WEBVTT - The Science of Break-Ups

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know from how Stuff Works

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark.

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>There's Charles w Chuck Bryan over there, there's Jerry Rush

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.959
<v Speaker 1>Rush Rush, Jerry. This is Stuff you Should Know. The

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Breakup edition, right, three people who you've never broken up

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>with one another? No, that's true, The Plus three Great

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Point Modern Triad. Yeah, the Tryad. So Hey, before we

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 1>get going, we want to tell everyone alright, at the

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>end of this episode and before listener mail, actually instead

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of listener mail, we're gonna have in a couple of

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>dudes from new show on our network and they're gonna

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>break up in front of us. No. There shows called

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>how to Money, and these guys are local and they

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>were big Stuff you should Know listeners, Matt and Joel,

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and they were like, we want to start a podcast

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>about finance and money matters in life that's sort of

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>like what you guys do, that's approachable and real and

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>just like a couple of people talking normal but about money. Yeah,

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's really really good. Yeah. So we're gonna have

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>those guys on at the end for a few minutes.

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>But it's a show I think everyone would love, so

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>stick around for that. Cool. Uh. So I picked this

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>one out because mainly, um it, uh, this is a refrain.

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>We get an email a lot um we hear from

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>heartbroken people a lot more than you would think that

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>are just like that's so sad heart and you uh,

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you guys have helped me with this show as a distraction,

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>which we will learn is one of the official ways

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to get over a breakup. Yeah, look over here, Yeah exactly.

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Um So it just got me thinking about, like, is

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>there any science behind breakups and the emotions that go

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>along with it? And it turns out there's a lot,

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>like a disturbing amount of study has been done. When

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you look at it, you're like, oh man, maybe you

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>should have allocated that money towards research toward other things

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>like cancer. Yeah, although social psychology couldn't do anything about cancer. No,

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>And it's you know, it's not like they're like, oh, well,

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll just it's all taken from one big pool, so

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll just allocate some of this break up money towards

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>cancer research. Well, you could allocate the money, but the

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:30.799
<v Speaker 1>mental energy, I guess is what I'm talking about. Yeah,

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>but this that was just it seemed like study after study,

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and and also we should point out to that I

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>think there was one case in here of one study

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>where they looked at homosexual couples, But most of this

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>study is like cis gendered straight couples through that lens,

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>only they're not doing a ton of research outside that.

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>I found. I found one that UM that that tracks

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>um it core relates the likelihood of breaking up to time,

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and they had it broken out by same sex and

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>um straight, married, and unmarried. Those were like the four categories.

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>So some people are doing it, but yeah, for the

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>most part now. And I think one of the reasons

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>why I chuck is a lot of this is from

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the mid two thousand's, early two thousand tens, and that

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>was you know, that was about the last the last,

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>like the tail end of that. Now I think it's

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>starting to change, fortunately, right because people of all genders

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and sexual orientation break up and get dumped, and we're

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>here to help all of you. So buckle in, grab

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a hanky, and let's get through this. Yeah, I mean,

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>let's we should go ahead and start out by saying

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess that um in theory, more people are breaking

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>up now because people are generally waiting longer to get married.

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>So if you could extrapolate that if you're not married

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>for in more years than let's say our parents were,

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>then maybe you've gone through a couple of more breakups

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>along the way. Yeah, we should give a shout out

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to Kristen Conger of Unladylike Media congs who wrote this

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>article our old pal and she points out that that

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>typically means that you are going to find somebody who

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you work with rather than rushing into it. But it also,

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>as she puts it, like leaves the window open longer

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>for heartbreak to be dumped. One thing I saw, Chuck,

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:35.280
<v Speaker 1>this is mind boggling to me. Of people, according to

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>this one study, um will be dumped in their lifetime,

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>will experience being a breakup in their lifetime? That means

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>of humanity won't. That is, those are some interesting people

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>have not had a breakup or been broken up with,

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>will not in their lifetime just going to either never

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 1>have a relationship or the first time they're going to

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>hit it out of the park. But that doesn't mean

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>like or settle. I've never been dumped. Yeah, like they'll

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>never have gone through a breakup, But I've been through

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>breakups I've done. I've been the dumper, right, I know

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying. No, I believe that they will not

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>have experience a breakup in their lifetime. Either way, Well,

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that's great. That means say I met the person that

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>they love when they're young, probably again. Or it means

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that they decided to live their life alone just fine, right,

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 1>or or both they like I said, they decided to like, yeah,

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna stick with this person. Yeah, I don't

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>want to. I want to be what. I don't want

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to ruin my record, a spotless record. I think it's

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>very interesting here that um supposedly and this is very

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>hanky how they found this out about the spikes and

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>breakups from like that's a Facebook data place. He doesn't count.

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Social psychology doesn't count. I agree, But it doesn't make

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of sense. And I could see this

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>being true that generally dumping someone or getting broken up

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 1>with can happen on any day of the year, but

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>there are spikes in early December, in early March because

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of Christmas holidays, in spring break. Yeah, and technically you

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>could see that being true. There has I'm sure it's

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>true at least on Facebook and yeah, this is a

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty big day to pull. But it's like, that's so lazy.

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>It's lazy, but I could see it because it's it

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>makes a little bit of sense that you would not

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 1>want to go through the holidays with someone that uh

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and you send a thing to. And this is important

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to point out, like when the breakup happens, when that

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>talk or these days text message or phone call happens,

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that is the end of something for maybe both of you,

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>but definitely one of you. Yeah, sometimes most of the

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>time that that actual act of saying we're breaking up,

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>that's at the end of many, many weeks or even

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>months or even years of contemplation about whether or not

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>you want to still be with this person. Right, And

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that's why being broken up with is almost across the

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>board way harder than breaking up because by the time,

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>like you said, by the time the person who initiates

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the breakup initiates the breakup, this is this is at

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the end of a long road of decision making, whereas

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the other person might have been blissfully unaware or at

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>least willfully ignorant um or not willing to address the issues.

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>And so they are one way or another largely caught

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:38.239
<v Speaker 1>off guard by being broken up with. So the person

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>who does the breaking up has already gone through all

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>these stages of grief of separation, Whereas now it's this person,

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the person who's just been dumped, it's their time to

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>go through. Right. So if you're if you're doing the dumping,

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>like the hour after you have that conversation, you're like,

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>what a relief, I'm I'm starting over. Let's go get

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>some gin, whereas the dumpy is like that, goes get

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>some jew. That begins, That begins their process. Although the

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>only thing I'll take issue with that whole line of

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>thought though, is that a lot of people, even that

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>might get dumped, aren't like what like they may have

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>known and just didn't want to admit it or weren't

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>brave enough or strong enough to do it themselves. Um

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and I agree with you on that. I think that

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>there's still a thread that they had not been preparing

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>themselves just by being insane, denial, unwilling to address it,

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>face it. Now they have no no choice but to

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>face reality, whereas the person who did the breakup was

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>like facing reality and coming to terms with it quietly

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and then now it's your right, which brings me back

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to my original point, which is Christmas and spring break

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>make a little bit of sense because the person who

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>was desperate to get out of a relationship and break

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>up with somebody, they're staring at those Christmas holidays and

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that first week of descend rolls around. They're like, I

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>gotta do this now because I don't want to travel

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time with this person and get through

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 1>the whole gift thing, and the holidays are just it's

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>tough to be in a relationship that's a lie. Well sure,

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, holidays are so about like connecting and

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>feeling and warmth and all that, and if you're faking

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it or have to fake it, you know, some people

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>are like, I'm not going through that. I also saw

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>an explanation in Harper's Bizarre of All Places that some

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>people may do that because of the pressure of coming

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>up with a really good gift, that the relationship is

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>not worth the pressure of coming up with a good

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:41.079
<v Speaker 1>gift outweighs the value of the relationship to those people.

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Or there are some people who don't want to put

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>their significant other through that, so they just break up proactively,

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>which also means that they didn't value the relationship that

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 1>much either, But at least in their mind, they're not

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>doing it for themselves. They're doing it for the other

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 1>person because they don't want to put the other person

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>through that that sure of having to get the perfect gift. Yeah.

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I've never had that thing either, where you start dating

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>someone and it's like a couple of weeks for their

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>birthday or Christmas, and you'r and then that pressure of like, man,

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>how do I play this one? You know, a couple

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of after a couple of weeks, yeah, this person? Or

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 1>but how do how deep do I go on this gift? Here?

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know you, So I got you a

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>basket of socks. Everyone loves socks. So here's an Amazon

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>gift card forty eight fifty right after a couple of weeks.

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>That's a little that's a little close to come up

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>with a perfect gift or even be expected to. And

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I did mention breaking up by text or whatever, like

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you would suspect if you were born before nineteen five,

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>like myself, Um, you break up in person supposedly about

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>seventy at the time. Post if you were born less

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>than fifty percent the time you're gonna do that in person?

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 1>And they say generation? Why whatever that is? I think

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>it's millennials, is it? I'm pretty sure when did they

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>name them? The like? Do they know what? Like? Does

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>my daughter have a generation already? I don't know like

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a name. I'm sure somebody out there is your daughter's generation.

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>You're annoying? No box her in right? Well, you got

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a pigeonhole, folks. Let her grow up, be her own person.

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 1>But if you are gen y, you're more likely to

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 1>do it over the phone. Uh. And of course this

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>says a searing instant message or an email. I think

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>these days you would call that a text. An email

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>is the lowest percent wise and compassion wise for four

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of people. That's the worst email. What was as pretty bad?

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Email is as bad as it gets? Is it? Sex

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>in the city? Where it was a sticky note? I

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>don't remember, feel like I didn't see the movie Sticky Note? Break?

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I think? So, um, should we take a break? Yeah,

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>let's take a break? Man. This is going really really

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>well so far? Okay, alright, Chuck, So we've talked about

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 1>when people break up, how they break up, why did

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>they break up? Well, actually, there's one more, Okay, I

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>think pretty important thing about the how, which is men

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and women. Women tend to present And this sort of

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>makes sense too if you want to be stereotypically, you know,

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>stereotypical about it. Women to to present a list of grievances,

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>here's all the things wrong with you both pretty much,

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>whereas men, uh, it's a little more uh supposedly a

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>little more nebulous. Where the magic go. Yeah, there you go.

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>That's apparently. The differences as far as like rationale for

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>breaking up and these are so macro level and broad

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 1>and how we talk about it. It's a little embarrassing

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to even do. But to talk about this stuff, I

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>know I would do this. Some women do this, right, No,

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>it's absolutely true. Um, that's but I feel like when

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you talk about this, people can find themselves in the

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>contours of thinks of all if you put all this

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff together, if you just took one study and said

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that this is definitive, people should punch you in the kidney. Agreed,

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>but not really. Don't punch anybody. You know, everyone. Over

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the last almost eleven years of stuff, you should know,

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I've said a lot of things that make it sound

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>like I'm inciting people to violence, friendly violence. So I

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 1>was joking every single time. Why someone said something, I

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>just I just want to make sure that everyone knows

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that I was never ever actually serious and saying hit

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>somebody in the head with attack camera or someone in

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the Actually, I'm kidding all the time, except for when

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you recommend that you pants somebody, And I was kidding

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>even then. To have a classroom or that's psychological abuse.

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>It's physical, but it's more psychological than anything. You've ever

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>been pants in front of people? Yes? Really, yes, And

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you it's psychological. I don't think I've

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>ever been pants. Boy, I can't imagine anything more horrifying

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>than being pants. What's underwear? On what? I can confirm

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that because I can't remember being pants. I just remember

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that I have been pants. So I think I just

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>immediately blocked out everything. Yeah, no story, no story there.

0:14:54.720 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Um okay. Uh So if you get broke en up

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>with um, you will feel And we're gonna talk about

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the science of a lot of this because it's very

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>similar to overcoming addictions sometimes but um, of course depression

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and anxiety, uh sometimes suicidal thoughts, sometimes homicide. Oh sure,

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's an outcome and the worst case outcome

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that and suicide of breakups. But they are directly related

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to breakups. That's how bad breakups can be. Yeah. Uh

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>And apparently you know when people do right in about

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>getting dumped and stuff, always say, you know, it's the

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>most trite thing in the world, but like time is

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that really helps, Like ice cream and

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that is good, but like it really does

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>decrease over time. However, in studies, um, eight weeks after

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>being dumped in this study, people still had signs of

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>clinical depression, and twelve percent appeared moderately or severely depressed.

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>So depends on the relationship along you're in it, how

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>much it meant to you, what kind of person you are.

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>But it can stick around for for a bit, it

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>can so. Um. The thing is, though, there are things

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you can do to help accelerate the healing process, and

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about those at the end. How about that.

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll make y'all wait, all right, So, um, where are

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we at, chucker? We at the the well the attachment styles.

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it is interesting because um, we did talk

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>about like gay straight cis gendered. Uh, you know, on

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the gender spectrum, maybe none of that matters. Maybe what

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>matters is what they call your attachment style. That's that's

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>what this says pretty plainly, that that's what it comes

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>down to, how you attach yourselves to other people. You

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>can be a needy, clingy dude, You can be um

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a avoidant woman, or you can be either one of

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>those things anywhere on the gender spectrum. That's the thing.

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Like the the idea that women are clinging men are

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>distant is is fabled. Yeah, it's at least ham fisted. Yeah,

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 1>I think so. It's it's sort of that thing in

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>social science that bothers me, which is like you're either

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>this or this right, like one thing or the other,

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 1>and really all you are as a white college student,

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that's what they really mean. Yeah, we had a little

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>time on their hands, right, you needed extra credit. But

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>there are two supposedly again two things um attachment styles,

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>anxious attachment and avoidant. Congre points out like that's two

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>ends of a spectrum, and you can fall somewhere on there.

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>There's actually a it's pretty straightforward. It's um uh the

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>oh oh I s I believe or O s I.

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a scale where you pick how your relationship is

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>best described by a series of ven diagrams, and one

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>circles you. One circle is your significant other, and they're

0:17:54.600 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>just increasingly together, from just barely touching too almost completely

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.719
<v Speaker 1>merged into one single circle, and you just circle the

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>one that best describes your your sense of what your

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>relationships like, and that supposedly gets your your spectrum replacement

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>on the spectrum of attachment across. So interesting, So it's

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 1>real subjective and self reported, so that is to say,

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:23.719
<v Speaker 1>not scientific, right, Unfortunately, um, Supposedly two thirds of women

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>initiate divorces. Uh, and this article says that might give

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>them a statistical edge over getting over a relationship because

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>they initiated the breakup, so they've been in the process already.

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's what I think she meant. I think so,

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not so sure that just because a woman

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>initiates a divorce, it may have been after years of

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>systematic abuse, you know, which may not mean like she's

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.919
<v Speaker 1>so ready to get over this uh quicker than he

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>might be, right, you know, Yeah, No, I mean you

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>can't just say, like if X, then I with this stuff.

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>It's relationships sir as messy as as humans get. It's

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:11.199
<v Speaker 1>a relationship. Yeah, that's all you need to say. Well,

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:13.120
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the brain a little bit, because this

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>is where it does get a little more interesting, I think,

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>slightly god slightly more scientific. Uh. There was a study

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eleven by neurologists at the Einstein College

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>of Medicine which sounded totally fake, but it's not. I

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>have sounds made up for written down. It's in the bronx. Yeah,

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:35.719
<v Speaker 1>there's also they were also anthropologists from Rutgers and Sunny

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to legitimize things. Oh, in this study its Rutgers is

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>legitimizing things. We're in trouble. Is that? Is that? Really?

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I thought Rutgers was all right? Or am I confusing

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it with toughs Ah, you're probably thinking Princeton, Okay, both

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.959
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey schools. I thought Rutgers was the public

0:19:55.000 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>ivy Okay, sorry, Rutgers I tried. Then they're gonna be

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 1>so mad at me. I've hung out at Rutgers. I've

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>been there people, so you know what you're talking about.

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>And exactly what is it like the Detroit of New

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Jersey colleges or something that's not untrue? Okay? All right,

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 1>he don't disagree. Boy, we're gonna get killed. That's okay.

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>So this study from Einstein College of Medicine found that

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>just looking at a photograph of an ex partner caused um,

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the second somo somato sensory cortex and the dorsal dorsal

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>posterior insula. Jeez uh. And these areas process physical discomfort.

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>They start lighting up. The same thing as happens is

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>when you get physically injured, basically like you are in actual,

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 1>legitimate pain as far as your brain is concerned, in

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the midst of a breakup, at least when you're stuck

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:55.679
<v Speaker 1>in an m r I machine and showing a picture

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of your recent acts, which is a big deal now

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>with social media, because every modern article I read about

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>breakups and getting over them talked about what a deletrious

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 1>effect social media will have on your recovery process. Are

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you taunting me? Because the stuffs everywhere? Now. It used

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to be easy. You could just throw everything in a

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 1>shoe box and set it on set it on fire,

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and send it down a river and a little boat

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>made of rage. Um, But you can't do that anymore

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 1>because they're everywhere. No, but that's that's tip number one

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 1>from psychologist Guy Winch, author of How to Fix a

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 1>Broken Heart. Stay the h off of social media. Do

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>not stalk your X on social do not check in,

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>like just separate. Imagine that would be really hard because

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in the old days, it was just left to your

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>imagination to think about how much fun they were having

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>with you know, now you can see pictures of the

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>nine new boyfriends that she has. Hum but yeah, you're

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.199
<v Speaker 1>right now, or you know, maybe it helps people. I

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I think it's imperative that you not do

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that to help to help. Like, it's not like watching

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>them on social media will prevent you from ever getting

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>over it. I think no matter what you do, you're

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>going to eventually get past this. But all you're doing

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is prolonging the process, and that like unnecessarily uh. And

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 1>then also when you were on the f m RI

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>machine and they did brain scans from people who have

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 1>been broken up with recently, they found that very much

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 1>similar to people overcoming like an addiction to cocaine. Uh,

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and that that same circuitry is of overcoming addiction is

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>just lighting up. It's that potent. Yeah, so so far

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>with this m r I study from Albert Einstein came

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>up with is that you were in physical pain from

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the breakup, and you're the same centers that are activated

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>by addiction cravings with draws are activated by the breakup

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>as well. That's astounding. Yeah, And this weird mental cycle

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>happens basically when you do look at like a photograph

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of a uh what they say, a former lover right

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>over like the burger king laying rug. But you will,

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you'll see the photo and the weird thing is you'll

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>immediately get a reward. You will get a dopamine hit,

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 1>like a pleasurable feeling by seeing this person. And then

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:31.239
<v Speaker 1>you realize, oh wait, well then you get sad all

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 1>right immediately afterwards? Uh and then that sagnus sagness. Where

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>did that come from? It is a little saggy feeling

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that triggers the brains ventral tech mental area and the

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:49.439
<v Speaker 1>nucleus uh acumen bins acumen bins. I think so, I

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:52.120
<v Speaker 1>know we've run into that before. We just talk about

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the brain a lot more human beins. I think we

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>figured out the brain though, right, so we stopped. We

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>were like do um, But the these two things working

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>together regardless of how I mispronounced them. They trigger the

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>urge to see that person, so you get sad, and

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>then your brain lights up in two areas and then

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you go, hey, I remember that dopamine hit you get

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>from looking this picture. Why don't you just give him

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a call and see what's going on? Right? You want

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the real stuff? Go go? They also those two areas

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 1>apparently also UM are analytical as well, so they're responsible

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>for rehashing the the relationship, but apparently they're not very

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>realistic because most people, when rehashing the relationship, highlight the

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 1>good parts and forget about all the bad parts. I

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of have tended to do that, I think everybody does.

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand why. I don't know. I don't agree

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>with that, like Emily, and when we of course, I've

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>been married so long the subject never comes up anymore.

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 1>But I was always like, oh, with the old girlfriend,

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:01.880
<v Speaker 1>what was so bad there? And then if I really

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:04.479
<v Speaker 1>thought about it, I would remember where She's always like,

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>oh that was awful? Yeah gotcha? Well she's smart. Yeah

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe so I'm dumb dumb so but but okay, so

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>even and you're not dumb dumb, even if UM like

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 1>you represent a third of people or a half of

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 1>people who do real when rehashing, only think about the

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>good stuff and forget about all the negative stuff, like

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>what is that? Why does that even happen? It's bizarre

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 1>if you think about the personality thing, like if I

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>tend to be optimistic maybe or yeah, yeah, I guess

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty good explanation to tell you the truth.

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>What I was going to say is if you look

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>at relationships or romantic love as um a a evolutionary

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:51.919
<v Speaker 1>drive to pair and mate successfully over and over again

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:55.199
<v Speaker 1>and to stay together, that would bring you back to

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>this person that you've already connected with, rather than making

0:25:57.840 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you go look for another mate. That makes sense, So

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 1>may be it's kind of like a backstopp or fail

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>safe for breakups evolutionarily speaking, right, like I was so

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>close to having nine babies, Like I really want to

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>start all over again, right, Which is funny because that

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 1>means that Emily is more evolved than you in that sense. Yeah,

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>in every sense. But the end of that mental cycle,

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>basically though, is those areas light up that say go

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>back and see that person. Then you are immediately unsatisfied

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and about the fact that that's not happening. That's when

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you're a pre frontal cortex trips into gear and that's

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>when you get angry. And it's just that mental cycle

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that starts seeing that photo on a social media platform

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>and ending up upset in the end. But UM, the

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:51.679
<v Speaker 1>same study led by Helen Fisher, found that UM, after

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>over time, the same process is greatly degraded. I think

0:26:56.240 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>they did a follow up in well months, Congress says, uh,

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I found that the whole process and in all of

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the neurochemicals and the brain regions are much less active,

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>which again just time, give it time, right. But if

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't give it time and you do the thing

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 1>where you do get back together, UH, that that can

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>be great. You know it's UM. Sometimes you can work

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>it out and people can't change UM. But there's a

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 1>big caveat there. Well, right, go ahead, no no, no,

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.360
<v Speaker 1>no you you say yours okay, because I think I'm

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 1>talking about something else. So UM. What I saw was

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that if you get back together, rather than saying like

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 1>this is a fresh start, we're gonna try this over again, UM,

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna really make a go of it. If you

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 1>do that, all you're going to do is just walk

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>right back into the same pitfalls and pratfalls because the

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>separation probably did nothing or virtually nothing to your individual personalities,

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>which are the source of all of your conflicts. So

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not like you just magically worked your conflicts out

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and you're getting back together there and everything's fine. That's

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 1>just a charade. But if you get back together and

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>say I decided I love you the way you are

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and I don't want to be away from you, and

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I just accept you for you, and I accept our

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>relationship with all of its problems, you're probably going to

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>have a successful reunion. If you go into it like

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>all of our problems are solved because we broke up.

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>You're just going to do the same thing again down

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the line. And that's apparently a fairly frequent thing. That

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>something like six or some crazy percentage of UM younger

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the younger generation generation. Why I guess um the process

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of breaking up the majority of them that that breakup

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>involves getting back together multiple times, not just once. Yeah,

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>so they're you're getting back together and just going through

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the same pattern. I think there's a field of thought

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and psychology called scripts. These are scripts that we're playing

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>out one another scripts, and if you don't alter the script,

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna go through the same script over and over again. Uh,

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>You're you're working out the same things from your past

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>or from your childhood against one another, and you're not

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>doing it in the right way. So all you're doing

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>is creating conflict. And that doesn't just magically go away

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>because you spend a couple of months apart. You have

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to just say I love you for who you are

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to just just keep going. Yeah, I

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:21.959
<v Speaker 1>think what I was gonna say was, Um, don't they

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:23.959
<v Speaker 1>think though? That that also depends on just what kind

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of person you are in terms of thinking. Either people

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>can really make substantial change in their lives or they can't.

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>That's how how you deal with a breakup, which we'll

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about in a minute. That sounds like a good

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>place for a break I think so too, all right,

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>before we get to that, what we were just talking

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>about before the split. Um, this is one piece of

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>data UM from the same sex couple community. Supposedly from studies,

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>they do think that same sex couples are better at

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>staying friends. Yeah, I saw that after a breakup, which

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly UM lesbian couples, yeah, and then gay men and

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>then straight couples are like, forget about it. Yeah, it's

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>an interesting thing. Can you really be friends after And

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>it all depends on how intense and how long and

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and how kind of a person you are, But um, yeah,

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting when I meet people that legitimately are friends

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>with people that they seriously dated years later. It's pretty rare,

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I think. Actually, I think it's too. I think it

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>seems less rare because you see it on TV shows

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot, you know, um, And it's also almost aspirational, like, oh,

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>look at how like how laid back and like with

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>these people are that they can be friends after this,

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you know. Um, I think it's pretty rare. Actually, I

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's an idealized form because people like to you

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>like to think that like you're on good terms with

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>everybody in your life. I think that's usually the person

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>breaking up though. There it's like I'd like to still

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 1>be friends, whereas the person getting broken up with it

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>like or you could get it by car, right, yeah,

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and that would solve the problem. Um. And then sticking

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>with the whole same sex straight thing, are we saying straight? Still?

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that doesn't feel right, does it. It doesn't,

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>So let's just say same sex and hetero. Yeah, hetero,

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a clinical name for it. Boy. Um

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>so uh. The time and marriage seemed to be the

0:31:57.560 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>two greatest indicators, at least as far as this one

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>study I saw went um for the likelihood of staying

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 1>together over long periods of time. Like all relationships, same

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>sex and hetero um man woman, all of them are

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>in at the greatest risk of breakup within the first

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>year or two, and then it starts to drop precipitously.

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think married hetero couples have a fairly low

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>rate of a low chance of breaking up over time

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>is pretty much flat the whole time, um say. And

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>then with same sex couples, the same thing happens. That

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the chance to break up is pretty high at the beginning,

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and then it starts to come down, and then it's

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>basically tracks with hetero couples for marriage. So marriage is

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of the factor. Time is a second factor, but

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>then time stops being a factor after like thirty or

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 1>forty years. For unmarried couples both hetero and same sex,

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>they started to break up after year like thirty or forty,

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Like the chance of a breakup increases. Yeah, but once

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you get married, once you get a ring on it,

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:08.239
<v Speaker 1>um over time, over like you know, decades is what

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about. Your chance is almost nil of of

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>breaking up all right, like less than I think a percent.

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't sound right because that the like half

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of all marriages into divorce. Yeah, this thing was way off,

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 1>but maybe that's when taking into account maybe that's frontloaded

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>by all the divorce that happened the first five years

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. Yeah, OK, that would make a

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit more sense. They do find that your chances

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of getting over a breakup or adjusting to that new

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 1>post breakup life, um, really centers around regaining your sense

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of self. Um that when you couple up with someone. Uh.

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not saying you can't have a sense of self anymore,

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>because it's very healthy too. But there's an inevitable um

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:59.719
<v Speaker 1>absorption and morphing that happens, and a little bit of

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>your sense of self goes away when you couple. Yeah,

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>all the same friends, the same phone number, yeah, and

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the same madre yes. Yeah boy? What about couples that

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 1>share the email address? Yeah? You mean I have one

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 1>really never had one, But you have your own too, Well, yeah,

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:18.800
<v Speaker 1>we just have our own, but we have our shared

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 1>one too. I think I'm talking about the people that

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 1>just have the shared address. I've always found that interesting. Yeah,

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm judging. I don't know anybody who just has a

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 1>shared address. I don't get why people would have the

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>same one. I guess I just always Emily says a

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 1>mind spring address. Wow, is it Emily at MindSpring dot com? No?

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 1>And that is the truth, because I'm not saying that

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 1>just to keep people from emailing her. But she's she

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:43.800
<v Speaker 1>had it for so long and I make fun of

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.280
<v Speaker 1>her all the time because she still pays like twenty

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year for this what And she was like,

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I've had it for so long that I just can't

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>give it up. Well, that's why people stay on Facebook. Yeah, Like,

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:57.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm not changing my email address. There's like many memories there.

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 1>It's like even that just contech list and every email. Like,

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I just think it's funny. I was like,

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>where's that money going? Who owns mind Spring? The air

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of the mind spring fortune? He can count on twenty

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:19.359
<v Speaker 1>bucks a month back of cigarettes every months because oh man. UM.

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 1>And then for recovery, uh, the the whole stress related

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>growth thing that can happen with recovery, which is UM.

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think women tend to be more apt to

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 1>do this than man. But like, all right, you know what,

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm free now, I'm gonna do all those things that

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:39.759
<v Speaker 1>I lost while I was with him. It didn't have

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 1>time for my friends anymore. I lost connections with them.

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't do I didn't fly model airplanes or RC

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 1>airplanes any I'm gonna drop some weight. I'm gonna start

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 1>eating healthier. The post breakup weight loss is a huge,

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:53.760
<v Speaker 1>huge thing. It is, and partially from stress, but partially

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>just because like I'm gonna make myself the best I

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 1>can be and I'll show her or him. I think

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:02.359
<v Speaker 1>it's also like, um, just as simple as like more

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 1>free time, you know too, and something to do that is,

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, exercises also stress relieving. UM, you might not

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:13.400
<v Speaker 1>be eating as much because your stomach is tied up

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 1>into stress. Not so there are a bunch of reasons

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 1>for it. But here is that here's where that um,

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that part you're talking about earlier I said we would

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 1>get too kind of kicks in is how much of

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the self you identify with UM does relate to how

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:32.359
<v Speaker 1>well you handle a break up, how much of your

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 1>how much of the U is the we in the relationship?

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:38.879
<v Speaker 1>And what they found is that that's a huge part

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of it, but more significant is the amount of growth

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that happens while you're in a relationship. Like you can

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>share a tremendous amount of the same self with your

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>significant other and grow as a person as a result.

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And if you do that, UM, you're actually going to

0:36:55.920 --> 0:37:00.360
<v Speaker 1>have a harder breakup because that we that that uper

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 1>attachment UM that led to that personal growth is related

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to that other person who's now gone. Whereas if you

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 1>were even if you were totally in messed with another person,

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 1>but you didn't grow much personally, if you experience a

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>burst of growth after the breakup, you're going to have

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the easiest breakup of all. Even though you were super

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:23.839
<v Speaker 1>in messed with the person, you weren't growing. But then

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you grow afterward. Now that period of non growth is

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:29.759
<v Speaker 1>related to that person who's gone, And you can be like,

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 1>so long zero, I'm gonna make myself a hero. Yeah,

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:39.720
<v Speaker 1>do you see sure? Did they come across? Yeah? Because

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 1>sometimes I'm not the best at explaining things, which is

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:47.879
<v Speaker 1>pretty funny if you think about it, there really is UM.

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand, they did a study at Northwestern University

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:55.240
<v Speaker 1>where they did find out though that UM. They asked people,

0:37:55.239 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I believe, how bad do you think this breakup is

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be? If you if you you know, you're

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in a relationship, what if you broke up? And then

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 1>they found out that they weren't as bad off as

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 1>they thought they would be, which is encouraging, it is,

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 1>but also think about this, chuck, These vultures who are

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 1>running the study where like, you're in a relationship, just

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:20.440
<v Speaker 1>just we're going to study just in case you guys

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>break up, And so they would get that info, that

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 1>self reporting info about how bad the breakup would be,

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and then they swooped in upon the breakup there like

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:33.879
<v Speaker 1>how bad is it? Tell us? And the person was like, well,

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>this is as bad as it is. And it was

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 1>almost across the board, not not anywhere near as bad

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:42.439
<v Speaker 1>as the people thought it would be when they were

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 1>in the relationship, which is pretty surprising. And what was

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:48.319
<v Speaker 1>even more surprising is the more in love you are,

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:52.479
<v Speaker 1>the easier it's going to be relative to how bad

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:54.959
<v Speaker 1>do you think it will be during the relations, Which

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 1>makes sense if you stop and think about it. Yeah.

0:38:57.680 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought the other interesting thing too when we were

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:03.839
<v Speaker 1>talking to out, um getting over a breakup in your

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:07.359
<v Speaker 1>sense of self that's closely tied to how you feel

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 1>about rejection and um, there are a couple of I

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:15.359
<v Speaker 1>mean more than a couple of ways. But if your

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 1>reflection of your how you think about rejection is tied

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:22.839
<v Speaker 1>heavily into how you feel about yourself, So there's some

0:39:22.880 --> 0:39:26.600
<v Speaker 1>people that might be rejected and it might devastate them

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 1>because they start to analyze themselves and what did I

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 1>do wrong? And what's wrong with me? There's a whole

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:34.720
<v Speaker 1>other camp out there, And I think this goes into

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:38.279
<v Speaker 1>personality and ego and all that stuff. But you call

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 1>these people healthy or sociopaths. Oh you think so? Maybe

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I just we just put both of our cards on

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:52.439
<v Speaker 1>this table. Then. But the people that are like, yeah,

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I got broken up with and I but and I

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:57.920
<v Speaker 1>got rejected. But you know, as happens that happens in life.

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 1>People get rejected. It's not because of me, I thought

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 1>everyone you know, so you find it, you find this

0:40:03.160 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 1>quote sociopathic. I learned that two people can both be

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>quality individuals, but that doesn't mean they belong together. That's

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:13.359
<v Speaker 1>sociopathic to you. That's that was Oh wait it says

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you said that it was dead Bundy Patrick Bateman. No, no no, no,

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it necessarily means you're a sociopath. But

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 1>I think someone with that is a true sociopath would

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 1>probably be way more apt to be like, oh yeah,

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 1>well it was them, not me. Yeah, it's like it's fine, breakup.

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 1>There's a sub subgroup to that sociopath as you call

0:40:34.719 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it camp, and they are like, well, breakups happen. Um,

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I heard what the other person said, and there's some

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 1>things that I feel like I need to work on,

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Like sin, I was a terrible communicator, so I'm gonna

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 1>work on becoming a better communicator as a result. It's

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>called stress related growth is what that's called. Where you're

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>growing out of this horrific experience. Um, and that's healthy,

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:02.879
<v Speaker 1>that's super healthy. But they the key is what's unhealthy

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>is to say this was all because of some fatal

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 1>flaw that I have, that's part of my personality that

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll never be able to get rid of. And so

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:14.359
<v Speaker 1>all I'm going to do is poison every relationship from

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 1>here on out, and I'm just gonna build walls and

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 1>keep everybody at a distance. And that's just some people

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>do as a result of a breakup, and you can't

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 1>do that. Even if your brain starts to go that way,

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 1>this research says, stop it. Don't you have to disassociate

0:41:29.160 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 1>yourself become the sociopath. I guess if need be to say,

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:37.840
<v Speaker 1>this is not because of an inherent flaw in me

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:41.279
<v Speaker 1>that's uncorrectable. Even if the person was right, even if

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:45.400
<v Speaker 1>they're like, you're a terrible communicator and you have serious

0:41:45.520 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 1>mommy issues, that doesn't mean that you will always be

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a terrible communicator with serious mommy issues. You could work

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:57.880
<v Speaker 1>on those post breakup and become a much better s

0:41:57.960 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 1>O to the next person or whatever. The key is

0:42:01.160 --> 0:42:04.279
<v Speaker 1>not not being a fatalist, like there's nothing you can

0:42:04.280 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 1>do to change. And then also you should evaluate whether

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the person was saying that in anger, how much faith

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you put in their opinion of you. There's a lot

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of factors that you need to take into account before

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you take on that kind of thing that just puts

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 1>you in the bottom of a well where you could

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>conceivably hang out for the rest of your life if

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you're not careful without copious amounts of therapy, agreed, or

0:42:29.520 --> 0:42:32.959
<v Speaker 1>turning the drugs and alcohol, which is a big, yeah,

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 1>big thing that a lot of people do. Jim cuts

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:37.879
<v Speaker 1>both ways. Uh, should we talk about some of these

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:42.839
<v Speaker 1>tips from this guy psychologist Guy Winch. Remember number one is, um,

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:46.439
<v Speaker 1>don't check up on them on social media. Here's why.

0:42:46.640 --> 0:42:49.799
<v Speaker 1>He says that this will reinforce your excess presence in

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:52.080
<v Speaker 1>your mind and will make it harder for you to

0:42:52.080 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>stop fantasizing about your broken relationship. You're basically just like

0:42:56.840 --> 0:42:59.800
<v Speaker 1>literally keeping them right there in front of your face

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 1>through social media. Yeah, which is why it's a bad

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 1>idea to avoid creating mysteries about why the breakup happened.

0:43:10.000 --> 0:43:12.840
<v Speaker 1>And again, this is along those same lines of just

0:43:12.960 --> 0:43:17.520
<v Speaker 1>keeping your ex like forefront in your mind, which is hard.

0:43:17.560 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's gonna take a little while. It's makes

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:23.600
<v Speaker 1>day to pop up and just be like, well, they're

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:26.759
<v Speaker 1>out of my mind. That's sociopathic. Yeah, even if you're

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 1>the breaker upper, Um, you know, it doesn't mean that

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a process to go through as well. Sure,

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, but That's why he says, avoid creating mysteries

0:43:35.239 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's probably going to happen, but like be

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:40.319
<v Speaker 1>mindful when it's going on and be like enough, I'm

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:42.799
<v Speaker 1>gonna go work out, yeah, or go drink some gin

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 1>or both. Uh. Number three, Make a list of all

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:48.799
<v Speaker 1>the comper this is a good one. Make a list

0:43:48.840 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of all the compromises that you had to make that

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to make again, and start to think about, like, yeah,

0:43:54.160 --> 0:43:56.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, when I was with this person, I felt

0:43:56.400 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 1>like I could never really have my real sense of

0:43:59.640 --> 0:44:02.400
<v Speaker 1>humor out in public because they thought it was loud.

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 1>The counters that that um that rehashing, that just focuses

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 1>on the positive. It cuts the legs out from under

0:44:11.200 --> 0:44:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that cutting legs. What about number four? Do the things

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that used to bring you enjoyment is kind of what

0:44:16.640 --> 0:44:19.239
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about earlier, even if they don't seem

0:44:19.239 --> 0:44:21.839
<v Speaker 1>interesting now. That whole thing where like, jeez, I used

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to really love pottery and throwing clay, and I just

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I quit doing it once I started dating Josh. Yeah

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in my house uh, And Josh hated it when Chuck

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 1>went to the Potter's Wheel because it reminded him of

0:44:39.680 --> 0:44:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Ghost and Josh hated that movie, so he wouldn't allow

0:44:42.600 --> 0:44:44.799
<v Speaker 1>me to do it. But you know what, I'm gonna

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:48.759
<v Speaker 1>reclaim that pottery wheel, which is ironic because I was

0:44:48.760 --> 0:44:51.520
<v Speaker 1>always walking around our house just like Patrick Swayzey in

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that scene. But I still hated that movie. Oh that

0:44:57.480 --> 0:45:01.800
<v Speaker 1>was more like the Chris Farley chipping Dale Patrick Swazy version.

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Um number five, remove reminders, Um, this is the box

0:45:06.680 --> 0:45:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that you will burn, which is now just a your

0:45:09.440 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 1>laptop in the fireplace, right in your smartphone, and then

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:15.279
<v Speaker 1>like reconnect with your friends, like, yeah, you left him

0:45:15.320 --> 0:45:17.960
<v Speaker 1>in the dusty years ago, but they're still alive and

0:45:18.000 --> 0:45:20.320
<v Speaker 1>they probably wouldn't mind hearing from you. Yeah. The problem

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:23.680
<v Speaker 1>here is is if you truly do have a mix

0:45:23.719 --> 0:45:26.279
<v Speaker 1>of friends that you both love, and it's not like

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't leave behind all my old friends or the

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:32.799
<v Speaker 1>worst case scenarios like all of my friends are from you.

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Now what do I do? Go down to the Y

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:38.720
<v Speaker 1>m c A and make some new friends? I guess.

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:42.000
<v Speaker 1>So I found this one last study I thought was interesting,

0:45:42.840 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 1>The best way to get over a breakup according to science.

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:49.560
<v Speaker 1>This is actually published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology.

0:45:49.680 --> 0:45:53.920
<v Speaker 1>UH and they tested a bunch of strategies. We're getting

0:45:53.920 --> 0:45:58.840
<v Speaker 1>over a breakup, twenty four heartbroken people. They just thirty

0:45:58.840 --> 0:46:01.000
<v Speaker 1>seven that had in and at least a two and

0:46:01.000 --> 0:46:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a half year relationship, so pretty significant. Some were dumpy,

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:08.000
<v Speaker 1>some were dumpers. And they said there were three strategies.

0:46:08.000 --> 0:46:12.960
<v Speaker 1>One is too negatively re appraise your ex. I just

0:46:12.960 --> 0:46:16.319
<v Speaker 1>think about all the bad things. Um. The other one

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:21.480
<v Speaker 1>was called love reappraisal, which is, uh, believe in read

0:46:21.560 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 1>statements like it's okay to love someone I'm no longer with,

0:46:25.239 --> 0:46:28.840
<v Speaker 1>It's all right. And then the third was distraction literally

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the ice cream and movies drake, the black mirror trick.

0:46:35.040 --> 0:46:37.040
<v Speaker 1>And then there was the fourth prompt, which was the control,

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:40.040
<v Speaker 1>which was don't think about anything. Of course means you're

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:41.920
<v Speaker 1>thinking of the state of March about I don't think

0:46:41.920 --> 0:46:46.239
<v Speaker 1>about anything really, just undermine the science of that. Clear

0:46:46.239 --> 0:46:49.279
<v Speaker 1>your brain. So those were the four prompts. Then they

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:51.560
<v Speaker 1>showed everyone They hooked everyone up to an E e

0:46:51.719 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 1>G machine, showed them photos of their exes, and they

0:46:55.520 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 1>measured the intensity of emotion in response to that photo,

0:46:59.840 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and then had them use these different prompts to see

0:47:02.560 --> 0:47:05.080
<v Speaker 1>like which one works best when they looked in the

0:47:05.120 --> 0:47:07.880
<v Speaker 1>people who were not thinking about anything, they were bleeding

0:47:07.880 --> 0:47:11.360
<v Speaker 1>out of their eyes, sucking. They were um And according

0:47:11.440 --> 0:47:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to the readings, all three, all three of the strategies

0:47:14.880 --> 0:47:20.239
<v Speaker 1>significantly decrease their emotional response through the photos relative to

0:47:20.280 --> 0:47:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the control. Um. If you looked at your ex in

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a negative light that first one, like they was such

0:47:27.920 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a jerk, you had a decrease in feelings of love.

0:47:31.120 --> 0:47:33.960
<v Speaker 1>But you left in a worse mood like that drudged

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:36.799
<v Speaker 1>up bad feelings like you you wasted your time or

0:47:36.840 --> 0:47:40.400
<v Speaker 1>something that maybe or just like just really took me

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:42.480
<v Speaker 1>off thinking about all that stuff. Right, you know? So

0:47:42.800 --> 0:47:48.799
<v Speaker 1>now did dump study some clay? That's right? Uh, distraction

0:47:49.040 --> 0:47:54.160
<v Speaker 1>made feel made you feel better overall, Um, but didn't

0:47:54.160 --> 0:47:56.479
<v Speaker 1>that have much of an effect on how you really

0:47:56.480 --> 0:47:59.440
<v Speaker 1>felt about them? You just didn't leave in a necessarily

0:47:59.440 --> 0:48:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a bad mood. You just got ice cream and watched

0:48:01.480 --> 0:48:03.919
<v Speaker 1>funny movie good enough, which is fine. But they said

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that that doesn't do anything long term to help you recover,

0:48:07.080 --> 0:48:09.479
<v Speaker 1>just like a temporary whatever does it prolong it? Though?

0:48:09.719 --> 0:48:12.279
<v Speaker 1>Do you think? I mean, you know, as much as

0:48:12.280 --> 0:48:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the people conducted it said, it's a form of avoidance

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that is shown to reduce the recovery. Okay, so it

0:48:19.360 --> 0:48:22.200
<v Speaker 1>would prolong it. Then I guess everybody stop eating ice

0:48:22.239 --> 0:48:25.680
<v Speaker 1>cream and watching Black Mirror. Uh. And then Love Appraisal

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:28.760
<v Speaker 1>showed no effect on your mood or how you feel

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:32.440
<v Speaker 1>about them, but it did dull the emotional response a

0:48:32.440 --> 0:48:35.959
<v Speaker 1>little bit. So there's really nothing to do. Doesn't sound

0:48:36.000 --> 0:48:40.040
<v Speaker 1>like it. I saw a couple more tips. One is,

0:48:40.239 --> 0:48:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you can write a letter that, under no circumstances will

0:48:43.480 --> 0:48:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you ever send. Yeah, that's a good trick relationships. It's

0:48:48.520 --> 0:48:51.600
<v Speaker 1>like anything bothering her. It also really works well for

0:48:51.680 --> 0:48:55.600
<v Speaker 1>grieving too. Um, you just write a letter and you

0:48:55.640 --> 0:48:57.560
<v Speaker 1>say whatever you want because you know for a fact

0:48:57.600 --> 0:49:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that the other person will never read it. Dear, you

0:49:00.680 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 1>can say whatever you want, and it's just like a

0:49:02.719 --> 0:49:06.240
<v Speaker 1>cathartic process that can help hasten things. And then also,

0:49:06.800 --> 0:49:11.239
<v Speaker 1>why do sad songs feel so good when you're going

0:49:11.280 --> 0:49:13.720
<v Speaker 1>through a breakup? Why do people seek out sad songs?

0:49:14.120 --> 0:49:17.440
<v Speaker 1>And the best explanation I saw, the best theory is

0:49:17.480 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that a song is a little capsule of emotion, and

0:49:21.160 --> 0:49:23.799
<v Speaker 1>when you're seeking out a sad song, you're confronting the

0:49:23.960 --> 0:49:28.640
<v Speaker 1>very emotions that you're probably stifling right then, and confronting

0:49:28.680 --> 0:49:31.720
<v Speaker 1>it in such a raw form forces you to express

0:49:31.719 --> 0:49:36.120
<v Speaker 1>those emotions i e. Cry and that helps you process

0:49:36.200 --> 0:49:39.600
<v Speaker 1>them faster because you're you're not pushing them off any longer.

0:49:39.880 --> 0:49:43.439
<v Speaker 1>You're you're you're you're expressing them, you're sorting through them.

0:49:43.480 --> 0:49:45.799
<v Speaker 1>So that's what sad songs make you do. That's why

0:49:45.880 --> 0:49:48.520
<v Speaker 1>people seek out sad songs when they're down, and it

0:49:48.600 --> 0:49:55.680
<v Speaker 1>actually helps hasten recovery. Lady and Red, I don't think

0:49:55.719 --> 0:49:59.239
<v Speaker 1>that's a sad standing with me. That's the saddest song.

0:49:59.360 --> 0:50:05.239
<v Speaker 1>You're like, it takes me away? That uh sailing by

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Christopher Cross A lady in Red and then um Dan

0:50:08.239 --> 0:50:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Vogelberg's saying, same old anxide three set a song. Jerry

0:50:12.120 --> 0:50:15.879
<v Speaker 1>knows that song. Those were two Christopher Cross songs. He's

0:50:15.920 --> 0:50:17.719
<v Speaker 1>got two of the three sets. Lady and Red's not

0:50:17.800 --> 0:50:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Christopher Cross. I think it is five dollars Jerry. We're

0:50:22.320 --> 0:50:25.759
<v Speaker 1>all nodding now, five dollars is on the table. All right,

0:50:25.840 --> 0:50:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll look it up. Well, you guys will find out

0:50:28.080 --> 0:50:30.840
<v Speaker 1>next episode whether I was right or not. I remember

0:50:30.840 --> 0:50:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the guy's name. It's Christopher Cross. Oh, Jerry's rare is

0:50:36.280 --> 0:50:39.240
<v Speaker 1>doing one of her rare speaking parts. She says, Chris

0:50:39.360 --> 0:50:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Christoph Waltz, that's the actor. You know what's funny is

0:50:43.200 --> 0:50:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I miss type something and it changed my search to

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Lady in Red Wings like red Wing boot must be

0:50:50.040 --> 0:50:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a fetish site, I guess. So yeah, Well, while Chuck's

0:50:53.440 --> 0:50:55.880
<v Speaker 1>doing that, if you want to know more about breakups,

0:50:56.120 --> 0:50:58.319
<v Speaker 1>go read about them, because that's way better than going

0:50:58.360 --> 0:51:01.480
<v Speaker 1>through them. Uh. And since we said that, it's time

0:51:01.520 --> 0:51:04.759
<v Speaker 1>for listener mail. Well no, no, First of all, that

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:09.080
<v Speaker 1>is Christin burg Um. Who is Krista Berg. It's a

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:13.080
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing burg Oh, I got you, not Krista burgh

0:51:13.960 --> 0:51:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, but I think he was a one hit wonder.

0:51:17.920 --> 0:51:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Probably he's British Okay art rock performer. Lady in bed

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Night says, wow, So Christopher Cross did not have that song? No,

0:51:27.520 --> 0:51:31.399
<v Speaker 1>he's great to look so no, no, no, no listener mail.

0:51:31.440 --> 0:51:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Let's get the How the Money guys in here. So

0:51:36.520 --> 0:51:38.879
<v Speaker 1>here we are everybody, as promised, we have a very

0:51:38.920 --> 0:51:42.759
<v Speaker 1>special non listener mail listener mail segment. Instead, we're gonna

0:51:42.840 --> 0:51:45.399
<v Speaker 1>hang out with Joel and Matt, the dudes from How

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:48.439
<v Speaker 1>to Money. So welcome guys. Hey, thanks for having me. Yeah,

0:51:48.440 --> 0:51:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. Yeah, thank you for being here. Listen

0:51:50.200 --> 0:51:54.799
<v Speaker 1>to those voices, right, podcasting voices for We've been working

0:51:54.800 --> 0:51:56.760
<v Speaker 1>on him. It takes a while, you know, to develop

0:51:56.760 --> 0:51:58.719
<v Speaker 1>a voice this golden, but it takes time, but you

0:51:58.760 --> 0:52:00.879
<v Speaker 1>get there, you know, yes, you know, I've just learned

0:52:00.880 --> 0:52:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the English language. So so how this all happened was

0:52:05.160 --> 0:52:07.600
<v Speaker 1>my friend from high school is a mutual friend of yours,

0:52:07.640 --> 0:52:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Matt keg stand Todd. He got in touch to via

0:52:12.400 --> 0:52:14.520
<v Speaker 1>social media and said, hey, I got these friends. It

0:52:14.600 --> 0:52:16.440
<v Speaker 1>was sort of that thing that everyone dreads, which is

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:19.839
<v Speaker 1>like they have a podcast, would you have coffee with them?

0:52:19.880 --> 0:52:22.560
<v Speaker 1>And then I listened to the show and it was great,

0:52:22.640 --> 0:52:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, you guys are sort of doing

0:52:24.560 --> 0:52:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and stuff you should know. He approach to finance and

0:52:28.160 --> 0:52:29.920
<v Speaker 1>would you join our network? And it was kind of

0:52:29.960 --> 0:52:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that simple. Yeah. The thing is is it wasn't a mistake, right,

0:52:33.040 --> 0:52:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Like we've I've been a fan of s Y s

0:52:35.040 --> 0:52:39.240
<v Speaker 1>K for for years and the approach of just talking

0:52:39.280 --> 0:52:41.839
<v Speaker 1>about things that you're interested or that you find, you know,

0:52:41.960 --> 0:52:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a curiosity, and it was it was a huge draw

0:52:44.840 --> 0:52:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to finding a way to talk about money in a

0:52:46.719 --> 0:52:49.640
<v Speaker 1>way that was helpful, uh to folks out there needing

0:52:49.680 --> 0:52:52.040
<v Speaker 1>help with their finances. Yeah. That's the key, isn't it,

0:52:52.120 --> 0:52:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Just to like be actually interested in what you're talking about. Yeah, So, like,

0:52:56.040 --> 0:52:58.879
<v Speaker 1>what are some of the topics you guys cover typically? Yeah,

0:52:58.960 --> 0:53:01.920
<v Speaker 1>so we cover all sorts of topics really more than anything,

0:53:01.920 --> 0:53:05.759
<v Speaker 1>stuff that interests Matt and I, and so we cover Uh.

0:53:05.840 --> 0:53:07.799
<v Speaker 1>We just realized that every time we got together, when

0:53:07.880 --> 0:53:09.880
<v Speaker 1>we end up talking about money related issues, that's just

0:53:09.920 --> 0:53:11.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of what we care about. And so we wanted

0:53:11.880 --> 0:53:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to help people figure out how to handle their money

0:53:14.680 --> 0:53:16.600
<v Speaker 1>better because it's like a huge issue, right, And so

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:19.399
<v Speaker 1>we talked about tax refunds, We talked about student loan debt.

0:53:19.920 --> 0:53:22.520
<v Speaker 1>We talk about how investing is like so much simpler

0:53:22.560 --> 0:53:25.600
<v Speaker 1>than you think it is. There's this concertative effort to

0:53:25.640 --> 0:53:27.400
<v Speaker 1>make it seem like it's a really hard thing, and

0:53:27.480 --> 0:53:29.759
<v Speaker 1>people they get there, they get their panties in a

0:53:29.760 --> 0:53:31.560
<v Speaker 1>lot because they don't know how to invest, and they

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:33.879
<v Speaker 1>decide not to do it at all because it's so hard, right,

0:53:33.920 --> 0:53:36.280
<v Speaker 1>And so we want to just help people make it easier.

0:53:36.480 --> 0:53:41.799
<v Speaker 1>So it's like a public service. Basically, you for doing

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that because there is a lot of like scary thought

0:53:44.640 --> 0:53:47.719
<v Speaker 1>and um it just fear of the unknown for sure

0:53:47.760 --> 0:53:50.880
<v Speaker 1>with finances and a lot of people have problems with money.

0:53:50.920 --> 0:53:52.920
<v Speaker 1>So to go out there and do that to to

0:53:53.040 --> 0:53:56.360
<v Speaker 1>explain it to whipping into shape for people, um is

0:53:56.440 --> 0:53:59.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's hats off. Yeah. I mean there's just not

0:53:59.719 --> 0:54:03.279
<v Speaker 1>come station happening around personal finance, Like right, fewer folks

0:54:03.320 --> 0:54:06.000
<v Speaker 1>were talking about it that that that need to actually

0:54:06.000 --> 0:54:08.480
<v Speaker 1>be be discussing it, right, It needs to be talked

0:54:08.520 --> 0:54:11.319
<v Speaker 1>about more. And I think you know, by leading by

0:54:11.360 --> 0:54:13.360
<v Speaker 1>example to a certain extent, by talking about it and

0:54:13.400 --> 0:54:17.200
<v Speaker 1>having conversations about it like that alone kind of demystifies

0:54:17.320 --> 0:54:21.400
<v Speaker 1>these you know, financial topics and principles. And you know,

0:54:21.400 --> 0:54:24.640
<v Speaker 1>if we can do that and encourage conversation through the show,

0:54:24.680 --> 0:54:26.680
<v Speaker 1>through the podcast, then you know, we see that as

0:54:26.719 --> 0:54:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a as a huge win. Yeah. I think the danger

0:54:29.520 --> 0:54:33.920
<v Speaker 1>for especially like um, younger listeners and millennials, that they

0:54:34.239 --> 0:54:36.680
<v Speaker 1>just sort of shut it down because they might think

0:54:36.719 --> 0:54:39.480
<v Speaker 1>it's boring or it's scary and so I don't even

0:54:39.480 --> 0:54:41.799
<v Speaker 1>want to like go there. And you guys do it

0:54:41.800 --> 0:54:45.000
<v Speaker 1>in such an approachable way that it demystifies it and

0:54:45.080 --> 0:54:47.799
<v Speaker 1>makes it accessible and it really kind of is like

0:54:47.840 --> 0:54:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a public service in a way. Yeah, so I think

0:54:51.400 --> 0:54:54.799
<v Speaker 1>it's so uh for Matt and I to to do

0:54:54.840 --> 0:54:56.560
<v Speaker 1>this show right first, it just came out of what

0:54:56.600 --> 0:54:59.160
<v Speaker 1>we generally talk about, like, Hey, what do we do

0:54:59.200 --> 0:55:01.040
<v Speaker 1>when we get together. We drink a beer and we

0:55:01.040 --> 0:55:02.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about money, and so on the show we drink

0:55:02.520 --> 0:55:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a beer too, which is part of our kind of approach,

0:55:04.480 --> 0:55:07.399
<v Speaker 1>like let's just be normal human beings that talk about money,

0:55:07.400 --> 0:55:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that care about this stuff. And so it's been really, honestly,

0:55:10.160 --> 0:55:13.080
<v Speaker 1>it's been super cool to see the listeners respond, to

0:55:13.120 --> 0:55:16.160
<v Speaker 1>see them taking action, to hear the sorts of moves

0:55:16.200 --> 0:55:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that people have made in their financial lives already. And

0:55:18.480 --> 0:55:20.319
<v Speaker 1>the cool thing, the best part about the whole thing

0:55:20.440 --> 0:55:22.799
<v Speaker 1>is that at the end of the day, they've they've

0:55:22.800 --> 0:55:25.480
<v Speaker 1>empowered themselves, right, They they've made a change their own

0:55:25.520 --> 0:55:29.160
<v Speaker 1>lives that makes their future self so much happier and

0:55:29.200 --> 0:55:32.919
<v Speaker 1>even honestly there their self today because as you start

0:55:32.960 --> 0:55:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to kind of take um, take the range of your

0:55:35.160 --> 0:55:39.320
<v Speaker 1>own financial life back. Uh, there's something that's so free

0:55:40.280 --> 0:55:42.800
<v Speaker 1>getting out from under debt. There's like no better feeling

0:55:42.800 --> 0:55:45.080
<v Speaker 1>than that, like you feel like the man doesn't own

0:55:45.120 --> 0:55:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you anymore, you know, like you're not indebted literally and

0:55:48.280 --> 0:55:50.600
<v Speaker 1>figuratively at that point. Yeah, but it's like, how do

0:55:50.640 --> 0:55:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I start, how do I even like get the ball rolling?

0:55:52.719 --> 0:55:54.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's what keeps people from like sitting on the

0:55:54.680 --> 0:55:56.839
<v Speaker 1>couch and not doing anything. And so yeah, we want

0:55:56.840 --> 0:55:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to be that motivating factor but also kind of explain

0:55:59.520 --> 0:56:03.160
<v Speaker 1>some of us that that typically are shrouded in secrecy. Well,

0:56:03.160 --> 0:56:05.239
<v Speaker 1>you said, you guys talk about beer a lot on

0:56:05.400 --> 0:56:08.239
<v Speaker 1>the podcast or it's a part of it's like a

0:56:08.280 --> 0:56:11.719
<v Speaker 1>third third host kind of another character. Right, it's the

0:56:11.800 --> 0:56:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Jerry of How to Money. I wish Jerry was a beer. Um,

0:56:18.080 --> 0:56:21.839
<v Speaker 1>so she'd be long gone by now, though, Um so

0:56:22.080 --> 0:56:26.480
<v Speaker 1>have what beer have you come across that is expensive

0:56:26.600 --> 0:56:30.640
<v Speaker 1>but worth the outlay in your opinion? I mean I would. So.

0:56:31.000 --> 0:56:32.400
<v Speaker 1>One of the reasons we have the beer on the

0:56:32.440 --> 0:56:35.359
<v Speaker 1>show is that it's an example of us focusing on

0:56:35.480 --> 0:56:39.279
<v Speaker 1>enjoying life now while also balancing saving for the future. Yeah.

0:56:39.280 --> 0:56:41.439
<v Speaker 1>That's important. Yeah, because a lot of times folks get

0:56:41.440 --> 0:56:44.440
<v Speaker 1>too caught up in u compounding interest calculators and they

0:56:44.480 --> 0:56:46.400
<v Speaker 1>look ahead and they say, man if I don't spend

0:56:46.400 --> 0:56:49.239
<v Speaker 1>another ten bucks this month like that back thousands and

0:56:49.239 --> 0:56:51.920
<v Speaker 1>thousands down the road, and what happens is folks end

0:56:52.040 --> 0:56:55.600
<v Speaker 1>up just depriving themselves of of things that they enjoy

0:56:55.760 --> 0:57:02.000
<v Speaker 1>now or something, but with money, yes, exactly, And so

0:57:02.400 --> 0:57:04.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty much any beer that we know we want to

0:57:04.520 --> 0:57:06.759
<v Speaker 1>have on the show. Certainly there's some that are better

0:57:06.760 --> 0:57:09.480
<v Speaker 1>than others, but we enjoy every single one that we

0:57:09.480 --> 0:57:11.239
<v Speaker 1>have on because it's a it's an example, it's an

0:57:11.239 --> 0:57:15.400
<v Speaker 1>illustration of us taking time, taking time for ourselves, you know,

0:57:15.440 --> 0:57:17.640
<v Speaker 1>like we don't do that enough, but but really it

0:57:17.960 --> 0:57:19.840
<v Speaker 1>is a huge part of the show, and we felt

0:57:19.840 --> 0:57:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that it was always important that we maintained that, Uh,

0:57:22.640 --> 0:57:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that we maintained that in the podcast. The fact that

0:57:24.960 --> 0:57:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't discriminate from beer to beer. I just I

0:57:28.320 --> 0:57:33.120
<v Speaker 1>love both of you. Hats off to you again. Well,

0:57:33.160 --> 0:57:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you guys are the mystifying the process. You're

0:57:36.200 --> 0:57:41.480
<v Speaker 1>making finance um interesting and funny, and uh I I

0:57:41.560 --> 0:57:43.800
<v Speaker 1>feel great that you guys thought of us as an

0:57:43.800 --> 0:57:46.640
<v Speaker 1>inspiration for doing that, and uh, I think you really

0:57:46.680 --> 0:57:48.480
<v Speaker 1>are doing a great service. So, like, if you're out

0:57:48.520 --> 0:57:52.360
<v Speaker 1>there in podcast land and finance scares you or bores

0:57:52.400 --> 0:57:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you like, listen to How the Money for Real, because

0:57:55.240 --> 0:57:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it can. It can be a great sidekick and a

0:57:58.280 --> 0:58:02.360
<v Speaker 1>teacher for you. Thanks. Thanks, guys, We appreciate it. And um, yeah,

0:58:02.400 --> 0:58:03.680
<v Speaker 1>we're just glad to be a part of the network

0:58:03.680 --> 0:58:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and we love what you guys are doing. Great too, man,

0:58:06.200 --> 0:58:08.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks man, thanks so much. It's a lot of fun

0:58:08.040 --> 0:58:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to be part of the family for sure. Yeah. And

0:58:10.720 --> 0:58:13.080
<v Speaker 1>so they can find you, guys, what on Apple? Podcasts,

0:58:13.080 --> 0:58:17.720
<v Speaker 1>on iHeart radio app everywhere they get podcasts, okay, great?

0:58:17.800 --> 0:58:21.760
<v Speaker 1>And when do you publish Mondays and Wednesdays? What's your

0:58:21.800 --> 0:58:25.240
<v Speaker 1>social Oh, let'sten how to Money pod? Pretty much everywhere,

0:58:25.240 --> 0:58:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe, yes. And the best part is our Facebook group,

0:58:27.680 --> 0:58:29.720
<v Speaker 1>so if you want to join in there there's over

0:58:29.760 --> 0:58:32.880
<v Speaker 1>a thousand people asking each other questions, commenting, and that's

0:58:32.920 --> 0:58:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the community is super fun. Yeah. The fact that the

0:58:34.800 --> 0:58:37.760
<v Speaker 1>community has sort of formed around the show. Yeah, there's

0:58:37.760 --> 0:58:40.440
<v Speaker 1>folks helping each other out and you know, asking questions,

0:58:40.520 --> 0:58:42.960
<v Speaker 1>answering other questions of stuff that they do know about.

0:58:43.600 --> 0:58:46.560
<v Speaker 1>That is super cool. Like between that and the emails

0:58:46.600 --> 0:58:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that we receive of folks, you know, explaining how they

0:58:48.920 --> 0:58:51.320
<v Speaker 1>have created a budget for the first time ever, or

0:58:51.640 --> 0:58:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to set aside money towards you know, putting

0:58:54.040 --> 0:58:57.560
<v Speaker 1>money in my four oh one k uh, finally accepting

0:58:57.600 --> 0:59:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the employer match, like just different things, Like it's so rewarding,

0:59:01.440 --> 0:59:03.120
<v Speaker 1>it's huge. I wish I would have had this show

0:59:03.200 --> 0:59:06.680
<v Speaker 1>because I was a late bloomer, uh in knowing anything

0:59:06.720 --> 0:59:08.840
<v Speaker 1>about finances. So if I would have had the show

0:59:08.840 --> 0:59:10.560
<v Speaker 1>on my twenties, I'd be a lot further along then

0:59:10.640 --> 0:59:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I am today. Goes. If only weekend time travel, you know,

0:59:13.760 --> 0:59:17.320
<v Speaker 1>exactly getting the way back, I'd be richer and slimmer.

0:59:18.160 --> 0:59:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for coming by you guys who appreciate it. Uh.

0:59:21.120 --> 0:59:22.959
<v Speaker 1>If you want to get in touch with me, Chuck

0:59:23.080 --> 0:59:25.960
<v Speaker 1>or Jerry, you can shoot us an email to stuff

0:59:26.040 --> 0:59:34.040
<v Speaker 1>podcast how stuff Works dot for more on this and

0:59:34.120 --> 0:59:36.680
<v Speaker 1>thousands of other topics. Is it how stuff Works dot

0:59:36.680 --> 0:59:47.360
<v Speaker 1>com