WEBVTT - Conquering Roads and Trails with Peloton's Susie Chan

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:03.870
<v Susie Chan>I just  thought  maybe  I  could  do  this.  I didn't think I  definitely  can 

0:00:03.870 --> 0:00:07.470
<v Susie Chan>do  this,  and  that  was  enough  for  me  to give it a go. So  if 

0:00:07.470 --> 0:00:09.420
<v Susie Chan>you  have  any  sort  of  sense  of  adventure,  or  just trying to 

0:00:09.750 --> 0:00:12.030
<v Susie Chan>do  something  which  is  a  little  bit  out  of  your 

0:00:12.030 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Susie Chan>comfort  zone,  just  give  it  a  go.

0:00:19.230 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Hey,  everybody,  and  welcome  to  Set  the  Pace,  the  official 

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:26.070
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>podcast  of  New  York  Road  Runners,  presented  by  Peloton.  I'm 

0:00:26.070 --> 0:00:28.350
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>your  host,  Rob  Simmelkjaer,  the  CEO  of  New  York  Road 

0:00:28.350 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Runners.  And  with  me week in,  week  out,  my  co- host,  Peloton 

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:37.530
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>instructor,  and  currently  my  coach,  Becs  Gentry.  Hello,  Becs,  how 

0:00:37.530 --> 0:00:37.740
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>are  you?

0:00:37.740 --> 0:00:40.470
<v Becs Gentry>Hello.  I'm  good.  How  are  you  doing?

0:00:40.620 --> 0:00:41.970
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>I'm  doing  great.  I  feel  really good.

0:00:41.971 --> 0:00:43.290
<v Becs Gentry>Okay,  good.

0:00:43.290 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>We'll  talk about  my  training  in  a  little  bit.

0:00:44.970 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Becs Gentry>We  will.

0:00:45.180 --> 0:00:50.100
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>I'm  feeling  really,  really  good,  and  the  weather  has  been 

0:00:50.100 --> 0:00:51.750
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>nice  around  here  lately.

0:00:51.750 --> 0:00:52.380
<v Becs Gentry>Yes,  finally.

0:00:52.380 --> 0:00:55.380
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>God,  it  just  cooled  off  a  bit.  The  air  quality's 

0:00:55.380 --> 0:00:59.550
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>not  ideal  with  some  of  what's  left,  I  guess,  from 

0:00:59.550 --> 0:01:01.890
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>the  Canadian  fires.  You  can  see  it  in  the  air, 

0:01:01.890 --> 0:01:04.470
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>but  I  don't  know,  it  hasn't  bothered  me  this  year, 

0:01:04.470 --> 0:01:07.470
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>as  it  was  last  year.  I've  been  feeling  pretty  good, 

0:01:07.470 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>and  we've  had  some  good  enough  weather,  I  think  a 

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:12.569
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>lot  of  people  have  been  feeling  good  with  the  running. 

0:01:12.569 --> 0:01:13.830
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>What  about  you,  have you  been  getting  out?

0:01:14.190 --> 0:01:19.140
<v Becs Gentry>I  have  not.  Today  was  my  first  run  since  last 

0:01:19.140 --> 0:01:21.541
<v Becs Gentry>Wednesday,  so  nearly  a  week  of  no  running.

0:01:21.541 --> 0:01:21.542
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Wow.

0:01:21.542 --> 0:01:25.919
<v Becs Gentry>It  was  fantastic.  Yeah,  we  went  away  to  Canada  actually, 

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.310
<v Becs Gentry>we  went  to  Lake  Simcoe  on  Thursday,  for  a  big 

0:01:29.310 --> 0:01:34.230
<v Becs Gentry>family  summer  get- together.  There's  like  16  of  us  who 

0:01:34.230 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Becs Gentry>go.  And  we  just  did  water  sports,  so  if  I'm 

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:43.170
<v Becs Gentry>honest,  my  back  and  shoulders  and  arms  are  really  sore 

0:01:43.260 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Becs Gentry>from  wake  surfing  and  paddleboarding  and  kayaking,  all of  the  water 

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:52.950
<v Becs Gentry>sports.  So it  was  fantastic  to  do  other  things  rather  than 

0:01:52.950 --> 0:01:53.790
<v Becs Gentry>the  regular  running.

0:01:54.090 --> 0:01:57.330
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>You  are  having  a  great  summer,  with  the  running  that 

0:01:57.330 --> 0:02:00.270
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>you  do,  obviously,  is  part  of  your  job,  but  hey, 

0:02:00.540 --> 0:02:04.470
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>you  clearly  deserve  some  time  just  running a  little  here  and 

0:02:04.470 --> 0:02:07.380
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>there,  given  all  you've  done.  It  seems  really  smart  and 

0:02:07.380 --> 0:02:10.530
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>healthy,  and  I  love  hearing  that  for  you.  It  sounds 

0:02:10.530 --> 0:02:13.380
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>amazing,  and  what's  better  than  being  in  a  lake  doing 

0:02:13.380 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>a  little  water  skiing.

0:02:13.920 --> 0:02:17.970
<v Becs Gentry>Exactly.  Yeah,  it's  funny  because  you  get  so  tied  up 

0:02:18.030 --> 0:02:20.850
<v Becs Gentry>in  running,  as  a  runner.  As  somebody  who  is  a 

0:02:20.850 --> 0:02:23.550
<v Becs Gentry>hobby  runner,  yes,  it's  part  of  my  job,  but  I 

0:02:23.550 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Becs Gentry>love  it  too.  And  I  don't  do  other  things,  I 

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Becs Gentry>just  do  running,  and  life's  too  short  for  that,  for 

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.730
<v Becs Gentry>me  personally.  Just  being  there  on  that  lake,  I  could 

0:02:32.730 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Becs Gentry>have  got  up  and  went  for  a  run.  I  took 

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.530
<v Becs Gentry>my  running  stuff  with  me. I was  in  a  beautiful  location,  but 

0:02:37.590 --> 0:02:39.419
<v Becs Gentry>instead  I  was  like, " You  know  what  I  want  to 

0:02:39.419 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Becs Gentry>do?  I  want  to  go  for  a  paddleboard  before  Tallulah 

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Becs Gentry>wakes  up,  because  I  can.  It's  right  there."  We  were 

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.750
<v Becs Gentry>on  the  lake  with  a  dock,  and  I can't  do  that 

0:02:48.750 --> 0:02:50.220
<v Becs Gentry>in  New  York.  I  can  go  for  a  run  in 

0:02:50.220 --> 0:02:52.980
<v Becs Gentry>New  York.  So  it's  just  that,  to  me,  is  shifting 

0:02:52.980 --> 0:02:59.910
<v Becs Gentry>your  mindset  of  use  your  fitness  to  enjoy  other  activities 

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.660
<v Becs Gentry>when  you're  not  training  for  stuff.  It's  been  really  lovely.

0:03:03.930 --> 0:03:07.500
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>I  love  that.  I  actually  love  that.  It's  beautiful.  I 

0:03:07.500 --> 0:03:10.020
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>played  a  little  golf  myself,  for  a  couple  days  this 

0:03:10.020 --> 0:03:11.970
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>week,  which  I  hadn't  done  much  of  lately.

0:03:14.010 --> 0:03:14.401
<v Becs Gentry>Good  core  workout.

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:16.350
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>It's not a lot of... Yeah, a good core workout.  Definitely  the  twisting  is  good.

0:03:16.350 --> 0:03:16.410
<v Becs Gentry>Yeah.

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>I  walked  too, so a lot of  time  on  feet,  which  was  good,  but 

0:03:20.790 --> 0:03:22.530
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>had  to  get  back  to  the  running  pretty  quickly.  We'll 

0:03:22.530 --> 0:03:24.750
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>talk  about  that  in  a  little  bit.  We  had  a 

0:03:24.750 --> 0:03:28.889
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>nice  day  in  Harlem  this  past  weekend,  the  Percy  Sutton 

0:03:28.889 --> 0:03:33.959
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Harlem  5K.  The  weather  was  so  nice  for  the  runners 

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:35.970
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>in  Harlem.  It  was  so  great  to  see,  because  that's 

0:03:35.970 --> 0:03:38.580
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>been  a  hot  race,  as  you  can  imagine,  in  August, 

0:03:38.940 --> 0:03:41.820
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>up  in  Harlem,  but  it  was  a  gorgeous  day.  On 

0:03:41.820 --> 0:03:45.630
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>the  men's  side,  Ryan  Couch  was  the  winner,  14: 58. Khia Kurtenbach 

0:03:45.630 --> 0:03:50.460
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>on  the  women's  side, 16: 49.  Non- binary  Jack  Marley  Payne, 

0:03:50.460 --> 0:03:54.150
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>19:35.  But  I  think  the  best  part  of  the  day, 

0:03:54.150 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Becs, is  for  New  York  Road  Runners,  this  is  such  a 

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:01.980
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>special  event,  because  all  of  our  programs  are  on  beautiful 

0:04:01.980 --> 0:04:05.790
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>display  at  the  Percy  Sutton  Harlem  5K.  Not  only  did 

0:04:05.790 --> 0:04:09.750
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>we  have  the  race  with 5, 000  runners,  we  had  the 

0:04:09.750 --> 0:04:14.370
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Run  for  the  Future  girls  doing  their  big  graduation  5K. 

0:04:14.370 --> 0:04:18.300
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>This is  a  group  of  50  young  women,  high  school- aged, 

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.060
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>rising  for  this  fall,  and  none  of  them  had  ever 

0:04:21.060 --> 0:04:23.700
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>really  been  runners  before.
 They  had  been  training  with  their 

0:04:23.700 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>run  buddies  and  their  mentors  all  summer  long,  and  they 

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:31.740
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>graduate  at  the  Percy  Sutton  Harlem  5K. And they  did  a  phenomenal 

0:04:32.010 --> 0:04:34.260
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>job.  As  you  know,  that's  a  hard  course,  that  race 

0:04:34.260 --> 0:04:37.410
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>course, that's  some  really  big  hills  there,  especially  in  mile  two, 

0:04:37.770 --> 0:04:40.980
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>but  they  did  a  phenomenal  job.  And  Becs,  seeing  the 

0:04:40.980 --> 0:04:44.460
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>look  of  pride  on  these  girls'  faces  as  they  finished 

0:04:44.460 --> 0:04:47.099
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>this,  and  they  got  their  medals,  and  posed  for  pictures, 

0:04:47.430 --> 0:04:51.029
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>it  was  awesome,  and  it's  a  beautiful  program  we  have 

0:04:51.029 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>at  New  York  Road  Runners,  so  I  really  enjoyed  seeing 

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:55.229
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>them,  hanging  out  with  all  of  them  before  and  after 

0:04:55.230 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>the  race,  and  that  was  thrilling.  And  then  we  also 

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>had  races  for  all  the  kids.  We  had  stage  one, 

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.930
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>two,  and  three  races  happening  in  Harlem,  plus  we  had 

0:05:03.930 --> 0:05:07.050
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>our  Striders  out  there  as  well,  our  older  adults  doing 

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:11.250
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>their  walking  thing.  They  walked  a 1. 5- mile  course,  and 

0:05:11.250 --> 0:05:15.299
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>it  was  the  15th  anniversary  celebration  of the  Striders  program  as 

0:05:15.300 --> 0:05:18.779
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>well.  So  it  was  just  an  awesome  day  for  everything 

0:05:18.779 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>that  we  do  at  New  York  Road  Runners.

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:24.990
<v Becs Gentry>Oh, I love all of the celebrations and all of the joy.  What  a  perfect  weekend.

0:05:29.070 --> 0:05:31.529
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Now,  I  was  able  to  take  a  Saturday  off.  I 

0:05:31.529 --> 0:05:33.810
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>did  not  run  Harlem,  because  I  did  my  long  run 

0:05:33.810 --> 0:05:36.750
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>on  Friday,  Becs,  and  I  have  to  say  it  went 

0:05:36.779 --> 0:05:40.409
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>pretty  well.  Becs  had  prescribed  a  14- miler  for  me 

0:05:40.950 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>last  week.  I  did  it  on  Friday  morning,  beautiful  weather, 

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:48.180
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>and  it  was  good.  I  felt  really  good.  I  stayed, 

0:05:48.180 --> 0:05:50.339
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>more or  less,  at  my  marathon  pace.  This is  one  thing  I 

0:05:50.339 --> 0:05:52.710
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>wanted  to  talk  to  you  about,  which  is  pacing  for 

0:05:52.710 --> 0:05:56.850
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>long  runs.  Because  when  I  had  previously  trained  for  marathons, 

0:05:56.850 --> 0:05:59.910
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>most  of  my  long  runs  were  just  at  an  easy 

0:05:59.910 --> 0:06:04.350
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>pace.  I  really  hadn't  focused  that  much  on  pacing  in 

0:06:04.350 --> 0:06:07.860
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>my  long  runs  before,  which  probably  was  not  a  good 

0:06:07.860 --> 0:06:10.980
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>thing.
 And  so  you  gave  me  an  assignment  to  run 

0:06:10.980 --> 0:06:14.610
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>14  miles  at  my  marathon  pace.  I  kind  of  alternated 

0:06:14.610 --> 0:06:16.470
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>off  that  a  little.  I  did  about  three  miles  at 

0:06:16.470 --> 0:06:18.900
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>marathon  pace,  then  slowed  a  bit,  then  another  three  at 

0:06:18.900 --> 0:06:21.510
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>marathon  pace,  then  slowed  a  bit.  But  I  had  some 

0:06:21.510 --> 0:06:24.390
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>really  good  sustained  periods.  I  was  actually  a  little  faster 

0:06:24.390 --> 0:06:27.089
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>than  my  marathon  pace  for  most  of  those  kind  of 

0:06:27.089 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>pickups,  which  was  good,  but  then  I  would  drop  back 

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:31.950
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>a  bit.  Can  you  talk  to  runners  out  there  about, 

0:06:32.250 --> 0:06:35.310
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>for  the  long  runs,  for  the  most  part,  how  much 

0:06:35.310 --> 0:06:38.910
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>should  they  be  focused  on  running  at  that  marathon  pace? 

0:06:38.910 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Should it be for  the  whole  long  run  typically,  should  they  be  picking 

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:47.550
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>out  bits  and  pieces  of  two,  three  miles  per  push, 

0:06:47.550 --> 0:06:49.500
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>let's  say?  What  do  you  really  recommend?

0:06:49.830 --> 0:06:52.380
<v Becs Gentry>I  personally,  and  this  is  every  coach  is  different,  I 

0:06:52.380 --> 0:06:56.670
<v Becs Gentry>personally  prescribe  my  runners  to  run  all  their  long  runs 

0:06:56.730 --> 0:07:00.510
<v Becs Gentry>at  their  goal  marathon  pace.  You  actually  hit  it.  You 

0:07:00.510 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Becs Gentry>were  fine,  even  though  you  did some fast and  some  slow.

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:02.041
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Net-net, I did. Yeah, net-net, I did, because my average was below.

0:07:02.041 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Becs Gentry>You did.  Your  average  pace  was-

0:07:05.580 --> 0:07:05.580
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Yeah, just under eight minutes a mile.

0:07:05.580 --> 0:07:09.989
<v Becs Gentry>I gave you  15- second  window  to  fill  it  in.  And  that's 

0:07:09.989 --> 0:07:13.710
<v Becs Gentry>the  thing,  is  to  me,  it's  more  about  offering  a 

0:07:13.710 --> 0:07:16.770
<v Becs Gentry>window  of  pace  range  for  my  runners  on  those  long 

0:07:16.770 --> 0:07:19.830
<v Becs Gentry>runs  so  they  get  used  to  having  a  little  bit 

0:07:19.830 --> 0:07:23.490
<v Becs Gentry>of  variability.  Now,  the  only  time  I  would  do  something 

0:07:23.490 --> 0:07:25.860
<v Becs Gentry>a  bit  different  to  that,  would  be  for  an  advanced 

0:07:25.860 --> 0:07:29.700
<v Becs Gentry>runner  who  is  looking  to  shave  time  off  their  previous 

0:07:29.700 --> 0:07:34.230
<v Becs Gentry>marathon  finish  time,  and  I  would  prescribe  something  more  along 

0:07:34.230 --> 0:07:37.590
<v Becs Gentry>the  lines  of  a  tempo  versus  marathon  run  in  their 

0:07:37.590 --> 0:07:41.250
<v Becs Gentry>long  run.  It's  pretty  disgusting.  It's  the  kind  of  workouts 

0:07:41.250 --> 0:07:43.710
<v Becs Gentry>I  did  when  I  was  training  for  the  Olympic  trials. 

0:07:43.770 --> 0:07:46.260
<v Becs Gentry>It  was  mile  at  tempo,  mile  at  marathon,  mile  at 

0:07:46.260 --> 0:07:49.020
<v Becs Gentry>tempo,  mile  at  marathon  for  up  to  21  miles.  It 

0:07:49.020 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Becs Gentry>was  brutal,  but  it  got  my  turnover  so  much  stronger, 

0:07:54.630 --> 0:07:57.780
<v Becs Gentry>not  just  that,  it  got  my  confidence  stronger.
 So  already, 

0:07:57.780 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Becs Gentry>you  already  said  that.  You  didn't  mean  to  say  it, 

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Becs Gentry>but  you  already  said  it in  your  description  of  your  run,  was "

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.460
<v Becs Gentry>I  was  actually  faster  than  my  marathon  pace  in  one 

0:08:05.460 --> 0:08:08.250
<v Becs Gentry>of  them."  So  netting  it  out,  if  you'd  have  just 

0:08:08.250 --> 0:08:12.420
<v Becs Gentry>stayed  on  a  progressive  run  within  that  15- second  window, 

0:08:13.020 --> 0:08:15.150
<v Becs Gentry>you  would've  been  fine  because  you  have  it  in  you. 

0:08:15.570 --> 0:08:19.980
<v Becs Gentry>But  sometimes  just  getting  that  marathon  pace  in  every  weekend 

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:24.810
<v Becs Gentry>is  all  people  need  in  their  mind  to  be  ready 

0:08:24.810 --> 0:08:28.710
<v Becs Gentry>to  hit  that  26.2  miles  at  their  goal  pace.  And 

0:08:29.940 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Becs Gentry>no  shade  to  anyone  who  doesn't  do  this,  I  hate 

0:08:33.210 --> 0:08:37.740
<v Becs Gentry>that  some  people  prescribe  marathon  pace  only  for  shorter  runs, 

0:08:38.070 --> 0:08:40.410
<v Becs Gentry>because  when  people  get  to  that  start  line,  how  on 

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:43.950
<v Becs Gentry>Earth  are  they  supposed  to  understand  the  discomfort  of  running 

0:08:44.100 --> 0:08:48.179
<v Becs Gentry>26.2  miles  at  their  goal  pace  if  they  have  never 

0:08:48.330 --> 0:08:53.940
<v Becs Gentry>run  26.2  miles,  or  near  it,  at  a  similar  pace?


0:08:53.940 --> 0:08:55.980
<v Becs Gentry>It's  just  not  fair  in  my  mind.  And  I've  run 

0:08:55.980 --> 0:09:01.589
<v Becs Gentry>a  fair  few  races  to  understand  disappointment  and  discomfort,  and 

0:09:01.590 --> 0:09:05.370
<v Becs Gentry>you  don't  need  to  go  into  that  setting  people  up 

0:09:05.580 --> 0:09:08.340
<v Becs Gentry>for  discomfort.  So  as  these  weeks  roll  on,  you've  got 

0:09:08.340 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Becs Gentry>16  at it  this  weekend,  steady  cruise,  it's  just  about  building 

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Becs Gentry>you,  and  you'll  see  that  your  weeks  are  not  overloaded 

0:09:15.660 --> 0:09:19.530
<v Becs Gentry>with  other  things.  Your  workout,  your  speed  workouts,  for  example, 

0:09:19.530 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Becs Gentry>aren't  long  and  really,  really  demanding,  they're  just  about  pickup 

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:26.699
<v Becs Gentry>and  turnover,  and  the  real  focus  is  your  long  run, 

0:09:26.700 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Becs Gentry>because  you're  going  for  a  hopeful  time  here.

0:09:29.790 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Yeah,  I  really  like  the  approach.  It's  definitely  something  new 

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:37.590
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>for  me,  but  it  makes  sense.  I  mean,  you know  the 

0:09:37.590 --> 0:09:40.890
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>race  environment  is  going  to  give  you  something  extra,  right? 

0:09:40.890 --> 0:09:43.530
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>You're  going  to  have  a  little  more  adrenaline,  a  little 

0:09:43.530 --> 0:09:46.740
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>more  speed,  just  from  being  in  a  race,  but  it 

0:09:46.740 --> 0:09:49.890
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>comes  down  to  how  much  you're  going  to  rely  on 

0:09:49.890 --> 0:09:53.550
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>that  race  adrenaline  fr  on  race  day,  right?  Because  you 

0:09:53.550 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>don't  want  to  over  rely  on  that.  If  your  body 

0:09:56.730 --> 0:10:01.050
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>hasn't  done  the  work,  hasn't  done  the  15  miles  at 

0:10:01.050 --> 0:10:05.609
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>marathon  pace  to  20, 22  miles,  yeah,  I  guess  really  the 

0:10:05.610 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>question  is  how  can  you  expect  it  to  do  it 

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>on  marathon  day? And  so  I  know  there's  different  philosophies  of 

0:10:12.270 --> 0:10:15.090
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>how  much,  maybe  it's  pick  up,  drop  back,  pick  up, 

0:10:15.090 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>drop  back,  but  at  least  you've  done  long,  long  mileage 

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:21.540
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>with  a  sustained  amount  of  time  at  your  marathon  pace 

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:23.429
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>so  that  you  know  it's  in  you.

0:10:23.850 --> 0:10:25.770
<v Becs Gentry>Yes,  you  do.  You  got  to  know it's in you.

0:10:26.670 --> 0:10:27.959
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>I  love  it.  I  really  love  it.

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:28.020
<v Becs Gentry>Yeah.

0:10:28.020 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>The speed work  went  well  this  morning.  I  still  had  to  go 

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.199
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>out on  the  track.  I  still  have  not  gotten  myself  onto 

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:36.929
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>the  treadmill,  but  it  was  better  for  me  today.  I 

0:10:36.929 --> 0:10:39.330
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>felt  better  on  the  track.  It  was  beautiful.  Plus  I 

0:10:39.330 --> 0:10:40.949
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>got  my  daughter,  Julia,  to  come  out  and  do  some 

0:10:40.949 --> 0:10:44.790
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>speed  work  with me this morning, and that's definitely not happening than a  treadmill.

0:10:44.790 --> 0:10:48.449
<v Becs Gentry>That's  so  sweet. But they  were  longer  efforts.  When  you're  talking  more 

0:10:48.450 --> 0:10:52.500
<v Becs Gentry>like  the  shorter  ones,  that  can  be  fun  on  the 

0:10:52.500 --> 0:10:54.330
<v Becs Gentry>tread.  It can  be  fun  on  the  track,  as  you  say. 

0:10:54.330 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Becs Gentry>As  long  as  you  get out and do it, I don't care. Get  it  done  on  the  tread, 

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Becs Gentry>on  the  track,  on  the  road,  you  do  it,  wherever 

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:01.710
<v Becs Gentry>it  takes  you.

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:04.890
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>It  was  so  much  fun,  so  things  going  well  from 

0:11:04.890 --> 0:11:06.809
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>now.  We  will  keep  things  going,  and  I'll  keep  you 

0:11:06.809 --> 0:11:10.260
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>updated  as  I  work  towards  Chicago.  And  of  course,  so 

0:11:10.260 --> 0:11:13.050
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>many  of  you  working  towards  the  TCS  New  York  City 

0:11:13.050 --> 0:11:17.010
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Marathon  a  few  weeks  after  my  run  in  early  November. 

0:11:17.010 --> 0:11:19.980
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Well,  coming  up  on  today's  show,  we  have  a  colleague 

0:11:19.980 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>of  Becs  is  truly  amazing.  Susie  Chan,  she  runs  in 

0:11:25.350 --> 0:11:30.300
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>deserts,  she  runs  in  jungle,  she  has  run  Badlands,  and 

0:11:30.300 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>she  runs  of  course,  on  the  treadmill  with  Becs  at 

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:36.780
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Peloton.  She  just  celebrated  her  50th  birthday,  and  it  seems 

0:11:36.780 --> 0:11:39.090
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>she's  just  getting  started.  She's  going  to  tell  us  all 

0:11:39.090 --> 0:11:43.230
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>about  her  adventures  and  her  book  as  well.  Then  our 

0:11:43.260 --> 0:11:46.260
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>friend,  Meb  Keflezighi,  will  be  here  with  today's  featured  member, 

0:11:46.530 --> 0:11:51.179
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Margaret  Schwartz.  Margaret  ran  20  consecutive  TCS  New  York  City 

0:11:51.179 --> 0:11:54.809
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Marathons,  but  lately,  she's  decided  to  tread  some  new  ground. 

0:11:55.050 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>She'll  be  here  to  tell  us  what  she  has  learned 

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>along  the  way.
 And  we've  got  a  special  Meb  Minute 

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>with  HSS  today,  the  hospital  for  special  surgery,  Chrysta Irolla,  director 

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.599
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>of  HSS's  world- class  Prosthetics  and  Orthotics  service,  is  here 

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:12.210
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>with  expert  tips  on  how  to  get  the  right  shoes 

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:16.589
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>and  inserts  to  run  more  efficiently.
 Ready  to  see  real 

0:12:16.590 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>results?  Try  the  Peloton  app  for  free  and  get  expert-

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:24.540
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>designed  running  programs  that  build  speed,  strength,  and  endurance.  Run 

0:12:24.540 --> 0:12:28.170
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>outdoors  with  real- time  coaching,  as  instructors  guide  your  form 

0:12:28.410 --> 0:12:31.650
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>and  pace  every  step  of  the  way.  Plus  strength  for 

0:12:31.650 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Runners,  a  program  built  to  help  runners  boost  muscle  and 

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>prevent  injury,  complements  your  training  so  you  can  crush  your 

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>goals  even  faster.  Try  the  app  for  free  for  30 

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:43.949
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>days,  and  download  it  now  from  the  app  store  or 

0:12:43.950 --> 0:12:48.270
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Google  Play.  Terms  apply.  Peloton,  the  official  digital  fitness  partner 

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:53.370
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>of  New  York  Road  Runners.
 Our guest  today  is  British  ultramarathon 

0:12:53.370 --> 0:12:58.530
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>runner,  and  Becs'  fellow  Peloton  tread  instructor,  Susie  Chan.  Susie 

0:12:58.530 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>didn't  start  running  until  she  was  35  years  old,  when 

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.780
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>her  brother  convinced  her  to  join  him  for  a  half-

0:13:03.780 --> 0:13:07.590
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>marathon.  Six  months  later,  she  ran  her  first  full  marathon 

0:13:07.590 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>in  Paris,  and  since  then,  she's  completed  about  20  marathons, 

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>including  all  six  original  Abbott  World  Marathon  majors.  But,  like 

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>so  many  people  we  have  spoken  to  here  on  Set 

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>the  Pace,  26.2  miles  just  wasn't  enough  for  Susie.  She 

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.700
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>kept  going,  went  on  to  conquer  the  Marathon  des  Sables, 

0:13:26.700 --> 0:13:31.890
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>a  six- day,  250- kilometer  race  through  the  Sahara  Desert, 

0:13:32.340 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>and  set  a  world  record  by  running 68. 54  miles  on 

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:40.650
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>a  treadmill  in  12  hours.  That  is  like  my  all-

0:13:40.650 --> 0:13:42.630
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>time  worst  nightmare,  I  can't  wait  to  hear  how  she 

0:13:42.630 --> 0:13:46.530
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>did  this.  She  also  made  ultramarathon  running  history  as  the 

0:13:46.530 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>first  European  woman  to  finish  all  three  Badwater  Ultramarathon  races in 

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:54.329
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>the  same  year.  And  along  the  way,  she's  overcome  serious 

0:13:54.330 --> 0:13:58.650
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>challenges,  including  a  thyroid  cancer  diagnosis  shortly  after  running  the 

0:13:58.650 --> 0:14:02.939
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Chicago  Marathon.
 Susie's  also,  as  if  this  wasn't  enough,  an  award-

0:14:02.940 --> 0:14:06.900
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>winning  author.  Her  book,  Trails  and  Tribulations,  the  Running  Adventures 

0:14:06.900 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>of  Susie  Chan,  won  Sports  Performance  book  of  the  year 

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:16.890
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>at the  2025  Charles  Tyrwhitt  Sports  Book  Awards.  Susie,  what  is 

0:14:16.890 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>wrong  with  you?  You  can't  seem  to  stop  doing  things, 

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:21.210
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>are  you  okay?

0:14:21.420 --> 0:14:23.700
<v Susie Chan>No,  I  don't  know  if  I  am.  Do  you  know 

0:14:23.700 --> 0:14:26.700
<v Susie Chan>what,  it's  not  until  actually  I  wrote  the  book,  and 

0:14:26.700 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Susie Chan>I  was  forced  to  reflect,  because I'm  very  much  a  forward-

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:33.030
<v Susie Chan>looking  person,  and I  was  forced  to  sort  of  think  about 

0:14:33.030 --> 0:14:35.820
<v Susie Chan>all  the  things  I've  done.  It  was like, "Oh,  actually,  I  have 

0:14:35.820 --> 0:14:38.190
<v Susie Chan>been  quite  busy,  haven't  I?"  And  also,  some  of  the 

0:14:38.190 --> 0:14:41.910
<v Susie Chan>things,  hearing  them  back  like  that,  it  doesn't  sound  like 

0:14:41.910 --> 0:14:46.170
<v Susie Chan>me.  I  don't  know  genuinely,  how  I  did  some  of those 

0:14:46.350 --> 0:14:49.170
<v Susie Chan>things  now,  because  as I'm  a  little  bit  older,  I'm  a 

0:14:49.170 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Susie Chan>little  bit  slower,  things are a  little  bit  harder  when  I'm  running, 

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Susie Chan>and  then  I'm  like, " How  did  I  do  those  things?" 

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:59.910
<v Susie Chan>So  yeah,  I've  been  very,  very  lucky,  very  privileged,  and 

0:14:59.910 --> 0:15:03.450
<v Susie Chan>I've  seen  the  world  through  running  around  on  my  two 

0:15:03.450 --> 0:15:07.710
<v Susie Chan>feet.  And  I  think  overall,  largely  loved  it  all.  There 

0:15:07.710 --> 0:15:11.550
<v Susie Chan>were  some  low  moments,  as  runners  experience,  but  what  a  journey.

0:15:11.940 --> 0:15:13.770
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>All  right,  so  I  don't  know  where  to  start.  I 

0:15:13.770 --> 0:15:16.290
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>guess,  let's  start  at  the  start.  So  you  run  a  half-

0:15:16.290 --> 0:15:21.330
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>marathon  with  your  brother,  and  did  that  trigger  something  in 

0:15:21.330 --> 0:15:23.070
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>you?  You  hadn't  really  been  a  runner,  right,  so  did 

0:15:23.070 --> 0:15:26.010
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>you  feel  all  of  a  sudden,  through  the  process  of 

0:15:26.250 --> 0:15:28.950
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>training  for  and  running  that  half,  that, " Oh,  my  God, 

0:15:28.950 --> 0:15:30.060
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>this  is  what  I  meant  to  do?"

0:15:30.540 --> 0:15:32.370
<v Susie Chan>It  was  a  bit  of  a  delayed  reaction,  I'm  going 

0:15:32.370 --> 0:15:35.070
<v Susie Chan>to  say.  I  didn't  really  want  to  run.  I  didn't 

0:15:35.310 --> 0:15:38.250
<v Susie Chan>have  any  interest  in it.  It  sounded  awful.  And  I  used 

0:15:38.250 --> 0:15:40.050
<v Susie Chan>to  sit  at  home  and  watch  London  Marathon  when  it 

0:15:40.050 --> 0:15:42.900
<v Susie Chan>came  on  my  TV,  in  awe  of  what  they  were 

0:15:42.900 --> 0:15:46.410
<v Susie Chan>doing,  but  not  really  having  any  comprehension  of  how  far 

0:15:46.410 --> 0:15:48.270
<v Susie Chan>that  is,  and  how  much  work  you  have  to  do 

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Susie Chan>to  get  there.  But  I was in a bit of a  rough  patch  in  my  life. 

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:53.670
<v Susie Chan>I  was  drinking  too  much.  I  was  a  smoker.  I was in 

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:57.330
<v Susie Chan>a  bit  of  a  life  rut.  I  hadn't  had  much 

0:15:57.330 --> 0:15:59.430
<v Susie Chan>money,  I  was  a  single  mom.  And  I  think  my 

0:15:59.430 --> 0:16:02.340
<v Susie Chan>brother  could  sort  of  identify  that  within  me,  and  he 

0:16:02.340 --> 0:16:05.010
<v Susie Chan>wanted  to  run  his  half.  He  was  signed  in  for 

0:16:05.010 --> 0:16:08.130
<v Susie Chan>a  marathon,  he  was  like, "I'm going to do  a  bucket  list  marathon. I'm going to run a  marathon, 

0:16:08.130 --> 0:16:11.940
<v Susie Chan>tick  it  off."
 And  he  picked  a  local  half- marathon 

0:16:11.940 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Susie Chan>to  me,  to  run  as  a  training  one.  And  basically, 

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:16.650
<v Susie Chan>he  said, " Run  this  with  me,  run  this  with  me." And 

0:16:17.220 --> 0:16:19.530
<v Susie Chan>I  agreed.  I  didn't  really  know  how  far  it  was 

0:16:19.530 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Susie Chan>either.  And  I  started  training,  this  is when it was 20,  when did  we  say, 

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:27.030
<v Susie Chan>2010,  something  like  that.  And I had  no  watch. I mean,  I  didn't  have 

0:16:27.030 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Susie Chan>a  watch.  I  can  remember  trying  to  run  my  first run 

0:16:31.830 --> 0:16:33.750
<v Susie Chan>around  a  field.  It  had  two  football  pitches  in  it, 

0:16:33.750 --> 0:16:35.370
<v Susie Chan>and I  was  trying  to  run  around that  that  without  stopping,  couldn't 

0:16:35.370 --> 0:16:38.790
<v Susie Chan>do  it, and it was  just  awful.  But  because  I  had  this  goal, 

0:16:38.790 --> 0:16:41.700
<v Susie Chan>I  kept  on trying to run  a  little  bit  further,  a little  bit  further.

0:16:41.700 --> 0:16:42.150
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Yep.

0:16:42.900 --> 0:16:46.770
<v Susie Chan>And  then  race  day  came,  I  was  stood  there,  terrified. 

0:16:46.830 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Susie Chan>Looked  around,  everybody  else  knew  what  they  were  doing.  They 

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:53.190
<v Susie Chan>all  had  the gear on.  I  didn't  even  have  a  proper  running 

0:16:53.190 --> 0:16:54.541
<v Susie Chan>bra  or  running  shoes.

0:16:54.541 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Oh, man.

0:16:56.370 --> 0:16:59.250
<v Susie Chan>Oh,  honestly.  And  then  as  I  was  stood  there,  about 

0:16:59.250 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Susie Chan>five  minutes  before  the  race  started,  somebody  leaned  over  and  said, "

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.409
<v Susie Chan>Do  you  like  trail  running?" And  I  was  like, " What's  trail 

0:17:04.410 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Susie Chan>running?"  And  the  whole  thing  was  this  trail  half- marathon. 

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Susie Chan>It  was  like  off- road,  over  fences,  narrow,  up  mud. 

0:17:13.380 --> 0:17:16.650
<v Susie Chan>And  so I was so  distracted  trying  not  to  fall  over,  I'm  thinking "

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:18.900
<v Susie Chan>What  is  happening  to  me,"  up  these  hills  and  down 

0:17:18.900 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Susie Chan>these  hills. Because I'd been  running on  a  flat  road,  I  was  trying  to 

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.310
<v Susie Chan>stay  alive.  And  then  I  got  to  nine  miles, and  I  thought, "

0:17:26.310 --> 0:17:28.140
<v Susie Chan>Oh,  my  God,  I'm  going  to  run  this  half- marathon."
And then 

0:17:28.410 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Susie Chan>it  just  filled  me  with  something  which  I  hadn't  ever 

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:33.660
<v Susie Chan>experienced  before.  I  was  very  tired,  but  I  just  suddenly 

0:17:33.660 --> 0:17:35.730
<v Susie Chan>believed  I  could  do  it,  and  then  crossed  the  finish 

0:17:35.730 --> 0:17:38.130
<v Susie Chan>line.  And  then  of  course,  all  those  finish  line  feels 

0:17:38.130 --> 0:17:41.460
<v Susie Chan>that  you  get,  and  everybody  that's  had  that  first  race 

0:17:41.460 --> 0:17:44.250
<v Susie Chan>experience,  you're  on  such  a  high.  And I was on  such  a  high 

0:17:44.250 --> 0:17:47.790
<v Susie Chan>for  days  and  days,  I  thought  I  need  more  of 

0:17:47.790 --> 0:17:50.490
<v Susie Chan>this.  I  need  to  keep  running.  That's  how  it  started, 

0:17:50.490 --> 0:17:52.170
<v Susie Chan>and  then  I  went  in  pretty  hard  after  that.

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:54.389
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Yeah,  I  would  say  so.  First  of  all,  I love  that 

0:17:54.390 --> 0:17:57.630
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>you  were  running  a  trail  half- marathon and  did  not  realize 

0:17:57.630 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>it  was  a  trail  half- marathon  until  you  were at  the 

0:17:59.880 --> 0:18:00.570
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>starting  line.

0:18:00.810 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Susie Chan>No.

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:04.260
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Very  different,  very  different  experience  than  running on  the  road,  but 

0:18:04.260 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>that's  awesome.  And  you're  right,  the  focus  you  get  on 

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>a  trail  run,  sometimes  you  stop  thinking  about  the  miles 

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:11.580
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>because  you're  trying not  to  break  your  face,  yeah.

0:18:11.580 --> 0:18:13.950
<v Susie Chan>I was just looking at whatever  was  coming  next.  It was  like, " Oh,  there's  some  trees. 

0:18:13.950 --> 0:18:16.500
<v Susie Chan>Oh,  there's  some  mud."  Oh, it was  just  like  a  fence,  and it was  like, "

0:18:16.500 --> 0:18:18.151
<v Susie Chan>Oh,  gosh."  It  was  very busy in my head.

0:18:18.151 --> 0:18:22.500
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>I love it.  So  from  there,  did  your  mind  go  right  to 

0:18:22.500 --> 0:18:23.580
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>the  marathon  distance?

0:18:23.850 --> 0:18:27.510
<v Susie Chan>No,  I  then  thought, "Oh, I can run a  10K  obviously,  that's  shorter."  It's a  very 

0:18:27.510 --> 0:18:29.310
<v Susie Chan>different  kettle  of  fish  actually,  running  a  10K,  because  you 

0:18:29.310 --> 0:18:31.470
<v Susie Chan>have  to  run a  little  bit  faster.  And  then  I  did 

0:18:31.470 --> 0:18:35.790
<v Susie Chan>a  couple  of  more  half- marathons,  and  then  I  started 

0:18:35.790 --> 0:18:37.425
<v Susie Chan>to do  a  bit  more  fitness because  it  was  making  me  feel 

0:18:37.425 --> 0:18:40.470
<v Susie Chan>good,  so  I  joined  a  couple  of  little  fitness  groups, 

0:18:40.470 --> 0:18:45.510
<v Susie Chan>and  they  were  all  running  Paris  Marathon.  And  basically,  I 

0:18:45.510 --> 0:18:49.109
<v Susie Chan>was  like, " Yeah, yeah." I was  very  much " Give  it  a  go,"  like "

0:18:49.109 --> 0:18:52.619
<v Susie Chan>What's  the  worst  that  could  happen?"  I  didn't  really  overthink 

0:18:52.770 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Susie Chan>things  too  much,  which  probably  was  how  I've  ended  up 

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:57.330
<v Susie Chan>doing  some  of the  things  I'm  doing.  I'd  rather  give  it 

0:18:57.330 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Susie Chan>a  go and  maybe  fail,  than  not  experience  it,  so  I signed up 

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:05.070
<v Susie Chan>for  Paris  Marathon,  trained  so  hard  for  that,  and  came-

0:19:05.070 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>I assume  you  got  some  shoes  and  a  sports  bra, and all the things.

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.929
<v Susie Chan>I wore  the  correct  bra,  and  I  bought  some  shoes. I had  my 

0:19:12.930 --> 0:19:17.158
<v Susie Chan>gate  analyzed.  Yes, I did all the right things.  I  didn't  have  a  watch  still.  Those 

0:19:17.159 --> 0:19:20.580
<v Susie Chan>were  a  bit  expensive  for  me  back  then,  but  at 

0:19:20.580 --> 0:19:24.510
<v Susie Chan>least  I  was  dressed  more  appropriately  for  the  thing  I 

0:19:24.510 --> 0:19:27.750
<v Susie Chan>was  doing.  And  I  was  so  hell- bent  on  getting 

0:19:27.750 --> 0:19:32.070
<v Susie Chan>four  hours,  aren't  we  all, for that  first  marathon.  Trained  so  hard. 

0:19:32.070 --> 0:19:36.419
<v Susie Chan>And  I  think  I  came  at  like  407, 409,  something  like 

0:19:36.420 --> 0:19:39.209
<v Susie Chan>that. And  I  was  devastated  when  that...  I  was  just  fighting 

0:19:39.210 --> 0:19:41.100
<v Susie Chan>for  my  life  for  that  last  10  miles,  as  you 

0:19:41.100 --> 0:19:44.220
<v Susie Chan>do  in  your  first  marathon. And when  the  pacer  came  past  me, 

0:19:44.220 --> 0:19:47.250
<v Susie Chan>at  about  17  miles, and  I  just  couldn't  keep  with  him. 

0:19:47.580 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Susie Chan>And  then  I  can  remember, I thought  I  was  going  to  be 

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Susie Chan>one  and  done,  because  I  was  happy  with  my  half-

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Susie Chan>marathon  distances.  It  was  fulfilling  me  enough.
 And then I  remember  crossing 

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.260
<v Susie Chan>the  line,  thinking " I'm  going  to have to  do  this  again,  because 

0:19:58.260 --> 0:20:00.810
<v Susie Chan>I  have  to get it." Because it  was  close  enough  to  think  I can  do 

0:20:00.810 --> 0:20:04.230
<v Susie Chan>it.  And  then  just  this  is  how  it  happens,  and 

0:20:04.230 --> 0:20:06.524
<v Susie Chan>you  find  an  excuse,  don't  you,  for  every  race  that 

0:20:06.525 --> 0:20:10.139
<v Susie Chan>you  do  thereafter.  And  so  the  excuses  started  to  build, and 

0:20:10.170 --> 0:20:12.420
<v Susie Chan>so  I  did  a  marathon,  and  then  not  long  after 

0:20:12.420 --> 0:20:14.820
<v Susie Chan>that,  I  signed  up  for  the  Marathon  des  Sables,  which 

0:20:14.820 --> 0:20:17.670
<v Susie Chan>you  talked  about  there,  which  again,  was  more  born  out 

0:20:17.670 --> 0:20:23.070
<v Susie Chan>of...  I had  not  accidentally  found  myself  there,  but  I  didn't 

0:20:23.070 --> 0:20:25.889
<v Susie Chan>think  I  would  end  up  at  that  start  line, and I did,  and 

0:20:25.890 --> 0:20:29.940
<v Susie Chan>it  was  terrifying  and  life  changing  at  the  same  time.

0:20:29.940 --> 0:20:33.209
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>So  I  just  want  to  understand  that,  it's  not  something 

0:20:33.300 --> 0:20:36.869
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>I'm  familiar  with.  So  you're  running  through  the  Sahara  Desert?

0:20:37.500 --> 0:20:41.190
<v Susie Chan>Yeah.  So  it's  a  six- day,  it's called  a  multi- stage 

0:20:41.190 --> 0:20:44.369
<v Susie Chan>race,  so  it  takes  place  across  six  days,  and  you 

0:20:44.369 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Susie Chan>are  running.  The  course  changes  every  year.  You  are  plonked 

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:51.270
<v Susie Chan>into  the  Sahara  Desert,  and  you  run  each  day,  a 

0:20:51.270 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Susie Chan>different  distance.  And  normally,  it  follows  the  same  format,  it's 

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.250
<v Susie Chan>something  like  20  miles,  20  miles,  but  technical,  with  some 

0:20:56.250 --> 0:21:00.750
<v Susie Chan>mountains,  and  then  a  longer  stage,  20, 22  miles.  And  then 

0:21:00.750 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Susie Chan>you  have  something  called  the  long  stage,  which  is  an 

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:05.609
<v Susie Chan>ultramarathon,  and  then  you  finish  on  a  marathon,  and  then 

0:21:05.609 --> 0:21:09.690
<v Susie Chan>a  fun  run.  And  the  hard  thing  is,  is  it's  self-

0:21:09.690 --> 0:21:13.140
<v Susie Chan>sufficient,  so  you  need  everything  to  survive  for  the  week, 

0:21:13.140 --> 0:21:15.060
<v Susie Chan>you  have  to  carry  right  from  the  start.  So  that 

0:21:15.060 --> 0:21:17.609
<v Susie Chan>is  all  your  food,  which  is  the  heaviest  thing,  your 

0:21:17.609 --> 0:21:21.149
<v Susie Chan>sleeping  gear,  and  anything,  any  survival  kit.  So  the  first 

0:21:21.150 --> 0:21:23.100
<v Susie Chan>time  in  my  life,  I  was  like  just  trying  to 

0:21:23.100 --> 0:21:25.889
<v Susie Chan>find  out  what  an  anti- venom  pump  was,  things  like this. I'm like, "What?" 

0:21:26.220 --> 0:21:27.780
<v Susie Chan>Just  in  case  I  get  bitten  by  something  which  is 

0:21:27.780 --> 0:21:28.198
<v Susie Chan>going  to  kill  me.

0:21:28.199 --> 0:21:28.888
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Oh,  my  goodness.

0:21:29.070 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Susie Chan>So  they give you a tent. It's not really a tent, it's  like  a  blanket  on  sticks,  and  they  move 

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:35.429
<v Susie Chan>that  further  and  further  away,  and  then  you  run  towards 

0:21:35.430 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Susie Chan>it  each  day.  And  it's  you're  carrying...  I'd  say  for 

0:21:40.410 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Susie Chan>women,  I'm  not  very  tall,  I'm  like  five- foot  three. 

0:21:42.930 --> 0:21:45.270
<v Susie Chan>For  smaller  women,  it's  harder,  because  carrying  the  same  amount 

0:21:45.270 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Susie Chan>as  some  six- foot  three  dude  that's  done  Ironman.  So 

0:21:50.369 --> 0:21:55.890
<v Susie Chan>it's  pretty  tough,  it's  pretty  tough.  And  yeah,  I  ended 

0:21:55.890 --> 0:22:00.149
<v Susie Chan>up  doing  that,  because I  had  a  very  long  wait  list, 

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.210
<v Susie Chan>and  I  couldn't  really  find  out  too  much  about it.  This is before 

0:22:03.420 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Susie Chan>the  internet  is  what  it  is  today.  And  I  thought, "

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:07.830
<v Susie Chan>I  know,  I'll  sign  up  to  this  very  long  wait 

0:22:07.830 --> 0:22:11.369
<v Susie Chan>list."  I  was  like  198th,  or  something,  and " I'll  get 

0:22:11.369 --> 0:22:13.260
<v Susie Chan>some  emails  about  it."  And  I  signed  up to  the  wait 

0:22:13.260 --> 0:22:14.699
<v Susie Chan>list,  and  then  in  three  months,  I  was  at  the 

0:22:14.700 --> 0:22:16.590
<v Susie Chan>top of it. I was  terrified.

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:18.450
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Wow.

0:22:18.869 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Susie Chan>fortunately,  where  I  live,  I  live  about  50  miles  outside 

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Susie Chan>of  London,  a  place  called  Hampshire,  in  UK.  And  by 

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:32.310
<v Susie Chan>some  weird  geographical  freak,  it's  very  sandy,  so  the  trails 

0:22:32.369 --> 0:22:36.990
<v Susie Chan>are  very  sandy  near  me.  So  in  the  summer,  I 

0:22:36.990 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Susie Chan>could  easily  run  on  sand,  because  it's  just  where  I 

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:43.500
<v Susie Chan>run.  I  find  it  slightly...  I  don't  find  it  any 

0:22:43.500 --> 0:22:45.388
<v Susie Chan>easier,  but  I'm  just  more  used  to  it,  I'm  going 

0:22:45.388 --> 0:22:49.199
<v Susie Chan>to  say. I'm better. I'm quite good  at  reading  where  to  put  my  foot,  and 

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:51.810
<v Susie Chan>then  seeing...  I  don't  think  I'm  more  efficient,  I'm  just 

0:22:51.810 --> 0:22:52.290
<v Susie Chan>more  used  to it, I would say.

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:55.649
<v Becs Gentry>Yeah.  And  you're  probably  your  ankles  and  your  tendons  and 

0:22:55.650 --> 0:22:58.199
<v Becs Gentry>your  ligaments  around  your  ankles  and  your  knees,  are  probably 

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Becs Gentry>just  that  bit  stronger,  and  as  you  say,  more  accustomed 

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.450
<v Becs Gentry>to  it  than  somebody  who  runs  on  the  road  or 

0:23:03.450 --> 0:23:04.981
<v Becs Gentry>track  more.

0:23:04.981 --> 0:23:05.431
<v Susie Chan>Yeah.

0:23:05.490 --> 0:23:07.679
<v Becs Gentry>Yeah.  What  a  feat.  I  mean,  most  people  do  it 

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:11.160
<v Becs Gentry>once,  and  say " Thank  you,  that  was  enough."  Susie  goes 

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Becs Gentry>back  three  more  times.

0:23:12.330 --> 0:23:12.661
<v Susie Chan>Yeah.  I loved that race.

0:23:12.661 --> 0:23:12.662
<v Becs Gentry>It says a lot.

0:23:12.662 --> 0:23:12.663
<v Susie Chan>I do love it.

0:23:12.663 --> 0:23:16.050
<v Becs Gentry>You  do.  You  do.

0:23:18.420 --> 0:23:21.149
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>So  I  think  people  always  want  to know,  just  like  non-

0:23:21.150 --> 0:23:23.580
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>runners  want  to  know  what  would  get  someone  to  run 

0:23:24.030 --> 0:23:26.550
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>a  half- marathon  or  a  marathon,  I  think  even  people 

0:23:26.550 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>who  run  marathons  want  to  know  what  is  it  that 

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>would  drive  you  to  take  on  a  challenge  like  that?

0:23:32.310 --> 0:23:36.239
<v Susie Chan>I  think  you just have to be a little  bit...  You've  got  to  want  to.  I 

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:39.330
<v Susie Chan>think at  any  run,  anybody  that  runs,  you've  got  to  have 

0:23:39.330 --> 0:23:42.570
<v Susie Chan>a  desire  to do it, because  that  is  half  of  the  battle.  You've 

0:23:42.570 --> 0:23:44.250
<v Susie Chan>got  to  maybe  want  to  see  what  it's  like  to 

0:23:44.250 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Susie Chan>feel  like  to  finish  a  half- marathon, to  finish  a  marathon, 

0:23:46.890 --> 0:23:49.619
<v Susie Chan>and that desire  is  going  to  get  you a  very,  very  long  way. 

0:23:49.890 --> 0:23:53.730
<v Susie Chan>I  think  it's  always,  I  don't  overthink  these  things.  Which 

0:23:53.730 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Susie Chan>sometimes,  I'll  be honest with you, Rob, it  hasn't  worked  out  that  well for  me,  because 

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:58.740
<v Susie Chan>I've  not  really  found  out  as  much  about  race,  and I 

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Susie Chan>found  myself in  a  situation  which  is  nearly  beyond  how  good 

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.940
<v Susie Chan>I  am.  But  I  think  it's  only  running,  it's  not 

0:24:08.940 --> 0:24:12.750
<v Susie Chan>that  deep.  If  you  want  to  see  the  Sahara,  what 

0:24:12.750 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Susie Chan>better  way  than  to  try  and  run  around  it  for 

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:19.050
<v Susie Chan>a  few  days?
 And  that  race  is  actually,  yes,  it 

0:24:19.050 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Susie Chan>is  very  difficult,  and  the  terrain  is  quite  tough  to 

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Susie Chan>get  through,  but  the  timings  are  such that  a  lot  of 

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.380
<v Susie Chan>people,  they  hike  it,  they  run  very  small,  they  run 

0:24:28.380 --> 0:24:29.970
<v Susie Chan>periods of it, and  then  they  walk  a  lot  of  it.  And  the 

0:24:29.970 --> 0:24:32.609
<v Susie Chan>timings  are  such  that  you  can  actually  probably  fast-  walk 

0:24:32.609 --> 0:24:35.100
<v Susie Chan>the  whole  thing  and  get  through  it.  So  if  you 

0:24:35.100 --> 0:24:41.340
<v Susie Chan>just  add  in  just a little bit  of  adventure,  I  just  thought  maybe 

0:24:41.340 --> 0:24:43.619
<v Susie Chan>I  could  do  this.  I  didn't  think  I  definitely  can 

0:24:43.619 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Susie Chan>do  this,  and  that  was  enough  for  me  to  give 

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Susie Chan>it  a  go.  So  if you  have  any  sort  of  sense 

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:51.090
<v Susie Chan>of  adventure,  or  just  trying  to do  something  which  is  a 

0:24:51.090 --> 0:24:53.429
<v Susie Chan>little  bit  out  of  your  comfort  zone,  just  give  it 

0:24:53.430 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Susie Chan>a  go.  What's  the  worst?  You  just  stop  and  you've 

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:59.369
<v Susie Chan>only  experienced  some  of  it,  it's  not  that  deep.  Yeah.

0:25:00.180 --> 0:25:02.550
<v Becs Gentry>I  love  that.  I  love  that.  And  that's  so  true. 

0:25:02.550 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Becs Gentry>It's  so  you.  I  mean,  I'm  so  lucky  that  I 

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:08.430
<v Becs Gentry>know  you.  I've  known  you  for  a  decade  at  least, 

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Becs Gentry>maybe  longer,  but  that's  so,  so  true,  that  people  need 

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:17.580
<v Becs Gentry>to  remember  that.  It's  not  that  deep.  And  I  think 

0:25:18.060 --> 0:25:21.060
<v Becs Gentry>yes,  of  course,  if  you  are  a  professional  athlete  listening 

0:25:21.060 --> 0:25:22.649
<v Becs Gentry>to  this, it  is  that  deep  for  you.  It  is  your 

0:25:22.650 --> 0:25:26.940
<v Becs Gentry>career,  it  is  your  whole  life.  But  for  the  rest 

0:25:26.940 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Becs Gentry>of  us,  as  hobby  runners,  who  do  things  outside  of 

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:32.790
<v Becs Gentry>our  careers  and  our  other  hats  that  we  wear,  to 

0:25:32.790 --> 0:25:35.731
<v Becs Gentry>fulfill  something  else  inside  us,  if  it  doesn't  work  out, yes.

0:25:35.731 --> 0:25:35.732
<v Susie Chan>It's okay.

0:25:35.732 --> 0:25:36.120
<v Becs Gentry>It's okay.

0:25:37.888 --> 0:25:41.429
<v Susie Chan>I  don't  know  how  you  do  what  you  do,  Becs. 

0:25:41.638 --> 0:25:43.830
<v Susie Chan>We've  had  this  conversation  off  the  record  several  times,  about 

0:25:43.830 --> 0:25:48.090
<v Susie Chan>how  you  do  that  with that.  But  the  time  pressure,  I mean I'm not the fastest. 

0:25:48.090 --> 0:25:50.250
<v Susie Chan>Really,  I'm  very  much  a  middle- packer,  and  I'm  very 

0:25:50.250 --> 0:25:54.900
<v Susie Chan>comfortable  with  being a  middle- packer,  and  that  affords  me,  and 

0:25:54.900 --> 0:25:57.959
<v Susie Chan>everybody  else  around  me,  the  benefit  of  it  doesn't  matter 

0:25:57.960 --> 0:25:59.790
<v Susie Chan>if  we're  slower  that  day, it  doesn't  matter  if  we  don't 

0:25:59.790 --> 0:26:02.398
<v Susie Chan>get our PB.  I'm  not  trying  to  do  what  Becs  is  trying 

0:26:02.398 --> 0:26:06.630
<v Susie Chan>to do and  run  that  fast.  And  so  it's  nice  to be able to do  that, 

0:26:06.630 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Susie Chan>but  to  take  that  comforting  space,  and  then  put  it 

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:11.250
<v Susie Chan>in  an  environment  which  is  actually  a  bit  more  taxing 

0:26:11.250 --> 0:26:14.490
<v Susie Chan>and  difficult,  is  my  sweet  spot.  It's  just  being  middle-

0:26:14.490 --> 0:26:17.820
<v Susie Chan>packing  somewhere  a  little  bit  more  adventurous  and  seeing  how 

0:26:17.820 --> 0:26:20.100
<v Susie Chan>far  I  could  get  on  my  steam.

0:26:21.630 --> 0:26:25.109
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>That  makes  a  lot  of  sense.  I  think  that's really cool.  And 

0:26:25.109 --> 0:26:28.470
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>so  when  we  started  this  conversation,  you  talked  about  how 

0:26:28.500 --> 0:26:30.540
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>early  on,  when  you were in  that  first  half  with  your  brother, 

0:26:31.140 --> 0:26:33.660
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>your  life  wasn't  in  a  great  place,  and  you  had 

0:26:33.660 --> 0:26:37.140
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>some  money  issues,  and  things  like  that.  And  so  running, 

0:26:37.290 --> 0:26:40.410
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>little  did  you  know,  I'm  sure,  ended  up  changing  your 

0:26:40.410 --> 0:26:43.590
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>life,  in  terms  of  your  career  as  well.  Can  you 

0:26:43.590 --> 0:26:46.109
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>talk  about  how  that  all  came  about,  and  what  led 

0:26:46.109 --> 0:26:49.709
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>you  to  Peloton?  And  now  you're  this  star  instructor  on 

0:26:49.710 --> 0:26:49.771
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>the  tread.

0:26:49.771 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Susie Chan>I don't know, Rob, how this happened to me.  I  am  not  joking.  Sometimes  I'll  turn  up  to 

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:58.530
<v Susie Chan>work,  and  I'll  think " How  have  I  ended  up  here," 

0:26:58.530 --> 0:27:01.890
<v Susie Chan>to  be  totally  honest  with  you. But I did  always,  I  think  I 

0:27:01.890 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Susie Chan>managed  to  hit  ultra- running  at  the  right  time.  When 

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.530
<v Susie Chan>I  started  in  the  UK,  there  were,  I  think,  15 

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:10.109
<v Susie Chan>ultramarathons  in  the  whole  of  the  UK.  There's  now  over 

0:27:10.109 --> 0:27:12.869
<v Susie Chan>200.  I  think  I  just  hit  something  at  the  right 

0:27:12.869 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Susie Chan>moment.  Social  media  was  relatively  in  its  infancy.  I'm  not 

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:19.889
<v Susie Chan>a  huge  on  social  media,  but  I  just  started  to 

0:27:19.890 --> 0:27:22.530
<v Susie Chan>document  what I  was  doing. There  were  very  few  women  doing  these 

0:27:22.530 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Susie Chan>sorts  of  events,  and  so  I  just  started  to  document 

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.780
<v Susie Chan>it.  And  I  did  have  a  couple  of  little  rules 

0:27:27.780 --> 0:27:31.859
<v Susie Chan>for  myself.  If  I've had had  a  bad  day, or I don't know, got  a  parking  ticket, 

0:27:31.859 --> 0:27:33.990
<v Susie Chan>or  something,  wasn't  going  to  come  to  social  media  to start 

0:27:34.170 --> 0:27:36.150
<v Susie Chan>to  moan  about  that.  That's  not  what  I'm  there  for, 

0:27:36.150 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Susie Chan>I'm  there  just  to  talk  about  my  running  and  to 

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Susie Chan>keep  it  quite  a  light  positive  space.
 So  I  just 

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Susie Chan>chronicled  my  running  journey.  And I  had  a  normal  job.  I've 

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:47.910
<v Susie Chan>worked  for  20  years,  in  the  museum  and  gallery  sector, 

0:27:47.910 --> 0:27:50.310
<v Susie Chan>putting  on  exhibitions,  so  I  did  love  that,  but  I 

0:27:50.310 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Susie Chan>was  at  the  weekend  then,  doing  these  races,  very  long 

0:27:54.330 --> 0:27:56.909
<v Susie Chan>races,  and  coming  into  work  on  Monday.  And  there  was just 

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:00.660
<v Susie Chan>a  moment  there,  where  social  media  was  beginning  to  take 

0:28:00.660 --> 0:28:04.199
<v Susie Chan>off,  I  started  to  get  brand  deals  and  invited  to 

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Susie Chan>things.  I  then  got  sponsorship,  which  wasn't  a  lot  of 

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:09.388
<v Susie Chan>money,  but  it  was  just  enough  for  me  to  think 

0:28:10.650 --> 0:28:12.420
<v Susie Chan>maybe  I  could  just  step  away  from  museums  and  see 

0:28:12.450 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Susie Chan>where  this  leads  me.  And  I  was  doing  race  commentating, 

0:28:15.540 --> 0:28:17.100
<v Susie Chan>sort  of  commentary,  I  was  doing  a  little  bit  of 

0:28:17.100 --> 0:28:20.010
<v Susie Chan>presenting  with  it.  So I was doing  all  these  little  things, and  just  trying 

0:28:20.010 --> 0:28:22.020
<v Susie Chan>to  make  everything  work.  And  there  was  a  point  where 

0:28:22.470 --> 0:28:24.300
<v Susie Chan>I  was  very  stretched,  and  I  wasn't  doing  my  day 

0:28:24.300 --> 0:28:26.310
<v Susie Chan>job  very  well, and  I  wasn't  really  applying  myself  to  my 

0:28:26.310 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Susie Chan>races  very  well,  so I  just  stopped  on  the  day  job, 

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:32.970
<v Susie Chan>which  was  terrifying,  and  took  the  plunge.
 And  I  was 

0:28:32.970 --> 0:28:36.930
<v Susie Chan>just doing bits  and  pieces,  and  then  lockdown  happened,  which  worried  me, 

0:28:36.930 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Susie Chan>because  a  lot  of  my  brand  deals,  and  things,  were 

0:28:39.810 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Susie Chan>governed  by  producing  content,  which  we  weren't  allowed  to  do 

0:28:42.780 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Susie Chan>because we were  all  sitting  in  indoors.  And  then  I  just  got 

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Susie Chan>a  phone  call  from  Peloton,  and  I  genuinely  was  like, "

0:28:48.210 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Susie Chan>Oh,  what?" And the  first  thing  I  said,  Becs,  was, " Do  you 

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:52.709
<v Susie Chan>know  how  old  I  am?"  And  they  said " Yes,  and 

0:28:52.710 --> 0:28:56.430
<v Susie Chan>we  don't  care."
 Because  I  was  in  my  mid- 40s 

0:28:56.430 --> 0:28:58.980
<v Susie Chan>by  this  point,  and  I  just  had  in  my  head,  I just thought "

0:28:59.310 --> 0:29:03.900
<v Susie Chan>Really?"  I'm  an  older  woman,  and  actually,  all  Peloton  cared 

0:29:03.900 --> 0:29:07.410
<v Susie Chan>about  is  authenticity  and  if  you  love  it,  and  if 

0:29:07.410 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Susie Chan>you  love  running,  you  want  to  share  your  journey.  And 

0:29:11.070 --> 0:29:16.170
<v Susie Chan>did  various  screen  tests  and  interviews,  and  things.  And  here 

0:29:16.170 --> 0:29:19.950
<v Susie Chan>I  am,  working  with Becs.  And  last  time  I  saw  Becs 

0:29:20.190 --> 0:29:23.010
<v Susie Chan>was  when  she  disappeared  off  the  face  of  the  Earth 

0:29:23.010 --> 0:29:25.770
<v Susie Chan>in  London. She was like  a  big  name  on  the  scene,  big  name. 

0:29:25.770 --> 0:29:27.780
<v Susie Chan>Everybody's  like, " Becs  is  so  cool,"  and  then  she  just 

0:29:27.780 --> 0:29:30.570
<v Susie Chan>disappeared,  and  then  popped  back  up on  Peloton.  And  then  I 

0:29:30.570 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Susie Chan>was  following,  I don't know,  maybe  three  years  later.

0:29:34.890 --> 0:29:37.980
<v Becs Gentry>I love  that,  that  Susie  always  tells  me  that.  Like  literally, "

0:29:37.980 --> 0:29:40.830
<v Becs Gentry>Do  you  know  you  disappeared?  You  literally  just  one  day, 

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:41.761
<v Becs Gentry>you  were  not  in  London."

0:29:41.761 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Susie Chan>I was like, "Where has she gone? She hasn't posted anything for ages."  I  started  to  get  worried.  Anyway.

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:53.130
<v Becs Gentry>Oh,  my  gosh.  Okay,  let's  talk.  Whilst  we're  talking  about 

0:29:53.130 --> 0:29:58.170
<v Becs Gentry>Peloton  and  treadmill  running,  you  are  such  a  fantastic  advocate 

0:29:58.170 --> 0:30:01.290
<v Becs Gentry>for  all  the  ways  people  can  run,  whether  it's  road, 

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:06.150
<v Becs Gentry>trail,  tread,  and  you  and  I  are  both  in  that 

0:30:06.150 --> 0:30:09.870
<v Becs Gentry>mindset.  I  think  we're  very  similar  in,  I  would  say, 

0:30:09.870 --> 0:30:12.330
<v Becs Gentry>80%  of  the  way  we  run,  in  that  we  get 

0:30:12.330 --> 0:30:14.730
<v Becs Gentry>it  done.  We  just  get  it  done.  And  we  both 

0:30:14.730 --> 0:30:17.580
<v Becs Gentry>love a  tread  for  speed  work,  it's  like  a  set  it 

0:30:17.580 --> 0:30:23.219
<v Becs Gentry>and  forget  it  sort  of  thing.  But  you,  Susie,  eighth, 

0:30:23.610 --> 0:30:27.450
<v Becs Gentry>nearly,  no,  nine  years  ago,  I  guess  now,  in  2016, 

0:30:27.450 --> 0:30:32.970
<v Becs Gentry>you  broke  the  Guinness  World  Record  by  running  68.5  miles on a 

0:30:33.450 --> 0:30:37.140
<v Becs Gentry>treadmill  in  12  hours.  I  mean,  you  can  hear  in 

0:30:37.140 --> 0:30:43.170
<v Becs Gentry>my  voice,  and  I  just...  Tell  our  listeners  about  that. What was it 

0:30:43.170 --> 0:30:46.709
<v Becs Gentry>like?  And  I  love  the  tread,  but  that  seems  like 

0:30:46.710 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Becs Gentry>it  would  be  harder  than  anything.

0:30:49.050 --> 0:30:52.260
<v Susie Chan>It  was  grim.  I  don't  know  what  else  to  say. 

0:30:52.830 --> 0:30:56.670
<v Susie Chan>Well, what happened was  I  ended  up  there  because  a  friend  of  mine, 

0:30:56.670 --> 0:30:59.190
<v Susie Chan>so  when  I  do  some  of  the  races I do,  I  tend 

0:30:59.190 --> 0:31:02.190
<v Susie Chan>to  lean  towards  hot  environments.  And  so  my  friend  is actually 

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:08.310
<v Susie Chan>a  doctor  in  ultramarathon,  he's a  sports  scientist. And so I'd go  and  train.  He 

0:31:08.310 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Susie Chan>had  a  heat  chamber  set  up  at  his  university,  so 

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:13.170
<v Susie Chan>I'd  go and do a lot of  my  heat  training  there.  And  then  he,  as 

0:31:13.170 --> 0:31:16.860
<v Susie Chan>part  of  his  research  into  ultramarathoners and  the  effects  of  ultramarathons 

0:31:16.860 --> 0:31:19.709
<v Susie Chan>on  body,  he  wanted  people  to  run  50  miles on a  treadmill 

0:31:19.710 --> 0:31:22.470
<v Susie Chan>in  an  experiment  and  just  record  the  effects  of  it. 

0:31:22.860 --> 0:31:25.020
<v Susie Chan>So  not  many  people  came  forward  for  that,  as  you 

0:31:25.020 --> 0:31:27.990
<v Susie Chan>can  imagine.  I  helped  him  out,  me  and  a  few 

0:31:27.990 --> 0:31:29.940
<v Susie Chan>friends  went  and  did our  50  miles.  He  was  monitoring  our 

0:31:29.940 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Susie Chan>blood,  how  we  felt,  doing  blood  tests  and  saliva  tests, 

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Susie Chan>and  all  sorts  of...  Did  that,  so I  went  along.  I 

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:38.340
<v Susie Chan>was  super  fit, because I'd  just  finished  an  Iron  Man.  I  was 

0:31:38.340 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Susie Chan>super  fit,  I  just  hopped  on  the  treadmill,  ran  50 

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:43.290
<v Susie Chan>miles and  just  went  home.
 And  then  I  just  did  a 

0:31:43.290 --> 0:31:46.110
<v Susie Chan>little  tweet about it, or  something,  like, " Oh, I just did  50  miles  on  the  treadmill." And 

0:31:46.470 --> 0:31:50.310
<v Susie Chan>somebody  said  to  me  on  Twitter, " If  you'd  kept  going, 

0:31:50.310 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Susie Chan>you  would've  broken  the  world  record."  I  was  so  close 

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Susie Chan>and  I  didn't  know. I didn't know  that  these  things  existed.  And  the 

0:31:56.190 --> 0:31:58.980
<v Susie Chan>truth  is,  not  many  people  give  these  a  go  because 

0:31:58.980 --> 0:32:02.490
<v Susie Chan>they  are  quite  grim,  and  they  are  also  incredibly  difficult 

0:32:02.490 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Susie Chan>to  set  up.  And  so  we set it up, and  Dennis  sent  a  23-

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:08.490
<v Susie Chan>page  document  on  all  the  things  we  had  to  do 

0:32:08.490 --> 0:32:11.130
<v Susie Chan>to  make  it  valid,  which  was  numerous.  There  were  lots 

0:32:11.130 --> 0:32:13.530
<v Susie Chan>of  things  about  the  calibration  of the treadmill, it  had  to  be  public, 

0:32:13.710 --> 0:32:16.469
<v Susie Chan>it had to  be  filmed  constantly,  it  had  to  have  independent  witnesses. 

0:32:16.470 --> 0:32:18.540
<v Susie Chan>There  was  so  many  rules  that  we had  to  do,  but 

0:32:18.540 --> 0:32:23.130
<v Susie Chan>we  set  about  with  the  university,  Kingston  University.
 And  I 

0:32:23.130 --> 0:32:25.170
<v Susie Chan>thought  it  wouldn't  be  too  bad,  because  I  wasn't  that 

0:32:25.170 --> 0:32:28.530
<v Susie Chan>far  off,  just  doing  that  50  miles on  the  treadmill.  And 

0:32:28.530 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Susie Chan>actually,  I  felt  okay.  What  had  happened,  was  it  took 

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:35.010
<v Susie Chan>eight  months  to  set  up,  and  I  had  lost  a 

0:32:35.010 --> 0:32:38.940
<v Susie Chan>reasonable  amount  of  fitness.  I  wasn't  quite  Iron  Man- fit 

0:32:38.940 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Susie Chan>anymore. And  I  hopped  on  on  the  day  of  it, and it  had 

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:46.110
<v Susie Chan>gone  viral.  I  had  thousands  of  people  watching  me.

0:32:46.110 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Becs Gentry>Yeah,  I  remember.

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:51.990
<v Susie Chan>You know  when  you  start  running,  some  days  you  just start  running, 

0:32:51.990 --> 0:32:54.660
<v Susie Chan>and  you  think, " Oh, actually I'm  not  feeling  this  today."  Yeah,  it 

0:32:54.660 --> 0:32:56.940
<v Susie Chan>was  one  of those.  I  just  hopped  on, I thought, "I'm not  really  in  the 

0:32:56.940 --> 0:33:00.390
<v Susie Chan>mood  for  this."  And  it  was  too  late.  We'd  had 

0:33:00.420 --> 0:33:03.420
<v Susie Chan>so  many  people  there  watching,  and  I  just  had  to 

0:33:03.420 --> 0:33:06.060
<v Susie Chan>run  through  a  day  of  running when  I  didn't  want  to 

0:33:06.060 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Susie Chan>run  on  a  treadmill.  I  got  very  seasick,  because  the 

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:13.380
<v Susie Chan>treadmill  we  had  to  use  was  huge,  and  it  wasn't 

0:33:13.380 --> 0:33:15.090
<v Susie Chan>too  far  away  from  the  wall.  We  couldn't  move  it 

0:33:15.090 --> 0:33:17.130
<v Susie Chan>away  from  the  wall,  and  so I was  just  staring  at  a 

0:33:17.130 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Susie Chan>wall  for  12  hours  whilst  running.  And  do  anything,  it 

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Susie Chan>doesn't  matter  what it  is,  just  staring  at a wall for  12  hours,  and 

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:23.491
<v Susie Chan>you  will get a bit. So I was so throwing up.

0:33:23.491 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Is  that  what  you  were  doing?  So  were  you  staring 

0:33:29.340 --> 0:33:32.070
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>at  a  wall?  Did  you  have  something,  you  weren't  watching 

0:33:32.070 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>anything,  you  weren't-

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:35.670
<v Susie Chan>Well,  they  kind  of  got  a  TV  screen  there.  And 

0:33:35.670 --> 0:33:38.850
<v Susie Chan>then  I  had  people  coming. I had a  treadmill  next  to  me for friends and  people 

0:33:38.850 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Susie Chan>to  join  me,  just  to  kind  of  keep  me  buoyed 

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:43.650
<v Susie Chan>up.  But  essentially,  I  couldn't  really,  because  if  I  fell 

0:33:43.650 --> 0:33:46.350
<v Susie Chan>over,  it  was  over.  I  couldn't  touch  the  treadmill  bars, 

0:33:46.350 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Susie Chan>I  couldn't  touch  any  of  it,  because  it  was  done. 

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Susie Chan>So  I  had to have  no  sort  of  assistance  holding  it,  so 

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:54.750
<v Susie Chan>I  couldn't  really  look.  I  did  a  bit  of  it, 

0:33:54.750 --> 0:33:58.410
<v Susie Chan>but  it  was  really  rough.  And  I  started  to  throw 

0:33:58.410 --> 0:34:03.420
<v Susie Chan>up  because I was  getting  seasick,  and  then  it  got  very  hard 

0:34:03.630 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Susie Chan>in  the  last  few  miles.  I  think  the  YouTube  video, 

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:09.509
<v Susie Chan>which  we  had  to  record,  is  out there somewhere,  of  me  just 

0:34:09.510 --> 0:34:11.819
<v Susie Chan>going  greener  and  greener  around  the  gills.  But  I  broke 

0:34:11.820 --> 0:34:15.360
<v Susie Chan>the  world  record,  and  it  did  go  viral.  And  then 

0:34:15.570 --> 0:34:18.870
<v Susie Chan>it's  subsequently  been  broken  by  somebody  else,  who  she's  welcome 

0:34:18.870 --> 0:34:20.729
<v Susie Chan>to  it,  because  this,  it  was  hardcore.

0:34:22.469 --> 0:34:26.790
<v Becs Gentry>That's  hilarious.  Oh,  my  goodness.  I  can't  even  imagine.  And 

0:34:27.300 --> 0:34:33.450
<v Becs Gentry>obviously,  back  in  2016,  the  technology  for  treadmills  was  so 

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:37.170
<v Becs Gentry>much...  There  was  so  little  compared  to  now,  what  we 

0:34:37.170 --> 0:34:40.650
<v Becs Gentry>have,  like  our  Peloton  Tread  Plus  is  so  beautiful. And if  I 

0:34:40.650 --> 0:34:42.540
<v Becs Gentry>had  to  run  on  a  tread  for  12  hours,  I 

0:34:42.570 --> 0:34:46.770
<v Becs Gentry>would  be  undoubtedly  on  that  tread.  But  I  can't  imagine 

0:34:46.770 --> 0:34:51.002
<v Becs Gentry>just  banging  away  on  that,  on  the  belt,  just  (inaudible) .

0:34:50.730 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Yeah,  the  old  school  belt.  I mean, Becs,  we've  had  people  on 

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:57.660
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>this  podcast  who've  done  a  lot  of  amazing  things,  yourself 

0:34:57.660 --> 0:35:02.310
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>included.  I  don't  think  there's  anything  I've  heard  that  terrifies 

0:35:02.310 --> 0:35:07.350
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>me  more  than  what  Susie  did.  And  I  mean,  do 

0:35:07.350 --> 0:35:10.739
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>you  still  think  back  to  that  and  feel  the  trauma, 

0:35:10.739 --> 0:35:13.110
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Susie?  Because  I'm  feeling  it  and  I  didn't  even  do  it.

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:16.710
<v Susie Chan>Yeah,  a  little  bit.  It  took  me  a  long  time 

0:35:16.710 --> 0:35:18.330
<v Susie Chan>to  get  back  on  a  treadmill  after  that,  for  a 

0:35:18.330 --> 0:35:22.650
<v Susie Chan>while.  I  was  just  outside  at  any  opportunity.  It  was 

0:35:22.650 --> 0:35:26.940
<v Susie Chan>really,  really  tough.  And I've  never  felt  that  I'm  well  running, 

0:35:27.900 --> 0:35:31.859
<v Susie Chan>and  there  was a lot of... I think  if  there  wasn't so  much  pressure,  because  so 

0:35:31.860 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Susie Chan>many  people  were  watching  and  there,  I  think  I  probably 

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Susie Chan>would've  just  gone  home.  It  was a little but you have  to  keep  going because there's  so 

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:42.090
<v Susie Chan>many  people  looking  at  you,  it  was  a  little  bit 

0:35:42.090 --> 0:35:45.390
<v Susie Chan>like  that.  But  thank  God  they  were  there,  because  actually, 

0:35:45.390 --> 0:35:47.370
<v Susie Chan>I  did  manage  to  do  it. And  I  think  left  to 

0:35:47.370 --> 0:35:50.069
<v Susie Chan>my  own  mental  space,  I  probably  wouldn't  have  done  it, 

0:35:50.070 --> 0:35:53.370
<v Susie Chan>so  there's  a  little  bit  said  about  the  vanity  of 

0:35:53.370 --> 0:35:55.530
<v Susie Chan>trying  to look  good  in  front  of  people.

0:35:56.489 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Becs Gentry>Well,  here  we  are  today.  I  just  looked it up., The  current 

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:01.921
<v Becs Gentry>record,  just  for  your  information,  is 81 miles in 12 hours.

0:36:01.921 --> 0:36:07.020
<v Susie Chan>Oh,  I  couldn't  have  done  that.  I  was  aiming  for, 

0:36:07.020 --> 0:36:12.420
<v Susie Chan>I  think  we had me down to do about  76,  75,  which  was  within  my  capabilities. 

0:36:13.890 --> 0:36:17.430
<v Susie Chan>Which  wasn't  really,  we  were  on  target  for  until  the 

0:36:17.430 --> 0:36:20.011
<v Susie Chan>last  three hours, and then all the  vomit  was  really  slowing me down.

0:36:20.011 --> 0:36:20.012
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Oh, my goodness.

0:36:20.011 --> 0:36:25.140
<v Becs Gentry>You  got  past  the  record,  and  you're  like, " Tap  me 

0:36:25.259 --> 0:36:26.219
<v Becs Gentry>out  baby,  I'm  done."

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Susie Chan>Yeah.

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:32.730
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Well, Becs,  Susie  is  back  to  the  more  conventional  outdoor  road 

0:36:32.730 --> 0:36:37.830
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>running  marathon  distance.  She's  training  for  the  Sydney  Marathon  coming 

0:36:37.830 --> 0:36:38.251
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>up  this  fall.

0:36:38.251 --> 0:36:38.610
<v Becs Gentry>Yes.

0:36:38.610 --> 0:36:40.230
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>And  she  was  telling  me  as  we  came  on  the 

0:36:41.190 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>interview,  that  she  had  a  little  bit  of  a  registration 

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:46.050
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>issue,  wasn't  actually  sure  she  was  going  to  make  it, 

0:36:46.110 --> 0:36:47.010
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>but  she's  in.

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:47.070
<v Becs Gentry>Okay.

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Susie Chan>I  hadn't  fully  completed  my  registration.  There  was  an  extra 

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:53.250
<v Susie Chan>layer,  which  I  didn't  know about.

0:36:54.330 --> 0:36:55.620
<v Becs Gentry>Until  when,  recently?

0:36:55.860 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Susie Chan>This  morning, Becs.

0:36:56.400 --> 0:36:58.860
<v Becs Gentry>I  was  going  to  say, hold on,  I  saw  you a  week  ago 

0:36:58.860 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Becs Gentry>in  London,  and  you  were all go.

0:37:00.900 --> 0:37:05.219
<v Susie Chan>I  was  getting  some.  Anyway,  some  minor  detail  that  I've 

0:37:05.219 --> 0:37:07.410
<v Susie Chan>dotted  the Is  and  crossed  the  Ts,  thank  goodness,  because  I've 

0:37:07.410 --> 0:37:08.701
<v Susie Chan>bought  that  plane  ticket.  Can  you imagine?

0:37:08.700 --> 0:37:11.940
<v Becs Gentry>I was going to  say  she's  off with  19  days  to  spare,  and  we're 

0:37:11.940 --> 0:37:12.540
<v Becs Gentry>officially  in.

0:37:12.540 --> 0:37:17.070
<v Susie Chan>Yeah,  I  hadn't  quite  completed  it.  Anyway,  I'm  in. I'm  very  excited.

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:20.790
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>So  you've  already  got  the six- star  medal,  so  this  will 

0:37:20.790 --> 0:37:23.850
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>be  number  seven  for  you,  on  the  road  to  whatever 

0:37:23.850 --> 0:37:27.840
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>it  will  be,  nine  perhaps.  What's  got  you  back  in 

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:30.360
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>the  marathon  phase?  Is it  just  the  challenge  and  it's  a 

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:33.149
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>new  place,  new  experience,  and  all  of  that?

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:39.840
<v Susie Chan>Yeah. I mean, this is how they get you, isn't it? The sixth star, so  I  thought I  was  done.  They  announced  Sydney,  my  friends 

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:45.029
<v Susie Chan>are  saying " I'm  going, are you going?" And I was like, " Oh,  okay then," because you don't want to have the FOMO of  seeing  your  friends  get 

0:37:45.030 --> 0:37:49.050
<v Susie Chan>the  seventh  and  you  haven't.  So  I'm  dreadful.  I'm  very 

0:37:49.050 --> 0:37:52.950
<v Susie Chan>easily  persuaded  in  things  like  this,  Rob,  very,  very  easily. 

0:37:52.950 --> 0:37:55.859
<v Susie Chan>And  so  a  couple  of  my  friends  are  going,  and 

0:37:55.860 --> 0:37:59.430
<v Susie Chan>I  was  like, " Okay,  I'll  come  too,"  because  I  couldn't 

0:37:59.670 --> 0:38:03.930
<v Susie Chan>bear  to  miss  out,  so  I'm  off.  I  haven't  run. 

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Susie Chan>Last time  I  was  in  Sydney,  in  Australia,  it  was like  20 

0:38:07.110 --> 0:38:09.660
<v Susie Chan>years  ago,  so  I  wasn't  even  a  runner,  so very much  looking 

0:38:10.350 --> 0:38:13.620
<v Susie Chan>forward  to  it.  Never  been  to  Sydney.  Slightly  anxious  about 

0:38:13.620 --> 0:38:17.940
<v Susie Chan>the  course  profile,  which  I  looked  at,  and  it's 1, 500- foot.

0:38:18.090 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Yeah,  there's  some  legit  elevation  in  there,  absolutely.

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:24.961
<v Becs Gentry>It  gives  New  York a  run for its money.

0:38:24.961 --> 0:38:27.239
<v Susie Chan>Yes, it really does. And  I've  run  New  York  three  times,  and  actually,  the 

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:29.700
<v Susie Chan>last  time  I  ran  New  York,  I  really  felt  the 

0:38:29.700 --> 0:38:34.890
<v Susie Chan>hills,  and  they're  not  my  strengths.  But  on  the  day, 

0:38:34.890 --> 0:38:36.930
<v Susie Chan>this  only  happens  on  the  day,  doesn't  it?  Race  day, 

0:38:36.930 --> 0:38:42.150
<v Susie Chan>another  world  marathon  major,  I'm  way  off  racing  this,  so 

0:38:42.150 --> 0:38:45.270
<v Susie Chan>I'm  just  going  to  go  with  my  friends  and  have 

0:38:45.270 --> 0:38:48.750
<v Susie Chan>as  much  fun  as  possible,  and  do  it  justice.  I'm 

0:38:48.750 --> 0:38:52.469
<v Susie Chan>going  to  do  my  best  that  I  can,  because  it's 

0:38:52.469 --> 0:38:54.660
<v Susie Chan>a  world  marathon major.  I'm  so  lucky  to  be  there,  so 

0:38:54.660 --> 0:38:57.779
<v Susie Chan>I'll  give  it  a  crack.  Not  super  fast,  but  just 

0:38:57.810 --> 0:38:59.790
<v Susie Chan>consistent.  I'll  try  and  be  as  consistent  as  I  can on 

0:38:59.850 --> 0:39:00.390
<v Susie Chan>those  hills.

0:39:00.870 --> 0:39:03.660
<v Becs Gentry>Yeah,  you've  got  this.  And  as  you  say,  there's  something 

0:39:03.660 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Becs Gentry>about  the  energy  of  these  world  marathon  majors,  and  this 

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:09.299
<v Becs Gentry>one  being  the  inaugural  official  one,  I  think,  is  going 

0:39:09.300 --> 0:39:12.960
<v Becs Gentry>to  be  really  cool.  You've  been  running  through  extreme  heat 

0:39:13.170 --> 0:39:14.700
<v Becs Gentry>in  the  UK  this  summer.

0:39:16.860 --> 0:39:17.191
<v Susie Chan>I  love  it.

0:39:17.190 --> 0:39:20.700
<v Becs Gentry>Yeah, you love it.  So  maybe  the  coolness  of  a  spring  race  in 

0:39:20.700 --> 0:39:23.131
<v Becs Gentry>Sydney  is  going  to  be  exhilarating for the body.

0:39:23.131 --> 0:39:27.150
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Yeah. I think  for  some  reason,  Sahara  Desert  runner  here,  I'm  not 

0:39:27.150 --> 0:39:28.621
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>thinking  heat's  a  big  issue  for  you,  Susie.

0:39:28.621 --> 0:39:28.622
<v Becs Gentry>No, it's not a big-

0:39:28.622 --> 0:39:28.623
<v Susie Chan>I love running in the heat, yeah.

0:39:28.623 --> 0:39:28.624
<v Becs Gentry>Oh, my God.

0:39:28.624 --> 0:39:36.450
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>I would hope so.  Tell  us  about  your  book  and  what  drove  you 

0:39:36.450 --> 0:39:38.910
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>to  write  the  book,  what  can  someone  get  from  reading 

0:39:38.910 --> 0:39:40.469
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>your  book?  What's  the  story?

0:39:41.010 --> 0:39:43.650
<v Susie Chan>So  I  didn't  really  want  to  write  this  book.  The 

0:39:43.650 --> 0:39:46.710
<v Susie Chan>book  company,  Bloomsbury,  they  asked  me  a  couple  of  times, 

0:39:46.710 --> 0:39:50.730
<v Susie Chan>and  I  said  no,  mainly  because,  I  don't  know,  I 

0:39:50.730 --> 0:39:53.550
<v Susie Chan>just  thought, " Well,  I'm  not  that  interesting.  I  haven't  really 

0:39:53.550 --> 0:39:56.399
<v Susie Chan>done  that  much."  And  also,  I felt  a  lot  of  imposter 

0:39:56.400 --> 0:39:59.310
<v Susie Chan>syndrome  there,  like " I  don't  know.  I  really  don't  know." 

0:40:00.270 --> 0:40:04.140
<v Susie Chan>And  then  a  couple  of  things  happened,  lockdown  happened,  and 

0:40:04.140 --> 0:40:07.770
<v Susie Chan>then  so  everything  that  we  could  do  was  taken  away. 

0:40:08.219 --> 0:40:12.660
<v Susie Chan>And  then  I  got  into  the  race  of  my  dreams, 

0:40:12.660 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Susie Chan>which  was  my  final  destination  race.  I  finally  got  into 

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:19.379
<v Susie Chan>that  race.  And  so  those  two  things  made  me  think, "

0:40:19.380 --> 0:40:20.670
<v Susie Chan>I'm  just  going  to  embrace  them.  I'm  just  going  to 

0:40:20.670 --> 0:40:24.750
<v Susie Chan>embrace  life  as  it  is  right  now,  and  say  yes." 

0:40:24.750 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Susie Chan>So  I'd  already  established  myself  in  Peloton.  I'd  been  there 

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:30.480
<v Susie Chan>for  about  a  couple  of  years,  and  I  thought, "Okay, I've got a little bit of  space 

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:32.969
<v Susie Chan>to  try  and  write  the  book."
 So  I  started  to 

0:40:32.969 --> 0:40:34.740
<v Susie Chan>write  the  book.  And  I'm  saying  right  at  the  beginning, Becs, that 

0:40:36.810 --> 0:40:39.180
<v Susie Chan>writing  the  book  actually  made  me  do  a  lot  of 

0:40:39.180 --> 0:40:44.430
<v Susie Chan>reflection  and  realize  that  I've  been  in  some  extraordinary  situations, 

0:40:44.430 --> 0:40:46.920
<v Susie Chan>and  been  really  lucky  with  my  running.  And  I  had, 

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:49.350
<v Susie Chan>in  fact,  I've  done  quite  a  lot  with  it.  So 

0:40:50.850 --> 0:40:56.670
<v Susie Chan>it's  just a  story  of  a  normal  woman  fighting  her  through 

0:40:56.670 --> 0:40:59.700
<v Susie Chan>some  very  long  miles,  and  on a bit of  a  journey  of  discovery. 

0:40:59.700 --> 0:41:02.250
<v Susie Chan>I'm  going  to  say  a  journey  from  being  not  confident 

0:41:04.469 --> 0:41:08.430
<v Susie Chan>and  not  confident  and  a  single  mum,  to  just  reinvention, 

0:41:08.430 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Susie Chan>and just  finding  my  strength,  and  finding  a  whole  community  of 

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:16.469
<v Susie Chan>empowerment  within  the  runners.

0:41:17.460 --> 0:41:20.819
<v Becs Gentry>It's  such  a  great  book.  Obviously,  I've  read  it,  and 

0:41:20.820 --> 0:41:24.810
<v Becs Gentry>I've  actually  listened  to  it  as  well.  I  listened  to a lot of 

0:41:25.410 --> 0:41:30.390
<v Becs Gentry>it  during  7,  7,  7,  where  Hillary  was  actually  listening 

0:41:30.390 --> 0:41:32.850
<v Becs Gentry>to  it  when  we  met.  It  was  so  weird.  It 

0:41:32.850 --> 0:41:36.359
<v Becs Gentry>was  on  her  phone,  and  I  was  like, " Wait,  that's 

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:38.310
<v Becs Gentry>my  Susie.  You're  listening  to  my  Susie."

0:41:38.310 --> 0:41:40.350
<v Susie Chan>I'm  so  flattered.  That's  wild.

0:41:40.350 --> 0:41:41.939
<v Becs Gentry>Those  were  the  two  of  us  on  the  plane.

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:44.250
<v Susie Chan>Yes,  yes.

0:41:44.250 --> 0:41:45.240
<v Becs Gentry>Of  course,  with  this  voice, I mean-

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:48.270
<v Susie Chan>It was  an  intense  three  days,  but I was like, " I'm  down  for  a 

0:41:48.270 --> 0:41:52.530
<v Susie Chan>recording.  I  can  do  this."  So  yes,  yes.  But  really, it 

0:41:52.530 --> 0:41:57.060
<v Susie Chan>just  chronicles  what  is  that  transformative  period  of  my  life, 

0:41:57.060 --> 0:42:01.739
<v Susie Chan>from  being  very  unfit  and  unhealthy,  and  having  no  confidence 

0:42:01.739 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Susie Chan>at  all,  like  terrified  to  speak  publicly,  to  running  on 

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Susie Chan>a  treadmill,  talking  to  millions  of  people  about  running.  And 

0:42:11.190 --> 0:42:15.630
<v Susie Chan>it  really is, it's like a  love  story  about  me  and  running  and  everybody 

0:42:15.630 --> 0:42:19.440
<v Susie Chan>I've  met  along  the  way,  and  just  some  extraordinary,  extraordinary 

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:19.681
<v Susie Chan>people  out  there.

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:23.011
<v Becs Gentry>And it's  very  funny  as  well.  You're  a  very  funny  writer.

0:42:23.011 --> 0:42:23.641
<v Susie Chan>Thank you.

0:42:24.300 --> 0:42:26.250
<v Becs Gentry>Not  all  the  way  through.  It's  not  a  comedy  of 

0:42:26.250 --> 0:42:29.460
<v Becs Gentry>course,  but  there  are  some  true  Susie  Chan  moments  that 

0:42:29.460 --> 0:42:32.700
<v Becs Gentry>really  make  you  have  a  good  chuckle.  But  it  is, 

0:42:32.700 --> 0:42:35.190
<v Becs Gentry>everyone  should  read  it,  because  it's  such  a  testament  to 

0:42:35.190 --> 0:42:39.660
<v Becs Gentry>how  strong  you  are.  You've  been  in  some, I'm not going  to  give 

0:42:39.660 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Becs Gentry>away  the  plot  lines,  but  you  have,  you've  put  yourself 

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:47.010
<v Becs Gentry>in  some  gnarly  situations.  You've  had  some  very  scary  experiences.

0:42:47.010 --> 0:42:51.420
<v Susie Chan>I  have,  yes.  And  I'm  very  pleased,  because  I  did 

0:42:51.420 --> 0:42:54.030
<v Susie Chan>actually,  I  refused  a  ghost  writer.  I  was  like, " I'm 

0:42:54.030 --> 0:42:58.170
<v Susie Chan>writing  this  all  myself."  And  it  was  a  slog  to 

0:42:58.170 --> 0:43:00.419
<v Susie Chan>get  that  thing  out,  but  I  did  it.  Yeah.

0:43:01.380 --> 0:43:04.049
<v Becs Gentry>So  amazing.  Trails  and  Tribulations,  everyone  needs  to  go  and 

0:43:04.050 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Becs Gentry>read  it.  Susie,  while  we're  talking  about  scary  things,  I 

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:12.900
<v Becs Gentry>think  one  of  the  scariest  things  for  me,  is  when 

0:43:13.110 --> 0:43:19.110
<v Becs Gentry>people  go  into  marathon  races  and  they  fall  down.  And 

0:43:19.230 --> 0:43:22.590
<v Becs Gentry>as  another  runner,  you  run  past,  and  you  just,  for 

0:43:22.590 --> 0:43:26.190
<v Becs Gentry>the  rest  of  your  race,  you're  just  thinking, " Please,  goodness 

0:43:26.190 --> 0:43:30.030
<v Becs Gentry>above,  please  hope  that  person  is  okay."  And  this  is 

0:43:30.030 --> 0:43:31.529
<v Becs Gentry>what  happened  to  you  at  the  end  of  the  Chicago Marathon, right?

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:33.450
<v Susie Chan>Yes.

0:43:34.739 --> 0:43:35.850
<v Becs Gentry>In  2017,  was  it?

0:43:35.850 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Susie Chan>I  was  about  to  say,  you  pointed  the  date.  Yeah, 

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:41.670
<v Susie Chan>was it  2017?  Yes,  it  was.  I  had  been  feeling  very 

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:44.280
<v Susie Chan>just  off  and  on,  unwell  for,  I'm  going  to  say 

0:43:44.280 --> 0:43:46.560
<v Susie Chan>a  few  months.  I  couldn't  quite  put  my  finger  on 

0:43:46.560 --> 0:43:49.770
<v Susie Chan>it.  I  was  feeling  very  sluggish,  very  slow,  sweaty,  everything 

0:43:49.770 --> 0:43:51.690
<v Susie Chan>was  a  bit  of  a  chore.  And  I  thought, " Well, 

0:43:51.690 --> 0:43:55.350
<v Susie Chan>maybe  I'm  just  getting  unfit,  maybe  I'm  getting  older."  There 

0:43:55.350 --> 0:43:59.370
<v Susie Chan>was  no  obvious  symptom,  but  the  biggest  symptom  I  had 

0:43:59.370 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Susie Chan>is  I  kept  having  this  dreadful  cough,  which  was  just an 

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:05.940
<v Susie Chan>awful  cough,  which  would  come  and  go. And  I  was  put 

0:44:05.940 --> 0:44:09.360
<v Susie Chan>on  antibiotics,  it  came  back.  And  I  had  this  terrible 

0:44:09.360 --> 0:44:11.489
<v Susie Chan>cough,  and  I  was  doing  Chicago  Marathon,  which  was  my 

0:44:11.489 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Susie Chan>sixth,  and  then,  I  thought,  final  World  Marathon  major,  so 

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:20.010
<v Susie Chan>it  was  huge.  I'd  qualified,  I'd  got  in,  the  hotel 

0:44:20.010 --> 0:44:21.570
<v Susie Chan>was  booked,  I  was over there  with  a  few  friends,  we're  all 

0:44:21.570 --> 0:44:25.049
<v Susie Chan>getting  our six- star  medal  together. It was a  moment,  and  I  had  not 

0:44:25.050 --> 0:44:29.070
<v Susie Chan>been  feeling  great  coming  into  it.
I  had  this  cough.  And 

0:44:29.550 --> 0:44:31.680
<v Susie Chan>I  ran  the  marathon.  I  was  running  with  one  of 

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:34.290
<v Susie Chan>my  very  good  friends,  Sophie,  who's  also  doing  Sydney  with 

0:44:34.290 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Susie Chan>me.  And  I  said, " This  cough,  I  feel  dreadful."  And 

0:44:39.600 --> 0:44:41.700
<v Susie Chan>I  said,  I  remember  telling  her,  Becs,  I  said  this, "

0:44:42.090 --> 0:44:43.650
<v Susie Chan>If  I  faint,  don't  let  them  take  me  off  the 

0:44:43.650 --> 0:44:48.150
<v Susie Chan>course  because  I  need  this  sixth  star. I can't come back a  year  later."  And I was 

0:44:48.780 --> 0:44:50.910
<v Susie Chan>clinging  on  and  clinging  on.  I  can  remember  my  vision 

0:44:50.910 --> 0:44:53.129
<v Susie Chan>being  a  bit...  She  was  one  side  of  me,  trying 

0:44:53.130 --> 0:44:56.370
<v Susie Chan>to  make  sure  I  was  okay. And  I  finished  the  race. 

0:44:57.030 --> 0:45:00.660
<v Susie Chan>It  wasn't  my  finest  moment.  But  we  were  being  presented 

0:45:00.660 --> 0:45:03.360
<v Susie Chan>with our sixth  star  medals  and  being  videoed,  they  were  talking  to 

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:06.210
<v Susie Chan>us,  and I remember  thinking,  and  I  was  very  British  about  it, 

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:13.050
<v Susie Chan>because  I  said, " I'm  so  sorry, I think I'm going to faint." And then I just fainted.  I  collapsed  and  I 

0:45:13.050 --> 0:45:16.620
<v Susie Chan>was  so English about it, " How  embarrassing,  I'm  so  sorry."
 And  when  I 

0:45:16.620 --> 0:45:18.690
<v Susie Chan>fainted,  and  then  I  don't  really  know  what  happened.  But 

0:45:18.810 --> 0:45:21.180
<v Susie Chan>the  short  version  is  Sophie  was  very  worried.  She  was  like, "

0:45:21.180 --> 0:45:23.009
<v Susie Chan>She  can  run  100  miles  through  a  desert,  there's  something 

0:45:23.010 --> 0:45:25.710
<v Susie Chan>wrong  with  you."  Phoned  a  doctor,  went  home,  had  an  X-

0:45:25.710 --> 0:45:28.500
<v Susie Chan>ray  on  my  lungs,  because  they  thought there was perhaps something  my  lungs,  and 

0:45:28.500 --> 0:45:30.989
<v Susie Chan>they  found  a  huge  tumor  in  my  neck.  It was  quite 

0:45:30.989 --> 0:45:34.890
<v Susie Chan>a  large  tumor  in  my  thyroid.  And  I  had  thyroid 

0:45:34.890 --> 0:45:40.530
<v Susie Chan>cancer,  and  I  didn't  know.  I  was  very  lucky.  I've 

0:45:40.530 --> 0:45:43.770
<v Susie Chan>seen  and  know  people that  have  been  on  cancer  journeys,  which 

0:45:43.770 --> 0:45:48.270
<v Susie Chan>have  been  incredibly  rough,  challenging,  and  hard.  And  being  completely 

0:45:48.270 --> 0:45:51.540
<v Susie Chan>honest  with you, I  was  incredibly  lucky.  It  was  a  very  easy, I had 

0:45:51.690 --> 0:45:56.219
<v Susie Chan>a  couple  of  operations,  mild  treatment,  and  I  dealt  with 

0:45:56.219 --> 0:46:01.950
<v Susie Chan>it,  probably  not  in  the  most  normal  way.
 I  did 

0:46:01.950 --> 0:46:04.980
<v Susie Chan>a  half- marathon  about  two  weeks  after  my  operation.  Didn't 

0:46:04.980 --> 0:46:08.009
<v Susie Chan>ask  my  oncologist,  just thought  I  can.  Exactly,  I'll  just go for a run, and  if 

0:46:08.010 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Susie Chan>I stop, I just  stop.  Finished,  and  then  went  on  and  did  a 

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Susie Chan>very,  very  life- affirming  Marathon des Sables  with  my  best  friends  a 

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Susie Chan>couple  of  weeks  after.

0:46:20.010 --> 0:46:20.430
<v Becs Gentry>Wow.

0:46:20.430 --> 0:46:25.590
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Wow, wow.  Glad  that  was  a  successful  journey,  a  successful  ending 

0:46:25.590 --> 0:46:29.310
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>for  you  too,  because  obviously  a  scary  thing,  and  clearly, 

0:46:29.310 --> 0:46:32.550
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>has  not  held  you  back.  So,  all  right,  so  Sydney 

0:46:32.550 --> 0:46:37.170
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Marathon's  next.  I  guess,  in  closing,  is  there  another  big 

0:46:37.230 --> 0:46:41.250
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>crazy  thing  out  there  that  you  have  your  eyes  on? 

0:46:41.250 --> 0:46:44.279
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Is it  what  Becs  did  with  the  Great  World  Race?  Is 

0:46:44.280 --> 0:46:46.980
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>there  anything  else  out  there  that  you  look  at  and  say, "

0:46:47.460 --> 0:46:49.800
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Yeah,  this  needs  to  be  my  next  big  thing?"

0:46:50.010 --> 0:46:52.410
<v Susie Chan>Rob,  it  never  ends.  And  I  actually,  I  mean,  maybe 

0:46:52.410 --> 0:46:55.290
<v Susie Chan>Becs is  the  person  actually.  There's  one  itch  left  to  scratch, 

0:46:55.380 --> 0:46:58.530
<v Susie Chan>and I don't know  if this will  ever  happened,  because  I  have  to  be...  I'm 

0:46:58.530 --> 0:47:01.469
<v Susie Chan>getting  older.  I  want  to  be  running  until  I'm  a 

0:47:01.469 --> 0:47:05.160
<v Susie Chan>little  old  lady,  and  I  need  to just  look  after  myself. 

0:47:05.160 --> 0:47:07.350
<v Susie Chan>And  I  can't  run  like  I  used  to,  I  just 

0:47:07.350 --> 0:47:09.840
<v Susie Chan>throw  myself  into  anything  without  much  thought, and  now  I  have 

0:47:10.469 --> 0:47:14.100
<v Susie Chan>bit  more  considerate.  But  maybe  I'm  just going to ask Becs live  on  this  podcast, 

0:47:14.100 --> 0:47:16.020
<v Susie Chan>if  she  would.  I  want  to  run  in  the  Arctic, Becs. 

0:47:16.230 --> 0:47:17.700
<v Susie Chan>I  know  you've  run  there  already,  so  you're  like  an 

0:47:17.700 --> 0:47:20.280
<v Susie Chan>old  hat  at  this  thing,  but  there  is  one  race 

0:47:20.280 --> 0:47:24.300
<v Susie Chan>in  the  Yukon,  where  we  just  run,  walk  100  miles 

0:47:24.300 --> 0:47:27.360
<v Susie Chan>with  a  little  sled.  I  love  it.

0:47:27.930 --> 0:47:31.980
<v Becs Gentry>Done,  in.  I  did  Antarctica,  so  technically,  the  Arctic's  different.

0:47:31.980 --> 0:47:37.710
<v Susie Chan>Oh  yes,  there  we go. Yeah. I don't know if it'll  ever  happened,  but  you  only  see 

0:47:37.710 --> 0:47:39.541
<v Susie Chan>those  people  with  their  sledges,  and  they're  like  that.  Yeah, I'd quite like to see that.

0:47:39.540 --> 0:47:42.810
<v Becs Gentry>Yeah,  I  would  love  to  do  that  for  the  exploring 

0:47:42.810 --> 0:47:45.299
<v Becs Gentry>side  of  it  too,  because  I  ran  four  loops  around 

0:47:45.690 --> 0:47:48.270
<v Becs Gentry>one  base  in  Antarctica,  so  I  didn't  really  see  it. So I feel like 

0:47:48.810 --> 0:47:51.480
<v Becs Gentry>that  would  be,  yes,  see  it.  I  think  we  do, 

0:47:51.480 --> 0:47:54.570
<v Becs Gentry>we  need  to do a  big, big  ultra  together.

0:47:54.570 --> 0:47:54.721
<v Susie Chan>We  need  to do something.

0:47:54.720 --> 0:47:54.721
<v Becs Gentry>Something like, I don't know, the old-

0:47:54.721 --> 0:48:01.110
<v Susie Chan>You'd have to  either  get  the  kettle  on  when  you get over  the  finish 

0:48:01.110 --> 0:48:03.002
<v Susie Chan>line  or  slow  down  if you  want  to be  (inaudible) .

0:48:03.002 --> 0:48:06.000
<v Becs Gentry>No, we'll do  it  together.  It's  an  ultra,  we'll  do  it  together. 

0:48:06.000 --> 0:48:08.219
<v Becs Gentry>The  Hippie  Trail,  I'd  love  to  be  able  to  actually 

0:48:08.219 --> 0:48:10.530
<v Becs Gentry>do  the  Hippie  Trail,  the  original  Hippie  Trail,  like  across, 

0:48:10.530 --> 0:48:12.421
<v Becs Gentry>but  I  don't  think  politically  we  can  do  that  anymore.

0:48:12.421 --> 0:48:14.969
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>I don't know. If  I  ever  go  to  the  Arctic,  I  want  to 

0:48:14.969 --> 0:48:18.870
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>be  pulled  by  eight  Huskies,  you  know,  sled  dogs.  That 

0:48:18.870 --> 0:48:23.040
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>sounds  like  fun.  Maybe  I'll  pass. Maybe I'll pass,  you  guys.  Yeah.

0:48:23.670 --> 0:48:24.029
<v Becs Gentry>Yeah.

0:48:24.420 --> 0:48:28.950
<v Susie Chan>There's always something.  I'm  very  much  driven  by  experience  over  experience  with 

0:48:28.950 --> 0:48:33.330
<v Susie Chan>people  to  the  race  rather  than  a  distance  or  a 

0:48:33.330 --> 0:48:33.960
<v Susie Chan>time  now.

0:48:34.620 --> 0:48:38.610
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>It  makes  sense.  Well,  Susie,  congrats  on  everything.  Congrats  on 

0:48:38.610 --> 0:48:42.390
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>your  book,  Trails  and  Tribulations,  which  is  out  now.  And 

0:48:42.719 --> 0:48:45.090
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>good  luck  in  Sydney,  hope  you  have  a  great,  great 

0:48:45.090 --> 0:48:48.030
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>time. And  the  first  time  Sydney's  a  major,  so  you'll  always 

0:48:48.030 --> 0:48:51.480
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>have  that  experience  to  go  on.  And  keep  going  on 

0:48:51.480 --> 0:48:55.155
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>those  treadmills  for  all  those  Peloton  classes,  but  not  for 

0:48:55.155 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>86  miles.
 New  York  Road  Runners  is  a  nonprofit  organization 

0:49:00.630 --> 0:49:03.870
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>with  a  vision  to  build  healthier  lives  and  stronger  communities 

0:49:04.050 --> 0:49:07.710
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>through  the  transformative  power  of  running.  The  support  of  members 

0:49:07.710 --> 0:49:10.770
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>and  donors  like  you  helps  us  achieve  our  mission  to 

0:49:10.770 --> 0:49:14.040
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>transform  the  health  and  well- being  of  our  communities  through 

0:49:14.040 --> 0:49:18.509
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>inclusive  and  accessible  running  experiences,  empowering  all  to  achieve  their 

0:49:18.510 --> 0:49:25.050
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>potential.  Learn  more,  and  contribute  at  nyrr. org/ donate.
 Margaret 

0:49:25.050 --> 0:49:27.690
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Schwartz  is a  very  familiar  face  to  New  York  Road  Runners, 

0:49:27.690 --> 0:49:33.270
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>having  run 263  NYRR  races,  20  of  which  were  New  York 

0:49:33.270 --> 0:49:37.739
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>City  Marathons.  But  after  completing  her  20th  consecutive  marathon  in 

0:49:37.739 --> 0:49:41.160
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>2021,  she  made  the  decision  to  step  back  from  the 

0:49:41.160 --> 0:49:45.840
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>26.2  mile  distance.  And  despite  her  streaker  status,  she  hasn't 

0:49:45.840 --> 0:49:49.020
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>run  a  full  marathon  since  crossing  that  last  Central  Park 

0:49:49.020 --> 0:49:53.550
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>finish  line.  Instead,  she's  become  a  devoted  marathon  spectator,  and 

0:49:53.550 --> 0:49:57.719
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>has  swapped  endurance  running  for  endurance  swimming.  A  lifelong  athlete, 

0:49:57.719 --> 0:50:01.410
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Margaret  is  both  the  certified  yoga  instructor  and  trainer,  and 

0:50:01.410 --> 0:50:04.920
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>she  brings  two  decades  of  marathon  grit  and  her  growing 

0:50:04.920 --> 0:50:08.489
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>love  of  open- water  swimming  to  today's  member  moments.

0:50:08.610 --> 0:50:13.080
<v Meb Keflezighi>Thanks,  Rob.  Thanks,  Becs.  Margaret,  welcome  to  the  Set  the 

0:50:13.080 --> 0:50:14.910
<v Meb Keflezighi>Pace  Podcast.  How's  it  going  today?

0:50:15.180 --> 0:50:17.310
<v Margaret Schwartz>It's  going  well.  And  I'm  just  really  happy  to  be 

0:50:17.310 --> 0:50:19.680
<v Margaret Schwartz>here  and  talk  to  you.  But  we  see  you  from 

0:50:19.680 --> 0:50:21.509
<v Margaret Schwartz>afar,  so  this  is  exciting  for  me.

0:50:21.510 --> 0:50:23.430
<v Meb Keflezighi>Very  kind  of  you.  It's  great  to  be  with  you. 

0:50:23.910 --> 0:50:27.690
<v Meb Keflezighi>So  let's  get  to,  wow,  263  races  with  the  New 

0:50:27.690 --> 0:50:33.779
<v Meb Keflezighi>York  Road  Runners,  you  run  the TCS New York City  Marathon  20  times,  but 

0:50:33.780 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Meb Keflezighi>now  you  consider  yourself  retired  from  the  26.2  miles.  What 

0:50:38.520 --> 0:50:41.610
<v Meb Keflezighi>drove  you  to  run  year  after  year?  How  did  you 

0:50:41.700 --> 0:50:45.120
<v Meb Keflezighi>give  yourself  permission  to  stop  the 26. 2?

0:50:45.780 --> 0:50:49.440
<v Margaret Schwartz>Well,  it's  a  soft  provision,  Meb, I'm  not  going  to  lie. 

0:50:49.440 --> 0:50:52.410
<v Margaret Schwartz>It  hasn't  been  easy.  And  in  my  own  mind,  I 

0:50:52.410 --> 0:50:56.219
<v Margaret Schwartz>haven't  missed  one  marathon  yet.  So  when  vacations  come  up 

0:50:56.219 --> 0:50:58.920
<v Margaret Schwartz>and  someone  says, " First  Sunday  of  November,"  I'm  like, " Not 

0:50:58.920 --> 0:51:01.200
<v Margaret Schwartz>yet."  I  still  have  to  be  in  New  York  City 

0:51:01.650 --> 0:51:05.040
<v Margaret Schwartz>on  what  I  believe,  maybe  next  to  the  Thanksgiving  Day 

0:51:05.040 --> 0:51:09.480
<v Margaret Schwartz>Parade,  is  one  of  the  most  happiest  times  in  New 

0:51:09.480 --> 0:51:15.870
<v Margaret Schwartz>York  City.  So  it's  my  favorite  day.
 So  permission  was 

0:51:17.790 --> 0:51:21.000
<v Margaret Schwartz>I  just  wanted  to  quit  while  I  was  ahead.  I 

0:51:21.000 --> 0:51:23.430
<v Margaret Schwartz>had  a  few  injuries  along  the  way.  We  can  all 

0:51:23.700 --> 0:51:28.379
<v Margaret Schwartz>cringe  at  plantar  fasciitis.  I  had a  labral  tear  at  one 

0:51:28.380 --> 0:51:30.840
<v Margaret Schwartz>point,  and  thought  I'd  never  come  back  again,  where  a 

0:51:30.840 --> 0:51:35.520
<v Margaret Schwartz>friend  of  mine  convinced  me  to,  or  I  used  the 

0:51:35.520 --> 0:51:39.450
<v Margaret Schwartz>Galloway  method to  do  probably  what  was  my  14th  marathon,  to 

0:51:39.450 --> 0:51:43.379
<v Margaret Schwartz>keep  the  streak  going.  And  then  I  became  a  streaker, 

0:51:43.380 --> 0:51:47.640
<v Margaret Schwartz>and  knew  I'd  have  guaranteed  entry.  And  so  I  guess 

0:51:47.730 --> 0:51:50.489
<v Margaret Schwartz>in  the  back  of  my  mind,  I  know  that  I 

0:51:50.489 --> 0:51:55.170
<v Margaret Schwartz>can  run  the  marathon  at  any  given  time.  And  I'm 

0:51:55.170 --> 0:51:58.140
<v Margaret Schwartz>turning  59  this  year,  and  then  I  thought  to  myself, "

0:51:58.140 --> 0:52:00.840
<v Margaret Schwartz>Maybe  every  decade  I'll  just  complete  it,  so  I'll  do 

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:04.350
<v Margaret Schwartz>it  when  I'm  60."  Who  knows?  I  don't  know.  Jury's 

0:52:04.350 --> 0:52:05.070
<v Margaret Schwartz>out  on  that  one.

0:52:05.400 --> 0:52:07.500
<v Meb Keflezighi>It's  a  wonderful  idea.  I  think  it's  great  to  be 

0:52:07.500 --> 0:52:09.989
<v Meb Keflezighi>able  to  do  what  you  have  done,  20  of  them, 

0:52:09.989 --> 0:52:12.060
<v Meb Keflezighi>and  then  if  you  have  the  desire  or  the urge  to 

0:52:12.060 --> 0:52:14.700
<v Meb Keflezighi>come  back  every  decades,  we'd  love  to  see  you  there. 

0:52:15.810 --> 0:52:19.890
<v Meb Keflezighi>From  your  perspective  though,  how  was  running  the  first  marathon 

0:52:19.890 --> 0:52:21.150
<v Meb Keflezighi>different  from  running  the 20th time?

0:52:23.070 --> 0:52:26.190
<v Margaret Schwartz>The  first  one  is,  for  me,  and  this  is  all 

0:52:26.190 --> 0:52:30.270
<v Margaret Schwartz>my  personal  experience,  no  one  in  my  family  was  a 

0:52:30.270 --> 0:52:33.569
<v Margaret Schwartz>runner,  and  I  wasn't  a  runner.  And  I  had  started 

0:52:33.570 --> 0:52:39.450
<v Margaret Schwartz>working  close  to  Central  Park.  And  back in  2000,  yay,  Central 

0:52:39.450 --> 0:52:43.380
<v Margaret Schwartz>Park  Conservancy.  The  Central  Park  wasn't  what  it  is  today. 

0:52:43.410 --> 0:52:45.900
<v Margaret Schwartz>So  I  would  leave.  Back  then,  there  were  no  phones. 

0:52:46.260 --> 0:52:49.650
<v Margaret Schwartz>I  would  leave  a  note  with  a  person,  saying, " I'm 

0:52:49.650 --> 0:52:51.509
<v Margaret Schwartz>going  to  Central  Park  now.  If  I'm  not  back  in 

0:52:51.510 --> 0:52:54.930
<v Margaret Schwartz>an  hour,  something  has  happened  to  me."  So I mean,  I  feel 

0:52:54.930 --> 0:52:58.050
<v Margaret Schwartz>like  I'm  sort  of  getting  that  experience,  because  we  take 

0:52:58.050 --> 0:53:00.540
<v Margaret Schwartz>it  for  granted,  this  beautiful  place  that  we  have  to 

0:53:00.540 --> 0:53:03.420
<v Margaret Schwartz>run.  And  for  me,  as  a  little  girl,  I  grew 

0:53:03.420 --> 0:53:05.850
<v Margaret Schwartz>up  in  Queens,  and  I  always  went  to  watch  the 

0:53:05.850 --> 0:53:10.080
<v Margaret Schwartz>marathon,  I  guess 15 and  a  half  at  the  Queensborough  Bridge,  and 

0:53:10.080 --> 0:53:12.030
<v Margaret Schwartz>I  just  thought  they  were  people  doing  something  that  I 

0:53:12.030 --> 0:53:14.460
<v Margaret Schwartz>could  never  do.
 And  then  one  year,  my  friend,  in 

0:53:14.460 --> 0:53:18.960
<v Margaret Schwartz>1999,  did  it.  And  so  I  finally  knew  someone  who 

0:53:18.960 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Margaret Schwartz>ran  the  marathon,  and  I  thought " I  can  do  that." 

0:53:21.810 --> 0:53:23.700
<v Margaret Schwartz>And  so  it's  really  about  completing  it  for  me,  and 

0:53:23.700 --> 0:53:26.910
<v Margaret Schwartz>I  thought " One  and  done,  I'm  out."  And  then  it  was, "

0:53:26.910 --> 0:53:28.200
<v Margaret Schwartz>Well,  let's  see  if  I  can  do  it  a  little 

0:53:28.200 --> 0:53:33.090
<v Margaret Schwartz>better  the  second  time."  And  then  it  was "Now  I  qualified 

0:53:33.090 --> 0:53:35.670
<v Margaret Schwartz>for  Boston.  Okay,  I'm  going  to  end  it  with  Boston." 

0:53:35.969 --> 0:53:38.760
<v Margaret Schwartz>And  I  remember  talking  to  someone  on  the  plane  to 

0:53:38.760 --> 0:53:42.060
<v Margaret Schwartz>Boston,  and  I  said, " Well,  no,  this  was  I  thought 

0:53:42.060 --> 0:53:43.800
<v Margaret Schwartz>it  would  never  happen,  so  I'm  going  to  be  done 

0:53:43.800 --> 0:53:45.690
<v Margaret Schwartz>here."  And  she  looked  at me,  and  she  said, " No,  you're 

0:53:45.690 --> 0:53:49.980
<v Margaret Schwartz>not."  I don't  know  what  she  saw  in  me.  But  the 

0:53:49.980 --> 0:53:53.130
<v Margaret Schwartz>last  one  was  also  special,  because  it  was  the  50th 

0:53:53.130 --> 0:53:55.589
<v Margaret Schwartz>running  of  the  New  York  City  Marathon,  and  I  got 

0:53:55.590 --> 0:53:58.620
<v Margaret Schwartz>to do it  with  my  wife.  So I'd  like  to  say  maybe  in 

0:53:58.620 --> 0:54:03.000
<v Margaret Schwartz>my  last  five  marathons,  I  called  them  completing  marathons.  I 

0:54:03.000 --> 0:54:06.420
<v Margaret Schwartz>didn't  necessarily  run  them,  I  used  the  Galloway,  and  certainly, 

0:54:06.420 --> 0:54:08.640
<v Margaret Schwartz>that  last  one  was  a  run- walk  coming  out  of COVID.

0:54:09.090 --> 0:54:12.029
<v Meb Keflezighi>Amazing.  I  said,  my  first  one  I  did  in  New 

0:54:12.030 --> 0:54:13.830
<v Meb Keflezighi>York,  I  said, " This  is  my  first  and  last,  I don't 

0:54:14.130 --> 0:54:16.560
<v Meb Keflezighi>think  I  want  to  do it."  But  somehow,  someway,  you've  done 

0:54:16.560 --> 0:54:19.051
<v Meb Keflezighi>20 of them, you've done 26,  but  we're  grateful  for  that.

0:54:19.051 --> 0:54:19.381
<v Margaret Schwartz>Yes.

0:54:20.040 --> 0:54:23.250
<v Meb Keflezighi>So  you  are  also  a  crazy  leg  runner,  which  means 

0:54:23.250 --> 0:54:26.790
<v Meb Keflezighi>you  have  run  the  Mini- 10K  at  least  15  times. 

0:54:27.120 --> 0:54:31.500
<v Meb Keflezighi>You  ran  your  first  Mini- 10K in 2001.  What  is  it  about 

0:54:31.500 --> 0:54:33.810
<v Meb Keflezighi>that  race  that  makes  you  want  to  keep  coming  back?

0:54:34.140 --> 0:54:38.460
<v Margaret Schwartz>I  love  that  race. First and  foremost,  I  think  the  new  course 

0:54:38.460 --> 0:54:40.290
<v Margaret Schwartz>is  great.  It's  a  little  outside  of  the  park,  so you 

0:54:40.410 --> 0:54:43.560
<v Margaret Schwartz>got  that  first  mile  on  Central  Park  West.  But  along 

0:54:43.560 --> 0:54:46.950
<v Margaret Schwartz>with  that,  there  was  a  time,  and  I  always  say 

0:54:46.950 --> 0:54:50.160
<v Margaret Schwartz>this  to  my  running  students,  where  they  didn't  think  women 

0:54:50.160 --> 0:54:53.730
<v Margaret Schwartz>could  run  more  than  a  5K,  and  that's  the  impetus 

0:54:53.730 --> 0:54:56.700
<v Margaret Schwartz>of  that  race,  to  run  the  10K,  and  that  women 

0:54:56.700 --> 0:55:00.450
<v Margaret Schwartz>got  together,  and  said, " We  can  do  this."  But  the 

0:55:00.450 --> 0:55:04.620
<v Margaret Schwartz>New  York  City  Marathon,  people  like  me  get  to  run 

0:55:04.650 --> 0:55:09.180
<v Margaret Schwartz>next  to  people  like  you,  or  Edna  Kiplagat,  or  Catherine 

0:55:09.180 --> 0:55:12.660
<v Margaret Schwartz>Switzer.  And  it's  just  mind  blowing  that  we  can  be 

0:55:12.660 --> 0:55:18.270
<v Margaret Schwartz>sort  of  these  non- professionals  doing  our  best.
 And  I 

0:55:18.270 --> 0:55:20.910
<v Margaret Schwartz>always  say  in  that  race,  at  the  halfway  point,  the 

0:55:20.910 --> 0:55:24.330
<v Margaret Schwartz>race  is  over.  Somebody  already  won.  It's  just  crazy  that 

0:55:24.330 --> 0:55:27.180
<v Margaret Schwartz>these  women  are  doing  it  in  30  minutes.  It's  just 

0:55:27.570 --> 0:55:31.080
<v Margaret Schwartz>crazy.  So  I love  that  race,  and  so  in  my  heart, 

0:55:31.530 --> 0:55:33.330
<v Margaret Schwartz>it  will  always  be  a  crazy...  It  will  always  be 

0:55:33.330 --> 0:55:36.810
<v Margaret Schwartz>a  Mini  and  one  New  York  City  half.  If  it's 

0:55:36.810 --> 0:55:41.580
<v Margaret Schwartz>not  the  United,  perhaps  Brooklyn,  but  there  will  always  be 

0:55:41.580 --> 0:55:46.319
<v Margaret Schwartz>a  New  York  Road  Runners  half- marathon  and the  crazy  lights 

0:55:46.320 --> 0:55:47.790
<v Margaret Schwartz>for  me,  as  long  as  I  can  do  it.

0:55:48.120 --> 0:55:50.580
<v Meb Keflezighi>You're going  to  keep  doing it.  Just  keep  doing  those  small  things, that makes 

0:55:50.850 --> 0:55:52.799
<v Meb Keflezighi>a  big  difference.  You're  inspiring  many.

0:55:52.800 --> 0:55:53.010
<v Margaret Schwartz>Yeah.

0:55:53.760 --> 0:55:57.690
<v Meb Keflezighi>But  now,  your  endurance  sport  is  swimming.  How  does  swimming 

0:55:57.690 --> 0:56:00.420
<v Meb Keflezighi>in  open  water  compare  to running  a  marathon?

0:56:01.050 --> 0:56:04.890
<v Margaret Schwartz>They're  very  similar,  except  it  takes  you  much  longer  to 

0:56:04.890 --> 0:56:08.009
<v Margaret Schwartz>swim  a  mile  than  to  run  a  mile.  Whether  it's 

0:56:08.010 --> 0:56:12.150
<v Margaret Schwartz>me  or  you,  it  just  takes  longer.  So  I  remember 

0:56:12.150 --> 0:56:14.460
<v Margaret Schwartz>the  first  time  when  I  thought  I  could  swim  a 

0:56:14.460 --> 0:56:17.969
<v Margaret Schwartz>5K,  I  had  two  miles  under  my  belt  easy, and  I  said, "

0:56:17.969 --> 0:56:21.660
<v Margaret Schwartz>What's  another  one?"  It's  a  lot.  And  the  truth  is 

0:56:21.719 --> 0:56:25.109
<v Margaret Schwartz>when  you're  running,  you  can  start  to  walk.  When  you're 

0:56:25.110 --> 0:56:29.969
<v Margaret Schwartz>swimming,  there's  no  walking,  and  usually  no  standing  up.  I 

0:56:29.969 --> 0:56:33.390
<v Margaret Schwartz>swim  with  a  safety  buoy,  so  it's  different  in  that 

0:56:33.390 --> 0:56:42.420
<v Margaret Schwartz>respect.  They're  very  similar  though,  nutrition- wise,  so  I  can 

0:56:42.450 --> 0:56:47.520
<v Margaret Schwartz>use  the  skills  I  had  from  running  distance  events  and 

0:56:47.520 --> 0:56:52.140
<v Margaret Schwartz>put  them  into  swimming  events.  And  it's  much  easier  on 

0:56:52.140 --> 0:56:56.400
<v Margaret Schwartz>my  body.  I  know  when  I  run  a  5K,  but 

0:56:56.400 --> 0:56:59.160
<v Margaret Schwartz>sometimes  I  can  forget  that  I  swam  a  5K, I  just 

0:56:59.160 --> 0:57:01.140
<v Margaret Schwartz>don't  feel  it  in  physical  body  as  much.

0:57:01.560 --> 0:57:03.689
<v Meb Keflezighi>No,  the  impact  is  definitely  less  on  the  body,  but 

0:57:03.690 --> 0:57:06.150
<v Meb Keflezighi>I  think  you're  doing  a  great  job  balancing  10K,  the 

0:57:06.150 --> 0:57:09.450
<v Meb Keflezighi>mini,  or  the  United  Airline  Half- marathon,  stuff  like  that, 

0:57:09.450 --> 0:57:13.980
<v Meb Keflezighi>to  do  great  job.  So  how  did  participating  in  yoga 

0:57:13.980 --> 0:57:17.010
<v Meb Keflezighi>make  a  difference  in  your  running,  and  do  you  find 

0:57:17.010 --> 0:57:19.020
<v Meb Keflezighi>it  helps  with  your  swimming  as  well?

0:57:20.700 --> 0:57:24.930
<v Margaret Schwartz>Well,  I  started  yoga  probably  in  the  late- 90s,  when 

0:57:24.930 --> 0:57:28.050
<v Margaret Schwartz>it  wasn't  as  in  vogue  as  it  is  now.  And 

0:57:28.440 --> 0:57:35.070
<v Margaret Schwartz>I  think  like  many  runners  are  terrible  about  post- recovery, 

0:57:35.160 --> 0:57:38.550
<v Margaret Schwartz>like  doing  stretching.  So  for  me,  as  a  student,  it 

0:57:39.450 --> 0:57:42.120
<v Margaret Schwartz>forced  me  to  stretch.  It  forced  me  to  move  my 

0:57:42.120 --> 0:57:46.410
<v Margaret Schwartz>body  differently.  But  there  is  similarities  with  it,  and  as 

0:57:46.410 --> 0:57:50.220
<v Margaret Schwartz>a  yoga  instructor,  and  knowing  more  about  yoga  in  general, 

0:57:51.120 --> 0:57:56.250
<v Margaret Schwartz>the  mind- body  connection  is,  to  me,  the  same.  So 

0:57:56.250 --> 0:58:00.510
<v Margaret Schwartz>if  you're  in  a  hard  posture,  even  if  it's  warrior 

0:58:00.510 --> 0:58:05.400
<v Margaret Schwartz>one,  it's  been  said  that  the  second  you  want  to 

0:58:05.400 --> 0:58:08.040
<v Margaret Schwartz>come  out  of  the  posture  is  when  the  yoga  begins. 

0:58:08.520 --> 0:58:11.280
<v Margaret Schwartz>And  just  like  when  you  hit  mile  20,  for  me, 

0:58:11.850 --> 0:58:16.680
<v Margaret Schwartz>that's  the  marathon.  The  final  10K  is  the  marathon.  20, 

0:58:16.860 --> 0:58:20.520
<v Margaret Schwartz>we  all  do  that.  That  last  10K  is  more  here 

0:58:21.300 --> 0:58:24.270
<v Margaret Schwartz>than  physically  for  me.  I  can't  speak  for  anybody  else.

0:58:24.270 --> 0:58:28.350
<v Meb Keflezighi>I  think  I  could  relate.  The last 10K  is  a  more  mental 

0:58:28.350 --> 0:58:32.970
<v Meb Keflezighi>thing.  But  having  done  yoga  since  1994, '95  also  kind  of 

0:58:32.970 --> 0:58:37.770
<v Meb Keflezighi>helps  you  with  everything,  to  just  stretch,  be in the moment,  and  visualization. 

0:58:38.430 --> 0:58:41.490
<v Meb Keflezighi>With  all  your  experiences  as  a  runner,  swimmer,  and  a 

0:58:41.490 --> 0:58:45.690
<v Meb Keflezighi>coach,  what's  the  biggest  insight  or  piece  of  advice  you 

0:58:45.690 --> 0:58:47.790
<v Meb Keflezighi>find  to  yourself  sharing  with  others?

0:58:50.610 --> 0:58:54.420
<v Margaret Schwartz>Well,  with  my  experience,  so  in  my  mind,  I  know 

0:58:54.420 --> 0:58:58.140
<v Margaret Schwartz>that  I'm  capable  in  the  distance.  For  those  20  years 

0:58:58.140 --> 0:59:01.350
<v Margaret Schwartz>that  I  was  running,  I  always  had  a  base,  always. 

0:59:01.770 --> 0:59:04.410
<v Margaret Schwartz>And  so  when  I  stopped  running  the  marathon,  I  thought 

0:59:04.410 --> 0:59:07.170
<v Margaret Schwartz>I  could  just  run  10K and  just  bang  that  out.  I 

0:59:07.380 --> 0:59:10.200
<v Margaret Schwartz>cannot  do  that.  You  still  have  to  build.  So  I 

0:59:10.200 --> 0:59:12.450
<v Margaret Schwartz>actually  had  to  train  for  a  half- marathon  for  the first time. I was always half-marathon ready. So knowing where you are in the 

0:59:17.820 --> 0:59:20.550
<v Margaret Schwartz>moment,  it  doesn't  matter  what  you  did  six  months  ago 

0:59:20.550 --> 0:59:25.290
<v Margaret Schwartz>or  six  years  ago.  Although  mentally,  that  foundation  is  still 

0:59:25.290 --> 0:59:28.200
<v Margaret Schwartz>there,  I  like  to  train,  Meb,  on  the  less  is 

0:59:28.200 --> 0:59:31.980
<v Margaret Schwartz>more.  Less  is  more.  And  especially  as  you  get  older, 

0:59:33.420 --> 0:59:37.410
<v Margaret Schwartz>pushing  those  miles,  and  having  40, 50- mile  weeks,  which  by 

0:59:37.410 --> 0:59:40.650
<v Margaret Schwartz>the  way,  if  you  have  any  other  life  besides  running, 

0:59:40.650 --> 0:59:44.460
<v Margaret Schwartz>if  you're  not  professional,  you  have  another  job.  So  actually, 

0:59:44.460 --> 0:59:50.040
<v Margaret Schwartz>to  put  that  time  in  is  very  time  consuming  and 

0:59:50.100 --> 0:59:55.560
<v Margaret Schwartz>hard  on  the  body,  hard  mentally.
 So  I'd  just  say 

0:59:55.560 --> 0:59:58.410
<v Margaret Schwartz>less  is  more.  Have  your  base  before  you  even  start 

0:59:58.410 --> 1:00:01.439
<v Margaret Schwartz>training  for  a  marathon,  and  then  build  on  that.  And 

1:00:01.470 --> 1:00:03.720
<v Margaret Schwartz>always  distance  first.  I  mean,  you  know  this.  This  isn't 

1:00:03.720 --> 1:00:08.070
<v Margaret Schwartz>anything  that  we  can't  find  anywhere.  Speed  is  second.  Complete, 

1:00:08.280 --> 1:00:10.320
<v Margaret Schwartz>and  then  add  your  speed  to  it.  One  of  my 

1:00:10.320 --> 1:00:14.760
<v Margaret Schwartz>friends  told  me,  who  became  a  full  Ironman,  Kona  Ironman, 

1:00:15.240 --> 1:00:17.220
<v Margaret Schwartz>and  was  injured  along  the  way,  she  said " The  one 

1:00:17.220 --> 1:00:20.910
<v Margaret Schwartz>reason  why  I  had  longevity  was  because  I  never  pushed 

1:00:20.910 --> 1:00:23.729
<v Margaret Schwartz>the  speed,"  and  I  think  she  was  right.

1:00:23.970 --> 1:00:26.940
<v Meb Keflezighi>I  agree.  I  think  the base  is  important.  You  could  always 

1:00:28.200 --> 1:00:32.220
<v Meb Keflezighi>convert  endurance  to  speed,  but you  can't  convert  speed  to  endurance. 

1:00:32.250 --> 1:00:34.470
<v Meb Keflezighi>So  as  long  you  can  do  the  fundamental  work  and 

1:00:34.470 --> 1:00:38.610
<v Meb Keflezighi>progression  run,  and  longevity  is  important.  So as long as  you're  having  fun, 

1:00:38.610 --> 1:00:42.810
<v Meb Keflezighi>staying  healthy,  have  a  maintained  lifestyle,  a  healthy  lifestyle,  great 

1:00:42.810 --> 1:00:44.310
<v Meb Keflezighi>things  can  happen.  So  Margaret-

1:00:44.670 --> 1:00:45.210
<v Margaret Schwartz>Can  I  ask  you a question, Meb?

1:00:45.210 --> 1:00:45.300
<v Meb Keflezighi>Sure.

1:00:47.310 --> 1:00:50.700
<v Margaret Schwartz>Because  the  final  marathon  you  did,  of  course  I did  a 

1:00:50.700 --> 1:00:54.420
<v Margaret Schwartz>little  history  here,  looked  back,  a  little  homework.  You  were 

1:00:54.810 --> 1:00:59.130
<v Margaret Schwartz>one  hour  longer  than  you're  winning  New  York  City  Marathon 

1:00:59.400 --> 1:01:03.360
<v Margaret Schwartz>time.  How  was  that  for  you?  Because  I'm  one  hour 

1:01:03.360 --> 1:01:05.610
<v Margaret Schwartz>longer  than  I have  ever  been,  and  then  you  get  to 

1:01:05.610 --> 1:01:07.860
<v Margaret Schwartz>a  time  where  it  is  what  it  is,  right?  It 

1:01:07.860 --> 1:01:08.370
<v Margaret Schwartz>is  what  it  is.

1:01:08.370 --> 1:01:11.790
<v Meb Keflezighi>I  was  with  a  New  Balance  person  yesterday,  having  a 

1:01:11.790 --> 1:01:18.780
<v Meb Keflezighi>dinner,  I said  that  win  in  Boston,  or  the  finish  equally 

1:01:18.780 --> 1:01:22.170
<v Meb Keflezighi>hurt  the  last  time  I  did  it,  last  year.  Same 

1:01:22.170 --> 1:01:26.580
<v Meb Keflezighi>pain.  But  at  the  same  time,  I  was  ready  for 

1:01:26.580 --> 1:01:28.860
<v Meb Keflezighi>it.  It's just  the  last  time,  I  had  a  lot  of 

1:01:28.860 --> 1:01:32.340
<v Meb Keflezighi>injuries  going  into  the  race.  But  it  equally  hurts.  You 

1:01:32.340 --> 1:01:35.970
<v Meb Keflezighi>have  to  prepare  for  it.  A  marathon,  you  can't  just 

1:01:35.970 --> 1:01:38.160
<v Meb Keflezighi>walk  into  it,  you  have  to  do  the  work.  And 

1:01:38.160 --> 1:01:40.500
<v Meb Keflezighi>if  you do  the  work,  we  might  make  it  look  seamless 

1:01:40.500 --> 1:01:43.080
<v Meb Keflezighi>or  effortless,  but  it  hurts.  Whether  you're  in  front  of 

1:01:43.080 --> 1:01:45.930
<v Meb Keflezighi>the pack or the middle of the  pack  or  the  back  of  the  pack,  it  hurts. 

1:01:46.050 --> 1:01:48.030
<v Meb Keflezighi>But  at  the  end  of the  day,  you  could  say, "Hey,  I 

1:01:48.030 --> 1:01:50.100
<v Meb Keflezighi>have  done  it."  Coming  across  the  finish  line  is  such 

1:01:50.340 --> 1:01:52.020
<v Meb Keflezighi>a  gratifying  moment,  no  matter  what.

1:01:53.220 --> 1:01:56.460
<v Margaret Schwartz>I  think  exactly  what  you  just  said,  it  hurts  at 

1:01:56.460 --> 1:01:57.690
<v Margaret Schwartz>208  and  it  hurts at 308.

1:01:57.690 --> 1:01:57.750
<v Meb Keflezighi>Yeah.

1:01:58.920 --> 1:02:00.810
<v Margaret Schwartz>But  yet  you  feel  like  you're  running  as  fast  as 

1:02:00.810 --> 1:02:01.740
<v Margaret Schwartz>you  did  when  you  ran  that 208.

1:02:02.310 --> 1:02:06.210
<v Meb Keflezighi>The  only  thing, Margaret, I could say, is if you can  do  even  pace  or  negative  splits,  it 

1:02:06.210 --> 1:02:09.060
<v Meb Keflezighi>hurts  a  little  bit  more  than  then  just  going  out 

1:02:09.060 --> 1:02:14.370
<v Meb Keflezighi>hard.  If  you  go  127  and  come  back  140,  that's 

1:02:15.390 --> 1:02:15.871
<v Meb Keflezighi>not  pretty,  that hurts.

1:02:15.871 --> 1:02:15.961
<v Margaret Schwartz>Heartbreaking, heartbreaking. Go for the negative split always.

1:02:19.260 --> 1:02:21.990
<v Meb Keflezighi>Negative  split.  Makes  it  easier.  It  doesn't  mean  it  doesn't 

1:02:21.990 --> 1:02:24.150
<v Meb Keflezighi>hurt,  it  just  makes  it  easier  that  day,  and  also 

1:02:24.150 --> 1:02:25.050
<v Meb Keflezighi>the  recovery  process.

1:02:25.050 --> 1:02:25.620
<v Margaret Schwartz>Yes, yes,  yes.  Absolutely.

1:02:26.190 --> 1:02:27.870
<v Meb Keflezighi>So  great  time  to  be  able  to  talk  to  you 

1:02:27.930 --> 1:02:30.540
<v Meb Keflezighi>as  Member  Moments,  Margaret.  Keep  up  the  great  work,  and 

1:02:30.900 --> 1:02:32.520
<v Meb Keflezighi>congratulations  on  all  your  accomplishments.

1:02:33.810 --> 1:02:36.450
<v Margaret Schwartz>Thank  you. Thank you, Meb.  So  nice  to  be  with  you  here,  and 

1:02:36.450 --> 1:02:39.600
<v Margaret Schwartz>very  inspirational.  My  friends  are  going  to  be  very  jealous, 

1:02:39.600 --> 1:02:40.290
<v Margaret Schwartz>that's  all  I'm  saying.

1:02:40.290 --> 1:02:42.360
<v Meb Keflezighi>We  had  a  nice  conversation.  Pleasure  to  be  with  you.

1:02:42.360 --> 1:02:44.430
<v Margaret Schwartz>Yes,  hopefully  I'll  see  you  at  the  Streaker  Luncheon.

1:02:44.430 --> 1:02:45.480
<v Meb Keflezighi>All  right,  sounds  good.

1:02:45.810 --> 1:02:48.900
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Now  it's  time  for  today's  Meb  minute  with  HSS.

1:02:49.260 --> 1:02:52.770
<v Meb Keflezighi>Thanks,  Rob.  Chrysta,  welcome  to  Set  the  Pace  Podcast.  How's 

1:02:52.770 --> 1:02:53.041
<v Meb Keflezighi>it  going  today?

1:02:53.041 --> 1:02:53.371
<v Chrysta>Great. Yeah, it's going really well.

1:02:56.160 --> 1:02:59.490
<v Meb Keflezighi>Great  to  have  you.  Many  recreational  runners  aren't  sure  whether 

1:02:59.490 --> 1:03:03.540
<v Meb Keflezighi>their  aches  are  normal or a  sign  they  need  help.  How  do 

1:03:03.540 --> 1:03:07.110
<v Meb Keflezighi>you  assess  runner's  gait  and  foot  mechanics  to  decide  whether 

1:03:07.110 --> 1:03:11.130
<v Meb Keflezighi>the  custom  insert  could  be  beneficial,  or  if  a  well-

1:03:11.130 --> 1:03:12.930
<v Meb Keflezighi>chosen  shoe  is  sufficient  enough?

1:03:13.980 --> 1:03:18.510
<v Chrysta>Sure.  So  I  think  there are a few things that we do in  a  clinical  setting  that  actually, 

1:03:19.020 --> 1:03:23.700
<v Chrysta>we  recommend  patients  and  runners  can  do  at  home,  two 

1:03:23.700 --> 1:03:26.610
<v Chrysta>types  of  assessment  that  they  can  do  of  their  own 

1:03:26.610 --> 1:03:30.450
<v Chrysta>feet  and  their  own  alignment.  One  is  a  static  assessment, 

1:03:30.450 --> 1:03:34.800
<v Chrysta>this  means  just  standing  and  observing.  I  think  the  first 

1:03:34.800 --> 1:03:36.900
<v Chrysta>really  helpful  thing  you  can  do  is  look  at  where 

1:03:36.900 --> 1:03:40.229
<v Chrysta>you  have  calluses  on  your  feet.  Calluses  is  a  little 

1:03:40.230 --> 1:03:43.950
<v Chrysta>bit  of  your  body's  way  of  saying, " I  wasn't  quite 

1:03:43.950 --> 1:03:46.560
<v Chrysta>designed  for  the  pressure  and  forces  you're  putting  on  this 

1:03:46.560 --> 1:03:50.820
<v Chrysta>section  of  my  foot."  So  the  calluses  can  be  indicative 

1:03:50.850 --> 1:03:54.930
<v Chrysta>of  areas  that  have  too  much  friction,  or  too  much 

1:03:54.930 --> 1:03:58.320
<v Chrysta>pressure  against  them,  while  you're  running  and  moving.  So  looking 

1:03:58.320 --> 1:04:02.280
<v Chrysta>at  those  calluses  and  seeing  where  they're  located.  The  second 

1:04:02.280 --> 1:04:05.070
<v Chrysta>is  looking  at  your  alignment,  standing  in  front  of  a 

1:04:05.070 --> 1:04:08.550
<v Chrysta>mirror,  or  doing  a  footprint  test,  where  even  almost  like 

1:04:08.550 --> 1:04:11.550
<v Chrysta>just  stepping  with  a  wet  foot  on  a  piece  of 

1:04:11.550 --> 1:04:16.050
<v Chrysta>paper  and  seeing  how  much  of  that  bottom  surface  of 

1:04:16.050 --> 1:04:19.919
<v Chrysta>your  foot  is  contacting  the  ground.
 And  you  can  see 

1:04:19.920 --> 1:04:24.060
<v Chrysta>online,  they're  really  easy  to  find,  footprint  alignments  that  show 

1:04:24.060 --> 1:04:27.840
<v Chrysta>you  a  high,  normal,  or  flat  arch.  Essentially,  the  more 

1:04:27.840 --> 1:04:30.630
<v Chrysta>that  that  footprint  is  in  contact  with  the  ground,  the 

1:04:30.630 --> 1:04:33.210
<v Chrysta>flatter  your  foot.  The  less  in  contact,  where  it  looks 

1:04:33.210 --> 1:04:35.130
<v Chrysta>like  it's  jumping  from  the  heel  to  the  ball  of 

1:04:35.130 --> 1:04:38.100
<v Chrysta>the  foot,  that's  a  higher  arch.  And  you're  sort  of 

1:04:38.100 --> 1:04:43.290
<v Chrysta>trying  to  determine  what  type  of  arch  alignment  you  personally 

1:04:43.290 --> 1:04:46.230
<v Chrysta>have,  and  that's  what  we'll  use  to  determine  if  you 

1:04:46.230 --> 1:04:50.070
<v Chrysta>need  something  more  significant.  So  callusing,  looking  at  your  foot 

1:04:50.070 --> 1:04:54.000
<v Chrysta>alignment,  and  then  looking  at  the  mobility  of...  Primarily,  I 

1:04:54.000 --> 1:04:56.580
<v Chrysta>think  the  biggest  ones  for  runners  are  your  calf,  so 

1:04:56.580 --> 1:05:00.120
<v Chrysta>how  much  ankle  movement  do  you  have,  and  your  first 

1:05:00.120 --> 1:05:03.540
<v Chrysta>toe.  So  your  calf,  you  should  be  able  to  get 

1:05:03.540 --> 1:05:07.710
<v Chrysta>at  least  10  degrees  of  motion,  up  from  90  degrees, 

1:05:08.040 --> 1:05:10.170
<v Chrysta>and  you  should  be  able  to  get  that  first  toe 

1:05:10.170 --> 1:05:12.480
<v Chrysta>to  be  at  a  90  degree  angle  up  with  the 

1:05:12.480 --> 1:05:15.900
<v Chrysta>rest  of  your  foot.
 And  if  you're  not,  that  sort 

1:05:15.900 --> 1:05:19.980
<v Chrysta>of  tightness,  or you  have  significant  tightness,  that's  usually  indicative  of 

1:05:20.040 --> 1:05:23.850
<v Chrysta>maybe  some  orthotic  intervention,  or  a  different  type  of  shoe 

1:05:23.850 --> 1:05:27.390
<v Chrysta>might  be  beneficial.  So  that's  sort  of  the  static  things. 

1:05:27.420 --> 1:05:30.990
<v Chrysta>And  then  the  dynamic  things  are  really  just  having  people 

1:05:30.990 --> 1:05:34.680
<v Chrysta>take  videos,  or  looking  at  pictures  of  your  running,  and 

1:05:34.680 --> 1:05:37.620
<v Chrysta>seeing  what  your  foot  and  ankle  alignment  look  like  when 

1:05:37.620 --> 1:05:40.560
<v Chrysta>you're  running.  So  if  your  knees  are  collapsing  inward,  your 

1:05:40.560 --> 1:05:43.770
<v Chrysta>feet  are  rolling  inward,  your  heels  are  rolling  inward,  that 

1:05:43.770 --> 1:05:47.580
<v Chrysta>usually  indicates  a  flatter  arch,  and  that  might  be  something 

1:05:47.580 --> 1:05:50.220
<v Chrysta>that  we'd  want  to  do  an  orthotic  intervention  or  a 

1:05:50.220 --> 1:05:53.130
<v Chrysta>more  substantial  shoe  for.

1:05:53.760 --> 1:05:56.490
<v Meb Keflezighi>Pretty  awesome  information.  Self- diagnose  a  little  bit, and  then  go 

1:05:56.490 --> 1:05:57.540
<v Meb Keflezighi>to  the  experts.

1:05:57.810 --> 1:05:58.050
<v Chrysta>Yeah.

1:05:58.500 --> 1:06:02.190
<v Meb Keflezighi>For  someone  dealing  with  recurring  shin  splints,  or  plantar  fascia, 

1:06:02.190 --> 1:06:06.690
<v Meb Keflezighi>what  role  can  orthotic  insert  play  in  reducing  pain  or 

1:06:06.690 --> 1:06:08.370
<v Meb Keflezighi>helping  them  get  back  into  training?

1:06:08.640 --> 1:06:12.840
<v Chrysta>Sure.  So  shin  splints  happen  for  a  few  reasons,  one 

1:06:12.900 --> 1:06:16.020
<v Chrysta>reason  can  be  overtraining.  So  sometimes  it's  just  that  you're 

1:06:16.020 --> 1:06:20.070
<v Chrysta>overtraining,  and  that  might  be  more of  a  physical  therapy  strengthening 

1:06:20.310 --> 1:06:24.330
<v Chrysta>adjustment  to  your  training  schedule  intervention.  But  orthotics  can  really 

1:06:24.330 --> 1:06:27.210
<v Chrysta>help  if  one  of  the  things  contributing  to  your  shin 

1:06:27.210 --> 1:06:30.480
<v Chrysta>splints  is  that  you're  over  pronating,  so  that  arch  is 

1:06:30.480 --> 1:06:33.660
<v Chrysta>collapsing  a  little  too  much  while  you're  running  and  putting 

1:06:33.660 --> 1:06:38.490
<v Chrysta>a  little  bit  of  a  rotational  force  on  that  shin, 

1:06:38.670 --> 1:06:41.250
<v Chrysta>which  is  more  likely  to  result  in  you  developing  the 

1:06:41.250 --> 1:06:44.220
<v Chrysta>shin  splints.  So  having  an  arch  support  that  puts  your 

1:06:44.220 --> 1:06:49.860
<v Chrysta>arch  in  the  correct  alignment  and  provides  good  support  along 

1:06:49.860 --> 1:06:52.440
<v Chrysta>the  inside  arch  of  your  foot,  can  really  help  your 

1:06:52.440 --> 1:06:55.230
<v Chrysta>muscles  act  in  the  plane  that  they're  supposed  to  be 

1:06:55.230 --> 1:06:58.410
<v Chrysta>functioning  in,  instead  of  having  this  extra  rotation  put  on 

1:06:58.410 --> 1:07:01.410
<v Chrysta>them  when  you  over  pronate.
And  I  always  recommend  for  things 

1:07:01.410 --> 1:07:04.290
<v Chrysta>like  shin  splints,  that  people,  especially  if  it's  their  first 

1:07:04.290 --> 1:07:07.110
<v Chrysta>time,  or  it's  a  milder  case  and  they've  done  some 

1:07:07.110 --> 1:07:10.500
<v Chrysta>physical  therapy,  or  changes  to  their  training,  and  it  seemed 

1:07:10.500 --> 1:07:13.260
<v Chrysta>to  go  away,  that  they  really  start  with  an  off- the-

1:07:13.260 --> 1:07:17.640
<v Chrysta>shelf  orthotic  insert  and  see  if  that's  enough.  If  it's 

1:07:17.640 --> 1:07:21.180
<v Chrysta>a  recurring  problem,  then  I  usually  recommend  people  go  to 

1:07:21.180 --> 1:07:23.790
<v Chrysta>somebody,  like  an  orthotist  or  podiatrist,  to  see  if  they 

1:07:23.790 --> 1:07:27.600
<v Chrysta>can  get  something  custom- made  to  really  more  directly  address 

1:07:27.600 --> 1:07:30.000
<v Chrysta>their  alignment  if  they're  continually  seeing  the  shin  splints reoccur.

1:07:30.570 --> 1:07:33.120
<v Meb Keflezighi>And  how  long  is  too  long  to  have  a  problem? 

1:07:33.270 --> 1:07:34.920
<v Meb Keflezighi>Sometimes  you  say, " Oh,  it's  going  to  get  better.  It's 

1:07:34.920 --> 1:07:37.140
<v Meb Keflezighi>going  to  get  better." Is it  a  month,  is  it  weeks?  And 

1:07:37.290 --> 1:07:39.390
<v Meb Keflezighi>for  me,  personally,  when  I  was  at  UCLA,  I  used 

1:07:39.390 --> 1:07:42.330
<v Meb Keflezighi>to  have,  and  when  I  first  wake  up  and  the 

1:07:42.330 --> 1:07:46.260
<v Meb Keflezighi>first  three,  four  steps  were  excruciating  pain,  so  when  is 

1:07:46.260 --> 1:07:47.910
<v Meb Keflezighi>the  time  to  go  see  a  professionalist?

1:07:48.330 --> 1:07:53.220
<v Chrysta>Yeah,  I'd  say  anytime  this  pain  is  more  significant,  like 

1:07:53.220 --> 1:07:55.830
<v Chrysta>where  it's  excruciating,  I  would  say  always  go  to  see 

1:07:55.830 --> 1:07:58.919
<v Chrysta>a  specialist,  if  you're  starting  to  see  a  significant  amount 

1:07:58.920 --> 1:08:02.520
<v Chrysta>of  pain.  If  it's  more of  a  soreness,  and  it  seems 

1:08:02.520 --> 1:08:05.610
<v Chrysta>to  go  away  within,  I'd  say,  give  it  a  two 

1:08:05.610 --> 1:08:09.750
<v Chrysta>to  three- month  period  with  intervention  to  see  if  something's 

1:08:09.750 --> 1:08:14.160
<v Chrysta>working.  If  after  three  months,  you've  tried  off- the- shelf 

1:08:14.160 --> 1:08:19.500
<v Chrysta>foot  orthotics,  you've  tried  stretching  interventions,  you've  done  some  exercises 

1:08:19.500 --> 1:08:22.590
<v Chrysta>to  help  strengthen  your  muscles,  like  you're  intervening,  you've  changed 

1:08:22.590 --> 1:08:24.660
<v Chrysta>your  shoes.  That's  the  first  thing  I  tell  people, " You 

1:08:24.660 --> 1:08:26.400
<v Chrysta>have  shin  splints,  when  was  the  last  time  you  bought 

1:08:26.700 --> 1:08:28.349
<v Chrysta>a  new  pair  of  running  sneakers?"  Change  your  shoes.

1:08:28.679 --> 1:08:28.921
<v Meb Keflezighi>Treat  yourself.

1:08:28.920 --> 1:08:32.640
<v Chrysta>Right.  Change  your  shoes,  because  sometimes  it's  just  that  the 

1:08:33.060 --> 1:08:36.930
<v Chrysta>padding  and  the  foam  has  worn  down,  and  the  shoe 

1:08:36.930 --> 1:08:39.090
<v Chrysta>is  just  not  providing  the  same  amount  of  cushioning  and 

1:08:39.090 --> 1:08:42.120
<v Chrysta>impact  absorption  that  it  used  to.  So  I'd  say  more 

1:08:42.120 --> 1:08:46.020
<v Chrysta>than  three  months,  definitely  go  see  somebody.  Anything  that  feels 

1:08:46.020 --> 1:08:50.340
<v Chrysta>significant  or  very  poignant,  like  this  sharp  pain  here,  very 

1:08:50.340 --> 1:08:54.840
<v Chrysta>localized,  or  it's  consistent,  it's  hurting  all  day,  then  definitely 

1:08:54.840 --> 1:08:57.600
<v Chrysta>see  somebody  much  sooner  than  that. I  would  say  within  the 

1:08:57.600 --> 1:08:59.880
<v Chrysta>first  week  or  two  of  starting  to  experience  the  pain, 

1:08:59.880 --> 1:09:01.860
<v Chrysta>you  want  to  see  somebody  much  sooner,  because  you  could 

1:09:01.860 --> 1:09:05.250
<v Chrysta>also  be  misdiagnosing  it.  It  could  be  something  different  than 

1:09:05.250 --> 1:09:08.280
<v Chrysta>shin  splints,  especially  if  it's  that  acute  and  sharp.  But 

1:09:08.280 --> 1:09:11.250
<v Chrysta>the  dull  ache,  which  seems  to  go  away  and  come 

1:09:11.250 --> 1:09:14.580
<v Chrysta>back  every  now  and  then,  try  interventions  for,  I  would 

1:09:14.580 --> 1:09:16.620
<v Chrysta>say,  two  to  three  months,  to  see  if  they  work, 

1:09:16.620 --> 1:09:19.950
<v Chrysta>and  if  not,  then  escalate  to  the  next  level.

1:09:20.910 --> 1:09:24.479
<v Meb Keflezighi>Great  job.  I  think  it's  always  good  to  self- diagnose 

1:09:24.479 --> 1:09:26.220
<v Meb Keflezighi>a  little  bit,  when you  going  for  a  run,  kind  of 

1:09:26.220 --> 1:09:28.800
<v Meb Keflezighi>pay  attention  a  little bit to  what  the  body  is  doing  and 

1:09:28.800 --> 1:09:31.439
<v Meb Keflezighi>try  to  stretch  in  the  stability  and  exercise.  And  if 

1:09:31.439 --> 1:09:35.040
<v Meb Keflezighi>not,  then  go  see  yourself  a  specialist.  But  yeah,  when you have 

1:09:35.310 --> 1:09:37.470
<v Meb Keflezighi>a  little  bit  knee  or  plantar  fascia,  it  could  be 

1:09:37.470 --> 1:09:40.200
<v Meb Keflezighi>the  shoes,  simple  as  that.  But  if  not,  you  got 

1:09:40.200 --> 1:09:41.700
<v Meb Keflezighi>to  go  to  the  experts.

1:09:42.090 --> 1:09:42.780
<v Chrysta>Yeah,  for  sure.

1:09:43.470 --> 1:09:45.960
<v Meb Keflezighi>Well, Chrysta, I said  it  all  here.  Thank  you  so  much  for  taking 

1:09:45.960 --> 1:09:48.180
<v Meb Keflezighi>the  time  to  give  out  this  wise  advice  to  be 

1:09:48.180 --> 1:09:51.570
<v Meb Keflezighi>better  runners,  and  be  able  to  move  forward  quickly  and 

1:09:51.570 --> 1:09:52.559
<v Meb Keflezighi>efficiently  as  possible.

1:09:53.220 --> 1:09:53.881
<v Chrysta>Of  course.  Thank  you so much for having me.

1:09:53.881 --> 1:09:53.882
<v Meb Keflezighi>My pleasure.

1:09:53.882 --> 1:09:58.800
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>All right,  that  does  it  for  another  episode  of  Set  The 

1:09:58.800 --> 1:10:01.920
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Pace.  We  want  to  thank  our  guests  today,  Susie  Chan 

1:10:01.920 --> 1:10:07.530
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>from  Peloton,  Margaret  Schwartz,  and  HSS's  Chrysta  Irolla.  If  you 

1:10:07.530 --> 1:10:10.050
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>liked  the  episode,  make  sure  you  give  us  a  five-

1:10:10.050 --> 1:10:13.290
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>star  rating,  share  it,  leave  a  comment  so  we  can 

1:10:13.290 --> 1:10:15.269
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>hear  from  you.  We'd  love  to  hear  from  all  of 

1:10:15.270 --> 1:10:18.600
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>our  great  listeners  out  there.  Hope  everybody  enjoyed  the  show. 

1:10:18.960 --> 1:10:21.780
<v Rob Simmelkjaer>Enjoy  those  miles  out  there.  We  will  see  you  next  week.