raiders taking on the Broncos, Scott. This is

1:04:28.280 --> 1:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a Raider's offense. It's been highly dysfunctional, but a Broncos

1:04:31.520 --> 1:04:34.840
<v Speaker 1>defense that's mostly been very good. Yeah. Mostly. They're the

1:04:34.920 --> 1:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>number one past defense against the past, allowing the fewest

1:04:38.120 --> 1:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>passing yards and fewest passing touchdowns just six passing touchdowns

1:04:41.720 --> 1:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>on the season. Close to that. That's insane. That's absolutely insane.

1:04:46.760 --> 1:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh So I have car on the bench. He's been

1:04:48.440 --> 1:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a fine two and forty yard wanted to score guy,

1:04:50.720 --> 1:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>but this is a bad spot for him. I do have.

1:04:53.200 --> 1:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I do still have Davontae Adams with an A grade

1:04:55.880 --> 1:04:59.480
<v Speaker 1>because he's had a level game in all but one game,

1:04:59.560 --> 1:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and that was the game. He was sick all week

1:05:01.640 --> 1:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>leading up to He does have a slight abdomen injury

1:05:04.560 --> 1:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>this week, but I'm not too worried about it from

1:05:06.960 --> 1:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>all reports, so I still have an a grade on him.

1:05:09.840 --> 1:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Mac Hollins is back to the bench. He went to

1:05:12.040 --> 1:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>for eighteen last week with Waller and renfrewout. Ren fro

1:05:16.400 --> 1:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>out that he had that one huge hundred fifty plus day,

1:05:19.480 --> 1:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>but all the other days, even with players out, he's

1:05:21.680 --> 1:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>done virtually nothing. I will say this is the number

1:05:25.640 --> 1:05:29.280
<v Speaker 1>one past d against both outside receivers and slot receivers,

1:05:29.360 --> 1:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>so I basically everyone else besides Adam on the bench. Fostermorrow, Um,

1:05:35.480 --> 1:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I have a bench grade on him, but it wouldn't

1:05:37.720 --> 1:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>surprise me. He's been a three for forty type guy

1:05:40.240 --> 1:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>with Waller out. Um. This is a Broncos team that

1:05:43.080 --> 1:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>just allowed sixty two yards in a score to Titans

1:05:46.080 --> 1:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>last week eighty two yards the week before. UM. Interesting

1:05:49.480 --> 1:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>pick up there. He's got a match up with the

1:05:51.160 --> 1:05:54.919
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks next week. That's that's planning ahead a little bit. Yeah,

1:05:54.960 --> 1:05:56.720
<v Speaker 1>so that might be a pre spect. I'm gonna change

1:05:56.760 --> 1:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>my prespect, but now I'm not going to go get

1:05:59.360 --> 1:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow for the next for next week's matchup. Josh Jacobs

1:06:03.000 --> 1:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a B grade here. He took thirty three touches for

1:06:05.520 --> 1:06:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and seventy five yards against the same team

1:06:08.280 --> 1:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in week four. It's not hard to envision another day

1:06:10.920 --> 1:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in the high twenties against them. I will say, though,

1:06:13.560 --> 1:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>this Broncos rund you. They held Derrick Henry down, Breece

1:06:16.680 --> 1:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Hall somehow, Damian Pierce, Austin Ekelah, all those guys under

1:06:23.280 --> 1:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>eight yards. But Josh Jacobs took him to the house.

1:06:26.000 --> 1:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Um the pure volume in the fact that he already

1:06:28.800 --> 1:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>did it. I'm giving a B grade to Josh Jacobs. Um,

1:06:31.880 --> 1:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>even even in this tough matchup, he already did it once.

1:06:35.280 --> 1:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson on the other side, I hate to do it,

1:06:38.440 --> 1:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>but I gotta give a C grade. It's too good

1:06:40.360 --> 1:06:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of a match. It's a good matchup that got hit

1:06:44.960 --> 1:06:49.439
<v Speaker 1>nineteen times last week. I didn't see that hits. Also,

1:06:49.520 --> 1:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>did you see this. There's a report from one of

1:06:51.880 --> 1:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the Denver Talk sports talk radio hosts saying that he's

1:06:56.160 --> 1:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>heard that Russell Wilson is calling out audibles from the

1:07:00.760 --> 1:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks playbook. Oh you know, imagine you're Tyler locket and

1:07:07.600 --> 1:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>he calls an audible for a Playboo, what do I do?

1:07:13.240 --> 1:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Or Courtland Sutton? Yeah, that's uh, that would be crazy. Yeah, yes,

1:07:23.040 --> 1:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson sideline. I just did exactly what Russell Wilson.

1:07:28.840 --> 1:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I have a theory that Drew lock was included in

1:07:31.400 --> 1:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that trade for Russell Wilson, so there wouldn't be a

1:07:33.240 --> 1:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>quarterback controversy. The Raiders are the fifth best matchup for

1:07:38.320 --> 1:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>fantasy quarterbacks, having allowed multiple scores in all but one game.

1:07:42.320 --> 1:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>They also allowed two hundred and sixty yards per game,

1:07:45.720 --> 1:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and they've even allowed four rushing touchdowns per game. Russell

1:07:48.560 --> 1:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Wilson got one of those in the previous game that

1:07:50.520 --> 1:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>they played. Fifth most passing touchdowns allowed. I mean, this

1:07:53.720 --> 1:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>is a great spot for Wilson, but all those averages

1:07:57.920 --> 1:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>are light years above Russell Wilson's average of two seven

1:08:01.440 --> 1:08:05.479
<v Speaker 1>yards and zero point eight eight touchdowns. So I'm only

1:08:05.560 --> 1:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>giving him a C grade. I could see him squeak

1:08:07.680 --> 1:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>out better, but he's just been so bad this year

1:08:10.360 --> 1:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>it's really tough to give him much higher than that.

1:08:12.360 --> 1:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>No more Russell talk. Let's go, Yes, Jerry Judy, it

1:08:16.280 --> 1:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>was two minutes. It really was it really was. Jerry

1:08:19.920 --> 1:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Judy has been ruled out. kJ Hamler is going to

1:08:22.320 --> 1:08:28.639
<v Speaker 1>be out a little while longer. Uh. Hinton Man, Tristan Hinton, Hilton,

1:08:28.840 --> 1:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>what's his name again? Kendall Kendall Kendall Hinton Hint Kendall Hinton.

1:08:33.800 --> 1:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh is dealing with his shoulder injury after getting a

1:08:36.080 --> 1:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>decent amount of work last week. I have them on

1:08:38.800 --> 1:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the bench. I I only have Sutton with a B grade,

1:08:42.160 --> 1:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and mostly because Judy and Hammler are out and someone's

1:08:46.120 --> 1:08:48.719
<v Speaker 1>got to catch balls out there. It's a byproduct the injuries.

1:08:48.720 --> 1:08:51.599
<v Speaker 1>He had six for sixty six and to score last week.

1:08:51.720 --> 1:08:54.479
<v Speaker 1>Talk to me about Dulphitch though, that's where this gets interested. Yes,

1:08:54.640 --> 1:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>let's let's go here. Uh. He disappeared last week, but

1:08:57.960 --> 1:09:00.799
<v Speaker 1>he's at double digit Fantasy days in three straight. Prior

1:09:00.880 --> 1:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to that. I mentioned the injuries that are already there. Um,

1:09:04.200 --> 1:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>he was averaging four catches for sixty yards on six

1:09:06.920 --> 1:09:09.479
<v Speaker 1>targets in those It's a better matchup Shore. We keep

1:09:09.560 --> 1:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about the Broncos allowed four touchdowns to Kelsey. You

1:09:12.360 --> 1:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>gotta throw that out, but five other tight ends have

1:09:15.520 --> 1:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>had fifty plus and or a score and even Kyle

1:09:18.160 --> 1:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Granson had a great week last week against them. I

1:09:21.080 --> 1:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>got a C grade on Dulstitch. But you can talk

1:09:23.240 --> 1:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to you can talk me. You know I'm a Dulstitch fan.

1:09:25.840 --> 1:09:27.519
<v Speaker 1>He was my one number one tight end coming out

1:09:27.560 --> 1:09:29.479
<v Speaker 1>of the draft. You could talk me into a B.

1:09:29.840 --> 1:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>But I don't love Russell Wilson running this offense. No,

1:09:33.120 --> 1:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I do either. I have C grades

1:09:35.000 --> 1:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>on both the backs here, four straight leadbacks of top

1:09:37.880 --> 1:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>two hundred fifteen yards on the Raiders. The Broncos don't

1:09:40.880 --> 1:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>really have a lead back. It's kind of fifty fifty.

1:09:43.120 --> 1:09:46.680
<v Speaker 1>But Murray gets the goal line stuff. Gordon gets the receptions.

1:09:47.160 --> 1:09:49.519
<v Speaker 1>This is a team that's allowing twenty nine touches per game,

1:09:49.520 --> 1:09:51.919
<v Speaker 1>a hundred fifty combo yards per game, and a touchdown

1:09:51.920 --> 1:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>per game. You can split that up and get two

1:09:54.160 --> 1:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>C grades out of these two. Paying me to have

1:09:57.120 --> 1:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to start any brodect it really would. I would not

1:09:59.760 --> 1:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>blame me from benching. If I had to start one,

1:10:01.800 --> 1:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it's probably Gordon because I don't want to rely on

1:10:03.600 --> 1:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the touchdown. I want to rely on the receptions when

1:10:06.040 --> 1:10:09.479
<v Speaker 1>we come back. Premature speculation, find out the players you

1:10:09.560 --> 1:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>want to pick up this week that everybody else been

1:10:12.439 --> 1:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to pick up next week, but you got him first.

1:10:16.479 --> 1:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly continues some moments. It is the final

1:10:37.080 --> 1:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>segment of Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Charge and Scott Fish

1:10:41.240 --> 1:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson with you. If you missed parts of the

1:10:43.360 --> 1:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>show and you want to go back and here the show. Obviously,

1:10:47.080 --> 1:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you can go to the podcast if you're listening over

1:10:48.760 --> 1:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the air. If you're listening via podcast, check for this

1:10:51.840 --> 1:10:54.599
<v Speaker 1>over the air. This show is available both ways, which

1:10:54.640 --> 1:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>is kind of cool. Also, you can get all over

1:10:55.880 --> 1:10:59.680
<v Speaker 1>play rankings available at KIO Team leagues dot com. This

1:10:59.800 --> 1:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>is a segment we like to lead with premature speculation

1:11:04.240 --> 1:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>players you can pick up now battle the people will

1:11:07.720 --> 1:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>be trying to pick up next week. Scott. We begin

1:11:10.040 --> 1:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>with you, let's try putting in the mic Gun. Let's

1:11:13.840 --> 1:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>go with Foster. Oh, I'm just kidding. I just kind

1:11:15.800 --> 1:11:17.439
<v Speaker 1>of didn't mention that the last segment. Let's go with

1:11:17.560 --> 1:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham Jr. He's only thirty percent rostered and he

1:11:20.720 --> 1:11:23.680
<v Speaker 1>has narrowed his candidate. He's cleared, he's healthy, and he's

1:11:23.680 --> 1:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>been cleared by doctors now, so he's just got to

1:11:25.760 --> 1:11:28.639
<v Speaker 1>pick a team physical and the ones that he has

1:11:29.240 --> 1:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>pegged out, the Chiefs, the Cowboys, the Bills, like the Giants.

1:11:34.360 --> 1:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>He could either even with the Giants, you could come

1:11:36.360 --> 1:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>in as the number one reight receiver or number two

1:11:38.360 --> 1:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>on several of those teams. Ever be back, um, but

1:11:43.400 --> 1:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>some decent offenses that he could jump into and actually

1:11:46.080 --> 1:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>have a decent fantasy role. See, I'm very skeptical but

1:11:48.880 --> 1:11:50.799
<v Speaker 1>of what he's gonna do. But I like the pis

1:11:51.560 --> 1:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>using him then using him as a as a bargaining chip. Sure,

1:11:54.360 --> 1:11:56.439
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of people name recognition alone, you can

1:11:56.479 --> 1:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>get a lot for Oh b J once he gets signed. Brian,

1:11:59.320 --> 1:12:02.479
<v Speaker 1>who's your premia chure speculation player, I got a Raiders

1:12:02.560 --> 1:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>running back, samere white. Now. In the summer, we were

1:12:05.200 --> 1:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>saying it's very possible the Raiders run Josh Jacobs into

1:12:08.240 --> 1:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the ground in this contract year has worked out that way.

1:12:12.000 --> 1:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>But the Raiders season is pretty much coming to an end,

1:12:15.479 --> 1:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and I'm hoping they have the decency to not run

1:12:18.400 --> 1:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs into the ground for no reason. Oh yeah, if

1:12:20.800 --> 1:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>there's any organization that's going they we saw some flashes

1:12:26.400 --> 1:12:28.680
<v Speaker 1>from some mere White in the preseason. They're gonna want

1:12:28.720 --> 1:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to see what they have in him with they want

1:12:30.800 --> 1:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to give him an extended look. I'm assuming they're going

1:12:32.920 --> 1:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to want to do that later in the season, so

1:12:34.960 --> 1:12:37.680
<v Speaker 1>we could see some mere white starting running back in

1:12:37.800 --> 1:12:40.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, weeks fourteen fifteen sixteen. So if you got

1:12:40.600 --> 1:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a bench spot open, go grabs him. You're white. I

1:12:43.880 --> 1:12:46.439
<v Speaker 1>have reason to believe that the tight end waste land

1:12:46.600 --> 1:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is here. So here's an angle for you for those

1:12:49.000 --> 1:12:51.639
<v Speaker 1>that are looking deep. You may remember from back from

1:12:51.680 --> 1:12:54.479
<v Speaker 1>April Arizona Draft at the first tight knight off the board,

1:12:54.640 --> 1:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Trey McBride, and you know, at the time, we're like, well,

1:12:57.479 --> 1:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'll see you Trey McBride, like three years

1:12:59.800 --> 1:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>when zach Ertz retires. Well, that whole time table got

1:13:02.800 --> 1:13:05.439
<v Speaker 1>moved up a lot last week after Art's got knocked

1:13:05.439 --> 1:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>out early in the game, McBride got all of the

1:13:07.400 --> 1:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>tight end work of the game snaps and how many

1:13:11.360 --> 1:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>routes did he run? Yeah, I mean, you know, so

1:13:14.960 --> 1:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>they put him into coverage a ton or you know,

1:13:16.760 --> 1:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I like the opportunity for Tray McBride. Nobody's talking about

1:13:20.360 --> 1:13:22.479
<v Speaker 1>this opportunity, But if you're in a spot at tight end,

1:13:23.120 --> 1:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>this thing has some weeks to develop because Earth's is

1:13:25.320 --> 1:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>not likely to play again this year. That's uh, that's

1:13:27.760 --> 1:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity for you now is done at least that

1:13:30.960 --> 1:13:34.519
<v Speaker 1>season ending. Yeah, okay, it's officially well it's still not

1:13:34.600 --> 1:13:36.559
<v Speaker 1>expected to play this year. Yes, I don't think I down.

1:13:36.920 --> 1:13:39.879
<v Speaker 1>You can't argue that all. Let's go to the Bengals

1:13:39.920 --> 1:13:43.200
<v Speaker 1>taking on the Steelers. Last time we saw the Bengals,

1:13:43.280 --> 1:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mixon was scoring five touchdowns. Yeah. I don't know

1:13:46.040 --> 1:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>if we get five touchdowns in this one, but he

1:13:47.800 --> 1:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>did have a good game when these teams met in

1:13:50.280 --> 1:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Week one. Uh, he had hundred forty five combo yards,

1:13:53.320 --> 1:13:55.439
<v Speaker 1>so he gets an a here. Before their bye week

1:13:55.560 --> 1:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>last week, the Steelers had surrendered a running back touchdown

1:13:58.160 --> 1:14:01.639
<v Speaker 1>in seven consecutive games Himes, so in a for Mixing

1:14:01.720 --> 1:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and a for t Higgins. He got hurt in that

1:14:03.720 --> 1:14:07.559
<v Speaker 1>week one game left early. Jamaar Chase Tyler Boyd both

1:14:07.680 --> 1:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>scored in that one. We know chases out for this one,

1:14:11.120 --> 1:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>so we should see a lot of te Higgins in

1:14:12.800 --> 1:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a plus matchup. Pittsburgh is allowing nearly two hundred yards

1:14:16.320 --> 1:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and one and a half touchdowns per game to opposing

1:14:19.160 --> 1:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers and do get Minka. I f it's Fitzpatrick back,

1:14:22.240 --> 1:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>which factors, but with Chase out, I like Higgins a

1:14:25.360 --> 1:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>lot here should see a lot of volume. He gets

1:14:27.080 --> 1:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the A B for Tyler Boyd, as I mentioned, he

1:14:29.960 --> 1:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>scored in the first meeting and now has two touchdowns

1:14:32.920 --> 1:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and two of his last three games against the Steelers,

1:14:36.840 --> 1:14:38.799
<v Speaker 1>who I also just mentioned is a pretty good matchup

1:14:38.840 --> 1:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>for wide receivers. So that's why Boyd gets the B.

1:14:41.360 --> 1:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>And so does Hayden Hurst, who has scored at least

1:14:44.360 --> 1:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>eight PPR points in five of his last six games.

1:14:47.680 --> 1:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>That's like he leaves just forty yards pretty much every week. Uh,

1:14:52.479 --> 1:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>He's has some touchdown upside. He had a season high

1:14:55.160 --> 1:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>eight targets against the Steelers back in Week one. Over

1:14:57.840 --> 1:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>their last two games, the Steelers have allowed more than

1:15:00.439 --> 1:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>sixty yards per game to the position, including a touchdown

1:15:03.479 --> 1:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>catch to Juwan john excuse me Jawan Johnson last week.

1:15:07.240 --> 1:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>So would be for hearst At an easy A for

1:15:09.720 --> 1:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Burrow and I can get into that with all those

1:15:11.479 --> 1:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>starting grades for his pass catchers. Over to the Pittsburgh side,

1:15:15.160 --> 1:15:17.639
<v Speaker 1>Najie Harris just a see for him. His snap share

1:15:18.040 --> 1:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>has continued to drop as the season progresses, and he

1:15:21.080 --> 1:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>has been nearly as effective as Jalen Warren has with

1:15:24.120 --> 1:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>his touches, but the Bengals have softened against the run

1:15:27.439 --> 1:15:30.559
<v Speaker 1>since Week five, allowing the sixth most rushing yards per

1:15:30.680 --> 1:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>game and the second highest explosive run rates. So I

1:15:34.000 --> 1:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>will start Harris with the Sea, but I like my

1:15:36.479 --> 1:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>take a chance of me running back a little more,

1:15:38.120 --> 1:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's Jalen Warren, So he liked him if it

1:15:41.479 --> 1:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>came down to one of the other. Because a lot

1:15:43.000 --> 1:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of people are rostering Didge Harris and Jalen Warren. I

1:15:46.240 --> 1:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>think the Bengals put a lot of points. I think

1:15:48.080 --> 1:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the stealer is gonna put up points, and I think

1:15:49.880 --> 1:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Warren he does more with his touches, and he's the

1:15:52.160 --> 1:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>better pass catcher, and I think they're playing catch up.

1:15:54.240 --> 1:15:55.479
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, if I had to pick one, I would

1:15:55.520 --> 1:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>pick Warren and Uh. Deonte Johnson charge he was gonna

1:15:58.160 --> 1:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me wide receiver, and I think

1:16:00.280 --> 1:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you could also take a chance on George Pickens. Will

1:16:02.240 --> 1:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>give him a see. He lines up on the right

1:16:04.320 --> 1:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>side most often, will face Eli Apple uh in the

1:16:07.360 --> 1:16:09.559
<v Speaker 1>Apple's last three games. He's a loud at least fifty

1:16:09.640 --> 1:16:12.599
<v Speaker 1>yards end or a touchdown. Uh and with quarterback chie

1:16:12.720 --> 1:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Dobezier out, it's open season on the left side against

1:16:16.320 --> 1:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>rookie cam Taylor Brett. We've mentioned him a couple of times,

1:16:19.040 --> 1:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>who's yielded a perfect eight point three passer rating in

1:16:22.880 --> 1:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>three games since taking over as a starter, so see

1:16:25.400 --> 1:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>for Pickens. Also a cee for Pat Friar Muth and

1:16:28.840 --> 1:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>its three career games against Cincinnati, including that Week one matchup.

1:16:32.680 --> 1:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Muth has finished with a touchdown or at least seventy

1:16:35.280 --> 1:16:38.679
<v Speaker 1>five yards in every game. He's also averaging seven point

1:16:38.760 --> 1:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>six targets with Kenny Pickett as the starter. It's not

1:16:41.800 --> 1:16:44.479
<v Speaker 1>the best matchup on paper. The Bengals are allowing less

1:16:44.479 --> 1:16:46.599
<v Speaker 1>than five catches and fifty yards pre game to tight ends,

1:16:46.840 --> 1:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>but they did surrender a tight end to um excuse me,

1:16:49.760 --> 1:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>surrender a touchdown to tight end Tommy Tremble their last

1:16:52.760 --> 1:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>time out, so Friar Muth could do the same. He

1:16:54.800 --> 1:16:56.479
<v Speaker 1>gets to the Sea and Kenny Pickett was gonna take

1:16:56.479 --> 1:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a chance, and the quarterback Chief's take on the Chargers

1:17:00.040 --> 1:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday and excuse me, Sunday night, and there's a

1:17:03.720 --> 1:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of moving parts on this thing on the Chargers side,

1:17:05.840 --> 1:17:08.599
<v Speaker 1>but the Chiefs side is a lot more straightforward, where

1:17:08.640 --> 1:17:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelsey are a's like usual, Mahomes

1:17:12.760 --> 1:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>will be without Juju Smith, Schuster and Nicole Hardman, which

1:17:15.280 --> 1:17:18.799
<v Speaker 1>is not trivial, but you know still it's Patrick Mahomes

1:17:18.880 --> 1:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and you've probably fine here. Kadarius Tony coming off a

1:17:21.920 --> 1:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>statement game, and that was to take a chance of

1:17:24.000 --> 1:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>me play for for you, Scott Fish. I gave a

1:17:28.080 --> 1:17:31.880
<v Speaker 1>C grade to Terrius Tony in this game mvs. If

1:17:31.960 --> 1:17:34.599
<v Speaker 1>fully off the injury part. He had some midweek illness.

1:17:34.680 --> 1:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>He is okay now. He's notched at least sixty yards

1:17:38.000 --> 1:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in four of his last six games, and he's coming

1:17:40.040 --> 1:17:42.719
<v Speaker 1>off his first score of the season. I like Marquez

1:17:42.800 --> 1:17:47.759
<v Speaker 1>Velde Scantling in this game. The charter secondaries playing better lately,

1:17:48.160 --> 1:17:51.400
<v Speaker 1>holding receivers scoreless and back to back games, but I

1:17:51.520 --> 1:17:54.639
<v Speaker 1>like his individual matchup on the outside against Michael Davis,

1:17:54.920 --> 1:17:57.400
<v Speaker 1>who gave up a season high sixty five yards last

1:17:57.479 --> 1:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>week and allows a passer rating of a one in

1:18:00.439 --> 1:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>six and four of his last six starts. That is

1:18:02.720 --> 1:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a positive individual matchup. MBS definitely startable as a by

1:18:06.360 --> 1:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>week fill in for your team. Also startable in the

1:18:09.840 --> 1:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>passing game. Justin Watson boy Sneaky played Dynasty Er Love

1:18:16.320 --> 1:18:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you right now? I bet they did. He ran twenty

1:18:20.520 --> 1:18:24.479
<v Speaker 1>more snaps than Kadarius Tony did last week. He projects

1:18:24.520 --> 1:18:26.400
<v Speaker 1>as the starter in this game, running from both the

1:18:26.479 --> 1:18:29.559
<v Speaker 1>slot and outside, and he's got winnable matchups at every spot,

1:18:29.720 --> 1:18:32.479
<v Speaker 1>so you know, the volume has not been there. He's

1:18:32.520 --> 1:18:34.639
<v Speaker 1>also been on the team for like twenty more months

1:18:34.680 --> 1:18:39.160
<v Speaker 1>than actors into Honestly, yeah, I wish I could go

1:18:39.280 --> 1:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>back and go. And he's had these like spots. Reason

1:18:41.720 --> 1:18:44.559
<v Speaker 1>where Justin Watson has had these big games really hasn't.

1:18:44.600 --> 1:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>It's like one and two catches he's and he's got

1:18:46.760 --> 1:18:49.360
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns on the season. But if you're like, if

1:18:49.360 --> 1:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you're in a pinch, consider Justin Watson A let's go

1:18:52.080 --> 1:18:55.839
<v Speaker 1>to the Runners first. Let's start here. Clyde Edwards despair

1:18:56.200 --> 1:18:59.519
<v Speaker 1>totally phased out of this offense just four snaps last week.

1:19:00.080 --> 1:19:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Not only is he not startable here, he is absolutely droppable.

1:19:04.439 --> 1:19:07.400
<v Speaker 1>You does not belong on your team. Isaiah pacheco As

1:19:07.479 --> 1:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>might take a chance on the Runner also startable. Derrick

1:19:11.479 --> 1:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>McKinnon because of his increasing snapcout at the expense of

1:19:15.320 --> 1:19:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Clyde Edwards Hilaire. He is a PPR helper with six

1:19:19.000 --> 1:19:21.479
<v Speaker 1>catches in back to back games. If he's gonna get

1:19:21.520 --> 1:19:24.400
<v Speaker 1>six catches in in a bye week, he's scored in

1:19:24.439 --> 1:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the first meeting between these teams. Jerick McKinnon startable. All right,

1:19:28.280 --> 1:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>let's go to a much more complicated matchup. Unfortunately with

1:19:31.160 --> 1:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the Charger side of this UM, I think I'm gonna

1:19:33.960 --> 1:19:37.920
<v Speaker 1>begin with Mike Williams and Keenan Allen. Okay, look, you

1:19:38.040 --> 1:19:40.519
<v Speaker 1>know the danger in starting both of these guys. They're

1:19:40.600 --> 1:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>rolling into this thing limited and it's a Sunday night game.

1:19:44.320 --> 1:19:46.640
<v Speaker 1>We have very few options in terms of flexing to

1:19:46.720 --> 1:19:49.360
<v Speaker 1>somebody else if it turns out they don't go. So

1:19:49.520 --> 1:19:53.400
<v Speaker 1>this is one of the biggest risk reward moments of

1:19:53.520 --> 1:19:57.120
<v Speaker 1>your entire season. If you're a Mike Williams or Keenan

1:19:57.240 --> 1:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Allen fantasy manager, They're ups is tremendous. The Chiefs are

1:20:02.200 --> 1:20:05.400
<v Speaker 1>allowing the sixth most fantasy points to wide receivers, and

1:20:05.479 --> 1:20:08.360
<v Speaker 1>at least one receiver gets paid in virtually every Chief's game.

1:20:09.280 --> 1:20:13.559
<v Speaker 1>The downside with Mike Williams and Keenan Allen is zero

1:20:13.640 --> 1:20:17.400
<v Speaker 1>points like they're they're they're active and they don't play

1:20:17.439 --> 1:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>which we've seen Keenan Allen do before they're active and

1:20:20.080 --> 1:20:24.360
<v Speaker 1>they get reinjured. I will add this, they both logged

1:20:24.560 --> 1:20:27.439
<v Speaker 1>a full practice on Friday, their first one since getting

1:20:27.439 --> 1:20:30.200
<v Speaker 1>injured for both of them. Yes, so that that's promised,

1:20:30.240 --> 1:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that's that's that's but before adds you know whatever, seven

1:20:37.320 --> 1:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty Central, eight thirty Eastern. With those guys on board,

1:20:41.320 --> 1:20:43.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna do it, you need to have somebody

1:20:43.439 --> 1:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>else on your roster that you can pivot to. And

1:20:46.120 --> 1:20:47.880
<v Speaker 1>by the way, you can't even go to DeAndre Carter,

1:20:47.960 --> 1:20:49.679
<v Speaker 1>who might not go in this game, so you can't

1:20:49.680 --> 1:20:53.679
<v Speaker 1>even go same games. Same to you, Michael Bandy. Maybe

1:20:53.760 --> 1:20:56.759
<v Speaker 1>that's your angle. You pick up Justin Watson most likely

1:20:56.960 --> 1:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>get well. DeAndre Carson might be the other guy to

1:20:59.840 --> 1:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>have Rosster. Great point, excellent point, Josh Palmer. Upgrade. I've

1:21:03.880 --> 1:21:05.439
<v Speaker 1>right now, I've got a C grade on new but

1:21:05.600 --> 1:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't I'm not gonna end up with a C

1:21:07.160 --> 1:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>grade on him at the end of this because we're

1:21:09.760 --> 1:21:12.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna upgrade him to a B. If Williams does not go,

1:21:12.600 --> 1:21:14.879
<v Speaker 1>he runs with the Williams routes, and I'm gonna downgrade

1:21:14.920 --> 1:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>him to bench if Williams does go, So you know

1:21:18.040 --> 1:21:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the deal on Palmer. He's been very inconsistent, but a

1:21:20.960 --> 1:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>plus matchup, and if Williams doesn't go, he's startable with

1:21:24.400 --> 1:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a B grade. Gerald Everett is another guy that you

1:21:28.160 --> 1:21:30.519
<v Speaker 1>can't necessarily know what to do with. He's got a

1:21:30.600 --> 1:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>groin injury. He's shaping up as a game time decision,

1:21:33.439 --> 1:21:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and because it's the Sunday night game, you had all

1:21:35.439 --> 1:21:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the same problems that Williams and Allen had and you've

1:21:37.680 --> 1:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>got much of the same upside. In the earlier matchup

1:21:41.040 --> 1:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>this year between these teams, Gerald Everett was targeted ten times,

1:21:45.000 --> 1:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>so that's his upside. The downside is the risk of

1:21:48.040 --> 1:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>re injury or be him being inactive and getting use

1:21:51.000 --> 1:21:56.839
<v Speaker 1>no points. Let's go to Justin Air Bear. His offensive

1:21:56.840 --> 1:21:59.719
<v Speaker 1>line is killing him, maybe from basically from the rib injury.

1:21:59.800 --> 1:22:03.599
<v Speaker 1>For forward, he's been a disaster so far since Week three,

1:22:04.680 --> 1:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Justin Air Bear averaging just one touchdown per game and

1:22:08.600 --> 1:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>he has not hit the three yard marks since Week four.

1:22:11.960 --> 1:22:14.599
<v Speaker 1>The best news here, though, Austin Ekeler is a receiver,

1:22:14.920 --> 1:22:16.839
<v Speaker 1>is gonna have a huge game, and we love Eckler

1:22:16.960 --> 1:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is an obvious A grade. The Chiefs have allowed the

1:22:19.400 --> 1:22:22.799
<v Speaker 1>second most receptions, fourth most yards, second most receiving touchdowns

1:22:22.840 --> 1:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to opposing running backs. You know what to do with

1:22:25.280 --> 1:22:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Austin necklace. Obvious A grade and a C grade for

1:22:29.160 --> 1:22:34.400
<v Speaker 1>justin air bear him, wear bear, now the wear bear.

1:22:34.560 --> 1:22:39.360
<v Speaker 1>If he beware, beware, be kind of like wear bear though,

1:22:39.439 --> 1:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>like as if you know, like on a full moon

1:22:41.320 --> 1:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>only justin Jeffy, you've got to plot that out. Is

1:22:44.960 --> 1:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>he awesome in a full moon game? Our final matchup

1:22:48.400 --> 1:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>is the Monday Night or forty nine is taking on

1:22:50.560 --> 1:22:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals. Yeah, this, this one's an interesting one. It's

1:22:54.400 --> 1:22:56.519
<v Speaker 1>a it's a really good spat spot for the forty

1:22:56.600 --> 1:22:59.559
<v Speaker 1>Niners players especially get this. This is the staff from

1:22:59.600 --> 1:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>adding Adam Aser from CBS. The forty Niners as a

1:23:03.040 --> 1:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>team average the most yards after the catch, which makes sense.

1:23:07.200 --> 1:23:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Kittles debo. The Cardinals allow the most yards after the catch.

1:23:13.040 --> 1:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>It feels like, so giddy up here for some some

1:23:16.200 --> 1:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>starting grades. Jimmy g was my take a chance on

1:23:19.160 --> 1:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>me players, So obviously I like a lot of these guys.

1:23:21.320 --> 1:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Ayuk the most consistent receiver on this team, at

1:23:25.240 --> 1:23:27.479
<v Speaker 1>least six catches and at least eighty yards in four

1:23:27.600 --> 1:23:31.639
<v Speaker 1>straight very really reliable B grade guy, about nine targets

1:23:31.680 --> 1:23:34.599
<v Speaker 1>per game in that stretch. Cards allowing the sixth most

1:23:34.680 --> 1:23:38.559
<v Speaker 1>receptions to receivers, and they including five wide receiver touchdowns

1:23:38.600 --> 1:23:41.400
<v Speaker 1>in just last four games. That said, only three wide

1:23:41.439 --> 1:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>receivers have topped eighty yards this year, so they're not

1:23:43.720 --> 1:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>giving up the giant games, but they're giving up a

1:23:46.640 --> 1:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of B level grades. So I have a B

1:23:48.479 --> 1:23:51.400
<v Speaker 1>grade on Ayuk. I have a B grade on Deebo

1:23:51.479 --> 1:23:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Samuel as well. He's been relegated to the six to

1:23:53.960 --> 1:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>ten touch guy between carries and catches. Not as much

1:23:57.880 --> 1:24:01.640
<v Speaker 1>boom this year, especially with m caffrey back um, but

1:24:01.760 --> 1:24:03.360
<v Speaker 1>this is the first this is the first time in

1:24:03.439 --> 1:24:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a bit he's been um completely off the injury report

1:24:07.800 --> 1:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>with that hamstring injury, so he might be a little

1:24:10.040 --> 1:24:13.519
<v Speaker 1>bit more ready to take on more work this week. Uh,

1:24:13.720 --> 1:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>George Kittle A grade. It's death taxes and start your

1:24:16.360 --> 1:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>tight ends against Arizona Cardinals, who allowed the most receptions,

1:24:19.800 --> 1:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>yards and touchdowns to tight ends in the running game,

1:24:23.120 --> 1:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I have an A grade on Christian McCaffrey and a

1:24:25.200 --> 1:24:30.599
<v Speaker 1>C grade on Elijah Mitchell. McCaffrey gets the pass catching,

1:24:30.880 --> 1:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>he gets the red zone work, he gets, he gets

1:24:33.320 --> 1:24:37.599
<v Speaker 1>the touchdowns. Um, he gets just as much work as Mitchell.

1:24:37.760 --> 1:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell really just gets the runs. If we're going to

1:24:40.080 --> 1:24:42.360
<v Speaker 1>go on based on the one game sample size of

1:24:42.560 --> 1:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>last week runs interesting. But even in that, if we're

1:24:48.800 --> 1:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at thirty ish touches for these two, Christian with

1:24:52.120 --> 1:24:55.479
<v Speaker 1>the pass catching and the impossible touchdowns and tend to

1:24:55.560 --> 1:24:58.439
<v Speaker 1>fifteen from Mitchell on the ground, it's still a sea

1:24:58.520 --> 1:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>level grade worth of volume in this matchup. Over on

1:25:01.880 --> 1:25:04.799
<v Speaker 1>the other side, if you have Kyler Murray or McCoy,

1:25:05.000 --> 1:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I have them both on the bench where you cannot

1:25:07.120 --> 1:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>risk waiting until Monday night to see if Kyler Murray

1:25:10.000 --> 1:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>is gonna go with a hamstring injury that might take

1:25:12.160 --> 1:25:14.479
<v Speaker 1>away the running problem. And that's the thing, right, even

1:25:14.479 --> 1:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>if he plays without the rushing, do you really want

1:25:17.439 --> 1:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray no arm to try to get there by

1:25:20.840 --> 1:25:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to a fantasy victor by itself against the fo's defense

1:25:24.000 --> 1:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that has held six quarterbacks under two yards and really

1:25:27.040 --> 1:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>only Mahomes had a good day in this matchup, So no,

1:25:30.600 --> 1:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I have I have them whoever starts a quarterback on

1:25:33.360 --> 1:25:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the bench. DeAndre Hopkins popped up with a hamstring injury

1:25:37.080 --> 1:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>on and miss practiced Thursday. Uh, it sounds like he's

1:25:40.760 --> 1:25:43.439
<v Speaker 1>still gonna go and it's not that serious. So if

1:25:43.479 --> 1:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>he does, he's averaging nearly twelve targets per game since

1:25:46.120 --> 1:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>his return. Forget that ridiculous amount. Wide receivers getting even

1:25:49.880 --> 1:25:52.839
<v Speaker 1>eight targets or more against the forty Niners are averaging

1:25:52.920 --> 1:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half catches for ninety yards. You're not

1:25:54.880 --> 1:25:59.360
<v Speaker 1>benching DeAndre Hopkins. Let's move on. Uh, let's go over

1:25:59.400 --> 1:26:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to Ronde or who I have a B grade on.

1:26:02.000 --> 1:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>More has thrived with Markus Brown out, averaging over ten

1:26:05.360 --> 1:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>targets per game over the last three at least seven

1:26:08.439 --> 1:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>catches in each a couple of games over ninety yards.

1:26:11.479 --> 1:26:14.599
<v Speaker 1>Now with Earth's out he might see even more targets. Um,

1:26:14.840 --> 1:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a safe spot for him. Four ns D has

1:26:17.040 --> 1:26:19.400
<v Speaker 1>allowed six wide receivers over a hundred yards and or

1:26:19.439 --> 1:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a score in just the last three games where they

1:26:22.320 --> 1:26:25.360
<v Speaker 1>were really good earlier in the season. Marquis Brown, you're

1:26:25.400 --> 1:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>not starting to my him on the bench. But he is.

1:26:29.479 --> 1:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>He's been practicing in the videos. Look good in practice,

1:26:32.360 --> 1:26:34.519
<v Speaker 1>But I I can't trust a Monday night thing. Even

1:26:34.520 --> 1:26:36.360
<v Speaker 1>if they say he's gonna go. You you got him

1:26:36.400 --> 1:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>on your bench. I also have McBride on on on

1:26:39.200 --> 1:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>my bench. But I want to see what he does.

1:26:40.880 --> 1:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just a bad, bad match up against the place

1:26:44.520 --> 1:26:47.120
<v Speaker 1>for a breakout game. I'm excited to see how he does, though,

1:26:47.160 --> 1:26:49.120
<v Speaker 1>But only two tight ends of top twenty three yards

1:26:49.120 --> 1:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>against the forty Niners James Conner just to see grade,

1:26:52.160 --> 1:26:55.639
<v Speaker 1>mostly due to the volume. Forty Niners only allowed three

1:26:55.680 --> 1:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>point to five yards per carry, which is best in

1:26:57.680 --> 1:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. Fust rush yards allowed running back his top

1:27:01.160 --> 1:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>sixty yards only four running back touchdowns allowed. That's like nothing.

1:27:05.479 --> 1:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>But James Connor is gonna get fifteen plus touches, so

1:27:08.439 --> 1:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>he gets my patented volume. See now with you know

1:27:11.280 --> 1:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Benjamin out of town. Yes, all right, did patented. By

1:27:15.200 --> 1:27:17.519
<v Speaker 1>the way, I'm nicely done. Getting out through the patent office.

1:27:17.600 --> 1:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Not easy. It's not that is not easy. Talk to

1:27:20.360 --> 1:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>me about Marquis Brown upon his return. Not this Monday.

1:27:23.160 --> 1:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's just go next Monday forward. Because without Hopkins, he

1:27:27.720 --> 1:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>was like a top five fantasy receiver. Now with Hopkins back,

1:27:33.160 --> 1:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you think going forward? What about Hopkins with

1:27:36.200 --> 1:27:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Marked I don't know. I think they're both wide receiver twos.

1:27:39.720 --> 1:27:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know they can both be a wide receiver one. Yeah.

1:27:43.360 --> 1:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Ron Delmore does disappear and Arts is out,

1:27:46.320 --> 1:27:48.519
<v Speaker 1>so there's target right, So that's that does help. I

1:27:48.600 --> 1:27:51.439
<v Speaker 1>think both guys can become effective starters. I trust I

1:27:51.479 --> 1:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>only trust Tyler Murray to keep two receivers active total

1:27:54.880 --> 1:27:57.599
<v Speaker 1>on that quick angle. Colt McCoy stash and deep super

1:27:57.680 --> 1:28:00.639
<v Speaker 1>flex leagues because the Cardinals love is there are seasons

1:28:00.840 --> 1:28:05.320
<v Speaker 1>effectively over. Maybe you never know with Brown and don't.

1:28:05.360 --> 1:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I want pull mcquit or any

1:28:06.880 --> 1:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>situation maybe QB two leagues. Thank you for listening to

1:28:11.320 --> 1:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. Best of luck going forward. If you

1:28:14.360 --> 1:28:16.640
<v Speaker 1>want all the player ratings and explanations, you can go

1:28:16.720 --> 1:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to guillotine a leagues dot com. We've got all that

1:28:18.640 --> 1:28:21.920
<v Speaker 1>available for free for you. Best of luck week eleven.

1:28:22.040 --> 1:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk to you next week. Week twelve, playoffs aluming

1:28:24.640 --> 1:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna keep getting your team in shape for its

1:28:27.080 --> 1:28:33.519
<v Speaker 1>playoff run. Stay tuned next week. Everybody, Bye Bye. Fantasy

1:28:33.560 --> 1:28:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly is a production of I heart Radio. For

1:28:36.520 --> 1:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the i heart

1:28:38.960 --> 1:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

1:28:41.960 --> 1:28:42.679
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.