WEBVTT - How Tesla Became Elon’s Collateral Damage

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Let me tell you we have a new star.

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 3>A star is born Elon On mars Juson Kennedy. He

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 3>is the Thomas Edison plus plus plus of our age.

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Probably his whole life is from a position of insecurity.

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:23.440
<v Speaker 2>I feel for the guy. I would say ninety eight

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 2>percent really appreciate what he does. But those two percent

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 2>that are nasty, they are. I'll be in four post.

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 2>We are meant for great things in the United States

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 2>of America, and Elon reminds us.

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 4>Of that we don't have a fourth branch of governments

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 4>called Elon Musk.

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Elanik Bloomberg's weekly podcast about Elon Musk. It's Tuesday,

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 2>March fourth. I'm your host, David Papadopolis. So as Elon

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 2>has been exploring his new life as a government worker

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 2>at the share price of his publicly traded company, Tesla

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 2>has been on a wild ride. The stock skyrocketed after

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Trump's selection, but recently it's been in freefall and Elon

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 2>is become increasingly the target for Democrat protesters. Every weekend,

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 2>more people have showed up at Tesla dealerships across the

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:23.119
<v Speaker 2>US marching, chanting, vandalizing, and overseas it might even be worse.

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Tesla sales have collapsed in Europe. Could the Trump trade

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.759
<v Speaker 2>be a bad deal for Elon and his investors? And

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 2>then we'll look at some new feuds. Finally, some new

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 2>feuds appearing on the horizon. For Elon. It's no longer

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 2>the tech CEOs that he's beefing with, they've pretty much

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 2>all fallen in line behind him and Trump, but instead

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 2>its entire international alliances. And lastly we hear some truly

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 2>wild state of the Union Elon predictions. So to discuss

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 2>all things Tesla, we are joined by the Bloomberg Global

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Autos are in London, Craig Trudell. Craig Hello there, sir, Hello,

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 2>and we have our regulars of course, as always with

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 2>us here Max Chafkin in the studio with me. Max, Hey, David,

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 2>and Dana Hall beaming in from California. Dana, Hello, Hey, David. Okay,

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 2>So for all of you some numbers first, to get

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a perspective about just how crazy this

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 2>ride has been. From the run up to the election

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 2>back in the summer to the post election peak. The

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Tesla stock price almost tripled just it was in an

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 2>absolute tear. Since that peak, it's been pretty darn ugly

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 2>down over two hundred dollars per share, a drop of

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 2>nearly fifty percent, much of it coming since the inauguration,

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 2>and the stock is now essentially back at the level

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 2>it was on election Day. It's plummeting again today, down

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 2>roughly seven percent or so this morning, as we're recording

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 2>part of a broader route across markets here in the

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.239
<v Speaker 2>wake of the Trump tariffs. But also there were some

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 2>really bad sales numbers for Tesla out of China overnight. Now, Craig,

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 2>you've seen a lot of wild gyrations during your time

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 2>covering Kesla, but even by those standards, this is pretty dramatic.

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 2>What the hell is going on here?

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:19.239
<v Speaker 1>I think we're seeing a dramatic rethinking of whether it's

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>such a good thing that Elon Musk has so emphatically

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>thrown his dark Maga hat in with President Trump.

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 2>So I mean, I remember, again at the very beginning, Craig,

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 2>the market was adamant that it was a brilliant idea.

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 2>The market bid the stock up furiously in the first

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 2>couple of weeks after the election.

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, I think the instant analysis, the sort of knee

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 5>jerk reaction to this was, how can it possibly be

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 5>a bad thing to be incredibly close to the most

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 5>powerful person in the world, to essentially, you know, be

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 5>his first buddy, to be his cabinet mate. I think everybody,

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure was clear eyed months ago that you know,

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 5>Trump was not necessarily, you know, wildly popular. He's very polarizing.

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 5>But I think if you told people in October or

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 5>early November that Trump and Musk were going to do

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 5>some of the things they've done in the first I

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 5>think we're six weeks in now of this presidency, you know,

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 5>people would have said, you know, you've got Trump derangement syndrome.

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 5>I think they've been really really aggressive, very sort of

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:27.720
<v Speaker 5>stick it in your face, and I think we are seeing,

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, you can't really sort of take it out

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 5>on SpaceX, right. I suppose you can leave X or Twitter.

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 5>A lot of people have already done that. If you

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 5>really want to stick it to elon you, you stick

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 5>it to his most valuable company that has cars all

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 5>over the place. And we're seeing that, We're seeing, you know,

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 5>dozens of protests across the US. I think we're also

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 5>seeing you know, even some of of Tesla's own customers

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 5>putting different companies' badges onto their cars so that people

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 5>think they're driving them Mazda or a BMW instead of

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 5>a Model three.

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 2>It's it's wait, wait a minute, wait a minute, tell

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 2>me more about that. How does that? A? How exactly

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 2>does that work? And B does it work? Is someone like, oh,

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 2>that's a nice Mazda. And by the way, who wants

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:20.919
<v Speaker 2>a nice Maza? Hey, don maza clugged my Mazda. You

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 2>just wait a minute. So you turned your Tesla into

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 2>a Masa? Is that what you're saying?

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, no, sir.

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 5>But but I mean, I think it's a pretty simple

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 5>deal of of you sort of you know, chip off

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 5>your your t dcal off of the back of your vehicle.

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 1>You put on a different badge.

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 5>Those you know, you can buy those in the aftermarket

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:42.919
<v Speaker 5>pretty cheaply, and you just hope people don't notice.

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 2>But that they're not thrown by the by the body

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 2>type of the car.

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 4>There is a cyber truck that is around here around

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 4>our office in New York.

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 2>You thought it was a four F one.

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 4>No, it has a old school Toyota logo of a tailgate.

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 4>And I don't think they're trying to trick anybody, but

0:05:57.920 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 4>I do think it looks kind of cool.

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.239
<v Speaker 2>That is that is there you go, Max on Craig's

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 2>point that he made at the beginning, you know, when

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 2>we had that wild run up in November and into

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 2>early December, I actually believe if you pull the tape

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 2>on this show, we said, this seems like a fine

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 2>idea in the abstract, like is a very you know,

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 2>an investing thesis, like you know, yeah, his first buddy

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 2>super close to power as an abstract investing thesis. It

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 2>sort of seemed like it worked, but we did keep saying, well,

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 2>what the hell does that look like in the nitty gritty.

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 4>One hundred percent? And I've made this point before, but like,

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 4>the main rationale for the run up in the price

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 4>was that somehow Donald Trump was going to be good

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 4>for Elon Musk's robotaxi ambitions, but it was not at

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 4>all clear how he would be good. Like if Donald

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 4>Trump like waves a magic wand and legalizes like cyber

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 4>trucks for cybercabs, yeah, you still got to produce, you

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 4>gotta make one, and they still haven't done that, and

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.159
<v Speaker 4>so that's a problem. And then I do think what

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 4>Craig is saying is true. Right, the sort of volume

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 4>of and sort of the energy from Musk is more

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 4>aggressive than we would have expected, maybe more polarizing than

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 4>we expected. I also think that what Musk is doing

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 4>is cutting against his own brand in ways that are

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 4>very harmful. Not just not just because Tesla has a

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 4>lot of left wing customers and those customers are now

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 4>very mad and they want to protest or cover up

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 4>the Tesla logos, but also because Musk's personal brand and

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 4>like what made him appealing was like inventing stuff and

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 4>coming up with And now obviously there are you can

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 4>debate just how much inventing he actually did or whatever,

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 4>But this is a guy who's made his thing creating

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 4>new products, and all of a sudden he's sort of

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 4>couse playing as one of the consultants from office Space.

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean to the point where he's like literally wearing

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 4>it as a slogan, almost forgetting that those guys were

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 4>not cool in office space, like people do not necessarily.

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 4>So in addition to all the polarization, you also so

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 4>just have this kind of like brand confusion and all along.

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 4>And I'm sure Dan is about to say this, but

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 4>Tesla's actual sales, the actual numbers that are coming out

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 4>of this company have been bad.

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, and to Max's point, he's sort of,

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, flinging around a chainsaw and really embracing this

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 3>role as this destroyer of the federal government and like

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 3>moving fast and breaking things and firing people. And let

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 3>me tell you, people do not buy cars when they're

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 3>worried about the economy, when they're worried about losing their job,

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 3>when they are worried about interest rates, when they're worried

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.319
<v Speaker 3>about their four oh one k going up in smoke.

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's been a pretty brutal sell off, yes, yeah.

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 3>And to be clear, and Craig knows as well, the

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 3>first quarter is always like the worst for car sales typically, right, Like,

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's a lot of incentives to clear out

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 3>inventory at the end of the year, so the fourth

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 3>quarter is typically very strong. The first quarter is typically

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 3>very slow. But what you're seeing out of the Tesla

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 3>numbers now is like despite all of these incentives, free

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 3>supercharging and YadA YadA, like they are not moving metal

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 3>and their lineup is really old and the cyber truck

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 3>sales are very weak. And it's not just in the

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 3>United States where musk is very polarizing, it's in Europe

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 3>and it's in China. Like those are the big three markets.

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 3>So the first quarter is going to be super ugly.

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 2>If we can go back also, and I hate to

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 2>talk up myself here, but if you go to the

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 2>year end clips max, Okay, when everybody may prediction, no,

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.559
<v Speaker 2>I made a lot of bad, bad predictions, including my

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Kentucky Derby pick, which isn't looking good at all. But

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:37.079
<v Speaker 2>I did predict a convergence in the valuations of Tesla

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 2>and SpaceX, and man, if you would put that trade on,

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 2>if you'd gone short Tesla long SpaceX, holy smokes, you'd

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 2>be retiring. It's looking good.

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think we're there's still quite a gap

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 4>between the you know, reported valuation of SpaceX and the

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 4>current valuation of Tesla. You know, nearly four hundred billion

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 4>for SpaceX, a little more than eight hundred billion for

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 4>Tesla last I checked. But still they've that gap has closed.

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 4>And I think the issue is, you know, Craig brought

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 4>this up, but like being the first buddy is great

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 4>and I think it really impressed investor. But the problem

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 4>is that is an unpaid position, and and to monetize

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 4>that position, Elon Musk has limited options, Like there are

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 4>ways that SpaceX SpaceX can monetize Musk's access. Tesla has

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 4>really struggled. And there was this, like, you know, this

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 4>weird story that we talked about weeks ago on the

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 4>podcast about the State Department maybe putting an item in

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 4>a spreadsheet saying was gonna buy four hundred million dollars

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 4>worth of cyber trucks and.

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 2>That'll but even so, that ain't much, number one, That's

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 2>not much, and we're and that is sort of turning

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 2>into like a mini scandal.

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Earlier today or yesterday, Connecticut Senator Richard Blumenthal sent a

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 4>letter basically saying, we need.

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 2>To explain this.

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 4>You see, like it's gonna be hard for Musk to

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.439
<v Speaker 4>to monetize this without creating even more.

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 2>From the Tesla side.

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 4>From the Tesla side, but you know, I think even

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 4>from the SpaceX side, frankly, I think, but I think

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 4>it's easier from the space SpaceX has a much easier

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 4>so hard.

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 2>To monetize there. But but dan As Craig was alluding

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 2>to earlier It's really easy because Tesla is such a

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, a is a is a consumer product for

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 2>consumers to take it out on the brand in a

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 2>way that you know, SpaceX is largely shielded from that, right,

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 2>you cannot punish it.

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I suppose you, if you were really angry,

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 3>you could like show up at the beach in Boca

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 3>Chica and try to like swing by in your boat

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 3>with a protest sign or fly a bunch of drones

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 3>or something. But but yeah, I mean the thing about

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Tesla showrooms is that they are in visible locations in

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 3>congressional districts all across the country. And you know this

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 3>whole quote unquote Tesla takedown protests. It's like a very

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 3>easy way for like the average citizen to participate in

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 3>something visible and the anchor is really about Doge. I mean,

0:11:57.720 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 3>I went to the one in Berkeley a couple of

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 3>weeks ago, and you know, it's all these people. Some

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 3>of them owned Teslas, some of them didn't, but they're

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 3>very upset about what Trump and Musk are doing Visa

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 3>VI Doge. And you can like go to the showroom

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 3>and then you can go out to lunch like this

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 3>is like the way that a lot of people are participating.

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 3>But I think you know, the other thing to just

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 3>remember about Tesla and sales is that Elon's politics aside,

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 3>the company has a really stale lineup. The cyber truck

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 3>is not doing well, so that is like the main thing.

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Like there are a lot of other electric vehicles on

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 3>the market now and if you care about climate and

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 3>want to buy an EV Tesla is no longer the

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 3>game and talent.

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 4>Well guess because Musk kind of bet on this idea

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 4>that he didn't need to refresh the lineup, like he

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 4>thought that cars were essentially like software, you could just

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 4>update him the iPhone pretty much looks the same as

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 4>it's always you know, it's always looked, and that, you know,

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 4>basically the halo around the company was going to lift

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 4>it and make it possible to basically have an iPhone

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 4>of cars. Like if you look way back before we

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 4>started hearing the Robotaxi story, that was the extreme bowl

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 4>case for Tesla. It was that it was going to

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 4>change the paradigm of the car business.

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:13.439
<v Speaker 2>The hardware didn't matter anymore. All that mattered was a

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 2>solid That.

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 4>Story was like really dependent on the Elon Musk brand

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 4>on Elon Musk as this innovator, as this as this

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 4>guy who was bringing the world to this world of

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 4>abundance and cleaner technology and all those things, and now

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 4>he stands, you know, for something else. And it seems

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 4>like Elon Musk is trying, at least to some extent,

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 4>to address this.

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 4>He went on Joe Rogan's podcast again, over three hours long. Again,

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of my day on Friday was just sort

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 4>of waiting for the guillotine to fall, you know, I

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 4>have to drop everything and listen to this. But anyway,

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 4>it really seemed like the point of the interview. They talked,

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 4>they talked, they hit all the usual Rogan topics. They

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 4>talked about flying saucers, they talked about is there a

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 4>secret repulsion system. I can't remember if they hit ancient

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 4>aliens or not, but I would be just absolutely shocked

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 4>if they didn't somehow. But it seemed like the real

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 4>point of the appearance was essentially to deny that he

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 4>had made a Nazi salute at the inauguration. Rogan kind

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 4>of backed him up on that. They moved on from

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 4>it very quickly. It didn't it wasn't didn't feel super

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 4>enthusiastic on Rogan's part, but they sort of got through it,

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 4>and it really seemed like an effort to address some

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 4>of these slogans that are being chanted by protesters, as

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 4>well as the ad campaign we talked about the other day,

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, where people were putting up these posters say

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 4>calling the Tesla a swastikar, in reference, of course to

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk's gesture at the inauguration, which he said was

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 4>not a Nazi salute.

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 2>For the record, right now, Craig, back to you. Give

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 2>us the latest update on sales numbers out of Europe.

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 2>I know they were starting to look gram they're really Graham.

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 3>We have.

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Have we had any fresh reports in recent days?

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean I do want to just quickly, you know,

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 5>go back to when Dana was talking about how the

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 5>first quarter is always seasonally really slow for Tesla but

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 5>also for the industry. Last year, the first quarter was

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 5>really crummy for Tesla. So not only are the numbers

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 5>I'm about to share not good, but they're sort of,

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 5>you know, off of an already depressing level. And so

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 5>you know, in January we saw a forty five percent

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 5>drop across Europe just for that month, some of the

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 5>biggest markets in Europe, you know, down sixty three percent

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 5>in France, down fifty nine percent in Germany. In February,

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 5>we are just starting to get reports for a couple

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 5>of the biggest markets in France down twenty six percent,

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 5>So I guess that's you know, you know, incrementally some improvement,

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 5>but that's still you know, year to date is a

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 5>pretty ugly figure. They're down dramatically in Norway, Sweden, and Denmark.

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 5>And we'll get some figures from Germany and the UK

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 5>on Wednesday. And then I think we mentioned already in China.

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 5>You know, the wholesales figures out of China.

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, now explain those numbers. So those are different

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 2>than the numbers you were just describing out of Europe,

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 2>is that right.

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right.

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 5>So in Europe we're talking about registrations, so that's actually

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 5>you know, cars being registered and handed over to consumers.

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 5>In terms of in China, these wholesales, this is basically

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 5>shipments from the factory that Tesla has in Shanghai. So

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 5>this is more akin to production than it is retail sales.

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 5>And so I do think one point that we absolutely

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 5>have to mention is that there is this real question

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 5>of how much of this is elon sort of self

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 5>owning and how much of this is.

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>A model why issue?

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 5>And we should note that as stale as the lineup

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 5>is that the company is giving a facelift to the

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 5>Model Y that is far and away their most important vehicle,

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 5>and you know, having a multi week shutdown of the

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.920
<v Speaker 5>Model Y was a big factor in why wholesales were

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 5>down forty nine percent in February. The question, of course

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 5>is how much of that is you know, disruption and

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.640
<v Speaker 5>the time it takes to rent back up from that disruption,

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 5>and how much of it is also you know, not

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 5>feeling the need to crank out as many Model threes

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 5>because that hasn't been in strong demand.

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 2>That production is both for sale in China and then

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 2>for export to some of their export markets, including Europe,

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 2>including Europe, right I see now, Dan, So while all

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 2>this is happening, while the stock is giving it up

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 2>in a big way, Must came out in recent days

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 2>and eked a not a forecast, but in ambition they

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 2>hope and aspiration that the stock would rise to seven

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 2>hundred dollars over in coming years a rally of one

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 2>thousand percent Dana Hall, and I'm like, hmm, this seems

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 2>like the old Carnival Barker at work here.

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I mean he's sort of said this before. I

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 3>mean he said multiple times that, like, Tesla has the

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.439
<v Speaker 3>potential to be the most valuable company in the world,

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 3>and it's going to pend depend on strong it's execution,

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 3>but he's optimistic that there's a path to get there.

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 3>Blah blah blah. I mean, it's all about Tesla as

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 3>an AI company. And I think the truth is Elon

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 3>Busk is bored of cars, like he is bored of

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 3>building cars. The future of the company is all about

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 3>the Robotaxi. We reported last week exclusively that Tesla has

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 3>applied for a permit to kind of get into the

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 3>right hailing business in California. They have not They have

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 3>not talked at all about really their future product lineup.

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Like they're supposed to be coming out with a more

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 3>affordable version. People think it's like a decontented Model Y,

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 3>or maybe it's a cheaper car, or maybe it's just

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 3>the robotaxi. But there hasn't been a lot of visibility

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 3>into like what their product pipeline is they showed off

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 3>like a van at some point we have heard anything

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 3>else about the van. So just this whole idea that

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 3>this is a car company with like a whole product

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 3>cycle of cars. They're not talking about that. Elon is

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 3>only talking about AI and Grock and Doge. And he's

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 3>been in Washington, d C. Basically since the election. He's

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 3>been in DC or Texas or mar Alago.

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, he indeed is acting, as you said,

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:24.919
<v Speaker 2>like a board car maker. And you know, Max, it

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 2>reminds me of an old Gabrielle Garcia Marquez line, which

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 2>is a board writer makes for a board reader. And

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 2>in this case, yea, I would say a board car

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 2>maker makes for a board car driver. You know, it

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 2>seems like between the you know, the political pushback against

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 2>him and the fact that he doesn't really seem to

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 2>much care about cars right now, is not a great mix.

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, one hundred percent. And even I think part of

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 4>the problem here with the stock is that, in addition

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.199
<v Speaker 4>to the sales problems that we've been talking about, in

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 4>addition to the challenges with the lineup that you're kind

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 4>of bringing up, they're behind on robotaxis. So even if

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:07.199
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk hits this very ambitious goal of launching a

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 4>robotaxi service in Austin, Texas in June, he's behind today

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 4>or yesterday. This week, you know, Uber and Weimo announced

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:18.479
<v Speaker 4>that they've they've been testing Weimo's been testing in Austin

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 4>for some time. They are going to open Weaimo up

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 4>to customers shortly so, so they've gotten beat to that market.

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 4>They're not going to be the first one of that market.

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 4>And even the kind of novelty of the robotaxi we're

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 4>seeing in China bid giving away, it's basically equivalent of

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 4>Tesla FSD, the so called full self driving system for

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:45.479
<v Speaker 4>free right, Like, it's not clear that these technologies that

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 4>he has said are going to be worth you know,

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 4>thirty trillion dollars or something crazy, are actually going to

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:52.919
<v Speaker 4>be worth that that they're going to be worth that

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 4>to consumers. It isn't working out that way for the

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 4>companies that are already in these markets.

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we're gonna wrap it up there with you, Craig.

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 2>I would just say a couple of final thoughts. One is,

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:07.439
<v Speaker 2>as my son has often pointed out to us, we

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 2>are a contrarian indicator here. So every time we talk

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 2>about the stock collapsing in a big way, it immediately rebounds.

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Everybody should brace for the rebound. But Craig, we want

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 2>you back on when you convert your Mazda to a Tesla.

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Take a picture of it, okay, and send it over

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 2>and then and then we'll get you on and we'll

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 2>interview about that.

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna convert my Honda Odyssey to a cyber truck

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 4>just to be I like it.

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:38.160
<v Speaker 5>I changed over my Masta because I knew Elon was crazy.

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly it, Craig, talk soon.

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 4>Thanks.

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, mister Chaffkin. You have some feuds to report, but

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of weird feuds. It's big, high concept feuds.

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:58.719
<v Speaker 4>Well, Elon Musk, I haven't actually checked the data, and

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure we will do this at some point, but

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 4>he seems like he's been more active on X than ever,

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 4>or as active as ever, and and yet it's it's

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 4>so many feuds that it's easy to even lose them.

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:12.360
<v Speaker 2>The first one I want to start with, I feel

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 2>like we went from a dearth of feud we had

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 2>a few drought to all of a sudden, you feel

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.160
<v Speaker 2>like they're all over the place. Again you see feuds everywhere.

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they're everywhere, and so many feuds in fact that

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 4>he is feuding with abstract concepts.

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:29.360
<v Speaker 2>So this, so this is and this is.

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 4>The most important feud I think going on right now.

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 4>It is not just because Elon has been exing about

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 4>it and so on, but because it it you know,

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 4>it affects all of us. It is Elon Musk and GDP,

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 4>the the the concept of gross domestic.

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Place wrestling with gross domestic product.

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 4>He has said, I think more than once that he

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 4>thinks it's a like a not a good statistic because

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 4>it it includes government spending. If you better if it

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.880
<v Speaker 4>didn't include government spending. We've seen others in the Trump world,

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 4>including Howard Lutnek, the Commerce Secretary, pick up on this idea.

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 4>And of course what's behind this is that the Atlanta

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 4>Federal Reserve said that it thinks there's going to be

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 4>a recession, that that GDP is falling.

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, or if not an outright recession, at least sees

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 2>one really bad sorry, yes, a pretty bad economic contraction

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 2>coming up.

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 4>And of course, you know, first of all, it's not

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 4>surprising that people would be thinking about this, and as

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk well knows, because he's you know, enacting this

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 4>personal austerity measure in the in the federal government and

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 4>with many federal contractors there there, there is going to

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:40.880
<v Speaker 4>be at least some economic pain, at least by design.

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 3>He's basically saying it's going to be like short term

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 3>pain for long term gain. Right. Yes, people are going

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 3>to be fired and lose their jobs, but like eventually,

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:52.640
<v Speaker 3>like interest rates will come down and we'll get we'll

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 3>stop you know, this deficit spending.

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, now, and listen, if they managed to pull that off,

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 2>that would be something I mean economic you know, adjustments,

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 2>fiscal adjustments. Fiscal austerity is a tried in true formula

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 2>and game plan implemented by leaders throughout the world, certainly

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 2>in the developing world. I mean when you mentioned that

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 2>chainsaw earlier, Dana, that that Musk was wielding the other day,

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 2>that was a chainsaw handed to him right now by

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 2>the greatest practitioner of this model, Javier Malay, an ally

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 2>of Musks in Argentina and Melay has done this. He

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 2>did radically got government spending in a country that has

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 2>a bad history of overspending and there was a lot

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 2>of lot of real short term pain, but there's a

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 2>place where they are actually seeing the fruits of it now.

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:41.879
<v Speaker 2>Inflation is coming down rapidly. Argentines are happy with me.

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 5>Lay.

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, though, Max, at this point that team

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Musk and team Doge have actually cut enough to truly

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 2>drive the economy. My sense is what's driving the economy

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 2>and sentiment. And again the fact that the not just

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Tesla is crashing today but the broader market is crashing

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 2>is just the sense that the wh Trump package, certainly

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 2>with the terrorists and everything, is just spoiling consumer sentiment.

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 4>And yeah, I think that's right. Although they are laying

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 4>off a substantial number of government employees, and I don't

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 4>think it would show it be showing up just yet.

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I don't know that it's enough at

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 2>this point to have a to have a critical mass there.

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 2>But in any of it, he's grappling with mister Gross

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 2>and mister Product. Does mister Product have anything to say

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:28.919
<v Speaker 2>in return? He's got no comment?

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Well, I will say, uh Axios did a pre

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 4>good piece on this yesterday basically pointing out that this

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 4>this has been a question It's not like economists are

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 4>unaware of the issues with GDP. The you know there

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 4>people talk about this all the time. In fact, the

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 4>GDP statistics are frequently shown in different, you know, different ways.

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 4>The problem is it's pretty hard to remove. If you

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:54.120
<v Speaker 4>remove government spending, you arguably remove you know, a bunch

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 4>of the economy. The government spends money, and then it's

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 4>sort of the people who are working at those jobs

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 4>and money elsewhere. Like it's it's hard to untangle.

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 2>As a former economics reporter, I have heard this debate

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 2>many times, I will just say that at this point

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 2>in the US, where where government spending is indeed a

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 2>real driving force in this economy, and because it's just

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 2>grown in recent years, it is indeed incredibly difficult to

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 2>disentangle the two.

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 3>I mean.

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 4>The awkwardness is that Trump did not run on this program.

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 4>Really he yeah, taught, yes, Like he brought up Elon

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 4>and said Elon was going to make things more efficient,

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 4>but he didn't. But he didn't quite say the thing

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 4>that Elon has said, which is we're going to have

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 4>you know, a couple of years of unpleasantness for a

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, great future. And and it's hard to know

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 4>how you know how the politics are going to play.

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 4>You know, my suspicion is that a lot of Trump voters,

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 4>not to mention democrats, are are going to be upset.

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, what's your next feud?

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 4>Okay, next feud? This is kind of a similar thing.

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 4>This is elon against global alliances. So NATO, like UH,

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:04.439
<v Speaker 4>NATO and the United Nations. So so he a you know,

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 4>roughly we've been using this measure for about eighty years.

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:11.640
<v Speaker 4>The UN was the UN founded about seventy seventy five

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 4>years ago. He responded to a blue check tweet saying

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 4>it's time to leave NATO and the UN, saying I agree,

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 4>So so strike one for leaving the UN. Okay, no

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:29.159
<v Speaker 4>response from the UN, as know just yet.

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 2>The Secretary General didn't decide to chime in. Okay, So

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 2>he's taking on GDP, NATO, the UN. He also seems

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 2>to be Now this is a much more or do

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 2>you have any more? Because I actually have him in

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 2>there a zillion fail. Can I give you to give

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:46.719
<v Speaker 2>you the two most geopolitically high concept Can I give

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 2>you one that's just sort of more of an old

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 2>school brawl. Yes, But the other side hasn't taken the

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 2>pit yet, and it is Elon Musk versus Mike Myers. Now,

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 2>did anybody or did everybody see the Saturday Night Live skit?

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:01.919
<v Speaker 2>They saw the Mic Myer Mike Myers doing Elon. We

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 2>have a we have an audio clip, and I don't

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 2>actually see it. All right, magnus hit us with the clip.

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:07.400
<v Speaker 3>I've watched it.

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 2>I really enjoy everything you're doing with dough Gelong. They're

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 2>saying I'm firing people with no cools, but I do

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 2>have caols. It's cools. I feel like glitch now. I

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 2>myself thought it was pretty damn funny. Elon did not.

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 2>I believe Elon's ekes was. Uh. Humor fails when it lies, you.

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 4>Know, I gotta I guess I have to add my

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 4>abstract feud list to Elon Musk Versus Humor. Now, just

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 4>to critique the Myers performance for a minute.

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh, so you're with Musk. It's match Chapion and Elon

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Musk versus Mike Myers.

0:28:56.880 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 4>I think the accent needs a little work probably, I

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 4>thought were strong, and the kind of the way he

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 4>sort of presented Musks kind of manic, you know, you know,

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 4>pinballing from like joking, not joking, that whole thing like

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 4>that felt very true. And then the kind of dynamic

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 4>between Musk and Trump was was was quite funny.

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 2>No, it was, it was brilliant, and they turned it

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 2>around really quickly. Although no Max disapproves of the accent.

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 2>I will note Max one final point on Mike Myers.

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 2>He being Canadian and all, he had a T shirt

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 2>on which I had not realized initially that red Canada

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 2>is not for sale. Okay, so State of the Union

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 2>is just a few hours from now. For those listening

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 2>immediately once the pod, it's what should be about, sorry,

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 2>State of the Union? Trump will address Congress. Musk almost certainly.

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean the first buddy's got to be there. What's

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 2>he wearing, Max Chafkin.

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 4>Oh man, I mean, he's clearly gonna wear his kind

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 4>of weird like Oval office get up, the you got

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 4>the dark maga.

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 2>He's not gonna go dressed up as Zelenski.

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 4>The sports coat, the text support or other novelty.

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 2>T shirt, dopacle, dressed down dark trouser.

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:19.719
<v Speaker 4>The question is how many Musk children?

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:19.959
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 2>That's so you're your ex is definitely there. The question

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 2>is who which of Ex's siblings joins?

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 4>If X is not there, I would be shocked.

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 2>You're turning it off. No X, I'm not watching. Okay,

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 2>that's what you got there.

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm super curious to see who Musk sits with, Like

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 3>is he sitting with the cabinet? Is he sitting with

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:42.719
<v Speaker 3>his mom? Is he sitting with like Republican members of Congress? Like?

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 3>I want the seating chart of like the chamber.

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the thing we really should be looking at,

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 4>especially for people who are interested in kind of Musk's

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 4>future here within the Trump administration is how Trump talks

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 4>about it. How enthusiastic does Trump praise Elon? How big

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 4>on Doge is he? Did you see any efforts to

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 4>Hedge or anything like that? You know, though, those are

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 4>going to be questions for me, although based on the

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 4>body language and everything we've seen recently, I would you know.

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 4>It seems like Trump will probably tout it as one

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 4>of his ears.

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 2>My out of the out of the box guess is

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 2>that Hedge is so great that he keeps Elon out

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 2>of the room.

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 3>What what did you say, keeps him out of the west?

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Take them? You know, Elon doesn't show up out

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 2>of the room.

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 4>Room.

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 3>David Elon is addressing Republican members of Congress before the

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 3>State of the.

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:42.959
<v Speaker 2>Union like this is this is this is about as

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 2>good as my Kentucky Derby is uh m, what's his

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 2>name again? Your mcpatrick by the way, he's hurt, right mcpatrick,

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 2>But he's he runs this Saturday. He's back off the

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 2>bench this Saturday. Tampa Bay Downs. It's five o'clock. I'll

0:31:56.080 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 2>be watching right, okay, Max, Danna, thank you as always.

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 4>Great to be here.

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:01.479
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 2>This episode was produced by Stacy Wong. Anna Maserakas is

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 2>our editor, and Rayhan Harmanci our senior editor. Blake Maples

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 2>handles engineering, and Dave Procell fact checks. Our supervising producer

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 2>is Magnus Henrickson. The Elon Inc. Theme is written and

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 2>performed by Taka Yasuzawa and Alex Sugi Eira. Brendan Francis

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Newnham is our executive producer, and Sage Bauman is the

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 2>head of Bloomberg Podcasts. A big thanks as always to

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 2>our supporters Joel Weber and Brad Stone. I'm David Papadopolis.

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 2>If you have a minute, rate and review our show.

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 2>It'll help other listeners find us, see you next week.