1 00:00:02,340 --> 00:00:06,230 Speaker 1: Welcome back to what happens next the podcast that examines 2 00:00:06,230 --> 00:00:09,260 Speaker 1: some of the biggest challenges facing our world and ask 3 00:00:09,260 --> 00:00:12,789 Speaker 1: the experts what will happen if we don't change and 4 00:00:12,789 --> 00:00:15,550 Speaker 1: what can we do to create a better future? I'm 5 00:00:15,550 --> 00:00:19,680 Speaker 1: dr Susan Karlin, keep listening to find out what happens next. 6 00:00:27,050 --> 00:00:29,390 Speaker 1: N. F. T. S. Are an interesting use of crypto 7 00:00:29,390 --> 00:00:33,129 Speaker 1: technology and could enable artists to make a living from 8 00:00:33,130 --> 00:00:36,900 Speaker 1: their work. But they could also be, well kind of silly. 9 00:00:36,909 --> 00:00:41,030 Speaker 1: Do they work are they here to stay R. N. F. T. S. 10 00:00:41,030 --> 00:00:43,910 Speaker 1: As nifty as they seem? Stay with us over the 11 00:00:43,909 --> 00:00:46,750 Speaker 1: next two episodes of what happens next As we take 12 00:00:46,750 --> 00:00:48,230 Speaker 1: a look at N. F. T. S. 13 00:00:52,260 --> 00:00:55,510 Speaker 1: So firstly and don't laugh at me. Tech heads, what 14 00:00:55,510 --> 00:00:58,450 Speaker 1: the hell is an N. F. T. Oh boy. How 15 00:00:58,450 --> 00:00:59,580 Speaker 1: long is this podcast? 16 00:01:01,750 --> 00:01:03,710 Speaker 2: This is going to be a challenge. But I'll try. 17 00:01:04,959 --> 00:01:08,780 Speaker 2: It exists in this world we can't touch and we 18 00:01:08,780 --> 00:01:09,450 Speaker 2: can't see. 19 00:01:09,459 --> 00:01:13,890 Speaker 1: The short answer is it's a non fungible token. Non fungible. Hey, 20 00:01:13,900 --> 00:01:14,580 Speaker 1: when 21 00:01:14,840 --> 00:01:19,270 Speaker 2: it's non fungible it's got an identification number that's unique 22 00:01:19,280 --> 00:01:20,199 Speaker 2: to that token. 23 00:01:20,370 --> 00:01:24,550 Speaker 1: Okay, so N. F. T. Stands for non fungible token. 24 00:01:24,880 --> 00:01:28,119 Speaker 1: Non fungible means it can't be replaced. But that sounds 25 00:01:28,130 --> 00:01:30,910 Speaker 1: odd because an N. F. T. Is usually an artwork 26 00:01:30,910 --> 00:01:33,440 Speaker 1: in the form of a digital file, like a jpeg 27 00:01:33,450 --> 00:01:37,260 Speaker 1: or video, which can obviously be duplicated copied and shared 28 00:01:37,270 --> 00:01:42,060 Speaker 1: over and over again. However, and if I'm following this right. 29 00:01:42,069 --> 00:01:45,560 Speaker 1: What makes an N. F. T. Unique is that every N. F. T. 30 00:01:45,569 --> 00:01:50,490 Speaker 1: Artwork has its own code. Can someone please just give 31 00:01:50,490 --> 00:01:52,240 Speaker 1: me a simple definition. 32 00:01:52,740 --> 00:01:56,330 Speaker 1: Okay it's a it's a digital receipt 33 00:01:58,660 --> 00:02:02,250 Speaker 1: a digital receipt a digital receipt. There we go. That 34 00:02:02,250 --> 00:02:10,810 Speaker 1: was easy attached to a Blockchain which is okay so 35 00:02:10,810 --> 00:02:13,400 Speaker 1: an N. F. T. Is a unique token that is 36 00:02:13,400 --> 00:02:16,630 Speaker 1: attached to the Blockchain. You know the Blockchain? It's like 37 00:02:16,630 --> 00:02:19,060 Speaker 1: a shared database of transactions on the. 38 00:02:20,040 --> 00:02:24,470 Speaker 1: Okay how about I get art lawyer Alana Kushnir to explain. 39 00:02:24,480 --> 00:02:27,240 Speaker 1: Well the first question really is what is Blockchain? I 40 00:02:27,240 --> 00:02:29,800 Speaker 1: think when you're trying to understand what an N. F. T. 41 00:02:29,800 --> 00:02:33,120 Speaker 1: Is you have to question what is Blockchain? Blockchain is 42 00:02:33,120 --> 00:02:34,760 Speaker 1: a type of a technology 43 00:02:35,120 --> 00:02:40,680 Speaker 1: which is a distributed ledger where transactions are recorded and 44 00:02:40,680 --> 00:02:43,180 Speaker 1: the idea is they're immutable in that they can never 45 00:02:43,180 --> 00:02:46,630 Speaker 1: be hacked or change. They can only be built on 46 00:02:46,639 --> 00:02:49,620 Speaker 1: top of it's written in stone is written in stone. 47 00:02:49,630 --> 00:02:51,870 Speaker 1: So part of the value of N. F. T. S. 48 00:02:51,870 --> 00:02:53,980 Speaker 1: Comes with this immune ability that the block 49 00:02:53,990 --> 00:02:58,049 Speaker 1: chain gives N. F. T. So tokens essentially live on 50 00:02:58,050 --> 00:03:02,269 Speaker 1: the Blockchain tokens represent the transactions that are recorded on 51 00:03:02,270 --> 00:03:04,810 Speaker 1: the Blockchain and some of those are fungible. Some of 52 00:03:04,810 --> 00:03:09,820 Speaker 1: those are non fungible and fungible tokens are Bitcoin ethereum 53 00:03:09,820 --> 00:03:12,820 Speaker 1: that your cryptocurrencies and the idea is if I had 54 00:03:12,830 --> 00:03:17,220 Speaker 1: one Bitcoin and you had one Bitcoin we exchange those, 55 00:03:17,220 --> 00:03:18,649 Speaker 1: we would end up with the same 56 00:03:18,790 --> 00:03:23,210 Speaker 1: amount. Whereas a non fungible token is slightly different. So 57 00:03:23,210 --> 00:03:25,750 Speaker 1: it's kind of like if I bought a Picasso and 58 00:03:25,750 --> 00:03:29,600 Speaker 1: you bought a Rembrandt and we exchange those paintings, we 59 00:03:29,600 --> 00:03:31,750 Speaker 1: wouldn't end up with the same thing that we started 60 00:03:31,750 --> 00:03:33,990 Speaker 1: off with. So they're non fungible. So the idea is 61 00:03:33,990 --> 00:03:37,060 Speaker 1: the token is unique and that's also a part of 62 00:03:37,060 --> 00:03:40,320 Speaker 1: the value of non non fungible tokens lies because they 63 00:03:40,330 --> 00:03:42,670 Speaker 1: are unique on the Blockchain. We can tell that there's 64 00:03:42,670 --> 00:03:44,320 Speaker 1: only one of that type. 65 00:03:46,350 --> 00:03:49,210 Speaker 1: So if I'm an artist, how do I create one 66 00:03:49,210 --> 00:03:51,950 Speaker 1: of these tokens? How do I make an N. F. T. 67 00:03:51,960 --> 00:03:54,020 Speaker 1: I need to speak to a digital artist. 68 00:03:54,030 --> 00:03:59,080 Speaker 2: Hi I'm john McCormack, a computer artist and computer scientist 69 00:03:59,090 --> 00:04:01,960 Speaker 2: and I'm the director of Sensei Lab, a creative technologies 70 00:04:01,960 --> 00:04:04,620 Speaker 2: lab at Monash University's caulfield campus. 71 00:04:06,110 --> 00:04:08,010 Speaker 1: Right? I want to create an N. F. T. For 72 00:04:08,010 --> 00:04:11,010 Speaker 1: this painting that I've created. How do I do that? 73 00:04:11,010 --> 00:04:12,730 Speaker 1: How do I make an N. F. T. For that? 74 00:04:12,740 --> 00:04:15,680 Speaker 2: So usually you do it via one of the many 75 00:04:15,680 --> 00:04:19,660 Speaker 2: sites that deal in cryptocurrencies and N. F. T. S. 76 00:04:19,670 --> 00:04:22,420 Speaker 2: So you basically go onto the site, you have to 77 00:04:22,420 --> 00:04:25,960 Speaker 2: have a digital asset usually associated with your work people 78 00:04:25,960 --> 00:04:30,650 Speaker 2: have associated with physical paintings or physical objects as well. 79 00:04:31,060 --> 00:04:35,140 Speaker 2: Um And then basically you pay what's called a gas 80 00:04:35,140 --> 00:04:38,050 Speaker 2: fee which is the fee to generate some unique token 81 00:04:38,050 --> 00:04:40,410 Speaker 2: which is the N. F. T. Itself and you get 82 00:04:40,410 --> 00:04:44,770 Speaker 2: given the N. F. T. Digitally and then someone can 83 00:04:44,779 --> 00:04:48,070 Speaker 2: buy that N. F. T. From you and transfer ownership 84 00:04:48,070 --> 00:04:51,120 Speaker 2: from you to the person who buys that. 85 00:04:52,670 --> 00:04:55,290 Speaker 1: Okay, so if I'm an artist I can turn an 86 00:04:55,300 --> 00:04:58,679 Speaker 1: artwork into an N. F. T. And sell it. However, 87 00:04:58,690 --> 00:05:01,420 Speaker 1: if I'm buying an N. F. T. What do I 88 00:05:01,430 --> 00:05:02,900 Speaker 1: actually own? 89 00:05:03,830 --> 00:05:06,500 Speaker 2: Hi, My name is Ben Hayward. I'm a senior lecturer 90 00:05:06,500 --> 00:05:08,810 Speaker 2: in the Department of Business Law and taxation at the 91 00:05:08,810 --> 00:05:11,990 Speaker 2: Monash business School. And my research work looks at how 92 00:05:11,990 --> 00:05:16,219 Speaker 2: the law can support international trade in various forms in particular. 93 00:05:17,060 --> 00:05:17,420 Speaker 1: So 94 00:05:17,420 --> 00:05:19,780 Speaker 2: you don't really own that artwork in the same way 95 00:05:19,779 --> 00:05:22,390 Speaker 2: that you might own a physical painting. What you worrying 96 00:05:22,390 --> 00:05:24,990 Speaker 2: is the token and it's linked to some extra right? 97 00:05:25,000 --> 00:05:27,300 Speaker 1: You can actually think of it like buying a bottle 98 00:05:27,300 --> 00:05:29,090 Speaker 1: of water from a vending machine or 99 00:05:29,240 --> 00:05:31,750 Speaker 1: um you know, buy a cup of coffee when you 100 00:05:31,760 --> 00:05:34,930 Speaker 1: buy that bottle of water or a coffee. You own 101 00:05:34,930 --> 00:05:37,540 Speaker 1: that property, you can enjoy it to the exclusion of 102 00:05:37,550 --> 00:05:40,719 Speaker 1: anybody else. That's the kind of that's the fundamental principle 103 00:05:40,730 --> 00:05:43,729 Speaker 1: of personal property. It's something that you can possess and 104 00:05:43,730 --> 00:05:45,820 Speaker 1: you can possess it to the exclusion of anyone else. 105 00:05:45,830 --> 00:05:49,130 Speaker 1: So take that in the context of a painting or 106 00:05:49,130 --> 00:05:51,350 Speaker 1: a sculpture, you buy your painting, you buy a sculpture, 107 00:05:51,350 --> 00:05:51,760 Speaker 1: you can 108 00:05:51,890 --> 00:05:55,560 Speaker 1: display in your house, you can loan it to somebody. 109 00:05:55,570 --> 00:05:56,980 Speaker 1: You know, you could loan it to a museum for 110 00:05:56,980 --> 00:06:00,530 Speaker 1: an exhibition, you could sell it as well. Um So 111 00:06:00,529 --> 00:06:04,409 Speaker 1: that's your kind of traditional artwork. Um But you know 112 00:06:04,410 --> 00:06:06,370 Speaker 1: when it comes to digital artwork it's a little bit 113 00:06:06,380 --> 00:06:09,700 Speaker 1: different and that's because it's so easy to reproduce. Right? 114 00:06:09,700 --> 00:06:10,099 Speaker 1: So 115 00:06:10,290 --> 00:06:13,300 Speaker 1: you don't necessarily, you know, if I send it to 116 00:06:13,300 --> 00:06:16,690 Speaker 1: you via email, you know, a digital file, we could 117 00:06:16,690 --> 00:06:19,400 Speaker 1: both enjoy it at the same time. You could look 118 00:06:19,400 --> 00:06:21,150 Speaker 1: at the image the digital file and I could look 119 00:06:21,150 --> 00:06:22,580 Speaker 1: at it on, you know, we could be in complete 120 00:06:22,580 --> 00:06:24,670 Speaker 1: other sides of the world and we can both enjoy 121 00:06:24,670 --> 00:06:27,450 Speaker 1: it um as it's meant to be enjoyed. So in 122 00:06:27,450 --> 00:06:32,360 Speaker 1: that way a digital artwork has some fundamental differences to 123 00:06:32,360 --> 00:06:34,040 Speaker 1: a painting or a sculpture. 124 00:06:34,240 --> 00:06:36,710 Speaker 1: Um And you know if we look at the history 125 00:06:36,710 --> 00:06:39,410 Speaker 1: of art and especially you know, late modern art and 126 00:06:39,410 --> 00:06:43,260 Speaker 1: contemporary art, a lot of artists were um driven by 127 00:06:43,260 --> 00:06:47,739 Speaker 1: this idea of wanting to question this idea of what 128 00:06:47,740 --> 00:06:50,539 Speaker 1: is an original artwork. What is an authentic artwork? The 129 00:06:50,540 --> 00:06:54,480 Speaker 1: idea that there's no, you know, in today's world there's 130 00:06:54,480 --> 00:06:58,340 Speaker 1: no such thing as the one authentic piece. Um You know, 131 00:06:58,339 --> 00:07:01,219 Speaker 1: think of like performance art for example, that's also intangible. 132 00:07:01,220 --> 00:07:01,600 Speaker 1: So 133 00:07:01,880 --> 00:07:04,370 Speaker 1: you know in some ways I also think digital artworks 134 00:07:04,370 --> 00:07:06,950 Speaker 1: and FTS not so new artists have really been pushing 135 00:07:06,950 --> 00:07:09,360 Speaker 1: the boundaries when it comes to what is art and 136 00:07:09,360 --> 00:07:12,080 Speaker 1: what you buy when you buy an artwork for far 137 00:07:12,080 --> 00:07:15,810 Speaker 1: longer than N. F. T. S. Have existed. What N. F. T. S. 138 00:07:15,810 --> 00:07:18,850 Speaker 1: Do though is um you know from a very practical 139 00:07:18,850 --> 00:07:22,200 Speaker 1: level they do tell us who owns that N. F. T. 140 00:07:22,210 --> 00:07:25,960 Speaker 1: Who owns that digital artwork. So that's the that's the 141 00:07:25,970 --> 00:07:30,260 Speaker 1: basic benefit of minting your digital artwork as an N. F. T. 142 00:07:31,650 --> 00:07:35,090 Speaker 1: So why are people so excited about N. F. T. S. 143 00:07:35,100 --> 00:07:36,710 Speaker 1: Here's Ben Hayward. 144 00:07:37,000 --> 00:07:39,900 Speaker 2: I think people get excited about anything that's new. People 145 00:07:39,900 --> 00:07:42,580 Speaker 2: got excited about the Beatles and Elvis when they hit 146 00:07:42,580 --> 00:07:45,180 Speaker 2: the scene. And I wonder if it's really much different, 147 00:07:45,190 --> 00:07:48,470 Speaker 2: much different to that. Um I think it's it's a 148 00:07:48,470 --> 00:07:52,820 Speaker 2: way for us to explore new types of trade and 149 00:07:52,820 --> 00:07:55,670 Speaker 2: you know in the future this may be something that persists. 150 00:07:55,670 --> 00:07:57,690 Speaker 2: We might end up using N. F. T. S. For 151 00:07:57,690 --> 00:08:00,710 Speaker 2: different purposes. It's a bit hard to know at this 152 00:08:00,710 --> 00:08:03,940 Speaker 2: stage but they give us an opportunity to do something 153 00:08:04,280 --> 00:08:07,120 Speaker 2: we've never really done before. And I guess for the 154 00:08:07,120 --> 00:08:10,500 Speaker 2: purpose of trading art where previously you have a digital 155 00:08:10,500 --> 00:08:14,740 Speaker 2: file that represents some artwork that's infinitely reproducible meaning its 156 00:08:14,740 --> 00:08:16,520 Speaker 2: value is basically nothing. 157 00:08:16,680 --> 00:08:20,210 Speaker 2: Not really a very attractive prospect for trading those kinds 158 00:08:20,210 --> 00:08:24,250 Speaker 2: of artworks online. And this is a way to maybe 159 00:08:24,260 --> 00:08:28,050 Speaker 2: deal with that make online artwork unique and allow it 160 00:08:28,050 --> 00:08:31,820 Speaker 2: to have a tradable value and possibly support artists at 161 00:08:31,820 --> 00:08:32,550 Speaker 2: the same time. 162 00:08:32,559 --> 00:08:36,059 Speaker 1: Do you think N. F. T. S. Are beneficial for artists? 163 00:08:36,460 --> 00:08:40,360 Speaker 2: They could be in the sense that I don't know 164 00:08:40,360 --> 00:08:43,250 Speaker 2: that there was really an effective way to trade digital 165 00:08:43,260 --> 00:08:45,570 Speaker 2: art before this technology. 166 00:08:45,910 --> 00:08:48,930 Speaker 2: I guess artists are going to want to make sure 167 00:08:48,929 --> 00:08:52,160 Speaker 2: that the contracts they have in place around the trade 168 00:08:52,160 --> 00:08:54,670 Speaker 2: in these N. F. T. S are beneficial to them. 169 00:08:54,670 --> 00:08:58,280 Speaker 2: Whether that means retaining the intellectual property rights, making sure 170 00:08:58,280 --> 00:09:02,020 Speaker 2: they are properly paid for the work they're producing, 171 00:09:02,170 --> 00:09:04,840 Speaker 2: but I guess, as we've said, if you've got an 172 00:09:04,840 --> 00:09:11,370 Speaker 2: ordinary file infinitely reproducible, so effectively worth nothing, this situation 173 00:09:11,380 --> 00:09:14,839 Speaker 2: has some definite advantages over that. Personally. I have a 174 00:09:14,840 --> 00:09:17,850 Speaker 2: lot of reservations, so I've never really used them. 175 00:09:17,860 --> 00:09:20,870 Speaker 1: Here's Director of Sensei Lab, john McCormack 176 00:09:21,280 --> 00:09:23,800 Speaker 2: dabbled a little bit, but I didn't really get in 177 00:09:23,800 --> 00:09:26,130 Speaker 2: when it was, I probably could have probably wouldn't be 178 00:09:26,130 --> 00:09:27,390 Speaker 2: talking to you now, or you'll be talking to me 179 00:09:27,390 --> 00:09:30,210 Speaker 2: from my multi million dollar apartment somewhere 180 00:09:30,860 --> 00:09:35,719 Speaker 2: wherever. Um if I had. But um I'm not sure, 181 00:09:35,720 --> 00:09:37,860 Speaker 2: I mean, I do appreciate the fact that there were 182 00:09:37,860 --> 00:09:40,110 Speaker 2: a lot of people who had menial jobs who wanted 183 00:09:40,110 --> 00:09:44,370 Speaker 2: to be artists who suddenly could could live that that possibility. 184 00:09:44,380 --> 00:09:46,880 Speaker 2: I mean, being an artist and earning money to things 185 00:09:46,880 --> 00:09:49,179 Speaker 2: that normally don't go together, and if you look at, 186 00:09:49,190 --> 00:09:52,709 Speaker 2: even in Australia, the average income of people who professionally say, 187 00:09:52,710 --> 00:09:56,809 Speaker 2: the artist is amongst the lowest of any profession, 188 00:09:57,160 --> 00:10:00,800 Speaker 2: so I certainly don't want to deny people, you know, 189 00:10:00,809 --> 00:10:04,540 Speaker 2: if a technical mechanism enables somebody to earn a living 190 00:10:04,540 --> 00:10:08,079 Speaker 2: from something that is creative and gives them enjoy them 191 00:10:08,080 --> 00:10:11,150 Speaker 2: pleasure and gives other people enjoyment, then I think that's 192 00:10:11,150 --> 00:10:12,280 Speaker 2: a fantastic thing, 193 00:10:12,730 --> 00:10:16,800 Speaker 2: but also, you know, cryptocurrencies ultimately are kind of Ponzi schemes. 194 00:10:16,800 --> 00:10:19,949 Speaker 2: They're basically they rely on a whole lot of collective 195 00:10:19,950 --> 00:10:23,069 Speaker 2: herd mentality about the value of something that doesn't really 196 00:10:23,070 --> 00:10:24,640 Speaker 2: actually have that value. 197 00:10:24,650 --> 00:10:28,670 Speaker 1: N. F. T. Proponents might say that it helps protect 198 00:10:28,670 --> 00:10:32,530 Speaker 1: from fraud and theft, because you've got this untraceable digital 199 00:10:32,530 --> 00:10:35,650 Speaker 1: receipt that's forever linked to a particular artwork, but that's 200 00:10:36,380 --> 00:10:38,800 Speaker 1: yeah, that doesn't, to my mind that doesn't hold up 201 00:10:38,800 --> 00:10:41,580 Speaker 1: to scrutiny at all, josh. Drummond is an artist from 202 00:10:41,580 --> 00:10:44,670 Speaker 1: new Zealand and a very proud N. F. T cynic. 203 00:10:45,040 --> 00:10:48,070 Speaker 1: One of the major problems when I first got big 204 00:10:48,070 --> 00:10:49,050 Speaker 1: was people would 205 00:10:49,730 --> 00:10:52,979 Speaker 1: um N. F. T. Fans or grifters or whatever, um 206 00:10:52,990 --> 00:10:56,620 Speaker 1: would grab someone's jpeg that's floating around on the internet, 207 00:10:56,630 --> 00:10:59,690 Speaker 1: like like a named artist or someone, someone with the following, 208 00:10:59,700 --> 00:11:02,559 Speaker 1: they take their work and just sell it, make an N. F. D. 209 00:11:02,559 --> 00:11:05,179 Speaker 1: Of it and sell someone else's stuff that's that's just 210 00:11:05,190 --> 00:11:08,290 Speaker 1: that's just stealing and it facilitated tons of this stuff 211 00:11:08,300 --> 00:11:11,720 Speaker 1: and none of the N. F. T. Marketplace is originally, 212 00:11:11,809 --> 00:11:15,199 Speaker 1: and I still don't really think currently had super robust 213 00:11:15,200 --> 00:11:17,400 Speaker 1: systems in place to protect against this. So they didn't 214 00:11:17,400 --> 00:11:19,219 Speaker 1: really facilitate um 215 00:11:19,620 --> 00:11:22,569 Speaker 1: and viability, they actually just made it a lot easier 216 00:11:22,570 --> 00:11:25,400 Speaker 1: to steal I'm not gonna lie, this is a big 217 00:11:25,400 --> 00:11:27,569 Speaker 1: problem at the moment, and I'm finding that a lot 218 00:11:27,570 --> 00:11:31,720 Speaker 1: of artists that I work with are finding copycat N. F. T. 219 00:11:31,720 --> 00:11:34,230 Speaker 1: S of their works online and they ask the same question, 220 00:11:34,230 --> 00:11:35,830 Speaker 1: what do I do, what can I do at this 221 00:11:35,830 --> 00:11:39,600 Speaker 1: point in time? Most mainstream and FT platforms have set 222 00:11:39,600 --> 00:11:42,440 Speaker 1: out what we call a D. M. C. A takedown 223 00:11:42,450 --> 00:11:47,120 Speaker 1: notification process. And that's essentially an american style of requesting 224 00:11:47,120 --> 00:11:48,990 Speaker 1: that you take down infringing content 225 00:11:49,250 --> 00:11:52,660 Speaker 1: and you have to follow the strict guidelines that the 226 00:11:52,660 --> 00:11:55,270 Speaker 1: platform sets out in order to do that. But you know, 227 00:11:55,270 --> 00:11:58,160 Speaker 1: even myself in practice when I've acted for artists and 228 00:11:58,160 --> 00:12:01,200 Speaker 1: we've done these takedown notices, it hasn't been that straightforward 229 00:12:01,210 --> 00:12:03,720 Speaker 1: even a year ago. I would say, you know, a 230 00:12:03,720 --> 00:12:05,329 Speaker 1: lot of the mainstream platforms 231 00:12:05,910 --> 00:12:08,340 Speaker 1: perhaps didn't get as much legal advice as they have 232 00:12:08,340 --> 00:12:11,980 Speaker 1: at this point in time. And so those processes that 233 00:12:11,990 --> 00:12:15,390 Speaker 1: are set up weren't that straightforward. They weren't easy for some, 234 00:12:15,400 --> 00:12:18,060 Speaker 1: you know, for somebody who's not a lawyer to be 235 00:12:18,059 --> 00:12:21,620 Speaker 1: able to navigate and do, they are getting easier. Um 236 00:12:21,630 --> 00:12:23,270 Speaker 1: But you know, 237 00:12:23,790 --> 00:12:27,260 Speaker 1: there's been lots of instances in which artists have tried 238 00:12:27,260 --> 00:12:30,459 Speaker 1: to get their content taken down. They haven't had the 239 00:12:30,470 --> 00:12:33,260 Speaker 1: result that they wanted. Some of them have gone out 240 00:12:33,260 --> 00:12:37,140 Speaker 1: on social media vented about on social media. And unfortunately 241 00:12:37,140 --> 00:12:40,350 Speaker 1: unfortunately that's when the platforms have acted unless you can 242 00:12:40,350 --> 00:12:43,109 Speaker 1: afford or no you've got a friend as a copyright 243 00:12:43,110 --> 00:12:48,230 Speaker 1: lawyer who can afford to fling out notices all day. 244 00:12:48,470 --> 00:12:51,910 Speaker 1: And it's a lot of overhead with, even if even 245 00:12:51,910 --> 00:12:53,960 Speaker 1: if you are wealthy, it's um it's it would be 246 00:12:53,960 --> 00:12:57,069 Speaker 1: pretty hard to keep up with. So yeah, that's um 247 00:12:57,080 --> 00:13:01,740 Speaker 1: I think the promise of of you know of eternal 248 00:13:01,740 --> 00:13:04,460 Speaker 1: receipt or whatever. I think I really think it's it's 249 00:13:04,460 --> 00:13:07,140 Speaker 1: kind of overblown. The main interest for me was whether 250 00:13:07,140 --> 00:13:10,699 Speaker 1: seeing artists could kind of hitch their hitch there, 251 00:13:11,010 --> 00:13:15,040 Speaker 1: their artwork to this trendy new bandwagon and make a 252 00:13:15,040 --> 00:13:18,120 Speaker 1: killing off it. And some definitely did like people is 253 00:13:18,120 --> 00:13:22,559 Speaker 1: the obvious use case who is now richer than God 254 00:13:24,910 --> 00:13:27,300 Speaker 1: before N. F. T. S were a thing the digital 255 00:13:27,309 --> 00:13:31,090 Speaker 1: artist known as people, Mike Winkelmann to his friends hadn't 256 00:13:31,090 --> 00:13:35,230 Speaker 1: sold a print for anything over $100. However, since he 257 00:13:35,230 --> 00:13:37,309 Speaker 1: turned some of his work into N. F. T. S, 258 00:13:37,320 --> 00:13:41,920 Speaker 1: he's made some serious money. How serious. Well one of 259 00:13:41,920 --> 00:13:44,370 Speaker 1: his N. F. T. S. A collage of his work 260 00:13:44,380 --> 00:13:50,860 Speaker 1: sold at auction for almost $90 million yep, 90 million. 261 00:13:51,179 --> 00:13:54,500 Speaker 1: So for that price, the buyer of people's work gets 262 00:13:54,500 --> 00:13:58,320 Speaker 1: a digital file and the artist himself as josh Drummond 263 00:13:58,320 --> 00:14:00,750 Speaker 1: just said, becomes richer than God, 264 00:14:02,190 --> 00:14:04,189 Speaker 1: But is the artwork any good 265 00:14:05,450 --> 00:14:08,780 Speaker 1: or is this just a fundamental never ending question we 266 00:14:08,780 --> 00:14:11,600 Speaker 1: seem to ask every time something new happens in the 267 00:14:11,600 --> 00:14:12,400 Speaker 1: art world, 268 00:14:15,990 --> 00:14:16,250 Speaker 1: if 269 00:14:16,250 --> 00:14:19,530 Speaker 2: you look at the famous FT works like the people 270 00:14:19,530 --> 00:14:22,720 Speaker 2: work if you know about this, people was an artist 271 00:14:22,720 --> 00:14:25,320 Speaker 2: who he was well known but not super well known 272 00:14:25,710 --> 00:14:30,690 Speaker 2: and he famously auctioned off this work that sold for 273 00:14:30,700 --> 00:14:33,810 Speaker 2: millions and millions of dollars, huge amounts of money, massive 274 00:14:33,810 --> 00:14:36,150 Speaker 2: amounts of money, but anyone can have a copy of 275 00:14:36,150 --> 00:14:38,220 Speaker 2: that work, the same copy that the person who paid 276 00:14:38,220 --> 00:14:40,410 Speaker 2: all that money has, there's no difference. 277 00:14:40,740 --> 00:14:44,610 Speaker 2: So I have the full resolution image, is it great art? 278 00:14:44,620 --> 00:14:47,900 Speaker 2: It doesn't, not, to me it's not, it's not worth 279 00:14:47,910 --> 00:14:49,720 Speaker 2: anywhere near the amount of money that was paid for. 280 00:14:49,720 --> 00:14:52,670 Speaker 2: If you compare it to actual works that you think 281 00:14:52,670 --> 00:14:55,810 Speaker 2: throughout history of sort of earned a reputation as being 282 00:14:55,820 --> 00:14:59,530 Speaker 2: significant human works of art. This is not in that league, 283 00:14:59,530 --> 00:15:04,090 Speaker 2: in my opinion. Um, so there is this, this tainted 284 00:15:04,100 --> 00:15:06,740 Speaker 2: aspect that this has, that, I think it's sort of 285 00:15:06,740 --> 00:15:08,190 Speaker 2: typical of the tech world 286 00:15:08,320 --> 00:15:10,609 Speaker 2: at the moment when as soon as something, there's a 287 00:15:10,610 --> 00:15:14,550 Speaker 2: scheme to make money, this sort of human greed takes 288 00:15:14,550 --> 00:15:18,420 Speaker 2: over and it just seems to be the vehicle that 289 00:15:18,420 --> 00:15:22,150 Speaker 2: provided that money making mechanism and it was largely peripheral. 290 00:15:22,160 --> 00:15:25,100 Speaker 1: I suppose in the end, people will buy whatever art 291 00:15:25,100 --> 00:15:29,620 Speaker 1: they like, whether it's good or rubbish or, you know, 292 00:15:29,620 --> 00:15:31,660 Speaker 1: if you look at it as a talented artist and 293 00:15:31,670 --> 00:15:32,580 Speaker 1: that's a piece of 294 00:15:32,750 --> 00:15:36,060 Speaker 1: crap, but I might go, but it's lovely, like that's 295 00:15:36,060 --> 00:15:39,130 Speaker 1: always existed, hasn't it? Like, you know, people, 296 00:15:39,490 --> 00:15:43,390 Speaker 2: yeah, you know, I've thought about this quite a line, 297 00:15:43,390 --> 00:15:45,910 Speaker 2: I wrote an essay recently about it and I think 298 00:15:45,910 --> 00:15:48,080 Speaker 2: it's more complicated than that. I think 299 00:15:48,390 --> 00:15:51,140 Speaker 2: a lot of it was to do with because there's 300 00:15:51,140 --> 00:15:55,500 Speaker 2: money involved and eye watering amounts of money in some cases. 301 00:15:55,510 --> 00:15:58,410 Speaker 2: I think people lost sight of the fact that it 302 00:15:58,410 --> 00:16:01,570 Speaker 2: might just have artistic value for its own sake and 303 00:16:01,570 --> 00:16:03,760 Speaker 2: looked at it more as a kind of investment thing. 304 00:16:03,770 --> 00:16:06,670 Speaker 2: I think it's also the kind of fear of missing out. 305 00:16:06,670 --> 00:16:08,570 Speaker 2: Like if all of your friends are saying I bought 306 00:16:08,570 --> 00:16:09,930 Speaker 2: an N. F. T. I own this, 307 00:16:10,430 --> 00:16:13,570 Speaker 2: Look at what I bought for $20,000. You think I've 308 00:16:13,570 --> 00:16:15,020 Speaker 2: got to get into that too? I don't want to 309 00:16:15,020 --> 00:16:19,260 Speaker 2: be left out. And so issues of aesthetics or taste 310 00:16:19,260 --> 00:16:22,500 Speaker 2: or meaning or you know, any of those things that 311 00:16:22,500 --> 00:16:25,510 Speaker 2: you might traditionally think of as being qualities that you 312 00:16:25,510 --> 00:16:29,020 Speaker 2: might cause you to like not kind of thrown out 313 00:16:29,020 --> 00:16:31,210 Speaker 2: the window. You know that's the power of ownership is 314 00:16:31,210 --> 00:16:32,110 Speaker 2: really important 315 00:16:32,420 --> 00:16:35,080 Speaker 2: because that's the only thing that really did. They didn't 316 00:16:35,080 --> 00:16:38,280 Speaker 2: change the art itself. I mean people were always making digital. 317 00:16:38,280 --> 00:16:41,630 Speaker 2: I they just had this weird way of saying you 318 00:16:41,630 --> 00:16:46,430 Speaker 2: own this in some very nebulous, unleash Ghaly, verifiable sense. 319 00:16:48,080 --> 00:16:50,860 Speaker 1: That's really interesting. I wonder if it tapped into this 320 00:16:50,860 --> 00:16:52,540 Speaker 1: part of the human psyche 321 00:16:53,060 --> 00:16:55,770 Speaker 1: uh you know this very 322 00:16:56,980 --> 00:16:59,680 Speaker 1: animalistic part of human psyche which is I want the 323 00:16:59,680 --> 00:17:02,920 Speaker 1: rare thing I want the thing that other people can't 324 00:17:02,920 --> 00:17:07,189 Speaker 1: have because it makes it valuable and so n. F. T. S. 325 00:17:07,190 --> 00:17:10,109 Speaker 1: We're putting something that's very rare in the hands of 326 00:17:10,109 --> 00:17:12,179 Speaker 1: every day. Most of us can't will never be in 327 00:17:12,180 --> 00:17:15,840 Speaker 1: a position to buy the $5 million.01 of a kind 328 00:17:15,840 --> 00:17:18,900 Speaker 1: sports car or you know the Picasso. 329 00:17:19,320 --> 00:17:22,920 Speaker 1: But N. F. T. S. Were saying actually you you 330 00:17:22,920 --> 00:17:24,780 Speaker 1: can do this now you can have a thing no 331 00:17:24,780 --> 00:17:26,220 Speaker 1: one else can have and it will give you the 332 00:17:26,220 --> 00:17:29,700 Speaker 1: bragging rights and I wonder if there's a very human 333 00:17:29,710 --> 00:17:32,199 Speaker 1: inclination to want those things. 334 00:17:32,210 --> 00:17:36,380 Speaker 2: There's a whole lot of psychology around conspicuous consumption and 335 00:17:36,390 --> 00:17:39,070 Speaker 2: people you know why why do people have an art 336 00:17:39,070 --> 00:17:41,130 Speaker 2: collection that they want to show off to show that 337 00:17:41,130 --> 00:17:44,310 Speaker 2: they have wealth power and status and so on. 338 00:17:44,640 --> 00:17:47,220 Speaker 2: Um And then there's sort of more probably more fundamental 339 00:17:47,230 --> 00:17:50,110 Speaker 2: evolutionary biological reasons why you might want to do that 340 00:17:50,119 --> 00:17:53,210 Speaker 2: to just to just to sort of show the quality 341 00:17:53,210 --> 00:17:56,280 Speaker 2: of genetically that you've that you've managed to achieve this 342 00:17:56,280 --> 00:18:00,000 Speaker 2: ability to buy something that no one else can can have. 343 00:18:00,640 --> 00:18:02,200 Speaker 2: So I think there was a lot of it was 344 00:18:02,200 --> 00:18:05,670 Speaker 2: that a lot of it is also that you could 345 00:18:05,670 --> 00:18:07,520 Speaker 2: own a Porsche if you traded in N. F. T. 346 00:18:07,520 --> 00:18:08,930 Speaker 2: S at the right time. So if you bought in 347 00:18:08,930 --> 00:18:12,140 Speaker 2: low and sold hi you could basically take your crypto 348 00:18:12,140 --> 00:18:14,109 Speaker 2: money that you paid for the N. F. T. Or 349 00:18:14,109 --> 00:18:15,820 Speaker 2: that you received for it when you sold it on 350 00:18:15,820 --> 00:18:18,770 Speaker 2: to someone else and turn that into real money and 351 00:18:18,770 --> 00:18:22,409 Speaker 2: then actually be able to spend that real money on something. 352 00:18:25,320 --> 00:18:28,950 Speaker 1: It turns out there are also environmental impacts associated with 353 00:18:29,690 --> 00:18:32,140 Speaker 1: Professor john McCormack explains 354 00:18:32,540 --> 00:18:37,460 Speaker 2: when I first took off and cryptocurrencies became a mainstream thing, 355 00:18:37,500 --> 00:18:41,210 Speaker 2: there was a lot of discussion about the environmental impact. 356 00:18:41,210 --> 00:18:45,630 Speaker 2: So you were seeing for example large bit mining of 357 00:18:45,640 --> 00:18:49,090 Speaker 2: Bitcoin mining factories, I guess you could call them in 358 00:18:49,100 --> 00:18:52,670 Speaker 2: china for example that were using coal fired power plants 359 00:18:52,670 --> 00:18:53,460 Speaker 2: to power 360 00:18:53,990 --> 00:18:57,790 Speaker 2: their their crypto mining that they were doing. 361 00:18:58,330 --> 00:19:01,300 Speaker 2: And so there was a reaction against this. It gets 362 00:19:01,300 --> 00:19:05,730 Speaker 2: more complicated technically because there's two different kinds of crypto 363 00:19:05,740 --> 00:19:08,760 Speaker 2: mining mechanisms they're called and one of them is far 364 00:19:08,760 --> 00:19:12,350 Speaker 2: less environmentally damaging than the other. But the major platforms 365 00:19:12,350 --> 00:19:16,790 Speaker 2: like ethereum Bitcoin still use the old method which is 366 00:19:16,800 --> 00:19:19,690 Speaker 2: environmentally quite, you know, I mean also 367 00:19:19,700 --> 00:19:23,390 Speaker 2: you know there's lots of industries that are environmentally bad 368 00:19:23,390 --> 00:19:25,560 Speaker 2: in terms of their power consumption but this just seems 369 00:19:25,560 --> 00:19:28,639 Speaker 2: to be an added thing that's purely largely for human 370 00:19:28,640 --> 00:19:31,380 Speaker 2: folly and the environmental impacts have been really high and 371 00:19:31,380 --> 00:19:34,440 Speaker 2: now that when the market drops out it's also not 372 00:19:34,440 --> 00:19:37,929 Speaker 2: just the power consumption, it's all the e waste. So 373 00:19:37,930 --> 00:19:41,080 Speaker 2: people were this big shortage of 374 00:19:41,380 --> 00:19:46,149 Speaker 2: computer chips partially arose because of this rise in crypto 375 00:19:46,150 --> 00:19:50,859 Speaker 2: and 50 people were buying hundreds of thousands or hundreds 376 00:19:50,859 --> 00:19:54,290 Speaker 2: of thousands of Gpus or Cpus putting them in big 377 00:19:54,290 --> 00:19:58,480 Speaker 2: racks running them with from coal fired power for example 378 00:19:58,859 --> 00:20:01,899 Speaker 2: and that caused a chip shortage that caused a whole 379 00:20:01,900 --> 00:20:04,230 Speaker 2: lot of people that might be using these for other 380 00:20:04,230 --> 00:20:06,430 Speaker 2: perhaps you might argue more 381 00:20:07,450 --> 00:20:12,140 Speaker 2: well ethically interesting or ethically valid reasons we're not able 382 00:20:12,140 --> 00:20:14,350 Speaker 2: to access it because the crypto miners have brought them 383 00:20:14,350 --> 00:20:17,219 Speaker 2: all up. So I think there is this huge issue 384 00:20:17,230 --> 00:20:19,790 Speaker 2: with it. It still exists today. The theory have said 385 00:20:19,790 --> 00:20:22,560 Speaker 2: they're going to change to a more environmentally friendly scheme 386 00:20:22,560 --> 00:20:24,270 Speaker 2: but they haven't yet. 387 00:20:24,780 --> 00:20:28,750 Speaker 2: Um and you know so and I think there was 388 00:20:28,750 --> 00:20:32,340 Speaker 2: a lot of pressure on artists to to think carefully 389 00:20:32,340 --> 00:20:35,710 Speaker 2: about the environmental impact of selling their work on N. F. T. S. 390 00:20:35,710 --> 00:20:38,780 Speaker 2: And so a lot of platforms arose that were supposedly green. 391 00:20:38,790 --> 00:20:41,250 Speaker 2: I mean any N. F. C. Or any computer system 392 00:20:41,250 --> 00:20:43,380 Speaker 2: uses power. You can't get around that. 393 00:20:43,850 --> 00:20:46,659 Speaker 2: So there is an additional cost in terms of the 394 00:20:46,670 --> 00:20:50,050 Speaker 2: power consumption and that's largely opaque to the user. Where 395 00:20:50,710 --> 00:20:53,650 Speaker 2: does the crypto get its power from and who's doing 396 00:20:53,650 --> 00:20:56,550 Speaker 2: the mining and because it's all distributed it's very difficult 397 00:20:56,550 --> 00:20:59,660 Speaker 2: to chase all that up. So 398 00:20:59,660 --> 00:21:01,600 Speaker 1: has the bubble already burst on? 399 00:21:03,310 --> 00:21:05,760 Speaker 2: I think a lot of interest. And again I think 400 00:21:05,760 --> 00:21:08,640 Speaker 2: this is due to sort of hesitated at the end 401 00:21:08,640 --> 00:21:10,510 Speaker 2: of the pandemic. But at least a change in the 402 00:21:10,510 --> 00:21:14,030 Speaker 2: way we're no longer in lockdown. We're no longer galleries 403 00:21:14,030 --> 00:21:16,000 Speaker 2: are open again. You can go to museums. People are 404 00:21:16,000 --> 00:21:18,780 Speaker 2: getting out digital works great if you're sitting in front 405 00:21:18,780 --> 00:21:20,850 Speaker 2: of a computer. But as you said, I mean you 406 00:21:20,850 --> 00:21:22,389 Speaker 2: can print them out and hanging on the wall if 407 00:21:22,390 --> 00:21:23,310 Speaker 2: you want to. But 408 00:21:23,980 --> 00:21:25,879 Speaker 2: most of them I think people might look back and 409 00:21:25,880 --> 00:21:28,630 Speaker 2: say really I paid that much money for that. 410 00:21:31,100 --> 00:21:33,180 Speaker 1: I'm glad I can finally get my head around what 411 00:21:33,180 --> 00:21:35,640 Speaker 1: an N. F. T. Actually is. R. N. F. T. 412 00:21:35,640 --> 00:21:38,330 Speaker 1: Is all that bad? Is there potential for artists to 413 00:21:38,330 --> 00:21:41,500 Speaker 1: get paid and consumers to make a good investment? What 414 00:21:41,500 --> 00:21:43,260 Speaker 1: does the future look like for N. F. T. S. 415 00:21:43,530 --> 00:21:46,600 Speaker 1: In our next episode, experts in the field of business 416 00:21:46,600 --> 00:21:48,919 Speaker 1: and law discuss some of the ways they are helping 417 00:21:48,920 --> 00:21:53,410 Speaker 1: both artists and consumers navigate the tricky legal world of N. F. T. S. 418 00:21:53,869 --> 00:21:57,949 Speaker 1: We'll also find out about the world's first self proclaimed 419 00:21:57,960 --> 00:22:01,869 Speaker 1: anti TNF T project. Thanks to all our guests. Dr 420 00:22:01,869 --> 00:22:06,899 Speaker 1: Ben Hayward, Professor john McCormack, Alana Kushnir and josh Drummond 421 00:22:06,910 --> 00:22:09,950 Speaker 1: for more information about their work, visit our show notes. 422 00:22:10,030 --> 00:22:13,270 Speaker 1: If you're enjoying what happens next, don't forget to give 423 00:22:13,270 --> 00:22:16,180 Speaker 1: us a five star rating on Apple podcast or Spotify 424 00:22:16,190 --> 00:22:19,060 Speaker 1: and share the show with your friends. Thanks for joining us. 425 00:22:19,070 --> 00:22:20,120 Speaker 1: See you next week