WEBVTT - The Final Four - January Madness

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice.

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Now along with the guys from fanball dot com. Here's

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the host for Fantasy Football Weekly, Paul. It is Fantasy

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. I am Paul Charchy in my co host

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Like last week, Brian Johnson, welcome back. What's up charge?

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 1>I should just get my name in the intro at

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 1>this point. Yeah, like every off season, we're supposed to

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>be a nice rotation. Yeah, what happened to the rotation?

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>What does happen to these guys? And Jim Matt Now

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Att did one of our off season one's like

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you've done all the rest of them? No Fish, No

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Christian Peterson. That's okay? Well, uh, you know, Scott Fish

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 1>hot off the heels of like the humanitarian I am

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you're talking to me? I don't know. I think he

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>signed up barely a human let alone Humanitarian of the Year.

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh tell me that is a compliment, Like I'm a machine.

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:05.759
<v Speaker 1>Tip of the cap to Scott Fish for the award.

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh the Fantasy Sports and Gaming Association Awards the humanitarian

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of a year within the industry, somebody who's done good

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>for others, and Scott Fish was the recipient. He's raised

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>over a one hundred thousand dollars over the course of

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Cares works out of our office here and many

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of our listeners are familiar with Scott and its contributions

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to this show. So tip of the hat to Scott.

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>And before we break down the a f C and

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 1>NFC championship games, how about the real life sabotage drop

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that Cowboys performed on the Giants here. It's a very

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>savvy move from a very unsavvy franchise, isn't it. Jason

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Garrett interviewing to be the offensive coordinator of the Giants, Well,

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm emotionally detached. I just had enough of

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Gettleman last year. Draft Day was you know, the straw

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that broke the camel's back. But this accelerates I'm gonna

0:01:57.920 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>go back to being a giantsman as soon as they

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>can get Leman. This can only accelerate that process. In

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>my well, was he wrong? We all thought he was wrong.

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Many thought he was wrong about Daniel Jones. Was he no? Again?

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Probably not? He looks like a good player. I still

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>think he could have traded down to get Dan Jones.

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm from the believer of that. And there were many

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>egregious moves before the Dan. I'm gonna give you another one.

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>When he traded Snacks Harrison. I thought he was insane

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>because he's trading one of the best run stuffers in

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. And the Lions got him, and they went

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>from being like last in the league against the run

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to like top five. And but Snacks is talking about

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>retirement right now, he's starting about hanging it up. I'll

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>give you a third Odell Beckham. Who the hell wants

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham anymore? You know, the Brown's may very well

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>cut him out right. They gave him a lot of

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed money that which made no sense. The Giants they

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>signed him to an extension and then that is like,

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what you're doing at that time. That

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>is true. But they got out of Beckham as the

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>insanity was beginning. So you know, I think in the moment,

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these gentleman moves have been worse than

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>they've actually worked out. The return was always light though

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>in all these instances, I think and I know they've

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>turned out to be good moves, they still could have

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>maximized them. For Mark, I agree with that. With that,

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>we shall see. Uh how Jason Garrett, you know, he

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>he has ties. He's from New Jersey, like he was

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a parcels guy way back in the day. So he

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>was eventually gonna work for this team. He's worked for

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Dallas a little too long probably about Yeah. Well, that

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that division though, it's it's disgusting, the NFC East, that's bad.

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Well it is this yere you know, but you know

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 1>by next year, who knows you could have a thirteen

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>game winner come out of that division. Philly better to

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>dominate that for the next year, so they stay healthy.

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>You think they're the best team, and Dallas should be

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in that conversation as well. We'll find out. Let's break

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>down the a f C and NFC championship games, Brian,

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>beginning with Tennessee taking on Kansas City. There seven and

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a half point favorites. These teams met in week ten.

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee won that game and put up thirty five points.

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>But I'll note that that was the first game back

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>for Patrick Mahomes off that gruesome knee injury and Mahomes

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't quite himself, although they Kansas City still scored thirty

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>two points and lost in that game, and Mahomes through

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>for four touchdowns six yards. You can't really point at

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes ago. Well, you know, he came out rusty and

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that's why they lost. So the victors of both games

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>last week, the Titans and the Chiefs, very bizarre games,

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:27.280
<v Speaker 1>both of them. Yeah, so like I don't so, yeah, Well,

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll mention this week ten match up a lot between

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>UH Tennessee and Kansas City as Kansas City. As we

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:36.119
<v Speaker 1>go through this, let's start with King Henry Derrick Henry.

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>He had twenty three carries for one eight, eight and

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>two on the ground in that game. And you know,

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City. You run against Kansas City, you don't throw

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 1>against Kansas City. Only years passed, the path of least

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>resistance was through the air. It's not that way this year.

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>UH Kansas City's ranks against the run by Football Outsiders

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the v o A. They've allowed the fourth highest chords

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>per carry this season. Houston backs it into a whole

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>lot alright, but hold on, Kansas Cities run defense have

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>proved a lot down the stretch over the last four

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.119
<v Speaker 1>games are giving up three point nine yards per carry

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>in half a touchdown per game on the ground. That's it.

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is an improved run defense from the version

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that's skewing season long stats because they were so bad

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 1>in the first half of the season against the run.

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 1>They have gotten a lot better. That is true. That

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is true. Um, I want to go back to Henry

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>really quick. By the way, his last eight games glum

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, so it's unbelievable. Well over yards and eleven

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in his last eight games. It's the all time

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>record for most rushing yards in any eight game stretch

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>in NFL history. His average, his average game since Week ten,

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>which is probably the eight games average game, twenty five carries.

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 1>That's a season, that's a one game season high for

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>most backs in this league. That's his average game. One

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred sixty nine rushing yards and one point four touchdowns,

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>six point three yards per carry. They're all mind boggling

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>over such a big stretch of games. It sounds like

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>anyone back's best game of the year, and it's Derrick

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Henry's average game. I know he's uh running very motivated

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 1>going into unrestricted circling back real quick. How Kansas City

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>is tough on paper right now against running backs, but

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>starting in week fourteen, Patriots no run game, no running

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>back head more than seven carries, Denver third team total carries.

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>It looks like then Chicago. So not the greatest of

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>competition for uh. But but you know they're they're gonna

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:34.479
<v Speaker 1>ride Henry into the sunset, ride or die whatever, you know,

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:36.919
<v Speaker 1>playing one to throw out there. Um, I will mention

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the Colts and Titans are the only teams to allow

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>more receptions to opposing running backs than the Chiefs game.

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 1>So I will mention Dian Lewis one more time. No

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 1>touches last week? The he did not need to touch

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the ball? Well, no, they got ahead and they stayed

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>had you you we expected Baltimore to get ahead and

0:06:55.600 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>stay ahead. Certainly the Chiefs have that potential which might

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>bring Dion Lewis into play, which you know makes him

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>a cheap DFS dart. But h by the way, your

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>your DFS darts last week I think paid off. We

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>uh we love Damien Williams. That paid off. You like

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Darren Fell that paid off. He should have had like

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>three more catches too. He had had two drops and

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>there was another tight end you liked. Oh it was

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>hollow star. He didn't do as he didn't do so well,

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>no he did not. But yeah, let's let's talk about

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the Tennessee tight ends who led the team in receptions

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>in that weekend game. They had seven catches. John Nu

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Smith and Anthony Ferks are No other Titans receiver had

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>more than one. Well they only how many? They only

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>completed like eleven passes in the game. Uh so in

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that game, john Nu Smith and Folks are combined for

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>seven catches, seventy six yards and a touchdown. Ferks had

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to touchdown. Um, john Nu Smith when he sees the ball,

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>which he doesn't see it enough. Listen to these numbers.

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Yards per target ten that's number two tight ends among

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.559
<v Speaker 1>forty one qualified tight ends. And yards after the catch

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>per reception seven point eight that's second as well. He

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't see the ball enough. That's you are the

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>guy who was mocking me one show ago for my

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>love of Johnny Smith. I wasn't mocking. Yes, you mocked,

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you absolutely mocked. I would have to check the tape.

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>He he wasn't used as a receiver at all in

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the wild Guard game. So it was Fers wasn't the guy?

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was Matt. Maybe it was Matt. I didn't,

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't. I like Johnny Smith. Um, so the Chiefs

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>uh last week, as you mentioned, fellas had to touchdown

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and so continue to the playoffs. They've been given up

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to tightens all the year. The surrender the second most

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>catches to tight ends. Kansas City has third most red

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>zone targets to the position. So I'm like Johnny Smith

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and Anthony Folks are the two best receivers on the

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>team going into this game. And I saw the odds

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>for Ferks here to score the first touchdowns like one

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and then at any point in the game. It's like

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>one kind of like, I like Johnny Smith's chances better.

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>His odds aren't as good, but is are way up there.

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 1>But so what do you think a J. Brown in

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>this one? You know, there's not even another receiver worth

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>mentioning this game other than Brown, and he I know

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>he runs the majority of his routes on the left,

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>which puts him on Brashot Brelan, which is he's probably

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the worst of the cornerbacks they've got, although he's not bad,

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>but he's probably the worst of the ones I've got. Yeah,

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's It's another tough matchup and Brown has struggled.

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>And tough matchup starting in week fifteen is New Orleans,

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>New England Baltimore. He's had like one catching each of

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:23.319
<v Speaker 1>those games, and this matchup is arguably almost as bad

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>as all of those. So I'm not loving A J. Brown.

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>He's a contrarian play at this point. Again, and see,

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:29.839
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like him as a contrarian play, almost

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>like Corey Davis more. Yeah, just because he's cheaper. Called

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the birthday touchdown, by the way, nicely done. But here's

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the thing A J. Browns could Yeah, And you know, so,

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you think Tennessee's gonna be competitive, if

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you think they're gonna be passing more to stay in

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the game, which I do, I like it. I think

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>they would make an effort to put a Dorry Jackson

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>on E J. Brown, though I don't know. I don't

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>like either of them to put it that. I mean,

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 1>I like the tight ends and uh Derrick Henry and uh.

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Last week Ryan Tannehill had one one and two passing

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and three rushes for thirty seven yards in that Week

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>ten game. And I'm mentioning the rushing yards because I'm

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>loving the prop bed on his rushing yards at fifteen

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 1>and a half is the over under thirty seven Taniel

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>had in that Week ten game. Now here's some other

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks rushing totals against the Chiefs of this year. Give

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>me one second, uh, Derek Carr eighteen yards, that's more

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>than fifteen and a half. Lamar Jackson forty six, of course,

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Stafford eighteen yards, Shaun Watson forty two yards, Aaron

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers twenty nine yards, Tannehill again thirty seven, Tom Brady

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>twenty yards. Hammer Day over on the Ryan Tannehill rushing

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>proplects like it. Okay good um, Yeah, he's he's more

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>fleet of foot than people realize. Again, a converted wide

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>receiver when he played a year and a half of

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>quarterback at a ok Oho. I can't remember when he

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 1>went to a big time school too, but anyway, unlike

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>years passed tho again, Kansas City, very tough secondary. They

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>did lose starting uh free safety. I'm blanking on. His

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>name is definitely not honey badger. He will play and

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>he's been great. He's been great kans Their best rusher,

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Chris Jones, who led the team in sacks for the Chiefs,

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>missed last week's status still very up in the air

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>for this one, so that would bide well for Tannehill.

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>But again, it's just all about Derrick Henry in this game.

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Kansas City real quick. So I can't

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.839
<v Speaker 1>do Kansas City quickly because I talk about feeling we're

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>running long on this one. But we'll kick back. So

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore had basically eight scoring opportunities last week. They had

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>drives that finished on Tennessee's thirty six, thirty one, four

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>yard line, eighteen yard line, thirty one, fifteen, sixteen, and

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty one yard line, and they lost and finished with

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>twelve points. That's crazy. It's not like the Titans were

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>shutting down Baltimore. They just couldn't execute in scoring range.

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>And I liked the Chiefs chances to execute in scoring

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>range in this one. We mentioned Mahomes had four or

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>forty six and three in that first game. The Titans

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>have surrendered multiple passing scores in eleven of seventeen regular

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>season games. If you're throwing one line up in any

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of contest, you gotta have my homes in it.

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you do too. Um, Can I just mention

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>this about my homes? You know, for as much as

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>he's already accomplished, Brian, you know, one thing he hadn't

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>faced yet was a huge deficit in the playoff game.

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 1>And it didn't face him at all, unflappable. And there

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of young quarterbacks and he's still we

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>forget you know, he's still a very young quarterback. Um,

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>he didn't even did not even phase him in the

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>slightest There are a lot of guys that might have

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that might a lot of younger quarterbacks that might have

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>just gone belly up at that moment and not not

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>pattern here he rose to the occasion eccasion big time

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that I don't know who was the first or the

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>second touchdown. It was still on the comeback, like he

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>completed the comeback in the second quarter, by the way, Yeah,

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I really like the greatest comebacks of all time. Those

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>are like cool games. He did in the quarter when

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>he dragged his foot like everyone thought he was over

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the Yeah, I mean yeah, how about press of mine? Nothing?

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>And I nudged my wife and I was at that

0:12:57.800 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>point I was leaving for Vegas the next day and

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I said too. I said to her, oh, man, i'd

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>i'd still even down twenty for nothing. I think I'd

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 1>be betting them to win right now. And she's like, oh,

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't seem like a very good you know, I

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem very likely twenty for nothing nobody know. I'm like, yeah,

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>nobody ever comes back from twenty for nothing, but if anything,

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of be that one. And then they did it

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>at half and I'm thinking, here, I was trying to be,

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, contrarian guy, and they've made it look easy. Crazy.

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>We need to legalize gambling in Minnesota so we can

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 1>make those bets. Because I had the same thought as

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>well as like, no better money on a live bet

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>for at the time, you didn't seem like good, but

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>it was very plausible and it came through. In the

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>earlier matchup with Tennessee Mahomes through fifty passes five zero, man,

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>if he gets in anything close to fifty, yeah, it's

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna be explosive output for him. What do you think

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>it's go ahead? Nineteen of those passes went to Tyree

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 1>Hills Gonna catches for seven and one for Tyreek and

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>targets for Tyreek Hills there. And by the way, you

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>think that you hear her the chiefs if I told

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you the cheaper would come back from twenty four nothing

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>score fifty one points. But Tyreek Hill is gonna have

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>forty five scoreless yards gonna uh, He's probably gonna get

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>his in this one. Uh. Again, it was a weird

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>game for Baltimore and Tennessee last week. Baltimore kind of

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>comeback moved. But Ravens wide out said eight teen catches

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>in that game. That's a lot. So you gotta like

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Tyree Hill a lot. You think Sammy Watkins goes back

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to back here, back to back, like like doing something,

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>because he had a good game last week. It was decent.

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>He didn't score right, I don't think he did scar right.

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>He had He had like fifty six combo arts, which

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>is sadly a good game for He had five for

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine on nine targets in that Week ten matchup.

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>He had two rushes for twelve yards as well. Again,

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I like me Cole Hardman the most outside of Tyreek

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Hill only seventeen percent of the snaps last week. DeMarcus

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Robinson Robinson's bad all drops last week, holy and had

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>four targets in the seventeen very high percentage, so'll get

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>him on the field more. He had one catch for

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>sixty three yards in a touchdown in that Tennessee game,

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>So give him a four or five targets. We want

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to do now, Kelsey's obvious right. He went seven targets,

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>seven catches, seventy five yards and a touchdown in the

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>earlier meeting. Tennessee rock by tight ends in December, although

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>they did hold Mark Andrews in check last week, well

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Andrews got hurt. He and Hayden her combined for eight

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>two and one, and then even Ben Watson had three

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>for thirty eight, which if that's like yards and uh

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it real quick. Kelsey now tight end one in PPR

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>over the last four years, also a top ten wide

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>receiver in PPR scoring four years. I'd still take kill

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Off ahead of him next year. Yeah, it's definitely in

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>like a dynasy Empire format, of course. Yeah, that's that's

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a tough one. Yet Arths is falling out

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of favor in that argument. Um, and you mentioned Tennessee

0:15:57.520 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>getting shredded by tight tight ends over the last seven

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>regular season games. They allowed five tight end touchdowns four

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>top seventy yards. So let's talk. Let's talk Damian Williams.

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>M I was in as I mentioned, I was in

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas last week for the Fantasy Sports Trade Are

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Spent Fantasy Sports and Gaming Association Conference, and I placed

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a sizeable wager on Damian Williams. And I want I'm

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>not gonna say which way I went until after you're done,

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see if our thinking lines up on this.

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna guess you took the under on rushing yards

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>because only three running backs have. So Williams had nineteen

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>carries for seventy seven yards rushing five catches for thirty

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>two yards in that oh Week ten matchup. Only three

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>running backs have topped ninety rushing yards against Tennessee all year,

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey, Carlos Hide, Leonard four Nette and it was

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>not Carlos Hide last week. That was in the regular season,

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and they all needed twenty four carries to get their

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore running backs combined for forty two rushing yards on

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>just nine carries last week against Tennessee. It's a tough

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>matchup on the ground, uh not through the air, though

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>only the Colts have allowed more catches to opposing running

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>backs than the To's uh So I like Williams a

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>lot more through the air in this one. I don't

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna put up numbers quite like last week

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>or in previous weeks uh more recently, but yeah, he's

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:14.439
<v Speaker 1>he should be the only running back getting touches for

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 1>this team. That's the part I like. Nobody else touches

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:19.479
<v Speaker 1>the ball. And I think I think the Chiefs are

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna get up early and they're gonna run a lot

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 1>more than we've seen Tennessee, just doesn't you know, Because

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>they've been winning so many of their games, they haven't

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 1>had to sweat a lot of big volume runners. I

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>think a big volume games coming from Damian Williams. And

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the line is was lower than most people would probably

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>guess on Damian Williams for rushing yards. For rushing yards

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 1>seven oh, I would take that over then isn't much

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 1>so um, you know, if if Sony Michelle in a

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>loss can get to sixty one yards, Damian Williams in

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>a win is gonna get over fifty seven. You parlay

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that with the Ryan Tamhill over fifteen and a half

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that that would be the angles, and uh yeah, there's

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>no weather concerns in this one either and Sonny not

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>too windy, so two over under. I would take the

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.120
<v Speaker 1>over probably you would. You would hope you see over

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty points in this game. But it should be fun one.

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>When we come back green Bay taking on San Francisco,

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>will break it down fantasy style for you in just

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a moment. Welcome back, Paul Georgie and Brian Johnson with you.

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay taking on San Francisco. In San Francisco, these

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>teams met in week twelve. It was a one sided affair,

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven to eight in favor of San Francisco. Now

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>in San Franco. It was in I'm pretty sure was

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>in Green Bay. I think it happened in Lambo if

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>memory serves, And um, it wasn't maybe quite as lopsided

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>as the score suggests, but it was. It was pretty

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>darned lopsided. Let's break down the Green Bay side of

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>this where Aaron Rodgers as I feel like I say,

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 1>I've been saying every week for I don't know since Halloween,

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and the number just aren't there. He's um, He's been

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>under two hundred forty three yards in eight of the

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>last nine games. Two three is nothing. Get this, he

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 1>had a blow up game against the Giants. If I

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 1>take that game out in the Giants terrible secondary. If

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 1>I take that game out, Rogers average game in the

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:25.639
<v Speaker 1>second half of the season and playoffs two hundred nine

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>yards and a touchdown. Uh so it is that that

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>game was in San Francis. Thank you, and the over under.

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.880
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna barth with excitement maybe, but you're not gonna

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>leave two thirty nine and a half for over under.

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm passing arts for Aaron Rodgers. It's come to this,

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers. While it is high, honestly, he I bet,

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I bet at least in the second half of the season,

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>he's only got a couple of games higher than two

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine. That's probably it um now in Aaron Rodgers favor,

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>He's only thrown one interception in the second half of

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the season. I mean, that's mostly what Aaron Rodgers brings

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to the table right now. He doesn't make mistakes, but

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that's about all he brings to the table. The San

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Francisco uh past defense is so good they get the

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>ferocious pass rush they get you know, Nick Ford and

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>sorry Nick Bosa, d Ford DeForrest Buckner, all fantastic pass

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>rushers and over the across the entire league. Pro Football

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Focus ranks their past rush as third best. Now, in fairness,

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the Green Bay offensive line is great. It's always great

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and um and you know they will provide some time

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 1>for Aaron Rodgers, but it mostly on the balance of

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it, it it hasn't mattered a lot. I'm guessing Brian Bulaga

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is good to go because I was like, yeah, I

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>think that, yeah, right, I believe. I believe he will play.

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>We expected to play in this UM. Cornerback at Kello

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:43.959
<v Speaker 1>Witherspoon got benched last week. He will probably not go.

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>His replaced Emmanuel Moseley, gave up only three catches for

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty four yards against the Vikings, so Emmanuel mostly expected

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to start there. So then the question is where do

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:53.479
<v Speaker 1>you What do you do with the Davante Adams Right,

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 1>most of the other receivers don't even matter. So do

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you put Adams on Richard Sherman's side of the field

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.719
<v Speaker 1>where he gets raised probably and try to make hay

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 1>with your other guys, or do you put Davontae Adams

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.439
<v Speaker 1>on the left side of the field away from Richard Sherman,

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>knowing that they'll just roll extra coverage to that side

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and you're not throwing a Richard Sherman's side anyway. And

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>now you've got a huge problem potentially on both sides

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of the field. And that's the conundrum that they give

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you with Sherman being so good one on one. And

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>then if you do that, it gives you the ability

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to do heave a few passes on the left side

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit like the Digs touchdown last week, probably

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 1>to uh Alan los Art, but very you're most likely

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>candidate to pull something in. You know who almost would

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 1>be likely candidate would be Geronimo Allison if not for

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>his birthday being on Saturday. I'm a huge mistake. You

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:51.439
<v Speaker 1>don't like the pre day, you don't like the birthday

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 1>of the day before that. That's the hangout on the

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>next Absolutely avoid Geronimo at all costs. Let's talky about

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the writing game for the Packers last week. Dalvin Grant

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>for two yards per carry. That's it. Uh Aaron Jones

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>is more of a threat to San Francisco than um

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>than We're sorry Aaron. What am I trying to say here?

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the Niners. I think the Niners are gonna

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>play to shut down Here's what I'm trying to say.

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the Niners a gonna play to shut down

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones because Aaron Jones is a bigger threat than

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers is. Aaron Rodgers doesn't worry me if I'm

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the Niners, I don't want Aaron Jones beating because he's

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>winning games. They're winning games on Aaron Jones, not Aaron Rodgers.

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't I think that's gonna be. I think they're

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:35.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna play to shut down Aaron Jones, much like they

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 1>did to Dalvin Cook. And I mentioned this last week.

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Let me mention it again because it was super relevant

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>last week. San Francisco is awesome against past receiving backs.

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:49.239
<v Speaker 1>They held Dalvin Cook, I believe to eight catches for

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>nine yards through a lot of them are negative yards,

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>like what was the longest by like three yards something

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>like that. San Francisco is allowed the third fewest running

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>back receptions, the second fewest running backers eaving yards, and

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>they didn't give up a single touchdown through the air

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>door running back. It became quite evident to you me,

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>anyone like stopped throwing screen passes. It's not working. Although

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:11.199
<v Speaker 1>some of that was Kirk checking down for sure, but still, um,

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it's I'm nervous about Aaron Jones here because I really

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>believe that's that's going to be the foremost element that

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the Niners will take away sixty four point five is

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the over under run rushing yards for Jones. SERI receiving

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that's not as easy to find. That's not very good, ux,

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, that seems high. All right, let's go to uh,

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the passing game for the Niners. Garoppolo

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.239
<v Speaker 1>barely used last week only through nineteen passes. In the

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.959
<v Speaker 1>games they didn't have to, I think they ran fifty times.

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Green based pass defense has been really good. They've allowed

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>zero or one touchdown in six straight games. In the

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>second half of the season. They've allowed less than one

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 1>touchdown pass per game. Deebo Samuel runs almost half his

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>plays from Emmanuel Moseley side of the field, so he'll

0:23:56.640 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>avoid Richard Sherman mostly. Our Sorry, that's that I got

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the team's backwards on that. Sorry, that's a man, that

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>says if Tebo Samuels running on his own team. UM

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Diebo Samuel runs most of his plays on the left

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>side of the field. That's Kevin King's side. Uh predominantly angle, UM,

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 1>and so that that's your angle for Deebo. Samuel is

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>um that he gets the worst cornerback available, so that

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 1>might work out. Emmanuel Sanders will UM will have to

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>plays a lot of the slot. He plays the right

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>side of the field. Dores are worst matchups predominantly. UM.

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Trmon Williams has been shocking in his eight fourth year

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of service in the slot and Jr. Alexander has really

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 1>come along nicely. I'm I'm less optimistic about Emmanuel Sanders here.

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>Kendrick Bourne scored last week. Could be a wild card,

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>but he's UM. I think that's all he is a

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>wild card, and I don't love chasing last week's But

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>he will be a popular chalky cheap option because of

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>last week because the last week he runs predominantly from

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the slot as well. And again I don't love the

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>slot matchups here. UM. Kyle use check Uh. I know

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>some people tried him as a minimum salary attempt. Did

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>not work out at all last week because the Niners

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>got up so by so much they didn't have to

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>throw to him, and that's where his value comes in.

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about use check as a potential

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 1>DFS minimum salary guy? Yeah, I'd go to uh Anthony

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Ferkser instead, because you don't want to You don't get

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 1>cute at running back in any even regular season post

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>season DFS contest. I always pay up for running backs

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>because you want the guaranteed touches, Bill cow whatever you

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>want to say. But yeah, in the flex, I would

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:34.120
<v Speaker 1>punt with Brokes through this week. Um, yeah, they gotta

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 1>stop George Kittle, which is a problem. Um he's laboring

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:38.360
<v Speaker 1>with a bit of an ankle issue, but it shouldn't

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>be an issue here. Kittle roasted the Packers in the

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 1>first meeting six targets, six catches, one hundred twenty nine

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 1>yards and a touchdown. And the Packers have faced four

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>really good tight ends this year, with Kittle being one

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of them. Also Zach Ertz, Darren Waller, and Travis Kelsey.

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.880
<v Speaker 1>They all posted very strong fantasy games. Yeah, and we've

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>liked Hollister last week he didn't come through, but on

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>paper it's quite obviously like tight ends against the Packers. Yes, actually,

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>George and hollistered into nothing. He had at least a

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>handful of catches. Uh, let's talk about the San Francisco

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:19.479
<v Speaker 1>running game against Green Bay. We Um, you know this

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 1>is a team that loves to run the ball if

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>they get ahead, and if you know their favored by

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half, just like last week. Um, that's

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to run the ball. So did you hear

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that it came out late that Mostard was hurt? Yeah,

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>we didn't know that was hurt. Um. And he's practicing now,

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 1>and so a lot of us thought most it was

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the eye. So it's Matt Breed a week

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>then maybe because actually Coleman's little thing up now too,

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>So it might be I think this might be one

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>to just avoid. Prior to Tevin Coleman's hundred five yards

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>last week, no Niners back had topped sixty nine yards

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 1>in four games. Only one one hundred yard game had

0:26:55.640 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 1>been posted since Week eight. So yeah, I just don't think.

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think there's an angle with any of

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 1>these runners that I feel great about. Well, if Coleman

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>is truly ding, that's very interesting. This one book. I'm

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>not gonna give it a free advertising, but most of

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>it's over un run. Rushing yards is forty five and

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:16.159
<v Speaker 1>a half and Coleman's is forty four and a half.

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Wilson, Jeff Wilson, I had to go back to

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones very quickly. Two and a half receptions is

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>over under That seems pretty well, that's low, but again

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:28.159
<v Speaker 1>the Niners are awesome against that. But look at you know,

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings completed eight or nine to Dalvin Cook. They

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:34.439
<v Speaker 1>just didn't go anywhere. And then maybe that's and maybe

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that the Packers are gonna look at that and go, well,

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>we're not even gonna pass. They put the necessary pressure

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to like you said, forcing to check down and a lot,

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 1>so I would hammer that over. I feel could be

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Um what else you want to say about the running

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>game here? Only Christian mcaffrey's top to one hundred yards

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:49.719
<v Speaker 1>against Green Bay in the second half of the season.

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>But they're giving up four and a half yards per

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:53.479
<v Speaker 1>carry in the second half of the season. That's kid

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 1>gets you to a big game. I don't think holding

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Marshawn Lynch like Green Bay did to two yards per

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>carry means anything. Marshawn Lynch is completely and utterly cooked.

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Just nothing left there. I don't think so, just from

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a as a side note, that's done a fantasy breakdown

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 1>on this seven and a half. Both games are roughly

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half points. Are you laying the seven

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half? No, I'm not. I think the favorites

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>finally play like the favorites in this one. It's especially

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:34.360
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. I just I don't see Green Bay put

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>up much doing much better than the Vikings did last week.

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know, maybe a little bit better. But Tennessee,

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>who knows, they're running hot. But in Kansas City, I

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's it's it's got to come to an

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>end somewhere between one. If I had to pick one

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>delay the points, they would it would be the Chiefs.

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean I would take the points with the Titans,

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>especially with the hook seven and a half. But that

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>half is that half makes it awfu, doesn't it? When

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it comes to daily this is probably even though it's

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 1>It's granted it's only four games, but outside of the

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks on fanball, you can play two super flex but

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the tight ends Kelsey and Kittle plays over all the

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>running backs even Derrick Henry, I'd rather fight to pick two.

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Would you play? Would you play more but fanball U

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>super flex? Would you play, Well, you don't even have

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to be super flex for the two tight ends. Would

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you play? Would you prioritize a two tight end lineup? Oh? Yeah,

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean Kelsey Kittle might be the highest

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>scoring school position players, especially in PPR, and that includes

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry and Davante Adams of course, yeah, definitely could be.

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Brian, great job clocking in it almost exactly thirty

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>minutes for this podcast. We managed to talk about two

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>games for thirty minutes. Dear Lord, congratulations for those of

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>you that got to the end of the podcast. We

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>love that. Thank you for listening throughout the whole thing.

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>We encourage you to go to fanball dot com play

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>some sury cap this weekend. Still uh so's to me,

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot more fun with two games than it

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>is with one game. But we will break down the

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl beginning next week as well. Talk to you

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>in a week everybody. Bobbye Fantasy Football Weekly is a

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts from my

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app Apple podcasts,

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.