WEBVTT - 4/8, part 2: Zach Eflin, Monday pickups, Yandy Diaz, Ryan Mcmahon

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess dude, Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Did we

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>just become best friends? Fantasy best friends forever? Our number

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>two Fantasy best friends forever. Fantasy Sports your network live

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:59.279
<v Speaker 1>with you here on the Fantasy What's your network? Makes sense? Instead? Right?

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's Stample. I'm Greg Sauceman, joined as we

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>are each and every day at this time. It's a closer.

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 1>Chris benshows up, Chris, what's up? What's up? Your boy?

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:12.839
<v Speaker 1>The closer? It's your boy. I had to do it once.

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>You do you want Jaguars, Jaguars little b d N

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>action for Chris. Yeah, this is gonna be better this year.

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Jumping back on the Jaguars the D. I gotta like

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the gotta like the d this year. Oh no, where's

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the purple hair? Right? Are you supposed to reveal it?

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna tell you what she bought me, purple

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>spray tint and everything. And it's like she just didn't

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>do it, Like she didn't want to do the whole project.

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>She bailed on me. What did you do instead? Man?

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>She was like, I don't know, online looking up shopping

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>places to go for our wedding. Nice, and she's more important,

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess. Yeah, So she was looking at that stuff

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's nice, purple hair. It's a little bit more

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>important to me. Him going to Fiji laying, he was

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty pumped about. Then, what famous golfer is from Fiji?

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>He's American? Yeah, he's I don't know. I don't know.

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know answers Louis US days, No LOUISUS days

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>in South Africa. He's not a golf like the only

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>two that I know. He's not a golf from today.

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>He's a golfer from like to the Tigers, heyday. I'd

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>say the Tigers big rivals for a little while. No clue, Alex,

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>do you know, I don't know that'd be a hard

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 1>nor now, Okay, does anybody know down there? My answer,

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you think John Daly is from from Fiji? Bryan, you

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>think John Phil Nicholson's from Fiji. It is a name

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that I know. Jesus Christ, we're going to amateurs here now.

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>The name that we're looking for is VJ. Singh J

0:02:56.320 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 1>from Fiji. Wow, good old VJ. That's rare. Is there's

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>not that many people who feed you. I don't think

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>true story. I've been to feed you. Yeah, nice place

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>which there's a lot of islands. I don't know. Greg

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:10.399
<v Speaker 1>has been all around the world. I tried the Adventures

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of Greg Sessmen. Yeah. No, that's a good place to go.

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>That's why I was picking you that old galopicos never

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>been there. Yea South American island. It's the coast of Peru. Yeah.

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>One of those things are looking up for you. When

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:24.799
<v Speaker 1>when are you going? Next year? Next year? So we're

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to get a good price, makes sense. I was.

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I screwed this up being of flights, looking at flights

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>for my bachelor party in Fort Lauderdale. They've all gone up.

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>This is a disaster. I thought cheap, there's raining for

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>them to go down, and instead of going down, they

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>went up. Uh, that's not working out well for you. Sorry,

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it's very bad. That's it. You gotta try earlier. So

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I was earlier. It was fine, So it was really mad.

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>The week before I made a decision place where that's great, perfect,

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>very happy round trip. Yeah, two hucks round trip, it's perfect.

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>A week later, they're up to forty four. I'm like,

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a joke. Well you've been to do it

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>now before they go up again. So then I waited

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and they were on to sixty six and like, this

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>is stupid. Now the flights are empty because I'm literally

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>looking at the seats on the flights that I want

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're empty. Empty, keep going trolling, you keep going up.

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Now they're up to two eight, and what is happening?

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm pissed. Now you might as well wait longer? Could

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you go back down? That's what I'm I don't know.

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait till it's three bills and then it's

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna sit here. What's happening? Three hundred Dollarsdale saved a

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of hundred because you're talking about two tickets. That's true. Yeah,

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:44.479
<v Speaker 1>it's oh, you're gonna buy party, Okay. I didn't hear

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the bachelor party. Yeah, all right's baseball. How'd your How

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>was your baseball weekend? Good? Yeah? Good? You know my

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>boy went off ja yeah next week right when I

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>drop getting hot, get drop Josh Bill. Yeah, he was

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>getting intense to pick up till in pit league. Yeah,

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>someone pick him up, it goes, I'm looking at the

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>wrong league. I don't know. Well, I think that I

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>think of Dandy, and I think of Dandy Andy. That's

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a good pick up. We should talk about Yandy d

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>as a lot of people excited about him. A few

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>people were asking us about Yandy DZ and the chapel

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and just look at Josh Yeah, big timer. I was

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 1>listening and watching this who actually had to uh and

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>him a little SmackDown last week? Actually second place team

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>right here, it looks like I do know how to

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>play in category leagues. After first, I mean, I'm in second.

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>But regarding Yandy ds Greg, one of the first things

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that I told you today when I came in was

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Yandy's lifting the ball more. And that's exactly what we

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 1>needed to see. Guy who always had a lot of power.

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>He's built like a football player. He's jack out of

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>his mind you see some of his off season workout

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff like the guy's huge look. He's like he's Sespedous

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>esque and in terms of how big is and you know,

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>coming into the year, he has a twenty two percent

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 1>fly ball rate this year, small sample size again, thirty

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>eight late appearances, but a thirty three percent fly ball rate,

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>so one third of the time that he's making contact,

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>he's putting it in the air, and he's hitting the

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>ball extremely hard to start the year. So you're seeing

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that reflected in his stats. Every three batting average seems

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>again its pretty good plays discipline too, greg because he's

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>walking thirteen percent at a time, making a ton of contact,

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>he's striking out only eight percent at a time. He's

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>hitting three hundred and against leftist he's leading off, and

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>against right he's still in the middle of the lineup.

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>So what's not to like about Yandy Diaz? And I

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I would have dropped Josh Bell for him,

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>because I see the appeal with Bell, and you know,

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>he's been hot already to start the year, and mind you,

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that's in Pittsburgh all the weather. You know, the weather

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>has warmed up a little bit. But for the most part,

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>it's still been I don't know if it would have

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>done that. I would like to add Yandy Diaz. I

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it would have dropped Josh Bell, but

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>if he's out there, even in your twelve team leagues,

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I I would try and get your dash and I

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>made a call and I did it. Ye both. I

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>thought could potentially be really good this year, so it

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>might not be a bad move for you. Right personally

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>made it, But I would like to try and add

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>y d As if I can. Yeah, definitely. The only

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>thing I see issue with Yandy in ESPN leagues he's

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a d H only, which is kind of annoying. Really, Yeah,

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that should change, right, It's interesting if he gets ten

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>games in the outfield, his eligibility should change. Yeah, you

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>think that's Let's see on the year, he has three

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>games at first base and he's already got six at third,

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:41.679
<v Speaker 1>So in my league it's only only five games, So okay,

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>he has third, and it looks like he should he's

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. You're gonna get first base eligibility as well

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>because he gains left handed pitching and I'm gonna play

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>g Manchoi and they play Yandy Das. While we're on

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the topic of conversation of the Rays. Remember I kept

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>telling you guys before the season, Nate low remember the

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>name Nathaniel Lowe. If he's available in your lead, this

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>is a deeper play and al only brand. Maybe you're right,

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>but he had his second home run ready, and I

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>have a feeling that the Rays didn't have him break

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>camp just because they want to get the extra service

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>time out of him, and they could have. You know,

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it's easier for them to sell that because you know

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>they like g Man choice. But it's like, I don't

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 1>know how long Man Choi is gonna last. You know,

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the starting first baseman gets right handed pitching. But this guy,

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Nate low last yeas year for the race in the

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>minor leagues between Double A and Triple A and High A.

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>He so he progressed from High eight to Triple A

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>in one minor league season. It's twenty seven home runs

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>with a hundred and two art guys, three thirty batting

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>average p s. He's already off to a good start.

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.079
<v Speaker 1>I think it won't be long before Nate Low is

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>in the major leagues for the Tampa Bay Race. Years old,

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have a sick lineup man, Tommy Fan, Yandy Diaz,

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Austin's Nate Low Ran Low they got, they got a

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>little sneaky line up man. I like Tampa Bay, remember

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the name. I'm just telling you that I'm in on

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Yandy for sure, though Yandy is definitely a good one.

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Did you make any bids over the weekend venture? Um? Up?

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Would I pick up? I picked up Frankie Mantas a lot,

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 1>of course, even with the astro start, the astro start

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 1>I watched actually uh and he was good. It was

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>just that that line up is good. Uh. Al TV scored.

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>They scored the first round. Often when al TV check

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>swinged and hit the infield single was short in the hole, like,

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>come on, it wasn't a good hit. And then you

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>know Bregman had a nice hit and then he gave

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>up another run. He wasn't that bad. He got into

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>trouble and got out of it. Um. He still had

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a strikeout for any against the five strikeouts in five innings,

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and he had six strikeouts in six innings in his

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>first start. Yeah, a strikeout for penning from on top

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>right and the second start, honestly, impressed me more because

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of the lineup and because of the tough situations, even

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in basic loaded situations. I also picked up Christian Walker

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>in one place, Clint Frasier for for a daily league.

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:55.559
<v Speaker 1>For the meantime. Who you've been dropping anyone of note?

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Um lords, Gorrielle, I think it's fair. Yeah, he's one

0:09:59.920 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of the most dropped players in CBS. Makes sense, Yeah,

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm dropping him. Um, I had Tyler White. I didn't

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>really want him, but I had him for a while,

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and now I dropped him. Okay, okay with that too,

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>in the right situation. Yeah, yours nobody else really? Oh,

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Luke Weaver, I dropped That's who I dropped to pick

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 1>up Frankie Montas in one league. I'm dropping Weaving and

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm dropping Strong, dropping Weaver and Strong. So I'm glad

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 1>you bring up Weaver and Stroup. Strong one of the

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 1>most dropped players as well, So I think it's fair.

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair to bring him up. So we

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>were will start there because the first one you mentioned

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>two starts, two dots of great stars. His last one

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better. Three runs, five hits over five

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>innings against the Red Sox and a tough matchup this

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>week home against San Diego, who you know better than

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:43.839
<v Speaker 1>the used to be not a bad matchup, but I

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think at home with the even do it right? No,

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just a man. Yeah, I agree that. I agree.

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Shrug at three in his first down and struck out

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>four in his second. Okay, okay, dropping And it's only

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>two starts, which is a very small sample size. Seven

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>were kay to walk ratio? Like how many weeks I

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>would like to hold onto him? The skills don't look

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>good as of right now. That's what is really small.

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>But seven percent swinging strike rate, first pitch strike percentage

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>percent chase rate, so people aren't chasing his pitches, which

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is leading to the walks. As you mentioned, Greg, he

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>only has seven strike as he has four walks in

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:23.839
<v Speaker 1>nine and a third endings pitched. Would you say you

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>dropped him for one league mantas, Yeah, I would have.

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I would have made that move to I also picked

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>up that I had him in a lot of leagues

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>because I want to believe that we was, you know,

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 1>the prospect. We thought he was right, but it doesn't look.

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>One thing that really bothers me about him is that

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 1>he's not going deep into games either, and I need

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I like to have guys that could at least, you know,

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>pitching five six cent you get me quality start um.

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:52.839
<v Speaker 1>And I also picked up a turn bull your boy

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>against the Indians, though well, I mean, I'm picking I

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I'm plugging him in right away, but

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're picking him up, you gotta plug him unless

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you have like five superstar pitchers. Because against the any

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 1>it just doesn't get better than that. Why they're playing

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>right now again, they lead baseball in strikeouts right now,

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's a turnable coming off a start. We had

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>ten strikeouts against the Royals, a team that typically makes

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of contact. So I think that there's a

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:23.719
<v Speaker 1>lot to like. They're just getting back to Luke Weaver.

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking into him a little bit more. Greg. Remember

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the reason why we liked him was because we read

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>an article on the Athletic that's saying that he was

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>working on a curveball. About this, he's storing his curveball

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>less is here than he was last year eight percent

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:37.319
<v Speaker 1>of the time and last year was twelve percent of

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the time. I don't love that. And the command hasn't

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>been good. Yeah, Like I'm al right dropping for these

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>guys that we're talking about, Turnbull, even Zimmerman on a

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>two start week. You know, if people seem to be

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>split on Zimmerman, I think a lot of people have

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 1>been burned by him, so they don't really want to

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>buy back in the Jordan Zimmerman. And I can't knock

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you like if that's the reason. If you've been burned

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>by Jordan Zimmerman and you just don't want to pick

0:12:57.600 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>him up, I'm fine with that. Me personally, I haven't

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:02.439
<v Speaker 1>been burned by him, so I actually do like him

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 1>for this two start a week again against the Indians

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and against the Minnesota Twins. Don't love the Twins start.

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 1>But he is doing things differently with his arsenal. He's

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>throwing his breaking pitches more. He's throwing his fastball less.

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>It's additioned by subtraction. It's fastball has been one of

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the worst pitches in baseball over the past couple of years.

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>So I like I like those like those Tigers guys

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>over over Weaver, I would I would make that well.

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>The only thing with me is with demand is that

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>uh and I discussed this with Steve the other day.

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Also I was like, I think, like he's had two

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>or three years now where he's been pretty much bad, terrible, terrible.

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I wrote about this on my Patreon over the past.

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Since he during the Tigers, he has the second highest

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>era A among all starting pitchers, behind only James Shields

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>is the A over five. So he's not been good exactly,

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and then I can't defend that. And we're not talking

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>one year, we're talking a few years now. Uh, he's

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>not the same guy he was. I don't think there's

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:00.080
<v Speaker 1>a resurgent season coming back for him this year just

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>because he had two good sults so far. That's my thing.

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:04.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm not buying into it yet. And I think it's

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>okay that I don't pick him up because I feel

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>like if someone does pick him up, pick him up

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>with the two stocks and then drop him so I

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>could always get him again if I decide I want

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>him later on. I'm just not sold on him yet.

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sold on on him being this good yet.

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>That's fair, that's fair. And he's gone through stretches in

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the past few years where he looks like he's good

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and then he just smucks down again. So I think

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>as long as he's throwing that fastball last and throwing

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a slider and curveball. More and more apt to buy

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>in on Jordan's immiman. I'm not saying he's gonna be great,

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>but I just really like streaming against Cleveland Indians right now. Greg,

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>someone who does have a tough matchup this week. Is

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>there something else you wanted to get into it, Weaver?

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to hit strang because you meant you mentioned

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>strong ventro and you bound that first down in two

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and two thirds he was. He was horrible last and

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>against Cardinals five innings, two rounds, only one of them

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>were earned. It was basically all unun for his fault anyway,

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>but only with five in he only struck out two guys.

0:14:59.880 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>And A's why people are jumping off board, Frank, how

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>come strikeouts are down right now? From Matt stram I

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>how people were excited? It's the velocity. You look at

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the velocity right now, and in years past, I know

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>he was used more as a reliever, and you know,

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe your velocity takes down a little bit when you

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>get put back in the rotation. But the past couple

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of years he's been around fastball. Greg. This year is

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>fastball sitting at ninety one point three miles per hour

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>on average, so the VLO is down. The slider vlo

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is also down last year's eighties seven miles per hour.

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>This year it's down to eighty four. Again. This might

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>be because he's back in the rotation, so can he

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>can he amp it up? Kenny throw as hard as

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>he wants to, When normally in a relief appearance you

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>can kind of go all out because you're only going

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>one or two innings. He probably just can't get the

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>velo that high if he wants to sustain going five

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>or six innings pitched. So I think that's why you're seeing,

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>uh the lack of strikeouts here from Matt Trump And

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>so that coupled with the fact that he's not really

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>going deep into games either right so far, and I

0:15:57.840 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>think that's gonna be a problem most season for him

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>because he is coming from the bullpen. So I'm not

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>trusting that this is the back end of my rotation

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>fantasy type of guy. So I'm okay with dropping him

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and picking up a guy like Frankie Mantas or these

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>other guys. Talk about Spencer Turnbull, I wouldn't I would

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>have done that as well. I don't want to completely

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>give up. I don't want to team leagues like maybe

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I would try and hold on again. I like Mantas,

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I like Turnbull, so I probably would have done it

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>for those guys, but anyone else that's just like a

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>fringe e like I'm not don't hold on to Strom

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>for now? Would you drop drop Strom for Nick marka Vicious?

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Not even kidding? No, I wouldn't. Okay, Yeah, I think

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Stram has higher upside and and Strong and Weaver. They

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>actually face each other this week, so how about that?

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that's funny. You guys were all Arizona against Luke.

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>What have I told you that Nick marka Vicious? Mrs No,

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>he misses St. Louis and he places in San Francisco,

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>which is great. You really just need to start or

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not thinking. I'm just I'm just asking. It's just

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>like stashing for upside, I'm planning in San Francisco. I

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>still think that Strong has more upside than market Vicious.

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 1>You just need to start this week then, yeah, I

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 1>would rather stream against the Giants and at Arizona the Vicious, right.

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to I want to ask you about Jack

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Flowery when we come back faces the Dodgers. Yeah, let's

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>do it. What's up at Jack Flowerday? Moore On the

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>other side, nick a Vicious. Maid Sailors is the leading

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>cleaning service in New York City and Boston. We service homes, offices,

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>corporate departments and Airbnb turnarounds. Give us a call or

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a text at two and two zero to book now.

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>That's two one two one zero. Use the promo code

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.959
<v Speaker 1>f n T s Y for off your first cleaning.

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 1>For more information and go to maid sailors dot com.

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 1>That's made sailors dot com. What's your I R S problem?

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 1>Do you act taxes? Is there a lean placed on

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 1>your property? Have your bank accounts been frozen or seized?

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Have your wages been garnished? Are you being audited by

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the I R S? Are they sending you letters that

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>demand actions and have urgent due dates? Well? Solving your

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>tax problems is as easy as calling taxes three to one.

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 1>The I R S is the largest collection agency in

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the world. You need the best representation to give you

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>peace of mind. You need experienced professionals that can cut

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>through the red tape and stop the collection process. If

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 1>you have a serious problem with the I R S

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>called the taxes three to one network Today, we'll get

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>them off your back. Eight hundred nine six one thirty

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 1>six thirty one, eight hundred nine six one thirty six

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty one, eight hundred nine six one thirty six thirty one,

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred nine six one three six three one brief

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:03.679
<v Speaker 1>Naked Rain. I'd be more piste off that instead of

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>letting guy take that last second debtordid and shot, you

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>chose to foul him and give them a nonshooting faublic.

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Give Virginia the ball out of mounds and have an

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to get it to him in the corner for

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to shoot that three to begin with. If you just

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:20.479
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't let him take that shot and not found him,

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't have had a champ to inbound it to

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>him in the corner week days six and nine am

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on the Fantasy Sports networking on your popular podcast.

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Providers joined the experts live on the air every day

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>by calling in at April four, seven nine to join

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Sports Network. Burn It Down, Be Slayer. You're

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>welcome because you yell at aim like I Now, did

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>you catch any WrestleMania Adventure. Uh not very much. No,

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I did not. How was it? I know coffee coffee

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>coffee did his thing, he got the belt just kofef Mania.

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>It's kofee coffee. I don't know, coffee coffee, kofe Mania.

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Finally it's the strap greggyment moment to night match. The

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>night it was it was beautiful. What a terrible ending too.

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>It's like so much potential with the women's match and

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.479
<v Speaker 1>ends on a box. I don't That wasn't supposed to happen, right,

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 1>It was not the box. Obviously it was supposed to

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>end that pin was supposed to end. There was what

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>was the box. It's so basically Rhonda Rousy had Becky

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>on her shoulders for a move and Becky reversed it

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>to like a pinning combination hitting Rhonda rousing. So that

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be the end of the match one,

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>two three, and it was the problem was when the

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 1>red kind of one, Rhonda shoulders were just she was

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>basically sitting up, so her shoulders, shoulders weren't on the match.

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>So then they did the two three when her shoulders

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 1>were on the map, and it was controversial. It was

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>controversial when it wasn't. I don't know if it was

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be. How do you know for sure that

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be the ending? Forever they are bread? Well,

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>what about the tweet that floral sentence? Yeah he's not.

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Sean Ross was good, sap, He's good, but not as

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>in the know as some other people. I believe I

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>trust more. All right, Well, it was still crap regardless,

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 1>that's very bad. Could and a lot of people like

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the results of the matches. They like who won at WrestleMania, Like,

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, we had Rawlins, Kofy and Becky Lynch

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>all went on the same car, and wow, this is

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the greatest WrestleMania's matches were bad. The Kope

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>match was great. The Kope match was great. MS vers

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>sane I seem like mixed reactions. I actually kind of

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>liked it, Like the spots were really cool. It was

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a lost count anywhere, so they did something like pretty

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>like around the State Adium Triple Asian Batista again actually

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 1>did some cool stuff, but like, way too long on

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the match for these old guys. Yeah they're too old. Yeah,

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and um like Seth Rollins was cool or in versus

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>AJ Styles was cool, but like none of the matches.

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>They were fine, but they didn't like stand out the show.

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I went to New Japan Saturday night at MSG and

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that was amazing, dude, Like the matches were awesome, and

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Friday n XC the matches were awesome as well. It's

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 1>just like I don't even know how WrestleMania follows up

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>after a weekend of that type of action. Greg's problem

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>so bad. It's still like they still very much so

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>appeal to just like the entertainment side of things, and

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>like I guess pleasing kids more so, what I want

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to see is this really good wrestling matches, And yeah,

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>they just really weren't. How long are these like, because

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I like the long matches, Like the best match that

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:56.360
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind to me is Sean Michael's verse Bread

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Hart in that Iron Iron was one of the best

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.880
<v Speaker 1>matches ever him like that, Like I love those type

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of matches. They need to be a little longer, I feel.

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>And the card was so like so stacked so many

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>matches that towards the end they had to rush everything,

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>so like you know, these guys only got like seven

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>eight minutes like finn ballor match was like less than

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>ten minutes long, yea, and like it could have been

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>better than that. Um, I think Kofe and Daniel Bryan

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 1>probably had the most time, right, I think Triple H

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and Batist that the most time. Probably true, but it

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>was close. But like the Kofe and Daniel Bryan, they

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>had enough time and it was perfect minutes. But actually

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>I actually thought Brian was going to kick out of

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the trouble in Paradise and we keep going a little

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>bit longer. But I was okay that he didn't. Yeah,

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>like when when't underwhelming for me? Greg? When Kofe kicked

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 1>out of the knee and that was cool. Yep, that

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>was awesome because the knee, I don't know what anyone's

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>kicked out of a bit, so it's awesome. Yeah. The

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a j Orton match underwhelmed too. I remember we said Friday,

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>we thought that could see the show. It didn't. It didn't.

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I would like to see the Shanel mac Oh. You

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 1>should check out the bump that he did. I feel

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>like he's the best, like getting thrown through tables and

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 1>stuff like. Yeah, so they so they went like a

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>scaffolding and he got superlexed off that was cool. Yeah,

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>like landing on the sting and they both go through it.

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 1>But what happened was because of the way they landed,

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>shiman Man actually landed on top of the miss so

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:17.360
<v Speaker 1>we won the matched. That's how he won the match.

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I called I called it. I wish I bet on that. Yeah,

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you had, right, you had, SHANEO mac as, you're upset

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of the night. What did I have? I think I

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>had the iconics. Yeah, both of our both of our upsets.

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Well that college really second favorite, we said, right, yeah, yeah,

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 1>yeah it was the girls. Was there something else? Was

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>there another upset that happened with us? Right? I don't.

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:41.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so, because Brock Kofe and Rock Kofe

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and Becky all won Alkins a rider. But I don't

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>know if the betting odds are are on that. Well,

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I would think KOFEE winning is kofe Kofe Kofee winning

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is an upset? No, because other story was headed Yeah

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>yeah it was anything I mean And good point from

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Perry here in the chat says everyone knew KOFE was

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna win as they were least the cow W Championship

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>t shirt. Halfway through the match, I guess that must

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 1>have happened on like w W dot com. But you

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>said you knew because they came out with a present beforehand,

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and I knew based on the video package beforehand, like

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:17.919
<v Speaker 1>this is his dream and like to me, they're appealing

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to kids, like they're not gonna like try and shoot

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 1>down like a kid's dream. To me, they brought out

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a present and they showed a podium that was covered

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.479
<v Speaker 1>with something. What could the compodium be covered with other

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>than the title? So they ruined that. Yeah, they got

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 1>they need new writers for the stories. They just need

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>better presentation the writers. I'm better actors maybe, Greg. I

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 1>asked you before the break Jack Flaherty, who faces the

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers this week. And the Dodgers are amazing what they've

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:51.199
<v Speaker 1>done so far this year. I mean, their lineup has

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>been great. They are second in baseball with eighty four

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>run scored. They actually had the highest team ops. Cody

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Boinger has just been phenomenal with their whole you're doing

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 1>an event, by the way, what please do in the

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>main event. I think I'm in the third or fourth

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>in my league. I don't know about the overall. I'm

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>about overall yet about third or fourth year league. Okay, yeah,

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and thenn um, well, okay, I don't have Jack Flaberty

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>in the main event, team, Greg, I was just asking

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>about Jack Flaherty because I have Cody Bellinger in the

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>main event. That's why you mentioned Bellinger. Going on, why

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 1>I asked you? But regarding Flaherty, did you bench him

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>against the Dodgers this week? Gig, he's at home? No,

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you're just leaving him in? All right, Well it was

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 1>very very quick answer. All right, venture, how about you

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 1>for who? How about Yanni Tournos Toronto Blue Jays? You

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>do that, it's getting cute. Well, I'm going to tell

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you something that I'm about that I'm probably gonna do.

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:46.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing a similar thing, and you tell me if

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I should do this. I'm benching Zach Wheeler for uh

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Matt Boyd. Boyd at home against Cleveland would do it.

0:26:56.800 --> 0:27:00.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's funny to me. It's kind of similar. Ob

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Jack correct, it's different because Jack Flaherty get blown up

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in his first start seven walks. Well, he allowed four

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>earned runs. Okay, four runs, four earned runs, very very

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 1>different in my opinion, or runs he had a It

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 1>was a three run bombs and Braun and then one

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 1>other run. All right, he walked nobody in that start, yes,

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>struck out four. Okay. In the next start he allowed

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>no runs. He struck out six. Does he walk anybody?

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Had two walks? Not bad though. It's a good st

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:39.679
<v Speaker 1>stop at all, at at all to me. Jack Flaherty's

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>pitched well enough that you drafted him to be RSP two.

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>But it's either him or ty Own. Those are my seconds,

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever you're saying. The third starters, tyn Up going to

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:55.239
<v Speaker 1>dagainst Cubs and and Jack Flawery second start against at

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Cubs at Washington. So it's not great damn Um and Flaherty.

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I I don't want to so I know how hot

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:05.719
<v Speaker 1>the Dodgers has been. Flowerty at home where you drafted him.

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Not but I care so much about that. He wasn't

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't gotten blown off that we're at the point

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>where you bend him. It's not in cores either, right,

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you know it's actually at home in St. Louis, which

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 1>is good, Which is fine. Well, bend Jack Flowery for

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>as well as streaming, I understand. I think that's getting

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit cute. The Zach Wheeler thing. The Zach

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Wheeler thing. I think it's legit. Frank and I have him.

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 1>So Frank and I had this argument with Floria this morning.

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>You're just joining us. We wanted to bench Zack Wheeler

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>for Spencer Turnbull. I know I heard you. Yeah, Modica

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>said for turn About. Yes. No, he said no, He's like,

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you can't do that. I thought he said Montas No, okay,

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>he said, you can't do it for Zach Wheeler. If

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm you, hell yeah, boyd who has been one of

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the hottest and can a ton of people that doesn't

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 1>bother me nearly as much as that one will bother Yeah,

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I would start Flowerty. I think I think Greg sold

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>me on that I would start. Frank, I still have

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>him on the bench for Yannis right there, we got time, right, yeah,

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I have about thirty minutes, forty minutes. Wait, all the

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>whole one blocks, the whole thing locks. ESPN changed to

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>where only the game. That's how it should be. Absolutely much.

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Lawyers who are playing in the early game should be locked,

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and everything else exactly. You have so much other news

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>things that come out, like what if David Dolls back

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in the lineup and you want to throw him in there. Yeah,

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 1>well that's right. Now, that's a good segway to what

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>do you do with David doll if you're in a

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:36.479
<v Speaker 1>weekly league and you gotta plug in where bench from

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>from rymel Tapia, which might end up being a terrible decision,

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>but I have to make my decision before. So as

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of right now, what I know is he's dealing with

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>no bleak. But you haven't seen anything else regarding David

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Doll so and he has a history of oblique injuries.

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of worried about it. Yeah, no, I know,

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and especially if you know weekly, if if this guy

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 1>misses a C series, I kill That'll kill you. That'll

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>kill you. You don't want that totally. I would have

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to start Byron Buckston in his place. That's my that's

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>my thing. I don't know. You gotta Starbucks. I think

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it's safe. It's only played five games this week and

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the Rockies play seven, but Doll they have zero. Yeah,

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>what about Tim Beckham? Is he gonna play? Why wouldn't

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>he hurt her last night? Day to day Beckham got hurt? Yeah,

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't even see that one. Yeah, it's Beckham got hurt.

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Left the game last night. It could be a problem,

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that could be an issue, and he's been. He's been

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>for real, So it's dollar dollar is Beckham's injury? Beckham

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>it was a quad, I'll tell you right now, dealing

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 1>with somebody's game against the White Sox now too though

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in that game, and it says the severity of the

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>injury remains unclear. There you go, everything's unclear answers. I

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 1>got a good question regarding before the show started. Okay,

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>so the Reds only played five games this week, and

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a chance that yell Peet hit with a suspension

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>based on the benches clearing incident yesterday. So what do

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you do with so again, it matters like who for right, Like,

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can answer that. Would you mention

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>him for a seven game j Bruce? Yes, for a

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>seven game boom boom man seen because those those my

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>realistic options. Yea, yeah, totally fairly. Gotta figure he's going

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:28.719
<v Speaker 1>to be suspended at least a couple of games, right,

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>which he'll appeal. You don't think so, I think he

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>make it one. I think he didn't punch a guy

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>out right, he took a swing, context, I don't think so.

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah much like he's done in baseball this year. Took

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a swing and didn't make it. An there's the other issue.

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't been so that's another thing. Yeah, to answer

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the fire. Look, normally, if there was no suspension looming,

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I would just leave Peak in my lineup because we

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>all have averages like he's gonna get that. What that

0:31:57.280 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>says you're gonna get? Don't just don't bench him? You know,

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:02.239
<v Speaker 1>miss again, if you worry about the suspension, especially if

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I play in the Points League, I need volume any

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>guys that are gonna play right, so you know j

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Bruce seven games, traight Man seen seven games, Alex Gordon

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>seven games as opposed to pos playing only three four

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>This peek peek venture woe is the one that's yeah,

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>coffee kings. It could be pronounced a lot of different things.

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:28.719
<v Speaker 1>We don't have to talk about coffee kingson much. That's right,

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>coffee and probably coffee like coffee. Probably most people do.

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't either, I don't. How do you

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>say coffee? Coffee cofie cofiefie, p w e e g

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>venturo Okay, right, I can't even spill out coffee because

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just it just can't out fine, I throws f f.

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I alright, that'd be coffee. Yeah, that's what I was.

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>It was okay, alright, CoFe. There you go, Cofie. And

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>who's feeling on the Reds book? He gave us the

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 1>pooty big Pig a week. I mean, come on, it's

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 1>so it's close close, Uh, Frank, I think it's a

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 1>really fair question. Um. I think if I played the

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 1>band Boom Boom, I would I would bench Pleak for

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 1>some of these seven game opens. I would too, just

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 1>because of the safety of knowing that he's gonna play

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. And J Bruce has been hot. I like

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that one too. I'd plug Jay Bruce right in. Jay

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Bruce has been hot. He didn't play us. You know

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 1>who else is hot in the Mariners. The entire Mariners

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>lineup has been awesome. But vogel Bach, what do you

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>guys make of Dan vogel back here, who's been red hot?

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 1>But where is he gonna play? That's the problem because

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>they have Bruce and they have an't Karinacione, so first

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>base in DH is kind of locked up. They can't

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 1>use J. Bruce in the outfield. But that hurts their

0:33:57.520 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 1>outfield defense. Then he's gonna rotate. He's gonna rotated. And now, yeah,

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>so does that affect Incarnacio and Bruce, Like maybe Bruce

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>has seven games, but is he gonna play every day

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 1>at least five? Yeah? I think he's probably basic at

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 1>least six. And it's vogo Box is a lefty two.

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like they get have to say, all right, well,

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 1>bench j Bruce against lefties because vogo Box is a

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>lefty as well, typically has struggled against him. I'm not buying,

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 1>but he's been awesome man, even like people who have

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 1>been expecting him to be good for a long time. Now, Guys,

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I remember Box. I mean three multi hit games in

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a row, but he's played one, he sat out one,

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>he's played when he sat out one, and then he

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:39.840
<v Speaker 1>played yesterday. But he has four home runs in his

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 1>last three games play. He's six RBIs yesterday. The way

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 1>that this matter's line up is playing. Any interest in

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 1>Dan voge Box, Yeah, vogo Box just got picked up

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in deeper daily transactionsly like I could see it because

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:54.719
<v Speaker 1>because you can just plug him in when he's gonna play.

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to say he got picked in my Holy

0:34:57.560 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I think, which is daily tens. Actually he did. Yeah, well,

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Bok has just been scorching hot. Um. I don't love

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 1>that he hits seventh eighth in the lineup on most nights.

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter when your lineup is as good as

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the Marriagers, right when you're hitting home run every day. Also,

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it also doesn't matter, honestly, but I think in the

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:15.399
<v Speaker 1>daily transaction league, as long as you have another first

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 1>basement to put in there when he's not going to play,

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:19.879
<v Speaker 1>I'll do with it. I don't want I don't want

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.399
<v Speaker 1>to just have to throw him in there and set

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and forget. Yeah, you don't want him obviously, you're not

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>picking him up in a weekly league and in the

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:34.440
<v Speaker 1>shallow twelve team league only. I mean he should be owned, Yes, deeply.

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 1>A few people were aggressive on him last night. Me personally,

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't just because I frankly, I can't worry about

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the playing time. Maybe later on in the year, if

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that the Mariners revert back to being

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 1>the Mariners and they you know, trade away guys like

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:51.279
<v Speaker 1>Incarnacione and and and J Bruston, Yeah he's gonna play

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>every day at that point. Sure, Like I'll love him

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>if he plays every day, but I don't think it's

0:35:57.600 --> 0:35:59.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen right now. It's not only that too, it's

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we're definitely buying this or is just

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:04.320
<v Speaker 1>him just being hot right now? You know, we know

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Voge has been around for a while, He's got his

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 1>opportunities before. He's done well with opportunity, had an opportunity

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to play every day, not every but he's been he

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 1>has played in this He had a lineup you know,

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:18.799
<v Speaker 1>in the past, and had streaks where he's been hot

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and played a lot, and then he's also gotten really cold.

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 1>This is a Nando guy too, right, Absolutely, seventh career

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 1>hitter in the miners, seventy nine career ops. Like, he's

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a good player in the minors. Last year twenty homers,

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 1>year before that seventeen, the year before that twenty three

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 1>walks a lot to He's basically a carbon copy of

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Schwarber. Total. He actually is in the American League

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 1>where they have the d h correct so you know,

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>people were actually drafting Schwarber as their what fourth fifth outfielder.

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>No one's drafting Dan Vogel Box. Swarber doesn't play against lefties.

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>He only plays against right He's I mean he could,

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 1>like I think their value is actually, you know, pretty

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 1>close to being similar. Yeah, I mean I agree. I

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 1>think you should be picked up in deeper leagues, but

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 1>like in shallow leagues and stuff like that. Weekly not yet, yeah,

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 1>like I have. I haven't even thought about adding him

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 1>in any of Like home, We're gonna go over some

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:16.800
<v Speaker 1>weekend stuff. Um when we came back. Gary Sanchez is scary,

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Zach Efflyn, I'm more, Rob Ryan McMahon worth conversation. We'll

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 1>do it next. The Fantasy Sports Network is ready to

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 1>take you out to the ball game. Our experts and

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 1>analysts are following the Boys of Summer through all one

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:36.239
<v Speaker 1>and sixty two games of the two thousand nineteen MLB

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:39.600
<v Speaker 1>season with the best fantasy baseball analysis in the industry.

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Catch the latest news and notes every day to help

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you win your fantasy leagues and your d best tournaments.

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Will always want you back listening and watching the Fantasy

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Sports Network on the F and T s Y Radio

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:51.360
<v Speaker 1>app and the f F T s Y YouTube channel.

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>The Fantasy Sports Network where we're root root rooting for

0:37:54.560 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 1>your fantasy baseball team. Brains make it ring eight Cody

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Becky Lynch was gonna be the new champion and we're

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the last moment at the end of rest Lemania.

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 1>The closing shot at the end of Restlemania was Becky

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Lynch holding the championship up. I I gave you more

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:12.279
<v Speaker 1>than I said I would bet I went more end

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>oh in those bets. That's how we make it rain.

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 1>It don't matter with a Major League Baseball, C three, lacrosse,

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 1>or reality TV show. We make it rain to the

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>degenerates out week day six and nine am Eastern on

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Sports If we're working on your popular podcast

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>providers Maurice Salad two thousand and fifteen to two thousands

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 1>and sixteen, European Long Drive Tour Champion two thousand seventeen,

0:38:34.200 --> 0:38:41.279
<v Speaker 1>World number one me personally, I keep my game face

0:38:41.320 --> 0:38:46.840
<v Speaker 1>on me all the time, especially coming out of the bunker,

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 1>leaving the range, or you're leaving the poors. What's your story?

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:54.799
<v Speaker 1>You go to game based grooming dot Com from all

0:38:54.840 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 1>your athletic facial wipes and body cleansing needs out Fantasy Sports.

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Nobody on that Celtic team could ever have gotten away

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 1>with all the crap. Those these younger guys have bird

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 1>McHale Parrish. They would throw these mL car They would

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to throw those guys off the team in two seconds.

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Those guys were all about team. But I really do

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:15.879
<v Speaker 1>believe these guys, these millennials, these young guys, they don't

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:18.359
<v Speaker 1>play the same way. Cliff Klingsbury and using a cell

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:20.320
<v Speaker 1>phone during meetings to give them breaks to what to

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:22.239
<v Speaker 1>go on the cell phone shoud not the ridiculous at

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>his weekdays due to four BM Eastern on the Fantasy

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Sports Network and on your popular podcast providers back with

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you all the fantasy best friends forever fan see Sports

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Radio Network. Let me let you know you can tune

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 1>into calling the Shots that Keith. There is already all

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the fantasy sports rare you are weekdays from eight to

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 1>eleven Eastern is Keith takes you around the sporting world.

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Check on live game actually with daily streaming with a

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>double guests second to none of your home catch the

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 1>video feed on f N T s Y on YouTube

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:21.799
<v Speaker 1>or on O T T. It's called the Shots that Keith.

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 1>The ros are Fantasy Sports or Radio Network and the

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Network YouTube page. Weekdays from eight to eleven

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern There you see it right now on YouTube and

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>on f N T S y O RA do. You

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:38.280
<v Speaker 1>can also with the first round of the NFL Draft

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 1>just like two weeks away now through a half weeks away.

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 1>The NFL three sixty five Fantasy Football Package over roado

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>xpers dot com has the best math based seasonal projections

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and rankings available anywhere on the Internet. Oh Man, Davis

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Maddick and the Road to Experts are providing dynasty season

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 1>long betting, basketball and NFL Draft content each and every

0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>day of the year to give you an edge your

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>gros and what type of fantasy football that you played

0:40:57.880 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 1>save temper cent at Road to Espers dot com. But

0:40:59.640 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the promo code F andc s Y, that's temper sent

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:03.239
<v Speaker 1>off with promo code F ANDC s Y. It's the

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 1>NFL three sixty five Fantasy Football package. A bell right

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 1>now over Rhado Experience dot Com. All right, I said

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 1>going to break that. One of the guys I wanted

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to bring up was my man Frankie zack Eflyn, who

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 1>was pitched twelve innings. He's a lout of one run

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that was a leadoff home run Adam Fraser. I believe

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:28.319
<v Speaker 1>maybe We didn't make that up, No, it was. It's

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in Minnesota, so that's that's not possible. Kel Kepler was

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the Kepler at home rightly Keler Max Kepler. It's a

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>home run. Other than that, Elin has been a fantastic

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 1>fourteen strikeouts through twelve innings in his first two starts.

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Right we were high on Ethlyn coming into the year.

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Is what he's doing ant sa sustainable because it's not,

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 1>but Okny, keep it going. Yeah, I'm excited about zak

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:56.719
<v Speaker 1>eflyn Um. I really like the fourteen of one strikeout

0:41:56.760 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to walk ratio. Obviously, the swinging strike. Swinging strikes are

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:02.919
<v Speaker 1>up this year. He's up at eleven percent the first

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:05.719
<v Speaker 1>pitch strike percentage Greg so working ahead of the count

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the time is zach eflin first pitch

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:11.919
<v Speaker 1>strike percentage. So he's pounding the strike zone early, maybe

0:42:11.960 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 1>when hitters aren't expecting it, and he's getting hitters to

0:42:15.960 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 1>chase pitches outside the strike zone at a little bit

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 1>above league average rate. So Yeah, I'm excited about zach

0:42:23.000 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 1>eflyn Uh. I would keep him in the lineup based

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 1>on what he's done. I'd really like to strike out

0:42:27.760 --> 0:42:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to walk race. I'm excited about him. He's in Miami,

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:33.759
<v Speaker 1>first start this week, so he deserves me quite obviously. Um,

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I know we didn't necessarily expect him to seek this

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:37.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff forward, being as dominant as he is,

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>but Ethlyn Chris also a great start. Do you think

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 1>he can keep it going? Yeah, yeah, I'm buying it.

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he's up there with those top guys, like

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I said before Montas and stuff, maybe even ahead of

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:51.720
<v Speaker 1>those guys pick ups because some leagues, shallow leagues. He's available,

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>um when I don't think he should be. I think

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 1>at this point this is a guy you should definitely

0:42:55.600 --> 0:42:57.880
<v Speaker 1>pick up and putting in rotation and hold for a

0:42:57.920 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 1>little while, see what he does. And I think he

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 1>can keep it going and obviously not at this crazy

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of a rate, but like you know, he'll be a

0:43:03.920 --> 0:43:05.840
<v Speaker 1>solid picture throughout the season. I think it could be

0:43:05.880 --> 0:43:08.359
<v Speaker 1>consistent as well. Um, the better option than a lot

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that's out there right now that might be doing well.

0:43:11.040 --> 0:43:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't know about this guy Thornton, uh, Trent Thornton,

0:43:15.040 --> 0:43:17.759
<v Speaker 1>like he's doing well now. I'm not buying it though,

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Like I would much rather have the other guys we

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 1>spoke of a couple other guys that I've been picking up,

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and that I like Jorgel Faro catching option. If you

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:29.600
<v Speaker 1>have a catcher like Danny Jansen who hasn't been doing anything,

0:43:30.200 --> 0:43:32.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a good replacement. A far has been

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 1>ripping it too homes the other day, and uh, the

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Mingo Harman, I think the Mingo Han deserves to be

0:43:38.040 --> 0:43:41.480
<v Speaker 1>picked up in most leagues at this point. You guys

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:49.440
<v Speaker 1>agree harmon it into the six yesterday and again it

0:43:49.560 --> 0:43:51.840
<v Speaker 1>was against the Oreos, so you take it with a

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:54.480
<v Speaker 1>grain of salt. But look, he has nasty stuff. He's

0:43:54.560 --> 0:43:58.359
<v Speaker 1>just gotta uh work on limiting the walks. He saw

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:00.359
<v Speaker 1>that in his first start against the Tigers he had

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:02.840
<v Speaker 1>five walks with him yesterday only had two walks. But

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:05.279
<v Speaker 1>he also only had three strikeouts. So I kind of

0:44:05.320 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a mixed bag from Domingo Herman yesterday. But he definitely

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:12.400
<v Speaker 1>does have some filthy pitches. Just hope that the Yankees

0:44:12.400 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 1>allow him to go this deep into games, at least six,

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:16.799
<v Speaker 1>so that we can get quality starts of him. Right

0:44:16.880 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 1>we talked previously so deep they don't really need him

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to go that far into the game. We talked previously

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:23.480
<v Speaker 1>about Domingah Harman and how long he'll stay in the

0:44:23.560 --> 0:44:26.319
<v Speaker 1>rotation for se hes about the he's expected back uh

0:44:26.520 --> 0:44:29.840
<v Speaker 1>this weekend and actually, um, her mom's I believe on

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 1>her mom's turn, but her mom the way he's pitched

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>will not leave this rotation be Yeah, he's gonna get

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 1>wise is the one that's gonna go back. Yeah, I

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 1>agree with that. It's just to night for the Yankees.

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:44.359
<v Speaker 1>I think even just tonight, think so and Domingh Haman

0:44:44.440 --> 0:44:46.840
<v Speaker 1>this week faces the White Side. So I like that start.

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought they I think they flip floffed them. I

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:53.799
<v Speaker 1>think the night's okay. I think I think I think um,

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:57.000
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, so for those that want to take that

0:44:57.120 --> 0:44:59.839
<v Speaker 1>shot on Herman Luis every years, like I'm back front

0:44:59.840 --> 0:45:02.759
<v Speaker 1>of them months. Yeah, like you're talking middle middle nay

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:06.719
<v Speaker 1>pitching tonight. Maybe they filil on that way. Maybe maybe

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:08.920
<v Speaker 1>they flipped on them that way. I supposedly whatever, Well

0:45:09.160 --> 0:45:13.920
<v Speaker 1>verlanda tonight soaka tomorrow is tomorrow. So they flipped on

0:45:14.040 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 1>them that way. Okay, So so there you go to

0:45:16.040 --> 0:45:18.799
<v Speaker 1>not gonna night other wise gonnamorrow, both guys, Um, we'll

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 1>be pitching early this week. Hermon will be in that

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:24.359
<v Speaker 1>rotation going forward, because Luisa rain was coming back eight

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:27.040
<v Speaker 1>times in think Kershaw is, by the way, which we

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:31.719
<v Speaker 1>have to mention, Kershaw making expected to start potentially next

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:35.239
<v Speaker 1>weekend for the Dodgers. That's how quickly he's coming back.

0:45:36.040 --> 0:45:40.400
<v Speaker 1>It's happy making rehab start tomorrow tomorrow in double A,

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:43.520
<v Speaker 1>so you know, maybe he makes one more rehab started.

0:45:43.560 --> 0:45:45.600
<v Speaker 1>For that, we could put him on track four, not

0:45:46.080 --> 0:45:49.520
<v Speaker 1>this upcoming week's weekend, but the next one, so we'll

0:45:49.560 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 1>see what happens. Is right, who's the who gets the

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 1>first boot from the from the Dodgers rotation? My first instinct,

0:45:58.120 --> 0:46:02.400
<v Speaker 1>my first inclination to answer to the for you stripling,

0:46:03.080 --> 0:46:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Hulio. You're as man. I'll say that, Greg,

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:09.799
<v Speaker 1>even though you might be right. Yeah, I just don't

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:12.279
<v Speaker 1>say it. You're probably right. They've been very honest about

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:15.520
<v Speaker 1>wanting the limited the innings for him. We saw last

0:46:15.640 --> 0:46:17.880
<v Speaker 1>night he only went three and two thirds game, up

0:46:17.920 --> 0:46:19.920
<v Speaker 1>three runs on four hits, obviously with five things at

0:46:19.920 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the first time against San Francisco, for sure. Not disagreeing.

0:46:24.880 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I'm trying to find every way to defend

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the gay right. I don't want him to go No, No,

0:46:29.440 --> 0:46:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody does. That's my instinct. You're probably right, though,

0:46:34.080 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 1>ye a limit because in limit right, I wanted to

0:46:37.280 --> 0:46:40.680
<v Speaker 1>be careful, but he couldn't bounce back and forth. What happens.

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a dropping I'm not cutting him. But you

0:46:44.040 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 1>know I was answering the question speaking of someone getting

0:46:47.640 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 1>demoted or leaving a rotation. He wasn't in the rotation,

0:46:50.680 --> 0:46:53.279
<v Speaker 1>but he got demoted. Alex Reys, Yeah, dropping out x

0:46:53.360 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Rays Craig, I am, I am, I you know what?

0:46:56.360 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 1>You can stab on him to see if even team leagues,

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:01.399
<v Speaker 1>I am, I am. You're taking a stamp on him,

0:47:01.520 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 1>or took a stamp on him rather to see if

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you become this year's Josh, are potentially right through both

0:47:05.480 --> 0:47:07.799
<v Speaker 1>the linings and you fall into the closer's role. There

0:47:08.760 --> 0:47:11.759
<v Speaker 1>didn't happen. Run run, run run. And the worst part

0:47:11.880 --> 0:47:14.920
<v Speaker 1>is that option triple A and they're keeping him as

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:17.719
<v Speaker 1>a reliever, the option triple to stretch him out. I'm

0:47:17.760 --> 0:47:21.040
<v Speaker 1>holding on. I'm interesting, but because they're not stretching him

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 1>out that he's wanted to get used to pitching consistently

0:47:23.239 --> 0:47:26.160
<v Speaker 1>as a reliever. Yeah, you know, if he becomes a

0:47:26.200 --> 0:47:27.840
<v Speaker 1>closer a couple of months to pick him back up.

0:47:27.880 --> 0:47:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Obviously he has the name value, the name recognition, obviously

0:47:30.560 --> 0:47:32.719
<v Speaker 1>has the talent. I don't think you'd be hold on

0:47:32.960 --> 0:47:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and you don't have a roster about to hold onto

0:47:34.560 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 1>him right now. I don't think I agree. And even

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 1>if you do drop him, no one's gonna pick him

0:47:38.280 --> 0:47:40.319
<v Speaker 1>up right now, so you have the option to pick

0:47:40.400 --> 0:47:43.319
<v Speaker 1>him up later. So that's fine. It's fine to drop him.

0:47:43.360 --> 0:47:46.640
<v Speaker 1>What about Sir Anthony Dominguez? What with this? Heck the

0:47:47.000 --> 0:47:52.040
<v Speaker 1>nearest nonsense? Now I'm I'm still holding this guy. Yeah,

0:47:52.239 --> 0:47:55.880
<v Speaker 1>in its twelve points league, Yeah, that you playing, I

0:47:56.040 --> 0:47:59.120
<v Speaker 1>probably would not own uh, Sorr Anthony. That's what I'm thinking.

0:47:59.160 --> 0:48:01.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking, maybe it's abou time I dropped. In any

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:04.160
<v Speaker 1>type of Rhodo league where you need saves, I would

0:48:04.200 --> 0:48:06.120
<v Speaker 1>hold him just because you don't know what's gonna happen.

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:09.040
<v Speaker 1>So again, in Rhodo, I would hold on to Dominguez

0:48:09.280 --> 0:48:11.600
<v Speaker 1>um even in head ted categories, if saves as a

0:48:11.640 --> 0:48:13.480
<v Speaker 1>category or holds, I would hold on to him there.

0:48:13.719 --> 0:48:17.160
<v Speaker 1>In your in the points league, headside points league, I

0:48:17.280 --> 0:48:21.080
<v Speaker 1>think Sir Anthony Dominguez is probably droppable. Yeah, I think

0:48:21.080 --> 0:48:25.680
<v Speaker 1>so too. Well in Quinn, Yahoo's owned right now. Yeah,

0:48:25.760 --> 0:48:27.239
<v Speaker 1>that makes see. The thing is there's a lot of

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:29.879
<v Speaker 1>upside and that's why people want to hold him. Um,

0:48:30.080 --> 0:48:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I get it. But he's been in shell lately. Sheld

0:48:33.200 --> 0:48:35.959
<v Speaker 1>and uh. My other issue is that well wanted to early.

0:48:36.000 --> 0:48:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he could work that out because we've seen Felipe A.

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:41.399
<v Speaker 1>Vasquez last year get sheld early on and turned things

0:48:41.440 --> 0:48:44.440
<v Speaker 1>around significantly, right, maybe he could do the same. The

0:48:44.520 --> 0:48:47.560
<v Speaker 1>other thing is that I don't have on this particulars

0:48:47.560 --> 0:48:52.040
<v Speaker 1>he My only other closer is um Michael Gibons. No.

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:55.319
<v Speaker 1>I got rid of him. Um what's his name? Your

0:48:55.360 --> 0:48:59.680
<v Speaker 1>boy on Detroit. I spent the nine dollars to get

0:48:59.800 --> 0:49:01.560
<v Speaker 1>him because I had no closes. I had to do

0:49:01.600 --> 0:49:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it available. There's no closest. I got a elbow. He's

0:49:06.040 --> 0:49:12.440
<v Speaker 1>red hot man. Yeah, it's first and seven the seven

0:49:12.480 --> 0:49:16.960
<v Speaker 1>games seven, Right, he's already given us seven return on investment.

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:20.080
<v Speaker 1>One second. That it's a great and that's why as

0:49:20.120 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a reliever in your league, though, there's nobody that could

0:49:22.080 --> 0:49:25.680
<v Speaker 1>get sad, nobody, not even he Swarzak. Is he available?

0:49:25.719 --> 0:49:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Like I'd rather find him than Domingo is in the

0:49:27.480 --> 0:49:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Points League. That's see, that's my my problem is do

0:49:30.440 --> 0:49:34.239
<v Speaker 1>I drop the talent of Domingo got a better team

0:49:34.280 --> 0:49:37.640
<v Speaker 1>with the Phillies. But there's three guys there now, Tambertson

0:49:37.760 --> 0:49:40.359
<v Speaker 1>and Hector Nerris. I'm not worried about Robertson as much.

0:49:40.360 --> 0:49:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I feel like he's also you know, not that good anymore.

0:49:43.760 --> 0:49:45.560
<v Speaker 1>He's old and he's not the same picture. He must

0:49:45.600 --> 0:49:47.520
<v Speaker 1>be really good with the Yankees the past couple of years,

0:49:47.840 --> 0:49:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but the Walks are in a big issue

0:49:51.080 --> 0:49:53.120
<v Speaker 1>with something never an issue really for him before. I

0:49:53.160 --> 0:49:57.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like, um, it's it's nearest that that bothers me.

0:49:57.840 --> 0:50:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Now there's a third guy in the mix that bothers absolutely.

0:50:01.040 --> 0:50:03.399
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know. Maybe I'll drop I'll drop him,

0:50:03.400 --> 0:50:05.359
<v Speaker 1>but like I might wait a week. I just want

0:50:05.400 --> 0:50:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to see what happens this week. I'm kind of still

0:50:07.680 --> 0:50:09.239
<v Speaker 1>I still like the guy, you know, I still think

0:50:09.239 --> 0:50:11.160
<v Speaker 1>he could be the closing And again that's only in

0:50:11.200 --> 0:50:14.759
<v Speaker 1>points leaves like anywhere where saves or holds or league.

0:50:14.800 --> 0:50:16.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm still holding onto Dominguas for sure. But the heads

0:50:16.880 --> 0:50:19.440
<v Speaker 1>ad Points League, how many relievers do you start? Just

0:50:19.520 --> 0:50:21.680
<v Speaker 1>too you could start as many as you want. In

0:50:21.760 --> 0:50:23.960
<v Speaker 1>my leagues, it's normally you have to start two closers.

0:50:24.719 --> 0:50:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Probably not owning him there. How about Ryan McMahon, Guys,

0:50:28.239 --> 0:50:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people might have this question,

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:33.000
<v Speaker 1>especially in deeper leagues. What do I do with Ryan?

0:50:33.239 --> 0:50:36.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's funny. So so I tell you I actually

0:50:36.080 --> 0:50:39.480
<v Speaker 1>have Patrick Saunders Twitter up for just like the latest

0:50:39.480 --> 0:50:41.520
<v Speaker 1>information on all these Rockies guys to try to get

0:50:41.640 --> 0:50:46.200
<v Speaker 1>try to get it in. Uh McMahon hyper extended that elbow. Um,

0:50:47.400 --> 0:50:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, is it some of these back in ten days?

0:50:50.760 --> 0:50:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he Garrett Hamson run away with his job in

0:50:53.640 --> 0:50:58.200
<v Speaker 1>ten days. Maybe he's got a shot here. He's got

0:50:58.239 --> 0:51:01.719
<v Speaker 1>seven games straight this week, seven games, he's got it off.

0:51:01.719 --> 0:51:04.440
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna have an opportunity thre three games in Coors Field.

0:51:04.640 --> 0:51:06.279
<v Speaker 1>You gotta play it every day? Right? They're not gonna

0:51:06.360 --> 0:51:10.880
<v Speaker 1>mess around? Are they probably have a choice? Yeah? I

0:51:10.920 --> 0:51:16.399
<v Speaker 1>think what they played like it? Why do they hate

0:51:16.440 --> 0:51:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Hampson bang up and the athlete? Yeah, that's why

0:51:22.200 --> 0:51:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I think with David dal banged up, what all these

0:51:24.239 --> 0:51:27.839
<v Speaker 1>guys banged up? I do think that Hampson's with seven

0:51:27.880 --> 0:51:29.719
<v Speaker 1>games this week, he probably plays at least five at

0:51:29.800 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 1>least at least Yeah, he's gonna get his opportunity. Now,

0:51:33.120 --> 0:51:34.360
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing. I don't know if you want to

0:51:34.360 --> 0:51:37.040
<v Speaker 1>plug him in in your weekly lineup, I doubt you know,

0:51:37.080 --> 0:51:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it depends on what you got. I have that similar

0:51:39.040 --> 0:51:40.759
<v Speaker 1>situation where I have a you know, like a Tim

0:51:40.800 --> 0:51:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Beckham who's banged up. Do I plug him in for

0:51:43.200 --> 0:51:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you know Beckham? I don't know. It's a situation because

0:51:47.560 --> 0:51:51.120
<v Speaker 1>he's been so cold and Kane a lot bang a lot.

0:51:51.520 --> 0:51:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't like that. That bothers me. Regarding Ryan Greg

0:51:55.080 --> 0:51:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I asked, because he's the most drop player in Yahoo

0:51:57.360 --> 0:52:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of all players available, and just surprises me like dropped

0:52:02.280 --> 0:52:06.280
<v Speaker 1>in over like five thousand leagues right now. I would firstly,

0:52:06.320 --> 0:52:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I would probably try and hold Ryan McMahon. McMahon's owned

0:52:09.560 --> 0:52:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in just thirty three of Yahoo leagues because it's Rocky's exposure.

0:52:15.239 --> 0:52:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Remember I picked up We had the conversation last last

0:52:18.480 --> 0:52:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday or Thursday, that who do I pick up Ryan

0:52:21.360 --> 0:52:23.040
<v Speaker 1>McMahon or trade man, and seeing I'm gonna pick up

0:52:23.080 --> 0:52:28.760
<v Speaker 1>which ever one gets hit today got lucky? So people

0:52:28.800 --> 0:52:31.799
<v Speaker 1>one of the Rockies exposure. He has more strikeouts than

0:52:31.840 --> 0:52:34.680
<v Speaker 1>total bases. This year's Ryan McMahon. I don't want to

0:52:34.719 --> 0:52:42.040
<v Speaker 1>wait yep and look another another very highly dropped player,

0:52:42.280 --> 0:52:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Jock Peterson. We spoke about with Florio I think two

0:52:45.040 --> 0:52:48.480
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. Since then, Greg, he's over his last sixteen

0:52:49.040 --> 0:52:52.480
<v Speaker 1>not coincidentally months what I've said about Jock Peters, not

0:52:52.520 --> 0:52:55.080
<v Speaker 1>coincidentally when I picked him up and dropped Rum and Loriana,

0:52:55.160 --> 0:53:00.799
<v Speaker 1>which worked out deals. Winker also garbage. He's betting oh

0:53:00.920 --> 0:53:03.160
<v Speaker 1>forty two for the season. Another guy I really like

0:53:03.320 --> 0:53:06.720
<v Speaker 1>car into the air. But it's the law of averages righter.

0:53:07.360 --> 0:53:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Winker should turn it around. Winker should because he's not

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:11.600
<v Speaker 1>giving him the shot to play every day and lead

0:53:11.640 --> 0:53:13.360
<v Speaker 1>off for that team, because they know what what what

0:53:13.480 --> 0:53:15.920
<v Speaker 1>they have and he you know, this is a prospect

0:53:16.000 --> 0:53:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that Listen doesn't trick doesn't trick out much, you know

0:53:18.600 --> 0:53:21.920
<v Speaker 1>in the past, at least right not supposed to hits

0:53:21.960 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 1>for high average. So you think this guy more like

0:53:25.160 --> 0:53:26.839
<v Speaker 1>more than likely turn around. You gotta get him out

0:53:26.840 --> 0:53:29.719
<v Speaker 1>of your lineup. Peterson. Peterson, I'm right with you. Yeah,

0:53:29.719 --> 0:53:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't leve him in your line but Peterson, until

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:33.680
<v Speaker 1>he gets hot, Peterson, I'm with you. Listen, that this

0:53:33.719 --> 0:53:35.680
<v Speaker 1>is the guy that hits like two thirty less. You

0:53:35.760 --> 0:53:38.239
<v Speaker 1>hit what two thirties something, So he's not a guy

0:53:38.239 --> 0:53:39.919
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna hit for high average. You know, he's gonna

0:53:39.920 --> 0:53:42.400
<v Speaker 1>go into see severe Colt streaks and he's very bad

0:53:42.400 --> 0:53:45.400
<v Speaker 1>against lefties, so he doesn't again doesn't play against him.

0:53:45.440 --> 0:53:48.440
<v Speaker 1>So this was a classic, uh first weekend victory lab

0:53:48.480 --> 0:53:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Craig that people fell for once again. Scott Peterson not

0:53:51.520 --> 0:53:53.839
<v Speaker 1>that you look, we're two weeks in. I can't just say, oh,

0:53:53.920 --> 0:53:56.680
<v Speaker 1>he's automatic bus, but this is who he is. You're

0:53:56.680 --> 0:53:58.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna have games where, you know, maybe you'll have a

0:53:58.760 --> 0:54:00.360
<v Speaker 1>multi homer game, and he's gonna had a lot of

0:54:00.360 --> 0:54:02.880
<v Speaker 1>people excited. Well, maybe this is the year Drop Peterson

0:54:02.920 --> 0:54:05.400
<v Speaker 1>finally puts it together, all the prospect pedigree, and then

0:54:05.440 --> 0:54:09.960
<v Speaker 1>he goes over his next six team. Who Drop Peterson is?

0:54:09.960 --> 0:54:13.600
<v Speaker 1>At this point, it's been around a while regarding Jesse Winker,

0:54:14.000 --> 0:54:15.839
<v Speaker 1>normally a guy who makes a ton of contact, Right,

0:54:16.200 --> 0:54:18.480
<v Speaker 1>how about a twenty seven percent strikeout rate this year,

0:54:19.840 --> 0:54:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a three point eight percent walk. Great as a leadoff

0:54:22.960 --> 0:54:27.759
<v Speaker 1>hitter for his team. Jesse Winker bencham, but don't drop him.

0:54:27.800 --> 0:54:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't drop him yet about this. I'm in lasting

0:54:30.160 --> 0:54:33.640
<v Speaker 1>my great Fantasy base momentational and rightfully so, because for

0:54:33.760 --> 0:54:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the first week and a half or so, I've had

0:54:36.440 --> 0:54:38.759
<v Speaker 1>both Cedric Mullins and Jesse Winker on my lineup. Greg

0:54:40.400 --> 0:54:43.720
<v Speaker 1>as like my fourth and fifth outfielders. Zero points, nothing,

0:54:44.640 --> 0:54:47.480
<v Speaker 1>zero garbage. It's a fifty team early league. I'm in

0:54:47.600 --> 0:54:52.800
<v Speaker 1>last with like thirty points. Real bad, but that's just

0:54:52.880 --> 0:54:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a bad so. I mean, Mollans, you could drop. I

0:54:54.440 --> 0:54:57.640
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't drop Winky yet, though I wouldn't do it. Mullins

0:54:57.680 --> 0:55:00.200
<v Speaker 1>is another leadoff hitter guy. You're just gonna give up.

0:55:01.000 --> 0:55:03.279
<v Speaker 1>He might give up quicker because look, in a twelve

0:55:03.320 --> 0:55:06.480
<v Speaker 1>team league, it's fine, like to look, uh, Mullins shouldn't

0:55:06.480 --> 0:55:07.759
<v Speaker 1>be on in a twelve team league. This is I'm

0:55:07.760 --> 0:55:09.719
<v Speaker 1>talking about a fifteen team rotal league. It's hard to

0:55:09.760 --> 0:55:12.719
<v Speaker 1>come buy outfielders, and there's really not much available. Like

0:55:12.840 --> 0:55:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the top outfielder's word Hayward and Gordon and Milky Cabrera Like,

0:55:18.200 --> 0:55:21.759
<v Speaker 1>it's not great, so the replacement value, it's not much

0:55:21.800 --> 0:55:23.759
<v Speaker 1>better than Cedric Mullins. You probably don't even have a

0:55:23.800 --> 0:55:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Brinson out there. No, no, he's on, he's yes, one

0:55:27.640 --> 0:55:31.560
<v Speaker 1>fifteen teamers like it's harder to drop guys like Winker

0:55:31.640 --> 0:55:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and Mullins. I agree with you that I would be

0:55:33.280 --> 0:55:37.880
<v Speaker 1>more likely to drop Mullins than Winker, but I wouldn't

0:55:37.880 --> 0:55:40.520
<v Speaker 1>want to start either one right now yet be concerned

0:55:41.880 --> 0:55:45.480
<v Speaker 1>playing enough. That's another huge concerns. Winker has been in

0:55:45.520 --> 0:55:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the past, like past what five games? Really he's been playing,

0:55:51.640 --> 0:55:53.920
<v Speaker 1>but he's just been terrible. I thought he also was out.

0:55:54.080 --> 0:55:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was checking this earlier in the season.

0:55:56.440 --> 0:55:58.960
<v Speaker 1>He was out of the lineup. It's been Yeah, he

0:55:59.280 --> 0:56:01.040
<v Speaker 1>played four or in is two in a row, played

0:56:01.080 --> 0:56:03.120
<v Speaker 1>four in a row. Mr, he's played five in the

0:56:03.160 --> 0:56:06.960
<v Speaker 1>last six games. Yeah, he's been playing terrible. But yeah,

0:56:07.040 --> 0:56:09.239
<v Speaker 1>wait wait for that. He has one hit. He has

0:56:09.360 --> 0:56:14.279
<v Speaker 1>one hit all season long. Yeah, dropping Winker, yes, yeah,

0:56:14.480 --> 0:56:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you know he's got the itchy trigger finger. One hit

0:56:17.800 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 1>this season. I know. But it's so early, and he's

0:56:20.040 --> 0:56:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a guy that they're gonna give a chance to, you know,

0:56:24.000 --> 0:56:26.000
<v Speaker 1>or they won't because they but this is a guy

0:56:26.040 --> 0:56:28.160
<v Speaker 1>they you know, they had last year. They're invested into me.

0:56:28.200 --> 0:56:30.200
<v Speaker 1>He's a prospect. He's a guy they want in their

0:56:30.239 --> 0:56:33.160
<v Speaker 1>lineup eventually. I just think he needs time to adjust.

0:56:33.640 --> 0:56:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I give him another week or two at least before

0:56:36.160 --> 0:56:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm dropping him, but I'm benching him. Greg. Would you

0:56:38.480 --> 0:56:43.560
<v Speaker 1>drop Winker for Dan Vogelbach? You needed you to play?

0:56:45.400 --> 0:56:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm just running down the list. No, you're right, you're right,

0:56:48.239 --> 0:56:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and like so, my thought process is always between do

0:56:51.520 --> 0:56:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you hold on and wait or you take the hot guy? Yes,

0:56:55.560 --> 0:57:00.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm driving Jesse Winker. No, No, you're not doing that one.

0:57:01.080 --> 0:57:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Keep an eye on Yes, how about Kevin Kermeyer, who's

0:57:04.520 --> 0:57:07.880
<v Speaker 1>played well? No, nor so you seem kind of makeing

0:57:07.880 --> 0:57:10.920
<v Speaker 1>out of the same way, Like, what do they Matt Modica,

0:57:11.000 --> 0:57:13.640
<v Speaker 1>what do they? Everybody downstairs as well, Frank and Chris.

0:57:13.719 --> 0:57:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Gregg see tomorrow, we hope.