WEBVTT - Hour 1:   The Battle Lines Are Drawn

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.800
<v S1>Hi friend, thank you so much for downloading this podcast

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:06.920
<v S1>and I truly hope you hear something that edifies encourage, equips, enlightens,

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:09.520
<v S1>and then gets you out there in the marketplace of ideas.

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:11.440
<v S1>But before you go, I want to tell you about

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:14.680
<v S1>this month's truth tool. It's called Have You Ever Wondered?

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:17.720
<v S1>And I absolutely love this topic because if you're like me,

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:19.600
<v S1>going out into the night sky and looking up and

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.439
<v S1>seeing a million stars, don't you just stop and think

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:24.560
<v S1>about God? And are you not in a moment of

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:27.960
<v S1>awe and wonder or looking out over the vast expanse

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.600
<v S1>of an ocean and you start thinking, what is man,

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:32.800
<v S1>that thou art mindful of him? And it makes you

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:36.240
<v S1>wonder about the magnificence of God? I think that sense

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.480
<v S1>of wonder was put there on purpose, and this wonderful

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.720
<v S1>book includes a composite of multiple authors who have written

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.879
<v S1>from their perspective as a scientist, or a historian, or

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.160
<v S1>a mathematician or an artist, on why they all have

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:51.599
<v S1>this sense of awe through the work that they do.

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.120
<v S1>In other words, the heavens declare the glory. And as

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.440
<v S1>it tells us in Romans, we are really without excuse

0:00:56.440 --> 0:01:00.150
<v S1>because his handiwork is everywhere. And this book invites you

0:01:00.150 --> 0:01:03.550
<v S1>to walk through the chapters written by people who all

0:01:03.550 --> 0:01:06.310
<v S1>have a sense of awe and wonder when it comes

0:01:06.310 --> 0:01:09.110
<v S1>to God through their various disciplines in life. It's an

0:01:09.110 --> 0:01:11.430
<v S1>amazing book and it's yours. For a gift of any amount,

0:01:11.430 --> 0:01:16.270
<v S1>just call 877 Janet 58. That's 877 Janet 58. Ask

0:01:16.270 --> 0:01:19.150
<v S1>for a copy of Have You Ever Wondered? And we'll

0:01:19.150 --> 0:01:20.390
<v S1>send it right off to you as my way of

0:01:20.390 --> 0:01:22.950
<v S1>saying thank you, because we are listener supported radio. Or

0:01:22.950 --> 0:01:25.350
<v S1>you can go online to in the market with Janet Parshall.

0:01:26.550 --> 0:01:29.389
<v S1>When you're also on the website, consider becoming a partial partner.

0:01:29.390 --> 0:01:31.630
<v S1>Those are people who give every single month at a

0:01:31.630 --> 0:01:34.110
<v S1>level of their own choosing. You always get the truth tool,

0:01:34.150 --> 0:01:36.270
<v S1>but in addition to that, you get a weekly newsletter

0:01:36.270 --> 0:01:39.069
<v S1>that includes my writing and an audio piece just for

0:01:39.069 --> 0:01:43.230
<v S1>my partial partner. So 877 Janet 58 or the website

0:01:43.230 --> 0:01:46.830
<v S1>in the market with Janet parshall.org consider becoming a partial

0:01:46.830 --> 0:01:49.790
<v S1>partner or asking for this month's truth tool. Have you

0:01:49.790 --> 0:01:53.110
<v S1>ever wondered? And now please enjoy the broadcast.

0:01:58.300 --> 0:02:01.100
<v S2>Welcome to In the Market with Janet Parshall. Today's program

0:02:01.100 --> 0:02:03.500
<v S2>is where Janet and her husband, Craig, take some of

0:02:03.500 --> 0:02:06.660
<v S2>the stories making headlines this week and offer their insight

0:02:06.660 --> 0:02:09.540
<v S2>and analysis. Before they get started, let's take a quick

0:02:09.540 --> 0:02:11.740
<v S2>look back at some of the highlights from the week.

0:02:17.220 --> 0:02:21.340
<v S3>I is an extremely powerful thing and has enormous capacity

0:02:21.380 --> 0:02:25.780
<v S3>for both good and evil. But every bit of thought

0:02:25.780 --> 0:02:31.340
<v S3>in AI is human thought, and AI leverages leverages our thoughts.

0:02:31.340 --> 0:02:33.900
<v S3>I think in some ways that we don't fully understand yet.

0:02:33.940 --> 0:02:36.940
<v S3>I mean, it's a very complex matter, but everything in

0:02:36.980 --> 0:02:40.579
<v S3>there is us. The computer is just is just the instrument.

0:02:40.580 --> 0:02:43.900
<v S3>It's the tool. We must not let our lives be

0:02:43.900 --> 0:02:47.900
<v S3>governed by this idea that since God is God and he's.

0:02:47.940 --> 0:02:51.460
<v S3>He is, uh, good and gracious and generous. He's going

0:02:51.500 --> 0:02:53.139
<v S3>to do for me whatever he wants to do, whether

0:02:53.139 --> 0:02:56.299
<v S3>or not I ask. And I just think the answer

0:02:56.300 --> 0:02:59.740
<v S3>to that is no, he isn't. He has suspended the

0:02:59.780 --> 0:03:03.540
<v S3>bestowal of his blessings on the petitions and the intercession

0:03:03.540 --> 0:03:06.380
<v S3>of his people. So I know that's hard for people

0:03:06.380 --> 0:03:08.700
<v S3>to reconcile, but there's no way to get around the

0:03:08.700 --> 0:03:10.620
<v S3>clear teaching of Scripture in that regard.

0:03:10.940 --> 0:03:13.019
<v S4>We never think to pray for the people with talent

0:03:13.020 --> 0:03:15.339
<v S4>who don't know the Lord. And so I want to

0:03:15.340 --> 0:03:18.900
<v S4>highlight the names of people who really are incredible talents

0:03:18.940 --> 0:03:22.540
<v S4>given from God, and ask us to lift them up

0:03:22.540 --> 0:03:25.820
<v S4>and to let God work through them personally, not just

0:03:25.820 --> 0:03:28.180
<v S4>with their talent. And so I like to do it

0:03:28.180 --> 0:03:31.860
<v S4>with people with names of people who really are household

0:03:31.900 --> 0:03:34.300
<v S4>to a lot of us. And so this is the

0:03:34.300 --> 0:03:36.020
<v S4>way I don't want to say on here, they need

0:03:36.020 --> 0:03:38.820
<v S4>Jesus or they're lost or they're bad. I want to say,

0:03:38.820 --> 0:03:41.180
<v S4>let's appreciate their talent. We know it's from God, and

0:03:41.180 --> 0:03:43.660
<v S4>let's lift them up so the Lord can do more

0:03:43.660 --> 0:03:44.300
<v S4>with them.

0:03:44.980 --> 0:03:47.780
<v S5>Anybody claiming the Bible doesn't have a sexual ethic has

0:03:47.780 --> 0:03:52.940
<v S5>either not read the Bible or is reading the Bible, um, with, with, uh,

0:03:52.940 --> 0:03:56.930
<v S5>blindfold Because virtually every book in the New Testament, not

0:03:56.930 --> 0:04:00.130
<v S5>to mention most of the Old Testament books, mentions and

0:04:00.130 --> 0:04:03.130
<v S5>condemns sexual sin that right away tells you there is

0:04:03.130 --> 0:04:06.530
<v S5>such a thing as sexual behavior that is not God's will.

0:04:06.770 --> 0:04:10.410
<v S5>And the only form of sexual expression that's commended in

0:04:10.410 --> 0:04:15.130
<v S5>both testaments is a heterosexual covenant union of marriage between

0:04:15.130 --> 0:04:16.450
<v S5>a man and a woman.

0:04:16.610 --> 0:04:18.890
<v S6>They don't want to be under Hamas. They don't want

0:04:18.890 --> 0:04:21.210
<v S6>to be under the Palestinian Authority. They want to be

0:04:21.210 --> 0:04:24.690
<v S6>under Israel. And so there's going to be a great pushback.

0:04:24.690 --> 0:04:27.010
<v S6>So what are we just going to force these people

0:04:27.010 --> 0:04:29.570
<v S6>to do this and it's going to get worse. We're

0:04:29.570 --> 0:04:32.530
<v S6>going to get worse. It's just going to cause more radicalism.

0:04:32.890 --> 0:04:35.450
<v S6>So who knows what's going to happen. But it's just

0:04:35.490 --> 0:04:39.530
<v S6>Israel again is in the vice grip. They just go

0:04:39.529 --> 0:04:43.810
<v S6>from one crisis to another. And this is a vise grip.

0:04:43.810 --> 0:04:46.130
<v S6>They've got a date. They've got a time. We're forcing

0:04:46.130 --> 0:04:50.010
<v S6>a Palestinian state. And whether you like it or not, well,

0:04:50.010 --> 0:04:53.920
<v S6>what country would undergo Go that and not fight back.

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.120
<v S2>To hear the full interviews from any of those guests,

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.359
<v S2>go to In the Market with Janet Parshall and click

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:04.960
<v S2>on Past Programs. Here's some other stories making headlines this week.

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:09.520
<v S7>US job growth cooled in May amid uncertainty about President

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:13.520
<v S7>Trump's tariffs, according to a closely watched report out Friday

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:14.720
<v S7>from the Labor Department.

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:18.039
<v S8>Immigrant communities across the United States are reacting in shock

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:20.200
<v S8>to the president's sweeping new travel ban.

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:23.400
<v S9>Donald Trump and Chinese leader XI Jinping spent over an

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:27.200
<v S9>hour on the phone Thursday talking trade. The rare leader

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:30.239
<v S9>to leader call came after weeks of tensions over tariffs

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:31.760
<v S9>and critical minerals.

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:35.440
<v S2>Janet and Craig have lots to share, and they'll put

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.960
<v S2>the first story on the table when we return. To

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.599
<v S2>get more information or to download the podcast of any

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.600
<v S2>of the interviews, go to In the Market with Janet Parshall.

0:05:57.830 --> 0:06:00.470
<v S1>So many in our culture today are spiritually curious but

0:06:00.510 --> 0:06:03.830
<v S1>hesitant about religion. That's why I've chosen. Have you ever wondered,

0:06:03.830 --> 0:06:07.390
<v S1>is this month's truth to explore how everyday experiences might

0:06:07.390 --> 0:06:10.590
<v S1>be the signpost pointing to deeper biblical truths? As for

0:06:10.589 --> 0:06:12.750
<v S1>your copy of have you ever wondered when you give

0:06:12.750 --> 0:06:14.790
<v S1>a gift of any amount to in the market, call

0:06:14.790 --> 0:06:19.550
<v S1>877 Janet 58. That's 877 Janet 58 or go to

0:06:19.589 --> 0:06:21.029
<v S1>in the market with Janet Parshall.

0:06:25.670 --> 0:06:31.029
<v S10>This is London. London calling in the home overseas and

0:06:31.029 --> 0:06:36.750
<v S10>European services of the BBC and through United Nations radio Mediterranean.

0:06:37.390 --> 0:06:43.990
<v S10>And this is John Snagge speaking. Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary

0:06:43.990 --> 0:06:48.390
<v S10>Force have just issued communique number one, and in a

0:06:48.390 --> 0:06:52.630
<v S10>few seconds I. I will read it to you. Communique

0:06:52.670 --> 0:06:58.470
<v S10>number one, under the command of General Eisenhower, Allied naval forces,

0:06:58.710 --> 0:07:03.670
<v S10>supported by strong air forces, began landing Allied armies this

0:07:03.670 --> 0:07:09.870
<v S10>morning on the northern coast of France. I'll repeat that communique.

0:07:09.990 --> 0:07:15.830
<v S10>Communique number one. Under the command of General Eisenhower, Allied

0:07:15.830 --> 0:07:22.910
<v S10>naval forces, supported by strong air forces, began landing Allied

0:07:22.910 --> 0:07:29.950
<v S10>armies this morning on the northern coast of France. This

0:07:29.950 --> 0:07:34.590
<v S10>ends the reading of Communique Number one from Supreme Headquarters

0:07:34.870 --> 0:07:36.590
<v S10>Allied Expeditionary Force.

0:07:37.950 --> 0:07:42.670
<v S1>And that's what radio sounded like June 6th, 1944. Hello, friends.

0:07:42.670 --> 0:07:44.990
<v S1>Welcome to In the Market with Janet Parshall. Craig partial

0:07:44.990 --> 0:07:46.870
<v S1>is with me. And this is where Craig and I

0:07:46.870 --> 0:07:50.940
<v S1>want to start today because history matters and we need

0:07:50.940 --> 0:07:55.740
<v S1>to understand who we were, particularly when that great, great

0:07:55.740 --> 0:07:58.300
<v S1>group of people who fought in World War Two are

0:07:58.300 --> 0:08:01.860
<v S1>slowly stepping into eternity. Our dads were part of World

0:08:01.860 --> 0:08:06.100
<v S1>War two. My children's grandparents were part of World War two.

0:08:06.140 --> 0:08:09.020
<v S1>And with each succeeding generation, we are one tick away

0:08:09.260 --> 0:08:11.340
<v S1>from trying to understand how in the world do you

0:08:11.340 --> 0:08:14.100
<v S1>press on, persevere, and hang on to hope when the

0:08:14.100 --> 0:08:17.380
<v S1>entire world is on fire. So D-Day was in fact

0:08:17.380 --> 0:08:20.740
<v S1>the name given on the June 6th, 1944 date. It

0:08:20.740 --> 0:08:22.860
<v S1>was the invasion of the beaches at Normandy. There were

0:08:22.860 --> 0:08:27.059
<v S1>actually five beaches on that northern coast of France. U.S. troops,

0:08:27.060 --> 0:08:30.220
<v S1>Canadian troops, UK troops and others during World War II.

0:08:30.260 --> 0:08:33.420
<v S1>What you just heard was the BBC covering Great Britain.

0:08:33.420 --> 0:08:36.020
<v S1>You can imagine how they were glued to their radios

0:08:36.020 --> 0:08:39.620
<v S1>hearing about this assault that was taking place. Remember, it's

0:08:39.620 --> 0:08:42.020
<v S1>not that far from the southern part of the UK

0:08:42.020 --> 0:08:44.339
<v S1>to the northern coast of France. You can actually drive

0:08:44.380 --> 0:08:48.370
<v S1>a tunnel underneath the ocean between those two countries. Now, France,

0:08:48.370 --> 0:08:50.490
<v S1>at the time, you will recall, was occupied by the

0:08:50.490 --> 0:08:55.330
<v S1>armies of Nazi Germany and the amphibious amphibious assault. It

0:08:55.330 --> 0:08:59.010
<v S1>had a codename. It was called Operation Overlord. Landed some

0:08:59.010 --> 0:09:04.130
<v S1>156,000 Allied soldiers on the beaches of Normandy by the

0:09:04.130 --> 0:09:07.290
<v S1>end of the day. Now, despite their success, some 4000

0:09:07.330 --> 0:09:10.329
<v S1>Allied troops were killed by German soldiers defending the beaches.

0:09:10.650 --> 0:09:14.330
<v S1>And at the time, the D-Day invasion was the largest naval,

0:09:14.330 --> 0:09:17.729
<v S1>air and land operation in history, and within a few days,

0:09:17.730 --> 0:09:25.569
<v S1>about 326,000 troops, more than 50,000 vehicles and some 100,000

0:09:25.610 --> 0:09:29.809
<v S1>tons of equipment had landed. By August of 1944, all

0:09:29.850 --> 0:09:33.170
<v S1>of northern France had been liberated. In the spring of 1945,

0:09:33.210 --> 0:09:36.370
<v S1>the allies had defeated the Germans. Historians often referred to

0:09:36.410 --> 0:09:40.850
<v S1>D-Day as the beginning of the end of World War Two.

0:09:40.890 --> 0:09:43.969
<v S1>It's very important that we remember what happened that day,

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.559
<v S1>but it took courage. The same choice to be brave then,

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:50.680
<v S1>is the same choice to be brave now. General Dwight

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:54.280
<v S1>D Eisenhower was at the time the general for the U.S. forces.

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:56.040
<v S1>He would later go on to become president of the

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.559
<v S1>United States. But you can imagine what it would be

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:01.400
<v S1>like to give the directive, when so many would end

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:05.600
<v S1>up giving all that they had on those beaches of Normandy.

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:07.640
<v S1>Here's a part of what General Eisenhower said.

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:15.240
<v S11>Soldiers, sailors and airmen of the Allied Expeditionary Force, you

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:18.720
<v S11>are about to embark upon the great crusade toward which

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:21.760
<v S11>we have striven these many months. The eyes of the

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:25.439
<v S11>world are upon you. The hopes and prayers of liberty

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:29.800
<v S11>loving people everywhere march with you in company with our

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.560
<v S11>brave allies and brothers in arms. On other fronts, you

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.360
<v S11>will bring about the destruction of the German war machine,

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:40.119
<v S11>the elimination of Nazi tyranny over the oppressed peoples of Europe,

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:44.910
<v S11>and security for ourselves in a free world, your task

0:10:44.910 --> 0:10:48.470
<v S11>will not be an easy one. Your enemy is well trained,

0:10:48.470 --> 0:10:53.070
<v S11>well equipped and battle hardened. He will fight savagely. But

0:10:53.070 --> 0:10:57.110
<v S11>this is the year 1944. Much has happened since the

0:10:57.110 --> 0:11:02.350
<v S11>Nazi triumphs of 1940 41. The United Nations have inflicted

0:11:02.350 --> 0:11:07.070
<v S11>upon the Germans great defeats in open battle. Man to man.

0:11:07.870 --> 0:11:11.470
<v S11>Our air offensive has seriously reduced their strength in the

0:11:11.470 --> 0:11:14.550
<v S11>air and their capacity to wage war on the ground.

0:11:15.270 --> 0:11:19.150
<v S11>Our home fronts have given us an overwhelming superiority in

0:11:19.150 --> 0:11:23.030
<v S11>weapons and munitions of war, and placed at our disposal

0:11:23.070 --> 0:11:27.469
<v S11>great reserves of trained fighting men. The tide has turned.

0:11:27.990 --> 0:11:31.189
<v S11>The free men of the world are marching together to victory.

0:11:32.070 --> 0:11:35.190
<v S11>I have full confidence in your courage, devotion to duty

0:11:35.190 --> 0:11:39.030
<v S11>and skill in battle. We will accept nothing less than

0:11:39.030 --> 0:11:43.470
<v S11>full victory. Three. Good luck, and let us all beseech

0:11:43.470 --> 0:11:47.829
<v S11>the blessing of Almighty God upon this great and noble undertaking.

0:11:48.790 --> 0:11:53.350
<v S1>The roughly 160,000 allied troops who landed in Nazi occupied

0:11:53.350 --> 0:11:59.030
<v S1>France on June 4th. June 6th, 1944. Not only successfully

0:11:59.030 --> 0:12:02.910
<v S1>executed the largest air, land, and sea invasion in history,

0:12:02.910 --> 0:12:05.670
<v S1>and that remains to this day. They did so amid

0:12:05.670 --> 0:12:09.630
<v S1>daunting obstacles, terrible bloodshed and stakes that couldn't have been higher.

0:12:09.870 --> 0:12:13.670
<v S1>Dwight D Eisenhower said, we will accept nothing less than

0:12:13.670 --> 0:12:17.710
<v S1>full victory, and victory in this battle was far from

0:12:17.710 --> 0:12:20.550
<v S1>certain in the first hours of that day. Out of

0:12:20.590 --> 0:12:25.350
<v S1>that day came the saying, all gave some, some gave all.

0:12:25.470 --> 0:12:28.270
<v S1>When Steven Spielberg made his movie Saving Private Ryan, it

0:12:28.270 --> 0:12:31.350
<v S1>opens with 22 minutes of action of the landing on

0:12:31.350 --> 0:12:34.309
<v S1>the beaches. There's not a single word of dialogue spoken.

0:12:34.630 --> 0:12:36.990
<v S1>And history records that there were several World War Two

0:12:37.030 --> 0:12:39.500
<v S1>vets who, in the opening of that film, found it

0:12:39.500 --> 0:12:42.500
<v S1>so realistic they literally had to walk out of the theater.

0:12:42.700 --> 0:12:45.380
<v S1>We cannot forget their sacrifice. It's easy to do that,

0:12:45.380 --> 0:12:49.900
<v S1>particularly with each continuous generation. But Craig, it's imperative that

0:12:49.900 --> 0:12:52.780
<v S1>we remember. I look at America now, and I look

0:12:52.780 --> 0:12:57.059
<v S1>at our animus and our our slothfulness and our licentiousness,

0:12:57.059 --> 0:12:59.380
<v S1>and I think to myself, do we still have that

0:12:59.380 --> 0:13:02.060
<v S1>same character? Do we still have that same courage? Could

0:13:02.059 --> 0:13:04.860
<v S1>you get out of that first boat that hit Omaha

0:13:04.900 --> 0:13:07.179
<v S1>Beach as one of the five beaches as an example,

0:13:07.380 --> 0:13:09.380
<v S1>and you see the bullets the way the Germans were

0:13:09.380 --> 0:13:10.980
<v S1>bunkered up at the top of the hill. So you

0:13:10.980 --> 0:13:13.620
<v S1>talk about, from a military perspective, they had clear aim

0:13:13.620 --> 0:13:16.020
<v S1>right down at those soldiers who hit the beach. And

0:13:16.020 --> 0:13:17.740
<v S1>the footage, by the way, which you can find black

0:13:17.740 --> 0:13:20.500
<v S1>and white, some of it colorized, is horrific because in

0:13:20.500 --> 0:13:23.580
<v S1>very short order, the waters were filled with the bodies

0:13:23.580 --> 0:13:25.860
<v S1>of our troops. Who gave their all your thoughts?

0:13:25.940 --> 0:13:29.500
<v S12>Yeah, we think so much, and rightly so, of the

0:13:29.500 --> 0:13:34.260
<v S12>landing crafts that had to wade in to a storm

0:13:34.260 --> 0:13:38.570
<v S12>of bullets coming their way. But also we had the

0:13:38.570 --> 0:13:42.690
<v S12>Army Air Corps as an example, uh, trying to protect

0:13:42.690 --> 0:13:47.569
<v S12>them and and soften up the Nazi defenses, uh, along

0:13:47.570 --> 0:13:52.650
<v S12>that coast. I read one account, uh, where a gentleman

0:13:52.650 --> 0:13:55.809
<v S12>who is now 106 years old and was at, uh,

0:13:56.690 --> 0:13:59.689
<v S12>as part of the attack on, uh, in the landing

0:13:59.690 --> 0:14:01.810
<v S12>in Normandy, he was with the Air Corps, and he

0:14:01.809 --> 0:14:05.209
<v S12>was a repairman for those pilots and for those airplanes

0:14:05.210 --> 0:14:07.850
<v S12>for the Army Air Corps. He said half of the

0:14:07.850 --> 0:14:13.330
<v S12>pilots in his one company lost their lives on D-Day,

0:14:13.370 --> 0:14:17.089
<v S12>trying to protect those on those landing crafts. So as

0:14:17.130 --> 0:14:22.770
<v S12>of now, we may think, well, was victory uh, shortly after, actually,

0:14:22.770 --> 0:14:26.650
<v S12>it took 11 months after that, before V-E day, victory

0:14:26.650 --> 0:14:31.610
<v S12>in Europe. But every historian of that war recognizes this,

0:14:31.650 --> 0:14:36.479
<v S12>and that is it created the way forward to achieve victory.

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:40.800
<v S12>Had we not done that, had those men and women

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:47.760
<v S12>given their last sacrifice, the most important sacrifice for freedom?

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:53.400
<v S12>In that storm of of defense that the Nazis raised,

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:57.240
<v S12>then it could have been several years. It could have

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:01.680
<v S12>been a non-victory, considering some of the weaponry that Nazi

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.040
<v S12>Germany was experimenting with at the time.

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:05.880
<v S1>And, you know, it was a high risk decision, wasn't it?

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.520
<v S1>Operation Overlord, you find it very interesting that that was

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:10.560
<v S1>the code name that they gave for it. But you

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.960
<v S1>rightfully pointed out that it takes almost a year before

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:17.000
<v S1>you can claim victory. But here's what is so significant

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.920
<v S1>about that day. And it has it tells me. And

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.280
<v S1>Eisenhower was a man of faith, by the way, but

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:23.600
<v S1>tells me that they had to do a lot of

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:25.360
<v S1>soul searching before they knew they were going to send

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.760
<v S1>so many people into harm's way. But by being on

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.920
<v S1>that beach, it established a new major front against the

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.080
<v S1>Germans in the West, and it helped the Soviet forces

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:35.830
<v S1>facing the bulk of German troops in the east. And

0:15:35.830 --> 0:15:38.910
<v S1>that's why, less than a year later, Germany was forced

0:15:38.910 --> 0:15:41.670
<v S1>to surrender. You wonder what would have happened if there

0:15:41.670 --> 0:15:46.190
<v S1>had not been a D-Day, June 6th, 1944. If so

0:15:46.190 --> 0:15:49.430
<v S1>many weren't willing to go into harm's way for the

0:15:49.430 --> 0:15:52.230
<v S1>sake of something greater than themselves. And again, I just

0:15:52.230 --> 0:15:56.310
<v S1>keep asking myself the question today, when we're in a post-truth, post-modern,

0:15:56.310 --> 0:15:59.190
<v S1>post-Christian era, do we still have the same strength of

0:15:59.190 --> 0:16:03.510
<v S1>character if called upon today? Could we still have some

0:16:03.510 --> 0:16:06.430
<v S1>who gave all but some, some who gave all and

0:16:06.430 --> 0:16:07.510
<v S1>all who give some?

0:16:07.550 --> 0:16:12.590
<v S12>Yeah. We also have to remember that there were, uh, climactic, uh,

0:16:12.590 --> 0:16:16.070
<v S12>and I don't mean, uh, dramatic, but I mean the

0:16:16.070 --> 0:16:21.670
<v S12>climate and the weather point in that landing, uh, the,

0:16:21.870 --> 0:16:25.830
<v S12>the planning team behind the invasion and the timing of

0:16:25.830 --> 0:16:30.550
<v S12>it had to take into consideration what the weather factors were, uh,

0:16:30.550 --> 0:16:35.110
<v S12>and it, uh, You knew at some point that it

0:16:35.110 --> 0:16:37.369
<v S12>was going to be between the fifth and the 7th

0:16:37.370 --> 0:16:41.230
<v S12>of June, but that was depending on weather. And, of course,

0:16:41.230 --> 0:16:47.990
<v S12>weather is beyond human control. Yes, but we know in whom, uh, that, uh,

0:16:48.350 --> 0:16:53.510
<v S12>atmospheric and weather condition lies. Uh, we we cannot forget

0:16:53.510 --> 0:16:57.510
<v S12>the providential hand of God and the prayers, even, uh,

0:16:57.630 --> 0:17:02.270
<v S12>and most importantly, from General Eisenhower himself, uh, asking for

0:17:02.270 --> 0:17:08.070
<v S12>God's providential care and support in winning that war against

0:17:08.109 --> 0:17:13.070
<v S12>absolute abject evil. And there's no way to counter to

0:17:13.109 --> 0:17:16.110
<v S12>characterize it other than that it was a battle of

0:17:16.109 --> 0:17:16.870
<v S12>good and evil.

0:17:17.270 --> 0:17:19.910
<v S1>Every Memorial Day weekend, we have a concert that's held

0:17:19.910 --> 0:17:22.270
<v S1>in front of the U.S. Capitol. It's called the Memorial

0:17:22.310 --> 0:17:25.469
<v S1>Day Concert. And every year we honor those who have served.

0:17:25.470 --> 0:17:28.470
<v S1>This year, there were several members who did fight on

0:17:28.510 --> 0:17:32.460
<v S1>that day in 1944, all of them very aged, all

0:17:32.460 --> 0:17:35.139
<v S1>of them very proud, all of them keenly aware of

0:17:35.140 --> 0:17:38.619
<v S1>the sacrifice their brothers made on the beaches at Normandy.

0:17:38.660 --> 0:17:42.379
<v S1>May we never forget and always remember their courage. That's

0:17:42.380 --> 0:17:54.020
<v S1>the legacy they left for us back after this. I

0:17:54.060 --> 0:17:57.100
<v S1>shared yesterday that on today's edition of In the Market

0:17:57.100 --> 0:17:59.460
<v S1>with Janet Parshall, knowing that Craig would be with us

0:17:59.460 --> 0:18:02.780
<v S1>and his background as a constitutional attorney, that we would

0:18:02.780 --> 0:18:05.899
<v S1>break down two significant cases that were handed down by

0:18:05.900 --> 0:18:07.979
<v S1>the U.S. Supreme Court yesterday. There were more than two

0:18:08.020 --> 0:18:10.140
<v S1>that were handed down, but two in particular. We're going

0:18:10.140 --> 0:18:13.700
<v S1>to highlight both of them a 9 to 0 decision. Now,

0:18:13.700 --> 0:18:16.580
<v S1>there are only nine justices that sit at the High Court.

0:18:16.580 --> 0:18:20.260
<v S1>So that's pretty rare. But it also really solidly affirms

0:18:20.260 --> 0:18:23.020
<v S1>the outcome of the particular case, by the way. Let

0:18:23.020 --> 0:18:25.100
<v S1>the record reflect, Your Honor, that this is the merry

0:18:25.100 --> 0:18:28.100
<v S1>month of June and the and the term ends at

0:18:28.100 --> 0:18:30.370
<v S1>the end of the month. We're still waiting for some

0:18:30.369 --> 0:18:34.410
<v S1>very important decisions, including one called Skrmetti, and that could

0:18:34.410 --> 0:18:36.730
<v S1>come down any time. And that will deal with a

0:18:36.730 --> 0:18:41.650
<v S1>whole myriad of issues of free speech, exercise of religion, transgenderism.

0:18:41.650 --> 0:18:43.530
<v S1>So it's going to be one of those hot button ones.

0:18:43.530 --> 0:18:46.090
<v S1>I guess the hotter they are, the later in the

0:18:46.090 --> 0:18:47.690
<v S1>month they get handed down. But you can bet Craig

0:18:47.690 --> 0:18:49.010
<v S1>and I will be on top of that and we'll

0:18:49.010 --> 0:18:51.090
<v S1>share when they come out. But as for now, let

0:18:51.090 --> 0:18:55.290
<v S1>me start first with one. And in a unanimous decision yesterday,

0:18:55.290 --> 0:18:57.690
<v S1>the Supreme Court upheld the claims of a woman who

0:18:57.690 --> 0:19:02.570
<v S1>faced workplace discrimination because of her majority group identity and

0:19:02.570 --> 0:19:04.530
<v S1>in this case, what was her majority group. She was

0:19:04.530 --> 0:19:07.729
<v S1>a heterosexual. So the decision upholds the rights of a

0:19:07.730 --> 0:19:11.370
<v S1>majority group, individuals, to be free from reverse discrimination. I

0:19:11.369 --> 0:19:13.850
<v S1>find that to be a sloppy word anyway. Discrimination is

0:19:13.850 --> 0:19:17.530
<v S1>discrimination when it comes in any way, shape or form. Uh,

0:19:17.530 --> 0:19:20.369
<v S1>but but the part of this that's so significant is

0:19:20.369 --> 0:19:23.570
<v S1>that it was considered about the protection provided us under

0:19:23.570 --> 0:19:26.879
<v S1>title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. For

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:31.600
<v S1>Justice Jackson delivered the opinion. Justice Thomas delivered a concurring

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:35.280
<v S1>opinion and that was joined by Justice Gorsuch as well. So, Craig,

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:37.400
<v S1>give the background on the facts of this case and

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.359
<v S1>why this was significant. And again, you don't have this

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:42.960
<v S1>kind of unanimity that often in Washington. I always jump

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:44.760
<v S1>up and down and wave the flagpole when it happens.

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:46.400
<v S1>So you get a nine zip. That means there must

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:48.200
<v S1>have been some real clarity in the law on this one.

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:49.040
<v S1>Talk to me about it.

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:53.040
<v S12>Yeah. The the person who brought this lawsuit originally, um,

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:57.919
<v S12>in the case called Ames versus Ohio Department of Youth Services, uh,

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.840
<v S12>the plaintiff was Marlene Ames, and she's, as you said,

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.160
<v S12>was a heterosexual woman. Uh, she worked for the Department

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:08.840
<v S12>of Youth Services, uh, for a number of years. In fact, uh,

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:14.520
<v S12>started around 2004. So she had been there until, uh,

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.560
<v S12>the episode that led to the lawsuit, which is 2019.

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:19.720
<v S12>So she was there for 15 years. She was a

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:25.800
<v S12>veteran of that agency, uh, apparently highly qualified. And she

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:29.120
<v S12>applied for a new management position that was open. And

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.200
<v S12>as you know, in government agencies, they they will make

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:37.000
<v S12>public postings of, uh, promotional opportunities. And she applied for that,

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:40.640
<v S12>but she was turned down and she was replaced in

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:44.160
<v S12>that position, which she was qualified for by another candidate

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:48.840
<v S12>who was a lesbian. Um, so, uh, based on some

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:52.000
<v S12>of the fact finding that she and her attorney made, uh,

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:55.960
<v S12>by the way, they subsequently later on, they demoted her

0:20:56.119 --> 0:21:00.800
<v S12>from her role as a program administrator. Um, and later

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.560
<v S12>hired a gay man to fill that role. So, in

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:06.320
<v S12>other words, not only does she not get the promotion,

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:10.440
<v S12>but then she was demoted and replaced in her regular

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.520
<v S12>position that she had been at for some 15 years. Um,

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:18.640
<v S12>by by a gay person. So twice she was discriminated against,

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:23.280
<v S12>according to her lawsuit by, uh, a minority group, which is, uh,

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.510
<v S12>you know, a gay woman and a gay man. Um,

0:21:26.510 --> 0:21:29.389
<v S12>but here's here's the issue. Here's the legal issue. The

0:21:29.390 --> 0:21:32.590
<v S12>legal issue is title VII of the Civil Rights Act

0:21:32.630 --> 0:21:37.389
<v S12>says that if you are discriminated against in employment, and

0:21:37.390 --> 0:21:41.190
<v S12>that's what title VII deals with, is discrimination in employment

0:21:41.470 --> 0:21:48.629
<v S12>based on protected categories such as race or religion or sex.

0:21:49.869 --> 0:21:52.750
<v S12>Then you have a claim and you can bring your

0:21:52.750 --> 0:21:54.590
<v S12>claim if you can prove that in fact, it was

0:21:54.590 --> 0:21:57.510
<v S12>done intentionally and not accidentally or for some other reasons,

0:21:57.510 --> 0:22:01.550
<v S12>like poor performance on the part of the employee. Uh,

0:22:01.550 --> 0:22:04.830
<v S12>but what has happened over the years, because, of course,

0:22:04.830 --> 0:22:07.470
<v S12>1967 was the beginning of the Civil Rights Act and

0:22:07.470 --> 0:22:11.070
<v S12>a lot of lower court decisions trying to interpret, well,

0:22:11.070 --> 0:22:15.310
<v S12>what happens in a reverse discrimination case where, let's say

0:22:15.310 --> 0:22:20.590
<v S12>a majority group, uh, is so-called discriminated against by a

0:22:20.590 --> 0:22:24.540
<v S12>minority group, uh, in who are in charge of that

0:22:24.540 --> 0:22:28.300
<v S12>particular place of employment. So they have this rule. And

0:22:28.300 --> 0:22:31.180
<v S12>the Sixth Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals had followed their

0:22:31.180 --> 0:22:35.379
<v S12>own created rule. It's not in the text that Congress passed.

0:22:35.900 --> 0:22:39.700
<v S12>It's the legal rule generated by the courts, the lower

0:22:39.700 --> 0:22:43.460
<v S12>courts saying this if you're in a majority opinion or

0:22:43.460 --> 0:22:47.980
<v S12>in a majority category, like let's say a heterosexual, um,

0:22:49.500 --> 0:22:52.540
<v S12>then you have a higher burden of proof. You don't

0:22:52.540 --> 0:22:56.420
<v S12>have an equal opportunity for proving your case. You actually

0:22:56.420 --> 0:22:59.379
<v S12>have a higher level of proof. You have to show

0:22:59.420 --> 0:23:03.500
<v S12>additional background information to show why you fit into the

0:23:03.540 --> 0:23:07.020
<v S12>very unusual, in the words of the court category of

0:23:07.020 --> 0:23:10.900
<v S12>reverse discrimination against majority group. Here's what the Supreme Court

0:23:10.900 --> 0:23:15.740
<v S12>all nine justices, regardless of what their jurisprudential philosophy is, left,

0:23:15.740 --> 0:23:18.980
<v S12>middle or right. Every one of them said, wait a minute,

0:23:19.260 --> 0:23:24.369
<v S12>the text. of the law is what should be binding here.

0:23:24.369 --> 0:23:28.290
<v S12>And there's no such test. It says if you're discriminated

0:23:28.290 --> 0:23:32.850
<v S12>against based on sex or religion or race, regardless of

0:23:32.850 --> 0:23:36.210
<v S12>whether you're a majority or minority, it's an it should

0:23:36.210 --> 0:23:39.690
<v S12>be an equal outcome. It should be an equal application

0:23:39.690 --> 0:23:43.370
<v S12>of justice. But the Sixth Circuit said no. Supreme court

0:23:43.369 --> 0:23:47.649
<v S12>said no. Go back and wipe that extra rule off

0:23:47.650 --> 0:23:53.970
<v S12>the books. The the law itself doesn't apply. Any additional proof,

0:23:54.290 --> 0:23:58.090
<v S12>any additional evidentiary, uh, proof that you have to bring

0:23:58.130 --> 0:24:01.810
<v S12>as a majority, uh, rather than a minority. But there's

0:24:01.810 --> 0:24:05.650
<v S12>a bigger implication for this. And it's how much power

0:24:05.650 --> 0:24:08.490
<v S12>do federal judges have to make it up as they

0:24:08.490 --> 0:24:11.889
<v S12>go along in terms of inventing rules that aren't there

0:24:11.890 --> 0:24:14.770
<v S12>in the congressional statute they're supposed to interpret?

0:24:14.810 --> 0:24:17.570
<v S1>Well, to that point, I think there's many layers to

0:24:17.609 --> 0:24:20.000
<v S1>this decision. And I'm so thankful that you talked about

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:22.919
<v S1>the legal perspective. There's a cultural application to this as well.

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:25.200
<v S1>And I do also want to talk about another 9

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:29.080
<v S1>to 0 decision handed down yesterday. This one deals specifically

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:31.719
<v S1>with religious liberty. These are important cases by the way.

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.640
<v S1>And again just let the record reflect it's June. This

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.040
<v S1>is when now all the ones where they've heard oral arguments,

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:39.440
<v S1>almost every one of them will have a written and

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:41.840
<v S1>decision made by the High Court that will be handed

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:43.280
<v S1>out by the end of the term, which is the

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:45.760
<v S1>end of this month. So for the next couple of weeks,

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:47.719
<v S1>it's going to be a legal heyday. We'll keep you

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:56.200
<v S1>posted more after this. Jesus told us to go into

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:57.840
<v S1>the world and not run away from it, and he

0:24:57.840 --> 0:24:59.680
<v S1>didn't say it would be easy. In the market with

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.000
<v S1>Janet Parshall is a program designed to come alongside and

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.920
<v S1>walk with you into the marketplace of ideas. Partial partners

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:06.840
<v S1>are those friends who support our program on a regular

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:09.920
<v S1>monthly basis. They know the mandate of influencing and occupying

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:12.199
<v S1>until he comes. So why don't you become part of

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:16.000
<v S1>the inner circle of support? Call 877 Janet 58 or

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:21.040
<v S1>go to in the market with Janet Parshall. This is

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:23.160
<v S1>in the market with Janet Parshall. Craig partial is with

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:24.879
<v S1>me as he is on Fridays, where we put on

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:26.480
<v S1>the lens of Scripture and take a look at the

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.320
<v S1>world around us. Two important cases handed down by the

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:31.400
<v S1>US Supreme Court yesterday that you and I should know

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:34.320
<v S1>about both of them, 9 to 0. So that's significant

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.160
<v S1>and solid. And the first one dealt with whether or

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.280
<v S1>not there is such a thing as reverse discrimination. And

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:43.080
<v S1>it all involves a woman who was working in Ohio

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.120
<v S1>who not once but twice was passed over for her

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:49.879
<v S1>majority position. She was a heterosexual and given to a

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.920
<v S1>member of the LGBTQ community. So it raises the question about,

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:57.080
<v S1>is there such a thing under that title? Seven protection

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.200
<v S1>of the Civil Rights Act of 64. Is there such

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:02.400
<v S1>a thing as protection from, quote, reverse discrimination? Now, let

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:05.200
<v S1>me repeat myself. I happen to find the words cryptic discrimination,

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:08.239
<v S1>particularly for a believer, is discrimination. It's not reverse. I

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:11.120
<v S1>understand its application in the law, but to me it's

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:15.910
<v S1>it's repeating yourself. Discrimination is discrimination. So the court to nine.

0:26:15.950 --> 0:26:19.310
<v S1>ZIP says, no, absolutely not. And I also take umbrage

0:26:19.310 --> 0:26:22.750
<v S1>with categorizing somebody in a, quote, majority opinion. But here's

0:26:22.750 --> 0:26:24.750
<v S1>something that I thought about, Craig, you started out talking

0:26:24.750 --> 0:26:28.270
<v S1>about the legal application of this decision. I think there's

0:26:28.270 --> 0:26:31.350
<v S1>a cultural application that cannot be ignored. I think this

0:26:31.350 --> 0:26:34.750
<v S1>was a very sharp finger in the eye of die.

0:26:35.109 --> 0:26:38.670
<v S1>When you want to talk about diversity, equity and inclusion,

0:26:38.670 --> 0:26:42.150
<v S1>and you're hiring people based on what their skin color

0:26:42.150 --> 0:26:46.710
<v S1>is or what their sexual orientation is, you are practicing

0:26:46.710 --> 0:26:50.750
<v S1>just by the application of that, a form of reverse discrimination.

0:26:50.750 --> 0:26:54.270
<v S1>So I'm wondering, even if it wasn't addressed directly in

0:26:54.270 --> 0:26:56.510
<v S1>the decision, and we talked about three who wrote on it,

0:26:56.550 --> 0:27:00.470
<v S1>Brown delivers it. Thomas concurs, and Gorsuch writes an opinion

0:27:00.470 --> 0:27:03.190
<v S1>along with the concurrence by Thomas. I'm wondering if that

0:27:03.190 --> 0:27:05.669
<v S1>will take some of the wind out of the application

0:27:05.670 --> 0:27:08.989
<v S1>of die, knowing that because of this ruling, now you

0:27:08.990 --> 0:27:09.909
<v S1>have to be careful.

0:27:09.950 --> 0:27:14.260
<v S12>Yeah, really, if you kind of go to 1000 foot

0:27:14.900 --> 0:27:19.340
<v S12>perspective on this. It really involves the question is the

0:27:19.340 --> 0:27:24.540
<v S12>ground upon which the Constitution is based level ground for everybody,

0:27:24.820 --> 0:27:28.140
<v S12>or are some groups going to get super preference under

0:27:28.140 --> 0:27:30.740
<v S12>the Constitution? Well, the answer should be no. The same

0:27:30.740 --> 0:27:34.180
<v S12>thing with title VII or any act passed by Congress.

0:27:34.180 --> 0:27:39.540
<v S12>Because of course, Congress has to abide by the Constitution

0:27:39.820 --> 0:27:42.260
<v S12>in the laws that they create. Because if it becomes

0:27:42.260 --> 0:27:46.420
<v S12>an unconstitutional statute that Congress passes, the Supreme Court ultimately

0:27:46.420 --> 0:27:48.939
<v S12>will knock it down. They will send it back and say,

0:27:49.220 --> 0:27:54.540
<v S12>start it again. Try another version, because this one's unconstitutional. Likewise,

0:27:54.540 --> 0:28:01.860
<v S12>if title seven, which involves discrimination against, you know, classic

0:28:02.340 --> 0:28:07.900
<v S12>categories of protection like race, sex or religion, uh, if

0:28:07.940 --> 0:28:12.290
<v S12>the if the landscape underneath those principles in that statute

0:28:12.290 --> 0:28:15.890
<v S12>are not even they're not equal, then in fact, we

0:28:15.890 --> 0:28:20.930
<v S12>have unequal application of justice. And that's unconstitutional no matter

0:28:20.930 --> 0:28:24.050
<v S12>which way you look at it. So discrimination, as you said,

0:28:24.050 --> 0:28:28.170
<v S12>is discrimination regardless of whether you're a, quote, majority group,

0:28:28.170 --> 0:28:31.929
<v S12>let's say white employees with three Asians in it, the

0:28:31.930 --> 0:28:34.810
<v S12>Asians are in a minority position in that company. But

0:28:34.850 --> 0:28:38.130
<v S12>as Justice Thomas, in his concurrence, by the way, when

0:28:38.130 --> 0:28:42.650
<v S12>the Supreme Court, um, arrives at a unanimous decision, justices

0:28:42.650 --> 0:28:46.290
<v S12>can still agree with it but have concurring opinions to

0:28:47.250 --> 0:28:48.450
<v S12>add some additional.

0:28:48.490 --> 0:28:48.770
<v S1>Further.

0:28:48.770 --> 0:28:54.210
<v S12>Background and context to other concerns they have that really

0:28:54.210 --> 0:28:58.690
<v S12>gave their vote in favor of the unanimity of the decision.

0:28:58.690 --> 0:29:01.770
<v S12>Justice Thomas made the point of saying, look, how do

0:29:01.770 --> 0:29:05.770
<v S12>you categorize majority in some states in the union, there

0:29:05.810 --> 0:29:09.730
<v S12>are actually numerically slightly more women than men. So are

0:29:09.730 --> 0:29:12.890
<v S12>men a minority? And then if you look at religion,

0:29:13.250 --> 0:29:17.170
<v S12>are you talking majority religions versus minority religions? There are

0:29:17.170 --> 0:29:20.690
<v S12>some communities where other religions are a majority and they're

0:29:20.690 --> 0:29:22.810
<v S12>not Christian. So how do you divide that pie up?

0:29:23.170 --> 0:29:25.770
<v S1>That's a dangerous precedent to start. Let me continue with

0:29:25.770 --> 0:29:28.130
<v S1>Thomas because I thought his observation was brilliant. He wrote,

0:29:28.130 --> 0:29:31.730
<v S1>in his opinion, to highlight the problems that arise when

0:29:31.730 --> 0:29:36.130
<v S1>judges create a textual legal rules and frameworks that becomes

0:29:36.130 --> 0:29:39.090
<v S1>a problem. And he calls the rule, quote, a product

0:29:39.090 --> 0:29:43.330
<v S1>of improper judicial lawmaking. Now, that's tongue in cheek because

0:29:43.370 --> 0:29:46.450
<v S1>judges don't make laws. And what he's saying is the

0:29:46.450 --> 0:29:49.650
<v S1>Sixth Circuit, basically Ex Nihilo, came up with a standard

0:29:49.650 --> 0:29:51.770
<v S1>that doesn't exist. And I found it interesting that, in

0:29:51.770 --> 0:29:55.330
<v S1>her opinion, Justice Brown also said there's nothing in the

0:29:55.330 --> 0:29:57.610
<v S1>text that says that you've got this higher standard that

0:29:57.610 --> 0:29:59.370
<v S1>has to be applied to someone who's in a majority

0:29:59.410 --> 0:30:03.290
<v S1>category as opposed to minority. So I think that's extremely important.

0:30:03.290 --> 0:30:07.010
<v S1>And I think, like I said, with the conversation that's

0:30:07.010 --> 0:30:11.040
<v S1>been going on non-stop in this country about die. This decision,

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:15.000
<v S1>I think, offers a clarity that says you can try,

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:17.720
<v S1>but if you really do hiring and there isn't. For example,

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:20.680
<v S1>under title seven of the 64 Civil Rights Act, you've

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:24.800
<v S1>done a Passover and you have discriminated against. This is

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:25.720
<v S1>going to be the consequence.

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:27.800
<v S12>Yeah. And in a broader sense, you know, I've always

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:30.280
<v S12>taken the position and I still hold to it because

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.520
<v S12>I think there's some truth in it that when courts

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:37.160
<v S12>all the way up to the US Supreme Court release

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:40.760
<v S12>an opinion and they render an opinion in a given case,

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:45.000
<v S12>they do really two things. The most important thing and

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:49.440
<v S12>the constitutional thing in the, uh, the article three of

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:53.120
<v S12>the Constitution thing is that they are acting as judiciary,

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:55.920
<v S12>as a separate branch of government that says what the

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:59.040
<v S12>law is. They don't write the law. They simply interpret

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:02.440
<v S12>what the law is as written. And if Congress intended

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:05.720
<v S12>something else, then the Supreme Court says, you better rewrite it,

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:09.870
<v S12>because we're just going on the text. So the job

0:31:09.870 --> 0:31:13.910
<v S12>of the court is to interpret, not to write. Uh,

0:31:14.310 --> 0:31:16.830
<v S12>and in this case, the Sixth Circuit and a number

0:31:16.830 --> 0:31:21.830
<v S12>of other circuits devised these rules because it made it

0:31:21.830 --> 0:31:25.350
<v S12>easier for them to say, we're doing the right thing

0:31:25.350 --> 0:31:29.590
<v S12>here in a discrimination case, but it's not the judge's rule, uh,

0:31:29.950 --> 0:31:33.030
<v S12>authority to say, what is the better thing to do?

0:31:33.230 --> 0:31:36.270
<v S12>That's for Congress to do. That's why we elect them

0:31:36.270 --> 0:31:40.670
<v S12>to Congress to do the right thing by their constituency. Rather,

0:31:40.670 --> 0:31:45.030
<v S12>the judges simply say title VII doesn't say that. And

0:31:45.030 --> 0:31:48.310
<v S12>if Congress wants to rewrite it and add some additional

0:31:48.350 --> 0:31:51.950
<v S12>burdens on majority groups, we'll review that when the time comes,

0:31:51.950 --> 0:31:52.750
<v S12>but not now.

0:31:52.790 --> 0:31:54.790
<v S1>Scalia was famous for saying just that if you don't

0:31:54.790 --> 0:31:56.830
<v S1>like the law, come back with different laws. But we

0:31:56.830 --> 0:31:58.950
<v S1>don't make the laws. So let's turn our attention to

0:31:58.990 --> 0:32:01.590
<v S1>the other case, another nine zero decision that was handed

0:32:01.590 --> 0:32:05.500
<v S1>down yesterday, this one, the Catholic Charities Bureau. Uh v

0:32:05.500 --> 0:32:09.940
<v S1>Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission. That's long, cumbersome title,

0:32:09.980 --> 0:32:12.180
<v S1>but this is an important case dealing with religious liberty.

0:32:12.180 --> 0:32:13.220
<v S1>What are the facts, Greg?

0:32:13.260 --> 0:32:16.860
<v S12>Yeah, this was very troublesome. I remember you and I

0:32:16.900 --> 0:32:17.940
<v S12>discussing this case.

0:32:17.980 --> 0:32:18.260
<v S1>On this.

0:32:18.260 --> 0:32:20.100
<v S12>Show. And in fact, we talked about both cases, but

0:32:20.100 --> 0:32:23.660
<v S12>this one in particular, um, you know, I don't like

0:32:23.660 --> 0:32:27.340
<v S12>to prophesize or predict, but, uh, you may remember that

0:32:27.340 --> 0:32:31.820
<v S12>I said this, this one really should be, um, an

0:32:31.900 --> 0:32:34.180
<v S12>not an easy one, but an easier one for the

0:32:34.180 --> 0:32:37.700
<v S12>Supreme Court to agree on. Um, it should be a

0:32:37.740 --> 0:32:41.060
<v S12>no brainer here. The state of Wisconsin, all the way

0:32:41.060 --> 0:32:46.020
<v S12>up to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, affirmed a rule in

0:32:46.020 --> 0:32:53.140
<v S12>Wisconsin where a Catholic charity was denied tax exemption because,

0:32:53.380 --> 0:32:57.700
<v S12>in the opinion of the trial court that was supported

0:32:57.700 --> 0:33:01.100
<v S12>by the Wisconsin State Supreme Court, in the opinion of

0:33:01.100 --> 0:33:05.770
<v S12>the courts, uh, the charity, which had a goal and

0:33:05.770 --> 0:33:10.890
<v S12>mission statement that was based on their beliefs, based on

0:33:11.010 --> 0:33:14.770
<v S12>the biblical view of charity and helping others because of

0:33:14.810 --> 0:33:18.410
<v S12>the freedom that the gospel gives us. They said, no,

0:33:18.410 --> 0:33:21.410
<v S12>that's not enough. You have to show that you are,

0:33:21.730 --> 0:33:26.410
<v S12>in fact proselytizing, which is another word for evangelizing. Um,

0:33:26.850 --> 0:33:30.930
<v S12>to change people's mind with your message. And if your

0:33:30.970 --> 0:33:34.530
<v S12>charity work doesn't include that? Well, we're not going to

0:33:34.530 --> 0:33:37.010
<v S12>give you an exemption. Now, at the time, I remember

0:33:37.010 --> 0:33:39.490
<v S12>our discussion because I was the thing that troubled me

0:33:39.490 --> 0:33:43.210
<v S12>the most was the fact that you've got judges saying, no,

0:33:43.570 --> 0:33:45.050
<v S12>that's not religious.

0:33:45.050 --> 0:33:45.570
<v S1>That's not church.

0:33:45.610 --> 0:33:46.450
<v S12>That's not religious.

0:33:46.490 --> 0:33:46.850
<v S1>Enough.

0:33:47.170 --> 0:33:49.610
<v S12>Right. And that's not the role of the court to

0:33:49.650 --> 0:33:55.170
<v S12>decide whether, uh, they've got their doctrine strapped on. Right. Uh,

0:33:55.170 --> 0:33:58.570
<v S12>to be religious enough to qualify for an exemption. Um,

0:33:58.610 --> 0:34:03.810
<v S12>if you are going to say exemptions for any religious activity,

0:34:03.810 --> 0:34:07.410
<v S12>then you have to interpret ultimately religion fairly broadly, not

0:34:07.410 --> 0:34:13.770
<v S12>so broad as to be inapplicable, or I should say nonsensical.

0:34:14.170 --> 0:34:16.370
<v S12>There are some groups that pretend to be religious. You

0:34:16.370 --> 0:34:21.010
<v S12>and I have talked about them that really are are fake, uh,

0:34:21.570 --> 0:34:25.089
<v S12>organizations for political purposes or sociological purposes. They really aren't

0:34:25.090 --> 0:34:28.089
<v S12>religious at all. But there's no question that this was

0:34:28.090 --> 0:34:31.730
<v S12>a religion based charity, and all the work they did

0:34:31.730 --> 0:34:36.089
<v S12>was empowered and influenced by those religious beliefs that should

0:34:36.090 --> 0:34:40.330
<v S12>have qualified easily. And the Supreme Court agreed, uh, that,

0:34:40.370 --> 0:34:44.210
<v S12>in fact, to parse it out that way, to impose

0:34:44.250 --> 0:34:49.489
<v S12>yet another requirement on a religion or followers of a

0:34:49.489 --> 0:34:53.970
<v S12>religion to have equal treatment again and its equal treatment

0:34:53.969 --> 0:34:58.250
<v S12>under law, issue this one involving religion. You better make

0:34:58.290 --> 0:35:01.560
<v S12>sure that you have level ground for everybody and that

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:03.240
<v S12>your interpretation makes sense.

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:07.520
<v S1>Uh, hats off to. Becket fund for their superb representation

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:09.960
<v S1>in this case. So grateful for the work that they do.

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:13.319
<v S1>And continue to do. Their tagline is Religious Liberty for all.

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:15.839
<v S1>And this was a perfect example of. That so hat

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:18.239
<v S1>tip to Becket for the superb work that they were doing,

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:20.640
<v S1>what I found was necessary. Craig, is that again, we've

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:22.719
<v S1>talked about this. In colloquial terms, that nowhere in the

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:25.240
<v S1>Constitution do you find the phrase separation of church and state.

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:27.759
<v S1>That that song has been played over and over and

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:31.440
<v S1>over again. And it really was in that remarks that

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:34.680
<v S1>Jefferson made, not to government, but to a group of Baptists,

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:37.480
<v S1>the Danbury Baptist Society. It was an assurance to them

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:39.759
<v S1>that the government wasn't going to poke their nose in

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:41.400
<v S1>their lives, and they were going to be free to

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:44.040
<v S1>worship as they saw fit. And remember, we just had

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:46.319
<v S1>a revolution from a nation that forced you to have

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:48.600
<v S1>a particular kind of religion and actually has a history

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:50.400
<v S1>of burning people at the stake who didn't believe the

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:53.040
<v S1>way the state believed. So why this is part of

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:54.839
<v S1>the First Amendment is because that was one of the

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:57.359
<v S1>more onerous things that they were rebelling against as part

0:35:57.360 --> 0:36:00.230
<v S1>of the American Revolution. But this really was a question

0:36:00.270 --> 0:36:04.390
<v S1>of unnecessary entanglement. When the government decides to say to

0:36:04.430 --> 0:36:07.150
<v S1>a religious organization, nah, we don't think that was a

0:36:07.150 --> 0:36:10.190
<v S1>religious enough organization. If there were such a thing as

0:36:10.190 --> 0:36:11.750
<v S1>church and state, you would have hit the red button

0:36:11.750 --> 0:36:15.070
<v S1>at that point. But they didn't. They they just pushed

0:36:15.070 --> 0:36:17.469
<v S1>their way in. That's why the only people who use

0:36:17.469 --> 0:36:20.110
<v S1>that as a cudgel are the people who really want

0:36:20.150 --> 0:36:24.069
<v S1>government intrusion in religion, not people who are saying, look,

0:36:24.070 --> 0:36:26.029
<v S1>just let us be free to worship as we see fit.

0:36:26.030 --> 0:36:29.430
<v S1>That's why Becket's tagline is so important religious liberty for all.

0:36:29.469 --> 0:36:31.630
<v S1>Government doesn't get in the way of your liberties.

0:36:31.670 --> 0:36:35.350
<v S12>If you don't want entanglement, then give a broad version

0:36:35.390 --> 0:36:38.430
<v S12>of treatment for religion rather than a narrow version that

0:36:38.430 --> 0:36:39.310
<v S12>kicks some of them out.

0:36:39.350 --> 0:36:42.549
<v S1>Right. So two excellent decisions yesterday. Doesn't always happen that way,

0:36:42.550 --> 0:36:45.150
<v S1>but these are a couple we're celebrating back after this.

0:36:49.190 --> 0:36:51.310
<v S1>So it's interesting, Craig, you talked before about how we

0:36:51.310 --> 0:36:54.549
<v S1>discussed both of those Supreme Court cases in previous episodes

0:36:54.550 --> 0:36:57.340
<v S1>of In the Market with Janet Parshall. Well, we discussed

0:36:57.340 --> 0:37:01.100
<v S1>suicide pods in previous episodes as well. A right to

0:37:01.140 --> 0:37:05.540
<v S1>die activist questioned for murder after the death of a

0:37:05.540 --> 0:37:09.340
<v S1>woman using one of those suicide pods, has died by

0:37:10.020 --> 0:37:13.420
<v S1>assisted suicide. You can't make this stuff up. Stick with me.

0:37:13.460 --> 0:37:17.060
<v S1>Florian Willet apparently had a mental health crisis after he

0:37:17.060 --> 0:37:21.100
<v S1>was arrested by Swiss police in September last year, said

0:37:21.140 --> 0:37:24.300
<v S1>Philipp Nietzsche. You cannot make this up if you know

0:37:24.300 --> 0:37:27.860
<v S1>Nietzsche is the paradox here. Cannot be missed. Exactly. Philipp

0:37:27.860 --> 0:37:32.339
<v S1>Nietzsche is the inventor of the suicide capsule. Yes. There

0:37:32.340 --> 0:37:35.620
<v S1>you go. Nothingness. Uh, Mr. Willett was the director. The

0:37:35.620 --> 0:37:38.420
<v S1>one who committed suicide by assisted suicide. Who developed the

0:37:38.420 --> 0:37:40.660
<v S1>suicide pods. Are you tracking with me? Here was the

0:37:40.660 --> 0:37:45.300
<v S1>director of last resort. Note the twisting of language. The suicide.

0:37:45.300 --> 0:37:49.100
<v S1>The Swiss suicide organisation which was set up to facilitate

0:37:49.100 --> 0:37:52.660
<v S1>the use of these suicide pods. So apparently, the 47

0:37:52.660 --> 0:37:56.209
<v S1>year old German was investigated for aiding and abetting suicide.

0:37:56.210 --> 0:37:58.730
<v S1>So it wasn't cut and dry. Not just quite the clean,

0:37:58.770 --> 0:38:01.290
<v S1>slick market program. They had about just go out in

0:38:01.290 --> 0:38:02.969
<v S1>the woods and slip in one of these pods, and

0:38:02.969 --> 0:38:06.250
<v S1>all your problems will go away forever. No, it wasn't

0:38:06.250 --> 0:38:10.210
<v S1>quite that tidy. So prosecutors investigated whether he had strangled

0:38:10.210 --> 0:38:12.370
<v S1>the woman when she was in the pub. But that

0:38:12.370 --> 0:38:15.370
<v S1>was ruled out because before he was released in December

0:38:15.610 --> 0:38:20.650
<v S1>after 70 days of pre-trial detention. And so Mr. Nietzsche,

0:38:21.050 --> 0:38:25.569
<v S1>the director of Exit International, he must have teamed up

0:38:25.570 --> 0:38:27.530
<v S1>with his buddy Jean-Paul Sartre. Right, Craig?

0:38:27.690 --> 0:38:29.530
<v S12>So a happy bunch.

0:38:29.610 --> 0:38:34.130
<v S1>Happy bunch. Exactly. Gone was his warm smile, said Mr. Nietzsche.

0:38:34.330 --> 0:38:36.890
<v S1>And self-confidence in its place was a man who was

0:38:36.890 --> 0:38:40.650
<v S1>deeply traumatised by the experience of incarceration and the wrongful

0:38:40.650 --> 0:38:44.610
<v S1>accusation of strangulation. Talk about missing the forest for the trees.

0:38:44.610 --> 0:38:48.570
<v S1>So he was mentally depressed because of his being incarcerated.

0:38:48.570 --> 0:38:50.529
<v S1>How about the fact that you built a machine that

0:38:50.530 --> 0:38:52.450
<v S1>took a woman's life? That that bother you at all,

0:38:52.450 --> 0:38:54.089
<v S1>or just the part that you were incarcerated.

0:38:54.090 --> 0:38:57.569
<v S12>Your thoughts? Yeah. Um, you know, I was struck with it.

0:38:57.650 --> 0:39:01.810
<v S12>You and I have gone back, uh, many years dealing

0:39:01.810 --> 0:39:06.330
<v S12>with this issue. I handle a case in a state

0:39:06.330 --> 0:39:09.489
<v S12>Supreme court, um, dealing. And this was a long time

0:39:09.489 --> 0:39:12.810
<v S12>ago dealing with the issue. And it is one that

0:39:12.850 --> 0:39:15.850
<v S12>really tells us a lot about the problems in our

0:39:15.850 --> 0:39:21.450
<v S12>culture and in the thinking that has, uh, really a

0:39:21.450 --> 0:39:24.650
<v S12>very delusional aspect to it. And that is that somehow

0:39:24.650 --> 0:39:28.530
<v S12>you're winning if you are the person deciding the time

0:39:28.530 --> 0:39:31.850
<v S12>and date of your demise. What you don't realize is

0:39:31.850 --> 0:39:35.970
<v S12>God already knew it in advance. He didn't cause it.

0:39:35.969 --> 0:39:39.650
<v S12>But in a world, a sin sick world, uh, since

0:39:39.650 --> 0:39:43.210
<v S12>the garden, um, people make bad choices. And I really

0:39:43.210 --> 0:39:46.450
<v S12>felt bad for this individual because there were some mental

0:39:46.450 --> 0:39:50.009
<v S12>health issues with him, clearly. And apparently he had sought

0:39:50.050 --> 0:39:52.480
<v S12>psychiatric help. But you know what I thought? I thought

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:55.240
<v S12>of a verse. I thought of what Jesus said in

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:59.359
<v S12>the 10th chapter of John, verse ten. He said, the

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:04.080
<v S12>thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:08.360
<v S12>came so that they might have life and have it abundantly. Um.

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:12.399
<v S12>Euthanasia like this. Which is a fancy word that is

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:17.280
<v S12>a euphemism for suicide. Let's face it. It's taking your

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:20.919
<v S12>own life, no matter what aspect of language you want

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:24.080
<v S12>to apply to it. The bottom line is you. For

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:27.840
<v S12>you to say, I'm making a choice, and I'm being

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:32.040
<v S12>victorious by being the person determining the time and date

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:34.439
<v S12>of my life is not only a delusion, because that

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:38.439
<v S12>was determined when you know God created the first atom

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:42.920
<v S12>in the universe. But more importantly, he's lost the opportunity

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:46.880
<v S12>for an abundant life, that there are forces out there

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:52.109
<v S12>and bad ideas that have come to steal, kill and destroy.

0:40:52.310 --> 0:40:55.830
<v S12>They don't come dressed like that. They come dressed like

0:40:55.830 --> 0:41:01.630
<v S12>the euthanasia movement for self-determination and having a good exit

0:41:01.630 --> 0:41:05.069
<v S12>from life and choosing your way to be able to

0:41:05.110 --> 0:41:09.310
<v S12>leave this life behind us. And the language and the

0:41:09.310 --> 0:41:14.870
<v S12>flourishes and the advocacy all covers the fact that this

0:41:14.870 --> 0:41:18.950
<v S12>is killing and destroying a life that could have found

0:41:18.950 --> 0:41:22.950
<v S12>an abundant life and eternal life had they gone to

0:41:22.989 --> 0:41:24.950
<v S12>the life giver and His Word.

0:41:25.750 --> 0:41:27.910
<v S1>There is a way that seemeth right unto man and

0:41:27.910 --> 0:41:29.509
<v S1>the end there in his death. I mean, if that

0:41:29.510 --> 0:41:32.509
<v S1>isn't a succinct verse for that particular situation. The other

0:41:32.510 --> 0:41:34.550
<v S1>thing I was also thinking about, too, is this raises

0:41:34.550 --> 0:41:37.350
<v S1>some transcendent issues that is maturing believers we need to

0:41:37.350 --> 0:41:40.509
<v S1>be thinking about. And that is, is there anything profitable

0:41:40.510 --> 0:41:43.110
<v S1>that can come out of suffering? You know, we've talked

0:41:43.150 --> 0:41:45.350
<v S1>interesting a couple of times this week. We've been talking

0:41:45.350 --> 0:41:47.469
<v S1>about suffering. It is an age old question. It's one

0:41:47.469 --> 0:41:50.259
<v S1>humankind has struggled with since we walked out of the garden.

0:41:50.260 --> 0:41:53.219
<v S1>But can we see a value in that? Why would

0:41:53.219 --> 0:41:56.060
<v S1>we be invited into the fellowship of his suffering? So

0:41:56.300 --> 0:41:59.340
<v S1>you've got someone who's suffering mentally or physically, and you're thinking,

0:41:59.340 --> 0:42:01.060
<v S1>isn't it merciful? I mean, look what we do to

0:42:01.100 --> 0:42:03.140
<v S1>the family dog. Isn't it merciful to do this to

0:42:03.180 --> 0:42:07.060
<v S1>a family member as well? Well, those are deep theological questions.

0:42:09.860 --> 0:42:13.819
<v S1>Searching about this. And I've decided for me personally that

0:42:13.860 --> 0:42:16.940
<v S1>while no one wants to suffer. Suffer is where I

0:42:16.940 --> 0:42:20.259
<v S1>get refined like no place else. The points get whittled off,

0:42:20.260 --> 0:42:23.660
<v S1>the having to press into him, completely understanding you were

0:42:23.660 --> 0:42:27.820
<v S1>never in control. And these circumstances are reminding you absolutely

0:42:27.820 --> 0:42:31.820
<v S1>you have no control whatsoever. So, um, the idea that

0:42:31.820 --> 0:42:33.140
<v S1>all you have to do to get rid of your

0:42:33.140 --> 0:42:35.620
<v S1>problems is to simply step into this pod, which, by

0:42:35.620 --> 0:42:37.700
<v S1>the way, this woman who was killed, I'm not going

0:42:37.700 --> 0:42:40.340
<v S1>to say she committed suicide. They said it was fast

0:42:40.340 --> 0:42:42.780
<v S1>and it was dignified. They put her in a pod

0:42:42.780 --> 0:42:45.500
<v S1>and they suffocated her. That's what, in a word, that's

0:42:45.500 --> 0:42:49.580
<v S1>how the mechanics work. There's nothing dignified about that. It's brutal.

0:42:49.580 --> 0:42:52.739
<v S1>And it fails in our recognition of the image of

0:42:52.739 --> 0:42:56.300
<v S1>God in our fellow man. How dare we? Your thoughts?

0:42:56.340 --> 0:42:58.700
<v S12>You know God has a plan for how we should

0:42:58.739 --> 0:43:01.939
<v S12>handle suffering. The perspective. And it's again in his word.

0:43:01.940 --> 0:43:04.540
<v S12>He made it easy for us. Second Corinthians, the very

0:43:04.540 --> 0:43:09.500
<v S12>first chapter. God who comforts us in all our afflictions

0:43:09.540 --> 0:43:12.939
<v S12>so we may be able to comfort those who are

0:43:13.060 --> 0:43:16.940
<v S12>in any affliction with the comfort with which we ourselves

0:43:16.980 --> 0:43:19.779
<v S12>are comforted by God. When you go through trials and

0:43:19.780 --> 0:43:23.219
<v S12>tribulations and God is able to bring you through, you

0:43:23.219 --> 0:43:27.380
<v S12>can bring that fact of God's comfort to other people

0:43:27.380 --> 0:43:30.060
<v S12>who are suffering so that they may receive the blessing

0:43:30.060 --> 0:43:30.820
<v S12>of it as well.

0:43:30.900 --> 0:43:34.100
<v S1>We talked to Doctor Matthew McCullough of Edgefield Church yesterday

0:43:34.100 --> 0:43:36.259
<v S1>on his new book, remember Heaven. And one of the

0:43:36.260 --> 0:43:39.340
<v S1>reasons why he challenged us to remember heaven is to

0:43:39.380 --> 0:43:41.740
<v S1>remember that when we get our perspective right on heaven,

0:43:41.739 --> 0:43:44.300
<v S1>it helps us endure. As the words of Scripture declared

0:43:44.300 --> 0:43:49.370
<v S1>these momentary afflictions that whatever we're dealing with here, it

0:43:49.370 --> 0:43:52.930
<v S1>is going to be surpassed by the eternality of being

0:43:52.930 --> 0:43:56.170
<v S1>forever in his presence. So it's important that we remember

0:43:56.170 --> 0:43:59.050
<v S1>that and that we continue to press on. So something

0:43:59.050 --> 0:44:01.250
<v S1>to think about. A lot of stories there. So we

0:44:01.250 --> 0:44:03.170
<v S1>thank you so much for spending the hour with us,

0:44:03.170 --> 0:44:06.930
<v S1>reminding you again love our truth tool. It talks about

0:44:06.930 --> 0:44:09.290
<v S1>the wonder of God. So a whole bunch of authors

0:44:09.290 --> 0:44:12.810
<v S1>contributed and asked questions about why we seek money when

0:44:12.810 --> 0:44:15.410
<v S1>we know it won't satisfy, why we want happy endings

0:44:15.410 --> 0:44:18.569
<v S1>and stories, why we long for happiness. The list goes

0:44:18.570 --> 0:44:20.530
<v S1>on and on and on. And when it all gets

0:44:20.530 --> 0:44:23.009
<v S1>said and done, it points to God himself and the

0:44:23.010 --> 0:44:25.649
<v S1>relationship of a great king who put that sense of

0:44:25.650 --> 0:44:28.130
<v S1>awe and wonder in us because he is the very

0:44:28.130 --> 0:44:31.129
<v S1>essence of awe and wonder. It's a great truth tool.

0:44:31.130 --> 0:44:33.650
<v S1>It's yours for a gift of any amount. 877 Janet

0:44:33.650 --> 0:44:37.450
<v S1>58 or online at in the market with Janet parshall.org.

0:44:38.210 --> 0:44:39.850
<v S1>Have a great weekend. Stick around if you can join

0:44:39.850 --> 0:44:41.570
<v S1>us for the next hour or listen on the podcast.

0:44:41.570 --> 0:44:42.570
<v S1>We'll see you next time.