WEBVTT - Will Parker Anderson Talks Publishing

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:06.520
<v S1>And so a mantra I think good nonfiction writers adopt

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:09.639
<v S1>is make it about them. Make it about your readers.

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:15.160
<v S1>Make it about serving them and forefronting their needs, their dreams,

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.600
<v S1>their hopes, their fears. And if you do that, a

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.200
<v S1>concept is going to resonate a lot more.

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:27.080
<v S2>Welcome to the Habit podcast conversations with writers about writing.

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:31.639
<v S2>I'm Jonathan Rogers. Your host, Will Parker Anderson, is a

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:35.560
<v S2>senior editor at Waterbrook Multnomah, a division of random House publishing.

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:39.160
<v S2>He's also the proprietor of a Substack called Writer's Circle,

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:41.480
<v S2>in which he provides tips on the writing craft and

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:45.360
<v S2>seeks to demystify the publishing industry. In this episode, Will

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:49.519
<v S2>and I talk about the three legs of publishing platform, content,

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:53.479
<v S2>and concept. Will Parker Anderson, I'm so glad to have

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:55.760
<v S2>you on The Habit podcast. Thanks for being here.

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.560
<v S1>Yeah, thanks for having me, I appreciate it.

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:01.860
<v S2>Yeah. Um, as I was telling you right before we

0:01:01.860 --> 0:01:06.820
<v S2>started recording, I have typically made it a practice not

0:01:06.819 --> 0:01:09.980
<v S2>to talk about publishing on the Habit podcast. But, you know,

0:01:09.980 --> 0:01:11.580
<v S2>I was looking at your Substack and saw some of

0:01:11.580 --> 0:01:13.780
<v S2>the interesting things you had to say about publishing and decided,

0:01:14.060 --> 0:01:17.819
<v S2>let's do publishing, let's talk about publishing. So, uh, editing

0:01:17.819 --> 0:01:22.140
<v S2>and publishing, uh, you are an editor at, um, Waterbrook.

0:01:23.020 --> 0:01:25.020
<v S1>That's right. Waterbrook and Multnomah. Yeah.

0:01:25.060 --> 0:01:28.060
<v S2>Yeah. And you've just recently started a or maybe I

0:01:28.060 --> 0:01:31.819
<v S2>should say, restarted a Substack, uh, called The Writer's Circle.

0:01:31.860 --> 0:01:32.780
<v S2>Tell me about that.

0:01:34.180 --> 0:01:37.140
<v S1>Absolutely. So in my day job, you know, I'm working

0:01:37.140 --> 0:01:41.260
<v S1>with authors who mainly come to us through agents. And

0:01:41.260 --> 0:01:47.020
<v S1>so they normally have established audiences and platforms. What's missing

0:01:47.020 --> 0:01:50.020
<v S1>from my day job is getting to develop other writers

0:01:50.020 --> 0:01:55.540
<v S1>and honestly, just rub elbows with other writers, something I love. Uh, people,

0:01:55.540 --> 0:01:58.540
<v S1>when you're an editor, you know, people tend to approach

0:01:58.540 --> 0:02:01.520
<v S1>you and have questions about how does this work? And

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.720
<v S1>even yesterday I got a text from a friend saying, hey,

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:07.920
<v S1>can you read my friend's book? That happens a lot.

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:09.799
<v S1>So I just wanted to create a space that was

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:14.960
<v S1>safe where there's no cool kids, there's no inside crowd.

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:17.480
<v S1>Elite inner circle. That's this is why I call it

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.799
<v S1>the writer's circle. But rather than who's in, who's out,

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:23.919
<v S1>which is what publishing often feels like the writer's circle

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.480
<v S1>is intended to be. Hey, let's huddle up. Let's get

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.760
<v S1>in a circle and let's just talk about what we love,

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:33.880
<v S1>which is writing. And so that that's what, you know,

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.680
<v S1>it was born out of. And then also to sort

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.880
<v S1>of demystify publishing, because it really is a hard nut

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.520
<v S1>to crack for most of us. And so just offering

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:47.120
<v S1>whatever I can to give people that next step or

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.760
<v S1>that one encouragement that they need to keep going because

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:53.639
<v S1>it is a long obedience in the same direction as

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:56.520
<v S1>they say to publish your work. It's no joke.

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:01.570
<v S2>Yeah, Well, let's start with the the matter of what

0:03:01.570 --> 0:03:02.690
<v S2>editors are looking for.

0:03:04.570 --> 0:03:08.450
<v S1>Sure. Yeah, that's a loaded question. I can really speak

0:03:08.450 --> 0:03:11.250
<v S1>to the lane that I'm in, which is quite narrow,

0:03:11.290 --> 0:03:16.530
<v S1>which is Christian adult non-fiction. Okay, so a bunch of

0:03:16.530 --> 0:03:18.730
<v S1>listeners are already thinking, all right, well, I'm going to

0:03:18.730 --> 0:03:22.010
<v S1>turn this off, but no, there's a lot of principles

0:03:22.010 --> 0:03:27.450
<v S1>that carry across genres. So for you fiction people, uh,

0:03:27.810 --> 0:03:31.329
<v S1>those folks who write children's books, a lot of this

0:03:31.330 --> 0:03:35.770
<v S1>applies to them. But yeah, there's really three things that

0:03:36.010 --> 0:03:39.170
<v S1>publishers are looking for. You'll hear this repeated in publishing

0:03:39.170 --> 0:03:42.930
<v S1>rooms all over the place. And, uh, we describe it

0:03:42.930 --> 0:03:46.250
<v S1>as a three legged table. And I think that concrete

0:03:46.250 --> 0:03:50.369
<v S1>image is quite helpful. So for your writing to stand

0:03:50.610 --> 0:03:52.490
<v S1>and for it to get out into the world, you

0:03:52.490 --> 0:03:56.490
<v S1>really need these three legs of the table sturdy, or

0:03:56.490 --> 0:03:58.830
<v S1>at least two of them sturdy. Maybe one can be

0:03:58.830 --> 0:04:01.670
<v S1>a little shorter, you know, a slight wobble. But yeah,

0:04:01.670 --> 0:04:04.750
<v S1>and the three are number one. I'll start with the

0:04:04.750 --> 0:04:08.590
<v S1>dreaded word, which is, uh, platform. And and that's such

0:04:08.590 --> 0:04:14.390
<v S1>a dirty word among true creatives. And trust me, I

0:04:14.550 --> 0:04:20.110
<v S1>share that disdain, uh, for the social media, you know,

0:04:20.150 --> 0:04:25.470
<v S1>put yourself. Be loud. Um, become this personality. Uh, a

0:04:25.510 --> 0:04:28.630
<v S1>lot of us who are writers, we express ourselves on

0:04:28.630 --> 0:04:31.150
<v S1>the page, and we're not interested in setting up a

0:04:31.150 --> 0:04:34.470
<v S1>tripod and an iPhone and recording a reel that has

0:04:34.470 --> 0:04:39.030
<v S1>zero appeal to us. Yeah, but publishing has just vastly

0:04:39.029 --> 0:04:44.790
<v S1>changed with the advent of social media. And so where

0:04:44.830 --> 0:04:49.590
<v S1>maybe 15, 20 years ago, a publisher really held most

0:04:49.589 --> 0:04:53.989
<v S1>of the responsibility for platforming a writer. You could be

0:04:53.990 --> 0:04:57.010
<v S1>a quote unquote no name Same writer, but if you

0:04:57.050 --> 0:05:00.570
<v S1>were gifted and a publisher took your project on, you

0:05:00.570 --> 0:05:04.409
<v S1>could find yourself in Barnes and Noble, placed right next

0:05:04.410 --> 0:05:07.210
<v S1>to a best selling author who had sold millions of copies.

0:05:07.210 --> 0:05:09.970
<v S1>And here you are, newly on the scene. So that

0:05:09.970 --> 0:05:13.169
<v S1>kind of discoverability, it just doesn't work that way anymore

0:05:13.170 --> 0:05:17.490
<v S1>because of largely social media. So when I say platform,

0:05:17.890 --> 0:05:20.089
<v S1>it doesn't have to be social media, but we're just

0:05:20.089 --> 0:05:23.210
<v S1>looking to see are people listening to what you have

0:05:23.210 --> 0:05:27.770
<v S1>to say? And specifically on the topic or the idea

0:05:27.770 --> 0:05:32.410
<v S1>that you're pitching to us. And so have you sort

0:05:32.410 --> 0:05:36.210
<v S1>of created momentum around your ideas. And that could be

0:05:36.210 --> 0:05:39.690
<v S1>social media, or it could be something like Substack. It

0:05:39.690 --> 0:05:43.089
<v S1>could be, uh, a community that you're a part of,

0:05:43.089 --> 0:05:47.049
<v S1>like the rabbit room, um, where there's lots of people

0:05:47.050 --> 0:05:49.490
<v S1>accessing your writing. It can look a number of ways,

0:05:49.490 --> 0:05:53.770
<v S1>but generally speaking, we're just looking to see if a

0:05:53.810 --> 0:05:57.750
<v S1>writer has garnered some kind of a following, um, because

0:05:57.790 --> 0:05:59.310
<v S1>at the end of the day. Oh, go ahead.

0:05:59.430 --> 0:06:01.070
<v S2>I was going to say, is it a rude question

0:06:01.070 --> 0:06:02.549
<v S2>to ask when you say some kind of a following?

0:06:02.589 --> 0:06:07.670
<v S2>Are you talking hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands? Can you

0:06:07.670 --> 0:06:08.870
<v S2>even put it in those terms?

0:06:09.589 --> 0:06:11.710
<v S1>Yeah, that's the question people want to know. Is there

0:06:11.710 --> 0:06:15.670
<v S1>a sort of a set metric that if I hit this, yeah,

0:06:15.710 --> 0:06:18.630
<v S1>I'll get a book deal, and I have good news

0:06:18.630 --> 0:06:20.270
<v S1>and bad news. I'll start with the bad news. No,

0:06:20.270 --> 0:06:22.870
<v S1>there's no magic number. And we would love that kind

0:06:22.870 --> 0:06:27.510
<v S1>of clarity and formula. But what's cool, I think what's

0:06:27.510 --> 0:06:32.150
<v S1>encouraging is that I've seen book proposals where the author

0:06:32.150 --> 0:06:36.310
<v S1>had hundreds of thousands of followers and we did not

0:06:36.350 --> 0:06:41.390
<v S1>offer a contract. And then just recently, I was able

0:06:41.390 --> 0:06:48.510
<v S1>to acquire this amazing project. The author had maybe 300 followers. And,

0:06:48.950 --> 0:06:51.950
<v S1>you know, those are numbers. Most people would hear and think, okay,

0:06:51.950 --> 0:06:55.050
<v S1>I could probably pull that off. Yeah, right. And the

0:06:55.050 --> 0:06:58.330
<v S1>reason why it worked was his topic was it just

0:06:58.330 --> 0:07:02.089
<v S1>tapped into something that a lot of people love, which

0:07:02.089 --> 0:07:05.450
<v S1>is birding of all things. And so he was a

0:07:05.450 --> 0:07:09.169
<v S1>fantastic writer. I can't give away too much because we

0:07:09.170 --> 0:07:12.570
<v S1>haven't announced it, but I'll just say this person has

0:07:12.570 --> 0:07:16.730
<v S1>some loose rabbit room affiliation, which is fun. And, um,

0:07:17.130 --> 0:07:19.530
<v S1>you know, even the, uh, the artist we're bringing on

0:07:19.530 --> 0:07:23.650
<v S1>has some connections, so. But that said, yes, there's no

0:07:23.690 --> 0:07:27.890
<v S1>magic number, but we definitely are looking to see that

0:07:27.890 --> 0:07:30.210
<v S1>people are coming to you for whatever it is that

0:07:30.210 --> 0:07:33.250
<v S1>you're writing. So in this case, this author had started

0:07:33.250 --> 0:07:38.010
<v S1>a website completely devoted to birding through a Christian lens.

0:07:38.490 --> 0:07:41.890
<v S1>And we just love that. So that's the first leg

0:07:41.890 --> 0:07:45.250
<v S1>of the table. The other two, I'm sorry.

0:07:46.050 --> 0:07:47.330
<v S2>Before you move on to the to the other two

0:07:47.330 --> 0:07:49.010
<v S2>legs of the table, I got a few more questions

0:07:49.010 --> 0:07:52.490
<v S2>about platform. Like I said, we've we've got six years

0:07:52.490 --> 0:07:56.190
<v S2>of of, uh, of of questions not asked about platform

0:07:56.190 --> 0:08:00.030
<v S2>in this podcast. So you have to answer all of them. Um, the.

0:08:02.310 --> 0:08:08.710
<v S2>Has how has Substack changed? I mean like two years

0:08:08.710 --> 0:08:12.270
<v S2>ago platform it felt like, oh, we're talking about social media.

0:08:12.270 --> 0:08:15.590
<v S2>And now it's now there's Substack seems to me something

0:08:15.590 --> 0:08:21.230
<v S2>that's that's much more that writers are much more enthusiastic

0:08:21.270 --> 0:08:25.510
<v S2>about than, as you said, reels or or I know

0:08:25.510 --> 0:08:26.790
<v S2>I can't even think of the other ones are called

0:08:26.830 --> 0:08:29.990
<v S2>TikTok and that kind of stuff. Yeah. Tell me about that.

0:08:30.030 --> 0:08:32.910
<v S2>I mean, how how was that changed the way editors

0:08:32.910 --> 0:08:35.709
<v S2>think about platform or has it.

0:08:37.230 --> 0:08:41.390
<v S1>Yeah. Great question. I don't know that it's significantly changed

0:08:41.390 --> 0:08:45.270
<v S1>the way publishers look at it or not. Um, and

0:08:45.309 --> 0:08:48.710
<v S1>I'm newer to Substack. I'm a couple months in myself.

0:08:48.710 --> 0:08:53.560
<v S1>But yeah, Substack definitely is geared more toward writers, but

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:57.480
<v S1>I'm actually part of a Substack mastermind because I just

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.280
<v S1>wanted to learn myself. What is this platform all about?

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.480
<v S1>And the leader of that mastermind has said Substack. Actually,

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.679
<v S1>they don't even view themselves as catering to writers, which

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:10.560
<v S1>I found interesting, really intriguing. I would have said that's

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:14.720
<v S1>absolutely what they're about, but they're actually their mission is

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:19.160
<v S1>to help people earn an income based on their content

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:23.160
<v S1>and whatever form that takes. And so they're introducing video

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.720
<v S1>now and a lot of other things. And I'm hearing

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:27.760
<v S1>the cries of lament from a lot of people who

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:29.520
<v S1>have been on the platform like, oh, great, this is

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:33.040
<v S1>going to look just like Instagram now or Facebook or something.

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:35.439
<v S1>I think it's too early to tell, but from what

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:40.320
<v S1>I've seen, there's definitely an appetite for longer form writing

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:44.400
<v S1>on Substack, and it doesn't have that same doom scroll

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:48.880
<v S1>depressive vibe of some of the other platforms. And I

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:53.220
<v S1>really appreciate that. It's highly it's more interactive than even

0:09:53.220 --> 0:09:57.340
<v S1>an email newsletter. And so one thing this is relevant,

0:09:57.340 --> 0:10:01.220
<v S1>I think, that publishers look for is engagement. You can

0:10:01.220 --> 0:10:02.860
<v S1>have all the followers in the world, but if no

0:10:02.860 --> 0:10:08.500
<v S1>one's really consuming or interacting with your content, something's probably

0:10:08.500 --> 0:10:11.860
<v S1>amiss there. You want to start a conversation with your writing.

0:10:11.860 --> 0:10:14.900
<v S1>And so Substack has there's nothing like it that I

0:10:14.940 --> 0:10:19.179
<v S1>found in terms of shareability. People can spread your ideas

0:10:19.179 --> 0:10:24.300
<v S1>for you getting to interact through comments, direct messages, things

0:10:24.300 --> 0:10:27.100
<v S1>like that. I think the platform is really well built

0:10:27.100 --> 0:10:31.260
<v S1>to build community around ideas, which is exciting.

0:10:31.580 --> 0:10:35.700
<v S2>Yeah. Yeah. Well, um, one thing that that seems to

0:10:35.700 --> 0:10:40.260
<v S2>me is maybe different about Substack as compared to some

0:10:40.260 --> 0:10:46.459
<v S2>of the other social media platforms, is that a thousand

0:10:46.460 --> 0:10:52.319
<v S2>followers on Facebook and a thousand followers on Substack to me,

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.600
<v S2>feel like two. Two very different things. You know, who

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.760
<v S2>knows if if you're thousand people on on Facebook are

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.920
<v S2>going to see what you have posted on Facebook. It

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.959
<v S2>depends on some algorithms that I don't that nobody understands.

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:10.520
<v S2>And on something like Substack, you can actually see, oh, 40%

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:16.680
<v S2>of my readers open this email. You know, and so, uh,

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:18.960
<v S2>it it just feels like a to me. It feels

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:21.200
<v S2>like a the metrics feel different.

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:26.440
<v S1>Absolutely. Yeah. One of the most powerful tools any writer

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:31.000
<v S1>can have at their disposal today is an email address. Yeah.

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:34.920
<v S1>Because number one, you know, we're not manipulating people on

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.839
<v S1>Substack into giving us their email they've chosen to. And

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:41.600
<v S1>they know that they will now receive your writing in

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:45.600
<v S1>their inbox, which is already crowded. Um, but they're they're

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:50.580
<v S1>desiring to give you their attention. And that is very significant.

0:11:50.580 --> 0:11:53.579
<v S1>So you're right. Substacks it's a different mentality. When you

0:11:53.580 --> 0:11:57.420
<v S1>subscribe to someone on Substack, you're expecting their content now

0:11:57.420 --> 0:12:01.380
<v S1>to be delivered to you, whereas on another platform, really

0:12:01.380 --> 0:12:04.820
<v S1>all you're agreeing to when you subscribe or follow someone is.

0:12:05.140 --> 0:12:09.780
<v S1>I might peruse your feed once a year for 10s,

0:12:09.780 --> 0:12:13.300
<v S1>and that's about it. So that's a huge distinguisher. I'm

0:12:13.300 --> 0:12:16.220
<v S1>glad you brought that up, because what you can do

0:12:16.820 --> 0:12:20.420
<v S1>is you can use that email list to not just

0:12:20.420 --> 0:12:23.780
<v S1>share your posts, but as you have other things materializing,

0:12:23.780 --> 0:12:26.140
<v S1>maybe you have a new project or a book that's

0:12:26.140 --> 0:12:29.580
<v S1>coming out that you're self-publishing or whatever it is, and

0:12:29.580 --> 0:12:32.939
<v S1>you can keep your audience in the loop. So Substack

0:12:32.940 --> 0:12:37.100
<v S1>is not as sophisticated as some of the email subscription

0:12:37.100 --> 0:12:42.860
<v S1>services like ConvertKit, right, or Beehive or MailChimp. So there's

0:12:42.860 --> 0:12:47.700
<v S1>no optimizing, you know, or automating emails or things like that.

0:12:47.700 --> 0:12:51.560
<v S1>But it's got enough tools that you can do a

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:53.800
<v S1>lot more, which is nice. Yeah.

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.560
<v S2>Yeah. All right. Well, thanks. I just wanted to. To

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:58.320
<v S2>slow you down. Just a minute. Now you can move on.

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:02.280
<v S2>Feel free to second leg of your three legged stool

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:02.800
<v S2>or table.

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:04.680
<v S1>Yeah. We're going to build this thing by the end.

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:09.160
<v S1>We'll have it complete. Yes. So probably the most obvious

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:11.360
<v S1>one I'll do this one second. So if the first

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:15.160
<v S1>leg is platform, the second is content. And that really

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:19.440
<v S1>refers to the quality of writing itself. And that may

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:23.600
<v S1>seem overly obvious, but if I peel back the curtain

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.480
<v S1>as an editor, I'll just tell you you'd be surprised

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:30.319
<v S1>at the state of some of the manuscripts that come

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:35.480
<v S1>to us. Um, both. Yeah. Level of writing and the

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:39.240
<v S1>organization of the manuscript. And this is not bagging on

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:43.120
<v S1>any author that I've worked with, but it's very difficult

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:47.000
<v S1>to write a book. And so, you know, because there's

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:51.500
<v S1>so much Preoccupation with platform and numbers of followers today.

0:13:52.059 --> 0:13:56.180
<v S1>Writing can subtly slip to the back burner for a

0:13:56.179 --> 0:13:59.380
<v S1>lot of people. Or you have influencers who will get

0:13:59.380 --> 0:14:02.340
<v S1>book deals but who have never written really a word

0:14:02.340 --> 0:14:05.500
<v S1>in their life. They've just talked to a camera, and

0:14:05.500 --> 0:14:09.860
<v S1>that is a very new reality. So, um, every publisher

0:14:09.860 --> 0:14:13.939
<v S1>is different. But yeah, at Waterbrook, we're certainly looking for

0:14:13.940 --> 0:14:18.340
<v S1>those that are gifted writers. They have a fresh way

0:14:18.340 --> 0:14:23.220
<v S1>of saying things. Uh, you know, they're a lot of

0:14:23.220 --> 0:14:27.540
<v S1>writers are striving for total originality, something that's never been

0:14:27.540 --> 0:14:31.780
<v S1>said before. And in the nonfiction world, that's really a

0:14:31.820 --> 0:14:36.500
<v S1>fool's errand. You know, as Ecclesiastes says, there's nothing new

0:14:36.540 --> 0:14:40.940
<v S1>under the sun. And so whenever a writer says, well,

0:14:40.940 --> 0:14:44.740
<v S1>no one's ever written about this before, what I immediately

0:14:44.740 --> 0:14:47.460
<v S1>think is, well, you just haven't done your homework, because

0:14:48.230 --> 0:14:51.510
<v S1>probably tons of people have and they've probably done it

0:14:51.510 --> 0:14:56.190
<v S1>really well. But what's amazing about modern publishing is that,

0:14:56.230 --> 0:15:01.030
<v S1>you know, God raises up voices to say old truths

0:15:01.030 --> 0:15:06.190
<v S1>in new ways. And he's also given you, as a writer,

0:15:06.470 --> 0:15:12.150
<v S1>a unique experiences, perspectives. And he will use all of that, uh,

0:15:12.230 --> 0:15:17.790
<v S1>to take your book and reach readers in this time in,

0:15:17.830 --> 0:15:20.750
<v S1>you know, these, these places. And I find that quite beautiful.

0:15:21.630 --> 0:15:24.910
<v S1>But yeah, we're looking for writers who know how to write.

0:15:24.950 --> 0:15:28.070
<v S1>I mean, as elementary as that sounds. And people who

0:15:28.070 --> 0:15:32.110
<v S1>have that gift, uh, as an editor, I'm, of course,

0:15:32.150 --> 0:15:35.110
<v S1>evaluating how much work is this going to like? Is

0:15:35.110 --> 0:15:38.590
<v S1>this going to be a delightful labor of love as

0:15:38.590 --> 0:15:41.430
<v S1>I edit this, or am I going to have to?

0:15:41.510 --> 0:15:43.870
<v S1>Is it going to be ten times the work because

0:15:43.870 --> 0:15:47.330
<v S1>this writer hasn't mastered their craft yet? So we're definitely

0:15:47.330 --> 0:15:49.810
<v S1>looking at that. And I think a community like the

0:15:49.810 --> 0:15:54.410
<v S1>Rabbit Room, anytime I dip my toe into this community,

0:15:54.450 --> 0:15:56.570
<v S1>I read an article or I listen to a lecture

0:15:56.570 --> 0:15:59.890
<v S1>or something, I just feel like I get a fire

0:15:59.890 --> 0:16:07.210
<v S1>hose of thoughtful, stretching, um, inspiring, challenging content. And so

0:16:07.370 --> 0:16:10.730
<v S1>this is the type of place in a sort of superficial,

0:16:11.810 --> 0:16:14.530
<v S1>you know, five second scrolling world if you really want

0:16:14.570 --> 0:16:18.770
<v S1>to absorb, if you really want to grow, uh, go

0:16:18.770 --> 0:16:22.250
<v S1>to Hutch, you know, listen to the podcast. And I'm

0:16:22.250 --> 0:16:25.330
<v S1>preaching to the choir here, but, um, it's yeah, it's

0:16:25.330 --> 0:16:29.250
<v S1>quite refreshing what this community has going on. And I

0:16:29.250 --> 0:16:32.210
<v S1>would encourage people to spend as much time in these

0:16:32.250 --> 0:16:36.610
<v S1>kind of communities and less time trying to, you know,

0:16:36.650 --> 0:16:40.370
<v S1>shoot a viral reel. Uh, and again, for listeners who

0:16:40.370 --> 0:16:43.410
<v S1>like being on camera and they're great oral communicators, that's awesome.

0:16:43.850 --> 0:16:46.950
<v S1>Not downplaying that. But, uh, But in terms of craft,

0:16:46.950 --> 0:16:49.870
<v S1>which is what we're talking about in writing. Yeah, definitely.

0:16:50.230 --> 0:16:52.230
<v S1>Just spend as much time as you can with those

0:16:52.230 --> 0:16:53.990
<v S1>who are better than you and who can speak into

0:16:53.990 --> 0:16:54.510
<v S1>your writing.

0:16:54.510 --> 0:16:57.670
<v S2>So yeah, well, one thing you pointed out that had

0:16:57.670 --> 0:17:00.430
<v S2>never really I'd never really put it together. Uh, but

0:17:00.430 --> 0:17:06.190
<v S2>this is in one of your, you know, Substack posts, letters. Um,

0:17:06.590 --> 0:17:12.390
<v S2>you pointed out that that, uh, platform building and growing

0:17:12.430 --> 0:17:15.430
<v S2>in craft don't have to be two different things, right?

0:17:15.470 --> 0:17:21.470
<v S2>When you commit to a regular newsletter, for instance, that is, yes,

0:17:21.470 --> 0:17:24.909
<v S2>a way to build a platform. And at the same time,

0:17:24.950 --> 0:17:26.670
<v S2>it's it's the kind of thing that is building your

0:17:26.670 --> 0:17:32.510
<v S2>craft in a way that shooting another Instagram reel doesn't. Yeah.

0:17:32.510 --> 0:17:33.590
<v S2>So I appreciated that.

0:17:34.430 --> 0:17:38.189
<v S1>No, absolutely. In fact, since launching my Substack, I needed

0:17:38.190 --> 0:17:41.270
<v S1>a breather. So I had written a newsletter every year

0:17:41.590 --> 0:17:43.629
<v S1>or every week, I mean, for the last year and

0:17:43.630 --> 0:17:45.490
<v S1>a half. So I had a lot of content to

0:17:45.530 --> 0:17:47.449
<v S1>pull from, and as I went to post some of

0:17:47.450 --> 0:17:50.250
<v S1>those older ones, I'd open it up, I'd start reading,

0:17:50.250 --> 0:17:54.850
<v S1>and I'd think, this isn't that great. And and I've

0:17:54.850 --> 0:17:57.050
<v S1>written my whole life. So it's not that that I

0:17:57.050 --> 0:17:59.970
<v S1>just started writing, but still I was like, this is

0:17:59.970 --> 0:18:01.890
<v S1>I could do so much better. And so I'd edit

0:18:01.890 --> 0:18:03.649
<v S1>and I'd change, and maybe that's the editor in me,

0:18:03.650 --> 0:18:05.970
<v S1>but I think it yeah, just that discipline and that

0:18:05.970 --> 0:18:09.770
<v S1>rhythm of writing, writing, writing, writing it does pay off,

0:18:09.850 --> 0:18:13.250
<v S1>but it's silent and subtle, like the growth of a child,

0:18:13.250 --> 0:18:14.929
<v S1>where you have to make those tick marks on a

0:18:14.930 --> 0:18:15.730
<v S1>door frame.

0:18:15.930 --> 0:18:16.410
<v S2>Yeah, right.

0:18:16.450 --> 0:18:19.210
<v S1>You don't see them growing day to day. But as

0:18:19.210 --> 0:18:21.530
<v S1>you have these metrics or these milestones, you can look

0:18:21.530 --> 0:18:25.650
<v S1>back and see it. And so absolutely, in fact, I

0:18:25.650 --> 0:18:28.370
<v S1>would liken it to the, the single person who really

0:18:28.369 --> 0:18:31.930
<v S1>wants to meet their soulmate, so to speak. And the

0:18:31.930 --> 0:18:35.169
<v S1>more you focus on it and obsess over it, uh,

0:18:35.250 --> 0:18:37.170
<v S1>the worse of a person to go on a date

0:18:37.170 --> 0:18:39.730
<v S1>with you will become. Yeah, right. You kind of just

0:18:39.730 --> 0:18:42.570
<v S1>got to live your life. And, um, and I would

0:18:42.570 --> 0:18:47.070
<v S1>say so as writers just right. And that platform that

0:18:47.070 --> 0:18:51.230
<v S1>you want so badly. It may come. It may not. Yeah. Um,

0:18:51.270 --> 0:18:54.550
<v S1>but if you're consistently putting content out there, that is

0:18:54.550 --> 0:18:58.230
<v S1>the best that you can create and you're putting your

0:18:58.230 --> 0:19:01.429
<v S1>whole heart into it, that's much more important than having

0:19:01.430 --> 0:19:05.910
<v S1>a strategy. The strategy part, it matters. Having, you know,

0:19:05.950 --> 0:19:10.510
<v S1>for instance, a a content calendar or something that you

0:19:10.510 --> 0:19:13.990
<v S1>follow or just a number of posts you want to

0:19:13.990 --> 0:19:18.030
<v S1>do each month, those are great goals, but people can

0:19:18.030 --> 0:19:23.790
<v S1>get so lost and so discouraged. And the anonymity of

0:19:23.790 --> 0:19:28.470
<v S1>the algorithm feeling lost in the rush that they neglect

0:19:28.470 --> 0:19:31.390
<v S1>what really matters, which is their craft, and people will

0:19:31.390 --> 0:19:36.350
<v S1>find good content. I believe, you know, uh, the cream

0:19:36.390 --> 0:19:38.629
<v S1>eventually rises to the top, and it doesn't mean you

0:19:38.630 --> 0:19:42.189
<v S1>don't put any effort into platform, but it certainly means

0:19:42.390 --> 0:19:44.610
<v S1>you put effort into your writing?

0:19:45.290 --> 0:19:49.090
<v S2>Well, I, I have found it. You know, I guess

0:19:49.090 --> 0:19:53.130
<v S2>in 2018, I said I'm going to deliver a newsletter

0:19:53.130 --> 0:19:56.570
<v S2>every week, which at the time I thought was kind

0:19:56.609 --> 0:19:58.250
<v S2>of crazy because it was really hard for me. I

0:19:58.250 --> 0:19:59.930
<v S2>was having a hard time hitting deadlines as it was.

0:19:59.970 --> 0:20:02.689
<v S2>And then to commit to a weekly deadline. Uh, but

0:20:02.690 --> 0:20:05.690
<v S2>it's been so good for me, for one thing, to

0:20:05.730 --> 0:20:09.930
<v S2>have people expecting something. Yes. People who might be disappointed.

0:20:09.970 --> 0:20:11.409
<v S2>I mean, I don't know if they would be, but

0:20:11.410 --> 0:20:13.129
<v S2>I think they might be disappointed if they didn't get

0:20:13.130 --> 0:20:15.250
<v S2>something from me on a Tuesday morning after they've been

0:20:15.290 --> 0:20:18.369
<v S2>expecting it every Tuesday morning since, you know, for a

0:20:18.369 --> 0:20:22.969
<v S2>long time. And, um, and as you said, just that act.

0:20:23.530 --> 0:20:27.010
<v S2>It's meant so much to me as a writer, um,

0:20:27.330 --> 0:20:31.570
<v S2>in a lot of different ways. Uh, there's the only strategy.

0:20:31.570 --> 0:20:33.690
<v S2>The only plan was, I'm going to do this every week.

0:20:33.810 --> 0:20:36.290
<v S2>And then over the course of that, you sort of discover, oh,

0:20:36.290 --> 0:20:37.810
<v S2>here's what I need to be writing about. Here's what

0:20:37.810 --> 0:20:41.530
<v S2>people respond to. Um, and, and you just get better

0:20:41.530 --> 0:20:45.139
<v S2>at it as time goes on. And I think that

0:20:45.180 --> 0:20:48.100
<v S2>that commitment to say I'm going to do something that

0:20:48.100 --> 0:20:52.619
<v S2>people will expect and will be hopefully disappointed if I

0:20:52.619 --> 0:20:57.020
<v S2>don't do it. Yes, I think that's that's a pretty

0:20:57.460 --> 0:21:02.619
<v S2>important principle for platform building. That doesn't feel like the

0:21:02.619 --> 0:21:03.660
<v S2>selling of one's soul.

0:21:04.700 --> 0:21:08.580
<v S1>Absolutely. Yeah. I think the best advice on building platform

0:21:08.580 --> 0:21:11.500
<v S1>that I've heard is do things that are life giving

0:21:11.540 --> 0:21:14.900
<v S1>to you, not things that make your soul feel like

0:21:14.900 --> 0:21:19.619
<v S1>you're trying to, you know, manipulate it into some mold.

0:21:19.940 --> 0:21:24.820
<v S1>And so I'm the same way, Jonathan. Writing weekly has

0:21:24.820 --> 0:21:29.260
<v S1>been amazing accountability, but it's so rewarding just to be

0:21:29.300 --> 0:21:34.340
<v S1>able to share something every week and to to know

0:21:34.340 --> 0:21:37.820
<v S1>that maybe in some way it's it's helping or inspiring

0:21:37.820 --> 0:21:42.399
<v S1>someone and, uh, otherwise I think I can really build

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.320
<v S1>up writing in my mind like it's an event. It's

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:48.000
<v S1>this thing that I'm going to do when I finally

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.840
<v S1>can get away from home. I got three young kids,

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:54.639
<v S1>so it's like I'm going to rent a cabin somewhere

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.000
<v S1>at some time, and it's all so ethereal that it

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:01.879
<v S1>never actually happens. And so the reality, what it looks

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.639
<v S1>like is, okay, I'm writing every week. I got to

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:07.920
<v S1>get this done. So sometimes it's 11 p.m. I wrote

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:12.719
<v S1>one newsletter literally in the air this year, um, sitting

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.160
<v S1>in the bed with an IV like, it's you just

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.560
<v S1>you got to get it done. It's. Yeah, for me.

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:20.160
<v S2>So you don't rent a cabin every week to write your, uh,

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:20.879
<v S2>your thing?

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:25.480
<v S1>I wish, I wish, but no. Nope. It's what, in

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:29.240
<v S1>the those nooks and crannies. And I'm not super disciplined either.

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.240
<v S1>Some of your listeners probably are. And they can lock

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:36.360
<v S1>in that two hour writing session each week. For me,

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:40.160
<v S1>it's sporadic, you know, it's midday, it's early morning, it's

0:22:40.300 --> 0:22:43.859
<v S1>late at night. It's just whenever I can. And so, yeah,

0:22:43.859 --> 0:22:48.580
<v S1>whatever works, you know, as long as you get it done. And, um, I,

0:22:48.980 --> 0:22:51.619
<v S1>I feel really proud, as I'm sure you do, that

0:22:51.619 --> 0:22:57.540
<v S1>I've been consistent and haven't missed a single newsletter. And

0:22:57.900 --> 0:23:01.620
<v S1>so even though the process has been messy to get

0:23:01.619 --> 0:23:05.100
<v S1>those out, I haven't missed one. And that's just a

0:23:05.100 --> 0:23:08.020
<v S1>great that's something every writer, I think would love to

0:23:08.060 --> 0:23:11.380
<v S1>look back on and be able to say, yeah, even

0:23:11.420 --> 0:23:14.180
<v S1>though not every week was maybe my best work, I did.

0:23:14.220 --> 0:23:17.380
<v S1>I gave my best. But life happened. But I I'm

0:23:17.380 --> 0:23:20.060
<v S1>committed to this thing and and here we are. So.

0:23:20.460 --> 0:23:23.020
<v S2>Well, I'm going to say one more one more thing about, uh,

0:23:23.020 --> 0:23:27.419
<v S2>delivering something every week. And that is it helps. It

0:23:27.420 --> 0:23:29.820
<v S2>has helped me let go of some of the preciousness

0:23:31.020 --> 0:23:35.460
<v S2>of believing, like it's the the amount of time I

0:23:35.460 --> 0:23:38.180
<v S2>spend on it and the amount of, of care I,

0:23:38.380 --> 0:23:42.399
<v S2>I give. I mean, beyond a certain threshold. It doesn't

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:46.760
<v S2>seem to be related directly to how to how well

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:49.560
<v S2>people respond to it. It's something that I've just sort

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.440
<v S2>of like in the in the 11th hour just said, okay,

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.040
<v S2>I got to get something out. Here it is. It's

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:58.280
<v S2>been really instructive to me to see how often that's

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:02.960
<v S2>what people respond to. Um, and it's helped me let

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.920
<v S2>go of some, some things and some need to be,

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:09.160
<v S2>I mean, a certain amount of I'm not the kind

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.240
<v S2>of perfectionist that some people are, but but what little

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:15.000
<v S2>perfectionism I have had has gotten kind of gotten beaten

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:18.840
<v S2>out of me by, well, I say beaten up in

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.159
<v S2>some way. Just, yes, you know, beaten out of me

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:25.800
<v S2>because Tuesdays, Tuesdays just keep on coming. Yeah. But also

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.560
<v S2>in a much gentler way, just letting go of some

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:31.639
<v S2>things by saying, oh, this is not a function of,

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:35.960
<v S2>you know, of of how hard I work on this necessarily. Um,

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:38.399
<v S2>you know, I always say only God can make a

0:24:38.500 --> 0:24:41.500
<v S2>tomato like you. You've got some work to grow. Tomatoes.

0:24:41.500 --> 0:24:44.260
<v S2>There's some things I've got to do. But ultimately, it's

0:24:44.260 --> 0:24:47.300
<v S2>God's job to make the tomato. I can weed, I can,

0:24:47.300 --> 0:24:48.219
<v S2>I can plant.

0:24:48.820 --> 0:24:52.580
<v S1>Yeah, yeah. That's that's so true. Another thing it's done

0:24:52.580 --> 0:24:56.740
<v S1>for me writing consistently has been because I feel that

0:24:56.740 --> 0:24:59.899
<v S1>pressure to make it the best I can. It's actually

0:24:59.900 --> 0:25:04.139
<v S1>driven me toward other people for their feedback. And, you know,

0:25:04.180 --> 0:25:06.980
<v S1>you sort of have that internal pebble in your shoe

0:25:06.980 --> 0:25:10.380
<v S1>as a writer where you just know something's off. But

0:25:10.700 --> 0:25:13.379
<v S1>but a lot of times it's on Friday evening and

0:25:13.380 --> 0:25:16.139
<v S1>I send mine out Saturday mornings. So I'll go to

0:25:16.140 --> 0:25:18.780
<v S1>my wife and I'll either read it aloud to her

0:25:19.180 --> 0:25:21.980
<v S1>or I'll have her read it. And she's we think

0:25:21.980 --> 0:25:25.740
<v S1>very differently and that's quite helpful. So, you know, she'll say,

0:25:26.100 --> 0:25:29.100
<v S1>oh yeah, that doesn't make sense. Or I think your

0:25:29.100 --> 0:25:31.700
<v S1>tone there, I know what you you mean or intend,

0:25:31.700 --> 0:25:34.140
<v S1>but I think you should maybe dial that back or

0:25:34.140 --> 0:25:35.899
<v S1>maybe turn up the volume and be a little bit

0:25:35.900 --> 0:25:39.000
<v S1>more bold, get off the fence or whatever. And man,

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.359
<v S1>that has been so helpful. Whereas to your point, when

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:46.280
<v S1>you view your writing as too precious, sometimes you hoard

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:50.360
<v S1>it to yourself and you don't let other people in.

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:52.960
<v S1>And that's not good for your writing either. So that'd

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.040
<v S1>be one other thing as we're talking that came to

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.280
<v S1>mind as I've shared my writing more than ever, I

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:02.119
<v S1>don't mean by publishing it, I mean by welcoming others

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:07.280
<v S1>into edit. And that's been another good muscle to develop

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:10.280
<v S1>creatively is not being afraid of what others have to say.

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:14.720
<v S2>So that's good. All right. We better keep moving. Third

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:16.720
<v S2>leg of the stool or the. That's right.

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.920
<v S1>Yes. And I already touched on this I think. But

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.200
<v S1>so you have the first leg is platform, the second

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:26.719
<v S1>is content. And then the third is your concept. And

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:30.640
<v S1>that's where I think we were getting into this idea

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:34.240
<v S1>that you don't have to put the pressure on your

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:40.090
<v S1>shoulders of a totally original, never seen before idea. And

0:26:40.090 --> 0:26:43.610
<v S1>this goes for fiction writers, too, you know, sort of

0:26:43.650 --> 0:26:48.410
<v S1>latent in your own storytelling and the worlds maybe that

0:26:48.410 --> 0:26:54.690
<v S1>you create somewhere in there. Um, you're regurgitating, uh, those

0:26:54.690 --> 0:26:57.690
<v S1>fiction writers that you love, even if it's just the

0:26:57.690 --> 0:27:01.890
<v S1>techniques they use, the beat of the dialogue, um, the,

0:27:02.650 --> 0:27:05.929
<v S1>the way of jumping into the action, whatever it is,

0:27:06.730 --> 0:27:09.649
<v S1>all of that's flowing out. And that's not something we

0:27:09.650 --> 0:27:13.090
<v S1>should shy away from or apologize for. We all stand

0:27:13.090 --> 0:27:16.690
<v S1>on the shoulders of the literature that has come before,

0:27:16.890 --> 0:27:19.450
<v S1>and I think it's actually a way of showing respect

0:27:19.450 --> 0:27:24.850
<v S1>to those that have, uh, nourished our craft. So when

0:27:24.850 --> 0:27:29.810
<v S1>I say publishers are looking for a fresh concept, really

0:27:29.810 --> 0:27:34.690
<v S1>what that means, certainly in the nonfiction world is we're

0:27:34.690 --> 0:27:37.110
<v S1>not looking as much to see. Is this writer telling

0:27:37.109 --> 0:27:42.030
<v S1>us about themself or are they talking about a topic?

0:27:42.310 --> 0:27:46.910
<v S1>Those are often, I think, reductionistic ways of describing what

0:27:46.910 --> 0:27:49.150
<v S1>a book is. So if an author, if their only

0:27:49.150 --> 0:27:50.830
<v S1>goal is like, well, I want to tell my story,

0:27:51.510 --> 0:27:53.990
<v S1>or if their only goal is, well, I want to

0:27:53.990 --> 0:27:56.869
<v S1>talk about this topic, that that's not actually a mission

0:27:57.750 --> 0:28:01.030
<v S1>that can be cathartic to tell your story, and your

0:28:01.030 --> 0:28:05.109
<v S1>story matters immensely. It's it's valuable as one created in

0:28:05.109 --> 0:28:08.230
<v S1>God's image, and it may even bless people. But the

0:28:08.230 --> 0:28:12.149
<v S1>minute you talk about not just writing something, but wanting

0:28:12.190 --> 0:28:15.270
<v S1>to get paid to write it, and publishers having to

0:28:15.310 --> 0:28:17.669
<v S1>pay to produce it and ship it to thousands of

0:28:17.670 --> 0:28:22.909
<v S1>people suddenly now, um, a marketing angle. And this, this

0:28:22.910 --> 0:28:26.190
<v S1>is going to sound slimy at first, but a marketing

0:28:26.230 --> 0:28:29.390
<v S1>angle comes into play where now the question is, will

0:28:29.430 --> 0:28:32.830
<v S1>people actually want to read this? And that is not

0:28:32.830 --> 0:28:39.810
<v S1>an evil question. Uh, or a question that steamrolls, you know, creativity. Um,

0:28:39.930 --> 0:28:45.330
<v S1>certainly the idea of will an audience come to this

0:28:45.330 --> 0:28:50.610
<v S1>can be approached in a poorly. But at the heart

0:28:50.610 --> 0:28:53.090
<v S1>of it, what we are looking for is, does this

0:28:53.090 --> 0:28:57.170
<v S1>book address a felt need? Does it name an ache

0:28:57.810 --> 0:29:02.930
<v S1>that readers feel? Does it unearth or articulate a problem

0:29:03.210 --> 0:29:06.050
<v S1>that they experience, but they haven't quite been able to

0:29:06.090 --> 0:29:09.810
<v S1>put language to it? But this book is their aha

0:29:09.850 --> 0:29:14.290
<v S1>moment where they realize, oh yes, that's me. I need

0:29:14.330 --> 0:29:17.530
<v S1>help here, I need direction, I need encouragement, I need

0:29:17.570 --> 0:29:21.570
<v S1>guidance and a paradigm shift that's helpful when you're forming

0:29:21.570 --> 0:29:26.450
<v S1>your concept. Is this, um, writers sometimes make the mistake

0:29:26.450 --> 0:29:30.610
<v S1>of placing themselves as the hero of the story instead

0:29:30.610 --> 0:29:33.290
<v S1>of making themselves the guide. And some will have heard

0:29:33.290 --> 0:29:37.510
<v S1>this before. But rather than saying, you know, I have

0:29:37.510 --> 0:29:40.430
<v S1>all the answers, listen to me, I'm the expert. And

0:29:40.470 --> 0:29:42.830
<v S1>of course, as writers, we hope to come with knowledge

0:29:42.830 --> 0:29:47.190
<v S1>and expertise, but instead it's to say to focus on

0:29:47.190 --> 0:29:50.110
<v S1>the reader, to look them in the eye and say, okay,

0:29:50.150 --> 0:29:52.470
<v S1>I know that you feel this, you struggle with this,

0:29:52.470 --> 0:29:55.950
<v S1>or you have this problem. Um, let me come alongside

0:29:55.950 --> 0:29:59.790
<v S1>you and let's walk this journey together. And, you know,

0:29:59.830 --> 0:30:03.190
<v S1>I've learned a couple things. Maybe through success, maybe through failure.

0:30:03.310 --> 0:30:05.150
<v S1>But I'm going to share some things along the way.

0:30:05.150 --> 0:30:09.709
<v S1>But let's walk side by side down this path. That tone,

0:30:09.830 --> 0:30:13.830
<v S1>I think, really resonates with readers a lot. And you

0:30:13.830 --> 0:30:18.230
<v S1>can still share your expertise. You can still tell your story,

0:30:18.230 --> 0:30:21.870
<v S1>you can still address your topic, but it's framed in

0:30:21.870 --> 0:30:25.550
<v S1>a different way that puts the reader first. Um, and

0:30:25.550 --> 0:30:29.830
<v S1>so a mantra I think good nonfiction writers adopt is

0:30:29.830 --> 0:30:32.950
<v S1>make it about them, make it about your readers, make

0:30:32.950 --> 0:30:38.330
<v S1>it about serving them and forefronting their needs, their dreams,

0:30:38.330 --> 0:30:41.770
<v S1>their hopes, their fears. And if you do that, a

0:30:41.770 --> 0:30:45.810
<v S1>concept is going to resonate a lot more, and it's

0:30:45.810 --> 0:30:50.530
<v S1>going to help you with the pacing of telling your story. And, uh, even,

0:30:50.570 --> 0:30:52.729
<v S1>you know, in a memoir, I think this can be

0:30:52.730 --> 0:30:56.930
<v S1>done really well. Where the bulk of memoirs is focused

0:30:56.930 --> 0:31:01.330
<v S1>on the author, it's focused on their experiences. But whether

0:31:01.370 --> 0:31:10.170
<v S1>implicitly or explicitly, they're giving the reader. Insights about their

0:31:10.170 --> 0:31:16.770
<v S1>own lives. Again, they're expressing these inner desires and hopes

0:31:16.770 --> 0:31:21.010
<v S1>that maybe the reader has never recognized in themselves, never

0:31:21.010 --> 0:31:24.090
<v S1>been able to put words to. And so, yeah, that's

0:31:24.090 --> 0:31:25.450
<v S1>the third leg. So.

0:31:26.090 --> 0:31:29.610
<v S2>So by by concept, could you just give me a

0:31:29.650 --> 0:31:32.310
<v S2>one sentence definition of what you mean when you say concept.

0:31:33.150 --> 0:31:39.150
<v S1>Absolutely. I mean, very basically it's, um, what are you

0:31:39.150 --> 0:31:42.110
<v S1>talking about and how will it help readers?

0:31:42.150 --> 0:31:42.630
<v S2>Okay.

0:31:42.830 --> 0:31:47.070
<v S1>And some would only give that first clause, you know. Yeah.

0:31:47.110 --> 0:31:50.750
<v S1>What is this book about? Yeah. But including in your concept,

0:31:50.790 --> 0:31:54.870
<v S1>how will it help readers, uh, looking through that lens? Specifically,

0:31:55.350 --> 0:31:58.670
<v S1>I think is a great shift that writers can make.

0:31:59.150 --> 0:32:02.230
<v S2>Yeah. I mean, you're talking about memoir. Sometimes I have

0:32:02.230 --> 0:32:05.550
<v S2>to when I work with writers who've who've written memoir,

0:32:05.550 --> 0:32:07.830
<v S2>we have to talk about the difference between autobiography and memoir.

0:32:08.390 --> 0:32:11.830
<v S2>You know, for if you're Bono, everything you say is

0:32:11.830 --> 0:32:15.150
<v S2>interesting because people are interested in it. Right. And so

0:32:15.190 --> 0:32:18.510
<v S2>Bono says, I like I like to twist my Oreos apart.

0:32:19.590 --> 0:32:21.750
<v S2>People say, whoa, Bono's is like me. He likes to

0:32:21.750 --> 0:32:25.030
<v S2>twist his Oreos apart. And if Bono met the Pope,

0:32:25.030 --> 0:32:27.590
<v S2>it's like, wow, Bono met the Pope. That's so interesting.

0:32:27.630 --> 0:32:30.990
<v S2>You know who? Who knew? Yeah, but if you like

0:32:30.990 --> 0:32:33.360
<v S2>to twist your ears apart. I'm not that interested, to

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:36.120
<v S2>tell you the truth. Sorry. But you know, it's just

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:40.400
<v S2>the truth. And, um. But the question then is, you know.

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:47.720
<v S2>Sometimes writers of of memoir don't quite get that. They

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:49.360
<v S2>think because it's something that happened to them, it was

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:51.720
<v S2>interesting to them. It'd be interesting to a reader. Yeah.

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:53.720
<v S2>Whereas as you said, the question is always, what does

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:56.719
<v S2>this mean? You know what? What does this mean to

0:32:56.760 --> 0:33:01.360
<v S2>the reader? And um, and so your, your, your trip

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:06.080
<v S2>to the, to the ER recently, you know that, uh,

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:10.640
<v S2>I'm not I'm sorry you went to the ER, but

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:12.840
<v S2>you know, my question is what does this have, you know,

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:14.160
<v S2>what does this have to do with me.

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:15.920
<v S1>Yeah, exactly.

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:16.440
<v S2>Yeah.

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:17.240
<v S1>Yeah.

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:20.160
<v S2>One of the challenges, by the way, of of, uh,

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:25.160
<v S2>anytime anybody writes memoir related to medical questions is the

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:26.360
<v S2>fact that I was sick is one of the most

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:28.920
<v S2>important things that's ever happened to me. But if you're

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:31.660
<v S2>not the person who was sick, it's like, well, everybody

0:33:31.660 --> 0:33:33.620
<v S2>gets sick. So what else do we have to say

0:33:33.620 --> 0:33:34.459
<v S2>about that?

0:33:34.500 --> 0:33:38.300
<v S1>So yeah, that's great. I had a colleague. She's this

0:33:38.660 --> 0:33:42.100
<v S1>wonderful person and veteran editor. She did a deep dive

0:33:42.100 --> 0:33:45.900
<v S1>into memoirs because they don't sell. Um, you know, this

0:33:45.900 --> 0:33:48.580
<v S1>is through the publishing lens now. Yeah. And that's not

0:33:48.580 --> 0:33:51.500
<v S1>to say memoirs aren't worth writing, but they're really tough

0:33:51.500 --> 0:33:54.540
<v S1>to sell. And so she just. Yeah. Did a deep dive.

0:33:54.540 --> 0:33:57.100
<v S1>And one of the things that emerged, one of the

0:33:57.100 --> 0:34:01.580
<v S1>critiques of the memoir genre is that, um, exactly what

0:34:01.580 --> 0:34:04.260
<v S1>you mentioned, a lot of people who are sick, they'll

0:34:04.260 --> 0:34:06.780
<v S1>write about it. And so you you have all these

0:34:06.780 --> 0:34:10.180
<v S1>cancer stories, you have all these, you know, tragedy stories.

0:34:10.420 --> 0:34:13.300
<v S1>And it's not that they don't matter. It's just, yeah,

0:34:13.300 --> 0:34:16.859
<v S1>it's very difficult to write a good book that's going

0:34:16.900 --> 0:34:21.500
<v S1>to draw in readers about those things. And, um, that's tough.

0:34:21.540 --> 0:34:24.380
<v S1>That's a tough pill to swallow because as you said,

0:34:24.380 --> 0:34:28.899
<v S1>these experiences, I mean, they are earth shattering. They they

0:34:28.900 --> 0:34:31.879
<v S1>shape us. Often God does a lot of work in

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:35.239
<v S1>our lives through them. You know, I have cancer that

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.280
<v S1>has touched my family in some very significant ways. And

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:42.560
<v S1>but yes, it's having that awareness, that reader awareness of

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:46.120
<v S1>what's truly going to help them. And so that's something

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:47.320
<v S1>we all have to wrestle with.

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.080
<v S2>Yeah. Well, before we run out of time, I do

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:52.560
<v S2>want to ask you about an idea that you wrote

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:55.320
<v S2>about on your Substack recently, and that is the difference

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:59.520
<v S2>between writing out of your wounds and writing out of scars. Mhm.

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:01.359
<v S2>Because I think, I mean, since we're, since we're talking

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:03.200
<v S2>about medical issues, um.

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:05.279
<v S1>Open it up.

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:12.200
<v S2>Uh, let's, uh, tell me about that idea as people again.

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:14.760
<v S2>I think a lot of people listen to this podcast

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:18.279
<v S2>are interested in writing memoir. Um, so let's talk about

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:19.680
<v S2>scars versus wounds.

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:24.160
<v S1>Absolutely. Well, I'll tell a quick story. I had a

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:29.460
<v S1>friend who was a pastor at a church and the

0:35:29.460 --> 0:35:32.219
<v S1>church just blew up. The senior pastor, who was not

0:35:32.219 --> 0:35:35.540
<v S1>my friend, had had fallen into quite a lot of trouble.

0:35:36.020 --> 0:35:40.780
<v S1>I had made some pretty terrible decisions and quickly was

0:35:40.780 --> 0:35:45.100
<v S1>taken out of leadership because of how the situation was handled.

0:35:45.100 --> 0:35:48.540
<v S1>My friend felt he needed to resign out of integrity,

0:35:49.020 --> 0:35:51.379
<v S1>so he just it was a whirlwind. Didn't see any

0:35:51.380 --> 0:35:54.900
<v S1>of it coming. Uh, nothing. He hadn't caused any of

0:35:54.900 --> 0:35:57.980
<v S1>it directly, but still, the fallout affected him. And so

0:35:58.140 --> 0:36:02.340
<v S1>a publisher approached him and said, because this church was

0:36:02.460 --> 0:36:05.980
<v S1>large and nationally known, they said, can you write a

0:36:05.980 --> 0:36:10.140
<v S1>book about your experiences? Sort of an inside take on

0:36:10.140 --> 0:36:13.940
<v S1>everything that's happened. And, uh, he was so disoriented. He

0:36:13.940 --> 0:36:19.380
<v S1>said yes, very quickly, wrote the book, turned it in. Uh,

0:36:19.739 --> 0:36:22.780
<v S1>it was essentially his family's income at the time because

0:36:22.780 --> 0:36:26.580
<v S1>he had lost his job. And then it came time

0:36:26.580 --> 0:36:30.640
<v S1>to start, you know, the marketing process and really rolling

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:34.480
<v S1>the book out to release it. And he felt this

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:39.240
<v S1>conviction within. I can't publish this. Uh, it's so raw.

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:43.480
<v S1>It's going to increase the hurt that people feel, the

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:46.520
<v S1>sense of betrayal they feel from what's happened. So he

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:49.760
<v S1>calls his publisher and he says, hey, I can't publish this.

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:54.520
<v S1>And they're furious. Like, really at this point after all

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:57.680
<v S1>of this? So they tell him, the only way we're

0:36:57.680 --> 0:36:59.160
<v S1>going to let you out of this contract is if

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:02.959
<v S1>you pay back all of the advance, and that's it.

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:07.880
<v S1>So my friend knew it would drain his family's savings account.

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:12.480
<v S1>He has no contingency plan, but he ultimately pulls the book,

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:15.359
<v S1>and he pays back every penny of the advance, and

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:19.600
<v S1>he eats that. And, uh, I just I love that

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:23.640
<v S1>story because of not only his integrity, but he had

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:26.480
<v S1>the wherewithal to realize that. And the way he put

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:28.739
<v S1>it was as he read through the book, knowing this

0:37:28.739 --> 0:37:30.899
<v S1>was about to be released, he said it read more

0:37:30.900 --> 0:37:35.660
<v S1>like an angry diary entry than even a thoughtful critique.

0:37:35.700 --> 0:37:38.340
<v S1>Write some books. There's a place for that of calling

0:37:38.340 --> 0:37:43.820
<v S1>out the injustice, of contending for victims, things like that.

0:37:44.420 --> 0:37:46.780
<v S1>But he realized this was not that. This was something else.

0:37:46.820 --> 0:37:51.859
<v S1>And how do we distinguish between just an angry rant

0:37:52.340 --> 0:37:57.420
<v S1>in a prophetic critique and the words that one of

0:37:57.420 --> 0:38:00.540
<v S1>my colleagues used that I just immediately latched on to

0:38:00.580 --> 0:38:05.020
<v S1>and have used is the problem arises when writers write

0:38:05.060 --> 0:38:09.260
<v S1>out of the wound, not the scar. So that distinction,

0:38:09.300 --> 0:38:13.580
<v S1>that distinction between wounds and scars I find super helpful.

0:38:13.620 --> 0:38:20.060
<v S1>A a wound is still bleeding. It's fresh. And you know,

0:38:20.100 --> 0:38:23.020
<v S1>the objection to all of this is, well, why are

0:38:23.020 --> 0:38:27.910
<v S1>you censoring your emotion? You should pour that rage onto paper.

0:38:27.910 --> 0:38:31.030
<v S1>You should not apologize. You should just get it out there.

0:38:31.870 --> 0:38:33.709
<v S1>But that's why I find the image of a wound

0:38:33.710 --> 0:38:36.310
<v S1>so helpful. And this is a little gross, but it

0:38:36.310 --> 0:38:40.070
<v S1>makes the point. When someone has a gushing, leaking wound,

0:38:40.070 --> 0:38:42.469
<v S1>you don't want to be anywhere near that. If you're

0:38:42.469 --> 0:38:46.430
<v S1>a medical professional, you have gloves on a mask. You're

0:38:46.430 --> 0:38:49.709
<v S1>protecting yourself from that. So yes, you can bleed onto

0:38:49.710 --> 0:38:52.910
<v S1>the page, but and that's honest and raw. But it's

0:38:52.910 --> 0:38:56.790
<v S1>quite unsettling as a reader to encounter that. Yeah. And

0:38:56.790 --> 0:38:59.670
<v S1>so going back to the memoir example, uh, one of

0:38:59.670 --> 0:39:02.989
<v S1>my colleagues was talking about this memoir that that she

0:39:02.989 --> 0:39:05.910
<v S1>was editing, and this person's mother had passed away through

0:39:05.910 --> 0:39:10.149
<v S1>a long, hard battle with some disease. And he just

0:39:10.150 --> 0:39:16.430
<v S1>went into extreme detail about the tubes and bodily fluids

0:39:16.430 --> 0:39:19.870
<v S1>and just far more than the reader needed to know,

0:39:20.550 --> 0:39:24.430
<v S1>and was actually saying less about who his mother was

0:39:24.850 --> 0:39:29.810
<v S1>then just the terrible, terrible situation she was in. And

0:39:29.810 --> 0:39:33.410
<v S1>so that's an example that for a writer, it can

0:39:33.410 --> 0:39:35.890
<v S1>feel cathartic. It can feel freeing to get that all

0:39:35.890 --> 0:39:40.410
<v S1>onto the page. But it was still too fresh. Yeah.

0:39:40.450 --> 0:39:44.089
<v S1>So the difference between a wound and a scar, the

0:39:44.090 --> 0:39:46.010
<v S1>main one is time. Yeah.

0:39:46.890 --> 0:39:49.529
<v S2>Well, as you said, I mean, write whatever you need

0:39:49.530 --> 0:39:52.930
<v S2>to write for yourself. That doesn't mean it's it's for

0:39:52.930 --> 0:39:56.330
<v S2>everybody else. And write out your wounds into your journal

0:39:56.330 --> 0:39:56.890
<v S2>for sure.

0:39:57.290 --> 0:40:00.770
<v S1>Yes. Yeah. There's a place where those wounds can live

0:40:01.170 --> 0:40:04.810
<v S1>and help you process. In fact, maybe my friend would

0:40:04.810 --> 0:40:07.530
<v S1>look at that first book draft he wrote and tending

0:40:07.570 --> 0:40:10.770
<v S1>originally to publish it. But maybe that was a stepping

0:40:10.770 --> 0:40:15.129
<v S1>stone on the journey toward writing something that would be

0:40:15.130 --> 0:40:18.250
<v S1>more helpful to the general public. And that's what he

0:40:18.250 --> 0:40:22.210
<v S1>ended up doing. So he published a second book a

0:40:22.210 --> 0:40:28.469
<v S1>few years later after much counseling and time and healing

0:40:28.469 --> 0:40:32.670
<v S1>and conversations and as much reconciliation as could be attained

0:40:32.670 --> 0:40:37.310
<v S1>in that time frame, and he wrote a beautiful, I think,

0:40:37.310 --> 0:40:44.750
<v S1>memoir about what he experienced. But that sharp edge, uh, is,

0:40:45.390 --> 0:40:48.469
<v S1>is there in some ways, but it just reads differently

0:40:48.469 --> 0:40:52.030
<v S1>because his wound had time to heal into a scar.

0:40:52.070 --> 0:40:56.310
<v S1>And here's why I love this analogy. Scars. They're not pretty.

0:40:57.030 --> 0:40:59.590
<v S1>So we're not talking about tying up your pain with

0:40:59.590 --> 0:41:05.270
<v S1>a bow, or airbrushing your experience, or downplaying the injustice.

0:41:05.630 --> 0:41:08.469
<v S1>What we're talking about is being able to describe it

0:41:08.469 --> 0:41:12.509
<v S1>in a way that people can receive. And so Steve

0:41:12.830 --> 0:41:15.750
<v S1>delves into this is the my friend who wrote the book.

0:41:15.870 --> 0:41:19.950
<v S1>He delves into some of the most hurtful things that

0:41:19.950 --> 0:41:24.009
<v S1>were said. He goes there and he tells those stories. um,

0:41:24.170 --> 0:41:29.450
<v S1>with grace and truth. But again, it's not leaking anymore.

0:41:29.450 --> 0:41:33.210
<v S1>And it's it's, uh, it's helpful, actually, to hear some

0:41:33.210 --> 0:41:36.250
<v S1>of those behind the scenes stories and then to hear

0:41:36.250 --> 0:41:40.529
<v S1>him reflect on what God has taught him through them

0:41:40.530 --> 0:41:44.330
<v S1>and his own sin. That sort of has become more

0:41:44.330 --> 0:41:47.290
<v S1>clear in the rear view as well. So it's just

0:41:47.330 --> 0:41:50.690
<v S1>there's a big difference between wounds and scars. Yeah.

0:41:51.130 --> 0:41:52.930
<v S2>Great. Thanks. Well, well, we better wrap this thing up,

0:41:52.930 --> 0:41:56.129
<v S2>but I want to ask you my customary last question. Sure.

0:41:56.130 --> 0:41:57.850
<v S2>And that is, who are the writers who make you

0:41:57.850 --> 0:41:58.810
<v S2>want to write? Well.

0:42:00.250 --> 0:42:04.370
<v S1>That's one of the hardest questions for me, because it

0:42:04.410 --> 0:42:06.690
<v S1>feels like I should just give you a list of

0:42:06.690 --> 0:42:11.690
<v S1>50 names. But yeah, a couple folks that come to mind.

0:42:12.010 --> 0:42:14.450
<v S1>One has been on the show, uh, Leif Enger.

0:42:14.890 --> 0:42:15.489
<v S2>Um.

0:42:15.890 --> 0:42:22.090
<v S1>So on the fiction side, his descriptions. Yeah. His dialogue.

0:42:23.310 --> 0:42:27.190
<v S1>Just a master of the craft. Yeah. And when I

0:42:27.190 --> 0:42:29.790
<v S1>read him, I'm just filled with envy, if I'm honest.

0:42:29.950 --> 0:42:32.629
<v S1>It's just. How in the world do you do that

0:42:32.630 --> 0:42:36.029
<v S1>on the page? And so I. I love his writing.

0:42:36.270 --> 0:42:37.030
<v S2>Yeah, I do too.

0:42:37.550 --> 0:42:40.190
<v S1>Another person would be Andy Crouch.

0:42:40.510 --> 0:42:40.910
<v S2>Um.

0:42:41.630 --> 0:42:45.149
<v S1>So as someone who has mixed feelings on technology and

0:42:45.150 --> 0:42:49.509
<v S1>its impact on our lives, Andy's words cast a really

0:42:49.510 --> 0:42:54.510
<v S1>beautiful vision. I think, of why we're here as Christians,

0:42:54.590 --> 0:42:59.550
<v S1>what we're called to, and how to live lives of flourishing. Uh,

0:42:59.550 --> 0:43:03.750
<v S1>I'd have to mention Eugene Peterson for the way he

0:43:03.750 --> 0:43:06.230
<v S1>can do exactly what we're talking about. He just has

0:43:06.230 --> 0:43:10.110
<v S1>this knack of naming the ache we feel and bringing

0:43:10.150 --> 0:43:15.710
<v S1>truth and comfort. Uh, here's one that might surprise people.

0:43:15.710 --> 0:43:19.870
<v S1>And I doubt anyone's mentioned there's a writer named Eddie Schlesner.

0:43:20.230 --> 0:43:21.890
<v S2>Okay, I don't know. Eddie Schlesner.

0:43:22.250 --> 0:43:24.370
<v S1>He is actually a copywriter.

0:43:24.770 --> 0:43:25.090
<v S2>Huh.

0:43:25.610 --> 0:43:30.570
<v S1>But he thinks deeply and writes stunningly about the human experience.

0:43:30.570 --> 0:43:34.009
<v S1>So when people hear copywriter, they might think, oh, jeez, great,

0:43:34.010 --> 0:43:40.330
<v S1>a marketing mind. But man, he is a thought leader

0:43:40.330 --> 0:43:44.890
<v S1>for writers. And his book, Very Good Copy, which is

0:43:44.890 --> 0:43:48.609
<v S1>tailored to copywriters, is really about how to capture the

0:43:48.610 --> 0:43:51.290
<v S1>human experience in your writing.

0:43:51.290 --> 0:43:52.450
<v S2>So, okay.

0:43:52.489 --> 0:43:57.050
<v S1>I can't recommend his newsletter more highly. It's called very

0:43:57.050 --> 0:44:03.330
<v S1>Good Copy. And maybe lastly, I'm I'm embarrassed to say,

0:44:03.330 --> 0:44:08.370
<v S1>but I'm just starting to really dip into Wendell Berry. Oh, and.

0:44:08.690 --> 0:44:10.410
<v S2>Um, good for you. You got a lot to look

0:44:10.410 --> 0:44:10.970
<v S2>forward to.

0:44:11.370 --> 0:44:14.370
<v S1>Uh, that's what everyone tells me. And and I, uh,

0:44:14.370 --> 0:44:18.170
<v S1>I'm already captured by what I'm reading. Um, but I'm

0:44:18.170 --> 0:44:22.300
<v S1>reading his book, Standing by Words. which is a collection

0:44:22.300 --> 0:44:26.980
<v S1>of essays. And so I'm hopping on that train finally. Yeah,

0:44:27.020 --> 0:44:30.940
<v S1>those are a few I have not yet. No, no.

0:44:30.980 --> 0:44:32.339
<v S2>So good. You're going to love it.

0:44:32.820 --> 0:44:34.940
<v S1>Yeah, I can't wait. Do you have a recommendation where

0:44:34.940 --> 0:44:35.740
<v S1>I should start?

0:44:36.020 --> 0:44:41.060
<v S2>Well, uh, a couple possibilities. One is to start with

0:44:41.060 --> 0:44:44.580
<v S2>his short stories. That distant land is a great a

0:44:44.580 --> 0:44:47.140
<v S2>great way to start. Um, but if you want to

0:44:47.140 --> 0:44:51.140
<v S2>start with a novel, you know, it's Jaber Crowe. Is

0:44:51.180 --> 0:44:54.660
<v S2>is Jaber Crowe and Hannah Colter are the the two

0:44:54.700 --> 0:44:58.580
<v S2>that people usually start with. And, um, those are both

0:44:58.580 --> 0:45:02.420
<v S2>just fantastic novels. I mean, it's all great, but.

0:45:02.900 --> 0:45:05.700
<v S1>Yeah. Yeah. That's great. My wife just read Jaber Crowe

0:45:05.700 --> 0:45:06.859
<v S1>and really enjoyed it.

0:45:06.860 --> 0:45:09.700
<v S2>So yeah, it's I hope she's not going to open

0:45:09.700 --> 0:45:11.340
<v S2>a barber shop. Um.

0:45:12.219 --> 0:45:13.219
<v S1>I think we're safe.

0:45:13.260 --> 0:45:15.779
<v S2>Yeah. Okay. Well, there's there's, uh, somebody in here in

0:45:15.780 --> 0:45:17.900
<v S2>Nashville who, uh. Yeah. Opened a barber shop after he

0:45:17.900 --> 0:45:21.480
<v S2>read Jaber Crowe, so that's fantastic. Yeah. All right, Will

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:23.200
<v S2>Parker Anderson, thanks so much for being here. It's been

0:45:23.200 --> 0:45:23.720
<v S2>a pleasure.

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:26.840
<v S1>Yeah. Thank you Jonathan, I appreciate the work you do.

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:28.520
<v S1>And thanks for having me on.

0:45:28.760 --> 0:45:33.279
<v S2>Thanks. The habit podcast is brought to you by the

0:45:33.280 --> 0:45:37.360
<v S2>Rabbit Room, where art nourishes community, and community nourishes art.

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:40.640
<v S2>You can support their work including this podcast, by becoming

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:46.920
<v S2>a member. Visit COVID-19. Special thanks as well to Taylor

0:45:46.920 --> 0:45:49.400
<v S2>Leonard for letting us use her song diamonds as the

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:52.279
<v S2>theme music for The Habit podcast. You can learn more

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:57.120
<v S2>about Taylor and follow her work at Taylor Comm. The

0:45:57.120 --> 0:46:00.520
<v S2>Habit Membership is a library of resources for writers by me,

0:46:00.520 --> 0:46:03.759
<v S2>Jonathan Rogers. More importantly, the habit is a hub of

0:46:03.760 --> 0:46:06.920
<v S2>community where like minded writers gather to discuss their work

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:09.759
<v S2>and give each other a little more courage. Find out

0:46:09.760 --> 0:46:10.920
<v S2>more at the habit.