WEBVTT - Can NFTs Help Digital Artists?

0:00:02.340 --> 0:00:06.230
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to what happens next the podcast that examines

0:00:06.230 --> 0:00:09.260
<v Speaker 1>some of the biggest challenges facing our world and ask

0:00:09.260 --> 0:00:12.789
<v Speaker 1>the experts what will happen if we don't change and

0:00:12.789 --> 0:00:15.550
<v Speaker 1>what can we do to create a better future? I'm

0:00:15.550 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>dr Susan Karlin, keep listening to find out what happens next.

0:00:27.050 --> 0:00:29.390
<v Speaker 1>N. F. T. S. Are an interesting use of crypto

0:00:29.390 --> 0:00:33.129
<v Speaker 1>technology and could enable artists to make a living from

0:00:33.130 --> 0:00:36.900
<v Speaker 1>their work. But they could also be, well kind of silly.

0:00:36.909 --> 0:00:41.030
<v Speaker 1>Do they work are they here to stay R. N. F. T. S.

0:00:41.030 --> 0:00:43.910
<v Speaker 1>As nifty as they seem? Stay with us over the

0:00:43.909 --> 0:00:46.750
<v Speaker 1>next two episodes of what happens next As we take

0:00:46.750 --> 0:00:48.230
<v Speaker 1>a look at N. F. T. S.

0:00:52.260 --> 0:00:55.510
<v Speaker 1>So firstly and don't laugh at me. Tech heads, what

0:00:55.510 --> 0:00:58.450
<v Speaker 1>the hell is an N. F. T. Oh boy. How

0:00:58.450 --> 0:00:59.580
<v Speaker 1>long is this podcast?

0:01:01.750 --> 0:01:03.710
<v Speaker 2>This is going to be a challenge. But I'll try.

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.780
<v Speaker 2>It exists in this world we can't touch and we

0:01:08.780 --> 0:01:09.450
<v Speaker 2>can't see.

0:01:09.459 --> 0:01:13.890
<v Speaker 1>The short answer is it's a non fungible token. Non fungible. Hey,

0:01:13.900 --> 0:01:14.580
<v Speaker 1>when

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:19.270
<v Speaker 2>it's non fungible it's got an identification number that's unique

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:20.199
<v Speaker 2>to that token.

0:01:20.370 --> 0:01:24.550
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so N. F. T. Stands for non fungible token.

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.119
<v Speaker 1>Non fungible means it can't be replaced. But that sounds

0:01:28.130 --> 0:01:30.910
<v Speaker 1>odd because an N. F. T. Is usually an artwork

0:01:30.910 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>in the form of a digital file, like a jpeg

0:01:33.450 --> 0:01:37.260
<v Speaker 1>or video, which can obviously be duplicated copied and shared

0:01:37.270 --> 0:01:42.060
<v Speaker 1>over and over again. However, and if I'm following this right.

0:01:42.069 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>What makes an N. F. T. Unique is that every N. F. T.

0:01:45.569 --> 0:01:50.490
<v Speaker 1>Artwork has its own code. Can someone please just give

0:01:50.490 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>me a simple definition.

0:01:52.740 --> 0:01:56.330
<v Speaker 1>Okay it's a it's a digital receipt

0:01:58.660 --> 0:02:02.250
<v Speaker 1>a digital receipt a digital receipt. There we go. That

0:02:02.250 --> 0:02:10.810
<v Speaker 1>was easy attached to a Blockchain which is okay so

0:02:10.810 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>an N. F. T. Is a unique token that is

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.630
<v Speaker 1>attached to the Blockchain. You know the Blockchain? It's like

0:02:16.630 --> 0:02:19.060
<v Speaker 1>a shared database of transactions on the.

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:24.470
<v Speaker 1>Okay how about I get art lawyer Alana Kushnir to explain.

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Well the first question really is what is Blockchain? I

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>think when you're trying to understand what an N. F. T.

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Is you have to question what is Blockchain? Blockchain is

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a type of a technology

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>which is a distributed ledger where transactions are recorded and

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.180
<v Speaker 1>the idea is they're immutable in that they can never

0:02:43.180 --> 0:02:46.630
<v Speaker 1>be hacked or change. They can only be built on

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.620
<v Speaker 1>top of it's written in stone is written in stone.

0:02:49.630 --> 0:02:51.870
<v Speaker 1>So part of the value of N. F. T. S.

0:02:51.870 --> 0:02:53.980
<v Speaker 1>Comes with this immune ability that the block

0:02:53.990 --> 0:02:58.049
<v Speaker 1>chain gives N. F. T. So tokens essentially live on

0:02:58.050 --> 0:03:02.269
<v Speaker 1>the Blockchain tokens represent the transactions that are recorded on

0:03:02.270 --> 0:03:04.810
<v Speaker 1>the Blockchain and some of those are fungible. Some of

0:03:04.810 --> 0:03:09.820
<v Speaker 1>those are non fungible and fungible tokens are Bitcoin ethereum

0:03:09.820 --> 0:03:12.820
<v Speaker 1>that your cryptocurrencies and the idea is if I had

0:03:12.830 --> 0:03:17.220
<v Speaker 1>one Bitcoin and you had one Bitcoin we exchange those,

0:03:17.220 --> 0:03:18.649
<v Speaker 1>we would end up with the same

0:03:18.790 --> 0:03:23.210
<v Speaker 1>amount. Whereas a non fungible token is slightly different. So

0:03:23.210 --> 0:03:25.750
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like if I bought a Picasso and

0:03:25.750 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you bought a Rembrandt and we exchange those paintings, we

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:31.750
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't end up with the same thing that we started

0:03:31.750 --> 0:03:33.990
<v Speaker 1>off with. So they're non fungible. So the idea is

0:03:33.990 --> 0:03:37.060
<v Speaker 1>the token is unique and that's also a part of

0:03:37.060 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the value of non non fungible tokens lies because they

0:03:40.330 --> 0:03:42.670
<v Speaker 1>are unique on the Blockchain. We can tell that there's

0:03:42.670 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>only one of that type.

0:03:46.350 --> 0:03:49.210
<v Speaker 1>So if I'm an artist, how do I create one

0:03:49.210 --> 0:03:51.950
<v Speaker 1>of these tokens? How do I make an N. F. T.

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:54.020
<v Speaker 1>I need to speak to a digital artist.

0:03:54.030 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Hi I'm john McCormack, a computer artist and computer scientist

0:03:59.090 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 2>and I'm the director of Sensei Lab, a creative technologies

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.620
<v Speaker 2>lab at Monash University's caulfield campus.

0:04:06.110 --> 0:04:08.010
<v Speaker 1>Right? I want to create an N. F. T. For

0:04:08.010 --> 0:04:11.010
<v Speaker 1>this painting that I've created. How do I do that?

0:04:11.010 --> 0:04:12.730
<v Speaker 1>How do I make an N. F. T. For that?

0:04:12.740 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 2>So usually you do it via one of the many

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:19.660
<v Speaker 2>sites that deal in cryptocurrencies and N. F. T. S.

0:04:19.670 --> 0:04:22.420
<v Speaker 2>So you basically go onto the site, you have to

0:04:22.420 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 2>have a digital asset usually associated with your work people

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:30.650
<v Speaker 2>have associated with physical paintings or physical objects as well.

0:04:31.060 --> 0:04:35.140
<v Speaker 2>Um And then basically you pay what's called a gas

0:04:35.140 --> 0:04:38.050
<v Speaker 2>fee which is the fee to generate some unique token

0:04:38.050 --> 0:04:40.410
<v Speaker 2>which is the N. F. T. Itself and you get

0:04:40.410 --> 0:04:44.770
<v Speaker 2>given the N. F. T. Digitally and then someone can

0:04:44.779 --> 0:04:48.070
<v Speaker 2>buy that N. F. T. From you and transfer ownership

0:04:48.070 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 2>from you to the person who buys that.

0:04:52.670 --> 0:04:55.290
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so if I'm an artist I can turn an

0:04:55.300 --> 0:04:58.679
<v Speaker 1>artwork into an N. F. T. And sell it. However,

0:04:58.690 --> 0:05:01.420
<v Speaker 1>if I'm buying an N. F. T. What do I

0:05:01.430 --> 0:05:02.900
<v Speaker 1>actually own?

0:05:03.830 --> 0:05:06.500
<v Speaker 2>Hi, My name is Ben Hayward. I'm a senior lecturer

0:05:06.500 --> 0:05:08.810
<v Speaker 2>in the Department of Business Law and taxation at the

0:05:08.810 --> 0:05:11.990
<v Speaker 2>Monash business School. And my research work looks at how

0:05:11.990 --> 0:05:16.219
<v Speaker 2>the law can support international trade in various forms in particular.

0:05:17.060 --> 0:05:17.420
<v Speaker 1>So

0:05:17.420 --> 0:05:19.780
<v Speaker 2>you don't really own that artwork in the same way

0:05:19.779 --> 0:05:22.390
<v Speaker 2>that you might own a physical painting. What you worrying

0:05:22.390 --> 0:05:24.990
<v Speaker 2>is the token and it's linked to some extra right?

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.300
<v Speaker 1>You can actually think of it like buying a bottle

0:05:27.300 --> 0:05:29.090
<v Speaker 1>of water from a vending machine or

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.750
<v Speaker 1>um you know, buy a cup of coffee when you

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.930
<v Speaker 1>buy that bottle of water or a coffee. You own

0:05:34.930 --> 0:05:37.540
<v Speaker 1>that property, you can enjoy it to the exclusion of

0:05:37.550 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 1>anybody else. That's the kind of that's the fundamental principle

0:05:40.730 --> 0:05:43.729
<v Speaker 1>of personal property. It's something that you can possess and

0:05:43.730 --> 0:05:45.820
<v Speaker 1>you can possess it to the exclusion of anyone else.

0:05:45.830 --> 0:05:49.130
<v Speaker 1>So take that in the context of a painting or

0:05:49.130 --> 0:05:51.350
<v Speaker 1>a sculpture, you buy your painting, you buy a sculpture,

0:05:51.350 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you can

0:05:51.890 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>display in your house, you can loan it to somebody.

0:05:55.570 --> 0:05:56.980
<v Speaker 1>You know, you could loan it to a museum for

0:05:56.980 --> 0:06:00.530
<v Speaker 1>an exhibition, you could sell it as well. Um So

0:06:00.529 --> 0:06:04.409
<v Speaker 1>that's your kind of traditional artwork. Um But you know

0:06:04.410 --> 0:06:06.370
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to digital artwork it's a little bit

0:06:06.380 --> 0:06:09.700
<v Speaker 1>different and that's because it's so easy to reproduce. Right?

0:06:09.700 --> 0:06:10.099
<v Speaker 1>So

0:06:10.290 --> 0:06:13.300
<v Speaker 1>you don't necessarily, you know, if I send it to

0:06:13.300 --> 0:06:16.690
<v Speaker 1>you via email, you know, a digital file, we could

0:06:16.690 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>both enjoy it at the same time. You could look

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.150
<v Speaker 1>at the image the digital file and I could look

0:06:21.150 --> 0:06:22.580
<v Speaker 1>at it on, you know, we could be in complete

0:06:22.580 --> 0:06:24.670
<v Speaker 1>other sides of the world and we can both enjoy

0:06:24.670 --> 0:06:27.450
<v Speaker 1>it um as it's meant to be enjoyed. So in

0:06:27.450 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that way a digital artwork has some fundamental differences to

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a painting or a sculpture.

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.710
<v Speaker 1>Um And you know if we look at the history

0:06:36.710 --> 0:06:39.410
<v Speaker 1>of art and especially you know, late modern art and

0:06:39.410 --> 0:06:43.260
<v Speaker 1>contemporary art, a lot of artists were um driven by

0:06:43.260 --> 0:06:47.739
<v Speaker 1>this idea of wanting to question this idea of what

0:06:47.740 --> 0:06:50.539
<v Speaker 1>is an original artwork. What is an authentic artwork? The

0:06:50.540 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>idea that there's no, you know, in today's world there's

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:58.340
<v Speaker 1>no such thing as the one authentic piece. Um You know,

0:06:58.339 --> 0:07:01.219
<v Speaker 1>think of like performance art for example, that's also intangible.

0:07:01.220 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>So

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:04.370
<v Speaker 1>you know in some ways I also think digital artworks

0:07:04.370 --> 0:07:06.950
<v Speaker 1>and FTS not so new artists have really been pushing

0:07:06.950 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the boundaries when it comes to what is art and

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>what you buy when you buy an artwork for far

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:15.810
<v Speaker 1>longer than N. F. T. S. Have existed. What N. F. T. S.

0:07:15.810 --> 0:07:18.850
<v Speaker 1>Do though is um you know from a very practical

0:07:18.850 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>level they do tell us who owns that N. F. T.

0:07:22.210 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Who owns that digital artwork. So that's the that's the

0:07:25.970 --> 0:07:30.260
<v Speaker 1>basic benefit of minting your digital artwork as an N. F. T.

0:07:31.650 --> 0:07:35.090
<v Speaker 1>So why are people so excited about N. F. T. S.

0:07:35.100 --> 0:07:36.710
<v Speaker 1>Here's Ben Hayward.

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.900
<v Speaker 2>I think people get excited about anything that's new. People

0:07:39.900 --> 0:07:42.580
<v Speaker 2>got excited about the Beatles and Elvis when they hit

0:07:42.580 --> 0:07:45.180
<v Speaker 2>the scene. And I wonder if it's really much different,

0:07:45.190 --> 0:07:48.470
<v Speaker 2>much different to that. Um I think it's it's a

0:07:48.470 --> 0:07:52.820
<v Speaker 2>way for us to explore new types of trade and

0:07:52.820 --> 0:07:55.670
<v Speaker 2>you know in the future this may be something that persists.

0:07:55.670 --> 0:07:57.690
<v Speaker 2>We might end up using N. F. T. S. For

0:07:57.690 --> 0:08:00.710
<v Speaker 2>different purposes. It's a bit hard to know at this

0:08:00.710 --> 0:08:03.940
<v Speaker 2>stage but they give us an opportunity to do something

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 2>we've never really done before. And I guess for the

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.500
<v Speaker 2>purpose of trading art where previously you have a digital

0:08:10.500 --> 0:08:14.740
<v Speaker 2>file that represents some artwork that's infinitely reproducible meaning its

0:08:14.740 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 2>value is basically nothing.

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:20.210
<v Speaker 2>Not really a very attractive prospect for trading those kinds

0:08:20.210 --> 0:08:24.250
<v Speaker 2>of artworks online. And this is a way to maybe

0:08:24.260 --> 0:08:28.050
<v Speaker 2>deal with that make online artwork unique and allow it

0:08:28.050 --> 0:08:31.820
<v Speaker 2>to have a tradable value and possibly support artists at

0:08:31.820 --> 0:08:32.550
<v Speaker 2>the same time.

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:36.059
<v Speaker 1>Do you think N. F. T. S. Are beneficial for artists?

0:08:36.460 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 2>They could be in the sense that I don't know

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.250
<v Speaker 2>that there was really an effective way to trade digital

0:08:43.260 --> 0:08:45.570
<v Speaker 2>art before this technology.

0:08:45.910 --> 0:08:48.930
<v Speaker 2>I guess artists are going to want to make sure

0:08:48.929 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 2>that the contracts they have in place around the trade

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:54.670
<v Speaker 2>in these N. F. T. S are beneficial to them.

0:08:54.670 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Whether that means retaining the intellectual property rights, making sure

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:02.020
<v Speaker 2>they are properly paid for the work they're producing,

0:09:02.170 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 2>but I guess, as we've said, if you've got an

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:11.370
<v Speaker 2>ordinary file infinitely reproducible, so effectively worth nothing, this situation

0:09:11.380 --> 0:09:14.839
<v Speaker 2>has some definite advantages over that. Personally. I have a

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:17.850
<v Speaker 2>lot of reservations, so I've never really used them.

0:09:17.860 --> 0:09:20.870
<v Speaker 1>Here's Director of Sensei Lab, john McCormack

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 2>dabbled a little bit, but I didn't really get in

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.130
<v Speaker 2>when it was, I probably could have probably wouldn't be

0:09:26.130 --> 0:09:27.390
<v Speaker 2>talking to you now, or you'll be talking to me

0:09:27.390 --> 0:09:30.210
<v Speaker 2>from my multi million dollar apartment somewhere

0:09:30.860 --> 0:09:35.719
<v Speaker 2>wherever. Um if I had. But um I'm not sure,

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:37.860
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I do appreciate the fact that there were

0:09:37.860 --> 0:09:40.110
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people who had menial jobs who wanted

0:09:40.110 --> 0:09:44.370
<v Speaker 2>to be artists who suddenly could could live that that possibility.

0:09:44.380 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, being an artist and earning money to things

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.179
<v Speaker 2>that normally don't go together, and if you look at,

0:09:49.190 --> 0:09:52.709
<v Speaker 2>even in Australia, the average income of people who professionally say,

0:09:52.710 --> 0:09:56.809
<v Speaker 2>the artist is amongst the lowest of any profession,

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 2>so I certainly don't want to deny people, you know,

0:10:00.809 --> 0:10:04.540
<v Speaker 2>if a technical mechanism enables somebody to earn a living

0:10:04.540 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 2>from something that is creative and gives them enjoy them

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:11.150
<v Speaker 2>pleasure and gives other people enjoyment, then I think that's

0:10:11.150 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 2>a fantastic thing,

0:10:12.730 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 2>but also, you know, cryptocurrencies ultimately are kind of Ponzi schemes.

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:19.949
<v Speaker 2>They're basically they rely on a whole lot of collective

0:10:19.950 --> 0:10:23.069
<v Speaker 2>herd mentality about the value of something that doesn't really

0:10:23.070 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 2>actually have that value.

0:10:24.650 --> 0:10:28.670
<v Speaker 1>N. F. T. Proponents might say that it helps protect

0:10:28.670 --> 0:10:32.530
<v Speaker 1>from fraud and theft, because you've got this untraceable digital

0:10:32.530 --> 0:10:35.650
<v Speaker 1>receipt that's forever linked to a particular artwork, but that's

0:10:36.380 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>yeah, that doesn't, to my mind that doesn't hold up

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:41.580
<v Speaker 1>to scrutiny at all, josh. Drummond is an artist from

0:10:41.580 --> 0:10:44.670
<v Speaker 1>new Zealand and a very proud N. F. T cynic.

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:48.070
<v Speaker 1>One of the major problems when I first got big

0:10:48.070 --> 0:10:49.050
<v Speaker 1>was people would

0:10:49.730 --> 0:10:52.979
<v Speaker 1>um N. F. T. Fans or grifters or whatever, um

0:10:52.990 --> 0:10:56.620
<v Speaker 1>would grab someone's jpeg that's floating around on the internet,

0:10:56.630 --> 0:10:59.690
<v Speaker 1>like like a named artist or someone, someone with the following,

0:10:59.700 --> 0:11:02.559
<v Speaker 1>they take their work and just sell it, make an N. F. D.

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:05.179
<v Speaker 1>Of it and sell someone else's stuff that's that's just

0:11:05.190 --> 0:11:08.290
<v Speaker 1>that's just stealing and it facilitated tons of this stuff

0:11:08.300 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and none of the N. F. T. Marketplace is originally,

0:11:11.809 --> 0:11:15.199
<v Speaker 1>and I still don't really think currently had super robust

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>systems in place to protect against this. So they didn't

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:19.219
<v Speaker 1>really facilitate um

0:11:19.620 --> 0:11:22.569
<v Speaker 1>and viability, they actually just made it a lot easier

0:11:22.570 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to steal I'm not gonna lie, this is a big

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:27.569
<v Speaker 1>problem at the moment, and I'm finding that a lot

0:11:27.570 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of artists that I work with are finding copycat N. F. T.

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:34.230
<v Speaker 1>S of their works online and they ask the same question,

0:11:34.230 --> 0:11:35.830
<v Speaker 1>what do I do, what can I do at this

0:11:35.830 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>point in time? Most mainstream and FT platforms have set

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>out what we call a D. M. C. A takedown

0:11:42.450 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>notification process. And that's essentially an american style of requesting

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:48.990
<v Speaker 1>that you take down infringing content

0:11:49.250 --> 0:11:52.660
<v Speaker 1>and you have to follow the strict guidelines that the

0:11:52.660 --> 0:11:55.270
<v Speaker 1>platform sets out in order to do that. But you know,

0:11:55.270 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>even myself in practice when I've acted for artists and

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>we've done these takedown notices, it hasn't been that straightforward

0:12:01.210 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>even a year ago. I would say, you know, a

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:05.329
<v Speaker 1>lot of the mainstream platforms

0:12:05.910 --> 0:12:08.340
<v Speaker 1>perhaps didn't get as much legal advice as they have

0:12:08.340 --> 0:12:11.980
<v Speaker 1>at this point in time. And so those processes that

0:12:11.990 --> 0:12:15.390
<v Speaker 1>are set up weren't that straightforward. They weren't easy for some,

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.060
<v Speaker 1>you know, for somebody who's not a lawyer to be

0:12:18.059 --> 0:12:21.620
<v Speaker 1>able to navigate and do, they are getting easier. Um

0:12:21.630 --> 0:12:23.270
<v Speaker 1>But you know,

0:12:23.790 --> 0:12:27.260
<v Speaker 1>there's been lots of instances in which artists have tried

0:12:27.260 --> 0:12:30.459
<v Speaker 1>to get their content taken down. They haven't had the

0:12:30.470 --> 0:12:33.260
<v Speaker 1>result that they wanted. Some of them have gone out

0:12:33.260 --> 0:12:37.140
<v Speaker 1>on social media vented about on social media. And unfortunately

0:12:37.140 --> 0:12:40.350
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately that's when the platforms have acted unless you can

0:12:40.350 --> 0:12:43.109
<v Speaker 1>afford or no you've got a friend as a copyright

0:12:43.110 --> 0:12:48.230
<v Speaker 1>lawyer who can afford to fling out notices all day.

0:12:48.470 --> 0:12:51.910
<v Speaker 1>And it's a lot of overhead with, even if even

0:12:51.910 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>if you are wealthy, it's um it's it would be

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:57.069
<v Speaker 1>pretty hard to keep up with. So yeah, that's um

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:01.740
<v Speaker 1>I think the promise of of you know of eternal

0:13:01.740 --> 0:13:04.460
<v Speaker 1>receipt or whatever. I think I really think it's it's

0:13:04.460 --> 0:13:07.140
<v Speaker 1>kind of overblown. The main interest for me was whether

0:13:07.140 --> 0:13:10.699
<v Speaker 1>seeing artists could kind of hitch their hitch there,

0:13:11.010 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>their artwork to this trendy new bandwagon and make a

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>killing off it. And some definitely did like people is

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 1>the obvious use case who is now richer than God

0:13:24.910 --> 0:13:27.300
<v Speaker 1>before N. F. T. S were a thing the digital

0:13:27.309 --> 0:13:31.090
<v Speaker 1>artist known as people, Mike Winkelmann to his friends hadn't

0:13:31.090 --> 0:13:35.230
<v Speaker 1>sold a print for anything over $100. However, since he

0:13:35.230 --> 0:13:37.309
<v Speaker 1>turned some of his work into N. F. T. S,

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>he's made some serious money. How serious. Well one of

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.370
<v Speaker 1>his N. F. T. S. A collage of his work

0:13:44.380 --> 0:13:50.860
<v Speaker 1>sold at auction for almost $90 million yep, 90 million.

0:13:51.179 --> 0:13:54.500
<v Speaker 1>So for that price, the buyer of people's work gets

0:13:54.500 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a digital file and the artist himself as josh Drummond

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:00.750
<v Speaker 1>just said, becomes richer than God,

0:14:02.190 --> 0:14:04.189
<v Speaker 1>But is the artwork any good

0:14:05.450 --> 0:14:08.780
<v Speaker 1>or is this just a fundamental never ending question we

0:14:08.780 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>seem to ask every time something new happens in the

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>art world,

0:14:15.990 --> 0:14:16.250
<v Speaker 1>if

0:14:16.250 --> 0:14:19.530
<v Speaker 2>you look at the famous FT works like the people

0:14:19.530 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 2>work if you know about this, people was an artist

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 2>who he was well known but not super well known

0:14:25.710 --> 0:14:30.690
<v Speaker 2>and he famously auctioned off this work that sold for

0:14:30.700 --> 0:14:33.810
<v Speaker 2>millions and millions of dollars, huge amounts of money, massive

0:14:33.810 --> 0:14:36.150
<v Speaker 2>amounts of money, but anyone can have a copy of

0:14:36.150 --> 0:14:38.220
<v Speaker 2>that work, the same copy that the person who paid

0:14:38.220 --> 0:14:40.410
<v Speaker 2>all that money has, there's no difference.

0:14:40.740 --> 0:14:44.610
<v Speaker 2>So I have the full resolution image, is it great art?

0:14:44.620 --> 0:14:47.900
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't, not, to me it's not, it's not worth

0:14:47.910 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 2>anywhere near the amount of money that was paid for.

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.670
<v Speaker 2>If you compare it to actual works that you think

0:14:52.670 --> 0:14:55.810
<v Speaker 2>throughout history of sort of earned a reputation as being

0:14:55.820 --> 0:14:59.530
<v Speaker 2>significant human works of art. This is not in that league,

0:14:59.530 --> 0:15:04.090
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion. Um, so there is this, this tainted

0:15:04.100 --> 0:15:06.740
<v Speaker 2>aspect that this has, that, I think it's sort of

0:15:06.740 --> 0:15:08.190
<v Speaker 2>typical of the tech world

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:10.609
<v Speaker 2>at the moment when as soon as something, there's a

0:15:10.610 --> 0:15:14.550
<v Speaker 2>scheme to make money, this sort of human greed takes

0:15:14.550 --> 0:15:18.420
<v Speaker 2>over and it just seems to be the vehicle that

0:15:18.420 --> 0:15:22.150
<v Speaker 2>provided that money making mechanism and it was largely peripheral.

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:25.100
<v Speaker 1>I suppose in the end, people will buy whatever art

0:15:25.100 --> 0:15:29.620
<v Speaker 1>they like, whether it's good or rubbish or, you know,

0:15:29.620 --> 0:15:31.660
<v Speaker 1>if you look at it as a talented artist and

0:15:31.670 --> 0:15:32.580
<v Speaker 1>that's a piece of

0:15:32.750 --> 0:15:36.060
<v Speaker 1>crap, but I might go, but it's lovely, like that's

0:15:36.060 --> 0:15:39.130
<v Speaker 1>always existed, hasn't it? Like, you know, people,

0:15:39.490 --> 0:15:43.390
<v Speaker 2>yeah, you know, I've thought about this quite a line,

0:15:43.390 --> 0:15:45.910
<v Speaker 2>I wrote an essay recently about it and I think

0:15:45.910 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 2>it's more complicated than that. I think

0:15:48.390 --> 0:15:51.140
<v Speaker 2>a lot of it was to do with because there's

0:15:51.140 --> 0:15:55.500
<v Speaker 2>money involved and eye watering amounts of money in some cases.

0:15:55.510 --> 0:15:58.410
<v Speaker 2>I think people lost sight of the fact that it

0:15:58.410 --> 0:16:01.570
<v Speaker 2>might just have artistic value for its own sake and

0:16:01.570 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 2>looked at it more as a kind of investment thing.

0:16:03.770 --> 0:16:06.670
<v Speaker 2>I think it's also the kind of fear of missing out.

0:16:06.670 --> 0:16:08.570
<v Speaker 2>Like if all of your friends are saying I bought

0:16:08.570 --> 0:16:09.930
<v Speaker 2>an N. F. T. I own this,

0:16:10.430 --> 0:16:13.570
<v Speaker 2>Look at what I bought for $20,000. You think I've

0:16:13.570 --> 0:16:15.020
<v Speaker 2>got to get into that too? I don't want to

0:16:15.020 --> 0:16:19.260
<v Speaker 2>be left out. And so issues of aesthetics or taste

0:16:19.260 --> 0:16:22.500
<v Speaker 2>or meaning or you know, any of those things that

0:16:22.500 --> 0:16:25.510
<v Speaker 2>you might traditionally think of as being qualities that you

0:16:25.510 --> 0:16:29.020
<v Speaker 2>might cause you to like not kind of thrown out

0:16:29.020 --> 0:16:31.210
<v Speaker 2>the window. You know that's the power of ownership is

0:16:31.210 --> 0:16:32.110
<v Speaker 2>really important

0:16:32.420 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 2>because that's the only thing that really did. They didn't

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 2>change the art itself. I mean people were always making digital.

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.630
<v Speaker 2>I they just had this weird way of saying you

0:16:41.630 --> 0:16:46.430
<v Speaker 2>own this in some very nebulous, unleash Ghaly, verifiable sense.

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.860
<v Speaker 1>That's really interesting. I wonder if it tapped into this

0:16:50.860 --> 0:16:52.540
<v Speaker 1>part of the human psyche

0:16:53.060 --> 0:16:55.770
<v Speaker 1>uh you know this very

0:16:56.980 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>animalistic part of human psyche which is I want the

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>rare thing I want the thing that other people can't

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:07.189
<v Speaker 1>have because it makes it valuable and so n. F. T. S.

0:17:07.190 --> 0:17:10.109
<v Speaker 1>We're putting something that's very rare in the hands of

0:17:10.109 --> 0:17:12.179
<v Speaker 1>every day. Most of us can't will never be in

0:17:12.180 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a position to buy the $5 million.01 of a kind

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:18.900
<v Speaker 1>sports car or you know the Picasso.

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>But N. F. T. S. Were saying actually you you

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:24.780
<v Speaker 1>can do this now you can have a thing no

0:17:24.780 --> 0:17:26.220
<v Speaker 1>one else can have and it will give you the

0:17:26.220 --> 0:17:29.700
<v Speaker 1>bragging rights and I wonder if there's a very human

0:17:29.710 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 1>inclination to want those things.

0:17:32.210 --> 0:17:36.380
<v Speaker 2>There's a whole lot of psychology around conspicuous consumption and

0:17:36.390 --> 0:17:39.070
<v Speaker 2>people you know why why do people have an art

0:17:39.070 --> 0:17:41.130
<v Speaker 2>collection that they want to show off to show that

0:17:41.130 --> 0:17:44.310
<v Speaker 2>they have wealth power and status and so on.

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.220
<v Speaker 2>Um And then there's sort of more probably more fundamental

0:17:47.230 --> 0:17:50.110
<v Speaker 2>evolutionary biological reasons why you might want to do that

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:53.210
<v Speaker 2>to just to just to sort of show the quality

0:17:53.210 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 2>of genetically that you've that you've managed to achieve this

0:17:56.280 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 2>ability to buy something that no one else can can have.

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 2>So I think there was a lot of it was

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:05.670
<v Speaker 2>that a lot of it is also that you could

0:18:05.670 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 2>own a Porsche if you traded in N. F. T.

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:08.930
<v Speaker 2>S at the right time. So if you bought in

0:18:08.930 --> 0:18:12.140
<v Speaker 2>low and sold hi you could basically take your crypto

0:18:12.140 --> 0:18:14.109
<v Speaker 2>money that you paid for the N. F. T. Or

0:18:14.109 --> 0:18:15.820
<v Speaker 2>that you received for it when you sold it on

0:18:15.820 --> 0:18:18.770
<v Speaker 2>to someone else and turn that into real money and

0:18:18.770 --> 0:18:22.409
<v Speaker 2>then actually be able to spend that real money on something.

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:28.950
<v Speaker 1>It turns out there are also environmental impacts associated with

0:18:29.690 --> 0:18:32.140
<v Speaker 1>Professor john McCormack explains

0:18:32.540 --> 0:18:37.460
<v Speaker 2>when I first took off and cryptocurrencies became a mainstream thing,

0:18:37.500 --> 0:18:41.210
<v Speaker 2>there was a lot of discussion about the environmental impact.

0:18:41.210 --> 0:18:45.630
<v Speaker 2>So you were seeing for example large bit mining of

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:49.090
<v Speaker 2>Bitcoin mining factories, I guess you could call them in

0:18:49.100 --> 0:18:52.670
<v Speaker 2>china for example that were using coal fired power plants

0:18:52.670 --> 0:18:53.460
<v Speaker 2>to power

0:18:53.990 --> 0:18:57.790
<v Speaker 2>their their crypto mining that they were doing.

0:18:58.330 --> 0:19:01.300
<v Speaker 2>And so there was a reaction against this. It gets

0:19:01.300 --> 0:19:05.730
<v Speaker 2>more complicated technically because there's two different kinds of crypto

0:19:05.740 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 2>mining mechanisms they're called and one of them is far

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:12.350
<v Speaker 2>less environmentally damaging than the other. But the major platforms

0:19:12.350 --> 0:19:16.790
<v Speaker 2>like ethereum Bitcoin still use the old method which is

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.690
<v Speaker 2>environmentally quite, you know, I mean also

0:19:19.700 --> 0:19:23.390
<v Speaker 2>you know there's lots of industries that are environmentally bad

0:19:23.390 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 2>in terms of their power consumption but this just seems

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 2>to be an added thing that's purely largely for human

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:31.380
<v Speaker 2>folly and the environmental impacts have been really high and

0:19:31.380 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 2>now that when the market drops out it's also not

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:37.929
<v Speaker 2>just the power consumption, it's all the e waste. So

0:19:37.930 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 2>people were this big shortage of

0:19:41.380 --> 0:19:46.149
<v Speaker 2>computer chips partially arose because of this rise in crypto

0:19:46.150 --> 0:19:50.859
<v Speaker 2>and 50 people were buying hundreds of thousands or hundreds

0:19:50.859 --> 0:19:54.290
<v Speaker 2>of thousands of Gpus or Cpus putting them in big

0:19:54.290 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 2>racks running them with from coal fired power for example

0:19:58.859 --> 0:20:01.899
<v Speaker 2>and that caused a chip shortage that caused a whole

0:20:01.900 --> 0:20:04.230
<v Speaker 2>lot of people that might be using these for other

0:20:04.230 --> 0:20:06.430
<v Speaker 2>perhaps you might argue more

0:20:07.450 --> 0:20:12.140
<v Speaker 2>well ethically interesting or ethically valid reasons we're not able

0:20:12.140 --> 0:20:14.350
<v Speaker 2>to access it because the crypto miners have brought them

0:20:14.350 --> 0:20:17.219
<v Speaker 2>all up. So I think there is this huge issue

0:20:17.230 --> 0:20:19.790
<v Speaker 2>with it. It still exists today. The theory have said

0:20:19.790 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 2>they're going to change to a more environmentally friendly scheme

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:24.270
<v Speaker 2>but they haven't yet.

0:20:24.780 --> 0:20:28.750
<v Speaker 2>Um and you know so and I think there was

0:20:28.750 --> 0:20:32.340
<v Speaker 2>a lot of pressure on artists to to think carefully

0:20:32.340 --> 0:20:35.710
<v Speaker 2>about the environmental impact of selling their work on N. F. T. S.

0:20:35.710 --> 0:20:38.780
<v Speaker 2>And so a lot of platforms arose that were supposedly green.

0:20:38.790 --> 0:20:41.250
<v Speaker 2>I mean any N. F. C. Or any computer system

0:20:41.250 --> 0:20:43.380
<v Speaker 2>uses power. You can't get around that.

0:20:43.850 --> 0:20:46.659
<v Speaker 2>So there is an additional cost in terms of the

0:20:46.670 --> 0:20:50.050
<v Speaker 2>power consumption and that's largely opaque to the user. Where

0:20:50.710 --> 0:20:53.650
<v Speaker 2>does the crypto get its power from and who's doing

0:20:53.650 --> 0:20:56.550
<v Speaker 2>the mining and because it's all distributed it's very difficult

0:20:56.550 --> 0:20:59.660
<v Speaker 2>to chase all that up. So

0:20:59.660 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>has the bubble already burst on?

0:21:03.310 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of interest. And again I think

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 2>this is due to sort of hesitated at the end

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:10.510
<v Speaker 2>of the pandemic. But at least a change in the

0:21:10.510 --> 0:21:14.030
<v Speaker 2>way we're no longer in lockdown. We're no longer galleries

0:21:14.030 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 2>are open again. You can go to museums. People are

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:18.780
<v Speaker 2>getting out digital works great if you're sitting in front

0:21:18.780 --> 0:21:20.850
<v Speaker 2>of a computer. But as you said, I mean you

0:21:20.850 --> 0:21:22.389
<v Speaker 2>can print them out and hanging on the wall if

0:21:22.390 --> 0:21:23.310
<v Speaker 2>you want to. But

0:21:23.980 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 2>most of them I think people might look back and

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.630
<v Speaker 2>say really I paid that much money for that.

0:21:31.100 --> 0:21:33.180
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad I can finally get my head around what

0:21:33.180 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 1>an N. F. T. Actually is. R. N. F. T.

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:38.330
<v Speaker 1>Is all that bad? Is there potential for artists to

0:21:38.330 --> 0:21:41.500
<v Speaker 1>get paid and consumers to make a good investment? What

0:21:41.500 --> 0:21:43.260
<v Speaker 1>does the future look like for N. F. T. S.

0:21:43.530 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>In our next episode, experts in the field of business

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:48.919
<v Speaker 1>and law discuss some of the ways they are helping

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:53.410
<v Speaker 1>both artists and consumers navigate the tricky legal world of N. F. T. S.

0:21:53.869 --> 0:21:57.949
<v Speaker 1>We'll also find out about the world's first self proclaimed

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:01.869
<v Speaker 1>anti TNF T project. Thanks to all our guests. Dr

0:22:01.869 --> 0:22:06.899
<v Speaker 1>Ben Hayward, Professor john McCormack, Alana Kushnir and josh Drummond

0:22:06.910 --> 0:22:09.950
<v Speaker 1>for more information about their work, visit our show notes.

0:22:10.030 --> 0:22:13.270
<v Speaker 1>If you're enjoying what happens next, don't forget to give

0:22:13.270 --> 0:22:16.180
<v Speaker 1>us a five star rating on Apple podcast or Spotify

0:22:16.190 --> 0:22:19.060
<v Speaker 1>and share the show with your friends. Thanks for joining us.

0:22:19.070 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 1>See you next week