WEBVTT - When the Kennedeys met the Windsors (with Caroline Hallemann)

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Noble Blood, a production of iHeartRadio and Grim

0:00:04.640 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and Mild from Aaron Mankey listener Discretion advised. Welcome to

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a very special episode of Noble Blood. I'm Danish Wartz

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:18.119
<v Speaker 1>and I'm joined by Caroline Halliman, who's the digital director

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of Town and Country and the author of the new

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:24.479
<v Speaker 1>book The Kennedy's and the Windsors, which is out next week,

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>available for pre order now. It is a fascinating book,

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>super readable, super fun, like the best sort of historical

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:37.879
<v Speaker 1>gossip about these two families that are a global obsession. Caroline,

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for coming on the podcast.

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for having me. I'm so excited

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 2>to talk to you today.

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 3>My first question is what drew you to a book

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 3>focused on these two families in particular?

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 4>Sure, so I am as the digital director at Town

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 4>and Country.

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 2>I have covered both of these families for just.

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 4>About ten years now, so I came into writing this

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 4>book with kind of a deep background on both of them.

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 2>But what really kind of.

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 4>Sparked the idea to write a book was when Prince

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 4>William announced that he was bringing his Earthshot Prize, which

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 4>is his big environmental initiative to Boston, and that was

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 4>in the second year of the prize, and he talked

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 4>a lot about how President Kennedy's Moonshot and his kind

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 4>of ambition to go to the Moon and his declaration

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 4>that we would do that within ten years was really

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 4>an inspiration and a driving force for William's big project.

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 4>And I just started thinking about that, and I was like,

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 4>that's so interesting because it was really Prince William kind

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 4>of leaning on the Kennedy iconography and the Kennedy mythology

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 4>and kind of like the language of the Kennedys to

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 4>launch his big project on a global scale, to bring

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 4>that to America.

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 2>And I was like, that is.

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 4>Just it just felt like a reversal of the whole,

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 4>like the Kennedy so the closest thing that America has.

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 2>To the royal family.

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 4>And so I actually covered that visit to Boston for

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 4>Town and Country, and I just kept thinking about that,

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 4>and I kept thinking about the different connections between the

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 4>two families. And the following week, Prince Harry had another

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 4>event with another branch.

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 2>Of the Kennedy family.

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 4>He received the Ripple of Hope Award, and so I

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 4>just kept thinking about it, and I kept thinking about

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 4>Joe Kennedy in the UK prior to World War Two,

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 4>and I kept thinking about, like, you know, the nineteen

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 4>sixty one meeting at Buckingham Palace, which has been fictionalized

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 4>in the Crown and all of these things, and I

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 4>was like, there must be a book about this, and

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 4>so I was, you know, I was looking it up.

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 4>I was trying to find something, and there wasn't one.

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 4>And so then I was like, well, maybe maybe I

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 4>should try and write something. And I pitched it to

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 4>my agent. I had been kind of working on a

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 4>separate idea and she was like, that's it, Like, that's

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 4>the book. You should start on that. And so that's

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 4>kind of the origin story.

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 3>I love that infamous visit that you mentioned that was

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 3>depicted in The Crown, when Jackie Kennedy and JFK visited

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 3>Queen Elizabeth and her husband Philip. As you mentioned, it

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 3>was depicted in The Crown, but you also write about

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 3>it very beautifully in the book. Can you explain the

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 3>context of that visit and what happened?

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 4>Sure, So the nineteen sixty one visit, it came after

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 4>President Kennedy was in Vienna, which was kind of like

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 4>a key meeting with Khrushchev about the Cold War, and

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 4>they talked about the state of Germany, they talked about

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.679
<v Speaker 4>the state of Laos. It was a big meeting for him,

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 4>and they knew that he wanted to debrief with the

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 4>UK Prime Minister afterwards, but he didn't want to make

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 4>kind of other allies in NATO mad about essentially the

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 4>US UK special relationship. So they wanted to get to

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 4>the UK. And actually his god daughter was being baptized.

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 4>So Jackie Kennedy's sister Lee Radswell's daughter Tina had been premature,

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 4>it had been a difficult pregnancy, and this was a

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 4>good enough reason for them to get over to the

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 4>UK after Vienna that President Kennedy's goddaughter was going to

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 4>be baptized, and so that's a whole lot of context

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 4>for why they were there. But while they were there,

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 4>Queen Elizabeth was like, of course, please invite them to dinner,

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, like, let's make this happen. And so there

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 4>was a little bit of back and forth about whether

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 4>the Radzawells would be invited because they had been divorced,

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 4>and there was just all of this back and forth.

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 3>But as we know, divorce in the royal family at

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 3>this time.

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 4>Big no now exactly exactly, but eventually President Kennedy and

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 4>Jackie they get to Buckingham Palace for this dinner. And

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 4>what the Crown gets right is that Jackie was not

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 4>exactly impressed with Buckingham Palace. She thought that, you know,

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 4>she thought that Prince Philip and she thought that the

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 4>Queen were nice enough. But we have several accounts of

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 4>her saying, you know that she was a little bit disappointed.

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.799
<v Speaker 4>She was disappointed with the food, she was disappointed with

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 4>with the state of Buckingham Palace, and she was disappointed

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 4>with what the Queen chose to do where. And I

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 4>think that that little colonel has just like expanded and expanded,

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 4>expanded beyond in the kind of telephone of history and

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 4>has led to this kind of idea that the two

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 4>women had this intense rivalry or something like that, and

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 4>that's not true. And when you think about it, I mean,

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 4>they had a lot in common. They were very different,

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 4>but at the same time, they were both young mothers.

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 4>They were both two women, you know, under enormous scrutiny.

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 2>In the public eye. And what I like to.

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 4>Point to is that they were both passionate equestrians. Like,

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 4>if you know anything about these two women and their hobbies,

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 4>you know that they love horses. So even though that

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 4>first meeting together was kind of you know, as I say,

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 4>Jackie was less than impressed, she returned.

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 2>The following year and had lunch at bucking And Palace.

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 4>Again that is depicted in the Crown and is fictionalized.

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Certainly, what we know happened is.

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 4>That they talked about horses in that second meeting, and

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 4>that's what they really connect it on. And you know,

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 4>I just love that bit of history. I think of

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 4>them both as kind of family matriarchs, but also horse girls.

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 3>They are both horse girls, and both of them I

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 3>often think about how lonely and isolating it is to

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 3>be famous. Feels almost like a diminishing word for what

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 3>the Queen or what Jackie is like so constantly scrutinized,

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 3>and there are so few people who understand what that's like.

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 3>And even if these two women weren't quite friends, there

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 3>was probably an understanding between them.

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. I think that hits the nail right on the head.

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 4>They have singular experiences that very few other people can understand,

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 4>and you know, they occupied different roles, but I think

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 4>there was commonality there for sure.

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Do we know how the Queen felt about Jackie? The

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Crown depicted her as a little envious that Jackie was

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 3>more beautiful, glamorous, this French speaking woman. Was that a

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 3>fictional invention?

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 4>I think yes, it was fictionalized, that is true, you know.

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 4>But I would say that certainly the Royal family they

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 4>looked to the Kennedys for kind of like an injection

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 4>of vitality. They saw how successful that was, and the

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 4>royal family definitely.

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:26.239
<v Speaker 2>Took inspiration from that in the years to come.

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 4>And frankly, I think they could do that again, honestly

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 4>kind of in present day.

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I think you're absolutely right. What I also find

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 3>interesting that you mentioned before is this symbiotic relationship between

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 3>the two of them. How did the Kennedys benefit from

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 3>their royal associations, both with the idea of Camelot and

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 3>by associating themselves with the Windsors.

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 4>Sure, I think to answer that question you have to

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 4>go back to Joe Kennedy, who was President Kennedy's father.

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 4>He was the ambassador to the UK prior to World

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 4>War Two. When he started in that position when he

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 4>brought his family over to the UK, he saw it

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 4>as a real opportunity to kind of push them up

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 4>the social ladder, and to that effect, you know, Rose Kennedy,

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 4>his wife, JFK's mother, really saw kind of their time

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 4>in the UK as kind of the first step toward

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 4>JFK's presidency. So while they were there, they took every

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 4>opportunity to socialize with royals and with aristocrats, and for

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 4>their children too as well.

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 2>And I know you did an episode I can't.

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 4>Remember if it was earlier this year or at the

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 4>end of last year, about Kick, who is fascinating.

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 3>I was about to bring up for audience members who

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 3>don't remember. Kick Kennedy was the sister of JFK who

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 3>married into British nobility, and she died very tragically young.

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 4>Yes, but during their time in the UK, you know

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 4>that was seen as a real benefit of this position,

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:57.359
<v Speaker 4>is that Joe could have his children make these connections

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 4>with people, and you know, those were some of JFK's

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 4>very close associates during his presidency as well.

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 2>I feel like that's a great example.

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 4>And then you kind of look toward the myth making

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 4>of Jackie. After President Kennedy's death and the idea of

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 4>Camelot for listeners who are unfamiliar. In the handful of

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 4>days after President Kennedy's assassination, Jackie gave an interview for

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 4>Life magazine in which she kind of crafted the myth

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 4>of Camelot. She spoke about how she and JFK had

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 4>listened to records the famous Broadway musical Camelot, how that

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:36.559
<v Speaker 4>was one of his favorites, and she kind of made

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 4>a comparison blinking the Kennedy administration and their family to

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 4>the myth of King Arthur and his knights in Camelot,

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:46.559
<v Speaker 4>and that it was a time of you know, prosperity

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 4>and goodness and you know, celebration of the arts and all.

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Of those things.

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 4>And so it is a link that she crafted between

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 4>royalty and the Kennedy family, and the Kennedy's had been

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 4>called kind of the closest thing that America has to

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 4>the royal family during the Kennedy administration. That didn't start

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 4>with this, but it certainly has had a long lasting

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 4>impact on how this family is viewed in American popular culture.

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 4>And so it's that idea of the Kennedys as royalty

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 4>as the closest thing America has to royalty. It has

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 4>really perpetuated, and I think that stems from Jackie. And

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.839
<v Speaker 4>she didn't really give interviews after that, which makes that

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 4>interview all the more important. It really solidified what she

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 4>wanted JFK's legacy to be, and then she kind of

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 4>left it at that and she kind of disappeared, which

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 4>I find fat. I mean, she didn't disappear, but from

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 4>giving interviews and sharing her perspective. She never wrote a

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 4>memoir or anything like that, and I think I think

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:47.439
<v Speaker 4>that link was important to her.

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 3>One thing I find really compelling about your book is

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 3>the parallels you draw between generations. I think that the

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 3>comparison between Jackie Oh and Queen Elizabeth makes sense. I

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 3>think people also sometimes associate her with Princess Diana, just

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 3>as this young figure who, as you said, injected some

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 3>vitality into the families you married into. But you and

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 3>the book draw a link between JFK Junior and Diana,

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 3>which makes a lot of sense as two very glamorous

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 3>figures who died young. Can you talk a little bit

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 3>about that comparison.

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, sure, I mean Diana is someone who I think

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 4>you could compare it to many people in the Kennedy family.

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:35.319
<v Speaker 4>I think she's a fascinating figure. But during the nineteen nineties,

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 4>there were, you know, few people as famous as Princess

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 4>Diana and JFK. Junior, and I think two people who

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 4>were courted by the media intensely, and I think how

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 4>they handled it is interesting. I think a lot of

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 4>people make a comparison between Princess Diana and Carolyn Besseid Kennedy,

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 4>and absolutely there's one to make there, Yeah, but I

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 4>think think Carolyn was not as adept at kind of

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 4>handling the media.

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 2>She just kind of she didn't have a sense of

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 2>how she.

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 4>Could work with them or make it work for her

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 4>in any way, which Diana was kind of exactly exactly.

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 4>And I would say John F. Kennedy Junior was the

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 4>same way. He didn't let it bother him as much

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 4>because well, first of all, it's all he'd known his

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 4>whole life. That is a differentiator between these two people,

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 4>but he certainly knew how to use it to his advantage.

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't think he was upset to be on the

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 4>cover of People magazine, you know, sexiest man alive like

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 4>that did not bother him.

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't know who it would bother.

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 2>But so I do think that that.

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 4>I think that that is the interesting comparison between them

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 4>is kind of is in the sense of the media, certainly.

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 3>In terms of the tragedy of these two families. How

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 3>do you think each fail family handled their respective tragedies

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 3>in individually. Obviously these are different systems in place, but

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 3>the royal family was sort of stemied in their ability

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 3>to respond to the death of Diana.

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think certainly.

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:21.079
<v Speaker 4>I mean that also was a comparison between these two

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 4>people is the way they were grieved by the public

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 4>and the kind of almost cathartic outpouring of grief by

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.559
<v Speaker 4>people who didn't know them, the parasocial relationship that people

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:34.599
<v Speaker 4>had between themselves and Princess Diana and themselves and John F.

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Kennedy Junior.

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 4>In both cases, people kind of created memorials to them outside.

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 4>There was weeping in the streets in both cases, which

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 4>is just difficult to kind of imagine that, but that's

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 4>what happened, and the parallel of public grief for both

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 4>of them was one of the first things that came

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 4>to mind. And obviously with Princess Diana, and her sons

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 4>kind of walking behind her coffin.

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 2>And then for.

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 4>Every time there is a death in the Kennedy family,

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 4>it is public. Even for a death like Tatianis Shlasburg recently,

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, there were photographs of the family leaving the

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 4>funeral that were published in a variety of publications. There

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 4>is and she was not a very public facing person.

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 4>That is one of the parallels between these two families

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 4>that illustrates how challenging it is to be in the

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 4>public eye. There are so many benefits to being as

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 4>famous as these two families are. That is undeniable, but

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 4>there are because so much is expected of them. There's

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 4>an expectation for them to grieve in public, and that's

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 4>just not something that is expected of very many people.

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 3>How did celebrity culture and sort of the paparazzi culture

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 3>affect both families in the nineties and early two thousands.

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 4>Sure, I think we think about paparazzi and we think

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 4>about celebrity culture today and we think, wow, it's really obtrusive.

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 2>These people are being photographed all the time.

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 4>All of that take it back to the nineties and

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 4>amplify it to the nth degree. It was different back then,

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 4>and Diana is the perfect example. Yes, she manipulated and

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 4>had a relationship with the press. She was able to

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 4>get what she wanted from them in some cases, but

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 4>certainly they also pursued her. That is absolutely true. And

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 4>the same was the case for Carolyn in the nineties.

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 4>They would not leave them alone. There was no way

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 4>for them to kind of escape interest. In the modern day,

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 4>I think there is. It's not a parallel, but it's

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 4>it's interesting to think about the fact that everyone has

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 4>a cell phone. That is a way that you cannot

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 4>escape that in the modern day. But you know, I

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 4>think recently about Tom holland AND's and Deaya. They got married,

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 4>nobody seen pictures, nobody knows about it. That is possible. Now,

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 4>that wasn't really possible in the same way. So yeah,

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 4>it's just different.

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 3>We'll find out how possible it is if we get

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 3>secret pictures of Taylor Swift.

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, exactly, exactly.

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 3>That's going to be the real test. So the meeting

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 3>between the Kennedy's and the Windsors in nineteen sixty one

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 3>is very famous, But are there any other times that

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 3>these families have come together that you find notable?

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 4>Sure this is it's not exactly a meeting necessarily, But

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 4>one of my favorite parts of the book is is

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 4>Jackie covering Queen Elizabeth's coronation as a journalist. Prior to

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 4>Jackie marrying JFK, she worked as a journalist at the

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 4>Washington Times Herald in DC, and she, you know, was

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 4>sent to cover the coronation for her Inquiring Camera Girl column,

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 4>which was kind of a man on the street column.

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 2>And so she covered the.

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 4>Ship over which was which she dubbed kind of the

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 4>Coronation crossing, and then she and she spoke with with

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 4>numerous people on the ground. She reported, you know, from

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 4>the ground about all of the festivities leading leading up

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 4>to the coronation. She went to several kind of legendary

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 4>parties after the coronation, and I this is kind of

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 4>is my favorite chapter because I feel like it offers

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 4>rare insight into what Jackie was like before she was famous,

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 4>which I think is really interesting. It's a great parallel

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 4>between her and Queen Elizabeth because it's kind of these

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 4>two young women on the brink of exceptional lives, kind

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 4>of right on the edge of something. And you know,

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 4>Jackie is funny and she has these doodles that she drew,

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 4>and she's just just you know, I just I love

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 4>it because, like I said, you know, she was so

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:58.199
<v Speaker 4>public and polished during the Kennedy administration, and then she

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 4>gave these kind of final interviews then you don't hear

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 4>from her again, and so it's just a really insightful

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 4>look at who she was at her core as a

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 4>young woman.

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 3>I love that. What would you say are the things

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 3>that each family has learned from each other? What lessons

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:16.919
<v Speaker 3>have they taken from the other side.

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:18.360
<v Speaker 2>That's a great question.

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 4>The kind of youth and vitality piece of it, I

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:26.400
<v Speaker 4>think is what the Royals had learned from the Kennedys,

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 4>and they looked to them and that was a piece

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 4>of kind of what they saw as helpful and the

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 4>pr of it all. I think they saw that and

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 4>they were like, Okay, you know, that is the way

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:38.439
<v Speaker 4>to go.

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 2>I think both of.

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 4>These families, their histories and their perceptions have been so

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:47.959
<v Speaker 4>shaped by television, and I think that the Kennedy presidency

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 4>and the Kennedy administration. You know, he won the debate

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 4>because of TV. Jackie gave her kind of television tour

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 4>of the White House, and you kind of see television

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 4>as starting to have importance with with the coronation of

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 4>Queen Elizabeth and kind of with other events.

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 2>So I think that is so interesting.

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 4>Their perception of how they are seen, I think is

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 4>so key, and I think that's you know, the royals

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 4>always knew that, but I think that was like one

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 4>lesson they learned from the Kennedys. What the Kennedys took

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 4>from the royal family, that's interesting. I think, again, not

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 4>to keep talking about this, but the kind of you know,

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 4>never complain, never explain, attitude of you know, not speaking

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 4>to the press unless it's like absolutely necessary. You saw

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 4>that with Jackie, You saw that with Caroline Kennedy, and

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 4>I think you see that today. You know the reason

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 4>why her speaking out against her cousin R. F. Kennedy Junior,

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 4>prior to him being appointed to the Trump Cabinet, why

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 4>that had so much impact is because she doesn't speak

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 4>to the press. I think it had much more impact

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 4>because of the rarity of it all.

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I think that that's completely correct. I think people

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 3>understand the power of withholding now, especially in an era

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 3>when as you said, everyone has a cell phone. It

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 3>feels like there's so much information at any given time,

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 3>there is power in saying less absolutely what future I mean, obviously,

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 3>these families are in very different positions, given that the

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Windsors are literally monarchs. What future do you sort of

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 3>predict for each family?

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Now, gosh, that's a good question.

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 4>If you had asked me even two years about about

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 4>the Kennedy's, I would have had a very different answer.

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And as has something happened? Is something in the

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 3>news or something?

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think that R. F. Kennedy, Robert F.

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 4>Kennedy Junior, being in the Trump administration has set them

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 4>on an interesting path.

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 2>He's been in the public eye.

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 4>People ask me, you know, why do people care about

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 4>the Kennedys still, And I'm like, well, I think there's

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:56.719
<v Speaker 4>all this history, and I think that they are so

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 4>tied to the core of America and history given kind

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 4>of the violent death of JFK.

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 2>That's one reason. But now it's like Robert F.

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 4>Kennedy Junior is in the news constantly right now, he

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 4>is having an impact that people should be aware of,

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 4>people should be paying attention to that. Also, you know,

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 4>Jack Slosberg is running for Congress. He is kind of

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 4>the next generation of the Kennedys, and I don't see

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 4>him going away regardless of what the outcome of that

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 4>race is, And so they are back in the cultural narrative.

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 4>So I think watching those two people in particular, I

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:35.959
<v Speaker 4>think will be interesting to see the future of what

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.640
<v Speaker 4>that family means to American culture.

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 2>There's also going to be a whole new show.

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 4>About them on Netflix starring Michael Fassbender. And I think

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 4>popular culture has kept them in the public, the forefront

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:53.400
<v Speaker 4>of the public mind, both families, certainly, but I think

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:57.239
<v Speaker 4>that will continue to keep them kind of in the

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 4>conversation regardless of whether they continued to.

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Stay in politics. But I think they probably will.

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this podcast is called Noble Blood. I think,

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 3>if nothing else, something that people are fascinated by is

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 3>the juxtaposition of extreme wealth and power and privilege and

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 3>tragedy and bodies that better than the Kennedy.

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 4>Sure, sure, I think, yeah, absolutely. I think, for lack

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 4>of a better phrage, the drama of it all. You know,

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of the cover of People magazine type stories,

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 4>whether that is the glamorous wedding or the tragedy. I

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 4>think that continues to fascinate or the family feod You

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:43.639
<v Speaker 4>know again, I think that is both relatable and intriguing.

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 3>What about the Windsors, what is going to happen with them?

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, obviously King Charles is getting older, William and

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Kate are next in line, But how do you think

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 3>they are going to continue to navigate a pretty archaic

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 3>institution in the twenty first century.

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 4>Sure, you know there are rumors from people who know

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 4>more than me that Prince William would like to make

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 4>changes when he becomes king. I think he did not

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 4>have a formal investiture as the Prince of Wales. I

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:21.199
<v Speaker 4>think that is kind of an indicator of maybe his

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.360
<v Speaker 4>coronation will look quite different.

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 3>And when I say that he didn't have a formal investiture,

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 3>what does that mean?

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 4>Sure, so, again not to refer to the crown, but

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 4>I feel like it's a good kind of reference point

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 4>for the average person. So you see in that King

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 4>Charles when he became Prince of Wales had basically like

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 4>a little coronation in Wales.

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 3>If you remember the episode of Crowns, he learned a

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 3>little well, she was.

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 4>Very cute, yes, exactly, And you don't need that to

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 4>become the Prince of Wales.

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 2>But it is tradition.

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 4>And ceremonial and all of those sort of things. So

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 4>when Prince William became Prince of Wales, he decided we're

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 4>not doing that.

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's.

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 4>Interesting and I think it's a good thing to look

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 4>at as perhaps an indicator of how things will be

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 4>moving forward, maybe a little bit less pump and more

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 4>kind of focus on the work. But at the same time,

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 4>you know, a line that I particularly like from my

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 4>book is that you know, is a royal still a

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 4>royal if she wears Zara jeans? Like sometimes like royalty,

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 4>people want the kind of escapism. People who are invested

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 4>in royalty and are monarchists kind of at their core,

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 4>they like all of that. They like the jewels, they

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:45.199
<v Speaker 4>like the traditions, they like all of that. And I

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 4>think it's kind of like if you start to do

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 4>away with those things, then what even is it?

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 2>A little bit?

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:54.199
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I mean, I will go on the record as

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.919
<v Speaker 3>saying I do not think a full authoritarian monarchy is

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 3>the best known form of government yet. And yet I

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 3>do want to say I think in a society where

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 3>we don't believe in the most people don't believe in

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:09.640
<v Speaker 3>the divine right of kings that this is God himself

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 3>anointing this one person to rule us. Without that sort

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:17.679
<v Speaker 3>of supernatural buy in, what is it that bestows this

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 3>person power?

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Why?

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.959
<v Speaker 3>I think people sometimes then can blink and be like,

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm an adult person, you know, I'm an adult woman

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 3>kneeling to another adult who's drinking from a gold cup.

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 3>And when you strip away the context, what's left can

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 3>look a little silly.

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah.

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 4>I think where the British Royal family can do a

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 4>lot of good is by spotlighting causes that are important

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 4>to them, charities that are doing amazing work. I think

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 4>the idea of public duty is a really great thing,

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 4>and I think that's something that can be found in

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 4>the Kennedy family as well. The issue that the British

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 4>Royals are facing right now is that they don't have

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 4>a lot of young people kind of to take over

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 4>after this next generation. And I think, you know, there's

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 4>a lot to be said about Harry and Meghan and

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 4>everything kind of with kind of that that family feud,

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 4>to speak of family feuds, but I think they could

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 4>have used them.

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 2>I guess that's what I'll say.

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 3>That's that's I think spot on. And then just before

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 3>I let you go, what advice would you give to

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 3>the Windsors now if you could, if you were in

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 3>charge of their PR.

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 4>Oh, if I was in charge of the Windsors PR,

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 4>give me that job. No, I think, you know, I

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:39.640
<v Speaker 4>think what Charles and Camilla did in the United States,

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 4>like what we're talking, we're talking about kind of that

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 4>just as their trip is coming to an end.

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 2>I liked the way that.

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 4>They they had a variety, They did a variety of things,

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 4>some that's felt very traditional, some that felt very modern,

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 4>and I think that that's important. I think they were

0:26:56.800 --> 0:27:00.040
<v Speaker 4>speaking about things that they're passionate about, whether that's the

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 4>environment or Camilla meeting with kind of advocates for you know,

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 4>those who support people who have experienced domestic abuse, things

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 4>like that. I think that's amazing. I think they should

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 4>do more of that. I think that, you know, as

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 4>often as William and Kate can be front and center

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 4>as young people and talking about kind of the future

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:21.120
<v Speaker 4>of the monarchy, I think that's what they should be doing.

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 4>I think they have to think about that from a

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:29.479
<v Speaker 4>PR perspective. Absolutely, it's the challenges that the windsors are

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:32.880
<v Speaker 4>facing were only amplified when Kate had a health crisis recently.

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 4>Of course she couldn't work, she was kind of out

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 4>of commission in that capacity, and Prince William was having

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 4>to step up with his kind of nuclear family and

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 4>things like that. Absolutely understandable, but I think it illustrates

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 4>that they don't have as deep of a bench as

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:50.679
<v Speaker 4>they used to for young people doing the work. I

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 4>don't know Edward and Sophie also, have you know whether

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 4>that's maybe Lady Louise.

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Kind of doing some engagements. I'm not sure. It's kind

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:00.119
<v Speaker 2>of a they're kind of in a tricky position.

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Especially when I'm sure, as you recall, with Kate's health crisis,

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:09.160
<v Speaker 3>we saw sort of the social media conversation spiral out

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 3>of control in a way that I think revealed the

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:16.199
<v Speaker 3>ways in which the current royal family maybe doesn't have

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 3>quite as firm of grasp on the speed and ferocity

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 3>of social media as they might have hoped.

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:28.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Absolutely, I think that it's been interesting to see

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 4>William and Kate and their shift towards kind of making

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 4>pre planned videos and things like that to stay a

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 4>part of the conversation in a way that they can

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 4>control where they might not have to be physically you know,

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 4>visible or something like that, but they can still be

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 4>putting out content, so to speak, at a more rapid clip.

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 4>It's been I mean, I just think that's that's interesting

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 4>kind of that they're tapping into that psychology.

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 3>Is there any anything you learned researching this book that

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 3>surprised you.

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 4>I was less familiar with Joe Kennedy and his kind

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 4>of time in the UK. Honestly, Get the kickstory is

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 4>one that I wish I could have spent more time

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 4>on because it was so interesting to me. It was Again,

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 4>if for those listeners go back and listen to Dana's episode,

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 4>it's so good. It's about you know, kind of forbidden

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 4>love and tragedy and you know her her parents did

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 4>not want her to marry someone from the British aristocracy

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 4>because of religious reasons and all sorts of things. It's fascinating.

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 4>So I learned a lot there, certainly, And I also learned.

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 2>A good bit. We haven't touched on this yet, but

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 2>that JFK.

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 4>Junior and Diana actually met in New York in a

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 4>secret meeting that was not reported on at the time,

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 4>and that again, is so interesting that they were able

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 4>to keep that out of the tabloids, because again, they

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 4>were two of the very most famous people in the world.

0:29:58.120 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 4>And you know, he had asked her to be on

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 4>the CU of his magazine and she very kindly said no.

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 2>But they had a very lovely tea at the Carlisle Hotel.

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 3>That's lovely. I wish I could have seen that meeting.

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 3>I wish, you know, we'll have to settle for fiction,

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 3>but that's fascinating to imagine. Caroline. Thank you so much

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 3>for your time and for this fascinating book. The book

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 3>is The Kennedy's and the Windsors. It's available for pre order.

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 3>It comes out next Tuesday. If you're interested in both

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 3>of these families, you absolutely should pick it up. Caroline,

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 3>is there anywhere on social media that you want to

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 3>direct the listeners to?

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 4>Sure, maybe just Caroline Holliman dot com. Then it gets

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 4>all the links and all the socials are there.

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Fantastic. Thank you so much for joining us. Noble Blood

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 3>is a production of iHeartRadio and Grim and Mild from

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Aaron Manky. Noble Blood is hosted by me Dana Schwartz.

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Writers for Noble Blood are hands Na Johnston, Hannah Zwick,

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Paul Jaffey, Natasha Laski, and me Danish Swartz. The show

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 3>is edited and produced by Jesse Funk and Nomes Griffin,

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 3>with supervising producerrima Ill Kali and executive producers Aaron Manke,

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 3>Trevor Young, and Matt Frederick. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 3>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 3>to your favorite shows.