WEBVTT - Can I Sue for Working Off the Clock? | Jason Thompson

0:00:00.330 --> 0:00:02.909
<v S1>The statements expressed in the following program are those of

0:00:02.910 --> 0:00:05.340
<v S1>the Speaker. They do not necessarily represent the views and

0:00:05.340 --> 0:00:08.760
<v S1>opinions of the sponsor, the hosts, and or OLAS media.

0:00:10.350 --> 0:00:11.299
<v S2>OLAS media.

0:00:12.980 --> 0:00:17.130
<v S1>This is Overdue Over time, presented by Sommers Schwartz. And

0:00:17.130 --> 0:00:19.560
<v S1>now here's your host, Justin Isaac.

0:00:21.540 --> 0:00:24.750
<v S2>Welcome to Overdue Over Time, a podcast for lawyers and

0:00:24.750 --> 0:00:28.230
<v S2>employees interested in learning about lawsuits for unpaid overtime and

0:00:28.230 --> 0:00:31.140
<v S2>other wage benefits. My name is Justin Isaac and I

0:00:31.140 --> 0:00:33.750
<v S2>am your host today. I am an estate planning attorney

0:00:33.750 --> 0:00:36.450
<v S2>based in San Diego, and I'm actually joined today by

0:00:36.450 --> 0:00:39.750
<v S2>Jason Thompson of Sommers Schwartz. Jason, thank you very much

0:00:39.750 --> 0:00:40.500
<v S2>for joining us.

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:43.680
<v S3>Great to be here, Justin. Looking forward to talking to

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:45.060
<v S3>you about off the clock work.

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:48.090
<v S2>As my and you know, speaking of off the clock,

0:00:48.090 --> 0:00:51.809
<v S2>we're back in 2021. Forbes magazine did a report and

0:00:51.810 --> 0:00:54.900
<v S2>they said that the average American worker worked an extra

0:00:54.900 --> 0:00:58.320
<v S2>day in unpaid overtime each week. And they said that

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.050
<v S2>one of the most common ways that employers try and

0:01:01.050 --> 0:01:05.250
<v S2>avoid paying these wages is off the clock work. So please,

0:01:05.250 --> 0:01:07.560
<v S2>let's let's talk about off the clock work. What is it?

0:01:07.569 --> 0:01:10.110
<v S2>How do we notice it? What are we looking for?

0:01:11.350 --> 0:01:16.270
<v S3>Yeah. When I saw that statistic, even somebody like myself

0:01:16.270 --> 0:01:20.080
<v S3>who specializes in this area of law and handles these cases,

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.350
<v S3>my jaw dropped. I mean, can you imagine the reaction

0:01:23.350 --> 0:01:26.140
<v S3>if most people realized that they were working an extra

0:01:26.140 --> 0:01:28.480
<v S3>day a week and not getting paid for it? It's

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.620
<v S3>it's I mean, it's it's really amazing. It was it

0:01:31.630 --> 0:01:36.000
<v S3>was incredible study. So when when I think of off

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:37.920
<v S3>the clock work, I got to kind of put two

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:40.500
<v S3>hats on one more of a common sense way. What

0:01:40.500 --> 0:01:42.470
<v S3>does it mean to most people? And then, of course,

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:46.950
<v S3>as a lawyer who specializes in these cases, I get

0:01:46.950 --> 0:01:49.800
<v S3>deep into the elements of the case, but at its essence,

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.050
<v S3>off the clock work is just what it sounds like.

0:01:52.470 --> 0:01:56.220
<v S3>You're performing work in services without getting paid for it.

0:01:56.220 --> 0:01:59.070
<v S3>That's the off the clock piece of that of that phrase.

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.370
<v S3>You're working off the clock. You're working for free.

0:02:03.390 --> 0:02:06.510
<v S2>So when you have an employer who's asking an employee

0:02:06.510 --> 0:02:10.470
<v S2>to when it's not explicit, there's so many times where

0:02:10.470 --> 0:02:13.889
<v S2>I'm sure there's employees who are working, where the employer

0:02:13.889 --> 0:02:16.830
<v S2>doesn't say, I want you to work, but don't clock in.

0:02:16.860 --> 0:02:19.860
<v S2>That's very rare, I imagine. But there's got to be

0:02:19.860 --> 0:02:23.790
<v S2>other instances where this would be considered off the clock work,

0:02:24.389 --> 0:02:28.260
<v S2>but it might not be so prevalent, I guess, or

0:02:28.260 --> 0:02:31.110
<v S2>it might not be so easy to see. Is there

0:02:31.110 --> 0:02:32.880
<v S2>any way to kind of look for something like that

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:34.200
<v S2>or what should we be looking for?

0:02:35.660 --> 0:02:39.950
<v S3>You know, it's a great question. Let me start by

0:02:39.950 --> 0:02:43.160
<v S3>saying you'd be surprised how many people are asked to

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:48.109
<v S3>work explicitly off the. Really? Yeah, absolutely. By their employer.

0:02:48.590 --> 0:02:53.870
<v S3>And it's not it's not easy to look your boss,

0:02:54.260 --> 0:02:57.620
<v S3>your manager or your employer in the eye and say, no,

0:02:57.830 --> 0:03:01.850
<v S3>that's illegal. I'm not going to do it. When you're

0:03:02.300 --> 0:03:06.110
<v S3>facing rent, like today's rent prices go up and all

0:03:06.110 --> 0:03:10.790
<v S3>of the inflation that that's happening, it's a very difficult

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.669
<v S3>kind of trigger to pull. And so you find a

0:03:13.669 --> 0:03:19.910
<v S3>lot of middle management or foremen, people who have production

0:03:19.910 --> 0:03:23.690
<v S3>quotas hanging over them and looming over them, jam that

0:03:23.690 --> 0:03:27.290
<v S3>pressure down on the workforce and tell them, listen, we've

0:03:27.290 --> 0:03:29.540
<v S3>got to do a few extra things here today. I

0:03:29.540 --> 0:03:33.380
<v S3>want you punched out or before we actually punch in,

0:03:33.500 --> 0:03:35.330
<v S3>we're going to get everything set up. I'm getting a

0:03:35.330 --> 0:03:37.370
<v S3>lot of heat from above and I need to get

0:03:37.370 --> 0:03:39.110
<v S3>my numbers up. So we're going to do a few

0:03:39.110 --> 0:03:42.290
<v S3>extra things here. And if you don't like it, take,

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:44.960
<v S3>you know, get a get a different job and or

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:45.770
<v S3>don't show up.

0:03:47.070 --> 0:03:50.700
<v S2>So before we get into the actual elements of what

0:03:50.700 --> 0:03:53.760
<v S2>off the clock work would be, because for anyone who,

0:03:53.790 --> 0:03:56.850
<v S2>you know, doesn't have a legal background, there's usually when

0:03:56.850 --> 0:03:58.860
<v S2>there's a violation of some kind of code, there are

0:03:58.860 --> 0:04:01.920
<v S2>elements that you need to meet, and that's either established

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:05.580
<v S2>by the legislature or usually some kind of case law.

0:04:05.820 --> 0:04:08.820
<v S2>So there's certain things where if an element isn't met,

0:04:08.820 --> 0:04:12.240
<v S2>then it might not be considered a violation of whatever

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:14.640
<v S2>you know, we're talking about. But before we get into

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.370
<v S2>the elements of what off the clock work is, I

0:04:17.370 --> 0:04:19.800
<v S2>do want to ask what if there is an employer

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:24.419
<v S2>who asks an employee to clock out, but says that

0:04:24.420 --> 0:04:28.770
<v S2>they'll be compensated elsewhere? Or maybe they'll be looked at

0:04:28.770 --> 0:04:32.820
<v S2>in favor with the upper management, or I'll buy you

0:04:32.820 --> 0:04:34.800
<v S2>a burger or something like that. Is that still considered

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:36.690
<v S2>off the clock work or does it have to be

0:04:36.690 --> 0:04:39.270
<v S2>strictly monetary compensation?

0:04:41.950 --> 0:04:45.460
<v S3>Well, I've never seen in all my years a case

0:04:45.460 --> 0:04:50.410
<v S3>where a employer took the position that we actually complied

0:04:50.410 --> 0:04:54.400
<v S3>with the law. You got your benefit of the bargain

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:57.760
<v S3>because we got your cheeseburger or, you know, we bought lunch.

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:02.230
<v S3>You know, that's that's never come across my desk before.

0:05:02.620 --> 0:05:05.799
<v S3>The law certainly isn't written that way. It all comes

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.890
<v S3>back to your hourly wage. Yeah, it is about the money.

0:05:08.890 --> 0:05:12.010
<v S3>And if there's a if there's a agreement to provide

0:05:12.010 --> 0:05:15.880
<v S3>an hour of labor for $15 an hour, then once

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.940
<v S3>that labor has been provided, that time has been provided,

0:05:18.940 --> 0:05:23.110
<v S3>that hour has been incurred, that $15 is owed. If

0:05:23.110 --> 0:05:25.230
<v S3>you want to buy me a cheeseburger on top of that,

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:28.560
<v S3>that's great. But you have to pay for the hour

0:05:28.570 --> 0:05:31.060
<v S3>once once the work is done, the wages owed.

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.580
<v S2>And that makes sense. I was just thinking, you know,

0:05:35.580 --> 0:05:38.970
<v S2>I'm sure there's some kind of employer out there who

0:05:38.970 --> 0:05:41.760
<v S2>might have said, Oh, I paid you in other ways

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:45.029
<v S2>when you worked these, you know, X amount of hours.

0:05:45.029 --> 0:05:47.820
<v S2>And I, you know, put you up for promotion. So

0:05:47.820 --> 0:05:50.520
<v S2>I expect you to do these things off the clock.

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.580
<v S2>And and that again, goes back to that power imbalance where,

0:05:53.910 --> 0:05:59.190
<v S2>you know, you the employee want something and they're willing

0:05:59.190 --> 0:06:01.589
<v S2>to make these kind of sacrifices where the employer can

0:06:01.589 --> 0:06:02.730
<v S2>take advantage, right?

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:07.659
<v S3>Yeah, exactly. I can't tell you how many clients I've represented. And,

0:06:07.660 --> 0:06:10.710
<v S3>you know, they've come to me with a particular problem,

0:06:10.710 --> 0:06:14.070
<v S3>a particular circumstance. We end up filing a lawsuit over it.

0:06:14.430 --> 0:06:16.230
<v S3>But in the course of getting to know the client,

0:06:16.230 --> 0:06:20.160
<v S3>getting to know their background, there's been many instances that

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.250
<v S3>led up to that. And it's exactly what you just

0:06:23.250 --> 0:06:28.469
<v S3>talked about. It's those subtle requests, those innuendoes about promotion

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:31.770
<v S3>and whatnot. It's human nature and people react to that.

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:35.550
<v S3>And all my clients have to make that decision. Look,

0:06:35.550 --> 0:06:37.800
<v S3>am I going to tip over the applecart? Am I

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:41.940
<v S3>going to risk angering, you know, my supervisor when I

0:06:41.940 --> 0:06:44.729
<v S3>got a nice gig here, or am I just going

0:06:44.730 --> 0:06:48.210
<v S3>to be quiet about it and and see what happens?

0:06:48.810 --> 0:06:51.690
<v S3>It's it's it's never an easy choice for people who

0:06:51.690 --> 0:06:55.770
<v S3>are living paycheck to paycheck and trying to make ends meet.

0:06:56.370 --> 0:06:59.219
<v S2>Yeah. Yeah, that makes sense. So let's talk about the

0:06:59.220 --> 0:07:03.799
<v S2>elements of a violation for off the clock work. What

0:07:03.810 --> 0:07:06.779
<v S2>are we looking for? And does this vary the state

0:07:06.779 --> 0:07:09.300
<v S2>by state or is this kind of a national standard?

0:07:10.530 --> 0:07:13.640
<v S3>So most states have their own wage and hour laws.

0:07:13.650 --> 0:07:16.380
<v S3>That's what this is called wage and hour law. But

0:07:16.380 --> 0:07:21.210
<v S3>the federal law is pretty much applicable in all states.

0:07:21.510 --> 0:07:26.550
<v S3>And any state that has its own statute essentially mirrors it.

0:07:26.550 --> 0:07:28.739
<v S3>So for today's purposes, we're going to just talk as

0:07:28.740 --> 0:07:32.180
<v S3>if there was there was one set of laws, okay,

0:07:32.500 --> 0:07:35.400
<v S3>for off the clock work requires a couple of things.

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:38.730
<v S3>First of all, the activity that we're talking about actually

0:07:38.730 --> 0:07:42.660
<v S3>has to be work. Second of all, your employer needs

0:07:42.660 --> 0:07:45.120
<v S3>to know or should have known that the work was

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:50.190
<v S3>being performed. And then thirdly, the job classification needs to

0:07:50.190 --> 0:07:53.670
<v S3>be covered by the law itself, by the Fair Labor

0:07:53.670 --> 0:07:57.030
<v S3>Standards Act or the state wage and hour laws. And

0:07:57.030 --> 0:07:59.190
<v S3>we could chat about each of those three elements. But

0:07:59.190 --> 0:08:02.100
<v S3>those are those are those are kind of the general

0:08:02.130 --> 0:08:05.280
<v S3>tests that anybody would have to go through in order

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:07.770
<v S3>to establish a claim for off the clock work.

0:08:08.430 --> 0:08:11.670
<v S2>Okay. So let's start off with, is the activity actually work?

0:08:11.670 --> 0:08:14.940
<v S2>Can you give an example of some situations where something

0:08:14.940 --> 0:08:18.750
<v S2>might be considered work, something might not be considered work,

0:08:18.750 --> 0:08:22.980
<v S2>like maybe planning a party for someone's birthday in the office,

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:25.590
<v S2>something like, Can you give a couple of examples?

0:08:26.340 --> 0:08:29.340
<v S3>Yeah. And you just started to exactly zero in on

0:08:29.340 --> 0:08:32.280
<v S3>what the law looks at. The law looks at something

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:37.680
<v S3>that's indispensable or intrinsic to the principal activities of the job.

0:08:38.070 --> 0:08:40.590
<v S3>I know that's kind of a big definition or some

0:08:40.590 --> 0:08:43.980
<v S3>some some large words there, but essentially what it comes

0:08:43.980 --> 0:08:48.600
<v S3>down to is, was this activity part of your actual

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:53.220
<v S3>principal job duties? So if if you have a job

0:08:53.220 --> 0:08:57.390
<v S3>and you're stocking shelves, planning the birthday party for one

0:08:57.390 --> 0:09:00.480
<v S3>of your coworkers, that's not really part of your job.

0:09:01.020 --> 0:09:04.470
<v S3>You're stacking the shelves. If it's unwrapping the shipment in

0:09:04.470 --> 0:09:07.709
<v S3>the back room of the materials before you stocked the shelves,

0:09:08.340 --> 0:09:10.770
<v S3>you can start to see how that stuff is. Principal

0:09:10.770 --> 0:09:15.510
<v S3>activity that is intrinsic. If you can't actually complete the

0:09:15.510 --> 0:09:20.070
<v S3>job function without the activity you're talking about, chances are

0:09:20.070 --> 0:09:21.270
<v S3>that's actually work.

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:27.560
<v S2>Interesting. So I imagine there are scenarios where people are

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:29.570
<v S2>asked to do things that are outside the scope of

0:09:29.570 --> 0:09:34.640
<v S2>their work and it does that factor in because, okay,

0:09:34.700 --> 0:09:38.150
<v S2>so I'm I'm trying to think for people who who

0:09:38.150 --> 0:09:40.310
<v S2>don't have that legal background, what kind of questions would

0:09:40.309 --> 0:09:42.829
<v S2>be asked here? So your person who's a stock boy

0:09:42.830 --> 0:09:47.450
<v S2>who is asked to do something for a birthday party

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.030
<v S2>set up for one of the other employees. And I

0:09:50.030 --> 0:09:52.070
<v S2>imagine that if you were to talk to that person

0:09:52.070 --> 0:09:56.120
<v S2>and say, you know, did you consider this work? Is

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.449
<v S2>this a subjective standard or objective standard when we're talking

0:09:59.450 --> 0:10:01.400
<v S2>about what is or isn't considered work?

0:10:02.030 --> 0:10:06.229
<v S3>It's an objective standard. That's that's okay. It has a

0:10:06.230 --> 0:10:11.300
<v S3>third party, somebody who is looking at that job title,

0:10:11.510 --> 0:10:14.360
<v S3>the job function and how it fits into the business.

0:10:14.570 --> 0:10:17.720
<v S3>Would a reasonable person conclude that? Yes, that's and that's

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:24.199
<v S3>an intrinsic that's indispensable. The perform task has to be done.

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:26.600
<v S3>Every day is part of that job. That's that's what

0:10:27.110 --> 0:10:29.720
<v S3>tests for work. So, yeah, it's an objective test, not

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:30.920
<v S3>a subjective test.

0:10:31.610 --> 0:10:35.420
<v S2>Okay. And so if it's not something that's actually work,

0:10:35.420 --> 0:10:38.900
<v S2>then kind of falls by the wayside pretty quick. Right?

0:10:39.770 --> 0:10:42.080
<v S3>Right. So here's here's kind of a real world example

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:45.470
<v S3>from my personal life. When I was in in college,

0:10:45.470 --> 0:10:48.200
<v S3>I worked at a furniture warehouse and we would load

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:52.100
<v S3>up trucks, you know, people who are moving. And one

0:10:52.100 --> 0:10:54.530
<v S3>day the owner of the company gave me 20 bucks

0:10:54.530 --> 0:10:59.420
<v S3>and said, Go get my car washed. Hmm. So I did.

0:10:59.510 --> 0:11:03.530
<v S3>Of course. And, yeah, I came back and wondered whether

0:11:03.530 --> 0:11:06.770
<v S3>I should give him his change back. But I did that, too. And, yeah,

0:11:07.010 --> 0:11:09.770
<v S3>and I never got docked for that half hour. I

0:11:09.770 --> 0:11:12.710
<v S3>was gone. I never punched out to go do that.

0:11:13.010 --> 0:11:15.500
<v S3>You know, he's paying me. He just chose to have

0:11:15.500 --> 0:11:19.400
<v S3>me wash his car rather than move furniture. But if

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.010
<v S3>I was trying to make a claim for that as

0:11:22.010 --> 0:11:24.860
<v S3>being off the clock work, it wouldn't meet the test.

0:11:25.070 --> 0:11:28.160
<v S3>You know, wash having the boss's car washed and taking

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.860
<v S3>it out and returning it from the car wash had

0:11:30.860 --> 0:11:34.910
<v S3>nothing to do with my warehouse and furniture moving assignments. So,

0:11:35.150 --> 0:11:38.180
<v S3>you know that that's an example that that just wouldn't

0:11:38.179 --> 0:11:41.720
<v S3>meet the test. But notice how I said my employer

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.030
<v S3>did not ask me to punch out. He didn't give

0:11:44.300 --> 0:11:46.790
<v S3>me the half hour. I got paid. So no harm,

0:11:46.790 --> 0:11:47.450
<v S3>no foul.

0:11:48.470 --> 0:11:50.510
<v S2>Well, I imagine there's a lot of people who are

0:11:50.510 --> 0:11:53.780
<v S2>being asked to do things outside the scope of work

0:11:54.170 --> 0:11:58.370
<v S2>that are not on their hourly time. BLOCK So if

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.699
<v S2>you're what about a in a situation where he asked

0:12:01.700 --> 0:12:04.400
<v S2>you to have his car washed after you had just

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.400
<v S2>clocked out, that's not considered a part of your normal

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.699
<v S2>scope of work. However, you're still being asked to do

0:12:10.700 --> 0:12:12.620
<v S2>something that you wouldn't normally do. Could that could be

0:12:12.620 --> 0:12:15.920
<v S2>considered some other violation or something like that?

0:12:17.470 --> 0:12:21.880
<v S3>Unfortunately, no, that's not fall, in my opinion, under the

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:26.320
<v S3>definition of work. So, you know, in your scenario, you're

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:28.330
<v S3>dealing with a lot of the same elements we've been

0:12:28.330 --> 0:12:33.370
<v S3>talking about here so far. Power imbalance, pressure from above,

0:12:33.610 --> 0:12:39.580
<v S3>implicit promises of of reward. But under the law, you know,

0:12:39.580 --> 0:12:41.890
<v S3>as we've talked about, that first element of an off

0:12:41.890 --> 0:12:45.069
<v S3>the clock work claim is it has to be indispensable

0:12:45.250 --> 0:12:49.270
<v S3>or an intrinsic element to the principal activities of the job. And.

0:12:49.510 --> 0:12:51.910
<v S3>Going to get the car wash for the boss really

0:12:51.910 --> 0:12:56.290
<v S3>has nothing to do with moving furniture and loading trucks.

0:12:56.740 --> 0:12:58.780
<v S3>Of course, it has everything to do with me getting

0:12:58.780 --> 0:13:01.460
<v S3>scheduled to work next week. It has everything to do.

0:13:01.780 --> 0:13:06.070
<v S3>Keeping a good relationship at the at the warehouse. But

0:13:06.070 --> 0:13:09.309
<v S3>it would not a basis for a wage and hour lawsuit.

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.420
<v S2>And from a like, you know, I'm not trying to

0:13:13.420 --> 0:13:16.240
<v S2>get too far sidetracked here, but from a liability standpoint,

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:19.330
<v S2>legally speaking, it could mean a lot for that business

0:13:19.330 --> 0:13:21.520
<v S2>owner if you were to get into a car accident

0:13:21.820 --> 0:13:25.059
<v S2>with his car, like if it's considered a part of like,

0:13:25.059 --> 0:13:26.860
<v S2>you know, But anyways, I don't want to get too,

0:13:26.890 --> 0:13:28.990
<v S2>too far into something else because I know we want

0:13:28.990 --> 0:13:29.949
<v S2>to talk about wage and hour.

0:13:30.370 --> 0:13:32.559
<v S3>Yeah, trusting me to drive your car when I was

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.020
<v S3>in college is certainly a whole nother podcast.

0:13:37.330 --> 0:13:41.380
<v S2>And a whole nother host of liability there. Okay, So

0:13:41.650 --> 0:13:44.410
<v S2>let's talk about I think the second element was did

0:13:44.410 --> 0:13:46.870
<v S2>the employer know or should have known the work was

0:13:46.870 --> 0:13:47.859
<v S2>being performed? Is that right?

0:13:48.790 --> 0:13:52.600
<v S3>Exactly. So once we've crossed the first threshold and it's

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:56.320
<v S3>actually work that you're asking, you're being asked to do

0:13:56.410 --> 0:14:01.760
<v S3>either early or late or on your day off. Then

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:05.570
<v S3>the next element is, did your employer actually know? So,

0:14:05.570 --> 0:14:07.250
<v S3>you know, let's talk about some of those scenarios where

0:14:07.250 --> 0:14:10.790
<v S3>the middle management or the foreman or the office manager,

0:14:11.150 --> 0:14:13.370
<v S3>you know, with a wink and a nod or explicitly

0:14:13.370 --> 0:14:16.309
<v S3>says to you, come on in on Saturday, or come on,

0:14:16.309 --> 0:14:19.160
<v S3>stay late tomorrow. We've got a few extra things to do.

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:24.170
<v S3>That's not the employer we're talking about in this element

0:14:24.170 --> 0:14:27.290
<v S3>of the test. Who we're talking about is actually the

0:14:27.290 --> 0:14:31.130
<v S3>corporation or the company or the owner of the business.

0:14:31.370 --> 0:14:35.090
<v S3>That's the employer that we're talking about. And it is

0:14:35.090 --> 0:14:39.710
<v S3>a defense. If they don't know that the work is

0:14:39.710 --> 0:14:43.040
<v S3>being performed now, it's not quite as cut and dry

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:45.350
<v S3>as I just made it sound, because there's also the

0:14:45.350 --> 0:14:51.170
<v S3>second criteria knew or should have known. So let me

0:14:51.170 --> 0:14:54.890
<v S3>give you a great example of the should have known. Okay.

0:14:56.300 --> 0:15:00.770
<v S3>So so let's say, for example, you're a call center worker,

0:15:01.310 --> 0:15:05.750
<v S3>and in a call center you have to have a computer.

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.690
<v S3>It has to be turned on. You have to have

0:15:08.690 --> 0:15:12.740
<v S3>your headset that has to be booted up. There's usually

0:15:12.740 --> 0:15:16.700
<v S3>three or four other programs that you have to have

0:15:16.700 --> 0:15:21.770
<v S3>loaded on your laptop or your or your computer and opened. Oftentimes,

0:15:21.770 --> 0:15:26.270
<v S3>there's an early set of emails from your manager, things

0:15:26.270 --> 0:15:29.210
<v S3>that are going on today. You have to read those

0:15:29.660 --> 0:15:33.500
<v S3>and then your shift starts at 7 a.m.. Well, in

0:15:33.500 --> 0:15:37.940
<v S3>call centers, it's a very automated, very high tech business

0:15:37.940 --> 0:15:43.040
<v S3>environment and those calls are routed to you starting at 7:00,

0:15:43.350 --> 0:15:47.030
<v S3>not nine and not seven or one. They start coming in.

0:15:47.450 --> 0:15:49.490
<v S3>And if you were working at a call center and

0:15:49.490 --> 0:15:53.540
<v S3>your shift started at 7:00, that first call comes in

0:15:53.540 --> 0:15:57.080
<v S3>at 7:00 or 701. You have to be ready to

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:01.190
<v S3>take that call. Everything I've just told you, Justin, is

0:16:01.730 --> 0:16:04.850
<v S3>for that industry. Anybody running a call center over the

0:16:04.850 --> 0:16:08.570
<v S3>last ten years would tell you, Yeah, that's exactly how

0:16:08.570 --> 0:16:13.100
<v S3>it works now. How in the world are you supposed

0:16:13.100 --> 0:16:16.070
<v S3>to be ready to take a call if you arrive

0:16:16.070 --> 0:16:20.300
<v S3>at your desk and sit down at 659 when you've

0:16:20.300 --> 0:16:25.730
<v S3>got five, seven, nine, maybe even 12 minutes of elementary work,

0:16:26.210 --> 0:16:29.510
<v S3>preliminary activity that needs to be done so that at

0:16:29.510 --> 0:16:33.320
<v S3>7:00 you can take that first call. The answer is

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:34.130
<v S3>it's impossible.

0:16:34.460 --> 0:16:36.080
<v S2>Yeah. There's a lot of prep, it sounds like.

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:41.420
<v S3>Where the employer should have known that their workers at

0:16:41.420 --> 0:16:45.440
<v S3>a 7:00 shift had to be paid an additional amount

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:49.190
<v S3>of time to set up their computers, get their headsets working,

0:16:49.190 --> 0:16:52.430
<v S3>open up the apps and read any, you know, early

0:16:52.430 --> 0:16:54.530
<v S3>emails from from the department head.

0:16:55.310 --> 0:16:59.300
<v S2>Yeah. So it's the two elements of that the know

0:16:59.300 --> 0:17:02.330
<v S2>or should have known. I mean no is just pretty straightforward.

0:17:02.330 --> 0:17:05.060
<v S2>It's explicit. It's just knowledge that this person is working

0:17:05.060 --> 0:17:07.760
<v S2>and they're not clocked in and the should've known definitely

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.550
<v S2>makes sense to because if you have these requirements for

0:17:10.550 --> 0:17:15.350
<v S2>all this the setup, you can't claim that they have

0:17:15.350 --> 0:17:17.810
<v S2>to start right at seven and not pay them for

0:17:17.810 --> 0:17:20.990
<v S2>that prep that they were doing before seven. So you

0:17:20.990 --> 0:17:24.320
<v S2>should have known that since you made these requirements for

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.890
<v S2>them to that they needed to take this extra time

0:17:27.890 --> 0:17:29.629
<v S2>and therefore should be paid for that, correct?

0:17:30.050 --> 0:17:31.100
<v S3>That's exactly right.

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.129
<v S2>So that all makes sense to and that the with

0:17:34.130 --> 0:17:37.490
<v S2>regards to the know or should have known. I did

0:17:37.490 --> 0:17:41.750
<v S2>want to ask, though, because you mentioned that lower level management,

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:46.310
<v S2>mid management might not be able to we might not

0:17:46.310 --> 0:17:49.190
<v S2>be able to hold accountable the actual corporation, the owner,

0:17:49.430 --> 0:17:52.729
<v S2>because they didn't know what was going on and we

0:17:52.730 --> 0:17:55.460
<v S2>can't really hold them legally liable. Is that correct?

0:17:57.700 --> 0:18:01.270
<v S3>Well, you know, like we talked about it, it depends

0:18:01.270 --> 0:18:04.900
<v S3>on what the activity is. And that's why these elements

0:18:04.900 --> 0:18:07.750
<v S3>all kind of dovetailed together. And they fit very nicely.

0:18:08.260 --> 0:18:13.990
<v S3>Because if if the activity is an indispensable and important

0:18:13.990 --> 0:18:17.129
<v S3>part of the of the job duty. Well, then the

0:18:17.130 --> 0:18:19.440
<v S3>employer should know what needs to be done. The call

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:22.740
<v S3>center example we just gave is a perfect example. Here's

0:18:22.740 --> 0:18:27.030
<v S3>another one working in a restaurant. How many times does

0:18:27.030 --> 0:18:31.230
<v S3>a waiter or a waitress or a hostess come in

0:18:31.230 --> 0:18:34.919
<v S3>early to fold napkins, set the table, put the flowers

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:39.240
<v S3>in the base, make sure the silverware spotless, the wineglasses spotless.

0:18:39.570 --> 0:18:42.030
<v S3>That's done all the time by restaurant workers again. I

0:18:42.030 --> 0:18:44.850
<v S3>have personal experience that you may have experience with that.

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.270
<v S3>So the owner of the restaurant can't say, My gosh,

0:18:48.270 --> 0:18:50.879
<v S3>I didn't know that was happening. I feel awful, but

0:18:51.030 --> 0:18:54.630
<v S3>I'm sorry. I just didn't know that was happening. Well,

0:18:54.630 --> 0:18:57.210
<v S3>that's not fair. It's not reasonable. It's not going to

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.220
<v S3>that's not going to hold water when you open your

0:18:59.220 --> 0:19:02.550
<v S3>restaurant at noon for lunch. Guess what? That table didn't

0:19:02.550 --> 0:19:06.179
<v S3>set itself magically. You know, your manager was having the

0:19:06.180 --> 0:19:09.010
<v S3>waitstaff and the hostess come in 10 minutes, early 15

0:19:09.010 --> 0:19:11.580
<v S3>minutes early to fold the napkins and do all that work.

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:17.220
<v S3>So the elements really are dovetailing together as we move

0:19:17.220 --> 0:19:19.500
<v S3>through this conversation. On the other hand, if we go

0:19:19.500 --> 0:19:22.619
<v S3>back to the carwash example and my manager had to

0:19:22.619 --> 0:19:25.020
<v S3>go wash the car at 1130 and then be ready

0:19:25.020 --> 0:19:28.830
<v S3>to go at noon. Well, the employer could say, I'm sorry,

0:19:28.830 --> 0:19:31.380
<v S3>I feel bad about that, too. But I had no

0:19:31.380 --> 0:19:34.440
<v S3>idea that the manager was asking the waitstaff to wash

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:35.460
<v S3>and wax this car.

0:19:37.540 --> 0:19:41.770
<v S2>Yeah. So is there is there recourse where say you

0:19:41.770 --> 0:19:46.030
<v S2>have a. I do have experience as a manager of

0:19:46.030 --> 0:19:48.340
<v S2>a restaurant and an employee of a restaurant for many

0:19:48.340 --> 0:19:51.429
<v S2>years before I went to law school. And I'm thinking

0:19:51.430 --> 0:19:54.040
<v S2>of maybe someone who was considered a key holder, which

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:55.960
<v S2>is not a full time manager, but someone who just

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.680
<v S2>helps out as a manager and say they knew that

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:02.889
<v S2>someone was working or doing things off the clock. Are

0:20:02.890 --> 0:20:06.940
<v S2>we is the employers still going to be held liable

0:20:06.940 --> 0:20:10.149
<v S2>in that situation? And it sounds like maybe not.

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:14.470
<v S3>Well, I don't want to get too far. Stray from from,

0:20:14.470 --> 0:20:17.080
<v S3>you know, the laws that we're talking about here. But

0:20:17.950 --> 0:20:21.459
<v S3>there are other claims that lawyers such as myself and

0:20:21.460 --> 0:20:24.340
<v S3>at my firm bring that would be designed to scoop

0:20:24.340 --> 0:20:29.710
<v S3>that stuff up. Breach of contract, unjust enrichment. Those are

0:20:29.710 --> 0:20:32.740
<v S3>other claims under the law. That would probably be a

0:20:32.740 --> 0:20:36.790
<v S3>better fit and would be less susceptible to a defense

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:41.440
<v S3>by the employer lawyer under the technical requirements of wage

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:42.190
<v S3>and hour laws.

0:20:43.270 --> 0:20:46.330
<v S2>Yeah. So it's still it's still some kind of violation

0:20:46.330 --> 0:20:51.280
<v S2>or still some kind of there is recourse or compensation available,

0:20:51.430 --> 0:20:54.040
<v S2>but it might not necessarily fit perfectly in the box

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.220
<v S2>for the wage and hour law. So if you're listening

0:20:57.220 --> 0:21:00.580
<v S2>to something like this and you feel like you're your claim,

0:21:00.580 --> 0:21:03.400
<v S2>you have some kind of claim to and you think, well,

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:05.169
<v S2>I you know, it might not be explicit or it

0:21:05.170 --> 0:21:07.869
<v S2>might not hit this particular element. Well, there's obviously a

0:21:07.869 --> 0:21:11.620
<v S2>lot of different things that an attorney such as Jason

0:21:11.619 --> 0:21:13.330
<v S2>would be able to help you with in figuring out

0:21:13.690 --> 0:21:17.260
<v S2>where there is compensation for a claim that you might have,

0:21:17.260 --> 0:21:20.109
<v S2>whether it be through wage and hour or some other

0:21:20.109 --> 0:21:22.330
<v S2>kind of unknown thing. Like a lot of people don't

0:21:22.330 --> 0:21:26.200
<v S2>know what unjust enrichment is. And, you know, I guess

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:29.830
<v S2>I can try and give like a pretty generic explanation.

0:21:29.830 --> 0:21:32.620
<v S2>And Jason, feel free to chime in. So I would

0:21:32.619 --> 0:21:35.620
<v S2>say unjust enrichment is where someone is getting a benefit

0:21:35.619 --> 0:21:40.030
<v S2>from something you're doing without either like a contract or,

0:21:40.090 --> 0:21:43.419
<v S2>you know, and it doesn't necessarily have to be monetary,

0:21:43.420 --> 0:21:46.240
<v S2>in my knowledge. Unjust enrichment is just someone who's getting

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:50.680
<v S2>a benefit from something that you did that probably was

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.950
<v S2>not intended to be so. Would you agree with something

0:21:53.950 --> 0:21:54.310
<v S2>like that?

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.760
<v S3>Right. I think that's a that's a wonderful definition. And

0:21:58.210 --> 0:22:02.770
<v S3>the unfair thread is is, you know, woven through that

0:22:02.770 --> 0:22:05.620
<v S3>as well. And so in our little example, yeah, you know,

0:22:05.619 --> 0:22:10.840
<v S3>wash again, it's it's really unfair to quote unquote ask

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.930
<v S3>the hostess or the waiter to go wash the car.

0:22:14.950 --> 0:22:19.330
<v S3>Even given the situation, the only reason they're saying yes

0:22:19.510 --> 0:22:22.240
<v S3>is because they they know you are their manager and

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:25.960
<v S3>they need the job. And there's an implicit, you know,

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:28.000
<v S3>threat that if you're not going to help me out

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:30.940
<v S3>with my personal life, I'm going to make yours miserable.

0:22:31.310 --> 0:22:34.179
<v S3>So that's the other thread of it on, you know,

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:37.390
<v S3>the thread, I should say, of an unjust enrichment claim.

0:22:37.810 --> 0:22:40.720
<v S3>And so something like that would certainly be be something

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:42.550
<v S3>we would look at for our client who had that

0:22:42.550 --> 0:22:43.600
<v S3>situation going on.

0:22:45.130 --> 0:22:47.859
<v S2>I do want to ask you, I want to go

0:22:47.859 --> 0:22:50.229
<v S2>over that last element in just one second. But I

0:22:50.230 --> 0:22:54.080
<v S2>do after this, I want to talk about like compensation.

0:22:54.100 --> 0:22:57.190
<v S2>How is compensation calculated? And, you know, is there double

0:22:57.190 --> 0:23:03.040
<v S2>damages for really wrongful acts by the employer? But let's

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.609
<v S2>talk about what workers are actually covered by these wage laws,

0:23:06.609 --> 0:23:09.040
<v S2>are they? I know you mentioned this in the top

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.620
<v S2>of or the beginning of the show, but there's got

0:23:11.619 --> 0:23:16.060
<v S2>to be some people who are excluded, unfortunately, from, you know,

0:23:16.060 --> 0:23:19.510
<v S2>unfair practices like off the clock, you know, violations.

0:23:21.109 --> 0:23:25.639
<v S3>Right. So like every law, there's exceptions. So if you

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:29.629
<v S3>think about it, why else would you penalize really an

0:23:29.630 --> 0:23:34.690
<v S3>employer for having work force work over 40 hours a week? Right.

0:23:34.700 --> 0:23:36.830
<v S3>Over 40 hours a week means you get time and

0:23:36.830 --> 0:23:39.560
<v S3>a half in America. Well, that's the law we're talking about.

0:23:40.010 --> 0:23:42.919
<v S3>And so what Congress wanted to do was say, stop

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:47.930
<v S3>overworking one person and instead hire the second person. We're

0:23:47.930 --> 0:23:52.100
<v S3>in a depression. Unemployment's through the roof. This country needs workers.

0:23:52.100 --> 0:23:55.940
<v S3>Everybody needs a job. It has tremendous benefits. It creates

0:23:56.450 --> 0:24:01.700
<v S3>tax dollars, stable communities, etc., etc.. So, you know, what

0:24:01.700 --> 0:24:04.460
<v S3>the law was designed to do was to get people

0:24:04.460 --> 0:24:06.170
<v S3>back to work. And the way it chose to do

0:24:06.170 --> 0:24:09.080
<v S3>it was set a number at 40. And so if

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:14.780
<v S3>you are working in a in a hourly position. And

0:24:14.780 --> 0:24:17.840
<v S3>you're working more than 40 hours a week. The law

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:22.879
<v S3>kicks in for overtime if that same job is is

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:26.180
<v S3>at issue and you're and you're not being paid minimum wage,

0:24:26.180 --> 0:24:30.410
<v S3>then that also is protected by the statute. Primarily, what

0:24:30.410 --> 0:24:36.020
<v S3>our lawsuits are for for overtime and it's for hourly workers. Now,

0:24:36.020 --> 0:24:43.280
<v S3>having said that, there are literally hundreds of exemptions and

0:24:43.790 --> 0:24:48.410
<v S3>there's sometimes common sense to them. One of the early

0:24:48.410 --> 0:24:53.150
<v S3>ones I found somewhat intriguing was the carnival worker exemption.

0:24:54.160 --> 0:25:02.620
<v S3>So carnival workers are clearly hourly workers and they travel

0:25:02.619 --> 0:25:05.109
<v S3>all over the country and they go from county to

0:25:05.109 --> 0:25:10.630
<v S3>county fair, City fair. And for whatever reason, their lobbyists

0:25:10.630 --> 0:25:15.429
<v S3>were successful in getting an exemption from them. And, you know,

0:25:15.430 --> 0:25:18.280
<v S3>the argument is woe is me. We couldn't stay in

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:20.919
<v S3>business if we had to pay for all this downtime.

0:25:21.790 --> 0:25:24.790
<v S3>Mm hmm. I don't know. Maybe it makes sense. You know,

0:25:24.790 --> 0:25:28.700
<v S3>I would imagine there is a lot of downtime. But.

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:31.389
<v S3>But be that as it may, that's. That's an exemption.

0:25:31.510 --> 0:25:36.220
<v S3>Flight attendants, similar situation. So there's a lot of different

0:25:36.430 --> 0:25:41.950
<v S3>jobs and and even hourly jobs that frankly, are not

0:25:41.950 --> 0:25:43.750
<v S3>covered by the wage and hour law. And you would

0:25:43.750 --> 0:25:47.620
<v S3>just have to talk to a specialist such as myself

0:25:47.619 --> 0:25:53.409
<v S3>to find out if your particular job title and position

0:25:53.410 --> 0:25:58.450
<v S3>was exempt or not. The other big exemption and I

0:25:58.450 --> 0:26:01.479
<v S3>shouldn't say exemption because exemption really is for hourly workers,

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:06.129
<v S3>but but it's the phrase we use is high compensated

0:26:06.130 --> 0:26:13.420
<v S3>individuals like executives, people who are actually running the business

0:26:13.420 --> 0:26:18.340
<v S3>or people who are working in a administrative capacity. Getting

0:26:18.340 --> 0:26:21.340
<v S3>back to my example, at the furniture warehouse, there was

0:26:21.340 --> 0:26:24.869
<v S3>a whole front office that handled the invoicing and the paperwork.

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:27.370
<v S3>They had nothing to do with the furniture. They didn't

0:26:27.369 --> 0:26:30.220
<v S3>move furniture, they didn't run trucks. They didn't do anything

0:26:30.220 --> 0:26:32.590
<v S3>that was part of that core business. But of course,

0:26:32.590 --> 0:26:37.210
<v S3>you had to have them. That's an administrative exemption. So

0:26:37.210 --> 0:26:39.730
<v S3>we could go on and maybe someday we'll do another

0:26:39.730 --> 0:26:42.340
<v S3>podcast about all the exemptions. I'm not sure it's all

0:26:42.340 --> 0:26:45.940
<v S3>that terribly interesting. But, you know, back to your your

0:26:45.940 --> 0:26:48.340
<v S3>real question. If you just think about it in terms

0:26:48.340 --> 0:26:53.500
<v S3>of hourly workers and not not in a supervisory capacity

0:26:53.500 --> 0:26:57.459
<v S3>or not as an executive, you pretty much have the

0:26:57.460 --> 0:27:00.640
<v S3>working definition of who's covered in anybody who's in that

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.730
<v S3>type of a position that is being asked to work

0:27:03.730 --> 0:27:08.500
<v S3>off the clock should seriously consider coming forward and taking action.

0:27:09.580 --> 0:27:13.750
<v S3>You know, part of part of what our firm specializes

0:27:13.750 --> 0:27:18.369
<v S3>in is group cases. So, you know, that's that's a

0:27:18.369 --> 0:27:20.800
<v S3>whole other podcast. We probably will we will want to

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.860
<v S3>talk about as to how those group cases or class

0:27:23.859 --> 0:27:28.060
<v S3>actions get put together. And that's where you can really,

0:27:28.060 --> 0:27:32.230
<v S3>really have some fun, because businesses at that point have

0:27:32.230 --> 0:27:35.260
<v S3>a lot of money at stake. It's an entire classification

0:27:35.260 --> 0:27:38.980
<v S3>of workers or a whole state of workers. And as

0:27:38.980 --> 0:27:40.910
<v S3>we all know, the way the world works, you know,

0:27:40.930 --> 0:27:43.150
<v S3>the more at stake, the more attention you're going to get,

0:27:43.150 --> 0:27:46.360
<v S3>the bigger club you kind of wield to solve these problems.

0:27:46.930 --> 0:27:51.490
<v S2>Yeah, it's very interesting, too, because there's so many nuances

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:54.730
<v S2>to this field of law. And, you know, as I mentioned,

0:27:54.730 --> 0:27:56.889
<v S2>the beginning of the show, I'm an estate planning attorney.

0:27:56.900 --> 0:28:01.720
<v S2>I focus on estate planning. And I, I was looking

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:03.460
<v S2>at some of the material when it comes to off

0:28:03.460 --> 0:28:05.710
<v S2>the clock work. And I was like, this is fascinating

0:28:05.710 --> 0:28:08.500
<v S2>because I'm sure there's an exemption to an exemption to

0:28:08.500 --> 0:28:11.199
<v S2>an exemption. And you can get so far into the

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:14.950
<v S2>weeds for certain things. And I guess like so you're

0:28:14.950 --> 0:28:19.790
<v S2>saying that general hourly employees, non executives, non, you know,

0:28:19.810 --> 0:28:23.500
<v S2>managerial were the ones who are who this law really

0:28:23.500 --> 0:28:28.270
<v S2>applies to. What about salaried employees that would be exempt

0:28:28.270 --> 0:28:29.590
<v S2>from this as well.

0:28:30.609 --> 0:28:33.070
<v S3>Right. So there's there's you know I don't know about

0:28:33.070 --> 0:28:34.990
<v S3>you but I was kind of always brought up to

0:28:34.990 --> 0:28:37.180
<v S3>believe that if you were on salary, you didn't get

0:28:37.180 --> 0:28:39.790
<v S3>overtime if you were hourly and did get overtime. It's

0:28:39.790 --> 0:28:42.700
<v S3>a little bit more complicated than that because there's a

0:28:42.700 --> 0:28:45.310
<v S3>there's a job duties test. And you have to you

0:28:45.310 --> 0:28:47.530
<v S3>have to get into some of the weeds in terms

0:28:47.530 --> 0:28:51.400
<v S3>of the job duties. Mm hmm. But basically, you know,

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:56.750
<v S3>for for for most instances, hourly workers are who are

0:28:56.750 --> 0:28:59.490
<v S3>or always kind of the target for this for this

0:28:59.500 --> 0:29:01.510
<v S3>law and the coverage of its benefits.

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:04.780
<v S2>And that makes sense. And so you talked about this

0:29:04.780 --> 0:29:07.600
<v S2>is obviously something you need to speak to a specialist about.

0:29:07.930 --> 0:29:11.380
<v S2>And these are common at your firm at some resorts,

0:29:11.380 --> 0:29:15.250
<v S2>or is it, you know, 20% of what you do pretty,

0:29:15.250 --> 0:29:15.910
<v S2>pretty often?

0:29:16.900 --> 0:29:22.660
<v S3>No, the department that I co-chair and manage works exclusively

0:29:22.660 --> 0:29:27.070
<v S3>on these cases. We file about 50 to 60 cases

0:29:27.070 --> 0:29:31.990
<v S3>a year. Our cases are in almost every state. We

0:29:31.990 --> 0:29:34.630
<v S3>still chuckle about wanting to get Hawaii and fight for

0:29:34.630 --> 0:29:38.620
<v S3>that assignment. But. But we're all over the country. It

0:29:38.620 --> 0:29:41.860
<v S3>is a specialization. As I said, there's there's a lot

0:29:41.860 --> 0:29:44.470
<v S3>of areas within the law and you've alluded to some

0:29:44.470 --> 0:29:47.650
<v S3>of the specialization, but what we do are handle the

0:29:47.650 --> 0:29:50.380
<v S3>class actions and that that is a whole nother level

0:29:50.380 --> 0:29:54.790
<v S3>of specialization. There's a whole other test and a set

0:29:54.790 --> 0:29:58.719
<v S3>of questions that the lawyer has to, you know, be

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:01.270
<v S3>successful in. In addition to the things you and I

0:30:01.270 --> 0:30:04.240
<v S3>have talked about here today. In order for a case

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:06.400
<v S3>to be certified as either a class action or a

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:11.140
<v S3>collective action. And so we have. About 2 to 3

0:30:11.170 --> 0:30:15.730
<v S3>administrative staff or what you call paralegal positions that are

0:30:15.730 --> 0:30:19.360
<v S3>working on these cases. There are four senior partners such

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:22.500
<v S3>as myself, who specialize in these cases and would and

0:30:22.510 --> 0:30:26.860
<v S3>would handle the primary court hearings and any trials. And

0:30:26.860 --> 0:30:31.330
<v S3>then we have three or four associate attorneys, younger attorneys

0:30:31.330 --> 0:30:34.660
<v S3>that are assisting us with both all aspects of the

0:30:34.660 --> 0:30:40.150
<v S3>of the case and the preparation. And then lastly, but

0:30:40.150 --> 0:30:44.080
<v S3>certainly not least, is our intake specialists. So we have

0:30:44.530 --> 0:30:50.140
<v S3>anywhere varies from year to year, but 3 to 5000 leads, calls,

0:30:50.140 --> 0:30:54.750
<v S3>client while they come in a year with potential cases.

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:58.870
<v S3>And that's a full time position for our intake specialist.

0:30:59.230 --> 0:31:04.690
<v S3>Absolutely manages the software for that and and is is

0:31:04.690 --> 0:31:07.630
<v S3>a pretty darn good resource in terms of the law

0:31:07.630 --> 0:31:10.240
<v S3>and what type of cases there are. And she can

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:13.060
<v S3>decide right away whether or not that needs to be

0:31:13.060 --> 0:31:16.140
<v S3>escalated to one of the attorneys or whether it's the

0:31:16.180 --> 0:31:18.070
<v S3>what we call a turn back. It just doesn't fit

0:31:18.070 --> 0:31:18.520
<v S3>the law.

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:21.340
<v S2>Yeah, I think that a lot of people don't really

0:31:21.340 --> 0:31:23.200
<v S2>think about that aspect. I do get a lot of

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.650
<v S2>calls at my firm for other things other than estate planning.

0:31:26.650 --> 0:31:30.160
<v S2>And it's it's really a challenge sometimes to train people

0:31:30.490 --> 0:31:33.990
<v S2>to know what is the appropriate response, whether it's something

0:31:33.990 --> 0:31:36.520
<v S2>that we can help them with or not. And that

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:40.090
<v S2>requires a lot of hands on training. And with with

0:31:40.090 --> 0:31:43.570
<v S2>this field of law, I imagine this intake specialist, you know,

0:31:43.570 --> 0:31:46.270
<v S2>whether or not she has a legal background, I guess,

0:31:46.660 --> 0:31:48.310
<v S2>you know, it would be it would be helpful if

0:31:48.310 --> 0:31:52.120
<v S2>she did. But if she just knows what you're looking for,

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:55.150
<v S2>if you have those kind of details, that would be

0:31:55.150 --> 0:31:58.209
<v S2>so helpful because as an attorney, we don't want to

0:31:58.210 --> 0:32:01.960
<v S2>take on something or waste time, the client's time, our time.

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:04.630
<v S2>We want to make sure we're being efficient. And and

0:32:04.630 --> 0:32:07.360
<v S2>I imagine that it's really difficult to find if you're

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:10.540
<v S2>getting that many inquiries every year. You really need to

0:32:10.540 --> 0:32:12.820
<v S2>have someone who's going to be able to weed out

0:32:13.150 --> 0:32:15.430
<v S2>the ones that just don't apply or something that you

0:32:15.430 --> 0:32:16.120
<v S2>can't help with.

0:32:17.780 --> 0:32:21.710
<v S3>Yeah, it it's a daunting task. She'll tell you. I mean,

0:32:21.710 --> 0:32:25.790
<v S3>it's it's it's a very, very broad set of questions

0:32:25.790 --> 0:32:28.610
<v S3>and fact patterns, and she does a lot more than

0:32:28.610 --> 0:32:32.240
<v S3>just filter the cases to. I mean, people ask questions

0:32:32.510 --> 0:32:38.540
<v S3>on on hot button issues, you know, Can I get fired? Yes. Yeah. What?

0:32:38.540 --> 0:32:40.340
<v S3>You know, what's going to happen to me if we

0:32:40.340 --> 0:32:44.240
<v S3>don't win? Will I get blackballed in my industry over

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:47.540
<v S3>this lawsuit even if we do win? You know, I'm

0:32:47.540 --> 0:32:50.240
<v S3>looking forward to getting back together with you and talking

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:52.820
<v S3>about these and other podcasts, because there's just a lot

0:32:52.820 --> 0:32:56.690
<v S3>of a lot of other topics. You know, how do

0:32:56.690 --> 0:33:00.020
<v S3>I pay you? Well, you know, you don't that's one

0:33:00.020 --> 0:33:02.960
<v S3>of the features of of the law and of the

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:07.640
<v S3>of the, you know, the plaintiff's lawyer. We only get

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:10.760
<v S3>paid if we win. The client never pays us. It's

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:13.190
<v S3>a portion of their wages, you know, a portion of

0:33:13.190 --> 0:33:17.360
<v S3>the settlement that that we would apply for as our fee.

0:33:17.660 --> 0:33:20.120
<v S3>And here's a wonderful part about the law. There is

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:23.870
<v S3>an attorney fee shifting provision in the statute. So what

0:33:23.870 --> 0:33:26.690
<v S3>does that mean? That means the defendant, the employer, if

0:33:26.690 --> 0:33:30.550
<v S3>they lose, they've got to pay your legal fees. Oh, so,

0:33:30.590 --> 0:33:35.180
<v S3>you know, it's a it's a fantastic statute. Our intake

0:33:36.170 --> 0:33:40.010
<v S3>specialist understands all the key points, and she will field

0:33:40.010 --> 0:33:45.440
<v S3>questions from from a wide array of perspectives. Some of

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:47.810
<v S3>the stuff we talked about and a whole lot more.

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:52.670
<v S2>I would I would love to hear her process because

0:33:52.670 --> 0:33:56.690
<v S2>I'm pretty fascinated by that. And in just this field

0:33:56.690 --> 0:33:59.510
<v S2>of law in general, I kind of touched on this

0:33:59.510 --> 0:34:02.000
<v S2>a second ago and maybe this will kind of I'll

0:34:02.030 --> 0:34:07.810
<v S2>weave two questions together. What kind of damages. I know

0:34:07.810 --> 0:34:10.569
<v S2>you mentioned, obviously compensation. And then, you know, the attorneys

0:34:10.570 --> 0:34:13.980
<v S2>get paid through that. But are there situations where you'll

0:34:13.989 --> 0:34:18.759
<v S2>have double or treble damages for a particularly egregious act?

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:21.640
<v S2>Do you have any kind of story that we can

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:25.750
<v S2>that you can tell? Redacted information, of course, to make

0:34:25.750 --> 0:34:28.029
<v S2>sure it's kept private. But I'm sure a lot of

0:34:28.030 --> 0:34:30.730
<v S2>people would like to hear some kind of interesting story

0:34:30.730 --> 0:34:33.969
<v S2>where someone was really hit hard and you had a

0:34:33.969 --> 0:34:36.190
<v S2>nice success story for your for your clients.

0:34:38.460 --> 0:34:40.770
<v S3>Well, there's so many. And, you know, I hate to

0:34:40.770 --> 0:34:45.210
<v S3>sound cliche, but I've been practicing law for over 30 years,

0:34:45.210 --> 0:34:47.580
<v S3>you know, and I've been in this for the last

0:34:47.940 --> 0:34:51.840
<v S3>17 or 18 years. And, you know, with 3000 leads

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:56.069
<v S3>coming in a year, the the number of cases starting

0:34:56.070 --> 0:34:59.190
<v S3>to mount. So I'll say I'll tell you a couple

0:34:59.190 --> 0:35:03.180
<v S3>of things. The statute, the wage and hour law we've

0:35:03.180 --> 0:35:05.790
<v S3>been talking about today, the Fair Labor Standards Act or

0:35:05.790 --> 0:35:10.350
<v S3>the FLSA, not only awards you attorney fees if you win,

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:13.710
<v S3>but in addition, if there's a lack of good faith

0:35:13.710 --> 0:35:17.340
<v S3>by the defendant, you know, by the employer, then the

0:35:17.340 --> 0:35:22.049
<v S3>wages are liquidated, which is just a fancy word for doubling. So,

0:35:22.050 --> 0:35:24.540
<v S3>you know, if you're earning 13, 14 bucks an hour

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:27.630
<v S3>and you've been having to work, you know, even 5

0:35:27.630 --> 0:35:30.510
<v S3>minutes off the clock, you know, every minute is compensable.

0:35:30.510 --> 0:35:34.080
<v S3>Every minute you work is compensable in this world. And

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:38.010
<v S3>it adds up tremendously quickly. If you if you have

0:35:38.010 --> 0:35:40.950
<v S3>5 minutes of off the clock, work a day and

0:35:40.950 --> 0:35:43.860
<v S3>you're working overtime 60 days a week and you know,

0:35:43.860 --> 0:35:46.350
<v S3>you get up to four weeks of vacation or two

0:35:46.350 --> 0:35:49.410
<v S3>weeks of vacation, it doesn't take long before you start

0:35:49.410 --> 0:35:53.880
<v S3>talking about thousands of dollars. Mm hmm. And the law

0:35:54.540 --> 0:35:59.670
<v S3>was designed, again, to really force employers to comply. It's

0:35:59.670 --> 0:36:05.970
<v S3>a very labor protective statute. In most instances, the employee

0:36:05.969 --> 0:36:08.660
<v S3>wins the benefit of the doubt. The old baseball analogy,

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:11.050
<v S3>the tie goes to the runner, if you will. You know,

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:14.219
<v S3>the worker is the runner in this scenario. And so

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:18.930
<v S3>you get your attorney fees paid for and you get

0:36:18.930 --> 0:36:24.569
<v S3>double the damages. So it does have some fantastic protections.

0:36:26.070 --> 0:36:28.440
<v S3>The reason I don't have a really good story for

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:32.280
<v S3>you in terms of a particular case where, you know,

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:37.560
<v S3>we could say we slayed the dragon or particularly effective

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:41.189
<v S3>in getting these liquidated damages is because it's a fairly

0:36:41.190 --> 0:36:47.140
<v S3>easy task. You know, Yeah, the good faith violation or

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:50.910
<v S3>lack of good faith. And I don't know. I didn't

0:36:50.910 --> 0:36:54.810
<v S3>know Gee was confusing. Gosh, my lawyer got it wrong.

0:36:54.930 --> 0:36:59.730
<v S3>None of that works. And so basically, in every case

0:37:00.810 --> 0:37:05.310
<v S3>and in every settlement, liquidated damages and attorney's fees are

0:37:05.310 --> 0:37:08.400
<v S3>on the table. And part of the negotiation, you know,

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:11.160
<v S3>in addition to the base wage that wasn't paid.

0:37:11.950 --> 0:37:16.060
<v S2>So one last question before we wrap up. What percentage

0:37:16.060 --> 0:37:18.850
<v S2>would you say of your cases actually go to trial

0:37:18.850 --> 0:37:22.390
<v S2>and what are what percentage are just settled before you

0:37:22.390 --> 0:37:23.620
<v S2>even get close to trial?

0:37:25.250 --> 0:37:29.690
<v S3>A. A. A review of our case filings. Know we're

0:37:29.690 --> 0:37:32.180
<v S3>fairly selective in the cases that we take, but a

0:37:32.180 --> 0:37:34.700
<v S3>review of our case filings will show you that less

0:37:34.700 --> 0:37:41.000
<v S3>than less than 5% ever go to trial. We're going

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:43.940
<v S3>to do another podcast with you about mediation, because that's

0:37:43.940 --> 0:37:48.860
<v S3>really today's substitution for trial. That's that's how most of

0:37:48.860 --> 0:37:52.190
<v S3>these cases get resolved is with a mediation. And a

0:37:52.190 --> 0:37:55.760
<v S3>mediation is where both sides have had a year or

0:37:55.760 --> 0:38:02.570
<v S3>so to investigate the case, interview witnesses, and maybe have

0:38:02.570 --> 0:38:07.640
<v S3>some preliminary legal disputes with the judge once that's over.

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:10.460
<v S3>Rather than spend a whole lot of time getting ready

0:38:10.460 --> 0:38:15.890
<v S3>for trial. In today's world, in today's courts across America,

0:38:16.010 --> 0:38:21.259
<v S3>mediation has really replaced trial and both sides will agree

0:38:21.260 --> 0:38:26.300
<v S3>upon a third party. It's usually a retired judge or

0:38:26.300 --> 0:38:29.300
<v S3>a lawyer who's got a lot of experience and later

0:38:29.300 --> 0:38:32.120
<v S3>in their practice decides they want to be a mediator.

0:38:33.260 --> 0:38:36.380
<v S3>They are. They are the third party that tries to

0:38:36.380 --> 0:38:39.290
<v S3>get the parties to settle their case. They don't have

0:38:39.290 --> 0:38:43.130
<v S3>any authority. They certainly are in charge of the case.

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:47.180
<v S3>It's all secretive from the judge, but they're very effective.

0:38:47.180 --> 0:38:52.250
<v S3>They're good communicators. They're they're experts in many aspects of

0:38:52.250 --> 0:38:56.719
<v S3>of courtroom and litigation and perhaps even the law that's

0:38:56.719 --> 0:39:00.919
<v S3>at issue. And most of our cases, we work up

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:04.100
<v S3>for a year to to that's how long it takes.

0:39:04.489 --> 0:39:09.500
<v S3>And they end up in mediation. And our clients are

0:39:09.590 --> 0:39:13.610
<v S3>active in that process. Of our clients participate in the

0:39:13.610 --> 0:39:18.260
<v S3>mediation and they are they are vitally important to making

0:39:18.260 --> 0:39:21.830
<v S3>that final decision as to, okay, is this a good

0:39:21.830 --> 0:39:24.890
<v S3>settlement or is this not a good settlement? Is this enough?

0:39:25.739 --> 0:39:28.130
<v S3>You know, yeah, really being honest with us. And a

0:39:28.130 --> 0:39:30.680
<v S3>lot of that inside information that only a client can

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:31.820
<v S3>bring to that process.

0:39:32.780 --> 0:39:35.779
<v S2>Yeah, I know. I have so many different questions, but

0:39:35.780 --> 0:39:38.239
<v S2>I know we need to wrap up here. We're going

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:42.770
<v S2>to definitely have to do this again because I mediation, compensation,

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:44.989
<v S2>all the things that are involved in this. I'm just

0:39:45.050 --> 0:39:47.690
<v S2>super curious as you know, an individual and as an

0:39:47.690 --> 0:39:50.690
<v S2>attorney how it all works. So we definitely need to

0:39:50.810 --> 0:39:53.239
<v S2>have you back on or do a new another podcast

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:56.990
<v S2>pretty soon. So Jason Thompson from Summer Schwartz, thank you

0:39:56.989 --> 0:40:00.920
<v S2>so much for all the great information. And it was

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:03.440
<v S2>it was really there was a lot of good things

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:04.100
<v S2>to think about.

0:40:05.210 --> 0:40:06.740
<v S3>Thank you, Justin. Happy to be here.

0:40:14.230 --> 0:40:18.130
<v S1>If you have comments, questions and show ideas, visit Somer's

0:40:18.130 --> 0:40:22.480
<v S1>PC dot com. Overdue Overtime is produced at the IVC Media

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:26.469
<v S1>Lab in San Diego, California. Your host is Justin Isaac.

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:30.280
<v S1>Jessica Garcia serves as general manager. Elia Ramos is the

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:34.300
<v S1>creative director. Lina Alvarez assists with production in Chad Peace

0:40:34.300 --> 0:40:39.200
<v S1>is president and founding partner. So this has been a

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:42.469
<v S1>presentation of Sommers Schwartz on the OLAS Media network.

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:45.290
<v S2>OLAS Media.