WEBVTT - On the Horizon: Farm Tech - Innovation and Pulling the Trigger with Tim Rethus

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:12.380
<v S1>Take that challenge. Nut it out. Really a bit of persistence,

0:00:12.380 --> 0:00:14.420
<v S1>a bit of support from someone else to get some

0:00:14.420 --> 0:00:17.270
<v S1>ideas on how to fix that. Discs in wet conditions.

0:00:17.270 --> 0:00:20.150
<v S1>What are other people doing to get through those wet conditions?

0:00:20.150 --> 0:00:23.000
<v S1>How do they do that? Can I keep climbing that

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:25.279
<v S1>ladder rather than starting back from scratch? Because as we

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:28.610
<v S1>climb that ladder, we're getting our yields are improving. We're

0:00:28.610 --> 0:00:32.550
<v S1>getting way better soil health. It's better for our bottom line.

0:00:32.550 --> 0:00:34.350
<v S1>We're getting way more sustainable farms.

0:00:35.490 --> 0:00:39.420
<v S2>Hello and welcome back to Shared Ag Solutions by BCG. I'm

0:00:39.420 --> 0:00:42.420
<v S2>Janine Batters. And today we're going to be speaking with

0:00:42.420 --> 0:00:46.110
<v S2>Tim Rethus for our first episode of our new series

0:00:46.110 --> 0:00:49.230
<v S2>On the Horizon Farm Tech. And we thought we'd start

0:00:49.229 --> 0:00:52.320
<v S2>this one just by discussing with Tim some of the

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:55.270
<v S2>things that he does on his farm, whether he actually

0:00:55.270 --> 0:00:58.570
<v S2>adopts a new technology and whether he keeps it too.

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:01.900
<v S2>So Tim has got a lot of new tech on

0:01:01.900 --> 0:01:04.540
<v S2>his farm, and I'm just so excited. Tim, thanks so

0:01:04.540 --> 0:01:05.620
<v S2>much for being here today.

0:01:05.650 --> 0:01:08.410
<v S1>Thanks, Jeanine. I always love new tech and it's great

0:01:08.410 --> 0:01:10.209
<v S1>that you're doing the podcast. It's gonna be really interesting,

0:01:10.209 --> 0:01:10.690
<v S1>I think.

0:01:10.690 --> 0:01:13.300
<v S2>I'm so excited. I'm excited to have Tim, because I

0:01:13.300 --> 0:01:15.550
<v S2>do ring you a little bit about things, and he's

0:01:15.550 --> 0:01:17.380
<v S2>always sort of my one of my go to people

0:01:17.380 --> 0:01:19.770
<v S2>to to find out if I'm not understanding something or

0:01:19.770 --> 0:01:21.510
<v S2>if I want something new. So I really wanted to

0:01:21.510 --> 0:01:25.860
<v S2>share your knowledge with our listeners. So just really quickly, Tim,

0:01:25.860 --> 0:01:27.899
<v S2>I think a lot of people would know you from

0:01:27.900 --> 0:01:29.910
<v S2>social media, but if they don't, can you just give

0:01:29.910 --> 0:01:32.040
<v S2>a quick background on yourself and your farm?

0:01:32.069 --> 0:01:34.710
<v S1>Our main farm is at Horsham, so we're in the Wimmera,

0:01:34.709 --> 0:01:37.890
<v S1>which is a rain fed farming system. About 300 mms

0:01:37.890 --> 0:01:39.660
<v S1>of rain falls over winter, which is when we grow

0:01:39.660 --> 0:01:42.010
<v S1>our crops, but there's only about 100 over summer. It's

0:01:42.010 --> 0:01:44.200
<v S1>quite variable, so it's too hot and dry to grow

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.660
<v S1>crops over summer. So we do a really big range

0:01:46.660 --> 0:01:48.700
<v S1>of crops because our soil types are quite good. It's

0:01:48.700 --> 0:01:51.160
<v S1>considered probably some of the better cropping soils in Australia

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:55.090
<v S1>so we can grow canola, wheat, barley, lentils, field peas, chickpeas,

0:01:55.090 --> 0:01:58.000
<v S1>faba beans, oaten hay vetch pretty much anything that you

0:01:58.000 --> 0:01:59.800
<v S1>can grow over winter. We can grow really well, but

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:01.150
<v S1>yeah, not irrigated .

0:02:01.150 --> 0:02:01.930
<v S2>How long have you been farming?

0:02:02.170 --> 0:02:05.410
<v S1>My grandpa's been there since just after the war. So 40s.

0:02:05.410 --> 0:02:08.210
<v S1>And so that's what, 77 years or something so far.

0:02:08.300 --> 0:02:09.530
<v S1>Third generation at the moment.

0:02:09.530 --> 0:02:11.540
<v S2>And have you always been a farmer, Tim?

0:02:11.570 --> 0:02:15.680
<v S1>No, I haven't. Dad was quite insistent that we follow our

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.020
<v S1>own paths. And so all us kids went to uni,

0:02:18.169 --> 0:02:20.419
<v S1>four kids. We went to uni and did different things.

0:02:20.510 --> 0:02:24.230
<v S1>One's an accountant, one's a microbiologist, one did telecommunications engineering

0:02:24.230 --> 0:02:26.270
<v S1>and I did chemical engineering. And I worked at Shell

0:02:26.270 --> 0:02:29.299
<v S1>Oil Company for 11 years before coming back to the farm.

0:02:29.330 --> 0:02:32.540
<v S2>There you go. So we'll jump in. Maybe we should

0:02:32.540 --> 0:02:34.640
<v S2>talk about just just some of the farm tech that

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:35.630
<v S2>you've got on your farm.

0:02:35.630 --> 0:02:37.760
<v S1>I think it goes through different phases. And so I

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:39.320
<v S1>think one of the things to know first up is

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:42.290
<v S1>that my brother and I are both engineers. He's telecommunications.

0:02:42.290 --> 0:02:43.640
<v S1>And he came back to the farm a year after

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.550
<v S1>I did. I'm a chemical engineer and engineering, the key thing

0:02:46.550 --> 0:02:48.530
<v S1>that they do is they just solve problems. And so

0:02:48.530 --> 0:02:50.300
<v S1>when we came to AG back to the farm, it

0:02:50.300 --> 0:02:52.490
<v S1>was like, okay, it's just solving problems. The same thing

0:02:52.490 --> 0:02:54.769
<v S1>that we do at work, at our old jobs. So

0:02:54.770 --> 0:02:57.380
<v S1>we're really keen to try new things. We're in that phase.

0:02:57.380 --> 0:02:59.840
<v S1>We figure that anything that they can throw at us

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:01.460
<v S1>with this new tech, we probably have a pretty good

0:03:01.460 --> 0:03:02.900
<v S1>chance of trying to get a good handle on it.

0:03:02.900 --> 0:03:04.430
<v S1>So we're pretty excited to try a lot of these

0:03:04.430 --> 0:03:06.890
<v S1>new things and provide good feedback. So we do have

0:03:06.889 --> 0:03:10.700
<v S1>probably a high preponderance of new initiatives going on. Not

0:03:10.700 --> 0:03:13.190
<v S1>all of them are successful, but it's always good fun.

0:03:13.190 --> 0:03:16.250
<v S1>If we go to spraying, we have we've had PWM spraying.

0:03:16.250 --> 0:03:19.190
<v S1>Dad's been quite an innovator. Pulse width modulation and turn

0:03:19.190 --> 0:03:21.500
<v S1>compensation we've had on our sprayer for quite some time.

0:03:21.500 --> 0:03:25.040
<v S1>We've incorporated camera spraying with AI. So green on green

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.250
<v S1>and green on brown spraying. We do variable applications with

0:03:28.250 --> 0:03:30.290
<v S1>the sprayer, which a lot of people can do. Now

0:03:30.290 --> 0:03:31.970
<v S1>we've got a big network of weather stations on our

0:03:31.970 --> 0:03:34.070
<v S1>farm that we measure soil moisture with, which we then

0:03:34.070 --> 0:03:37.100
<v S1>use to actually do yield predictions and then help that

0:03:37.100 --> 0:03:40.970
<v S1>inform nitrogen applications. We do a lot of imagery. We've

0:03:40.970 --> 0:03:43.680
<v S1>got satellite images coming in. We've been doing yield maps

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.410
<v S1>since the 90s. Not all of these things are used

0:03:46.410 --> 0:03:48.360
<v S1>that well, but we do collect them. We figure they're

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:50.700
<v S1>very important. We're doing a lot of grid sampling and

0:03:50.700 --> 0:03:52.740
<v S1>trying to use that to inform our management zones. And

0:03:52.740 --> 0:03:55.320
<v S1>so we're still building in that area. Played around with Taranis Ag,

0:03:55.530 --> 0:03:57.750
<v S1>which was a really interesting tool where they used drones

0:03:57.750 --> 0:04:01.710
<v S1>to do submillimeter resolution imagery across your field and then

0:04:01.710 --> 0:04:05.430
<v S1>count insects and count disease spots and plant numbers. That's cool.

0:04:05.430 --> 0:04:08.880
<v S1>That is pretty cool. Unfortunately, it's expensive, so don't do

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:10.920
<v S1>that anymore. But it would be cool to do it again. Yeah.

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:13.200
<v S1>Control traffic on our farm. So that's an important thing.

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.630
<v S1>And we have inter-row sowing. And we do a lot

0:04:15.630 --> 0:04:18.150
<v S1>of things with tracks to reduce our compaction and use

0:04:18.150 --> 0:04:22.440
<v S1>VF tires. We do control traffic haymaking, which has taken

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:23.849
<v S1>a long time to get to where it is now,

0:04:23.850 --> 0:04:26.279
<v S1>but we're sort of pretty comfortable with how our control

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:26.969
<v S1>traffic works.

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:27.930
<v S2>How do you do that?

0:04:28.500 --> 0:04:30.870
<v S1>How do you do that? Well, it's just it's a

0:04:30.870 --> 0:04:32.740
<v S1>slow Every time we buy a new piece of gear

0:04:32.740 --> 0:04:34.690
<v S1>for our hay gear stuff, we work towards it. But we've

0:04:34.690 --> 0:04:36.820
<v S1>managed to get a system where we cut three. We

0:04:36.820 --> 0:04:38.859
<v S1>use three mowers to cut on one tractor. So our

0:04:38.860 --> 0:04:41.600
<v S1>front mower and two back mowers, we can cut 40ft

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.140
<v S1>or 12m, and then we can use our rake and

0:04:44.140 --> 0:04:46.029
<v S1>our tedder to spread the crop. And then we can

0:04:46.029 --> 0:04:48.490
<v S1>rake it back into one 40 foot windrow 12 meter windrow.

0:04:48.490 --> 0:04:50.110
<v S1>And then we can bale it. And then we have

0:04:50.110 --> 0:04:52.690
<v S1>a stacker that we can use to pick up off

0:04:52.690 --> 0:04:55.659
<v S1>tramlines and take the bales. These are big squares back

0:04:55.660 --> 0:04:57.550
<v S1>to the end and then truck them out for export.

0:04:57.550 --> 0:04:58.359
<v S1>So yeah, that.

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.300
<v S2>Is pretty cool. That's pretty cool. Yeah. What are VF tyres?

0:05:01.300 --> 0:05:04.150
<v S1>Very flexion tyres. It just means they bulge a lot,

0:05:04.150 --> 0:05:05.560
<v S1>and it means they can carry more weight. So they

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.529
<v S1>can carry about 40% more weight for the same tyre

0:05:08.529 --> 0:05:11.830
<v S1>pressure as conventional tyres. So what that means is you

0:05:11.830 --> 0:05:14.979
<v S1>can run lower tyre pressures with the tyre. So if

0:05:14.980 --> 0:05:17.349
<v S1>you run a like on our sprayer, we run a

0:05:17.350 --> 0:05:20.680
<v S1>480 wide tire, 480 mm wide tyre. You can drop

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.589
<v S1>the pressure down to under a bar in it, which

0:05:23.589 --> 0:05:25.900
<v S1>is really good because that spreads. Instead of spreading the

0:05:25.900 --> 0:05:28.690
<v S1>tyre out wide with duals, you spread it out long

0:05:28.690 --> 0:05:31.330
<v S1>by bulging and making the footprint longer. So it's like

0:05:31.330 --> 0:05:33.790
<v S1>a track, but it's a tyre kind of thing. So yeah,

0:05:33.790 --> 0:05:35.560
<v S1>it's just a way of trying to manage our tramlines,

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.920
<v S1>because when you do CTF, you create these tramlines to

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.770
<v S1>run on every year, repeating them every year. But because

0:05:41.770 --> 0:05:42.910
<v S1>you're driving on them a lot, you've got to do

0:05:42.910 --> 0:05:45.479
<v S1>road maintenance. If you can use tyres, like with the

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:48.030
<v S1>trucks on the road, you know, more axles, spreads the load,

0:05:48.029 --> 0:05:50.580
<v S1>protects the roads better. Same with the farm. You know

0:05:50.580 --> 0:05:52.859
<v S1>you're using tracks or you're using VF tyres to try

0:05:52.860 --> 0:05:55.260
<v S1>and spread the load and protect those tracks for longer.

0:05:55.260 --> 0:05:57.120
<v S1>So you have to do less maintenance on them.

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.970
<v S2>Yeah, there's been a lot of wheel track renovating going on.

0:05:59.970 --> 0:06:02.550
<v S1>These wet conditions have been terrible for it. Yeah, really

0:06:02.550 --> 0:06:04.710
<v S1>really painful. We've got a disc seeder. We've got a

0:06:04.710 --> 0:06:06.030
<v S1>disc seeders a bit novel. We used to have a

0:06:06.029 --> 0:06:08.390
<v S1>single disc and we went. We tried a precision planter,

0:06:08.390 --> 0:06:10.370
<v S1>like a corn planter, which was kind of cool, but

0:06:10.370 --> 0:06:13.400
<v S1>it can't. So, uh, crops like oats. So we had

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.620
<v S1>to have two machines that seemed a bit excessive. So

0:06:15.620 --> 0:06:17.420
<v S1>we invested in one big one, and we sort of

0:06:17.420 --> 0:06:20.420
<v S1>got an 80 foot. So a 24 metre, um, twin

0:06:20.420 --> 0:06:23.599
<v S1>disc seeder. So two discs together, um, it's got individual

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.870
<v S1>downforce control and it can do inter-row sowing with its

0:06:26.870 --> 0:06:29.779
<v S1>own GPS on the machine to guide between the rows.

0:06:29.779 --> 0:06:31.910
<v S1>We have a liquid system on that to do our

0:06:31.910 --> 0:06:34.230
<v S1>secret herbs and spices we were talking about earlier for

0:06:34.230 --> 0:06:36.960
<v S1>our fertilizer. Yeah. And then also with harvesting, you know,

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:38.700
<v S1>we play around with harvesting and a lot of harvesters

0:06:38.700 --> 0:06:41.250
<v S1>have GPS control on them now. And they've got management

0:06:41.250 --> 0:06:43.710
<v S1>of the engine and engine load. So to get more

0:06:43.710 --> 0:06:46.980
<v S1>efficiency out of the machine. And also they've got cameras

0:06:46.980 --> 0:06:49.860
<v S1>inside to look at the grain quality and then self-adjust

0:06:49.860 --> 0:06:51.870
<v S1>the harvester on the go. So the cool thing with

0:06:51.870 --> 0:06:54.150
<v S1>the new harvesters is they're becoming more and more automated.

0:06:54.150 --> 0:06:57.420
<v S1>So they're incrementally creeping towards automation. You still have to

0:06:57.420 --> 0:06:59.130
<v S1>have a supervisor. I like to think of it as

0:06:59.130 --> 0:07:01.710
<v S1>a as the person on the pool guy that sits

0:07:01.710 --> 0:07:03.930
<v S1>in the chair watching the people swimming in the pool.

0:07:03.930 --> 0:07:05.640
<v S1>That's kind of where the farm is getting to. The

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:07.800
<v S1>machine should do everything, but if something really bad happens,

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:09.720
<v S1>you're there to jump in and save the day or

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:11.610
<v S1>help set it up or tell people the rules. So

0:07:11.610 --> 0:07:14.160
<v S1>you need to be there to have that influence on, oh,

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.020
<v S1>there's a pile of dirt there that the machine didn't

0:07:16.020 --> 0:07:18.030
<v S1>anticipate being there, and now it's having a problem, or

0:07:18.030 --> 0:07:19.950
<v S1>it threw a belt or something like that. So maintenance

0:07:19.950 --> 0:07:20.640
<v S1>problem so.

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:21.970
<v S2>So farmers can feel like the hero.

0:07:21.970 --> 0:07:23.410
<v S1>We can feel like a hero. But at the same

0:07:23.410 --> 0:07:25.090
<v S1>time we can spend way more time on Twitter and

0:07:25.090 --> 0:07:26.020
<v S1>things like that.

0:07:27.250 --> 0:07:27.910
<v S2>The important things.

0:07:27.910 --> 0:07:28.660
<v S1>Yeah, yeah.

0:07:28.660 --> 0:07:30.790
<v S2>That sounds really cool. What else? You've got a few

0:07:30.790 --> 0:07:31.150
<v S2>more things.

0:07:31.150 --> 0:07:33.310
<v S1>Uh, yeah. With the machine. We've also been playing around

0:07:33.310 --> 0:07:35.680
<v S1>with protein meters, so probably I know you're going to

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:37.360
<v S1>do a session with John Dyer in the future, which

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.280
<v S1>will be great. He's way more experienced at it than me.

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.310
<v S1>But but yeah, using protein meters to actually A, work towards

0:07:42.310 --> 0:07:45.070
<v S1>profitability maps. So that's what we really care about as farmers.

0:07:45.070 --> 0:07:46.960
<v S1>How much money are we making per hectare, and is

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:48.610
<v S1>this the best way to make money that out of

0:07:48.610 --> 0:07:50.860
<v S1>that hectare, are we spending too much or too little

0:07:50.860 --> 0:07:53.679
<v S1>and also using it to inform our nitrogen decisions the

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:56.680
<v S1>following year? So in our system I found it's tricky.

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:58.870
<v S1>So in some systems like say Western Australia where they're

0:07:58.870 --> 0:08:01.690
<v S1>very high preponderance of canola and wheat, both of those

0:08:01.690 --> 0:08:04.660
<v S1>are nitrogen consumers. So you can use the previous year's

0:08:04.660 --> 0:08:07.360
<v S1>map to inform the next year because it's probably a

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.000
<v S1>similar nitrogen consumer. But with ours, we'll flip to a

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.090
<v S1>legume or something, and then the legume fixes its own nitrogen,

0:08:13.090 --> 0:08:15.340
<v S1>and that can also make it more challenging. So still

0:08:15.340 --> 0:08:17.620
<v S1>working through stuff, but it's really great to have people

0:08:17.620 --> 0:08:20.440
<v S1>like in Western Australia that are working quite strongly, or John,

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:22.300
<v S1>who's got a big thing on that with his durum

0:08:22.300 --> 0:08:24.670
<v S1>to actually get those insights and then try and apply

0:08:24.670 --> 0:08:25.690
<v S1>them back to your farm.

0:08:25.690 --> 0:08:29.260
<v S2>It's exciting, isn't it? Farmers sharing solutions. Everyone's trying different things.

0:08:29.260 --> 0:08:29.890
<v S2>And yeah.

0:08:30.100 --> 0:08:32.199
<v S1>There's always an expert in a field somewhere, and it's just

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:34.160
<v S1>a matter of trying to work out how that would

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:35.540
<v S1>work in your area and whether it would work, and

0:08:35.540 --> 0:08:37.460
<v S1>whether it be useful in your farming system.

0:08:37.460 --> 0:08:39.170
<v S2>I love it, I love it. I think we could

0:08:39.170 --> 0:08:41.480
<v S2>have a podcast probably talking to you on each of

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:43.910
<v S2>these things. I'm just thinking about that, that seeder of yours.

0:08:43.940 --> 0:08:46.880
<v S2>I'm like, I've got so many questions, but I better not.

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:50.900
<v S2>We might get stuck, we might save it. So what

0:08:50.900 --> 0:08:54.260
<v S2>we wanted to focus on for this podcast was so

0:08:54.260 --> 0:08:56.570
<v S2>in leading into some of the new technologies that we're

0:08:56.570 --> 0:08:58.890
<v S2>going to be talking about, how do you know whether

0:08:58.890 --> 0:09:00.660
<v S2>you're going to take on a new technology Tim? What

0:09:00.660 --> 0:09:01.260
<v S2>do you do?

0:09:01.260 --> 0:09:03.090
<v S1>I always look at it as we're always on the

0:09:03.090 --> 0:09:05.189
<v S1>look for new things, and it doesn't have to be

0:09:05.190 --> 0:09:08.489
<v S1>some fancy high tech digital solution. It just needs to

0:09:08.490 --> 0:09:10.469
<v S1>be something that's solving a problem I've got on the farm.

0:09:10.470 --> 0:09:12.689
<v S1>And so when you're out there in the Harvester and

0:09:12.690 --> 0:09:14.940
<v S1>you've got more time because it's automated, you're looking at

0:09:14.940 --> 0:09:17.309
<v S1>it and going, why is that area doing that? What

0:09:17.309 --> 0:09:19.110
<v S1>can I do to fix that? And you might have

0:09:19.110 --> 0:09:20.790
<v S1>a great idea, oh, I wish I had a protein

0:09:20.790 --> 0:09:23.069
<v S1>meter because then I could actually get quality data, and

0:09:23.070 --> 0:09:25.290
<v S1>then I could actually make a decision of whether I'm

0:09:25.290 --> 0:09:28.170
<v S1>overspending or not, and to have that tool there. But

0:09:28.170 --> 0:09:29.850
<v S1>then at the same point, what was available at the

0:09:29.850 --> 0:09:31.740
<v S1>time was like, oh, it's not really what I wanted.

0:09:31.740 --> 0:09:33.630
<v S1>And for us, we're playing around with the John Deere

0:09:33.660 --> 0:09:36.540
<v S1>Harvest Lab, which is essentially the second type of protein

0:09:36.540 --> 0:09:38.460
<v S1>meter you can get. There's the crop Scan's been available

0:09:38.460 --> 0:09:40.290
<v S1>for a long time, but we found the John Deere

0:09:40.290 --> 0:09:42.870
<v S1>one integrates really well with our equipment. And all the

0:09:42.870 --> 0:09:45.390
<v S1>layers come together. And they all play friends quite quickly

0:09:45.390 --> 0:09:47.080
<v S1>and easily. And I can look at them on, on

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:49.000
<v S1>the go as we're harvesting. So you look at it

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:51.130
<v S1>and go, oh, there's my solution. And then I start

0:09:51.130 --> 0:09:53.410
<v S1>working and chipping towards that goal, which is I want

0:09:53.410 --> 0:09:57.130
<v S1>that full per hectare based profitability and performance. So I

0:09:57.130 --> 0:09:59.920
<v S1>want to know is that hectare doing the best water

0:09:59.920 --> 0:10:03.040
<v S1>use efficiency? Is it actually hitting its yield potential for

0:10:03.130 --> 0:10:05.440
<v S1>whatever reason? Is it got a problem with soil constraints

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.720
<v S1>that I can track down. So that's where I'm getting to.

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.000
<v S1>But I'm not there yet. But we're just slowly chipping

0:10:10.010 --> 0:10:11.780
<v S1>away at these things and you know where you want

0:10:11.780 --> 0:10:14.090
<v S1>to go. And so you then use these things to

0:10:14.090 --> 0:10:16.699
<v S1>try and work towards it. And sometimes it's not a

0:10:16.700 --> 0:10:18.740
<v S1>silver bullet, you know, it's rarely that you're going to

0:10:18.740 --> 0:10:21.620
<v S1>buy a new piece of equipment that's going to solve

0:10:21.620 --> 0:10:23.479
<v S1>your problem in one hit. It's usually it's like going

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:25.580
<v S1>to get you maybe 70 or 80% of the way there.

0:10:25.580 --> 0:10:29.300
<v S1>And then the other 20% is your innovation. Or maybe

0:10:29.300 --> 0:10:31.310
<v S1>it's get something better next time.

0:10:31.580 --> 0:10:34.550
<v S2>So what I'm hearing is that for each hectare that

0:10:34.550 --> 0:10:38.920
<v S2>you have, you also you have a strategy. So do

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.319
<v S2>you have a strategy or do you have some principles

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.410
<v S2>for your farm that you use to help you make those decisions?

0:10:44.410 --> 0:10:46.360
<v S1>I think that's the key thing, isn't it? It's about

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:48.490
<v S1>having some visions on where you want your farm in

0:10:48.490 --> 0:10:50.230
<v S1>the future and how you want it to look, and

0:10:50.230 --> 0:10:52.030
<v S1>every farm is going to be slightly different, but I'll

0:10:52.030 --> 0:10:55.600
<v S1>go through my top five, maximize profitability per hectare. So

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:57.550
<v S1>we get all these maps that are based on whole fields.

0:10:57.550 --> 0:11:00.260
<v S1>But I want to go down smaller. We've got bigger fields.

0:11:00.260 --> 0:11:02.449
<v S1>We've pulled fences out to make things more efficient with

0:11:02.450 --> 0:11:04.220
<v S1>our big gear, but we have to use what we

0:11:04.220 --> 0:11:06.110
<v S1>used to use in corporate world, you know, think local,

0:11:06.110 --> 0:11:08.870
<v S1>act global. We're acting global. We've got big paddocks, but

0:11:08.870 --> 0:11:10.550
<v S1>we've got to go back to what the old timers did,

0:11:10.550 --> 0:11:12.800
<v S1>which is look at each paddock on its merits. And

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.349
<v S1>they put fences down, fencing out soil types and stuff

0:11:15.350 --> 0:11:16.910
<v S1>like that. We've got to get that back into our

0:11:16.910 --> 0:11:19.580
<v S1>system using variable rate applications and stuff like that. So

0:11:19.580 --> 0:11:21.410
<v S1>I want to make sure each piece of land I've got,

0:11:21.410 --> 0:11:24.319
<v S1>because it's getting so expensive now, is performing at its best.

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:26.990
<v S1>So that's number one. Then the other one is if

0:11:26.990 --> 0:11:30.140
<v S1>I have healthy soils, I'll get healthy crops. So if

0:11:30.140 --> 0:11:32.180
<v S1>I can get my soil health right. So that means

0:11:32.179 --> 0:11:36.200
<v S1>thinking about stubble retention, conserving moisture, trying to trap as

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.050
<v S1>much of that limited moisture we get in the soil

0:11:39.050 --> 0:11:40.819
<v S1>is going to give me the most yield. So water

0:11:40.820 --> 0:11:44.420
<v S1>equals yield. Very important timeliness. This is also part of

0:11:44.420 --> 0:11:47.510
<v S1>soil health as well. The best farmers as we're told.

0:11:47.510 --> 0:11:50.719
<v S1>Kate Burke will tell you this endlessly. Get things done

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.420
<v S1>on time. One of the great things with good soil health,

0:11:53.420 --> 0:11:56.060
<v S1>good healthy plants, because the soil is healthy is they

0:11:56.059 --> 0:11:58.010
<v S1>give you that little bit wider window. So they're a

0:11:58.010 --> 0:12:00.140
<v S1>little bit they take a little bit less time to

0:12:00.140 --> 0:12:02.179
<v S1>get infected with the disease. And that means you've got

0:12:02.179 --> 0:12:04.850
<v S1>more time to get in on time to treat them

0:12:04.850 --> 0:12:07.219
<v S1>and manage with it. So getting things done on time

0:12:07.220 --> 0:12:09.860
<v S1>and that might mean bigger gear, it might just mean

0:12:09.860 --> 0:12:12.010
<v S1>better monitoring. So you know when to get out there

0:12:12.010 --> 0:12:14.319
<v S1>or not. The other one we have is is weeds.

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.720
<v S1>We're in a no till system. So weeds can be

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.540
<v S1>a problem. We don't burn very often. We don't cultivate

0:12:19.540 --> 0:12:21.040
<v S1>very often. And so we end up with a lot

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.350
<v S1>of weed banks, and we're reliant on our herbicides to

0:12:23.350 --> 0:12:25.600
<v S1>do most of the work. We don't have any stock.

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:26.830
<v S1>So if you're going to be dealing with that, we've

0:12:26.830 --> 0:12:28.270
<v S1>got to look for opportunities to get rid of those

0:12:28.270 --> 0:12:30.340
<v S1>weeds at every time to run them down. So that'll

0:12:30.370 --> 0:12:33.220
<v S1>be things like spray topping might be windrowing , spraying

0:12:33.220 --> 0:12:37.140
<v S1>under windrow Carter bars, diverse rotations in your herbicides, things

0:12:37.140 --> 0:12:39.600
<v S1>like that. A lot of farmers are doing that anyway.

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.729
<v S1>And then the other thing is looking for efficiencies. So

0:12:41.730 --> 0:12:44.460
<v S1>labor's getting hard. So we're always looking for how we

0:12:44.460 --> 0:12:46.920
<v S1>can do more with less workers just because it's really

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.050
<v S1>hard to get good ones and also too, inputs. So

0:12:49.050 --> 0:12:51.990
<v S1>we want to reduce our inputs. Can we use less fertilizer.

0:12:51.990 --> 0:12:53.280
<v S1>Or maybe we need to use more to get the

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:56.099
<v S1>better result in another area. Can I use less herbicides

0:12:56.100 --> 0:12:59.280
<v S1>but not being just setting targets to reduce those, it's

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.229
<v S1>about can I be more efficient with them because that's

0:13:01.230 --> 0:13:03.329
<v S1>going to save me money anyway. So it's in my

0:13:03.330 --> 0:13:06.750
<v S1>best interest. So it's about that long term sustainability. But

0:13:06.750 --> 0:13:09.120
<v S1>yeah keeping that money per hectare is the key number

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:09.689
<v S1>for me.

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.060
<v S2>Do you find, though, that your principles change depending on

0:13:12.059 --> 0:13:14.340
<v S2>what the technology is that you want. Ah.

0:13:14.730 --> 0:13:17.280
<v S1>Can can I mean the thing is that sometimes you're

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.770
<v S1>just doing stuff because you're really excited about it. I mean,

0:13:19.770 --> 0:13:22.500
<v S1>the classic is drones, right? We don't use drones much

0:13:22.500 --> 0:13:25.210
<v S1>other than maybe taking some harvest footage for a video

0:13:25.210 --> 0:13:27.190
<v S1>for for looking at it later on. But, you know,

0:13:27.190 --> 0:13:29.230
<v S1>other people are mad keen on them. And that's because

0:13:29.230 --> 0:13:31.480
<v S1>when somebody has a real passion for it, they will

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.480
<v S1>find a way to justify it. That's the classic I

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.569
<v S1>can think of is the self-propelled sprayer versus the tow

0:13:37.570 --> 0:13:41.140
<v S1>behind sprayer debate. Some farmers will argue that a self-propelled

0:13:41.140 --> 0:13:44.560
<v S1>sprayer is completely unnecessary, and a tow behind sprayer is

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:46.780
<v S1>by far the best because that's what they've got. And

0:13:46.780 --> 0:13:48.849
<v S1>then another farmer will be like trying to justify a

0:13:48.850 --> 0:13:51.220
<v S1>self-propelled sprayer. And you can tell by the time that

0:13:51.220 --> 0:13:53.140
<v S1>they're trying to justify it that they really just want one.

0:13:53.140 --> 0:13:55.059
<v S1>And they'll they'll make a justification for it to happen

0:13:55.059 --> 0:13:57.220
<v S1>when they get it, they'll be really happy with the result.

0:13:57.220 --> 0:14:00.910
<v S1>But often the numbers get massaged to suit what you

0:14:00.910 --> 0:14:02.439
<v S1>think is right. So the key thing is to stick

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:05.260
<v S1>to your principles and make sure you're not just going, wow,

0:14:05.260 --> 0:14:06.970
<v S1>I just love a gold Mercedes. And you go, well,

0:14:06.970 --> 0:14:09.640
<v S1>how does that fit with your with your principles? You know,

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:11.440
<v S1>it doesn't really. It's just because you want one.

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.730
<v S2>And having them written down, I suppose. So that would

0:14:13.730 --> 0:14:15.680
<v S2>probably help you stick to them. Do you think? Do

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:16.850
<v S2>you have yours written down?

0:14:16.850 --> 0:14:19.160
<v S1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, we've done a few presentations before, so

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:21.230
<v S1>I kind of stuck with the same ones as I've

0:14:21.230 --> 0:14:23.510
<v S1>gone through different presentations and found that they don't change

0:14:23.510 --> 0:14:26.210
<v S1>very much. So yeah, I think you'll find they'll be

0:14:26.210 --> 0:14:28.610
<v S1>pretty much the same all the time. Obviously it varies

0:14:28.610 --> 0:14:31.190
<v S1>per condition, like if you're talking about a digital solution

0:14:31.190 --> 0:14:33.920
<v S1>which is relatively cheap, versus like, I'm going to buy

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:35.990
<v S1>a new seat or a new harvester, that's a completely

0:14:35.990 --> 0:14:37.530
<v S1>different set of things. But yeah.

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.380
<v S2>Okay. So that was one thing. So make sure that

0:14:40.380 --> 0:14:43.290
<v S2>if you're adopting a new technology, you would say, do

0:14:43.290 --> 0:14:46.110
<v S2>they align with your farming principles? But I also heard

0:14:46.110 --> 0:14:49.980
<v S2>you talking about your perception of change and how your

0:14:49.980 --> 0:14:52.170
<v S2>problem solving is really important. Yeah.

0:14:52.170 --> 0:14:55.380
<v S1>That's right. So you're always looking for ways to make

0:14:55.380 --> 0:14:59.190
<v S1>your life easier. Clearly. And normally farmers, if they're doing

0:14:59.190 --> 0:15:02.940
<v S1>liquid blends they'll have hoses with cam locks, like, you know,

0:15:02.940 --> 0:15:06.780
<v S1>self-releasing fittings everywhere and stuff goes everywhere. And you get

0:15:06.780 --> 0:15:09.360
<v S1>all wet and it's cold because it's winter and they're

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:11.730
<v S1>sticky and you got to wear gloves and it's horrible.

0:15:11.730 --> 0:15:14.160
<v S1>So then, like, we've gone and spent all this money

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.970
<v S1>putting in this nice clean with flow meter mixing facility

0:15:17.970 --> 0:15:21.390
<v S1>that's all piped and plumbed and closed and it's like, well, yeah,

0:15:21.390 --> 0:15:22.800
<v S1>it might have cost a few dollars to do it,

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:25.260
<v S1>but my God, it made that job so much easier.

0:15:25.260 --> 0:15:26.670
<v S2>Is that the batching machine you're talking about?

0:15:26.670 --> 0:15:29.130
<v S1>This is our this is our liquid batching system. So

0:15:29.130 --> 0:15:32.010
<v S1>when we do a liquid batching system for our sewing,

0:15:32.010 --> 0:15:33.570
<v S1>and it's a terrible job that usually you have to

0:15:33.570 --> 0:15:35.250
<v S1>do at 10:00 at night and it's cold and you

0:15:35.250 --> 0:15:36.870
<v S1>don't want to be out there. And the seeder guy goes,

0:15:36.870 --> 0:15:38.190
<v S1>I think you're going to be short. Can you go

0:15:38.190 --> 0:15:40.800
<v S1>and get me some more? So making that job as

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.590
<v S1>simple and painless as possible so that the guy that's

0:15:43.590 --> 0:15:46.380
<v S1>doing that tender truck, the grouper, can actually go and

0:15:46.380 --> 0:15:47.820
<v S1>do it and go, oh, all right, fine. Only take

0:15:47.820 --> 0:15:49.500
<v S1>me 15 minutes. That's fine. But if you have to

0:15:49.500 --> 0:15:51.150
<v S1>go out there for an hour and get wet at

0:15:51.150 --> 0:15:53.190
<v S1>10:00 at night, you're not so excited about it. And

0:15:53.190 --> 0:15:55.650
<v S1>it just makes you frustrated and gets you annoyed with

0:15:55.650 --> 0:15:57.660
<v S1>the seeder guy because he didn't tell you that earlier

0:15:57.660 --> 0:15:59.100
<v S1>when you could have done it before tea before you

0:15:59.100 --> 0:16:00.780
<v S1>had a shower, you know, those sort of things. So

0:16:00.780 --> 0:16:03.270
<v S1>those little things that just annoy you and tweak on

0:16:03.270 --> 0:16:04.950
<v S1>you and that ends up with like, I know a

0:16:04.950 --> 0:16:07.170
<v S1>bit of grading between people as well because it's like, ah,

0:16:07.170 --> 0:16:09.210
<v S1>why didn't they plan ahead? Why it's not my problem

0:16:09.210 --> 0:16:11.250
<v S1>and why am I dealing with this? So sometimes these

0:16:11.250 --> 0:16:14.260
<v S1>little things can actually lead to bigger rewards that are

0:16:14.260 --> 0:16:17.050
<v S1>really less tangible. You know, like you talk about green

0:16:17.050 --> 0:16:19.660
<v S1>on green spraying or just green on brown spraying where

0:16:19.660 --> 0:16:21.850
<v S1>you're spraying weeds in a fallow and you go, okay,

0:16:21.850 --> 0:16:23.140
<v S1>so why are you doing that? Oh, you're going to

0:16:23.140 --> 0:16:25.480
<v S1>save 90%. That's what the claim is, 90% of the

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:28.750
<v S1>chemical consumption. And it's like, well, okay. But then you

0:16:28.750 --> 0:16:30.250
<v S1>go and do it yourself and you find out it's

0:16:30.250 --> 0:16:33.010
<v S1>not 90%, you might only be saving 70%, which is

0:16:33.010 --> 0:16:35.620
<v S1>still fantastic, but you're not saving what they think. So

0:16:35.620 --> 0:16:39.100
<v S1>I guess there's perception and the reality and then there's

0:16:39.100 --> 0:16:42.280
<v S1>the intrinsic benefits out of that. So for instance, in

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:44.890
<v S1>the camera spraying case, you're not filling up as often.

0:16:44.890 --> 0:16:46.990
<v S1>Saves you heaps of time not filling up as often,

0:16:46.990 --> 0:16:49.090
<v S1>even though you might only be spraying half as much

0:16:49.090 --> 0:16:51.430
<v S1>and nowhere near what the manufacturer claimed you could do,

0:16:51.460 --> 0:16:53.590
<v S1>it's still saving you a lot. And that gap of

0:16:53.590 --> 0:16:55.750
<v S1>how much did the time save me can be very

0:16:55.750 --> 0:16:58.630
<v S1>hard to quantify. And so you did your business case

0:16:58.630 --> 0:17:01.390
<v S1>based on saving 90% of chemical. In practice. You didn't

0:17:01.390 --> 0:17:03.770
<v S1>get there, but there were these other benefits, but they're

0:17:03.770 --> 0:17:05.960
<v S1>much harder to measure. So sometimes it's not quite so

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.480
<v S1>black and white piece of paper business case.

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.060
<v S2>So that's probably where it's important to talk to people

0:17:11.060 --> 0:17:13.160
<v S2>isn't it. And you talk be on social media and

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.710
<v S2>talk to your agents and that sort of thing I think.

0:17:15.710 --> 0:17:17.450
<v S1>So I think what I look at is, is pretty

0:17:17.450 --> 0:17:20.180
<v S1>much if you think something's going to be viable, it

0:17:20.180 --> 0:17:22.370
<v S1>probably will pay for itself and it might not be.

0:17:22.369 --> 0:17:25.130
<v S1>It saves you $1 every year. It could be like

0:17:25.130 --> 0:17:29.359
<v S1>a storage facility where you build it and you save $100.

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:33.350
<v S1>You gain $100 a ton every 10th year. That would

0:17:33.350 --> 0:17:36.530
<v S1>be better than saving $1 every year. So it may

0:17:36.530 --> 0:17:38.660
<v S1>not make you money every year. But there's one great

0:17:38.690 --> 0:17:41.060
<v S1>year where it really pays off. So camera spraying is

0:17:41.060 --> 0:17:43.940
<v S1>a very good example. You get no summer, summer rains.

0:17:43.940 --> 0:17:46.429
<v S1>You don't get any summer weeds. You didn't use it.

0:17:46.430 --> 0:17:48.949
<v S1>So it's wasted. Right. But then the next year you

0:17:48.950 --> 0:17:51.840
<v S1>used extensively used it 2 or 3 times on every field.

0:17:51.990 --> 0:17:54.750
<v S1>Huge payoff. And so you got to average out of

0:17:54.750 --> 0:17:56.159
<v S1>the long term. Make sure you get the benefit. And

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.080
<v S1>don't try and get money every year. So when you're

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.090
<v S1>doing your business case, it's not like, well, I'll save

0:18:00.090 --> 0:18:02.910
<v S1>$32 on that one and I'll save $16 on that one.

0:18:02.910 --> 0:18:05.190
<v S1>It's like, well, the hope is that 80% of the time,

0:18:05.340 --> 0:18:07.080
<v S1>you know, I need three cases to pay it off,

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.990
<v S1>or 80% of the time I'll get this, or what

0:18:09.990 --> 0:18:12.330
<v S1>I like to do is you get the technology you

0:18:12.330 --> 0:18:14.970
<v S1>think it should be break even, and then what can

0:18:14.970 --> 0:18:17.490
<v S1>I do with it extra that will get me extra benefit.

0:18:17.490 --> 0:18:19.710
<v S1>And that could be peace of mind. It could be

0:18:19.710 --> 0:18:22.380
<v S1>de-stressed workers. It could be that you found a completely

0:18:22.380 --> 0:18:24.900
<v S1>new use for it. So with the camera spraying, guys

0:18:24.900 --> 0:18:27.330
<v S1>got clever and we're using it for fungicide spraying. When

0:18:27.330 --> 0:18:29.280
<v S1>we had the beans dying out with the disease a

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:31.619
<v S1>couple of years ago, you could go and spray fungicide

0:18:31.619 --> 0:18:35.129
<v S1>on the remaining alive beans using the green on brown technology.

0:18:35.130 --> 0:18:37.949
<v S1>No point spraying fungicide on a dead bean, but you

0:18:37.950 --> 0:18:39.780
<v S1>could put the expensive stuff out on the stuff that

0:18:39.780 --> 0:18:41.459
<v S1>was still living and keep it through to the finish.

0:18:41.460 --> 0:18:44.070
<v S1>So you. And that was another application that is not

0:18:44.070 --> 0:18:46.560
<v S1>marketed with that. But you could, like you say, go

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.570
<v S1>through social media or find it from other people, some

0:18:48.570 --> 0:18:51.030
<v S1>clever ways of getting extra value out of some of

0:18:51.030 --> 0:18:52.110
<v S1>these technologies.

0:18:52.109 --> 0:18:55.859
<v S2>That's interesting. So you have your approach so problem solving

0:18:55.859 --> 0:19:00.420
<v S2>have your key principles. And also looking for those ways

0:19:00.420 --> 0:19:03.399
<v S2>that it might what you could make it work better

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:04.270
<v S2>for you. Like yeah.

0:19:04.450 --> 0:19:07.090
<v S1>It's the cream on top right. So yeah you've got

0:19:07.090 --> 0:19:09.640
<v S1>your normal your normal solution. And then what can I

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:11.500
<v S1>add to it. Can I get a cherry on top

0:19:11.500 --> 0:19:14.679
<v S1>with that somehow by getting an extra benefit that wasn't

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:15.910
<v S1>actually in the plan?

0:19:15.910 --> 0:19:17.920
<v S2>That's really smart. And I really like how you talked

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:21.610
<v S2>about the stressed workers and the I can completely relate

0:19:21.609 --> 0:19:23.830
<v S2>to the, you know, oh, oh, we ran out and

0:19:23.830 --> 0:19:25.780
<v S2>I need more of this. And oh, it's at 10:00

0:19:25.780 --> 0:19:28.600
<v S2>at night. And I really I think that would probably

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:32.350
<v S2>work profitability wise in terms of you might be able

0:19:32.350 --> 0:19:34.030
<v S2>to get staff.

0:19:34.060 --> 0:19:36.369
<v S1>You can get staff, you have less mistakes. So you're

0:19:36.369 --> 0:19:39.070
<v S1>not spending more time fixing things because somebody has, you know,

0:19:39.070 --> 0:19:40.990
<v S1>been a bit annoyed and they've made a made an

0:19:40.990 --> 0:19:43.149
<v S1>error dump some grain on the ground or something and

0:19:43.150 --> 0:19:44.770
<v S1>then spent a while shoveling it up, you know, stuff

0:19:44.770 --> 0:19:46.629
<v S1>like that. Like it's just wasted time.

0:19:46.630 --> 0:19:49.240
<v S2>I got cold, they got a cold because they got cold.

0:19:49.330 --> 0:19:51.739
<v S1>Yeah that's right, that's right, that's right. But then it

0:19:51.740 --> 0:19:54.409
<v S1>makes it more pleasurable working. Working environment too. So if

0:19:54.410 --> 0:19:56.510
<v S1>things are going well and also too like people will

0:19:56.510 --> 0:19:57.859
<v S1>come up with some ideas, they'll be like, oh, I

0:19:57.859 --> 0:19:59.480
<v S1>think we need to put a rubbish bin over next

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:00.980
<v S1>to this because I have to keep walking all the

0:20:00.980 --> 0:20:02.780
<v S1>way over there to put, oh yeah, that's a good idea.

0:20:02.810 --> 0:20:05.600
<v S1>Little tiny thing like that could make somebody very happy

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:07.609
<v S1>and save a lot of effort. And then all of

0:20:07.609 --> 0:20:10.070
<v S1>a sudden everyone's on the same page, every one's thinking about

0:20:10.070 --> 0:20:12.230
<v S1>how can I improve things? How can I change things?

0:20:12.230 --> 0:20:13.220
<v S2>That's the approach, isn't it?

0:20:13.550 --> 0:20:15.859
<v S1>That's the approach. You want that innovative thing going in there and

0:20:15.859 --> 0:20:19.010
<v S1>you want people to always be thinking about, don't, don't

0:20:19.010 --> 0:20:20.570
<v S1>say I hate this. It's like, what could I do

0:20:20.570 --> 0:20:23.060
<v S1>to make it better if you ever saw this, hey,

0:20:23.060 --> 0:20:25.369
<v S1>I found this when I was at the field days. Uh,

0:20:25.369 --> 0:20:27.800
<v S1>you know, the Wimmera machinery field days. This thing was there.

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:29.270
<v S1>We should. You should go and have a look at that.

0:20:29.270 --> 0:20:30.680
<v S1>It was really cool. It'd be really good for this

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.080
<v S1>job that we do, which would make our lives so

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:33.859
<v S1>much easier.

0:20:33.859 --> 0:20:36.050
<v S2>And I also think that would help with your team, too,

0:20:36.050 --> 0:20:37.489
<v S2>because they all feel like they've got a little bit

0:20:37.490 --> 0:20:39.890
<v S2>of ownership, they all feel like they're involved and it

0:20:39.890 --> 0:20:41.359
<v S2>it's sort of a good team environment.

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:44.270
<v S1>I think with our group generally our team have quite

0:20:44.270 --> 0:20:47.120
<v S1>specific roles. So like I do a spraying and harvesting.

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:49.970
<v S1>So I'm crop growing and harvesting and Luke does the

0:20:49.970 --> 0:20:53.120
<v S1>marketing and a lot of the logistics. And then Glenn

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.490
<v S1>used to be our hay dog. He just loved hay.

0:20:55.490 --> 0:20:58.040
<v S1>So you know when it comes to doing anything with hay,

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:00.380
<v S1>you'd make sure that Glenn was cool with it before

0:21:00.380 --> 0:21:02.060
<v S1>you went and made any purchases, or if there was

0:21:02.060 --> 0:21:04.129
<v S1>any suggestions of things we could change, he'd be the

0:21:04.130 --> 0:21:06.000
<v S1>one looking for them because he's the guy talking to

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:08.160
<v S1>other people that like hay. And he'd be like, oh,

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:09.720
<v S1>these other guys are using this. Maybe we should get

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:11.220
<v S1>one of those, you know, hey, that's a great idea,

0:21:11.220 --> 0:21:11.730
<v S1>I love that.

0:21:11.730 --> 0:21:15.660
<v S2>So problem solving team approach. Yeah. What else. Anything else

0:21:15.660 --> 0:21:18.240
<v S2>that you would recommend to farmers when they're thinking. Because

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.940
<v S2>I think sometimes it can be like, oh well it's

0:21:20.940 --> 0:21:23.280
<v S2>all right for him, you know, or oh, we can't

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:27.000
<v S2>afford that. Or so what would you say to some

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.190
<v S2>of our listeners who are thinking, oh, but I just

0:21:29.190 --> 0:21:31.800
<v S2>don't want to spend the money, Tim, or I'm not sure.

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:33.420
<v S2>I'm not sure about this tech. I think it could

0:21:33.420 --> 0:21:33.960
<v S2>be good.

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:36.149
<v S1>I think you end up selling it to yourself. But

0:21:36.150 --> 0:21:37.889
<v S1>I think the key thing is the support that's got

0:21:37.890 --> 0:21:40.500
<v S1>to be there, too. The support could be the dealer,

0:21:40.500 --> 0:21:42.990
<v S1>for instance. You know, with the protein meter, you've got

0:21:42.990 --> 0:21:45.330
<v S1>very good support with them guys. When we were playing

0:21:45.330 --> 0:21:47.429
<v S1>around with that and they were very attentive and listening

0:21:47.430 --> 0:21:50.550
<v S1>and trying. You're also trying to provide good feedback because

0:21:50.550 --> 0:21:52.780
<v S1>they're invested in what you're doing as well. Because we

0:21:52.780 --> 0:21:54.850
<v S1>talked about this, it's like because it's a new product

0:21:54.850 --> 0:21:57.699
<v S1>coming out, they're very keen for it to succeed. So

0:21:57.700 --> 0:22:00.130
<v S1>if you come in with the right mentality of I'm

0:22:00.130 --> 0:22:03.280
<v S1>trying to contribute to make this product success, then they

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:05.560
<v S1>will also be on board with you too. So provide

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:08.260
<v S1>good feedback. They will provide good support to help get

0:22:08.260 --> 0:22:10.480
<v S1>that through. So when you're also looking at it from

0:22:10.630 --> 0:22:12.490
<v S1>the tech point of view, it doesn't necessarily have to

0:22:12.490 --> 0:22:15.490
<v S1>be the technician. That's the wizard. It could be just

0:22:15.490 --> 0:22:17.090
<v S1>a farmer, you know, that does a really good job

0:22:17.090 --> 0:22:19.250
<v S1>at it. So like someone like Broden Holland or John

0:22:19.250 --> 0:22:21.260
<v S1>Dyer that are really good at protein maps are the

0:22:21.260 --> 0:22:23.419
<v S1>ones that you'd be trying to form a relationship and

0:22:23.420 --> 0:22:26.090
<v S1>communicating with and asking a few questions about. And then

0:22:26.090 --> 0:22:27.800
<v S1>when you go to talk to the tech, he may

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.020
<v S1>not be as up to date as those two guys even,

0:22:30.020 --> 0:22:31.910
<v S1>but at least you can sort of speak the language

0:22:31.910 --> 0:22:33.979
<v S1>and sort of ask some good questions about it as well.

0:22:34.010 --> 0:22:35.480
<v S1>The other thing I find that's really interesting with this

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.210
<v S1>technology too, is, is trying to understand where it's coming

0:22:38.210 --> 0:22:40.190
<v S1>from and how it's trying to work. So a lot

0:22:40.190 --> 0:22:42.290
<v S1>of the times like if you a classic is if

0:22:42.290 --> 0:22:44.990
<v S1>you're buying a new car, you tend to go and

0:22:44.990 --> 0:22:47.359
<v S1>test drive the car and you want a car that

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:49.550
<v S1>kind of feels like your old car but new. And

0:22:49.550 --> 0:22:51.770
<v S1>it's like, well, that's not necessarily the best car. So

0:22:51.770 --> 0:22:53.629
<v S1>if you're going to drive an EV, it's going to

0:22:53.630 --> 0:22:56.750
<v S1>drive completely different to your Mazda. You can't compare apples

0:22:56.750 --> 0:22:59.300
<v S1>with apples. You've got to understand how that car wants

0:22:59.300 --> 0:23:01.669
<v S1>to behave, and then try and use it in the

0:23:01.670 --> 0:23:03.710
<v S1>way it was intended to be used before you make

0:23:03.710 --> 0:23:06.109
<v S1>a decision that, oh, this is absolutely rubbish. So when

0:23:06.109 --> 0:23:08.450
<v S1>you get a new technology, it's like, okay, so how

0:23:08.450 --> 0:23:10.520
<v S1>is the interface supposed to work? How am I trying

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.669
<v S1>to use it? Am I just trying to push my

0:23:13.670 --> 0:23:16.940
<v S1>opinion on it of what I've experienced before, onto it

0:23:16.940 --> 0:23:19.670
<v S1>and not letting it shine? And now I'm getting frustrated

0:23:19.670 --> 0:23:21.230
<v S1>because it's not working the way because I didn't think

0:23:21.230 --> 0:23:21.890
<v S1>about how it was.

0:23:21.890 --> 0:23:24.619
<v S2>So you said a very nice way of saying maybe

0:23:24.619 --> 0:23:26.270
<v S2>it's sometimes the operator, sometimes it's you.

0:23:26.270 --> 0:23:29.180
<v S1>Yeah, sometimes it's you. That's exactly right. So make sure

0:23:29.180 --> 0:23:30.320
<v S1>you try and use it. Because if you can do

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:32.150
<v S1>that all of a sudden unlocks how it was working.

0:23:32.150 --> 0:23:33.439
<v S1>So you've got to almost get your mind of how

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:35.180
<v S1>the engineers intended it to go.

0:23:35.180 --> 0:23:36.230
<v S2>Anything else?

0:23:36.230 --> 0:23:38.270
<v S1>I think also, too, when you're looking at the technology,

0:23:38.270 --> 0:23:40.729
<v S1>it's always an opportunity when you're purchasing something new. So

0:23:40.730 --> 0:23:42.860
<v S1>if you're purchasing a new tractor, you're purchasing a new

0:23:42.859 --> 0:23:45.530
<v S1>seat or a new harvester. Are there things I could

0:23:45.530 --> 0:23:47.750
<v S1>potentially be throwing in here? If you buy a harvester

0:23:47.750 --> 0:23:50.720
<v S1>and it cost you $1 million, adding an extra $5,000

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:54.210
<v S1>for some upgrade is insignificant to the whole scheme of things,

0:23:54.210 --> 0:23:56.699
<v S1>but it could be worth way more than $5,000 to you.

0:23:56.700 --> 0:23:59.340
<v S1>And this is the 1 in 7 year purchase that

0:23:59.340 --> 0:24:01.830
<v S1>you do of a harvester. So is it where I

0:24:01.830 --> 0:24:03.990
<v S1>need it to be in seven years? Is there anything

0:24:03.990 --> 0:24:06.000
<v S1>I can do that's going to help? So when you

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:07.830
<v S1>look at these tools, it's always good to look at

0:24:07.830 --> 0:24:10.500
<v S1>the options and what's available and just have a really

0:24:10.500 --> 0:24:12.119
<v S1>good think about it before you make the decision. So

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.700
<v S1>you're making the decision based on fuel economy or horsepower

0:24:14.700 --> 0:24:17.219
<v S1>or whatever. But what else is there that that machine

0:24:17.220 --> 0:24:20.130
<v S1>could also deliver for you that might actually be beneficial

0:24:20.130 --> 0:24:22.590
<v S1>down the track that you haven't actually had before. So

0:24:22.590 --> 0:24:27.240
<v S1>almost like maybe try 5% extra, try 5% new, something

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:29.220
<v S1>a bit different, just to try and tease it up.

0:24:29.220 --> 0:24:31.650
<v S1>And maybe that'll make your thinking change as you start

0:24:31.650 --> 0:24:32.699
<v S1>using that tool.

0:24:32.820 --> 0:24:35.040
<v S2>But now when everything. Tim, how do I decide what

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:36.990
<v S2>what I should start focusing on first?

0:24:36.990 --> 0:24:37.890
<v S1>Did you check your budget?

0:24:37.890 --> 0:24:38.220
<v S2>Yeah.

0:24:39.210 --> 0:24:40.350
<v S3>Well, that's the problem.

0:24:40.350 --> 0:24:40.980
<v S2>How do I.

0:24:41.010 --> 0:24:41.430
<v S3>How do I.

0:24:41.430 --> 0:24:43.930
<v S2>Know I've got a certain amount of budget, but I've

0:24:43.930 --> 0:24:45.729
<v S2>got five things that I want.

0:24:45.730 --> 0:24:46.990
<v S1>I think you've got to look at your principles. Don't

0:24:46.990 --> 0:24:49.150
<v S1>you got to go back to your principles. Which one

0:24:49.150 --> 0:24:51.490
<v S1>is actually following my principles and which ones? Like following

0:24:51.490 --> 0:24:53.469
<v S1>what the neighbors are doing, following what the guy on

0:24:53.470 --> 0:24:55.510
<v S1>Twitter is doing, which ones actually, I think are going

0:24:55.510 --> 0:24:57.730
<v S1>to deliver the biggest benefit for me and which is

0:24:57.730 --> 0:25:00.910
<v S1>also the clearest benefit for me. So you've got green

0:25:00.910 --> 0:25:03.129
<v S1>on green and I always get summer rain. I'm definitely

0:25:03.130 --> 0:25:05.200
<v S1>going to get also green on brown. I'm always going

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.100
<v S1>to get spraying with green on brown. It's going to

0:25:07.100 --> 0:25:08.960
<v S1>be a big benefit to me, and I always get

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:11.899
<v S1>contractors in, and I spend $60,000 getting contractors in. I

0:25:11.900 --> 0:25:14.000
<v S1>could pay for the system by not buying contractors in,

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:15.770
<v S1>you know, that sort of thing. So you're doing that

0:25:15.770 --> 0:25:17.179
<v S1>and you can clearly see that's going to be a

0:25:17.180 --> 0:25:18.560
<v S1>big win. So clearly you're going to go for that

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:20.600
<v S1>one first. The one of I'm going to put an

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:24.020
<v S1>extra weather station in which might be cheaper, but it's

0:25:24.020 --> 0:25:25.880
<v S1>not maybe going to be useful when there's another one

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:28.160
<v S1>a kilometer away. Maybe that would be the one you'd

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:30.500
<v S1>save on at the time. Like it just depends on

0:25:30.500 --> 0:25:32.430
<v S1>where you're at. But I would always go back to

0:25:32.430 --> 0:25:33.840
<v S1>see which one's going to give me the biggest bang

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.870
<v S1>for buck, or which is the most frustrating problem that

0:25:36.930 --> 0:25:38.550
<v S1>it's going to help me solve. And usually that's going

0:25:38.550 --> 0:25:40.889
<v S1>to be the same bang for buck sort of solution.

0:25:40.890 --> 0:25:43.889
<v S2>That's a really good point. I think thinking about perhaps

0:25:43.890 --> 0:25:46.980
<v S2>not what the neighbors doing, but perhaps it's good to

0:25:46.980 --> 0:25:48.179
<v S2>know what the neighbor is doing. And you might you

0:25:48.180 --> 0:25:50.369
<v S2>might do that. And it's great to get ideas. But

0:25:50.369 --> 0:25:53.370
<v S2>thinking about how is this new technology going to work

0:25:53.369 --> 0:25:54.830
<v S2>for me? How am I going to make it work

0:25:54.830 --> 0:25:55.850
<v S2>for me on my farm?

0:25:55.850 --> 0:25:58.070
<v S1>Yeah, exactly. Exactly. I think you always need to go

0:25:58.070 --> 0:26:00.229
<v S1>back and saying, is this following the neighbors are going

0:26:00.230 --> 0:26:02.359
<v S1>to have different rules to you and different principles that

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.879
<v S1>they're working towards. So you've always got to be conscious

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:08.030
<v S1>of am I following my the way I'd like my

0:26:08.030 --> 0:26:10.040
<v S1>farm to be in 25 years time?

0:26:10.130 --> 0:26:14.060
<v S2>Okay. So anything else in terms of what you would

0:26:14.060 --> 0:26:17.840
<v S2>recommend to farmers that are thinking about applying new tech?

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:19.699
<v S1>Oh, I mean, the other thing too is there's obviously

0:26:19.700 --> 0:26:22.490
<v S1>a lot of father son or father daughter farms. I mean,

0:26:22.490 --> 0:26:24.050
<v S1>maybe this is an opportunity to give it to the

0:26:24.050 --> 0:26:26.689
<v S1>younger guy and say, or the younger girl and say, look,

0:26:26.690 --> 0:26:28.580
<v S1>we're going to get this thing out and we're going

0:26:28.580 --> 0:26:32.060
<v S1>to get protein metre on our harvester. That's your job.

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:34.940
<v S1>You manage that? I'm just the tractor driver. Now, you

0:26:34.940 --> 0:26:36.950
<v S1>I want you to lead on this. So maybe trying

0:26:36.950 --> 0:26:39.260
<v S1>to usher in because there obviously will generally find that

0:26:39.260 --> 0:26:42.500
<v S1>they're more, uh, savvy when it comes to technology. So

0:26:42.500 --> 0:26:44.609
<v S1>maybe getting in some younger people involved in the farm

0:26:44.609 --> 0:26:46.980
<v S1>and giving them a core responsibility like that to work

0:26:46.980 --> 0:26:49.409
<v S1>with might be a good thing to give them some ownership.

0:26:49.410 --> 0:26:51.960
<v S2>Okay, so we haven't got too much time left, Tim,

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:54.540
<v S2>but I've got a couple more questions. I was wondering

0:26:54.540 --> 0:26:57.420
<v S2>whether you could quickly talk us through the technology that

0:26:57.420 --> 0:26:59.670
<v S2>you think has been the best on your farm?

0:27:00.030 --> 0:27:01.020
<v S1>Oh.

0:27:01.470 --> 0:27:02.580
<v S1>The best.

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:03.990
<v S2>Or most profitable.

0:27:03.990 --> 0:27:06.480
<v S1>I reckon. Probably one of our ones I've got the

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:09.449
<v S1>most enjoyment out of probably has been things like the

0:27:09.450 --> 0:27:13.020
<v S1>grid soil testing coupled with our moisture probes. I think

0:27:13.020 --> 0:27:16.320
<v S1>the moisture probes have been really insightful to show where

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:18.240
<v S1>the actual moisture is in the soil throughout the season,

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:20.820
<v S1>and then trying to actually do essentially a yield profit

0:27:20.820 --> 0:27:23.760
<v S1>model every month and refining that and trying to get

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:26.400
<v S1>as close as possible to our end goal. So where

0:27:26.460 --> 0:27:27.960
<v S1>my old job was at the refinery. We did a

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:30.030
<v S1>lot of spreadsheeting work. So it's really cool to look

0:27:30.030 --> 0:27:32.320
<v S1>into that and then trying to get a I guess

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:33.969
<v S1>what I'm trying to say is we spend a lot

0:27:33.970 --> 0:27:38.020
<v S1>of time guessing about how things are so variable rates are a fantastic example,

0:27:38.020 --> 0:27:40.300
<v S1>variable rate. All the machines can do variable rate. Now

0:27:40.300 --> 0:27:42.280
<v S1>the question is not can you do variable rate? It's

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:43.780
<v S1>what number do I put in there.

0:27:43.780 --> 0:27:45.280
<v S2>How much do you want to put on.

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:47.260
<v S1>Yeah exactly. It's like what do I put in there.

0:27:47.260 --> 0:27:49.239
<v S1>What number. And so it's all well and good for

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:50.830
<v S1>someone to give you a variable rate map. But the

0:27:50.830 --> 0:27:51.940
<v S1>first thing they're going to say is how much do

0:27:51.940 --> 0:27:53.620
<v S1>you want to apply. And you're like, well, that's the

0:27:53.650 --> 0:27:56.120
<v S1>that's the hard part. The easy part is doing the map.

0:27:56.150 --> 0:27:58.670
<v S1>So the question then is how can I get more

0:27:58.670 --> 0:28:00.800
<v S1>of those guesses to be more accurate? And so things

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.230
<v S1>like the soil probes that are telling you how much

0:28:03.230 --> 0:28:05.210
<v S1>moisture is in the soil, and the weather stations recording

0:28:05.210 --> 0:28:08.120
<v S1>the rainfall in that particular field or that zone, is

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.879
<v S1>giving you a way more accurate estimate of how much

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:13.820
<v S1>fertilizer to put out. And it'll be variable between the

0:28:13.820 --> 0:28:17.000
<v S1>neighbor's paddocks, like paddocks next to each other. Just by

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:18.980
<v S1>history is going to be different in that and you

0:28:18.980 --> 0:28:22.190
<v S1>end up with this very different characterization in your application.

0:28:22.190 --> 0:28:24.440
<v S2>So you would put on what Yield prophet puts on.

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.260
<v S1>I would. Yeah. Or more. But like it's the key

0:28:27.260 --> 0:28:29.179
<v S1>thing is, is, is to try and get rid of

0:28:29.180 --> 0:28:31.400
<v S1>those guesses in the game. I think I just don't

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:34.010
<v S1>like those guesses because it's not scientific. It's what BCG

0:28:34.010 --> 0:28:37.610
<v S1>is all about, right? Research driven solutions and a lot

0:28:37.609 --> 0:28:40.250
<v S1>of it is just gut feel. And that shouldn't be.

0:28:40.250 --> 0:28:41.660
<v S1>We should be able to get some of those out.

0:28:41.660 --> 0:28:45.140
<v S1>So you're always tweaking and tuning to try and clean

0:28:45.140 --> 0:28:47.750
<v S1>those out. And it's an 80 - 20 rule. You're always

0:28:47.750 --> 0:28:49.400
<v S1>going to get the low hanging fruit, you're going to

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:52.700
<v S1>pick the easiest one to simplify weather station soil probe

0:28:52.700 --> 0:28:55.100
<v S1>first step. The next one is how do I accurately

0:28:55.100 --> 0:28:58.100
<v S1>model wheat growing in the Wimmera, you know, with this

0:28:58.100 --> 0:29:00.590
<v S1>particular variety. But if it gets me 80% of the

0:29:00.590 --> 0:29:02.959
<v S1>way there, that's okay. The next step will be the

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.180
<v S1>next step. And I'll take the next lowest hanging fruit

0:29:05.180 --> 0:29:05.960
<v S1>after that.

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.300
<v S2>I love that 8020 approach. It's so clever.

0:29:08.300 --> 0:29:10.370
<v S1>Yeah it is. It gives 20% error. It's great.

0:29:10.370 --> 0:29:13.250
<v S2>Which means yeah, it helps the head doesn't it. So

0:29:13.250 --> 0:29:15.890
<v S2>what are you doing? What's the next thing.

0:29:15.890 --> 0:29:18.170
<v S1>I would really like? I've been hassling everybody about these

0:29:18.170 --> 0:29:21.500
<v S1>profitability maps. I think profitability maps that could actually tell

0:29:21.500 --> 0:29:25.430
<v S1>me where each hectare is performing versus full potential, and

0:29:25.430 --> 0:29:28.520
<v S1>then using that to actually come up with more automated solutions.

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:30.380
<v S1>So at the moment, like we talked with variable rate,

0:29:30.380 --> 0:29:33.970
<v S1>we're doing a lot of crunching on zones. How could

0:29:33.970 --> 0:29:36.820
<v S1>I make that automatic. How can I make the all

0:29:36.820 --> 0:29:39.790
<v S1>these data layers we've been collecting every year off our

0:29:39.790 --> 0:29:42.940
<v S1>harvester and our seeder and our sprayer and our spreader?

0:29:42.940 --> 0:29:45.310
<v S1>How can on our grid sampling, how can I make

0:29:45.310 --> 0:29:48.070
<v S1>the computer interpret a lot more of that data rather

0:29:48.070 --> 0:29:51.370
<v S1>than me sitting there comparing maps? Can I just have

0:29:51.370 --> 0:29:54.730
<v S1>a Siri to say Siri? Why is the left side

0:29:54.730 --> 0:29:56.740
<v S1>of the paddock higher than the right side? And it'll

0:29:56.740 --> 0:29:58.860
<v S1>go well. Back three years ago you actually did a

0:29:58.860 --> 0:30:01.890
<v S1>lime application there and that could be related. It matches

0:30:01.890 --> 0:30:04.230
<v S1>perfectly and you go, oh, okay. But at the moment

0:30:04.230 --> 0:30:06.810
<v S1>it's like there's too many data layers, too many satellite

0:30:06.810 --> 0:30:09.840
<v S1>images for you to protest h umanly, it needs a like

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:11.820
<v S1>a virtual assistant. So I'd love to see it get

0:30:11.820 --> 0:30:14.580
<v S1>to the point where we have a virtual assistant narrowing

0:30:14.580 --> 0:30:19.230
<v S1>our viewpoint. So we're we're managers, we're not technicians. So

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:21.760
<v S1>farmers are managers. We should be making decisions about the

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:23.709
<v S1>top five things every day. And it'd be great to

0:30:23.710 --> 0:30:25.780
<v S1>have an assistant that sort of collated that end user

0:30:25.780 --> 0:30:28.660
<v S1>data and not just feel really. So that's where it

0:30:28.660 --> 0:30:30.940
<v S1>wants to be. And that'll come in with that profitability

0:30:30.940 --> 0:30:33.070
<v S1>map too, because that'll come down to you'll be using

0:30:33.070 --> 0:30:35.770
<v S1>that as your first layer. Is that piece as profitable

0:30:35.770 --> 0:30:36.550
<v S1>as it could be?

0:30:36.550 --> 0:30:39.729
<v S2>That is an excellent point about the the AI or

0:30:39.730 --> 0:30:43.060
<v S2>the virtual assistants for the farmer, because my big question

0:30:43.060 --> 0:30:46.300
<v S2>I've written down here is how much time do you

0:30:46.300 --> 0:30:49.360
<v S2>allocate to researching new technology?

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:50.650
<v S1>I think it's one of those things you can do

0:30:50.650 --> 0:30:52.450
<v S1>on the job, though, when you're spraying and you have

0:30:52.450 --> 0:30:55.750
<v S1>an inspiration and you're running along beautifully and everything's going okay,

0:30:55.750 --> 0:30:59.080
<v S1>then you. No trees, no power poles, then you you

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:00.700
<v S1>have time to look these things up and ponder them.

0:31:00.700 --> 0:31:03.430
<v S1>So farmers I think by getting freed up with the technology,

0:31:03.430 --> 0:31:05.230
<v S1>also gives them more time to think about these things.

0:31:05.230 --> 0:31:09.040
<v S1>And of course also to you're following friends. You're going

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:11.530
<v S1>to expos those sort of things and look for opportunities

0:31:11.530 --> 0:31:13.660
<v S1>for seeing these new things, because you don't know what

0:31:13.660 --> 0:31:15.700
<v S1>you don't know. So there could be a new tool

0:31:15.700 --> 0:31:18.280
<v S1>out there, but your algorithm is not necessarily going to

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:20.410
<v S1>send you to the right technology if you've never looked

0:31:20.410 --> 0:31:23.410
<v S1>for it before. So going to a field day and

0:31:23.410 --> 0:31:25.570
<v S1>listening to a speaker talk about a new technique or

0:31:25.570 --> 0:31:28.300
<v S1>a new technology is always very insightful. And then you

0:31:28.300 --> 0:31:30.490
<v S1>go back and research it, but you don't really spend

0:31:30.490 --> 0:31:33.040
<v S1>that much time looking up those sort of things. Not

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:35.520
<v S1>until you're really getting close to I want to buy it.

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:37.830
<v S1>I think it's something that's really good fit to me.

0:31:37.830 --> 0:31:40.740
<v S1>It's more about keeping abreast of everything and then banking

0:31:40.740 --> 0:31:42.900
<v S1>it in your brain. And then when you encounter a problem,

0:31:42.900 --> 0:31:46.230
<v S1>you go, ah, that thing I saw four weeks ago

0:31:46.230 --> 0:31:48.000
<v S1>could be handy. What was that called again? And you

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:50.790
<v S1>go looking for it, then maybe that's something we could do.

0:31:50.820 --> 0:31:54.930
<v S2>That makes sense too. So Tim, in terms of technology,

0:31:54.930 --> 0:31:56.880
<v S2>we've had a bit of feedback that there's just so

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:59.630
<v S2>many providers, there's so much information and it can be

0:31:59.630 --> 0:32:02.540
<v S2>really hard for farmers to know who to use, what

0:32:02.540 --> 0:32:04.550
<v S2>technology to use, which one is going to be best.

0:32:04.550 --> 0:32:05.750
<v S2>What would you say to them?

0:32:05.750 --> 0:32:08.090
<v S1>I think there's two ways about that. One is one

0:32:08.090 --> 0:32:10.580
<v S1>is what are other people using. So our classic I

0:32:10.580 --> 0:32:12.740
<v S1>was talking to Jess about Google, you know before Google

0:32:12.740 --> 0:32:14.900
<v S1>there was heaps of search engines. And then when Google

0:32:14.900 --> 0:32:17.450
<v S1>took over it was superior and everybody just jumped on.

0:32:17.450 --> 0:32:19.880
<v S1>And now pretty much everybody does a Google search. Now

0:32:19.910 --> 0:32:23.430
<v S1>whoever's the biggest is often the best for support and

0:32:23.430 --> 0:32:26.910
<v S1>experience from other farmers, which is really good. So look

0:32:26.910 --> 0:32:29.100
<v S1>what other people have been using and using success. And

0:32:29.100 --> 0:32:30.750
<v S1>you can ask a few of them, you know, how

0:32:30.750 --> 0:32:32.580
<v S1>is that performing for you? What don't you like about it?

0:32:32.610 --> 0:32:34.350
<v S1>What do you like about it? And then the other

0:32:34.350 --> 0:32:37.350
<v S1>thing is, is the person that's actually selling the product

0:32:37.350 --> 0:32:39.510
<v S1>is what sort of support are they giving? How good

0:32:39.510 --> 0:32:41.520
<v S1>are they at understanding their product? Are they just a

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:44.700
<v S1>sales person? Are they a technician? Are they really there?

0:32:44.700 --> 0:32:47.520
<v S1>If you form a good relationship with the retailer, that's

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:50.400
<v S1>a really good start. But then also use farmer friends

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:53.430
<v S1>that have used it before to learn from. And things

0:32:53.430 --> 0:32:55.440
<v S1>like WhatsApp groups have been a classic. We've been using

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:58.020
<v S1>WhatsApp groups for different technologies just so that we can

0:32:58.020 --> 0:33:00.330
<v S1>communicate problems we've had, and whether somebody else has seen

0:33:00.330 --> 0:33:03.000
<v S1>this before, and then the provider is all like, oh yeah, well,

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:05.340
<v S1>this is obviously happened twice. I should something we should fix.

0:33:05.340 --> 0:33:06.990
<v S1>You know, it's a really good thing for them to.

0:33:06.990 --> 0:33:10.410
<v S2>Okay. And in terms of obviously youre, youre no till

0:33:10.410 --> 0:33:12.490
<v S2>you're using your disc seeder and that sort of thing,

0:33:12.490 --> 0:33:14.770
<v S2>we've had some pretty good years. We're really lucky here

0:33:14.770 --> 0:33:16.180
<v S2>to have had some pretty good years. So there's been

0:33:16.180 --> 0:33:19.090
<v S2>a lot of stubble around. And I mean, we sowed

0:33:19.090 --> 0:33:21.040
<v S2>a paddock on the weekend and it had a heap

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:23.140
<v S2>of stubble on it and it was just amazing the

0:33:23.140 --> 0:33:25.420
<v S2>moisture in that paddock. Yeah it was. We were pretty

0:33:25.420 --> 0:33:28.180
<v S2>happy about it. But it's tricky, isn't it, because sometimes

0:33:28.180 --> 0:33:30.160
<v S2>you come up with a problem and you're thinking, oh,

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:31.630
<v S2>how am I going to, how am I going to

0:33:31.630 --> 0:33:34.330
<v S2>get through this? But it's the technology that's got us

0:33:34.330 --> 0:33:36.670
<v S2>there to get the more stubble. What would you.

0:33:36.670 --> 0:33:39.400
<v S1>Say? I think it can be really frustrating, and it

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:41.710
<v S1>can always be easy to fall back on what you know,

0:33:41.710 --> 0:33:43.630
<v S1>and that can be something that's like 30 years ago

0:33:43.630 --> 0:33:45.130
<v S1>and let's go and burn it and dig it up,

0:33:45.130 --> 0:33:47.410
<v S1>and that'll solve my problem. But then I think the

0:33:47.410 --> 0:33:50.890
<v S1>real challenge is can you save that gain? You've stepped

0:33:50.890 --> 0:33:53.110
<v S1>up that ladder, you've gone from the ground level, you've

0:33:53.110 --> 0:33:55.690
<v S1>stepped up, you've got that stubble retained. You've kept that moisture.

0:33:55.690 --> 0:33:59.260
<v S1>It's fantastic. Can I somehow go up the ladder then,

0:33:59.260 --> 0:34:01.209
<v S1>rather than stepping back down to the bottom again? So

0:34:01.210 --> 0:34:03.580
<v S1>is there a way that a technology could solve that problem?

0:34:03.580 --> 0:34:05.680
<v S1>Is it just a bit of persistence? But this is

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:07.990
<v S1>where you learn and you actually go, when I did this,

0:34:08.020 --> 0:34:10.570
<v S1>it really helped. You'll find that when we did the

0:34:10.690 --> 0:34:12.700
<v S1>seeder trial about, oh, it's about 7 or 8 years

0:34:12.700 --> 0:34:16.000
<v S1>ago now, the one near Birchip here, the best seeder

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.370
<v S1>was the 15 year old Flexicoil. There was some brand

0:34:18.370 --> 0:34:21.640
<v S1>new horsches or some precision seeders, but the best seeder

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:25.160
<v S1>was the 15 year flexicoil because it was his farm

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:26.600
<v S1>and he knew how to use it, and he'd used

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:29.750
<v S1>it 15 times in that field. He knew how to sow,

0:34:29.780 --> 0:34:32.029
<v S1>whereas the new machines you're still learning. You haven't got

0:34:32.030 --> 0:34:34.760
<v S1>the full benefit out of it yet. So you don't

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:37.220
<v S1>abandon the brand new horsche and go to the 15

0:34:37.219 --> 0:34:39.020
<v S1>year old Flexicoil you go, well, I'm going to get

0:34:39.020 --> 0:34:41.450
<v S1>this horsche to work in my system and you've got

0:34:41.450 --> 0:34:44.720
<v S1>to keep stepping up. So take that challenge nut it out.

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:47.120
<v S1>Really a bit of persistence, a bit of support from

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:49.340
<v S1>someone else to get some ideas on how to fix

0:34:49.340 --> 0:34:52.189
<v S1>that discs in wet conditions. What are other people doing

0:34:52.190 --> 0:34:55.040
<v S1>to get through those wet conditions? How do they do that?

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:58.520
<v S1>Can I keep climbing that ladder rather than starting back

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:00.500
<v S1>from scratch? Because as we climb that ladder, we're getting

0:35:00.500 --> 0:35:04.760
<v S1>our yields are improving. We're getting way better soil health.

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:07.100
<v S1>It's better for our bottom line. We're getting way more

0:35:07.100 --> 0:35:08.210
<v S1>sustainable farms.

0:35:08.210 --> 0:35:10.580
<v S2>Because it makes I can I keep coming back to

0:35:10.580 --> 0:35:12.580
<v S2>rock climbing. I've been doing a tiny bit of rock

0:35:12.580 --> 0:35:15.640
<v S2>climbing and it looks like it too. Yeah, and you

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:19.420
<v S2>want to go? You don't want to. It's hard going up.

0:35:19.450 --> 0:35:21.219
<v S2>You want to come back down. You want to be

0:35:21.219 --> 0:35:23.319
<v S2>in your comfort zone again, which is what you're talking

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:26.469
<v S2>about with staying with the flexicoil or or perhaps burning.

0:35:26.469 --> 0:35:29.410
<v S2>But you've it's hard to climb up and it's going

0:35:29.410 --> 0:35:30.850
<v S2>to be a challenge. But you know, when you get

0:35:30.850 --> 0:35:32.380
<v S2>to the top, it's going to be awesome.

0:35:32.380 --> 0:35:35.080
<v S1>Absolutely. That's the goal is you always want to improve.

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:38.260
<v S1>Everybody wants to improve their farms. Otherwise they wouldn't be farmers. Um,

0:35:38.260 --> 0:35:41.230
<v S1>they're custodians of the land. They're managing it. They want

0:35:41.230 --> 0:35:43.480
<v S1>to do the best they possibly can. And sometimes you

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:45.069
<v S1>have to do things like dig up a paddock or

0:35:45.070 --> 0:35:47.350
<v S1>burn it every now and again. But you really do

0:35:47.350 --> 0:35:49.270
<v S1>want to keep moving forwards.

0:35:49.270 --> 0:35:51.160
<v S2>Even though, because I'm thinking you don't want to be

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:54.340
<v S2>moving forward with something that's not working, but using coming

0:35:54.340 --> 0:35:58.450
<v S2>back to your principles, coming back to your problem solving approach.

0:35:58.450 --> 0:36:01.350
<v S2>So have you ever pulled the pin on something?

0:36:01.380 --> 0:36:04.799
<v S1>Uh, yeah. We've, um, classic is, um, vetch and lentils, right?

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:08.310
<v S1>Vetch and lentils. They are almost cousins in, uh, variety,

0:36:08.310 --> 0:36:10.920
<v S1>so there's very little chemistry to separate them. One of

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:13.200
<v S1>the solutions we initially ran with was a shielded sprayer.

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:15.690
<v S1>So we had a shielded sprayer to spray between the

0:36:15.690 --> 0:36:18.750
<v S1>rows and spray the vetch out, which will get you

0:36:18.750 --> 0:36:23.010
<v S1>probably 80% of the vetch. That was okay, except it's

0:36:23.010 --> 0:36:26.650
<v S1>quite a scary job because you're spraying knock down chemicals

0:36:26.650 --> 0:36:29.890
<v S1>in crop, and if you don't go on the vetch,

0:36:29.890 --> 0:36:32.170
<v S1>you kill the lentils, which is not good. But the

0:36:32.170 --> 0:36:35.740
<v S1>other alternatives are, um, Clearfield lentils, which we do. So

0:36:35.739 --> 0:36:37.989
<v S1>chemistry that allows us to try and kill the vetch.

0:36:37.989 --> 0:36:40.930
<v S1>But it sort of probably only 80% effective. But then

0:36:40.930 --> 0:36:43.210
<v S1>now they've introduced these green on green camera spraying, and

0:36:43.210 --> 0:36:47.680
<v S1>they've invented a algorithm that identifies purple flowers. And so

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:50.770
<v S1>when we change to the bigger seeder the shielded sprayer was

0:36:50.770 --> 0:36:53.259
<v S1>too narrow to match the big seeder. So we got

0:36:53.260 --> 0:36:55.870
<v S1>rid of it. And we've essentially going to rely on

0:36:55.870 --> 0:36:59.439
<v S1>the Clearfield chemistry and the camera spraying to hopefully control

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.020
<v S1>the vetch in the lentils for now. So it's a

0:37:02.020 --> 0:37:04.660
<v S1>slow evolution. We tried it. It kind of worked good.

0:37:04.660 --> 0:37:06.580
<v S1>We did get some additional benefits. We used it in

0:37:06.580 --> 0:37:08.859
<v S1>oats to clean the rows between the oats of, but

0:37:08.860 --> 0:37:10.660
<v S1>then it didn't fit and come to its end of

0:37:10.660 --> 0:37:12.370
<v S1>its life. And we moved on and gone to a

0:37:12.370 --> 0:37:13.140
<v S1>new solution.

0:37:13.140 --> 0:37:14.640
<v S2>And I can hear that it's sort of coming back

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:17.760
<v S2>to a how many of those principles does it align with?

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:21.030
<v S1>That's right, that's right. It was a frustrating, scary job. Um,

0:37:21.030 --> 0:37:23.520
<v S1>but it was a really cool machine, like very clever.

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:25.950
<v S1>And I think if I'd be tempted to get it again,

0:37:25.950 --> 0:37:27.690
<v S1>I mean, if you think about weed smart and the

0:37:27.690 --> 0:37:29.970
<v S1>big six, you know, how many different ways can you

0:37:29.969 --> 0:37:33.120
<v S1>kill weeds? It's a really good way of introducing a

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:36.270
<v S1>different attack on that weed and reduce that seed bank.

0:37:36.270 --> 0:37:39.170
<v S1>So it's probably worthwhile having as a tool in the shelf,

0:37:39.170 --> 0:37:41.630
<v S1>but it's obviously more money sitting in the shed that

0:37:41.630 --> 0:37:43.069
<v S1>you don't use that often.

0:37:43.100 --> 0:37:47.090
<v S2>Last question, Tim, what is the best advice you've been given?

0:37:47.090 --> 0:37:48.830
<v S2>This is just one I like to throw in there.

0:37:48.980 --> 0:37:53.450
<v S1>I think sometimes we dilly dally on our decision making

0:37:53.450 --> 0:37:56.420
<v S1>and we agonize over it. And it might take you

0:37:56.450 --> 0:37:59.060
<v S1>five years to get your back garden done, for instance.

0:37:59.060 --> 0:37:59.600
<v S2>That's me.

0:37:59.930 --> 0:38:01.900
<v S1>But if you just had it done the first year,

0:38:01.900 --> 0:38:03.549
<v S1>you would have had five years of benefit out of it.

0:38:03.550 --> 0:38:07.090
<v S1>So I think sometimes, uh, you probably should just say

0:38:07.090 --> 0:38:08.650
<v S1>it's 80 over 20. We just got to do it.

0:38:08.650 --> 0:38:10.810
<v S1>We got to take a punt, take a risk. We

0:38:10.810 --> 0:38:13.240
<v S1>think it's going to work back yourself to solve it.

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:16.060
<v S1>You've got good support and try it and get start

0:38:16.060 --> 0:38:18.669
<v S1>reaping the benefits rather than waiting for this perfect solution

0:38:18.670 --> 0:38:20.589
<v S1>to come down the track. In the end, it may

0:38:20.590 --> 0:38:21.370
<v S1>never turn up.

0:38:21.700 --> 0:38:23.350
<v S2>So take action. Make a decision.

0:38:23.350 --> 0:38:24.850
<v S1>Take action. Make a decision.